BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The invention relates generally to a new method of manufacturing potassium 1 , 1 - dinitramino-5, 5-bistetrazolate ("K ₂ DNABT") and to an explosive composition which includes K ₂ DNABT.

[0002] K ₂ DNABT was first synthesized in 2015 using a sophisticated synthetic process involving numerous steps as shown in Figure 1 . The process involves a nitrating step using an expensive nitration reagent namely, N2O5 which is not commercially available and must be prepared freshly by reacting NO ₂ and ozone. [0003] K ₂ DNABT, however, shows a sensitivity towards impact, friction and electrostatic discharge and, to facilitate its safe handling and commercial use the product must be desensitized.

[0004] It is an objective of the invention to provide a method of making K ₂ DNABT in a way that addresses the aforementioned shortcomings and to desensitize K ₂ DNABT to allow practicable, safe and reliable deposition of an explosive mixture thereof onto a heating element to function as an igniter of explosives.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0005] In the description that follows, abbreviations used in respect of certain compounds will have the meaning ascribed to such compounds in the appended glossary. [0006] The invention provides a method of producing K ₂ DNABT which includes the steps of: (a) reacting dialkyl carbonate with hydrazine hydrate to produce C1 ;

(b) reacting the C1 with glyoxal to produce C2;

(c) halogenating the C2 with a halogenating agent to form C3;

(d) azidation of the C3 with an azide to produce C4;

(e) cyclization of the C4 with a ring closing electrophile reactant to produce C5;

(f) deprotecting the C5 with a nitrating agent to produce C6;

(g) alkaline hydrolyses of the C6 with potassium hydroxide to produce K ₂ DNABT; and wherein the nitrating agent is selected from the following: dinitronium disulphate; a mixture of nitric acid and sulfuric acid; a mixture of nitric acid and phosphorous pentoxide; and nitric acid with acetic anhydride.

[0007] Preferably, the nitrating agent is nitric acid and phosphorous pentoxide or nitric acid with acetic anhydride. More preferably, the nitrating agent is nitric acid with acetic anhydride.

[0008] Steps (a) and (b) may be combined in a first one-pot reaction step in which hydrazine hydrate, and then glyoxal, are added to dialkyl carbonate to produce C2.

[0009] Steps (c) and (d) may be combined in second one-pot reaction step in which C2 is dissolved in a first solvent before the halogenating (step (c)) and the azidation (step (d)).

[0010] Steps (d) and (e) may be combined in a second alternative one-pot reaction step in which C3 is dissolved in a second solvent before the azidation (step (d)) and the cyclization (step (e)). [0011] In the step (e), the C4 may be dissolved in the second solvent before cyclization to produce C5.

[0012] The first solvent may be any of the following: DMF, DMSO, NMP, sulfolane, DMA, dioxane, water, EtOH, chloroform, MeOH, MeCN, THF, ethanol and water, and DMSO. [0013] In the step (c) the halogenating agent may be /V-Chlorosuccinimide (NCS).

[0014] The azide in step (d) may be an earth metal azide, for example, sodium azide, lithium azide. Preferably, the azide is sodium azide.

[0015] The second solvent may be any of the following : DMF, ethanol, sulfolane, THF, MeCN, dioxane, chloroform. Preferably chloroform is used. [0016] The ring closing electrophile may be selected from: HCI, SOCI ₂ , POCI ₃ , SO ₂ CI2, CO ₂ CI2 sulphuric acid and NaCI. Preferably, the electrophile is SOCI ₂ or HCI. The HCI, preferably, is in a 37% concentration.

[0017] The steps (f) and (g) may be combined in a third one-pot reaction step in which the C5 and the nitrating agent are added to produce a reaction mixture which is then added to a solution of potassium hydroxide to produce K ₂ DNABT.

[0018] The potassium hydroxide solution may be a 85 wt.% solution .

