AN ABRASIVE FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE, AN ABRASIVE MATERIAL CLASSIFIER AND BLASTING SYSTEMS INCORPORATING SAME

Field of the invention

The present invention is related to formation and control of blast materials dispersed in high-pressure air for cleaning, removing rust and old coatings, etc. on metallic surfaces before painting and coating. The invention is particularly related to structures for forming abrasive flows by compressed air and blast systems for treatment of surfaces by means of abrasive flows. The invention is also related to classification of blast materials by means of compressed air, particularly to classification of blast materials for using in systems for treatment of surfaces by means of abrasive flows.

Description of the related arts

The use of abrasive materials, particularly flows of abrasive particles dispersed in a suitable vehicle, for treatment of metallic surfaces is well known, particularly in shipbuilding and ship repair.

To date, technologies of abrasive flows have been developed towards two directions, namely wet and dry abrasive flows.

Methods of dry abrasive flows employ abrasive particles dispersed in dry high- pressure air, whereas in methods of wet abrasive flows employ the same with water is added to the flows in form of mist.

With methods of wet abrasive flows, less dust is produced in the cleaning process and therefore those methods are preferred when work safety and environmental protection are taken into account. Nevertheless, a main drawback of those methods is the necessity of a suitable means for treating the newly blasted surface in order to avoid of the formation of colloidal oxides when it contacts with wet air in the abrasive flow.

The most effective measure associated with wet abrasive flows is the use of special compositions, which are capable of coating wet surfaces and at the same time treating any impurities remained on the newly blasted surfaces. Among other things, a weak point of this measure as well as the methods of wet abrasive flow is its high cost.

In contrast, with methods of dry abrasive flow, the newly blasted surfaces are not wetted and therefore not oxidized and can be coated with paints of lower prices.

Noteworthy weak points of conventional methods include high consumption of abrasive materials, low blasting and cleaning efficiency, and dust pollution.

One of the main causes of those weak points is that blast systems are unable to control the flow rate and speed of abrasive flows by means of any devices which are incorporated with the blast guns and in practice, operators employ the maxima of the flow rate and pressure of compressed air as well as the flow rate of abrasive materials.

In the blast systems known in the art, abrasive particles are dispersed in an air flow and directly led to a blast gun as illustrated in Figure 1.

Referring now to Figure 1 , a blast system known in the art includes an abrasive material storing tank 1 with a one-way valve Vl operated by compressed air, and mounted at the bottom of the storing tank 1 are respectively an abrasive material valve V5, a cross-shaped tube 2 with an upper mouth 2a as the inlet of abrasive particles from the storing tank 1 to a dispersion space G and a lower mouth 2b as a gate for discharging abrasive particles out of the space G when required by opening a discharging valve V2, a left mouth as a compressed air inlet 2c for compressed air to enter the space G and a right mouth as an abrasive flow outlet 2d for the abrasive flow to go out.

When compressed air is led into the compressed air inlet 2c, it is turbulently mixed with abrasive particles from abrasive material inlet 2a, forming an abrasive flow going out of the outlet 2d to a blast gun 5. The flow rate and pressure of the abrasive flow is adjusted by means of a compressed air valve V3.

In addition to control of the inflow of abrasive particles into the cross-shaped tube body 2 by means of the abrasive material valve V5, the system also includes a pressure control valve V4 for controlling the pressure inside the storing tank, thereby adjusting the inflow of abrasive particles into the inlet 2a.

A drawback of this blast system is that it can only used with an air flow of limited flow rates, which are usually in the range of 3 - 1 1 m ³ /minutes because in practice, when the air flow has a higher flow rate, abrasive particles fail to enter the cross-shaped tube body 2, that is no abrasive flow is formed, regardless of the pressure inside the storing tank 1.

Furthermore, adjustment of the valve V5 brings in very limited effect and in fact, the valve V5 has indeed no adjusting effect when the air flow reaches a certain flow rate and/or speed.

Theoretically, the efficiency of blasting or abrasion is higher when the kinetic energy of the abrasive flow is increased. As such, since an increase in the flow

rate and/or speed of the air flow has limited effect, the kinetic energy of abrasive flows in the blast systems known in the art is also limited and the efficiency of cleaning is therefore low. In other words, a weak point of the dry blast systems known in the art is their low cleaning efficiency, particularly when the consumption rate of abrasive particles is taken into account. This also occurs in wet blast systems.

Because it is impossible to adjust the flow of abrasive particles, conventional blast systems are usually operated with a maximum flow of abrasive particles and with a medium flow rate of compressed air, the consumption of abrasive particles is then even bigger. That leads to heavy dust pollution at the workplace of blast systems since a large part of abrasive particles become dust without blasting, i.e. without any cleaning effect.

Moreover, those blast systems have a latent risk of severe pollution if large amounts of used abrasive particles are not or impossible to be treated because of economic and technical causes. Such a drawback can even drive the development of the shipbuilding industry into a deadlock.

Besides, because the inflow of abrasive particles into the cross-shaped tube body 2 is dependent on the weight, i.e. the specific density of abrasive particles and the pressure difference between the abrasive material inlet 2a and the air flow inlet 2c, the systems can only operate in a stable manner with abrasive particles having nearly the same dimension and specific density.

As such, another weak point of conventional blast systems is low stability. In fact, they are easy to be choked or become unworkable when a different sort of abrasive material is used, or when abrasive particles have not the same dimensions and specific density, for instance, when sand is used as abrasive particles.

Such poor stability of conventional blast system also results in extreme difficulties in adjusting the abrasive flow.

There are some solutions for operators to adjust the flow rate of abrasive particles as well as abrasive flows by means of remote-controlled devices, particularly for controlling the flow rate and pressures of compressed air, and the flow rate of abrasive particles to be fed to blast guns. Nevertheless, first, such systems are costly but their durability is low, particularly when they must work in a dusty environment of dry abrasive treatment. Second, such advanced blast systems require abrasive particles that have nearly the same physical properties, i.e. specific density and particle size, and more particularly, they must be equipped with specific apparatus for feeding abrasive particles that are never compatible to various sorts of abrasive materials.

Furthermore, abrasive materials with almost the same physical properties are usually expensive and blast treatment therewith is therefore costly.

Meanwhile, natural sand after preliminary screening has excellent properties such as high blasting capacity, large availability and low cost. A weak point of sand after preliminary screening is its uneven particle size and specific density, which disable it from being used in any advanced dry blast systems, for instance those systems equipped with remote-controlled panels.

