BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Corrosion of the metals making up the cooling water circulating system is of primary concern to owners and operators of such equipment. Of particular concern is the corrosion of the heat exchangers.

In industrial cooling systems, water from rivers, lakes, ponds, wells, wastewater treatment plant effluent etc., is employed as the cooling media for heat exchangers. These waters can contain a variety of either dissolved or suspended materials such as mineral salts, metals, organics, silt, mud etc. The cooling water from a heat exchanger is typically passed through a cooling tower, spray pond or evaporative system prior to discharge or reuse. In such systems, cooling is achieved by evaporating a portion of the water passing through the system. Because of the evaporation that takes place during the cooling, both dissolved and suspended solids concentrate.

The concentrating of various anionic ions such as chlorides and sulfates can increase the rate of corrosion of the metals making up the cooling system. This is especially true with the metals making up the heat

exchangers that are experiencing higher temperatures due to heat transfer. Other contaminates such as hydrogen sulfide can also increase corrosion rates.

Mineral salts such as calcium and magnesium can induce scaling of the heat exchangers that reduces heat transfer. A scale common to many cooling systems is calcium carbonate. Additionally, scales such as calcium phosphate can also inhibit heat transfer as well as induce under deposit corrosion.

Deposit formation on heat exchangers also impedes heat transfer. For example, corrosion byproducts can form on the metal surface where a corrosion cell has formed.

Alternatively, deposits from metal oxides, silt, mud, microbiological activity and process contamination can reduce the efficiency of heat transfer as well as increase corrosion.

Reducing the occurrence of corrosion, scaling, and deposition upon heat exchangers and associated cooling system equipment is essential to the efficient and economical operation of a cooling water system.

Excessive corrosion of the metallic surfaces can cause the premature failure of process equipment, necessitating down time for the replacement or repair of the equipment. Additionally, the buildup of corrosion products on the heat transfer surfaces impedes water flow and reduces heat transfer efficiency thereby limiting production or requiring downtime for cleaning.

To effectively apply inhibitors in dynamic conditions such as those described, the real-time performance of the inhibitor program is required. Undetected periods of high pitting rates and/or deposit formation can severely impede both performance and equipment life.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART U. S. Patent No. 4, 648,043 teaches a computerized

chemical application system for a water treatment system.

A computer control senses the conductivity of a reference water flowing through the chemical introduction header and, based upon the differential conductivity and values relating conductivity to concentration for the water treatment liquid, precise control of the amount of water treatment liquid added is achieved.

U. S. Patent No. 5,213,694 is directed toward a water treatment control system for treating cooling tower makeup water. The system utilizes a source of vacuum applied to an injector valve to draw chemicals from a holding tank into the make-up water.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention describes an apparatus for the optimized control of various treatment chemicals (corrosion inhibitors and supporting treatments) applied for corrosion and/or deposit inhibition. The apparatus consist of a microprocessor system that controls inhibitor concentrations as a result of processed inputted data. The inputted data includes, but is not limited to, values consistent with the monitoring of Electrochemical Noise and Linear Polarization Rate, heat transfer, concentrations of water treatment chemistry, critical water chemistry parameters, and critical operational characteristics. Although the invention has been described with relation to water treatment processes, it is contemplated that the process can further be utilized for process side applications where electrolytes are present, but may be the solute rather than the solvent, e. g. processes dealing with hydrocarbons where water is only present at a very small percentage of the overall solution.

Accordingly, it is an objective of the instant invention to teach a device and a process for its use

which can identify corrosion, particularly pitting corrosion, and institute steps to moderate such pitting conditions, under microprocessor control and in real-time thereby avoiding or substantially eliminating the initial stages of pit formation upon all affected metallic surfaces, particularly heat exchange surfaces.

It is an additional objective of the instant invention to integrate, under microprocessor control, the corrosion identifying process with a process for corrosion inhibition which can quickly suppress the corrosion cell (s) by making real-time adjustments to the inhibitor program.

