Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
CHRONIC WOUND TREATMENT
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2009/104005
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
The invention provides the use of an unbound polyphosphate to promote chronic wound healing, in which the polyphosphate has at least 3 phosphate units. Also provided are a method of treatment and a pharmaceutical composition, both based on the use of the polyphosphate.

Inventors:
RICHARDSON JOHNATHAN CRAIG (GB)
DETTMAR PETER WILLIAM (GB)
ALLEN REBECCA LOUISE (GB)
COYLE CATHAL PADRAIG (GB)
Application Number:
PCT/GB2009/000504
Publication Date:
August 27, 2009
Filing Date:
February 23, 2009
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
TECHNOSTICS LTD (GB)
RICHARDSON JOHNATHAN CRAIG (GB)
DETTMAR PETER WILLIAM (GB)
ALLEN REBECCA LOUISE (GB)
COYLE CATHAL PADRAIG (GB)
International Classes:
A61K33/42; A61P41/00
Domestic Patent References:
WO2001072313A12001-10-04
WO2008155512A22008-12-24
Foreign References:
US6599523B22003-07-29
Other References:
EDWARDS J VINCENT ET AL: "Human neutrophil elastase and collagenase sequestration with phosphorylated cotton wound dressings.", JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH. PART A NOV 2007, vol. 83, no. 2, November 2007 (2007-11-01), pages 446 - 454, XP009117314, ISSN: 1549-3296
CHIANG ET AL: "Enhancing skin wound healing by direct delivery of intracellular adenosine triphosphate", AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, PAUL HOEBER, NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 193, no. 2, 19 January 2007 (2007-01-19), pages 213 - 218, XP005897679, ISSN: 0002-9610
See also references of EP 2254585A1
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
HARRISON, Michael (Marlborough HouseWestminster Place,York Business Park, Nether Poppleton York YO26 6RW, GB)
Download PDF:
Claims:

CLAIMS

1. Use of an unbound polyphosphate to promote chronic wound healing, in which the polyphosphate has at least 3 phosphate units.

2. Use according to Claim 1 , wherein the polyphosphate inhibits the action of at least one enzyme which contributes to the prevention or delay of wound healing.

3. Use according to Claim 2, wherein the enzyme is one or more of pepsin, collagenase, elastase and hyaluronidase.

4. Use according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the polyphosphate an average of from 4 to 40 phosphate units.

5. Use according to any of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the polyphosphate has a P 2 O 5 content of at least 55% by weight.

6. Use according to Claim 5, wherein the polyphosphate has a P 2 O 5 content of at least 60% by weight.

7. Use according to Claim 6, wherein the polyphosphate has a P 2 O 5 content of from 60 to 75% by weight.

8. Use according to Claim 7, wherein the polyphosphate has a P 2 O 5 content of from 65 to 70% by weight.

9. Use according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the polyphosphate is an alkali metal salt.

10. Use according to Claim 9, wherein the polyphosphate is a sodium or potassium salt, or a mixture thereof.

11. A method of promoting chronic wound healing comprising the administration of a therapeutically effective amount of a polyphosphate having at least 3 phosphate units.

12. A method according to Claim 11, wherein the amount of polyphosphate is from 300mg to 24,000mg as a daily dosage.

13. A method according to Claim 11 or Claim 12, wherein the polyphosphate is administered at a pH of from 6 to 8.

14. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a polyphosphate having at least 3 phosphate units in admixture with a pharmaceutically acceptable adjuvant, diluent or carrier.

Description:

Chronic Wound Treatment

Field of the Invention

The present invention is concerned with chronic wound healing and, in that connection, includes the use of certain compounds, as well as methods of treatment and pharmaceutical compositions.

Background to the Invention

Wound healing is a complex physiological process; however, it normally follows a predictable ordered sequence of events. This sequence has been arbitrarily divided into a series of stages namely (i) an inflammatory phase; (ii) a tissue formation phase and (iii) a tissue regeneration phase. Acute wounds, which are often caused by trauma/surgery, will repair by progressing through these stages in an ordered and timely manner. In contrast, chronic wounds do not follow this ordered sequence and become 'stuck' in the inflammatory phase. This delays the healing process and means certain chronic wounds may never heal or may take years to do so (Rovee DT and Maibach HI in The Epidermis in Wound Healing

(2003) Informa HealthCare, NY, US).

It has been suggested that chronic wounds do not follow the sequence of healing stages that occurs with acute wounds because the spatial and temporal expression of degradative enzymes has been distorted. In the early stages of healing, enzymes are specifically expressed to degrade extracellular matrix (ECM). ECM is the component of tissue that, amongst other roles, provides support and anchorage for cells. In broad terms there are three major components of ECM: fibrous elements (e.g. collagen, elastin), link proteins (e.g. fϊbronectin) and space filling molecules (e.g. hyaluronan). The degradation of ECM during healing allows cells such as fibroblasts, neutrophils and macrophages to migrate into the wound area to effect the tissue repair. ECM degradation is also essential to allow the ECM to remodel so that it can support the synthesis of new tissue. As the healing process progresses the activity of ECM degrading enzymes in wounds should be reduced to allow a balance between the necessary breakdown and restructuring of existing ECM and the synthesis of new ECM. The persistent activity of degrading enzymes at the site of tissue repair may explain the chronicity of wound healing. For example, studies by numerous researchers have demonstrated that the levels of enzymes that degrade ECM are considerably higher in chronic

wounds than in acute wounds. Yager et al (J Invest Dermatol 1996; 107: 743-8) showed that levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were significantly higher in wound fluid from chronic pressure ulcers compared to acute surgical wounds. Yager et al (Wound Rep Reg 1997; 5: 23-32) also showed that chronic wound fluids had elevated levels of elastase activity. Finally, Dechert et al (Wound Rep Reg 2006; 14: 252-258) showed that hyaluronidase activity in pressure ulcers was significantly elevated compared with acute wounds.

