Arrangement for controlling and/or supervising in the first instance yarn feed elements/yarn feed functions in or on a textile machine.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to an arrangement for controlling and/or supervising, with the aid of a computerized system, a number of ele¬ ments/functions forming part of a textile machine, yarn feed' ¹ elements/ /yarn feed functions being intended here in the first instance. For each element/function the system has one or more units, which serve the element/the function and which together with other units form a network in the system. One or more units in the system can moreover, if neces¬ sary, serve more than one element/one function.

An example of functions which have to be controlled and supervised in a weaving machine is e.g. checking whether the yarn is arriving in. the reception end of the shed in a weaving machine, which can be supervised with the aid of an arrival monitor of a type known per se. The arrival monitor gives an acknowledgement signal of the run of the weft, which can be of interest for the yarn feeder which released the yarn and possibly for subsequent yarn feeders. Yarn breaks can moreover be indicated. The yarn break may occur before, in or after the feeder. Changing-over of feeders in multi-colour weaving and pick initiation signals are other examples. In a weaving loom it is today typically necessary to be able to intiate 1200 picks/min.

It is previously known to provide elements in a textile machine with a computer for control of functions of the elements and of the machine, and it is likewise previously known to electronically control and supervise a function/functions of the yarn feed elements of a weaving machine.

SUBSTITUTESHEET

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Technical problem

The yarn feeders exist in different types and variants and have to be capable of being applied to different types and variants of weaving machines. The electrical connection of the feeders to one another and to the controlling or supervising system of the weaving machine has hitherto been brought about in a different manner for each connection case. The connection is in general effected in terminal boxes in which a number of connection wires must be assigned their positions which are fixed for the connection case. There is a need for more standardized kinds of connection.

The weaving machine and yarn feed elements represent a large number of functions which on the one hand have to be capable of being individu- ally -controlled and supervised and on the other have to be mutually inter-related to achieve an optimum functioning of the weaving machine. This means that the supervising and/or controlling system must be able to work rapidly and functionally reliably with e.g. short reaction times for yarn breaks, faults in the weaving pattern etc.

The use of a computerized system opens up the possibility of storing a large amount of information which can be used for the control and the supervision of elements/the machine. Signal-processing units, transmit¬ ters and drive units can be used in large numbers. A large range of different variants and solutions is offered to clients who wish to adapt their machinery according to the case selected for the occasion, which means that solutions which permit simple modifications of exis¬ ting equipment are attractive.

Considering the large amount of information and the requirement for accuracy of the information, the transmission in the computerized system must take place accurately and with such speed that events which have occurred in the system are detected sufficiently rapidly in the places where the events which have occurred are to be acted upon in

SUBST2T

- 3 -

some respect. For each transmission case, the principle which applies is that a sequence of events is to be carried out. This sequence must in general be synchronized in some way, which can be achieved with the aid of, on the one hand, a run initiation signal (trigger signal) which gives rise to a certain sequence being carried out in the system, and, on the other, an acknowledgement signal which issues acknowledgement that an effected sequence is performed. In certain cases, an acknowled¬ gement signal can be such that it directly initiates a new run; Alter¬ natively, acknowledgements can be collected at a suitable place in the system in order to initiate a new run, taking as a starting point these together with some other criterion.

In order that the transmission be effective, it must have the following characteristics. The signal is to reach its destination within a stipu¬ lated time. Often it is a matter of a maximum permissible time between event and action, in which respect it can be of interest to know when the event occurs. In certain cases, therefore, time delays can be com¬ pensated. Another requirement is that the transmission must take place with high reliability, which means that the transmission must not be sensitive to interferences in the environment in which the equipment operates. The risk of faulty connection or faulty transmission must be minimized. The communication must also operate with considerable dyna¬ mics. Upon start-up and adjustment of the equipment before a determined operating state, relatively large amounts of data are to be transmit¬ ted, but without any greater requirement for short times. The contrary can apply for synchronization signals in which there is no data, but only a message that the occurrence concerned is to be transmitted. A further requirment for making it possible for synchronization to be carried out in a rapid and effective manner is that the synchronization must be capable of being sent from or by all units concerned. The res- pective units concerned must moreover be capable of detecting the sig¬ nal, as in many cases an event within the functional run of the elements or of the textile machine requires actions from a number of units.

SUBSTITUTESHEET

The use of the new micro-electronics (computer technology) means that problems arise in collecting and reaching the different pieces of in¬ formation at physical bounderies or interfaces. In order to connect the units together, electrical or optical lines are used for the signal transmission. The use of the textile machine and associated connectable elements is to a great extent dependent upon how the different control¬ ling and supervising units are connected together with the connection concerned. A complicated machine has hitherto led to extremely compli¬ cated wiring. This has meant that reconstruction of a machine has not only been a matter of exchanging a lot of units, but it has also requi¬ red extensive rearrangements of flexes an wires.

There is also a requirement to optimize the weaving function in the weaving machine so that even rapid weaving runs have gentle effects or stress on different parts in the weaving machine and/or feed elements. This means, inter alia, that actions, e.g. activations and stops, of certain parts and elements are to be capable of being prepared in advance so that sudden accelerations and decelerations are avoided or high speeds can be avoided.

It is also of great interest to anticipate and measure, in a rapid, effective and supervisory manner, the yarn consumption, which in indi¬ vidual cases is desired to be optimum with the least possible waste.

SOLUTION

The aim of the present invention is to propose an arrangement which solves one or more of the problems indicated above.

An arrangement according to the invention can be considered to be characterized principally, inter alia, in that each unit is connected or connectable to a connection which forms part of the network and at which message transmission within the system takes place serially and digitally, and, that the message transmission at the connection prefer- ably consists of message types which are ranked from the point of view

SUBSTITU

of priority. A further characteristic is preferably that the units and the connections are arranged so as to discriminate in the message transmission effected and guarantee a transmission time of a finally transmitted message between units concerned, or unit concerned and other communication part within the system, of a maximum of 2.0 ms for at least three different instantaneous signals/trigger signals which are attributable to selected yarn feed elements/yarn feed functions and/or textile machine functions.

According to the invention, different types of messages are transmitted with different priority. This is achieved, inter alia, by virtue of the fact that time-critical messages are not obstructed by other less important messages. In one embodiment, each message is >ϋrelatively short. An important message is therefore not obstructed ^* by a long and/or unimportant message. In one embodiment, faults are detected in the transmission by the equipment with the aid of parity bits and control bits which form part of the message. Moreover, it is proposed that some form of confirmation be utilized. The hardware for transmission of data is designed to cope with an environment which is problematic from the electrical point of view. In one embodiment, optical transmission is utilized.

