BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to structures adapted to atten ate sound normally accompanying the flow of a fluid medium such as air or gas streams in a confined place, and more particularly to an acoustical gas flow silencer which may be typically used in heating, venti¬ lating and air conditioning systems, power plants, engine intakes and exhausts, process blowers and compressors, etc. The silencer of the present inventors may include sound absorptive (dissipative) elements as well as reactive (nondissipative) configurations and may function as a combined dissipative and reactive attenuator or as a purely reactive one.

Description of the Prior Art

One type of silencer that is in common use is a splitter silencer which generally consists of baffles con¬ taining sound absorptive materials, of varying lengths and thicknesses, disposed parallel to the direction of the fluid stream flow. The sound absorptive materials are usually protected by perforated metal sheets or screens and, for very high velocity applications, by additional materials. Because of this silencer's re¬ liance on sound absorptive material for the attenuation of noise, it may generically be called a "dissipative" type silencer, and the term "dissipative" will be used herein to define such a silencer. One advantage of the "dissi¬ pative" type of splitter silencer is that with good aero¬ dynamic design it has a relatively low pressure drop. This feature makes the silencer particularly well-suited

OMPI

for applications involving large volumes of fluid flow. It will be understood that pressure drop is always an important factor in that the lesser the amount of energy required to push fluids through the silencers and other system components, the more energy is available for other purposes such as generating electricity or producing other marketable goods. Pressure drop is, of course, also very important in situations where air supply is marginal to begin with. Another advantage of dissipative type split¬ ter silencers is that they are generally effective in attenuating noise in a wide range of both high and low frequencies.

There is, however, a significant shortcoming asso¬ ciated with the use of dissipative type splitter silencers in "dirty" environments such as steel plants, food pro¬ cessing operations, coal mines, aluminum reduction plants, power plants, and in particular, coal fired power plants which generate a significant amount of fly ash. More particularly, when dissipative type splitter silencers are used in such environments, the perforations of the silencer's absorptive surfaces tend to become clogged by the particular contaminants contained in the fluid passing through the silencer. This clogging results in significan losses in the noise reduction characteristics of the sil- encer, and so, undesirably frequent cleaning of the sound absorptive surfaces is required.

With certain fan or air/gas handling applications, as in power plants, for instance, the undesirable noise encountered is often due to certain discrete tones which may be attributable to the fan blade pass frequency. These frequencies usually lie in a relatively broad low fre¬ quency range such as from about 100 to 500 Hz. A particu¬ lar type of dissipative splitter silencer which has been suggested for use in environments such as power plants is

OM

⁰ one in which the absorptive surfaces thereof are largely contained within pockets on each side of the splitter and are separated by means of a solid spline. However, this type of silencer, in addition to a clogging problem, also suffers from a further related problem. More particularly, 5 the pockets of this type of splitter silencer, which are essentially at right angles to the direction of fluid flow, act as collectors for the particulate contaminants in the fluid. Thus, in addition to clogging the sound absorptive surfaces inside the pockets, they facilitate

10 the build-up of accumulating contaminants. Further, the typical construction of these particular silencers is such that ready access cannot be had to the portions of the si¬ lencer where the fluid contaminants have collected so as to hinder cleaning and declogging of the silencer. It

15 will be noted that the noise reduction characteristics of the silencer will be seriously impaired by such accumu¬ lations. This is particularly significant in power plants. Power plants are constructed so as to be operative for periods on the order of forty or more years. Silencers,

20 therefore, should be useful and accessible for mainten¬ ance for the same length of time. It will be appreciated that if a power plant had to shut down for any reason, the economic and social impact can be enormous.

25. From the above, it will be understood that a silencer which will attenuate the relatively broad low range of frequencies typically encountered in power plants, in¬ dependent of the functioning of potentially clogged dis¬ sipative components, i.e., the perforated or screened

30 plates covering the acoustically absorptive material, is highly desirable.

Another type of silencer in use is commonly called a "reactive" type silencer. As used herein a "reactive" 5 type silencer refers to a silencer which is not dependent

OMPI

on the presence of sound absorptive or flow resistant materials. Reactive silencers attenuate sound predomi¬ nantly by virtue of volumetric relationships and the re¬ flection of energy, rather than by use of sound absorptive materials, thus avoiding the above-mentioned clogging problem associated with dissipative type silencers. How¬ ever, reactive type silencers generally operate effectivel only over a relatively narrow frequency range, and thus, do not provide an optimum solution to noise reduction in environments such as power plants.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a sound silencer which, while employing sound absorptive material, is so constructed so as to retard clogging, minimize the need for cleaning, and maintain effective noise attenuation over a wide range of high and low frequencies for longer periods of time than known silencers.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a sound silencer having the above characteristics which can effectively attenuate noises in.a relatively wid range of frequencies even when the perforated plates or screens covering the acoustically absorptive material are clogged by contaminants such as fly ash in the fluid stream which flows through the silencer.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a sound silencer having the above characteristics and which also maintains a low degree of pressure drop.

