BACKGROUND Vinyl fluoride is a useful monomer for the preparation of fluorocarbon polymers which have excellent weathering and chemical resistance properties.

Vinyl fluoride can be produced from acetylene and hydrogen fluoride using mercury catalysts. It can also be produced by the dehydrofluorination of 1,1 -difluoroethane. The dehydrofluorination of 1,1 -difluoroethane to vinyl fluoride and hydrogen fluoride is an equilibrium reaction. According to published literature the following equilibrium concentrations of vinyl fluoride (VF), based on the moles of VF divided by the moles of HFC-152a + VF, have been determined; about 13% VF at 2270C, about 40% VF at 3270C and about 99% VF at 427"C.

U.S. Patent No. 2,599,631 discloses a process for the manufacture of vinyl fluoride by the dehydrofluorination of HFC- 1 52a. The dehydrofluorination is done in the presence or absence of a catalyst. The dehydrofluorination catalysts disclosed include oxygen, charcoal, and the free metals, salts and oxides of the elements of Groups IA, IB, IIA, IIB, VB and VIII of the periodic table. In an example using the divalent Group II metal compound calcium fluoride as a catalyst (at about 500"C), the conversion of HFC-152a to vinyl fluoride was 66% (i.e., about 66% of equilibrium). There is an ongoing interest in developing more efficient catalysts for the conversion of HFC- 152a to VF.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION A process is provided for the manufacture of vinyl fluoride (i.e., CH2=CHF, VF or 1141) from 1,1-difluoroethane (i.e., CH3CHF2, F152a or HFC-152a) which comprises contacting said 1,1 -difluoroethane at an elevated temperature with a catalyst containing at least one divalent Group II metal compound. The process of this invention is characterized by contacting said 1,1 -difluoroethane at a temperature of from about 200cm to 4000C with a catalyst containing (a) at least one compound selected from the oxides, fluorides and oxyfluorides of magnesium, zinc and mixtures of magnesium and zinc, and optionally (b) at least one compound selected from the oxides, fluorides and oxyfluorides of aluminum; provided that the atomic ratio of any metals other than magnesium and zinc (e.g., aluminum) in total, to the total of magnesium and zinc in said catalyst is about 1:4. or less (e.g., 1:9).

DETAILED DISCUSSION The present invention provides a process for the manufacture of vinyl fluoride by contacting 1,1 -difluoroethane in the vapor phase in the presence of catalysts selected from the group consisting of oxides, fluorides and oxyfluorides of magnesium, zinc and mixtures of magnesium and zinc. The catalysts may also contain metals other than magnesium and/or zinc provided that the atomic ratio of metals other than magnesium and zinc to the total of magnesium and zinc is about 1:4, or less. Of note are embodiments which contain in addition to the oxides, fluorides and/or oxyfluorides of magnesium and zinc, at least one compound selected from the oxides, fluorides and oxyfluorides of aluminum; provided that the atomic ratio of aluminum to the total of magnesium and zinc in said catalyst is about 1:4, or less (e.g., about 1:9). Preferred catalysts include catalysts consisting essentially of magnesium fluoride, and catalysts consisting essentially of magnesium fluoride and at least one compound selected from the oxides, fluorides and oxyfluorides of aluminum.

A suitable catalyst may be prepared, for example, as follows: Magnesium oxide is dried until essentially all water is removed, e.g., for about 18 hours at about 100°C. The dried material is then transferred to the reactor to be used. The temperature is then gradually increased to about 400"C while maintaining a flow of nitrogen through the reactor to remove any remaining traces of moisture from the magnesium oxide and the reactor. The temperature is then lowered to about 200"C and a fluoriding agent such as HF or other vaporizable fluorine containing compounds such as SF4, CCl3F, CCl2F2, CHF3 or CCl2FCClF2, diluted with nitrogen is passed through the reactor. The nitrogen can be gradually reduced until only HF or other vaporizable fluorine containing compounds is being passed through the reactor. At this point the temperature can be increased to about 450"C and held at that temperature for a time sufficient (depending on the fluoriding agent flowrate and the catalyst volume) to convert the magnesium oxide to a fluoride content corresponding to at least 40% by weight (e.g., for from 15 to 300 minutes). The fluorides are in the form of magnesium fluoride or magnesium oxyfluoride; the remainder of the catalyst is magnesium oxide. It is understood in the art that fluoriding conditions such as time and temperature can be adjusted to provide higher than 40 weight % fluoride- containing material.

Another suitable procedure for the catalyst preparation is to add ammonium hydroxide to a solution of magnesium nitrate and (if present) zinc nitrate and/or aluminum nitrate. The ammonium hydroxide is added to the nitrate solution to a pH of about 8.8. At the end of the addition, the solution is filtered, the solid obtained is washed with water, dried and slowly heated to 5000C, where

it is calcined. The calcined product is then treated with a suitable fluorine- containing compound as described above.