It is yet an additional objective of the instant invention to teach a process for monitoring corrosion values for both electrochemical noise (ECN) and linear polarization rate (LPR) under heat transfer.

It is still an additional objective of the instant invention to teach a method of operation wherein the ECN and LPR values are processed to compare how the corrosion signals correlate.

Other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein are set forth, by way of illustration and example, certain embodiments of this invention. The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention and illustrate various objects and features thereof.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Figure 1 is illustrative of a circulating system useful for conducting tests replicating a typical cooling water treatment application; Figure 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a MENTOR CHx device;

Figure 3 is a flow diagram for a basic tower application using microprocessor control; Figure 4 is a graphical representation of Activity Factor with Chloride Addition; Figure 5 is a graphical representation of Linear Polarization Rate with Chloride Addition; Figure 6 is a graphical representation of Electrochemical Noise with Chloride Addition ; Figure 7 is a graphical representation of Activity Factor During Cleaning; Figure 8 is a graphical representation of Linear Polarization Rate During Cleaning; Figure 9 is a graphical representation of Electrochemical Noise During Cleaning.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention describes an apparatus for the optimized control of various treatment chemicals (inhibitors) applied for corrosion and/or deposit inhibition. The apparatus consists of a microprocessor system that controls inhibitor concentrations as a result of processed inputted data, coupled with the devices needed to collect said data. The inputted data includes, but is not limited to, values consistent with the monitoring of Electrochemical Noise and Linear Polarization Corrosion, heat transfer coefficients (fouling factors), concentrations of water treatment chemistry, critical water chemistry parameters, and critical operational characteristics.

Figure 1 is illustrative of a circulating system useful for conducting tests replicating a typical cooling water treatment application. With reference to Figure 1, the instant device is comprised of a system that incorporates a MENTOR CHx heat transfer device (see Figure 2) 110 that is made of the metallurgy to be tested. The

metallurgy under heat transfer is in contact with an electrolyte which is pumped via pump 116 through a heat exchanger 112 through which electrolyte from electrolyte reservoir 114 is passed. The electrolyte flow rates and rates of heat transfer are adjusted to desired levels by adjusting flow regulator 118. A flowmeter 120 is in fluid communication for ease of adjustments. If added, the concentration of a passivator is measured using a standardized amperometric analyzer. A sample line 124 is optionally provided for convenience in withdrawing samples for testing.

With reference to Figure 2, a MENTOR CHx device is illustrated. For our testing we utilized the MENTOR-CHx system, available from Integriti Solutions Corp., to simulate the conditions associated with heat transfer equipment.

Now with further reference to Figure 2, a block 210 is comprised of a series of pieces of the desired metallurgy 212 that are joined with an insulating material 214 placed between each adjoining piece. This series of adjoined pieces will be designated the"block". A hole (not shown) is incorporated at some part of the construction process through which the electrolyte will contact the block. The metal pieces making up the block are equipped with appropriate sensing apparatus (not shown) for the sensing of ECN and LPR. Other sensing apparatus for determination of temperature gradients, heat transfer coefficients, etc. can be applied in a way that does not interfere with the performance of ECN and LPR sensing apparatus. The block is equipped with a device 216 to provide heat thru the block. The block is combined with other supporting equipment necessary for replicating the operational environment of the heat transfer equipment in question.

This can include, but is not limited to, equipment necessary for replicating electrolyte flow rate,

electrolyte chemical parameters, and skin temperature at the heat exchanger electrolyte interface, etc.

The process control parameters are adjusted and controlled to replicate the operational environment at the heat exchanger metal-electrolyte interface.

In accordance with Figure 3, a typical installation is illustrated in the form of a basic tower application.

A tower 310 receives the output of multiple heat exchangers 312 via flow line 314. Effluent from the tower is sampled vial sample line 316 which is in fluid communication with analyzers 318 and Mentor CHx 320. Data derived from both the analyzers and Mentor CHx units are transmitted to a central microprocessor 322 which may be analyzed via terminal 324. In accordance with the processing of data in microprocessor 322 utilizing programs based on applications experience, the processed data is utilized to optimize inhibitor concentrations by controlling flow from the chemical feed system 326 based on real-time performance. This provides the user with assured performance even under varying or upset conditions.

In the examples which follow, the operational conditions are adjusted to replicate the operational environment at the heat exchanger metal-electrolyte interface in question.

EXAMPLES : The ability to measure the performance of water treatment programs is essential to optimizing the addition and concentration of various corrosion and deposit control treatments. When program performance can be quantified, optimization of treatment (s) can be made in real-time to maintain system integrity even in upset conditions. This level of control and performance has remained somewhat elusive for water treatment professional.

Figure 1 illustrates the circulating system used to

conduct the test. All testing was performed at a skin temperature of 144°F using 1010 carbon steel. Flowrate was regulated at 3.8gpm.

Example 1 A passivating agent was added to the electrolyte to induce passivation of the electrodes. The electrolyte was circulated through the CHx until steady state was reached.

The concentration of passivator was measured using both a standardized amperometric sensor, and wet chemistry methodology. The concentration needed to sustain the passive condition was maintained throughout the testing period.

Referring to figures 4-6, data points from 1-11 illustrate a steady state condition. 100ppm of Chlorides as Cl-was added to the electrolyte to represent an upset condition.

The"Activity Factor" (AF) is calculated using the equation: AF (ii/irms where oi is the standard deviation of the electrochemical current noise data, and irma is the root mean square of the electrochemical current noise.

The AF detects changes in current and highlights the deviation from the steady state condition. However, it alone does not indicate the nature of corrosion since increased oxidation potential of the electrolyte such as with the addition of passivating agents will increase current, and induce an increase in AF.

Because the data collected using electrochemical noise (ECN) corrosion techniques is non-intrusive, the corrosion data is clean of interferences like the applied potential technique linear polarization. For this reason, the data is related to those mechanisms directly involved with corrosion. When ECN electrodes are exposed to either a pitting or passivating environment, the electrochemical

noise current increases, thereby indicating an increase in AF, and typically a corresponding increase in ECN corrosion rate.

LPR is an intrusive technique that applies a potential that polarizes the electrode. Because LPR is an intrusive technique for measuring corrosion, the technique is limited to measuring changes in current from the steady state condition (polarized state). When the LPR electrode is polarized, then exposed to a pitting environment, the initial measured corrosion rate decreases. However, when LPR electrodes are exposed to a passive environment, the initial measured corrosion rate increases. When the LPR electrode is polarized, then depolarized as a result of exposure to a pitting environment, the initial corrosion rate decreases. However, when LPR electrodes are polarized and then depolarized while being exposed to a passive environment, the initial corrosion rate increases.

This phenomena is a result of the difference in driving force that induces the flow of current. In the first case, the driving force is the formation of a large cathode around the small anode (pit). In the later case, the driving force is the high potential passivating agent in the electrolyte.

When a large cathode forms, the large cathodic area is highly polarized and exhibits an increased resistance.

Because LPR corrosion rates are directly related to resistance by the equation: MPY = K/Rp (A) where: K is the Stern-Geary constant (generally available from the literature and dependent upon the metal/environment combination) A is the electrode surface area Rp is the polarization resistance where Rp = AE/AI (change in potential/change in current).

It has been discovered that the characteristics of LPR can be used in combination with the true readings of ECN to determine the nature of corrosion. Once the true nature of corrosion is determined, appropriate selection and addition of corrosion inhibitors can be applied in real-time to prevent the propagation of localized corrosion.

Although the examples herein compare LPR corrosion rate to AF, the instant invention contemplates similar comparisons which could be made, e. g. by comparing electrochemical noise corrosion rate versus LPR corrosion rate or comparing LPR resistance versus AF or ECN corrosion rate.

