2. Description of the Background Art Conventional ballistic- and blast-resistant materials provide protection through a number of mechanisms such as plastic/elastic deformation, momentum reduction, and specifically break-up of the projectile, erosion, and cominution for ballistic protection. SMh et al. (United States Patent No. 6,532,857, issued March 18, 2003) (the entirety of which is incorporated herein for all purposes) encapsulated an array of ceramic tiles in an elastomer, typically a polysulfide. The elastomer is was used to (1) attenuate stress waves, (2) accommodate the lateral displacement of ceramic fracturing and (3) isolate adjacent tiles during the backing vibration stage. At high strain rates and temperatures corresponding to ballistic events, Shin's elastomer exhibits the behavior of rubber. Shih et al. requires two casting processes and vulcanization under pressure. In addition, it requires two grades of elastomers: surface rubber to protect against the non-ballistic battlefield environment and interior rubber which will control the dynamic response of the armor.

Summary of the Invention

It is an object of the present invention to provide an armor material with resistance to both blast and ballistic energy. It is another object of the present invention to provide an armor material with strong resistance to shock waves. It is a further object of the present invention to provide an armor material in which a volume of rigid armor is confined along three dimensions when exposed to ballistic or blast energy. These and other objects are achieved by encapsulating or sandwiching a rigid inclusion or plate in a strain rate hardening elastomer.

Brief Description of the Drawings

Fig. Ia shows the cross-sectional view of encapsulated ceramic tiles in polyurea, and the backing structural material, according to the present invention.

Fig. Ib shows a plan view of encapsulated ceramic tiles in polyurea according to the present invention.

Fig. 2a and Fig. 2b show types of arrangements for encapsulation ceramic tiles in curved surfaces such as body armor and helmets.

Fig. 3a and Fig. 3b show one method by which a ballistic cloth or fiber, such as Kevlar™ (aramid) or Spectra™, may be wrapped around a ceramic tile to be encapsulated according to the present invention.

Figure 4a and Fig. 4b shows the engagement of a projectile with an array of hard-faced balls (or other shape) of ceramic or steel arrays of hard-faced balls (or other shape) of ceramic or steel with the sandwich armor according to the present invention. .

Fig. 5a shows the front and cross-sectional view of sandwich-type armor with front and back application of the elastomer (polyurea). Fig. 5b show another arrangement according to the present invention in which an elastomer is on the outer surface of the sandwich and is weakly bonded to another surface. Fig. 5c shows another embodiment of the present invention.

Fig. 6 shows the change from slow loading to very high strain rate behavior of a typical elastomer useful in the present invention. Line A shows elastomer behavior under conventional stress-strain (slow loading). Line B shows elastomer behavior at a strain rate of 3500/sec (unconfined). Line C shows elastomer behavior at a strain rate of 6500/sec (confined).

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

Any array or a plate of a rigid material, such as ceramic, metal, polycarbonate, or composite inclusions or a metal, composite or ceramic plate, is encapsulated or sandwiched by an elastomer having high strain rate hardening. Typically, elastomers useful in the present invention have a strain rate sensitivity hardening of 10,000/second to 1,000,000/second, and include, for example, some polyurethanes and some polyureas. Generally, elastomers having this characteristic will meet the following criteria in low rate of loading conditions: Young's modulus of 700-1000 psi at 100% strain; Young's modulus of 1200-1400 psi at 300% strain; Young's modulus of 4000-6000 psi at 400% strain; Elongation in the range of 200-800%, typically more than about 400%; Tensile strength of 2000-8000 psi; Poison's ratio 0.45-0.49 (as close to 0.5 as possible, which makes it incompressible). As a result of high rate sensitivity, the Young's modulus of elastomers useful in the present invention increases at high rate loading (e.g. rate loading of about 5000-6000/sec) from about 400 psi to about 20,000 psi -30,000 psi under unconfined conditions and about 500,000 psi - 600,000 psi under confined conditions. The elastomer (throughout the specification and the claims that follow, the term "elastomer" includes blends of more than one elastomer or blends of an elastomer with a material (e.g., plasticizers, antioxidants, etc.) that enhances it's usefulness, unless otherwise stated) chosen will depend on the application for which the armor material of the present is intended. Table 1 shows the properties of some typical materials which exhibit the strain rate sensitivity, required to achieve the desired performance in blast and armor applications. Table 1

