Examples of exogenous chemical substances include, but are not limited to, chemical pesticides (such as herbicides, algicides, fungicides, bactericides, viricides, insecticides, aphicides, miticides, nematicides, molluscicides, and the like), plant growth regulators, fertilizers and nutrients, gametocides, defoliants, desiccants, mixtures thereof, and the like.

Exogenous chemicals, including foliar-applied herbicides, have at times been formulated with surfactants, so that when water is added, the resulting sprayable composition is more easily and effectively retained on the foliage (e. g., the leaves or other photosynthesizing organs) of plants.

Surfactants can also bring other benefits, including improved contact of spray droplets with a waxy leaf surface and, in some cases, improved penetration of the accompanying exogenous chemical into the interior of leaves. Through these and perhaps other effects, surfactants have long been known to increase the biological effectiveness of herbicide compositions, or other compositions of exogenous chemicals, when added to or included in such compositions. Thus, for example, the herbicide glyphosate (N- phosphonomethylglycine) has been formulated with surfactants such as polyoxyalkylene-type surfactants including, among other surfactants, polyoxyalkylene alkylamines. Commercial formulations of glyphosate herbicide marketed under the trademark ROUNDUPt) have been formulated with a surfactant composition based on such a polyoxyalkylene alkylamine, in particular a polyethoxylated tallowamine, this surfactant composition being identified as MON 0818. Surfactants have generally been combined with glyphosate or other exogenous chemicals either in a commercial concentrate (herein referred to as a "coformulation"), or in a diluted mixture that is prepared from separate compositions, one comprising an exogenous chemical (e. g. glyphosate) and another comprising surfactant, prior to use in the field (i. e., a tank mix).

Various combinations of exogenous chemicals and surfactants or other adjuvants have been tested in the past. In some instances, the addition of a particular surfactant has not produced uniformly positive or negative changes in the effect of the exogenous chemical on the plant (e. g., a surfactant that

may enhance the activity of a particular herbicide on certain weeds may interfere with, or antagonize, the herbicidal efficacy on another weed species).

Some surfactants tend to degrade fairly rapidly in aqueous solutions. As a result, surfactants that exhibit this property can only be used effectively in tank mixes (i. e., mixed with the other ingredients in solution or dispersion in the tank soon before spraying is to occur), rather than being coformulated in an aqueous composition with the other ingredients in the first instance. This lack of stability, or inadequate shelf-life, has hindered the use of certain surfactants in some exogenous chemical formulations.

Other surfactants, though chemically stable, are physically incompatible with certain exogenous chemicals, particularly in concentrate coformulations. For example, most classes of nonionic surfactant, including polyoxyethylene alkylether surfactants, do not tolerate solutions of high ionic strength, as for example in a concentrated aqueous solution of a salt of glyphosate. Physical incompatibility can also lead to inadequate shelf-life. Other problems that can arise from such incompatibility include the formation of aggregates large enough to interfere with commercial handling and application, for example by blocking spray nozzles.

Another problem that has been observed in the past is the effect of environmental conditions on uptake of an exogenous chemical composition into foliage of a plant. For example, conditions such as temperature, relative humidity, presence or absence of sunlight, and health of the plant to be treated, can affect the uptake of a herbicide into the plant. As a result, spraying exactly the same herbicidal composition in two different situations can result in different herbicidal control of the sprayed plants.

One consequence of the above-described variability is that often a higher rate of herbicide per unit area is applied than might actually be required in that situation, in order to be certain that adequate control of undesired plants will be achieved. For similar reasons, other foliar-applied exogenous chemicals are also typically applied at significantly higher rates than needed to give the desired biological effect in the particular situation where they are used, to allow for the natural variability that exists in efficiency of foliar uptake. A need therefore exists for compositions of exogenous chemicals that, through more efficient uptake into plant foliage, allow reduced use rates.

Many exogenous chemicals are commercially packaged as a liquid concentrate that contains a significant amount of water. The packaged concentrate is shipped to distributors or retailers. Ultimately the packaged concentrate ends up in the hands of an end user, who further dilutes the concentrate by adding water in accordance with label instructions on the package. The dilute composition thus prepared is then sprayed on plants.

A significant portion of the cost of such packaged concentrates is the cost of transporting the concentrate from the manufacturing site to the location where the end user purchases it. Any liquid concentrate formulation that contained relatively less water and thus more exogenous chemical would reduce the cost per unit amount of exogenous chemical. However, one important limit on the ability of the manufacturer to increase the loading of the exogenous chemical in the concentrate is the stability of

that formulation. With some combinations of ingredients, a limit will be reached at which any further reduction of water content in the concentrate will cause it to become unstable (e. g., to separate into discrete layers), which may make it commercially unacceptable.

Accordingly, a need exists for improved formulations of exogenous chemicals, particularly herbicides, that are stable, effective, less sensitive to environmental conditions, and permit the use of reduced amounts of exogenous chemical to achieve the desired biological effect in or on plants. A need also exists for stable liquid concentrate formulations of exogenous chemicals that contain less water and more exogenous chemical than prior art concentrates.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to novel methods and compositions wherein exogenous chemicals are applied to plants to generate a desired biological response.

One embodiment of the present invention is a plant treatment composition that comprises (a) an exogenous chemical and (b) an alkylether surfactant or mixture of such surfactants having the formula RZ-0- (CH2CH2O) (CH (CH3) CH2O) m-R3 VI wherein Rl2 is an alkyl or alkenyl group having about 16 to about 22 carbon atoms, n is an average number of about 10 to about 100, m is an average number of 0 to about 5 and R is hydrogen or Cl 4 alkyl. The alkylether surfactant or mixture thereof is present in an amount such that the weight/weight ratio of said alkylether surfactant or mixture of such surfactants to the exogenous chemical is about 1 : 3 to about 1 : 100. The term"alkylether"as used herein should be understood to include alkenylether surfactants. Preferably Rl2 is a saturated straight-chain alkyl group, R is hydrogen, m is 0 and n is from about 10 to about 40, more preferably from about 20 to about 40. Most preferably the alkylether surfactant is a polyoxyethylene cetyl or stearyl ether or mixture thereof having 20-40 moles of ethylene oxide (EO).

In one embodiment, the composition is an aqueous concentrate further comprising water and an amount of a solid inorganic particulate colloidal material effective to stabilize the composition, said composition not exhibiting phase separation over a period of time T as defined below when stored in a closed container at a temperature in the range from about 1 5°C to about 30°C ; wherein the exogenous chemical and the surfactant are present at concentrations in the absolute or relative to each other such that, in the absence of the colloidal material, phase separation would occur during said period of time T.

The period of time T over which a composition can be observed to determine if phase separation occurs is in the range from about 1 hour to about 60 days."Phase separation"in the present context means separation of at least part of the surfactant component from other ingredients of the composition as a distinct phase. The particulate colloidal material preferably is present in an amount between about 0.01% and about 5% by weight, more preferably between about 0.5% and about 2.5% by weight, of the composition. By"aqueous concentrate"is meant a composition comprising water and from about 10% to about 60% by weight of the exogenous chemical.

Examples of suitable solid particulate colloidal materials include inorganic oxides such as silicon oxides, aluminum oxides, titanium oxides, and mixtures thereof. Preferably the particulate colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 50 to about 400 m2/g, more preferably about 180 to about 400 m2/g. In one particular embodiment, the particulate colloidal material has a bimodal distribution of specific surface area whereby a first component of the colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 50 to about 150 m2/g and a second component of the colloidal material has an average specific surface area of about 180 to about 400 m2/g.

In another embodiment of the invention, compositions are provided comprising (a) an exogenous chemical, (b) an alkylether surfactant or mixture of such surfactants having the formula shown above, and (c) a compound of formula Rl4 Co-A-Rt Vll wherein R is a hydrocarbyl group having about 5 to about 21 carbon atoms, R is a hydrocarbyl group having 1 to about 14 carbon atoms, the total number of carbon atoms in R and Rl5 is about I I to about 27, and A is O orNH. R preferably has about 11 to about 21 carbon atoms, Rl5 preferably has I to about 6 carbon atoms and A is preferably O. The aqueous composition in embodiments comprising a compound of formula VII preferably is an emulsion comprising an oil phase that comprises said second excipient substance, for example a water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsion or an oil-in-water emulsion.

A composition comprising a compound of formula VII can, if desired or necessary, further comprise an amount of solid inorganic particulate colloidal material effective to stabilize the composition, exactly as defined above.

In certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, the compound (c) is a C1 4 alkyl ester of a Cl2 18 fatty acid, more preferably a C, 4 alkyl ester of a Cl2 18 saturated fatty acid. Propyl, isopropyl or butyl esters of Cl2 18 fatty acids, such as butyl stearate, are especially preferred.

A wide variety of exogenous chemicals can be used in the compositions and methods of the present invention. A preferred class is foliar-applied exogenous chemicals, i. e. exogenous chemicals that are normally applied post-emergence to foliage of plants. A preferred subclass of foliar-applied exogenous chemicals is those that are water-soluble. By"water-soluble"in this context is meant having a solubility in distilled water at 25°C greater than about 1% by weight. Especially preferred water- soluble exogenous chemicals are salts that have an anion portion and a cation portion. In one embodiment of the invention, at least one of the anion and cation portions is biologically active and has a molecular weight of less than about 300. Particular examples of such exogenous chemicals where the cation portion is biologically active are paraquat, diquat and chlormequat. More commonly it is the anion portion that is biologically active.

Another preferred subclass of exogenous chemicals is those that exhibit systemic biological activity in the plant. Within this subclass, an especially preferred group of exogenous chemicals is N- phosphonomethylglycine and its herbicidal derivatives. N-phosphonomethylglycine, often referred to by

its common name glyphosate, can be used in its acid form, but is more preferably used in the form of a salt. Any water-soluble salt of glyphosate can be used in the practice of this invention. Some preferred salts include the sodium, potassium, ammonium, mono-, di-, tri-and tetra-C, 4-alkylammonium, mono-, di-and tri-CI 4-alkanolammonium, mono-, di-and tri-CI 4-alkylsulfonium and sulfoxonium salts. The ammonium, monoisopropylammonium and trimethylsulfonium salts of glyphosate are especially preferred. Mixtures of salts can also be useful in certain situations.

Compositions of the present invention can be used in methods of treating plants. Foliage of a plant is contacted with a biologically effective amount of the composition."Contacting"in this context means placing the composition on the foliage.

A composition of the present invention comprising an exogenous chemical and an alkylether surfactant as described above can have a number of different physical forms. For example, the composition can further comprise water in an amount effective to make the composition a dilute aqueous composition ready for application to foliage of a plant. Such a composition typically contains about 0.02 to about 2 percent by weight of the exogenous chemical, but for some purposes can contain up to about 10 percent by weight or even more of the exogenous chemical.

Alternatively, the composition can be a shelf-stable concentrate composition comprising the exogenous chemical substance in an amount of about 10 to about 90 percent by weight. Such shelf- stable concentrates can be, for example, (1) a solid composition comprising the exogenous chemical substance in an amount of about 30 to about 90 percent by weight, such as a water-soluble or water- dispersible granular formulation, or (2) a composition that further comprises a liquid diluent, wherein the composition comprises the exogenous chemical substance in an amount of about 10 to about 60 percent by weight. In this latter embodiment, it is especially preferred for the exogenous chemical substance to be water-soluble and present in an aqueous phase of the composition in an amount of about 15 to about 45 percent by weight of the composition. In particular, such a composition can be, for example, an aqueous solution concentrate or an emulsion having an oil phase. If it is an emulsion, it can more specifically be, for example, an oil-in-water emulsion, a water-in-oil emulsion, or a water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsion. When a compound (c) such as butyl stearate is included in an emulsion composition, it is predominantly present in the oil phase.

As described above, one embodiment of the invention is a sprayable composition that comprises an exogenous chemical, an aqueous diluent, and an alkylether surfactant.. The term"spray composition" is sometimes used herein to mean a sprayable composition.

In a related embodiment of the invention, a concentrate composition is provided which, upon dilution, dispersion or dissolution in water forms the sprayable composition just described. The concentrate composition contains a reduced amount of the aqueous diluent, or, in a particular embodiment, is a dry composition having less than about 5% water by weight. Typically a concentrate composition of the invention contains at least about 10% by weight of the exogenous chemical,

preferably at least about 15%.

The compositions and methods of the present invention have a number of advantages. They provide enhanced biological activity of exogenous chemicals in or on plants in comparison with prior formulations, either in terms of greater ultimate biological effect, or obtaining an equivalent biological effect while using a reduced application rate of exogenous chemical. Certain herbicide formulations of the present invention can avoid antagonism that has been observed in some prior art herbicide formulations, and can minimize quick production of necrotic lesions on leaves that in some situations hinder overall translocation of herbicide in the plant. Certain herbicide compositions of the invention modify the spectrum of activity of the herbicide across a range of plant species. For example, certain formulations of the present invention containing glyphosate can provide good herbicidal activity against broadleaf weeds while not losing any herbicidal effectiveness on narrowleaf weeds. Others can enhance herbicidal effectiveness on narrowleaf weeds to a greater extent than on broadleaf weeds. Still others can have enhanced effectiveness which is specific to a narrow range of species or even a single species.

Another advantage of the present invention is that it employs relatively small amounts of the alkylether surfactant in relation to the amount of exogenous chemical employed. This makes the compositions and methods of the present invention relatively inexpensive, and also tends to reduce instability problems in specific compositions where the alkylether surfactant is physically incompatible with the exogenous chemical (e. g., in solutions of high ionic strength, such as concentrated glyphosate salt solutions).

Even at the low concentrations of the excipient substances used in the present invention, there may be limits on the maximum concentration of exogenous chemical that can be used without causing compatibility problems (e. g., separation of the composition into discrete layers). In some preferred embodiments of the invention, composition stability at high ladings of exogenous chemical is maintained by adding other ingredients such as, for example, colloidal particulates. Some compositions of the present invention exhibit enhanced biological activity and have a higher loading of exogenous chemical than possible in prior art compositions.

Further, compositions of the present invention are less sensitive in some instances to environmental conditions such as relative humidity at the time of application to the plant. Also, the present invention allows the use of smaller amounts of herbicides or other pesticides, while still obtaining the required degree of control of weeds or other undesired organisms.

DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS Examples of exogenous chemical substances that can be included in compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to, chemical pesticides (such as herbicides, algicides, fungicides, bactericides, viricides, insecticides, aphicides, miticides, nematicides, molluscicides and the like), plant growth regulators, fertilizers and nutrients, gametocides, defoliants, desiccants, mixtures thereof and the like. In one embodiment of the invention, the exogenous chemical is polar.

A preferred group of exogenous chemicals are those that are normally applied post-emergence to the foliage of plants, i. e. foliar-applied exogenous chemicals.

Some exogenous chemicals useful in the present invention are water-soluble, for example salts that comprise biologically active ions, and also comprise counterions, which may be biologically inert or relatively inactive. A particularly preferred group of these water-soluble exogenous chemicals or their biologically active ions or moieties are systemic in plants, that is, they are to some extent translocated from the point of entry in the foliage to other parts of the plant where they can exert their desired biological effect. Especially preferred among these are herbicides, plant growth regulators and nematicides, particularly those that have a molecular weight, excluding counterions, of less than about 300. More especially preferred among these are exogenous chemical compounds having one or more functional groups selected from amine, carboxylate, phosphonate and phosphinate groups.

Among such compounds, an even more preferred group are herbicidal or plant growth regulating exogenous chemical compounds having at least one of each of amine, carboxylate, and either phosphonate or phosphinate functional groups. Salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine are examples of this group of exogenous chemicals. Further examples include salts of glufosinate, for instance the ammonium salt (ammonium DL-homoalanin-4-yl (methyl) phosphinate).

Another preferred group of exogenous chemicals which can be applied by the method of the invention are nematicides such as those disclosed in U. S. Patent No. 5,389,680, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Preferred nematicides of this group are salts of 3, 4,4-trifluoro-3- butenoic acid or of N- (3, 4,4-trifluoro-1-oxo-3-butenyl) glycine.

Exogenous chemicals which can usefully be applied by the method of the present invention are normally, but not exclusively, those which are expected to have a beneficial effect on the overall growth or yield of desired plants such as crops, or a deleterious or lethal effect on the growth of undesirable plants such as weeds. The method of the present invention is particularly useful for herbicides, especially those that are normally applied post-emergence to the foliage of unwanted vegetation.

Herbicides which can be applied by the method of the present invention include but are not limited to any listed in standard reference works such as the"Herbicide Handbook,"Weed Science Society of America, 1994,7th Edition, or the"Farm Chemicals Handbook,"Meister Publishing Company, 1997 Edition. Illustratively these herbicides include acetanilides such as acetochlor, alachlor and metolachlor, aminotriazole, asulam, bentazon, bialaphos, bipyridyis such as paraquat, bromacil, cyclohexenones such as clethodim and sethoxydim, dicamba, diflufenican, dinitroanilines such as pendimethalin, diphenylethers such as acifluorfen, fomesafen and oxyfluorfen, fatty acids such as C9 10 fatty acids, fosamine, flupoxam, glufosinate, glyphosate, hydroxybenzonitriles such as bromoxynil, imidazolinones such as imazaquin and imazethapyr, isoxaben, norflurazon, phenoxies such as 2,4-D, phenoxypropionates such as diclofop, fluazifop and quizalofop, picloram, propanil, substituted ureas such as fluometuron and isoproturon, sulfonylureas such as chlorimuron, chlorsulfuron, halosulfuron,

metsulfuron, primisulfuron, sulfometuron and sulfosulfuron, thiocarbamates such as triallate, triazines such as atrazine and metribuzin, and triclopyr. Herbicidally active derivatives of any known herbicide are also within the scope of the present invention. A herbicidally active derivative is any compound which is a minor structural modification, most commonly but not restrictively a salt or ester, of a known herbicide. These compounds retain the essential activity of the parent herbicide, but may not necessarily have a potency equal to that of the parent herbicide. These compounds may convert to the parent herbicide before or after they enter the treated plant. Mixtures or coformulations of a herbicide with other ingredients, or of more than one herbicide, may likewise be employed.

An especially preferred herbicide is N-phosphonomethylglycine (glyphosate), a salt, adduct or ester thereof, or a compound which is converted to glyphosate in plant tissues or which otherwise provides glyphosate ion. Glyphosate salts that can be used according to this invention include but are not restricted to alkali metal, for example sodium and potassium, salts ; ammonium salt ; alkylamine, for example dimethylamine and isopropylamine, salts ; alkanolamine, for example ethanolamine, salts ; alkylsulfonium, for example trimethylsulfonium, salts ; sulfoxonium salts ; and mixtures thereof. The herbicidal compositions sold by Monsanto Company as ROUNDUPO and ACCORD@ contain the monoisopropylamine (IPA) salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The herbicidal compositions sold by Monsanto Company as ROUNDUPO Dry and RIVALS contain the monoammonium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The herbicidal composition sold by Monsanto Company as ROUNDUPO Geoforce contains the monosodium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The herbicidal composition sold by Zeneca as TOUCHDOWNX contains the trimethylsulfonium salt of N-phosphonomethylglycine. The herbicidal properties of N-phosphonomethylglycine and its derivatives were first discovered by Franz, then disclosed and patented in U. S. Patent 3,799,758, issued March 26,1974. A number of herbicidal salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine were patented by Franz in U. S. Patent 4,405,531, issued September 20,1983. The disclosures of both of these patents are hereby incorporated by reference.

Because the commercially most important herbicidal derivatives of N-phosphonomethylglycine are certain salts thereof, the glyphosate compositions useful in the present invention will be described in more detail with respect to such salts. These salts are well known and include ammonium, IPA, alkali metal (such as the mono-, di-, and trisodium salts, and the mono-, di-, and tripotassium salts), and trimethylsulfonium salts. Salts of N-phosphonomethylglycine are commercially significant in part because they are water soluble. The salts listed immediately above are highly water soluble, thereby allowing for highly concentrated solutions that can be diluted at the site of use. In accordance with the method of this invention as it pertains to glyphosate herbicide, an aqueous solution containing a herbicidally effective amount of glyphosate and other components in accordance with the invention is applied to foliage of plants. Such an aqueous solution can be obtained by dilution of a concentrated glyphosate salt solution with water, or dissolution or dispersion in water of a dry (e. g. granular, powder, tablet or briquette) glyphosate formulation.

Exogenous chemicals should be applied to plants at a rate sufficient to give the desired biological effect. These application rates are usually expressed as amount of exogenous chemical per unit area treated, e. g. grams per hectare (g/ha). What constitutes a"desired effect"varies according to the standards and practice of those who investigate, develop, market and use a specific class of exogenous chemicals. For example, in the case of a herbicide, the amount applied per unit area to give 85% control of a plant species as measured by growth reduction or mortality is often used to define a commercially effective rate.

Herbicidal effectiveness is one of the biological effects that can be enhanced through this invention."Herbicidal effectiveness,"as used herein, refers to any observable measure of control of plant growth, which can include one or more of the actions of (1) killing, (2) inhibiting growth, reproduction or proliferation, and (3) removing, destroying, or otherwise diminishing the occurrence and activity of plants.

The herbicidal effectiveness data set forth herein report"inhibition"as a percentage following a standard procedure in the art which reflects a visual assessment of plant mortality and growth reduction by comparison with untreated plants, made by technicians specially trained to make and record such observations. In all cases, a single technician makes all assessments of percent inhibition within any one experiment or trial. Such measurements are relied upon and regularly reported by Monsanto Company in the course of its herbicide business.

The selection of application rates that are biologically effective for a specific exogenous chemical is within the skill of the ordinary agricultural scientist. Those of skill in the art will likewise recognize that individual plant conditions, weather and growing conditions, as well as the specific exogenous chemical and formulation thereof selected, will affect the efficacy achieved in practicing this invention. Useful application rates for exogenous chemicals employed can depend upon all of the above conditions. With respect to the use of the method of this invention for glyphosate herbicide, much information is known about appropriate application rates. Over two decades of glyphosate use and published studies relating to such use have provided abundant information from which a weed control practitioner can select glyphosate application rates that are herbicidally effective on particular species at particular growth stages in particular environmental conditions.

Herbicidal compositions of glyphosate or derivatives thereof are used to control a very wide variety of plants worldwide. Such compositions can be applied to a plant in a herbicidally effective amount, and can effectively control one or more plant species of one or more of the following genera without restriction: Abutilon, Amaranthus, Artemisia, Asclepias, Avena, Axonopus, Borreria, Brachiaria, Brassica, Bromus, Chenopodium, Cirsium, Commelina, Convolvulus, Cynodon, Cyperus, Digitaria, Echinochloa, Eleusine, Elymus, Equisetum, Erodium, Helianthus, Imperata, Ipomoea, Kochia, Lolium, Malva, Oryza, Ottochloa, Panicum, Paspalum, Phalaris, Phragmites, Polygonum, Portulaca, Pteridium, Pueraria, Rubus, Salsola, Setaria, Sida, Sinapis, Sorghum, Triticum, Typha, Ulex, Xanthium, and Zea.

Particularly important species for which glyphosate compositions are used are exemplified without limitation by the following : Annual broadleaves : velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) buttonweed (Borreria spp.) oilseed rape, canola, indian mustard, etc. (Brassica spp.) commelina (Commelina spp.) filaree (Erodium spp.) sunflower (Helianthus spp.) morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) kochia (Kochia scoparia) mallow (Malva spp.) wild buckwheat, smartweed, etc. (Polygonum spp.) pursiane (Portulaca spp.) russian thistle (Salsola spp.) sida (Sida spp.) wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) cocklebur (Xanthium spp.) Annual narrowleaves : wild oat (Avena fatua) carpetgrass (Axonopus spp.) downy brome (Bromus tectorum) crabgrass (Digitaria spp.) barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) goosegrass (Eleusine indica) annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) rice (Oryza sativa) ottochloa (Ottochloa nodosa) bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) canarygrass (Phalaris spp.) foxtail (Setaria spp.) wheat (Triticum aestivum) corn (Zea mays)

Perennial broadleaves : mugwort (Artemisia spp.) milkweed (Asclepias spp.) canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) kudzu (Pueraria spp.) Perennial narrowleaves : brachiaria (Brachiaria spp.) bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylo) yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) purple nutsedge (C. rotundus) quackgrass (Elymus repens) lalang (Imperata cylindrica) perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) guineagrass (Panicum maximum) dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum) reed (Phragmites spp.) johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) cattail (Typha spp.) Other perennial : horsetail (Equisetum spp.) bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) blackberry (Rubus spp.) gorse (Ulex europaeus) Thus, the method of the present invention, as it pertains to glyphosate herbicide, can be useful on any of the above species.

