BIODESULFURIZATION OF BITUMEN FUELS

Technical Field

The invention relates to the desulfurization of carbonaceous fuels by microorganisms. More particularly, the invention enables the removal of sulfur by biotechnical means from emulsified fuels containing bitumen and water.

The removal of sulfur from various carbonaceous fuels including petroleum oils, coal and coal/petroleum mixtures is known, but the implementing technology for these fuels has not been adaptable to fuels of the bitumen-in-water type. These fuels contain tar-like bitumens which are not crude oils when viewed by either legal or practical engineering considerations. Unless emulsified, they are not liquid at 15°C, typically requiring heating to 70° to 90°C to be treated as a liquid. These bitumens are finding application in the form of emulsions where water is employed as a minor component but forms the continuous phase.

Unfortunatel , despite their relative economy, abundance and desirable properties, these fuels often have sulfur contents which make them too environmentally expensive to use. Moreover, this is, in some fuels, coupled with high vanadium contents which can cause slagging and corrosion problems when burned.

It would be desirable to have a process which permitted efficiently treating emulsified bitumen fuels to reduce these problems on a large scale and at reasonable cost.

Background Art

The development of bitumen-in-water emulsions has provided renewed interest in burning vast stores of viscous hydrocarbons, variously called bitumen, native bitumen, tar, natural asphalt, viscous crude oil and heavy crude. See in this regard the paper Evaluation of Handling & Combustion Characteristics of A Bitumen- in-Water Emulsified Fuel in a Commercial Utility Boiler presented in December 1989 by Blair A. Kennedy at the Power-Gen '89 Conference. See also, U.S. Patent No. 4,618,348 to M. E. Hayes et al . One commercially available bitumen-in-water emulsion product, known as Ori ulsion, is made with about 70% Venezuelan Orinoco crude and about 30% water. Reserves of Orinoco crude are estimated at 1.2 trillion barrels, but it typically has high sulfur and vanadium contents which deter widespread commercialization.

The removal of sulfur is desirable to limit the emissions of S0 _χ compounds to the atmosphere during combustion. These compounds are known to contribute to

the formation of acid rain. Removal of contaminants prior to combustion is particularly advantageous due to the concentrated form of these contaminants prior to their reaction with oxygen to form SO _χ compounds during combustion. The removal of SO _χ compounds by post-combustion methods involves the treatment of higher molecular weight compounds entrained in high-temperature, high-volume flue gases and requires that substantial capital and operating costs be applied to each major source of combustion.

Pre-combustion removal of contaminants has the advantage of being conducted on the preoxidized state of the contaminant and may be conducted at any point in the fuel handling and distribution stream prior to combustion. Pre-combustion treatment methods may involve physical, chemical or biological treatment. Unfortun¬ ately, the offending sulfur compounds cannot be removed physically, and chemical treatment requires large investments in capital and high operating costs due to the use of hydrogen, solvents or the like.

For petroleum oils and coals, prior workers have attempted to remove both pyritic and organic sulfur through the use of microbial techniques. For a recent review of this, see Monticello and Finnerty, "Microbial Desulfurization of Fossil Fuels", JLnn. Rev.

Microbiol . 1985 (39:371-89). The discussion is primarily directed to the underlying biochemistry, not to the practical implementation of it, especially for bitumens which pose unique handling and processing problems. See also, Lee and Yen, "Sulfur Removal from Coal Through Multiphase Media Containing Biocatalysts", J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol . , 1990, vol.48, pp.71-79.

Several early patents have described large-scale processes for removing sulfur from oils. For example, in U.S. Patent No. 2,521,761, Strawinski discloses using any of a variety of known microorganisms, but employs a "diverter" as carbon source as an alternative to the petroleum. Unfortunately, the diverter such as sugar or starch is costly. Later, in U.S. Patent No. 2,574,070, Strawinski disclosed first converting sulfur to sulfates and then removing the sulfates in a second stage microbiological reaction by converting them to hydrogen sulfide. In U.S. Patent No. 2,641,564, Zobell also teaches using a microbiological catalyst to remove sulfur from petroleum by reaction with hydrogen to produce hydrogen sulfide. These reactions are necessarily conducted on liquid petroleum and require the use of complex gas-liquid contact devices and produce large quantities of foul-smelling and dangerous by-products.

