TH E HERBICIDAL SUBSTITUTED BICYCLIC TRIAZOLES CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This application is a continuation-in-part of patent application U.S. Serial No. 07/581,994, filed September 13, 1990.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The compounds of the instant invention are known for use as herbicides. Such disclosure is found in U.S. Patent 4,213,773 and U.S. Patent 4,881,967. These patents, however, do not teach use of such herbicides on plantation crops. Plantation crops are an important market and crops such as citrus, sugarcane, coffee, banana, oil palm, etc. are very important to mankind's diet. Also, plantation crops such as rubber are an important source of an industrial raw material. These crops are cultivated particularly in regions of the Pacific rim and South America. A need therefore exists for herbicidal material which are useful for treating plantation crops such as those mentioned.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION This invention comprises the novel use of the compound of Formula I iand their agriculturally suitable salts for broad spectrum weed control in plantation crops.

wherein R is isopropyl, allyl, propargyl or -CH(CH3>C≡CH;

X is Cl or Br;

Y is F or Cl;

I

Z is H or can be taken together with R as -CH2CHCH3 such that the KτιTHτιg oxygen is attached to the methine carbon;

Preferred for reasons of more efficient weed control and/or better crop tolerance are:

1. A method for controlling undesired weeds in plantation crops which comprises applying to the locus of the weeds a herbicidally effective amount of a compound of Formula I wherein X is C1, Y is Cl and Z is H.

2. A method of Preferred 1 wherein the plantation crop is selected from citrus, sugarcane, coffee, banana and loblolly pine.

3. A method of Preferred 1 wherein the compound is 2-[2,4- dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-l,2,4 - triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one.

4. A method of Preferred 3 wherein the plantation crop is citrus.

5. A method of Preferred 3 wherein the plantation crop is sugarcane.

6. A method of Preferred 3 wherein the plantation crop is coffee.

7. . A method of Preferred 3 wherein the plantation crop is banana.

8. A method of Preferred 3 wherein the plantation crop is loblolly pine and the compound is applied preemergent.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Synthesis

The compounds of Formula I can be prepared according to the procedures of U.S. 4,213,773 and U.S. 4,881,967. The disclosure of which are herein incorporated by reference.

Particularly important compounds for use in this invention include the following:

1ΔBLEL1

E

X £

Formulations

Useful formulations of the compounds of Formula I can be prepared in conventional ways. They include dusts, granules, pellets, solutions, suspensions, emulsions, wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates and the like. Many of these may be applied directly. Sprayable formulations can be extended in suitable media and used at spray volumes of from a few liters to several hundred liters per hectare. High strength compositions are primarily used as intermediates for further formulation. The formulations, broadly, contain about 0.1% to 99% by weight of active ingredient(s) and at least one of (a) about 0.1% to 20% surfactant(s) and (b) about 1% to 99.9% solid or liquid diluent(s).

More specifically, they will contain these ingredients in the following approximate proportions:

Weight Percent* Active Ingredient Diluent(s)

Wettable Powders 20-90 0-74 1-10

Oil Suspensions, 3-50 40-95 0-15 Emulsions,

Solutions, (including Emulsifiable Concentrates)

Aqueous Suspension 10-50

Dusts 1-25

Granules and Pellets 0.1-95 High Strength 90-99 0-10 0-2 Compositions

^♦ Active ingredient plus at least one of a Surfactant or a Diluent equals 100 weight percent.

Lower or higher levels of active ingredient can, of course, be present depending on the intended use and the physical properties of the compound. Higher ratios of surfactant to active ingredient are sometimes

desirable, and are achieved by incorporation into the formulation or by tank mixing.