Furthermore, the blast systems known in the art can hardly use abrasive particles of uneven particle size like sand, if sand is not sieved or classified by particle sizes or if sand is wet. In practice, such sand can quickly choke the tube that leads it from the storing tank to blast guns as well as blast guns.

Another weak point of sand blast systems known in the art is low cleaning efficiency due to low speed of the sand blast flow.

Because the flow of sand is not controllable, sand blast systems known in the art are usually operated at maximum air flow and sand flow then the consumption of sand is very high.

Also due to poor adjustability of conventional blast systems, the addition of water in form of mist into the abrasive flow is not easy.

Nevertheless, if water is added into an abrasive flow at a certain ratio, it helps significantly reduce dust, meaning that dust produced from the blasting to the surface by abrasive particles will quickly fall down and therefore affect less on blast gun operators' health.

Therefore, there is a high demand for a blast system with high efficiency and stability, low consumption of abrasive materials, and moreover, with ability of adjustment so as to use various sorts of abrasive particles, preferably sand, in which blast gun operators can easily adjust the abrasive flow without choke, and more preferably, with ability to easily convert from a dry abrasive flow into a wet abrasive flow.

In conventional blast systems, although storing tanks accompanying blast guns are designed and fabricated with relatively large volumes, they are usually filled at minimum level in order to avoid of choke. Therefore, the operation of the blast systems must be interrupted for feeding abrasive particles to storing tanks accompanying blast guns. In advanced systems that use standard particles and remote-controlled devices to reach high blast efficiency, the interval between two consecutive feedings of abrasive particles is still long yet for other systems, the feeding time is so long that their effectiveness is worsened. Therefore, there is a high demand for a blast system, in which abrasive particles can be fed continuously to the storing tank associated with the blast gun.

To date, sand is still one of materials that are widely used as abrasive materials in blast technologies. Usually, sand is washed to remove mud and soil and bulky impurities. In practice, washed sand still contained fine or very fine particles, which are estimated at 30 - 40% of the total weight.

Similarly, other artificial abrasive materials still contain a certain percentage of fine and very fine particles.

In general, fine and very fine particles have no blasting effect and during blast processes, they become dust, heavily polluting workplaces and surrounding areas, if no control measure is taken.

That is why there are many measures to classify particles, i.e. to remove fine and very fine particles from abrasive materials. Those measures are based on gravity and centrifugal force.

A most common measure is one or more cyclones, a drawback of which is the need of very large space(s) for installing cyclone(s) as well as storing classified products.

A solution for classification of particles is compact classifiers, for instance, the classifier disclosed in USP 6,540,918 (Gil et al, 01 April 2003). In this classifier, an air flow containing particles is driven in it via an inlet which is tangential to its body. Under gravity and centrifugal force, heavier particles spirally deposit while lighter particles float and escape. It is apparent that this classifier and the like are only suitable for classification of air flows with relatively low contents of particles. A drawback of this solution and other similar ones lies in that the body of the classifier is quickly eroded by any particle-containing air flow of high flow rate and speed, and this is even truer with the airflow containing abrasive materials. And when the body is eroded, the risk of explosion is high when the pressure inside the system is kept high for sake of high productivity of the classifier. Furthermore, replacement of the body will be time-consuming and costly. Therefore, because of safety and economic causes, this kind of classifier cannot be used for blast systems.

Wet selection systems, in which water flows replace air flows, have the same structure and reach high classification efficiency without matters of explosion risk. However, particles must be dried after classification and overall, that is costly.

There is therefore a high demand of classifiers, which can be used for abrasive materials with high safety and low cost.

The present invention is provided to satisfy the aforementioned demands. Disclosure of the invention

In a first feature of the present invention, it is an objective of the invention to provide a structure to continuously adjust the abrasive flow at the blast gun of blast systems without any remote-controlled device, in particularly to adjust the flow rate of abrasive materials to be fed to the blast gun, and the flow rate of inflow of high-pressure air coming into the blast gun.

A second objective of the present invention is to provide a blast system that can work continuously in a long time, in which abrasive materials are fed continuously to storing tanks that accompany blast guns.

In a second aspect, it is third objective of the present invention to provide a simple structure to provide an abrasive flow of high kinetic energy from abrasive materials and a flow of compressed air of high flow rate and speed, that allow adjustment of the abrasive flow at ease and furthermore, the structure can be adjusted for using any sort of abrasive materials, preferably sand.

A fourth objective of the present invention is a wet or dry blast system with an abrasive flow of high cleaning effect, low dust and easy adjustment.

In a third aspect, it is a fifth objective of the present invention is a simple apparatus for classification of abrasive materials, which is cost-effective in fabrication, and highly safe and economical in operation in which with the most eroded parts can be easy and quickly replaced.

The invention achieves the first objective by adjusting a hole, though which abrasive materials are suctioned to an abrasive particle suctioning pipe, by means of two coaxial tubes pivotable to each other, on the tubular walls of the two tubes have holes with substantially similar positions and dimensions, and at the same time, by adjusting the negative pressure that suctions abrasive materials by means of adjusting the open of a vent hole from the adjusting structure to the air.

The invention achieves the second objective by incorporating the continuously adjusting structure with the storing tank and the system to supply abrasive materials by means of compressed air.

The invention achieves the third objective by providing a structure for making a high-speed abrasive flow, the structure includes a cross-shaped tube with an upper mouth to receive abrasive materials and a lower mouth 2b to discharge abrasive materials when required, an outer horizontal tube inserted horizontally into the cross-shaped tube body 2 with a first end expanding to a structure to connect with the abrasive flow guide tube and having at least a first through- hole near the plane perpendicular to the horizontal axis and containing the vertical axis of the cross-shaped tube body 2, an inner horizontal tube inserted into the horizontal outer tube 32 and the inner diameter of the inner tube is varied such that a dispersion space with horizontal Venturi structure is formed inside the cross-shaped tube body 2.

The invention achieves the forth objective by providing a valve to adjust the inflow of abrasive materials into the dispersion space, the adjusting valve comprises a blocking tube which is coaxially installed with the inner tube and fixed to the cross-shaped tube body 2, the blocking tube has at least a second through-hole at the same position as that of the first through-hole.

