The present invention relates to the technical field of peptide synthesis. More precisely, the present invention provides a new possibility to introduce cleavable linkers into chemically synthesized peptides, thereby creating new peptide conjugates. Prior art

Cleavable linkers, defined as chemical moieties which connect two functionalities through a cleavable bond, are important tools in solid phase synthesis (SPS) and chemical biology. Especially in solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) these linkers can help solving issues regarding the physicochemical properties, handling and purification of peptides: Through a cleavable linker peptides can be modified with functional tags (for example solubility enhancing moieties) and after the cleavage of the linker the desired peptide is released, with or without a residue of the linker. Cleavable linkers are widely used in organic synthesis and solid phase synthesis (see for example Leriche et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 571-582; Scott et al, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2251- 2268). Cleavage may be performed by chemical (nucleophiles, basic reagents, electrophiles, acidic reagents, reducing reagents, oxidizing reagents, organometallic and metal catalysts), by photochemical or enzymatic means. In peptide synthesis cleavable linkers are mainly used to link the nascent peptide to a resin which can be cleaved off after completion of solid phase peptide synthesis (see for example Novabiochem Peptide Synthesis Catalogue, Merck; Jensen et al. (Ed.), Peptide Synthesis and Application, Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1047, Springer Protocols, Humana Press, Springer, New York, 2013).

For internal incorporation into a peptide sequence cleavable linker building blocks have also been described. a,y-Diamino-B-hydroxybutanoic acid and y-amino-a,b- dihydroxybutanoic acid based linker building blocks for peptide synthesis have been described by Amore et al., ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 123-131. These linkers can be cleaved by oxidative means, i.e. using sodium periodate. Disadvantageous may be oxidation of oxidation sensitive components within the peptide like cysteine or methionine residues.

Photocleavable linker building blocks for peptide synthesis which have been described by Kim et ah, Synlett 2013, 24, 733-736 are another example. Disadvantages of photoirradiation may be incomplete linker cleavage and side reactions arising from radical reactions. A cyclitively cleavable linker for alcohols based on [2- (aminomethyl)phenyl]acetic acid has been described by Xiao et al., J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 379-382. This linker has only been applied for the synthesis and release of alcohols by using a solid support. A derivative which can be used for internal incorporation in peptide synthesis has not been described. Peptide synthesis applying cleavable solubilizing tags has been described using different chemistries and cleavage conditions (see for example: Jacobsen et al, JACS 2016, 138, 11777-11782; WO 2016047794).

Peptide synthesis applying cleavable purification tags has been described using different chemistries and cleavage conditions (see for example: Funakoshi et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1991, 88, 6981-6985; Funakoshi et al, J. Chromatogr. 1993, 638, 21-27; Canne, et al. Tetrahedron Letters 1997, 38, 3361-3364; Vizzavona et al., Tetrahedron Letters 2002, 43, 8693-8696; Hara et al., Journal of Peptide Science, 2009, 15, 369-376; Aucagne et al, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2012, 51, 11320-11324; Reimann et al., Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2015, 54, 306-310; Hara et al, Journal of Peptide Science, 2016, 15, 379-382; Patents: Aucagne et al. WO 2011058188, Zitterbart et al. WO 2017129818 Al). In this approach, the linkers are usually attached in the last cycle of SPPS to the N-terminus of the growing peptide chain to enable selective immobilization of the desired full-length peptide onto a solid support. Side products are removed by washing the solid support and eventually the target peptide is released by cleavage of the linker. The cleavable linkers used for non-chromatographic purification of peptides usually require strong basic conditions. Under these conditions undesired side-reactions might occur e.g. racemization. A major problem of the frequently used sulfonate-elimination linkers are the highly reactive electrophiles, which are generated during the cleavage reaction. These intermediates react rapidly with the nucleophilic side-chain groups (e.g. arginine, cysteine) and consequently limit the application of the sulfonate based cleavable linkers. The rather rare example of an oxidatively cleavable purification linker from Vizzavona et al. (Tetrahedron Letters 2002, 43, 8693-8696) circumvent the aforementioned problems, but is most likely not compatible with methionine or cysteine containing peptides.

Isoacyl dipeptides are tools for enhancing synthetic efficiency in Fmoc SPPS (Y. Sohma et al., Chem. Commun. 2004, 124-125). Isoacyl dipeptides consist of a Boc- protected serine or threonine derivative in which the B-hydroxyl group is acylated by a Fmoc-protected amino acid. After incorporation of an isoacyl dipeptide building block within the sequence of a peptide, the secondary structure of the peptide is changed enabling more efficient synthesis. Furthermore, after cleavage and deprotection the isoacyl form of the peptide can be purified by HPLC. At pH 7.4 O —N intramolecular acyl migration takes place to generate the regularly amide linked peptide. Applying these isoacyl dipeptide building blocks no cleavage reaction can be performed.

Peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates are an emerging class for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. However, the synthesis of these conjugates remains a major challenge (see reviews of N. Venkatesan et al., Chemical Reviews 2006, 106, 3712- 3761 and K. Lu et al., Bioconjugate Chemistry 2010, 21, 187-202). A straight forward approach would be to assemble the desired peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates on a polymeric support by means of solid-phase based synthesis. Unfortunately, established methods of solid-phase oligonucleotide and peptide synthesis are not fully compatible. The solid-phase synthesis of peptides requires the use of strong acids and thereby prevents the synthesis of peptide -oligonucleotide conjugates due to instability of oligonucleotides under acidic conditions. This is why the stepwise synthesis of peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates usually proceeds by first assembling the peptide, followed by oligonucleotide synthesis on the same solid support. Albeit this strategy has been successfully applied for the synthesis of rather simple peptide -oligonucleotide conjugates, the method is still lacking the full spectrum of compatible protecting groups to address the challenging chemistry of the amino acids side chains. Conclusively, a reliable and general applicable method for the stepwise solid-phase based synthesis of peptide -oligonucleotide conjugates is not available. Therefore, the synthesis of peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates usually proceeds by employing a convergent strategy. Here the peptide and the oligonucleotide fragments are synthesized separately by using routine building blocks and protocols of solid-phase synthesis. After purification the two fragments are conjugated and the desired peptide-oligonucleotide conjugate is isolated after an additional purification step. Low overall yields, increased expenditure of time and high costs are the major disadvantages of this strategy, which result from the aforementioned numerous purification steps and intermediate lyophilization procedures. Moreover, HPLC-based purification steps and intermediate lyophilization imped the possibility of achieving a high-throughput synthesis of peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates by means of automation. These drawbacks become particularly troublesome, if a large number of peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates needs to be synthesized, which is required e.g. for screening a suitable transfection peptide on a known antisense oligonucleotide. A perfect method would combine the ease of established solid-phase synthesis and post-synthetic conjugation while bypassing the need of any HPLC-based purification.

However, all the above disclosed methods for applying cleavable linkers for peptide synthesis have several disadvantages like inefficient incorporation or cleavage, harsh, damaging cleavage conditions, complex reagent synthesis or restricted use.

Brief description of the invention

The present invention therefore provides a building block comprising the structure

wherein 2 < n < 24, m = 2 or 3, and A and B are protective groups. Usually, A and B are orthogonal protective groups which are cleaved under different conditions. In one embodiment, A is an acid labile protective group and

B is a tag or base labile protective group. In one particular embodiment, A is Boc and/or B is Fmoc.

In a second aspect, the present invention provides a compound comprising the structure

wherein 2 < n < 24, m = 2 or 3, X is a peptide, or a solid support and Y is selected from a group consisting of a peptide, a functional group, a tag, and a peptide containing a functional group or a tag.

In one embodiment, Y is either a solubility enhancing tag, an immobilization tag or a solid phase. For example, Y may be selected from a group consisting of PEG, poly- lysine, poly-arginine, poly-glutamic acid, and poly-aspartic acid. Y may also be selected from a group consisting of biotin, hydrazine, aminooxy, azide, alkynyl, alkenyl, aldehyde, ketone, pyrroloalanine, carboxy and thiol.

In a third aspect, the present invention provides a method comprising the steps of synthesizing a peptide on a solid support, said peptide comprising a terminal amino group, providing a building block as disclosed above, and coupling said building block to said peptide Said method may further comprise the steps removing protective group B, and coupling at least one amino acid building block to the terminal amino group

Alternatively, said method may further comprise steps removing protective group B, optionally coupling at least one amino acid building block to the terminal amino group, and coupling a tag or a functional group to the terminal amino group

Said functional group or tag may be selected from a group consisting of PEG, poly- lysine, poly-arginine, poly-glutamic acid, poly-aspartic acid, biotin, hydrazine, aminooxy, azide, alkynyl, alkenyl, aldehyde, pyrroloalanine, carboxy, and thiol.

In addition, the methods disclosed above may further comprise the step of

removing protective group A at a pH < 6, thereby also removing other protective groups present on said peptide and cleaving said peptide from the solid support, which may occur at a pH > 8.

