Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
FORMING STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLIES WITH 3-D WOVEN JOINT PRE-FORMS
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2002/066235
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
A system and method for forming structural assemblies (10) with 3-D woven joint pre-forms (14). The method of the present invention forms complex structural assemblies (10) with pre-formed structures (12). Adhesive (16) is applied between the preformed structures (12) and uncured 3-D woven textile pre-forms (14). Then together the preformed structures (12) and uncured resin impregnated 3-D woven textile (14) are cured with heat and/or pressure to form the larger complex structural assemblies (10).

Inventors:
SCHMIDT RONALD P
Application Number:
PCT/US2002/001324
Publication Date:
August 29, 2002
Filing Date:
January 16, 2002
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
LOCKHEED CORP (US)
International Classes:
B29C65/00; B29C65/50; B29C70/34; B29D99/00; B64C1/06; B64C3/18; B64C3/20; B29C35/02; B29C65/48; (IPC1-7): B29C70/24; B29D31/00; B64C3/18; B64C1/06; B29C65/00
Foreign References:
EP0257148A11988-03-02
US5533693A1996-07-09
Other References:
SHEAHEN P ET AL: "PRIMARY SANDWICH STRUCTURE: A UNITIZED APPROACH", COLLECTION OF TECHNICAL PAPERS - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS STRUCTURES, STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS AND MATERIALS CONFERENCE, AIAA, WASHINGTON, DC, US, vol. 1, no. 1, 3 April 2000 (2000-04-03), pages 700 - 707, XP008005786, ISSN: 0273-4508
OWENS S D, SCHMIDT R P, DAVIS J J: "Tension Pull-off and Shear Test Methods to Characterize 3-D Textile Reinforced Bonded Composite Tee-Joints", COMPOSITE STRUCTURES - THEORY AND PRACTICE. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM, 17 May 1999 (1999-05-17) - 18 May 1999 (1999-05-18), Seattle, WA, USA, pages 398 - 409, XP008005792
LEAVERSUCH R: "ELECTRON-BEAM TREATMENT UPGRADES A RANGE OF HIGH-VOLUME MATERIALS", MODERN PLASTICS INTERNATIONAL, MCGRAW-HILL,INC. LAUSANNE, CH, vol. 25, no. 7, 1 July 1995 (1995-07-01), pages 18 - 19, XP000520967, ISSN: 0026-8283
BERSUCH L, HUNTEN K, BARON B, TUSS J: "3-D Composites in Primary Aircraft Structure Joints", BOLTED/BONDED JOINTS IN POLYMERIC COMPOSITES (PROCEEDINGS), January 1997 (1997-01-01), USA, pages 16.1 - 16.10, XP008005791
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Bradley, James E. (L.L.P. P.O. Box 61389 Houston, TX, US)
Download PDF:
Claims:
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A structural assembly comprising: a first precured assembly; and a 3D woven textile preform impregnated with an uncured resin and coupled to said first precured assembly, a film adhesive being located between the assemblies, and wherein said first precured assembly and said 3D woven textile preform are cured to form the structural assembly.
2. The structural assembly of Claim 1 further comprising: at least one additional assembly wherein said at least one additional assembly is coupled and cured to said first precured assembly and said 3D woven textile preform, a film adhesive being located between said at least one additional assembly and said first precured assembly.
3. The structural assembly of Claim 2, wherein said at least one additional assembly is a metal assembly or a precured assembly.
4. The structural assembly of Claim 2, wherein said first precured assembly and said at least one additional assembly are precured laminated composite structures.
5. The structural assembly of Claim 2, further comprising composite overwrap plies on the exterior surface of said 3D woven textile preform.
6. The structural assembly of Claim 1, wherein said 3D woven textile pre form further comprises at least one fiber woven through critical intersection zones.
7. A method of forming a structural assembly, comprising the steps of : affixing a first precured assembly to a 3D woven textile preform impregnated with an uncured resin, a film adhesive being located between said first precured assembly and said preform ; affixing at least one additional precured assembly to said 3D woven textile, additional film adhesive being located between said at least one additional precured assembly and said preform ; and curing said resin and said adhesive films to form the structural assembly.