A digital communication protocol with standardized mechanical and electrical characteristics can be used. This opens up the possibility that any piece of equipment can be connected together with any other, provided that it satisfies standardization requirements concerned. In many cases, the connected equipment can thus be used directly only by it being necessary to make an addition in any central computer which configures the system. In other cases, it may be a case of modification in the respective connected unit so that this comprises the command which is transmitted on the network in a correct manner. According to the invention, a common type of connection is also proposed for all types of equipment concerned. An input and an output are thus obtained in which the variants are obtained by means of different encoding and interpretation of the serially transmitted data. An interface which is complicated in terms of hardware can thus be replaced iSa a single

SUBSTITUTE SHέET

connection (inexpensive contact) . The consequently more complicated data processing can be dealt with simply and inexpensively with exis¬ ting modern micro-electronics. Connection to or from other computer systems in or on the machine can be carried out without adjustment of the program in the supervising unit or main computer.

The prioritization proposed by the invention is based upon the fact that information is to be transmitted between the units. This transmis¬ sion takes place via the serial connection and consequently means that an asynchronous process is carried out in time. Collision between simultaneous transmissions from the units must be avoided, which is achieved by prioritization. According to the invention, two logic levels are utilized at the connection, one of which is dominant and the other non-dominant. This means that, irrespective of how many of the transmitters transmit a bit which is non-dominant, a dominant bit will be received if a unit transmits a dominant bit at the same time. Anot¬ her characteristic is that when a unit starts to tansmit, this is detected by all connected units within a predetermined time. By these means, it is ensured that the digital levels of the communication remain stable at the moment when the units read off the bit from the communication. Each unit furthermore interrupts its transmission immediately it detects that the transmission is occupied by one which is transmitting a dominant bit when the unit itself is transmitting a non-dominant bit.

In one embodiment, each unit can comprise a communication control part which on the one hand is provided with one or more first micro-compu¬ ters and/or advanced digital circuits etc., and on the other is provi¬ ded with or connected to a second micro-computer and/or advanced digi¬ tal circuit etc., with the aid of which one or more of the functions of the feedwheel element are controllable and/or supervisable. The diffe- rent communication control parts of the feed elements can thus function together with one another and/or with one or more control elements (e.g. main computer) in the system via the digital and serial connec¬ tion which thus functions as a data bus between the communication control parts or between the communication control parts and the control element(s) .

SUBSTITUTESHEET

The units of the feeders thus comprise communication control parts with connection interfaces to, on the one hand, the connection, preferably two-wire, which functions as a data bus connection, and, on the other, microcomputers or equivalent which are divided up for control or super- vision of the functions of the feeders. The serial bit flow effected by the communication control parts/the units at the serial connection proceeds in the form of messages which respectively comprise a frame and data part. Said frames comprise bits which are divided up for the transmission and reception functions of the system, e.g. for synchroni- zation, encoding etc.

In one embodiment, the units can be assigned physical locations close to or on the respective feeder. The units or parts thereof, e.g. said communication control parts, are individually interchangeable with one another since they can effect control and/or supervision of a number, preferably all, of the functions of the feeders. The actual function/ /functions for the yarn feeders is/are thus selectable for the actual application.

A predetermined message type, which is attributable to the trigger signals and which is exchanged between the units/the communication control parts/the control elements has, at the digital and serial con¬ nection, priority over other messages which are attributable to the continous operation of the feeders and/or the weaving machine. Exchange of a message belonging to the first message type takes place immedia¬ tely after completion of exchange of a message of the second message type if such is available at the time of transmission of said first message. Furthermore, the bit speed is selected so that said short times for exchange of a message of the first type are available. Times within the range 0.1-1.0 ms are preferably used in this respect. Bit speeds of e.g. 1 MHz/sec can be used in the system.

In a further embodiment, the units/the communication control parts are responsive to one or more predetermined markings or addresses in said messages/frames. In the event of messages/frames intended for a given

SUBSTITUTESHEET

yarn feeder element, this receives and stores the message for action depending upon the content of the message.

The units can also work with a feedback function. Each unit can take care of the control function for the associated feeder which can thus be provided with or interact with one or more transmitters which feed¬ back stepwise or continuously a parameter change caused within the control function, e.g. change in movement, state etc.

In a further embodiment, at the two-wire connection, information is effected from one unit to another unit, or from the control element (the main computer) which preferably forms part of the electronic system/computer system of the weaving machine. Said information can relate to control information or activation information, which in turn selects or intiates stored control information in the unit concerned, e.g. in its second microcomputer. With the aid of said control informa- tion the unit effects control action/control actions of associated yarn feed elements. The control action/control actions can relate to a first control of the motor of the feed element depending upon a weaving pat¬ tern which is programmed or selected in the electronic system/computer system of the weaving machine. Each control action can also relate to a second control of the motor of the feed element in relation to the motor/motors of other feed elements. Alternatively or complementarily, there may be a third such control of the motor of the feed element, where preparatory acceleration and/or deceleration runs for the motor and part/parts influenced by it can be effected in advance so that the motor/the part/the parts are assigned their essential speed of motion before they come into operation for execution of an actual part of the functioning of the feed element in the weaving machine. Said runs can also be controlled so that exceeding the maximum speed or overspeeding can be prevented in the motor/the part/the parts.

The above proposals provide particulars relating to an effective inte¬ gration and simple connection of the electronic control of the feed elements in or on the textile machine or to the supervising control system of the textile machine. The communications between the different

SUBSTITUTESHEET

functional parts in the textile ^' machine or feed elements can ,be carried out rapidly and reliably. Units which work together can be connected and exchanged in the system without extensive reconnection or repro- gra ming. Thus, e.g. the feeder system can be connected easily and unambiguously to the weaving machine.

LIST OF DRAWINGS

An at present proposed embodiment of an arrangement which displays the features characteristic of the invention is described below with simul¬ taneous reference to the attached drawings in which:

Figure 1 shows in the form of a skeleton diagram a weaving machine with a system for control and supervision, to which a system for control and supervision of the ξeeά\ers of the weaving machine is connectable via a digital connection for serial communication transmission, which -serves as a data bus connection,

Figure 2 shows in principle the construction of a first type of message/frame which has priority over a second type or types of message/frame at the digital connection,

Figure 3 shows in principle the construction of another type of message/frame which can appear in the digital connection,

Figure 4 shows, in the form of a block diagram, connection of two units to the connection,

Figures 4a-7 show, in diagram form, signal trains, attributable to three different units, in association with prioritization when the units simultaneously require accoss Ho-the con- nection,

Figure 8 shows, in the form of a block diagram, different construc¬ tions of units,

SUBSTITUTESHEET

Figure 9 shows in principle, and in the form of a block diagram, the connection of weaving machine functions comprising feeder functions served by computer system,

Figure 10 shows in the form of a skeleton diagram and a block dia- gram the connection of a computer system to a flat knit¬ ting machine,

Figure 11 shows in perspective the connection of the computer system to a KETTEN machine,

Figure 12 shows in the form of a block diagram and in principle the construction of a unit which comprises or interacts with an execution element in the form of a servo-controlled cylinder,

Figure 13 shows in the form of a block diagram and in principle a number of units and execution elements according to Figure 12 connected to a digital and serial connection,

Figure 14 shows in principle a dobby (shaft weaving machine) comp¬ rising a computer system,

Figure 15 shows in the form of a skeleton diagram the control of a shaft according to Figure 9, and

Figure 16 shows in the form of a skeleton diagram the connection of a number of units and execution elements according to Figure 15 to a communication line for serial and digital transmission.