In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method comprising the steps of a) synthesizing a peptide on a solid support, said peptide comprising a terminal amino group, b) providing a building block as disclosed above, and c) coupling said building block to said peptide d) removing protective group B, e) optionally coupling at least one amino acid building block to the terminal amino group, and f) coupling a solubilizing or immobilizing tag to the terminal amino group,

and further comprising the steps g) removing protective group A at a pH < 6, thereby also removing other protective groups present on said peptide and cleaving said peptide from the solid support h) purifying said peptide, and i) cleaving off said solubilizing tag at a pH > 8, or g) removing protective group A at a pH < 6, thereby also removing other protective groups present on said peptide and cleaving said peptide from the solid support h) immobilizing said peptide via said immobilizing tag on a solid support i) optionally conjugating said peptide to an additional chemical entity, and j) cleaving off said immobilizing tag at a pH > 8.

Said chemical entity may be a carbohydrate, a protein, a peptide, a dye, a hapten, or the like. In particular, said chemical entity may be a nucleic acid, oligonucleotide or nucleotide containing compound, preferably a nucleoside-hexaphosphate.

Brief description of figures Figure 1

Peptide synthesis comprising introduction of linker 1 according to example 3 a) peptide synthesis

b) solvation in 0.05 M NaHCCb solution (pH = 8.2), triggering cyclization c) LC-MS shows cleavage of peptide AB into A and B over time Figure 2

Synthesis of a hydrophobic peptide according to example 4 a) cleavage of poly- lysine tag from insoluble peptide 12.

b) LC-MS of H-KKKKKlAhaGISFSIRFAIWIRFG-NH2 (10)

c) MS (ESI) of insoluble peptide 12

Figure 3

Affinity purification according to example 5 a) crude peptide mixture after SPPS and cleavage from resin

b) supernatant after 30 min

c) supernatant after incubation with 0.02 M NH4HCO3 (pH=8.8) for 30 min

Figure 4

Scheme: Rapid synthesis of nucleoside-peptide conjugates according to example 7 a) synthesis of peptides and nucleoside -peptide conjugates by solid-supported conjugation and non-chromatographic purification

Figure 5

HPLC-analyses of conjugates obtained in example 7

Detailed description of the invention

List of definitions and abbreviations:

Fmoc: Fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl

Boc: tert-Butyloxycarbonyl

SPPS:Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis

SPS: Solid Phase Synthesis TFA: Trifluoroacctic acid DBU: l ,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undcc-7-cnc DMF: N, N-Dimcthylformamide DAB: Diamino butyric acid

EDC: /V'-(3-Dimcthylaminopropyl)-/V'' -cthylcarbodiimidc DMAP: A'',A''-Dimcthylpyridin-4-aminc

HATU : 1 -[Bis(dimethylamino)methylene]- 1H- 1 ,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3- oxid hexafluorophosphate

DIPEA: N,N-Diisopropylethyl amine

THPTA: Tris(3-hydroxypropyltriazolylmethyl)amine

Pra: Propargylglycine

Aha: Azidohomoalanine

TIS: Triisopropyl silane

Definitions:

Tag: In the context of the present invention, a tag is a chemical moiety which alters the chemical or physical properties of a molecule and/or renders the molecule recognizable. For example, a purification tag may facilitate purification of a molecule. A tag may be an immobilization tag, i.c. a chemical moiety that can be attached to a solid support. A tag may also be a solubility enhancing tag, that means a chemical group which if present increases the solubility of a certain molecule.

Functional Group: Functional groups arc specific chemical groups (moieties) of atoms or bonds within molecules that arc responsible for the characteristic chemical reactions of those molecules. Functional groups arc specific substituents or moieties within molecules that are responsible for the characteristic chemical reactions of those molecules. The same functional group will undergo the same or similar chemical rcaction(s) regardless of the size of the molecule it is a part of. This allows for systematic prediction of chemical reactions and behavior of chemical compounds and design of chemical syntheses. Furthermore, the reactivity of a functional group can be modified by other functional groups nearby. In organic synthesis, functional group interconversion is one of the basic types of transformations. Functional groups are groups of one or more atoms of distinctive chemical properties no matter what they arc attached to. The atoms of functional groups are linked to each other and to the rest of the molecule by covalent bonds. For repeating units of polymers, functional groups attach to their nonpolar core of carbon atoms and thus add chemical character to carbon chains. Functional groups can also be charged.

Protecting group:

