The invention relates to fluorous phosphines and a process for their preparation. The invention also relates to the metal complexes based on the fluorous phosphines, methods for the preparation of metal complexes, to catalysts based on the fluorous phosphines and the use of said catalysts in catalysis.

In catalysis, homogeneous catalytic systems are often preferred over heterogeneous ones because of their better product and substrate selectivity. A general problem in homogeneous catalysis, however, is separation and recycling of the catalyst. This has led to the development of several supported catalytic systems, e. g. immobilised versions of homogeneous catalysts on inorganic supports (M. G. L. Petrucci, A. K. Kakkar, Adv. Mater., 1996, 8, 251 and references cited therein, W. A. Herrmann, B. Cornils, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

Engl, 1997, 36, 1098 and references cited therein) and systems connected to polymers or dendrimers (J. W. Knapen, A. W. Van der Made, J. C. Wilde, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, P.

Wijkens, D. M. Grove, G. van Koten, Nature, 1994, 372, 659), with the combined advantages of both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Another elegant solution for this separation/recycling problem is the aqueous biphasic Ruhrchemie/Rhone-Poulenc process (W. A. Hermann, C. W.

Kohlpaintner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 1524).

In this process a water soluble version of the conventional Rh/PPh3 catalyst is used, i. e. TPPTS/Rh (TPPTS = P (m- CsH4SO3Na) 3). The catalytic process is performed under biphasic conditions with the aqueous phase containing the catalyst, and the organic phase containing the products. The catalyst can be easily removed from the products by phase separation. In this process losses of rhodium are kept below

10-6 mg/kg of product produced.

Despite the advantage of aqueous biphasic systems in catalysis, they also have some disadvantages. Some reactants or catalysts hydrolyze when exposed to water, resulting in decreased performance for these systems. Furthermore, due to the two phase nature of the system, the catalyst is not homogeneously mixed with the products. Therefore, the reactants or catalysts have to cross or react at the phase boundary which could lead to mass flow limitations, resulting in considerable lower reaction rates as compared to single phase homogeneous systems. This effect is enhanced by the often low solubility in water of organic substrates with higher molecular weights (I. T. Horváth, J. Rabai, Science, 1994, 266, 72).

The special physical properties of perfluorinated compounds and the problem associated with aqueous bi-phasic catalysis inspired Horváth et al. to use fluorous bi-phase systems in rhodium catalysed hydroformylation (I. T. Horváth, J. Rabai, Science, 1994, 266, 72). Here, the fluorous phase, as an alternative to aqueous phase, denotes a solvent, which is rich in C-F bonds. Below a certain temperature the fluorous phase does not mix with an organic phase containing the reactants and products. At a certain temperature, the system consists of a fluorous phase, containing a fluorous phase soluble catalyst, and a hydrocarbon phase, containing the reactants. Above this temperature, the two phases mix to form one phase allowing efficient homogeneous catalysis to proceed. Catalyst recovery and product separation can then be achieved by cooling of the reaction mixture below the temperature where phase separation occurs. Alternatively, if e. g. the phase transition temperature of a certain fluorous bi-phasic system is too high, or if desirable for other reasons, the catalytic reaction can also be performed under bi-phasic conditions.

For reactions which cannot be performed in an aqueous bi-phasic system, e. g. due to low solubility of reactants in the aqueous layer, diffusion limitations or water sensitive components a fluorous bi-phasic system could be an alternative. Perfluoro solvents do not usually mix with water and can contain water only on the ppm level (see D. W. Zhu, Synthesis, 1993, 953).

To render a catalyst preferentially soluble in a fluorous phase, it is usually functionalised with one or several perfluoroalkylgroups, also sometimes referred to as ponytails or pigtails. Most often, perfluorohexyl (C6Fl3) and perfluoro-octyl (C8H17) groups are being used. The length and the number of perfluoroalkylgroups are important because they influence the solubility of perfluoralkylated compounds in a fluorous solvent.

Usually the reactivity and selectivity of homogenous catalysts are modified by reacting the catalytically active metal with different coordinating ligands. A widely used class of ligands for these purposes are phosphines. A serious drawback of the use of perfluorinated ponytails in ligands in general are the strong electron withdrawing properties of perfluoroalkyl functions. These properties can influence the coordinating characteristics of the phosphor atom and hence the resulting catalytic activity dramatically.

In order to reduce undesired effects of the perfluorinated ponytails on the activity of the catalyst, spacers have been introduced. The spacers which have been developed so far comprise ethylene, propylene or substituted phenyl, such as for instance described in I. T. Horváth, J.

Rabai, Science, 1994, 266, 72 ; European Patent application 94-304877. 7, US 93-88706 ; Bhattacharya, D. Gudmundsen, E. G Hope, R. D. W Kemmit, D. R. Paige. A. M. Stuart, J. Chem. Soc.

Perkin Trans. I, 1997, 3609 ; J. J. J Juliette, I. T. Horváth, J. A. Gladysz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl, 1997, 36, 161 ; S.

Kainz, D. Koch, W. Baumann, W. Leitner, Angew. Chem. Int.

Ed. Engl, 1997, 36, 1628.

However, there continues to be a need for more variations of these spacers for a more delicate tuning of ligands also because the existing catalyst systems with fluorous ligands often have lower activity when compared with their non-fluorous counterparts or analogues.

It is therefore a goal of the present invention to provide for fluorous ligands with different spacer groups. It is a further goal of the invention to provide for ligands with spacers which can reduce or even nullify the effect of the perfluorinated ponytails of the ligand on the catalytic activity. It is another goal of the present invention to overcome the above-mentioned disadvantages of other approaches and to provide for ligands who will allow efficient product-catalyst separation when applied in catalysis It has now been found that the use of certain non-carbon fragments in the spacer results in ligands that further enhance the applicability of the ponytail tailored ligands and of catalysts based thereon for use in homogeneous catalysis.

Accordingly, the invention relates to a fluorous phosphine wherein at least one phosphor atom is coupled to at least one aryl or alkyl moiety, to which moiety a fluorous tail is coupled, wherein a spacer group, containing a non- carbon atom, is positioned between the aryl or alkyl moiety and the fluorous tail.

The phosphines that in general can be most finely tuned with respect to their steric and electronic properties are monophosphines and diphosphines. By varying the delicate tuning of the ligands, the activity and selectivity of the catalyst containing these phosphines can be significantly

improved. Accordingly, a preferred embodiment provides for fluorous mono-and/or diphosphines.

In a more preferred embodiment, the phosphines according to the invention can be depicted by their general structure, P-A-S-T, wherein P is phosphorous, A is the alkyl or aryl moiety, S is the spacer, containing a non-carbon atom and T is the fluorous tail.

A preferred embodiment of the invention concerns fluorous phosphines and fluorous diphosphines wherein the fluorous tail is a CXF2x+l perfluoroalkyl group, wherein x is an integer from 1 to 30.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention the alkyl or aryl moiety is optionally substituted alkyl or aryl, preferably optionally substituted phenyl.

It is possible for the alkyl or aryl moiety to carry, additional to the phosphor and the non-carbon substituent, other substituents. There are, in general, no limitations to these substituents. These substituents can for instance be selected from other or identical ponytails, more spacer- extended ponytails, simple substituents which are considered common substituents in the design of ligands for homogenous catalysis such as for instance the substituents described by Tolman et al. in Chemical Reviews 1977, 77, pp 313 or C. D.

Frohming and Ch. W. Kohlpainter in"Applied Homogenous Catalysis with Organometallic compounds, B. Cornil, W. A.

Hermann (Eds.), VCH, Weinheim 1996, Vol. 1, pp 29-104.

In an embodiment of the invention the spacer group in the fluorous phosphines is

wherein Y is Si, Sn or Ge ; m is an integer from 1 to 3 ; R5, <BR> <BR> <BR> R6 is-c1-cl4-(cyclo) alkyl,-C1-Cl4-aryl,-C1-Cl4-ar (cyclo) alkyl, -C1-Cl4-(cyclo) alkylaryl, and/or, if m is not equal to 3, fluorous tails ; n is an integer from 0 to 3, the sum of m and n is smaller than or equal to 3 and z is an integer from 0 to 10. The branching point Y can thus be used to attach up to 3 perfluoroalkyl tails, in that way allowing the synthesis of phosphines with high fluorine content.

Without being bound by theory it is assumed that the presence of a non-carbon atom such as Si, Sn or Ge is capable of neutralising and/or compensating the electron-withdrawing effect of the fluorous ponytails on the phosphor of the ligand. This will effectively minimise the possible electron- withdrawing effects of the ponytails on the metal and thus on the catalytic activity.

A preferred embodiment of the invention is therefore a fluorous phosphine wherein the spacer contains a moiety that neutralises the electron-withdrawing effect from the fluorous tail.

A preferred embodiment of the invention relates to a fluorous monophosphine of the formula P (R1) (R2) (R3), wherein at least one of the groups Ru, R2 and R3 is alkyl-R4 or optionally substituted aryl-R4 and wherein R4 is the spacer group coupled to the fluorous tail.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a fluorous diphosphine of the formula (R') (R2) P-Z-P (R3) (R7), wherein Z is a achiral or chiral bridging hydrocarbyl moiety and wherein at least one of the groups Ru, R2, R3 or R7 is alkyl-R4 or optionally substituted aryl-R4 and wherein R4 is the spacer group coupled to the fluorous tail.

A preferred embodiment of the invention is a fluorous monophosphine wherein any one of R1, R2, R3, is optionally substituted aryl-R4 or a fluorous diphosphine wherein any one of R1, R2, R3, or R7 is optionally substituted aryl-R4.

A preferred embodiment of the invention is a fluorous phosphine wherein Y is Si.

A preferred embodiment of the invention is a fluorous phosphine wherein Rs and/or R6 is preferably-C1-C6-alkyl, more preferably ethyl or methyl, most preferably methyl.

A preferred embodiment of the invention is a fluorous diphosphine wherein Z is-(CH2) q-with q is an integer from 1 to 10.

The invention also relates to a process for the preparation of fluorous phosphines of formula P (Rl) (R2) (R3) comprising steps (a)- (c) or (d), followed either by steps (e)- (g) or step (h), with steps (a)- (h) being defined as : a) metallating X (CH zCxF2x+1; b) Reacting the metallated product obtained in step (a) with HY (X)m(R5)n(R6)3-m-n; c) Reacting the compound obtained in step (b) with X2 ; d) Reacting CH2=CH(CH2)zCxF2x+1 with HY (X) m (RS)" (R6) 3_-,-n, ; e) Mono-metallating an optionally substituted dihaloaryl compound ArX2 and reacting this compound with the compound obtained through steps (a)- (c) or d ; f) Metallating the compound obtained in step (e) ; g) Reacting the metallated compound obtained in step (f) with a trivalent phosphorus compound containing one or more P-X'bonds ; h) Reacting the compound obtained through steps (a)- (c) or (d) with tri-metallated phosphine obtained from P (ArX) 3 by halogen metal-exchange ; wherein X is halogen or pseudohalogen, X'is halogen, pseudohalogen, alkoxy, aryloxy, amido, triphlato or aryl leaving group, preferably Cl, OMe, OEt, NMe2 or NEt2, and Ar is aryl.

Throughout this description the different compounds are labeled using the designation A {m, x}-K {m, x}. Here, m

signifies the number of fluoro tails per silicon centre whereas x represents the number of fluorine-bearing carbon atoms in the CXF2x+l fluoro tails. Thus D {2, 6} denotes a phosphine as depicted in Figure 1, with m is 2 and x is 6 resulting in P [C6H4Si (CH2CH2C6F13) 2Me-4] 3. The compounds D {0} and G {0} depict species P (C6H4SiMe3-4) 3 and (Me3SiC6H4- 4) 2PCH2CH2P (C6HQSiMe3-4) 2 which serve as non-fluorous reference compounds.

For preferred embodiments of the invention these synthetic procedures are further clarified by Figures 1 and 2.