ADVANTAGES

The present invention also has in mind an arrangement to effectively control yarn feeders in a textile machine. This control can be used in association with the above computerized system, but can also be used separately, that is to say the invention can advantageously, but not

exclusively, utilize the system according to the present invention. In this context, a system is intended comprising two or more yarn feeders for textile machines, weaving machines for weaving of free pattern being intended in particular. So-called multi-colour weaving can be cited as an example. With the aid of variable speed control of the yarn winding-on element of each feeder, it can be ensured, according to the invention, that all feeders procure themselves a yarn stock from a yarn supply assigned to each feeder. Said yarn stock permits at every moment a yarn consumption from each feeder which is determined by a weaving pattern which is representative of the operating case in question and is programmed or stored in a control element assigned to the feeder system. On the basis of the programmed or stored weaving pattern, or part of the weaving pattern, the control element ascertains the coming yarn winding-on requirement. This ascertainment can be achieved depen- ding upon possible sensing or measurement of the existing yarn stock on each feeder. In the event of a yarn winding-on requirement, which in the absence of the arrangement would cause a greater acceleration and/or greater speed and/or greater deceleration of the yarn in its winding-on the feeder, a control action, which emanates from the con- trol element depending upon said ascertained coming yarn winding-on requirement, proceeds in advance to the yarn winding-on speed-control¬ ling element of the feeder. By these means, said acceleration/speed/ deceleration of the yarn is prevented from exceeding a predetermined value. By these means, considerable advantages are achieved because the best possible constant speed leads to the minimum loss in the yarn feeder. No unnecessary stresses occur in the yarn or rotating parts of the feeder.

A further arrangement which advantageously, but not exclusively, can be included in the system described above consists of a limiting arrange- ment for the maximum speed of the yarn feeder. In this case, all devi¬ ces are connected to a textile machine and provide information regar¬ ding the yarn consumption to a central unit which is utilized on the weaving machine. The central unit adds the reported yarn consumptions and on the basis of this calculates the maximum yarn consumption. Since it can be assumed that during one pattern report no feeder/device can have a higher consumption than the total consumption, the latter can

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

be used as a maximum value limit and transmitted back to all devices.

The advantage with this system is that the maximum speed can be repidly reduced on all devices/feeders. The reduction can be carried out auto¬ matically after mains operation and without communication with the weaving machine, that is to say the feedwheels represent a separate system in relation to the weaving machine. As the stress on the yarn is speed-dependent, it is important that the maximum speed of the motor is kept as low as possible during a transient process.

In one embodiment, the devices/feeders can obtain their address by means of their location in the transformer box. The device which occu¬ pies position 1 is supervising/the master and questions the devices/the units 2, 3, 4 etc. When no answer is received, it can be assumed that no device is connected. The prerequisite for the latter function is that a control is connected in position 1. Controls in positions other than 1 transmit only upon request from the control in position 1.

DETAILED EMBODIMENT

In Figure 1, the reference number 1 represents a textile machine of optional type, e.g. weaving machine, knitting machine, shuttle machine, jet machine etc. The machine is of the type which is provided with a supervising electronic system/computer system 2, by means of which the different functions of the machine are controllable and supervisable. The connections of the system to the machine have been symbolized with 3 and the connections of the machine to the system with 4. The control and the supervision can take place in known manner and are therefore not described in greater detail here.

Yarn feeders 5, 6, 7 and 8 are connected or connectable to the weaving machine. The feeders can also be of known type and are therefore not described in detail here. Thus, e.g. yarn magazines have not been shown for sake of clarity.

SUBSTITUTESH

- 13 -

^{■ :} i

Each feeder has electrical connection parts 5a, 6a, 7a and 8a respecti¬ vely, e.g. electromechanical parts. Each feeder is assigned a function control unit 9, 10, 11 and 12 respectively. In a preferred d£B£3iment, each unit is physically located close to or on each feeder. Each unit comprises one or more first micro-computers or advanced digital cir¬ cuits 13, 14 for serial interface control and serial bit flow process¬ ing. Memory circuit 15 (RAM, ROM) and a clock circuit* 16 aijέf also in¬ cluded. In addition, there can also be circuits for time logic, fault processing etc. In the figure, a communication port has also been shown with 17, via which port read-in and read-out elements can ^' £>©: connected via connections 18 for entering and retrieval of information^ _, for pro¬ gramming etc. Each unit comprises or is connected to a second micro¬ computer 19 which effects the action, supervision etc. of the ^" respec¬ tive feeder. By means of the second micro-computer, calculations can be carried out for optimum control and supervision of each feeder via the connection 20. The second micro-computer comprises conventional perip¬ herals such as memory circuits 21, communication circuits ^" 22f"etq The connection interface comprises A/D and D/A circuits, communication terminals, pulse output etc. The second micro-computer 19 can he int^e- grated in the unit 9 or alternatively constitute a separate ώiit, cf the connection of the second micro-computer 23 to a separate τJojαmunica- tion control part 24 which has a corresponding construction to that described for the unit 9, apart from the second micro-computer 19 with associated peripherals 21, 22. The parts 23, 24 communicate with one another via a connection interface 25 for parallel communication. The units 9-12 can be constructed with identical, or essentially^identical, connection interfaces so that individual interchangeability exists among the units, that is to say any unit can take the place of another unit, at least after a minor adjustment. In cases where . separate communication control part 24 exists in all units, these ' an be made individually interchangeable in corresponding manner.

Each unit 9-12 is arranged connectably to a two-wire connection 26,, 27 for serial communication or message transmission. The system 2'is also connectable to the connection 26, 27. The system can comprise one or more control computers 28 which can function as supervising computer or

SUBSTITUTESHEET

computers for the units 9-12 which, in interaction with the respective control computer, function as slaves. In one embodiment the units 9-12 are compleraentarily or alternatively arranged for reciprocal communica¬ tion. Two-way or one-way exchanges of messages/pieces of information between the control computer/the control computers and the units or between the units is symbolized with arrows 29-38. Further connec¬ tion(s) serving further units can be connected to the weaving loom computer system 2. The different computer systems can work in parallel or with a supervising and subordinate system. One or more units can thus be provided with more than one part 13, and each part 13 is con¬ nected to its part system or its loop (connection) which affects the unit in question. Two units which are connected via a connection, e.g. the main connection, can carry out internal communication with one another via the connection or the main connection, which internal co - munication is not involved in other communication at the connection (the main communication) .

