Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
DIRECT PURIFICATION OF A NICKEL LATERITE LEACHING EFFLUENT
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2012/103617
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
The present invention refers to a direct purification process of a nickel laterite leaching effluent.

Inventors:
BERNI TIAGO VALENTIM (BR)
PEREIRA ANTONIO CLARETI (BR)
Application Number:
PCT/BR2012/000026
Publication Date:
August 09, 2012
Filing Date:
February 01, 2012
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
VALE SA (BR)
BERNI TIAGO VALENTIM (BR)
PEREIRA ANTONIO CLARETI (BR)
International Classes:
C22B23/00; C22B3/42
Domestic Patent References:
WO2008022381A12008-02-28
Foreign References:
US3998924A1976-12-21
US4098867A1978-07-04
Other References:
None
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
VEIRANO E ADVOGADOS ASSOCIADOS (12.995 18° anda, CEP: -000 São Paulo SP, BR)
Download PDF:
Claims:
1/1

CLAIMS

1. A direct purification process of a nickel laterite leaching effluent wherein it comprises the steps:

(i) pH adjustment of a leaching solution;

(ii) ion exchange resin adsorbing nickel and cooper selectively over ferric or ferrous iron;

(iii) nickel recovery.

2. Process, according to claim 1 , wherein the pH of the leaching solution is adjusted to a pH between 1.0 and 3.0, preferably between 1.5 and 2.0.

3. Process, according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the ion exchange resin is a ion exchange resign having the functional group bis-picolylamine.

4. Process, according to anyone of claims 1 to 3, wherein the leaching solution is fed into the system at a temperature between 0°C and 100°C, preferably between 20 and 70°C, and at a flow rate of 5 to 50BV/h, preferably between 15 and 25BV/H (bed volumes of resin per hour).

5. Process, according to anyone of claims 1 to 4, wherein the ion exchange resin is employed in a conventional fixed bed system at a counter-current continuous system (clX).

6. Process, according to anyone of claims 1 to 5, comprising a step of removal of solids prior to the step of pH adjustment.

Description:
"DIRECT PURIFICATION OF A NICKEL LATERITE LEACHING EFFLUENT"

The present invention refers to a direct purification process of a nickel laterite leaching effluent.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A huge hurdle in nickel laterite processing is downstream purification. Options currently available are expensive, complex and often have to deal with high nickel losses in tailings. Costly downstream processing is one of the factors responsible for new nickel laterite projects struggle to survive. One of the main issues of downstream purification is the prior removal of iron and aluminum from solution before precipitation.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The proposed process is suitable for any leaching process available today or that may be developed in the future, as long as base metals such as nickel and cobalt are properly solubilized.

The proposed process needs a clean leaching effluent to work. If a HPAL, atmospheric leaching or other leaching process is used, prior removal of solids is needed. If heap leaching or other similar leaching method that produces already a leaching effluent that is free of solids, such stage is not needed. These operations are widely known by those skilled in the art.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be described in more details further below based on the example of execution represented in the drawing. The figure shows:

Figure 1 -a block diagram of the direct purification process of a nickel laterite leaching effluent, object of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The leaching solution needs to be in a pH range of 1.0-3.0, preferably between 1.5 and 2.0. This range of pH is needed to avoid iron hydrolysis. If needed, the pH can be adjusted with lime, limestone, MgO or any other neutralizing agent of choice. t

2

The pH-adjusted solution goes through an ion exchange resin that has the functional group bis-picolylamine, as Dow Chemical M-4195, Lanxess TP 220 or any other ion exchange resin with that functional group. This functional group has the capability of adsorbing nickel and copper selectively over ferric or ferrous iron and other impurities commonly found in a nickel laterite leaching effluent. The leaching effluent, also known as pregnant leaching solution or PLS, can be fed into the system at any temperature between 0°C and 100°C, but preferably between 20 and 70°C.

The ion exchange resin can be employed in a conventional fixed bed system, also known as lead-lag, at a counter-current continuous system (clX), or any other new equipment that may be developed, the second being preferred. Independently of the equipment, the ion exchange process has four main stages, namely loading, selective iron elution, elution and pre-conditioning.