The invention also relates to a process for the preparation of fluorous diphosphines of formula (R4Ar) 2P-Z- P (ArR4) 2 comprising the following steps : a) Reacting (X') 2P-Z-P (X') 2 with mono metallated ArX2 ; b) Metallating compound (XAr) 2P-Z-P (ArX) 2 obtained in step (a) ; c) Reacting the compound obtained in (b) with R4X ; wherein Z is a bridging hydrocarbyl moiety, X is halogen, X' is halogen, pseudo halogen, alkoxy, aryloxy, amido, triphlato or aryl leaving group, preferably Cl, OMe, OEt, NMe2 or NEt2, and R4 is the spacer group coupled to the fluorous tail.

The metallation procedures in the process according to the invention are conventional metallation procedures such as Grignard formation, lithiation with organolithium reagents such as butyllithium, whether n-, sec-or tert-or transmetallation reactions, for instance with Zn, Na, K or Cs compounds.

For preferred embodiments of the invention these synthetic procedures are further clarified by Figure 3.

As these ligands are likely candidates for use in homogenous catalysis, the invention in another aspect relates to a metalcomplex comprising at least one of the fluorous

phosphines. In an embodiment of the invention, the metal in the metal-phosphine complex as described is selected from rhodium, platinum, palladium, nickel, iron, ruthenium, osmium, cobalt, or iridium, preferably from rhodium, platinum, palladium, or nickel.

In an another embodiment of the invention, a metalcomplex, comprising a metal and at least one fluorous phosphine, is a catalyst or catalyst compound and the invention accordingly relates to catalytic systems comprising these catalysts or catalyst compounds for carrying out homogeneous catalytic reactions. More specific, the catalysts according to the invention can be used in chemical reactions wherein the chemical reaction is hydroformylation, hydroboration, hydrosilylation, carbonylation, Heck-type reactions, oligo-and polymerisations, cross-coupling and hydrogenation of unsaturated compounds, preferably alkenes.

Solubility and phase distribution of the fluorous monophosphines and diphosphines The invention provides the use of the monophosphine and diphosphine ligands developed for fluor phase immobilization of homogeneous catalysts, the solubility behaviour of the fluorous phosphines themselves in different fluorous and non- fluorous solvents and fluorous bi-phasic solvent combinations was studied. To demonstrate the increased fluorphase affinity the solubilities of the monophosphines D {m, x} in organic and fluoro-solvents were determined and listed in Table 1 as the amount of solute dissolved in 1 L of pure solvent.

Without being bound by theory, it appears that the"like dissolves like"principle is valid. The fluorous phosphines have consistently higher solubilities in the fluorous solvent c-C6F1lCF3 than in non-fluorous n-octane. There appears to exist an optimum in the fluorocarbon solubility for m = 2

(0. 25-0. 28 mol/L). For m = 3 the solubility drops to values below 0. 17 mol/L).

Table 1. Solubilities of Fluorous Triaryl Monophosphines D {m, x} in Organic and Fluorous Solvents at 25 °C, Expressed as the Amount of Phosphine which Dissolves in 1 L of Pure Solvent.

Compound F content n-octane c-C6F11CF3 (wt %) (mol/L) (g/L) (mol/L) (g/L) D {1, 6} 50 0. 037 55 0. 050 74 D {1, 8} 55 0. 008 14a 0. 055 98 D {2, 6} 60 0. 005 12 0. 249 615 D {2, 8} 63 0. 001 3 0. 277 851 D {3, 6} 64 a a 0. 162 502 D {3, 8} 67 0. 7-10-3 3 0. 029 127 Formation of a gel For applications in fluorous bi-phasic catalysis and for catalyst recycling by fluorous phase extraction techniques an important feature of the fluorous aryl phosphines and the derived catalytic complexes is the partition coefficient P (P = cfluorous phase/corganic phase, c = concentration) in fluorous bi- phasic systems. To demonstrate the fluorphase affinity of phosphines bearing fluorous tail coupled to the spacer in fluorous bi-phasic systems, partition coefficients of the fluorous aryl phosphines D {m, x} were determined in several fluorous bi-phasic solvent combinations (Table 2 and Figure 4). These data reflect a similar trend as was observed for their solubility data, i. e. there appears to be an optimum in fluorphase affinity for D {2, 6} and D {2, 8} except for the c-C6F1lCF3/n-pentane bi-phasic system, where a steady increase of P with the wt % of fluorine in D {m, x}, reaching a climax

for D {3, 8}, was found. A high fluoro phase affinity was found for D {2, 8} in c-C6F11CF3/n-octane (P = 11).

Table 2. Fluorous Partition Coefficients of Fluorous Triaryl Monophosphines D {m, x} at 0 °C in 1 : 1 mixture (v/v) of c-C6F11CF3 and Organic Solvent (P = cfluorous phase/corganic phase).a compound F content toluene/ n-octane/ n-pentane/ (wt %) c-C6F11CF3 c-C6F11CF3 c-C6F11CF3 (Tc = 89 °C) b (Tc = 42 °C)h (Tc # 10 °C) D {0} 0 0. 007 - - D {1, 6} 50 0. 13 0. 42 0. 53 D {1, 8} 55 1. 06 1. 4 0. 78 D {2, 6} 60 3. 8 6. 6 2. 0 D {2, 8} 63 3. 8 11 3. 3 D {3, 6} 64 2. 1 3. 7 5. 3 D{3,8} 67 1.0 4.8 7. 0 Derived from analysis of each of the two phases on phosphorus by ICP-AAS. The estimated experimental error is < 1 in the last digit. b Lo Nostro, P. Adv. in Colloid and Interface Sci. 1995, 56, 245-287.

As a demonstration of the fluorphase solubility of fluorous diphosphines with fluorotail containing spacer, diphosphines G {m, x} were tested for their solubility in perfluorinated solvents. The result are summarised in Table 3. For m > 1 a clear preferential solubility in the fluorinated solvent was found.

Table 3. Solubility of dppea and Fluorous and Non- Fluorous dppe Derivatives G {m, x} in Perfluorinated and Non- Fluorinated Solvents.

Compound solubility at room temperature melting range (°C) THF toluene FC-72° dppe +--134-138 G {0} + d _ 186-189 G {1, 6} + +-136-138 G {1, 8}}---155-159 G {2, 6} + d + oil G{3,6} - - + oil a dppe = bis (diphenylphosphino) ethane. b + > 0. 1 g/ml, -: 0. 01 g/ml. CFC-72 : mixture of perfluorinated hexanes. d Not determined.

Application of the fluorous monophosphines and diphosphines in catalysis.

The fluorous monophosphine and diphosphine compounds according to the invention can serve as ligands for transition metal complexes that have potential as catalysts or catalyst precursors for fluorous phase homogeneous catalysis and fluorous bi-phasic catalysis.

The invention accordingly relates to metal complexes comprising at least one of these monophosphines or diphosphines as well as the preparation of these complexes and the use of these complexes and these phosphines as catalyst or catalyst precursors for fluorous phase and/or fluorous bi-phasic catalytic processes.

Preferred metal complexes are those containing iron, ruthenium, osmium, cobalt, rhodium, iridium, nickel, palladium and/or platinum, most preferably rhodium, iridium, nickel, palladium and/or platinum.

Preferred catalytic chemical processes are hydroformylation, hydrosilylation, hydroboration, carbonylation, Heck-type reactions, oligo-and polymerisations, cross-coupling reactions and hydrogenation of unsaturated compounds, preferably alkenes.

Representative examples of metal complexes of the fluorous phosphines and diphosphines developed are listed in Table 4. They have been prepared by modification of classical procedures (see examples for details).

Table 4. Fluorous Metal Phosphine and Diphosphine Complexes and their Characteristic 31P-NMR Spectroscopic Data.

Complex Formula 8 (multiplicity) 1Jp M 2 no. (Hz) (Hz) H{1,6}a (D{1,6})3RhCl 48. 0 (dt) 190 37. 8 31. 4 (dd) 143 37. 6 H {1, 8} a (D {1, 8}) 3RhCl 48. 0 (dt) 192 37. 8 31. 4 (dd) 145 37. 4 I {1, 6}" (G {l, 6}) Rh (COD)] BPh4 56. 1 (d) 148- J{2,6}c (G{2,6})NiCl2 58. 1 (s)-- K {1, 6} b (G {1, 6}) PtCl2 41. 9 (s) 3604e K{2,6}d (G{2,6})PtCl2 42. 0 (s) 3568e- In FC-72/C6D6, 1 : 1 (v/v). b In CDCl3. c In C6/D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v) d In CDCl3/CF3C6Hs, 1 : 1 (v/v). e Satellites.

Furthermore the invention relates to the separation, selective extraction and/or recycling of fluorous metal complexes, catalysts and/or catalyst precursors containing at least one of the fluorous monophosphine and diphosphine ligands according to the invention and which is based on the preferential solubility of these complexes in perfluorinated or partially fluorinated solvents and/or their fluor phase

affinity in multiphase solvent systems consisting of at least one per-or polyfluorinated solvent phase and a non- fluorinated hydrocarbon phase. A preferred embodiment of the invention concerns the selective extraction/separation of soluble metal catalysts from a reaction mixture comprising organic reagents and reaction products and the reuse of these catalysts. The successful application of the fluorous catalysts developed and their efficient recycling using fluorous bi-phasic separation techniques was demonstrated by a rhodium catalysed hydrogenation of 1-alkenes.

It was found that rhodium complexes H {1, 6} and H {1, 8} obtained from [(COD) RhCl] 2 (COD = cyclooctadiene) and fluorous phosphines D {1, 6} and D {1, 8}, respectively, are active catalysts for hydrogenation of 1-alkenes under single phase fluorous conditions at 80 °C (Table 5). In this respect compounds H {1, 6} and H {1, 8} are true fluorous equivalents of the classical Wilkinson's hydrogenation catalyst (PPh3) 3RhCl.

The hydrogenation products were readily isolated from the catalyst layer by cooling of the reaction mixture to 0 °C followed by phase separation of the resulting biphasic system. In this way hydrogenation of 1-octene afforded n- octane in > 95% yield (GC, GC-MS). Less than 4. 3 % internal olefins resulting from isomerization were present. In case of H {1, 8} it was possible to recycle the fluorous catalyst layer multiple times allowing high turnover numbers and high conversions per cycle (Table 5 and Figure 5).

Table 5. Catalytic Hydrogenationa of 1-Octene using H {1, 6} and H {1, 8} as Pre-catalysts Complex cycle conv. t1/2 TOF50 TON Leachingb [%] (min) (h-l) (cumulative) Rh (%) P (%) H {1, 6} = 1 95 56 298 531 0. 27 8. 1 H{1,8}d 1 92 69 177 337 0. 11 2. 34 2 96 58 212 688 0. 05 2. 06 3 99 47 261 1048 0. 10 3. 24 4 92 43 277 1383 0. 11 3. 20 5 99. 8 40 304 1747 0. 18 3. 52 6 96. 8 30 397 2100 0. 08 2. 15 7 94 24 507 2444 0. 05 2. 34 8 99. 7 20 617 2808 0. 33e 4. 7 oye 9f 85 75 142 3117 0. 08 3. 41 Conditions : solvent = c-CF 3C6F, l, T = 80 °C, p (H2) = 1 bar. b AT T = 0 °C, estimated error of ICP/AAS analysis 0. 013 %. ° Containing 10 mol % of D {1, 6}, [1-octene]/[Rh] = 559, [Rh] o = 0. 0060 M. d [1- octene]/ [Rh] = 365, [Rh] = 0. 0087 M in the initial cycle. e High value due to experimental error during phase separation. r Fresh c-CF3C6F11 added as compensation for losses of fluorous solvent.

It was found for H {1, 8} that the activity increased with the number of cycles (up to TOF # 600 h-1 in the 8th cycle).