The term“protective group” or its synonyme“protecting group” denotes the group which selectively blocks a reactive site in a multifunctional compound such that a chemical reaction can be carried out selectively at another unprotected reactive site in the meaning conventionally associated with it in synthetic chemistry. Protecting groups can be removed at the appropriat point. Protecting groups arc amino- protecting groups, carboxy-protccting groups or hydroxy-protecting groups. A protecting group or protective group or blocking group is introduced into a molecule by chemical modification of a functional group to obtain chcmosclectivity in a subsequent chemical reaction. A protecting group is introduced to block or at least reduce the reactivity of functional groups. A deprotection is a chemical step of removal of a protecting group. Relevant protective groups in the field of peptide synthesis arc base labile protecting groups and acid labile protecting groups. Base labile protecting groups arc cleaved off at a pH between 7.5 and 12, but preferably at a pH between 8.0 and 10. Acid labile protective groups arc cleaved off at a pH between 6.5 and 3, but preferably at a pH between 6.0 and 5. For the present invention, amino protecting groups arc of particular importance. Amino-protecting groups are groups intended to protect an amino group and includes benzyl, bcnzyloxycarbonyl (carbobenzyloxy, CBZ), Fmoc (9-Fluorcnylmcthyloxycarbonyl), p-mcthoxybcnzyloxycarbonyl, p-nitrobenzyloxycarbonyl, tcrt-butoxycarbonyl (BOC), and trifluoroacctyl. Examples of these groups arc found in T. W. Greene and P. G. M. Wuts,“Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis”, 2nd cd., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1991 , chapter 5; E. Haslam,“Protective Groups in Organic Chemistry”, J. G. W. McOmic, Ed., Plenum Press, New York, N.Y., 1973, Chapter 5, and T.W. Greene,“Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1981 , Chapter 5.

Peptide: A peptide is a chain of amino acid building blocks linked through amide bonds with a length of 2 to 120 residues.

Novel clcavablc linkers for peptide synthesis have been developed. Cleavage occurs under mild basic conditions. The linkers arc based on a 4-aminobutanoatc core which undergoes intramolecular lactamization at pH >8 cleaving the ester bond by releasing two fragments, the N-tcrminal alcohol and the C-terminal lactam (scheme l a). As Nu-Fmoc- N Boc-protcctcd building block (scheme lb) this aminobutanoatc clcavablc linker can be employed in solid phase peptide synthesis. Aminobutanoatc linker 1 turned out to be stable during conventional peptide synthesis and surprisingly during an Fmoc deprotection of the successive amino acid no cyclization to a 6 membered diketopiperazine and the corresponding breakup peptide was observed.

O Scheme 1

a) Cyclitivcly cleavage of the linker (n> l ).

b) General formula of protected clcavable linker (n > 1 ).

During solid phase peptide synthesis the Ng-Boc protected amino group is unrcactivc and aminobutanoatc linker remains intact. Cleavage of the peptide from the solid support and deprotection of protecting groups under acidic conditions leads to removal of the Ng-Boc protecting group of the aminobutanoatc linker. Since the amino group is protonated under the acidic cleavage and deprotection conditions the lactamization reaction is fully suppressed and the aminobutanoatc linker remains intact. The peptide containing the intact aminobutanoatc linker can therefore also be purified under acidic conditions (i.c. water/ acetonitrile/ trifluoroacctic acid eluent). Under mild basic conditions the cleavage of the aminobutanoatc linker proceeds by means of an intramolecular cyclization reaction, releasing two peptides, one as a N- alcohol and the other as a C-tcrminal lactam. The general concept is shown in scheme 2 which shows solid phase peptide synthesis with an aminobutanoatc linker (n> l ) and final cleavage with release of two peptide fragments.

o

Scheme 2

It has been found that a cleavable linker with n = 1 is not suited since side reactions occurred during solid phase peptide synthesis (i.e. ester cleavage). However, cleavable linkers with n = 2 and n = 3 were compatible with solid phase peptide synthesis and yielded the desired linker-containing peptides , which could be cleaved under mild alkaline conditions. Therefore the above mentioned building blocks can be used to add a variety of functional groups to the N-terminus of a peptide which can be removed at a later process step.

One application of adding a cleavable functional group is to introduce a hydrophilic tag onto the N-terminus of a hydrophobic peptide in order to enable the purification (i.e. by HPLC) of such a hydrophobic peptide. After purification, the solubilizing tag can be cleaved off under mild basic conditions in order to release the purified hydrophobic target peptide.

The method can also be applied for an improved synthesis of oligonucleotide-peptide conjugates. This is of particular interest, if the peptide contains many hydrophobic residues. For instance, the hydrophobic peptide can be synthesized first, containing a conjugation site for the attachment of the oligonucleotide, such as azidohomoalanine. Then the cleavable aminobutanoatc linker is coupled, followed by introduction of a solubilizing tag sequence. After cleavage and deprotection the peptide can be purified by HPLC and finally be conjugated to an oligonucleotide functionalized with a conjugation site. Said conjugation site, for example, may be an alkyne group. Thereafter the conjugate can be purified and the solubilizing tag can be cleaved off under mild alkaline conditions.