The invention achieve the fifth objective by a classification apparatus of a classifier, a device to remove fine particles, a dust filter, characterized in that the classifier comprises a cover, a tubular body mounted beneath the cover, a truncated cone bottom with the larger bottom of the truncated cone being coaxially mounted with the tubular body, an inlet tube mounted coaxially to a center of the cover; an air outlet tube perpendicular to the axis of the cover; the outlet of classified abrasive materials is mounted to the smaller bottom of the truncated cone; and a flow diffusion structure mounted beneath the inlet and at a position substantially equal or lower than outlet of gas, thereby abrasive materials are classified through the apparatus and can be directly fed to blast systems.

Brief description of the figures

The nature and further characteristics and advantages of the present invention will be described in more detailed with reference to illustrative figures, where:

Figure 1 is a diagram showing a blast system known in the art;

Figure 2 is a perspective view of an abrasive flow control abrasive flow control structure in the first aspect of the invention;

Figure 3 is a perspective exploded view of the structure in Figure 2;

Figures 4a and 4b are views of the cross-sections A-A and B-B, respectively in Figure 2;

Figure 5 diagram showing the abrasive flow control structure in Figure 2, in where Figure 5a shows the abrasive material suctioning hole fully opened and Figure 5b shows the abrasive material suctioning hole partially closed;

Figure 6 is a diagram showing a blast system in the first aspect of the invention.

Figure 7 is a perspective view of an abrasive flow control structure in a second aspect of the invention;

Figure 8 is a perspective exploded view showing main components of the structure in Figure 7;

Figure 9 is a view of the cross-section showing an embodiment of the structure in the second aspect of the invention;

Figure 10 is an enlarged view of Part I of the structure Figure 4;

Figure 1 1 is a diagram showing a blast system in the second aspect of the invention.

Figure 12 is a diagram of an embodiment of an abrasive material classifying apparatus s in a third aspect of the invention;

Figure 13 is a diagram of the abrasive material classifying apparatus in the third aspect of the invention;

Figure 14 is a view of a flow diffusion structure in the apparatus for classifying abrasive materials in the third aspect of the invention, in which Figure 14a is the perspective view and; Figure 14b is the perspective exploded view; and

Figure 15 is a diagram illustrating a blast system in the third aspect of the invention.

In those illustrative figures, similar or identical components are given the same referrals.

Definitions

In this disclosure, the term "negative pressure" means a relative pressure lower than 0, meaning that the absolute pressure is lower than the atmospheric pressure (lat).

The term "abrasive materials" or "abrasive particles" means mixtures of particles of standard sizes, fine particles and dust.

The term "abrasive particles of standard sizes" or "standard abrasive particles" means abrasive particles that have suitable size and are effective in blasting.

The term "fine particles" means abrasive particles smaller than standard sizes, and therefore the blasting effect thereof is poor.

The term "dust" means particles that easy to diffuse in the air, causing dusty conditions without blasting effect during the application of abrasive flows.

Detailed description of the invention

As illustrated in Figs. 2 - 5, an abrasive flow control structure abrasive flow control structure in the first aspect of the present invention comprises:

- a cross-shaped tube body 2 having an upper mouth 2a as abrasive material inlet, a lower mouth 2b as an abrasive material discharging gate, a left mouth 2c and a right mouth 2c; the upper mouth 2a extended to be a flange to mount to an outlet of an abrasive material storing tank 1 of a blast machine;

- a discharging valve V2 mounted to the lower mouth 2b of the cross-shaped tube body 2 via a threaded funnel-shape connecting part 201 as illustrated;

- a suction tube 21 inserted through the left mouth 2c and right mouth 2c, and being coaxial with a line linking the centers of the left mouth 2c and the right mouth 2c, respectively, and on the tubular wall of the suction tube 21 it is provided at least one hole 211 facing the lower mouth 2b of the body 2, and at least one vent hole 212 open to the outside of the cross-shaped tube body 2;

- a stopping cover 22 stopping an end of the suction tube 21 ;

- an tubular outlet 23 mounted to an end of the suction tube 21 , a part of the tubular outlet 23 that is located inside the suction tube 21 has an outer

diameter smaller than the inner diameter of the suction tube 21 , thereby a passage for the air from outside to the inside of the cross-shaped tube body 2 via vent hole 212 is formed;

- a negative pressure adjusting nut 24 with at least a negative pressure adjusting hole 241 which has substantially the same position and dimension as the vent hole 212 of the suction tube 21 ;

- an outer tube 25 mounted coaxially and pivotally outside the suction tube 21 , and on the tubular wall of the horizontal outer tube 25 also has at least a hole 251 with the position and dimension substantially similar with those of the hole 211 of the suction tube 21 so as to provide the entrance for abrasive materials with an open degree varying continuously when the suction tube 21 and the horizontal outer tube 25 are pivoted one another.

In this structure, the hole for suctioning abrasive material is the orifice created by the holes 211 and 251 respectively on the suction/conducting tube 21 and the horizontal outer tube 25. By pivoting the horizontal outer tube 25, it is possible to adjust the abrasive material suctioning hole from closure to full open, thereby the flow rate of the abrasive material can be adjusted continuously as required.

In a preferred embodiment, there are three suction tube holes 211 and three outer tube holes 251 respectively on the suction tube 21 and the horizontal outer tube 25 and the holes have the centers thereof located on a plane perpendicular to the suction tube 21, and at least one suction tube hole 211 and one outer tube hole 251 face the lower mouth 2b of the cross-shaped tube body 2 body. In this embodiment, the abrasive material flow into the suction tube is dispersed better. This embodiment is illustrated in Figures 4 and Figure 5 with respective suction tube holes 211a, 211b, 211c and outer tube holes 251a, 251b and 251c.

In a further preferred embodiment, the numbers of suction tube holes 21 1 and the horizontal outer tube holes 251 are four and the centers thereof are located on a plane perpendicular to the suction tube 21 , and at least two holes thereof are directed towards the lower mouth 2b of the cross-shaped tube body 2.

In another embodiment, a device for tuning the turning movement of the horizontal outer tube 25 is made with a screw in combination with threads formed on the outer wall of the horizontal outer tube 32. Nevertheless, such an embodiment is complicated.

In a preferred embodiment, the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention further includes a stopping rod 26 tightly and slidably mounted inside the suction tube 21 , a first end of the stopping rod extending to be a cylindrical stopping head 261 which projects to the suction tube holes as illustrated in Fig. 4, and is positioned such that when the stopping rod 26 reciprocally moves inside the suction tube 21, the cylindrical stopping head 261 closes or opens the abrasive material inlet.