Without being bound by theory, this is most probably caused by the combined effects of a non-zero order rate dependence in rhodium and olefins, (observed) losses of fluorous solvent due to evaporation during phase separation under H2-flow and non-zero miscibility of c-C6F11CF3 in the product layer even at 0 °C (ca 5 % by volume). Consequently, an average loss of fluorous solvent of ca 12 % per cycle (ca 0. 25 mL) took place. However, restoring the amount of c-C6F11CF3 in the 9th

cycle to its initial volume showed that the catalyst activity had dropped by 19 % (entry 9, Table 6).

Rhodium leaching into the organic phase (as determined by ICP-AAS) was low. On average 0. 12 % of Rh per cycle was lost corresponding to a rhodium concentration of 3 ppm (by weight) in the product phase. Over 9 cycles only 1 % of rhodium was lost despite of the phase separation method used.

Leaching was higher for less fluorous pre-catalyst H {1, 6} : 0. 3 % (6 ppm) of rhodium was present in the organic phase after phase separation.

The amount of leached rhodium allows to calculate the average partition coefficients (P) of the rhodium species present during phase separation (Table 6). The values found, clearly demonstrate a significant positive effect of longer fluorochains and lower temperature on the value of P. The partitioning of rhodium found for H {1, 8} at 0 °C is higher than reported for RhCl [P (CH2) 2 (CF2) nCF3) 3 3 (696 and 811 for n = 5 and 7, respectively, in c-C6F1lCF3/toluene at 27 °C, Juliette, J. J. J. ; Rutherford, D. ; Horváth, I. T. ; Gladysz, J. A. ; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2696-2704.). Although a direct comparison is difficult because of the different solvent system used, this result is considered good for arylphosphine rhodium complexes taking into account the significant lower partition coefficients of the fluorous arylphosphines (D {1, 6} : P = 0. 13 ; D {1, 8} : P = 1. 06, in c- C6F1lCF3/toluene at 0 °C) as compared to the fluorous alkylphosphines P [(CH2) 2 (CF2) nCF3) 3] 3 (n = 5 : P = 82 ; n = 7 : P = 332 in c-C6F1lCF3/toluene at 27 °C, Juliette, J. J. J. ; Horváth, I. T. ; Gladysz, J. A. ; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.

1997, 36, 1610-1612).

Table 6. Average Partitioning Coefficients (P) a of Rhodium Species present in the Fluorous Biphasic Product Mixture Resulting from Hydrogenation of 1-Octene pre-catalyst F content of D {l, x} P (wt %) T = 25°CT = 0°C H 48. 7 76 293 H {1, 8} 53. 2 n. d. 1052C Calculated from of the amount of Rh found in the organic product phase by ICP-AAS analysis. b Obtained from data of 1 cycle. value over nine cycles.

The retention of free uncoordinated fluorous phosphine can be used for recycling the intact catalyst system. In fact, small amounts of fluorous phosphine were present in the alkane product phases (H {1, 6} : 130 ppm, 8 % of total phosphorus in precatalyst ; H {1, 8} : 64 ppm, 3 % of total phosphorus in precatalyst) indicating that leaching of fluorous ligand is more significant than that of rhodium and to a large extent responsible for the lower recycling efficiency of the H {1, 6}-derived catalyst solution.

To be able to directly compare the activities of fluorous derivatives H {1, 6} and H {1, 8} with non-fluorous P (ChHQ-4-S iMe3) 3RhCl (H O0) and the conventional Wilkinson catalyst (PPh3) 3RhCl, homogeneous hydrogenation of 1-octene were carried out under single phase conditions in the hybrid solvent a, a, a-trifluorotoluene at atmospheric H2 pressures.

The results obtained with the different pre-catalysts are listed in Table 7. Highest rates of hydrogen uptake (14. 2 mol. L~1. h~l) were measured for lc at relatively high rhodium and olefine concentrations (entry 2, Table 7). Under these conditions a zero-order dependence in [1-octene] was found up to ca 80 % conversion resulting in a linear conversion versus

time plot. In all other experiments ([Rh] = 4. 0-8. 0 mM, [1- octene] o = 1. 46 M) rates of hydrogen uptake were lower (< 11 mol. L-l. h-1) and conversion versus time plots corresponded to a rate law-d [1-octene]/dt = kg. [l-octene] for > 98% conversion allowing to evaluate catalyst activity in terms of the observed first order rate constant kobs. Since for these experiments the rates of dihydrogen uptake were well below the maximum value obtained in entry 2, diffusion limitation of H2 can be excluded. In addition to kobs, turn over frequencies (TOF in mol. mol-1.h-1) were derived from the tangent of a 4t''order polynomal fit to conversion versus time plots at 25 % conversion and serve as a measure of catalyst activity independent of any assumed kinetic relationship with substrate.

Table 7. Comparison of Fluorous and Non-Fluorous Pre- catalysts RhCl[P(C6H4-p-R)3]3 in the Hydrogenation of 1- Octene. a Entry Catalyst [Rh] [1-octene] con-TONb kobsc T° precursor vers ion (mM) (M) (%) (h-l) (h-1) 1 H 4. 0 1. 46 92 336 7. 5 (2) 1610 2 H 8. 0 2. 92 99 361-e 1910 3 H{1,6}° 4. 0 1. 46 99 363 4. 2 (1) 1110 4 (PPh3) 3RhCl 4. 0 1. 46 98 358 4. 0 (1) 960 5 H{1,8}d 4. 0 1. 46 99 355 3. 2 (1) 870 a Conditions : T = 80 °C, p (H2) = 1 bar, solvent : a, a, a- trifluorotoluene, stirring speed = 900 rpm. b TON = turn over number (mole of olefin/mole of Rh). ° Obtained by fitting the data to Xt = [1-exp (-kobs. t)] (Xt = conversion). d TOF = turn over frequency (mole of olefin/mole of Rh/hour) at 25 % conversion. e Zero order in olefin up to 80 % conversion, kobs = 14. 2 (1) mol. L-l. h-1.

From Table 7 it can be derived that [P (C6H4-4- SiMel) 13RhCl (H {01) displays a high activity being > 1. 5 times more active than Wilkinson's catalyst. This result shows the beneficial influence of the para-silyl substitution on catalytic activity. The H {1, 6} (entry 3) is comparable in activity to RhCl (PPh3) 3 (entry 4) despite its fluorotail functionalisation and the presence of small quantities of free phosphine (< 10 %) which are known to partially inhibit catalytic activity (Montelatici, A. ; van der Ent, A. ; Osborn, J. A. ; Wilkinson, G. ; J. Chem. Soc., (A), 1968, 1054-1058 and Jardine, F. H. in Progress Inorg. Chem., Lippard, S. J.

(ed), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981, Vol. 28, p 117-131.) The somewhat lower activity of H {1, 8} (entry 5) suggests a small negative electronic influence on catalytic activity caused by the longer fluor tail but solvation effects cannot be excluded, however. The overall activities of H {1, 6} and H {1, 8} in perfluormethylcyclohexane and solvent a, a, a- trifluorotoluene also compare favourably with turn over frequencies for 1-alkene hydrogenation by Wilkinson's catalyst in conventional solvents (TOF = 150-600 h-1 for hydrogenation of 1-heptene in benzene, Osborne, J. A. ; Jardine, F. H. ; Young, J. F. ; Wilkinson, G. ; J. Chem. Soc., (A), 1966, 1711-1732).

Another example concerns a nickel-catalysed cross- coupling reaction of butylmagnesium bromide and chlorobenzene in a fluorous bi-phasic reaction medium using a fluorous phase soluble diphosphine nickel dichloride complex as catalyst precursor (Figure 6). This example demonstrates the compatibility of the catalysts with the fluorous bi-phasic reaction medium employed and that at least partial catalyst recovery is possible using the technique of fluorphase

immobilisation (Table 8). It should be noted that no attempts were made to optimise the recycling efficiency.

Table 8. Results of Fluorous Biphasic Nickel-Catalysed Cross-Coupling after 20 h using (G {2, 6}) NiC12 (1 mol %) as Catalyst Cycle Yield of butylbenzene (%) 1 91 2 28 3 8 Reaction conditions : catalyst concentration : 0. 011 M in perfluormethylcyclohexane, 1 equiv. of chlorobenzene and 1. 1 equiv. butyl Grignard in nBu2O (1. 1 M), T = 90 °C (biphasic reaction conditions) Description of the figures : Figure 1. Reagents : (i) 1. 5 HSiMe2Cl, catalyst : H2PtCl6 (aq) ; (ii) Excess of Mg ; (iii) HSi (Me3 m) Clm ; (iv) Br2.

Figure 2. Reagents : (v) 1, 4-LiC6H4Br from 1, 4-BrC6H4Br and n-BuLi or from 1, 4-IC6H4Br and 2 tBuLi ; (vi) nBuLi or 2 tBuLi ; (vii) PCl3 or P (OMe) ; (viii) P (C6H4-p-Li) 3 from P (C6H4- p-Br) 3 and 6 tBuLi.

Figure 3. Reagents : (i) 4 p-BrC6H4Li ; (ii) 8 tBuLi ; (iii) 4 XSi (CH2CH2CxF2x+1)mMe3-m (m = 0, 1 ; X = Cl, m = 2, 3 ; X = Br) Figure 4. Partitioning coefficients P for phosphines D {m, x} in several fluorous biphasic solvent systems with c- C6FllCF3 as the fluorous phase. The invention will now be further illustrated by the following examples which do not intend to limit the scope of the invention.

Figure 5. Plot of turn over number (TON) and turn over frequency (TOF) for nine cycles. Conditions : catalyst = H {1, 8} ; solvent = CF3C6F11, T = 80 °C, p (H2) = 1 bar, [1-

octene]/ = 365, [Rh] o = 0. 0087 mol/L. Fresh c-CF3C6F11 added in 9t''cycle as compensation for losses of fluorous solvent.

Figure 6. Nickel-catalysed cross-coupling reaction of butylmagnesium bromide and chlorobenzene in a fluorous biphasic reaction medium using a fluorous phase soluble diphosphine nickel dichloride complex as catalyst precursor Examples General Remarks. Reactions were conducted under dinitrogen atmosphere unless noted otherwise. Solvents were employed as follows : benzene, toluene, n-pentane, n-hexane, diethyl ether distilled from Na/benzophenone ; FC-72, c- C6F1lCF3, CF3C6Hs (Acros, Alfa) degassed and stored over molecular sieves ; C6F6 (Acros), C6D6, CDCl3, n-C6D14 (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Aldrich) degassed and stored over molecular sieves. Reagents were utilised as follows : CXF2x+lCH=CH2 (x = 6, 8) (Acros), CXFzX+lCH2CH2I (x = 6, 8) (Lancaster), Mg turnings (Norsk Hydro, 99. 8+%) used as received ; HSiCl3, HSi (Me) Cl2, HSiMe2Cl, H2PtCl6 (aq) (Acros) stored under nitrogen and used as received. Chlorobenzene and di-n-butyl ether were distilled and stored over molecular sieves under dinitrogen atmosphere before use. Elemental and ICP-AAS analyses were carried out by H. Kolbe, Mikroanalytisches Laboratorium, Mühlheim an der Ruhr. NMR spectra were obtained on Varian INOVA 300 and Varian MERCURY 200 spectrometers. 1H-, 13C_, 29Si-NMR spectra were referenced relative to TMS, 31P-NMR relative to 85 % H3PO4 and 19F-NMR relative to CFC13 (external). The 19F-decoupler frequency in 13C {19F}NMR experiments was either set to [a] 8 =-121 or [b] 8

=-81 to 19F-decouple either the CF2-or the CF3-groups, respectively.

1. CxF2x+1(CH2)2SiMe2Cl (C{1,x}, x = 6, 8) by Hydrosilylation : See also Ameduri, B. ; Boutevin, B. ; Nouiri, M. ; Talbi, M. ; J. Fluorine Chem. 1995, 74, 191.