Effectiveness in greenhouse tests, usually at exogenous chemical rates lower than those normally effective in the field, is a proven indicator of consistency of field performance at normal use rates.

However, even the most promising composition sometimes fails to exhibit enhanced performance in individual greenhouse tests. As illustrated in the Examples herein, a pattern of enhancement emerges over a series of greenhouse tests; when such a pattern is identified this is strong evidence of biological enhancement that will be useful in the field.

Compositions of the present invention include one or more long-chain alkylether surfactants

having the formula VI above. R 12 can be branched or unbranched, saturated or unsaturated. Rl2 is preferably straight chain saturated Cl6 alkyl (cetyl) or straight chain saturated C, 8 alkyl (stearyl). In preferred alkylethers m is 0, n is an average number from about 20 to about 40 and R is preferably hydrogen. Among especially preferred alkylether surfactants are those identified in the International Cosmetic Ingredient Directory as ceteth-20, ceteareth-20, ceteareth-27, steareth-20 and steareth-30.

Aqueous concentrate compositions in some circumstances are limited in the degree to which an exogenous chemical such as glyphosate can be loaded. At some point, as the loading of exogenous chemical is increased, the composition will not remain suitably stable. Addition of a small amount of colloidal particulate to such compositions has surprisingly been found to greatly increase loading ability while retaining desired stability. Inclusion of such colloidal particulates can also enhance biological activity of an exogenous chemical formulation. Oxides of silicon, aluminum and titanium are preferred colloidal particulate materials. Particle size is preferably such that specific surface area is in the range from about 50 to about 400 m2/g. Where the exogenous chemical is glyphosate, the use of colloidal particulate enables glyphosate acid equivalent loadings of at least 30% by weight for compositions containing sufficient alkylether and fatty acid ester to show enhanced herbicidal effectiveness, or at least 40% by weight for compositions containing alkylether but no fatty acid ester, and showing herbicidal effectiveness at least equal to current commercial products loaded at about 30% by weight. We have found especially useful improvement in storage stability can be obtained using colloidal particulates having specific surface area between about 180 and about 400 in 2/g.

Other means of improving stability of highly loaded compositions may also be possible and are within the scope of the present invention.

Compositions in accordance with the present invention are typically prepared by combining water, the exogenous chemical, the alkylether surfactant, and other ingredients such as colloidal particulates and/or fatty acid esters if such ingredients are to be used. Details of specific processes used to prepare such compositions are included in the Examples herein.

The concentrations of the various components will vary, in part depending on whether a concentrate is being prepared that will be further diluted before spraying onto a plant, or whether a solution or dispersion is being prepared that can be sprayed without further dilution.

In an aqueous glyphosate formulation that includes a Ci6. 18 alkylether surfactant and butyl stearate, suitable concentrations can be: glyphosate 0. 1-400 g a. e./I, alkylether surfactant 0.001-10% by weight, and butyl stearate 0.001-10% by weight. To achieve the higher concentrations in these ranges, it is often beneficial to add other ingredients to provide acceptable storage stability, for example colloidal particulate silica or aluminum oxide at 0.5-2.5% by weight. In an aqueous glyphosate formulation that includes a Ci6 18 alkylether surfactant but no butyl stearate, glyphosate concentration can suitably be increased to 500 g a. e./l or more, in the presence of a colloidal particulate at 0.5-2.5% by weight.

In solid glyphosate formulations, higher concentrations of ingredients are possible because of the elimination of most of the water.

Although various compositions of the present invention are described herein as comprising. certain listed materials, in some preferred embodiments of the invention the compositions consist essentially of the indicated materials.

Optionally, other agriculturally acceptable materials can be included in the compositions. For example, more than one exogenous chemical can be included. Also, various agriculturally acceptable adjuvants can be included, whether or not their purpose is to directly contribute to the effect of the exogenous chemical on a plant. For example, when the exogenous chemical is a herbicide, liquid nitrogen fertilizer or ammonium sulfate might be included in the composition. As another example, stabilizers can be added to the composition. In some instances it might be desirable to include microencapsulated acid in the composition, to lower the pH of a spray solution on contact with a leaf.

One or more surfactants can also be included. Surfactants mentioned here by trade name, and other surfactants that can be useful in the method of the invention, are indexed in standard reference works such as McCutcheon's Emulsifiers and Detergents, 1997 edition, Handbook of Industrial Surfactants, 2nd Edition, 1997, published by Gower, and International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary, 6th Edition, 1995.

The compositions of the present invention can be applied to plants by spraying, using any conventional means for spraying liquids, such as spray nozzles, atomizers, or the like. Compositions of the present invention can be used in precision farming techniques, in which apparatus is employed to vary the amount of exogenous chemical applied to different parts of a field, depending on variables such as the particular plant species present, soil composition, and the like. In one embodiment of such techniques, a global positioning system operated with the spraying apparatus can be used to apply the desired amount of the composition to different parts of a field.

The composition at the time of application to plants is preferably dilute enough to be readily sprayed using standard agricultural spray equipment. Preferred application rates for the present invention vary depending upon a number of factors, including the type and concentration of active ingredient and the plant species involved. Useful rates for applying an aqueous composition to a field of foliage can range from about 25 to about 1,000 liters per hectare (I/ha) by spray application. The preferred application rates for aqueous solutions are in the range from about 50 to about 300 I/ha.

Many exogenous chemicals (including glyphosate herbicide) must be taken up by living tissues of the plant and translocated within the plant in order to produce the desired biological (e. g., herbicidal) effect. Thus, it is important that a herbicidal composition not be applied in such a manner as to excessively injure and interrupt the normal functioning of the local tissue of the plant so quickly that translocation is reduced. However, some limited degree of local injury can be insignificant, or even beneficial, in its impact on the biological effectiveness of certain exogenous chemicals.

A large number of compositions of the invention are illustrated in the Examples that follow.

Many concentrate compositions of glyphosate have provided sufficient herbicidal effectiveness in greenhouse tests to warrant field testing on a wide variety of weed species under a variety of application conditions. Aqueous compositions tested in the field comprising an alkylether surfactant and/or containing a fatty acid ester have included : Field Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of composition g a. e./l Fatty Surfactant surfactant fatty acid acid ester ester F-5 163 1. 0 10. 0 oleth-20 Bu stearate F-8 163 1. 0 10. 0 steareth-20 Bu stearate F-11 163 0.5 5. 0 oleth-20 Bu stearate F-12 163 0. 3 5. 0 oleth-20 Bu stearate F-13 163 0. 3 2. 5 oleth-20 Bu stearate F-16 163 0.5 5. 0 steareth-20 Bu stearate F-17 163 0.5 5. 0 ceteth-20 Bu stearate F-19 163 0.5 5. 0 ceteareth-27 Bu stearate F-22 163 5. 0 steareth-20 F-23 163 5. 0 ceteth-20 F-24 163 5. 0 laureth-23 F-25 163 0.3 5. 0 ceteareth-27 Bu stearate F-26 163 0.3 2. 5 ceteareth-27 Bu stearate F-27 163 5. 0 ceteareth-27 F-28 163 0.5 5. 0 ceteareth-27 Me stearate F-29 163 0.5 5. 0 steareth-20 Me stearate F-30 163 0.5 5. 0 oleth-20 F-33 163 0.5 5. 0 ceteareth-15 Bu stearate F-34 163 5. 0 ceteareth-15 F-35 163 0.5 5. 0 steareth-30 Bu stearate The above compositions were prepared by process (vii) if they contain fatty acid ester and by process (viii) if they do not. Both processes are described in the Examples.

Aqueous compositions tested in the field containing colloidal particulates have included : Field Glyphos- % w/w Type of Type of Type of Other composition ate Fatty Surf-Coll. Other surfactant colloidal fatty acid ingredients g a. e./i acid actant partic. particulate ester ester F-36 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 3 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate F-37 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 3 oleth-20 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate F-38 360 1. 0 10. 0 1.3 steareth-30 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate F-39 360 10. 0 1. 3 steareth-30 Aerosil 380 F-50 360 1. 0 10.0 1. 3 ceteareth-15 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate F-51 360 1 0 10. 0 1. 3 ceteth-20 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate F-52 360 1. 0 0. 0 1. 3 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate F-53 360 1. 0 10.0 1.3 oleth-20 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate F-54 360 1. 0 10. 0 1.3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate F-55 360 1 0 10 0 1. 3 steareth-30 Aerosil 380 Bu stearate Field Glyphos-% w/w Type of Type of Type of Other composition ate Fatty Surf-Col l. Other surfactant colloidal fatty acid ingredients g a. e./l acid actant partic. particulate ester ester F-56 360 10.0 1.3 steareth-30 Aerosil 380 F-57 360 10. 0 1.3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 F-58 360 10.0 1.3 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 F-59 360 10.0 1.3 oleth-20 Aerosil 380 F-60 360 1.0 10. 0 1.3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 Me stearate F-61 360 1. 0 10 0 1. 3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 Me palmitat F-62 300 10. 0 1.3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 F-63 240 10. 0 1. 3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 F-64 360 6. 0 1. 3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 F-65 300 6. 0 1. 3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 F-66 240 6. 0 1. 3 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 F-84 480 3. 0 0. 8 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 F-85 480 3. 0 1. 5 oleth-20 Aerosil 380 F-86 480 3.0 1. 5 oleth-20 Aerosil MOX-170 F-87 480 3.0 1. 5 oleth-20 Aerosil OX-50 F-89 480 3.0 1. 5 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 2 F-90 480 3.0 1.5 oleth-20 Aerosil blend 2 F-91 480 4. 5 1. 5 oleth-20 Aerosil 380 F-92 480 4. 5 1. 5 steareth-20 Aerosil380 F-93 480 3.0 1.5 steareth-20 Aerosil blend I F-94 480 1. 0 1.5 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 1 F-95 480 6.0 1, 5 steareth-20 Aerosil blend end) F-96 480 4.5 1. 5 0.5 steareth-20 Aerosil propylene blend 2 glycol F-97 480 6. 0 I. 5 0. 5 steareth-20 Aerosil propylene blend 2 glycol F-98 480 6. 0 1. 5 0.5 oleth-20 Aerosil propylene blend 2 glycol F-99 480 4. 5+ 1.5 0.5 steareth-20 Aerosil propylene 2. 3 + Ethomeen blend 2 glycol T/25 F-100 480 6. 0 1. 5 steareth-20 Al oxide C F-101 480 4.5+ 1.5 0.5 steareth-20 Al oxide C propylene 2. 3 + Ethomeen glycol T/25 F-102 480 4.5+ 1.5 0.5 steareth-20 Al oxide C propylene 1. 0 + Ethomeen glycol T/25 F-103 480 3. 0 1. 5 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 F-104 480 4. 5 1. 5 steareth-20 Al oxide C F-105 480 6.0 1.5 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 Field Glyphos-% w/w Type of Type of Type of Other composition ate Fatty Surf-Coll. Other surfactant colloidal fatty acid ingredients g a. ei acid actant partic. particulate ester estes F-106 480 4. 5 + 1.5 0.5 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 propylene 1. 0 + Ethomeen glycol T/25 F-107 480 4. 5 + 1. 5 0.5 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 propylene 2.3 + Ethomeen glycol T/25 F-108 480 4.5 1. 5 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 2 F-109 480 6.0 1. 5 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 2 F-110 480 4.5 + 1.5 0.5 steareth-20 Aerosil propylene 1. 0 + Ethomeen blend 2 glycol T/25 F-l !) 480 4.5 1.5 steareth-30 Aerosil blend 2 F-112 480 4. 5+ 1. 5 0.5 steareth-20 Aerosil propylene 1. 0 + Ethomeen blend 2 glycol T/25 F-113 480 6.0 1. 5 steareth-30 Aerosil blend2 F-1 14 480 4. 5 + 1. 5 0.5 steareth-20 Aerosil propylene 2. 3 + Ethomeen blend 2 glycol T/25 F-115 480 10. 0 1.5 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 2 F-116 480 4. 5 1. 5 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 F-117 480 6. 0 1. 5 ceteareth-27 Aerosil 380 F-118 480 4. 5 1. 5 ceteareth-27 Aerosil blend2 F-119 480 6.0 1.5 ceteareth-27 Aerosil blend 2 F-120 480 4. 5 1. 5 ceteareth-27 Al oxide C F-121 480 6. 0 I. 5 ceteareth-27 Al oxide C Aerosil blend 1 : Aerosil MOX-80 + Aerosil MOX-170 (1 : 1) Aerosil blend 2: Aerosil MOX-80 + Aerosil 380 (1 : 2)

The above compositions were prepared by process (ix) as described in the Examples.

Aqueous compositions tested in the field comprising soybean lecithin (45% phospholipid, Avanti), alkylether surfactant and fatty acid ester have included : Field Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of composition g a. e./l Lecithin MON Fatty Surfactant surfactant fatty acid 0818 acid ester ester F-136 360 6. 0 4.5 1.5 3.0 + 4.5 ceteareth-27 + Bu stearate Ethomeen T/25 Field Glyphosate Type of Type of composition g a. e./l Lecithin MON Fatty Surfactant surfactant fatty acid 0818 acid ester ester F-138 228 0. 8 3. 8 3. 0 + 3. 0 ceteareth-27 + Bu stearate Ethomeen T/25 F-139 228 1. 5 1. 5 3. 0 + 3.0 ceteareth-27 + Bu stearate Ethomeen T/25 The above compositions were prepared by process (x) as described in the Examples.

Dry compositions tested in the field have included :

Field % w/w Type of Type of Other composition Glyphos-Butyl Surfact-Colloidal Other surfactant colloidal ingredients ate a. e. stearate ant particulate particulate F-156 64 25.0 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend I F-157 68 20. 0 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend I F-158 72 15. 0 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend I F-159 64 25. 0 1. 0 ceteth-20 Aerosil 380 F-160 65 25. 0 1. 0 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 F-161 65 25. 0 1. 0 oleth-20 Aerosil 380 F-166 68 20. 0 2. 0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend F-167 66 2.0 20.0 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend I F-168 68 20. 0 2.0 oleth-20 Aerosil blend I F-169 66 2.0 20.0 2. 0. oleth-20 Aerosil blend F-170 66 2.0 20.0 2.0 ceteareth-27 Aerosil blend I F-171 48 14.1 36.1 ceteareth-27 NH4 phosphate F-172 65 20. 0 5.0 ceteareth-27 Na acetate F-173 70 20. 0 ceteareth-27 Aerosil blend 1 : Aerosil MOX-80 + Aerosil MOX-170 (1 : 1) The above compositions were prepared by the process described for dry granular compositions in Example 40.

EXAMPLES In the following Examples illustrative of the invention, greenhouse tests were conducted to evaluate relative herbicidal effectiveness of glyphosate compositions. Compositions included for comparative purposes included the following : Formulation B: which consists of 41% by weight of glyphosate IPA salt in aqueous solution.

This formulation is sold in the USA by Monsanto Company under the ACCORDS) trademark.

Formulation C: which consists of 41% by weight of glyphosate IPA salt in aqueous solution with a coformulant (15% by weight) of a surfactant (MON 0818 of Monsanto Company) based on polyoxyethylene (15) tallowamine. This formulation is sold in Canada by Monsanto Company under the ROUNDUP# trademark.

Formulation J: which consists of 41% by weight of glyphosate IPA salt in aqueous solution,

together with surfactant. This formulation is sold in the USA by Monsanto Company under the ROUNDUP# ULTRA trademark.

Formulation K: which consists of 75% by weight of glyphosate ammonium salt together with surfactant, as a water-soluble dry granular formulation. This formulation is sold in Australia by Monsanto Company under the ROUNDUPO DRY trademark.

Formulations B, C and J contain 356 grams of glyphosate acid equivalent per liter (g a. e./I).

Formulation K contains 680 grams of glyphosate acid equivalent per kilogram (g a. e./kg).

Various proprietary excipients were used in compositions of the Examples. They may be identified as follows : Trade name Manufacturer Chemical description Aerosil 90 Degussa amorphous silica, 90 m'/g Aerosil 380 Degussa amorphous silica, 380 m'/g Aerosil MOX-80 Degussa amorphous silica/aluminum oxide, 80 m'/g Aerosil MOX-] 70 Degussa amorphous silica/aluminum oxide, 170 m/g Aerosil OX-50 Degussa amorphous silica, 50 m/g Agrimul PG-2069 Henkel C9 i l alkylpolyglycoside Arcosolve DPM Arco dipropyleneglycol monomethyl ether Dowanol PNB Dow propylene glycol n-butyl ether Dowanol TPNB Dow tripropylene glycol n-butyl ether Emerest 2661 Henkel PEG-] 2 laurate Ethomeen T/25 Akzo tallowamine 15EO Fluorad FC-754 3M fluorinated alkyl quaternary ammonium chloride Fluorad FC-760 3M fluorinated alkanol EO Genapol UD-110 Hoechst C11 oxo alcohol I lEO MON 0818 Monsanto tallowamine 15EO-based surfactant Neodol 1-12 Shell C11 linear alcohol 12EO Neodol 1-9 Shell C11 linear alcohol 9EO Neodol 25-12 Shell C12-15 linear alcohol 12EO Neodol 25-20 Shell C12-15 linear alcohol 20EO Neodol 25-3 Shell C, 2-15 linear alcohol 3EO Neodol 45-13 Shell C14-15 linear alcohol 13EO Neodox 25-11 Shell C12-15 linear alcohol ethoxycarboxylate 11EO Orchex 796 Exxon paraffinic oil Pluronic F-108 BASF 128EO-54PO-128EO block copolymer Pluronic F-127 BASF 98EO-67PO-98EO block copolymer Pluronic F-68 BASF 75EO-30PO-75EO block copolymer Sident 9 Degussa abrasive silica, 50 m'/g Sipernat 22 Degussa hydrophilic precipitated silica, 190 m/g, av. aggregate size 100 tm Sipernat 22S Degussa hydrophilic precipitated silica, 190 m/g, av. aggregate size <10 Fm Span 60 ICI sorbitan monostearate Span 80 ICI sorbitan monooleate Stepfac 8170 Stepan nonylphenol EO phosphate Surfynol 104 Air Products tetramethyidecyne diol Tergitol 15-S-15 Union Carbide C) branched secondary alcohol 15EO Tergitol 15-S-20 Union Carbide C, 5 branched secondary alcohol 20EO Tergitol 15-S-30 Union Carbide C) s branched secondary alcohol 30EO Tergitol 15-S-40 Union Carbide C, 5 branched secondary alcohol 40EO Trade name Manufacturer Chemical description Tween 20 ici sorbitan monolaurate 20EO Tween 80 ICI sorbitan monooleate 20EO Velvetex AB-45 Henkel cocobetaine

Fatty alcohol ethoxylate (alkylether) surfactants are referred to in the Examples by their generic names as given in the International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary, 6th Edition, 1995 (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, Washington, DC). They were interchangeably sourced from various manufacturers, for example : Laureth-23: Brij 35 (ICI), Trycol 5964 (Henkel).

Ceteth-10 : Brij 56 (ICI).

Ceteth-20: Brij 58 (ICI).

Steareth-10 : Brij 76 (ICI).

Steareth-20: Brij 78 (ICI), Emthox 5888-A (Henkel), STA-20 (Heterene).

Steareth-30: STA-30 (Heterene).

Steareth-100 : Brij 700 (ICI).

Ceteareth-15 : CS-15 (Heterene).

Ceteareth-20: CS-20 (Heterene).

Ceteareth-27: Plurafac A-38 (BASF).

Ceteareth-55: Plurafac A-39 (BASF).

Oleth-2 : Brij 92 (ICI).

Oleth-10 : Brij 97 (ICI).

Oleth-20 : Brij 98 (ICI), Trycol 5971 (Henkel).

Where a proprietary excipient is a surfactant supplied as a solution in water or other solvent, the amount to be used was calculated on a true surfactant basis, not an"as is"basis. For example, Fluorad FC-135 is supplied as 50% true surfactant, together with 33% isopropanol and 17% water; thus to provide a composition containing 0. 1% w/w Fluorad FC-135 as reported herein, 0.2 g of the product as supplied was included in 100 g of the composition. The amount of lecithin, however, is always reported herein on an"as is"basis, regardless of the content of phospholipid in the lecithin sample used.

Spray compositions of the Examples contained an exogenous chemical, such as glyphosate IPA salt, in addition to the excipient ingredients listed. The amount of exogenous chemical was selected to provide the desired rate in grams per hectare (g/ha) when applied in a spray volume of 93 I/ha. Several exogenous chemical rates were applied for each composition. Thus, except where otherwise indicated, when spray compositions were tested, the concentration of exogenous chemical varied in direct proportion to exogenous chemical rate, but the concentration of excipient ingredients was held constant across different exogenous chemical rates.

Concentrate compositions were tested by dilution, dissolution or dispersion in water to form

spray compositions. In these spray compositions prepared from concentrates, the concentration of excipient ingredients varied with that of exogenous chemical.

Many of the Examples feature aqueous concentrate compositions of the invention. Except where otherwise indicated, these aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared by the following general processes (v) to (x).

(v) A weighed amount of lecithin powder of the type indicated was placed in a beaker and deionized water was added in sufficient quantity to provide, after sonication as detailed below, a lecithin stock at a convenient concentration, normally in the range from 10% to 20% w/w and typically 15% w/w. The beaker and its contents were then placed in a Fisher Sonic Dismembrator, Model 550, fitted with a 2.4 cm probe tip with the pulse period set at 15 seconds with I minute intervals between pulses to allow cooling. Power output was set at level 8. After a total of 3 minutes of sonication (12 pulse periods) the resulting lecithin stock was finally adjusted to the desired concentration if necessary with deionized water. To prepare an aqueous concentrate formulation, the following ingredients were mixed in the appropriate proportions with mild agitation, normally in the order given although this was sometimes varied and was found in some cases to affect the physical stability of the concentrate formulation : (a) exogenous chemical, for example glyphosate IPA salt as a 62% w/w solution at pH 4.4- 4.6; (b) lecithin stock; (c) other ingredients if required; and (d) water.

(vi) Water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) multiple emulsions were prepared as follows. First a water- in-oil emulsion was prepared. To do this, the required amounts of the selected oil and a first emulsifier (referred to in the Examples as"emulsifier &num I") were mixed thoroughly. If it was desired to prepare the formulation with glyphosate in the inner aqueous phase, a measured amount of concentrated (62% w/w) aqueous solution of glyphosate IPA salt was added to the mixture of oil and first emulsifier with agitation to ensure homogeneity. The amount of water required in the inner aqueous phase was then added to complete the water-in-oil emulsion, which was finally subjected to high-shear mixing, typically using a Silverson L4RT-A mixer fitted with a fine emulsor screen operated for 3 minutes at 10, 000 rpm.

The required amount of a second emulsifier (referred to in the Examples as"emulsifier #2") was next added to the water-in-oil emulsion with agitation to ensure homogeneity. If it was desired to prepare the formulation with glyphosate in the outer aqueous phase, a measured amount of concentrated (62% w/w) aqueous solution of glyphosate IPA salt was added to the blend of the water-in-oil emulsion and the second emulsifier with further agitation. To complete the water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsion composition, the amount of water required in the outer aqueous phase was added. The composition was finally subjected to high-shear mixing, typically using a Silverson L4RT-A mixer fitted with a medium emulsor screen, operated for 3 minutes at 7,000 rpm.

(vii) Oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions were prepared as follows. The required amount of the selected oil and surfactant (sometimes referred to in the Examples as"emulsifier #2"as it corresponds to the second emulsifier in process (vi)) were mixed thoroughly. If the surfactant selected was not free-

flowing at ambient temperature, heat was applied to bring the surfactant into a flowable condition before mixing with the oil. A measured amount of concentrated (62% w/w) aqueous solution of glyphosate IPA salt was added to the surfactant-oil mixture with agitation. The required amount of water was added to bring the concentration of glyphosate and other ingredients to the desired level. The composition was finally subjected to high-shear mixing, typically using a Silverson L4RT-A mixer fitted with a medium emulsor screen, operated for 3 minutes at 7,000 rpm.

(viii) Surfactant-containing aqueous solution concentrates having no oil component were prepared as follows. A concentrated (62% w/w) aqueous solution of glyphosate IPA salt was added in the desired amount to a weighed quantity of the selected surfactant (s). If the surfactant selected is not free-flowing at ambient temperature, heat was applied to bring the surfactant into a flowable condition before adding the glyphosate solution. The required amount of water was added to bring the concentration of glyphosate and other ingredients to the desired level. The composition was finally subjected to high-shear mixing, typically using a Silverson L4RT-A mixer fitted with a medium emulsor screen, operated for 3 minutes at 7,000 rpm.