The differing biochemical composition of the wound microenvironment in chronic wounds compared to acute wounds means that the methods of treating these distinct wound types is different. Falanga (Wounds 2002; 14 (2): 47-57) states that using therapeutic agents and wound bed preparation methods suitable for acute wounds are not appropriate for chronic wounds. This is because chronic wounds do not follow the ordered healing stages of acute wounds.

Chronic wounds may occur in humans both internally and externally. Internal chronic wounds result from damage to the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract and can occur as lesions or ulcerations in the oral cavity, throat, oesophagus, stomach, small and large intestine, colon and rectum. External chronic wounds affect the epidermis/dermis and include, for example, diabetic foot ulcers, venous stasis ulcers and pressure ulcers.

The healing of internal wounds is complicated by the presence of other proteolytic enzymes in the gastric intestinal tract. Gastric juice contains a series of aspartic proteases (Pepsin 1, 3a, 3b, 3c and gastricsin), which are synthesised in the gastric mucosa as an inactive precursor (pepsinogen) and, following stimulation of gastric chief cells, are released into the gastric lumen where they are activated by hydrochloric acid. The primary function of pepsin is to degrade dietary proteins and peptides into amino acid fragments suitable for absorption. Pepsin does not specifically degrade dietary protein and will indiscriminately cleave any suitable protein, peptide or glycoprotein. It will therefore degrade a range of constitutive proteins which are essential for normal physiological function, such as collagen and elastin. Indiscriminate degradation of these proteins, sometimes called autodigestion, is the underlying pathology of a number of disease states including dyspepsia, gastritis, ulceration and gastroesophageal reflux disease. In these disease states, the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract is damaged by the proteolytic activity of pepsin.

The gastric mucosa is protected from pepsin degradation by a number of defence mechanisms including the secretion of a mucus gel layer. The mucus gel layer acts as a diffusion barrier to prevent an interaction between pepsin and the underlying mucosal surface proteins. The mucus layer can, however, be degraded by pepsin and therefore a dynamic balance exists between mucus secretion and degradation. If this balance is disturbed, and the mucus barrier compromised, pepsin can digest the underlying epithelium and collagen resulting in tissue destruction and gastric injury. Similarly, if pepsin is refluxed beyond the oesophageal sphincter into the aero-digestive tract, extensive tissue damage can occur as the epithelium above this sphincter does not possess the protective mechanisms present in the stomach. The reflux of gastric contents into the oesophagus and larynx may give rise to damage to the squamous epithelium of the oesophagus and larynx and may cause gastroesophageal reflux disease and extra-esophageal reflux disease as well as predisposing the mucosa to Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal or laryngeal carcinoma.

Excess activity of enzymes which degrade ECM (including collagenase, hyaluronidase and elastase) contribute to the chronicity of both internal chronic wounds, such as lesions/ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract and external chronic wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers, venous stasis ulcers and pressure ulcers. Furthermore, the proteolytic enzyme pepsin is implicated as the causative enzyme in gastric, oesophageal and laryngeal lesions/ulceration as well as contributing to their delayed healing.

In addition, enzymes which degrade ECM and structural biomolecules in skin (including collagenase, hyaluronidase and elastase) have been implicated as a causative factor in the onset and progression of skin ageing.

The inhibition of such enzymes or the protection of the matrix components from degradation has been identified as a point of intervention in associated disorders. Thus, the regulation and/or inhibition of ECM active enzymes, for example aspartic proteinases, such as pepsin, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), such as collagenase, serine proteinases, such as elastase, and/or glycoside hydrolases, such as hyaluronidase, may be advantageous in the repair and/or maintenance of a robust ECM.

Polyphosphates are generally linear polymers of many tens or hundreds of orthophosphate residues linked by high-energy, phosphoanhydride bonds.

Polyphosphate is found in a broad spectrum of living cells and one of its roles is believed to be to serve as a phosphate storage reservoir for the production of ATP (adenosine triphosphate), which provides the energy to power a cell. Recently, it has been disclosed that in bacteria, polyphosphate helps these single-celled organisms adapt to nutritional deficiencies and environmental stresses. For example, when bacteria are subjected to nutritional deficiencies or environmental stresses (e.g., heat or osmotic pressure), polyphosphate is synthesized to supply the energy necessary for the production of various proteins.

International Patent application No. WO 01/72313, from Kyung Won Medical, describes the use of various polyphosphates (P 3 to P 798 ) in promoting wound healing and scar abatement of acute wounds.