Another application is the introduction of a purification tag which may be introduced at the N-terminus of a peptide. Biotin is a prominent example for such a purification tag. First, peptide is synthesized via SPPS including a capping step after each coupling. Thereafter the cleavable linker is coupled to the N-terminus of the peptide and finally biotin is coupled onto the cleavable linker. After cleavage and deprotection under acidic conditions, the biotin labeled peptide can be bound to streptavidin coated beads, which are preferably magnetic beads. Non-biotinylated by-products of SPPS (i.e. failure sequences, deletions) can be removed by washing. Thereafter, the purified peptide can be released from the streptavidin beads by cleaving the linker under mild alkaline treatment.

Contemporary methods for the convergent synthesis of peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates require multiple purification steps. Therefore, the screening of numerous peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates is a time-and cost-consuming endeavor. The method of the invention enables the rapid synthesis of peptide-(oligo)nucleotide conjugates. The method of the invention using the cleavable linker building block of the invention circumvents the need of tedious HPLC-purification steps by the combination of chemoselective reactivity units and cleavable purification tags and allowing for mild cleavage of the molecule of interest. This non-chromatographic purification approach enables the parallel synthesis of numerous conjugates in good yield and purity.

As will be shown within the examples, the cleavable linker of the invention is easy to synthesize, allows efficient incorporation into peptides and mild cleavage under slightly alkaline, non-destructing conditions.

Examples

Example 1: Synthesis of linker 1 (m=2; n=3)

DBU, H ₂ 0, DMF,

O rt, 2 h

¾ >

NHBoc NHBoc

NHBoc

Pd(PPh ₃ ) ₄ , PPh ₃ , sodium

2-ethylhexanoate, rt, 1 h

FmocHN

Scheme 3

Synthesis of compound 2:

Allyl 4-hydroxybutanoate

C7H12O3 To a solution of g-butyrolactone (5.00 g, 58.1 mmol) in DMF (17 ml) were added H2O (13.6 g, 13.6 ml, 755 mmol) and DBU (8.85 g, 8.67 ml, 58.1 mmol). After 1 h stirring at r.t. allyl bromide (10.5 g, 7.53 ml, 87.2 mmol) was added to the solution. The reaction was quenched after 1 h by addition of sat. aq. NH ₄ Cl solution (30 ml) and the aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 100 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2S0 ₄ and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Column chromatography over S1O2 (n-hexane/ethyl acetate = 1 :1) afforded the desired product (5.90 g, 40.9 mmol, 71%) as a colorless oil.

R _f (n-hexane/ethyl acetate = 1 : 1) = 0.33 (KMn0 ₄ )

¾-NMR (400MHz, CDCb): d = 6.06 - 5.86 (m, 1H), 5.42 - 5.04 (m, 2H), 4.59 (td, J = 1.4, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.25 - 4.06 (m, 1H), 3.73 - 3.67 (m, 1H), 2.55 - 2.41 (m, 2H), 2.34 - 2.16 (m, 1H), 1.99 - 1.83 (m, 1H), 1.62 (s, 1H).

Synthesis of compound 3:

4-(Allyloxy)-4-oxobutyl 2-((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)-4-((tert- butoxycarbonyl)amino)butanoate

NHBoc

C31H38N2O8

Commercially available Fmoc-Dab(Boc)-OH (1.00 g, 2.27 mmol) and compound 2 (360 mg, 2.50 mmol) were dissolved in CH2CI2 (7.5 ml) and cooled to 0°C. EDC- HC1 (479 mg, 2.50 mmol) and DMAP (28 mg, 0.227 mmol) were added to the solution. After 1 h stirring at r.t. sat. aq. NaCl solution (25 ml) was added to the reaction mixture which was then extracted with CH2CI2 (3 x 50 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2S0 ₄ and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure affording the desired product (1.27 g, 2.24 mmol, 99 %) as a colorless resin.

R _f (n-hexane/ethyl acetate = 1 : 1) = 0.63

^X H-NMR (400MHz, CDCb): d = 7.80 - 7.72 (m, 2H), 7.64 - 7.56 (m, 2H), 7.44 -

7.36 (m, 2H), 7.35 - 7.28 (m, 2H), 5.95 - 5.84 (m, 1H), 5.68 - 5.57 (m, 1H), 5.34 -

5.20 (m, 2H), 5.10 - 4.98 (m, 1H), 4.61 - 4.55 (m, 2H), 4.46 - 4.32 (m, 3H), 4.26 -

4.15 (m, 3H), 3.47 - 3.30 (m, 1H), 3.02 - 2.93 (m, J=5.3, 5.3, 8.3, 14.0 Hz, 1H), 2.46

- 2.37 (m, 2H), 2.12 - 1.94 (m, 3H), 1.82 - 1.72 (m, 1H), 1.51 - 1.35 (m, 9H).