(ix) For compositions containing a colloidal particulate, the required amount by weight of the selected colloidal particulate was suspended in a concentrated (62% w/w) aqueous solution of glyphosate IPA salt and agitated with cooling to ensure homogeneity. To the resulting suspension was added the required amount by weight of the selected surfactant (s). For a surfactant which is not free-flowing at ambient temperature, heat was applied to bring the surfactant into a flowable condition before adding it to the suspension. In those instances where an oil, such as butyl stearate, was also to be included in the composition, the oil was first thoroughly mixed with the surfactant and the surfactant-oil mixture added to the suspension. To complete the aqueous concentrate, the required amount of water was added to bring the concentration of glyphosate and other ingredients to the desired level. The concentrate was finally subjected to high-shear mixing, typically using a Silverson L4RT-A mixer fitted with a medium emulsor screen, operated for 3 minutes at 7,000 rpm.

(x) The procedure for preparing aqueous concentrate formulations containing lecithin and butyl stearate was different from that followed for other lecithin-containing concentrates. Exogenous chemical, for example glyphosate IPA salt, was first added, with mild agitation, to deionized water in a formulation jar. The selected surfactant (other than lecithin) was then added, while continuing the agitation, to form a preliminary exogenous chemical/surfactant mixture. Where the surfactant is not free-flowing at ambient temperature, the order of addition was not as above. Instead, the non-free- flowing surfactant was first added to water together with any other surfactant (other than lecithin) required in the composition, and was then heated to 55°C in a shaker bath for 2 hours. The resulting mixture was allowed to cool, then exogenous chemical was added with mild agitation to form the preliminary exogenous chemical/surfactant mixture. A weighed amount of the selected lecithin was added to the preliminary exogenous chemical/surfactant mixture, with stirring to break up lumps. The

mixture was left for about I hour to allow the lecithin to hydrate, then butyl stearate was added, with further stirring until no phase separation occurred. The mixture was then transferred to a microfluidizer (Microfluidics International Corporation, Model M- ! ! OF) and microfluidized for 3 to 5 cycles at 10,000 psi (69 MPa). In each cycle, the formulation jar was rinsed with microfluidized mixture. In the last cycle, the finished composition was collected in a clean dry beaker.

The following procedure was used for testing compositions of the Examples to determine herbicidal effectiveness, except where otherwise indicated.

Seeds of the plant species indicated were planted in 85 mm square pots in a soil mix which was previously steam sterilized and prefertilized with a 14-14-14 NPK slow release fertilizer at a rate of 3.6 kg/m3. The pots were placed in a greenhouse with sub-irrigation. About one week after emergence, seedlings were thinned as needed, including removal of any unhealthy or abnormal plants, to create a uniform series of test pots.

The plants were maintained for the duration of the test in the greenhouse where they received a minimum of 14 hours of light per day. If natural light was insufficient to achieve the daily requirement, artificial light with an intensity of approximately 475 microeinsteins was used to make up the difference.

Exposure temperatures were not precisely controlled but averaged about 27°C during the day and about 1 8°C during the night. Plants were sub-irrigated throughout the test to ensure adequate soil moisture levels.

Pots were assigned to different treatments in a fully randomized experimental design with 3 replications. A set of pots was left untreated as a reference against which effects of the treatments could later be evaluated.

Application of glyphosate compositions was made by spraying with a track sprayer fitted with a 9501 E nozzle calibrated to deliver a spray volume of 93 liters per hectare (I/ha) at a pressure of 166 kilopascals (kPa). After treatment, pots were returned to the greenhouse until ready for evaluation.

Treatments were made using dilute aqueous compositions. These could be prepared as spray compositions directly from their ingredients, or by dilution with water of preformulated concentrate compositions.

For evaluation of herbicidal effectiveness, all plants in the test were examined by a single practiced technician, who recorded percent inhibition, a visual measurement of the effectiveness of each treatment by comparison with untreated plants. Inhibition of 0% indicates no effect, and inhibition of 100% indicates that all of the plants are completely dead. Inhibition of 85% or more is in most cases considered acceptable for normal herbicidal use; however in greenhouse tests such as those of the Examples it is normal to apply compositions at rates which give less than 85% inhibition, as this makes it easier to discriminate among compositions having different levels of effectiveness.

EXAMPLE 1 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table la. These compositions are water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsions and were prepared by process (vi) described above.

Table la Conc. % w/w % in inner aq. Emulsifier Emulsifier phase comp. Glyphos-Butyl Emulsifier Emulsifier Water Glyphosate #1 #2 ate a. e. stearate #1 #2 1-01 10 18. 0 3. 0 5. 0 9. 0 20 Span 80 Tween 20 1-02 10 7.5 3.0 5.0 4. 5 20 Span 80 Tween 20 1-03 10 7. 5 3. 0 10. 0 4. 5 20 Surfynol 104 Neodol 25-12 1-04 10 7.5 3.0 10.0 4. 5 20 Surfynol 104 Neodol 25-20 1-05 10 7.5 3.0 10.0 4. 5 20 Surfynol 104 Tergitol 15-S-15 1-06 10 7. 5 3. 0 10. 0 4. 5 20 Surfynol 104 Tergitol 15-S-20 1-07 10 7. 5 3. 0 10. 0 4. 5 20 Surfynol 104 Tween 20 I-08 7. 5 3. 0 10. 0 4. 5 20 Surfynol 104 ceteareth-55 1-09 10 7.5 3.0 10.0 4.5 20 Surfynol 104 Tergitol 15-S-30 1-10 10 7.5 3.0 10.0 4.5 20 Neodol 25-3 ceteareth-55 1-11 10 7. 5 3. 0 10. 0 4. 5 20 Neodol 25-3 Tergitol 15-S-30 1-12 10 7.5 3.0 10.0 4. 5 20 Span 60 ceteareth-55 1-13 10 7. 5 3. 0 10. 0 4. 5 20 Span 60 Tergitol 15-S-30 1-14 10 7.5 3.0 10.0 4. 5 20 oleth-2 ceteareth-55 1-15 10 7. 5 3. 0 10. 0 4. 5 20 oleth-2 Tergitol 15-S-30 1-16 10 7.5 3.0 10.0 4.5 20 Emid 6545 ceteareth-55 1-17 10 7.5 3.0 10.0 4.5 20 Emid 6545 Tergitol 15-S-30

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 35 days after planting ABUTH and 33 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 17 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table I b.

Table lb Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF FormulationB 150 0 0 250 35 40 350 50 63 450 60 43 Formulation C 150 63 63 250 80 96 350 92 98 450 98 87 Formulation J 150 43 30 250 75 85 350 82 98 450 96 95 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 1-01 150 65 53 250 85 70 350 90 87 450 98 73 1-02 150 63 5 250 78 53 350 88 80 450 97 87 1-03 150 75 0 250 87 22 350 88 72 450 97 17 1-04 150 84 0 250 90 10 350 95 70 450 98 60 1-05 150 77 0 250 83 3 350 93 30 450 95 10 1-06 150 22 0 250 83 47 350 94 60 450 98 20 1-07 150 75 0 250 77 40 350 96 47 450 96 50 1-08 150 87 40 250 97 82 350 99 83 450 100 77 1-19 150 82 10 250 82 40 350 96 67 450 97 67 1-10 150 82 13 250 94 83 350 99 85 450 99 83 150 73 17 250 83 60 350 88 73 450 96 63 1-12 150 80 20 250 93 85 350 96 82 450 96 82 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 1-13 150 78 20 250 83 50 350 92 90 450 92 85 1-14 150 80 30 250 97 85 350 99 99 450 97 96 1-15 150 82 30 250 87 75 350 99 92 450 99 93 1-16 150 82 53 250 96 82 350 96 97 450 87 82 1-17 150 72 20 250 80 63 350 92 75 450 95 87

Considerable variation was seen in herbicidal effectiveness of water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsions of this Example, especially on ECHCF. Among the most efficacious were 1-08, 1-10, 1-12, 1- 14 and 1-16. All of these contained a Cl618 alkylether surfactant, ceteareth-55. When Tergitol 15-S-30, a C12 15 secondary alkylether surfactant, replaced ceteareth-55, as in 1-09, 1-11, 1-13, 1-15 and 1-17, herbicidal effectiveness, at least on ECHCF, was in most cases markedly reduced.

EXAMPLE 2 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 2a. Concentrate compositions 2-01 and 2-02 are water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsions and were prepared by process (vi), using Span 80 as emulsifier &num 1. Concentrate compositions 2-03 to 2-12 and 2-14 to 2-17 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate composition 2-13 is an aqueous solution concentrate and was prepared by process (viii), the component indicated below as"emulsifier &num 2"being the surfactant component.

Table 2a Conc. % w/w % in inner aq. Phase Emulsifier comp. Glyphos-Butyl Span 80 Emulsifier Water Glyphosate #2 ate a. e. stearate #2 2-01 10 18. 0 3. 0 5. 0 12. 2 20 Tween 20 2-02 10 7. 5 3. 0 5. 0 53 20 Tween 20 2-03 10 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-04 10 3. 0 10. 0 Neodol25-20 2-05 10 1. 0 5. 0 Neodol 25-20 Cone. % w/w % in inner aq. Phase Emulsifier comp. Glyphos-Butyl Span 80 Emulsifier Water Glyphosate #2 ate a. e. stearate #2 2-06 10 3. 0 5. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-07 15 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-08 15 3.0 10.0 Neodol 25-20 2-09 15 1. 0 5. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-10 15 3. 0 5. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-11 20 1. 0 5. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-12 20 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-13 10 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-14 10 7. 5 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 2-15 10 7.5 10.0 Neodol 25-12 2-16 10 7. 5 10. 0 steareth-20 2-17 10 7. 5 10. 0 oleth-20

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti. ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and 19 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 2b.

Table 2b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 30 250 10 40 350 37 73 450 58 68 Formulation C 150 42 79 250 77 98 350 99 97 450 97 93 Formulation J 150 43 67 250 73 90 350 94 98 450 77 78 2-01 150 58 76 250 75 77 350 88 93 450 95 83 2-02 150 27 63 250 60 87 350 82 98 450 77 92 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 2-03 150 47 76 250 65 92 350 94 99 450 95 91 2-04 150 70 86 250 86 95 350 97 98 450 99 90 2-05 150 42 80 250 72 90 350 90 93 450 99 96 2-06 150 48 57 250 78 92 350 94 99 450 96 92 2-07 150 78 95 250 96 96 350 98 98 450 100 97 2-08 150 88 96 250 98 98 350 100 99 450 100 99 2-09 150 82 93 250 94 96 350 99 97 450 99 93 2-10 150 72 83 250 97 93 350 99 100 450 100 98 2-11 150 87 83 250 98 97 350 100 99 450 100 99 2-12 150 93 99 250 99 99 350 99 97 450 100 99 2-13 150 70 90 250 91 88 350 97 94 450 99 86 2-14 150 67 76 250 93 80 350 98 95 450 95 78 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 2-15 150 68 65 250 90 87 350 97 80 450 98 93 2-16 150 83 73 250 90 93 350 99 100 450 100 100 2-17 150 80 66 250 98 77 350 99 83 450 100 85

Very high herbicidal activity was evident in compositions 2-13 to 2-17, which have a very high ratio of surfactant to glyphosate a. e. of 1 : 1. Activity was too high to clearly distinguish among these compositions, but 2-16 and 2-17, containing steareth-20 and oleth-20 respectively, exbited greater effectiveness on ABUTH at the lowest glyphosate rate than 2-14 and 2-15, containing Neodol 25-20 and Neodol 25-12 respectively.

EXAMPLE 3 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 3a. Concentrate compositions 3-01 and 3-02 are water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsions and were prepared by process (vi), using Span 80 as emulsifier &num 1. Concentrate compositions 3-03 to 3-12 and 3-14 to 3-17 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate composition 3-13 is an aqueous solution concentrate and was prepared by process (viii), the component indicated below as"emulsifier &num 2"being the surfactant component.

Table 3a Conc. % w/w % in inner aq. phase Emulsifier comp. Glyphos-Butyl Span80 Emulsifier Water Glyphosate #2 ate a. e. stearate #2 3-01 10 18.0 3.0 5.0 12. 2 20 Tween 20 3-02 10 7. 5 3. 0 5. 0 5. 3 20 Tween 20 3-03 1. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 3-04 10 3. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 3-05 10 1. 0 5. 0 Tween 80 3-06 10 3. 0 5. 0 Tween 80 3-07 15 1. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 3-08 1 15 3. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 3-09 5. 0 Tween 80 3-10 15 3. 0 5. 0 Tween 80 3-11 20 1. 0 5. 0 Tween 80 3-12 20 1. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 3-13 10 10. 0 Tween 80 3-14 10 7. 5 10. 0 Tween 80 Conc. % w/w % in inner aq. phase Emulsifier comp. Glyphos-Butyl Span 80 Emulsifier Water Glyphosate #2 ate a. e. stearate #2 3-15 10 7. 5 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 3-16 10 7. 5 10. 0 steareth-20 3-17 10 7. 5 10. 0 oleth-20

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and 19 days after planting ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 3b.

Table 3b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 0 250 3 10 350 17 20 450 20 30 Formulation C 150 70 33 250 80 70 350 85 80 450 97 77 Formulation J 150 7 20 250 70 80 350 78 80 450 83 80 3-01 150 40 7 250 48 20 350 73 23 450 75 30 3-02 150 3 0 250 17 350 47 23 450 50 30 3-03 150 0 2 250 33 13 350 63 40 450 68 43 3-04 150 17 7 250 43 20 350 78 63 450 78 63 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 3-05 150 10 3 250 20 13 350 58 40 450 75 40 3-06 150 3 0 250 27 20 350 60 23 450 72 23 3-07 150 32 10 250 68 20 350 75 50 450 86 60 3-08 150 27 20 250 68 30 350 82 40 450 90 73 3-09 150 43 10 250 60 33 350 72 63 450 75 73 3-10 150 33 10 250 62 30 350 77 60 450 83 70 3-11 150 48 13 250 72 63 350 83 80 450 87 80 3-12 150 23 13 250 60 50 350 75 80 450 86 78 3-13 150 32 13 250 47 40 350 75 50 450 78 70 3-14 150 27 20 250 75 53 350 82 70 450 92 67 3-15 150 70 20 250 78 30 350 92 80 450 93 80 3-16 150 68 40 250 73 30 350 93 80 450 93 77 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 3-17 150 73 20 250 85 30 350 93 60 450 95 63

Compositions 3-16 and 3-17, containing steareth-20 and oleth-20 respectively, exhibited very high herbicidal activity on ABUTH. At the very high surfactant to glyphosate a. e. ratio (1 : 1) of these compositions, no difference was evident between these compositions and an otherwise similar composition (3-15) containing Neodol 25-20 in place of steareth-20 or oleth-20.

EXAMPLE 4 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 4a. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Table 4a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 4-01 163 1. 00 10. 0 Tween 80 4-02 163 1. 00 10. 0 Neodol 25-12 4-03 163 1. 00 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 4-04 163 1. 00 10. 0 steareth-20 4-05 163 1. 00 10. 0 oleth-20 4-06 163 1. 00 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-40 4-07 163 1. 00 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-15 4-08 163 1. 00 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-20 4-09 163 0. 50 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-40 4-10 163 0. 50 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-15 4-11 163 0. 50 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-20 4-12 163 0. 50 5. 0 Tergitol 15-S-40 4-13 163 0. 50 5. 0 Tergitol 15-S-15 4-14 163 0. 50 5. 0 Tergitol 15-S-20 4-15 163 0.25 10.0 Tergitol 15-S-40 Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 4b.

Table 4b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 2 20 250 2 30 350 5 53 450 45 75 Formulation C 150 45 63 250 77 93 350 83 99 450 93 100 Formulation J 150 15 40 250 70 73 350 78 98 450 92 99 4-01 150 42 50 250 72 89 350 80 96 450 93 98 4-02 150 45 80 250 72 83 350 85 91 450 97 98 4-03 150 60 80 250 75 87 350 82 96 450 86 99 4-04 150 65 60 250 82 70 350 93 80 450 98 87 4-05 150 72 60 250 83 87 350 95 93 450 98 97 4-06 150 50 45 250 68 70 350 77 85 450 83 90 4-07 150 25 40 250 65 50 350 80 77 450 83 80 4-08 150 37 33 250 72 80 350 77 87 450 80 90 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 4-09 150 32 47 250 65 73 350 77 75 450 80 94 4-10 150 17 30 250 65 70 350 75 70 450 78 89 4 11 150 35 33 250 68 68 350 77 77 450 92 75 4-12 150 13 35 250 57 40 350 75 57 450 77 83 4-13 150 35 40 250 63 43 350 77 77 450 83 75 4-14 150 30 25 250 67 53 350 78 85 450 83 77 4-15 150 13 37 250 65 50 350 77 57 450 87 82

At a surfactant to glyphosate a. e. weight/weight ratio of about 1 : 1.5, compositions containing steareth-20 or oleth-20 (4-04 and 4-05 respectively) exhibited herbicidal effectiveness on ABUTH similar to one containing Neodol 25-20 (4-03).

EXAMPLE 5 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 5a. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Table 5a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./i Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 5-01 163 1. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 5-02 163 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol 25-12 5-03 163 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol25-20 5-04 163 1. 0 10. 0 steareth-20 5-05 163 1. 0 10. 0 oleth-20 5-06 163 1. 0 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-40 Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 5-07 163 1. 0 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-15 5-08 163 1. 0 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-20 5-09 163 0. 5 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-40 5-10 163 0. 3 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-15 5-11 163 0. 3 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-20 5-12 163 0. 3 10. 0 Tergitol 15-S-40 5-13 163 0. 3 5.0 Tergitol 15-S-15 5-14 163 0. 3 5. 0 Tergitol 15-S-20 5-15 163 0. 3 5.0 Tergitol 15-S-40

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 21 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 5b.

Table 5b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 23 250 0 40 350 5 53 450 13 57 Formulation C 150 0 47 250 28 87 350 72 98 450 97 97 FormulationJ 150 5 40 250 20 63 350 67 93 450 82 92 5-01 150 2 40 250 30 50 350 50 70 450 57 85 5-02 150 10 50 250 33 50 350 75 72 450 75 88 5-03 150 17 53 250 60 60 350 70 92 450 78 94 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 5-04 150 57 45 250 70 70 350 82 93 450 83 95 5-05 150 47 45 250 70 80 350 80 88 450 88 92 5-06 150 2 42 250 20 60 350 35 75 450 58 89 5-07 150 0 42 250 30 68 350 40 75 450 77 82 5-08 150 2 40 250 25 60 350 50 83 450 75 86 5-09 150 2 43 250 27 83 350 40 73 450 70 78 5-10 150 2 42 250 32 47 350 43 63 450 70 82 5-11 150 0 30 250 25 53 350 35 75 450 70 75 5-12 150 2 40 250 13 57 350 25 75 450 40 83 5-13 150 5 42 250 23 62 350 38 63 450 67 60 5-14 150 2 33 250 13 48 350 30 53 450 70 88 5-15 150 2 33 250 18 48 350 30 75 450 43 65

In this test, herbicidal effectiveness overall was lower than in the previous Example, particularly on ABUTH. In these circumstances, at a surfactant to glyphosate a. e. weight/weight ratio of about 1 : 1. 5, compositions containing steareth-20 or oleth-20 (5-04 and 5-05 respectively) exhibited greater herbicidal effectiveness on both ABUTH and ECHCF than one containing Neodol 25-20 (5-03).

EXAMPLE 6 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate ammonium or IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 6a. Concentrate composition 6-01 is a water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsion and was prepared by process (vi), using Span 80 as emulsifier &num 1. Concentrate compositions 6-02 to 6-11 and 6-17 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Concentrate compositions 6-12 to 6-16 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii), the component indicated below as"emulsifier &num 2"being the surfactant component.

Table 6a Conc. % w/w % in inner aq. phase Emulsifier Glyphosate comp. Glyphos-Butyl Span 80 Emulsifier Water Glyphosate #2 salt ate a. e. stearate #2 6-01 10 18.0 3. 0 5. 0 9. 0 20 Tween 20 IPA 6-02 15 1. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 IPA 6-03 15 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol 25-12 IPA 6-04 15 I. 0 10. 0 _ Neodol 25-20 IPA 6-05 15 1. 0 10. 0 steareth-20 I PA 6-06 15 1. 0 10. 0 oleth-20 IPA 6-07 1. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 ammonium 6-08 15 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol 25-12 ammonium 6-09 15 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 ammonium 6-10 15 1. 0 10. 0 steareth-20 ammonium 6-11 15 1. 0 10. 0 oleth-20 ammonium 6-12 10. 0 Tween 80 IPA 6-13 15 10. 0 Neodol 25-12 IPA 6-14 15 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 IPA 6-15 15 10. 0 steareth-20 IPA 6-16 15 10. 0 oleth-20 IPA 6-17 15 1. 0 10. 0 Emerest 2661 IPA

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 6b.

Table 6b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 2 5 250 3 25 350 28 30 450 53 50 Formulation C 150 5 25 250 60 50 350 85 83 450 88 88 Formulation J 150 2 10 250 70 40 350 82 53 450 87 83 6-01 150 23 20 250 72 30 350 80 80 450 85 69 6-02 150 18 250 72 38 350 82 63 450 85 83 6-03 150 25 20 250 70 57 350 85 68 450 90 83 6-04 150 25 27 250 77 67 350 85 62 450 88 70 6-05 150 60 25 250 82 62 350 87 73 450 85 80 6-06 150 50 32 250 78 78 350 91 91 450 98 98 6-07 150 5 25 250 55 77 350 77 86 450 83 99 6-08 150 0 13 250 58 78 350 80 85 450 85 87 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 6-09 150 7 25 250 57 72 350 77 83 450 91 92 6-10 150 50 25 250 80 55 350 86 87 450 92 82 6-11 150 53 30 250 78 80 350 87 89 450 95 98 6-12 150 0 25 250 50 77 350 77 90 450 83 94 6-13 150 2 30 250 55 75 350 72 92 450 85 80 6-14 150 12 30 250 75 78 350 84 90 450 96 94 6-15 150 55 35 250 78 80 350 80 94 450 86 98 6-16 150 50 35 250 73 63 350 84 83 450 89 95 6-17 150 0 10 250 10 53 350 53 83 450 62 87

Compositions containing steareth-20 or oleth-20 (6-05, 6-06,6-10,6-11, 6-15, 6-16) generally exhibited superior herbicidal effectiveness to counterparts containing Neodol 25-20 (6-04,6-09,6-14), at least on ABUTH. The presence of a small amount of butyl stearate tended to enhance effectiveness on ABUTH (compare 6-05 and 6-06 with 6-15 and 6-16).

EXAMPLE 7 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 7a. Concentrate composition 7-01 is a water-in-oil-in-water multiple

emulsion and was prepared by process (vi), using Span 80 as emulsifier &num 1. Concentrate compositions 7- 02 to 7-08,7-14,7-16 and 7-17 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Concentrate compositions 7-09 to 7-13 and 7-15 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii), the component indicated below as"emulsifier #2"being the surfactant component.

Table 7a Conc. % w/w % in inner aq. phase Emulsifier comp. Glyphos-Butyl Span 80 Emulsifier Water Glyphosate #2 ate a. e. stearate #2 7-01 10 18. 0 3.0 2. 5 9. 0 20 Tween 20 7-02 15 1. 0 10. 0 Emerest 2661 7-03 15 1. 0 10. 0 Tween 80 7-04 15 1. 0 10. 0 oleth-20 7-0 15 1. 0 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 7-06 15 1. 0 10. 0 ceteareth-27 7-07 15 1. 0 10. 0 ceteareth-55 7-08 15 1.0 10.0 Genapol UD-110 7-09 15 10. 0 ceteareth-27 7-10 15 10. 0 ceteareth-55 7 11 15 10. 0 Genapol UD-110 7-12 15 10. 0 oleth-20 7-13 10 10. 0 oleth-20 7-14 10 1. 0 10. 0 oleth-20 7-15 20 10. 0 oleth-20 7-16 15 0. 5 5. 0 oleth-20 7-17 I S 0. 5 10. 0 oleth-20

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 7b.