US 6,599,523 which describes the use of a phosphorylated wound dressing, formed from a 4 to 16% composition of sodium hexametaphosphate for the treatment of chronic, non-healing wounds. The wound dressings are composed of a support matrix, such as cotton cellulose, and an active agent associated with the support matrix. The active agent may be a protease sequestrant, in particular a sequestrant of a neutrophil-derived cationic protease such as elastase.

More recently, Edwards, et al, Journal of Biomedical Materials research Part A DOI 10.1002, 446-454; describes the use of phosphorylated cotton dressings in sequestration of elastase and collagenase. However, the prior art compositions act as sequestration agents and thereby require significantly higher phosphate content.

Statements of the Invention

According to the present invention, there is provided the use of an unbound polyphosphate to promote chronic wound healing, in which the polyphosphate has at least 3 phosphate units.

By "unbound" there is meant that the polyphosphate is not chemically bound to any other compound or substrate when it is in active use in wound treatment. Although it may be chemically bound as stored or even as applied, it becomes "unattached" under the treatment

conditions. It may be physically bound to, for instance, a substrate carrier but, again, it is essentially behaves as free polyphosphate during treatment.

The polyphosphates of use in the present invention may be administered, for instance, externally, topically or enterally and may be effective in inhibiting various enzymes including pepsin and those involved in the restructuring of the ECM, such as collagenase, elastase and hyaluronidase. Chronic conditions which are associated with excessive activity of these enzymes are:

Chronic external wounds, such as pressure ulcers, diabetic ulcers etc- the chronicity of these wounds result from excessive activity of collagenase (MMPs), hyaluronidase and elastase; and

Chronic internal wounds, such as lesions/ulceration of the GI tract- enzymes that degrade

ECM are responsible for causing these internal wounds (pepsin) and for their chronicity

(pepsin, collagenase, hyaluronidase and elastase).

Accordingly, it is preferred that the polyphosphate inhibits the action of at least one enzyme which contributes to the prevention or delay of wound healing. More preferably, the enzyme is one or more of pepsin, collagenase, elastase and hyaluronidase.

The polyphosphate may be a single chemical entity or it may be a mixture of polyphosphates with different numbers of phosphate units. Where it is a mixture, the average number of phosphate units is at least 3. Preferably, the polyphosphate has an average of from 4 to 40 phosphate units.

Preferably, the polyphosphate has a P 2 O 5 content of at least 55% by weight, more preferably at least 60% by weight. A preferred range is 60 to 75% by weight, more preferably 65 to 70% by weight.

By way of example, the material known as sodium hexametaphosphate is a mixture of polyphosphates with an average of 12 phosphate units and a P 2 O 5 content of about 68%.

Preferably, the polyphosphate is an alkali metal salt, more preferably a sodium or potassium salt, or a mixture thereof.

The present invention also provides a method of promoting chronic wound healing comprising the administration of a therapeutically effective amount of a polyphosphate having at least 3 phosphate units and/or as indicated above.

Preferably the amount of polyphosphate is from 300mg to 24,000mg as a daily dosage.

Preferably, the polyphosphate is administered at a pH of from 2 to 6.

The present invention further provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a polyphosphate having at least 3 phosphate units in admixture with a pharmaceutically acceptable adjuvant, diluent or carrier.

More Detailed Statements of the Invention

Examples of polyphosphates of use in the present invention are trimetaphosphate (P 3 ) and hexametaphosphate (ostensibly P 6 although in practice about P 12 ).

The polyphosphate may be, for instance, an alkali metal salt (as mentioned above), an alkaline earth metal salt, such as a calcium salt, or an ammonium salt. Preferably, it is a soluble salt.

The enzyme subject to inhibition by the polyphosphate may include an ECM active enzyme selected from the group consisting of a Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP), a serine proteinase and a glycoside hydrolase. The MMP may be, for instance, collagenase, the serine proteinase may be, for instance, elastase and the glycoside hydrolase may be, for instance, hyaluronidase.

The one or more enzymes may be active in the upper digestive tract. They include an aspartyl proteinase, for instance, pepsin, and an extracellular matrix (ECM) enzyme, for instance, selected from the group consisting of a Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP), a serine proteinase and a glycoside hydrolase. Examples are collagenase, elastase and a hyaluronidase.

The polyphosphate may be used in the manufacture of a medicament for the inhibition of an ECM or digestive tract active enzyme in a mammal.

The therapeutically effective amount of the polyphosphate may be from 0.1 to 500 mM and preferred ranges include 0.1 to 200 mM and 0.1 to 100 mM.

The polyphosphate may be administered at a pH, for instance, in the range of from 4 to 10. A preferred range includes 6 to 8 and a more preferred range is 6 to 7.

The method may be a method of reduction of scar formation and/or wound healing.

The method may be for the prevention, alleviation or treatment of gastric lesions caused by pepsin activity in a mammal. The therapeutically effective amount of the polyphosphate may be, for instance, from 0.1 to 500 mM or from 0.1 to 10 mM. The pH of administration may be in one of the ranges 2 to 8, 2 to 6 and 3 to 5.