MS (ESI): found 567.3 [M + H] ⁺ , 467.3 [M + H - Boc] ⁺ , calculated 567.3 [M + H] ⁺ Synthesis of linker 1:

4-((2-((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)-4-((ter t- butoxycarbonyl)amino)butanoyl)oxy)butanoic acid

NHBoc

FmocH

C28H34N2O8

To a solution of 4-(allyloxy)-4-oxobutyl 2-((((9H-fluoren-9- yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)-4-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)but anoate 3 (4.5 g, 7.94 mmol) in CTbCk/ethyl acetate 2:1 (75 ml) were added tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (275 mg, 0.238 mmol), triphenylphosphine (104 mg, 0.395 mmol) and sodium 2-ethylhexanoate (1.97 g, 11.9 mmol). The reaction was stirred at r.t. for 3 hours. Then 1 M HC1 (50 ml) was added. The reaction mixture was extracted with CH2CI2 (3 x 150 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2S0 ₄ and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Column chromatography over S1O2 (ethyl acetate + 1 % methanol) afforded the desired product 1 as a colorless solid.

R _f (ethyl acetate) = 0.38

¾-NMR (400MHz, CDCb): d = 7.79 - 7.73 (m, 2H), 7.64 - 7.55 (m, 2H), 7.44 - 7.37 (m, 2H), 7.35 - 7.28 (m, 2H), 5.70 - 5.54 (m, 1H), 5.18 - 5.02 (m, 1H), 4.47 -

4.33 (m, 3H), 4.28 - 4.16 (m, 3H), 3.43 - 3.32 (m, 1H), 3.04 - 2.94 (m, 1H), 2.55 -

2.25 (m, 3H), 2.15 - 1.98 (m, 3H), 1.48 - 1.38 (m, 9H).

MS (ESI): found 527.3 [M + H] ⁺ , 427.2 [M + H - Boc] ⁺ , calculated 527.2 [M + H] ⁺ Example 2: Synthesis of linker 4 (m=2; n=2)

Scheme 4

NHBoc NHBoc

6, EDC-HCI, DMAP,

0°C - rt, 2 h

O H

FmocH FmocH

OBn

O O

Synthesis of compound 5:

3-(benzyloxy)-3-oxopropyl 2-((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)-4- ((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)butanoate

NHBoc

FmocH

Commercially available Fmoc-Dab(Boc)-OH (2.5 g, 5.68 mmol) and benzyl 3- hydroxypropanoate (1.12 g, 6.25 mmol) were dissolved in CH2CI2 (20 ml) and cooled to 0°C. To this solution EDC-HC1 (1.20 g, 6.25 mmol) and DMAP (70.0 mg, 0.568mmol) were added. After 1 h sat. aq. NaCl solution (25 ml) was added, the organic phase was separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2CI2 (3 x 50 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2S0 ₄ and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Column chromatography over S1O2 (n- hexane/EtOAc 6:4) afforded the desired product (2.84 g, 4.71 mmol, 83 %) as a colorless resin. ¾-NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) d = 7.78 - 7.74 (m, 2H), 7.65 - 7.58 (m, 2H), 7.35 (s, 9H), 5.77 - 5.66 (m, 1H), 5.17 - 5.14 (m, 2H), 5.13 - 5.04 (m, 1H), 4.54 - 4.46 (m, 1H), 4.45 - 4.30 (m, 4H), 4.26 - 4.20 (m, 1H), 3.91 - 3.87 (m, 1H), 3.46 - 3.33 (m, 1H), 2.97 - 2.88 (m, 1H), 2.77 - 2.70 (m, 2H), 2.05 - 2.03 (m, 1H), 2.01 - 1.92 (m,

1H), 1.79 - 1.70 (m, 1H), 1.47 - 1.42 (m, 9H).

Synthesis of compound 4:

3-((2-((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)-4-((ter t- butoxycarbonyl)amino)butanoyl)oxy)propanoic acid

NHBoc

FmocH

Compound 4 (2.8 g, 4.65 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (50 ml). Palladium on carbon (Pd/C 10%, 742 mg, 0.69 mmol) was added to the solution and H ₂ was bubbled into the reaction mixture. After 1 h the reaction was diluted with CH2CI2 and filtered through a silica plug. Solvent was removed under reduced pressure affording the desired product (0.6 g, 1.17 mmol, 25%) as a colorless solid.

MS (ESI): 513.0 [M + H] , calculated 513.2 [M + H] ⁺ .

Example 3: Peptide synthesis applying linker 1:

A peptide with the sequence H-KATSG - (linkerl) - GLF-NH2 (7) (SEQ. ID. No: 1) was synthesized by solid phase peptide synthesis and purified by preparative HPLC. Linker 1 was stable during peptide synthesis, and surprisingly also during Fmoc deprotection with piperidine of the successive amino acid (Gly at position 5). No cyclization to a 6 membered diketopiperazine and the corresponding breakup peptide was observed (figure la). The purified peptide (AB in Figure lb) was then dissolved in 0.05 M NaFlCCb solution (pH = 8.2) which triggered the intramolecular cyclization reaction releasing the two fragments 8 and 9 (A and B, figure lb), identified by LC-MS (figure lc).