8. The method of Claim 7, wherein said first precured assembly and said at least one additional precured assembly are precured, laminated composite structures.
9. The method of Claim 7, wherein said step of curing is implemented in an autoclave with heat and pressure.
10. The method of Claim 9, wherein said pressure is applied with a pressure intensifier located proximate to said precured assemblies and said 3D woven textile pre form.
11. The method of Claim 9, wherein said step of curing is implemented within a low temperature vacuum bag.
12. The method of Claim 9, wherein said step of curing is implemented with an EBeam cure resin system.
13. The method of Claim 9, further comprising the step of applying composite overwrap plies on exterior surfaces of said 3D woven textile preform.
14. The method of Claim 10, wherein said pressure intensifier comprises a flexible material that forces said 3D woven textile against said first precured assembly and said at least one additional precured assembly.
15. The method of Claim 14, wherein said flexible material is rubber.
16. The method of Claim 7, wherein said 3D woven textile further comprises at least one fiber woven through critical intersection zones.
17. A method of forming structural assemblies with precured laminated composite structures, comprising the steps of : affixing a first adhesive film in between a first precured laminated composite structures and a 3D woven textile preform impregnated with an uncured resin;; affixing an additional adhesive film between at least one additional precured laminated composite structures and said 3D woven textile; and curing said adhesive films, said first precured laminated composite structures, said at least one additional precured laminated composite structures and said 3D woven textile preform to form the structural assemblies.
18. The method of Claim 17 wherein pressure is applied during said curing step with pressure intensifiers located proximate to said precured laminated composite structures and said 3D woven textile preform.
19. 4 19. The method of Claim 18, wherein said step of curing is implemented within a low temperature vacuum bag.
20. The method of Claim 18, wherein said step of curing is implemented with an EBeam cure resin system.
21. The method of Claim 18, further comprising the step of applying composite overwrap plies on exterior surfaces of said 3D woven textile preform.
22. The method of Claim 18, wherein said pressure intensifier comprises a flexible material that forces said 3D woven textile preform against said first precured laminated composite structures and said at least one additional precured laminated composite structures.
23. The method of Claim 22, wherein said flexible material is rubber.
24. The method of Claim 17, wherein said 3D woven textile preform further comprises at least one fiber woven through critical intersection zones.
25. The structural assembly of Claim 1, wherein said 3D woven textile is Pi shaped.
26. The structural assembly of Claim 1, wherein said 3D woven textile is T shaped.
27. The method of Claim 7, wherein said 3D woven textile is Tshaped.
28. The method of Claim 7, wherein said 3D woven textile is Pishaped.
29. The method of Claim 17, wherein said 3D woven textile is Tshaped.
30. The method of Claim 17, wherein said 3D woven textile is Pishaped.
31. The structural assembly of Claim 1, wherein the preform has tapered edges.
32. The method of Claim 7, further comprising tapering the edges of the pre form.
Description:
FORMING STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLIES WITH 3-D WOVEN JOINT PRE-FORMS TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates generally to systems and methods for fastening sub- assemblies in the formation of larger more complex structures, and more particularly, a system and method for co-bonding structural sub-assemblies with 3-D woven textile pre- forms.