The pharmaceutical composition may be in any suitable form including a dry powder, a gel or paste or as a liquid. The polyphosphate may be present in an amount of, for instance, 0.1 to 12.0% weight/volume. The composition may be in any suitable structure such as a spray, roll-on, patch, suspension, implant, sub-dermal depot, injection, lipstick / balm style applicator, suture / stitches or surgical glue.

The wound dressing for delivering a therapeutically effective amount of polyphosphate/ trimetaphosphate to the wound site will contain a wound contacting material. The wound contacting material (incorporating the polyphosphate/ trimetaphosphate) may take a number of forms. These include, without limitation, foams, fibers, fabrics, films, alginates, hydrogels, and hydrocolloids.

Foam generally refers to a cellular polymeric structure, and preferably an open cell structure. Suitable foams include such synthetic organic polymers as polyurethane, carboxylated butadiene styrene rubber, polyester, polyacrylate and non-synthetic/semi-synthetic polymers such as polysaccharides and there derivatives. It is generally desirable that the foam is hydrophilic; however, hydrophobic foams having a hydrophilic coating on them may be used. Hydrophilic foams include cellular polyurethane foam formed from isocyanates, polyether/ polyester polyols and water, catalysts, stabilizers and other substances.

Fabric may be formed from fibers such as synthetic fibers, natural fibers, or combinations thereof. Synthetic fibers include, for example, polyester, acrylic, polyamide, polyolefin, polyaramid, polyurethane, regenerated cellulose, and blends thereof. More specifically, polyester includes, for example, polyethylene terephthalate, polytriphenylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, polylactic acid, and combinations thereof. Polyamide includes, for example, nylon 6, nylon 6,6, and combinations thereof. Polyolefin includes, for example, polypropylene, polyethylene, and combinations thereof. Polyaramid includes, for example, poly-p-phenyleneteraphthalamid (i.e., Kevlar®), poly-m-phenyleneteraphthalamid (i.e., Nomex®), and combinations thereof. Natural fibers include, for example, wool, cotton, flax, and blends thereof. The fabric may be of any variety, including but not limited to, woven fabric, knitted fabric, nonwoven fabric, or combinations thereof.

The film may include thermoplastic materials, thermoset materials, or combinations thereof. Thermoplastic or thermoset materials may include polyolefin, polyester, polyamide, polyurethane, acrylic, silicone, melamine compounds, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol, nitrile rubber, ionomers, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, chloroisoprene, or combinations thereof. The polyolefin may be polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylvinyl acetate, ethylmethyl acetate, or combinations thereof. Polyethylene may include low density or high density polyethylene. The film may have a thickness of between about 1 and about 500 microns, or more preferably between about 1 and about 250 microns, or even more preferable between about 1 and about 100 microns.

Alginate is a natural polysaccharide that exists widely in many brown seaweeds. Sodium alginates are well known for their ability to form a gel in contact with most multivalent cations. Alginate fibers may be formed from alginate by extruding or spinning an alginate aqueous solution into a coagulating bath containing a multivalent cation (such as calcium) to cross-link and gel the alginate solution. The alginate fibers are then typically processed and incorporated into a wound care dressing.

Hydrogels generally consist of high-molecular molecules that form a coherent matrix for enclosing smaller molecules and aqueous solutions. Hydrogels can be described as a two- component system of water and a three-dimensional network polymer. Examples of hydrogels include starch, pectin, gelatin, other natural gums and insoluble cross-linked polymers such as polyethylene oxide.

Hydrocolloids are hydrophilic polymers, of vegetable, animal, microbial or synthetic origin, that generally contain many hydroxyl groups and may be polyelectrolytes. They are naturally present or added to control the functional properties of a material such as viscosity, including thickening and gelling, and water binding. They are advantageous for use as wound care devices because of their ability to absorb several times their weight in wound exudates. Examples of hydrocolloids include carbowax, vinyl polymers (such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and polyvinylacetate), cellulose derivatives (such as ethyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, and carboxymethyl cellulose), and natural gums (such as guar, acacia, and pectins).

Detailed Description of the Invention Azocoll dose response assay

Azocoll is a commercially available azo dye labelled collagen Type I substrate derived from bovine hide. In the presence of certain enzymes the red azo dye is liberated from the collagen and the resulting colour change can be measured and correlated with collagenolytic activity. The Azocoll assay was used to determine the inhibitory effect of polyphosphates on the action of pepsin, collagenase, snake venom metalloprotease, human gastric juice and human chronic wound fluid against azo-labelled collagen substrate.