The respective connection of units and/or control elements to the digi¬ tal connection 26, 27, which serves as a data bus, takes place via connection elements, e.g. terminal elements 39 which, for each unit/ control element, have a pair of screws, via which the connection to the unit/control element or the connection 26, 27 takes place. Message exchange can take place with messages of different types. The bit flow, which is effected between the units or between the units and the control element(s), in the digital data bus is arranged in said messa- ges which respectively comprise a frame part and a data part (applies to one type of message) . The messages/the frames can be executed with markings or addresses intended for the units. Each unit receives and stores its addresses which are assigned in the system/the systems. Alternatively, the system/the systems can operate with a certain order for the units. In the event that the units are controlled from a super¬ vising computer 28, the system can work with a start-up phase, in which control information is issued for selection of feeder functions, e.g. depending upon a programmed or selected weaving pattern, and a working phase in which the selected feeder function or functions are diagnosed, supervised, controlled for optimum function performance etc. , and effected. Thus, e.g. the yarn quantity can be measured, the thread

UBSTITUTE SHEET

tension supervised etc. The reciprocal message transmission between the units makes it possible for the functions of the feeders to be related to one another, e.g. speed-adapted depending upon the type of weaving machine, possible yarn breaks etc.

The feeders can work with a feedback function/feedback functions Where the system makes it possible for the feeders to utilize the same trans¬ mitter. The locking element function for the yarn measurement, ^" reten¬ tion and winding-off from the feeder drum can also be controlled.

Two or more message types can be utilized, one message type being given priority over other message types at the digital serial connection. Figure 2 shows a construction of a first type of message which in prin¬ ciple consists only of a frame part (system part) which has the same length as the message 40, the length of which is indicated with L. The message or the frame is constructed of different fields. A start field is indicated with 40a, a priority field with 40b, a control bit field with 40c, a total control field with 40d, and finally an acknowledge¬ ment and completion field with 40e and 40f respectively. The content in the priority field determines the ranking of the message from the point of view of priority. In one embodiment, all messages appearing at the connection are mutually ranked, instantaneous signals or trigger signals being attributed the highest priority and normal communication then having priority according to the time requirement. Pick signals, yarn break signals, arrival signals, feedwheel exchange signal etc. have the highest priorities, while transmission of information regar- ding the long-term functional working in the textile machine has lower priority.

The second message type 41 according to Figure 5 has, in principle, the same construction as the message type according to Figure 4. The dif¬ ference lies in the fact that the message in Figure 5 also comprises a data field 41a. The frame part in message 41 according to Figure 5 can be thought of as consisting of the parts 41b and 41c. The data field contains information which is to be transmitted between the units.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

The communication transmission works bit-synchronously, which is of significance, inter alia, in priority selection. The messages are assigned relatively short lengths L and L ¹ . In this manner, a message of lower ranking does not obstruct a message of higher ranking for any length of time in the event of transmission of the latter message taking place when a unit with a higher ranked message wishes access to the connection. The message length L' can be selected in the order of magnitude 0.05 - 0.1 ms (at 1 Mbit/sec). The distances a, a' and b respectively are selected with great accuracy. In order to carry out the functional working in the textile machine, bit speeds of e.g. 1 Mbit/sec or higher, e.g. 4 Mbit/sec, are utilized.

A basic feature of one type of transmission may be that two different types of logic levels are to be used, the first level here being called dominant level and consisting of "0" and the second level consisting of a non-dominant level "1".

By using said two levels, prioritization and fault detection are made possible. The hardware in the system is designed so that if one or more transmitters transmit a dominant bit or level, this will be received in the communication, irrespective of how many are transmitting a non-do- minant bit or level. As a bit fault in the communication appears in all connected communication unit (units) , 100% of all faults which have occurred are detected. This is based upon the fact that the transmit¬ ting unit sees that faults occur when the bit emerges in the communica¬ tion. For faults which have occurred locally (that is to say faults which only occur in the receiving unit) the following conditions apply. If more than five bits are faults, detection of the fault takes place to 100% and this applies irrespective of how these five faults are spread in the messge. A second condition is that if the number of faulty bits is odd, detection always takes place. As for the remaining types of faults (2 or 4 faulty bits) , these are detected with a proba¬ bility of 1/33000. The transmission of a bit is effected by means of the transmitted bit being divided up into five parts. The first part is a synchronizing part which normally starts the bit. The second part consists of an increase part (time increase part) , with which the bit is increased in the event of resynchronization. A third part relates to

SUBST

a first delay part which is attributable to a time interval, during which a stable level is obtained. At the end of this time, the value of the bit is read off. The fourth part consists of a second delay part, which forms a time interval in order that the circuit may determine internally whether it is the current unit which is to transmit _, the coming bit and which bit is to be transmitted in such a case. The fifth part is attributable to a reduction part which can be removed in the event of resynchronization. In cases where the communication part con¬ cerned cannot work entirely alone, it can be complemented with a micro- processor.

In one embodiment of the invention, all units which want to have access to the connection start to transmit their message as soon as the.re is a free space at the connection. The different messages have different priority, which means that all messages with lower priority are inter- rupted and only the message with the highest priority comes to be com¬ pleted. All those connected to the connection can, however, read the transmitted message. All units are adjusted or arranged to receive an assigned message and pick it up and, depending upon the message, carry out the function in question or pick up an actual piece of ^" information. Acknowledgement can take place in different ways. A receiving unit can e.g. transmit an acknowledgement bit when it considers it has received a correct message. Another possibility is that the receiving unit answers by means of transmitting a message back depending upon a recei¬ ved message. The receiver can alternatively transmit a special ^" acknow- ledgement message.

By menas of the prioritization function proposed according to the invention, the transmission of a large amount of information .between the units is made possible. The transmission consists oζ^jn asynchro¬ nous process which has to be carried out serially in time. The'units do not then receive knowledge in advance of the message transmission hap¬ pening. The system therefore has to work so that collisions between two different messages are prevented. According to the invention, it is proposed in one embodiment that prioritization takes 'place in. the transmitted message, which means that any unit can transmit to any unit without problems. In addition to the system thus working witli two logic

SUBSTITUTESHEET

levels, all connected units must be capable of detecting within a fixed time when a unit starts to transmit. By this means, it is ensured that the digital levels in the communication can be made stable at the moment when the units are reading off the bit from the communication. Another requirement in a system of this category is that each unit must interrupt its transmission as soon as it detects that the transmission comprises a message with a dominant bit when the unit itself is trans¬ mitting a non-dominant bit. Further action can be taken to ensure that a unit with high priority does not fail to transmit. In normal cases, the transmitting units start their transmission in a random manner in time, which makes it extremely improbable that two units start to transmit simultaneously (they have to happen to start the transmission within the same 100 - 300 ns at a bit frequency of 1 MHz) . In the event of transmission taking place simultaneously within this time, the selection is made by means of prioritization. The problem arises when the transmitting unit cannot transmit bacause the connection is occupied. When the connection becomes free, the probability is very high that there will be several messages waiting in turn to transmit. When the network becomes free, all those which are waiting in the queue can start their transmissions, in which case there is also the requirement that when a message is completed, all units which wish to transmit must start their transmissions in an interval which is approximately 10% of the bit period, which means that all units must start their transmission within the same 100 - 300 ns at a bit frequency of 1 MHz. This latter requirement is prescribed preferably in order that a unit with low priority does not start transmitting somewhat earlier than one with high priority and thus create an occupied connection. The above can, however, be used for prioritization. A manner of ordering priority is thus that after a completed message, the units receive different delays before they can start the transmission. The unit which has the highest priority has a short waiting time and those with low priority have to wait a long time before they can transmit.