[0019] In the preparation of the nitrating agent of phosphorous pentoxide or nitric acid, phosphorous pentoxide may be added to nitric acid in a molar ratio 1 : 10 at a temperature in the range -15°C to 5°C. [0020] In the preparation of the nitrating agent of nitric acid with acetic anhydride, acetic anhydride may be added to nitric acid in a molar ratio betweenl :3 and 1 :4 at a temperature in the range -15°C to 5°C.

[0021] In the step (a) the dialkyl carbonate may be dimethyl carbonate or diethyl carbonate. Preferably, diethyl carbonate is used.

[0022] In another aspect of the invention there is provided an explosive composition for use as an ignite-able formulation which includes the following components in the following amounts:

(a) K ₂ DNABT: 94 to 85 wt.%; (b) binder: 5 to 10 wt.%; and

(c) nitrocellulose (NC): 1 to 5 wt.% [0023] The binder may be graphite.

[0024] The invention also extends to a method of producing the explosive composition which includes the steps of: (a) dissolving K ₂ DNABT in a solvent to produce a K ₂ DNABT solution;

(b) adding a binder to the K ₂ DNABT solution to produce a slurry;

(c) evaporating the solvent to produce a K ₂ DNABT/binder mixture; and

(d) adding an energetic binder to the mixture to produce the explosive composition. [0025] The binder may be graphite dust.

[0026] The energetic binder may be ethanolic nitrocellulose (NC).

[0027] The method may include an additional step, after step (d), of drying the explosive composition with a nitrogen gas stream to increase the viscosity of the composition. [0028] The invention extends to a composition for use as an explosive igniter which includes the following components in the following amounts:

(d) K ₂ DNABT: 94 to 85 wt.%;

(e) graphite: 5 to 10 wt.%; and

(f) nitrocellulose (NC): 1 to 5 wt.% [0029] The final explosive product contains no heavy metals and increases human safety and decreased adverse environmental effects. The explosive has a relatively high VOD due to the high nitrogen/oxygen content.

[0030] The desensitization of the explosive product facilitates handling by lowering friction and impact sensitivity facilitate easier handling. The liquid nature of the formulation also facilitates automated deposition of the formulation onto a heating element, for use in an explosive igniter. In contrast, a primary explosive like lead azide becomes more sensitive when combined with additives. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] The invention is further described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein;

Figure 1 shows a current process for producing K ₂ DNABT; Figures 2A and 2B show respective processes for producing K ₂ DNAPT according to the invention;

Figures 3A and 3B illustrate a combination of step (a) and step (b) conducted in the processes in Figures 2A and 2B, respectively;

Figure 4A depicts a step (c) (halogenating) combined with a step (d) (azidation); Figure 4B shows a step (c) (halogenating) which forms a part of the processes shown in Figures 2A and 2B respectively;

Figures 5A and 5B show a step (d) (azidation) which is included in the processes shown in Figures 2A and 2B, respectively.

Figures 6A and 6B show a step (e) (cyclization) which is included in the processes shown in Figures 2A and 2B respectively;

Figures 7A and 7B show a step (f) (nitrating) and a step (g) (hydrolysis) which form part of the processes shown in Figures 2A and 2B; and

Figure 8 is a diagrammatical representation of a method of producing an explosive material use to according to the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0032] Methods 10A and 10B of producing K ₂ DNABT are schematically illustrated in Figures 2A and 2B, respectively. The difference between the methods shown in Figures 2A and 2B are as a result of a difference in the starting compounds, i.e. dimethyl carbonate and diethyl carbonate, respectively.

[0033] The method 10A, shown in Figure 2A, comprises a step 12A wherein dimethyl carbonate is reacted with a hydrazine hydrate to produce a C1 a which is then reacted with a glyoxal to produce a C2a. The step 12A constitutes a combination, in a one-pot reaction, of the first two reaction steps of the original method shown in Figure 1 . [0034] The C2a is subjected to a halogenating step 14A wherein the C2a is reacted with a halogenating agent, N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS), to form C3a. This step is shown in Figures 4A and 4B respectively. Subsequently, as shown in Figures 5A and 5B, C3a is reacted with sodium azide in a step 16A (azidation) to form C4a. Step 14A and step 16A could be combined in a single one-pot step as shown in Figure 5A. [0035] I n a step 18A (cyclization), C4a is reacted with an electrophile, hydrochloric acid, to form C5a as shown in Figures 6A.