Other processes have also failed to be implemented because they did not offer the promise of economical operation. In U.S. Patent No. 2,975,103 Kirshenbaum teaches contacting liquid petroleum with aerobic bacteria in a liquid-liquid contact column to oxidize the sulfur to sulfates and then removing the sulfates by precipitation with CaO, BaO or the hydroxides. This process, while requiring sophisticated equipment for operating on liquid oils could not be expected to operate on bitumen which is not liquid at temperatures effective for most biochemical reactions.

Similarly, in U.S. Patent No. 4,861,723, Madgavkar treats coal with microorganisms and follows the reaction with a required step of removing the aqueous phase prior to combustion.

It would be desirable to provide a process capable of removing sulfur from emulsion bitumen which could be implemented without complex and costly equipment or the use of expensive or hazardous chemicals and without any requirement that the aqueous phase be removed prior to combustion.

Disclosure of Invention

The invention provides a simple and effective solution to the problems associated with sulfur in bitumen, thereby making large quantities of fuel available for use in the production of power and for other purposes without sacrificing environmental or economic objectives. In one broad aspect, the invention provides a process for desulfurizing bitumen, comprising: contacting an emulsion of bitumen and water with a microbiological desulfurization agent selected from the group consisting of cell cultures, immobilized cell masses, fragmented cells, cell extracts, enzyme mixtures, synthetically prepared copies of active enzyme sequences or components, and mixtures of these; and, maintaining contact for a time and under conditions effective to reduce the oxidizable sulfur content of the bitumen.

The emulsions are preferably of the bitumen-in-water type. Following reaction, at least a portion of the original sulfur content of the bitumen has been converted to sulfates which concentrate in the aqueous phase of the emulsion. The treated fuel can be treated to remove these sulfates from SO _χ -creating combustion reactions by either physically separating these materials or rendering them chemically incapable of the offending

reactions by the addition of a suitable chemical agent during or following the reaction.

Brief Description Of The Drawing

The invention will be better understood and its advantages will become more apparent when the following detailed description is read in connection with the attached drawing wherein:

The Figure is a schematic flow diagram showing several alternative process schemes according to the invention.

Best Mode For Carrying Out The Invention

This description details several of the more preferred aspects of the invention, but it is to be understood that the invention has wide applicability. For example, while small-scale reactions are described and exemplified, it is to be understood that the principal utility of the technology of this invention is its ready adaptability to large-scale processing as would be necessary to treat the large quantities of bitumen which may be held in ocean-going tankers, within pipelines during transport of the fuel, underground storage facilities such as are now employed by the United States government as a strategic petroleum reserve, and the tanks in tank farms.

The process of the invention provides a simple and effective solution to the problems associated with sulfur

in bitumen. In one broad aspect, the process comprises contacting an emulsion of bitumen and water with a microbiological desulfurization agent and maintaining contact for a time and under conditions effective to reduce the oxidizable sulfur content of the bitumen.

Following reaction, at least a portion of the original sulfur content of the bitumen has been converted to sulfates which concentrate in the aqueous phase of the emulsion. The treated fuel can be treated to remove these sulfates from SO _χ -creating combustion reactions by either physically separating these materials or rendering them chemically incapable of the offending reactions by the addition of a suitable chemical agent during or following the reaction.

Reference is now made to the Figure which shows a preferred process scheme according to this invention. The Figure shows schematically several alternatives which can be applied to bitumens derived from any source, including the fields known to produce such in North America, Mexico, Venezuela or the Middle East. These bitumens typically have high densities, with API gravities as low as 10 degrees and less, e.g. about 7 to about 9 degrees API. Sulfur contents of up to 5% are not uncommon, and of from 1 to 4% are typical. This can be present in the form of inorganic and/or organic sulfur, and the present invention can be employed to facilitate the treatment of bitumen such that the SO _χ -potential of either or both is reduced.

The bitumen can be passed to an emulsifier 10 which can be any device effective for the purpose. The emulsions are preferably of the bitumen-in-water type.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

It is within the contemplation of the invention to employ emulsions which might be characterized also as either water-in-bitumen or complex, with the attributes of both types of emulsions. There are good reasons in some situations to employ one of these other emulsion forms.