The physical shape of the catalyst is not critical and may, for example, include pellets, powders or granules. Although not necessary, catalysts which have not been fluorided can be treated with HF before use. It is thought that this converts some of the surface oxides to oxyfluorides. This pretreatment can be accomplished by placing the catalyst in a suitable container (which can be the reactor to be used to perform the reaction of the instant invention) and thereafter, passing HF over the dried catalyst so as to partially saturate the catalyst with HF.

This is conveniently carried out by passing HF over the catalyst for a period of time (e.g., about 15 to 300 minutes) at a temperature of, for example, about 200"C to about 450"C. Nevertheless, this HF treatment is not essential.

The reaction temperature will normally be within the range from about 200"C to about 400"C, preferably about 225"C to 3750C. To provide for low acetylene by-product formation and to enhance catalyst life, the temperature is preferably kept within the range of from about 250"C to about 300"C, more preferably, from about 250"C to about 280"C.

The 1,1 -difluoroethane is typically passed over the catalyst at a rate of about 60 volumes to about 3600 volumes per volume of catalyst per hour; preferably 120 volumes to 720 volumes per volume of catalyst per hour. These volumes correspond to a contact time of about 60 seconds to about 1 second and preferably about 30 seconds to about 5 seconds. Normally a contact time is employed which is sufficient to provide a dehydrofluorination of HFC- 1 52a equal to at least 50% of the equilibrium value for conversion of I , 1 -difluoroethane to vinyl fluoride at the temperature employed; preferably at least 80%, and more preferably at least 90% of the equilibrium value at a given reaction temperature.

The reaction pressure can be subatmospheric, atmospheric or superatmospheric. Generally, near atmospheric pressures are preferred.

Unreacted starting material can be recycled to the reactor for the production of additional CH2=CHF. Vinyl fluoride (b.p. -72°C) may be recovered from the reaction product and any unreacted 1,1 -difluoroethane (b.p. -25°C) by conventional procedures such as distillation.

The process of this invention can be carried out readily in the vapor phase using well known chemical engineering practice.

The reaction zone and its associated feed lines, effluent lines and associated units should be constructed of materials resistant to hydrogen fluoride.

Typical materials of construction, well-known to the fluorination art, include stainless steels, in particular of the austenitic type, the well-known high nickel alloys, such as Moneli' nickel-copper alloys, HastelloyB nickel-based alloys and,

Inconel) nickel-chromium alloys, and copper-clad steel. Silicon carbide is also suitable for reactor fabrication.

Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in the art can, using the description herein, utilize the present invention to its fullest extent. The following specific embodiments are to be construed as illustrative, and not as constraining the remainder of the disclosure in any way whatsoever.

EXAMPLES Legend 1141 is CH2=CHF GCMS is gas chromatography- F152a is CH3CHF2 mass spectroscopy CT is contact time kf is rate constant of the kr is rate constant of the reverse reaction forward reaction PREPARATION OF CATALYSTS General Procedure for the Preparation of Metal Fluoride Catalysts: Unless stated otherwise, the following general procedure was followed for the preparation of metal fluoride catalysts containing one or more metal fluorides.

An aqueous solution of the metal(s) halide(s) or nitrate(s) in deionized water was treated with 48% aqueous HF with stirring. Stirring was continued overnight and the slurry evaporated to dryness on a steam bath. The dried solid was then calcined in air at 4000C for about four hours, cooled to room temperature, crushed and sieved to provide a 12-20 mesh (1.68-0.84 mm) fraction which was used in catalyst evaluations.

Preparation of MgF2 catalyst Following the general procedure described above for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts, a MgF2 catalyst was prepared from 150.0 g of Mg(NO3)2 6H2O, 500 mL deionized water and 75 mL 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of MgF2/AlF3 (98:2): Following the general procedure described above for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts, a MgF2/AlF3 catalyst having a nominal magnesium to aluminum atomic ratio of 43:1 was prepared from 251.28 g Mg(NO3)2 6H2O, 7.50 g Al(NO3)3,9H2O and 100 mL 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of MgF2/AlF3 (9:1): Following the general procedure described above for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts, a MgF2/AlF3 catalyst having a nominal magnesium to aluminum atomic ratio of 9:1 was prepared from 237.6 g Mg(NO3)2 6H2O, 34.76 g Al(NO3)3'9H2O and 120 mL 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of MgF2/AlF3 (1:1): Following the general procedure described above for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts, a MgF2/AlF3 catalyst having a nominal magnesium to

