DENNY PAUL (GB)
CHARLTON REBECCA (GB)
ROSSI-BERGMANN BARTIRA (BR)
WO2006015279A1 | 2006-02-09 | |||
WO2003062234A1 | 2003-07-31 | |||
WO2011060271A1 | 2011-05-19 | |||
WO2012162249A1 | 2012-11-29 | |||
WO2009137597A1 | 2009-11-12 | |||
WO2006040181A2 | 2006-04-20 | |||
WO2002036122A1 | 2002-05-10 | |||
WO2002034719A1 | 2002-05-02 |
US20200138964A1 | 2020-05-07 | |||
KR101819472B1 | 2018-01-17 | |||
US20090163545A1 | 2009-06-25 | |||
CN1765884A | 2006-05-03 | |||
US20050222166A1 | 2005-10-06 | |||
US6835371B1 | 2004-12-28 | |||
JP2002322059A | 2002-11-08 | |||
EP0470686A2 | 1992-02-12 |
WISE LAWRENCE D ET AL: "l-[3-(Diarylamino)propyl]piperidines and Related Compounds, Potential Antipsychotic Agents with Low Cataleptogenic Profiles", J. MED. CHEM, vol. 28, no. 21, 1 January 1985 (1985-01-01), pages 606 - 612, XP093004590
MARCEL KAISER ET AL: "Antiprotozoal Activity Profiling of Approved Drugs: A Starting Point toward Drug Repositioning", PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 8, 13 August 2015 (2015-08-13), pages e0135556, XP055344644, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135556
NI SHENGYANG ET AL: "A Radical Approach to Anionic Chemistry: Synthesis of Ketones, Alcohols, and Amines", JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, vol. 141, no. 16, 3 April 2019 (2019-04-03), pages 6726 - 6739, XP093004599, ISSN: 0002-7863, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b02238
NAIROUKH ZACKARIA ET AL: "The formation of all-cis-(multi)fluorinated piperidines by a dearomatization-hydrogenation process", NATURE CHEMISTRY, NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP UK, LONDON, vol. 11, no. 3, 21 January 2019 (2019-01-21), pages 264 - 270, XP036707001, ISSN: 1755-4330, [retrieved on 20190121], DOI: 10.1038/S41557-018-0197-2
XIONGJIE JIN ET AL: "Supported Gold Nanoparticles for Efficient [alpha]-Oxygenation of Secondary and Tertiary Amines into Amides", ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE, WILEY - V C H VERLAG GMBH & CO. KGAA, DE, vol. 128, no. 25, 6 May 2016 (2016-05-06), pages 7328 - 7333, XP071368620, ISSN: 0044-8249, DOI: 10.1002/ANGE.201602695
VISCHER H F ET AL: "Identification of novel allosteric nonpeptidergic inhibitors of the human cytomegalovirus-encoded chemokine receptor US28", BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 18, no. 2, 15 January 2010 (2010-01-15), pages 675 - 688, XP026835898, ISSN: 0968-0896, [retrieved on 20091206]
CHOI SUNG-WOON ET AL: "Novel (bisarylmethoxy)butylpiperidine analogues as neurotransmitter transporter inhibitors with activity at dopamine receptor sites", BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, vol. 10, no. 12, 1 December 2002 (2002-12-01), AMSTERDAM, NL, pages 4091 - 4102, XP093004604, ISSN: 0968-0896, DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00348-6
J. G. MINAJ. A. MOSELYH. Z. ALIH. SHAMS-ELDINR. T. SCHWARZP. G. STEELP. W. DENNY, INT. J. BIOCHEM. CELL BIOL., vol. 43, 2010, pages 1553 - 1561
SINHA ET AL.: "Cationic Liposomal Sodium Stibogluconate (SSG), a Potent Therapeutic Tool for Treatment of Infection by SSG-Sensitive and -Resistant Leishmania donovani", ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, vol. 59, no. 1, January 2015 (2015-01-01), pages 344 - 355
F. M. MARIMT. N. SILVEIRAD. S. LIMAD. S. ZAMBONI, PLOS ONE, vol. 5, 2010, pages e15263
A. S. FISCHLY. LIUA. BROWDYA. E. CREMESTI: "Methods in Enzymology", 2000, ACADEMIC PRESS
Claims 1. A compound of formula (I): , wherein X1 is CR3, N or SiR3; L1 and L2 are independently absent or a linker with a backbone consisting of between 1 and 5 atoms, the linker comprising at least one group, the or each group being independently selected from the list consisting of an optionally substituted C1-7 alkylene, an optionally substituted C2-7 alkenylene, an optionally substituted C2-7 alkynylene, NR5, O, S, SO and SO2; R1 and R2 are independently an optionally substituted C6-12 aryl, an optionally substituted 5 to 10 membered heteroaryl, an optionally substituted C1-12 alkyl, an optionally substituted C2-12 alkenyl or an optionally substituted C2-12 alkynyl; R3 is H, an optionally substituted C1-6 alkyl, an optionally substituted C2-6 alkenyl or an optionally substituted C2-6 alkynyl; L3 is a linker with a backbone consisting of between 2 and 7 atoms, the linker comprising at least one group, the or each group being independently selected from the list consisting of an optionally substituted C1-7 alkylene, an optionally substituted C2-7 alkenylene, an optionally substituted C2-7 alkynylene, NR5, O, S, SO and SO2; and R4 is an optionally substituted 5 or 6 membered heterocycle or heteroaryl comprising a nitrogen atom, wherein the nitrogen atom in the heterocycle is bonded directly to L3; R5 is H, C1-6 alkyl, C2-6 alkenyl or C2-6 alkynyl; or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, tautomeric form or polymorphic form thereof. 2. The compound according to claim 1, wherein the compound is a compound of formula (Ia): , wherein X2 is C or Si. 3. The compound of claim 2, wherein the compound is a compound of formula (Iai), formula (Iaii) or formula (Iaiii): 4. The compound of claim 2, wherein the compound is a compound of formula (Iaii): 5. The compound of any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein X2 is C. 6. The compound of any preceding claim, wherein L1 and L2 are absent. 7. The compound of any preceding claim, wherein R1 is an optionally substituted C6-12 aryl or an optionally substituted 5 to 10 membered heteroaryl. 8. The compound of claim 7, wherein R1 is 9. The compound of any preceding claim, wherein R2 may be an optionally substituted C6-12 aryl or an optionally substituted 5 to 10 membered heteroaryl. 10. The compound of claim 9, wherein R2 is an unsubstituted phenyl. 11. The compound of any preceding claim, wherein R3 is H or methyl. 12. The compound of claim 11, wherein R3 is H. 13. The compound of any preceding claim, wherein R4 is an optionally substituted pyrrolidinyl. The compound of claim 13, wherein R4 is , 15. The compound of any preceding claim, wherein L3 is –L4-L5-, wherein L5 is bonded directly to R4, L4 is NR5, O, S, SO or SO2 and L5 is an optionally substituted C1-7 alkylene, an optionally substituted C2-7 alkenylene or an optionally substituted C2-7 alkynylene,. 16. The compound of claim 15, wherein L4 is O. 17. The compound of claim 15 or claim 16, wherein L5 is –CH2CH2-, -CH2CH2CH2- or –CH2CH2CH2CH2-. 18. The compound of claim 17, wherein L5 is -CH2CH2CH2-. 19. The compound of claim 1, wherein the compound is selected from: (101) (102) 20. A pharmaceutical composition for treating a microbial infection comprising a compound of formula (I), as defined by anyone of claims 1 to 19, or a pharmaceutically acceptable complex, salt, solvate, tautomeric form or polymorphic form thereof, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or solvate thereof, and a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle. 21. A liposomal formulation comprising a compound of formula (I) as defined by any one of claims 1 to 19, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, tautomeric form or polymorphic form thereof and a liposomal carrier. 22. The compound of formula (I), as defined by any one of claims 1 to 19, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, tautomeric form or polymorphic form thereof, or the pharmaceutical composition as defined by claim 20, or the liposomal formulation defined by claim 21, for use as a medicament. 23. The compound of formula (I), as defined by any one of claims 1 to 19, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, tautomeric form or polymorphic form thereof, or the pharmaceutical composition as defined by claim 20, or the liposomal formulation defined by claim 21, for use in treating a microbial infection or an allergic reaction. 24. The compound or composition for use according to claim 23, wherein the compound is for use in treating a microbial infection, and the microbial infection is a parasitic infection, preferably a protozoan parasitic infection. 25. The compound or composition for use according to claim 24, wherein the parasitic infection is leishmaniasis, Chagas disease or African sleeping sickness. 26. The compound or composition for use according to claim 25, wherein the parasitic infection is leishmaniasis. |
Example 3 - Role of stereochemistry The inventors decided to investigate the role of stereochemistry in the structure activity relationship (SAR). In view of the results obtained in example 2, the inventors determined that the stereocentre on the pyrrolidine ring has little effect on antileishmanial activity as both (R)-147 and (S)-147 have an activity of approximately 2 mM against L. major promastigotes, see Table 1. The enantioselective synthesis illustrated in Figure 4 was performed to access analogues which explore stereochemistry on the benzhydryl carbon. The enantiopure benzhydrol, (R)-113 or (S)-113, were synthesised as explained below in the material and methods section. The head group was prepared, in two steps, by carrying out an N- alkylation with 2-bromoethanol under reflux to afford compound (R)-155 in a moderate yield of 48 %. The IR spectrum was used to confirm the formation of (R)-155 with an OH signal at 3385 cm -1 . A subsequent chlorination with thionyl chloride formed head group (R)-154 in a yield of 37 %. Formation of (R)-154 was confirmed by the mass spectrum which showed a chlorine isotope pattern with an intensity ratio of 3:1 (m/z = 148 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 150 (M( 37 Cl)H + )). The final step was the S N 2 etherification to form analogue (R, R)-147 or (R, S)-147 in a moderate yield. This provides access to N-linked clemastine analogues in higher yield as no by-product is formed. These single diastereomer N-linked analogues were then tested against L. major promastigotes and demonstrate that the (S)-configuration on the benzhydryl carbon, (R, S)-147, is about 4 times less active than analogue (R)-147 with mixed stereochemistry at this position (Figure 5). Hence, the benzhydryl stereocentre contributes to the antileishmanial activity to a greater extent than the chiral centre on the pyrrolidine ring. The (R)-configuration at the benzhydryl carbon in isomer (R, R)- 147 provided the highest activity (EC50 = 1.7 ± 0.3 μM) against L. major promastigotes. Example 3 – Extending the carbon linker It was hypothesised, that extending the linker to 3 carbon units, to form analogue (S, R)-157, could improve the antileishmanial activity of the compounds. As explained above, the stereocentre on the pyrrolidine ring has little effect on antileishmanial activity. The (S)-configuration in the pyrrolidine ring of analogues 157 and 158, with 3 and 4 carbon unit linker chains respectively, were synthesised with a racemic benzhydryl centre. Hence, (S)-157 and (S)-158 were synthesised by performing an SN1 reaction on benzhydrol 113 with bromopropanol and bromobutanol respectively, followed by an alkylation with 2-methylpyrrolidine (S)-148, see Figure 6. The compounds generated dose response curves against promastigotes, as shown in Figure 7. For analogue (S)-157 the antileishmanial activity drops to sub-micromolar (EC50 = 0.09 ± 0.02 μM), which is now equipotent to clemastine (EC50 = 0.172 ± 0.003 μM) and nor-clemastine (R, R)-112 (EC 50 = 0.13 ± 0.01 