In a detailed embodiment, the stopping rod 26 is fabricated with threads to mount to a positioning nut 27, and then the positioning nut 27 is thread-mounted inside the suction/conducting tube 21. This embodiment allows tuning the open of the abrasive material suctioning hole, which is tuning the abrasive material flow through the structure by turning an adjusting knob 28 mounted to a second end of the stopping rod 26.

In yet another preferred embodiment, a part of the cylindrical stopping head 261 that projects to the abrasive material inlet has a conical surface. This avoids the abrasive material, particularly the abrasive materials having uneven particle sizes such as preliminary screened sand, from choking. A surprising result with the cylindrical stopping head 261 having a conical projecting head is that even with wet sand, the structure is not choked during operation. That is a feature which has never seen in any blast machines known in the art. That characteristic allows blast machines according to the invention to use sand of certain moisture as abrasive material in order to reduce dust in the blasting process, and the moisture can be adjusted so as not to wet the metallic surface after blasting. That means the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention can, in the one hand, reduce dust pollution, and at the same time, keep the metallic surface dry enough after blasting and therefore ready for coating without using any costly specialized paints.

During operation, the tubular outlet 23 is a connector connecting with an abrasive flow tube which is in turned connected to a blast gun 5. When the abrasive material is fed to the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention via upper mouth 2a, the abrasive material fills in the cross-shaped tube body 2, closing the upper mouth 2a then the negative pressure inside the cross-shaped tube body 2is mostly dependent on the open of the vent passage. In other words, it is possible to adjust the vacuum pressure (or negative pressure) inside the cross-shaped tube body 2 by pivoting the negative pressure adjusting nut 24 to a suitable position.

In details, that is, when the open of the vent passage is small, the negative pressure inside the cross-shaped tube body 2 is high and the force suctioning the abrasive material is high. In opposite, when the open of the vent passage is large, the negative pressure inside the cross-shaped tube body 2 is small, the force suctioning the abrasive material is small.

As such, by combining the adjustments of the horizontal outer tube 25 and the negative pressure adjusting nut 24 and/or the cylindrical stopping head 261, it is possible to adjust continuously the abrasive material flow into the blast gun via the outlet of the structure according to the invention.

In a practical embodiment, the surface 337 of the projecting end of the horizontal outer tube 25 is made rough, and at the same time, the second end of

the stopping rod is mounted to an adjusting knob 28, both for conveniently handling.

Thus, by locking the discharging valve V2, and turning the negative pressure adjusting nut 24 to a position where the negative pressure adjusting hole 241 overlapping the vent hole 212 for the inside of the cross-shaped tube body 2 to be open to the ambient atmosphere, when the blast gun 5 is operated, the suctioning force from the blast gun 5 (as a result of the Venturi structure of the blast gun 5) creates a negative pressure suctioning the air flow, forming a flow of abrasive material containing air going through the suction tube 21. Then the negative pressure adjusting nut 24 may be turned to close partially the vent hole 212 that is to close a part of the vent passage from inside the cross-shaped tube body 2 to the ambience so as to lower the absolute pressure therein and thereby increase the abrasive material suctioning force.

As such, the abrasive material flow via structure according to the invention is adjusted not only in term of flow rate of the abrasive flow by means of the open of the passages formed between the suction tube 21 and the horizontal outer tube 25 and/or the cylindrical stopping head 261 but also in term of speed by the open of the vent passage. Since those opens can be adjusted continuously, in details, the open of the passage formed between the suction tube 21 and the horizontal outer tube 25 is adjusted by pivoting the horizontal outer tube 25 against the suction tube 21 as illustrated in Figure 6, and/or adjusting the stopping rod 26 to move and project so as to reduce the open of the passage, and at the same time, the open of the vent hole 212 to the ambience is adjusted by turning the negative pressure adjusting nut 24 against the suction tube 21 with the same mechanism.

Functions of the stopping nut 74 (only shown in Figure 4) and the fixing nut 29 are fixing the horizontal outer tube 25 and negative pressure adjusting nut 24, respectively after a suitable adjustment for the desired flow rate of the abrasive material.

It is apparent that an advantage of the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention is that an operator thereof can adjust the flow rate of the abrasive material by means of some simple operations and without any sophisticated and complicated instruments.

Another advantage of the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention is that it allows the use of any abrasive material of any particle size and specific density.

A further advantage of the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention is that an operation can lock the flow of the abrasive material to the blast gun 5 by pivoting the horizontal outer tube 25 to a position where the hole(s) 211 on the suction tube 21 is fully closed, and at the same time fully opening the vent hole 212. At that position, only the air passes the tubular

outlet/connector 23 and the blast machine can be used as an air jet for removing dust from a blasted surface prior to coating.

In general, the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention can be used with any blast machine after it is easily installed downstream the abrasive material storing tank and upstream the tube feeding abrasive material for the blast gun 5.

An advantage of this embodiment is that the abrasive flow formed at the outlet of the blast gun 5 has high intensity and high blasting effect. This characteristic was demonstrated in experiments and practices with preliminary screened sand as abrasive material, the air flow was provided at 1000 m ³ per hour, and the pressure of compressed air was 7 kg/cm ² . Using the same blast gun with a steel sheet, the blasted surfaces all met the grade of SA 2.5 according to standards of NACE and SSPC, but when the flow control structure according to the invention, the blast duration is shortened significantly and the sand consumption was cut half.

A surprising result recorded in experiments with a blast machine in which the structure for continuously adjusting the flow of abrasive material according to the invention is that the abrasive flow is in a state of laminar flow of high speed with a very high convergence, and that abrasive flow has a blast effect much higher than any abrasive flow from conventional blast machines, which provide turbulent flows. In other words, an advantage of this embodiment is the high convergence without any flow-converging structures known in the art.

A further advantage of the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention is that the dimension of the blast gun can be increased significantly. In practice, the author of the invention has fabricated and used blast guns with the inner diameters up to 20 mm, which was larger than 16 mm inner diameter of the biggest blast guns known in the art.

Experiments with the blast guns of the invention also showed that the abrasive flow therefrom was convergent, forming a large and focal blast area, which was the cross-section perpendicular to the axis of the abrasive flow. In details, the blast area has the diameter of 20 cm at a distance of between 80 and 100 cm from the mouth of the blast gun, which is much bigger than a blast area of 10 cm diameter at the distance of 25 - 30 cm from the mouth of a conventional blast gun.