Materials

Human chronic Human chronic wound fluid was extracted from primary wound wound fluid dressing by soaking a single dressing overnight in 5ml phosphate buffered saline. pH 4.0 - 6.0 5OmM sodium acetate adjusted to relevant pH with glacial acetic buffer acid pH 7.0 - 8.0 0.2 M Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) corrected to buffer relevant pH using 0.2M hydrochloric acid

Azocoll solution 0.30% w/v solution of Azocoll substrate (azo-dye labelled Type I collagen (Calbiochem, UK)) prepared in buffer

Inhibitor test Solutions of the following test compounds were prepared in solutions deionised water at concentrations varying from 0-122mg/ml

Sodium polyphosphates containing: 60% P 2 O 5 ; 65% P 2 O 5 ; 68% P 2 O 5 ;

69% P 2 O 5 ; 70% P 2 O 5 (Thermphos UK Ltd, UK and Fisher Scientific

UK Ltd , UK)

Potassium polyphosphate containing 60% P 2 O 5 (Budenheim,

Germany)

Table 1 : Reagents and buffers used in the Azocoll assay. (All reagents were purchased from standard laboratory suppliers, unless otherwise indicated)

Method

A series of test solutions containing between 0-122mg/ml of the proposed inhibitor were prepared. 100 μl of this test solution was then thoroughly mixed with 100 μl of the relevant enzyme solution on a vortex mixer before lOOOμl of buffered Azocoll solution was added and mixed. The inhibitor:enzyme:Azocoll sample was then incubated in a heated water bath for 3 hours at 37°C and inverted every 30 minutes during this incubation time. Samples were then removed from the incubator, placed in iced water to cool and centrifuged (Fisher Scientific, accuSpin Model 400 Benchtop Centrifuge) at 4000rpm for 5 minutes. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 540 nm (Labsystems Multiskan Ascent 354, ThermoFisher Scientific, Horsham, West Sussex, UK) using deionised water as a blank. The percentage inhibition of enzyme activity was calculated by comparing the absorbance intensity of test samples containing inhibitor with samples containing 0 μg/ml of inhibitor according to the equation below:

% Inhibition= Standard (0 iig/ml inhibitor) QD 540 nm - Test OD 540 nm x 100

Standard (0 mg/ml inhibitor) OD 540 nm

Tricholoroacetic Acid (TCA) precipitation assay

The TCA assay is based on the method described by M.L. Anson (1938). J General Physiol, 22, 79-89. The substrate, bovine haemoglobin, is digested by pepsin. Any remaining undigested haemoglobin is then precipitated with TCA to yield a supernatant which contains only products of digested haemoglobin. The concentration of haemoglobin breakdown products in the supernatant is measured spectrophotometrically and provides an indication of proteinase activity. The TCA precipitation assay was used to determine the inhibitory effect of polyphosphates and trimetaphosphate on the action of pepsin against haemoglobin.

Materials

Pepsin solution 20μg/ml of pepsin (from porcine gastric mucosa lyophilized powder, 3,200-4,500 units/mg protein :Sigma-Aldrich Ltd, UK) prepared in a buffered solution (pH 2-4 as desired) pH 2.0 buffer 0.2 M glycine and 0.1 M sodium chloride solution

Haemoglobin 3.3mg/ml solution of bovine haemoglobin (Sigma- Aldrich, UK)) solution prepared in relevant buffer

Trichloroacetic 10%w/v solution of trichloroacetic acid prepared in deionised water acid solution

Inhibitor test Solutions of the following test compounds were prepared in solutions deionised water at concentrations varying from 0-306mg/ml

Sodium polyphosphate containing: 68% P 2 O 5 (Fisher Scientific UK

Ltd)

Sodium trimetaphosphate (Fisher Scientific UK Ltd , UK)

Table 2: Reagents and buffers used in the trichloroacetic acid assay. (All reagents were purchased from standard laboratory suppliers, unless otherwise indicated)

Method

A series of test solutions containing between 0-306 mg/ml of the proposed inhibitor were prepared. 100 μl of this test solution was then thoroughly mixed with 100 μl of pepsin solution on a vortex mixer before 1500μl of buffered bovine haemoglobin solution was added and mixed. The inhibitor:enzyme:haemoglobin sample was then incubated in a heated water bath for 30 minutes at 37 0 C. The samples was then removed from the incubator, mixed with 2.0ml TCA solution and left to stand for 30 minutes in iced water. The sample was then centrifuged (Fisher Scientific, accuSpin Model 400 Benchtop Centrifuge) at 4000rpm for 5 minutes. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 280 nm (Labsystems Multiskan Ascent 354, ThermoFisher Scientific, Horsham, West Sussex, UK) using deionised water as a blank. The percentage inhibition of pepsin activity was calculated by comparing the absorbance intensity of test samples containing inhibitor with samples containing 0 μg/ml of inhibitor according to the equation below:

% Inhibition= Standard (0 ug/ml inhibitor) OD 280 nm - Test OD 280 nm x 100 Standard (0 mg/ml inhibitor) OD 280 nm

Elastin Congo red assay

Elastin Congo red is a commercially available elastin substrate impregnated with the chromophore Congo red. In the presence of elastase the Congo red dye is liberated from the elastin and the resulting colour change can be measured and correlated with elastolytic activity. The elastin Congo red assay was used to determine the inhibitory effect of polyphosphates and trimetaphosphate on the elastase against the elastin Congo red substrate.