[0036] In a step 20A, C5a is treated with a nitrating agent which comprises a mixture of nitric acid and acetic anhydride to form C6a which is subsequently subjected to alkaline hydrolysis to form an end product, K ₂ DNABT. [0037] Figure 2B shows the method 0B which is similar to the method 10A. The method 1 0B utilizes, as a starting compound, diethyl carbonate. All subsequent compounds are accordingly based on ethyl compounds. The steps of method 10B and resulting compounds have been designated "B" and "b", respectively, to distinguish these compounds and steps and compounds from their counterparts designated "A" and "a", respectively, in the aforegoing description of the method 10A. [0038] Overall the methods 10A and 10B have fewer synthesis steps than the method shown in Figure 1 . The reagents used are cheaper, the reaction conditions are milder and the yields achieved are higher.

Figure 8 is a diagrammatical representation of a method 30 of producing an explosive material. K ₂ DNABT, typically manufactured using the method 10A or 10B, is dissolved with ethanol or acetone in a dissolution step 32 to form a K ₂ DNABT solution. A binder 34 is added to the K ₂ DNABT solution in a step 36 to form a slurry 38. The solvent is evaporated in a step 40 to produce a K ₂ DNABT/binder mixture 42. In a desensitising step 44 an energetic binder 46 is added to the mixture 42 to produce an explosive composition 48.

PROCEDURE AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA (METHOD 10A) [0039] In a step 12A, shown in Figures 3A, dimethyl carbonate is treated with hydrazine hydrate and the resulting reaction mixture is stirred for one hour. Afterwards 500mL of water is added to the glyoxal solution (40% in water). Some acid (e.g. 37% or glacial acetic acid) is added to accelerate the precipitation of C2a. The reaction is refluxed for at least one hour and stirred overnight. C2a is collected by filtration to achieve a 90% yield. HALOGENATING AND AZIDATION (combined)

[0040] A feature of the current invention lies in the combined steps 14A and 16A, Figure 4A. Prior to halogenating, C2a is dissolved in dimethyl formamide (DMF) and N-Chlorosuccinimide (NCS) is added incrementally. After stirring at room temperature overnight, the reaction mixture is cooled to 0°C and sodium azide is added. A resulting suspension is stirred overnight before ice water is added. The precipitate is collected by filtration giving a fairly low yield of 22% of C4a.

[0041] The above protocol, redone with a larger amount of DMF, leads to a slightly better yield of C4a at 28%. AZIDATION

[0042] An improvement in the yield of the chloro/azido exchange, which occurs with intermediate C3a, was sought by using other solvents or azido compounds. As an alternative azido compound, lithium azide could be used as a replacement to sodium azide in step 16A.

[0043] Other solvents were analysed by suspending C3a in each of a variety of solvents (see Table 1) to assess if yield improved. Sodium azide is added to each of the suspended drop by drop. The reaction mixture is stirred overnight and a triple amount of water is added. The precipitate (C4a) is collected by filtration and air dried.

[0044] The highest yield obtained is with DMSO (65%), stirred overnight at room temperature. This is increased to an 80% yield with water / DSMO.

[0045] Although DSMO produces the best yield, it is not a solvent of choice if step 14A and step 16A are combined in a one-pot reaction. Therefore a second series of tests was conducted with other solvents at temperatures between 35°C and 100°C (See Table 2).

[0046] This second series of tests resulted in some good yields of C4a. CYCLIZATION

[0047] There are different possibilities for successful ring closing shown in Figure 6A without using gaseous HCI, as is used in the initial method Figure 1. AcCI, trifluoroacetic acid (CF ₃ - CO ₂ H), SOCl ₂ POCb, SO ₂ CI2, and CO ₂ CI2 cone. HCI or NaCI could be used as the electrophile reactant (see Table 3).