As the resistance increases, corrosion rate decreases. Therefore, when LPR corrosion rate is correlated with AF, the signals diverge with the onset of pitting corrosion.

With the increased AF at data point 12, data point 12 for AF and LPR was correlated which showed a dramatic divergence in signal. This divergence indicates the initiation of pitting corrosion.

After detection of the pitting corrosion, 50ppm of passivating agent was added to the electrolyte, which induced the electrodes to re-polarize by data point 15.

The real-time monitoring and evaluation of corrosion data proved a valuable tool in inhibiting the corrosion in its earliest stage of development.

Utilizing microprocessor control, the propagation of pitting was averted by combining: data generated using ECN and LPR corrosion measuring techniques, real-time identification of both increased corrosion activity (AF) and nature of corrosion (correlation of AF with LPR), selection of the appropriate corrosion inhibitor (s) and dosage (s), and a method of chemical (s) delivery to the electrolyte.

Preparation for Example 2 To achieve a skin temperature of 144°F, the CHx required 65.6412BTU/hr. ft2 x 103. This was recorded as the baseline heat transfer under steady state conditions. The CHx was then exposed to a corrosive electrolyte under stagnant conditions for several days.

When the circulation pump was activated, red water was observed leaving the CHx. After allowing the system to reach steady state under heat transfer, the rate of heat transfer required to achieve a skin temperature of 144°F was monitored and recorded as 52.8664BTU/hr. ft2 x 103.

The lower heat transfer value indicates a 19.46% reduction in heat transfer efficiency due to the presence of corrosion byproducts (ferric oxide). Based on the heat transfer data, it is apparent heat transfer was substantially impaired. In applications utilizing heat transfer equipment a 19.46% reduction in heat transfers could substantially impact production. Effective removal of the deposit (s) while under heat transfer is desired.

Difficulties exist in determining the: type of cleaning agent, concentration, and contact time.

Severe corrosion damage resulting from excessive concentrations, contact times, or poor selection of cleaners and/or corrosion inhibitors are common. The ability to optimize the selection, concentration and contact time by utilizing a microprocessor to effect real- time control would allow for optimum recovery of heat transfer while maintaining system integrity.

Example 2 The electrolyte was initially treated with 1000ppm of a peroxycitric acid solution made from a 2: 1 actives weight ratio of hydrogen peroxide and citric acid. Figure 9 illustrates the heat transfer increased (data point 4) while ECN (figure 8) showed a corresponding rise in corrosion rate. ECN corrosion rates then dramatically drop

(data point 5), followed by the onset of a passive-steady state condition (data points 8-13).

By data point 12, heat transfer recovered 22% of the lost heat transfer resulting from the removal of much of the insulating ferrous oxide. Data point 13 shows the affects of adding 1000ppm of HC1 (based on active (s))..

Heat transfer is completely restored while maintaining unprecedented control of ECN corrosion rate and Activity Factor (Figure 7).

100% recovery of heat transfer was achieved by removing the deposit while avoiding severe corrosion, especially pitting corrosion.

Conclusions: Using real-time condition monitoring, real-time adjustments under microprocessor control can be made to the electrolyte treatment thereby minimizing the detrimental affects, as well as reverse these effects (as in the case of deposit removal example). Implementation of this process control system would improve any corrosion and/or deposit control application where the electrolyte induces corrosion and/or deposits on metal surfaces, especially those applications where heat transfer is involved.

Real-time adjustments substantially improve equipment life while maximizing operational performance even under upset conditions. Incorporating artificial intelligence with this control technology would allow for proactive compensation effective to moderate corrosive conditions before the symptoms arise. Based on real-time analysis of incoming data for corrosion, heat transfer, water chemistry, operational conditions etc., adjustments in treatment (s) can be made based on analysis of historical data and events.

It is to be understood that while a certain form of the invention is illustrated, it is not to be limited to

the specific form or arrangement of parts herein described and shown. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention and the invention is not to be considered limited to what is shown and described in the specification and drawings.