C {1, 6} : 17. 3 g (50. 0 mmol) of C6F13CH=CH2 and 20. 0 mL (180 mmol) of HSiMe2Cl were combined, H2PtCl6 (aq) (40 mg) was added and the mixture was refluxed for 2 hours. Another 20 mg of catalyst were added followed by refluxing over night and fractional distillation. Yield : 13. 2 g (29. 9 mmol, 60 %) of C {1, 6} ; b. p. : 79 °C (0. 1 torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3) 8 2. 14 (m, 2 H), 1. 04 (m, 2 H), 0. 46 (s, 6 H, 2JSi,H = 7.0 Hz(). 19F NMR (#, C6D6)-81. 4 (tt, 3 F, LJF = 9. 8 Hz, JE, F = 2. 4 Hz),-114. 3 (m, 2 F),-122. 6 (m, 2 F),-123. 5 (m, 2 F),-123. 8 (m, 2 F),- 126. 9 (m, 2 F). l3C {1H} NMR (#, CDCl3) 25. 2 (t, 2JC,F = 24. 5 Hz), 8. 63 (t, 3JC,F = 2. 9 Hz), 1. 25 (s, 1JC,Si = 57. 7 Hz).

C {1, 8} : Following a similar procedure as for C[1,6}, 22. 3 g (50. 0 mmol) of C8F17CH=CH2 and 21. 7 mL (0. 2 mol) of HSiMe2Cl yielded 21. 4 g (39. 6 mmol, 79. 2 %) of C {1, 8} ; b. p.: 87 °C (0. 1 torr). 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) 8 2. 16 (m, 2 H), 0. 95 (m, 2 H), 0. 32 (s, 6 H). 19F NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) 8-81. 2 (m, 3 F),-115. 8 (m, 2 F,),-121. 5 (m, 6 F),-122. 4 (m, 2 F),-122. 9 (m, 2 F),-126. 0 (m, 2 F). 29Si NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) 5 30. 8 (s). 13C{19F}b NMR(CDCl3) # 118. 5 (m), 117. 5 (t ZtTC, F = 27. 5 Hz), 111. 3 (tm, 1JC,F = 268 Hz), 108. 8 (tt, F = 272 Hz, 2JC,F = 28. 7 Hz), 25. 6 (tm, 1JcH = 131 Hz), 8. 93 (t, Jc H = 121 Hz), 1. 46 (q, 1JC,H = 121 Hz).

2. Grignard of CxF2x+1CH2CH2I ( = 6, 8) 60 g (2. 5 mol) of Mg turnings were placed in a three necked round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirring

bar. While evacuating and heating the flask with a Bunsen burner the Mg turnings were stirred until a Mg-mirror had formed. After reaching room temperature the flask was filled with ca. 250 mL of diethyl ether and 25 g of CXF2x+l (CHz) 2I (52. 7 mmol, x = 6 ; 43. 5 mmol, x = 8) of 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H- perfluoroalkyl iodide dissolved in 60 mL diethyl ether were slowly added (ca. 1 drop per 15 s) under vigorous stirring.

The reaction mixture was stirred for another 15 h at room temperature affording a slightly yellow solution of the Grignard. All Grignard solutions used were freshly prepared and filtrated (G4 glass filter). Judging from a number of reactions with the hydrochlorosilanes to produce compounds B {m, x} the yields of the Grignard reaction were estimated to be > 79 % (x = 6) and > 75 % (x = 8).

3. HSiMe3 [ (CH2) 2CxF2x+l] (B {m, x}, m = 1, 2, 3 ; x = 6, 8) : For compounds B {3, x} also see Boutevin, B. ; Guida- Pietrasanta, F. ; Ratsimihety, A. ; Caporiccio, G. ; Gornowitz, G. ; J. Fluorine Chem., 1993, 60, 211 ; Améduri, B. ; Boutevin, B. ; Nouiri, M. ; Talbi, M. ; J. Fluorine Chem. 1995, 74, 191 ; Studer, A. ; Jeger, P. ; Wipf, P. ; Curran, D. P. ; J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 2917.

General Procedure : The CxF2x+l (cH2) 2I-Grignard solutions were treated with a stoichiometric amount of the respective chlorosilane (assuming 90 % conversion of the Grignard reaction) and stirred over night. The reaction mixtures, which either consisted of a liquid biphasic system or a white suspension, were quenched with water (100 mL). After phase separation the organic phases were combined with two 20 mL diethyl ether extracts of the water phase and dried over MgSO4. Volatiles were removed in vacuo. The light-yellow oils (B {2, 6}, B {3, 6}, B {1, 8}) and white waxy solids (B {2, 8}, B {3, 8}) contained # 10 % of Wurtz coupling product, which was

removed by Kugelrohr distillation or by fractional distillation (B {1, 6}).

B {1, 6} : A Grignard solution prepared from 12. 5 g (26 mmol) C6F13 (CH2) 2I, treated with 3. 3 mL (2. 8 g, 30 mmol) of HSiMe2Cl, yielded 7. 32 g (18. 0 mmol, 68 % based on 1H, lH, 2H, 2H-perfluoroalkyl iodide) ; b. p. : 60-62 °C (0. 1 torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3) : 8 3. 91 (non,'Ji,, = 180 Hz, 3JH,H = 3. 4 Hz, 1H), 2. 08 (m, 2 H), 0. 83 (m, 2 H), 0. 12 (d, 3JH H = 3. 4 Hz, 2JSi,H = 7.0 Hz, 6 H). 19F NMR (#, CDCl3)-81. 4 (t, JF,F = 9 Hz, 3 F),-115. 5 (quin, JF,F, = 9 Hz, 2 F),-121. 4 (m, 2 F),-122. 3 (m, 2 F),-122. 8 (m, 2 F),-125. 7 (m, 2 F) ; 29Si {1H} NMR (CDCl3) : # -11.1. 13C{1H} NMR (CDC13) : # 118. 5 (tt, je F = 253 Hz, JC, F 30. 4 Hz), 117. 4 (qt, 1JC,F = 287 Hz, 2JC,F = 32. 3 Hz), 26. 6 (t, 2JC,F = 24 Hz), 3. 88,-4. 73 ('Ji, c = 51 Hz). 13C{19F}a NMR (Cl3) : 118.5 (m), 117. 5 (q, 1JC F = 154 Hz), 111. 5, 111. 3, 110. 5, 108. 7 (q, 2JC,F = 20 Hz), 26. 6 (ttd, 1JC, H = 130 Hz, 2JC,H = 5. 5 Hz, 3JC,H = 2. 5 Hz), 3. 88 (tm, 1JC,H = 127 Hz),-4. 73 (qdt, 1JC,H = 122 Hz, 2JC, H = 7. 6 Hz, 3JC,H = 2. 0 Hz).

B {2, 6} : A Grignard solution prepared from 12. 5 g (26 mmol) of C6F13 (CH2) 2I, treated with 1. 24 mL (1. 38 g, 12. 0 mmol) of HSiMeCl2 yielded 7. 68 g (10. 4 mmol, 79 % based on 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluoroalkyl iodide), b. p. : 96 GC (0. 1 torr).

1H NMR (CDCl3) : 3. 91 (oct, 1JSi,H = 187 Hz, 3JH,H = 3. 8 Hz, 1H), 2. 10 (m, 4 H), 0. 90 (m, 4 H), 0. 19 (d, 3JH,H = 3. 8 Hz, 3 H). 19F NMR (#, CDCl3)-82. 0 (m, 3 F),-117. 1 (m, JF. F = 15 Hz, 2 F),-123. 0 (m, 2 F),-124. 0 (m, 2 F),-124. 5 (m, 2 F), -127. 3 (m, 2 F). 29Si {1H} NMR (Cl3) : # -6. 78 (s). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3) : b 26. 4 (t, 2JC,F = 23 Hz), 2. 33 (s),-6. 74 (s).

B {3, 6} : A Grignard solution prepared from 31. 52 g (66. 5 mmol) C6F13 (CH2)2I, treated with 2. 04 mL (2. 7 g, 19. 9 mmol) of HSiCl3 yielded 18. 4 g (17. 2 mmol, 77. 6 % based on

lH, lH, 2H, 2H-perfluoroalkyl iodide) ; b. p. : 150 °C (0.1 torr).

1H NMR (CDCl3) : # 3. 94 (m, 1JSi,H = 186 Hz, 1H), 2. 12 (m, 6 H), 0. 97 (m, 6 H). 19F NMR (CDCl#) : # -81. 5 (t, JF F = 12 Hz, 3 F), -116. 5 (m, JF, F = 15 Hz, 2 F),-122. 5 (m, 2 F),-123. 5 (m, 2 F),-124. 0 (m, 2 F),-126. 8 (m, 2 F). 29Si {1H} NMR (CDCl3) : b -2. 65 (s). 13C{1H} NMR (8, CDCl3) 118. 1 (tt, 1JC,F = 255 Hz, 2JC,F = 31. 4 Hz), 117. 5 (qt, 1Jc F = 288 Hz, 2JC F = 33. 0 Hz), 26. 3 (t, \p F = 23. 8 Hz), 0. 83. 13C{19F}a NMR (CDCl3): # 118. 1 (m), 117. 4 (q, Jc F = 232 Hz), 111. 3, 111. 2, 110. 4, 108. 7 (q, 2JC,F = 25. 7 Hz), 26. 3 (ttd, 1JcH = 130 Hz, 2JC,H = 5. 4 Hz, 3JC,H = 2. 4 Hz), 0. 84 (tm, 1Jc H = 123 Hz).

B {2, 8} : A Grignard solution prepared from 26. 2 g (45. 6 mmol) C8F17 (CH2)2I, treated with 2. 13 mL (2. 36 g, 20. 5 mmol) HSiMeCl2 yielded 14. 9 g (15. 9 mmol, 69. 7 % based on 1H, lH, 2H, 2H-perfluoroalkyl iodide) ; m. p. : 38-40 °C. Anal.

Calcd for C21H12F34Si : C 26. 85, H 1. 28, F 68. 84, Si 2. 98.

Found : C 26. 95, H 1. 36, F 68. 66, Si 2. 91. 1H NMR (#, CDCl3) 3. 91 (oct, 1JsiH = 191 Hz, 3JHH = 3. 6 Hz, 1H), 2. 11 (m, 4 H), 0. 91 (m, 4 H), 0. 20 (d, 3JH,H = 3. 6 Hz, 3 H). 19F NMR (d, CDCl3) -81. 7 (m, 3 F),-116. 9 (m, JF,F = 12 Hz, 2 F),-122. 7 (m, 6 F),-123. 5 (m, 2 F),-124. 1 (m, 2 F),-127. 0 (m, 2 F). 29Si NMR (8, CDC13)-6. 81 (d, 1JSi,H = 192 Hz). 29Si{1H} NMR (8, CDCl3) -6. 77. 13C{1H} NMR (6, CDCl3) 26. 4 (t, 2JC,F = 24 Hz), 2. 26,- 6. 86. 13C{19F}a NMR (#, CDCl3) 118. 4 (m), 117. 5 (q, 1Jc F = 269 Hz), 111. 7, 111. 5, 111. 2, 111. 1, 110. 6, 108. 8 (q, 2JC,F = 26. 3 Hz), 26. 6 (tm, 1JC,H = 130 Hz), 2. 42 (tm, 1JC,H = 119 Hz), -7. 01 (qm, 1JC, H = 121 Hz).