This invention was made with Government support under Contract Number F3361594C3210 awarded by The Department of the Air Force. The Government has certain rights in this invention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Conventional composite structural joints (co-cured, bonded orbolted) are severely limited in out of plane load capacity (as generated by fuel pressure loads in a wing box or kick loads at structural discontinuities). Joint out of plane loads cause high peel stresses and interlaminar stresses in conventional 2-D laminated composite joints as shown in FIGUREs lA-1E.

Typical composite resins have good tension and shear strengths, but very low peel strength.

Significant composite joint improvements were developed as far back as 1974 by using 3-D hand woven textile joint inserts in co-cured wing to span joints. However, due to high cost of the hand woven textiles, this technology was not used until the early 1990s when the F-2 program automated weaving of the deltoid insert shown in FIGURE 2.

This 3-D woven insert is primarily used as a radius filler on the lower wing skin to spar co-cured joints. While strength is increased, this application is still limited by

expensive tooling and processing required for co-cure fabrication of the F-2 composite wing. Also, the joint is still prone to delaminating up the middle.

The Beech Starship utilized another from of 3-D joint as shown in FIGURE 3.

This j oint utilized sandwich materials, therefore co-curing the entire structure would have been very difficult. Beech opted to precure the detail parts and secondarily bond them together. While this approach worked, it was still fairly load limited and had disadvantages common to secondary bonding (fitup of pre-cured piece to piece). This particular design was also limited to sandwich structures.

The NASA ACT (Advanced Composites Technology) program worked on entire structures that were 3-D woven, knitted, braided or stitched together. While these designs may have benefits in damage tolerance and joint strengths, there are severe limitations. Knitted, braided, stitched and 3-D woven structures typically have out of plane properties that are superior to conventional 2-D structures (made out of fabric and tape), however their in plane properties are generally much lower. This leads to weight penalties when the 3-D materials are used for wing skins, spar or bulkhead webs, fuselage skins, et cetera, that typically have high in plane loads. Also, complex geometry limits use of totally woven or stitched together structures due to machine and processing limitations.

The present invention generally uses conventional composite tape, fabric and/or metal details for structural skins, spar and bulkhead webs, fittings et cetera. Conventional laminates are used where high in plane properties are desired and metals are generally used where rigid fittings or hardpoints are desired. Many different material combinations are possible such as RTM details, thermoplastic details, fiberglass, BMI, etc. The most cost effective process of fabricating the details can be used, in example, a tape laid, platten press cured, waterjet trimmed spar web. The finished details are located with uncured, resin infused 3-D woven connectors (preforms) and adhesive in between the parts in a simple assembly jig or with self locating tooling features (tooling tabs or pins, etc.) Simple compliant overpresses are then placed over the weaves. The assembly is then vacuum bagged and cured, typically with heat and/or pressure, or E-beam processed

to avoid thermal effects. It is also possible to assemble structures with room temperature cure systems (wet layup).

The use of these advanced 3-D woven connectors combined with the co-bond process produces low cost, robust, composite structural joints not obtainable with other prior art. Simple, inexpensive, compliant overpresses can be used since the uncured 3-D textile connector forms against the cured detail parts during processing. This method avoids the precision tools required for co-cure (where all the parts are uncured) or the precise fit up required with secondary bonding (where multiple cured parts are brought together with a thin layer of adhesive in between).

Fabrication of the 3-D woven preforms is conducted on fully automated looms which allows cost effective, high quality, repeatable connectors. Once fabricated into a structure, the 3-D woven connector behaves similar to a fitting in between the detail parts transferring load in shear and tension, not peel.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a co-bonded structural assembly for composite materials that substantially eliminates or reduces disadvantages and problems associated with previously developed systems and methods used for bonding composite materials.

More specifically, the present invention provides a system and method of forming structural assemblies with 3-D woven joint pre-forms. The method of the present invention forms complex structural assemblies using pre-cured detail parts with the 3-D woven j oint pre-form. Adhesive is applied between the preformed structures and uncured 3-D woven textile pre-forms. Then together the pre-cured structures and uncured resin impregnated 3-D woven textile are cured with heat and/or pressure to form the larger complex structural assemblies.

The present invention provides an important technical advantage over prior systems and methods of forming complex composite structures. The present invention provides a robust joint between two pre-cured composites or metallic sub-assemblies.

By simultaneously co-bonding sub-assemblies to 3-D woven textile pre-forms structural strength is increased.

