Cement Sheath Removal

Cross reference to related applications

This application claims priority to United States Provisional patent application SN 62/084651, filed 11/26/2014, for all purposes. The disclosure of that application is incorporated herein by reference, to the extent not inconsistent with this disclosure.

Background - Field of the Invention

This invention relates to apparatus used to cut sections of tubulars, downhole in a wellbore, in addition to other actions such as cement and formation removal.

Summary of the Invention

A main body has an operating mechanism which uses fluid flow to rotate one or more operating arms from an first, retracted position (essentially within the main body), to a second extended position, rotated outwardly from the main body. Attached to the operating arms are at least two elongated cutter/stabilizer bases, which move radially outward as the operating arms rotate outward, and are held substantially parallel to the main body as they move radially outward.

A section of the cutter/stabilizer bases proximal the lower (downhole) end of same has no cutters mounted on it, forming a stabilizer section. Cutters are mounted on the cutter/stabilizer bases above this stabilizer section. The cutters are generally longitudinally extended along the cutter/stabilizer bases, and preferably rather long, for example as long as about 18". The cutters extend radially outward a sufficient dimension beyond the outermost surface of the

cutter/stabilizer bases to remove the desired tubular material, for example to the outer diameter of the casing collars of the casing string being milled.

Sections of the uppermost operating arms may overlap the cutter/stabilizer bases, such that the uppermost operating arms extend to a larger radius than the cutter/stabilizer bases when the tool is opened, forming cutout arms. The outermost tips of such cutout arms can therefore be used as "locator" tips, to detect the gaps between successive casing tubes. The cutout arms can then be used to make initial cuts through the casing, and to mill a relatively short "entrance" window in the casing. A combination of rotation speed and weight can then be used to rapidly wear away a portion of the cutout arms, to a maximum outer radius no greater than the inner diameter of the inner casing string at which time the tool can be lowered into the casing string below.

Pins, fitted in holes in the main body, provide the structure on which the operating arms rotate. The present invention comprises a novel pin retainer arrangement. The pin retainer arrangement uses pin retainer keys, which fit into matching recesses near the outermost edge of the pin holes in the main body. The retainer keys are held radially fixed (i.e. prevented from coming out of the recesses) by a disc-shaped retainer key locking sleeve, which in turn is held in place by a retaining screw that screws into the outermost end of the pin. A roll pin inserted through the locking sleeve into the pin keeps the locking sleeve rotationally locked with the pin.

A jet sub may be placed in the drillstring immediately above the casing cutting tool, to direct a portion of the overall drilling fluid stream into the annulus and onto the operating arms and cutter/stabilizer bases. The jet sub may include a check valve, which may be a poppet, flapper, plunger or other type of check or one-way valve.

Brief Description of the Drawings

Fig. 1 is a cross section view of the main body and operating mechanism of one embodiment of the tool, showing an operating arm 50.

Figs. 2 and 3 show closed and open positions of an exemplary embodiment of the cutting tool.

Fig. 4 shows an example of inner and outer casing strings in a wellbore, with a cement sheath between the casing strings.

Fig. 5 shows certain elements of the tool of the present invention, namely the stabilizer section of the cutter/stabilizer base against the inner wall of the inner casing string, and the radial extent of the cutter.

Figs. 6 and 7 show further detail of the cutter/stabilizer bases and cutters, in place within a casing string.

Figs. 8 - 10 show the cutting tool engaged in three different casing string diameters.

Fig. 11 shows a cutout arm arrangement.

Figs. 12 - 15 show a casing cutout/milling sequence.

Figs. 16 - 19 are additional views of a casing cutout/milling sequence.

Figs. 20 and 21 show various aspects of the pin assembly.

Fig. 22 is a cross section view of the pin assembly, viewed down the longitudinal axis of the tool.

Description of the Presently Preferred Embodiment(s)

With reference to the drawings some of the presently preferred embodiments can be described.

Fig. 1 is a cross section view of an embodiment of the casing cutting tool 10. A main body 20 has a means for moving operating arms 50 outwardly (namely, rotating them outwardly), said means may comprise an operating mechanism within, with a piston 21 responding to fluid flow. U.S. Patent No. 7063155, owned by the owner of this application, discloses one type of suitable fluid-driven operating mechanism, and the disclosure of that patent is incorporated herein by reference, to the extent necessary to disclose an exemplary operating mechanism. In this example, the operating mechanism rotates a pair of operating arms 50 outward, which may be the uppermost pair of operating arms 50. A plurality of operating arms 50 are provided, spaced longitudinally down the tool, as can be seen in Figs. 2 and 3. All of the operating arms 50 are rotatably attached to main body 20, by pins 52 inserted through aligned holes in one end of each positioning arm and in the main body. The pins are retained within the main body by a pin retainer system described in more detail below.