POLYUREA PROPERTIES

Plasite Air Products SPI SEMSTONE 403 Versalink 1000 Polshield Hi-E

The rigid (i.e., rigid compared to the elastomer) encapsulated or sandwiched material of the present invention is typically metal, ceramic, or composite. Any metal (e.g., steel (such as high-hard steel), titanium, aluminum, and aluminum alloys) typically used for armor plating may be encapsulated or sandwiched to make the armor of the present invention. Alternatively, the rigid material may be a polymer, such as polycarbonate. An advantage of the present invention is that the confinement provided by the hardening of the elastomer improves the ballistic and blast protection performance of lightweight, inexpensive materials such as aluminum and ceramics. The selection between a ceramic inclusion, a composite tile/plate, and a metal plate encapsulated or sandwiched material depends mainly upon factors such as cost, weight, flexibility, etc. Although several encapsulated metal tiles or other inclusions may be used in place of a single sandwiched metal plate, diminished performance may result. Where large plates of metal are sandwiched between layers of an elastomer according to the present invention, the metal surrounding the portion of the metal plate impacted by ballistic or blast energy laterally confines the impacted portion. Therefore, in this embodiment, the elastomer need not completely encapsulate the metal plate. It is possible to make powder metallurgy inclusions (such as tiles) or plates that would have superior strength and could provide extra stopping power. Inclusions could be fabricated from liquid metal particles with high quantities of nitrogen for example for very high strength. Also cermets, mixes of metals and ceramics, might have possibility as well. For example, metal could be cast with insoluble titanium diborides or titanium oxides included in the mix to provide additional stopping power. There is a great deal of potential in materials for this purpose. Fig Ia shows embodiment 100 of the present invention. Ceramic tiles 102 of thickness T2 are encapsulated within an elastomer (e.g., polyurea) 104 having high strain rate hardening. A thickness Tl of elastomer 104 covers the front surface of tiles 102. Tiles 102 are backed by a thickness T3 of elastomer 104. As shown in Fig. Ib, tiles 102 have dimensions "a" and "c." A gap of dimension "c" exists between the tiles. Unlike in Shih et al., gap "c" is not critical to the ballistic/blast protection offered by the present invention. Gap "c," however, is useful in enhancing the flexibility and shape-forming ability of the armor according to the present invention. Generally, gap "c" should be large enough to allow the armor to assume the desired shape/flexibility. A gap larger than necessary, however, needlessly increases the likelihood of penetration. Clearly, the exact dimensions for "a," "b," and "c" ("a" is the length/width, "b" is the distance between tiles, and "c" is distance from the edge of the tile to the edge of the elastomer layer) are dependant upon the desired end use. Similarly, the desired tile thickness must balance the ability of thicker tiles to better resist penetration with weight considerations. Fig. and Fig. show an improvement in which a Kevlar™, Spectra™, ballistic cloth, ballistic fiber (e.g., E-glass), or other (typically highly flexible) blast/ballistic-resistant material layer 201 is placed on a sticky, typically flexible backing 203 and wrapped around ceramic tile 102. Ceramic tile 102 is then encapsulated within. Ballistic layer 201 and elastomer 104 together further support confinement of ceramic tile 102. Backing 203 can also co-cure within elastomer 104. Fig. 3a and Fig. 3b show embodiment 300 of the present invention in which and array of hemispherical ceramic inclusions 302 are encapsulated by elastomer 304 having a high strain- rate hardening. This armor is attached to substrate 308. As shown in these figures, the helical shape of inclusions 304 converts the off-axis portion of momentum X from a penetrator 306 into momentum along arrow Y and torque along arrow Z. As a result, a portion of the energy of penetrator 306 is dissipated by rotation of inclusion 302 within elastomer 304. Fig. 4a, Fig. 4b, and Fig. 4c show embodiments of the present invention in which a metal plate is sandwiched between two layers of elastomer having high strain-rate hardening. Although both layers of elastomer will typically have the same composition, they do not need to have identical behavior or composition. In Fig.4a, a metal plate 402, is sandwiched between, and loosely bonded to, layers of elastomer 404. In Fig. 4b, metal plate is likewise sandwiched between layers of elastomer 404. However, an additional metal plate 406 and the rear surface of the inner layer of elastomer 404 further confines the elastomer and contributes to the elastomer's strain hardening . Fig. 4c shows the reverse of the Fig. 4b arrangement. Thin metal plate 408 is bonded to the front surface of a layer of elastomer 410 that is sandwiched between metal plates 408 and 412. The back of the metal plate 412 is directly adhered to a layer of elastomer 410. In the Fig. 4c embodiment, the sandwiching of the layer of elastomer 408 contributes to its strain hardening. In Figs. 4a, 4b, and 4c, the front surface of the armor is the surface facing projectile 414. Tiles 102 (Fig. Ia and Fig. Ib) need not have a square or rectangular cross-section, but may be any a cross-section of any shape, for example hexagonal, pentagonal, octagonal, circular, oval, etc., as shown in Fig. 5a and Fig. 5b. In Fig. 5a, vest 500 