aluminum atomic ratio of 1:1.1 was prepared from 128.2 g Mg(NO3)2 6H2O, 187.56 g Al(NO3)3 9H20 and 120 mL 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of MgF2/AlF3 (1:9): Following the general procedure described above for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts, a MgF2/AlF3 catalyst having a nominal magnesium to aluminum atomic ratio of 1:11 was prepared from 23.07 g Mg(NO3)2 6H2O, 337.6 g Al(N03)3 9H20 and 166 ml 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of ZnF2 Following the general procedure described for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts, ZnF2 was prepared from an aqueous solution of 148.73 g of Zn(NO3)26H2O and 62 mL of 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of ZnF2/AlF3 (1:1): Following the general procedure described for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts, a ZnF2/AlF3 catalyst having a nominal zinc to aluminum atomic ratio of 2.4:1 was prepared from 148.73 g Zn(NO3)2 6H2O, 187.56 g Al(N03)3 9H20 and 150 mL 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of ZnF2/AlF3 (1:9): Following the general procedure described for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts a ZnF2/AlF3 catalyst having a nominal zinc to aluminum atomic ratio of 0.2:1 was prepared from 26.77 g Zn(NO3)2 6H2O, 337.6 g Al(N03)3 9H20 and 166 mL 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of ZnF2/AlF3 (9:1): Following the general procedure described for the preparation of fluorinated catalysts, a ZnF2/AlF3 catalyst having a nominal zinc to aluminum atomic ratio of 24:1 was prepared from 267.71 g Zn(NO3)26H2O, 33.76 g Al(N03)3-9H20 and 120 mL 48% aqueous HF.

Preparation of Fluorided Magnesium Oxide To a reactor was charged 5.42 g, 5 cc of a commercial sample of magnesium oxide which was granulated to 12/20 mesh (1.68/0.84 mm) prior to use. It was heated in a flow of nitrogen (50 cc/min) for about one hour at 1750C.

After this period, a flow of HF (50 cc/min) was started through the reactor. The reactor was maintained for an additional hour at 1 750C. After this period, the nitrogen flow was reduced to 20 cc/min and the HF flow increased to 80 cc/min.

The reactor temperature was then gradually raised to 400cm over a two hour period. The reactor contents were cooled to room temperature under a flow of nitrogen. When discharged, the fluorinated catalyst weighed 6.6 g which corresponds to a 40% conversion of MgO to MgF2.

Magnesium oxide, gamma- alumina, calcium fluoride and alpha and beta- aluminum fluorides were obtained from commercial sources as powders and were granulated prior to use.

EXAMPLES 1 TO 9 This series of examples demonstrates catalyst efficacy for the dehydro- fluorination of 1,1-difluoroethane (HFC-152a) to vinyl fluoride (1141).

Table 1 (Examples 1 to 9) shows three specific catalysts, each studied in three different reactors: one to determine the rate of reaction, one for catalyst life, and one for coproduct formation.

TABLE 1 First Reactor Second Reactor Third Reactor Example Example Example Example kAsec)-l Hours %1141 % acetylene Catalyst 275or (cat. life) 27soy 275or 260or MgF2 1 2 2 3 0.26 550 30 0.000 MgF2/AlF3 4 5 5 6 (98:2) 1.00 511 33 0.014 MgF2/AlF3 7 8 8 9 (9:1) 1.18 723 40 0.069 CT(sec)-> .055-.79 6 6 6 The reactor used to collect the data in Examples 1, 4, and 7 consisted of a 6" (15.2 cm) x 1/4" (0.64 cm) stainless steel tube. It was heated in a furnace to internal reactor temperatures of 225, 250, and 275"C. The rates of reaction were determined by measuring the per cent conversion as a function of contact time; the actual flows of F152a were 10 (1.7x10-7 m3/s), 25 (4.2x10-7 m3/s), 38 (6.3x10-7 m3/s), 50 (8.3x10-7 m3/s), 75 (1.3x10-6 m3/s), 100 (1.7x10-6 m3/s), and 144 (2.4x10-6 m3/s) sccm. The volume of catalyst used in all cases was 0.132 mL ground to 20-25 mesh (0.84-0.71 mm) and dried by heating at 2500C for 1 hour while purging with dry nitrogen flowing at 25 sccm(4.2xl0-7 m3/s). The rate of the dehydrofluorination was determined by fitting the data to the following set of equations, CH3CHF2 o CH2=CHF + HF kf CH2=CHF + HF o CH3CHF2 kr while monitoring the HFC- 1 52a and vinyl fluoride concentrations at the conditions mentioned above.