Copper is strongly bound onto the resin, being only eluted using ammonium hydroxide solution. Ammonium sulphate or chloride can also be added to the system to reduce resin shrinking, preferably at concentrations between 0.1 and 5 molar. This solution needs to be fed at a pH range between 7 and 14, preferably between 8 and 10. There are two main options to solve that issue. Use the same ion exchange resin, or another one that loads copper preferably than other elements present, in a different system, as a copper guard. A simple lead-lag system, clX or any other equipment suitable for the job can be employed. The other option is to add a copper elution stage inside the main clX system, with the same discussed conditions. The same temperature range from loading can be employed, at a flow rate of 1 to 30BV/h, preferably between 5 and 15BV/h. A range between 1 and 50BV are needed to be fed to properly remove copper, preferably between 2 and 10BV.

The main stage of the ion exchange operation is loading. At this stage, nickel is loaded preferably from other elements. Mostly nickel and ferric iron are loaded at the resin. The solution, fed at the temperature range described above, can also be fed at a flow rate of 5 to 50BV/h, preferably between 15 and 25BV/H (bed volumes of resin per hour). One bed volume of resin is the volume of resin inside one column and normally used for volumetric flow rate description. One column can receive up to 50BV of solution before exhaustion, but the range between 10 and 30 is preferred. Cobalt is not loaded under preferred conditions.

Some iron is loaded into the resin and may be removed selectively by two methods: dilute sulphuric acid or nickel sulphate solution. The first method uses a dilute sulphuric acid solution (or of any other mineral acid) at concentrations between 0.01 and 10% in mass preferably between 0.25 and 2.5%. A range between 5 and 50BV are needed to properly remove the iron from the resin, preferably between 10 and 20BV. Flow rates between 5 and 20BV/h, preferably between 10 ans 15BV/h. Temperature range is the same as in loading. The second method uses a nickel sulphate solution to displace iron and properly load nickel into the resin. This nickel sulphate solution (or with matching anions from the mineral acid) can have a concentration of 1 to 400g/L (proportionally changing if the anion is changed), preferably between 20 and 120g/L at a pH range of 1 to 6, preferably between 1.5 and 3. Flow rates, residence time and temperature work at the same range as specified for the other method, dilute sulphuric acid.

Nickel elution is employed with sulphuric acid solution with concentrations in the range between 5 and 30%, preferably between 10 and 20%. The same temperatures, flow rates and residence times from the selective iron elution can be employed.

The nickel eluate can be treated to remove the excess acid by using a acid retardation resin or acid membranes, preferably. Other methods can also be employed, as neutralization of the acid with MgO or any other method known by those skilled in the art. Nickel can later be recovered any method known, as hydroxide or sulphide precipitation as well as electrowinning.

The barren solution can be partially sent back to leaching. The high iron content can help reducing overall iron leaching and acid consumption.

To recover cobalt, any method known in art can be used, as sulphide precipitation or hydroxide precipitation. Iron needs to be taken out first, also by conventional methods. Acid membranes or acid retardation ion exchange resins can also be used to recover acid prior to this stage. Manganese can be removed by contacting air with the solution in a packed column or any other equipment that increases air-solution contact. Other methods known in the literature can also be employed by those skilled in the art.

If only MgO is used as neutralizing agent, there's also the possibility of recycling Mg and S. The final effluent will be rich in MgSO4 that can be crystallized by pressure crystallization or by conventional evaporation. The MgSO4 solids can be sent to a furnace with coal or any other reducing agent to produce MgO and SO2. The MgO can be used as neutralizing agent and the SO2 can be sent to the acid plant.

Some advantages of the present process are:

• Increased extraction of value metal, such as nickel and cobalt;

• Better deposit exploitation;

• Reduced acid consumption;

• Reduced consumption of neutralizing agent;

• Better settling properties of pulp;

• Reduced consumption of flocculants;

• No need for saprolite/limonite separation;

• Better usage of autoclave free acidity.