[0048] Sulfolane, CHCb, DMF, EtOH, amongst others, were tried as alternative solvents

[0049] In one example, the C4a is suspended in chloroform and thionyl chloride is added. The mixture is heated to 55°C for 48 hours. The C5a is collected by suction filtration. However, ring closing worked best (yield: 90% after recrystallization) by adding 8.0 equivalents of SOCb (see Table 7 or Table 3). [0050] Using EtOH, THF, dioxane and MeCN as alternative solvents, and SOCI _2, and SO ₂ CI _2, cyclization occurred with high yield.

[0051] Ring closing was successful with high yields with POCl3 and SO ₂ CI ₂ in chloroform - see batches 15-17 in the above table. [0052] In a preferable example, to achieve ring closing, C4a is suspended in 37% HCI and heated overnight at 50°C (batch 19). The product (C5a) is clean and the yield is about 60%, which can be increased by a longer reaction time.

[0053] In another example, C4 is suspended in sulfuric acid and sodium chloride is added incrementally. The mixture is stirred overnight at room temperature with water added. The mixture is then extracted with ethyl acetate and the solvent removed. The NMR spectra showed successful ring closing but with a low yield (17%) and residual starting material.

ALTERNATIVE: AZIDATION AND CYCLIZATION (COMBINED)

[0054] Alternatively, steps 16A and 18A can be combined in a one-pot reaction, without isolating the C4a. [0055] For safety considerations, this one-pot reaction step is preferential.

[0056] The one-pot reaction step was tried with four different solvents: chloroform, ethanol, DMSO and DMF (see Table 4).

[0057] In each, C3a is suspended in the chosen solvent and sodium azide is added at room temperature. The suspension is stirred overnight and SOCI2 is added. The reaction is heated at 55°C for 2 days. In the case of ethanol, DMF and chloroform the solvent was removed in vacuum and the residue recrystallized in hot methanol. By using DMSO the mixture is diluted with water (150 mL ) and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic phases are dried over MgS0 ₄ and the solvent removed.

TABLE 4

[0058] From Table 4 it can be seen that the one-pot reaction step worked with DMSO (batch 3) and cone. HCI (batch 6). The challenge with DMSO is getting rid of the solvent which is achieved by extensive extraction with EtOAc. [0059] The preferred example, in the one-pot step, is with HCI with a yield of 24%. This step is easy and includes cheap and readily available reagents. However, the yield is low and needs to be improved. Yield improvement may be achieved by a longer reaction time for the chloro/azido exchange or use of less concentrated hydrochloric acid.

[0060] The one-pot step is to be contrasted with a two discrete step process (step (b ₂ ) and step (c)) which yields of 60% for C5a. NITRATION

[0061] The scheme showed in Figure 1 teaches nitrating C5 by adding this compound drop by drop to N2O5, (dissolved in MeCN at -5°C) quenching the solution by adding ice water to isolate an intermediate compound i.e. C6.

[0062] C6 has to be handled with care due to its sensitive behaviour towards impact (IS), friction (FS) and electrostatic discolouring. Its sensitivity is similar to that of K ₂ DNABT (see Table 5).

TABLE 5 [0063] K ₂ DNABT is prepared from C6 by the alkaline hydrolysis of the protecting groups using a 2M potassium hydroxide solution.

[0064] The disadvantage with the prior method is that N2O ₂ is prepared from dinitrogen pentoxide in dry acetonitrile as it is commercially unavailable. The preparation is laborious and includes expensive reagents. This is the motivation for a different nitration step 20A in the nitration of C5a shown in Figure 7A.

[0065] An alternative nitrating agent is selected from nitric acid, dinitronium disulphate (N2S2O7) , mixed acid (H NO3/H2SO4), nitric acid with phosphorous pentoxide (H NO3 / P4O10) and nitric acid with acetic anhydride (H NO3 / AC2O).