Additionally, the present invention provides another important technical advantage by eliminating the need for expensive tooling and fine tolerances to achieve uniform bondlines critical for structural performance.

Yet another technical advantage provided by the present invention is that pressure intensifiers or overpresses used can be inexpensively manufactured as an exact fit is not required as is needed by conventional bonding or co-curing.

Additionally, the present invention provides another important technical advantage by forcing uncured 3-D pre-forms to conform to the sub-assemblies or pre- cured details. This allows the flexible uncured 3-D woven textile pre-forms to be forced against adjacent sub-assemblies thus conforming to severe contours and angles.

Yet another technical advantage provided by the present invention is that the 3-D woven textile pre-forms provide a structural strength that cannot be matched with a conventional 2-D textile composite material joints. Fibers are woven into load bearing directions of intersections between sub-assemblies. Thus forming a textile flange that "fits"the 3-D woven textile pre-form to the sub-assemblies. Thus the present invention creates a joint with predominantly shear and tension loads when the web sub-assembly is loaded normal to the skin sub-assembly. Furthermore, peel forces are substantially reduced. These peel forces are a major problem associated with bonded assemblies.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals indicate like features and wherein: FIGUREs lA-lE depict prior art solutions; FIGURE 2 depicts a second prior art solution; FIGURE 3 depicts yet another prior art solution; FIGURE 4 depicts a structural assembly or part of the present invention;

FIGURE 5 illustrates fibers woven in load bearing directions in the cross-section of a textile flange between two subassemblies; FIGUREs 6A and 6B illustrate the lack of fibers in the intersection zone when a 2-D textile is employed; FIGUREs 7A, 7B, 7C and 7D depict different configurations of woven textile pre- forms and joints ; FIGURE 8 provides a flow chart illustrating the method of the present invention; FIGURES 9A, 9B, 9C and 9D depict a structural assembly or part of the present invention with overwrap plies applied to the exterior surface of the structural assembly; and FIGURE 10 graphically illustrates the load failure of structural assemblies of the present invention as compared to a baseline prior art system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Preferred embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in the FIGUREs, like numerals being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.

The present invention provides a unique method of assembling structural components as illustrated by FIGURE 4. FIGURE 4 depicts a structural assembly or part 10. This assembly is formed by various sub-assemblies 12. Subassemblies 12 are typically pre-cured laminated composite structures or metallic structures. Additionally, subassemblies 12 can be constructed from honeycomb sandwich structures or solid monolithic structures. However, the present invention need not be limited to this material type for sub-assemblies 12, other material types such as graphite, fiberglass, metals, Kevlar, and the like, as known to those skilled in the art can be used.

In the most general application, structural assembly 10 is formed by coupling at least one sub-assemblies 12 with an uncured pre-form 14 in a curing process. In one embodiment of the present invention, pre-form 14 is a 3-D woven textile impregnated with an uncured resin. Additionally, an adhesive film 16 can be placed between the sub- assemblies 12 and uncured pre-fonn 14. The adhesive layer can be incorporated into the

resin impregnating the 3-D woven textile. However, self-adhering resin systems typically do not have the same properties.

Structural assembly 10 is formed when sub-assemblies 12 and pre-form 14 are cured in place. This creates a robust joint between two pre-cured composites or metallic sub-assemblies 12. By simultaneously co-bonding sub-assemblies 12 to pre-form 14, fiber waviness in sub-assemblies 12, which seriously reduces structural strength, can be avoided. Additionally, the process avoids matching a cured composite structure to a cured sub-assembly, which requires expensive tooling and fine tolerances to achieve uniform bondlines that are critical for structural performance.

Curing in place allows compliant pressure intensifiers 18 to force the flexible uncured woven pre-form 14 against adjacent sub-assemblies 12 thus conforming to severe contours and angles. Additionally, the compliant pressure intensifiers 18 can be inexpensively manufactured as exact fit is not required since the uncured pre-forms 14 can conform to the sub-assemblies 12.