Bitumenous hydrocarbons, because of their highly viscous nature, typically require extraordinary means to remove them from wells. In the case of Orinoco crude from Venezuela, water and surfactants (sometimes with steam) is pumped into the wells to soften and emulsify the bitumen. The emulsions are pumped to the surface where the emulsions of bitumen in water are broken (typically by heating under pressure) separated into bitumen and water phases, and reemulsified such as in emulsifier 10. Emulsions of Orinoco crude are commercially available under the trademark Orimulsion. These are stable bitumen-in-water emulsions and do not normally require ree ulsification prior to processing according to the invention. This is, however, not a rigid rule, and there may be reason, for example, for removing at least a portion of the water phase and replacing it with one more compatible with the objectives of this invention.

Representative of the technology which can be employed to prepare emulsions of bitumenous hydrocarbons is that described in U.S. Patent No. 4,618,348, to Hayes et al , the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

In preparing suitable emulsions of bitumen in a continuous aqueous phase, the bitumen can be emulsified through the addition of any amount of water effective to

for the emulsion. Typically, from 30 to 70% water (by volume of the final emulsion) is added (as by line 12) and the bitumen (added by line 14) is thoroughly and finely dispersed therein. Where greater amounts of water are desired (up to about 10 times these amounts, e.g., 2 to 5 times) , it may be more efficient to add only a portion prior to emulsification, and simply blend in the remainder later. Effective dispersion is achieved by suitable devices, such as rotary (e.g., centrifugal pumps) , mechanical, or static, dynamic or other emulsifying devices. Desirably the bitumen is heated to a fluid state prior to emulsification. Any one of a number of known chemical or biological surfactants can be added to ensure the stability of the bitumen-in-water emulsion, with water being the continuous phase.

It is preferred to obtain droplet sizes effective to provide a high surface area of contact between the desulfurization agent and the bitumen during reaction. This is important to both the reaction rate and to the degree of reaction which can be achieved since reactions take place at the bitumen-water interface. Fine dispersion helps to maximize the chance that the sulfur content of the individual bitumen droplets will be contacted by the desulfurization agent during the entire reaction period. It is preferred to obtain mean droplet sizes below about 250 microns, and more preferably in the range of 10 to 100 microns. This size range allows effective surface area for reaction while also assuring stability of the emulsion at reasonable energy input and surfactant levels. Desirably, less than 5% of the droplets will be in excess of 100 microns, and preferably this will be kept to less than 2%.

While it is conceivable that desulfurization agents could be added to the aqueous phase during preparation of the oil-in-water emulsion, it is preferable that the emulsion be passed to a separate desulfurization zone, shown as 20 in the Figure, such as by line 16.

The reaction is initiated by introducing into the water phase of the emulsion a microbiological desul¬ furization agent (such as via line 22) which can be any biological organism, living or dead, any biologically- produced enzyme or sequence of enzymes, cellular matter of an organism, or chemically-synthesized equivalent that is capable of reacting with the sulfur in the bitumen, preferably by oxidizing it to sulfate. Among the various forms of microbiological desulfurization agents are those selected from the group consisting of cell cultures, immobilized cell masses, fragmented cells, cell extracts, enzyme mixtures, synthetically-prepared copies of active enzyme sequences or components, and mixtures of these.

The preferred agents are capable of cleaving carbon-sulfur bonds in bitumen, and particularly in emulsion form. The preferred desulfurization agents react with the bitumens such that the organic sulfur contained in them is released to the aqueous phase of the preferred bitumen-in-water emulsions. While a mixture of agents can be employed, to act on inorganic and organic sulfur with the modest utilization of carbon, the more preferred agents do not substantially affect the heating value of the fuel, but selectively oxidize organic sulfur to water-soluble sulfates which can either be physically removed or chemically bound so that they do not cause SO _χ production during combustion. It is, indeed, a

-li¬

major advantage of this invention that some fuels can be treated and directly burned with decreased SO _χ production, with no need to separately remove the metabolic residues of the sulfur when chemically bound.

Any of the organisms effective for reacting with the sulfur content of bitumen can be employed. Specifically identified as useful are the following:

MICROORGANISM REFERENCE

Pseudomonas sp.CBl U.S.Pat.No.4,562,156 ATCC NO. 39381

Mixed culture U.S.Pat.No.4,659,670 ATCC No. 39327

Acinetobacter sp.CB2 U.S.Pat.No.4,808,535 ATCC No. 53515

Mixed culture U.S.Pat.No.4,851,350

B. Sulfasportare U.S.Pat.No.4,632,906 ATCC No. 39909

Mixed culture Kilbane, Desulfurization of IGTS7 coal:the microbial solution, Trends in Biotechnology, April 1989, vol.7, no.4, pp.97-101

Rhodococcuε Kilbane, Biodesulfurization: rhodochrous IGTS8 Future Prospects in Coal Cleaning, Seventh Annual

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

International Pittsburgh Coal Conference Proceedings Sept.10-14, 1990, pp.373-382

B . εphaeri cus Ibid. IGTS9

Sulfolobus brierleyi Bhattacharyya, Khalid , Hsieh, Kermode, and Aleem; Bioprocessing of Coal and Model Compounds; U. S. Department of Energy Con tract No. DE-FC2289PC89851; Contractors Meeting, Oct.3-4, 1989

Pseudomonas putida Ibid.

Mixed culture Ibid. Oil-2

Sulfolobus Kargi and Robinson; Bio¬ acidocaldarius logical Removal of Pyritic Sulfur From Coal By The Thermophilic Organism Sulfolobus Acidocaldarius; Biotech, and Bioeng. , vol. 27, Jan. 1985, pp.41-49

Thiobacillus Andrews and Maczuga, ferrooκidans Biotechnol . Bioeng. Symp. , 12, 337 (1982)

Mixed culture of Ibid.

T. ferrooxidans and T. thiooxidanε

In addition to this relatively short list are those agents cited or otherwise referred to in the references identified by this application, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additionally, other microbiological desulfurization agents which meet the objectives of the invention can be employed whether now known or which will be later developed.

The reaction is conducted in any suitable reaction vessel or containment device 20 by maintaining contact between the desulfurization agent and the bitumen for a time and under conditions effective to reduce the oxidizable sulfur content of the bitumen. The desulfuri¬ zation zone can include storage, transport or intermediate processing vessels (including pipelines) as long as conditions are maintained to sustain microorganism or other agent activity. Nutrients are added as necessary to support the growth of microorganisms. Similarly, the pH is adjusted as necessary and aeration such as via line 24 and sparging apparatus 26 may be used to serve as a supply of oxygen and/or carbon dioxide for the microorganisms. In addition to mixing by gas sparging, it is also desired to provide additional mixing shear to better distribute the gas within the reaction vessel and to reduce any tendency for gas bubbles to inhibit the reaction.

Contact of the bitumen with the desulfurization organism or other agent is made at conditions effective for the reaction and will, like the supply of nutrients, pH adjustment, temperature, aeration, and the like, depend

on the particular desulfurization agent employed. For many of the useful agents, values for these parameters are known and for the others they can be readily determined by those skilled in the art. Temperatures of from about 15°C to about 90°C will generally be effective, and are most typically in the range of from about 20°C to about 35°C. While thermophilic organisms are known and have advantages in terms of high temperature operation, reaction at temperatures above about 80°C requires special precautions to assure against excessive water loss, heating costs, and emulsion disruption. For most cases, practical temperatures are below 100°C.

The reaction will be continued for a period of time sufficient to at least partially desulfurize the bitumen. Generally, time periods of under 120 days, e.g. less than 30 days will usually be adequate. There is typically no need to continue the reaction for this long. Conversely, there is usually no reason to stop the reaction at any particular time where the organisms do not degrade other aspects of the fuel. More typical reaction times will be encompassed in the range of from about 10 hours to about 300 hours of contact.

The contact of the bitumen with the organisms desirably results in a bitumen with a sulfur content of less than two percent and preferably one percent or less.

Following reaction, or one stage of reaction, the emulsion can be at least partially broken to produce a separable aqueous layer containing the ma ority of the desulfurization agent and sulfate oxidation products. The aqueous layer can then be separated from the bitumen, and the bitumen then reemulsified.

EET

During biochemical desulfurization, sulfur is transferred from the bitumen to the aqueous phase of the emulsion. The emulsion can be passed via line 28 to a separation zone 30 wherein separation is accomplished using known emulsion breaking techniques including the use of pressure, temperature, settling, centrifugation, chemical deemulsifiers or any combination. This results in the separation of desulfurized bitumen from the water, sulfates and organisms. The bitumen can be withdrawn as via line 32 for storage, reemulsification, refining, or burning.