Thanks to bigger blast guns, blast machines according to the invention obtain a higher blasting capacity.

It is noteworthy that the blast machines with the incorporation of the abrasive flow control structure have a distinctive property, which is the convergent abrasive flow. More particularly, the blast effect remain high when the distance from the blast gun mouth to the subject of surface treatment varies in a large

range, for example, from 20 cm to 100 cm, whereas conventional blast machines only work well when the same distance should be in a narrow range of 25 cm to 30 cm.

In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, a blast machine includes a blast gun according to the invention that is incorporated with an abrasive material storing tank. Thanks to the structure for continuously adjusting the abrasive material flow as discussed above, there is no choke in the path of the abrasive material and therefore, it is possible to design the abrasive material storing tank of any volume. In practice, the dimensions of the storing tank are calculated based on factors such as, for example, the amount of abrasive material needed for the blast process, the weight that any operator can move during operation and the total volume of the machine that allows easy moving thereof.

Since the structure for continuously adjusting the abrasive material flow helps avoid of choke in the path of the abrasive material, the abrasive material can be filled in the storing tank at a maximum level without impacts on the operation of blast machines. Therefore, in another embodiment of the present invention, the abrasive material is fed to a blast machine, that is to a working storing tank in a continuous manner by means of compressed air via a feeding gate.

In a preferred embodiment of a blast system according to the invention as illustrated in Figure 6, a blast machine thereof further includes an observatory gate 601 and a dust outlet 602 and the blast machine is fed with the abrasive material from the abrasive material storing 1 to a working tank 4 via a feeding system operated with compressed air, including a compressed air supply pipe and compressed air valves Vl and V2. The function of the observatory gate 601 is for monitoring the filling level of the abrasive material in the working tank 4 so as the inflow of abrasive material to the machine can be adjusted.

Because preliminary screened sand usually contains 30-40% of dust-causative fine particles that have not blast effect, the dust outlet 602 in this preferred embodiment helps minimize the dust produced and thereby control dust pollution yet keep the blast capacity intact when sand is used as abrasive material. The dust outlet 602 can be led away the workplace or connected to a dust filter 8 as shown in Figure 6.

In a second aspect of the invention, as shown in Figure 7, an abrasive flow control structure according to the invention has a similar shape as the conventional structure used for mixing an abrasive material with compressed air, that is a cross-shaped tube with two pathways, one for the abrasive material and another for compressed air, the two pathways are perpendicular to each other and the juncture thereof forms a dispersion space.

An upper flange has holes (not shown in the figures) for mounting the structure to the outlet of the abrasive material storing tank. The upper flange may also have a brim to avoid of leakage of compressed air.

A distinctive feature of the structure for providing the abrasive flow according to the invention is that a plurality of components with certain structures and mounting manners is combined to create a Venturi crossing the dispersion space in order to make full use of the kinetic energy of the high-speed compressed air to bring the abrasive material into the dispersion space in a controllable manner.

As shown in Figures 7 through 9, the basic components of an abrasive flow control structure in an embodiment of the present invention include: a cross-shaped tube body 2 with an upper mouth 2a to receive abrasive materials, a lower mouth 2b to discharge of abrasive materials when required; a horizontal outer tube 32 mounted pivotally inside the cross-shaped tube body 2 with an end expanding to form a suitable connector for connecting with an abrasive flow conducting tube, the horizontal outer tube 32 has at least a first through-hole 321 adjacent to a plane being perpendicular to the horizontal axis and at the same time containing the vertical axis of the cross-shaped tube body 2; a the horizontal inner tube 33 mounted inside the horizontal outer tube 32 with a first end expanding to form a connector for connecting with the high-speed compressed air flow conducting tube; the inner diameter of the horizontal outer tube 32 and the inner diameter of the horizontal inner tube 33 are designed such that a horizontal dispersion space of Venturi structure is formed inside the cross-shaped tube body 2

In another embodiment, a blocking tube 31 mounted coaxially with the horizontal inner tube 33 and fixed to the cross-shaped tube body 2, the blocking tube 31 has at least one second through-hole 311 at the same position as that of the first through-hole 321 so as to form a gate adjusting the inflow of the abrasive material into the dispersion space G.

In this embodiment, the abrasive material flow into the dispersion space G can be adjusted by pivoting the horizontal outer tube 32 such that the horizontal outer tube 32 partially stops the second through-hole 311. In this embodiment, when the horizontal outer tube 32 is pivoted such that the first through-hole 321 overlaps the second through-hole 311 when observed from the radial direction, the flow of abrasive material that can enter the dispersion space is maximum.

Details of components including the Venturi and adjusting structures, etc. are further shown in Figure 9. In an abrasive flow control structure according to the invention, the Venturi can be single, double or triple.

In a preferred embodiment with a double Venturi structure as shown in Figure 9, the passage of the flow on the horizontal axis from the compressed airflow inlet

44 to the abrasive flow outlet 312 varies as follows: it is narrowed in a certain part, then becomes instant because of the corresponding structure of the inner wall of the horizontal inner tube 33, then is further narrowed in a short distance prior to be instant thanks to the corresponding structure of the inner wall of the horizontal outer tube 32. As such, in this embodiment, two adjacent Venturi structures (i.e. a double Venturi) are respectively formed in the inner walls of the horizontal inner tube 33 and the horizontal outer tube 32.

In other embodiments, single Venturi structures are formed in the inner wall of the horizontal inner tube 33 or the horizontal outer tube 32, or the inner walls of the two tubes are fabricated to form a single passage having a Venturi structure or the like.

In other words, an abrasive flow control structure according to the invention can include a plurality of Venturi provided in series on the passage of the compressed air flow, and those structures are also called Venturi.

The blocking tube 31 has an end expanding to be a flange section 312 for welding it to the left mouth 2c of the cross-shaped tube body 2, the flange section 312 has through-holes for mounting the left flange 34 by means of bolts - nuts 72 and between the left flange 34 and the flange section 312 there is provided a buffer 35 to avoid of leakage of compressed air from inside the structure.

Advantages of this embodiment include easy fabrication and installation though it is possible to apply other conventional installation techniques to installation of those components, for instance, welding, molding or threading.

In the embodiments mentioned above, in order to avoid of compressed air leakage, the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention further includes other structures well known in the art. For instance, the horizontal inner tube 33 may have circumferential slots to mount O-ring(s) 71, preferably two O-rings as shown in the drawing.