B {3, 8} : A Grignard solution prepared from 24. 5 g (42. 6 mmol) C8F17 (CH2) 2I, treated with 1. 08 mL (1. 44 g, 10. 7 mmol) HSiCl3 yielded 14. 7 g (10. 7 mmol, 75. 3 % based on 1H, lH, 2H, 2H-perfluoroalkyl iodide) ; m. p. : 91 °C. Anal. Calcd

for C30H13F51Si: C 26. 27, H 0. 95, F 70. 71, Si 2. 04. Found C 26. 16, H 1. 10, F 70. 62, Si 2. 18. 1H NMR (CDC13/C6F6 3 : 1 (v/v)) : 5 3. 9 (m, 1JSi,H = 192 Hz, 1H), 2. 13 (m, 6 H), 1. 05 (m, 6 H). 19F NMR (CDC13/C6F6 3 : 1 (v/v)) # -81. 7 (m, 3 F),-116. 9 (m, 2 F),-122. 7 (m, 6 F),-123. 6 (m, 2 F),-124. 2 (m, 2 F), -127. 0 (m, 2 F). Sit H} NMR (CDC13/C6F6 3 : (v/v) 8-2. 38.

13C{19F}a NMR (#, CDCl3/C6F6 3 : 1 (v/v)) : # 118. 5 (m), 117. 8 (q, 1JC,F = 262 Hz), 111. 8 (s), 111. 8 (s), 111. 4 (s), 111. 4 (s), 110. 9 (s), 109. 0 (q, 2JC, F = 24. 4 Hz), 26. 6 (tm, Jc H = 130 Hz), 1. 0 (tm, 1Jc H = 124 Hz).

4. [CxF2x+1(CH2)2]mSiMe3-mBr (C{m,x}, m = 2, 3 ; x = 6, 8) : For compounds C{3,x} also see Studer, A. ; Curran, D. P. ; Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 6681 ; Studer, A. ; Jeger, P. ; Wipf, P. ; Curran, D. P. ; J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 2917.

General Procedure : The silanes B {m, x} were either dissolved in n-hexane or n-hexane/FC-72 mixtures and a 2 fold excess of Br2 was added to the reaction mixture at 0 °C.

After being stirred for 15 h at room temperature all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The slightly yellow or colorless oily or waxy residues or waxy solids, when necessary, were further purified by Kugelrohr, fractional distillation or recrystallisation.

C {2, 6} : A solution of 25. 4 g (34. 3 mmol) of B {2, 6} in 100 mL of n-hexane was treated with 3. 51 mL (11. 0 g, 68. 7 mmol) of Br2, yielding 27. 6 g (34, 0 mmol, 99. 1 % based on B {2, 6}) ; b. p. : 105 °C (0. 1 torr). 1H NMR (C6D6) : # 1.93 (m, 4 H), 0. 71 (m, 4 H), 0. 02 (s, 3 H). 19F NMR (8, C6D6) -81. 5 (t, -TF, = 9 Hz, 3 F),-115. 7 (m, JF, = 15 Hz, 2 F),-122. 3 (m, 2 F),-123. 3 (m, 2 F),-123. 5 (m, 2 F),-126. 6 (m, 2 F).

29Si{1H} NMR (#, C6D6) 29.2. 13C{1H} NMR (C6D6) : # 118.8 (tt, 1JC,F, = 255 Hz, 2JC,F = 30.6 Hz), 118.1 (qt, 1JC,F = 289 Hz, 2JC,F =

33. 0 Hz), 112. 3 (tquin, 1JC,F = 268 Hz, 2JC,F = 32. 0 Hz), 112. 1 (tquin, JCF = 271. 3 Hz, 2JC,F = 31. 8 Hz), 111. 3 (tquin, 1JC,F = 272 Hz, JCF = 31. 7 Hz), 109. 4 (tqt, 1JC,F = 260 Hz, 2JC,F = .30. 5 Hz), 26. 0 (t, 2JCF = 23. 8 Hz), 7. 73,-0. 38.

C {3, 6} : A suspension of 11. 8 g (11. 0 mmol) of B {3, 6} in 100 mL of n-hexane was treated with 1. 13 mL (3. 54 g, 22. 2 mmol) of Br2, yielding 10. 1 g (8. 79 mmol, 79. 9 % based on B {3, 6}) after fractional distillation ; b. p. : 180 °C (0. 1 torr). 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # 2. 10 (m, 6 H), 0. 98 (m, 6 H). 29Si {1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1: 1 (v/v)) : 5 30. 0 (s). 13C{1H} NMR (C6D6) : # 119-109 (m), 26. 2 (t, 2JC,F = 24. 2 Hz), 6. 42.

C {2, 8} : A solution of 24. 6 g (26. 2 mmol) of B {2, 8} in 400 mL of n-hexane was treated with 2. 7 mL (8. 4 g, 52. 4 mmol) of Br2, yielding 21. 3 g (20. 9 mmol, 79. 8 % based on B {2, 8}) after recrystallization in benzene. m. p.: 55 °C. Anal. calcd for C21H11BrF34Si : C 24. 77, H 1. 08, Br 7. 85, F 63. 50, Si 2. 75.

Found C 24. 87, H 1. 15, Br 7. 67, F 63. 62, Si 2. 69. 1H NMR (C6D6) : 2. 00 (m, 4 H), 0. 84 (m, 4 H), 0. 12 (s, 2JC,F = 6. 6 Hz, 3 H). 19F NMR (#, C6D6)-81. 0 (m, 3 F),-115. 2 (m, 2 F),- 121. 7 (m, 6 F),-122. 5 (m, 2 F),-122. 9 (m, 2 F),-126. 0 (m, 2 F). 29Si {1H} NMR (C6D6) : 5 29. 1 (s). 13C{19F}a NMR (C6D6) : 6 118. 7 (m), 117. 9 (q, 1JC,F = 272 Hz), 112. 0, 111. 7, 111. 6, 111. 1, 109. 8 (m), 25. 9 (tt, 1JC,F = 131 Hz, 2JC,F =5.5 Hz), 7. 61 (tm, 1JC,F = 122 Hz),-0. 31 (qm, Jc H = 123 Hz).

C {3, 8} : A biphase liquid system of 12. 6 g (8. 72 mmol) of B {3, 8} in 40 mL of FC-72 and 30 mL of n-hexane was treated with 1. 0 mL (3. 12 g, 19. 5 mmol) of Bru, yielding 11. 6 g (8. 00 mmol, 91. 7 % based on B {3, 8}) of pure C {3, 8} ; m. p. : 93 °C. 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 3 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 2. 21 (m, 6 H), 1. 13 (m, 6 H). 19F NMR (C6D6/C6F6 3 : 1 (v/v)) : 8-81. 6 (m, 3 F),-116. 0 (m, 2 F),-121. 9 (m, 6 F),-122. 8 (m),-123. 1 (m, 2 F),-126. 3 (m, 2 F). 29Si{1H} NMR (C, D6/C6F6 3 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 30. 1 (s).

5. p-[{CxF2x+1(CH2)2}mSiMe3-m]C6H4Br (E{m,x}, m = 0, 1 ; x = 6, 8) : General Procedure : p-LiC6H4Br was obtained from p- iodobromobenzene and one equivalent of n-BuLi (1. 5 M n-hexane solution), in n-pentane at 0 °C. After 1 hour the suspension was centrifuged and the liquid was decanted from the white precipitate. The respective chlorosilane dissolved in 10 mL of THF was added at-78 °C to a suspension of p-LiC6H4Br in n- pentane. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and was stirred over night. After quenching with saturated NH4Cl (aq), the water phase was extracted with two 20 mL portions of n-pentane. The combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4. Fractional distillation afforded the pure products. Compounds 1, 4- (RMe2Si) 2C6H4 (R = Me, -(CH2)2C6F13, - (CH2)2C8F17) were obtained as side products.

E : 1. 74 g (16. 0 mmol) of Me3SiCl, 5. 0 g (17. 7 mmol) of p-iodobromobenzene and 11. 8 mL (17. 7 mmol) of n-BuLi in 80 mL n-pentane yielded 3. 59 g (15. 7 mmol, 98. 1 %) based on Me3SiCl) ; b. p. : 238 °C. 1H NMR (C6D6): # 7. 34 (m, 2 H), 7. 05 (m, 2 H), 0. 09 (s, 9 H). 13C{1H} NMR (8, C6D6) 139. 4, 135. 6, 131. 6, 124. 4,-0. 82 (s). 29Si {1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8- 3. 67 (s).

E {1, 6) : 3. 58 g (7. 57 mmol) of C{1,6}, 2. 4 g (8. 48 mmol) p-Iodobromobenzene and 5. 6 mL (8. 4 mmol) of n-BuLi in 40 mL n-pentane yielded 3. 53 g (6. 29 mmol, 83. 1 % based on C {1, 6}) ; b. p. : 104 °C (0. 1 torr). 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 7. 25 (m, 2 H), 7. 12 (m, 2 H), 2. 02 (m, 2 H), 0. 94 (m, 2 H), 0. 22 (s, 6 H). 19F NMR (C6D6) : 6-81. 4 (m, 3 F),-116. 4 (m, 2 F), -122. 5 (m, 2 F),-123. 5 (m, 2 F),-123. 8 (m, 2 F),-126. 7 (m, 2 F). 29Si{1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6-1. 51. 13C{1H} NMR (C6D6) : # 136. 3 (s), 135. 6 (s), 131. 9 (s), 125. 0 (s), 119. 3

(tt, Jc F = 255 Hz, 2JC,F = 29. 8 Hz), 118. 2 (qt, 1JC,F = 287 Hz, Jc F = 31. 7 Hz), 112. 3 (tquin, 1JC,F = 268 Hz), 112. 2 (tquin, Jc F = 270 Hz, 2JC,F = 32. 5 Hz), 111. 3 (tquin, Jc F = 274 Hz, 2JC, = 31. 6 Hz), 109. 5 (tqt, Jc F = 270 Hz, 2JC,F = 31. 6 Hz), 26. 5 (t, 2IJC, F = 23. 7 Hz), 5. 56 (s, 1JC,Si = = 50.5 Hz), -3.65 (s, 'Jc, si = 52. 8 Hz).

E {1, 8} : 21. 9 g (40. 5 mmol) of C{1,8}, 12. 6 g (44. 5 mmol) of p-iodobromobenzene and 27 mL (40. 5 mmol) of n-BuLi in 80 mL of n-pentane yielded 23. 3 g (35. 2 mmol, 86. 9 % based on C{1,8}) : b. p. : 145-150 °C (0. 1 torr), m. p.: 38 °C. 1H NMR (C6D6) : # 7.31 (m, 2 H), 6. 89 (m, 2 H), 1. 84 (m, 2 H), 0. 75 (m, 2 H),-0. 06 (s, 6 H, 2JSi,H = 6. 4 Hz). 13C (1H NMR (8, C6D6) : # 136. 3, 135. 6, 131. 9, 125. 0, 119. 3 (tt, 1JC,F = = 254 Hz, 2JC,F = 31. 1 Hz), 118. 0 (qt, 1JC,F = 288 Hz, 2JC,F = 33.0 Hz), 112. 7, 112. 7, 111. 9, 111. 9 (tm), 111. 2 (tm), 109. 1 (tm), 26. 5 (t, 2JC,F = 23. 8 Hz), 5. 56 (s, lJc si = 50. 7 Hz),-3. 65 (s, lJc si = 53. 1 Hz).

6. p-[{CxF2x+1(CH2)2}mSiMe3-m]C6H4Li (F{m,x}, m = 0, 1 ; x = 6, 8) : General Procedure : A solution of E {m, x} in n-hexane was treated either with 1 molar equivalent of n-BuLi (1. 5 M solution in n-hexane) at 0 °C or with 2 molar equivalents of t-BuLi (1. 5 M solution in n-hexane) at-78 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to reach room temperature and stirred over night. The voluminous white precipitate formed was separated, washed twice with 20 mL of n-hexane and dried in vacuo.

F : 4. 67 g (20. 4 mmol) of E {0} in 100 mL of n-hexane and 13. 6 mL (20. 4 mmol) of n-BuLi yielded 2. 21 g (14. 2 mmol, 69. 6 %) of product. 2. 03 g (8. 84 mmol) of E {0} and 11. 8 mL

(0. 018 mmol) of t-BuLi afforded 1. 8 g of a mixture of 1. 15 g (7. 32 mmol, 82. 8 %) of F and LiBr. 1H NMR (C6D6) : 8 7. 45 (m, 1H), 7. 20 (m, 3 H), 0. 19 (s, 9 H).