Example 4: Synthesis of hydrophobic peptide:

H-AhaGISFSIRFAIWIRFG-NH ₂ (Aha = azidohomoalanine) (SEQ. ID. NO: 2) is an extremely hydrophobic peptide, which is insoluble in water, making the handling and HPLC purification after synthesis virtually impossible. In order to enhance solubility of this peptide a variant was prepared in which a cleavable N-terminal poly-lysine tag was synthesized after the peptide sequence and incorporated cleavable linker 1: H-KKKKK- (linker l)AhaGISFSIRFAIWIRFG-NH ₂ (10) (SEQ. ID. No: 3). Synthesis and purification of this modified peptide proceeded smoothly according to example 3 (figure 2b). Pure peptide 10 was dissolved in a 0.05 M aqueous NaHC03 solution and shaken for 2 h at r.t. (figure 2a). The cleavage reaction released the two peptides 11 and 12: While the poly-lysine tag 11 is water soluble, peptide 12 precipitated under the reaction conditions and could be easily isolated in high purity by centrifugation.

Figure 2b): LC-MS of H-KKKKK (linker 1 )- AhaGI SFSIRFAIWIRF G-NH ₂

(10), MS (ESI): 545.4 [M+5H] ^{5 +} , 681.6 [M+4H] ⁴⁺ , 908.3

[M+3H] ³⁺ , 1362.0 [M+2H] ²⁺ .

Figure 2c): MS (ESI) of insoluble peptide 12 (MS (ESI): 661.5 [M+3H] ³⁺ ,

991.3 [M+2H] ²⁺ , 1322.0 [3M + 2H] ²⁺ , 1983.1 [M+H] ⁺ ).

Example 5: Affinity purification via Biotin / Streptavidin interaction

The introduction of N-terminal affinity labels in combination with a peptide synthesis method applying capping after each coupling step enables affinity purification of full-length products. The full-length peptide is captured on streptavidin coated magnetic beads, by-products (shorter sequences) are removed by filtration and the pure full-length peptide is released.

After SPPS of the target peptide, first linker 1, and then Fmoc-Glu(biotinyl-PEG)- OH were coupled to the N-terminus of the peptide. This resulted in H- GluBiotinylPEG- 1 -IIKKST ALL-NH2 (13) (SEQ. ID. NO: 4). As the peptide sequence contains several sterically demanding amino acids, a complex mixture of full-length peptide and acetylated shorter fragments was obtained after cleavage from the resin. The crude product was dissolved in a phosphate buffer at pH = 6.2 and incubated for 30 minutes with streptavidin coated magnetic beads. The supernatant was analyzed by LC-MS indicating the complete removal of the biotinylated peptide from the mixture. The by-product containing buffer solution was removed and the beads were washed several times with phosphate buffer (pH = 6.2). Afterwards a volatile cleavage buffer (NH4HCO3, 0.02 M, pH = 8.8) was added to the beads and after 30 min incubation the desired peptide 14 was released from the beads.

A

Ac-Peptide _^ J\ Washing

By-products

Scheme

Results are shown in figure 3. Figure 3a shows the crude peptide mixture obtained after SPPS and cleavage from resin. Figure 3b shows the supernatant after 30 min incubation of the crude peptide mixture on streptavidin coated magnetic beads in phosphate buffer at pH = 6.2. The N-terminally biotin tag containing peptide 13 is completely captured by streptavidin. c) After washing away the acetylated peptide by-products and incubating the magnetic streptavidin beads with NH4HCO3 at pH 8.8 for 30 min to release the desired peptide HO(CH2) ₃ CO-IIKKSTALL-NH2 (14) (SEQ. ID. NO: 4)

Example 6: Synthesis of DNA-peptide conjugates employing cleavable solubilizing tag on peptide |[BF{2]

Solubilizing

H ₃

Oligonucleotide

5'-hexynyl-T20-3'

Soluble Oligo Peptide conjugate

NaHCOj (0.1M, aq.soi ),

2h rt

Scheme 6

A peptide with the sequence H-PEG10 (linker 1) Aha AFDYLAQYHGG-NH2 (15) (SEQ ID No: 5) was synthesized by SPPS (Aha = azidohomoalanine). Conjugation with the hexynyl-modified nucleic acid was performed by click chemistry. A solution of the azido-modified peptide 15 (4 mM in DMSO/tBuOH 3:1, 50 mΐ) was mixed with a solution of 5’-hexynyl-dT2o-3’ (0.55 mM in H2O, 180 mΐ) which was synthesized according to standard solid phase phosphoramidite approach. CuBr (100 mM in DMSO/tBuOH 3:1, 10 mΐ) and THPTA (100 mM in H2O, 20 mΐ) were mixed separately and the preformed complex was added to the oligonucleotide-peptide solution. After 1 h shaking at 37 °C the click reaction was complete. Cleavage of the solubilizing PEG linker was obtained adding NaHCCE (0.1 M in H2O, 3 ml). Dialysis of this solution (MWCO 1000 dialysis membrane) afforded the desired product 16. 5’-hex-T2o-3’: MS (ESI): found 1544.3 [M - 4H] ⁴ , calculated 1544.5 [M - 4H] ⁴ .