Typical solid diluents are described in Watkins, et al., "Handbook of Insecticide Dust Diluents and Carriers", 2nd Ed., Dorland Books, Caldwell, New Jersey, but other solids, either mined or manufactured, may be used. The more absorptive diluents are preferred for wettable powders and the denser ones for dusts. Typical liquid diluents and solvents are described in Marsden, "Solvents Guide", 2nd Ed., Interscience, New York, 1950. Solubility under 0.1% is preferred for suspension concentrates; solution concentrates are preferably stable against phase separation at 0°C. "McCutcheon's Detergents and

Emulsifiers Annual", MC Publishing Corp., Ridgewood, New Jersey, as well as Sisely and Wood, "Encyclopedia of Surface Active Agents", Chemical Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1964, list surfactants and recommended uses. All formulations can contain minor amounts of additives to reduce foaming, caking, corrosion, microbiological growth, etc.

The methods of making such compositions are well known. Solutions are prepared by simply mixing the ingredients. Fine solid compositions are made by blending and, usually, ginding as in a hammer or fluid energy mill. Suspensions are prepared by wet milling (see, for example, Littler, U.S. Patent 3,060,084). Granules and pellets may be made by spraying the active material upon preformed granular carriers or by agglomeration techniques. See J. E. Browning, "Agglomeration", Chf»τninfl Engineering. December 4, 1967; pp. 147ff. and 'Terry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook", 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973, pp. 8-57ff.

For further information regarding the art of formulation, see for example:

H. M. Loux, U.S. Patent 3,235,361, February 15, 1966, Col. 6, line 16 through Col. 7, line 19 and Examples 10 through 41;

R. W. Luckenbaugh, U.S. Patent 3,309,192, March 14, 1967, Col. 5, line 43 through Col. 7, line 62 and Examples 8, 12, 15, 39, 41, 52, 53, 58, 132, 138-140, 162-164, 166, 167 and 169-182;

H. Gysin and E. Knusli, U.S. Patent 2,891,855, June 23, 1959, Col.

3, line 66 through Col. 5, line 17 and Examples 1-4;

G. C. Klingman, "Weed Control as a Science", John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1961, pp. 81-96; and

J. D. Fryer and S. A. Evans, "Weed Control Handbook", 5th Ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1968, pp. 101-103.

In the following examples, all parts are by weight unless otherwise indicated.

Example A Wettable Powder

2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrah ydro-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 80% sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate 2% sodium ligninsulfonate 2% synthetic amorphous silica 3% kaolinite 13%

The ingredients are blended, hammer-milled until all the solids are essentially under 50 microns, reblended, and packaged.

Exam le p

Wettabte Ppwfor

2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrah ydro-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 50% sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate 2% low viscosity methyl cellulose 2% diatomaceous earth 46%

The ingredients are blended, coarsely hammer-milled and then air- milled to produce particles essentially all below 10 microns in diameter. The product is reblended before packaging.

fl-gflro fe c.

Granule

Wettable Powder of Example 11 5% attapulgite granules 95%

(U.S.S. 20-40 mesh; 0.84-0.42 mm) A slurry of wettable powder containing 25% solids is sprayed on the surface of attapulgite granules in a double-cone blender. The granules are dried and packaged.

Example D Extruded Pellet

2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)θ3ςjr]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-te trahydro-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 25% anhydrous sodium sulfate 10% crude calcium ligninsulfonate 5% sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate 1% calcium/magnesium bentonite 59%

The ingredients are blended, hammer-milled and then moistened with about 12% water. The mixture is extruded as cylinders about 3 mm diameter which are cut to produce pellets about 3 mm long. These may be used directly after drying, or the dried pellets may be crushed to pass a U.S.S. No. 20 sieve (0.84 mm openings). The granules held on a U.S.S. No. 40 sieve (0.42 mm openings) may be packaged for use and the fines recycled.

Fs-amplp. F.

Low Strength Grannie

2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrah ydro-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 1%

N,N-dimethylformamide 9% attapulgite granules 90%

(U.S.S. 20 to 40 sieve)

The active ingredient is dissolved in the solvent and the solution is sprayed upon dedusted granules in a double-cone blender. After spraying

of the solution has been completed, the blender is allowed to run for a short period and then the granules are packaged.