μM). This suggests that the optimum chain length is 3 carbons. Example 4 – Improving the activity of (S)-157 Based upon the results obtained in Example 2 for analogue 147, the inventors proposed that the (R)-configuration on the benzhydryl carbon would result in the isomer with the highest activity. Therefore, the single diastereomer, analogue (S, R)-157, was synthesised following the same procedure described above. Anti-promastigote assays Compounds (S)-157 and (S, R)-157 were tested against L. major and L. amazonensis promastigotes. The EC50 values shown in Figure 8 demonstrate that analogue (S, R)- 157 is about three times more active against L. major promastigotes (EC 50 = 0.058 ± 0.007 μM) than clemastine and equipotent to clemastine when tested against L. amazonensis promastigotes (EC50= 0.02 ± 0.01 μM). The inventors then wanted to further investigate the antileishmanial activity of (S, R)- 157 by testing it against the clinically relevant amastigote form of the disease. Cytotoxicity to BMDM Before the anti-amastigote assay could be conducted the cytotoxicity of compound (S, R)-157 against BMDM needed to be investigated using a resazurin-based cell-viability assay. As shown in Figure 9, compound (S, R)-157 proved to be 3-4 times less cytotoxic to host macrophages than clemastine. The low levels of cytotoxicity of (S, R)- 157 to BMDM (CC 50 = 73 ± 14 μM) suggest that this compound has the potential to be a more selective antileishmanial drug than clemastine. Overall, (S, R)-157 is a more accessible and selective compound (SI = 146) than clemastine (SI = 50). On-target effects On-target effects of (S, R)-157 required validation before it could be progressed into an animal model. The dose-dependent growth inhibition of L. major WT, Δ LCB2 and PX cell line were assessed and compared to validate on target effects of (S, R)-157 (Figure 10). Using cycloheximide as a control these assays showed that, similar to clemastine, (S, R)-157 is approximately 3 times more active against WT and PX cell lines than the mutant Δ LCB2 promastigotes. This suggested that both clemastine and (S, R)-157 are disrupting the sphingolipid pathway. The mutant assay indicates that analogue (S, R)-157 is having an effect on sphingolipid biosynthesis, however, IPCS still needed to be validated as the target. To achieve this, a biochemical assay adopted from the literature (J. G. Mina, J. A. Mosely, H. Z. Ali, H. Shams-Eldin, R. T. Schwarz, P. G. Steel and P. W. Denny, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 2010, 42, 1553–1561) was employed. In the assay NBD-C 6 - ceramide 80 and NBD-C6-IPC 81 (Figure 11) were separated via HPTLC and analysed through fluorescence spectroscopy. This experiment demonstrated that (S, R)-157 acted as an inhibitor of IPCS, because product IPC was not observed on the HPTLC plate (Figure 12). In vivo infection study As sub-micromolar activity has been observed for (S, R)-157 against Leishmania in vitro, it was hypothesised that this compound would be effective in an animal model infected with L. amazonensis parasites. Hence, a study was undertaken analysing in vivo efficacy of (S, R)-157 in the treatment mice infected with L. amazonensis. The intralesional route was chosen as it is immediately absorbed at the site action and therefore the most effective means of delivering the drug. The oral route was studied as an oral drug would be most accessible to those infected with leishmaniasis living in deprived communities. The in vivo study involved treatment of BALB/c mice infected with L. amazonensis expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). Treatment of four groups of mice was initiated one week post infection: clemastine (intralesional, IL), (S, R)-157 (intralesional, IL), glucatime solution (GLU) and untreated (UN). Clemastine (IL) was administered at a dose of 1.17 mg kg ‐1 twice a week. Analogue (S, R)-157 was also administered at a dose of 1.17 mg kg -1 via IL injection twice a week, the same treatment regime as used in the clemastine IL group enabling the two therapies to be directly compared. Finally, glucantime solution was used as the positive control at an IP dose of 1.30 g kg ‐1 twice a week. Mice were treated for 28 days and weight variation and lesion size were measured at least once a week to monitor the progression of the disease. On day 41 the animals were sacrificed and the fluorescence measured and parasite load quantified using limiting dilution assay (LDA). There was little variation in the weight of the treated mice (Figure 13a). However, (S, R)-157 appears less toxic than clemastine due to the higher weight gain observed as compared with the clemastine. Furthermore, on day 35 post-infection, mice treated with analogue (S, R)-157 IL showed a significant reduction in lesion size when compared to the untreated group. The lesion growth trend is similar for the groups treated with analogue (S, R)-157 and clemastine IL (Figure 13b). It should be noted that mice treated with glucantime solution, i.e. the positive control group, showed the greatest reduction in lesion size. This is partly due to glucantime solution being administered as an IP therapy, whereas IL treatments can cause inflammation to the ear increasing lesion measurements. Images in Figure 13c show similar improvements in the appearance of the lesion for analogue (S, R)-157 IL, clemastine IL and glucantime solution IP groups when compared to the untreated group. Similar to clemastine IL, results from the LDA showed statistical significance between the untreated group and analogue (S, R)-157 IL group (P £ 0.0001) (Figure 13d). This positive in vivo result supports the hypothesis that analogue (S, R)-157 could be an effective treatment for CL in an animal model. Example 5 – Testing further compounds The inventors synthesised the eleven further compounds identified in the table below. The structures of all of the compounds were confirmed using 1 H and 1 C NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. It will be noted that compound NTP-61 is the same as (S,R)-157, identified above. This compound was included in the (later) assay as a reference standard. Table 3: Structure of compounds and activity against L. amazonensis promastigote and L. major promastigote
As shown in the table, all of the compounds were found to be active against L. amazonensis promastigote, and the vast majority were also active against L. major promastigote. Example 6 – Further compounds The inventors synthesised four further compounds identified below. The structures of all of the compounds were confirmed using 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.
The inventors investigated the activity and cytotoxicity of NTP-85 compared to clemastine fumarate, and the results are provided in Table 4 below. Table 4: Activity and cytotoxicity of NTP-85 compared to clemastine fumarate As shown above, after 72 hours NTP-85 had an ED 50 of 143 nM against L.donovani AG83 promastigotes and an ED50 of 95 nM against L.donovani AG83 amastigotes. Both of these results are superior to the activity exhibited by clemastine fumarate. Furthermore, NTP-85 was not cytotoxic. Example 7 – Liposomal formulations The inventors then tested the activity of NTP-85 and clemastine fumarate in a phosphatidylcholine-stearylamine (PCSA) liposomal formulation. Amphotericin B (AmB) was used as a positive control. The formulations were prepared as described in Sinha et al. (“Cationic Liposomal Sodium Stibogluconate (SSG), a Potent Therapeutic Tool for Treatment of Infection by SSG-Sensitive and -Resistant Leishmania donovani”, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2015, Volume 59, Number 1, pages 344-355). The results are provided in table 5. Table 5: Activity and cytotoxicity of NTP-85 compared to clemastine fumarate It will be noted that the compounds offered significantly improved efficacy when provided in a liposomal formulation. Conclusion The inventors were able to develop simple synthetic routes to easily and quickly access N-linked analogues of clemastine. All of the compounds synthesised were active. In particular, with a 3-carbon chain linker and the appropriate (S, R) stereochemistry, compound (S, R)-157, was equipotent to clemastine against L. amazonensis promastigotes and more active than clemastine against L. major promastigotes. This compound was less toxic to macrophages than clemastine and showed similar activity to clemastine against L. amazonensis intramacrophage amastigotes. Therefore, compound (S, R)-157 was a more accessible and selective compound. The target of compound (S, R)-157 was validated as IPCS using mutant Δ LCB2 promastigotes and an LmjIPCS biochemical HPTLC assay. Compound (S, R)-157 was progressed into an in vivo infection study and showed efficacy as an IL therapy against CL. Materials and Methods Chemical experimental General experimental details SOLVENTS AND REAGENTS: All analytical grade solvents and commercially available regents were used as received from their respective suppliers or dried as required, using standard procedures. All reactions were performed under an inert atmosphere of argon unless otherwise stated. CHARACTERISATION: Reactions were monitored by LC-MS, GC-MS or by TLC using aluminium backed plates. Methods to visualise the spots included ultra-violet light (254 nm) and colour reagents. The visualising stains used were potassium permanganate, phosphomolybdic acid or ninhydrin. Column chromatography was performed using a Teledyne Isco CombiFlash® System with RediSep® Rf normal-phase and C-18 reversed-phase columns. Both carbon and hydrogen NMR spectra were acquired at 295 K on Varian VNMRS 700 (1H at 700 MHz, 13C at 176 MHz), Varian VNMRS 600 (1H at 600 MHz, 13C at 151 MHz), with sample dissolved in the analytical solvent CDCl3.2D COSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY were run to aid assignment of peaks. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million, ppm, to 2 decimal places; with the multiplicity of the signal reported as s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; coupling constants, J, are quoted to the nearest ± 0.5 Hz. Ar refers to aryl resonances which could not be accurately assigned. Infrared (IR) spectra were acquired using a Perkin-Elmer Paragon 1000 FT-IR and absorption maxima (νmax) are reported in wavenumbers (cm-1) and assigned as strong (s), medium (m), weak (w) or broad (br). Mass spectra were recorded using Shimadzu gas chromatography via electron ionization (EI) or on a Waters TQD spectrometer coupled to an Acquity UPLC. Melting points are measured using Fisher ScientificTM IA9000 melting point apparatus. Experimental procedure and compound characterisation General procedure A: Pd-catalysed etherification To a solution of alcohol (1 equiv.) and diphenylmethanol (1 equiv.) in DCE (5 mL mmol -1 ) was added PdCl 2 (0.1 equiv.). The reaction mixture was heated at 80 °C for 48 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure to afford the crude product. General procedure B: SN2 reaction of 4-chlorobenzhydrol and alkyl chloride The 4-chlorobenzhydrol (1 equiv.) and NaH (60%, 3 equiv.) were dissolved in anhydrous toluene (5 mL mmol -1 ) and heated under reflux for 3 h under nitrogen. The solution was cooled to rt and chloroethylpyrrolidine (1 equiv.) in toluene (2.5 mL mmol -1 ) was added. The reaction mixture was then reacted under reflux overnight. The reaction mixture was cooled, quenched with H2O (X mL) and diluted with EtOAc (X mL). The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with EtOAc (2 x X mL). The combined organic layers were then dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered, and then concentrated in vacuo. General procedure C: Fieser’s method for the workup of LiAlH 4 reactions A reaction mixture generated from X g of lithium aluminium hydride was cooled to 0 °C and diluted with ether. It was then carefully quenched with H2O (X mL), followed by 3 M NaOH(aq) (3X mL) and finally H2O (3X mL). This was warmed to rt and stirred for 15 min before the addition of anhydrous MgSO4 and then stirring for another 5 min. The salts were then removed by filtration and solvent was removed in vacuo to afford the crude product. (R)-(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol - (R)-113 Et 2 Zn (2.4 mL, 3.6 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of phenylboronic acid (146 mg, 1.2 mmol) in toluene (3 mL) under an argon atmosphere. After stirring for 12 h at 60 °C, the mixture is cooled to 0 °C and a toluene solution of [(2R)-1-methylpyrrolidin-2- yl]diphenylmethanol (27 mg, 0.1 mmol) was introduced. The reaction was stirred for an additional 15 min and the 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (70 mg, 0.5 mmol) then added. After stirring for 12 h at 0 °C the reaction was quenched with H 2 O (2 mL) and extracted with DCM (3 x 5 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO 4 , filtered, and solvent evaporated. Purification by chromatography (10% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford the desired product (77 mg, 56%) as a white solid. [α] D (c = 1.00 g/100 mL, CHCl 3 ) -27.0 ° (lit.: [α] D (c = 1.00 g/100 mL, CHCl 3 ) -16 °); 95 % ee (determined by chiral HPLC analysis). nmax (ATR) 3347 (br, m), 1489 (s), 1453 (m), 1089 (s), 1012 (s). δ H (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 7.41 - 7.28 (9H, m, ArH), 5.81 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 2.42 (1H, s, OH). δ C (101 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 143.5 (ArC), 142.3 (ArC), 133.4 (ArC), 128.8 (ArC), 128.7 (ArC), 127.9(9) (ArC), 127.9(6) (ArC), 126.6 (ArC), 75.7 (Ar 2 CH). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 201 (M( 35 Cl)–OH + ), 203 (M( 37 Cl)–OH+). (S)-(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol - (S)-113 Et 2 Zn (2.4 mL, 3.6 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of phenylboronic acid (146 mg, 1.2 mmol) in toluene (3 mL) under an argon atmosphere. After stirring for 12 h at 60 °C, the mixture is cooled to 0 °C and a toluene solution of [(2S)-1-methylpyrrolidin-2- yl]diphenylmethanol (27 mg, 0.1 mmol) was introduced. The reaction was stirred for an additional 15 min and the 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (70 mg, 0.5 mmol) then added. After stirring for 12 h at 0 °C the reaction was quenched with H 2 O (2 mL) and extracted with DCM (3 x 5 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and solvent evaporated. Purification by chromatography (10% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford the desired product (134 mg, 97%) as a white solid. [α] D (c = 1.00 g/100 mL, CHCl3) +17.9 ° (lit.: [α] D (c = 1.00 g/100 mL, CHCl3) +19°); 96 % ee (determined by chiral HPLC analysis). nmax (ATR) 3347 (br, m), 1489 (s), 1453 (m), 1089 (s), 1012 (s). NMR and mass spectra were consistent with the R enantiomer. 1-[(2-Bromoethoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene261 - 180 General procedure A was followed with 2-bromoethanol (0.1 mL, 1.41 mmol) and (4- chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol 113 (218 mg, 1.00 mmol) with the modification of AuCl (24 mg, 0.14 mmol) as the catalyst in the place of PdCl2 with a reaction time of 20 h. The product was purified by flash column chromatography (0 → 20 % EtOAc in hexanes) to afford the title compound (282 mg, 87%) as a colourless oil. nmax (ATR) 2858 (w), 1490 (m), 1453 (w), 1276 (w), 1185 (w), 1089 (m), 1029 (w), 1015 (m) cm -1 . δ H (700 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 7.37 – 7.33 (4H, m, ArH), 7.32 – 7.27 (5H, m, ArH), 5.41 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.82 – 3.74 (2H, m, 2’-H), 3.53 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1’-H). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 141.3 (ArC), 140.5 (ArC), 133.5 (ArC), 128.7(2) (ArC), 128.7(1) (ArC), 128.4(5) (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 83.4 (Ar2CH), 69.1 (C-2’), 30.7 (C-1’). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 347 (M( 35 Cl)( 79 Br) Na + ), 349 (M( 37 Cl)( 79 Br) Na + ) (M( 35 Cl)( 81 Br) Na + ), 351 (M( 37 Cl)( 81 Br) Na + ). 1-{2-[(4-Chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}pyrrolidine - 152 1-[(2-Bromoethoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 180 (117 mg, 0.36 mmol) is dissolved in MeCN (3 mL) and pyrollidine (0.04 mL, 0.43 mmol) and K2CO3 (69 mg, 0.50 mmol) are added. The reaction is heated to 60 °C and left to stir overnight. The reaction was extracted with EtOAc (3 x 5 mL) and washed with H2O (5 mL) and dried over Na2SO4. The crude product was purified by reversed phase column chromatography (5 → 100% MeCN in H2O with 0.1% formic acid) to afford the title compound (61 mg, 54%) as a yellow oil. nmax (ATR) 2962 (w), 2787 (w), 1490 (m), 1453 (w), 1088 (s), 1015 (m) cm -1 . δH (700 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 7.33 – 7.23 (9H, m, ArH), 5.35 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.62 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2’-H 2 ), 2.82 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1’-H 2 ), 2.66 – 2.61 (4H, m, 2-H 2 , 5-H 2 ), 1.82 – 1.76 (4H, m, 3-H 2 , 4-H 2 ). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 141.8 (ArC), 141.0 (ArC), 133.3 (ArC), 128.6(2) (ArC), 128.5(9) (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 83.4 (Ar 2 CH), 68.2 (C-2’), 55.7 (C-1’), 54.8 (C-2, C-5), 23.6 (C-3, C-4). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 316 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 318 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). Accurate mass: Found (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 316.1461: C19H23 35 ClNO requires M, 316.1468. Methyl (2S)-1-{2-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}pyrrolidine -2-carboxylate - (S)-150 1-[(2-Bromoethoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 180 (170 mg, 0.52 mmol) is dissolved in MeCN (5 mL) and L-proline methyl ester hydrochloride (104 mg, 0.63 mmol) and K2CO3 (144 mg, 1.04 mmol) are added. The reaction is heated to 60 °C and left to stir overnight. The reaction was extracted with EtOAc (3 x 5 mL) and washed with H 2 O (5 mL) and dried over Na 2 SO 4 . The crude product was purified by reversed phase column chromatography (5 → 100% MeCN in H2O with 0.1% formic acid) to afford the title compound (104 mg, 54%) as a colourless oil. n max (ATR) 2950 (w), 1732 (m), 1489 (m), 1452 (w), 1435 (w), 1262 (w), 1170 (m), 1087 (s), 1014 (m) cm -1 . δH (700 MHz, CDCl3) 7.32 – 7.20 (9H, m, ArH), 5.31 (0.5H, s, Ar2CH), 5.30 (0.5H, s, Ar2CH), 3.61 – 3.56 (2H, m, 2’-H2), 3.55 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.42 – 3.33 (1H, m, 2-H), 3.24 – 3.15 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 3.01 – 2.91 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 2.89 – 2.80 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 2.61 – 2.49 (1H, m, 1’- HH’), 2.19 – 2.09 (1H, m, 3HH’), 1.95 – 1.84 (2H, m, 4H 2 ), 1.84 – 1.75 (1H, m, 3HH’). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 174.5(4) (CO), 174.4(9) (CO), 141.9 (ArC), 141.0(2) (ArC), 141.0(0) (ArC), 133.3 (ArC), 133.2 (ArC), 128.6(1) (ArC), 128.5(9) (ArC), 128.5(6) (ArC), 128.5(5) (ArC), 128.5 (ArC), 128.3 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 126.9 (ArC), 83.4 (Ar 2 CH), 68.1 (C-2’), 65.9 (C-2), 54.5(1) (C-5), 54.4(9) (C-5), 54.0 (C-1’), 53.9 (C-1’), 51.7(8) (OCH 3 ), 51.7(7) (OCH 3 ), 29.7 (C-3), 29.6 (C-3), 23.3 (C-4). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 396.105 (M( 35 Cl)Na + ), 398.016 (M( 37 Cl)Na + ). Accurate mass: Found (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 374.1516: C 21 H 25 35 ClNO 3 requires M, 374.1523. Methyl (2R)-1-{2-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}pyrrolidine -2-carboxylate - (R)-150 1-[(2-Bromoethoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 180 (462 mg, 1.42 mmol) is dissolved in MeCN (7 mL) and D-proline methyl ester hydrochloride (282 mg, 1.70 mmol) and K2CO3 (471 mg, 3.41 mmol) are added. The reaction is heated to 60 °C and left to stir overnight. The reaction was extracted with EtOAc (3 x 10 mL) and washed with H2O (10 mL) and dried over Na2SO4. The crude product was purified by reversed phase column chromatography (5 → 100% MeCN in H 2 O with 0.1% formic acid) to afford the title compound (161 mg, 30%) as a colourless oil. n max (ATR) 2950 (w), 2870 (w), 1733 (m), 1489 (m), 1455 (w), 1435 (w), 1196 (m), 1169 (m), 1087 (s), 1072 (m), 1012 (m) cm -1 . δH (700 MHz, CDCl3) 7.32 – 7.20 (9H, m, ArH), 5.31 – 5.29 (1H, m, Ar2CH), 3.58 – 3.53 (5H, m, 2’-H2, OCH3), 3.35 – 3.30 (1H, m, 2-H), 3.21 – 3.16 (1H, m, 1’- HH’), 2.97 – 2.91 (1H, m, 5-H), 2.84 – 2.78 (1H, m, 5-H), 2.53 – 2.46 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.15 – 2.06 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.93 – 1.83 (2H, m, 4-H2), 1.81 – 1.74 (1H, m, 3-HH’). δC (176 MHz, CDCl3, mixture of diastereomers) 174.6(8) (CO), 174.6(5) (CO), 141.8(8) (ArC), 141.8(5) (ArC), 141.1 (ArC), 141.0 (ArC), 133.2 (ArC), 133.1 (ArC), 128.5(7) (ArC), 128.5(5) (ArC), 128.5(2) (ArC), 128.5(0) (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 128.3 (ArC), 127.7(3) (ArC), 127.6(5) (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 126.9 (ArC), 83.3 (Ar 2 CH), 68.2(1) (C-2’), 68.1(8) (C-2’), 65.9(4) (C-2), 65.9(2) (C-2), 54.5 (C-5), 54.0(3) (C-1’), 53.9(9) (C-1’), 51.7 (OCH 3 ), 29.7 (C-3), 29.6 (C-3), 23.4(0) (C-4), 23.3(9) (C-4). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 396.343 (M( 35 Cl)Na + ), 398.256 (M( 37 Cl)Na + ). Accurate mass: Found (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 374.1530: C 21 H 25 35 ClNO 3 requires M, 374.1523. [(2S)-1-{2-[(4-Chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}pyrrolidin -2-yl]methanol - (S)-149 To a 0 °C solution of methyl (2S)-1-{2-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}pyrrolidine -2- carboxylate (S)-150 (50 mg, 0.13 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was slowly added LiAlH4 (2.4 M solution in THF, 0.14 mL, 0.33 mmol), before being warmed to rt and stirred for 3h. The reaction mixture was then cooled in an ice bath and any reactive salts were quenched according to Fieser’s method (general procedure C). The product was purified by reversed phase column chromatography (5 → 100% MeCN in H 2 O with 0.1% formic acid). To afford the title compound (22.5 mg, 50%) as a yellow oil. nmax (ATR) 3408 (br, w), 2870 (w), 1490 (m), 1088 (s) cm -1 . δH (700 MHz, CDCl3) 7.34 - 7.23 (9H, m, ArH), 5.33 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.65 – 3.60 (1H, m, HOCHH’), 3.58 – 3.52 (2H, m, 2’-H 2 ), 3.41 – 3.36 (1H, m, HOCHH’), 3.21 – 3.14 (1H, m, 5–HH’), 3.10 – 3.02 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.77 – 2.69 (1H, m, 2-H), 2.66 – 2.59 (1H, m, 1-HH’), 2.42 – 2.34 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 1.90 – 1.82 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.77 – 1.68 (3H, m, 4-HH’, 3-H 2 ). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 141.8(3) (ArC), 141.7(7) (ArC), 141.0 (ArC), 140.9 (ArC), 133.3(3) (ArC), 133.3(1) (ArC), 128.7(0) (ArC), 128.6(7) (ArC), 128.3(2) (ArC), 128.3(0) (ArC), 127.9 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.0(0) (ArC), 126.9(5) (ArC), 83.5(2) (Ar 2 CH), 83.4(9) (Ar 2 CH), 68.2(4) (C-2’), 68.1(9) (C-2’), 65.2 (C-2), 62.6 (CH 2 OH), 62.5 (CH 2 OH), 55.2 (C-5), 55.1 (C-5), 54.3(6) (C-1’), 54.3(5) (C-1’), 27.6 (C-3), 24.1 (C-4). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 368 (M( 35 Cl)Na + ), 370 (M( 37 Cl)Na + ). Accurate mass: Found (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 346.1571: C 20 H 25 35 ClNO 2 requires M, 346.1574 [(2R)-1-{2-[(4-Chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}pyrrolidin -2-yl]methanol - (R)-149 To a 0 °C solution of methyl (2R)-1-{2-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}pyrrolidine -2- carboxylate (R)-150 (115 mg, 0.30 mmol) in THF (4 mL) was slowly added LiAlH 4 (2.4M solution in THF, 0.31 mL, 0.75 mmol), before being warmed to rt and stirred for 3h. The reaction mixture was then cooled in an ice bath and any reactive salts were quenched according to Fieser’s method (general procedure B). The product was purified by reversed phase column chromatography (5 → 100% MeCN in H 2 O with 0.1% formic acid). To afford the title compound (64 mg, 62%) as a yellow oil. n max (ATR) 3392 (br, w), 2946 (w), 2870 (w), 1489 (m), 1453 (w), 1403 (w), 1295 (w), 1185 (w), 1086 (s), 1028 (m), 1014 (s) cm -1 . δH (700 MHz, CDCl3) 7.35 - 7.23 (9H, m, ArH), 5.35 (1H, s, Ar2CH), 3.68 – 3.63 (1H, m, HOCHH’), 3.63 – 3.56 (2H, m, 2’-H2), 3.45 – 3.40 (1H, m, HOCHH’), 3.27 – 3.18 (1H, m, 5–HH’), 3.14 – 3.06 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.85 – 2.75 (1H, m, 2-H), 2.71 – 2.65 (1H, m, 1-HH’), 2.48 – 2.38 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 1.93 – 1.85 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.81 – 1.70 (3H, m, 4-HH’, 3-H 2 ). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 141.7 (ArC), 141.6 (ArC), 140.9 (ArC), 140.8 (ArC), 133.4 (ArC), 133.3 (ArC), 128.6(9) (ArC), 128.6(8) (ArC), 128.6(6) (ArC), 128.3(2) (ArC), 128.2(8) (ArC), 127.9 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.0 (ArC), 126.9 (ArC), 83.5(3) (Ar 2 CH), 83.5(1) (Ar 2 CH), 67.9(5) (C-2’), 67.8(9) (C-2’), 65.7 (C-2), 62.4(1) (CH 2 OH), 62.3(8) (CH 2 OH), 55.1(8) (C-5), 55.1(6) (C-5), 54.5 (C-1’), 27.5 (C-3), 24.1 (C-4). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 368 (M( 35 Cl)Na + ), 370 (M( 37 Cl)Na + ). Accurate mass: Found (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 346.1579: C 20 H 25 35 ClNO 2 requires M, 346.1574. (2R)-1-{2-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-2-(methoxy methyl)pyrrolidine - (R)-153 1-[(2-bromoethoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 180 (160 mg, 0.49 mmol) in DMF (0.8 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of the (R)-methoxymethylpyrrolidine (0.06 mL, 0.49 mmol), KI (8.3 mg, 0.08 mmol) and K2CO3 (135 mg, 0.98 mmol) in DMF (0.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 4 h. Following the addition of H2O (5 mL) and extraction with EtOAc (3 x 5mL), the combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (10% MeOH in CHCl3) to afford the title compound (114 mg, 65 %) as a brown oil. nmax (ATR) 2871 (w), 2810 (w), 1489 (m), 1453 (w), 1185 (w), 1088 (s), 1015 (m). δH (700 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 7.33 – 7.23 (9H, m, ArH), 5.37 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.74 – 3.57 (2H, m, 2’-H 2 ), 3.56 - 3.41 (1H, m, 1-HH’), 3.37 – 3.29 (4H, m, CH 3 , 1-HH’), 3.29 – 3.11 (2H, m, 1’-HH’, 5-HH’), 2.95 – 2.60 (2H, m, 1’-HH’, 2-H), 2.58 – 2.32 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 1.97 – 1.86 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.86 – 1.70 (2H, m, 4-H 2 ), 1.70 – 1.57 (1H, m, 3-HH’). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 141.8 (ArC), 141.7 (ArC), 141.0 (ArC), 140.9 (ArC), 133.3 (ArC), 133.2 (ArC), 128.6(3) (ArC), 128.6(1) (ArC), 128.5(9) (ArC), 128.4(4) (ArC), 128.3(8) (ArC), 127.8(2) (ArC), 127.7(7) (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 127.0 (ArC), 83.4 (Ar2CH), 75.4 (C-1), 67.8 (C-2’), 64.3 (C-2), 59.2 (CH3), 55.6 (C-5), 55.5 (C-5), 54.9 (C-1’), 28.0 (C-3), 23.2 (C-4). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 382 (M( 35 Cl)Na + ), 384 (M( 37 Cl)Na + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 360.1734: C21H27NO2 35 Cl requires M, 360.1730. (2S)-1-{2-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-2-(methoxy methyl)pyrrolidine - (S)-153 1-[(2-bromoethoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 180 (160 mg, 0.49 mmol) in DMF (0.8 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of the (S)-methoxymethylpyrrolidine (0.06 mL, 0.49 mmol), KI (8.3 mg, 0.08 mmol) and K 2 CO 3 (135 mg, 0.98 mmol) in DMF (0.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 4 h. Following the addition of H 2 O (5 mL) and extraction with EtOAc (3 x 5mL), the combined organic layers were dried and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (10% MeOH in CHCl 3 ) to afford the title compound (68 mg, 39 %) as a brown oil. n max (ATR) 2871 (w), 2811 (w), 1489 (m), 1452 (w), 1185 (m), 1087 (s), 1014 (m). δ H (700 MHz, CDCl3) 7.33 - 7.30 (4H, m, ArH), 7.30 – 7.26 (4H, m, ArH), 7.26 -7.23 (1H, m, ArH), 5.36 (1H, s, Ar2CH), 3.67 - 3.55 (2H, m, 2’-H2), 3.53 - 3.38 (1H, m, 1-HH’), 3.33 – 3.27 (4H, m, CH3, 1-HH’), 3.25 – 3.14 (2H, m, 1’-HH’, 5-HH’), 2.80 - 2.63 (2H, m, 1’-HH’, 2-H), 2.45 – 2.30 (1H, m, 5- HH’), 1.94 – 1.85 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.84 – 1.68 (2H, m, 4-H 2 ), 1.66 – 1.57 (1H, m, 3-HH’). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 141.9 (ArC), 141.8 (ArC), 141.1 (ArC), 141.0 (ArC), 133.2(2) (ArC), 133.1(9) (ArC), 128.5(9) (ArC), 128.5(8) (ArC), 128.5(7) (ArC), 128.5(6), 128.4(2) (ArC), 128.3(8) (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 127.0 (ArC), 83.3 (Ar 2 CH), 75.8 (C-1), 68.2 (C-2’), 64.2 (C-2), 59.2 (CH 3 ), 55.5(1) (C-5), 55.4(5) (C-5), 54.9 (C-1’), 28.1 (C-3), 23.2 (C-4). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 382 (M( 35 Cl)Na + ), 384 (M( 37 Cl)Na + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 360.1732: C 21 H 27 NO 2 35 Cl requires M, 360.1730. (2R)-1-{2-[(4-Chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-2-methylpy rrolidine - (R)-147 1-[(2-bromoethoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 180 (326 mg, 1.03 mmol) in DMF (1 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of the (R)-2-methyl-pyrrolidine hydrochloride (125 mg, 1.03 mmol), KI (17 mg, 0.10 mmol) and K2CO3 (285 mg, 2.06 mmol) in DMF (1.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h. Following the addition of H2O (5 mL) and extraction with EtOAc (3 x 5 mL), the combined organic layers were dried and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (10% MeOH in CHCl 3 ) to afford the title compound (217 mg, 65 %) as a brown oil. nmax (ATR) 2962 (w), 2869 (w), 2786 (w), 1490 (m), 1453 (w), 1375 (w), 1185 (w), 1088 (s) 1015 (m). δ H (700 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 7.33 – 7.23 (9H, m, ArH), 5.36 (1H, s, Ar 2 H), 3.62 – 3.55 (2H, m, 2’-H 2 ), 3.16 – 3.11 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 3.09 – 3.03 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.44 - 2.38 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 2.38 – 2.31 (1H, m, 2-H), 2.24 – 2.16 (1H, m, 1’ –HH’), 1.93 – 1.85 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.80 – 1.62 (2H, m, 4-H 2 ), 1.43 – 1.34 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.09 (1.5H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH 3 ), 1.08 (1.5H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH 3 ). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 142.0(2) (ArC), 141.9(6) (ArC), 141.2 (ArC), 141.1 (ArC), 133.2(2) (ArC), 133.1(9) (ArC), 128.6(2) (ArC), 128.5(7) (ArC), 128.5 (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 127.1(0) (ArC), 127.0(6) (ArC), 83.4 (Ar 2 CH), 68.6(0) (C-2’), 68.5(6) (C-2’), 60.4(3) (C-2), 60.4(0) (C-2), 55.0 (C-5), 54.9 (C-5), 53.5 (C-1’), 53.4 (C-1’), 32.6 (C-3), 22.0 (C-4), 19.2 (CH 3 ). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 330 (M( 35 Cl)Na + ), 332 (M( 37 Cl)Na + ). Accurate mass: Found (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 330.1630: C 20 H 25 35 ClNO requires M, 330.1625. (2S)-1-{2-[(4-Chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-2-methylpy rrolidine - (S)-147 1-[(2-bromoethoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 180 (310 mg, 0.95 mmol) in DMF (1 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of the (S)-2-methyl-pyrrolidine hydrochloride (115 mg, 0.95 mmol), KI (17 mg, 0.10 mmol) and K2CO3 (263 mg, 1.90 mmol) in DMF (1.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h. Following the addition of H2O (5 mL) and extraction with EtOAc (3 x 5 mL), the combined organic layers were dried and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (10% MeOH in CHCl 3 ) to afford the title compound (195 mg, 62 %) as a brown oil. nmax (ATR) 2962 (w), 2869 (w), 2785 (w), 1489 (m), 1453 (w), 1375 (w), 1293 (w), 1184 (w), 1087 (s), 1014 (m). δ H (700 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 7.32 - 7.22 (9H, m, ArH), 5.36 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.65 – 3.55 (2H, m, 2’-H 2 ), 3.20 – 3.13 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 3.10 – 3.04 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.47 – 2.35 (2H, m, 5- HH’, 2-H), 2.28 – 2.20 (1H, m, 1’ –HH’), 1.94 – 1.85 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.81 - 1.72 (1H, m, 4- HH’), 1.71 – 1.63 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.46 – 1.36 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.10 (3H, d, J = 6.0, CH3). δC (176 MHz, CDCl3, mixture of diastereomers) 141.9(3) (ArC), 141.8(6) (ArC), 141.1 (ArC), 141.0 (ArC), 133.2(2) (ArC), 133.1(9) (ArC), 128.6(0) (ArC), 128.5(8) (ArC), 128.5(5) (ArC), 128.4(2) (ArC), 128.3(8) (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 127.0 (ArC), 83.4 (Ar2CH), 68.3(2) (C-2’), 68.2(9) (C-2’), 60.5(9) (C-2), 60.5(6) (C-2), 54.9 (C-5), 54.8 (C-5), 53.4 (C-1’), 53.3 (C-1’), 32.5 (C-3), 32.4 (C-3), 22.0(0) (C-4), 21.9(9) (C-4), 18.9(3) (CH3), 18.9(1) (CH3). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 330 (M( 35 Cl)Na + ), 332 (M( 37 Cl)Na + ). Accurate mass: Found (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 330.1636: C20H25 35 ClNO requires M, 330.1625. 