In order to fix the position of the horizontal inner tube 33, the outer wall of the horizontal inner tube 33 may further have holes, while the left flange 34 may have through-holes for mounting stopping bolts 334 therethrough and locking thereby.

Besides, the outer wall of the horizontal inner tube 33 can be expanded to be a nut-like section 48 (as shown in Figure 2) for easy installation of the horizontal inner tube 33 with the compressed air conducting tube.

The outer wall of the horizontal outer tube 32 can be also expanded to form stepping structure 335 in order to secure close sealing when the horizontal outer tube 32 is mounted to the cross-shaped tube body 2 by means of a buffer ring 73 and a right flange 36.

In another preferred embodiment, a second end of the horizontal inner tube 33 projects above the through-hole 311. In this embodiment, the open of the through-hole 311 that leads the abrasive material into the dispersion space G in the cross-shaped tube body 2 is dependent not only on the deviation between the first through-hole 321 and the second through-hole 311 but also the projection of the projecting end of the horizontal inner tube 33. Therefore, an advantage of this embodiment is to provide an ability to tune the abrasive material inflow into the dispersion space, that is the abrasive material inflow into the abrasive flow. With this embodiment, the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention can use any abrasive material after appropriate trial runs and adjustment, that is to turn the horizontal outer tube 32 and to change the position of the horizontal inner tube 33, for instance, by changing the thickness of the buffer 35.

In another preferred embodiment, the second end of the horizontal inner tube 33 is tapered to form a conical face 336 as shown in Figure 10. In practice, this embodiment creates abrasive flows of high stability with no choke in the pathway that the abrasive material enters the abrasive flow. The effect of the tapered end mentioned above may be a result of change in the high-pressure air flow from laminar status to turbulent status. The author of the present invention has not conducted theoretical studies yet he found in practice an advantage of this embodiment that the abrasive flow is very stable yet controllable.

Although the horizontal inner tube 33 can be fixed to the cross-shaped tube body 2 as discussed above, in another preferred embodiment, the horizontal inner tube 33 is mounted pivotally inside the cross-shaped tube body 2. In this embodiment, in stead of locking into holes as described above, stopping bolts 334 abut against circumferential slots 331 which are formed on the outer wall of the horizontal inner tube 33. An advantage of this embodiment is easy fabrication, that is no need to calculate and fabricate the structure at any high accuracy for stopping bolts 334 to lock in holes as in other embodiments.

In an embodiment, the horizontal inner tube 33 is mounted inside the cross- shaped tune such that it can moves reciprocally along the axis thereof. This embodiment is realized by forming a plurality of circumferential slots 331. When inner tube 40 should be moved to adjust the abrasive flow, an operator needs only to loose stopping bolts 334 and move the horizontal inner tube 33, then tighten the stopping bolts 334. As such, this embodiment allows even easier tuning of the abrasive material flow into the dispersion space G.

In another preferred embodiment, the horizontal inner tube 33 is mounted inside the cross-shaped tube body 2 such that the reciprocating distance thereof can be adjusted continuously. In an embodiment, circumferential slots 331 are spiral. With this embodiment, an operator can easily tune continuously the abrasive material flow into the dispersion space by loosing stopping bolts 334, turning

the horizontal inner tube 33 to a desired position, and then tighten the stopping bolts 334 so as to fix the horizontal inner tube 33 in the structure.

The nut-like section 332 formed on the inner wall of the horizontal inner tube 33 as described above facilitates the adjustment. Further, the outer surface of the horizontal inner tube 33 can also have nut-like sections (as shown in Figures 7 and 8) for the operator to manually turn the horizontal inner tube 33 without common tools such as spanners or wrenches.

For fabrication and/or installation, it is optional to employ any suitable sealing method in order to secure the air-tightness inside the structure according to the invention. Preferably, welding is employed for the components fixed one another and O-rings 19 for pivotally mounted components.

For example, in an embodiment as illustrated in Figures 3 and 4, an O-ring 71 is mounted between the flanges of the horizontal outer tube 25 and the left mouth 2c, respectively. It is possible to mount a fixing nut 29 to fix the horizontal outer tube 25 after the horizontal outer tube 25 is adjusted to a desired position. Figure 3 illustrates a discharging valve V2 mount to the cross-shaped tube body 2 via a threaded funnel-shape connecting part 201. In practice, the cross-shaped tube body 2 can be constructed by mounding as a whole or by welding tubular components to one another.

In order to achieve another objective of the present invention, that is a blast system capable of stable operation with any compressed air of very high flow rates and speeds, a blast system according to the invention includes a blast system known in the art, except that in which the cross-shaped tube body 2 is replaced with an abrasive flow control structure according to the invention as easily compared the conventional blast system shown in Figure 1 with a blast system according to the invention as shown in Figure 1 1. Another difference between the two systems is the absence of an abrasive material valve V5 in the latter.

In general, with no complicated components and because the structure for providing an abrasive flow according to the invention has the same shape and dimension as the conventional cross-shape tube, there is no hindrance to the installation of the abrasive flow control structure and/or a sprayer for spraying mist into the abrasive flow according to the invention to any available blast system.

In practice, the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention works perfectly when it is installed in the sand blast systems of some shipyards in Vietnam. A distinctive feature is that while in the systems available at shipyards, the compressed air valve V2 is usually opened in a limited range in order to avoid of choke (as discussed in the description of related arts above), when the cross-shaped tube body 2 is replaced with the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention, it is allowable to fully open the compressed air valve

V3, meaning that the full capacity of compressed air supply systems can be utilized.

In a preferred embodiment, a blast system according to the invention includes a source of compressed air, an abrasive material storing tank 1, an abrasive flow control structure to receive the abrasive material from the abrasive material storing tank 1 and the compressed air from the source of compressed air so as to form a high-speed abrasive flow, a blast gun 5 receiving the high-speed abrasive flow, a compressed air valve V3 adjusting the pressure of the compressed air fed to the structure, and a pressure control valve V4 adjusting the pressure inside the storing tank.

The compressed air from the compressed air source is used to feed the abrasive flow control structure and at the same time to maintain a necessary pressure inside the abrasive material storing tank 1.

A distinctive and also advantageous feature of the blast system according to the invention is that with the presence of the abrasive flow control structure, operations of the system become very stable, regardless of difference in specific density and/or dimension of abrasive materials. In practice, the blast system according to the invention can work even with sand, inclusive of wet sand, as the abrasive material.