In one preferred form of the invention, the addition of water treatment agents (chemical sulfate binding agents) such as alkaline calcium, magnesium, aluminum, barium, and like metal compounds such as the oxides, hydroxides, and carbonates in effective amounts will eliminate the need to break the emulsion for the purpose of removing the sulfur metabolites, such as sulfates. These and other treatment agents are employed to chemically bind the sulfates thereby removing them from SO _χ formation. They can also be added in excess of sulfate such that SO _χ produced by unreacted sulfur is neutralized. These agents can be employed stagewise to most effectively react with the sulfates in solution. Magnesium-containing treatment agents, e.g. magnesium oxide and magnesium hydroxide, have the desirable added advantage of decreasing problems associated with vanadium. It is also possible to add these or other agents in the form of organic salts, such as the soluble salts of calcium, magnesium, or sodium with organic acids such as formic, acetic, propionic, butyric, and the like.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET

In another preferred form of the invention, the reaction is carried out in a plurality of stages, e. g. from 2 to 10, and typically less than 5. For each stage, the reaction is brought to partial completion, the emulsion is at partially broken, and the bitumen is worked effectively (separately or during reemulsification) to bring a fresh layer of sulfur compounds to the surfaces of the individual droplets. Reaction conditions, other than time, will closely follow those for single stage reactions.

In another preferred form of the invention, the cell culture is saved for reuse in a subsequent reaction or reaction stage, but is treated as by maceration or other known technique to obtain a cell extract which is then employed alone or in combination with another desulfuri¬ zation agent for a subsequent reaction or reaction stage. This technique is especially advantageous when used to prepare a fuel emulsion which can be burned directly. It has the further benefit of economy while diminishing the possibility of perpetuating a contaminated culture.

When desired, the aqueous phase can be withdrawn from the separation zone and passed such as by line 34 to a separate sulfate removal zone 40. In this or other zone (not shown) the aqueous phase may be first treated, such as by floculation and/or filtration, to remove any cellular or other suspended material. The cellular material may be reused in cellular form or as an extract.

The desulfurized bitumen can then be withdrawn such as by line 32 and stored, burned, reemulsified or refined. Desirably, in the case of very heavy bitumens such as

Orinoco bitumens and others, it can be reemulsified as a

desulfurized oil-in-water emulsion to assist in its storage and handling. Alternatively, it can be prepared as an oil-in-water emulsion fuel for combustion or further treatment. Combustion of heavy oil-in-water emulsions is well known to those skilled in the art, and may require modifications to burner nozzles to optimize combustion. It is an advantage of the invention that when Orimulsion fuel emulsions are treated by the process of this invention, they can very easily be employed to replace coal with reduced SO _χ and particulates.

The aqueous phase in zone 40 contains microorganisms, water and sulfur. The sulfur can be removed by the addition of a calcium, magnesium, aluminum or barium based water treatment/precipitating agent. Separation of the precipitated sulfates can be made at line 42 and the water and microorganisms can be recycled back to the desulfuri¬ zation step via conduit 44. If excess or unwanted organisms have evolved, then they can be directed as a waste stream for combustion or disposal. It is possible that new or regenerated organisms may need to be added to the recycle stream to replace those eliminated or killed in the overall process.

The following examples are presented to further illustrate and explain the present invention and should not be taken as limiting in any regard. Unless otherwise indicated, all parts and percentages are by weight, and are based on the weight at the particular stage of the processing being described.

Example 1

This example describes the desulfurization of Orimulsion bitumen-in-water emulsion.

An open barrel containing 30 gallons of emulsion is employed as the reactor. The barrel is held in a vat of water which is controlled to maintain the temperature at about 30"C. A sparging ring is positioned at the bottom of the barrel to deliver air into the emulsion at a rate of 100 liters per minute. The emulsion has the following analysis:

Parts (wt.)

Separately, a culture is prepared as in U.S. Patent No. 4,632,906. The organism (ATCC No. 39909) is a strain of Bacillus εulfasportare which has the ability to oxidize organic sulfur to water-soluble sulfates and utilize carbon dioxide as its sole source of carbon.

The aqueous phase of the emulsion is supplemented with minerals to sustain the growth of the culture and 1 liter of culture (containing 10 ⁹ cells per milliliter) is added to the reactor. Reaction is continued for 30 days with continued air sparging gently to agitate and supply of oxygen and carbon dioxide to sustain the reaction. The aqueous phase is analyzed daily for pH and sulfate. The reaction mixture is manually agitated twice daily with a large paddle to minimize the problems with channeling and poor distribution of oxygen to the culture. Magnesium carbonate is added as necessary to maintain the pH between 6 and 8. The fuel is burned in this form without removal of the cells or sulfate salts, simply straining prior to atomization by steam or air to assure that the injection nozzles are not clogged. The sulfates are bound by the magnesium and not available for the formation of SO _χ .