Materials

Sodium polyphosphates containing: 60% P 2 O 5 ; 65% P 2 O 5 ; 68% P 2 O 5 ; 69% P 2 O 5 ; 70% P 2 O 5 (Thermphos UK Ltd, UK; Fisher Scientific UK Ltd, UK)

Potassium polyphosphate: 60% P 2 O 5 (Budhenheim, Germany) Sodium trimetaphosphate (Fisher Scientific UK Ltd, UK)

Table 3: Reagents and buffers used in the elastin Congo red assay. (All reagents were purchased from standard laboratory suppliers, unless otherwise indicated)

Method

A series of test solutions containing between 0-306 mg/ml of the proposed inhibitor were prepared. 100 μl of this test solution was then thoroughly mixed with 100 μl of elastase solution on a vortex mixer. 1 OOOμl of buffered Elastin Congo red solution was then added and mixed. The inhibitor:enzyme:Elastin Congo red sample was then incubated overnight in a heated water bath at 37°C. Samples were then removed from the water bath and placed in iced water to cool for 30 minutes before being centrifuged (Fisher Scientific, accuSpin Model 400 Benchtop Centrifuge) at 13000rpm for 5 minutes. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 540 nm (Labsystems Multiskan Ascent 354, ThermoFisher Scientific, Horsham, West Sussex, UK) using deionised water as a blank. The percentage inhibition of elastase activity was calculated by comparing the absorbance intensity of test samples containing inhibitor with samples containing 0 μg/ml of inhibitor according to the equation below:

% Inhibition= Standard (0 ue/ml inhibitor) OD 540 nm - Test OD 540 nm x 100

Standard (0 mg/ml inhibitor) OD 540 nm

Hyaluronidase dose response assay

The hyaluronidase activity assay is based on the methods of Bonner and Cantey (Clin. Chim. Acta, 13 (1966) 746-752) and Reissig et al. J. Biol. Chem., 217 (1955) 959-966. It relies on the fact that sodium hyaluronate is degraded in the presence of hyaluronidase into saccharides with N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) end-groups. The NAG can then be quantified by heating with alkaline tetraborate to form an intermediate which reacts with p-dimethylamino benzaldehyde in acidic medium to form a coloured product. The colour change can be measured and correlated with the activity of hyaluronidase. The hyaluronidase assay was

used to determine the inhibitory effect of polyphosphates on the activity of hyaluronidase against the sodium hyaluronan substrate.

Materials

Table 4: Reagents and buffers used in the hyaluronidase assay. (All reagents were purchased from standard laboratory suppliers, unless otherwise indicated)

A series of test solutions containing between 0-61.2 mg/ml of the proposed inhibitor were prepared. 100 μl of this test solution was then thoroughly mixed with 100 μl of 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase using a vortex mixer before 200 μl of 4 mg/ml buffered, sodium hyaluronate solution was added. The polymer:hyaluronidase:HA test sample was then thoroughly mixed using a vortex mixer and incubated at 37 0 C for 4 hours. The reaction was subsequently

terminated by heating at 80°C for 5 min. After incubation, 60 μl of potassium tetraborate (0.8M) was added and the samples were again incubated at 80 °C for 5 minutes followed by cooling on ice for 5 minutes. Following cooling, 2.0 ml of DMAB solution was added and colour was allowed to develop at 37 0 C for 20 minutes. Samples were then removed from the incubator and centrifuged (Fisher Scientific, accuSpin Model 400 Benchtop Centrifuge) at 1500rpm (1854 x g) for 10 mins. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 540 nm using deionised water as a blank. The percentage inhibition of hyaluronidase activity was calculated by comparing the absorbance intensity of test samples containing inhibitor with samples containing 0 μg/ml of inhibitor according to the following equation.

% Inhibition = Standard (0 Dl inhibitor) OD 540 nm - Test OD 540 nm x 100

Standard (0 Dl inhibitor) OD 540 nm

Lysozyme dose response assay

The lysozyme dose response assay is based on the observation that in the presence of lysozyme the optical density of a cell suspension of Micrococcus lysodeikticus decreases. The rate of this decrease in optical density can be measured and correlated with the activity of lysozyme. The lysozyme assay was used to determine the inhibitory effect of sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 ) on the action of lysosyme against the Micrococcus lysodeikticus cell suspension substrate.

Materials:

Table 5: Reagents and buffers used in the lysozyme assay: (All reagents were purchased from standard laboratory suppliers, unless otherwise indicated)

Method: 2.5ml of Micrococcus lysodeikticus cell suspension was added to a cuvette (kartell disposable semi-micro PMMA, UV grade, 10mm pathlength, 1.5 ml capacity, 280 - 800 nm range, ThermoFisher Scientific Horsham, West Sussex, UK) and placed in a thermostatically controlled UV spectrophotometer maintained at 25°C. 100 μl of test solution containing between 0-61.2 mg/ml of the proposed inhibitor was then added to the cuvette and thoroughly mixed by inversion. The inhibitor: substrate sample was then incubated at room temperature for 1 hour before 100 μl of lysozyme solution was added and mixed by inversion. The absorbance of the inhibitor: substrate: lysozyme test sample was measured at 450 nm at 3 second intervals for 5 minutes (Unicam UV 500, Thermo-Spectronic, Cambridge, UK). Buffer was used as a blank.

The inhibition of lysozyme activity was calculated by comparing the maximum linear gradient of the fall in optical density over the 5 minute period for test samples containing inhibitor with samples containing 0 μg/ml of inhibitor. The percentage inhibition was calculated according to the equation below:

% Inhibition= Standard (0 μg/ml inhibitor) δA^o nm /min- Test δA 450nrn /min x 100

Standard (0 mg/ml inhibitor) δA 450nm /min

Chymotrypsin dose response assay The chymotrypsin dose response assay is based on the observation that in the presence of chymotrpysin the substrate Na-benzoyl-L-tyrosine ethyl ester (BTEE) is degraded into Na- benzoyl-L-tyrosine + Ethanol. This conversion can be measured spectrophotometrically by an increase in absorbance at 253nm. The rate of change in absorbance can then be measured and correlated with the activity of chymotrypsin. The chymotrypsin assay was used to determine the inhibitory effect of sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 ) on the action of chymotrypsin against the BTEE substrate.

Materials:

Table 6: Reagents and buffers used in the chymotrypsin assay. (All reagents were purchased from standard laboratory suppliers, unless otherwise indicated)

Method:

1.28ml of test solution containing between 0-61.2 mg/ml of the proposed inhibitor was added to a quartz cuvette and placed in a thermostatically controlled UV spectrophotometer maintained at 25°C. 1.26ml of BTEE solution and 0.07ml of calcium chloride solution were also added to the cuvette, mixed by inversion and allowed to equilibrate until the absorbance at 253nm was constant. 0.09ml of chymotrypsin solution was then added to the cuvette and immediately mixed by inversion. The absorbance of the inhibitor: substrate xhymotrypsin test sample was measured at 253 nm at 3 second intervals for 5 minutes (Unicam UV 500, Thermo Spectronic, Cambridge, UK). Buffer was used as a blank.

The inhibition of chymotrypsin activity was calculated by comparing the maximum linear gradient of the increase in absorbance at 253nm over the 5 minute period for test samples containing inhibitor with samples containing 0 μg/ml of inhibitor. The percentage inhibition was calculated according to the equation below:

% Inhibition= Standard (0 μg/ml inhibitor) δA 253nm /min- Test δA 253nm /min x 100

Standard (0 mg/ml inhibitor) δA 253nm /min

Results

The following discussion makes reference to the accompanying drawings, which are:-

Figure 1. Inhibition of pepsin by sodium polyphosphate (68%P 2 O 5 ) at varying pH. Mean n=2 for pH2. Mean n=3 for pH 4 and 6. Errors bars omitted for clarity.

Figure 2. Inhibition of pepsin by sodium polyphosphates varying in polymeric chain length (as defined by percentage P 2 O 5 content) at pH 4. Mean n=l .

Figure 3. Inhibition of pepsin by potassium polyphosphate (60% P 2 O 5 content) at pH 4.

Mean n=l.

Figure 4. Inhibition of pepsin by sodium trimetaphosphate at pH 2. Mean n=l.

Figure 5. Inhibition of collagenase by sodium polyphosphate (68%P 2 O 5 ) at varying pH. Mean n=2. Errors bars omitted for clarity.

Figure 6. Inhibition of collagenase by sodium polyphosphates varying in polymeric chain length (as defined by percentage P 2 O 5 content) at pH 7. Mean n=l.

Figure 7. Inhibition of collagenase by potassium polyphosphate (60% P 2 O 5 content) at pH 7.

Mean n=l. Figure 8. Inhibition of hyaluronidase by sodium polyphosphate (68%P 2 O 5 ) at varying pH.

Mean n=3 ±SEM.

Figure 9. Inhibition of hyaluronidase by sodium polyphosphates varying in polymeric chain length (as defined by percentage P 2 O 5 content) at pH 4.5. Mean n=l .

Figure 10. Inhibition of hyaluronidase by potassium polyphosphate (60% P 2 O 5 content) at pH 7. Mean n=l.

Figure 11. Inhibition of elastase by sodium polyphosphate (68%P 2 O 5 ) at varying pH. Mean n=3 ±SEM.

Figure 12. Inhibition of elastase by sodium polyphosphates varying in polymeric chain length (as defined by percentage P 2 O 5 content) at pH 8. All mean (n=l), except 68% P 2 O 5 which is mean (n= 4).

Figure 13. Inhibition of elastase by potassium polyphosphate (60% P 2 O 5 content) at pH 8. Mean n=l.

Figure 14. Inhibition of elastase by sodium trimetaphosphate at pH 8. Mean (n=2) ±SEM.

Figure 15. Inhibition of the proteolytic activity of human gastric juice by sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 ) at pH 4. Mean n=l .

Figure 16. Inhibition of snake venom metalloproteinase by sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 ) at pH 7.2. Mean n=l.

Figure 17. Inhibition of lysozyme by sodium polyphosphate (68%P 2 O 5 ) at pH 7. Mean n=l.

Figure 18. Inhibition of chymotrypsin by sodium polyphosphate (68%P 2 O 5 ) at pH 7.8. Mean n=l.

Figure 19. Inhibition of the proteolytic activity of human chronic would by sodium polyphosphate (68%P 2 O 5 ) at pH 7. Mean n=4 ±SEM.