The waiting time with normal use of the connection with a maximum transmission speed can be 148 O^s (2 x 111 bits) plus the time it takes for the processor to process the information with its program. The

SUBSTITUTESHE

minimum transmission time is half of the maximum. By means of only allowing, at sensitive moments, transmission of messages without data, this time can be reduced to 62 O s . All these calculations are made with a bit frequency of 1.5 Mbit/sec and on the assumption that the transmitted message has the highest priority. The circuit has the pos¬ sibility of interrupting a transmission by transmitting a fault frame, which is transmitted automatically when faults are discoverad in the communication and all units interrupt the reading-in and disregard all information read in. By transmitting such a signal, the message in progress can be interrupted and an important message can be transmitted directly afterwards. This should reduce the responce time to a maximum of 44 and a minimum of 40 O^s.

For messages which comprise a predetermined number of bits with the same level in succession, the transmission (the protocol) works with a bit which is inverse and follows the predetermined number (e.g. 5). The inverse bit can optionally be selected to form part of the message or not. Interference is thus prevented from locking the connection. Other¬ wise it would be possible for cases to arise in which the interference was repeated and the system went out of order. In the event of faults, all units transmit e.g. six dominant bits in succession as a sign that they have perceived the fault. All units then transmit e.g. six ^" non-do¬ minant bits. With this, the communication is restored and each unit is ready to or can start transmitting. Each unit which received the faulty message discards it and the unit which sent the message from the start resends. By these means, speeding up of alarm messages is brought about.

Figure 4 shows the connection in principle of three units 42, 43 and 44 to the connection 26' . The following table shows how the priority selection is arranged in a first example. The construction of the prio- rity field in the respective message for the respective unit 42-44 can be seen in the table. The message of the unit 44 has most dominant bits (levels) and is selected before the messages of the units 42 and 43.

SUBSTITUTESHEET

43 has transmitted 1 but received 0 and stopped its transmission

42 has transmitted 1 but received 0 and stopped its transmission.

Figure 4 shows that the unit transmits its respective bits and reads the levels (that is to say, transmits and reads simultaneously) which are received on the common communication line.

Figure 4a shows the case according to the table shown above where prio¬ ritization takes place in one part of the message. In the figure, a "1" indicates a non-dominant level/transmission and a "0" a low level/domi¬ nant transmission. The transmission at the respective connection must be so rapid that when the respective bit is read off by the receivers/ the units, all the transmitted bits must have reached the respective reveiver. Bl, B2, etc. to B8 indicate respectively a bit space. When the unit 42 compares the transmitted bit in the space Bl with the state received in the communication, the unit notes that the non-dominant bit has been overwritten by a dominant one. The unit therefore interrupts its transmission. This must take place since continued transmission of the bits of the unit would have rendered impossible the prioritization by means of overwriting of the dominant bits of the unit. At the bit space B3 the unit 43 makes the same observation of the difference bet¬ ween the transmitted bit value and that which the unit sees in the communication, for which reason the transmission is interrupted. At bit space B8 the unit 44 notes that it had the highest priority since it never had to interrupt its transmission. The unit 44 consequently comp¬ letes the message. The transmission (the message) can of course consist of both ones and zores even though only zeros are shown in the exemp¬ lary embodiment. In the example described, the prioritization process

SUBSTITUTE SH

takes place with the aid of eight bits. It is of course ^" possible to use more or fewer bits.

Figure 5 shows an alternative case with collision detection known per se. The units 42', 43' and 44' are assigned different waiting times Δt , At * and 4 " after collision. The unit (42') which is assigned the longest waiting time ( Δt") receives priority at the connection, whereas the other unit(s) must thus wait for their respective trans¬ mission.

Figure 5 also shows the signals which occur in a system in which three transmitters/units collide in their attempts to transmit simultane¬ ously. The units/the connection are normally executed so that no unit starts its transmission when another unit is transmitting. In the event of a simultaneous start, however, there is a slight risk of a respec¬ tive unit not managing to detect that another is transmitting simultan- eously. After a moment or a shorter time interval, the transmitting units/circuits come to indicate that their transmission is colliding with another transmitter. When a transmitting unit detects this, it goes into a fault detecting phase in order to complete the ¹ message and indicate to other units that the transmission has collided. The comple- tion is carried out in such a manner that all raits involve _d transmit a sequence of dominant bits which overlap one another so that by these means a clear and marked completion of the collision can be detected by all units which are all synchronized to the edge in question. From a time KA., all units wait a predetermined time and the unit with the highest priority waits the shortest time before the' unit starts to transmit. The units with lower priority wait a longer time and, when the time comes at which the latter units are to start to transmit, they indicate that the connection is occupied, for which reason the units concerned have to wait until the communication becomes free.

Figure 6 shows a further alternative concerning mechanically guided collision in which dominant levels are first transmitted in order to make clear that the unit(s) wish to transmit. The units 42'', 43'' and 44' ⁱ are assigned different wait times vtl, vt2 and vt3 after all units have finished transmitting dominant bits. The unit (42**) ^** with the

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

shortest wait time (vtl) thus gains priority to the connection. The edges of the pulse trains must be kept to the time tl with great accuracy (e.g. 100 nanosec) .

The case according to Figure 6 is almost identical with the case accor- ding to Figure 5. The functions differ in that the units in the case according to Figure 6 do not start to transmit any message without starting by transmitting the sequence which in the case according to Figure 5 indicates a collision. A collision is thus signalled irrespec¬ tive of whether any other unit is transmitting or not. The prioritiza- tion otherwise takes place in the same manner as in the case according to Figure 5. The advantage with the method according to Figure 6 is that the delay is constant and the collision indication does not need to be carried out. The disadvantage in relation to the case according to Figure 5 is that the prioritization takes a certain time even if there is only one unit which is to transmit.

Figure 7 shows a fourth example of priority selection for the units 42• ' ' , 43' ' ' and 4 ' ' ' . In this case, the starting point is the number of bits BA, BA* and BA" or times Tl, T2 and T3 respectively in the respective message. The message for the unit (44* ' ') with the greatest number (BA ¹ ') receives the transmission state.