Another excellent feature is inherited from the possible adjustment of the abrasive material flow into the abrasive flow, and at the same time, the air flow is accelerated many folds on passing the double Venturi as described above, the abrasive flow from the blast system according to the invention has very high blasting effect and very low dust, and therefore the costs of operation and environmental protection are reduced significantly.

Furthermore, since the consumption of abrasive materials is lower, the expense on treatment of the used abrasive material, for instance, collection and rendering it inert, etc. is cut down significantly.

Unlike conventional blast systems which do not allow adjustment of the abrasive material flow rate in order to avoid of choke in the pathway of the abrasive material from the storing tank to the abrasive flow, an advantage of this embodiment is that an user, that is an operator of the blast gun, can adjust the abrasive material flow rate as desired by combined adjustment of the compressed air valve V3 and the pressure control valve V4 while the system run in a stable manner.

The operation of the blast system according to the invention is as follows: first, the abrasive flow control structure, that means the horizontal outer tube 32 and the horizontal inner tube 33 are adjusted appropriately with the sort of abrasive material to be used as mentioned above. Then the compressed air valve V3 is fully opened, and the pressure control valve V4 for adjusting the pressure inside the storing tank is adjusted until the desired abrasive flow is obtained.

During operation, it is also allowed to increase or decrease the content of the abrasive material in the abrasive flow by adjusting the pressure control valve V4 and/or to increase or decrease the dimension, convergence, kinetic energy, etc. of the abrasive flow via the compressed air valve V3.

Because the system has high stability (no choke), the adjustment is easy without any complicated measuring and controlling means.

In fact, an operator can observe the dimension and convergence of the resultant abrasive flow and adjust it as desired. That is also a distinctive feature of the blast system according to the invention because on operating other blast systems known in the art, the workplace is full of dust and operators usually fail to observe abrasive flows.

Another advantage of the abrasive flow formed in the blast system according to the invention is its high convergence. As such, the abrasive flow is focused and the blasting effect is high.

The convergence of the abrasive flow in the blast system according to the invention is demonstrated in practice.

Further, while blast machines known in the art always require operators to position the blast gun at most 50 cm from the surface to be treated, with the blast system according to the invention, the abrasive flow still has high blast effects when the distance from the blast gun to the surface is at least 1 m.

Another advantage of the blast system in which the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention is utilized is that when the pressure inside the abrasive material storing tank is adjusted, that is when the pressure is reduced by closing the pressure control valve V4, the abrasive material can no longer enter the abrasive flow control structure, but the compressed air flow still has high speeds and flow rates. And with such adjustment, the blast gun becomes a blow pipe which can be used for blowing surfaces prior to coating or for other purposes, for instance, cleaning machines and equipment.

For increasing the content of the abrasive material in the abrasive flow, i.e. increasing the abrasive material consumption, it suffices to adjust only the pressure control valve V4.

The abrasive material flow into the abrasive flow control structure is maximum when the pressure control valve V4 is fully opened. At that time, the pressure

inside the storing tank is almost the same as the pressure of the compressed air flow into the dispersion space, and therefore, the abrasive material enters the dispersion space under gravity. That means the maximum abrasive material flow into the dispersion space is dependent on physical properties of the abrasive material (including dimension, specific density, shape, etc.) and pressure drops on related components.

In opposite, when the content of the abrasive material in the abrasive flow should be reduced, it is possible to adjust the pressure control valve V4. Depending on the open of the pressure control valve V4, together with gravity, the difference between the compressed air pressure and the pressure inside the storing tank makes change in the abrasive material flow into the abrasive flow control structure according to the invention.

The abrasive material flow into the abrasive flow control structure is zero (0) when the pressure control valve V4 is fully closed, because the high pressure of the compressed air flow prevents the abrasive material from going into the abrasive flow control structure.

In a preferred embodiment, an abrasive flow valve V6 is mounted on the passage of the abrasive flow. In practice, even after an operator has closed the abrasive flow valve V6, that is the abrasive material has been stopped and a small amount thereof remains in the abrasive flow conducting tube, still the system can work again when the operator reopens the abrasive flow valve V6. Naturally, depending on the amount and some other properties, for instance, moisture of the abrasive material to enter the abrasive flow, sometimes the discharging valve V2 should be opened prior to opening the abrasive flow valve V6.

In a preferred embodiment, a mist sprayer (not shown in the figures) is mounted in the passage of the abrasive flow. The present invention can employ any mist sprayer known in the art. With this embodiment, by opening or closing a water valve of the sprayer, an operator can optionally obtain a wet or dry abrasive flow.

Among other things, an advantage of wet abrasive flows is that dust is limited. Furthermore, some commercialized compositions allow prevent of oxidation of metallic surfaces within twenty four hours. Therefore, the blast system of this embodiment can conveniently utilize such compositions by simply connecting a water conducting tube with a tank of solutions of compositions mentioned above.

In a third aspect of the present invention, as shown in Figure 12, apparatus for classifying abrasive materials according to the invention comprises: an abrasive material classifier 6 a fine particle removing device 7

a dust filter 8,

Compared to conventional classifying apparatus, the distinctive features of the apparatus 6 for classifying abrasive materials is that it comprises a cover 67; a substantially vertical tubular body 61 mounted beneath the cover 67; a truncated-cone bottom 62 with the upper larger bottom mounted coaxially to substantially vertical tubular body 61 ; an inlet tube 63 mounted substantially coaxially to the cover 67 at the center of the cover 67; an air outlet tube 64 mounted to the cover 67 in a direction orthogonal to the symmetrical axis of the cover 67; at least one standard abrasive material outlet tube 65 mounted to the smaller bottom of truncated-cone bottom 62; and a conical flow diffusion structure 66 mounted right beneath the inlet tube 63 at an elevation substantially equal or lower than the air outlet tube as shown in Figure 2.

Compared with known classifiers, which separate particles from a liquid or gaseous flow, the abrasive material classifier according to the invention is characterized in that the abrasive material containing flow enters the classifiers in a direction coaxial with the classifier body while the air flow is perpendicular to the axis of the classifier body. A surprising result that with an abrasive material containing air flow of high flow rates and speeds, the classifier according to the invention can separate the abrasive material into two parts, namely a first part of fine particles and dust that escapes via the air outlet tube 64, and a second part of abrasive particles of large and even dimensions that goes out of the classifier via the standard abrasive material outlet tube 65. It is possible that the particles containing air flow in the classifier is in a strongly turbulent status. And it is also possible that under the effect of the conical flow diffusion structure 66 in combination with the cylindrical section 661 and the outlet of the air flow via the air outlet tube 64, meaning that the outflow perpendicular to the axis of the classifier 6 creates turbulent airflows that classify particles of various dimension and specific density.