It is another ob ect of the present invention to provide a sound silencer which is constructed so as to provide ready access to the portions thereof where contam¬ inants may collect for easy cleaning thereof when necessary.

OMP ''

It is another object of the present invention to provide a sound silencer of the reactive type as defined above, i.e., which does not require any sound absorptive materials or surfaces, which effectively attenuates sound over a relatively broad frequency range while retaining low pressure drop characteristics.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the above recited objectives, the present invention provides an acoustic filter silencer for insertion in a duct having a fluid stream flowing therethrough. The silencer comprises an outer housing which is preferably substantially rectangular in cross- section having an open entry end, an opposed open exit end, a base portion, a roof portion, and a pair of opposed sidewalls. It will be noted that the housing may also have configurations other than rectangular, and in addition, the subject silencer may be constructed so as to be unitary with the fluid duct. The preferred embodiment of the silencer of the present invention further comprises a plurality, of spaced apart, generally parallel sound- attenuating members which are disposed either substantially upright within the housing, extending from the base of the housing to the roof thereof, or longitudinally within the housing, extending from the entry end of the housing to the exit end thereof. When upright, the sound attenuating members are disposed substantially normal to the housing base, whereas when longitudinal, they are disposed sub¬ stantially parallel to the housing base. In either case, the sound attenuating members are arranged in columns and rows which define a first plurality of through passageways which are disposed substantially parallel to the direction of the main flow of the fluid stream and extending from the entry end of the housing to the exit end thereof, and a second plurality of through passageways which are dis-

posed substantially perpendicular to the direction of the main flow of the fluid stream and extending from one of the housing side walls to the other side wall thereof. Preferably, each of the sound attenuating members is sub¬ stantially rectangular in cross section having first and second pairs of opposed faces. The sound attenuating members may also have other configurations, however, such as trapezoidal, round, etc. so as to effect the reflecting of the fluid between adjacent sound alternating members.

In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, each of the sound attenuating members is filled with a sound absorptive material, with each of the operative face of the members (opposed pairs of faces contacting the fluid medium) being' acoustically transparent. The opera- tive faces of the sound attenuating members may be con¬ structed from unitary perforated plates or screens, per¬ forated channels and removable perforated plates, or simply opposed perforated channels which effect the expo¬ sure of the sound absorptive material within the members to the fluid stream flowing through the silencer. This embodiment combines maximum sound absorptive (dissipative) effect with the overall reactive configuration of the silencer and results in noise attenuation in a wide range of frequencies on the order of about 60 to 10,000 Hz.

In another embodiment of the present invention, it is contemplated that some of the operative surfaces of the sound attenuating members be acoustically opaque while others are acoustically transparent. Such an embodiment, also combines both dissipative elements and reactive con¬ figurations, and may be utilized where less high frequency attenuation is required than that provided by the previous described embodiment. However, it effects better or sub¬ stantially the same noise attenuation of the lower fre- quencies which lie in a range on the order of about 100 Hz

to about 700 Hz. These are frequencies typically encount¬ ered in power plants.

In-a further embodiment of the present invention, it is contemplated that all of the operative surfaces of the sound attenuating members be acoustically opaque

(solid without perforations) and do not include any exposed sound absorptive surfaces. This embodiment may be called a purely reactive silencer, and while exhibiting reduced noise reduction characteristics in high frequencies com- pared with the previously described embodiments (which combine dissipative elements and reactive configurations) , effects better or substantially the same noise attenuation in a low frequency range on the order of about 100 Hz to about 500 Hz, again a range typically encountered in power plants.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Figure 1 is a perspective view, cut away in part, of the preferred embodiment of the silencer of the present invention.

Figure 2 is a partial cross-sectional view of the silencer of the present invention taken along line 2-2 of Figure 1.

Figure 2A is a cross-sectional view of an alternate embodiment of one of the sound attenuating members illus¬ trated in Figure 2.

Figure 2B is a cross-sectional view of another alternate embodiment of one of the sound attenuating members illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 3 is a partial perspective view, cut away in part, of a second embodiment of the sound silencer of the present invention.

Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view of the sound silencer of the present invention taken along line 4-4 of Figure 3.

Figure 4A is a cross-sectional view of an alternate embodiment of one of the sound attenuating members of Figure 4.

Figure 4B is a cross-sectional view of another al¬ ternate embodiment of one of the sound attenuating members of Figure 4.

Figure 5 is a perspective view, cut away in part, of a third embodiment of the sound silencer of the present invention.

Figure 6 is a cross-sectional view of an alternate embodiment of the silencer illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 7 is a graph of the acoustical dynamic inser¬ tion loss at 1,000 feet per minute face velocity for a silencer of the present invention having a 337o open flow area under three operating conditions.