Table 7b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 0 250 8 20 350 27 40 450 62 50 Formulation C 150 27 50 250 75 70 350 92 80 450 97 92 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation J 150 23 30 250 72 50 350 94 63 450 95 80 7-01 150 22 30 250 60 40 350 83 57 450 90 67 7-02 150 12 33 250 45 50 350 73 63 450 83 83 7-03 150 27 43 250 68 50 350 80 63 450 87 87 7-04 150 68 47 250 95 73 350 99 78 450 95 90 7-05 150 50 50 250 77 77 350 90 83 450 98 83 7-06 150 78 67 250 93 82 350 97 87 450 99 97 7-07 150 87 57 250 96 73 350 99 85 450 99 97 7-08 150 42 30 250 73 53 350 82 85 450 95 89 7-09 150 67 40 250 95 73 350 99 95 450 99 98 7-10 150 85 60 250 96 68 350 96 91 450 100 88 7-11 150 13 10 250 67 50 350 78 60 450 88 73 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 7-12 150 72 43 250 97 68 350 98 83 450 99 93 7-13 150 73 57 250 88 70 350 98 87 450 99 96 7-14 150 80 50 250 96 70 350 99 85 450 98 88 7-15 150 70 43 250 96 53 350 97 82 450 99 89 7-16 150 62 53 250 88 72 350 99 81 450 99 91 7-17 150 72 58 250 95 68 350 100 89 450 100 93

The greatest herbicidal effectiveness in this test was exhibited by compositions containing a C16- 18 alkylether surfactant (oleth-20, ceteareth-27 or ceteareth-55).

EXAMPLE 8 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 8a. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Table 8a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 8-01 163 1. 00 10. 0 Tween 80 8-02 163 1. 00 10. 0 Emerest 2661 8-03 326 1.00 10.0 Genapol UD-110 8-04 326 0. 50 10. 0 Genapol UD-110 8-05 326 0. 25 10. 0 Genapol UD-110 8-06 163 0.25 10. 0 Genapol UD-110 8-07 163 1. 00 10. 0 Genapol UD-110 8-08 163 1. 00 10. 0 Neodol 1-9 8-09 163 1. 00 10.0 Neodol 1-12 8-10 163 1. 00 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 8-11 163 1.00 10.0 Neodol 25-12 Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 8-12 163 1. 00 10. 0 Neodox 25-11 8-13 163 1.00 10.0 laureth-23 8-14 163 1.00 10.0 ceteth-20 8-15 163 1. 00 10. 0 steareth-20 8-16 163 1.00 10.0 oleth-20

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 23 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 8b.

Table 8b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 0 250 25 22 350 60 40 450 65 52 Formulation C 150 43 52 250 72 83 350 87 98 450 97 95 Formulation J 150 50 43 250 75 91 350 86 96 450 95 97 8-01 150 50 30 250 75 75 350 85 87 450 90 92 8-02 150 35 47 250 58 77 350 75 85 450 80 96 8-03 150 33 32 250 57 53 350 75 78 450 84 94 8-04 150 20 25 250 55 68 350 78 91 450 82 97 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 8-05 150 37 12 250 58 42 350 81 70 450 86 73 8-06 150 50 8 250 65 40 350 81 65 450 92 85 8-07 150 50 30 250 63 48 350 84 68 450 98 84 8-08 150 43 35 250 52 65 350 73 85 450 84 85 8-09 150 55 40 250 68 58 350 79 65 450 97 73 8-10 150 69 40 250 81 68 350 94 92 450 99 96 8-11 150 58 50 250 84 60 350 90 83 450 94 93 8-12 150 50 40 250 57 67 350 65 84 450 75 98 8-13 150 57 53 250 78 73 350 89 97 450 98 97 8-14 150 68 67 250 85 73 350 97 98 450 100 97 8-15 150 72 50 250 88 89 350 89 98 450 99 97 8-16 150 65 53 250 87 72 350 97 85 450 100 95

Activity overall in this test was very high, and differences among compositions in herbicidal effectivess are difficult to discern clearly.

EXAMPLE 9 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 9a. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Table 9a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./i Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 9-01 163 1. 00 10. 0 Tween 80 9-02 163 1. 00 10. 0 Emerest 2661 9-03 163 1. 00 10. 0 Neodol 25-20 9-04 163 1. 00 10. 0 oleth-20 9-05 163 0. 50 5. 0 oleth-20 9-06 163 0. 25 2. 5 oleth-20 9-07 163 0.50 2.5 oleth-20 9-08 163 0. 50 1. 0 oleth-20 9-09 163 0.25 5.0 oleth-20 9-10 326 1. 00 10. 0 Neodol 1-12 9-11 326 0. 50 10. 0 Neodol 1-12 9-12 326 0.25 10.0 Neodol 1-12 9-13 326 1. 00 5. 0 Neodol I-12 9-14 326 0.50 5.0 Neodol 1-12 9-15 326 0.25 5.0 Neodol 1-12 9-16 326 0. 10 5. 0 Neodol 1-12

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 9b.

Table 9b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 50750 250 45 60 350 73 73 450 80 78 Formulation C 150 75 77 250 87 loo 350 96 99 450 99 97 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation J 150 72 77 250 83 89 350 97 99 450 97 98 9-01 150 60 75 250 80 85 350 93 97 450 98 98 9-02 150 57 75 250 70 83 350 87 83 450 90 94 9-03 150 77 80 250 87 92 350 97 87 450 99 98 9-04 150 80 89 250 93 92 350 99 99 450 100 99 9-05 150 83 83 250 92 93 350 97 90 450 100 93 9-06 150 77 77 250 80 91 350 90 99 450 98 99 9-07 150 77 83 250 82 89 350 90 91 450 97 98 9-08 150 47 82 250 73 82 350 80 97 450 91 9-09 150 73 78 250 87 88 350 97 94 450 99 99 9-10 150 52 67 250 70 80 350 93 88 450 93 94 9-11 150 40 68 250 72 85 350 87 96 450 93 96 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 9-12 150 37 60 250 68 83 350 85 85 450 93 75 9-13 150 28 63 250 53 80 350 85 97 450 88 97 9-14 150 37 63 250 58 73 350 83 96 450 90 91 9-15 150 30 70 250 47 83 350 82 89 450 87 89 9-16 150 40 53 250 53 82 350 80 80 450 88 77

Composition 9-04, containing 1 % butyl stearate and 10% oleth-20 (surfactant to glyphosate a. e. weight/weight ratio about 1 : 1. 5), exhibited marginally greater herbicidal effectiveness than composition 9-03, containing 1% butyl stearate and 10% oleth-20. At this very high surfactant to glyphosate ratio, however, both performed extremely well. Surprisingly, when the butyl stearate and oleth-20 concentrations were significantly lowered, this high level of performance was maintained to a remarkable degree. Even when butyl stearate was reduced to 0.25% and oleth-20 to 2.5% (surfactant to glyphosate a. e. ratio about 1 : 6), as in composition 9-06, herbicidal effectiveness was still similar to that obtained with commercial standard Formulations C and J.

EXAMPLE 10 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 10a. Concentrate compositions 10-01 to 10-08 and 10-11 to 10-16 are oil- in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 10-09 and 10-10 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii).

Table 10a Concentrate % w/w Type of compositionGlyphosate Butyl Surfactant surfactant a. e. stearate 10-01 15. 0 0. 25 5. 0 Emerest 2661 10-02 15. 0 0. 25 5.0 Tween 80 10-03 15. 0 0. 25 5. 0 Neodol 25-20 10-04 15. 0 0. 25 5. 0 laureth-23 Concentrate % w/w Type of composition Glyphosate Butyl Surfactant surfactant a. e. stearate 10-05 15. 0 0. 25 5. 0 ceteth-20 10-06 15. 0 0. 25 2. 5 Tween 80 10-07 15. 0 0. 10 1. 0 Tween 80 10-08 15. 0 1. 00 10. 0 Tween 80 10-09 15. 0 5. 0 laureth-23 10-10 15. 0 5.0 ceteth-20 10-11 15.0 1.00 10.0 Neodol 25-20 10-12 15. 0 1. 00 10. 0 oleth-20 10-13 15. 0 0. 50 5. 0 oleth-20 10-14 15. 0 0. 25 5. 0 oleth-20 10-15 15. 0 0. 25 2. 5 oleth-20 10-16 15. 0 0. 25 5. 0 Genapol UD-110

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 12 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 10b.

Table 10b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 2 10 250 5 20 350 43 30 450 58 43 Formulation C 150 68 50 250 92 79 350 96 90 450 98 85 Formulation J 150 57 43 250 90 63 350 95 80 450 95 95 10-01 150 7 33 250 50 43 350 77 53 450 80 93 10-02 150 17 50 250 72 70 350 80 80 450 80 93 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 10-03 150 43 40 250 75 68 350 87 75 450 96 95 10-04 150 33 47 250 73 63 350 80 77 450 90 93 10-05 150 73 37 250 92 57 350 95 88 450 95 73 10-06 150 25 35 250 68 47 350 80 92 450 88 85 10-07 150 3 30 250 57 40 350 77 53 450 80 67 10-08 150 53 43 250 77 62 350 80 88 450 93 80 10-09 150 32 60 250 77 53 350 93 73 450 97 93 10-10 150 75 35 250 92 77 350 96 77 450 97 93 10-11 150 75 53 250 90 78 350 95 89 450 98 97 10-12 150 80 43 250 95 73 350 96 92 450 98 89 10-13 150 75 53 250 92 97 350 97 99 450 96 93 10-14 150 78 70 250 90 92 350 93 97 450 95 93 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 10-15 150 70 60 250 83 98 350 95 99 450 97 99 10-16 150 27 52 250 75 73 350 80 98 450 83 99

Extremely high herbicidal effectiveness was again observed with a composition (10-15) containing 15% glyphosate a. e. and just 2.5% oleth-20 together with 0.25% butyl stearate. A comparison of 15% glyphosate a. e. compositions containing 5% alkylether surfactant and 0. 25% butyl stearate provided the following ranking of alkylethers in descending order of effectiveness: oleth-20 (10-14) > ceteth-20 (10-05) > Neodol 25-20 (10-03) = laureth-23 (10-04).

EXAMPLE 11 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table I la. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Table 11 a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./i Butyl stearate Surfactant surfactant 11-01 163 0. 50 5.0 oleth-20 11-02 163 0. 25 5. 0 oleth-20 11-03 163 0. 25 2. 5 oleth-20 11-04 163 1. 00 10. 0 oleth-20 11-05 163 0. 50 5. 0 steareth-20 11-06 163 0. 25 5. 0 steareth-20 11-07 163 0. 25 2. 5 steareth-20 11-08 163 1. 00 10. 0 steareth-20

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 11 b.

Table 10b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 30 250 20 43 350 43 53 450 68 57 Formulation C 150 60 47 250 75 53 350 450 Formulation J 150 42 43 250 83 60 3508773 450 93 87 11-01 1506060 250 78 63 350 450 92 78 11-02 150 70 43 2508091 43 450 96 87 I1-03 150 52 43 2507572 350 83 93 450 87 94 11-04 150 72 50 2509373 350 97 95 4509791 11-05 150 72 43 250 350 4509385 11-06 1506840 2508050 350 93 75 450 95 85 11-07 150 63 37 250 78 55 3508784 450 g3 g2 11-08 150 70 50 250 80 70 350 92 84 450 94 98

All compositions containing butyl stearate and either oleth-20 or steareth-20 showed a very high level of performance by comparison with commercial standard Formulations C and J.

EXAMPLE 12 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 12a. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Table 12a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl stearate Surfactant surfactant 12-01 163 0. 50 5.0 oleth-20 12-02 163 0. 25 5. 0 oleth-20 12-03 163 0. 25 2. 5 oleth-20 12-04 163 1. 00 10. 0 oleth-20 12-05 163 0. 50 5. 0 steareth-20 12-06 163 0. 25 5. 0 steareth-20 12-07 163 0. 25 2. 5 steareth-20 12-08 163 1. 00 10. 0 steareth-20

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-gaili, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 12b.

Table 12b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 3 10 250 28 23 350 72 37 450 73 50 Formulation C 150 57 43 250 87 62 350 93 83 450 99 95 Formulation J 150 27 47 250 70 53 350 92 75 450 94 92 12-01 150 68 50 250 85 47 350 97 70 450 99 83 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 12-02 150-67 40 250 78 50 350 96 63 450 99 68 12-03 150 52 40 250 72 50 350 95 63 450 97 85 12-04 150 72 40 250 97 53 350 97 77 450 99 90 12-05 150 75 40 250 0 53 350 88 53 450 96 78 12-06 150 98 40 250 93 50 350 97 68 450 97 82 12-07 150 73 40 250 92 50 350 98 63 450 98 80 12-08 150 77 43 250 93 57 350 97 77 450 98 88

All compositions containing butyl stearate and either oleth-20 or steareth-20 showed a very high level of performance by comparison with commercial standard Formulations C and J.

EXAMPLE 13 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 13a. All contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

All compositions of this example showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions containing oleth-20 were not acceptably storage-stable in the absence of the colloidal particulate.

Table 13a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl Oleth-20 Aerosil Aerosil stearate 13-01 488 3. 0 0. 4 OX-50 13-02 488 3. 0 0. 8 OX-50 13-02 488 3.0 1.5 OX-50 13-04 488 0.4 OX-50 Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a.e./l Butyl Oleth-20 Aerosil Aerosil stearate 13-05 488 0.8 OX-50 13-06 488 1. 5 OX-50 13-07 488 3. 0 0. 4 MOX-80 13-08 488 3. 0 0. 8 MOX-80 13-09 488 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80 13-10 488 0. 4 MOX-80 13-11 488 0.8 MOX-80 13-12 488 1. 5 MOX-80 13-13 488 3. 0 0. 4 MOX-170 13-14 488 3. 0 0. 8 MOX-170 13-15 488 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-170 13-16 488 0. 4 MOX-170 13-17 488 0. 8 MOX-170 13-18 488 1.5 MOX-170 13-19 488 3. 0 3.0 1.5 MOX-80

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 13b.

Table 13b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 27 250 17 37 350 47 57 450 60 60 Formulation J 150 57 50 250 82 87 350 95 99 450 98 99 13-01 150 37 60 250 73 70 350 96 97 450 96 99 13-02 150 43 50 250 73 63 350 93 96 450 98 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 13-03 150 53 60 2508387 350 87 97 450 98 98 13-04 150 45 40 250 57 6 350 78 95 450 94 100 13-05 150 47 50 2506082 350 92 96 450 95 99 13-06 150 38 53 250 68 96 350 82 99 4508395 13-07 150 50 57 2508788 350 91 99 450 98 98 13-08 150 53 DU 250 egg 85 3509697 450 97 100 13-09 150 40 30 250 37 47 350 57 80 450 77 94 13-10 150 47 50 250 70 95 350 75 99 4507798 13-11 150 27 60 250 72 85 350 82 98 450 75 99 13-12 150 37 250 73 86 350 80 99 450 85 100 13-13 150 45 53 250 85 94 350 95 100 450 98 99 13-14 1505050 250 78 83 350 94 98 450 98 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 13-15 150 53 67 250 75 88 350 93 97 450 96 99 13-16 150 42 50 250 47 96 350 70 98 450 90 99 13-17 150 27 83 250 57 98 350 87 99 450 87 100 13-18 150 33 60 250 47 94 350 83 99 450 93 99 13-19 150 45 47 250 80 73 350 96 94 450 99 98

Remarkably high levels of herbicida effectiveness were obtained in this test with compositions containing oleth-20 at a weight/weight ratio to glyphosate a. e. of about 1 : 14, and stabilized with colloidal particulates. In some cases the colloidal particulate alone contributed a major part of the efficacy enhancement. Results with composition 13-09 are out of line with other data and an application problem is suspected.

EXAMPLE 14 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 14a. Concentrate compositions 14-01 to 14-04,14-06, 14-08, 14-09, 14- 11, 14-12, 14-14 and 14-16 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 14-05, 14-07, 14-10, 14-13, 14-15 and 14-17 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii).

Table 14a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 14-01 163 0. 25 2.5 Neodoll-12 14-02 163 0. 25 2.5 laureth-23 14-03 163 0. 25 2.5 steareth-10 14-04 163 0. 25 2.5 steareth-20 14-05 163 2. 5 steareth-20 14-06 163 0. 25 2.5 steareth-100 14-07 163 2.5 steareth-100 ConcentrateGlyphosate% w/wType of composition g a. e./i Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 14-08 163 0. 25 2. 5 oleth-10 14-09 163 0. 25 2.5 oleth-20 14-10 163 2. 5 oleth-20 14-11 163 0. 25 2.5 ceteth-10 14-12 163 0. 25 2.5 ceteth-20 14-13 163 2. 5 ceteth-20 14-14 326 0. 50 5.0 ceteareth-27 14-15 326 5. 0 ceteareth-27 14-16 163 0. 25 2.5 ceteareth-55 14-17 163 2. 5 ceteareth-55

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 15 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 14b.

Table 14b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulationt50033 250 20 43 350 63 63 450 75 70 Formulation C 150 53 55 250 80 87 350 94 97 450 98 99 Formulation J 150 40 57 250 80 90 350 96 99 450 98 99 14-01 150 52 40 250 65 73 350 77 70 450 77 70 14-02 150 37 70 250 75 80 350 83 97 450 95 99 14-03 150 47 53 250 77 86 350 83 97 450 93 100 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 14-04 150 80 60 250 93 83 350 96 85 450 99 99 14-05 150 80 43 2509379 350 96 94 450 98 96 14-06 150 77 53 250 85 83 350 94 99 450 97 99 14-07 150 63 50 2508088 350 85 96 450 96 99 14-08 150 27 45 250 75 83 350 77 99 450 96 98 14-09 150 75 57 250 80 82 350 97 95 450 99 98 14-10 150 70 40 250 85 83 350 97 98 450 99 99 14 11 150 53 37 250 75 63 350 88 93 450 92 98 14-12 150 70 40 250 78 75 350 91 450 98 98 14-13 150 72 40 250 92 80 350 97 90 4509997 14-14 150 78 53 250 g9 gg 350 97 95 450 99 100 14-15 1508060 2509597 35098100 450 99 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 14-16 150 60 63 250 87 78 350 96 94 450 98 99 14-17 150 73 60 250 85 57 350 93 80 450 99 85

In combination with butyl stearate, steareth-20 (composition 14-04) gave greater herbicidal effectiveness than steareth-10 (14-03) on ABUTH. Similarly, oleth-20 (14-09) was more efficacious than oleth-10 (14-08) and ceteth-20 (14-12) than ceteth-10 (14-11). In the absence of butyl stearate, ceteareth-55 (14-17) was noticeably weaker on ECHCF than ceteareth-27 (14-15) but inclusion of butyl stearate (14-16) tended to correct this weakness. Note that while compositions 14-14 and 14-15 contained twice as high a concentration of excipients as the other compositions of the test, the concentration of glyphosate was also twice as high, thus the concentrations as sprayed were the same.

EXAMPLE 15 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 15a. Concentrate compositions 15-01 to 15-05, 15-07, 15-08, 15-10 and 15-12 to 15-16 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 15-06, 15-09 and 15-11 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii).

Table 15a

Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./I Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 15-01 163 0. 25 2. 5 Neodol 1-12 15-02 163 0. 25 2. 5 laureth-23 15-03 163 0. 25 2. 5 steareth-10 15-04 163 0. 25 2. 5 steareth-20 15-05 163 0. 25 2. 5 Pluronic F-68 15-06 163 2. 5 Pluronic F-68 15-07 326 1. 00 5. 0 Pluronic F-108 15-08 326 0. 50 5. 0 Pluronic F-108 15-09 326 5. 0 Pluronic F-108 15-10 163 0. 25 2. 5 Pluronic F-127 15-11 163 2. 5 Pluronic F-127 15-12 326 0. 50 5. 0 ceteareth-27 15-13 163 0. 25 2. 5 ceteareth-55 15-14 163 0. 25 2. 5 oleth-20 15-15 163 0. 25 2. 5 ceteth-20 15-16 163 0. 25 2. 5 steareth-100

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 15 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 15b.

Table 15b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 5 0 250 47 5 350 70 23 450 75 43 Formulation C 150 73 47 250 99 50 350 98 67 450 99 75 Formulation J 150 73 43 250 89 50 350 97 83 450 98 77 15-01 150 37 30 250 70 33 350 77 40 450 90 47 15-02 150 52 37 250 77 67 350 90 77 450 92 75 15-03 150 40 30 250 77 70 350 80 82 450 90 83 15-04 150 75 37 250 95 53 350 99 91 450 99 82 15-05 150 58 37 250 65 53 350 80 80 450 75 68 15-06 150 40 30 250 75 33 350 78 43 450 80 43 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 15-07 150 50 30 250 75 33 350 78 53 450 86 53 15-08 150 47 30 250 75 33 350 77 40 450 80 50 15-09 150 43 33 250 77 40 350 78 63 450 83 50 15-10 150 27 40 250 77 43 350 80 50 450 92 40 15-11 150 37 30 250 72 33 350 80 60 450 95 40 15-12 150 78 37 250 98 40 350 99 53 450 100 50 15-13 150. 75 30 250 88 40 350 98 47 450 100 65 15-14 150 73 30 250 87 40 350 98 50 450 99 53 15-15 150 72 30 250 93 40 350 96 43 450 99 50 15-16 150 73 40 250 83 40 350 98 40 450 100 47

Composition 15-04 containing steareth-20 outperformed its counterpart 15-03 containing steareth-10, though both gave greater herbicidal effectiveness, especially on ECHCF, than 15-02 containing laureth-23 or 15-01 containingNeodol 1-12.

EXAMPLE 16 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 16a. Concentrate compositions 16-01 to 16-07 and 16-09 to 16-15 are oil- in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 16-08 and 16-16 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii).

Table 16a

Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of composition g a. e./1 Oil Surfactant oil surfactant 16-01 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate oleth-20 16-02 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate oleth-20 16-03 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl oleate oleth-20 16-04 163 0. 5 5.0 butyl oleate oleth-20 16-05 163 0. 577 7 5. 0 methyl laurate oleth-20 16-06 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyllaurate oleth-20 16-07 163 0. 5 5. 0 Orchex 796 oleth-20 16-08 163 5. 0 none oleth-20 16-09 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate Neodol 1-9 16-10 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate Neodol 1-9 16-11 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl oleate Neodol 1-9 16-12 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyloleate Neodol 1-9 16-13 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl laurate Neodol 1-9 16-14 163 0.5 5.0 butyl laurate Neodol 1-9 16-15 163 0. 5 5. 0 Orchex 796 Neodol 1-9 16-16 163 5. 0 none Neodol 1-9 Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 16b.

Table 16b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 3 10 250 58 57 350 78 53 450 77 53 Formulation C 150 60 98 250 87 99 350 95 98 450 99 100 Formulation J 150 60 75 250 89 87 350 93 90 450 98 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition ga. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 16-01 150 75 96 250 99 97 350 97 99 450 99 100 16-02 150 60 60 250 97 67 350 99 98 450 100 95 16-03 150 63 40 250 83 82 350 97 86 450 97 88 16-04 150 73 40 250 94 82 350 97 100 450 99 100 16-05 150 67 47 250 86 67 350 97 88 450 99 100 16-06 150 60 43 250 78 91 350 97 83 450 94 86 16-07 150 70 53 250 80 53 350 97 82 450 97 92 16-08 150 70 62 250 83 83 350 91 87 450 98 98 16-09 150 45 42 250 72 72 350 77 73 450 78 89 16-10 150 40 30 250 82 80 350 78 98 450 89 93 16-11 150 40 30 250 65 60 350 77 90 450 96 92 16-12 150 20 30 250 63 73 350 80 75 450 93 86 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 16-13 150 20 27 250 67 60 350 82 91 450 88 92 16-14 150 7 30 250 72 81 350 87 78 450 80 85 16-15 150 20 23 250 65 60 350 77 81 450 87 88 16-16 150 12 30 250 57 53 350 68 85 450 85 85

Composition 16-08, containing as sole excipient substance oleth-20 at a 1 : 3 weight/weight ratio to glyphosate a. e., exhibited high herbicidal effectiveness, at least equal to commercial standard Formulations C and J on ABUTH but a little weaker on ECHCF. By comparison, composition 16-16, wherein the sole excipient substance was Neodol 1-9 at the same ratio to glyphosate, had much weaker activity. Addition of a small amount of fatty acid ester in most cases enhanced effectiveness, especially on ECHCF. In this study the most efficacious composition was 16-01, containing oleth-20 and methyl stearate. When added to Neodol 1-9, butyl stearate was more efficacious than methyl stearate, methyl oleate or butyl oleate. The mineral oil Orchex 796 did not substitute effectively for butyl stearate, either with oleth-20 or with Neodol 1-9.

EXAMPLE 17 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 17a. Concentrate compositions 17-01, 17-03, 17-05 to 17-08, 17-10 and 17-14 to 17-17 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 17-02, 17-04, 17-09 and 17-11 to 17-13 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Some compositions contained a coupling agent as indicated in Table 17a; the coupling agent was added with the surfactant.

Table 17a Conc. Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of comp. g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant Coupling coupling agent surfactant stearate agent 17-01 326 1. 0 5.0 2. 5 Arcosolve DPM oleth-20 17-02 326 5. 0 2. 5 Arcosolve DPM oleth-20 17-03 163 0. 5 2.5 none oleth-20 17-04 163 2. 5 none oleth-20 Conc. Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of comp. g a. e./I Butyl Surfactant Coupling coupling agent surfactant stearate agent 17-05 326 1. 0 5. 0 none ceteareth-27 17-06 326 1.0 5.0 2.5 PEG-400 ceteareth-27 17-07 326 1. 0 5. 0 2. 5 Dowanol TPNB ceteareth-27 17-08 326 1. 0 5. 0 2. 5 Dowanol PNB ceteareth-27 17-09 163 2.5 none ceteareth-27 17-10 326 0. 5 5. 0 none ceteareth-27 17-11 326 5. 0 2. 5 PEG-400 ceteareth-27 17-12 326 5. 0 2. 5 Dowanol TPNB ceteareth-27 17-13 326 5. 0 2. 5 Dowanol PNB ceteareth-27 17-14 163 0. 5 2. 5 none Neodol 1-9 17-15 163 0. 5 2. 5 none laureth-23 17-16 163 0.5 2.5 none steareth-20 17-17 163 0. 5 2. 5 none ceteareth-27

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 17b.

Table 17b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 5 250 38 20 350 63 30 450 70 70 Formulation C 150 70 75 250 92 94 350 99 99 450 99 98 Formulation J 150 65 50 250 88 92 350 97 99 450 98 97 17-01 150 58 83 250 77 88 350 93 96 450 93 99 17-02 150 40 76 250 75 100 350 92 100 450 92 100 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 17-03 150 48 75 250 83 96 350 92 100 450 99 100 17-04 150 40 82 250 78 99 350 87 99 450 98 100 17-05 150 68 92 250 87 99 350 95 99 450 99 99 17-06 150 55 60 250 83 99 350 97 99 450 98 98 17-07 150 63 57 250 80 96 350 95 97 450 99 98 17-08 150 73 75 250 90 90 350 95 97 450 100 97 17-09 150 73 68 250 87 73 350 92 90 450 97 95 17-10 150 70 63 250 87 80 350 98 94 450 99 96 17-11 150 73 60 250 90 77 350 99 93 450 100 95 17-12 150 72 67 250 83 75 350 90 82 450 99 94 17-13 150 73 70 250 80 83 350 99 94 450 100 92 17-14 150 5 20 250 55 63 350 77 93 450 78 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 17-15 150 43 57 250 78 88 350 88 98 450 90 98 17-16 150 65 57 250 83 82 350 88 98 450 95 97 17-17 150 72 50 250 80 93 350 88 90 450 95 97

The superiority of herbicidal effectiveness provided by Cl6 l8 alkylethers (oleth-20, ceteareth-27, steareth-20) over that provided by shorter chain alkylethers (Neodol 1-9, laureth-23) was very pronounced in this test.

EXAMPLE 18 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 18a. Concentrate compositions 18-01 to 18-07 and 18-09 to 18-15 are oil- in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 18-08 and 18-16 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii).

Table 18a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of composition g a. e./l Oil Surfactant oil surfactant 18-01 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate steareth-20 18-02 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate steareth-20 18-03 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl oleate steareth-20 18-04 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl oleate steareth-20 18-05 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl laurate steareth-20 18-06 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl laurate steareth-20 18-07 163 0. 5 5. 0 Orchex 796 steareth-20 18-08 163 5. 0 none steareth-20 18-09 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate ceteareth-27 18-10 163 0.5 5. 0 butyl stearate ceteareth-27 18-11 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl oleate ceteareth-27 18-12 163 0.5 5. 0 butyl oleate ceteareth-27 18-13 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyllaurate ceteareth-27 18-14 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl laurate ceteareth-27 18-15 163 0. 5 5. 0 Orchex 796 ceteareth-27 18-16 163 5. 0 none ceteareth-27 Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-gaili, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray

compositions were made 19 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 18b.

Table 18b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 15 5 250 57 20 350 83 50 450 78 73 FormulationC 150 65 63 250 87 93 350 92 94 450 98 100 Formulation J 150 50 73 250 90 90 350 94 98 450 98 99 18-01 150 72 70 250 88 85 350 96 83 450 99 86 18-02 150 73 53 250 83 87 350 97 99 450 97 98 18-03 150 68 33 250 87 92 350 93 97 450 98 93 18-04 150 72 50 250 87 88 350 94 86 450 98 97 18-05 150 72 67 250 83 82 350 99 97 450 98 98 18-06 150 73 33 250 95 83 350 99 95 450 99 88 18-07 150 73 55 250 93 73 350 95 83 450 98 91 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 18-08 150 75 40 250 94 60 350 98 86 450 99 92 18-09 150 77 50 250 90 50 350 98 92 450 99 98 18-10 150 72 53 250 92 77 350 96 86 450 99 99 18-11 150 72 60 250 87 87 350 97 97 450 97 99 18-12 150 70 57 250 90 90 350 96 96 450 98 99 18-13 150 68 40 250 90 77 350 99 95 450 99 98 18-14 150 77 33 250 94 70 350 96 82 450 99 93 18-15 150 75 30 250 96 75 350 97 88 450 99 92 18-16 150 77 40 250 99 47 350 98 67 450 98 78

Steareth-20 and ceteareth-27, as sole excipient substances (compositions 18-08 and 18-16 respectively) provided excellent herbicidal effectiveness, but further enhancements, especially on ECHCF, were obtained by inclusion of a small amount of fatty acid ester in the composition.

EXAMPLE 19 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 19a. Concentrate compositions 19-13 and 19-14 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 19-01 to 19-12 and 19-15

are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

Concentrate compositions 19-16 and 19-17 contained colloidal particulates but no surfactant.

Compositions 19-13 and 19-14 (both containing 162 g a. e./i glyphosate) showed acceptable- storage stability. However, at glyphosate ladings >480 g a. e./i (as in compositions 19-01 to 19-12 and 19-15) storage-stable compositions containing 3% oleth-20 could not be made except with the addition of colloidal particulate as shown below.

Table 19a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Oleth-20 Glycerin Aerosil Aerosil 19-01 492 3. 00 2.0 0.8 380 19-02 492 3. 00 5.0 1. 5 380 19-03 492 3. 00 2.0 0.8 380 19-04 492 3. 00 5.0 1. 5 380 19-05 492 3. 00 0. 8 OX-50 19-06 492 3. 00 1. 5 OX-50 19-07 492 3. 00 0. 8 380/OX-50 blend 19-08 492 3. 00 1. 5 380/OX-50 blend 19-09 492 3. 00 0. 8 380 19-10 492 3. 00 1. 5 380 19-11 492 3. 00 0. 8 380 19-12 492 3. 00 380 19-13 162 1. 13 none 19-14 162 1. 13 none 19-IS 492 3. 00 2. 0 1.5 380 19-16 488 0. 8 380 19-17 488 1. 5 380

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 19b.

Table 19b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 18 40 250 57 53 350 72 63 450 83 85 Formulation J 150 70 65 250 85 95 350 98 98 450 100 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 19-01 150 62 67 250 72 93 350 99 96 450 99 97 19-02 150 57 50 250 70 91 350 92 97 450 99 99 19-03 150 48 40 250 68 67 350 97 97 450 98 98 19-04 150 55 50 250 82 83 350 95 90 450 99 94 19-05 150 65 43 250 87 87 350 100 94 450 96 95 19-06 150 55 53 250 75 82 350 95 95 450 100 96 19-07 150 45 83 250 78 82 350 90 93 450 95 99 19-08 150 55 47 250 75 88 350 93 99 450 99 97 19-09 150 47 47 250 65 82 350 78 99 450 97 97 19-10 150 47 40 250 72 96 350 77 80 450 85 97 19-11 150 37 53 250 73 82 350 80 83 450 90 92 19-12 150 35 57 250 70 82 350 80 97 450 90 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 19-13 ISO 50 40 250 68 75 350 95 92 450 99 95 19-14 150 40 33 250 70 82 350 93 89 450 98 93 19-15 150 23 33 250 67 73 350 83 91 450 94 92 19-16 ! 13 40 250 45 50 350 62 72 450 77 77 19-17 150 7 33 250 50 50 350 60 70 450 75 73

Several high-loaded (492 g a. e./I) glyphosate compositions containing oleth-20 at just 3% exhibited surprisingly high herbicidal effectiveness, approaching or equalling that of commercial standard Formulation J, which is loaded at only about 360 g a. e./l and has a much higher surfactant to glyphosate ratio.

EXAMPLE 20 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 20a. Concentrate composition 20-08 to 20-14 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 20-15 to 20-17 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 20-01 to 20-07 contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

Compositions 20-08 to 20-17 (all containing 163 g a. e./l glyphosate) showed acceptable storage stability. However, at a glyphosate loading of 400 g a. e./I (as in compositions 20-01 to 20-07) storage- stable compositions containing 0. 5-1% butyl stearate and 5-10% alkylether surfactant could not be made except with the addition of colloidal particulate as shown below.

Table 20a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./i Butyl Surfactant Aerosil 90 surfactant stearate 20-01 400 1. 0 10. 0 1. 0 ceteareth-27 20-02 400 1. 0 10. 0 1. 0 steareth-20 Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant Aerosil 90 surfactant stearate 20-03 400 0.5 5.0 1.0 ceteareth-27 20-04 400 0. 5 5.0 1. 0 steareth-20 20-05 400 1. 0 5.0 1. 0 ceteareth-27 20-06 400 I. 0 5. 0 I. 0 steareth-20 20-07 400 1. 0 5.0 I. 0 steareth-30 20-08 163 0. 5 5. 0 oleth-20 20-09 163 0. 5 5.0 steareth-20 20-10 163 0. 5 5.0 ceteth-20 20-11 163 0. 5 5. 0 laureth-23 20-12 163 0. 5 5.0 ceteareth-27 20-13 163 0. 5 5. 0 Neodol 25-12 20-14 163 0.5 5.0 Neodol 25-20 20-15 163 5. 0 steareth-20 20-16 163 5.0 ceteth-20 20-17 163 5. 0 laureth-23

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 18 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 20b.

Table 20b Compositionapplied Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 0 40 250 20 60 350 68 82 450 83 96 Formulation C 150 68 93 250 93 99 350 loo 100 450 100 100 Formulation J 150 43 89 250 93 100 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-01 150 78 97 250 96 100 350 98 100 450 100 100 Composition applied Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 20-02 150 91 98 250 100 100 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-03 150 90 97 250 99 99 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-04 150 77 98 250 100 100 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-05 150 82 93 250 100 99 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-06 150 83 85 250 100 99 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-07 150 83 87 250 100 100 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-08 150 90 92 250 100 100 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-09 150 90 85 250 100 98 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-10 150 80 85 250 100 92 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-11 150 83 88 250 96 99 350 100 98 450 100 100 20-12 150 93 85 250 100 99 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-13 150 72 73 250 92 97 350 100 99 450 100 100 Composition applied Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 20-14 150 72 80 250 99 99 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-15 150 100 93 250 100 99 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-16 ISO loo 98 250 100 100 350 100 100 450 100 100 20-17 150 83 83 250 100 99 350 100 99 450 100 99

Outstanding herbicidal effectiveness was provided by compositions containing Cl618 alkylether surfactants (ceteareth-27, steareth-20, steareth-30, oleth-20, ceteth-20). High-loaded (400 g a. e./l) glyphosate compositions containing a Cl6 8 alkylether surfactant, butyl stearate and a colloidal particulate (Aerosil 90) to stabilize the compositions performed especially impressively in this test.

EXAMPLE 21 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 21 a. Concentrate composition 21-01 to 21-09,21-11 to 21-14, 21-16 and 21-17 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 21-10 and 21-15 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii).

Table 21a Conc. Glyphosate % w/w Type of Other comp. g a. e./l Oil Oleth-20 Other oil surfactant surfactant 21-01 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl laurate 21-02 163 0. 25 2.5 methyl myristate 21-03 163 0. 25 2.5 methyl palmitoleate 21-04 163 0. 25 2.5 methyl palmitate 21-05 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl linoleate 21-06 163 0. 25 2.5 methyl oleate 21-07 163 0. 25 2.5 methyl stearate 21-08 163 0. 25 2.5 ethyl stearate 21-09 163 0. 25 2.5 butyl stearate 21-10 163 2. 5 none 21-11 163 0.25 2. 5 methyl palmitoleate MON 0818 21-12 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl palmitat MON 0818 21-13 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl oleate MON 0818 21-14 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl stearate MON 0818 Conc. Glyphosate % w/w Type of Other comp. g a. e./l Oil Oleth-20 Other oil surfactant surfactant 21-15 163 2. 5 none MON 0818 21-16 163 0.25 2. 5 butyl stearate laureth-23 21-17 163 0. 25 2. 5 butyl stearate Neodol I-9

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 21b.

Table 21b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 2 35 200 52 67 300 77 83 400 78 87 Formulation C 100 25 77 200 72 99 300 87 100 400 99 t00 Formulation J 100 13 73 200 70 97 300 90 100 400 97 100 21-01 100 22 55 200 65 86 300 78 98 400 89 98 21-02 100 20 63 200 67 91 300 83 99 400 97 100 21-03 100 30 75 200 63 98 300 83 99 400 94 100 21-04 100 23 63 200 60 98 300 90 99 400 95 100 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 21-05 100 27 57 200 62 91 300 83 96 400 93 98 21-06 100 23 50 200 63 89 300 83 99 400 96 99 21-07 100 25 53 200 65 94 300 83 99 400 92 99 21-08 100 13 47 200 53 88 300 89 97 400 95 99 21-09 100 27 53 200 60 85 300 83 97 400 97 98 21-10 100 13 53 200 62 94 300 83 97 400 88 99 21-11 100 23 60 200 50 90 300 85 98 400 95 99 21-12 100 17 55 200 35 94 300 78 98 400 94 99 21-13 100 8 50 200 43 90 300 73 98 400 90 99 21-14 100 30 63 200 45 92 300 80 98 400 94 98 21-15 100 20 63 200 70 96 300 82 99 400 94 98 21-16 100 18 62 200 62 83 300 80 97 400 97 97 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 21-17 100 17 52 200 58 85 300 75 90 400 95 98

No great or consistent enhancement of herbicidal effectiveness of glyphosate compositions containing oleth-20 was obtained by adding a small amount of any of a variety of fatty acid esters in this study (compare 21-10 with 21-01 to 21-09).

EXAMPLE 22 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 22a. Concentrate composition 22-01 to 22-09,22-11 to 22-14, 22-16 and 22-17 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 22-10 and 22-15 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii).

Table 22a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of Other composition g a. e./l Oil Oleth-Other oil surfactant 20 surfactant 22-01 163 0. 25 2. 5 isopropyl myristate 22-02 163 0. 25 2. 5 ethyl myristate 22-03 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl palmitate 22-04 163 0. 25 2. 5 ethyl palmitate 22-05 163 0. 25 2. 5 ethyl linoleate 22-06 163 0. 25 2. 5 ethyl oleate 22-07 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl stearate 22-08 163 0. 25 2. 5 ethyl stearate 22-09 163 0. 25 2. 5 butyl stearate 22-10 163 2. 5 none 22-11 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl palmitate MON 0818 22-12 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl stearate MON 0818 22-13 163 0. 25 2. 5 ethyl stearate MON 0818 22-14 163 0. 25 2. 5 ethyl oleate MON 0818 22-15 163 2. 5 none MON 0818 22-16 163 0. 25 2. 5 butyl stearate laureth-23 22-17 163 0. 25 2. 5 butyl stearate Neodol 1-9

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 19 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 22b.

Table 22b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 12 33 200 45 43 300 73 63 400 80 63 Formulation C 100 43 57 200 75 88 300 95 99 400 100 99 Formulation J 100 53 60 200 77 75 300 96 95 400 99 98 22-01 100 35 40 200 73 72 300 83 91 400 99 97 22-02 100 38 30 200 70 43 300 87 82 400 96 80 22-03 100 25 27 200 68 50 300 90 73 400 96 82 22-04 100 27 27 200 75 50 300 80 73 400 96 80 22-05 100 33 27 200 68 43 300 83 70 400 97 91 22-06 100 33 28 200 72 53 300 83 60 400 99 70 22-07 100 37 25 200 72 40 300 83 50 400 97 65 22-08 100 32 25 200 73 43 300 87 60 400 98 67 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 22-09 too 35 25 200 75 43 300 95 57 400 98 63 22-10 100 35 27 200 73 40 300 83 76 400 97 73 22-11 100 35 33 200 67 67 300 80 86 400 92 70 22-12 100 25 30 200 67 70 300 83 76 400 88 80 22-13 100 27 33 200 70 66 300 78 63 400 93 60 22-14 100 33 30 200 67 47 300 80 70 400 92 77 22-15 too 20 30 200 68 40 300 83 75 400 90 72 22-16 100 30 25 200 62 43 300 73 73 400 77 70 22-17 100 30 23 200 58 40 300 75 60 400 80 73

In this study, isopropyl myristate (composition 22-01) was the most effective of the fatty acid esters tested as additives to oleth-20 (22-10) in glyphosate compositions.

EXAMPLE 23 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 23a. Concentrate composition 23-01 to 23-13 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 23-14 to 23-17 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii).

Table 23a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of composition g a. e./l Oil Surfactant oil surfactant 23-01 163 0.25 2. 5 butyl stearate laureth-23 23-02 163 0. 25 2. 5 butyl stearate steareth-20 23-03 163 0. 25 2. 5 butyl stearate ceteareth-20 23-04 163 0. 25 2. 5 butyl stearate ceteareth-15 23-05 163 0. 25 2.5 butyl stearate Neodol 45-13 23-06 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl stearate steareth-20 23-07 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl stearate ceteareth-20 23-08 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl stearate ceteareth-15 23-09 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl stearate Neodol 45-13 23-10 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl paimitate steareth-20 23-11 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl palmitate ceteareth-20 23-12 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl palmitate ceteareth-15 23-13 163 0. 25 2. 5 methyl palmitate Neodol 45-13 23-14 163 2. 5 none steareth-20 23-15 163 2. 5 none ceteareth-20 23-16 163 2. 5 none ceteareth-15 23-17 163 2. 5 none Neodol 45-13

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 24 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 23b.

Table 23b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF FormulationB 100 io 37 200 30 40 300 43 57 400 23 33 Formulation C 100 50 67 200 75 96 300 85 99 400 94 100 Formulation J 100 40 75 200 73 94 300 93 98 400 95 99 23-01 100 63 77 200 67 94 300 77 99 400 88 96 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 23-02 100 63 75 200 83 88 300 93 98 400 95 99 23-03 100 67 75 200 82 95 300 95 99 400 98 99 23-04 100 60 75 200 82 97 300 96 99 400 98 100 23-05 100 63 73 200 75 89 300 80 98 400 87 97 23-06 100 58 63 200 78 93 300 93 99 400 98 100 23-07 100 60 67 200 78 93 300 93 99 400 100 99 23-08 100 missing missing 200 missing missing 300 78 95 400 98 99 23-09 100 23 30 200 65 83 300 80 98 400 93 99 23-10 100 65 67 200 83 95 300 97 99 400 99 99 23-11 100 72 73 200 90 98 300 96 97 400 99 99 23-12 100 68 63 200 90 92 300 98 99 400 97 99 23-13 100 43 73 200 72 87 300 83 98 400 93 96 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 23-14 100 62 77 200 78 99 300 95 99 400 98 100 23-15 100 52 60 200 78 93 300 94 98 400 97 99 23-16 100 38 68 200 68 99 300 87 97 400 94 99 23-17 100 55 75 200 68 91 300 83 96 400 87 98

Herbicidal effectiveness exceeding that of commercial standard composition J, at least on ABUTH, was recorded with several compositions, including 23-02 (steareth-20 plus butyl stearate), 23- 03 (ceteareth-20 plus butyl stearate), 23-04 (ceteareth-15 plus butyl stearate), 23-10 (steareth-20 plus methyl palmitate), 23-11 (ceteareth-20 plus methyl palmitate) and 23-12 (ceteareth-15 plus methyl palmitate). Compositions lacking fatty acid ester performed slightly less well overall than those containing butyl stearate or methyl palmitat.

EXAMPLE 24 Spray compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 24a. Compositions were prepared by simple mixing of ingredients. Soybean lecithin (45% phospholipid, Avanti), where included, was first prepared with sonication in water to make a homogeneous composition. Four different concentrations of glyphosate (not shown in Table 24a) were prepared, calculated to provide, when applied in a spray volume of 93 1/ha, the glyphosate rates shown in Table 24b.

Table 24a Spray % w/w Lecithin Methyl oleate comp. Lecithin FC-754 Butyl Methyl Oleth-20 supplied as supplied as stearate oleate 24-01 0. 05 0. 050 soybean lecithin 24-02 0. 05 0. 050 soybean lecithin 24-03 0. 05 soybean lecithin 24-04 0. 050 24-05 0. 050 24-06 0. 05 LI-700 24-07 0. 005 0. 05 24-08 0. 01 0. 05 Spray % w/w Lecithin Methyl oleate comp. Lecithin FC-754 Butyl Methyl Oleth-20 supplied as supplied as stearate oleate 24-09 0.05 24-10 0. 005 24-11 0. 01 pure 24-12 0. 01 methylated seed oil

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and Prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH, 14 days after planting ECHCF and 21 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 14 days after application.

Formulations B and C were applied as comparative treatments, representing technical glyphosate IPA salt and a commercial formulation of glyphosate IPA salt respectively. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 24b.

Table 24b Spray composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Formulation B 50 0 0 0 100 38 35 35 200 87 50 90 300 95 88 94 Formulation C 50 0 2 0 100 32 55 25 200 85 97 93 300 96 99 96 24-01 50 78 53 88 100 90 60 95 200 99 96 99 300 99 97 98 24-02 50 25 15 43 100 72 30 82 200 94 62 93 300 95 77 94 24-03 50 20 8 32 100 52 22 78 200 87 55 91 300 95 65 93 24-04 50 62 37 85 100 82 68 92 200 97 96 95 300 98 95 97 Spray composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 24-05 50 15 10 25 100 47 27 23 200 85 62 87 300 90 63 92 24-06 50 0 2 0 100 20 15 20 200 85 60 82 300 90 65 90 24-07 50 67 27 82 too 87 55 93 200 94 92 96 300 97 99 97 24-08 50 62 30 75 100 78 63 200 93 96 96 300 94 98 98 24-09 50 65 45 77 100 80 73 95 200 93 98 97 300 95 99 99 24-10 50 10 25 5 100 23 35 37 200 90 50 93 300 92 73 94 24-11 50 10 25 0 100 52 33 43 200 88 72 93 300 94 78 94 24-12 50 0 15 0 100 43 35 33 200 70 90 300 94 82 93

Results of this test using glyphosate as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (24-09) gave extremely high effectiveness, superior to that obtained with the commercial standard. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (24-07) or 0.01 % methyl oleate (24-08) did not provide further enhancement.

EXAMPLE 25 Spray compositions were prepared containing paraquat dichloride and excipient ingredients.

Compositions 25-01 to 25-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 except that a different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH, 8 days after planting ECHCF and 21 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 12 days after application.

Standards included technical paraquat dichloride and Gramoxone, a commercial formulation of paraquat from Zeneca. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 25.

Table 25 Spray composition Paraquat rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Paraquat dichloride 25 50 83 55 (technical) 50 57 78 60 100 73 84 69 200 85 95 99 Gramoxone 25 40 72 40 (commercial) 50 60 70 52 100 72 58 55 200 72 89 63 25-01 25 75 93 67 50 82 97 91 100 95 98 97 200 100 99 99 25-02 25 67 80 48 50 68 87 65 100 88 97 93 200 96 99 98 25-03 25 55 65 42 50 62 87 65 100 83 96 93 200 95 99 97 25-04 25 53 82 45 50 63 94 53 100 88 99 86 200 92 99 98 25-05 25 58 67 50 50 60 62 45 100 70 73 62 200 85 90 88 25-06 25 53 77 43 50 60 92 40 100 80 93 55 200 96 99 78 25-07 25 65 80 45 50 82 92 70 100 96 96 89 200 100 98 99 Spray composition Paraquat rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 25-OS 25 67 80 37 50 82 90 71 100 97 98 65 200 99 99 93 25-09 25 72 90 SO 50 80 97 57 100 91 99 94 200 97 100 97 25-10 25 67 87 45 50 68 75 57 loo 78 93 63 200 82 97 82 25-11 25 65 80 45 50 73 77 62 100 90 95 62 200 94 98 78 25-12 25 67 78 37 50 75 90 55 100 77 97 90 200 85 99 92

Results of this test using paraquat as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (25-09) gave extremely high effectiveness, superior to that obtained with the commercial standard. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (25-07) or 0.01% methyl oleate (25-08) did not provide further enhancement.

EXAMPLE 26 Spray compositions were prepared containing acifluorfen sodium salt and excipient ingredients.

Compositions 26-01 to 26-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 respectively except that a different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH, 9 days after planting ECHCF and 22 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 10 days after application.

Standards included technical acifluorfen sodium and Blazer, a commercial formulation of acifluorfen from Rohm & Haas. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 26.

Table 26 Spray composition Acifluorfen rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Acifluorfen 25 20 15 (technical) 50 32 7 17 100 52 18 35 200 62 35 40 Blazer 25 30 30 5 (commercial) 50 53 53 12 100 55 55 7 200 65 65 32 26-01 25 60 7 20 50 63 20 20 100 65 43 33 200 80 70 48 26-02 25 25 7 5 50 42 12 25 100 60 30 22 200 68 68 50 26-03 25 22 5 10 50 55 7 33 100 62 25 27 200 65 55 48 26-04 25 57 7 13 50 67 10 32 100 67 35 32 200 70 70 45 26-05 25 30 3 15 50 47 27 27 100 55 42 37 200 65 60 38 26-06 25 28 0 3 50 50 0 10 100 55 30 25 200 67 58 47 26-07 25 35 20 17 50 55 35 27 100 58 63 32 200 67 67 55 26-08 25 40 20 8 50 57 30 28 100 60 60 30 200 70 77 48 26-09 25 47 20 22 50 55 35 35 100 62 65 38 200 68 82 50 Spray composition Acifluorfen rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 26-10 25 28 5 50 48 0 10 100 53 25 200 62 35 40 26-11 25 35 0 5 50 43 0 30 100 50 0 35 200 65 43 47 26-12 25 40 5 50 55 18 35 100 60 47 38 200 70 62 48

Results of this test using acifluorfen as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (26-09) gave effectiveness superior to that obtained with the commercial standard. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (26-07) or 0.01% methyl oleate (26- 08) did not provide further enhancement.

EXAMPLE 27 Spray compositions were prepared containing asulam and excipient ingredients. Compositions 27-01 to 27-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 respectively except that a different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH, 11 days after planting ECHCF and 21 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 14 days after application.

Standards included technical asulam and Asulox, a commercial formulation of asulam from Rh6ne-Poulenc. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 27.

Table 27 Spray composition Asulam rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Asulam 200 0 12 0 (technical) 400 17 27 5 800 48 32 20 1400 42 50 37 Asulox 200 3 5 0 (commercial) 400 27 30 20 800 52 45 25 1400 50 60 40 Spray composition Asulam rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 27-01 200 5 8 13 400 23 45 22 800 50 50 30 1400 60 65 48 27-02 200 0 20 17 400 33 40 20 800 47 48 33 1400 53 68 55 27-03 200 3 20 3 400 28 52 7 800 50 50 23 1400 50 58 43 27-04 200 3 40 7 400 35 45 18 800 52 50 25 1400 58 60 42 27-05 200 0 10 3 400 23 30 18 800 33 50 32 1400 45 57 38 27-06 200 2 30 10 400 8 47 17 800 50 55 28 1400 52 63 40 27-07 200 0 43 3 400 22 48 17 800 40 55 28 1400 52 60 33 27-08 200 7 47 22 400 20 48 22 800 53 55 30 1400 57 60 33 27-09 200 0 45 7 400 25 50 7 800 53 60 32 1400 55 63 37 27-10 200 22 37 10 400 27 45 10 800 50 43 23 1400 52 52 27 27-11 200 25 33 5 400 15 37 13 800 48 42 25 1400 42 52 28 27-12 200 3 25 17 400 13 42 18 800 50 45 30 1400 52 50 33

Results of this test using asulam as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (27-09) gave, at low exogenous chemical rates,- effectiveness on ECHCF superior to that obtained with the commercial standard. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (27-07) or 0.01% methyl oleate (27-08) did not provide further enhancement.

EXAMPLE 28 Spray compositions were prepared containing dicamba sodium salt and excipient ingredients.

Compositions 28-01 to 28-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 respectively except that a different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH, 8 days after planting ECHCF and 21 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 17 days after application.

Standards included technical dicamba sodium and Banvel, a commercial formulation of dicamba from Sandoz. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 28.

Table 28 Spray composition Dicamba rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Dicamba 25 47 30 (technical) 50 63 0 40 100 82 0 50 200 93 5 58 Banvel 25 47 0 35 (commercial) 50 68 0 40 100 91 0 53 200 93 3 63 28-01 25 42 0 38 50 67 0 48 100 92 0 67 200 93 3 73 28-02 2543043 50 58 0 50 100 85 0 62 200 89 8 72 28-03 2550032 50 65 0 45 10090060 200 94 13 68 Spray composition Dicamba rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 28-04 25 43 0 35 50 65 0 42 loo 94 0 53 200 94 13 67 28-05 25 50 0 35 50 68 0 40 100 88 0 53 200 92 15 60 28-06 25 40 0 40] 50 65 0 45 loo 88 0 52 200 92 8 70 28-07 25 45 0 42 50 57 0 45 100 88 0 62 200 88 20 68 28-08 25 40 0 38 50 62 0 45 loo 97 18 62 200 93 17 73 28-09 25 33 0 35 50 60 0 45 100 93 0 63 200 96 15 73 28-10 25 35 0 30 50 57 0 43 loo 90 0 50 200 90 3 70 28-11 25 45 0 30 50 53 0 42 100 89 0 55 200 92 0 73 28-12 25 38 0 37 50 60 0 45 100 96 0 52 200 93 0 70

Results of this test using dicamba as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (28-09) gave effectiveness on SIDSP superior to that obtained with the commercial standard. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (28-07) or 0.01 % methyl oleate (28-08) did not provide significant further enhancement.

EXAMPLE 29 Spray compositions were prepared containing metsulfuron-methyl and excipient ingredients.

Compositions 29-01 to 29-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 respectively except that a

different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH, 8 days after planting ECHCF and 21 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 14 days after application.

Standards included technical metsulfuron-methyl and Ally, a commercial formulation of metsulfuron from Du Pont. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 29.

Table 29 Spray composition Metsulfuron rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Metsulfuron 0. 5 72 0 5 (technical) 1 90 0 23 5 96 0 50 10 97 30 55 Ally 0. 5 75 0 5 (commercial) 1 85 0 22 5 95 0 42 10 97 25 53 29-01 0. 5 95 0 47 1 96 20 53 5 97 25 62 10 98 45 62 29-02 0.5 87 0 40 1 90 10 55 5 95 10 58 10 96 40 63 29-03 0. 5 87 0 27 1 90 0 40 5 96 10 57 10 97 33 63 29-04 0.5 90 0 33 1 95 10 50 5 98 17 62 10 99 28 58 29-05 0. 5 85 0 27 90 0 33 5 95 0 47 10 95 13 60 29-06 0. 5 77 0 30 89 10 47 5 96 17 62 to 98 33 60 Spray composition Metsulfuron rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 29-07 0.5 94 0 55 1 97 10 60 5 98 43 60 10 97 55 65 29-08 0. 5 93 0 55 1 96 5 58 97 42 60 10 97 50 60 29-09 0. 5 93 0 55 1 97 10 62 5 98 55 62 98 65 63 29-10 0.5 85 0 28 1 82 0 30 5 95 10 52 10 96 17 57 29-11 0.5 73 0 25 1 88 20 28 5 94 25 53 10 96 32 57 29-12 0.5 75 0 32 1 85 20 37 5 94 23 55 10 96 25 57

Results of this test using metsulfuron as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (29-09) gave high effectiveness, superior to that obtained with the commercial standard. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (29-07) or 0.01 % methyl oleate (29-08) did not provide further enhancement.

EXAMPLE 30 Spray compositions were prepared containing imazethapyr and excipient ingredients.

Compositions 30-01 to 30-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 respectively except that a different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH, 14 days after planting ECHCF and 21 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 14 days after application.

Standards included technical imazethapyr and Pursuit, a commercial formulation of imazethapyr from American Cyanamid. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 30.

Table 30 Spray composition Imazethapyr rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Imazethapyr 5 78 5 20 (technical) 10 83 20 30 25 93 35 40 50 94 53 50 Pursuit 5 70 5 25 (commercial) 10 73 33 30 25 90 50 42 50 93 62 57 30-01 5 70 45 35 10 75 62 52 25 92 63 57 50 93 72 62 30-02 5 73 57 32 10 75 67 43 25 90 70 52 50 92 72 57 30-03 5 70 42 27 10 78 42 35 25 90 53 45 50 92 62 52 30-04 5 73 55 33 10 77 68 45 25 93 68 47 50 94 68 60 30-05 5 73 47 32 10 73 45 40 25 90 62 47 50 91 68 52 30-06 5 78 72 30 10 83 70 35 25 93 77 62 50 94 78 58 30-07 5 82 75 38 10 90 90 52 25 93 93 53 50 97 97 62 30-08 5 75 77 38 10 90 92 50 25 95 93 57 50 97 99 63 30-09 5 78 80 40 10 83 89 63 25 93 93 62 50 96 93 60 Spray composition Imazethapyr rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 30-10 5 85 50 37 10 77 50 45 25 91 63 48 50 93 75 57 30-11 5 75 38 43 10 80 38 37 25 92 62 45 50 93 73 53 30-12 5 75 55 38 10 83 60 43 25 92 67 53 50 93 77 55

Results of this test using imazethapyr as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (30-09) gave extremely high effectiveness, greatly superior to that obtained with the commercial standard, especially on ECHCF. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (30-07) further enhanced performance of low exogenous chemical rates on ABUTH more effectively than addition of 0.01% methyl oleate (30-08).

EXAMPLE 31 Spray compositions were prepared containing fluazifop-p-butyl salt and excipient ingredients.

Compositions 31-01 to 31-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 respectively except that a different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla, BRAPP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH, 15 days after planting ECHCF and 16 days after planting BRAPP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 10 days after application.

Standards included technical fluazifop-p-butyl and Fusilade 5, a commercial formulation of fluazifop-p-butyl from Zeneca. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 31.<BR> <BR> <P> Table 31 Spray composition Fluazifop-p rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF BRAPP Fluazifop-p-butyl 2 0 0 20 (technical) 5 0 3 35 155 45 65 30 5 57 78 Spray composition Fluazifop-p rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF BRAPP Fusilade 5 2 0 0 27 (commercial) 5 0 27 33 15 5 52 78 30 7 75 85 31-01 2 0 0 20 5 2 27 30 15 5 58 78 30 10 87 83 31-02 2 0 7 25 5 0 35 30 15 2 58 75 30 8 78 75 31-03 2 0 0 18 5 0 8 27 15 0 45 75 30 0 55 75 31-04 2 0 20 32 5 2 42 25 15 2 55 72 30 5 80 78 31-05 2 0 13 32 5 2 42 32 15 2 55 72 30 7 58 73 31-06 2 2 17 23 5 0 20 25 15 0 50 75 30 0 73 77 31-07 2 0 50 40 5 0 52 60 15 0 67 80 30 0 92 85 31-08 2 0 43 35 5 0 55 37 15 7 88 82 30 3 96 85 31-09 2 0 47 18 5 0 50 35 15 0 80 80 30 3 93 85 31-10 2 0 23 10 5 0 37 42 15 5 55 75 30 10 58 80 31-11 2 0 7 10 5 0 30 28 15 0 50 62 30 12 53 68 Spray composition Fluazifop-p rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF BRAPP 31-12 0 5 20 507 35 5 48 68 30 12 60 77

Results of this test using fluazifop-p-butyl as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (31-09) gave extremely high effectiveness on ECHCF, superior to that obtained with the commercial standard. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (31- 07) or 0.01 % methyl oleate (31-08) did not provide significant further enhancement.

EXAMPLE 32 Spray compositions were prepared containing alachlor and excipient ingredients. Compositions 32-01 to 32-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 respectively except that a different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH, 8 days after planting ECHCF and 14 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 9 days after application.

Standards included technical alachlor and Lasso, a commercial formulation of alachlor from Monsanto Company. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 32.

Table 32 Spray composition Alachlor rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Alachlor 500 0 0 0 (technical) 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 Lasso 500 0 0 0 (commercial) 1000 0 5 13 2000 0 30 17 4000 15 43 65 32-01 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 4000 10 0 7 Spray composition Alachlor rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 32-02 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 22 7 4000 12 47 12 32-03 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 4000 10 0 0 32-04 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 4000 5 0 15 32-05 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 4000 3 0 5 32-06 500000 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 13 7 4000 0 37 12 32-07 500 0 0 0 1000 0 8 0 2000 0 28 15 4000 12 50 20 32-08 500 0 0 0 1000 0 8 0 2000 0 8 0 4000 5 20 5 32-09 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 3 0 4000 12 42 32 32-10 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 32-11 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 32-12 500 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 None of the compositions tested enhanced post-emergence foliar-applied herbicidal effectiveness of alachlor in this test. Alachlor is not known as a foliar-applied herbicide.

EXAMPLE 33 Spray compositions were prepared containing glufosinate ammonium salt and excipient ingredients. Compositions 33-01 to 33-12 were exactly like compositions 24-01 to 24-12 respectively except that a different active ingredient was used and a range of active ingredient concentrations was selected appropriate to the active ingredient being applied.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH), Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa, SIDSP) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 14 days after planting ABUTH, 10 days after planting ECHCF and 17 days after planting SIDSP. Evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 11 days after application.

Standards included technical glufosinate ammonium and Liberty, a commercial formulation of glufosinate from AgrEvo. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 33.

Table 33 Spray composition Glufosinate rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP Glufosinate 50 5 (technical) 100 47 0 10 300 90 23 96 600 98 43 94 Liberty 50 77 70 20 (commercial) 100 88 96 93 300 98 100 97 600 99 100 99 33-01 50 77 33 70 100 95 58 93 300 98 95 97 600 99 99 98 33-02 50 33 30 50 100 63 32 93 300 96 52 90 600 98 96 97 33-03 50 15 30 38 100 50 33 87 300 92 40 94 600 98 70 98 33-04 50 92 47 50 100 90 53 85 300 98 98 96 600 98 99 98 33-05 50 35 20 20 100 37 30 20 300 97 45 78 600 91 53 92 Spray composition Glufosinate rate % Inhibition g a. i./ha ABUTH ECHCF SIDSP 33-06 50 10 0 20 100 20 3 20 300 89 47 82 600 91 94 89 33-07 50 50 35 70 100 73 52 80 300 95 87 98 600989897 33-08 50 48 30 88 100 83 50 93 300 98 97 96 600 98 99 96 33-09 50 58 35 92 too 91 62 93 300 98 96 97 600 98 99 96 33-10 50 30 30 0 100 43 35 10 300 96 43 92 600 95 70 91 33-11 50 33 35 0 100 53 35 7 300 96 43 89 600 97 88 93 33-12 50 37 5 5 100 37 20 10 300 95 40 88 600 97 85 93

Results of this test using glufosinate as the exogenous chemical are summarized as follows : Oleth-20 at the low concentration of 0.05% (33-09) gave extremely high effectiveness, superior on SIDSP to that obtained with the commercial standard. Addition of 0.005% butyl stearate (33-07) or 0. 01% methyl oleate (33-08) did not provide further enhancement.

EXAMPLE 34 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 34a. Concentrate compositions 34-01 to 34-12 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Concentrate compositions 34-13 to 34-18 contained colloidal particulates but no surfactant.

The colloidal particulates of this example were in general too large to confer good storage stability to the compositions tested.

Table 34a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of composition g a.e./l Surfactant Silica surfactant silica 34-O1 488 3. 0 0. 8 steareth-20 Sident 9 34-02 488 3. 0 0. 8 steareth-20 Sipernat 22 34-03 488 3. 0 0. 8 steareth-20 Sipernat 22S 34-04 488 3. 0 0. 8 oleth-20 Sident 9 34-05 488 3.0 0.8 oleth-20 Sipernat 22 034-06 488 3. 0 0. 8 oleth-20 Sipernat 22S 34-07 488 3. 0 1. 5 steareth-20 Sident 9 34-08 488 3. 0 1. 5 steareth-20 Sipernat 22 34-09 488 3. 0 1. 5 steareth-20 Sipernat 22S 34-10 488 3. 0 1. 5 oleth-20 Sident 9 34-11 488 3. 0 1. 5 oleth-20 Sipemat 22 34-12 488 3. 0 1. 5 oleth-20 Sipernat 22S 34-13 488 0. 8 none Sident 9 34-14 488 1. 5 none Sipernat 22 34-15 488 0. 8 none Sipernat 22S 34-16 488 1. 5 none Sident 9 34-17 488 0. 8 none Sipernat 22 34-18 488 1.5 none Sipernat 22S

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 21 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 14 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 34b.

Table 34b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 3 37 200 10 57 300 43 87 400 57 88 Formulation J 100 33 80 200 72 98 300 96 99 400 97 99 34-01 100 47 89 200 78 97 300 87 99 400 98 99 34-02 100 37 83 200 70 99 300 90 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 400 95 100 34-03 100 40 89 200 70 99 300 90 100 400 95 100 34-04 100 37 94 200 58 98 300 87 99 400 95 100 34-05 100 30 60 200 73 95 300 85 99 400 97 99 34-06 100 33 67 200 70 97 300 78 99 400 92 100 34-07 100 32 81 200 60 99 300 83 98 400 88 100 34-08 100 40 63 200 65 93 300 90 99 400 90 100 34-09 100 43 70 200 55 98 300 88 99 400 94 100 34-10 100 33 91 200 70 99 300 83 99 400 94 99 34-11 100 20 63 200 70 97 300 92 100 400 94 100 34-12 100 48 67 200 70 93 300 88 98 400 94 100 34-13 100 20 50 200 60 83 300 83 97 400 94 99 34-14 100 43 43 200 67 88 300 83 97 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 400 91 99 34-15 100 30 50 200 67 73 300 77 96 400 97 96 34-16 100 43 43 200 75 79 300 87 94 400 87 91 34-17 100 40 27 200 68 53 300 87 92 400 93 98 34-18 100 47 10 200 75 37 300 83 63 400 92 88

Many of the high-load (488 g a. e./1) glyphosate formulations of this Example exhibited herbicidal effectiveness equal to or greater than that obtained with commercial standard Formulation J, in spite of containing only 3% alkylether surfactant.

EXAMPLE 35 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 35a. Concentrate compositions 35-01 to 35-12 and 35-14 to 35-16 are oil- in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate composition 35-13 is an aqueous solution concentrate and was prepared by process (viii).

Table 35a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of composition g a. e./I Oil Surfactant oil surfactant 35-01 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate steareth-30 35-02 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate steareth-30 35-03 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate Neodol 45-13 35-04 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate Neodol 45-13 35-05 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate ceteareth-15 35-06 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate ceteareth-15 35-07 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate laureth-23 35-08 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate oleth-20 35-09 163 0. 5 5. 0 butyl stearate steareth-20 35-10 163 0.5 5. 0 butyl stearate ceteareth-27 35-11 163 0. 3 5. 0 butyl stearate ceteareth-27 35-12 163 0. 3 2. 5 butyl stearate ceteareth-27 35-13 163 5. 0 none ceteareth-27 35-14 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate ceteareth-27 35-15 163 0. 5 5. 0 methyl stearate steareth-20 Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of composition g a.e./l Oil Surfactant oil surfactant 35-16 163 0.5 5.0 methyl stearate oleth-20

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application.

Formulations B, C and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 35b.

Table 35b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF FormulationB 100 45 57 200 35 53 300 50 57 400 38 33 Formulation C 100 70 98 200 90 99 300 97 100 400 100 100 Formulation J 100 72 88 200 93 99 300 97 99 400 98 99 35-01 100 83 97 200 97 100 300 99 100 400 100 100 35-02 100 80 99 200 96 100 300 99 100 400 99 100 35-03 100 73 98 200 92 100 300 98 99 400 99 100 35-04 100 73 98 200 87 99 300 97 99 400 99 100 35-05 100 80 98 200 87 100 300 98 100 400 100 100 35-06 100 78 97 200 95 98 300 98 100 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 400 99 100 35-07 100 78 98 200 88 100 300 96 100 400 98 100 35-08 100 75 98 200 93 99 300 97 99 400 100 99 35-09 100 83 93 200 95 100 300 98 100 400 100 100 35-10 100 80 97 200 95 98 300 98 99 400 100 100 35-11 100 80 97 200 93 99 300 98 100 400 100 99 35-12 100 77 93 200 88 100 300 99 i00 400 99 100 35-13 100 80 73 200 95 95 300 99 100 400 100 100 35-14 100 77 94 200 92 99 300 98 100 400 100 99 35-15 100 78 92 200 94 99 300 98 100 400 99 100 35-16 100 77 93 200 90 98 300 98 99 400 99 100 Extremely high herbicidal effectiveness was provided by ceteareth-27 (composition 35-13) ; this was further enhanced by addition of a small amount of butyl stearate (35-10, 35-11) or methyl stearate (35-14). Compositions performing better than commercial standard Formulations C and J, at least on

ABUTH, included those containing steareth-30, steareth-20 or ceteareth-27; in this test oleth-20 was not quite as effective as these saturated alkylethers.

EXAMPLE 36 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 36a. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Lecithin (45% phospholipid, Avanti) was first dispersed in water using sonication.

Table 36a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w composition g a. e./1 Lecithin Butyl Ethomeen Ceteareth-Ceteareth- stearate T/25 20 27 36-O1 220 0. 75 0. 75 1.5 36-02 220 0. 75 0. 75 1. 5 36-03 220 0. 75 0. 75 3. 0 36-04 220 0. 75 7. 50 1. 5 36-05 220 0. 75 7. 50 3. 0 36-06 220 3. 75 3. 75 3. 0 36-07 220 1. 50 1. 50 3. 0 36-08 220 1. 50 1. 50 1. 5 36-09 220 3. 75 3. 75 1. 5 1. 5 36-10 220 1. 50 1. 50 1. 5 1. 5 36-11 220 3. 75 7. 50 1. 5 1. 5 36-12 220 3. 75 1. 50 1. 5 I. 5 36-13 220 0. 75 3. 75 1. 5 1. 5 36-14 220 0. 75 7. 50 1. 5 1. 5 36-15 220 0. 75 3. 75 3. 0 3. 0 36-16 220 0. 75 7. 50 3. 0 3. 0 36-17 220 7. 50 3. 0 36-18 220 0. 75 7. 50 3. 0

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 23 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 36b.

Table 36b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 12 62 200 5 55 300 23 63 400 43 78 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation J 100 27 82 200 62 98 300 88 95 400 96 99 36-01 100 13 79 200 68 95 300 82 99 400 95 91 36-02 100 27 82 200 60 97 300 81 95 400 87 99 36-03 100 37 77 200 62 96 300 78 98 400 89 90 36-04 100 37 84 200 57 95 300 84 99 400 89 100 36-05 100 33 77 200 65 100 300 78 97 400 88 97 36-06 100 43 78 200 62 95 300 87 97 400 95 96 36-07 100 48 78 200 80 91 300 90 99 400 76 93 36-08 100 48 83 200 67 89 300 86 96 400 93 97 36-09 100 62 84 200 82 98 300 85 99 400 91 97 36-10 100 63 80 200 75 96 300 85 99 400 99 99 36-11 100 42 75 200 78 98 300 92 99 400 93 100 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 36-12 100 52 80 200 73 93 300 86 99 400 97 97 36-13 100 55 83 200 75 97 300 97 99 400 92 99 36-14 100 52 87 200 73 95 300 97 400 87 98 36-15 100 57 83 200 92 96 300 98 100 400 100 98 36-16 100 79 88 200 87 97 300 99 99 400 97 94 36-17 100 58 83 200 47 94 300 88 98 400 91 93 36-18 100 58 87 200 75 91 300 83 99 400 98

Outstanding herbicidal effectiveness was provided by composition 93-18, containing lecithin, ceteareth-27 and butyl stearate. Addition of 3% Ethomeen T/25 (36-16) further enhanced effectiveness.

Slightly reduced effectiveness at the lowest glyphosate rate was observed on ABUTH when the butyl stearate concentration was cut in half (36-15).

EXAMPLE 37 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 37a. Concentrate compositions 37-01 to 37-04,37-06,37-08,37-10 and 37-18 are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii). Concentrate compositions 37-05, 37-07 and 37-09 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 37-11 to 37-17 contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

The compositions of this example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown.

Table 37a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant Aerosil 380 surfactant stearate 37-01 163 0. 5 5. 0 steareth-20 37-02 163 0. 5 5. 0 ceteareth-27 37-03 163 0. 5 5. 0 oleth-20 37-04 163 0. 5 5. 0 ceteth-20 37-05 163 5. 0 ceteth-20 37-06 163 0. 5 5. 0 Neodol 45-13 37-07 163 5. 0 Neodol 45-13 37-08 163 0. 5 5. 0 ceteareth-15 37-09 163 5. 0 ceteareth-15 37-10 163 0. 5 5. 0 steareth-30 37-11 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 ceteth-20 37-12 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 Neodol 45-13 37-13 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 ceteareth-15 37-14 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 steareth-30 37-15 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 steareth-20 37-16 360 I. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 37-17 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 ceteareth-27 37-18 163 0. 5 5. 0 laureth-23

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-gaili, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 22 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 37b.

Table 37b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 0 30 200 2 60 300 17 75 400 50 73 Formulation J 100 20 63 200 42 98 300 75 100 400 83 98 37-01 100 27 57 200 67 98 300 80 99 400 87 98 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 37-02 100 27 63 200 53 87 300 77 99 400 87 99 37-03 100 12 50 200 53 99 300 65 100 400 83 99 37-04 100 20 63 200 50 98 300 73 98 400 87 98 37-05 100 18 70 200 57 93 300 80 99 400 83 99 37-06 100 17 63 200 35 95 300 60 100 400 75 100 37-07 100 3 43 200 43 95 300 62 100 400 68 96 37-08 100 20 43 200 43 88 300 75 99 400 80 97 37-09 100 37 57 200 55 93 300 83 100 400 83 99 37-10 100 37 50 200 60 96 300 83 99 400 88 99 37-11 loo 8 37 200 37 93 300 68 99 400 70 97 37-12 100 13 43 200 40 91 300 67 100 400 77 96 37-13 100 25 40 200 40 80 300 62 97 400 78 98 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 37-14 100 23 33 200 37 86 300 75 99 400 78 94 37-15 100 23 30 200 43 78 300 53 93 400 78 98 37-16 100 23 37 200 37 95 300 63 97 400 78 95 37-17 100 18 50 200 45 88 300 75 69 400 73 93 37-18 100 missing missing 200 missing missing 300 missing missing 400 missing missing

Compositions exhibiting herbicidal effectiveness greater than that provided by commercial standard Formulation J included 37-01 (steareth-20 plus butyl stearate), 37-09 (ceteareth-15) and 37-10 (steareth-20 plus butyl stearate).

EXAMPLE 38 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 38a. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Table 38a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./i Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 38-01 163 1. 00 10. 0 laureth-23 38-02 163 0. 50 5. 0 laureth-23 38-03 163 0. 25 2. 5 laureth-23 38-04 0 163 1. 00 10. 0 Neodol'i-9 38-05 163 0. 50 5. 0 Neodol 1-9 38-06 163 0. 25 2. 5 Neodol 1-9 38-07 163 1. 00 10. 0 steareth-10 38-08 163 0. 50 5. 0 steareth-10 38-09 163 0. 25 2. 5 steareth-10 38-10 163 0. 50 5. 0 steareth-20 38-11 163 0. 25 2. 5 steareth-20 38-12 163 0. 25 1. 0 steareth-20 38-13 163 0. 50 5. 0 oleth-20 38-14 163 0. 25 2. 5 oleth-20 Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./i Butyl Surfactant surfactant stearate 38-15 163 0. 25 1. 0 oleth-20 38-16 163 0. 50 5. 0 ceteareth-27 38-17 163 0. 25 2. 5 ceteareth-27 38-18 163 0.25 1.0 ceteareth-27

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 21 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 38b.

Table 38b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 0 42 200 43 300 23 50 400 0 28 Formulation J 100 0 73 2005785 300 68 93 400 87 94 38-01 100 18 75 200 58 92 300 85 90 400 94 95 38-02 100 3 77 200 47 90 300 65 89 400 87 95 38-03 100 13 80 200 53 88 300 72 98 400 82 99 38-04 100 0 0 200 53 88 300 67 95 400 83 95 38-05 100 2 60 200 50 83 300 70 93 400 85 92 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 38-06 too 0 52 200 55 83 300 62 96 400 77 98 38-07 100 8 70 200 68 95 300 91 99 400 95 100 38-08 100 10 65 200 67 99 300 78 99 400 93 100 38-09 100 5 80 200 52 98 300 75 100 400 86 98 38-10 100 0 65 200 62 84 300 58 94 400 75 100 38-11 too 5 83 200 50 99 300 63 97 400 87 99 38-12 100 10 76 200 60 96 300 72 100 400 100 100 38-13 100 20 85 200 67 100 300 91 100 400 96 98 38-14 100 23 68 200 62 89 300 80 100 400 99 99 38-15 100 5 57 200 55 93 300 89 95 400 90 98 38-16 100 30 68 200 68 94 300 83 98 400 100 100 38-17 100 43 68 200 62 99 300 78 100 400 100 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 38-18 loo 25 52 200 53 84 300 85 94 400 98 95

Compositions having a 1 : 3 or lower weight/weight ratio of surfactant to glyphosate a. e., yet outperforming commercial standard Formulation J at least on ABUTH in this test, included those containing just 1 % alkylether surfactant (ratio about 1 : 15) together with 0.25% butyl stearate, where the alkylether surfactant was steareth-20 (38-12), oleth-20 (38-15) or ceteareth-27 (38-18).

EXAMPLE 39 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 39a. All are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

The compositions of this example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown.

Table 39a Conc. Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of Other comp. g a. e./l Surfactant Aerosil Other surfactant Aerosil component 39-01 488 3. 0 1. 5 steareth-20 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 39-02 488 4. 5 1. 5 steareth-20 380 39-03 488 4. 5 1. 5 steareth-20 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 39-04 488 4. 5 1. 5 steareth-20 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 2) 39-OS 488 6. 0 1. 5 4. 12 steareth-20 380 glycerin 39-06 488 3. 0 1. 5 steareth-20 380 39-07 488 3. 0 1. 5 7. 12 oleth-20 380 propylene glycol 39-08 488 3.0 1. 5 oleth-20 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 39-09 488 4. 5 1. 5 oleth-20 380 39-10 488 4. 5 1. 5 oleth-20 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 21 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 39b.

Table 39b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 0 25 200 35 27 300 48 28 400 47 48 Formulation J 100 50 75 200 80 90 300 97 96 400 99 98 39-01 100 53 33 200 83 52 300 98 72 400 98 79 39-02 100 43 27 200 80 57 300 87 73 400 96 78 39-03 loo 48 30 200 81 70 300 98 78 400 63 57 39-04 100 45 32 200 87 75 300 97 73 400 98 83 39-05 100 38 27 200 37 23 300 45 32 400 35 18 39-06 100 42 40 200 78 52 300 91 72 400 96 80 39-07 100 37 43 200 48 32 300 73 58 400 55 28 39-08 100 43 37 200 68 57 300 84 62 400 89 82 39-09 100 37 32 200 83 67 300 94 82 400 63 48 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 39-10 100 32 40 200 75 68 300 90 88 400 65 63

Several high-load (488 g a. e./1) glyphosate compositions exhibited herbicidal effectiveness on ABUTH equal to commercial standard Formulation J, but none was equal to Formulation J on ECHCF in this test.

EXAMPLE 40 Dry granular concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate ammonium salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 40a. The preparation procedure was as follows. Ammonium glyphosate powder was added to a blender. Excipient ingredients were slowly added, together with sufficient water to wet the powder and form a stiff dough. The blender was operated for sufficient time to thoroughly mix all ingredients. The dough was then transferred to extrusion apparatus and was extruded to form granules, which were finally dried in a fluid bed dryer.

Table 40a Conc. % w/w Type of Type of comp. Glyphosate Lecithin Butyl Surfactant Colloidal surfactant colloidal a. e. stearate particulate particulate 40-01 68. 7 21. 0 steareth-20 40-02 66. 0 2. 2 22. 0 steareth-20 40-03 66. 1 24. 0 oleth-20 40-04 66. 0 2. 2 22. 0 oleth-20 40-05 67. 9 10. 0 2.0 10. 0 MON 0818 40-06 59. 2 10. 0 20. 0 + 2. 0 FC-754 + MON 0818 40-07 68. 0 21. 0 0. 8 Flomo 1407 Aerosil 90 40-08 68. 0 21. 0 0. 8 Flomo 1407 Aluminum oxide C 40-09 66. 1 24. 0 ceteth-20 40-10 66. 0 2. 2 22. 0 ceteth-20 40-11 71. 2 16. 1 2. 0 ceteth-20 Aerosil 380 40-12 71. 1 16. 3 1. 0 ceteth-20 Aerosil blend (*) 40-13 71. 2 16. 1 2. 0 steareth-20 Aerosi 1380 40-14 71. 2 16. 1 1. 0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend (*j 40-15 68. 0 20. 0 1. 9 oleth-20 Aerosil-380 40-16 70. 8 1626 1. 0 oleth-20 Aerosil blend (*)

(T) Aerosl MUX-xU + AerosU MUX-1/U (1 : 1) Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 21 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application.

Formulations J and K were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 40b.

Table 40b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation J 100 52 80 200 90 96 300 96 100 400 97 99 Formulation K 100 33 70 200 67 93 300 83 99 400 93 100 40-01 100 47 60 200 87 98 300 97 98 400 100 98 40-02 100 47 63 200 80 94 300 90 99 400 98 100 40-03 100 62 62 200 83 93 300 97 96 400 97 100 40-04 100 47 57 200 78 94 300 87 100 400 98 100 40-05 100 25 53 200 60 88 300 80 97 400 83 98 40-06 100 35 37 200 65 62 300 83 83 400 90 95 40-07 100 63 55 200 72 97 300 83 100 400 94 100 40-08 100 30 65 200 72 94 300 87 100 400 92 99 40-09 100 37 63 200 77 83 300 88 99 400 97 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 40-10 100 40 55 200 83 93 300 94 96 400 98 99 40-11 100 42 55 200 78 94 300 88 92 400 94 99 40-12 100 38 58 200 78 97 300 92 97 400 95 100 40-13 100 25 50 200 80 88 300 96 95 400 98 98 40-14 100 50 53 200 88 92 300 98 99 400 99 99 40-15 100 33 57 200 75 91 300 94 97 400 98 99 40-16 100 33 55 200 77 90 300 88 99 400 96 100

Several dry granular compositions of this Example outperformed commercial standard composition K, at least on ABUTH. They included 40-01 to 40-04 and 40-10 to 40-16, all containing an alkylether surfactant (steareth-20, oleth-20 or ceteth-20).

EXAMPLE 41 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 41a. All are oil-in-water emulsions and were prepared by process (vii).

Soybean lecithin (45% phospholipid, Avanti) was first dispersed in water either by ultrasonication or by use of a microfluidizer as indicated in the column of Table 41 a headed"Process".

Table 41a Conc. Glyphosate % w/w Process comp. g a. e./I Lecithin Butyl Ethomeen MON Ceteareth-Ceteareth- (*) stearate T/25 0818 20 27 41-01 220 0.75 3.75 3.0 3.0 B 41-02 220 0. 75 0.75 3.0 3.0 B Conc. Glyphosate % w/w Process comp. g a. e./i Lecithin Butyl Ethomeen MON Ceteareth-Ceteareth- (*) stearate T/25 0818 20 27 41-03 220 0. 75 3. 75 3. 0 3. 0 B 41-04 220 0. 75 0. 75 3. 0 3. 0 B 41-05 220 6. 00 1. 50 3. 0 3. 0 B 41-06 220 6. 00 1. 50 3. 0 3. 0 B 41-07 220 4. 00 1. 00 3. 0 3. 0 B 41-08 220 4. 00 1. 00 3. 0 3. 0 B 41-09 220 0. 75 3. 75 3. 0 3. 0 A 41-10 220 0. 75 0. 75 3. 0 3. 0 A 41-11 220 0. 75 3. 75 6. 0 B 41-12 220 0. 75 3. 75 6. 0 B 41-13 345 6. 00 1. 50 4. 5 4. 5 B 41-14 345 6. 00 1. 50 6. 0 3. 0 B 41-15 345 6. 00 1. 50 6. 0 6. 0 B 41-16 345 0. 50 7. 50 12. 0 B 41-17 345 6. 00 1. 50 4. 5 4. 5 3. 0 B

(*) Process : A Ultrasonicated B Microfluidized, 3 cycles Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 19 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 15 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 41 b.

Table 41b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF FormulationB 150 45 82 250 55 71 350 80 72 450 88 77 Formulation J 150 55 83 250 89 88 350 97 93 450 99 93 550 99 87 41-01 150 92 83 250 96 96 350 99 96 450 100 86 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 41-02 150 85 93 250 97 78 350 97 90 450 99 90 41-03 150 87 85 250 98 92 350 99 95 450 100 95 41-04 150 87 89 250 97 92 350 99 94 450 99 91 41-05 150 87 77 250 98 89 350 99 93 450 99 84 41-06 150 12 18 250 96 73 350 99 85 450 99 84 41-07 150 82 89 250 88 96 350 96 98 450 97 97 41-08 150 88 94 250 95 90 350 99 98 450 99 98 41-09 150 94 94 250 95 100 350 97 99 450 99 98 41-10 150 94 94 250 98 99 350 99 97 450 99 96 41-11 150 83 81 250 94 88 350 98 93 450 99 99 41-12 150 68 79 250 95 96 350 98 100 450 99 98 41-13 150 86 98 250 95 98 350 99 100 450 100 98 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 41-14 150 85 98 250 98 98 350 99 98 450 100 98 41-15 150 86 95 250 97 97 350 99 95 450 100 96 41-16 150 93 94 250 98 98 350 99 98 450 100 97 41-17 150 95 96 250 98 100 350 100 100 450 100 98

Many compositions containing lecithin and butyl stearate, together with ceteareth-20 or ceteareth-27, outperformed commercial standard Formulation J in this test.

EXAMPLE 42 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 42a. Concentrate compositions 42-04 and 42-05 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 42-06 to 42-13 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Concentrate compositions 42-01 to 42-03 contain colloidal particulate but no surfactant.

The compositions of this example containing colloidal particulate all showed acceptable storage stability. Of those containing steareth-20 but no colloidal particulate, composition 42-04 was acceptable storage-stable but composition 42-05 was not.

Table 42a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./t Steareth-20 Oleth-20 Aerosil Aerosil 42-01484"t. 5MOX-80 42-02 484 1.5 380 42-03 484 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 42-04 484 1. 5 none 42-05 484 3. 0 none 42-06 484 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-170 42-07 484 3. 0 1. 5 380 42-08 484 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/3 80 (1 : 1) 42-09 484 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 42-10 484 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80 42-11 484 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-170 42-12 484 3.0 1.5 380 Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a.e./l Steareth-20 Oleth-20 Aerosil Aerosil 42-13 484 3. 0 1.5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1)

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 42b.

Table 42b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 3 38 200 28 63 300 37 75 400 55 78 Formulation J 100 23 73 200 43 92 300 67 96 400 92 97 42-01 100 23 60 200 40 77 300 65 91 400 75 92 42-02 100 18 SO 200 25 53 300 33 75 400 67 82 42-03 100 27 57 200 35 72 300 50 86 400 70 93 42-04 100 42 67 200 48 78 300 78 82 400 80 85 42-05 100 28 43 200 45 77 300 70 92 400 80 95 42-06 100 42 57 200 70 75 300 89 87 400 94 94 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 42-07 100 43 68 200 62 90 300 88 92 400 97 92 42-08 100 53 57 200 72 87 300 88 94 400 92 97 42-09 100 27 60 200 62 75 300 75 92 400 83 90 42-10 100 47 43 200 73 73 300 82 88 400 97 93 42-11 100 48 57 200 63 75 300 80 91 400 89 98 42-12 100 30 40 200 42 63 300 68 75 400 73 83 42-13 100 37 40 200 57 75 300 73 80 400 78 94

Remarkably strong herbicidal effectiveness was provided by composition 42-05, in spite of its very low surfactant (steareth-20) to glyphosate a. e. ratio of about 1 : 13. Activity, at least on ABUTH, was further improved to a significant degree by inclusion in the composition of colloidal particulates such as Aerosil MOX-170 (42-06), Aerosil 380 (42-07), a blend of Aerosil MOX-80 and Aerosil 380 (42-08), and a blend of Aerosil MOX-80 and Aerosil MOX-170 (42-09).

EXAMPLE 43 Aqueous and dry granular concentrate compositions were prepared as shown in Table 43a. Dry granular concentrate compositions 43-01 to 43-11 contain glyphosate ammonium salt, and were prepared by the procedure described in Example 40.

Aqueous concentrate compositions 43-12 to 43-16 contain glyphosate IPA salt and soybean lecithin (45% phospholipid, Avanti) and were prepared by process (v).

Table 43a Conc. Glyphos-% w/w Type of Type of comp. ate Glyphos-Lecithin Butyl Surfactant Colloidal surfactant colloidal g a. e./i ate a. e. stearate particulate particulate 43-01 68. 7 21. 0 steareth-20 43-02 66. 1 24. 0 oleth-20 43-03 67.9 10. 0 2.0 10. 0 MON 0818 43-04 59.2 10.0 20.0 + 2. 0 FC-754 + MON 0818 43-05 66. 1 24. 0 ceteth-20 43-06 71. 2 16. 1 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil 380 43-07 71. 2 16. 1 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 43-08 68.0 20. 0 1. 9 oleth-20 Aerosi1380 43-09 63. 5 25. 0 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 43-10 67. 9 20. 0 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 43-11 72. 2 15. 0 2.0 steareth-20 Aerosil blend 43-12 370 4. 7 4. 7 steareth-20 43-13 350 4. 9 4. 9 ceteareth-27 43-14 348 5. 0 5. 0 ceteareth-15 43-15 348 5.0 5.0 oleth-20 43-16 351 4.4 5.0 steareth-30 Aerosil blend: Aerosil MOX-80 + Aerosil MOX-170 (1:1) Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 20 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 16 days after application.

Formulations J and K were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 43b.

Table 43b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF FormulationJ 100 0 20 200 28 57 300 58 96 400 73 99 Formulation K 100 22 13 200 42 83 300 48 91 400 58 95 43-01 100 28 30 200 48 80 300 80 97 400 85 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 43-02 100 43 52 200 68 80 300 72 88 400 86 94 43-03 100 2005083 300 75 88 400 85 96 43-04 100 50 45 200 73 80 300 85 92 400 95 94 43-05 100 1 8 45 200 65 83 300 87 95 400 94 86 43-06 100 200 62 68 300 82 94 400 91 87 143-o7 I l°oo 7ss I 43-07 100 50 200 60 3008787 400 93 43-08 100-1 200 55 300 82 85 400 88 43-09 100 45 50 2005778 300 83 83 400 84 89 43-10 100 42 50 200 57 80 300 73 91 400 91 90 43-11 100 28 48 200 50 75 300 70 87 400 82 89 43-12 100 20 40 200 63 80 300 67 96 400 80 88 43-13 100 27 35 200 50 85 3007790 400 84 8 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 43-14 100 27 25 200 40 70 300 68 94 400 89 91 43-15 100 17 20 200 47 82 300 58 89 400 91 95 43-16 100 22 20 200 41 80 300 84 89 400 99 98

All compositions of the invention in this study exhibited greater herbicidal effectiveness on both ABUTH and ECHCF, in some cases by a very substantial margin, than commercial standard Formulation K.

EXAMPLE 44 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 44a. Concentrate compositions 44-01 to 44-07,44-17 and 44-18 were prepared by process (v). Concentrate compositions 44-08 to 44-15 were prepared by process (x).

Concentrate composition 44-16 was prepared by process (viii).

Table 44a Conc. Glyphosate % w/w comp. g a. e./I Lecithin Fluorad Butyl Ethome Ceteareth-20 Arcosol Ceteareth-27 FC-754 stearate en T/25 ve DPM 44-01 348 3. 0 3. 00 0. 75 44-02 348 3. 8 3.75 5.00 44-03 348 3. 8 3.75 7. 50 44-04 348 2. 0 5. 00 0.75 44-05 348 5. 0 5.00 0.75 44-06 348 2. 0 2.00 44-07 348 1. 0 1. 00 44-08 220 1. 5 1. 5 3.00 3.0 44-092201. 5 1. 003. 0 44-10 220 1.5 1. 5 6.00 3.0 44-11 220 1. 5 1. 5 6.00 3.0 44-12 220 3. 0 I. S 3. 00 3.0 44-13 220 3. 0 1. 5 3. 00 3. 0 44-14 348 1.5 1. 5 6. 00 3. 0 44-15 348 3. 0 1.5 3. 00 3.0 44-16 348 3. 00 44-17 348 3. 0 3. 0 44-18 348 5.0 13.00 5. 0

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 44b.

Table 44b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 28 32 200 41 37 300 73 64 400 22 30 Formulation J 100 38 32 200 82 73 300 89 91 400 97 89 44-01 100 73 28 200 90 66 300 97 92 400 100 96 44-02 100 77 32 200 87 67 300 84 78 400 98 84 44-03 100 79 33 200 82 66 300 99 81 400 97 88 44-04 100 69 35 200 95 59 300 96 84 400 92 91 100 92 55 200 92 55 300 96 71 400 94 87 44-06 too 83 33 200 100 52 300 100 68 400 99 75 44-07 100 77 35 200 90 58 300 95 71 400 94 90 WO 98/17109 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 44-08 100 51 40 200 89 75 3009692 400 95 98 44-09 100 76 57 200 98 3009786 400 96 98 44-10 100 69 60 200 98 63 300 95 82 400 99 90 100 6 60 2009484 400 9 97 4009997 44-12 200 5 82 2009582 3009690 4009598 44-13 100 61 58 2009478 300 où 87 40010094 44-14 100 6 61 2008877 3009182 400 97 89 44-15 100 42 52 200 82 80 300 86 90 400 97 92 100 64 49 2008675 300 9/00 40010082 44-17 100 57 32 200 88 66 3009573 400 100 88 44-18 100 52 35 2007077 300 82 79 400 97 73 Compositions 44-08 to 44-15, containing lecithin, butyl stearate, Ethomeen T/25 and a Cl618 alkylether surfactant (ceteareth-20 or ceteareth-27) exhibited a very high degree of herbicidal

effectiveness. Not only was performance, at least of 44-08 to 44-13, on ABUTH substantially better than that of Formulation J, these compositions performed considerably better than Formulation J on ECHCF as well.

EXAMPLE 45 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 45a. All contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

The compositions of this example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown.

Table 45a Conc. Glyphosate % w/w Type of Type of comp. g a. e./i Oil Surfactant Aerosil oil surfactant 380 45-01 360 1. 0 10.0 1. 25 butyl stearate oleth-20 45-02 360 1. 0 10.0 1. 25 stearylamine oleth-20 45-03 360 1. 0 10.0 1. 25 stearyl alcohol oleth-20 45-04 360 1. 0 10.0 1. 25 docosane oleth-20 45-05 360 10. 0 1. 25 none oleth-20 45-06 360 1. 0 10.0 1. 25 butyl stearate steareth-30 45-07 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 stearylamine steareth-30 45-08 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 stearyl alcohol steareth-30 45-09 360 1. 0 10.0 1. 25 docosane steareth-30 45-10 360 10. 0 1. 25 none steareth-30 45-11 360 5. 0+5. 0 1. 25 none oleth-20 + steareth-20 45-12 360 5. 0+5. 0 1. 25 none oleth-20 + steareth-30 45-13 360 5. 0+5. 0 1. 25 none oleth-20 + ceteareth-27 45-14 360 5. 0+5. 0 1. 25 none oleth-20 + ceteareth-15 45-15 360 5. 0+5. 0 1. 25 none steareth-30 + steareth-20 45-16 360 5. 0+5. 0 1. 25 none steareth-30 + ceteareth-27 45-17 360 5. 0+5. 0 1. 25 none steareth-30 + ceteareth-15 45-18 360 10. 0 1. 25 none laureth-23

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 45b.

Table 45b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 0 60 200 15 73 300 33 88 400 57 91 Formulation J 100 5 70 200 37 92 300 80 99 400 77 96 45-01 100 13 88 200 32 85 300 48 98 400 90 93 45-02 100 10 70 200. 45 98 300 72 99 400 80 98 45-03 100 3 77 200 25 94 300 47 98 400 75 99 45-04 100 7 67 200 23 94 300 40 99 400 7 47 45-05 100 7 76 200 25 88 300 45 96 400 75 97 45-06 100 12 96 200 30 97 300 45 98 400 15 60 45-07 100 8 83 200 12 97 300 35 94 400 50 98 45-08 100 15 72 200 30 88 300 40 99 400 0 33 45-09 100 5 73 200 15 94 300 47 99 400 5 53 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 45-10 100 7 79 200 15 95 300 45 98 400 62 99 45-11 100 5 84 200 13 98 300 30 98 400 55 100 45-12 100 3 95 200 17 99 300 28 99 400 67 100 45-13 100 5 90 200 17 99 300 30 100 400 60 98 45-14 100 3 98 200 25 97 300 38 100 400 57 100 45-15 100 5 97 200 25 97 300 40 100 400 40 99 45-16 100 10 97 200 15 98 300 52 100 400 0 47 45-17 100 7 97 200 25 94 300 40 98 400 33 97 45-18 100 7 96 200 25 99 300 55 100 400 73 100

Percent inhibition data for the 400 g a. e./ha glyphosate rate in this test are unreliable and should be ignored. Neither oleth-20 (composition 45-05) nor steareth-20 (45-10) provided herbicidal effectiveness equal to Formulation J in this study, and no great or consistent further enhancement was obtained by adding butyl stearate.

EXAMPLE 46 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 46a. Concentrate compositions 46-01 to 46-03 are oil-in-water emulsions

and were prepared by process (vii). Compositions 46-04 to 46-18 all contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Different mixing methods were employed in the final stage of preparation of these compositions, as indicated in the column of Table 46a headed"Process".

The compositions of this example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown.

Table 46a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of Process composition g a. e./l Butyl Surfactant Aerosil 380 surfactant (*) stearate 46-01 163 0. 5 5. 0 oleth-20 46-02 163 0. 5 5. 0 steareth-20 46-03 163 0. 5 5. 0 ceteareth-27 46-04 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 ceteareth-15 A 46-05 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 ceteth-20 A 46-06 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 steareth-20 A 46-07 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 A 46-08 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 ceteareth-27 A 46-09 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 steareth-30 A 46-10 360 10. 0 1. 25 steareth-30 A 46-11 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 A 46-12 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 B 46-13 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 C 46-14 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 D 46-15 360 1. 0 10. 0 125 oleth-20 E 46-16 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 F 46-17 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 G 46-18 360 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 oleth-20 A

(*) Process : A Silverson mixer, medium screen, 3 minutes at 7000 rpm B Silverson mixer, coarse screen, 3 minutes at 7000 rpm C Fann mixer, 50% output, 5 minutes D Turrax mixer, 3 minutes at 8000 rpm E Overhead stirrer, low speed F Overhead stirrer, high speed G Hand shaking, 3 minutes Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 17 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 19 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 46b.

Table 46b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 20 40 200 45 50 300 65 72 400 78 85 Formulation J 100 43 53 200 80 80 300 96 82 400 99 94 46-01 100 45 57 200 80 72 300 89 78 400 98 83 46-02 100 53 57 200 80 78 300 89 77 400 93 83 46-03 100 45 60 200 83 75 300 97 73 400 97 85 46-04 100 45 45 200 80 80 300 83 83 400 95 95 46-05 100 42 42 200 77 77 300 93 93 400 98 98 46-06 100 30 30 200 42 42 300 27 30 400 3 20 46-07 100 40 40 200 77 75 300 90 93 400 97 86 46-08 100 43 50 200 80 80 300 92 93 400 96 98 46-09 100 0 2 200 82 75 300 83 96 400 90 88 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 46-10 100 57 60 200 80 70 300 88 88 400 95 93 46-11 100 35 47 200 72 75 300 80 75 400 85 77 46-12 100 47 47 200 72 77 300 80 90 400 86 78 46-13 100 55 50 200 75 83 300 78 92 400 91 92 46-14 100 52 50 200 75 78 300 83 88 400 99 92 46-15 100 47 47 200 70 73 300 87 87 400 75 63 46-16 100 43 40 200 78 75 300 88 88 400 87 91 46-17 100 43 43 200 67 88 300 80 75 400 92 83 46-18 100 27 40 200 63 57 300 82 73 400 87 70

Results obtained with composition 46-06 are out of line with other data in this Example and an error in formulation or application is suspected. Some differences in herbicidal effectiveness were evident when a composition containing 360 g a. e./i glyphosate, l% butyl stearate, 10% oleth-20 and 1. 25% Aerosil 380 was processed in different ways (46-11 to 46-17). However, as compositions 46-07 and 46-11 were identically processed yet differed in effectiveness, no firm conclusions can be drawn from this test.

EXAMPLE 47 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 47a. Concentrate compositions 47-01 to 47-09 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 47-10 to 47-18 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

Compositions of this example containing 3% or 6% surfactant were not acceptably storage-stable except in the presence of colloidal particulate as shown.

Table 47a Composition Glyphosate % w/w Type of no. g a. ei Steareth-Oleth-Velvetex Aerosil Aerosil 20 20 AB-45 47-01 488 1. 0 none 47-02 488 3. 0 none 47-03 488 6. 0 none 47-04 488 1. 0 none 47-05 488 3. 0 none 47-06 488 6. 0 none 47-07 488 1. 0 none 47-08 488 3. 0 none 47-09 488 4. 6 none 47-10 488 1. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 47-11 488 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 47-12 488 6. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 47-13 488 1. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 47-14 488 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 47-15 488 6. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 47-16 488 1. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 47-17 488 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 47-18 488 4. 6 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : l)

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 18 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 18 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 47b.

Table 47b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 10 40 200 38 67 300 70 80 400 86 92 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation J 100 43 58 200 65 82 300 91 94 400 100 95 47-01 100 23 60 200 40 65 300 73 87 400 80 92 47-02 100 38 67 200 77 82 300 95 83 400 99 93 47-03 100 33 67 200 78 73 300 90 94 400 100 96 47-04 100 23 63 200 48 81 300 68 87 400 72 88 47-05 100 30 63 200 63 80 300 78 89 400 95 93 47-06 100 25 85 200 68 93 300 77 93 400 99 95 47-07 100 13 60 200 42 80 300 57 95 400 92 96 47-08 100 20 73 200 43 92 300 83 93 400 72 96 47-09 100 30 73 200 50 94 300 65 96 400 75 98 47-10 100 10 65 200 53 88 300 72 94 400 83 95 47-11 100 15 50 200 57 77 300 82 95 400 92 97 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 47-12 100 30 70 200 68 98 300 78 97 400 96 98 47-13 100 15 77 200 43 93 300 68 95 400 77 99 47-14 100 10 73 200 40 93 300 68 98 400 78 98 47-15 100 missing missing 200 missing missing 300 missing missing 400 missing missing 47-16 100 0 60 200 30 93 300 40 99 400 50 99 47-17 100283 200 43 99 300 67 100 400 67 100 47-18 100 95 200 37 loo 300 60 100 400 78 100

In high-load (488 g a. e./1) glyphosate compositions, steareth-20 at 3% or 6% provided greater herbicidal effectiveness in this test than the same concentrations of oleth-20. Even at just 3%, steareth- 20 (composition 47-02) gave effectiveness equal to commercial standard Formulation J. Addition of a blend of colloidal particulates to stabilize the composition (47-11) slightly reduced effectiveness in this study.

EXAMPLE 48 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 48a. Concentrate compositions 48-01 to 48-04 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 48-08 to 48-18 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix). Concentrate compositions 48-05 to 48-07 contain colloidal particulate but no surfactant.

All compositions of this example except 48-01 to 48-03 were acceptably storage-stable.

Table 48a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. ei Steareth-Steareth-MON Aerosil Aerosil 20 100 0818 48-01 488 3. 0 48-02 488 4. 5 48-03 488 6. 0 48-04 488 3. 0 48-05 488 1. 5 380 48-06 488 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 48-07 488 3. 0 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 48-08 488 1. 5 48-09 488 3.0 3. 0 1. 5 380 48-10 488 4. 5 3. 0 1. 5 380 48-11 488 6. 0 3. 0 1. 5 380 48-12 488 3. 0 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 48-13 488 4. 5 3. 0 I. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 48-14 488 6. 0 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 48-15 488 3. 0 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 48-16 488 4. 5 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 48-17 488 6. 0 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 48-18 488 4. 5 3.0 1.5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1)

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 21 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 48b.

Table 48b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 2 23 200 18 50 300 42 67 400 63 80 Formulation J 100 20 47 200 40 86 300 83 98 400 93 98 48-01 100 10 75 200 62 83 300 80 96 400 93 99 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 48-02 100 40 60 200 77 92 300 87 97 400 93 99 48-03 100 23 40 200 38 63 300 78 91 400 97 91 48-04 100 20 38 200 23 77 300 43 94 400 73 94 48-05 100 7 30 200 25 37 300 42 60 400 67 63 48-06 100 7 30 200 20 53 300 52 67 400 83 67 48-07 100 5 35 200 20 63 300 57 80 400 43 85 48-08 100 22 83 200 47 99 300 86 98 400 78 100 48-09 100 12 45 200 25 77 300 40 83 400 37 95 48-10 100 13 53 200 73 99 300 85 98 400 99 99 48-11 100 25 50 200 60 88 300 93 99 400 99 99 48-12 100 25 45 200 57 88 300 85 97 400 100 94 48-13 100 30 52 200 68 87 300 93 99 400 100 92 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 48-14 100 40 45 200 73 88 300 81 98 400 100 99 48-15 100 8 57 200 33 96 300 81 99 400 95 99 48-16 100 10 62 200 48 83 300 99 98 400 100 100 48-17 100 27 58 200 65 92 300 75 98 400 93 99 48-18 100 5 40 200 33 87 300 55 98 400 75 98

Among stabilized high-load (488 g a. e./I) glyphosate compositions providing herbicidal effectiveness superior to commercial standard Formulation J, at least on ABUTH, were 48-10 and 48-11 (respectively 4.5% and 6% steareth-20 + 3% MON 0818 + 1. S% Aerosil 380), 48-13 (4.5% steareth-20 + 3% MON 0818 + 1. 5% Aerosil MOX-80/MOX-170 blend) and 48-16 (4.5% steareth-20 + 3% MON 0818 + 1. 5% Aerosil MOX-80/380 blend). The relatively poor performance of composition 48-04 and the good performance of composition 48-02 shows that the excellent results obtained with the stabilized compositions listed above are primarily attributable to the steareth-20 component.

EXAMPLE 49 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 49a. Concentrate compositions 49-01 to 49-09 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 49-10 to 49-18 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

Compositions of this example containing 3% or 6% surfactant were not acceptably storage-stable except in the presence of colloidal particulate as shown.

Table 49a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w Type of composition g a. e./i Steareth-Oleth-Velvetex Aerosil Aerosil 20 20 AB-45 49-01 488 1.5 none 49-02 488 3. 0 none 49-03 488 6. 0 none 49-04 488 1. 5 none 49-05 488 3. 0 none 49-06 488 6. 0 none 49-07 488 1. 5 none 49-08 488 3. 0 none 49-09 488 4. 5 none 49-10 488 1. 5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1:1) 49-11 488 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 49-12 488 6. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 49-13 488 1. 5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 49-14 488 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 49-15 488 6. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 49-16 488 1. 5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 49-17 488 3. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1) 49-18 488 4. 5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 1)

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 15 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 22 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 49b.

Table 49b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 0 10 200 3 27 300 13 30 400 33 40 Formulation J 100 2 53 200 30 97 300 70 99 400 80 99 49-01 100 5 67 200 30 89 300 58 98 400 80 100 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 49-02 100 20 60 200 45 90 300 78 99 400 80 100 49-03 100 20 57 200 47 93 300 78 96 400 83 98 49-04 100 3 57 200 30 83 300 63 99 400 82 98 49-05 100 5 53 200 27 83 300 47 98 400 77 100 49-06 100 5 40 200 23 70 300 47 92 400 77 99 49-07 100 3 53 200 30 85 300 60 94 400 72 97 49-08 100 3 50 200 22 88 300 53 97 400 80 100 49-09 100 0 40 200 20 83 300 40 99 400 67 99 49-10 too 0 40 200 27 60 300 47 83 400 78 94 49-11 100 5 47 200 25 77 300 57 96 400 87 97 49-12 100 15 43 200 52 88 300 87 98 400 87 98 49-13 100 0 40 200 17 70 300 35 83 400 53 88 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 49-14 100 0 33 200 18 67 300 28 90 400 62 98 49-15 100 2 33 200 25 70 300 53 85 400 72 97 49-16 100 0 30 200 17 50 300 27 67 400 72 87 49-17 100 0 0 200 7 63 300 32 88 400 47 90 49-18 100 0 5 200 12 60 300 25 83 400 45 97

Compositions containing steareth-20 generally performed better than counterparts containing oleth-20 in this study, both in the presence and in the absence of colloidal particulates.

EXAMPLE 50 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 50a. All contain colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

The compositions of this example all showed acceptable storage stability. The compositions shown as containing colloidal particulate were not storage-stable unless the colloidal particulate was included as shown.

Table 50a Concentrate % w/w Type of Type of composition Glyphosate Oil Surfactant Aerosil oil surfactant a.e. 380 50-01 31 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 Butyl stearate steareth-20 50-02 31 1. 0 10. 0 1. 25 Butyl stearate oleth-20 50-03 31 I. 0 10. 0 1. 25 Butyl stearate steareth-30 50-04 31 10.0 1. 25 none steareth-30

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Treatments were applied at four different hours of the day. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 22 days after application.

Formulation J was applied as a comparative treatment. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 50b.

Table 50b Concentrate composition Hour when Glyphosate rate % Inhibition applied g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation J 1000 100 5 33 200 42 75 300 67 83 400 77 93 50-01 1000 100 7 33 200 40 70 3005082 400 78 91 50-02 1000 100 18 33 200 37 73 300 48 91 400 80 92 50-03 1000 100 30 33 200 40 75 300 82 85 400 83 80 50-04 1000 100 30 30 200 43 78 300 78 92 400 93 95 Formulation J 1200 100 5 38 200 35 87 300 53 96 400 88 99 50-01 1200 100 30 200 47 91 300 70 89 400 78 97 50-02 1200 100 5 37 200 40 75 300 48 87 400 70 94 50-03 1200 100 20 37 200 50 82 300 78 98 400 83 97 50-04 1200 100 33 33 200 45 93 300 75 98 400 95 100 Formulation J 1400 100 15 40 200 30 90 300 55 100 400 80 100 Concentrate composition Hour when Glyphosate rate % Inhibition applied g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 50-01 1400 100 17 40 200 45 70 300 75 97 400 80 98 50-02 1400 100 17 47 200 35 83 300 67 97 400 63 97 50-03 1400 100 30 40 200 63 80 300 77 97 400 78 100 50-04 1400 100 23 40 200 45 87 300 73 100 400 78 100 Formulation J 1600 100 10 37 200 32 83 300 52 97 400 75 98 50-01 1600 100 27 43 200 40 89 300 77 99 400 95 99 50-02 1600 100 20 53 200 40 95 300 53 98 400 80 98 50-03 1600 100 27 60 200 60 93 300 78 97 400 96 100 50-04 1600 100 15 37 200 43 83 300 67 97 4007896

Composition 50-03 illustrates the consistency of high-level performance obtainable with, in this case, steareth-30 at an approximately 1 : 3 weight/weight ratio to glyphosate a. e., together with a small amount of butyl stearate and Aerosil 380. An average of percent inhibition of ABUTH across all four glyphosate rates shows the following comparison of 50-03 with Formulation J, applied at four different hours of the day: Hour Formulation J Composition 50-03 1000 48 59 1200 45 58 1400 48 62

1 1600 1 42 65 EXAMPLE 51 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 5 la. Concentrate compositions 51-01 to 51-07 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 51-08 to 51-18 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

Compositions 51-01 to 51-06 were not acceptably storage-stable. All other compositions showed acceptable storage stability.

Table 51a Concentrate Glyphosate % w/w composition g a. e./i Steareth-30 Steareth-20 Agrimul Aerosil 380 PG-2069 51-01 488 3. 00 51-02 488 4. 50 51-03 488 6. 00 51-04 488 3. 00 51-05 488 4. 50 51-06 488 6. 00 51-07 488 2. 0 51-08 488 3. 00 I. 5 51-09 488 4. 50 1. 5 51-10 488 6.00 1. 5 51-11 488 3. 00 1. 5 51-12 488 4. 50 1. 5 51-13 488 6. 00 I. 5 51-14 488 1. 50 1. 50 1.5 51-15 488 2. 25 2.25 1.5 51-16 488 3. 00 3.00 1.5 51-17 488 2. 25 2.25 2.0 I. 5 51-18 488 3. 00 3.00 2.0 1. 5 Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 23 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 51 b.

Table 51b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 100 2 20 200 22 33 300 35 67 400 68 73 Formulation J 100 32 63 200 78 90 300 83 93 400 92 97 51-01 100 38 57 200 50 63 300 62 80 400 75 89 51-02 100 20 57 200 63 70 300 75 88 400 80 96 51-03 100 47 53 200 72 80 300 87 96 400 100 99 51-04 100 33 30 200 48 60 300 75 73 400 90 83 51-05 100 10 30 200 43 50 300 68 82 400 83 92 51-06 100 22 40 200 43 50 300 75 83 400 83 87 51-07 100 10 37 200 40 63 300 78 86 400 95 96 51-08 100 23 43 200 68 63 300 92 88 400 98 93 51-09 100 47 57 200 78 70 300 95 92 400 100 96 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 51-10 100 37 57 200 85 68 300 92 85 400 100 93 51-11 100 28 43 200 63 73 300 85 83 400 95 96 51-12 100 40 53 200 75 88 300 90 92 400 100 97 51-13 100 40 53 200 75 75 300 99 92 400 100 98 51-14 100 30 43 200 68 72 300 83 82 400 96 97 51-15 100 38 47 200 77 72 300 94 92 400 100 96 51-16 100 33 43 200 75 67 300 92 88 400 100 94 51-17 100 25 43 200 68 82 300 78 96 400 99 96 51-18 100 13 37 200 72 70 300 87 80 400 99 85

Several stabilized high-load (488 g a. e./I) glyphosate compositions of this Example provided herbicidal effectiveness equal or superior, at least on ABUTH, to that obtained with commercial standard Formulation J.

EXAMPLE 52 Aqueous concentrate compositions were prepared containing glyphosate IPA salt and excipient ingredients as shown in Table 52a. Concentrate compositions 52-12 to 52-14 are aqueous solution concentrates and were prepared by process (viii). Concentrate compositions 52-01 to 52-11 and 52-15 to 52-17 are aqueous solution concentrates containing colloidal particulates and were prepared by process (ix).

Table 52a Cone. Glyphosate % w/w Type of comp. g a. e./l Steareth-Ethomeen Propylene Aerosil Aerosil 20 T/25 glycol 52-01 488 3. 0 0. 8 380 52-02 488 6. 0 1. 5 MOX-80/MOX-170 (1 : 1) 52-03 488 4. 5 1. 5 380 52-04 488 4. 5 2.25 0.5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 52-05 488 4. 5 0. 5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1: 2) 52-06 488 6. 0 0. 5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 52-07 488 3. 0 1. 50 0.5 1.5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 52-08 488 6. 0 3.00 0.5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 52-09 488 3. 0 1.50 0.5 1. 5 380 52-10 488 4. 5 2. 25 0.5 1. 5 380 52-11 488 6. 0 3.00 0.5 1. 5 380 52-12 488 1. 50 0.5 none 52-13 488 2. 25 0.5 none 52-14 488 3. 00 0.5 none 52-15 488 1. 50 0.5 1.5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 52-16 488 2. 25 0.5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2) 52-17 488 3. 00 0.5 1. 5 MOX-80/380 (1 : 2)

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 20 days after application.

Formulations B and J were applied as comparative treatments. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 52b.

Table 52b Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF FormulationB 100 0 3 200 10 12 300 43 22 400 47 27 Formulation J 100 13 15 200 25 22 300 58 53 400 68 82 52-01 100 30 20 200 60 53 300 73 88 400 87 96 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 52-02 100 40 23 200 63 55 300 88 87 400 93 93 52-03 100 42 20 200 72 55 300 82 83 400 90 88 52-04 100 60 32 200 70 57 300 90 88 400 90 93 52-OS 100 47 32 200 67 57 300 88 85 400 94 88 52-06 100 33 37 200 68 67 300 82 80 400 90 88 52-07 100 35 37 200 67 70 300 87 85 400 97 93 52-08 100 32 35 200 67 77 300 85 92 400 97 95 52-09 100 27 33 200 57 67 300 88 83 400 93 95 52-10 100 13 33 200 62 58 300 80 80 400 92 92 52-11 100 13 20 200 60 57 300 88 63 400 93 82 52-12 100 10 27 200 53 53 300 70 67 400 88 85 52-13 100 3 28 200 50 57 300 67 70 400 90 82 Concentrate composition Glyphosate rate % Inhibition g a. e./ha ABUTH ECHCF 52-14 100 3 28 200 55 57 300 70 83 400 87 87 52-15 100 10 20 200 58 43 300 70 72 400 83 85 52-16 100 12 22 200 55 57 300 73 77 400 92 90 52-16 100 7 20 200 53 55 300 70 75 400 85 88

Several stabilized high-load (488 g a. e./I) glyphosate compositions of this Example provided herbicidal effectiveness equal or superior, on both ABUTH and ECHCF, to that obtained with commercial standard Formulation J.

EXAMPLE 53 Glyphosate-containing spray compositions were prepared by tank-mixing Formulation B with excipients as shown in Table 53.

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti, ABUTH) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCF) plants were grown and treated by the standard procedures given above. Applications of spray compositions were made 16 days after planting ABUTH and ECHCF, and evaluation of herbicidal inhibition was done 22 days after application. Results, averaged for all replicates of each treatment, are shown in Table 53. Table 53 Glyphosate Glyphosate rate Additive Ratio % Inhibition composition g a. e./ha add./a. e. ABUTH ECHCF FormulationB 150 none 18 25 250 73 58 350 80 82 Formulation J 150 none 47 90 250 77 93 350 95 94 Formulation B 150 steareth-10 1 : 0.3 53 88 250 83 94 350 98 98 Formulation B 150 steareth-10 1 : 1 48 73 250 67 97 350 93 99 Glyphosate Glyphosate rate Additive Ratio % Inhibition composition g a. e./ha add./a. e. ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 steareth-10 1 : 1.5 52 60 250 65 95 350 86 99 Formulation B 150 steareth-10 1 : 3 48 73 250 65 83 350 80 98 FormulationB 150 steareth-10 1 : 6 50 81 250 60 87 350 85 97 Formulation B 150 steareth-20 1 : 0. 3 76 92 250 100 93 350 100 99 Formulation B 150 steareth-20 1 : 1 65 75 250 94 96 350 99 99 Formulation B 150 steareth-20 1: 1.5 52 95 250 84 92 350 98 98 Formulation B 150 steareth-20 1 : 3 53 82 250 82 100 350 98 93 Formulation B 150 steareth-20 1 : 6 47 62 250 68 93 350 92 97 Formulation B 150 steareth-30 1 : 0.3 63 88 250 97 100 350 100 100 Formulation B 150 steareth-30 1:1 53 72 250 88 96 350 97 97 Formulation B 150 steareth-30 1: 1.5 50 79 250 81 89 350 96 100 Formulation B 150 steareth-30 1 : 3 50 67 250 78 88 350 97 91 Formulation B 150 steareth-30 1: 6 47 58 250 75 99 350 89 99 Formulation B 150 ceteareth-30 1: 0.3 55 86 250 89 91 350 99 100 Formulation B 150 ceteareth-30 1 : 1 50 86 250 85 95 350 97 100 Formulation B 150 ceteareth-30 1: 1.5 43 75 250 80 100 3508898 Glyphosate Glyphosate rate Additive Ratio % Inhibition composition g a. e./ha add./a. e. ABUTH ECHCF Formulation B 150 ceteareth-30 1 : 3 33 73 250 60 92 350 94 100 Formulation B 150 ceteareth-30 1 : 6 37 73 250 53 89 350 88 100 Formulation B 150 Ethomeen T/25 1 : 0. 3 67 90 250 92 99 350 100 loo Formulation B 150 Ethomeen T/25 58 94 250 83 96 350 93 98 Formulation B 150 Ethomeen T/25 1 : 1. 5 50 73 250 86 100 350 99 100 Formulation B 150 Ethomeen T/25 1:3 45 83 250 89 95 350 100 100 Formulation B 150 Ethomeen T/25 1 : 6 35 82 250 73 350 88 98

Steareth-20, steareth-30 and ceteareth-30 were more effective additives for Formulation B than steareth-10 in this study.

The preceding description of specific embodiments of the present invention is not intended to be a complete list of every possible embodiment of the invention. Persons skilled in this field will recognize that modifications can be made to the specific embodiments described here that would be within the scope of the present invention.