IfaflTTipfe

Q∑snute 2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydr o-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 80% wetting agent 1% crude ligninsulfonate salt 10%

(containing 5-20% of the natural sugars) attapulgite clay 9%

The ingredients are blended and milled to pass through a 100 mesh screen. This material is then added to a fluid bed granulator, the air flow is adjusted to gently fluidize the material, and a fine spray of water is sprayed onto the fluidized material. The fluidization and spraying are continued until granules of the desired size range are made. The spraying is stopped, but fluidization is continued, optionally with heat, until the water content is reduced to the desired level, generally less than 1%. The material is then discharged, screened to the desired size range, generally 14-100 mesh (1410-149 microns), and packaged for use.

E a le G

Aqueous Suspension 2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydr o-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 40% polyacrylic acid thickener 0.3% dodecylphenol polyethylene glycol 0.5% ether disodium phosphate 1% monosodium phosphate 0.5% polyvinyl alcohol 1.0% water 56.7%

The ingredients are blended and ground together in a sand mill to produce particles essentially all under 5 microns in size.

F ^g aτ , 1 ^f> F High Strength Concentrate 2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydr o-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 99% silica aerogel 0.5% synthetic amorphous silica 0.5%

The ingredients are blended and ground in a hammer-mill to produce a material essentially all passing a U.S.S. No. 50 screen (0.3 mm opening). The concentrate may be formulated further if necessary.

Example T Wettable Powder 2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydr o-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 90% dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate 0.1% synthetic fine silica 9.9%

The ingredients are blended and ground in a hammer-mill to produce particles essentially all below 100 microns. The material is sifted through a U.S.S. No. 50 screen and then packaged.

Example J Wettable Powder 2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydr o-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 40% sodium Ugninsulfonate 20% montmorillonite clay 40%

The ingredients are thoroughly blended, coarsely hammer-milled and then air-milled to produce particles essentially all below 10 microns in size. The material is reblended and then packaged.

Example K

Qjl SttgpePSJPP 2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydr o-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 35% blend of polyalcohol carboxylic 6% esters and oil soluble petroleum sulfonates xylene 59%

The ingredients are combined and ground together in a sand mill to produce particles essentially all below 5 microns. The product can be used directly, extended with oils, or emulsified in water.

Example L

P lSt 2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydr o-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 10% attapulgite 10%

Pyrophyllite 80%

The active ingredient is blended with attapulgite and then passed through a hammer-mill to produce particles substantially all below 200 microns. The ground concentrate is then blended with powdered pyrophyllite until homogeneous.

Example M Oil Suspension 2-[2,4-dichloro-5-[(2-propynyl)oxy]phenyl]-5,6,7,8-tetrahydr o-l,2,4- triazolo-[4,3-a]-pyridin-3(H)-one 25% polyoxyeth lene sorbitol hexaoleate 5% highly aliphatic hydrocarbon oil 70%

The ingredients are ground together in a sand mill until the solid particles have been reduced to under about 5 microns. The resulting thick suspension may be applied directly, but preferably after being extended with oils or emulsified in water.

UΠLΠΎ

The compounds of the present invention are active herbicides for selective and/or general broadleaf and grass weeds control in all plantation crops including coffee, cocoa, oil palm, rubber, sugarcane, citrus, grapes, fruit trees, nut trees, banana, plantain, pineapple, conifers, e.g., loblolly pine, and turf species Kentucky bluegrass, St. Augustine grass, Kentucky fescue and bermudagrass.