In this solution, it is the start sequence itself which is used for the prioritization. In this case, the length of the start sequence varies and that which has the longest start sequence and is the last to stop with its start sequence has the highest priority. After the prioritiza- tion, a certain time TU is used up for the unit to clarify that it is itself which is to transmit. The different prioritization times Tl, T2 and T3 must be so different in length that they can never be mixed up with one another. There is in this case a degree of uncertainty in time, since the time from the time a transmitter starts to transmit until the start edge concerned is detected by other units.

Figure 8 shows examples of units 45 and 46 of different types, the unit 45 being highly intelligent and the unit 46 being of a simpler type. The unit 45 has a microcomputer 47 which is connected to or comprises

SUBSTITUTESHEET

memory areas 48, 49, e.g. in the form of RAM or ROM memory respecti¬ vely. The micro-computer 47 works into a connection interface 50 which comprises D/A and A/D converters. Also included are counters, pulse outputs and pulse inputs. The connection interface 50 can also be pro- vided with a communication terminal 51. The connection interface works into an electromechanical part 52 belonging to an actual element in the textile machine. The microcomputer 47 also works into a communication part 53 which can comprise one or more micro-computers, advanced cir¬ cuits etc. A circuit 54 which in particular configures the unit 45 can be included. Said circuit 54 is provided with inputs and outputs 55. The unit 45 is connected via an output 46 to the digital connection 26''. The unit 46 can consist of a communication part 57 which is con¬ nected to one or more transmitter elements 58 and one or more indica¬ tion elements 59 and/or execution elements 59' . The unit 46 has an output 60 which is connectable to the connection 26' .

Figure 9 shows symbolically, with Al, an air et weaving machine with Al. The machine is provided with arrival detectors A2 and reference transmitters A3 for the machine angle. A number (4) of feeders A4 belong to the machine. Each feeder is provided with inward and outward thread monitors A5 and A6. A thread measuring device A7 and motor con¬ trol elements A8 are also included. The respective yarn stock is indi¬ cated with A9. Each feeder is assigned a main nozzle A10 and relay nozzles are indicated with A10' and All and the thread with A12. Cutting elements A13 are also included. The drive element of the wea- ving loom is symbolized with A14.

The machine is controlled and supervised by two computerized systems according to the above. The serial digital connections in each system are indicated with A15 and A16 respectively. The computerized or elec¬ tronic control system of the weaving loom is indicated with A17.

Said elements forming part of the weaving machine are connected to the respective connection via units according to the above. The units have the same reference indications as their associated elements, but com¬ pleted with primes. Only the units whose elements are provided with reference indications are marked with the corresponding references.

SUBSTITUTESHEET

Similar elements (e.g. main nozzles for each feedwheel) each have their own unit in the figure, but elements can share the same unit or be connected in pairs to the same unit. Other units (cf motor control elements A8) can on the other hand be connected to two units A8', A8 ¹ ' which each belong to or are connected to their own of the two compute¬ rized systems. The control unit A17 of the machine is connected via the unit A17' and the call monitor A2 is connected to both systems via the units A2' and A2" .

The equipment according to Figure 1 works with a start-up phase and an operation phase. For the start-up, each feeder has e.g. been assigned an identification number in the system. This allocation can take place by means of a code being received in the terminal contact. The start-up phase in the system can be characterized by the following description. The respective feeder reads off its identification code via the commu- nication transmission effected at the respective connection from a supervising unit in the system. The weaving machine informs the system of its breadth and working speed. The weaving machine further informs the respective feeder of the coming pick sequence number, e.g. 16, for the machine speeds most closely corresponding to the number. The wea- ving machine also informs the respective feeder of how much time will run after the reference signal- before the feeder releases the thread. The respective feeder prepares itself with the aid of this information by taking up an optimum thread stock and adjusting itself to optimum maximum speed.

The operation phase is started by the weaving machine giving a start signal to the system(s) . Every time the reference transmitter A3 is passed, a reference signal is issued. The feeder whose turn it is to release thread, counts down the time until the release time. When the latter is reached, the feeder releases the thread. The feeder also measures the thread and activates its stop element at the right moment. The arrival monitor A2 gives a message when the thread passes. There¬ after, the sequence is repeated, reckoned from the reference signal of the reference transmitter. The repetition depends upon the length of the sequence. In one embodiment, the sequence can be repeated a further seven times. Thereafter, the weaving machine gives a pick sequence of a

~ ώ ~~ ~« -f

number of picks, e.g. eight picks, which are to come after the remai¬ ning picks, in this case eight picks, which have already been given. Once again the sequence is repeated from the stage at which a Reference signal is received when the reference transmitter A3 is passed. In the described operation phase, different types of message ^" according to Figures 2 and 3 are thus called for. The start signal of the weaving machine is a typical instantaneous signal/trigger signal. The signals from the reference transmitter, the activation signals of the feeders for the stop elements, and the signals from the arrival monitor are typical instantaneous signals. These signals have, according to the above, priority in the communication transmission system over messages

A. which contain data parts. An example of this message type is speed information and other messages which are to go to the" respective feeder. These messages can be stored in memory stacks which work on the first-in-first-out principle. The yarn quantity e.g. can be directly received in these messages.

An alternative embodiment of a functioning principle which can be utilized on the weaving machine according to Figure 9 starts oiit from the fact that the system is equipped with separate nozzle control which controls main and relay nozzles A10, A10' and All respectively. This nozzle control is thus connected to the same serial coάmunication as the weaving machine and the feeders. The start-up stage is started by the respective feeder A4 reading off its identification ςode in commu¬ nication transmission. The weaving machine indicates its breadth and its working speed. The weaving machine informs the respective feeder of the next pick sequence (e.g. 16) for the machine speeds most closely corresponding to the number (16). The respective feeder prepares itself with the aid of this information by taking up an optimum thread stock and adjusting itself to optimum maximum speed. The weaving machine (by means of its part A17) asks the respective feeder A4 how long after a release signal the feeders is to release the thread. The respective feeder informs the weaving machine of how long it takes from the release signal being received to the feeders releasing the thread. The weaving machine stores these values in order to be able in each opera- ting case to calculate an optimum time for transmitting a release signal to the actual feeder. The weaving machine instructs the respec

EET

tive feeder to indicate every time a certain length, e.g. 7 cm, has been unreeled. This information is read off simultaneously by the nozzle control.