2-((2R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)ethan-1-ol263 - (R)-155 2-Bromoethanol (0.23 mL, 3.20 mmol) in dry MeCN (2 mL) was added dropwise to a mixture of (R)-2-methylpyrrolidine (415mg, 3.32 mmol) and K 2 CO 3 (918 mg, 6.64 mmol) in dry MeCN (2 mL) heated under reflux. After 15 h the mixture was cooled to rt, filtered and concentrated. Et 2 O (5 mL) was then added and the product extracted with 1M HCl (2 x 5 mL). The aqueous phase was made basic with solid NaOH, then extracted with DCM (3 x 5 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered and concentrated to afford the product (200 mg, 48%) as a colourless oil. Carried through without further purification. [α] D (c = 1.00 g/100 mL, CHCl 3 ) -58.8°. n max (ATR) 3385 (br, m), 2963 (m), 2875 (m), 2806 (m), 1677 (m), 1416 (m), 1509 (m). δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 4.03 – 3.86 (3H, m, 2-H2, 5’-HH’), 3.42 – 3.35 (1H, m, 1-HH’), 3.33 – 3.23 (1H, m, 2’-H), 3.01 – 2.91 (2H, m, 1-HH’, 5’-HH’), 2.29 – 2.18 (2H, m, 3’-HH’, 4-HH’), 2.08 – 1.98 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.97 - 1.87 (2H, m, 3’-HH’), 1.54 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, CH3). δC (176 MHz, CDCl3) 64.6 (C-2’), 57.6 (C-2), 57.2 (C-5’), 54.6 (C-1), 31.4 (C-3’), 21.7 (C-4’), 15.9 (CH3). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 130 (MH+). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 130.1232: C 7 H 16 NO requires M, 130.1232. 2-((2S)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)ethan-1-ol263 - (S)-155 2-Bromoethanol (0.14 mL, 1.93 mmol) in dry MeCN (1 mL) was added to a refluxing mixture of (S)-2-methylpyrrolidine (257 mg, 2.00 mmol), K 2 CO 3 (535 mg, 3.87 mmol) in dry MeCN (2 mL). After 15 h the mixture was cooled to rt, filtered and concentrated. Et2O (5 mL) was then added and the product extracted with 1M HCl (2 x 5 mL). The aqueous phase was made basic with solid NaOH, then extracted with DCM (3 x 5 mL). The organic layers were dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered and concentrated to afford the product (200 mg, 48%) as a colourless oil. Carried through without further purification. [α] D (c = 1.00 g/100 mL, CHCl 3 ) +60.0°. n max (ATR) 3337 (br, m), 2948 (m), 2657 (m), 1451 (m), 1053 (m). NMR and mass spectra were consistent with the R enantiomer. (2R)-1-(2-chloroethyl)-2-methylpyrrolidine hydrochloride - (R)-154 A solution of thionyl chloride (0.57 mL, 7.87 mmol) in chloroform (3 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of 2-((2R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)ethan-1-ol (R)-155 (377 mg, 2.92 mmol) in chloroform (4 mL) at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was heated under reflux for 2 h and then concentrated under reduced pressure. Precipitation from a mixture of EtOH and Et 2 O afforded the title compound contaminated with 19% 2-((2R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)ethan-1-ol hydrochloride (353 mg, 35%) as a brown semi-solid. [α] D (c = 1.00 g/100 mL, CHCl 3 ) -23.7°. n max (ATR) 3392 (br, m), 2974 (m), 2554 (m), 2453 (m), 1452 (m), 1422 (m), 1393 (m). δH (700 MHz, CDCl3, 19% 2-((2R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)ethan- 1-ol hydrochloride) 12.56 (1H, s, NH + ), 4.15 – 4.10 (1H, m, 4’-HH’), 4.05 – 3.99 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 3.97 – 3.90 (1H, m, 5’-HH’), 3.72 – 3.66 (1H, m, 3’-HH’), 3.31 – 3.24 (1H, m, 2’-H), 3.12 – 3.05 (1H, m, 3’-HH’), 3.04 – 2.97 (1H, m, 5’-HH’), 2.30 – 2.17 (2H, m, 2-H2), 2.08 – 1.95 (2H, m, 1- H2), 1.64 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, CH3). δC (176 MHz, CDCl3, 19% 2-((2R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1- yl)ethan-1-ol hydrochloride) 65.3 (C-2’), 54.0 (C-3’), 53.8 (C-5’), 37.6 (C-4’), 31.1 (C-2), 21.6 (C- 1), 15.7 (CH 3 ). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 148 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 150 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). (2S)-1-(2-chloroethyl)-2-methylpyrrolidine hydrochloride - (S)-154 A solution of thionyl chloride (0.87 mL, 12 mmol) in chloroform (5 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of 2-((2S)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)ethan-1-ol (S)-155 (575 mg, 4.45 mmol) in chloroform (5 mL) at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was heated under reflux for 2 h and then concentrated under reduced pressure. Precipitation from a mixture of EtOH and Et 2 O afforded the title compound contaminated with 19% 2-((2S)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)ethan-1-ol hydrochloride (302 mg, 37%) as a brown semi-solid. [α] D (c = 1.00 g/100 mL, CHCl 3 ) +20.4°. n max (ATR) 3389 (br, m), 2974 (m), 2557 (m), 2461 (m), 1452 (m), 1423 (m), 1393 (m). NMR and mass spectra were consistent with the R enantiomer. (2S)-1-{2-[(S)-(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-2-meth ylpyrrolidine - (S, S)-147 General procedure B was used in the reaction of (S)-4-chlorophenyl(phenyl)methanol (S)-113 (119 mg, 0.43 mmol) and (2S)-1-(2-chloroethyl)-2-methylpyrrolidine (S)-154 (63 mg, 0.43 mmol). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (0 → 100% EtOAc in hexanes with 1% NEt3) to afford the title compound (78mg, 55%) as a colourless oil. nmax (ATR) 2962 (w), 2869 (w), 2787 (w), 1489 (m), 1453 (w), 1375 (w), 1086 (s), 1014 (m). δH (700 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 7.31 - 7.22 (9H, m, ArH), 5.34 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.57 (2H, t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2’-H 2 ), 3.15 – 3.09 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 3.04 (1H, dt, J = 12.5, 6.5 Hz, 1’-HH’), 2.39 (1H, dt, J = 12.5, 6.5 Hz, 1’-HH’), 2.36 – 2.30 (1H, m, 2-H), 2.22 – 2.16 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 1.91 – 1.84 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.78 – 1.69 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.69 - 1.61 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.41 - 1.33 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.07 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH 3 ). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 142.0 (ArC), 141.2 (ArC), 133.2 (ArC), 128.6(1) (ArC), 128.6(0) (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 83.4 (Ar 2 CH), 68.6 (C-2’), 60.5 (C-2), 54.9 (C-5), 53.4 (C-1’), 32.6 (C-3), 22.0 (C-4), 19.1 (CH3). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 330 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 332 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 330.1624: C20H25NO 35 Cl requires M, 330.1625. (2R)-1-{2-[(S)-(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-2-meth ylpyrrolidine - (R, S)-147 General procedure B was used in the reaction of (S)-4-chlorophenyl(phenyl)methanol (S)-113 (67 mg, 0.24 mmol) and (2R)-1-(2-chloroethyl)-2-methylpyrrolidine (R)-154 (12 mg, 0.08 mmol). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (0 → 100% EtOAc in hexanes with 1% NEt3) to afford the title compound (15 mg, 57 %) as a colourless oil. n max (ATR) 2963 (w), 2870 (w), 2789 (w), 1490 (w), 1453 (w), 1375 (w), 1089 (m), 1015 (w). δ H (700 MHz, CDCl3) 7.33 – 7.29 (4H, m, ArH), 7.29 - 7.27 (4H, m, ArH), 7.26 – 7.23 (1H, m, ArH), 5.36 (1H, s, Ar2CH), 3.69 – 3.54 (2H, m, 2’-H2), 3.22 - 3.14 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 3.12 – 3.05 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.54 – 2.36 (2H, m, 1-HH’, 2-H), 2.34 – 2.22 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 1.98 – 1.86 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.84 – 1.74 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.73 – 1.64 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.49 – 1.36 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.12 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH3). δC (176 MHz, CDCl3) 141.9 (ArC), 141.0 (ArC), 133.3 (ArC), 128.7 (ArC), 128.6 (ArC), 128.5 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 83.5 (Ar 2 CH), 68.2 (C-2’), 60.7 (C-2), 54.8 (C-5), 53.4 (C-1’), 32.4 (C-3), 22.0 (C-4), 18.9 (CH 3 ). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 330 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 332 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 330.1634: C 20 H 25 NO 35 Cl requires M, 330.1625. (2R)-1-{2-[(R)-(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-2-meth ylpyrrolidine - (R, R)-147 General procedure B was used in the reaction of (R)-4-chlorophenyl(phenyl)methanol (R)-113 (100 mg, 0.36 mmol) and (2R)-1-(2-chloroethyl)-2-methylpyrrolidine (R)-154 (53 mg, 0.36 mmol). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (0 → 100% EtOAc in hexanes with 1% NEt3) to afford the title compound as a colourless oil (72 mg, 61%). nmax (ATR) 2962 (w), 2869 (w), 2788 (w), 1490 (w), 1088 (m), 1015 (w). δH (700 MHz, CDCl3) 7.32 - 7.20 (9H, m, ArH), 5.35 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.58 (2H, td, J = 6.5, 1.5 Hz, 2’-H 2 ), 3.16 – 3.12 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 3.06 (1H, dt, J = 12.5, 6.5 Hz, 1’-HH’), 2.41 (1H, dt, J = 12.5, 6.5 Hz, 1’-HH’), 2.38 – 2.32 (1H, m, 2-H), 2.24 – 2.18 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 1.91 – 1.85 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.80 – 1.71 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.70 - 1.63 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.42-1.35 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.09 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH3). δC (176 MHz, CDCl3) 141.9 (ArC), 141.1 (ArC), 133.2 (ArC), 128.5(8) (ArC), 128.5(7) (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 127.1 (ArC), 83.4 (Ar2CH), 68.5 (C-2’), 60.5 (C-2), 54.9 (C-5), 53.4 (C- 1’), 32.5 (C-3), 22.0 (C-4), 19.1 (CH3). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 330 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 332 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 330.1632: C20H25NO 35 Cl requires M, 330.1625. 1-[(3-bromopropoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene - 183 To a solution of 4-chlorophenyl(phenyl)methanol 113 (500 mg, 2.29 mmol) and AuCl (33 mg, 0.23 mmol) in DCE was added 3-bromopropanol (318 mg, 2.29 mmol). This reaction was heated to 80 °C for 16 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography (0 → 20% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford the product as a colourless oil (244 mg, 54%). n max (ATR) 3029 (w), 2866 (w), 1489 (m), 1088 (s), 1014 (m). δ H (700 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 7.37 – 7.27 (9H, m, ArH), 5.5 (1H, s, Ar2CH), 3.61 – 3.56 (4H, m, 3’-H2, 1’-H2), 2.18 (2H, p, J = 6.0 Hz, 2’- H2). δC (176 MHz, CDCl3) 141.8 (ArC), 140.9 (ArC), 133.3 (ArC), 128.7 (ArC), 128.6 (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 127.9 (ArC), 127.0 (ArC), 83.3 (Ar2CH), 66.6 (C-3’), 33.1 (C-2’), 30.8 (C-1’). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 201 (M( 35 Cl)-OC3H6Br + ), 203 (M( 37 Cl)- OC3H6Br + ). Accurate mass: Found (M-OC3H6Br + ), 201.0474: C13H10 35 Cl requires M, 201.0471. (2S)-1-{3-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]propyl}-2-methylp yrrolidine - (S)-157 1-[(3-bromopropoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 183 (320 mg, 0.94 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of (2S)-2-methylpyrrolidine hydrochloride (115 mg, 0.94 mmol), KI (17g, 0.1 mmol) and K2CO3 (210mg, 1.88 mmol) in DMF (10 mL). The reaction was then stirred at rt for 24 h. Following the addition of EtOAc (10 mL), the organic layer was washed with H 2 O (5 x 10 mL), dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (10% MeOH in CHCl 3 ) to afford the title compound (217 mg, 65 %) as a colourless oil. n max (ATR) 2960 (w), 2869 (w), 2789 (w), 1489 (m), 1087 (s), 1014 (m). δ H (600 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 7.32 – 7.29 (4H, m, ArH), 7.28 – 7.26 (4H, m, ArH), 7.26 – 7.22 (1H, m, ArH), 5.30 (1H, s, Ar2CH), 3.51 – 3.47 (2H, m, 3’-H2), 3.17 – 3.09 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 2.95 – 2.86 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.31 – 2.22 (1H, m, 2-H), 2.16 – 2.10 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.10 – 2.04 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 1.93 – 1.81 (3H, m, 2’-H2, 3-HH’), 1.80 – 1.71 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.70 – 1.62 (1H, m, 4- HH’), 1.46 – 1.36 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.08 (1.5H, d, J = 6.0, CH3), 1.08 (1.5H, d, J = 6.0, CH3). δC (151 MHz, CDCl3, mixture of diastereomers) 142.2 (C-1’ Ph ), 141.2(8) (C-1 Ph ), 141.2(8) (C-1 Ph ), 133.1(3) (C-4 Ph ), 133.1(2) (C-4 Ph ), 128.5(7) (ArC), 128.5(5) (ArC), 128.5(4) (ArC), 128.5(2) (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 127.6(6) (C-4’ Ph ), 127.6(5) (C-4’ Ph ), 127.0 (ArC), 83.0 (Ar2CH), 67.8(3) (C- 3’), 67.8(0) (C-3’), 60.3 (C-2), 54.0(7) (C-5), 54.0(6) (C-5), 51.3 (C-1’), 51.2 (C-1’), 32.8 (C-3), 29.2 (C-2’).21.7 (C-4), 19.1 (CH3). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 344 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 346 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). Accurate mass: Found (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 344.1784: C21H27 35 ClNO requires M, 344.1781. 3-[(2S)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl]propan-1-ol - (S)-184 3-Bromopropanol (0.72 mL, 7.9 mmol) in dry MeCN (5 mL) was added dropwise to a mixture of (S)-2-methylpyrrolidine (1 g, 8.2 mmol) and K2CO3 (2.27g, 16.4 mmol) in dry MeCN (5 mL) heated under reflux. After 15 h the mixture was cooled to rt, filtered and concentrated. Et 2 O (10 mL) was then added and the product extracted with 1M HCl (2 x 10 mL). The aqueous phase was made more basic with solid NaOH, then extracted with DCM (3 x 10 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to afford product (620 mg, 55%) as a colourless oil. Carried through without further purification. n max (ATR) 3372 (br), 2961 (m), 2872 (w), 1114 (w). δ H (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 3.81 – 3.72 (2H, m, 3- H 2 ), 3.35 – 3.26 (1H, m, 1-HH’), 3.02 – 2.91 (1H, m, 5’-HH’), 2.43 – 2.34 (1H, m, 5’-HH’), 2.33 – 2.23 (1H, m, 2’-HH’), 2.13 - 2.02 (1H, m, 1-HH’), 2.01 - 1.81 (2H, m, 2-HH’, 3’-HH’), 1.79 – 1.60 (2H, m, 4’-H 2 ), 1.58 - 1.46 (1H, m, 2-HH’), 1.43 - 1.29 (1H, m, 3’-HH’), 1.11 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH 3 ). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 69.3 (C-2’), 61.9 (C-5’), 54.0 (C-1), 50.9 (C-3), 32.2 (C-3’), 27.3 (C-2), 21.6 (C-4’), 18.1 (CH 3 ). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 144 (MH + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 144.1393: C 8 H 18 NO requires M, 144.1388. (2S)-1-(3-chloropropyl)-2-methylpyrrolidine hydrochloride - (S)-185 A solution of thionyl chloride (0.74 mL, 10.24 mmol) in chloroform (2 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of 3-[(2S)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl]propan-1-ol (S)-184 (491 mg, 3.43 mmol) in chloroform (6 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was heated to reflux for 2 h and concentrated under reduced pressure. The product was precipitated from ethanol and diethylether to afford the title compound (172 mg, 25%) contaminated with 19% 3-[(2S)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl]propan-1-ol hydrochloride. nmax (ATR) 3404 (br), 2964 (m), 2600 (w), 2511 (w), 1633 (w), 1453 (w), 1063 (w). M.p.125 – 127 °C (lit. 265 : 150.5 – 152.0 °C). δ H (700 MHz, CDCl 3 , 19% 3-[(2S)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl]propan- 1-ol hydrochloride) 12.15 (1H, s, N + H), 3.93 - 3.83 (1H, m, 5’-HH’), 3.74 – 3.62 (2H, m, 3-H 2 ), 3.44 - 3.37 (1H, m, 1-HH ’ ), 3.24 – 3.12 (1H, m, 2’-H), 3.00 – 2.92 (1H, m, 1-HH ’ ), 2.89 – 2.79 (1H, m, 5’-HH’), 2.72 – 2.61 (1H, m, 2-HH’), 2.29 - 2.16 (3H, m, 3’-HH’, 4’- HH’, 2-HH’), 2.11 – 1.96 (2H, m, 3’-HH’, 4’- HH’), 1.64 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, CH 3 ). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 , 19% 3-[(2S)- 2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl]propan-1-ol hydrochloride) 65.3 (C-2’), 53.5 (C-5’), 51.4 (C-1), 42.1 (C- 3), 31.5 (C-3’), 28.2 (C-2), 21.5 (C-4’), 15.7 (CH 3 ). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 162 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 164 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 162.1041: C 8 H 17 N 35 Cl requires M, 162.1050. (2S)-1-{3-[(R)-(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]propyl}-2-met hylpyrrolidine - (S, R)-157 General procedure B was used for the reaction of (R)-4-chlorophenyl(phenyl)methanol 113 (76 mg, 0.27 mmol) and (2R)-1-(2-chloropropyl)-2-methylpyrrolidine (S)-185 (101 mg, 0.62 mmol). The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (0 → 100% EtOAc in hexanes with 1% NEt3) to afford the title compound (78 mg, 55%) as a colourless oil. nmax (ATR) 2960 (w), 1489 (w), 1089 (w). δH (700 MHz, CDCl3) 7.32 – 7.29 (4H, m, ArH), 7.27 – 7.22 (5H, m, ArH), 5.30 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.49 (2H, td, J = 6.0, 1.5 Hz, 3’-H 2 ), 3.21 – 3.15 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 2.98 – 2.90 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.39 – 2.31 (1H, m, 2-H), 2.22 – 2.10 (2H, m, 1’-HH’, 5- HH’), 1.96 – 1.85 (3H, m, 2’-H 2 , 3-HH’), 1.83 – 1.75 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.73 – 1.65 (1H, m, 4- HH’), 1.50 – 1.42 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.12 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH3). δC (176 MHz, CDCl3) 142.1 (C- 1’ Ph ), 141.2 (C-1 Ph ), 133.2 (C-4 Ph ), 128.5(7) (ArC), 128.5(6) (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 127.7 (C-4’ Ph ), 127.0 (ArC), 83.0 (Ar2CH), 67.6 (C-3’), 60.7 (C-2), 53.9 (C-5), 51.2 (C-1’), 32.7 (C-3), 28.9 (C- 2’), 21.7 (C-4), 18.7 (CH3). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 344 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 346 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 344.1783: C21H27NO 35 Cl requires M, 344.1781. 1-[(4-bromobutoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene - 186 General procedure A was used for 4-chlorophenyl(phenyl)methanol 113 (531 mg, 2.43 mmol) and 4-bromobutanol (372 mg, 2.43 mmol) with the modification of AuCl (56 mg, 0.24 mmol) as the catalyst in the place of PdCl 2 with a reaction time of 20 h. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (0 → 20% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford the title compound (350 mg, 41%) as a colourless oil. nmax (ATR) 3029 (w), 2941 (w), 2863 (w), 1489 (m), 1086 (s), 1014 (m). δH (600 MHz, CDCl3) 7.36 – 7.24 (9H, m, ArH), 5.30 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.47 (2H, t, J = 6.5 Hz, 4’-H 2 ), 3.43 (2H, t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1’-H 2 ), 2.00 (2H, p, J = 6.5 Hz, 2’-H), 1.79 (2H, p, J = 6.5 Hz, 3’-H). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 142.0 (C-1 Ph ), 141.1 (C-1’ Ph ), 133.2 (C-4 Ph ), 128.6(4) (C-3’ Ph ), 128.6(1) (C-3 Ph ), 128.3 (C-2 Ph ), 127.8 (C-4’ Ph ), 127.0 (C-2’ Ph ), 83.1 (Ar 2 CH), 68.1 (C-4’), 33.8 (C-1’), 29.9 (C-2’), 28.5 (C-3’). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 201 (M( 35 Cl)-OC 4 H 8 Br] + ), 203 (M( 37 Cl)-OC 4 H 8 Br] + ). Accurate mass: Found ([M- OC 4 H 8 Br] + ), 201.0480: C 13 H 10 35 Cl requires M, 201.0471. (2S)-1-{4-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]butyl}-2-methylpy rrolidine - (S)-158 1-[(4-bromobutoxy)(phenyl)methyl]-4-chlorobenzene 186 (106 mg, 0.3 mmol) in DMF (0.5 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of (2R)-2-methylpyrrolidine hydrochloride (46 mg, 0.38 mmol), KI (7 mg, 0.04 mmol) and K 2 CO 3 (105 mg, 0.76 mmol) in DMF (1 mL). The reaction was stirred at rt for 24 h. Following the addition of EtOAc (10 mL), the organic layer was washed with H2O (5 x 10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (0 → 100% EtOAc in hexanes with 1% NEt3) to afford the title compound as a colourless oil (49 mg, 46 %). nmax (ATR) 2954 (w), 2867 (w), 2789 (w), 1490 (m), 1453 (w), 1089 (s), 1015 (m). δH (600 MHz, CDCl 3 ) 7.31 – 7.28 (4H, m, ArH), 7.27 - 7.21 (5H, m, ArH), 5.28 (1H, s, Ar 2 CH), 3.47 – 3.41 (2H, m, 3’-H 2 ), 3.18 – 3.12 (1H, m, 5-HH’), 2.81 – 2.74 (1H, m, 1’-HH’), 2.29 – 2.19 (1H, m, 2- H), 2.09 –1.96 (2H, m, 5-HH’, 1’-HH’), 1.93 – 1.85 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.81 – 1.72 (1H, m, 4-HH’), 1.72 – 1.55 (5H, m, 4-HH’, 3’-H 2 , 2’-H 2 ), 1.45 – 1.38 (1H, m, 3-HH’), 1.07 (3H, d, J = 6.0, CH 3 ). δ C (176 MHz, CDCl 3 , mixture of diastereomers) 142.2(1) (C-1’ Ph ), 142.2(0) (C-1’ Ph ), 141.3 (C-1 Ph ), 133.2 (C-4 Ph ), 128.6(0) (ArC), 128.5(9) (ArC), 128.5(7) (ArC), 128.5(6) (ArC), 128.3(9) (ArC), 128.3(8) (ArC), 127.7 (C-4’ Ph ), 127.0(3) (ArC), 127.0(1) (ArC), 83.1 (Ar 2 CH), 69.1(6) (C-4’), 69.1(5) (C-4’), 60.5 (C-2), 54.3 (C-1’), 54.2 (C-1’), 54.1 (C-5), 32.8 (C-3), 28.2(4) (C-2’), 28.2(3) (C-2’), 25.7 (C-3’), 21.7 (C-4), 19.0 (CH 3 ). m/z (LC-MS, ESI + ) 358 (M( 35 Cl)H + ), 360 (M( 37 Cl)H + ). Accurate mass: Found (MH + ), 358.1949: C 22 H 28 35 ClNO requires M, 358.1938. General Reaction Schemes Below are general reaction schemes showing the synthesis of various compounds. Reaction Scheme 1 – Synthesis of compounds NTP-5, 8 and 9 Procedure D: Synthesis of 4‐bromo‐N‐(4‐bromobutyl)‐N‐phenylaniline (NTP-2). NaH (1.3 equiv.) was added to a 25 ml round bottom flask containing 4-bromo-N-phenylaniline (1 equiv.) in dry DMF (8.0 mL) and the reaction mixture was stirred for 15 min followed by the addition of 1,4-dibromobutane (1 equiv.). The reaction vessel was sealed, and the content was heated at 80 ºC overnight. Upon completion of the reaction, DMF was removed by air flow. The residue was re-suspended in dichloromethane (20 mL) and filtered. The filtrate was washed with aqueous NaCl (5%) (3x20 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuum. The obtained residue was purified by flash column chromatography with hexane/ethyl acetate (90:10) to afford the titled product. Procedure E: Synthesis of 4‐bromo‐N‐{4‐[(2S)‐2‐methylpyrrolidin‐1‐yl]b utyl}‐N‐phenylaniline (NTP-5). A solution of 4‐bromo‐N‐(4‐bromobutyl)‐N‐phenylaniline (NTP-2, 80.0 mg, 0.21 mmol), (R)-2- Methyl-pyrrolidine hydrochloride (25.4 mg, 0.21 mmol), Na2CO3 (101.8 mg, 0.96 mmol) and catalytic amount of KI (0.3 mg, 0.002 mmol) in acetonitrile (125 mL) were refluxed for 12h. Upon reaction completion, precipitate was removed by filtration and solvent was concentrated in vacuum to obtain crude residue which was purified by flash chromatography with dichloromethane/methanol to afford 4-bromo-N-{4-[(2R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl]butyl}-N- phenylaniline (NTP-5, 51.0 mg, 63.1%) as a white solid.. Reaction scheme 1 shows the synthesis of NTP-5, 8 and 9. Additionally, procedures D and E, above explain how NTP-5 was produced. Procedure D was used to produce building blocks N‐(4‐bromobutyl)‐4‐nitro‐N‐phenylaniline (NTP-3) and N‐(4‐bromobutyl)‐4‐chloro‐N‐phenylaniline (NTP-7), except 4-nitro-N-phenylaniline or 4- chloro-N-phenylaniline, respectively, were used instead of 4-bromo-N-phenylaniline. Similarly, procedure E was used to produce NTP-8 and 9, except NTP-3 and NTP-7, respectively, were used instead of instead of NTP-2. Procedure E was also used to produce NTP-10, except NTP-7 was used instead of instead of NTP-2 and (R)-2-methylpiperidine was used instead of (S)-2-methylpyrrolidine. Table 6: Structure of compounds and NMR data