The compounds can be applied as a preemergence or postemergence treatment using techniques of banding, directed sprays or broadcast applications. By selecting the appropriate rate which would be apparent to one skilled in the art, the compounds of this invention can be used in areas where complete control of all vegetation is desired, such as around fuel storage tanks, ammunition depots, industrial storage areas, oil well sites, drive-in theaters, around billboards, highway and railroad structures and in fence rows. Alternatively, by selecting the proper rates and adjuvants, the compounds of this invention can be used for selective weeds control in plantation crops such as citrus, sugarcane, coffee, oil palm, rubber, cocoa, grapes, fruit trees, pineapple, and turf species such as St. Augustine grass, Kentucky bluegrass, bermudagrass, Kentucky fescue. In general, the compounds of this invention are used at 5 to 5000 g ha with a preferred rate range of 10 to 2000 g/ha rate. One skilled in the art can select the proper rates for a given situation.

The compounds of this invention may be used in combination with other herbicides listed below. They are particularly useful in combinations for total vegetation control in plantation crops including: triazine, triazole, uracil, urea, amide, carbamate, bipyridylium, phenoxy, sulfonylurea and imidazole types. They may also be used in combination with mefluidide, glyphosate or gluphosinate.

Cpτn oπ Nam* Chemical Name acetochlor 2-chloro-N-(ethoxymethyl)-N-(2-ethyl-6-methyl- phenyl)acetamide acifluorfen 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitro- benzoic acid acrolein 2-propenal

alachlor 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxy- methyDacetamide anilofos S-4-chloro-N-isopropylcarbaniloylmethyl-0,0- dimethyl phosphorodithioate ametryn N-ethyl-N'-(l-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-l,3,5- triazine-2 ,4-diamine

IH- 1 ,2 ,4-triazol-3-amine

ammonium sulfamate

methyl [(4-aminophenyl)sulfonyl]carbamate

6-chloro-N-ethyl-N'-(l-methylethyl)-l,3,5- triazine-2 ,4-diamine

4-chloro-2-butynyl 3-chlorocarbamate

N-butyl-N-ethyl-2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)- benzenamine

bensulfuron methyl 2-[[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]- methylcarbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]methyl]benzoic acid, methyl ester

bensulide 0,0-bis(l-methylethyl) S-[2-[(phenylsulfonyl)- amino]ethyl]phosphorodithioate

3-(l-methylethyl)-(lH)-2,l,3-benzothiadiazin- 4(3H)-one, 2,2-dioxide

N-[4-(ethylthio)-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyI]- methanesulfonamide

N-benzoyl-N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-DL-alanine

methyl 5-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoate

5-bromo-6-methyl-3-(l-methylpropyl)- 2,4( lH,3H)pyrimidinedione

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile

N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethyl- phenyDacetamide

3-[5-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-4- hydroxy-l-methyl-2-imidazolidinone

4-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-N-(l-methylpropyl)-2,6- dinitrobenzenamine

S-ethyl bis(2-methylpropyl)carbamothioate

dimethyl arsinic oxide

2-chloro-N,N-di-2-propenylacetamide

2-chloroallyl diethyldithiocarbamate

3-(4,6-dimethoxy-l,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-l-[2-(2- methoxyethoxy)phenylsulfonyl]-urea

Cn-mmon N, flm* Chemi al aip

chloramben 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid

chlorbromuron 3-(4-bromo-3-chlorophenyl)-l-methoxy-l- methylurea

chlorimuron ethyl 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)ethyl- amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid, ethyl ester

chlormethoxynil 2 ,4-dichlorophenyl 4-nitro-3-methoxyphenyl ether

chlornitrofen 2 ,4,6-trichlorophenyl-4-nitrophenyl ether

chloroxuron N'-[4-(4-chlorophenoxy)phenyl]-N,N- dimethylurea chlorpropham 1-methylethyl 3-chlorophenylcarbamate

chlorsulfuron 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-l ,3 ,5-triazin- 2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamide

chlortoluron N'-(3-chloro-4-methylphenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea

cinmethylin exo-l-methyl-4-(l-methylethyl)-2-[(2-methyl- phenyl)methoxy]-7-oxabicyclo-[2.2.1]heptane

clethodim (E,E)-Gfc)-2-[l-[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy]imino]- propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2- cyclohexen-1-one

clomazone 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3- isoxazoHdinone

cloproxydim (E,E)-2-[l-[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy)imino]- butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2- cyclohexen-1-one