Peptide X - 5’- hex-T2o-3’: MS (ESI): found 1647.7 [M - 5H] ⁵ , calculated 1648.0 [M - 5 El] ⁵ .

Product 16: Peptide X - 5’- hex-T2o-3’(Depegilated): MS (ESI): found 1525.6 [M - 5H] ⁵ , calculated 1525.9 [M - 5H] ⁵ .

Example 7: Rapid synthesis of peptides and nucleoside-peptide conjugates by solid-supported conjugation and non-chromatographic purification using a cleavable immobilization linker

The reaction scheme disclosed in this example is illustrated in Fig. 4 and comprises two alternative routes A and B.

The peptide WWWWEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAE- AAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEEEEE (SEQ. ID. No: 6) was synthesized on a rink-amide resin using automated Fmoc-SPPS. Next, Fmoc-Pra-OH (N-alpha-(9- Fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl)-L-propargylglycine), Fmoc-protected cleavable linker 1, Fmoc-020c-0H (8-(9-Fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl-amino)-3,6- dioxaoctanoic acid) and Tri-Boc-hydrazine acetic acid were stepwise coupled to the resin-bound peptide by means of SPPS, yielding the desired peptide 17.

The peptide was cleaved from the resin with a mixture of TFA/TIS/H2O (95/2.5/2.5). After 2 h the solution was concentrated and added to a solution of cold ether. The precipitated peptide was separated from the supernatant, dissolved in a mixture of H2O/ACN (1/1) and freeze-dried. The crude material was dissolved in a mixture of an aqueous 0.25 M NaOAc/AcOH buffer (pH 4.2) and acetonitrile (20 vol.%). Sodium cyanoborohydride was added and the solution was transferred onto an aldehyde agarose resin. The suspension was agitated at room temperature and the progress of the immobilization reaction was monitored by HPLC (see fig. 5 A, B). After immobilization (~l h), the resin was washed with an aqueous 0.25 M NaOAc/AcOH buffer (pH 4.2), a mixture of H2O/ACN (2/1) and water. The resin- bound propargylgly cine-containing peptide 18 was brought into reaction with the azide -modified hexaphosphate thymidine (Fuller et al. PNAS 2016, 113 (19), p.5233-4238) in presence of CuS0 ₄ , THPTA, ascorbate and aminoguanidine in a mixture of an aqueous 0.2 M NaH ₂ P0 ₄ buffer (pH 6.5) containing 20 vol.% DMSO (see figure 4, route A). The suspension was agitated at 37°C for 16 h. The resin was washed with an aqueous 0.2 M NaHP0 ₄ buffer (pH 6.5) and a mixture of H2O/ACN (2/1). The desired Nucleoside-peptide conjugate 20 was released in good purity by treatment of the resin with an aqueous 0.2 M Na ₂ HP0 ₄ buffer (pH 8.5) for 16 h at room temperature.

(H0(CH ₂ ) ₃ C0NH-Pra(N ₃ (CH ₂ )n0(P0 ₂ ) ₆ dT)

WWWWEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAA-

EAAAEAAAEAAAEEEEE -NH ₂ :

MS (ESI): found 1101.3 [M - 6H] ⁶ , calculated 1101.2 [M - 6H] ⁶ ; found 944.0 [M - 7H] ⁷ , calculated 943.8 [M - 7H] ⁷ .

Alternatively, the resin bound peptide 18 could be also released under mild basic conditions (0.2 M Na ₂ HP0 ₄ buffer, pH 8.5, r.t., 16 h) from the agarose resin (see figure 4, route B) even before the nucleoside-conjugation step. Under these conditions, the unmodified peptide 19

HO(CH ₂ ) ₃ CONH-Pra

WWWWEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAAEAAA-

EAAAEAAAEAAAEEEEE -NH ₂ was isolated in high purity.

Product generation was monitored by HPLC analysis. Fig. 5 shows HPLC-analysis of the crude SPPS product (5A), the supernatant after immobilization (5B), the purified peptide 19 (5D) generated according to route B and the nucleoside-peptide conjugate 20 (5C).