Reaction Scheme 2 – Synthesis of compounds NTP-61 Reaction scheme 2 shows the synthesis of NTP-61. Procedure F: Synthesis of (R)‐(4‐chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol (NTP-59). Et2Zn (22.6 mL, 33.9 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of 4-chloro-phenylboronic acid (1.76 mg, 11.30 mmol) in toluene under a nitrogen atmosphere. After stirring for 12 h at 60 °C, the mixture was cooled to 0 °C and a toluene solution of [(2S)-1-methyl pyrrolidine-2- yl]diphenylmethanol (252 mg, 0.94 mmol) was introduced. The reaction was stirred for an additional 15 min and the benzaldehyde (500 mg, 4.71 mmol) then added. After stirring for 12 h at 0 °C the reaction was quenched with H2O (5 mL) and extracted with DCM (3 x 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent evaporated. Purification by flash chromatography (10% EtOAc in hexanes) afforded the title product as a white solid (724 mg, 70.3 %). The spectral data was in agreement with the reported data. Alternatively, if the 4-chloro-phenylboronic acid used as a starting product is replaced with 3- chloro-phenylboronic acid or 2-chloro-phenylboronic acid then the reaction scheme will produce (R)‐(3‐chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol or (R)‐(2‐chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol, respectively. Procedure G: Synthesis of (S)‐(4‐chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol (NTP-78). Et2Zn (20.5 mL, 30.73 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of phenylboronic acid (1.249 mg, 10.24 mmol) in toluene under a nitrogen atmosphere. After stirring for 12 h at 60 °C, the mixture is cooled to 0 °C and a toluene solution of [(2S)-1-methyl pyrrolidine-2- yl]diphenylmethanol (228 mg, 0.85 mmol) was introduced. The reaction was stirred for an additional 15 min and the 4-chloro-benzaldehyde (600 mg, 4.26 mmol) then added. After stirring for 12 h at 0 °C the reaction was quenched with H2O (5 mL) and extracted with DCM (3 x 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent evaporated. Purification by chromatography (10% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford the title product as a white solid (660 mg, 71%). The spectral data was in agreement with the reported data. Procedure H: Synthesis of building blocks NTP-52, NTP64, NTP-67, NTP-70 & NTP-83. 3-Bromo-1-propanol (0.72 mL, 7.9 mmol) in dry MeCN (5 mL) was added dropwise to a mixture of (S)-2-methylpyrrolidine (1 g, 8.2 mmol) and K 2 CO 3 (2.27g, 16.4 mmol) in dry MeCN (5 mL). The reaction mixture was heated under reflux. After 15 h the mixture was cooled to rt, filtered and concentrated. Et 2 O (10 mL) was then added and the product was extracted with 1M HCl (2 x 10 mL). The aqueous phase was made more basic with solid NaOH, then extracted with DCM (3 x 10 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered, and concentrated to afford product (NTP-52) in moderate to good yields as a colourless oils. Which was confirmed with LCMS and carried through without further purification. It will be appreciated that if the (S)-2-methylpyrrolidine is replaced with (R)-2- methylpyrrolidine, 2,2-dimethylpyrrolidine, pyrrolidine or (R)-2-methylpiperidine then the procedure will produce NTP-64, NTP-66, NTP-70 or NTP-83, respectively. Procedure I: Synthesis of Clemastine mimics: SN2 reaction of chlorobenzhydrol and alkyl chloride. The chlorobenzhydrol (1 equiv.) was dissolved in anhydrous DMF (3 mL) in an oven dried sealed tube and the solution was degassed with nitrogen. Then tBuOK (2.2 equiv.), NTP-52, 64, 67, 70 or 83 (1.2 equiv.) and tetra-n-butylammonium iodide (0.2 equiv.) were added to it and the mixture was degassed again and stirred at 50 ºC overnight. The reaction mixture was cooled, quenched with H 2 O (10 mL) and diluted with EtOAc (10 mL). The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with EtOAc (2 x 15 mL). The combined organic layers were then dried over Na 2 SO 4 , filtered, and then concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (0 → 100% EtOAc in hexanes with 1% NEt3) to afford the above compounds. Table 7: Structure of compounds and NMR data Biological experimental General experimental details MATERIALS: Biological grade materials, solvents, reagents and media components were purchased from commercial suppliers and used as provided. NBD-C6-ceramide 80 was from Invitrogen and AG 4-X4 ion exchange resin was from Bio-Rad. Reactions and media were prepared using ultrapure water from Milli-Q® water purification system. FBS refers to heat- inactivated foetal bovine serum. Solutions of test compounds were made up in DMSO, unless otherwise stated. INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT: 1.5 mL Eppendorfs were used during the preparation of serial dilutions. Media were filter-sterilised using a vacuum filter with a 0.22 μm pore CA membrane. Centrifugation steps were carried out using Sorvall® Legend RT centrifuge, Sorvall® Legend Micro 17R centrifuge, Beckman Coulter® centrifuges and ultracentrifuges. Eppendorf tubes were centrifuged using Sigma 1-14 microfuge. Disruption of yeast cells was performed using an IKA® Vortex Genius 3. Protein content and optical density (OD) were determined using a Boeco S-32 spectrophotometer. Eppendorf contents were dried using an Eppendorf Vacuum Concentrator 5301. Cells were counted using a Neubauer haemocytometer. 96-well plates used were Nest Biotechnology Co., Ltd cell culture plates (clear); Corning® Costar® cell culture plates (clear); Corning® V-bottom (clear); MultiScreen® Solvinert filter plates (Merck Millipore) and PerkinElmer OptiPlate-96 (black).24-well plates were supplied by Nest Biotechnology Co., Ltd and cover slips from Thomas Scientific®. Fluorescence quantification was carried out using SpectraMax® microplate reader with SoftMax® Pro 6.4 data analysis software from Molecular Devices and Synergy H4 and FLx800 microplate readers with Gen5® 1.08 data analysis software from Biotek. HPTLC silica plates were from Merck Millipore and imaged using a Fuji FLA-3000 plate reader with AIDA image analyser® (version 3.52). Solutions, buffers and media compositions are given in tables 8 and 9. Table 8: Details of the buffers and solutions used
Table 9: Details of the growth media used
Protocols All of the following biological procedures were carried out under sterile conditions unless otherwise stated. Leishmania culture Leishmania amazonensis (MHOM/Br/75/JOSEFA) promastigotes were maintained at 26 °C in Medium 199, supplemented with 15% FBS. Leishmania amazonensis (MHOM/Br/75/JOSEFA), Leishmania major (FV1) WT and Δ LCB2 promastigotes were maintained at 26 °C in Schneider’s insect medium at pH 7, supplemented with 15% FBS. Leishmania major (FV1) PX promastigotes were maintained at 26 °C in Schneider’s insect medium at pH 7, supplemented with 15% FBS and 40 μg mL-1 G418 (Gibco BRL). Leishmania amazonensis-GFP were selected for bright green fluorescence by 48 h-incubation in the presence of 1000 μg mL-1 G418 (Gibco BRL). Animals and ethics statement All mice used in the experiments were maintained under controlled temperature, filtered air and water, autoclave bedding, and commercial food at the animal facilities at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. The animal protocols for this study were approved by the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under the number 030/17. The research was conducted in compliance with the principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH). Isolation of Bone Marrow Derived Macrophages (BMDM) BMDM were differentiated from bone marrow of BALB/C, C57BL/6 and knock out C57BL/6 mice using L929-cell conditioned medium (LCCM) as a source of macrophage colony- stimulating factor (M-CSF) as described by Zamboni et al. (F. M. Marim, T. N. Silveira, D. S. Lima and D. S. Zamboni, PLOS ONE, 2010, 5, e15263). Briefly, bone marrow was extracted from the femurs and tibias and re-suspended in bone marrow differentiated media (which is RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 20% LCCM) in Petri dishes for 7 days at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After, the plates were washed with warm PBS to remove detached cells, the adherent BMDM were gently scraped off the surface and re-suspended in RPMI (without LCCM). These cells are ready to use in the anti-amastigote intramacrophage assay and the macrophage cytotoxicity assay described below. Drugs Clemastine fumarate and cycloheximide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Glucantime solution (meglumine antimoniate, 300 mg mL 1) was a gift from Sanofi Aventis. Clemastine derivatives were synthesised using the procedure outline in the previous section. Stock solutions of clemastine and its derivatives (10 mM) were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and kept at 0 - 4° C. Subsequent dilutions were done in culture media. For in vitro assays, all drugs were serially diluted in 100% DMSO, and then diluted 1:100 in culture medium, so that all final drug concentrations contained 1% DMSO. Preparation of LmjIPCS microsomal material Auxotrophic AUR1 mutant S. cerevisiae was complemented by the expression of the L. major IPCS to create YPH499-HIS-GAL-AUR1 pRS246 LmjIPCS. These steps were carried out under non-sterile conditions. Step 1: Preparation of cell extract Crude membranes from this mutant S. cerevisiae were prepared as described by Fischl et al. (A. S. Fischl, Y. Liu, A. Browdy and A. E. Cremesti, Methods in Enzymology, Academic Press, Massachusetts, 2000). The complemented yeast cells were propagated in SGR-W-L media until OD ³ 0.8. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (4,000 x g, 4 °C, 10 min) and washed with cold PBS (3 x 20 mL). The cell pellet was weighed and re-suspended in STE buffer (1.5 mL per 1g wet cell mass (WCM)). The yeast cells were disrupted using pre-chilled, acid washed glass beads (425-600 μm, 1.5 mL per 1g WCM), using a vortex mixer. Disruption step involved 30 cycles of 1 min vortex mixing followed by a 1 min rest on ice. Glass beads, unbroken cells and cell-wall debris were pelleted by centrifugation (3,800 x g, 4 °C, 15 min) to obtain cell extract (supernatant) which was removed and stored on ice. The pellet was re-suspended in STE buffer (0.5 mL per 1g WCM) and subjected to 20 further disruption cycles. Following centrifugation (3,800 x g, 4 °C, 15 min), the supernatant was removed and cell extracts combined. Step 2: Preparation of crude microsomal membrane fraction The microsomal membrane faction, enriched in IPCS, was isolated from the cell extract by differential centrifugation. An initial centrifugation of the cell extract (23,000 x g, 4 °C, 15 min) pelleted large organelles and cell debris. The supernatant was removed and re-centrifuged (150,000 x g, 4 °C, 90 min) to obtain a pellet enriched with microsomal membranes. The pellet was re-suspended in storage buffer (approximately 100 μL) and the protein content was determined according to Bradford’s protocol.274 The concentration was adjusted to 20 mg ml-1 and 100 μL aliquots were stored in LoBind Eppendorf tubes at -80 °C. Step 3: Preparation of washed microsomal membranes The crude microsomal membranes were adjusted to a concentration of 10 mg mL-1 using STE buffer. Equal volume of the microsomal membranes and 2.5% CHAPS solution were mixed together and kept on ice for 1 h without shaking. The mixture was centrifuged (150,000 x g, 4 °C, 90 min) and the pellet re-suspended in storage buffer. The protein content was quantified according to Bradford’s protocol274 and the membranes were stored in LoBind Eppendorf tubes at -80 °C. Step 4: Determination of the Protein Content in Enzyme Units To standardise the assay and remove variability from sample preparation, microsome samples were normalised with respect to active enzyme content. The data is presented in enzyme units (U), where one unit (U) of enzyme converts 1 pmol of substrate per minute under the conditions described (1U = 1 pmol(product) min-1). A stock solution of NBD-C6-ceramide 80 at a concentration of 10 pmol μL -1 was used to produce a standard curve ranging from 0.2 pmol to 80 pmol. The volumes were adjusted to 200 μL with 1M potassium formate in MeOH and the fluorescence was read (Ex460/Em540). Samples of the washed microsomal membranes were incubated with NBD-C6-ceramide 80 and PI under assay conditions described for the 96-well plate–based LmjIPCS assay. and the product fluorescence measured (Ex460/Em540). Correlation with the standard curve allowed the activity of the microsome preparation to be determined in U μL-1. The membranes were adjusted to 1.5 U μL-1 with storage buffer and stored in LoBind Eppendorf tubes at -80 °C. Assays Anti-promastigote assays L. major promastigotes in Schneider’s insect medium (100 μL at 1 × 106 mL−1) were incubated in 96-well plates with compounds in triplicate (amphotericin B and cycloheximide were used as positive controls, and untreated parasites with 1% DMSO as a negative control) at 26 °C for 48 h. Resazurin Solution (10 μL) was then added and the plate incubated at 26 °C for 4 h prior to measurement using a fluorescence plate reader (555 - 585 nm). EC 50 values were calculated using sigmoidal regression analysis (GraphPad Prism). L. amazonensis promastigotes in Schneider’s insect medium (100 μL at 5 × 105 mL−1) were incubated in 96-well plates with compounds in triplicate (amphotericin B was used as a positive control, and untreated parasites with DMSO as a negative control) at 26 °C for 48 h. Resazurin Solution (10 μL) was then added and the plate incubated at 26 °C for 4 h prior to measurement using a fluorescence plate reader (555 - 585 nm). EC50 values were calculated using sigmoidal regression analysis (GraphPad Prism). Anti-amastigote intramacrophage assay Bone marrow derived macrophages were diluted in RPMI 1640 medium to a concentration of 2 x 10 5 well -1 in a 24-well plate with round cover slips and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. They were infected with L. amazonensis promastigotes (10:1) at 37 °C for 4 h. Then washed with PBS twice to remove extracellular promastigotes and fresh RPMI medium supplemented with 5% FBS was added. After 24 h serial dilutions of the test compounds in RPMI medium (350 μL) were added and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The adherent infected cells were then stained with Giemsa modified solution and amastigotes were counted using an optical Nikon® microscope. Macrophage cytotoxicity assay Bone marrow derived macrophages in RPMI 1640 medium were seeded (1 × 10 6 mL −1 , 100 μL well -1 ) in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO 2 . Following removal of media, serial dilutions of the test compounds in fresh RPMI medium (100 μL) were added and the cells were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Aliquots of resazurin solution (10 μL) were then added and the cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO 2 for 4 h. Cell-viability measurement was carried out using a fluorescence plate reader. Triton was used as a reference compound. EC50 values were calculated using sigmoidal regression analysis. NO assay The generation of nitrite in bone marrow derived macrophages was assessed by the Griess Reagent System (1% sulfanilamide / 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediaminedihydrochloride/ 2.5% H 3 PO 4 ). Uninfected macrophages (1 × 10 6 mL −1 , 100 μL well -1 ) in 96-well plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Following removal of media, serial dilutions of the test compounds in fresh RPMI medium (100 μL) were added and the plate was incubated for 48 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The plates were centrifuged at 500 g/5 min and culture supernatants were then incubated with the Griess Reagent for 30 min at 37 °C. The absorbance was measured at 570 nm, and the nitrite concentration was determined using a standard curve of sodium nitrite (0 to 50 µM). The positive control was macrophages incubated with 1 µg mL-1 of LPS (Sigma- Aldrich, Brazil) and 10% conditioned medium of lymphocytes as a source of IFN. Negative controls were cells treated with DMSO and untreated cells. In vivo assay Two month old BALB/c female mice, weighing 20 - 25 g and of approximately the same age were used for the study. For infection of mice, stationary phase GFP L. amazonensis promastigotes were collected, washed and suspended in sterile PBS. A volume of 10 μl of sterile PBS containing 2 x 10 6 parasites was injected into the right ear. On day seven of infection, animals were randomly distributed into 4 groups; IL (S,R)-157 (5 animals), IL clemastine fumarate (5 animals), IP glucantime solution (5 animals) and untreated (6 animals). Mice were treated with glucantime solution at a dose of 1.30 g kg -1 by intraperitoneal injection twice a week for 28 days. Mice were treated with (S,R)-157 or clemastine fumarate at a dose of 1.17 mg kg -1 by intralesional injection twice a week for 28 days. Infected ear thicknesses were measured once or twice a week with a caliper gauge, and the lesion sizes were expressed as the difference between the thickness of infected and non-infected ear. On day 41 animals were sacrificed and the fluorescence measured (485 - 528 nm) and parasite load quantified using a limiting dilution assay (LDA). Data on lesion progression were analysed for statistical significance by using the Dunnett test as part of the one-way ANOVA (GraphPad Prism 8 software). A result was considered significant at * P £ 0.05, ** P £ 0.01, *** P £ 0.001, **** P £ 0.0001.225 High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) based LmjIPCS assay The following protocol was adapted from a literature procedure (J. G. Mina, J. A. Mosely, H. Z. Ali, H. Shams-Eldin, R. T. Schwarz, P. G. Steel and P. W. Denny, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 2010, 42, 1553–1561) and carried out under non-sterile conditions.145 Stock 1: Dry PI (1 mM, 30 μL) in a LoBind Eppendorf tube using a vacuum concentrator. To the dried PI, phosphate buffer (71.4 mM , pH 7.0, 105 μL), CHAPS (3 mM, 30 μL) and NBD-C6- ceramide 80 (200 μM, 1.7 μL) was added. The solution was mixed by vortex and stored on ice. Stock 2: Phosphate buffer (71.4 mM , pH 7.0, 105 μL), CHAPS (3 mM, 30 μL), storage buffer (6 μL) and microsomal membranes (1.5 μL) were combined in a LoBind Eppendorf tube. Stock 2 (23.75 μL) was added to n LoBind Eppendorf tubes (where n is the number of test compounds + controls), followed by the addition test compounds in DMSO (5 mM, 1 μL). After pre-incubation at 30 °C for 20 min, the reaction was started by the addition of stock 1 (23.75 μL) to each tube and incubation at 30 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixtures were quenched with CHCl 3 :MeOH:H 2 0 (10:10:3, 150 μL). The mixtures were centrifuged to separate phases, the organic layer was removed and dried using a vacuum concentrator. The residue was re-suspended in CHCl 3 :MeOH:H 2 0 (10:10:3, 20 μL) and loaded (3 x 3 μL ) onto HPTLC plates (silica gel 60 F 254 ). This was run using the solvent system CHCl 3 :MeOH:0.25% KCl (aq) (55:45:10) and the R f values for the excess NBD-C 6 -ceramide 80 and the product NBD-C6-IPC 81 were 0.96 and 0.57 respectively. Product quantification was carried out using a fluorescence plate reader (Ex473/Em520). 96-well plate–based LmjIPCS assay The following protocol was adapted from a literature procedure (J. G. Mina, J. A. Mosely, H. Z. Ali, H. Shams-Eldin, R. T. Schwarz, P. G. Steel and P. W. Denny, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 2010, 42, 1553–1561) and carried out under non-sterile conditions. Stock 1: Dry PI (1 mM, 48 μL) in a glass vial using a vacuum concentrator. To the dried PI, phosphate buffer (71.4 mM , pH 7.0, 1680 μL), CHAPS (3 mM, 480 μL) and NBD-C6-ceramide 80 (200 μM, 120 μL) was added. The solution was mixed by vortex and stored on ice. Stock 2: Phosphate buffer (71.4 mM , pH 7.0, 1680 μL), CHAPS (3 mM, 480 μL), storage buffer (72 μL) and CHAPS-washed microsomal membranes (0.6 U) were combined in a glass vial. The solution was mixed by vortex and stored on ice. In a V-bottom 96-well plate, stock 1 (19 μL well -1 ) and test compounds (0.8 μL) were added. The reaction was initiated by the addition of stock 2 (20 μL well-1) and was incubated at 30 °C for 25 min before quenching with MeOH (200 μL well -1 ). Separation of the reaction product, NBD-C 6 -ceramide 80, from the starting material, IPC-C6- caramide 81, was achieved using anion exchange chromatography.20% w/v AG4-X4 resin in EtOH (200 μL well -1 ) was added to a 96-well filter plate and centrifuged (2,450 x g, rt, 27 seconds). The resin was incubated with formic acid (50 μL well-1) for 5 minutes before being centrifuged (2,450 x g, rt, 27 seconds). The resin was then washed with water and dried by centrifugation (2,450 x g, rt, 27 seconds). The reaction mixture (200 μL) was loaded onto the resin and the starting material, NBD-C6- ceramide 80, removed by centrifugation (2,450 x g, rt, 1 min). The resin was washed with MeOH (5 x 200 μL) and subsequent centrifugation (2,450 x g, rt, 1 min). The product, NBD-C6- IPC 81, was eluted into black plates with potassium formate in MeOH (1M, 4 x 50 μL) followed by centrifugation (2,450 x g, rt, 1 min). Product quantification was carried out using a fluorescence plate reader (Ex460/Em540) and IC 50 values were calculated using sigmoidal regression analysis (GraphPad Prism). Anti-leishmanial activity upon Leishmania donovani AG83 strain The compounds were prepared in DMSO. The inventors incubated the L. donovani promastigotes with the 21 compounds for different time-points, i.e., 1h, 24 and 72h and checked the viability of the parasites using MTT tetrazolium assay. The inventors then proceeded to study the efficacy of these selected compounds at clearing L. donovani amastigotes from macrophage. For that they first estimated the toxicity of the compounds upon healthy RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line. The inventors then infected RAW cells with L. donovani parasites and 72 h post-infection, they treated these infected cells with the compounds for 1 h. Geimsa staining based analysis of amastigotes burden per 100 macrophages was used to determine the toxic effect upon the amastigotes.
Next Patent: A SERVICEABLE PART FOR AN ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE