FIELD

The present invention relates to compositions comprising polycarbonate block polyethers.

BACKGROUND

Non-ionic surfactants are typically produced using a mono-ol starter having a large hydrophobic block. Examples include palm oil alcohols which provide the hydrophobic block. Palm oil usage has led to deforestation of other plant species and a corresponding reduction in the natural habitat for a number of endangered species. As a consequence, replacements for palm oil alcohols and the like (C12-C20 alcohols) are being sought.

Surface-active agents combining polyether and polycarbonate blocks are known in the art of oil extraction. WO2010/062703 and WO2015/031348 describe polymer compositions and supercritical CO2 solutions of a potentially wide range of such polymers to assist with oil extraction. Such solutions form an emulsion waste product with water to assist with the oil extraction. There is no indication of any solubility in water or the use of such a water soluble polymer. The polymer compositions are designed to dissolve in liquid or supercritical CO2 applications. WO2010/062703 mentions examples with a polyether block and a polycarbonate block but such is not exemplified, and the blocks are not fully characterised or tested. WO2015/031348 describes polycarbonate blocks of the type:

Y-O-APC-O-CxHy wherein APC is a polycarbonate and C _x H _y is a saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbon. The terminal group Y can be H or several other groups such as a polyether chain, but the latter is not exemplified or further identified.

US2021309801 A1 discloses degradable ethylene oxide-based copolymers manufactured via boron-activated copolymerization of ethylene oxide monomers with carbon dioxide and their use as surfactants. Certain tri-block amphiphilic compounds are reported.

It would be beneficial to replace current aqueous non-ionic surfactants that use high hydrocarbyl alcohol derivatives as the hydrophobic section, either form fossil fuel or plant-based sources (such as palm oil) with lower hydrocarbyl sources which are cheaper and more readily available and potentially produced from bio sources such as bioethanol or butanol.

Surprisingly, the inventors have found that by altering the relative structure of the polycarbonate block polyether backbone lower hydrocarbyl alcohols can be utilised along with a polycarbonate section to form the hydrophobic group, providing a water-based surfactant without the need for higher hydrocarbyl alcohol derivatives. SUMMARY

According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a composition comprising a polycarbonate block polyether of the formula I

Z ¹ -(PC)P-(PE)Q-Z ² wherein PC represents a carbonate block with P repeat units of formula wherein R ^e1 , R ^e2 , R ^e3 , and R ^e4 are independently selected from H, methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, or an ether, ester or carbonate group, with the proviso that when one of R ^e1 , R ^e2 , R ^e3 , and R ^e4 is methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, or an ether, ester or carbonate group, the remaining R ^e1 , R ^e2 , R ^e3 , and R ^e4 are H;

PE represents a polyether block with Q repeat units of formula wherein R ^e1 ’,

R ^e2 ’, R ^e3 ’, and R ^e4 ’ are independently selected from H, methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, or an ether, ester or carbonate groups, with the proviso that when one of R ^e1 , R ^e2 , R ^e3 , and R ^e4 is methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, or an ether, ester or carbonate group, the remaining R ^e1 ’, R ^e2 ’, R ^e3 ’, and R ^e4 ’ are H;

Z ¹ is R, R-O, R-C(O)-O or R-O-C(O)-O;

R is an optionally substituted straight or branched chain C1-C11 alkyl group;

Z ² is H, R, R-(O)C or R-O-(O)C; and wherein the value of P does not exceed the value of Q.

Preferably Z ¹ is R-C(O)-O or R-O-C(O)-O. Preferably Z ¹ is a short (e.g. C2-C5 or C2-C4) chain carbonate or ester group.

Preferably Z ² is H or methyl, most preferably, Z ² is H.

Preferably, the polycarbonate block polyethers in compositions of the present invention are surface-active agents. Preferably, polycarbonate block polyethers in compositions of the present invention are surfactants.

Compositions of the invention are for use in the treatment, appearance, cleaning, caring or conditioning of the person and/or animals; the home or any of its contents; and foods including beverages and neutraceuticals.

Accordingly, compositions will comprise a further component beyond the polycarbonate block polyether polymer as described herein. The further component may be a functional material or an excipient I filler or the like.

The further component is not limited to but may include any of ionic surfactants (such as alkyl sulfates, phosphates, alkyl ether sulfates, quaternary ammoniums salts), amphoteric surfactants (such as cocamidopropyl betaine), chelating agents (such as EDTA, silicates), bleaches, enzymes, anti-foaming agents, perfumes, optical brighteners, fabric softeners, colourants, gelling agents, anti-caking agents, salts, preservatives, and anti-corrosion agents.

In the present invention the polycarbonate block acts as the hydrophobe and the polyether block acts as the hydrophile. As a consequence, when producing a composition according to the first aspect of the invention, the starter molecule does not need to be a large hydrocarbon chain such as that found in palm oil alcohols and other long chain alcohols and can instead be short chain alcohols or other starters, which are used to initiate synthesis of the polycarbonate block with a carbonate catalyst, prior to synthesis of a polyether block with an ether catalyst. Lower alcohol starters are also less expensive and more likely to be environmentally sustainable. Alternatively, the unique combination of the polyether block having the same number or more repeat units than the polycarbonate block that can be used and solubilised in a water-based surfactant composition allows production via a mono-hydroxyl functional polyether that can be used as an initiator for synthesis of a polycarbonate block with a carbonate catalyst, creating a polycarbonate block polyether via an alternative route, with no need for a long or short chain alcohol starter. If this method is used for production, it is preferable to end-cap the polycarbonate block, for example via reaction with an anhydride, to provide stability towards basic conditions and prevent degradation of the polycarbonate block. Surprisingly, it has been found that use of a suitably balanced hydrophobic polycarbonate and hydrophilic polyether block provides an alternative surfactant with much greater flexibility in design that is not dependent on environmentally damaging higher alcohols. This allows surfactants to be produced with smaller terminal hydrocarbyl groups.

According to a further aspect of the present invention is provided a composition of the first aspect in the form of a a solid tablet for dissolving in water Preferably, the solid tablet is a dishwasher tablet. According to a further aspect of the invention there is also provided an aqueous composition comprising the polycarbonate block polyether of formula I as aforesaid, and water, and optionally further functional materials and/or excipients.

According to a further aspect of the invention there is also provided a composition of the first aspect for the treatment, appearance, cleaning, caring or conditioning of the person and/or animals, the home or any of its contents, foods, drinks and nutraceuticals.

Also provided in accordance with the invention is the use of the compositions of the first aspect for the treatment, appearance, cleaning, caring or conditioning of the person and/or animals, the home or any of its contents, foods, drinks and nutraceuticals.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Preferably the polycarbonate block polyether has greater than 10wt% CO2 incorporation, more typically, greater than 15, 20 or 21wt% CO2 incorporation. Preferably the polycarbonate block polyether has 10 to 40wt% CO2 incorporation, typically, 15 to 40wt% CO2 incorporation, more typically, 20 to 40wt% CO2 incorporation.

The epoxide in both the polycarbonate and polyether sections is independently selected from ethylene oxide (EO), propylene oxide (PO), butylene oxide, pentylene oxide, hexylene oxide, glycidyl ethers, glycidyl esters or glycidyl carbonates, or a mixture of two or more thereof. Preferably in the polycarbonate block the epoxide is ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, butylene oxide or a mixture thereof, preferably ethylene oxide or propylene oxide. Preferably in the polyether block the epoxide is ethylene oxide or propylene oxide or a mixture thereof, preferably ethylene oxide or propylene oxide, typically ethylene oxide.

It will also be appreciated that when a mixture of epoxides is used the epoxides will typically be statistically distributed along the polymer backbone.

Thus, when a mixture of epoxides is used the polycarbonate and the polyether blocks respectively may be referred to as a random copolymer or a statistical copolymer.

The identity of R ^e1 , R ^e2 R ^e3 , R ^e4 R ^e1 ’, R ^e2 ’, R ^e3 ’, and R ^e4 ’ will depend on the nature of the epoxide used to prepare the polycarbonate or polyether. However, when one of R ^e1 to R ^e4 or one of R ^e1 ’ to R ^e2 ’ is methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, or an ether, ester or carbonate group the remaining three groups are H. Preferably R ^e1 , R ^e2 R ^e3 , R ^e4 R ^e1 ’, R ^e2 ’, R ^e3 ’, and R ^e4 ’ are H.

It will also be appreciated that if a mixture of epoxides are used, then each occurrence of R ^e1 and/or R ^e2 (or R ^e3 and/or R ^e4 , R ^e1 ’ and/or R ^e2 ’ and R ^e3 ’ and/or R ^e4 ’) may not be the same, for example if a mixture of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide are used in the PC block, R ^e1 (or R ^e3 ) may be independently hydrogen or methyl, and R ^e2 (or R ^e4 ) may be independently hydrogen or methyl. The skilled person will understand that when the epoxide is asymmetric, the adjacent epoxide monomer units in the backbone may be head-to-tail linkages, head-to-head linkages, or tail-to- tail linkages.

Preferably, the polycarbonate block polyether has a molecular weight (Mn) in the range of from about 300 to 20,000 Da, more preferably in the range of from about 400 to 8000 Da, most preferably from about 500-6000 Da.

The polycarbonate block of the polycarbonate block polyether preferably has a molecular weight (Mn) in the range of from about 200 to 4000 Da, more preferably in the range of from about 200 to 2000 Da, most preferably from about 200 to 1000 Da, especially from about 400 to 800 Da.

The polyether block of the polycarbonate block polyether preferably has a molecular weight (Mn) in the range of from about 100 to 20,000 Da, more preferably of from about 200 to 10,000 Da, most preferably from about 200 to 5000 Da.

The Mn and hence the PDI of the polymers used in the compositions of the invention may be measured using Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC). For example, the GPC may be measured using an Agilent 1260 Infinity GPC machine with two Agilent PLgel p-m mixed-D columns in series. The samples may be measured at room temperature (293K) in THF with a flow rate of I mL/min against narrow polystyrene standards (e.g., polystyrene low EasiVials supplied by Agilent Technologies with a range of Mn from 405 to 49,450 g/mol). Optionally, the samples may be measured against polyethylene glycol) standards, such as polyethylene glycol EasiVials supplied by Agilent Technologies.

The polycarbonate block of the polycarbonate block polyether may have at least 50% carbonate linkages, preferably at least 60% carbonate linkages, preferably at least 70% carbonate linkages, preferably at least 76% carbonate linkages, preferably at least 80% carbonate linkages, more preferably at least 85% carbonate linkages, at least 90% carbonate linkages or at least 95% carbonate linkages.

The polycarbonate block of the polycarbonate block polyether may also comprise ether linkages. The polycarbonate block may have less than 50% ether linkages, preferably less than 40% ether linkages, preferably less than 30% ether linkages, preferably less than 24% ether linkages, preferably less than 20% ether linkages, more preferably less than 15% ether linkages, less than 10% ether linkages, less than 5% ether linkages, less than 3% ether linkages or less than 1 % ether linkages.

For the avoidance of doubt, where the polycarbonate block comprises ether linkages, the polycarbonate block will not solely comprise P repeat units of formula solely carbonate linkages, but will instead comprise a mixture of both carbonate linkages as shown, and ether linkages as shown for the PE block. P is the sum of carbonate linkages and ether linkages in the PC block. Each carbonate or ether linkage comprises a repeat unit that may be derived from an alkylene oxide moiety, i.e., Therefore, where ether linkages are present, P may be considered as the number of repeat alkylene oxide derived moieties in the PC block.

Optionally, the polycarbonate block may be a generally alternating polycarbonate residue. If the epoxide is asymmetric, then the polycarbonate may have between 0-100% head to tail linkages, preferably between 40-100% head to tail linkages, more preferably between 50-100%. The polycarbonate may have a statistical distribution of head to head, tail to tail and head to tail linkages in the order 1 :2:1 , indicating a non-stereoselective ring opening of the epoxide, or it may preferentially make head to tail linkages in the order of more than 50%, optionally more than 60%, more than 70%, more than 80%, or more than 90%.

Optionally, the polyether block comprises only ether linkages. Typically, the polyether block is at least 90% derived, typically, at least 95% derived, more typically, at least 99%, most typically, 100% derived from epoxides.

Typically, the polyether block has less than 40% carbonate linkages, typically, less than 30% carbonate linkages, typically, less than 20% carbonate linkages, more typically, less than 10% carbonate linkages, most typically less than 5%, less than 2% or less than 1 % carbonate linkages. The polyether block may have 0% carbonate linkages.

For the avoidance of doubt, where the polyether block comprises carbonate linkages, the polyether block will not solely comprise Q repeat units of formula solely ether linkages, but will instead comprise a mixture of both ether linkages as shown, and carbonate linkages as shown for the PC block. Q is the sum of ether linkages and carbonate linkages in the PE block. Each ether or carbonate linkage comprises a repeat unit that may be derived from an alkylene oxide moiety, i.e., Therefore, where carbonate linkages are present in the PE block, Q may be considered as the number of repeat alkylene oxide derived moieties in the PE block.

Typically, the polycarbonate block is derived from epoxide and CO2, more typically, epoxide and CO2 provide at least 70% of the residues in the block, especially, at least 80% of the residues in the block, more especially, at least 90% of the residues in the block, most especially, the polycarbonate block at least 95% of the residues in the block are residues of epoxide and CO2. Most typically, the polycarbonate block includes ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide residues and optionally butylene oxide. At least 30% of the epoxide residues of the polycarbonate block may be ethylene oxide or propylene oxide residues, typically, at least 50% of the epoxide residues of the polycarbonate block are ethylene oxide or propylene oxide residues, more typically, at least 75% of the epoxide residues of the polycarbonate block are ethylene oxide or propylene oxide residues, most typically, at least 90% of the epoxide residues of the polycarbonate block are ethylene oxide or propylene oxide residues.

Typically, the polycarbonate block is derived from CO2 i.e., the carbonates incorporate CO2 residues. Typically, the polycarbonate block has between 70-100% carbonate linkages, more typically, 80-100%, most typically, 90-100%.

The value of P in Formula I does not exceed the value of Q. Preferably the ratio of Q to P is at or between 5:1 and 1 :1 , preferably between 2:1 and 1 :1 . By having P less than or equal to Q the solubility of the polycarbonate block polyether in water is improved. Preferably when the PC blocks derive from ethylene oxide the P:Q ratio is such that the carbonate blocks contribute at least about 50%w/w, preferably at least about 60%w/w of the composition. In this case PC weight contribution is most preferably from about 50%w/w up to about 66-67%w/w of the composition. Preferably when the PC blocks derive from propylene oxide the P:Q ratio is such that the carbonate blocks contribute at least about 25%w/w, preferably at least about 40%w/w, of the composition. In this case the PC weight contribution is most preferably from about 50%w/w up to about 70%w/w of the composition. Controlling the w/w carbonate content permits control over water solubility, renewable carbon content and amphiphilicity, which relates to surface active performance. We find that the more preferred polycarbonate block polyethers in compositions in accordance with the invention comprise 50-70 wt% carbonate blocks, even more preferred is 55- 70 wt%. The value of P is typically between 3 and 100, preferably between 3 and 50, 3 and 20 or 3 and 15. The value of Q is typically between 3 and 200, preferably between 3 and 100, 3 and 50, 5 and 20 or 5 and 15. The value of P may be between 20 and 100. The value of Q may be between 20 and 200.

Z ¹ is R, R-O, R-C(O)-O or R-O-C(O)-O. Preferably Z ¹ is R-C(O)-O or R-O-C(O)-O. Preferably Z ¹ is a short (e.g. C2-C5 or C2-C4) chain carbonate or ester group.

R is a Ci to C11 alkyl group. R may be a linear or branched Ci to Cn alkyl group. Preferably R is a C2 to C11 alkyl group, more preferably a C2 to Ce or a C2 to C5 alkyl group, typically a C2 to C4 alkyl group. Preferably R is a linear alkyl group, preferably a linear C2-C11 alkyl group. Preferably R is derived from a Ci to Cn alcohol, preferably a C2 to Ce alcohol, typically a C2 to C5 alcohol or a C2 to C4 alcohol. Preferably R is derived from a linear Ci to Cn alcohol, preferably a linear C2 to Ce or a C2 to C5 alcohol, typically a linear C2 to C4 alcohol or a linear C2 to C4 alcohol. Preferably the Ci to C11 alcohol is derived from renewable feedstocks. For example, the alcohol may be bioethanol etc.

Z ² is H, R, R-(O)C or R-O-(O)C, preferably Z ² is H or methyl, most preferably, Z ² is H.

In certain embodiments R ^e1 , R ^e2 , R ^e3 , and R ^e4 may independently be selected from H, methyl, or ethyl; R ^e1 ’, R ^e2 ’, R ^e3 ’, and R ^e4 ’ may independently be selected from H, methyl, or ethyl, Z ² may be methyl or H and the polyether block may have less than 2% carbonate linkages.

The polycarbonate block polyether may be suitable for use in an aqueous surfactant composition. Thus, the polycarbonate block polyether may be provided in the form of a solid tablet for dissolving in water, for example a dishwasher tablet. Thus, according to a second aspect of the invention is provided a solid tablet for dissolving in water comprising a composition according to the first aspect of the invention. Typically, the solid tablet is a dishwasher tablet. The polycarbonate block polyether may be present in the solid tablet at a level of 0.1 to 50wt%, preferably 0.1 to 15wt%, more preferably 5 to 15wt%.

According to a third aspect of the invention is also provided an aqueous surfactant composition comprising the polycarbonate block polyether as aforesaid, and water. Preferably the polycarbonate block polyether has a solubility in water of at least 0.25g/mol. Preferably the composition is a solution, i.e., the polycarbonate block polyether is present in solution.

Preferably the polycarbonate block polyether is present in solution at a level of > 0.1wt%. Preferably greater than 2wt%, more preferably greater than 5wt%. Preferably between 0.1 and 50wt%, typically between 2 and 30wt%, more typically between 5 and 15wt%.

The solid tablet or aqueous surfactant composition may further comprise any other suitable additives. Suitable additives are not limited to but may include ionic surfactants (such as alkyl sulfates, phosphates, alkyl ether sulfates, quaternary ammoniums salts), amphoteric surfactants (such as cocamidopropyl betaine), chelating agents (such as EDTA, silicates), bleaches, enzymes, anti-foaming agents, perfumes, optical brighteners, fabric softeners, colourants, gelling agents, anti-caking agents, salts, preservatives, and anti-corrosion agents.

According to a further aspect of the invention there is also provided a process for producing a composition according to the first aspect of the invention the method comprising the steps of (i) reacting carbon dioxide and an epoxide in the presence of a carbonate catalyst, and a monofunctional starter compound to form a polycarbonate compound and (ii) reaction of the polycarbonate compound of step (i) with an epoxide and an ether catalyst to produce the polycarbonate block polyether of formula I as herein described, before combining with at least one other material to form a composition according to the first aspect of the invention.

The monofunctional starter may be a Ci to Cn alcohol or a Ci to Cn carboxylic acid. Typically, the monofunctional starter is a Ci to Cn alcohol, preferably a C2 to Cn alcohol, typically a C2-6 alcohol or C2-4 alcohol.

The epoxide is selected from ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, butylene oxide, pentylene oxide, hexylene oxide, glycidyl ethers, glycidyl esters or glycidyl carbonates or a mixture of two or more thereof. Typically, the epoxide is selected from ethylene oxide, propylene oxide or a mixture thereof, preferably ethylene oxide.

The carbonate catalyst may be heterogeneous or homogeneous.

The carbonate catalyst may be a mono-metallic, bimetallic, or multi-metallic homogeneous complex or it may be a non-metallic Lewis acid-base pair (for example based upon combination of boranes and ammonium salts, as disclosed in patents WO2016203408, WO2020121262, WO2021005470).

The carbonate catalyst may comprise phenol or phenolate ligands.

Typically, the carbonate catalyst may be a bimetallic complex comprising phenol or phenolate ligands. The two metals may be the same or different.

The carbonate catalyst may be a catalyst of formula (IV): wherein:

M is a metal cation represented by M-(L) _V ; x is an integer from 1 to 4, preferably x is 1 or 2; a multidentate ligand or plurality of multidentate ligands;

L is a coordinating ligand, for example, L may be a neutral ligand, or an anionic ligand that is capable of ring-opening an epoxide; v is an integer that independently satisfies the valency of each M, and/or the preferred coordination geometry of each M or is such that the complex represented by formula (IV) above has an overall neutral charge. For example, each v may independently be 0, 1 , 2 or 3, e.g., v may be 1 or 2. When v > 1 , each L may be different.

The term multidentate ligand includes bidentate, tridentate, tetradentate and higher dentate ligands. Each multidentate ligand may be a macrocyclic ligand or an open ligand.

Such catalysts include those in WO2010022388 (metal salens and derivatives, metal porphyrins, corroles and derivatives, metal tetraaza annulenes and derivatives), W02010028362 (metal salens and derivatives, metal porphyrins, corroles and derivatives, metal tetraaza annulenes and derivatives), W02008136591 (metal salens), WO2011105846 (metal salens), WO2014148825 (metal salens), WO2013012895 (metal salens), EP2258745A1 (metal porphyrins and derivatives), JP2008081518A (metal porphyrins and derivatives), CN101412809 (metal salens and derivatives), WO2019126221 (metal aminotriphenol complexes), US9018318 (metal beta- diiminate complexes), US6133402A (metal beta-diiminate complexes) and US8278239 (metal salens and derivatives), the entire contents of which, especially, insofar as they relate to suitable carbonate catalysts for the reaction of CO2 and epoxide, in the presence of a starter and optionally a solvent as defined herein are incorporated herein by reference.

Preferably the carbonate catalysts are bimetallic phenolate catalysts. Suitable bimetallic phenolate complexes are those described in W02009/130470, WO2013/034750, WO2016/012786, WO2016/012785, WO2012037282 and WO2019048878A1 , the entire contents of which, especially, insofar as they relate to suitable carbonate catalysts for the reaction of CO2 and epoxide, in the presence of a starter and optionally a solvent as defined herein are incorporated herein by reference.

The ether catalyst may be any catalyst suitable for polymerising epoxides to form polyethers. Suitable ether catalysts include DMC catalysts, metal alkoxides, boron-based catalysts such as BF3 or BH3, anionic catalysts such as KOH, cationic, acidic or superacidic catalysts (such as HSbFe, CF3SO3H), PFs, activated monomer catalysts, organic catalysts such as imidazole or phosphazene reagents and metallosalenate catalysts. Preferably the ether catalyst is a DMC catalyst. Examples of DMC catalysts which can be used in the process of the invention include those described in US 3,427,256, US 5,536,883, US 6,291 ,388, US 6,486,361 , US 6,608,231 , US 7,008,900, US 5,482,908, US 5,780,584, US 5,783,513, US 5,158,922, US 5,693,584, US 7,811 ,958, US 6,835,687, US 6,699,961 , US 6,716,788, US 6,977,236, US 7,968,754, US 7,034,103, US 4,826,953, US 4,500 704, US 7,977,501 , US 9,315,622, EP-A-1568414, EP-A- 1529566, and WO 2015/022290, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.

The ratio of the carbonate catalyst to the ether catalyst may be in the range of from about 300:1 to about 1 :100, for example, from about 120:1 to about 1 :75, such as from about 40:1 to about 1 :50, e.g. from about 30:1 to about 1 :30 such as from about 20:1 to about 1 :1 , for example from about 10:1 to about 2:1 , e.g. from about 5:1 to about 1 :5. These ratios are mass ratios.

The process may be carried out in a one pot reactor or may be a dual reactor process.

The polycarbonate block polyether may be manufactured in a multiple reactor system; the system comprising a first and second reactor wherein a first reaction takes place in the first reactor and a second reaction takes place in the second reactor; wherein the first reaction is the reaction of a carbonate catalyst with CO2 and epoxide, in the presence of a monofunctional starter compound, and optionally a solvent, to produce a polycarbonate compound and the second reaction is the semi-batch or continuous reaction of an ether catalyst with the polycarbonate compound of the first reaction and epoxide to produce the polycarbonate block polyether, before combining with at least one other material to yield the composition of the first aspect of the invention.

Typically, the reaction mixture from the first step contains less than 5% CO2 by weight of the reaction mixture prior to the second step, preferably less than 2.5%, such as less than 1 .0%, less than 0.5% or less than 0.1 %. Typically, the second step is carried out without the independent addition of CO2, however it can be carried out under a pressure of CO2. The polyether block produced in the second step may have less than 40% carbonate linkages, preferably less than 30% carbonate linkages or less than 20% carbonate linkages, more preferably less than 10%, less than 5%, less than 2% or less than 1 % carbonate linkages. Preferably the polyether block produced in the second step is substantially free from carbonate linkages.

Typically, therefore the second step is carried out substantially in the absence of CO2.

Accordingly, by substantially in the absence of CO2 is meant that the second step is carried out in the presence of less than 4% CO2 by weight, preferably less than 2%, such as less than 1 .0%, less than 0.5% or less than 0.1 % by weight of total reactants, catalyst, and products in the second step.

Adding the components in the separate steps may be useful to increase activity of the catalysts and may lead to a more efficient process, compared with a process in which all of the materials are provided at the start of the process. Large amounts of some of the components present throughout the process may reduce efficiency of the catalysts. Reacting this material in separate steps may prevent this reduced efficiency of the catalysts and/or may optimise catalyst activity. The reaction conditions of each step can be tailored to optimise the reactions for each catalyst. The ether catalyst may be pre-activated prior to addition in the second step. Such pre-activation may be achieved by mixing one or both catalysts with epoxide (and optionally other components). Pre-activation of the ether catalyst is useful as it enables safe control of the reaction (preventing uncontrolled increase of unreacted monomer content) and removes unpredictable activation periods.

Although typically any residual CO2 from the first step may be removed from the crude reaction product of the first step prior to commencement of the second step such that the second step is carried out without CO2, it will be appreciated that a small amount of CO2 may be present in the reaction mixture in the second step as an unused reagent of the first step. Alternatively, both steps may be carried out under a pressure of CO2.

The reactions of the present invention may be carried out in the presence of a solvent; however, it will also be appreciated that the processes may also be carried out in the absence of a solvent. When a solvent is present, it may be toluene, hexane, t-butyl acetate, diethyl carbonate, dimethyl carbonate, dioxane, dichlorobenzene, methylene chloride, propylene carbonate, ethylene carbonate, acetone, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, n-butyl acetate, tetrahydrofuran (THF), etc. The solvent may be toluene, hexane, acetone, ethyl acetate and n-butyl acetate.

Adding the components in the separate reactions and reactors may be useful to increase activity of the catalysts and may lead to a more efficient process, compared with a process in which all of the materials are provided at the start of one reaction. Large amounts of some of the components present throughout the reaction may reduce efficiency of the catalysts. Reacting this material in separate reactors may prevent this reduced efficiency of the catalysts and/or may optimise catalyst activity. The reaction conditions of each reactor can be tailored to optimise the reactions for each catalyst.

Additionally, not loading the total amount of each component at the start of the reaction and having the catalyst for the first reaction in a separate reactor to the catalyst for the second reaction, may lead to even catalysis, and more uniform polymer products. This in turn may lead to polymers having a narrower molecular weight distribution, desired ratio, and distribution along the chain of ether to carbonate linkages, and/or improved stability.

Having the reactions with the two different catalysts separate and mixing only certain components in the first reaction and adding the remainder in the second reaction may also be useful, for example by adding a pre-activated ether catalyst or adding the reaction mixture to a pre-activated ether catalyst.

Preferred ether catalysts and carbonate catalysts are as described above.

The first reaction may be carried out in more than one reactor that feeds the crude reaction mixture into the second reaction, and reactor, continuously. Preferably, the second reaction is run in a continuous mode. The product of the first reaction may be stored for subsequent later use in the second reactor.

The two reactors may be located in a series, or the reactors may be nested. Each reactor may individually be a stirred tank reactor, a loop reactor, a tube reactor, or other standard reactor design.

Alternatively, the polycarbonate block polyether may be formed by reacting a monofunctional polyether starter compound with an epoxide and carbon dioxide in the presence of a carbonate catalyst. Hence, according to a further aspect of the invention is provided a method of producing a composition according to the first aspect of the invention, wherein a mono-hydroxy functional polyether is reacted (i) with a carbonate catalyst, epoxide and CO2 and (ii) with an end-capping group, such as an anhydride, to produce the polycarbonate block polyether, before combining with a least one other material to yield the composition of the invention. Typically, the resulting polycarbonate block is end capped with any suitable functional group. End capping the polycarbonate block stabilises the polycarbonate block polyether. Typically, the polycarbonate block is end capped with a suitable anhydride, typically an alkyl anhydride. The monofunctional polyether starter compound may be any suitable monofunctional polyether starter compound, typically a monofunctional PEG compound.

Definitions

The term "alkyl," as used herein, unless otherwise defined refers to saturated, linear- or branched- chain hydrocarbon radicals derived by removal of a single hydrogen atom from an aliphatic moiety. An alkyl group may be a “C1-20 alkyl group”, that is an alkyl group that is a straight or branched chain with 1 to 20 carbons. The alkyl group therefore has 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 carbon atoms. Preferably, an alkyl group is a C1-15 alkyl, preferably a C1-12 alkyl, more preferably a C1-10 alkyl, even more preferably a C1-8 alkyl, even more preferably a C1-6 alkyl group.

Unless defined otherwise herein, an ester group is optionally -OC(O)R ¹ - or -C(O)OR ¹ - wherein R ¹ can be an aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, alicyclic, heteroalicyclic, aryl or heteroaryl group. R ¹ may be unsubstituted aliphatic, alicyclic or aryl. Optionally R ¹ is methyl, ethyl, propyl, or phenyl. The ester group may be terminated by an aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, alicyclic, heteroalicyclic, aryl or heteroaryl group. It will be appreciated that if R ¹ is hydrogen, then the group defined by - OC(O)R ¹ - or -C(0)OR ¹ - will be a carboxylic acid group.

A carbonate group is optionally -OC(O)OR ² wherein R ² can be hydrogen, an aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, alicyclic, heteroalicyclic, aryl or heteroaryl group. R ² may be optionally substituted aliphatic, alicyclic or aryl. Optionally R ² is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl (for example n- butyl, isobutyl, or tert-butyl), phenyl, pentafluorophenyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl, tridecyl, tetradecyl, pentadecyl, hexadecyl, heptadecyl, octadecyl, nonadecyl, eicosyl, trifluoromethyl, cyclohexyl, benzyl or adamantyl. Optionally R ² is methyl, ethyl, propyl, or phenyl. It will be appreciated that if R ² is hydrogen, then the group defined by -OC(O)OR ² will be a carbonic acid group.

A carbonate functional group is -OC(O)O- and may be derived from a suitable source. Generally, it is derived from CO2.

An ether group is optionally -OR ³ wherein R ³ can be an aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, alicyclic, heteroalicyclic, aryl or heteroaryl group. R ³ may be unsubstituted aliphatic, alicyclic or aryl. Optionally R ³ is methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl (for example n-butyl, isobutyl, or tert-butyl), phenyl, pentafluorophenyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl, tridecyl, tetradecyl, pentadecyl, hexadecyl, heptadecyl, octadecyl, nonadecyl, eicosyl, trifluoromethyl or adamantyl. Optionally R ³ is methyl, ethyl, propyl, or phenyl.

As used herein, the term “optionally substituted” means that one or more of the hydrogen atoms in the optionally substituted moiety is replaced by a suitable substituent. Unless otherwise indicated, an "optionally substituted” group may have a suitable substituent at each substitutable position of the group, and when more than one position in any given structure may be substituted with more than one substituent selected from a specified group, the substituent may be either the same or different at every position. Combinations of substituents envisioned by this invention are preferably those that result in the formation of stable compounds. The term "stable", as used herein, refers to compounds that are chemically feasible and can exist for long enough at room temperature i.e. (16-25°C) to allow for their detection, isolation and/or use in chemical synthesis.

Substituents may be depicted as attached to a bond that crosses a bond in a ring of the depicted molecule. This convention indicates that one or more of the substituents may be attached to the ring at any available position (usually in place of a hydrogen atom of the structure). In cases where an atom of a ring has two substitutable positions, two groups (either the same or different) may be present on that atom.

Preferred optional substituents for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, halogen, hydroxy, nitro, carboxylate, carbonate, alkoxy, aryloxy, alkylthio, arylthio, heteroaryloxy, alkylaryl, amino, amido, imine, nitrile, silyl, silyl ether, ester, sulfoxide, sulfonyl, acetylide, phosphinate, sulfonate or optionally substituted aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, alicyclic, heteroalicyclic, aryl or heteroaryl groups (for example, optionally substituted by halogen, hydroxy, nitro, carbonate, alkoxy, aryloxy, alkylthio, arylthio, amino, imine, nitrile, silyl, sulfoxide, sulfonyl, phosphinate, sulfonate or acetylide).

Particularly preferred optional substituents for use in the present invention are selected from nitro, C1-12 alkoxy (e.g., OMe, OEt, O'Pr, O ⁿ Bu, O*Bu), Ce-is aryl, C2-14 heteroaryl, C2-14 heteroalicyclic, C1-6 alkyl, C1-6 haloalkyl, F, Cl, Br, I and OH, wherein in each of said C1-12 alkoxy, Ce-is aryl, C2-14 heteroaryl, C2-14 heteroalicyclic, C1-6 alkyl and C1-6 haloalkyl group may be optionally substituted by an optional substituent as defined herein. The term “continuous” used herein can be defined as the mode of addition of materials or may refer to the nature of the reaction method as a whole.

In terms of continuous mode of addition, the relevant materials are continually or constantly added during the course of a reaction. This may be achieved by, for example, adding a stream of material with either a constant flow rate or with a variable flow rate. In other words, the one or more materials are added in an essentially non-stop fashion. It is noted, however, that non-stop addition of the materials may need to be briefly interrupted for practical considerations, for example to refill or replace a container of the materials from which these materials are being added.

In terms of a whole reaction being continuous, the reaction may be conducted over a long period of time, such as a number of days, weeks, months, etc. In such a continuous reaction, reaction materials may be continually topped-up and/or products of the reaction may be tapped-off. It will be appreciated that although catalysts may not be consumed during a reaction, catalysts may in any case require topping-up, since tapping-off may deplete the amount of catalyst present.

A continuous reaction may employ continuous addition of materials.

A continuous reaction may employ a discontinuous (i.e., batch-wise or semi batch-wise) addition of materials

The term series used herein refers to when two or more reactors are connected so that the crude reaction mixture can flow from the first reactor to the second reactor.

The term nested used herein refers to when two or more reactors are configured so that one is located within the other. For example, in the present invention, when the second reactor is located inside the first reactor, allowing the conditions of both reactors to influence the other.

Machine Dish Wash Compositions

Compositions of the invention include those in the form of a solid tablet preferably a dishwasher tablet. Dishwasher tablets are generally used in dishwashing machines and are also referred to herein as “machine dishwasher tablets”.

Machine dishwasher compositions of the invention may be in any other suitable form, such as in the form of a liquid (e.g. gel), powder or a mixture thereof (e.g. a multi-compartmental capsule). They may be in unit-dose or non-unit dose form. Examples of unit-dose forms are tablets and capsules.

A machine dishwash composition is preferably provided as a water-soluble or water-dispersible unit dose. Particularly preferred unit doses are in the form of pouches, which comprise at least one further non-shape stable ingredient, such as a liquid and/or powder; or in the form of tablets. For ease of use, the unit dose is sized and shaped as to fit in the dosing cup of a conventional domestic machine dishwasher. In a preferred embodiment, the unit-dose machine dishwash composition has a unit weight of 5 to 50 grams, more preferably a unit weight of 10 to 30 grams, even more preferably a unit weight of 12 to 25 grams. Advantageous unit dose pouches preferably have more than one compartment. Advantageous unit dose tablets are those which have more than one visually distinct tablet region. Such regions can be formed by e.g. two distinct (colored) layers or a tablet having a main body and a distinct insert, such as forming a nested-egg. However oriented, one benefit of using multi-compartmental pouches/ multi-region tablets is that it can be used to reduce/prevent undesired chemical reactions between two or more ingredients during storage by physical segregation.

Preferably a unit dose dishwash composition is wrapped to improve hygiene and consumer safety. The wrapper advantageously is based on water-soluble film which preferably a polyvinylalcohol (PVA) based film. Such wrapping prevents direct contact of the composition with the skin of the consumer when placing the unit dose in the dosing cup/holder of a e.g. machine dishwasher. A further benefit of course is that the consumer also does not need to remove a water-soluble wrapping before use. pH profile

In case of machine dishwash composition, the composition advantageously provides a pH of a solution of 1 wt.% of the composition in water as measured at 25 degrees Celsius of from 7.0 to 12.0, more preferably of from 8.0 to 11.0 and even more preferably of from 8.5 to 10.5.

Additional Ingredients in case of machine dishwash compositions

Below are Additional Ingredients in case of machine dishwash compositions, preferably solid tablet compositions.

Non-ionic surfactants

In case of machine dishwash compositions, these may further comprise further non-ionic surfactants, preferably the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. Preferably low- foaming nonionic surfactants are used particularly from the group of alkoxylated alcohols. Alkoxylated, advantageously ethoxylated, in particular primary alcohols with preferably 8 to 18 C atoms and on average 1 to 12 mol of ethylene oxide (EO) per mol of alcohol, in which the alcohol residue may be linear or preferably methyl-branched in position 2 or may contain linear and methyl-branched residues in the mixture, as are usually present in oxo alcohol residues, are preferably used as nonionic surfactants. In particular, however, alcohol ethoxylates with linear residues prepared from alcohols of natural origin with 12 to 18 C atoms, for example from coconut, palm, tallow fat or oleyl alcohol, and on average 2 to 8 mol of EO per mol of alcohol are preferred. The preferred ethoxylated alcohols include for example C12-14 alcohols with 3 EO to 4 EO, C9-12 alcohol with 7 EO, C13-15 alcohols with 3 EO, 5 EO, 7 EO or 8 EO, C12-18 alcohols with 3 EO, 5 EO or 7 EO and mixtures of these, such as mixtures of C12-14 alcohol with 3 EO and C12-19 alcohol with 5 EO. Preferred tallow fatty alcohols with more than 12 EO have from 60 to 100 EO, and more preferably from 70 to 90 EO. Particularly preferred tallow fatty alcohols with more than 12 EO are tallow fatty alcohols with 80 EO. Nonionic surfactants from the group of alkoxylated alcohols, particularly preferably from the group of mixed alkoxylated alcohols and in particular from the group of EO-AO-EO nonionic surfactants, are likewise particularly preferentially used. Preferably used nonionic surfactants originate from the groups comprising alkoxylated nonionic surfactants, in particular ethoxylated primary alcohols and mixtures of these surfactants with structurally complex surfactants such as polyoxypropylene/ polyoxyethylene/ polyoxypropylene (PO/EO/PO). Such (PO/EO/PO) nonionic surfactants are furthermore distinguished by good foam control.

In case of machine dishwash compositions, the most preferred further nonionic surfactants are according to the formula: wherein n is from 0 to 5 and m from 10 to 50, more preferably wherein n is from 0 to 3 and m is from 15 to 40, and even more preferably wherein n is 0 and m is from 18 to 25. Surfactants according to this formula were particularly useful in reducing spotting of dishware treated in a machine dish washer. Preferably at least 50 wt. % of the nonionic surfactant comprised by the composition of the invention is nonionic surfactant according to this formula. Such nonionic surfactants are commercially available, for example under the tradename Dehypon WET (Supplier: BASF) and Genapol EC50 (Supplier Clariant).

In case of machine dishwash compositions, the composition preferably comprises from 0.1 to 20 wt. % of a nonionic surfactant or a mixture of two or more non-ionic surfactants. The preferred amount of total non-ionic surfactant if from 1 to 18 wt. %, more preferably from 4 to 16 wt. % and even more preferably from 6 to 12 wt.%. Such levels are considered optimal. The nonionic surfactant is preferably present in amounts of 25 to 90 wt. % based on the total weight of the surfactant system. Anionic surfactants can be present for example in amounts in the range from 5 to 40 wt. % of the surfactant system. In case of machine dishwash composition, the composition may comprise one or more further surfactants. Anionic surfactants may be chosen from the anionic surfactants described "Surface Active Agents" Vol. 1 , by Schwartz & Perry, Interscience 1949, Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, Interscience 1958, in the current edition of "McCutcheon’s Emulsifiers and Detergents" published by Manufacturing Confectioners Company or in "Tenside-Taschenbuch", H. Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981 . Preferably the surfactants used are saturated. Amineoxide surfactants may also be used in the present invention as anti-redeposition surfactant. Examples of suitable amineoxide surfactants are C10-C18 alkyl dimethylamine oxide and C10-C18 acylamido alkyl dimethylamine oxide.

Anionic surfactants

In case of machine dishwash composition, if present the amount of anionic surfactant is preferably is at most 5 wt. %, and more preferably at most 2 wt. % and even more preferably at most 1 .5 wt. %. Examples of suitable anionic surfactants are methylester sulphonates or sodium lauryl sulphate. Advantageously the composition comprises essentially no anionic surfactant.

Builders

Builder materials may be selected from 1) calcium sequestrant materials, 2) precipitating materials, 3) calcium ion-exchange materials and 4) mixtures thereof.

Examples of calcium ion-exchange builder materials include the various types of water-insoluble crystalline or amorphous aluminosilicates, of which zeolites are known representatives, e.g. zeolite A, zeolite B (also known as zeolite P), zeolite C, zeolite X, zeolite Y and also the zeolite P-type as described in EP-A-0,384,070. Zeolite and carbonate (carbonate (including bicarbonate and sesquicarbonate) are preferred further builders. The builder may be crystalline aluminosilicate, preferably an alkali metal aluminosilicate, more preferably a sodium aluminosilicate. This is typically present at a level of less than 15 wt. %. Aluminosilicates are materials having the general formula: 0.8-1 .5 M2O. AI2O3. 0.8-6 SiC>2, where M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium. These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g. The preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1 .5-3.5 SiC>2 units in the formula above. They can be prepared readily by reaction between sodium silicate and sodium aluminate, as amply described in the literature. The ratio of surfactants to alumuminosilicate (where present) is preferably greater than 5:2, more preferably greater than 3:1 .

Alkali carbonate is appreciated in view of its double function as builder and buffer and is preferably present in the composition. The preferred amount of alkali carbonate in the composition is from 2 to 75 wt.%, more preferably from 10 to 50 wt.% and even more preferably from 20 to 40 wt.%. Such level of alkali carbonate provides good Ca ²⁺ and Mg ²⁺ ion scavenging for most types of water hardness levels, as well as other builder effects, such as providing good buffering capacity. The preferred alkali carbonates are sodium- and/or potassium carbonate of which sodium carbonate is particularly preferred. The alkali carbonate present in the composition of the invention can be present as such or as part of a more complex ingredient (e.g. sodium carbonate in sodium percarbonate).

Aminopolycarboxylate

Aminopolycarboxylates are well known in the detergent industry and sometimes referred to as aminopolycarboxylic acids chelants. They are generally appreciated as being strong builders. Suitable aminopolycarboxylic acids include glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA), methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA), ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS), iminodisuccinic acid (IDS), iminodimalic acid (IDM), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), iminodiacetic acid (IDA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid (HEIDA) aspartic acid diethoxysuccinic acid (AES) aspartic acid-

N,N-diacetic acid (ASDA) , hydroxyethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid (HEDTA), hydroxyethylethylene-diaminetriacetic acid (HEEDTA) , iminodifumaric (IDF), iminoditartaric acid (IDT), iminodimaleic acid (IDMAL), ethylenediaminedifumaric acid (EDDF), ethylenediaminedimalic acid (EDDM), ethylenediamineditartaric acid (EDDT), ethylenediaminedimaleic acid and (EDDMAL), dipicolinic acid.

Preferred aminopolycarboxylates are GLDA, MGDA, EDDS, IDS, IDM or a mixture thereof, more preferred are GLDA, MGDA, EDDS or a mixture thereof and even more preferred are GLDA and MGDA or a mixture thereof. Of these GLDA is especially preferred as it can be made from bio-based materials (e.g. monosodium glutamate, which itself can be made as by-product from corn fermentation). Also, GLDA itself is highly biodegradable. MGDA is more preferred in view of it being somewhat less hygroscopic, which improves stability of the composition during storage.

If present the dishwash composition preferably comprises from 0.5 to 40 wt. % free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate. A particularly preferred amount of free acid equivalent of aminopolycarboxylate is from 0.5 to 20 wt. %, even more preferably from 1 .0 to 15 wt. %, still even more preferably from 2.0 to 10 wt. % and still even more preferably from 3.0 to 8 wt.%.

The dish wash composition beneficially is phosphate-free, i.e., contains at most 1.0 wt. %, preferably at most 0.8 wt.%, more preferably at most 0.5 wt. %, even more preferably at most

O.2 wt.% of phosphate and still even more preferably contains essentially no phosphate. The dishwash composition beneficially is phosphonate-free i.e., contains at most 1.0 wt. % of phosphonate, preferably at most 0.8 wt. %, more preferably at most 0.5 wt. %, even more preferably at most 0.2 wt. % of phosphonate and still even more preferably contains essentially no phosphonate. Examples of phosphonates and phosphates are 1-hydroxyethane-1 ,1- diphosphonic acid (HEDP), diethylenetriamine-penta (methylenephosphonic acid) (DTPMP), ethylenediaminetetra-methylenephosphonate (EDTMP), tripolyphosphate and pyrophosphate. Organic Acid

Inclusion of further organic acids and/or their corresponding salts (not being aminopolycarboxylic acids or hydroxamic acids) is beneficial in providing improved detergency whilst capable of being made from renewable materials (e.g. plant-based) and readily biodegradable. Said further organic acid used in dishwash compositions of the invention can be any organic acid. Particularly good results were achieved with organic acids being polyacids (i.e. acids having more than one carboxylic acid group), and more particularly with di- or tricarboxylic organic acids. The organic acids used in the invention have an average molecular mass of at most 500 Dalton, more preferably of at most 400 Dalton and most preferably of at most 300 Dalton, the molecular mass being based on the free acid equivalent. In any case, preferably the organic acid is not a polymer-based acid. The organic acid employed in accordance with the invention preferably comprises 3 to 25 carbon atoms, more preferably 4 to 15 carbon atoms. In view of consumer acceptance and reducing environmental impact, the organic acids preferably are those which are also found naturally occurring, such as in plants. As such, organic acids of note are acetic acid, citric acid, aspartic acid, lactic acid, adipic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, saccharic acids, their salts, or mixtures thereof. Of these, of particular interest are citric acid, aspartic acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, gluconic acid, their salts, or mixtures thereof. Citric acid was found highly advantageous. Citric acid is naturally occurring, highly biodegradable as well as providing added builder activity and disintegration properties.

Advantageously dishwash compositions of the invention comprise a free acid equivalent of organic acid of from 1 to 30 wt. %, more preferably of from 5 to 20 wt. % and even more preferably from 8.0 to 15 wt.%. Preferred salt forms of the further organic acid are alkali metal salts and beneficially their sodium salts.

Bleach

A dishwash composition of the invention preferably comprises from 0.1 to 25 wt. % of bleach. Inorganic and/or organic bleaches can be used. Bleach may be selected from peroxides, organic peracids, salts of organic peracids and combinations thereof.

Advantageously the bleach is selected from peroxides (including peroxide salts such as sodium percarbonate), organic peracids, salts of organic peracids and combinations thereof. More preferably, the bleach is a peroxide. Most preferably, the bleach is a percarbonate. Further preferred, the bleach is a coated percarbonate. More preferred amounts of bleach are from 1.0 to 25 wt.%, even more preferably at from 2.0 to 20 wt. % and still even more preferably from 5 to 15 wt.%.

Bleach Activators

A dishwash composition of the invention preferably comprises one or more bleach activators such as peroxyacid bleach precursors. Peroxyacid bleach precursors are well known in the art. As non-limiting examples can be named N, N, N', N'-tetraacetyl ethylene diamine (TAED), sodium nonanoyloxybenzene sulphonate (SNOBS), sodium benzoyloxybenzene sul phonate (SBOBS) and the cationic peroxyacid precursor (SPCC) as described in US-A-4, 751 ,015. A beneficial amount of bleach activator is from 0.1 to 10 wt.%, more preferably from 0.5 to 5 wt.% and even more preferably from 1 .0 to 4 wt. %.

Bleach catalyst

Bleach catalysts function by oxidizing typically via peroxide or a peracid to form a bleaching species. They require the presence of an oxidizable soil so that they can be reduced back to the starting bleach activator state. A preferred bleach catalyst is a manganese complex of formula (A):

[LnMn _m X _P ] ^z Yq

.wherein Mn is manganese, which can be in the II, III, IV or V oxidation state or mixtures thereof; n and m are independent integers from 1-4; X represents a co-ordination or bridging species; p is an integer from 0-12; Y is a counter-ion, the type of which is dependent on the charge z of the complex which can be positive, zero or negative; q = z/[charge Y]; and L is a ligand being a macrocyclic organic molecule of the general formula: wherein R ¹ and R ² can each be zero, H, alkyl or aryl optionally substituted; t and t’ are each independent integers from 2-3; each D can independently be N, NR, PR, O or S, where R is H, alkyl or aryl, optionally substituted; and s is an integer from 2-5. Such bleach catalysts are described in EP0458397A2.

A beneficial amount of bleach catalyst is from 0.0001 to 2.0 wt. %, more preferably from 0.001 to 1 .5 wt.%, even more preferably from 0.01 to 1 .0 wt. %.

Enzymes

Dishwash compositions of the invention preferably comprise enzyme. Examples of enzymes suitable for use in the cleaning compositions of this invention include lipases, cellulases, peroxidases, proteases (proteolytic enzymes), amylases (amylolytic enzymes) and others. Well- known and preferred examples of these enzymes are proteases, amylases, cellulases, peroxidases, mannanases, pectate lyases and lipases and combinations thereof, of which proteolytic and amylolytic enzymes are the more preferred. Enzymes may be added in liquid, granular or in encapsulated form to the dishwash composition, but preferably are not encapsulated. If enzymes are present the dishwash composition preferably also contains enzyme stabilizers such as polyalcohols/borax, calcium, formate or protease inhibitors like 4- formylphenyl boronic acid. Preferred levels of protease are from 0.1 to 10 mg, more preferably from 0.2 to 5 mg, most preferably 0.4 to about 4 mg active protease per gram of the dishwash composition. Preferred levels of amylase are from 0.01 to 5, more preferably from 0.02 to 2, most preferably from 0.05 to about 1 mg active amylase per gram of the dishwash composition.

Dispersing polymers

A dishwash composition of the invention beneficially comprises dispersing polymer. Dispersing polymers can be chosen from the group of anti-spotting agents and/or anti-scaling agents. Examples of suitable anti-spotting polymeric agents include hydrophobically modified polycarboxylic acids such as Acusol™460 ND (ex Dow) and Alcosperse™747 by Nouryon, whereas also synthetic clays, and preferably those synthetic clays which have a high surface area can be useful to reduce spotting, in particular those formed where soil and dispersed remnants are present at places where the water collects on the floor when the water subsequently evaporates.

Suitable anti-scaling agents are water soluble dispersing polymers prepared from an allyloxybenzenesulfonic acid monomer, a methallyl sulfonic acid monomer, a copolymerizable nonionic monomer and a copolymerizable olefin ically unsaturated carboxylic acid monomer as described in US5547612 or known as acrylic sulphonated polymers as described in EP851022. Polymers of this type include polyacrylate with methyl methacrylate, sodium methallyl sulphonate and sulphophenol methallyl ether such as Alcosperse™240 supplied (Nouryon). Also suitable is a terpolymer containing polyacrylate with 2-acrylamido-2 methylpropane sulphonic acid such as Acumer 3100 supplied by Dow. As an alternative, polymers and copolymers of acrylic acid having a molecular weight between 500 and 20,000 can also be used, such as homo-polymeric polycarboxylic acid compounds with acrylic acid as the monomeric unit. The average weight of such homo-polymers in the acid form preferably ranges from 1 ,000 to 100,000 particularly from 3,000 to 10,000 e.g. Sokolan ™ PA 25 from BASF or Acusol™425 from Dow. Also suitable are polycarboxylates co-polymers derived from monomers of acrylic acid and maleic acid, such as CP5 from BASF. The average molecular weight of these polymers in the acid form preferably ranges from 4,000 to 70,000. Modified polycarboxylates like Sokalan™ CP50 from BASF or Alcoguard™4160 from Nouryon may also be used. Mixture of anti-scaling agents may also be used. Particularly useful is a mixture of organic phosphonates and polymers of acrylic acid.

If present, the preferred amount of dispersing polymer is from 0.1 to 6 wt. %, more preferably from 0.2 to 4 wt. %, and even more preferably from 0.3 to 2 wt. %.

Perfume and colorants

Machine dish wash compositions preferably comprise one or more colorants, one or more perfumes and more advantageously a mixture of at least one colorant and at least one perfume. Colorants are beneficially present in an amount of from 0.0001 to 8 wt. %, more preferably from 0.001 to 4 wt. % and even more preferably from 0.001 to 1 .5 wt. %.

Perfume may be present in the range from 0.1 to 1 wt. %. Many suitable examples of perfumes are provided in the CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association) 1992 International Buyers Guide, published by CFTA Publications and OPD 1993 Chemicals Buyers Directory 80th Annual Edition, published by Schnell Publishing Co. In perfume mixtures preferably 15 to 25 wt. % are top notes. Top notes are defined by Poucher (Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 6(2):80 [1955]). Preferred top-notes are selected from citrus oils, linalool, linalyl acetate, lavender, dihydromyrcenol, rose oxide and cis-3-hexanol.

Examples

General Example 1 - carbonate block formation onto a monofunctional polyether

Catalyst (1) was prepared according to Example 2 of WO2017/037441. Polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether was added to a 100 mL Parr high pressure reactor. The vessel was dried by heating to 100 °C under vacuum for 60 mins before cooling and filling with low pressure CO2. Catalyst (1) was added.

To the mixture was added epoxide. The mixture was stirred and pressurized to approximately half target-pressure. The mixture was then heated to target temperature (70 °C) and pressure (20 bar) held at constant temperature.

At the end of the desired reaction time, the mixture was cooled to <10 °C and vented through an acid scrubber system.

The mono-ol was dissolved in dichloromethane containing triethylamine (1.3 eq.) and alkyl anhydride (1.05 eq.) and reacted at reflux for 16 h. The end-capped mono-ol was washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate, and concentrated to dryness in vacuo to afford the desired product. Ethylene carbonate by-product was removed using a Kugelrohr or short path evaporator (SPE).

Table 1: Example 1 experimental conditions

Table 2: Example 1 results

The data shows that polycarbonate block polyethers of the compositions of the invention are soluble in water, and that water solubility may be preferentially facilitated with respect to wt% carbonate content; preferential ranges of wt% carbonate content being described above.

General Example 2

Reaction 1

Mono-ol starter was added to a 100 mL Parr high pressure reactor system. The vessel was dried by heating to 100 °C under vacuum for 60 mins before cooling and filling with low pressure CO2. Catalyst (1) (see example 1) was added.

To the mixture was added EO. The mixture was stirred and pressurized to approximately half target-pressure. The mixture was then heated to target temperature and pressure held at constant temperature and target pressure.

At the end of the desired reaction time, the mixture was cooled to <10 °C and vented through an acid scrubber system. EO and anhydrous ethyl acetate were added to the cold stirring mixture before transferring into an intermediate holding vessel. Reaction 2:

Pre-dried mono-ol starter and a DMC composed of zinc hexacyanocobaltate and tert-butyl alcohol (2) was added to a 100 mL Parr high pressure reactor system. The vessel was held under vacuum for approximately 2 mins before filling with low pressure N2 and then anhydrous ethyl acetate (15 mL).

This vessel was then heated with 130 °C with stirring and the DMC activated with 2 portions of approximately 0.3 g PO. After activation (as evidenced by pressure drops) the external heater was removed, optionally the reactor could be pressurized with CO2, then the mixture was cooled to the target addition temperature. Upon reaching the target temperature, the mixture from Reaction 1 was added onto the active DMC system over approximately 60-90 mins. Once addition of the mixture was complete, the mixture was left to “cook-out” for several hours before cooling, venting and taking samples for analysis by NMR and GPC.

Table 3: Example 2 Reaction 1 experimental conditions/results

Table 4: Example 2 Reaction 2 experimental conditions

Table 5: Example 2 Reaction 2 results