Cnmmn-n arnP clopyralid 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxyHc acid

CMA calcium salt of MAA

cyanazine 2-!I4-cUoro-6-(ethylamino)-l,3,5-triazin-2- yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile

cycloate S-ethyl cyclohexylethylcarbamothioate

cycluron 3-cyclooctyl-l,l-dimethylurea

cyperquat l-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium cyprazine 2-chloro-4-(cyclopropylamino)-6-(isopropyl- amino)-g-triazine

cyprazole N-[5-(2-chloro-l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3,4- thiadiazol-2-yl]cyclopropanecarboxamide

cypromid 3',4'-dichIorocyclopropanecarboxanilide

dalapon 2,2-dichloropropanoic acid

dazomet tetrahydro-3,5-dimethyl-2H-l,3,5-thiadiazine-2- thione

DCPA dimethyl 2 ,3 ,5 ,6-tetrachloro-l,4-benzene- dicarboxylate

desmediphan ethyl [3-[[(phenylamino)carbonyI]oxy]phenyl]- carbamate

desmetryn 2-(isopropylamino)-4-(methylamino)-6-(methyl- thio)-s-triazine

diallate S-(2,3-dichloro-2-propenyl)bis(l-methylethyl)- carbamothioate

flnm-mop Nan-tfi Cham-fopl PTT ^ft

dicamba 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid

dichlobenil 2 ,6-dichlorobenzonitrile

dichlorprop (±)-2-(2 ,4-dichlorophenoxy)propanoic acid

dichlofop (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic acid, methyl ester

diethatyl N-(chloroacetyl)-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)glycine

difenzoquat l,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenyl-lH-pyrazoHum

dimepiperate S-1-methyl-l-phenylethylpiperidine-l-carbo- thioate

dinitramine N^ ,N3-diethyl-2 ,4-dinitro-6-(trifluoromethyl)- 1 ,3-benzenediamine

dinoseb 2-(l-methylpropyl)-4,6-dinitrophenol

diphenamid N,N-dimethyl-α-phenylbenzeneacetamide

dipropetryn 6-(ethylthio)-N,N'-bis(l-methylethyl)-l,3,5- triazine-2 ,4-diamine

diquat 6,7-dihydrodipyrido[l,2-a:2',l'-c]-pyrazinedium ion

diuron N'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea

DNOC 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol

Common λme Chemical Name

DSMA disodium salt of MAA

dymron N-(4-methylphenyl)-N'-(l-methyl-l-phenyl- ethyl)urea endothall 7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane-2,3-dicarboxyUc acid

EPTC S-ethyl dipropylcarbamothioate

esprocarb S-benzyl-N-ethyl-N-(l,2-dimethyl)propyl)thiol- carbamate

ethalfiuralin N-ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4- (trifluoromethyl)benzenamine ethofumesate (±)-2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-5- benzofuranyl methanesulfonate

Express® 2-[[[[N-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-l,3,5-triazine-2-yl)- N-methylaπm o]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid, methyl ester fenac 2,3,6-trichlorobenzeneacetic acid

fenoxaprop (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]- propanoic acid

fenuron N,N-dimethyl-N'-phenylurea fenuron TCA Salt of fenuron and TCA

flamprop N-benzoyl-N-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-DL- alanine

fluazifop (±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]- phenoxylpropanoic acid

Common Nam*

fluazifop-P (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]- phenoxyjpropanoic acid

fluchloralin N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4- (trifluoromethyDbenzenamine

fiuometuron N,N-dimethyl-N'-[3-(trifluoromethyl)- phenyl]urea

fluorochloridone 3-chloro-4-(chloromethyl)-l-[3-(trifluoro- methyl)phenyl]-2-pyrrolidinone

fluorodifen -nitrophenyl α,α,α,-trifluoro-2-nitro-p-tolyl ether

fluoroglycofen carboxymethyl 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoro- methyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoate

fluridone l-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)- phenyl]-4( lH)-pyridinone

fomesafen 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-N- (methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzamide

fosamine ethyl hydrogen (aminocarbonyl)phosphate

glyphosate N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine

haloxyfop 2-[4-[[3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]- oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid

Harmony® 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-l,3,5-triazin-2-yl)- amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophene- carboxyhc acid, methyl ester

Chemical Name

hexaflurate potassium hexafluoroarsenate hexazinone 3-cyclohexyl-6-(dimethylamino)-l-methyl-l,3,5- triazine-2,4(lH,3H)-dione

imazamethabenz 6-(4-isopropyl-4-methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)- m-toluic acid, methyl ester and 6-(4-isopropyl-4- methyl-5-oxo-2-imidazolin-2-yl)-p-toluic acid, methyl ester

imazapyr (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(l-methylethyl)-5- oxo-lH-imidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxyUc acid

imazaquin 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(l-methylethyl)-5-oxo- lH-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid

imazethapyr (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(l-methylethyl)-5- oxo-lH-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3- pyridinecarbo^rHc acid ioxynil 4-hydroxy-3 ,5-diiodobenzonitrile

isopropalin 4-(l-methylethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl- benzenamine

isoproturon N-(4-isopropylphenyl)-N',N'-dimethylurea isouron N'-[5-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-3-isoxazolyl3-N,N- dimethylurea isoxaben N-[3-( l-ethyl-l-methylpropyl)-5-isoxazolyl]-2 ,6- dimethoxybenzamide

karbutilate 3-[[(dimethylamino)carbonyl]amino]phenyl-(l,l- dimethylethyDcarbamate

lactofen (+)-2-ethoxy-l-methyl-2-oxoethyl 5-[2-chloro-4- (trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoate

Qmn-inn fl ** Chemical Name

lenacil 3-cyclohexyl-6,7-dihydro-lH-cyclopenta- pyrimidine-2 ,4(3H,5H)-dione

N'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methyl- urea

xnethylarsonic acid

monoammonium salt of MAA

MCPA (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid

MCPB 4-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)butanoic acid

MON 7200 S,S-dimethyl-2-(difluoromethyl)-4-(2-methyl- propyl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)-3,5-pyridinedicarbo- thionate

mecoprop (±)-2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)propanoic acid

mefenacet 2-(2-benzothiazolyloxy-N-methyl-N-phenyl- acetamide mefluidide N-[2,4-dimethyl-5-[[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]- amino]phenyl]acetamide

methalpropalin N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4- (trifluoromethyl)benzenamide

methabenzthiazuron l,3-dimethyl-3-(2-benzothiazolyl)urea metham methylcarbamodithioic acid

methazole 2-(3 ,4-dichloropheny l)-4-methyl- 1 ,2 ,4-oxa- diazolidine-3 ,5-dione

πr-r mn _? TΠP Chemical Name

methoxuron N'-(3-chloro-4-methoxyphenyl)-N,N-dimethyl- urea metolachlor 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2- methoxy-l-methylethyl)acetamide

metribuzin 4-amino-6-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)- l,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one

metsulfuron methyl 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-l,3,5-triazin-2-yl)- amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid, methyl ester