F {1, 6} : 6. 1 g (10. 9 mmol) of E {1, 6} in 50 mL of n-hexane and 14. 5 mL (21. 7 mmol) of t-BuLi yielded 4. 89 g (10. 0 mmol, 91. 7) of product. 1H NMR (C6D6) : 6 7. 27 (m, 1H), 7. 16 (m, 3 H), 1. 92 (m, 2 H), 0. 83 (m, 2 H), 0. 01 (s, 6 H).

F {1, 8} : 4. 36 g (6. 59 mmol) of E {1, 8} in 30 mL of n- hexane and 4. 39 mL (6. 58 mmol) of n-BuLi yielded 2. 74 g (4. 66 mmol, 70. 7 %) of product. 9. 28 g (14. 0 mmol) of E {1, 8} in 50 mL of n-hexane and 18. 7 mL (28. 1 mmol) of t-BuLi afforded 7. 07 g of a mixture of 6. 16 g (10. 5 mmol, 75. 0 %) F {l, 8} and LiBr. 1H NMR (C6D6) : 7. 27 (m, 1H), 7. 17 (m, 3 H), 1. 90 (m, 2 H), 0. 83 (m, 2 H), 0. 03 (s, 6 H).

7. P[C6H4-p-{SiMe3-m(CH2)2CxF2x+1}m]3 (D{m,x}, m = 0, 1; x = 6, 8) through Method a) : General Procedure : 3 equiv of F {m, x} were either suspended in n-pentane and cooled with ice water (x = 6) or dissolved in a mixture of n-hexane and THF (5 : 1 (v/v)) at-78 °C. One equivalent of PC13 or P (OMe) 3 were added slowly and one hour after the addition the cooling bath was removed.

After being stirred over night the reaction mixture was filtered and all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The white residue was washed three times with 20 mL of n-pentane. The volume of the combined n-pentane phases was reduced to 10 mL and it was stored at-10 °C. The solvent was decanted and the white precipitate was dried in vacuo.

D {0} has been prepared before using this route in US 2673210 ; Frisch, K. C. ; Lyons, H. ; J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1953, 75, 4078.

D : 1. 8 g of a mixture of F and LiBr containing 7. 36 mmol F {0} suspended in 40 mL of n-pentane and treated with 0. 289 mL (2. 45 mmol) of P (OMe)3 yielded 1. 06 g (2. 21 mmol, 90 % based on F {0}) as a yellow precipitate.

Recrystallization from ethanol afforded pure white, crystalline D {0}. 0. 68 g (4. 33 mmol) of F {0} in 30 mL of n- hexane and 5 mL of THF were treated with 0. 121 mL (1. 44 mmol) of PCl3 yielding 0. 4 g (0. 83 mmol, 57. 5 % based on F {0}) of D {0} ; m. p. : 194 °C. Anal. calcd for C27H39Si3P : C 67. 7, H 8. 21, Si 17. 6, P 6. 47 ; found C 67. 5, H 8. 31, Si 17. 8, P 6. 58. 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) 8 7. 35 (m, 2 H), 7. 23 (m, 2 H), 0. 28 (s, 9 H). 3lP 1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) 8-4. 61 (s). 29Si{1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # 4.03. 13C{1H} NMR (C, D6) 6 141. 3 (s, 1JSi,C = 64. 7 Hz), 138. 6 (d,'Jp, c 12. 2 Hz), 133. 8 (d, 3JP,C = 6. 6 Hz), 133. 6 (d, 2JP,C = 18. 9 Hz), -0.83 (s, 1JSi,C = 52. 3 Hz).

D {1, 6} : 4. 19 g (8. 6 mmol) of F {1, 6} in a mixture of 30 mL of n-hexane and 5 mL of THF was treated with 0. 25 mL (2. 84 mmol) of PC13 in 5 mL n-hexane. Yield 2. 85 g (1. 93 mmol, 67. 3 % based on F {1, 6)) ; m. p. : 89 °C. Anal. calcd for C48H42F39Si3P : C 39. 1, H 2. 85, F 50. 3, Si 5. 71, P 2. 10. Found C 39. 3, H 2. 87, F 50. 1, Si 5. 80, P 2. 08 ; 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6 7. 33 (m, 2 H), 7. 25 (m, 2 H), 2. 04 (m, 2 H), 0. 97 (m, 2 H), 0. 26 (s, 6 H). 31P{1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # -4. 66.

29Si{1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # -1. 69. 19F NMR (C6D6) : 6- 81. 4 (tt, JF, = 9. 7 Hz, Off = 2. 5 Hz, 3 F),-115. 8 (m, 2 F), -122. 2 (m, 2 F),-123. 2 (m, 2 F),-123. 3 (m, 2 F),-126. 5 (m, 2 F) . 13C{1H} NMR (C6D6) : 6 139. 4 (d, 1JP,C = 12. 7 Hz), 138. 7 ('Jsi, c = 65 Hz), 134. 3 (d, 3JP,C = 6. 7 Hz), 134. 1 (d, 2JP,C = 18. 9 Hz), 119. 3 (tt, 1JcF = 254 Hz, 2JC,F = 30. 5 Hz), 118. 1 (qt, 1JC, F = 289 Hz, 2JC,F = 33.3 Hz), 112. 3 (tquin, 1JC,F = 268 Hz, JC, F = 32. 0 Hz), 112. 1 (tquin, 1JC,F = 271 Hz, JCF F = 31. 8

Hz), 111. 3 (tquin, 1JC,F = 272 Hz, 2JC,F = 31. 7 Hz), 109. 4 (tqt, 1JC,F = 260 Hz, 2JC,F = 30. 5 Hz), 26. 6 (t, 2JC,F = 23. 5 Hz) 5. 62 (s, 1JC,Si = 50.9 Hz), -3. 51 (s, 1JC,Si = 53. 1 Hz). 13C{19F}a NMR (C6D6) : 6 139. 4 (dt, 1JPC = 12. 8 Hz), 138. 6, 134. 2 (dm), 119. 3 (s), 118. 1 (q, 1JC,F = 269 Hz), 112. 3, 112. 1, 111. 3, 109. 5 (q, 2JC,F = 25. 1 Hz), 26. 6 (tm, 1JC,H = 125 Hz), 5. 57 (t, JC H = 121 Hz), 4. 34 (q, 1JC,H = 121 Hz).

D {1, 8} : 2. 74 g (4. 65 mmol) of F {1, 8} in a mixture of 30 mL of n-hexane and 5 mL of THF was treated with 0. 135 mL (1. 55 mmol) of PC13 in 5 mL n-hexane. Yield : 1. 59 g (0. 89 mmol, 57 % based on F {1, 8}). 7. 07 g of a mixture of F {1, 8} and LiBr containing 10. 5 mmol of F {1, 8} was suspended in 100 mL of n-pentane was treated with 0. 41 mL (3. 48 mmol) of P (OMe) 3 yielding 4. 00 g (2. 25 mmol, 64. 3 % based on F {1, 8}) ; m. p. : 101 °C. Anal. calcd for C54H42F51Si3P: C 36. 52, H 2. 34, F 54. 6, Si 4. 74, P 1. 75. Found : C 36. 6, H 2. 41, F 54. 4, Si 4. 85, P 1. 86 ; 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 7. 34 (m, 2 H), 7. 25 (m, 2 H), 2. 04 (m, 2 H), 0. 98 (m, 2 H), 0. 27 (s, 6 H).

31P{1H} NMR (#, C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v))-4. 67. 29Si{1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6-1. 69. 13C {19F} a NMR (C6D6) : # 139. 4 (dt, 1JP,C = 12. 7 Hz, 2JC H = 6. 1 Hz), 138. 6 (m), 134. 3 (dm), 134. 1 (dm), 119. 3 (m), 118. 1 (q, 1JC,F = 268 Hz), 112. 3 (s), 112. 2 (s), 111. 8 (s), 111. 7 (s), 111. 1 (s), 109. 3 (qm, 2JC,F = 26 Hz, 26. 5 (tt, 1JC,F = 129 Hz, JF F = 5. 5 Hz), 5. 58 (t, Jc H = 121 Hz),-3. 51 (q, 1JC,H = 119 Hz). 19F NMR (C6D6) : 8-81. 4 (m, 3 F),-116. 7 (m, 2 F),-122. 2 (m, 6 F),-123. 0 (m, 2 F),-123. 7 (m, 2 F),-126. 8 (m, 2 F).

8. Tris (p-bromophenyl) phosphine P (C6H5-p-Br)3 : Slight variation of method described by Benassi, R. ; Schenetti, M. L. ; Taddei, F. ; Vivarelli, P. ; Dembech, P. ; J.

Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. II, 1974, 1338 ; Ravindar, V. ; Hemling, H. ; Schumann, H. ; Blum, J. ; Synthetic Communications, 1992, 22, 841.

1, 4-Dibromobenzene (20 g, 84. 8 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of 300 mL of n-hexane and 100 mL of diethyl ether, treated with 84. 8 mmol (53 mL, 1. 6 M) of n-BuLi and stirred for 5 minutes at room temperature. Before the addition of a solution of 2. 46 mL (28. 3 mmol) of PC13 in 40 mL of n-hexane the yellowish solution was cooled with a ethanol/dry ice bath for 20 minutes. The cooling bath was removed after 2 hours and the reaction mixture was stirred over night. The brownish mixture was quenched with 50 mL of a saturated NH4Cl solution in water. The aqueous phase was extracted two times with 20 mL of n-hexane. The combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4 and all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The light yellow solid obtained was recrystalized from 30 mL of n- hexane. The pure phosphine was isolated as a white crystalline solid. Yield : 10 g (20. 04 mmol, 70. 8 % based on PC13). 1H NMR (C6D6) : 6 6. 82 (m, 2 H), 7. 15 (m, 2 H) ; 31P {lH} NMR (C6D6) : 8-7. 98.

9. P [c6H4-p-siMe3-m {(CH2)2CxF2x+1}m]3 (D{m,x}; m = 0, 2, 3 ; x = 6, 8) through Method b) : General Procedure : P (C6H4-p-Br) 3 was dissolved in diethyl ether and treated with 6 equiv of t-BuLi (1. 5 M in n-hexane) at-78 °C. After 10 minutes, when a voluminous white precipitate was formed, a solution of the fluorous bromosilane (C {m, x}) in diethyl ether was added. The reaction mixture was allowed to reach room temperature and was stirred for another 15 h. In case the phosphines did not precipitate quantitatively the reaction mixture was filtered and the product was dried in vacuo. All volatiles of the filtrate

were removed in vacuo and the residue extracted in 50 mL of FC-72. The remainder of the product was isolated from the filtrate by removal of the volatiles in vacuo. Minor amounts of impurities were removed by washing with n-pentane. D {0} has been prepared before using method a) (See example 7).

D : 0. 27 mL (2. 1 mmol) of Me3SiCl, 0. 35 g (0. 70 mmol) of P (C6H4-p-Br) 3 in 60 mL diethyl ether and 2. 47 mL (4. 2 mmol) of t-BuLi solution yielded 0. 33 g (0. 684 mmol, 98 % based on SiMe3C1).

D {1, 6} : 6. 09 g (13. 8 mmol) of C{1,6}, 2. 30 g (4. 61 mmol) of P (C6H4-p-Br) 3 in 50 mL of hexane/diethyl ether (3 : 1, v/v) and 18. 4 mL (27. 7 mmol) of t-BuLi solution yielded 5. 23 g (3. 53 mmol, 77 % based on C {1, 6}) after quenching with degassed water (20 mL), phase separation and extraction with diethylether (30 mL).