The data in Examples 2, 5 and 8 were determined in a 1/2" (1.3 cm) x 11" (27.9 cm) tubular reactor made of Hastelloy'" nickel alloy. The catalysts were dried by heating to 3500C for 16 hours under a flow of dry nitrogen of 50 sccm (8.3x10-7 m3/s) prior to actual use. The reactor was cooled to 2750C and a flow of F152a was begun at 50 sccm (8.3x10-7 m3/s). When the flow of vinyl fluoride began to decrease from its near-equilibrium value, the run was concluded. All of the catalysts were ground to 12x20 mesh (1.68-0.84 mm).

The reactor used for the data in Examples 3, 6 and 9 was an InconelTM nickel alloy 3/4" (1.9 cm) x 12" (30.5 cm) pipe with an internal diameter of 5/8" (1.6 cm). The catalysts (5 mL) were dried by heating to 2600C under a flow of dry nitrogen of 50 sccm (8.3x10-7 m3/s) prior to use. A flow of F152a was begun at 50 sccm (8.3x10-7 m3/s). The reactor products were sampled every hour, and the products were determined by GCMS. All of the catalysts were ground to 12x20 mesh (1.68-0.84 mm).

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE A Calcium fluoride (5.6 gm, 5.0 mL, 12-20 mesh (1.68-0.84 mm)) was placed in an InconelTM nickel alloy 3/4" (1.9 cm) x 12" (30.5 cm) pipe with an internal diameter of 5/8" (1.6 cm). The catalyst was dried by heating to 250"C under a flow of dry nitrogen of 50 sccm (8.3x10-7 m3/s) prior to use. HFC-152a was passed into the reactor at 50 sccm (8.3x10-7 m3/s) at 260 and 275"C. The results are shown in Table A.

TABLE A Temp(°C) %Fl52a %1141 260 99.5 0.5 275 99.8 0.8 EXAMPLE 10 Magnesium oxide (5.4 gm, 5 cc, 12-20 mesh (1.68-0.84 mm)) was placed in an InconelTM nickel alloy 3/4" (1.9 cm) x 12" (30.5 cm) pipe with an internal diameter of 5/8" (1.6 cm). The catalyst was dried by heating to 2600C under a flow of dry nitrogen of 50 sccm (8.3x10-7 m3/s) prior to use, and activated by treating with a flow of HF up to 80 sccm (1.3x10-6 m3/s) and up to 4000C. A flow of F152a was begun at 50 sccm (8.3x10-7 m3/s). The contact time was 12 seconds. The reactor products were sampled every hour, and the products were determined by GCMS. The results are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Temp(°C) %F152a %1141

260 76.0 24.0 EXAMPLE 11 ZnF2 (1 mL, 12-20 mesh (1.68-0.84 mm)) was placed in a 1/4" (0.64 cm) x 3" (7.6 cm) tubular HastelloyTM nickel alloy reactor. The reactor was heated to 275"C and a flow of F152a was begun at 5 sccm (1.7x10-7 m3/s) to give a contact time of 12 sec. The results are shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Temp(°C) %F152a %1141 275 90 10 EXAMPLE 12 ZnF2/AlF3 (9:1, 0.132 mL, 20-25 mesh (0.84 to 0.71 mm)) was placed in a 6" (15.2 cm) x 1/4" (0.64 cm) stainless steel tube heated in a furnace and was dried by heating at 2500C for 1 hour while purging with dry nitrogen flowing at 25 sccm (4.2x10-7 m3/s). The temperature was then raised to 2750C and F152a was passed over the catalyst at 25 sccm (4.2x 10-7 m3/s). The contact time was 0.32 seconds. The conversion of Fl 52a was monitored by gas chromatography; the %1141 was 15.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES B-H The reactor was the same as that of Example 11 for Comparative Example B. ZnF2/AlF3 (1:9) (1 mL, 12-20 mesh (1.68-0.84 mm)) was heated to 275"C and a flow of F152a was begun at 20 sccm (1.7x10-7 m3/s) to give a contact time of 3 sec. The results are shown in Table B. For the rest of the comparative examples, the catalyst was placed in a 6" (15.2 cm) x 1/4" (0.64 cm) stainless steel tube heated in a furnace (.132 mL, 20-25 mesh (0.84 to 0.71 mm)) and was dried by heating at 2500C for 1 hour while purging with dry nitrogen flowing at 25 sccm (4.2x10-7 m3/s). The temperature was then raised to 2750C and F152a was passed over the catalyst at 25 sccm (4.2x10-7 m3/s). The contact time was 0.32 seconds. The conversion ofF152a was monitored by gas chromatography; the results are shown in Table B.

TABLE B Example Catalyst %1141 B ZnF2/AlF3 24 (1:9) C MgF2/AlF3 27 (1:9) D gamma-Al2O3 28 E ZnF2/AlF3 22 (1:1) F MgF2/AlF3 30 (1:1) G alpha-AlF3 22 H beta-AlF3 12