includes a variety of symmetric (503) and asymmetrically (502) shaped inclusions of ceramic or other rigid material in encapsulated within an elastomer which serves as a matrix. In Fig. 5b, the helmet is protected by an armor which includes a variety of symmetric and asymmetrically shaped inclusions 502, 503 of ceramic or other rigid material in encapsulated within elastomer 501. Defeating blast and ballistic threats normally makes use of conventional approaches, plastic deformation, momentum reduction, etc. as mentioned above. It is theorized that the present invention, while relying in-part upon conventional mechanisms, uses additional mechanisms to defeat blast and ballistic threats. In the case of ballistic impact, under the extremely high strain rate (up tol06/sec), which is initially generated by the projectile impact on the outer surface of the elastomer (e. g. polyurea), the elastomer will dynamically stiffen, introducing reflected shock waves with even higher intensity, and hence reduce the velocity of projectile before it engages the underlying encapsulated volume(s). These high intensity shock waves result from strain rate sensitivity and confinement which causes the elastomer to dynamically strengthen and stiffen and results in a significant increase of the wave speed in the elastomer (Fig. 6 shows typical behavior for a desired elastomer). After penetrating the front layer of the elastomer, the underlying encapsulated volume material is impacted. After shock waves reach the encapsulated volume they will propagate into the surrounding elastomer encapsulant, which will result in dynamically strengthening and stiffening the elastomer on the back face as well to increase its dynamic properties/bulk modulus. These two effects will further confine the encapsulated volume, thus reducing the onset of failure from fracture or shear plugging, depending on the damage mechanism in the encapsulated material. To restate by further example, if the encapsulated material is of a brittle nature (e.g. alumina), it will become highly confined under compressive hydrostatic stress, which will increase its fracture strength and resistance to the penetrator. The armor will engage the projectile as discussed in the background above, but with much improved transient strength and stiffness characteristics because of the confinement. Finally, the remainder of the projectile, which might not have been stopped in the initial phase of the engagement, would be further defeated by wave reflection and the absorption of energy by the backing elastomer. Other mechanisms are also involved in this final stage, such as surface decohesion of the elastomer and momentum trapping. Under oblique impact the instant invention will be even more effective than the previous state of the art, since it will further deflect the projectile before it engages with the encapsulated volume. (And when the projectile engages with the encapsulated volume, it will be at lower velocity and higher obliquity.) In blast loading, the strain rates are of the order of 103-104/sec, which also contribute to dynamic strengthening and stiffening and confinement of the elastomer. Fig. 6 shows the change from slow loading to very high strain rate behavior in a graph of engineering stress (psi) on the Y axis versus strain (inches/inches) along the X-axis. The actual encapsulation or sandwiching can be accomplished by casting, spraying, or by a trowelling of the elastomer around the volumes. The installation of the dual armor can also be in the form of a finished tile or panel/applique, which in turn can be glued to the surface of the platform to b< protected by adhesive bonding or by mechanical attachment. The armor composite of the present invention may be used without a substrate or can be attached to a variety of substrates, e.g., aluminum, steel, fiber reinforced plastic, clothing, and canvas. The armor may also be used without a substrate. An advantage of armor of the present invention is that it combines protection from both ballistic and blast threats in a relatively low-weight, low-cost configuration. Making use of the high- rate properties of certain rate-sensitive elastomers as. an encapsulant for enhancing damage resistance is a new feature that permits design of the dual-purpose armor. The ability to use encapsulated arrays of material permits the use of components, e.g. liquid metals, rapidly quenched volumes, where only small sizes can be practically produced, to be used for ballistic purposes. Further cost savings could be realized using low-cost ceramics, e. g. porcelains, whose response could be made equivalent to that of more costly alumina or boron carbides through augmentation by the elastomers. For protection of structures where the threat was well defined, the dual armor could result in weight savings where benefits derived from thinner/lighter ceramic, for example, with the low density elastomer dual armor combination could offset a heavier configuration containing only thicker/heavier ceramic tiles. In addition, less costly armor steels in conjunction with the elastomer could be as effective as more costly heavily treated armor steels. Given that availability of such steels is often limited, rapid substitution of less costly steels as a dual armor with the elastomer gives potential for more rapid response in time of emergency. The flexibility of the concept enhances the capability to develop armors in complex contours and irregular surfaces such as body armor and aircraft armor and to use complex shapes of encapsulated volumes.

Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.