Figure 8 is a perspective view, cut away in part, of a fourth embodiment of the silencer of the present inven- ion.

Figure 9 is a cross-sectional view of a modified tail member as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 10 is a cross-sectional view of a fifth em¬ bodiment of the silencer of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to Figures 1 and 2, the preferred embodi¬ ment of the silencer of the present invention is desig¬ nated generally by reference numeral 10 and includes a housing 20 which may be substantially rectangular in cross- section and is adapted to be installed between duct or conduit sections through which flows a fluid medium. As illustrated, housing 20 includes a base portion 21, a roof portion 22, a pair of opposed side walls 23 (one shown) , an open entry end portion 24, and an open exit end portion 25. The main flow of the fluid stream passing through silencer 10 is from entry end 24. of housing 20 to exit end 25 thereof. Although not shown, housing 20 may include a door or hatch member for permitting access to the silencer interior for cleaning. It will be noted that while housing 20 is shown as having a rectangular cross-section, other configurations may also be employed.

In addition, although the figures illustrate silencer 10 as being self-contained, i.e., having its own housing 20, the silencer may be constructed inside existing duct or con¬ duit systems thus not requiring an independent housing.

The subject silencer 10 further comprises a plurality of spaced apart, generally parallel sound attenuating members 30 which are disposed substantially upright within housing 20. In accordance with the present invention, sound attenuating members 30 are arranged in columns X and rows Y, each of the members 30 being disposed sub¬ stantially normal to housing base 21 and extending from base 21 to housing roof 22. As shown most clearly in Figure 2 the columns and rows of attenuating members 30 define a first plurality of through passageways L which

^• ξ EA OMPI

are disposed parallel to the direction of the main flow of the fluid stream and extend from the entry end 24 of housing 20 to the exit end 25 thereof, and a second plur¬ ality of through passageways W which are disposed per¬ pendicular to the direction of the main flow of the fluid stream and extend from one of the housing sidewalls 23 to the other sidewall thereof.

As illustrated in Figures 1 and 2 sound attenuating members 30 may be substantially rectangular in cross- section having a first pair of opposed faces 31 which are disposed substantially parallel to through passageways L and a second pair of opposed faces 32 which are disposed substantially parallel to through passageways W. In accordance with this embodiment of the invention, each of the sound attenuating members 30 is substantially fille with a sound absorptive material 34 such as foam, rock- wool, fiberglass or other acoustically absorptive bulk material, and each of the operative faces 31 and 32 of mem¬ bers 30 is acoustically transparent. As illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, this acoustical transparency may be effected by the inclusion of perforations 33 in metal faces 31 and 32. It will be noted, however, that faces 31 and 32 may take on other foraminous or acoustically trans¬ parent constructions such as, for example, wire mesh screen or the like, and they may be formed from non- metallic materials such as plastics. In addition, while sound attenuating members 30 are illustrated in Figures 1 and 2 as having unitary faces 31 and 32, alternate con¬ structions may be employed. Thus, as illustrated in Figure 2A sound attenuating members 30' may include sound absorptive material 34' which is enclosed by opposed perforated (or screened) channel members 31' which are disposed substantially parallel to passageways L and opposed perforated tor screened) plates 32' which are disposed substantially parallel to passageways W, plates

32' being removable so as to facilitate cleaning. As further illustrated in Figure 2B, sound attenuating mem¬ bers 30" may comprise opposed perforated (or screened) channel members 31" which are disposed substantially par¬ allel to passageways L, and opposed surfaces 32" which are substantially open so as to expose sound absorptive material 34".

Referring again to Figure 1, silencer 10 may further include a plurality of spaced apart nose members 40, each of which being aligned with one of the columns X of sound attenuating members 30, and disposed adjacent entry end portion 24 of silencer housing 20. Each nose member 40, includes a convex rounded end wall 41 disposed directly adjacent entry end portion 24 of the silencer housing and an opposed planar end wall 42 disposed substantially par¬ allel to the passageway W directly adjacent thereto. Silencer 10 also preferably includes a plurality of tail members 50, each of which being aligned with one of the columns Y of sound attenuating members 30, and disposed adjacent exit end portion 25 of silencer housing 20. Each tail member 50 includes a pair of opposed end walls 52 (see Figure 2) disposed substantially parallel to passage¬ ways W, and a pair of converging side walls 51 which are disposed at an angle relative to passageways L. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, nose members 40 may typically include sound absorptive filler 44, solid (non-perforated) i.e., not sound absorptive faces 41, and sound absorptive faces 42 having perforations 43. Tail members 50 may include sound absorptive filler 54 and acoustically transparent, i.e., sound absorptive faces 51 and 52 having perforations 53. It will be noted, however, that nose members 40 may also be constructed such that both faces 41 and 42 are solid, i.e., acoustically opaque. In addition, tail mem¬ bers 50 may also be constructed such that faces 51 and 52 are all solid or some perforated (screened) and some solid.

It will be understood that where the faces of tail mem¬ bers 50 are acoustically transparent they may have a con¬ struction similar to that of sound attenuating members 30' and 30" illustrated in Figures 2A and 2B. In addition, the subject tail members may be constructed so as to be segmented into a second plurality of tail sound attenuatin sections. More particularly, referring to Figure 9, each tail member 50 may comprise a plurality of tail sound attenuating sections 50'E, each of which being substan¬ tially trapezoidal in configuration having a pair of oppos parallel faces 52E disposed parallel to passageways W, and a pair of faces 51E disposed at an angle to passageways L. Each tail sound attenuating section is disposed substan¬ tially normal to the base of the silencer housing and extends from the base to housing roof. It will be noted that each tail sound attenuating section 50'E is illus¬ trated in Figure 9 as including sound absorptive material 54E and acoustically transparent faces 5IE and 52E each having perforations 53E. However, tail sound attenuating sections 50E may be constructed such that faces 52E or faces 51E and 52E are acoustically opaque. In addition, they may have non-unitary construction similar to those illustrated in Figure 2A and 2B.

Referring again to Figures 1 and 2, in operation the fluid medium passes tnrough silencer 10 from entry end portion 24 to exit end portion 25. While the main flow of the fluid medium passes through passageways L, with little if any, of the fluid passing through passageways W, the noise associated with the flow is attenuated by the absorp tive material contained in sound attenuating members 30 vi both pairs of acoustically transparent surfaces 31 and 32 (and 51 & 52) , and attenuated thereby with the overall reactive configuration of the silencer. When the silencer is used in "dirty" environments, i.e., where the fluid contains a significant amount of contaminants, surfaces

31 (and 51) will become clogged by the contaminants after a period of time. However, because little fluid flows through passageways W, surfaces 32 (and 52) will remain unclogged for a much longer period of time thus extending the effective period of sound absorption. In addition, when periodic cleaning of the silencer is desired, it may be done readily and efficiently, especially in the em¬ bodiments illustrated in Figures 2A and 2B wherein the acoustically transparent faces may be removed for cleaning, and others substituted (Figure 2A) , or the sound absorp- tive material removed and new material inserted (Figure 2B) . Finally, as will be described below, whereas the unclogged silencer depicted in Figures 1, 2, 2A and 2B combines maximum sound absorptive effect with the overall reactive configuration of the silencer so as to effec- tively attenuate noise in a wide frequency range on.the order of about 60 to 10,000 Hz, the silencer is still quite effective in the relatively broad low frequency range of about 100 to 500 Hz typically encountered in power plants even if all of the operative surfaces of the subject sound attenuating members become clogged.

Turning now to Figures 3 and 4, an alternate embodi¬ ment of the silencer of the present invention, which is designated generally by reference numeral 10A, is illustrated. For the sake of simplicity only partial perspective and cross-sectional views of this embodiment are shown. It will be understood that the portions of the silencer not shown such as the housing, nose members, etc., are identical in configuration to the corresponding elements illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, and that like references in Figures 3 and 4 relate to identical compo¬ nents in Figures 1 and 2. Referring to Figures 3 and 4 in detail, silencer 10A includes a plurality of spaced apart sound attenuating members 30A which are disposed substan- tially normal to the housing base 21 and are arranged in

^J EΛ .

columns X and rows Y so as to define first and second pluralities of perpendicular through passageways L and W. Passageways L are disposed substantially parallel to the direction of the main flow of the fluid stream and passageways W are disposed substantially perpen- dicular to the direction of the main flow of the fluid stream. As illustrated in Figures 3 and 4 sound attenuating members 30A may be generally rectangular in cross-section having a first pair of opposed faces 31A which are disposed substantially parallel to through passageways L, and a second pair of opposed faces 32A which are disposed substantially parallel to through passageways W. In accordance with this embodi¬ ment of the present invention, each of sound attenuating members 30A is filled with a sound absorptive filler material 34A, with faces 31A being acoustically opaque and faces 32A being acoustically transparent. As shown, faces 32A include perforations 33A, but it will be understood that any means for providing faces 32A with acoustical transparency may be employed. In addition, it will be understood that members 30A may be other than rectangular in cross-section, and that faces 31A and 32A may be non-unitary. Thus, as illustrated in Figure 4A sound ^' attenuating members may include acoustically opaque opposed channel members 31'A and acoustically transparent faces 31'A which are removable to facilitate cleaning. As further illustrated in figure 4B sound attenuating members 30"A may include acoustically opaque opposed channel members 31"A and opposed faces 32"A which are substantially open so as to expose sound absorptive material 34"A.

Further referring to Figures 3 and 4 it will be noted that silencer 10A may also include tail members 50A (in addition to nose members not shown but iden- tical to those illustrated in Figure 1) having a pair

of opposed end portions 52A which are disposed sub¬ stantially parallel to through passageways W and a pair of converging sidewalls 51A which are disposed at an angle relative to through passageways L. In this embodiment tail members 50A are again filled with sound absorptive material 54A but end portions 52A are acoustically transparent having perforations 53A while sidewall portions 51A are acoustically opaque. It will be noted that in addition to the unitary construction illustrated in Figures 3 and 4, tail members 50A may have a construction similar to that of sound attenuating members 30'A and 30"A shown in Figures 4A and 4B, and/or that of tail member 50E shown in Figure 9.

As will be described in more detail below, the embodiment of the subject silencer depicted in Figures 3, 4, 4A, and 4B attenuates noise by sound absorption and the overall reactive configuration of the silencer in substantially the same overall frequency range of the silencer of Figures 1, 2, 2A, and 2B. However, the silencer exhibits lower noise reduction charac¬ teristics in the higher f equencies, i.e., over 700 Hz, which is attributable to the fact that some of the surfaces of the sound attenuating members are acous¬ tically opaque, i.e., non-absorptive. It will be noted, however, that such a construction enables the silencer to exhibit noise attenuation characteristics which are better or substantially the same as the previously described embodiment in the relatively broad low frequency range on the order of 100 to 700 Hz. Thus, the silencer of Figures 3, 4, 4A, and 4B is quite suitable for attenuating noise frequencies typically encountered in power plants.

Turning now to Figure 5, another embodiment of the silencer is illustrated. More particularly, Figure 5

illustrates a silencer, designated generally by refer¬ ence numeral 10B, which may be termed a purely reactive silencer, as opposed to the silencers of Figures 1-4B which include both sound absorptive (dissipative) and reactive components. Again for the sake of simplicity only a partial view of this embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in Figure 5 in that the portions not shown (such as the housing and nose members) are identical to the components illustrated with respect to the previously described embodiments, and that like references in Figure 5 relate to components identical to those in Figures 1-4.

Referring to Figure 5 in detail, silencer 10B includes a plurality of spaced apart sound attenuating members 30B which are disposed substantially normal to the housing base 21 and are arranged in columns X and rows Y so as to define first and second pluralities of perpendicular through passageways L and W. Passage¬ ways L are disposed substantially parallel to the direction of the main flow of the fluid stream and passageways W are disposed substantially perpendicular to the direction of the main flow of the fluid stream. As illustrated in Figure 5 sound attenuating members 30B may be generally rectangular in cross-section having a first pair of opposed faces 31B which are disposed substantially parallel to through passageways L, and a second pair of opposed faces 32B which are disposed substantially parallel to through passageways W. In accordance with this embodiment of the present invention, each face 31B and 32B is acoustically opaque, i.e. , non- absorptive. As illustrated in Figure 5 sound attenuating members 30B are hollow (empty) , but they also may be completely solid and/or contain acoustical filler or other sound dampening materials. They also may be non- rectangular in configuration.

"&ΪJRE- OMPI

Further referring to Figure 5 it will be noted that silencer 10B may also include tail members 50B (in addition to nose members not shown but identical to those illustrated in Figure 1) having a pair of opposed end portions 52B which are disposed substan- tially parallel to through passageways W and a pair of converging sidewalls 5IB which are disposed at an angle to through passageways L. In this embodiment, tail member surfaces 51B and 52B are acoustically opaque (non-absorptive) . Again while tail members 50B are depicted in Figure 5 as being hollow (empty) , they may be solid and/or filled with acoustical filler or other sound dampening material. In addition, they may have a segmented construction similar to that illustrated in Figure 9. In operation, as the fluid medium flows through the silencer it is separated into portions which pass through passageways L and W, the bulk of the fluid passing through passageways L. The sound attenuation is effected by the reactive configu¬ ration of the silencer which provides, in effect, interacting impedances and capacitances..

In order to determine their noise reduction characteristics, silencers constructed in accordance with the present invention, as described above, were tested. In each case, the silencer was approximately 9 feet 4 inches long and was tested at a face velocity of 1,000 feet per minute. Each of the sound attenuating members of the silencers was approximately 10-5/8" x 4" in cross-section with each column of members being laterally spaced apart about 5-3/8", and longitudinally spaced apart about 4".

Example 1 A silencer was constructed as taught by Figures 1 2, 2A and 2B, i.e., wherein all of the sound attenuating members, nose members, and tail members were substantially filled with sound absorptive material, and all of the operative surfaces of the sound attenuating members and tail members, and the planar face of each nose member were acoustically transparent.

Example 2 A silencer was constructed as taught by Figures 3, 4, 4A, and 4B, i.e., wherein the sound attenuating members , nose members and tail members were substan¬ tially filled with absorptive material, and the operative surfaces of said members disposed parallel to the main flow of fluid were acoustically opaque (solid) , while the operative surfaces disposed perpen¬ dicular to the main flow of the fluid were acoustically transparent. It will be noted that such a construction also simulates the state of the silencer of Example 1 after it has been in use for a period of time in a "dirty" environment and has become partially clogged by contaminants , such as fly ash.

Example 3 A silencer,was constructed as illustrated in Figure 5, i.e., wherein all of the operative surfaces of the sound attenuating members, nose members and tail members were acoustically opaque. In this embodiment the subject silencer operates as a purely reactive silencer having no dependence on sound absorptive or flow resistive materials. It will be noted that such a construction simulates the state of the silencer of Example 1 after it has been used in a "dirty" environ¬ ment for a relatively long period of time such that all . of the operative surfaces of the silencer's sound attenuating members, nose members, and tail members have been clogged by contaminants in the fluid.

-fJ EA OMPI

Referring now to Figure 7, there is illustrated, in graph form, the noise attenuation characteristics of the silencers constructed in Examples 1, 2 and 3. Graph 1 reflects the noise attenuation characteristics of the silencer of Example 1, and as shown, said silencer very effectively attenuated noise in a wide range of high and low frequencies on the order of at least about 125 to 5,000 Hz. Graph 2 reflects the noise attenuation characteristics of the silencer of Example 2, and as shown, said silencer effectively attenuated noise in a similar frequency range as the silencer of Example 1, i.e. , on the order of about 125 to 5,000 Hz. However, it will be noted that whereas the silencer of Example 2 had reduced noise attenuation characteristics in the relatively high frequency range of about 700 to 5,000 Hz as compared to the silencer of Example 1, the silencer of Example 2 actually attenuated noise better than the silencer of Example 1 in the low frequency range of from about 125 to 315 Hz, and it exhibited substantially the same noise attenu- ation characteristics as the silencer of Example 1 in the range of about 315 to 700 Hz. Graph 3 reflects the noise characteristics of the silencer of Example 3, and as shown, said silencer had reduced noise attenuation characteristics as compared with the silencers of Example 1 and 2 in the higher frequency range of about 500 to 5,000 Hz. However, in the relatively wide low frequency range of about 125 to 250 Hz the silencer of Example 3 attenuated noise better than the silencers of Examples 1 and 2, and in the range of about 250 to 500 Hz, it exhibited substantially the same noise attenuation characteristics as the silencers of Examples 1 and 2. It should be noted that while the terminal points depicted in each of graphs 1-3 of Figure 7 are 125 Hz and 5,000 Hz, these cut-off points were only selected as a matter of convenience for easily

comparing the results obtained from the silencers of Examples 1-3. As a matter of fact, said silencers effectively attenuated noise in a wider range, specif¬ ically, on the order of about 60 to 10,000 Hz.

Referring to Examples 1-3 and Figure 7 as a whole, it will be understood that depending upon the particular noise attenuation characteristics desired, the silencer of the present invention may take on various construc¬ tions. Thus, where high noise attenuation over a wide range of high and low frequencies is required, it is preferable to use the silencer constructed as in Example 1, i.e., where all of the sound attenuating members, nose members and tail members include sound absorptive material and all of the operative surfaces of the sound attenuating members and tail members and the planar faces of the nose members are acoustically transparent. Such a construction combines maximum dissipative effect, i.e., sound absorption, with the reactive noise attenuation effect provided by the over- all configuration of the silencer. Where a particular application requires high noise attenuation in a relatively wide low frequency range, such as on the order of about 125 to about 700 Hz, rather than in a wide range of high and low frequencies, the silencers of Examples 2 and 3 may be employed, the essentially reactive silencer of Example 3 having the best noise attenuation characteristics in the low frequency range of about 125 to 250 Hz. In addition, while the silencers of Examples 1-3 were constructed with certain fixed dimensions, such dimensions may be varied to obtain desired acoustical performance characteristics. More particularly, referring to the Figures it will be noted that the dimensions for the depth D of each sound attenuating member, the longitudinal spacing d between each sound attenuating member, the width T of each

OMPI

sound attenuating member, and the lateral spacing t between each sound attenuating member, as well as the overall length and width of the silencer, may be varied in different combinations to achieve desired results . For example, increasing T while maintaining constant D, d, and the overall length and width of the silencer, improves the low frequency attenuation effected by the silencer. Decreasing dimensions d and D while main¬ taining constant dimensions T, t and the overall length and width of the silencer improves both low and high frequency attenuation where the sound attenuating members are filled with sound absorptive material and have acoustically transparent faces.

Referring again to Figure 7, it will be noted that each of the silencers of Example 1-3 is well suited for use -in "dirty" environments, i.e., wherein the -fluid passing through the silencer has a significant amount of contaminants which may clog the silencer. More particularly, the silencer of Example 1, in the unclogged state, attenuates noise in the wide range of high and low frequencies reflected in Graph 1 of Figure 7. After a period of use, the surfaces of the silencers' sound attenuating members and tail members which are disposed parallel to direction of the main fluid flow will become clogged, while the surfaces of said members which are disposed perpendicular to the direction of the main fluid flow as well as the planar faces of the nose members, will remain unclogged. Such a partially clogged silencer, of course, simulates or corresponds to the construction of the silencer of Example 2, and thus, such a partially clogged silencer would retain high noise attenuation characteristics in the range of approximately 125 to about 700 Hz as reflected in Graph 2 of Figure 7. After a longer period of use, without cleaning, the silencer of Example 1 would become

o completely clogged. However, even in a completely clogged state, the silencer would simulate or corres¬ pond to the construction of the purely reactive silencer of Example 3, and as reflected in Graph 3 of Figure 7, would exhibit noise attenuation better than or at least

5 substantially as good as the unclogged silencer of

Example 1 in the low frequency range of from about 125 Hz to about 500 Hz.

Thus, all of the silencers of the present invention

]_0 described above, are particularly well suited for use in "dirty" environments, such as coal fired power plants, wherein the critical or most ob ectionable noises are disposed in the relatively broad low frequency range on the order of about 100 to 500 Hz. They can effectively

^■* L5 combine both dissipative and reactive sound attenuating components in parallel so as to achieve high noise attenuation in a wide range of high and low frequencies. Moreover, in the low frequencies typically encountered in power plants they behave acoustically the same or

2o better when the silencer components (sound attenuating members, nose members and tail members) are reflective (solid or clogged) as when they have acoustically transparent or sound absorptive surfaces. And, the subject silencers, which do not include dimensionally

25 limited acoustic chambers, achieve such pronounced reactive characteristics with little pressure drop and in a much broader low frequency range than is obtainable with known reactive silencers which generally do have definable volumetric chambers. Again, it will be noted

3 _Q that the terminal points of 125 and 5000 Hz reflected in each of the graphs of Figure 7 were selected to show more clearly the comparative results obtained with the silencers of Examples 1-3, said silencers actually having attenuated noise effectively in a wider

3^ range on the order of about 60 to 10,000 Hz.

OMPI

While reasons for the above described performance of the subject silencers may be speculated, no attempt will be made herein to explain it mathematically. It has been found that silencers, for all practical purposes, must be developed pragmatically through full or model scale testing.

Thus, while all of the above described preferred embodiments of the present invention illustrate the sound attenuating members as being substantially rectang¬

10 ular in cross-section, it will be noted that they may have other configurations which may enhance the perfor¬ mance of the silencer. Accordingly, referring to Figure 6, the silencer which is designated generally by reference numeral IOC includes sound attenuating members

-, c 30C which are generally trapezoidal in configuration. More particularly, sound attenuating members 30C are filled with sound absorptive material 34C and include acoustically transparent faces 31C having perforations 33C disposed adjacent to and at an angle relative to

2 fluid through passageways L, and acoustically transparent faces 32C disposed substantially parallel to fluid through passageways W. Similarly tail members 50C are filled with sound absorptive material 54C and include acoustically transparent converging sidewalls 51C having

„,. perforations 53C, sidewalls 51C being disposed adjacent to and at an angle relative to fluid through passageways L, and acoustically transparent surfaces 52C which are disposed substantially parallel to fluid through pass¬ ageways W. The provision of surfaces 31C at. an angle

„ _π to passageways L effects the reflection of the fluid between the sound attenuating members 30C bordering each passageway L, and acts as an additional clogging retarder for surfaces 32C and 31C (and 51C & 52C) . It will be noted that while the silencer of Figure 6,

„_ which includes trapezoidal sound attenuating members

OMPI

° 30C, has been illustrated as having a construction quite similar to that of Figures 1 and 2, i.e. with all the operative surfaces of the sound attenuating members 30C and tail members 50C being unitary and acoustically transparent, it is contemplated that the constructions depicted in Figures 2A, 2B, 3, 4, 4A, 4B, 5 and/or 9 may also be employed.

Further to the teachings herein that many design modifications can be effected in the subject silencer while retaining the spirit of the present invention, reference is made to the silencer designated generally by reference numeral 10D in Figure 8. Whereas all of the previously described embodiments of the invention illustrate sound attenuating members disposed upright within the silencer housing 20, silencer 10D of Figure 8 includes sound attenuating members which are dis¬ posed longitudinally within the housing. More parti¬ cularly, silencer 10D includes a plurality of spaced apart sound attenuating members 30D which extend from entry end 24 of the housing to exit end 25 thereof and are disposed substantially parallel to housing base 21. Sound attenuating members 30D are arranged in columns X and rows Y which define a first plurality of through passageways L extending from entry end 24 of housing 20 to exit end 25 thereof, and a second plurality of through passageways W which are perpendicular to pass¬ ageways L and extend from one housing sidewall 23 to the other sidewall thereof.

As illustrated in Figure 8 each sound attenuating member 30D is substantially rectangular in cross-section having a first pair of opposed faces 31D which are dis¬ posed adjacent passageways L and perpendicular to housing base 21 and a second pair of opposed faces 32D which are disposed adjacent passageways W and substan-

OMP

tially parallel to housing base 21, each face being acoustically transparent and including perforations 33D. It will be noted that aside from the specific configuration illustrated in Figure 8, sound attenua¬ ting members 30D may also be constructed similar to those illustrated in the preceding Figures such that faces 31D and 32D may be both acoustically transparent or both acoustically opaque, or 32 may be acoustically transparent while the faces 31D are acoustically opaque. In addition, sound attenuating members 30D may have non-unitary constructions similar to those illustrated in Figures 2A, 2B, 4A and 4B.

Further referring to Figure 8 silencer 10D also includes a plurality .of spaced apart nose members 40, each of which being aligned with one of the columns X of sound attenuating members 30D, and disposed adjacent entry end portion 24 of the silencer housing. Nose members 40 are identical in configuration to those illustrated in Figure 1, and so, like reference numer- als have been retained. Thus, each nose member 40 in

Figure 8 includes a convex rounded end wall 41 disposed directly adjacent housing entry portion 24, and an opposed planar end wall 42, Silencer 10D further includes a plurality of spaced apart tail members 50D, each of which being aligned with one of the columns of sound attenuating members 30D, and disposed adjacent housing exit portion 25. Each tail member 50D includes a pair of converging sidewalls 51D which are disposed at an angle to passageways L, a first pair of opposed faces 52D which are disposed substantially perpendicular to passageways L and base 21 and a second pair of opposed faces 55D which are disposed parallel to housing base 21, In accordance with the invention, one end of each sound attenuating member 30D is mounted to a nose member 40 while its other end is mounted to the corresponding

tail member in the same column X, It will be noted that while each of the faces 55D and 51D of tail members 50D are illustrated as being unitary and both acousti¬ cally transparent, they may also be both acoustically opaque or one face may be acoustically opaque while the other is acoustically transparent. In addition, tail members 50D may take on a non-unitary construction similar to those illustrated in Figures 2A, 2B, 4A and 4B and/or be segmented similar to the tail member illustrated in Figure 9.

As a further departure from or modification of the embodiments of the subject invention illustrated in Figures 1-6 reference is made to Figure 10. Whereas all of the silencers illustrated in Figure 1-6 comprise columns and rows of equally spaced and equally dimen¬ sioned sound attenuating members, it is contemplated in accordance with the sub ect invention, that the above referenced silencer dimensions T, D, t and d may be varied within a given silencer so as to tune the silen- cer for particular noise reduction characteristics. Thus, the silencer depicted in Figure 10 comprises alternating columns of sound attenuating members X and X' , ^' Columns X comprise a plurality of sound attenuating • members 30F each member having two pairs of opposed faces 31F and 32F. Each sound attenuating member has a width T and a depth D is longitudinally spaced from an adjacent sound attenuating member a distance d and is laterally spaced from an adjacent column X' a distance t. Similarly, columns X' include a plurality of sound attenuating members 30'F each having two pairs of opposed faces 31'F and 32'F, a width T' , a depth D' and a longitudinal spacing d' from its adjacent sound attenuating member. While each of the sound attenuating members 30F and 30'F are illustrated as including sound absorptive material 34F and 34'F, and acoustically trans-

OMPI

parent faces having perforations 33F and 33'F it will be noted that said sound attenuating members may be non-rectangular and have the configurations illustrated in Figures 1-6. It will be further noted that in addi¬ tion to the provision of attenuating columns X and X', other combinations of the various silencer dimensions T, t, D, and d may be made so as to tune the silencer to obtain the desired noise reduction characteristics.

In summary, the present invention provides a new and improved silencer which can combine both reactive and dissipative sound attenuating components so as to be able to attenuate a wide range of high and low frequencies. Whereas, typical reactive silencers are generally always designed with definable volumetric chambers, the subject silencer has pronounced reactive characteristics even though the acoustic elements and the flow passageways defined thereby have the low pressure drop configuration similar to that of a splitter silencer. A very important feature of the silencer of the invention is that in the low frequencies, which are typically encountered in power plants, it behaves acoustically the same or better when the silencer components are reflective such as when clogged or otherwise, as when they have unclogged sound absorp- tive surfaces, Another important feature of the present invention is that the silencer has no pockets for accumu¬ lating contaminants, and that because of its particular construction it is readily cleanable, A further feature of the subject silencer is that its construction, in effect, retards the clogging of its components while the silencer is in use.

While there have been described herein what are at present considered preferred embodiments of the inven- tion, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art

OMPI

V/l, WIPO .1

that many modifications and changes may be made there¬ in without departing fromthe essence of the invention. It is therefore to be understood that the exemplary embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims, and that all modifications that come within the meaning and range -of equivalency of the claims are intended to be included therein.

OMPI