D {2, 6} : 9. 43 g (11. 6 mmol) of C {2, 6} in 150 mL of diethyl ether, 2. 09 g (4. 19 mmol) of P (C6H4-p-Br) 3 in 100 mL of diethyl ether and 16. 6 mL (24. 9 mmol) of t-BuLi solution yielded 9. 37 g (3. 79 mmol, 98 % based on C {2, 6}). m. p. : 67 °C. Anal. calcd for C69H45F78Si3P : C 33. 50, H 1. 82, F 59. 97, Si 3. 40, P 1. 25. Found : C 33. 64, H 1. 95, F 60. 11, Si 3. 32, P 1. 22. 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : b 7. 32 (m, 6 H), 7. 28 (m, 6 H), 2. 02 (m, 12 H), 1. 01 (m, 12 H), 0. 24 (s, 9 H). 31P{1H} NMR 1 :1 (v/v)) : 6-4. 62. 29Si{1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # 0. 24. 19F NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8-81. 5 (m, 3 F),-116. 0 (m, 2 F),-122. 0 (m, 2 F),-123. 0 (m, 2 F),-123. 3 (m, 2 F),-126. 4 (m, 2 F) ; l3C {lH} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 139. 0 (m), 138. 3, 134. 4 (dm), 119. 4 (s), 118. 5 (q, 1JC,F = 271 Hz), 112. 6, 112. 5, 111. 7, 109. 9, 26. 6 (tm, 1JC,H = 130 Hz), 4. 06 (t, Jc H = 120 Hz),-6. 45 (q, 1JC,H = 120 Hz).

D {3, 6} : 16. 4 g (14. 3 mmol) of C {3, 6} in 100 mL of diethyl, 2. 38 g (4. 77 mmol) of P (C6H4-p-Br) 3 in 100 mL of

diethyl ether and 19. 1 mL (28. 6 mmol) of t-BuLi solution yielded 14. 2 g (4. 09 mmol, 86 % based C {3, 6}), m. p. : 50-55 °C. Anal. calcd for C90H48F117Si3P : C 31. 2, H 1. 40, F 64. 1, Si 2. 43, P 0. 89. Found : C 33. 9, H 1. 68, F 60. 7, Si 2. 66, P 0. 96.

'H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # 7. 35 (m, 4 H), 2. 05 (m, 6 H), 1. 08 (m, 6 H). 31P{1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : b-4. 49.

"Si {'H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : b 1. 25. 19F NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6-81. 5 (m, 3 F),-115. 9 (m, 2 F),-121. 9 (m, 2 F),- 122. 9 (m, 2 F),-123. 2 (m, 2 F),-126. 3 (m, 2 F).

D {2, 8} : 23. 2 g (22. 8 mmol) of C {2, 8} in 130 mL of diethyl ether, 3. 42 g (6. 85 mmol) of P (C6H4-p-Br) 3 in 200 mL diethyl ether and 27. 4 mL (41. 1 mmol) of t-BuLi solution yielded 21. 0 g (6. 84 mmol, 90 % based on c {2, 8}) ; m. p. : 72 °C. Anal. calcd for C81H45F102Si3P: C 31. 65, H 1. 46, F 63. 10, Si 2. 73, P 1. 00. Found C 31. 71, H 1. 41, F 62. 91, Si 2. 72, P 1. 08 ; 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # 7. 30 (m, 4 H), 2. 03 (m, 4 H), 1. 02 (m, 4 H), 0. 25 (s, 3 H). 31P{1H} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8-4. 70. 29Si {lH} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 0. 23.

13C{19F}a NMR (C6D4/FC-72 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6 140. 4 (dt, 1JP,C = 14. 0 Hz, 2JC,H = 6. 7 Hz), 136. 1 (m), 134. 3 (dm), 119. 0 (m), 118. 4 (q, lJc F = 262 Hz), 112. 4 (s), 112. 3 (s), 112. 0 (s), 111. 4 (s), 109. 8 (qm, 2JC, F = 26 Hz), 26. 5 (tm, Jc H = 131 Hz), 3. 98 (t, 1JC,H = 123 Hz),-6. 98 (q, 1JC,H = 120 Hz). 19F NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # -82. 4 (m, 3 F),-117. 0 (m, 2 F),-122. 8 (m, 6 F),-123. 7 (m, 2 F),-124. 1 (m, 2 F),-127. 2 (m, 2 F).

D {3, 8) : 17. 2 g (11. 9 mmol) of C {2, 8} in 200 mL of diethyl ether, 1. 78 g (3. 57 mmol) of P (C6H4-p-Br) 3 in 200 mL diethyl ether and 14. 2 mL (21. 4 mmol) of t-BuLi solution yielded 15. 3 g (3. 50 mmol, 88 % based on C {3, 8}) ; m. p. : 124 °C. Anal. calcd for C108H48F153Si3P : C 29. 67, H 1. 10, F 66. 56, Si 1. 92, P 0. 71. Found : C 29. 66, H 1. 15, F 66. 38, Si 1. 96, P 0. 74 ;'H NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6 7. 35 (m, 4 H), 2. 07 (m, 6

H), 1. 3lP {lH} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8-4. 49 (s). 29Si {lH} NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : b 1. 24."F NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6-80. 9 (m, 3 F),-115. 4 (m, 2 F), -121. 4 (m, 6 F),-122. 3 (m, 2 F),-122. 6 (m, 2 F),-125. 8 (m, 2 F).

10. Solubility Studies : Saturated solutions in the appropriate solvent were prepared by stirring a suspension of the fluorous phosphine for 2 hours at 25 °C. A sample (3. 000 0. 002 mL) was taken after allowing the solution to settle. The total weight of the saturated solution was determined. All solvent was removed in vacuo (0. 1 mbar, for 15 h) upon which the weight was constant within 0. 001 g and the weight of the residue was determined.

11. Determination of Partition Coefficients.

The partition coefficients were determinded by dissolving a known amount of phosphine (typically between 11 and 60 p mol) in a fluorous biphasic system either consisting of c-C6FllCF3 (2. 000 0. 002 mL) and n-pentane, n-octane or toluene (2. 000 0. 002 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred at 25 °C until all solid had dissolved and equilibrated in a water ice bath (1 h). An aliquot (0. 500 0. 002 mL) was removed from each layer by syringe. Analysis by ICP-AAS on phosphorus gave the amount of phosphine present, with an accuracy of 0. 3 ppm. A conservative estimate of the experimental error in the partition coefficient is 1 in the last digit.

12. Bis (bis-4-bromophenylphosphino) ethane : p-Dibromobenzene (22. 5 g, 95. 3 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of 300 ml of n-hexane and 100 ml of ether. To this

solution 58. 1 ml of a 1. 64 M (95. 3 mmol) n-BuLi solution in pentane was added. After stirring for 5 minutes, the mixture was cooled to-78 °C followed by stirring for another 20 minutes. To the white suspension 5. 53 g (23. 8 mmol) of bis (dichlorophosphino) ethane was added. The cooling bath was removed after two hours. After stirring the reaction mixture overnight, 20 ml of saturated aqueous NH4C1-solution was added and the two layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted twice with 50 ml CH2C12 and the collected organic layers were dried on MgSO4. After filtration, the solvents were evaporated in vacuo, which yielded 14. 46 g of yellow-white solid (85%). Anal calcd. for C26H2oBr4P2 : C 43. 74, H 2. 82, P 8. 68. Found : C 43. 82, H 3. 01, P 8. 56 ;'H-NMR (CDC13) 1. 98 (4H, m), 7. 12 (8H, m), 7. 43 (8H, d) ; 31P-NMR (CDC13) : 6-13. 8 (s) 13. p-Silyl substituted dppe derivatives G {m, x} : General procedure : Bis (bis (4- bromophenyl) phosphino) ethane was dissolved in THF and cooled to-90 °C in an ethanol/liquid nitrogen bath. To this solution 8 equivalents of t-BuLi in pentane were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 minutes, while the temperature was kept below-60 °C. The green suspension was treated with 4 equivalents of silyl halide and the resulting solution was stirred below-60 °C for 1 hour. The yellowish solution, thus formed, was warmed very slowly to room temperature. In case of G {0} and G {1, 6}, after evaporating all solvents in vacuo, the white solid was dissolved in degassed water/CH2C12. The organic layer was separated, dried on MgSO4, filtrated and evaporated to dryness. The products were isolated as white solids. In case of G {2, 6} and G {3, 6}, the residue obtained after evaporating the solvent in vacuo was dissolved in a two-phase system consisting of 10 ml of

methanol and 10 ml of FC-72. The fluorous layer was separated and dried, resulting in a clear yellow oil. The compound was further purified by Kugelrohr G {2, 6} or washing with pentane G {3, 6}.

G : A solution of 1. 26 g (1. 76 mmol) of bis (bis (4- bromophenyl) phosphino) ethane in THF, 9. 4 ml (14. 1 mmol) of t- BuLi solution and 0. 80 g (7. 06 mmol) of Me3SiCl yielded 1. 10 g of a white solid (91 %) ; Anal. calcd. for C38H56P2Si4 : C 66. 42, H 8. 21, P 9. 01. Found : C 66. 51, H 8. 28, P 9. 06 ; 1H-NMR (CDC13) : # 0. 25 (s, 6H), 2. 13 (ps t, 4H), 7. 30 (m, 8H), 7. 44 (d, 8H) ; 31P-NMR (CDC13) : 8-11. 9 (s).

G{1,6} : A solution of 0. 87 g (1. 22 mmol) of bis (bis (4- bromophenyl) phosphino) ethane in THF, 6. 5 ml (9. 8 mmol) of t- BuLi solution and 2. 26 g (5. 12 mmol) of Cul, 6), yielded 2. 08 g of white solid (85 %) ; Anal. calcd. for C66HsoFs2P2Si4: C 39. 33, H 3. 00, P 3. 07. Found : C 39. 40, H 3. 09, P 2. 88 ; 1H-NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6 0. 25 (24 H, s), 0. 96 (m, 8H), 2. 01 (m, 8H), 2. 12 (ps t, 4H), 7. 22 (m, 8H), 7. 29 (d, 8H) ; 31P-NMR (C6D6/C6F6 1 : 1 v : v) : # =-11. 7 ; 19F-NMR (C6D6/C3F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # -128. 2 (m, 2F),-125. 1 (m, 2F),-124. 9 (m, 2F),-124. 0 (m, 2F),-117. 9 (m, 2F),-82. 8 (t, 3F).

G {2, 6} : A solution of 1. 20 g (1. 68 mmol) of bis (bis (4- bromophenyl) phosphino) ethane in THF, 9. 0 ml (13. 5 mmol) of t- BuLi solution and 6. 7 g of C {2, 6} yielded 4. 91 g of a colorless oil (87 %) ; Anal. calcd. for C94H64F104P2Si4 : C 33. 77, H 1. 93, P 1. 85. Found : C 33. 71, H 1. 83, P 1. 82 ; 1H-NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 0. 18 (s, 12H), 0. 96 (m, 16H), 2. 01 (m, 20H), 7. 25 (m, 16H) ; 31P-NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # -11. 4 (s) G {3, 6} : A solution of 0. 47 g (0. 66 mmol) of bis (bis (4- bromophenyl) phosphino) ethane in THF, 3. 5 ml (5. 3 mmol) of t- BuLi solution and 3. 58 g of C{3,6} yielded 1. 60 g of a yellow

oil (55 %) ; Anal calcd. for C122H68F156P2Si4: C 31. 37, H 1. 47, P 1. 33. Found : C 31. 46, H 1. 38, P 1. 44 ; 1H-NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6 1. 01 (m, 24H), 1. 95 (m, 28H), 7. 23 (m, 16H) ; 31P-NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6-11. 4 (s) G {1, 8} : A solution of 1. 15 g (1. 61 mmol) of bis (bis (4- bromophenyl) phosphino) ethane in THF, 8. 6 ml (12. 9 mmol) of t- BuLi solution and 3. 49 g (6. 45 mmol) of Cul, 81 afforded a light brown solid which was washed with with degassed water, acetone and dried in vacuo. Yield : 74 % ; Anal calcd for C74H6OF68p2si4 : C 36. 80, H 2. 50, P 2. 56. Found : C 36. 65, H 2. 59, P 2. 48 ; 1H NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 0. 23 (s, 24 H), 0. 94 (m, 8H), 2. 03 (m, 8H), 2. 12 (ps t, 4H), 7. 23 (m, 8H), 7. 30 (d, 8H) ; 31P NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6-11. 3 (s) ; 19F NMR (C6D6/C6F6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6-127. 6 (m, 2F),-124. 4 (m, 2F),- 124. 0 (m, 2F),-123. 2 (m, 6F),-117. 4 (m, 2F),-82. 8 (t, 3F).