It is understood that the operating mechanism may alternatively be a rack and pinion type mechanism, where the operating piston has a rack gear engaging circular gears on the ends of the uppermost operating arms.

Operating arms 50 carry a plurality of elongated cutter/stabilizer bases 30. Since operating arms 50 are all of substantially the same length, it can be appreciated that when uppermost operating arms are rotated outwardly, cutter/stabilizer bases 30 all move radially outward, remaining substantially aligned with main body 20 of the tool. The length of operating arms 50, and the thickness dimension of cutter/stabilizer bases 30, are such as to enable cutter/stabilizer bases to bear against the inner wall of the inner casing string in which the tool is deployed. As is described in more detail below, a single set of operating arms 50 may permit use of cutting tool 10 in multiple casing diameters.

Cutters 40 are mounted on cutter/stabilizer bases 30. Cutters may be of different designs, generally all comprising some sort of hardened cutting material, which may be carbide, carbide buttons, polycrystalline diamond compact disks, or other hardened cutting surfaces known in the relevant art. Preferably, cutters 40 have a relatively long longitudinal dimension or length, for example as long as 18". As later described, due to the manner of cutting this dimension enables uninterrupted cutting of relatively long windows in the casing string.

Figs. 4 and 5 show certain aspects of the setting in which the tool is typically run, and the interaction between the cutter/stabilizer bases, cutters, and tubular being milled. Fig. 4 shows an example of inner casing 200 and outer casing 300 strings, a casing collar 250 joining joints of the inner casing string 200, and a cement layer 350 between the casing strings. Referring to Fig. 5, the radial dimension "R" of cutters 40, beyond the outermost face of cutter/stabilizer bases 50, is of importance. Preferably, this radial dimension R is large enough to extend to, and slightly beyond, the maximum expected expected tubular outer diameter, which typically is the casing collar, as can be seen in Fig. 5. It can be readily understood, and will be explained in more detail below, that when the tool is in operation, cutter/stabilizer bases 30, and more specifically the radial outward face thereof, bear against the inner wall of the inner casing string. Cutters 40 therefore extend radially outward from the outermost face of the cutter/stabilizer bases, as noted above a sufficient distance to extend to the outermost tubular diameter to be cut (which may be the casing collar outer diameter). While the cutter radial dimension "R" can be varied to suit particular applications, it has been found that a cutter radial dimension of approximately 1-1/8" will cover a large number of casing wall thickness/collar thickness combinations. At the same time, cutter radial dimension "R" is small enough that it will not contact the inner wall of the outer casing string.

Preferably, the outermost face of cutters 40 is non-cutting; that is, contact with the casing wall by the outermost cutting face will not result in a cutting of the casing wall. For example, the outermost face of cutters 40 maybe a smooth, hardened steel surface. In addition, if desired, the uphole shoulder 40A of the cutters may be angled, as can be seen in Fig. 5, to assist in pulling the tool uphole after ajob, and to assist in cutting formation and/or cement.

As can be seen in the figures, a stabilizer section 32 of cutter/stabilizer bases 30 has no cutters 40 mounted on it, providing a means for bearing against the inner wall of the casing string and providing a stabilizing means for the cutting tool, and especially the cutters. Figs. 6 and 7 show additional detail of cutter/stabilizer bases 30 and cutters 40, relative to a casing string. A hard metal, non-cutting alignment pad 41 maybe mounted in stabilizer section 32.

It will be understood from the above description that multiple casing diameters may be milled, without changing the operating arms, cutter/stabilizer bases, or cutters, since the tool always opens up to its maximum possible diameter - namely, to the point that the stabilizer section 32 of the cutter/stabilizer bases 30 bears against the inner wall of the inner casing string 200. As can be seen by Figs. 8 - 10, for three exemplary casing diameters (9-5/8", 13-3/8", and 20"), the tool opens to its maximum allowable diameter for the given casing diameter, and therefore always positions the cutters 40 properly over the uppermost casing stub edge. A lower end 31 of cutter bases 30 may be angled to form a cutting/alignment nose, as seen in Figs. 8 - 10.

In some embodiments of the tool, an initial cutout arm is provided, to enable cutting out of the initial casing window and mill a relatively short section of casing, to provide a window for cutters 40 to be employed for the primary milling function. Referring to Fig. 11, cutout arm 53 may be formed as an extension of uppermost operating arm 50, or some other suitable configuration. As can be seen in Fig. 11, by extending the dimension or length of uppermost operating arm 50 as shown, when the tool is opened cutout arm 53 extends to a greater radial dimension than cutters 40 on the cutter/stabilizer base 30, hence contact the casing wall first, while cutters 40 are still spaced away from the casing wall. As is described below, the length of the cutout arms 53 in excess of the inner diameter of the inner casing string 200 may be removed or "burned away" in the overall casing window cutting process. Figs. 16 - 19, addressed below in more detail, provide further explanation of this procedure.