1. Inhibition of pepsin

Figure 1 shows that sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 content) inhibited the proteolytic activity of pepsin in a concentration dependent manner. The inhibition occurred across a wide range of polyphosphate concentrations. Inhibition was also pH dependent and found to be greatest at pH 4. At pH 4, levels of inhibition in excess of 90% were achieved with polyphosphate concentrations greater than 4.59mg/ml.

Figure 2 illustrates that the potency of inhibition varied with the polymeric chain length of sodium polyphosphates (expressed as P 2 O 5 content). Sodium polyphosphates with a greater P 2 O 5 content were more effective inhibitors of pepsin.

Figure 3 demonstrates that the concentration dependent inhibition of pepsin using a polyphosphate was unaffected by the choice of alkali metal counterion. Potassium polyphosphate inhibited pepsin in a comparable manner to that observed with sodium polyphosphate.

Figure 4 shows that sodium trimetaphosphate could also inhibit pepsin across a wide concentration range; however, the potency and extent of inhibition at maximal concentrations was not as large as that observed with polyphosphates.

2. Inhibition of collagenase

Figure 5 shows that sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 content) inhibited the proteolytic activity of collagenase in a concentration dependent manner. The inhibition occurred across a wide range of polyphosphate concentrations. Inhibition was also pH dependent and found to be greatest at pH 7. At pH 7, levels of inhibition in excess of 70% were achieved at higher polyphosphate concentrations.

Figure 6 illustrates that the potency of inhibition varied with the polymeric chain length of sodium polyphosphates (expressed as P 2 O 5 content). Sodium polyphosphates with a greater P 2 O 5 content were more effective inhibitors of collagenase.

Figure 7 demonstrates that the concentration dependent inhibition of collagenase using a polyphosphate was relatively unaffected by the choice of alkali metal counterion. Potassium polyphosphate inhibited collagenase in a comparable manner to that observed with sodium polyphosphate.

3. Inhibition of hyaluronidase

Figure 8 shows that sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 content) inhibited the digestive activity of hyaluronidase in a concentration dependent manner. The inhibition occurred across a wide range of polyphosphate concentrations. Inhibition was also pH dependent and found to be greatest at pH 4.5. At pH 4.5, levels of inhibition in excess of 90% were achieved at polyphosphate concentrations greater than 0.612mg/ml.

Figure 9 illustrates that the potency of inhibition varied with the polymeric chain length of sodium polyphosphates (expressed as P 2 O 5 content). Sodium polyphosphates with a greater P 2 O 5 content were more effective inhibitors of hyaluronidase.

Figure 10 demonstrates that the concentration dependent inhibition of hyaluronidase using a polyphosphate was unaffected by the choice of alkali metal counterion. Potassium

polyphosphate inhibited hyaluronidase in a comparable manner to that observed with sodium polyphosphate.

4. Inhibition of elastase Figure 11 shows that sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 content) inhibited the digestive activity of elastase in a concentration dependent manner. The inhibition occurred across a wide range of polyphosphate concentrations. At high polyphosphate concentrations levels of inhibition in excess of 90% were achieved.

Figure 12 illustrates that the potency of inhibition varied with the polymeric chain length of sodium polyphosphates (expressed as P 2 O 5 content). Although sodium polyphosphates with a P 2 O 5 content between 60-68% gave similar levels of inhibition, sodium polyphosphate containing 70% P 2 O 5 was able to inhibit 100% of elastase activity at higher concentrations.

Figure 13 demonstrates that the concentration dependent inhibition of elastase using a polyphosphate was not adversely affected by the choice of alkali metal counterion. Potassium polyphosphate inhibited elastase in a slightly superior manner to that observed with sodium polyphosphate.

Figure 14 shows that sodium trimetaphosphate could also inhibit elastase across a wide concentration range; however, the extent of inhibition at maximal concentrations was not as large as that observed with polyphosphates.

5. Inhibition of other enzyme and human bodily fluids containing enzymes Sodium polyphosphate (68% P 2 O 5 ) was also shown to inhibit other enzymes in the same classes to those described earlier.

Figure 15 shows that polyphosphate inhibited in a concentration dependent manner the proteolytic activity of human gastric juice. At polyphosphate concentrations greater than 6.12mg/ml nearly 100% of the proteolytic activity of human gastric juice was inhibited. Human gastric juice contains a mixture of aspartic proteases including Pepsin 1, 3a, 3b, 3c and gastricsin. The inhibition of activity for gastric juice demonstrates that polyphosphates can inhibit other aspartic proteases in addition to pepsin.

Figure 16 illustrates that polyphosphate can inhibit in a concentration dependent manner snake venom metalloproteinase. This demonstrates that, in addition to collagenase, polyphosphate can inhibit other matrix metalloproteinases.

Figure 17 shows that polyphosphate can inhibit in a concentration dependent manner the digestive activity of lysozyme. This demonstrates that, in addition to hyaluronidase, polyphosphate can inhibit other enzymes from the glycoside hydrolase class.

Figure 18 shows that polyphosphate can inhibit in a concentration dependent manner the digestive activity of α-chymotrypsin. This demonstrates that, in addition to elastase, polyphosphate can inhibit other enzymes from the serine protease class.

Finally, Figure 19 shows that polyphosphate can inhibit in a concentration dependent manner the proteolytic activity of fluid extracted from human chronic wounds.