The details of the conical flow diffusion structure 66 in a preferred embodiment of the invention are shown in Figure 13. The conical flow diffusion structure 66 is consisted of two parts. The first part is a tubular body 661 with an upper thread section 666 for mounting with the cover 67 of the abrasive material classifier 6, the tubular body is expanded to three symmetrical legs 82, on which there are through-holes 663. The second part of the flow diffusion structure includes a cylindrical section 661 connected with a conical section 662, and on

the cylindrical section 661 there are threaded holes 664 corresponding to through-holes 663 for mounting the first and the second parts by means of bolts 73. The abrasive material containing air flow enters the abrasive material classifier 6 smashes the conical section 662 and the conical section 662 is easily worn out. However, with the structure as disclosed above, it is easy and rapid to replace the second part of the conical flow diffusion structure 66. Furthermore, because the second part is small, it is easy to made it of anti-corrosive materials or coat it with anti-corrosive materials without any significant increase in the cost of the equipment. An observed advantage of the apparatus for classifying abrasive materials according to the invention is that only the conical flow diffusion structure 66 is worn, whereas the body is worn insignificantly in use. Furthermore, although the abrasive material containing air flow has a high pressure (5 - 7 kG/cm ² ), the pressure inside the abrasive material classifier is nearly zero, meaning that the safety thereof is high.

The outflows from the abrasive material classifier according to the invention contain the abrasive material in two segments, the first one of almost all fine particles and dust and the second of relatively large particles, about 2 mm.

In the apparatus for classifying abrasive materials according to the invention, the segment of fine particles is removed by a fine particle removing device 7 and the air outflow from the fine particle removing device 7 is led to a dust filter 8, where a dust segment is collected. As a result, the abrasive material is classified into three segments, namely (i) a segment of standard abrasive material from the standard abrasive material outlet tube 65 that can be fed directly to any blast system, (ii) a segment of fine particles from the outlet of the fine particle removing device 7 and (iii) dust collected at the dust filter 8. As such, an advantage of the apparatus for classifying abrasive materials according to the invention is that fine abrasive particles and dust are fully removed from the standard abrasive material, and any blast system using the abrasive material from the abrasive material classifier according to the invention can avoid of dust during blasting.

In a preferred embodiment, the cover 67 has a cupola shape and the air outlet tube 64 is mounted tangentially to the cover 67. In practice, this embodiment gives the best classification, maybe because it helps minimize the by-pass flows from the inlet tube 63 to the air outlet tube 64.

It is allowable to install any fine particle removing device and/or dust filter as a fine particle removing device in the apparatus according to the invention. However, in a preferred embodiment, the fine particle removing device is a screen filter and/or the dust filter is a bag filter. Advantages of this embodiment include low cost of production, easy operation with available components and easy replacement

In practice, preliminary screen sand is fed to the classifier according to the invention by an air flow. of 6 kG/cm ² at 10 liter/minute from an air compressor via a pipe of φ32 mm diameter and 100m length. The segments obtained have the particle sizes and percentages as given in Table 1.

Table 1

It is noteworthy that the segment of sand possibly used as a standard abrasive material contains almost no dust and fine particles then dust is limited in the blast process using thereof.

With components and parts as described above, the apparatus for classifying abrasive materials according to the invention can be used in any blast system, meaning that the obtained abrasive material, which can be used effectively as a abrasive material, can be fed to any feeder, for example, mechanical conveyors such as belt conveyor or pneumatic conveyors.

An advantage of the apparatus for classifying abrasive materials according to the invention is that it can be directly installed to any blast system as shown in Figure 15.

As shown in Fig. 15, the blast system according to the invention includes an abrasive material storing tank 1 , an abrasive material classifier 6, a fine particle removing device 7, a dust filter 8, a blast gun 5, with the abrasive material directly taken from the at least one abrasive material outlet 65 of the apparatus for classifying abrasive materials.

An advantage of the abrasive material classifier and the blast systems according to the invention is that a plurality of standard abrasive material outlet tube 65 can be installed, meaning that the abrasive material from the abrasive material classifier can be distributed to a plurality of blast guns.

Furthermore, the system can include the abrasive flow control structure for continuously adjusting abrasive material as discussed in the first aspect of the present invention. In this embodiment, the abrasive material classifier 6 is also the working tank 4.

The blast system according to the invention can work continuously by adjusting the abrasive material flow into the abrasive material classifier 6 and the abrasive flow control structure in combination with observing the level of abrasive

material remained in the abrasive material classifier 6 via any observatory gate (not shown in figures) known in the art.

Similarly, the blast system according to the invention can work well with the abrasive flow control structure discussed in the second aspect of the invention with some differences of pipe connections, which are easily made by a person skilled in the art.

It is noted that the embodiments described above are illustrative only for better understanding of the nature and scope of the invention, based on which, a person skilled in the art can made various modifications. For example, the flow diffusion structure can be molded as a whole, or the body thereof has only one leg to mount to the conical section, or the fine particle removing device is incorporated with the dust filter in order to remove fine particles together with dust without treatment.

The basic advantages of the structure for continuously adjusting the flow of abrasive material, the structure for accelerating the abrasive flow, the blast machine and the blast system in the first feature of the invention include their simplicity, easy and cost-effective fabrication, possibility to make full use of available known devices and equipment for significantly improved work. In details, that are the ability to use any and all sorts of abrasive materials, inclusive of natural sand with optional moisture, the low consumption of abrasive materials, the easy adjustment of abrasive material flows, the continuous operation, and more importantly, they help improve working conditions, that is to reduce dust pollution.

The basic advantages of the abrasive flow control structure in the second aspect of the invention include the supply of stable abrasive flows of high kinetic energy, the maximal use of the energy contained in compressed air, and thereby the blast system according to the invention has high blasting efficiency, low cost of operation and particularly low cost of environmental treatment.

Distinctive advantages of the blast system according to the invention include its high efficiency, low cost, easy operation and control.

The apparatus for classifying abrasive materials and the blast system in the third aspect of the invention can be used conveniently in blast technologies with advantages such as high safety and less dust.

Referrals