[0066] Dinitronium disulphate replaces dinitrogen pentoxide. This particular nitration agent is very similar to dinitrogen pentoxide and hydroiyses to one equivalent nitric acid and two equivalents of sulfuric acid upon contact with water. [0067] In one example, dinitronium disulphate is dissolved in dry acetonitrile at 0°C and C5 is added. After 3 hours, a 2 M potassium hydroxide solution is added. Against all expectations, a two-phase system was obtained consisting of two solutions. Water was added until the liquid phases combined. Stirring is stopped and the solution is cooled to 0 °C. After 1 hour no precipitate had formed and the synthesis attempt was considered to be a failure. [0068] The experimental routine was repeated using 2.2 equivalents of dinitronium disulphate and the dimethyl carbonatele of the reaction was doubled. This time, K ₂ DNABT could be obtained with an unexpectedly low yield of only 9%. [0069] N2S2O7 is unsuitable for the preparation of K ₂ DNABT. The neutralization of 2.2 equivalents dinitronium disulphate requires a lot of potassium hydroxide (2 M solution) due to the production of "mixed acid" upon contact with aqueous solutions. Large quantities of potassium sulphate are formed which is only slightly soluble at 0°C and is less soluble than potassium nitrate. Hence, the removal of potassium sulphate requires large amounts of water. This results in the dissolution of most of the produced K ₂ DNABT. This causes a decrease of the obtainable yield.

[0070] In another example, mixed acid comprising 1 part 100% nitric acid and 2 parts 100% sulfuric acid, is cooled to -10 °C and C5a is added. The resulting suspension is stirred for 4 hours at an initial temperature and subsequently poured into an ice-cold solution of 85 wt.-% potassium hydroxide, comprising a necessary amount of water for the complete dissolution of formed potassium nitrate and potassium sulphate. A large amount of precipitate was formed which dissolved almost completely upon mechanical stirring. The solid material is collected by suction filtration [0071] Setting the filter paper alight gave a loud report. This is an indication that K ₂ DNABT is produced.

[0072] The problem with this example is that the amounts of water needed for the complete dissolution of the inorganic by-products cause dissolution of K ₂ DNABT.

[0073] The preceding example is repeated using more starting material C5 (0.50 g, 1 .76 mmol) in comparison to the amount of mixed acid (nitric acid: 14.1 mmol, 0.88 g, sulfuric acid: 28.2 mmol, 2.66 g). The work-up routine is performed in the same manner as described above. The results were the same and no solid residue could be collected after the suction filtration. [0074] A further example uses dinitrogen pentoxide which is generated in situ by the reaction of 100% nitric acid with phosphorus pentoxide. Here, phosphorus pentoxide (0.80 g, 2.82 mmol) is added to nitric acid (1 .78 g, 28.2 mmol) at 0 °C using an ice-bath. C5 (0.25 g, 0.88 mmol) is added to the resulting slurry and mechanically stirred for 6 hours at an initial temperature. The reaction mixture is then poured into an ice-cold solution of 85 wt.-% potassium hydroxide (4.09 g, 62.0 mmol) comprising the necessary amount of water for the complete dissolution of formed potassium nitrate and potassium phosphate. The resulting suspension is stirred at 0°C for 30 minutes and the remaining solid is collected using suction filtration to give K ₂ DNABT (0.12 g, 0.36 mmol) with a yield of 43 %.

[0075] The viscosity of the HNO3/P4O10 mixture hinders diffusion in the reaction mixture. Therefore, longer reaction times may be needed for higher yields.

[0076] Several mixtures of 100% nitric acid and acetic anhydride with varying ratios of the reactants were attempted in the step 20A of C5a.

[0077] It is considered that dinitrogen pentoxide causes the nitration which is formed in situ as follows:

HNO3 + AcONO ₂ ≥ AcOH + N2O5

[0078] After a screening of the various nitration agents, the following nitrating step 18A is preferred as it offers the highest yield and purity of K ₂ DNABT.