Additionally, the 3-D pre-form 14 of the present invention is unique. Historically, 2-D textiles have been used to create joints between composite materials. The 3-D textile provides structural strength that cannot be matched with a conventional 2-D composite material. The 3-D textile has fibers 20 woven into load bearing directions of intersection zone 22. These fibers are illustrated in the cross-section of a textile flange presented in FIGURE 5. Thus a textile flange"fits"the 3-D pre-form 14 to sub-assemblies 12.

Adhesives and resins generally have high tensile and shear strengths but low peel strengths. The 3-D textile pre-form of the present invention creates a joint with predominantly shear and tension loads when the web sub-assembly is loaded normal to the skin surface. Cross-sections comparing these 3-D and 2-D textiles are provided in FIGUREs 6A and 6B to illustrate the lack of fibers in the intersection zone 22 when a 2- D textile 24 is employed.

Several potential embodiments of 3-D pre-form 14 are provided in FIGUREs 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D. However, it should be noted that the present invention is not limited to

the 3-D textile structures provided in FIGUREs 7A-7D rather these are provided for illustration purposes only and any 3-D structure may be used.

A flow chart illustrating one method for constructing assemblies 10 according to the present invention is provided in FIGURE 8. Beginning with step 100, an adhesive film 16, illustrated in FIGURE 4, is placed between the sub-assemblies 12 and 3-D woven textile pre-form 14. In step 102, compliant overpresses 18 are located over the exposed textiles 14.

In step 104, a vacuum bag 26 is placed outside the overpresses 18. Assembly 10 comprising the sub-assemblies 12 and 3-D woven textile pre-form 14 and adhesive 16 is then cured to form a single rigid structure in step 106. Typically, this cure is performed through the use of heat and/or pressure. In the instance where pressure is used, pressure intensifiers 18 are located proximate to the sub-assemblies 12 and said 3-D woven textile pre-form 14. An advantage associated with the pressure intensifiers of the present invention is that they may be formed inexpensively from a flexible material such as silicone rubber using molds made with stereo lithographic processes.

The entire assembly 10 can be placed within a vacuum bag 26. As the vacuum is drawn within vacuum bag 26, a uniform force is applied evenly to all the surfaces of assembly 10. This eliminates the need for expensive and specialized tooling to compress and hold assembly 10 during the curing process. This pressure uniformly forces the weave of flexible uncured 3-D woven textile pre-form 14 against the contours of sub- assemblies 12 ensuring uniform bondlines and avoiding fiber waviness which reduces structural strength.

Alternatively, the adhesive film and uncured 3-D woven textile pre-form can be cured using an E-Beam cure resin system instead of heat.

To add additional strength to assembly 10, overwrap plies 28, as shown in FIGURE 9A can be applied on exterior surfaces of the 3-D woven textile pre-form 14 and sub-assemblies 12 prior to cure 106.

FIGURE 9B illustrates a typical baseline blade fabricated by conventional methods without a woven preform.

FIGURES 9C and 9D illustrate the co-bond process utilizing a graphite"T"pre- form and a graphite"TT"pre-form.

Pressure is applied to hold the sub-assemblies 12 and pre-forms 14 together.

This may be accomplished through the application of overpresses and vacuum bagging or clamping the sub-assemblies 12 and pre-forms 14. Many resin systems require pressure beyond that obtainable with a vacuum bag so an autoclave is used to supplement the vacuum bag Stereo lithography allows the pressure intensifiers or overpresses to be formed from CAD-generated solid or surface models. The designed overpresses emerges as a solid three-dimensional part without the need for tooling.