14. (D{0})3RhCl (H{0}) : 1. 436 g (2. 999 mmol) of D {0} and 0. 177 g (0. 359 mmol) of [ (COD) RhCl] 2 were dissolved in a mixture of 20 mL of n-hexane and 5 mL of toluene. After stirring for 15 h all volatiles were removed in vacuo. The orange residue was dissolved in 10 mL of n-hexane, while warming up the mixture to ~40 °C. The solution was stored at-10 °C for 12 h. The precipitate was filtered off and the solution stored for 3 days at-10 °C.

Again, the precipitate was filtered off and all volatiles of the solution were removed in vacuo. 0. 657 g (0. 417 mmol, 58. 1 % based on Rh) of H {0} were obtained as an orange solid.

Anal. calcd for C81H117ClSi9P3Rh: C 61. 78, H 7. 49, Si 16. 05, P 5. 90. Found : C 61. 65, H 7. 56, Si 15. 83, P 5. 94 ; 1H NMR (C6D6) : b 7. 9 (m, 18 H), 7. 2 (m, 18 H), 0. 18 (m, 81 H)."C {'H} NMR (C6D6) : 6 141. 3 (s), 141. 0 (s), 137. 1 (m), 135. 5 (m), 134. 7

(d), 133. 8 (d), 132. 7 (m), 132. 1 (d)-0. 75 (s,'Jc, si = 52. 5 Hz).

15. (D {1, 6}) 3RhC1 (H {1, 6}) : 3. 210 g (2. 176 mmol) of D {1, 6} dissolved in a mixture of 20 mL of n-hexane and 5 mL of toluene was treated with 0. 179 g (0. 363 mmol) of [(COD) RhC1] 2 at 25 °C. After stirring for 15 h the volume of the solution was reduced by 2/3 and toluene was added (20 mL). Stirring was continued for 15 min affording a biphasic system. The upper phase was carefully decanted. The fluorous phase consisting of a dark red oil was washed two times with toluene (10 mL) and pre dried in vacuo (0. 1 bar). Further drying in high vacuum (10-6 bar) for 12 hours afforded 1. 50 g of a highly viscous dark red oil containing H {1, 6} (0. 318 mmol, 43. 8 % based on Rh) and 0. 1 equiv of D {1, 6}. Anal. calcd for C144H126F117ClSi9P3Rh : C 37. 9, H 2. 78, F 48. 71, Si 5. 54, P 2. 04. Found : C 37. 76, H 2. 85, F 48. 48, Si 5. 61, P 2. 11 ; 1H-NMR (FC-72/C6D6, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : b 7. 61 (m, 18 H), 6. 97 (m, 18 H), 1. 87 (m, 18 H), 0. 80 (m, 18 H), 0. 04 (m, 54 H).

16. (D {1, 8}), RhCl (H (1, 8)) : Method 1 : 2. 801 g (1. 578 mmol) of D {1, 8} dissolved in 60 mL of benzene was treated with 0. 130 g (0. 263 mmol) of [ (COD) RhCl] 2 at 25 °C. After stirring for 15 h, when a waxy, yellow precipitate was observed, the reaction mixture was treated with c-C6F1lCF3 (10 mL). The color of the fluorous phase turned to dark red, while the organic upper phase remained yellow. After phase separation the fluorous phase was washed two times with 10 mL of benzene and all volatiles were removed in vacuo (0. 1 bar). Further drying of the remaining dark red oil in high vacuum (10-6 bar) for 12 h

yielded 2. 497 g (0. 457 mmol, 86. 9 % based on Rh) of a highly viscous dark red oil being pure H {1, 8}.

Method 2 : 0. 914 g (0. 515 mmol) of D {1, 8} and 0. 158 g (0. 171 mmol) of RhCl (PPh3) 3 were dissolved in 20 mL of benzene at 25 °C. Instantly a dark red oil precipitated.

2. 5 mL of c-CF3C6Fl2 was added, when the formation of a dark red bottom layer and an orange upper layer was observed. The upper layer was decanted and all volatiles of the lower layer were removed in vacuo. The remaining red oil was further dried in high vacuum (10-6 bar, 12 h). 0. 690 g of a highly viscous dark red oil containing 0. 119 mmol of H {1, 8} (69. 6 % based on Rh) and 0. 15 equiv of D {1, 8} was obtained.

Anal. calcd for C162H126F153ClSi9P3Rh: C 35. 61, H 2. 32, F 53. 20, Si 4. 63, P 1. 70 ; Found : C 35. 74, H 2. 37, F 53. 03, Si 4. 66, P 1. 65. 1H NMR (CF3C6F14/C6Dl4, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 8 7. 43 (m, 18 H), 7. 00 (m, 18 H), 1. 89 (m, 18 H), 0. 85 (m, 18 H), 0. 15 (m, 54 H). 13C{1H} NM,R (CF3C6F14/C6D14, 1 : 1 (v/v)) : 6 138. 7 (s), 138. 4 (s), 137. 0 (s), 135. 3 (s), 134. 7 (s), 132. 4 (s), 128. 7 (s), 126-102 (m), 26. 4 (t, 2JC, F = 23. 8 Hz), 5. 51 (s),-4. 35 (s, ltJcSi = 52. 6 Hz).

17. [Rh (COD) (G {1, 6}] BPh4 (It1, 6}) : A THF solution of 0. 82 g (0. 41 mmol) of the diphosphine G {1, 6} was slowly added to a THF solution containing 128 mg (0. 41 mmol) of [Rh (COD) (Acac)] (Acac = acetylacetonate anion) and 0. 28 g (0. 82 mmol) of NaBPh4. After stirring for 10 minutes the solvent was removed in vacuo. To the residue 10 ml of CH2Cl2 was added. A pure orange compound was obtained after filtration and drying in vacuo. Yield : 0. 76 g (0. 30 mmol, 73 %). Anal. calcd for C9gH92BF52P2RhSi4 : C 46. 43, H 3. 66, P 2. 44. Found : C 46. 05, H 3. 70, P 2. 62 ; 1H NMR (CDCl3) : # 0. 38 (s, 24H), 1. 02 (m, 8H), 2. 10 (m, 20H), 4. 93 (m, 4H), 6. 76 (m,

4H), 6. 86 (m, 8H), 7. 30 (m, 8H), 7. 44 (m, 8H), 7. 60 (m, 8H) ; 31P NMR (CDCl3) : # 56.1 (D, 1JRhP = 148.4 Hz).

18. G {2, 6} NiCl2 (J {2, 6}) : In 100 mL of a 1 : 1 (v/v) mixture of ethanol and CF3C6H5, 2. 29 g (0. 69 mmol) of G {2, 6} was dissolved. The solution was slowly added to a solution of 163 mg (0. 69 mmol) of NiCl2.6H2O in ethanol (10 mL). After evaporating all solvents in vacuo, the remaining red waxy solid was washed with ethanol and pentane and dried in vacuo. Yield : 2. 13 g (0. 61 mmol, 89 %) Anal. calcd for C94H64Cl2F104NiP2Si4 : C 32. 51, H 1. 86, P 1. 78. Found : C 32. 38, H 1. 94, P 1. 88. 1H NMR (FC- 72/C6D6) : 8 8. 03 (br, 1w1/2 = 56 Hz, 8H), 7. 24 (br, lwl/2 = 47 Hz, 8H), 1. 90 (br, 1w1/2 = 52 Hz, 20H), 0. 83 (br, 1w1/2 = 28 Hz, 16H), 0. 043 (br, lwl/2 = 17 Hz, 12 H). 31P NMR (FC- 72/C6D6) : # 55. 7.

19. (G{m,6})PtCl2 (K{m,6}, m = 1, 2) : One equivalent of diphosphine G {m, 6} dissolved in CH2Cl2 was added to a CH2Cl2-solution of Pt (COD) Cl2. After stirring overnight, all solvent was removed in vacuo.

PtCl2 (G {1, 6}) : Addition of 0. 45 g (0. 22 mmol) of G {1, 6} to 84 mg (0. 22 mmol) of Pt (COD) C12 yielded 0. 46 g (0. 20 mmol, 93 %) of a white solid. Anal calcd for C66H60Cl2F52P2PtSi4 : C 34. 75, H 2. 65, P 2. 72 ; found C 34. 61, H 2. 70, P 2. 80 ; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) : 8 0. 34 (24 H, s), 1. 00 (8H, m), 2. 02 (8H, m), 2. 36 (4H, m), 7. 56 (8H, m), 7. 85 (8H, m) ; 31P NMR (CDC13) 41. 9 (1JPtP = 3604 Hz).

PtCl2 (G {2, 6}) : 0. 41 g (0. 12 mmol) of G {2, 6} and 46 mg (0. 12 mmol) of Pt (COD) C12 yielded 0. 39 g (0. 11 mmol, 91 %) of a light yellow solid. 31P NMR (CDC13/CF3C6Hs 1 : 1 (v/v)) : # 42. 0 (JPtP = 3593 Hz).

20. Rhodium catalyzed hydrogenation reactions : The catalytic experiments were carried out in a 30 mL Schlenk flask, under dihydrogen atmosphere (1 bar). The catalyst was either dissolved in a hydrogen saturated toluene or perfluoro solvent and the mixture was stirred with a magnetic stirring bar (900 rpm). The olefinic substrate was added after initial dihydrogen uptake had ceased. The dihydrogen uptake was monitored using two mineral oil filled gas burettes. During the hydrogenation reactions one burette was opened to the reaction vessel while the other was recharged with dihydrogen. Results are lsited in Table 5.

Recycling Experiments : Only catalysts prepared through method 1 were used. Catalytic reactions were carried out under single phase fluorous conditions in c-CF3C6F11 (2 mL) at 80 °C. After > 90 % conversion (monitored by the H2 uptake) the homogeneous reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C and the upper organic layer was siphoned of. In between cycles the fluorous layer was kept under H2 atmosphere. By warming up to 80 °C and addition of a fresh portion of 1-octene (12. 74 mmol) a new cycle was started. The organic phases resulting from the first cycle were analyzed by GC and ICP-AAS. Results are listed in Table 5.

Experiments in CF3C6H5 : Catalytic reactions were carried out under single phase conditions in CF, C, H, at 80°C under 1 bar of hydrogen pressure. After > 90 % conversion (monitored by the H2 uptake) volatiles were distilled off and analyzed by GC. Activities (TOF) were determined for 25 % conversion.

Results are listed in Table 7.

21. Nickel catalysed cross-coupling in a fluorous biphasic solvent system : In 2. 5 ml of c-CF3C6F11, 88 mg (17 pmol) of J {2, 6}) was dissolved. To this solution, 0. 24 ml (2. 4 mmol) of

chlorobenzene, a known amount (ca 350 mg) of n-decane (as internal standard) and 2. 5 ml of a 1. 1 M (2. 8 mmol) butyl magnesium bromide solution in di-n-butyl ether were added.

The reaction mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 20 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the biphasic mixture was filtered and the two phases were separated. The organic layer was quenched with 3 ml of HC1 (aq) (4 M) and filtered over MgSO4. Conversions were determined by GC. A new cycle was started by adding substrate, Grignard solution and internal standard to the fluorous layer and the above procedure was repeated. Results are listed in Table 8.