[0079] Nitric acid (7.09 g, 0.1 1 mol) is cooled to -1 0 °C in a 25 mL round bottom flask using an ice bath. Acetic anhydride (2.84 mL, 30.03 mmol) is slowly added keeping the temperature below 0 °C. C5a (1 .00 g, 3.52 mmol) is added in small portions over a period of 10 minutes. After a reaction time of 1 hour a yellow solution is formed which turns into a yellowish suspension about 20 minutes later. After an overall reaction time of about 3 hours, the suspension is added to a solution of about 85% potassium hydroxide (1 1.40 g, 172.7 mmol) in 92.00 g of a 50:50 ice-water-mixture. Additional potassium hydroxide is added until pH 12 or higher is reached. A precipitate is formed which is collected by suction filtration, the precipitate is then washed with 2 ml_ of cold water and dried to yield 1.07 g (91 %) of K ₂ DNABT.

PROCEDURE AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA (METHOD 10B)

[0080] The method 10A shown in Figure 2A involves a methylester protecting group. This is as a result of the dimethyl carbonate starting compound. Because of the poor solubility of the intermediate compounds and low yields in the chloro-azido exchange step 16A, an alternative method is proposed using a diethoxy protecting group. The essential difference between the prior method and the proposed method is the usage of diethyl carbonate instead of dimethyl carbonate as a starting reagent. An economic benefit is that diethyl carbonate is cheaper.

[0081] Following the preferred steps described above, but with a diethoxyl carbonate starting reagent, K ₂ DNABT is successfully synthesized in this ethoxy group synthesis as shown in Figure 2B. Table 7 shows that the yields of intermediate and end products are higher with the ethoxyl.

[0082] Of interest are the sensitivity values (Table 8) of the azido compounds (4,9) and ring closed compounds (5, 10).

[0083] The sensitivity value of the C4a and C4b differ and this is due to the protecting group. Consequently the C4b is less sensitive towards friction and impact. Thus it is easier and safer to handle. C5a and C5b have the same sensitivity values.

[0084] Therefore, the method 10B is preferred over the method 10A because of better yields, a less sensitive C5, cheaper starting materials and better solubility of products. [0085] The step 12B in the production of C2b is illustrated in Figure 3B. An amount of 8.8 g (157 mmol) of hydrazine hydrate is added incrementally to 20.06 g (169 mmol) of diethyl carbonate at room temperature. The mixture is stirred for 3 hours at room temperature until homogenous. Subsequently, 300 mL of a water/ethanol mixture (1 : 1 ) and 1 1 .2 g (77.2 mmol, 40% in H ₂ 0) of glyoxal solution is added. To speed up the precipitation, 4 mL of cone. HCI (37%) is added and the mixture is stirred overnight. The precipitate is collected by filtration and washed with water, ethanol and ether to give C2b (15.1 g, 65.2 mmol, 85%), a slightly yellow solid. HALOGENATING

[0086] The step 14B in the production of C3b is illustrated in Figure 4B. An amount of 5.0 g (21 .74 mmol) of C2b is suspended in 100 mL dimethylformamide and 8.7 g (65.22 mmol, 3.0 eq.) of N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) is added incrementally to the suspension. The reaction mixture is stirred overnight at room temperature. A resulting solid phase is then filtered off and washed with ethanol and diethylether to yield C3b (3.58 g, 12.0 mmol, 55%).

AZIDATION

[0087] The step 16B in the production of C4b is illustrated in Figure 5B. An amount 1.0 g (3.35 mmol) of C4b is suspended in 50 mL DMF and 0.5 g (7.4 mmol, 2.2 eq.) Sodium azide is added at 10°C. The mixture is stirred overnight at room temperature and is diluted with 100 mL of ice-water. The precipitate is collected by filtration and washed with water, ethanol and ether to yields C4b (0.4 g, .28 mmol, 40%).