In this case also the operation phase is started by the weaving machine giving a start signal. The respective feeder calculates and executes optimum acceleration and speed sequences. The reference signal is given when the reference transmitter A3 is passed. The weaving machine calcu¬ lates an optimum time for giving a release signal to the feeder which is to release thread and an optimum time for transmitting a message to the nozzle control to turn on the main nozzle. At the correct time, the weaving machine transmits a message for opening the main nozzle and a release signal to the actual feeder. The main nozzle is opened and immediately thereafter the feeder releases the thread. The feeder mea¬ sures the thread and transmits a situation signal every time 7 cm of thread have been unreeled. Guided by this, the nozzle control calcula¬ tes optimum times for opening and closing relay nozzles and closing off the main nozzle, in addition to which the nozzles are controlled accor¬ ding to this. The feeder calculates the correct time for activating its stop element and activates the stop element when the time comes. The arrival monitor A2 gives a message when the thread passes. Each element can, guided by the procedure, conclude whether the pick has been suc¬ cessful or not. If the pick is judged to be faulty, a message concer¬ ning this is transmitted. The weaving machine decides whether it is to stop or continue. The above sequence, reckoned from the respective feeder calculating and executing an optimum acceleration and speed sequence, is repeated a further 7 times. The weaving machine gives the pick sequence of eight picks which come after the remaining eight picks which have already been given. Repetition takes place again of the whole sequence from the phase in which the respective feeder calculates and executes an optimum acceleration and speed sequence.

For the cases described above, in the event of thread break before a feeder, the feeder in question transmits a message code (instantaneous signal) "thread break before feeder" and completes its pick. The wea¬ ving machine takes suitable action for the system. The feeder informs

the system whether the pick has been completed or not. In the event of thread break after a feeder (A6) , the feeder in question transmits a message code (instantaneous signal) "thread break after feeder". The weaving machine takes suitable action for the system.

Figure 10 shows an example of a flat knitting machine Cl with associa¬ ted computer system according to the above.

The machine comprises a drive pack C2, and a finished woven piece of fabric is shown with C3. The carriage of the machine has the reference C4, needle bed C5 and thread guide C6. Two groups of feeders are indi- cated with C7 and C8. The feeders are each fed from their own yarn stock C9. Each feeder is provided with a "positive" thread measuring device CIO. Each feeder is provided with inward ^" and outward thread monitors Cll and C12 respectively, a motor control element C13 and a ^• thread measurement element C14.

The machine is controlled and supervised by a computerized system according to the above. The serial digital connection is shown with C15 and can be open or closed (via broken line C15') . The control unit of the machine is indicated with C16. The elements described above of the weaving machine are connected to the connection C15 via units according to the above. The units have the same reference indications as the elements, but have been completed with primes. Only the units whose elements are provided with reference indications are provided with corresponding indications. Similar elements (e.g. thread monitors) can have the same or different units.

In a flat knitting machine, the stroke length may be changed every machine cycle. The flat knitting machine consumes significantly more yarn when the yarn guide C6 moves away from the feeder than when it moves towards the feeder. For example, for a knitting breadth of 1 m, 5.5 m of yarn is consumed when the carriage moves away from the feeder and 4.5 m when the carriage moves towards the feeder. The system for the flat knitting machine also works with a start-up phase and an operation phase. In the start-up phase, the respective feeder reads off

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

its identification number from the communication system. The knitting machine indicates the speed of the yarn guide C6 and whether the yarn guide is in the end position nearest the feeder or not. The knitting machine informs the respective feeder of those of the next strokes, e.g. the next 16 strokes, which are to supply yarn and what length or stroke respectively is to be given. The respective feeder calculates and stores the speed control for the coming number of picks, e.g. the coming 16 picks.

The knitting machine is then ready for the operation phase, which is started with a start signal. A reference signal is received when the carriage turns. Each feeder controls the yarn feed-out according to its sequence calculated for the current pick, if necessary corrected with information from a continuously measured yarn tension. The sequence from the time when the reference signal is received when the carriage turns is repeated a further predetermined number of times, e.g. 7 times-. The knitting machine then gives each feeder the data required for the pick sequence of a number of picks, e.g. eight picks, which has been given after the remaining number of picks, e.g. eight picks, which has already been given. Each feeder calculates during its idle time a suitable control sequence for the coming picks, in this case the coming eight picks. The whole is then repeated from the time when the refe¬ rence signal is received when the carriage turns.

In the event of thread break before the feeder, an indication is recei¬ ved from the inward thread monitor Cll. The feeder in question trans- mits a message code "thread break before feeder" and completes its pick. The flat knitting machine then takes suitable action for the system. The feeder in question indicates whether the pick has been completed or not. The flat knitting machine takes suitable action for the system. In the event of thread break after a feeder, the outward thread monitor C12 gives a warning. The feeder in question transmits a message code "thread break after feeder". The flat knitting machine takes suitable action for the system.

Figure 11 shows an example of the application of the invention in warp-knitting machines or hosiery machines, e.g. in the form of a

SUBSTITUTESHEE

KETTEN machine. The machine is symbolized with Dl and its feed elements with D2. Ther machine is assumed to be known and will be described here only in connection with the use of the machine together with a compu¬ terized system according to the invention. The control computer/elec- tronic control system of the machine is shown with D3. The serial and digital connection has the reference D4. The yarn stock of each feeder is shown with D5 and inward and outward thread πϊbnitors with D6 and D7 respectively. Motor control elements and thread measurement elements in each feeder are shown with D8 and D9 respectively. Said elements are connected to the connection D4 via units which have been given refe¬ rence indications corresponding to the elements, but completed with primes. Only the units which serve the elements which have been given reference indications in the figure have received corresponding refe¬ rence indications.

A warp machine has as in known one thread guide for each warp thread which lays the respective thread around or in selected needles. These thread guides are connected together with back guide bars which cause all thread guides in a thread system to move simultaneously. Usually there are two or more thread systems on a machine. The movements are controlled by a pattern wheel or a pattern drum. The principle is known and the movements in modern machines are very rapid. A thread layer sequence for laying one course can be carried out in l/20th sec, in extreme cases i l/40th sec. The hitherto known mechanical systems which are based on wheels or links have a shortcoming in that a change in the pattern requires exchange or modification of mechanical parts, which takes time and means that only a limited number of varianjiis can be accessible.

According to the present invention, the possibility is afforded of controlling, in a simple manner, each back guide bar,*cf DfO, D10' in Fig. 12 which shows a back guide bar in two different functional posi¬ tions. The back guide bar is displaceable in the directions of the arrow Dll. In Figure 12 a unit of the type referred to is shown with D12 and the serial and digital communication line with D13. The unit comprises in this case a communication unit or communication part D14, a control element D15 for an adjustment device, a servo valve D16 which

SUBSTITUTESHEET

is controlled by the control element D15, and a control cylinder D17 forming part of the servo valve. The piston D18 of the cylinder is sensed by a position indicator D19 which is fed back to the control element D15 via a feedback loop D20. The feedback can be continuous or stepwise, preferably with frequent steps (pulses).

According to the above, the control element has or is connected to a memory D15' and in this memory is stored the data which is required in order to give the movement pattern for the basic weaves it is desired to use. Examples of basic weaves are fringe, tricot, cloth, satin and velvet. These basic weaves each occur in the open or closed weave variants. A large number of basic weaves and variants of these are already known.