Example 2

The process of Example 1 is repeated, but this time the sulfur content of the emulsion is determined prior to reaction, and a stoichiometric amount of finely-divided dolomite is admixed with the emulsion at the beginning of the reaction. Periodic additions of magnesium carbonate are not employed.

Example 3

The process of Example 1 is again varied, this time the emulsion is transferred to a large vat after reaction and is there flooded with 300 gallons of water at 30 degrees Celcius. This treatment at least partially breaks the emulsion, permitting an aqueous layer to be decanted and the mass of live cells to be recovered. The resulting bitumen layer is then reheated and reemulsified.

Example 4

The process of Example 3 is repeated, but this time after separating the aqueous layer and recovering the live cells, calcium hydroxide is added in 10% excess of the sulfate to precipitate the sulfate as calcium sulfate which can be recovered and employed in the manufacture of gypsum products.

Example 5

The process of Example 3 is again repeated, but this time the recovered cells are macerated to prepare an extract.

Example 6

Ten gallons of Orimulsion fuel emulsion are placed in a reactor as in Example 1, to this are added: (1) an additional fifteen gallons of water, (2) calcium carbonate, in stoiciometric amount with the sulfur in the fuel, and (3) a cell extract as prepared in example 5. The reaction is then carried out as in Example 1.

Example 7

Ten gallons of Orimulsion fuel emulsion are placed in a reactor as in example 1, to this are added an inoculum of Rhodococcus rhodocrouε IGTS8, and the reaction is then carried out as in Example 1.

Example 8

The process of Example 7 is repeated but this time the emulsion is transferred to a pressure vessel following reaction and heated to about 110"C to break the emulsion. The phases are separated and the bitumen is reemulsified with sufficient water to provide an emulsion with 30% water.

Example 9

The procedure for Example 7 is repeated, but this time employing a culture of Bacillus sphaericu IGTS9, an additional five gallons of water is added before the reaction, no magnesium carbonate is added during reac¬ tion, and following reaction calcium hydroxide is added to the reaction mixture in stoiciometric quantity with the original sulfur content of the fuel.

Example 10

The process of Example 7 is repeated, but this time the organism is B. εphaericus IGTS9, the emulsion is broken chemically following reaction, and the aqueous phase is separated and treated with alumina trihydrate.

Example 11

The process of Example 10 is repeated, but this time an additional ten gallons of water are added prior to the reaction, and the reaction is carried out in three stages, each of ten days duration. After each stage, the emulsion is broken by heat and pressure and the bitumen reemulsified with a fresh aqueous phase. Following the third stage reaction, the water for emulsification is reduced to three gallons.

Example 12

The process of Example 11 is repeated, but this time the emulsion is preliminarily broken by causing pressure drop through a ball valve with exit to an open vat wherein at least a portion of the live cells are recovered for use in subsequent processing.

Example 13

The process of Example 1 is repeated, but this time employing a mixed culture of B. sphaericus IGTS9 and B. Sulfasportare ATCC 39909 and following reaction, adding a stoiciometric amount of alumina trihydrate based on the original sulfur content of the fuel.

Example 14

The process of Example 13 is repeated wherein the emulsion is then broken after reaction, the cells are separated from the aqueous phase prior to addition of the alumina trihydrate and the bitumen is reemulsified to achieve an emulsion containing 30% water.

Example 15

The process of Example 1 is repeated with several variations. In this Example, the emulsion is contacted with Rhodococcus rhodochrous IGTS8, again for thirty days and again at 30°C. Following reaction, the reaction mixture is transferred to a large vat and is there

flooded with 300 gallons of water at 30 degrees Celcius. This treatment at least partially breaks the emulsion, permitting an aqueous layer to be decanted and the mass of live cells to be recovered. The water phase is then reacted with a twenty percent excess of calcium oxide to precipitate the sulfates. The resulting bitumen layer is then reheated and reemulsified.

The above description is for the purpose of teaching the person of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the invention, and it is not intended to detail all those obvious modifications and variations of it which will become apparent to the skilled worker upon reading the description. For example, the advantages of this invention have application to other hydrocarbons, including coal and other crudes and petroleum fractions. It is intended that all such reasonable modifications and variations be included within the scope of the invention, which is defined by the following claims.