Method of use of the tool

A sequence of use of the tool can now be described. As noted above, Fig. 4 is a cross section view of a typical wellbore, showing inner and outer casing strings. In this drawing, a layer of cement is between the casing strings. The collar joining two joints of casing, in the inner casing string, is shown. A gap between the ends of the tubes of the two joints in the inner casing string can be seen.

Referring to Figs. 12 - 15, one possible sequence of use of the tool comprises the steps of:

• positioning of tool at a desired depth in a wellbore (Fig. 12)

• commence fluid flow to cause tool to open sufficiently for the cutout arms to contact the inner wall of the casing string

• if applicable, lowering of tool so that the ends of the cutout arms contact the casing tube gap, and verify depth of the gap (and the top of the casing collar)

• pick the tool up to the desired depth, and with fluid flow ongoing commence rotation and cutting into casing by the cutout arms (Fig. 13)

• once operational indications of full penetration of the casing wall are noted (changes in fluid flow, string weight, torque, etc.), lower the tool to cut desired entry window length (Figs. 13 and 14)

• upon achieving the desired entry window length, increase weight/rotational speed to

accelerate wear-out of the cutout arms (i.e. "burning off of the cutout arms) to a dimension no greater than the inner diameter of the casing string, noting a "drop" of the tool into the inner casing stub to signify same (Figs. 13 and 14)

• positioning of tool with the stabilizer section of cutter/stabilizer base in casing stub, with the cutters above casing stub, as in Fig. 15

• commence lowering of the tool with ongoing fluid circulation and rotation, with the

stabilizer section of the cutter/stabilizer base bearing against the inner wall of casing stub, and the cutters milling the casing (and casing collar, or any other material such as cement or formation) out to the full reach of the cutter radial dimension (Fig. 15)

• continue cutting process until completion of desired section length (Fig. 15)

• pick up tool above milled section, circulate out as needed

• with the tool positioned within the milled-out section, and circulation ongoing, the tool will be opened to its full extent (as permitted by outer casing string);

• commence pulling out of the hole with ongoing circulation and rotation, thereby

removing any cement sheath from the inner wall of the outer casing string, and any formation, while the tool is being pulled out of the hole

• when the desired length of casing window is cleaned, circulate out as necessary, pull out of the hole with the tool

Figs. 16 - 19 provide further description of this exemplary procedure.

Additional structural aspects of some of the preferred embodiments

Pins 52 in main body 20 provide the structure on which the operating arms rotate. The present invention comprises a novel pin retainer arrangement. Referring to Figs. 20 and 21 (Fig. 20 showing the pin retainer keys and pin retainer key locking sleeve, and Fig. 21 showing the pin retainer keys, pin retainer key locking sleeve, retaining sleeve with roll pin hole, and retaining screw, all in place on a pin), the pin retainer arrangement uses a pair of generally crescent shaped pin retainer keys 60, which fit into matching recesses 61 near the outermost edge of the pin holes in main body 20. As can be seen in Fig. 22, which is a cross section view of the pin arrangement within main body 20 the retainer keys cover a portion of the radial outward face of pin 52. In this position, retainer keys 60 cannot move radially outward, hence block movement of pin 52 and keep it from moving radially outward. Retainer keys 60 are held fixed (i.e. prevented from moving toward one another, and thereby coming out of the recesses 61) by a disc-shaped retainer key locking sleeve 70, which in turn is held in place by a retaining screw 80 that screws into the outermost end of pin 52. The retaining screw 80 preferably is self-locking, e.g. having aNylok insert, and in addition a thread locking compound maybe applied to retaining screw 80. A roll pin 71 inserted through the locking sleeve (namely, through roll pin hole) into pin 50 keeps locking sleeve 70 rotationally locked with pin.

As can be seen in Figs. 8 - 10 and 12 - 15, ajet sub may be placed in the drillstring immediately above the casing cutting tool, to direct a portion of the overall drilling fluid stream into the annulus and onto the operating arms and cutter/stabilizer bases. The jet sub may include a check valve, which maybe a poppet, flapper, plunger or other type of check or one-way valve. Conclusion

While the preceding description contains many specificities, it is to be understood that same are presented only to describe some of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and not by way of limitation. Changes can be made to various aspects of the invention, without departing from the scope thereof.

Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be determined not by the illustrative examples set forth above, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.