Each back guide bar can be assigned its unit according to Figure 13. The control unit D20 of the hosiery machine is like the units D21, D22, D23 etc. connected to the digital two-wire connection D24. Each unit has the basic construction shown in Figure 12. The pressure and return lines of the servo varve are shown with D25 and D26 respectively. The connection of the control units of the back guide bars has been shown in separate figures for the sake of clarity. The hosiery machine works with a start-up phase and an operation phase. In a first embodiment, the control unit D20 of the hosiery machine transmits to each adjust¬ ment device/unit D21, D22, D23 data which the adjustment device requi¬ res in order to be able to effect the basic weaves which are to be used for the manufacture of the desired textile goods. The hosiery machine/ control unit D20 further gives information regarding which basic weave each adjustment device/unit is to carry out during the next/coming stroke. The operation phase is started by the hosiery machine giving a start signal/instantaneous signal for the next stroke at a time chosen so that the back guide bars come to move in unison with other machine parts. The hosiery machine further gives information regarding which basic weave each adjustment device is to carry out during the stroke following the coming stroke. If any adjustment device fails in its sequence, this adjustment device gives a fault message. The above operation sequence is repeated.

Hosiery machines often interact with feeders when goods with weft inlays are being manufactured. As can be seen from the figure in ques¬ tion, these weft threads are laid in with a thread guide arrangement which gives i non-uniform thread consumption in the stroke. In order that each feeder is to be able to handle its thread in an optimum manner, the feeders must know the thread consumption pattern in every stroke and the variation of the stroke frequency during the next stro¬ kes. This information is known by the hosiery machine/the control unit D20.

A start-up phase for the above function is started by the hosiery machine transmitting to each feeder the data which each feeder requires in order to be able to determine the thread consumption ^" during every stroke. The hosiery machine then gives data regarding the stroke frequ¬ ency during the next strokes, for example the next eight strokes. The feeders adopt an optimum start position with regard to the size of the thread stock and motor control parameters.

In the subsequent operation phase, the hosiery machine gives a start signal/instantaneous signal and starts other.machine parts. The hosiery machine gives a signal when the yarn guide reaches the respective tur- ning position. Each feeder finely adjusts thread stock and speed. The above is repeated until the fourth stroke is begun. The hosiery machine transmits the necessary information regarding the four strokes which follow the next four strokes, whereupon the whole operation sequence is repeated again.

In the event of__ thread break before a feeder, the feeder in question transmits a message code "thread break before feeder" and completes its pick, whereupon the hosiery machine takes suitable action for the system. In the event of thread break after a feeder, the latter trans¬ mits a message code "thread break after feeder", at which the hosiery machine stops and takes suitable action for the system.

By means of the serial communication system described above, instead of controlling the shaft via a mechanical link system, cams or cam links, possibilities are opened up for using a hydraulic system, electric

system etc. for the control, which means that the machines can be constructed more simply. Furthermore, patterns can be changed more rapidly and more simply. This applies particularly to multi-colour jet machines in which it is important that interaction takes place with a large number of units such as feeders, nozzles and shafts.

In Figure 14, a dobby (= shaft weaving machine) is symbolically repres¬ ented with El. The machine is assumed to be already known and will only be described here in connection with the invention. A shaft is indica¬ ted with E2 and the machine is of the type which is provided with a control unit E3 which is computerized or has been made electronic. The shaft frames are assigned a computerized control unit E4 according to the above. The units E3 and E4 communicate in accordance with the above via a two-wire serial communication connection E5. The unit controls, via first and second serial and digital connections E6 and E7, units E8, E8*, E8" and E9, E9', E9" respectively. Each shaft frame is cont¬ rolled by means of two units E8, E9 etc. By means of the units, the shafts E10, Ell are controlled with the aid of a servo function which is described in greater detail below. Position indicators E12 and E13 respectively are arranged on the shafts. The connection units for the control units E3 and E4 to the connection E5 are indicated with E3' and E4' respectively which form communication parts.

Figure 15 shows the unit E8 in which in both the figures the shaft E10 adopts different functional positions. The unit comprises a communica¬ tion unit E13 and a control element E14. The control element controls a servo valve E15 which forms part of the execution element E16 which takes the form of a hydraulic cylinder with a displaceable piston E17. The piston is connected to the shaft E10 in a manner known per se. The shaft is displaceable in the longitudinal direction of the arrows E18. The serial communication loop E16 is connected to the communication unit E13. In Figure 1 the unit has been indicated so that it comprises the execution element with associated servo valve. However, the latter parts can of course form part of a separate element, the parts E13 and E14 forming the unit. Accordning to the above, the control element/the unit is provided with a memory element E13' or connected to such a

memory element. The servo valve is connected to the power supply line E19 and E20, e.g. constituting pressure and return lines in a hydraulic system.

Figure 16 shows in detail how the units E8, E8' and E8'' according to Figure 14 and execution elements belonging to them are arranged in relation to the serial digital connection. ' ^'

A weaving machine has in general a large number of shafts and a usual number in this connection is 16 shafts, but up to 36 shafts can occur. An extreme case is the so called Jacquard machine in which every heddle is individually controllable.

By means of the serial communication system described above, instead of controlling the shaft via a mechanical link system, cams or cam links, possibilities are opened up for using a hydraulic system-, electric system etc. for the control, which means that the machines can he cons- tructed more simply. Furthermore, patterns can be changed! more rapidly and more simply. This applies particularly to multi-colour jet machines in which it is important that interaction takes place with a large number of units such as feeders, nozzles and shafts.

The Figures 14-16 show only the shaft control and only one shaft is drawn for the sake of clarity. All shafts are constructed identically. A large number of movement patterns are programmed into the memory of the adjustment device E13'. Each of these has an unambiguous identifi¬ cation code. The movement is started when a trigger signal is given in the serial communication E5 or E6 respectively. Upon a signal to the servo valve, the piston E17 is operated in a manner known per se.

The system works with a start-up phase and an operation pha,se. The start-up of the system is started by each adjustment device reading off its identification code. The weaving machine transmits the desired identification code to each shaft adjustment device. The weaving mac¬ hine then transmits a trigger signal and then adopts the desired star¬ ting position. Finally, the weaving machine transmits identification

ITUTE SHEET

codes for the next sequence.

The operation phase is started by the weaving machine giving a trigger signal at the correct angular position of the machine. The weaving machine transmits identification codes for the next sequence, whereupon repetition takes place from the trigger signal being given at the cor¬ rect angular position of the machine.

The position indicator E12 is fed back via a feedback loop to the control element/the unit E14. The feedback can take place continuously and/or stepwise, preferably with conspicuously frequent intervals.

A data communication connection with a few wires can be utilized. In one embodiment, with a few wires means a connection with e.g. two wires/conductors for the signal transmission and access to earth (earth conductor) and a screened conductor which prevents interference into and out of the system. Two-wire is to be read with these conditions as the starting point.

The invention is not limited to the embodiment shown above by way of example, but can be subjected to modifications within the scope of the following claims.

SUBSTITUTESHEET