The process of taking tooling from original conception through all of the required necessary phases prior to implementation in a manufacturing environment, is both time consuming and costly. Since the amount of time that it takes to actually reach the production/manufacturing phase of a product can be directly measured in dollars and cents. Reducing this time makes the manufacturing process both more efficient and more profitable. CAD software is used as a method to define both the geometry and the dimensional requirements of the overpresses. The data from this CAD file is then electronically transmitted to a stereo lithography system. There are several different types of stereo lithography systems available, each utilizing its own distinct process depending on such factors as required model accuracy, equipment cost, model material, type of model, and probably most important modeling time. One such stereo lithography apparatus consists of a vat of a liquid polymer in which there is a movable elevator table/platform capable of moving (lowering) in very precise increments depending on the requirements defining the type of model that is to be constructed. A helium/cadmium laser is then used to generate a small but intense spot of ultraviolet light which is used to move across the top of the vat of liquid polymer by a computer controlled optical scanning system. At the point where the laser and the liquid polymer come into contact, the polymer is changed into a solid. As the laser beam is directed across an xy surface, the model is formed as a plastic object point by point and layer by layer as true as is

allowed by the type of photopolymer that is being used in all three dimensions: x, y, and z. As each layer is formed, the elevator platform is then lowered so that the next layer can be scanned in. As each additional layer is formed, it then bonds to the previous one and the resulting object is generated by a precise number of successive layers.

At the end of this process, the object can then be removed from the support structure and finished by any number of methods until the surface finish is of the texture that is required. The object can than be used as either a negative or positive mold to form the overpresses from a flexible material. Alternatively, if the polymer from which the object is constructed has the desired material properties, it can be used directly as the pressure intensifier or overpress.

Stereo lithography is capable of holding tight tolerances to 0.005, and even finer tolerances are possible by finish machining or precision grinding of the finished object.

Complex shapes and geometry of the produced objects is virtually limited only by ones imagination.

FIGURE 10 depicts the comparable strength of the co-bonded all composite joint of the present invention as compared to a bolted baseline joint with an aluminum frame as provided by the prior art. As one can see the Co-bonded joint 40 achieves approximately the same load as the baseline joint 42 prior to failure. Typical all composite joints carry approximately 1/3 of this load level. Matching the strength of bolting to an aluminum frame has not been accomplished before using prior art methods.

The present invention provides an important technical advantage over prior systems and methods of forming complex composite structures. The present invention provides a robust joint between two pre-cured composites or metallic sub-assemblies.

By simultaneously co-bonding sub-assemblies to 3-D woven textile pre-forms, fiber waviness, which seriously reduces structural strength, can be avoided.

Additionally, matching a cured composite structure to a sub-assembly typically requires expensive tooling and fine tolerances to achieve uniform bondlines that are critical for structural performance. The pressure intensifiers or overpresses used by the present invention can be inexpensively manufactured as exact fit is not required as is

needed by secondary bond processes since the uncured pre-forms conform to the sub- assemblies.

Curing in place allows the weave of flexible uncured 3-D woven textile pre-forms to be forced against adjacent sub-assemblies thus conforming to severe contours and angles. Additionally, pressure intensifiers can be inexpensively manufactured, since an exact fit is not required as is needed by pre-cured pre-forms as the uncured pre-forms conform to the sub-assemblies. Thus the expensive costs and tight tolerances associated with pre-cured pre-forms can be avoided.

Additionally, the 3-D woven textile pre-form of the present invention is unique providing a structural strength and damage tolerance that cannot be matched with a conventional 2-D textiles composite material joint. The 3-D textile has fibers woven into load bearing directions of intersections between sub-assemblies. Thus forming a textile flange that"fits"the 3-D woven textile pre-form to the sub-assemblies. Thus the present invention creates a joint with predominantly shear and tension loads when the web sub- assembly is loaded normal to the skin surface.

In summary, the present invention provides a system and method of forming structural assemblies with 3-D woven joint pre-forms. The method of the present invention forms complex structural assemblies with pre-cured composite or metal structures. Adhesive is applied between the pre-cured structures and uncured 3-D woven textile pre-forms. Then together the pre-cured structures and uncured resin impregnated 3-D woven textile are cured with heat and/or pressure to form the larger complex structural assemblies.

Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations canbemadehereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as described by the appended claims.