CYCLIZATION

[0088] Figure 6B illustrates the step 18 B in the production of C5b. An amount of 0.4 g (1.28 mmol) of C4b is suspended in 150 mL 37% HCI and heated overnight at 50°C. The resulting solution is extracted with ether (3 x 50 mL) and the solvent removed in a vacuum to give C5b (0.23 g, 0.74 mmol, 58%), a colourless crystals.

NITRATING

[0089] In a final step 20B, illustrated in Figure 7B, K ₂ DNABT is produced. An amount of 0.55 g (1 .76 mmol) of C5b is suspended in HNO3 (2.35 mL, 56.3 mmol, 100%) and cooled to -10°C. Within an hour Ac ₂ 0 (1.4 mL, 14.81 mmol) is added at -5°C. The resulting mixture is stirred between -5°C and -10°C for 3 hours. Subsequently, the mixture is added to an ice cold KOH solution (45 g ice, 6.0 g KOH). After stirring for 30 minutes the precipitate is collected by filtration giving K ₂ DNABT (0.49 g, 1 .46 mmol, 83%) a colourless solid.

Desensitization of K ₂ DNABT

[0090] Desensitization of the K ₂ DNABT is necessary. Wax, graphite and silicone oil have been tested as possible desensitization agents. Experimentally, different admixtures of the respective desensitizers were added to K ₂ DNABT and the corresponding sensitivities of the mixtures were determined (see Table 10).

TABLE 10

[0091] The best result was achieved using graphite dust. An admixture of 30wt.-% graphite causes a drastic decrease of the ESD sensitivity, but an admixture of 10wt.-% graphite offers the best overlap of a decreased sensitivity and a low admixture of non-energetic material. [0092] The add mixture of K ₂ D NABT and graphite is designated K ₂ D NABT-G.

[0093] The loss of performance due to the admixture is estimated using the EXPL05-code. The calculated value for K2DNABT-G (10% admixture):

Vdet. = 8137 m/s, pCJ = 26.97 GPa [0094] A preferred method of desensitization is described below.

[0095] In a first step, K ₂ DNABT (200 mg) is added to a plastic test tube and covered with 2 mL ethanol or acetone. Graphite dust (22.2 mg) is added and mechanical stirred for 2 hours. The stirring was stopped and the solvent is evaporated using a nitrogen gas stream. The homogeneous mixture is extracted with a plastic spatula. [0096] In a second step, an energetic binder is applied to K ₂ DNABT-G. K ₂ DNABT-G is left in the plastic test tube and a pre-calculated amount of a 1 wt.-% (2468.9 mg) ethanolic nitrocellulose (NC) solution is added in order to achieve an admixture of 10wt.-% binder. The resulting suspension is dried using a nitrogen gas stream until a viscous, sticky mass is obtained. [0097] The admixture of K ₂ DNABT-G thus includes the following components in the following amounts: K ₂ DNABT: 85.50 wt.-%; graphite: 9.50 wt.-%; and Nitrocellulose NC: 5.00 wt.-%.

[0098] The method described above is varied with the addition of half of the NC-solution (1234.5mg) in order to achieve a reduced binder content, of 5wt.-%. The obtained suspension is dried using a nitrogen gas stream until the mixture became viscous. [0099] In this example, an optional viscosity, for the application of the mixture is not achieved due to the reduced binder content. The degree of "polymer-swelling" is lower and the mixture is more difficult to handle.

Loading of Igniters [00100] In preparation of the ignition pill, the sticky mass of K ₂ DNABT-G is sucked up using a syringe or pipette and applied to a series of the electronic igniters as shown in Figure 1. Left to dry for 20 minutes, the loaded igniters are ready to fire.

[00101] The loaded igniters are then connected to a power supply (U = 20.5 V) with an interposed capacitor. The capacitor is charged by the power supply and the corresponding energy (E = 0.5CU2) is discharged by a fire button causing an electric current in the detonator chip.

[00102] For this test, five igniters were prepared with an admixture of 10 wt.-% binder and five with an admixture of 5 wt.-% binder. Both mixtures had a 00% firing rate.