MH 1 ,2-dihydro-3 ,6-pyridazinedione

molinate S-ethyl hexahydro-lH-azepine-1-carbothioate

monolinuron 3-(p.-chlorophenyl)-l-methoxy-l-methylurea

monuron N'-(4-chlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea

monuron TCA Salt of monuron and TCA

MSMA monosodium salt of MAA

naprop amide N,N-diethyl-2-(l-naphthalenyloxy)propanamide

naptalam 2-[( l-naphthalenylamino)carbonyl]benzoic acid

neburon l-butyl-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-l-methylurea

nitralin 4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl- aniline

nitrofen 2,4-dichloro-l-(4-nitrophenoxy)benzene

Cn- mn *føττ Chf-micp NλiP* nitrofluorfen 2-chloro-l-(4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoro- methyDbenzene

norea N,N-dimethyl-N'-(octahydro-4,7-methano-lH- inden-5-yl)urea 3aa,-4a,5a,7a,7aa-isomer

norflurazon 4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-[3-(trifluoromethyl)- phenyl]-3(2H)-pyridazinone

oryzalin 4-(dipropylamino)-3,5-dinitrobenzene- sulfonamide

oxadiazon 3-[2,4-dichloro-5-(l-methylethoxy)phenyl]-5- (l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3,4-oxadiazol-2(3H)-one oxyfluorfen 2-chloro-l-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(tri- fluoromethyDbenzene paraquat l,l'-dimethyl-4,4'-dipyridinium ion

pebulate S-propyl butylethylcarbamothioate

pendimethalin N-( l-ethylpropyl)-3 ,4-dimethyl-2 ,6-dinitro- benzenamine

perfluidone l,l,l-trifluoro-N-[2-methyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)- phenyljmethanesulfonamide

phenmedipham 3-[(methoxycarbonyl)amino]phenyl (3-methyl- phenyDcarbamate

picloram 4-amino-3 ,5 ,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid

PPG-1013 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitro- acetophenone oxime-O-acetic acid, methyl ester

Common Nfiτn ^ft Chemical Name

pretilachlor α-chloro-2,6-diethyl-N-(2-propoxyethyl)- acetanilide

procyazine 2-[[4-chloro-6-(cyclopropylamino)-l,3,5-triazine- 2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile

profluralin N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4- (trifluoromethyDbenzenamine prometon 6-methoxy-N,N'-bis(l-methylethyl)-l,3,5- triazine-2 ,4-diamine prometryn N,N'-bis(l-methylethyI)-6-(methylthio)-l,3,5- triazine-2 ,4-diamine

pronamide 3,5-dichloro-N-(l,l-dimethyl-2-propynyl)- benz amide propachlor 2-chloro-N-(l-methylethyl)-N-phenylacetamide

prop anil N-(3 ,4-dichlorophenyl)propanamide

propazine 6-chloro-NJ ^', -bis(l-methylethyl)-l,3,5-triazine- 2,4-diamine

propham 1-methylethyl phenylcarbamate

prosulfalin N-[[4-(dipropylamino)-3,5-dinitrophenyl]- sulfonyI]-S,S-dimethylsulfi_limine

prynachlor 2-chloro-N-(l-methyl-2-propynyl)acetaniHde

pyrazolate 4-(2,4-dichlorobenzoyl)-l,3-dimethylpyrazol-5-yl- p_-toluenesulphonate

pyrazon 5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenyl-3(2H)-pyridazinone

Conimop NλTT» ^p Chemical Name

pyrazosulfuron ethyl ethyl S-[3-(4,6-dimethoxypyriπύdin-2-yl)ureado- sulfonyl]-l-methylpyrazole-4-carboxylate

quinclorac 3,7-dichloro-8-quinoline carboxylic acid

quizalofop ethyl (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]- phenoxy]propanoic acid, ethyl ester

secbumeton N-ethyl-6-methoxy-N'-(l-methylpropyl)- 1,3,5- triazine-2 ,4-diamine

sethoxydim 2-[l-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]- 3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-l-one

siduron N-(2-methylcyclohexyl)-N'-phenylurea

simazine 6-chloro-N,N'-diethyl-l,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine

SK-233 l-(α,α-dimethylbenzyl)-3-(4-methylphenyl)urea

sulfometuron methyl 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]- carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid, methyl ester

TCA trichloroacetic acid

tebuthiuron N-[5-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylj- N,N'-dimethylurea terbacil 5-chloro-3-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-6-methyl- 2,4(lH,3H)-pyrimidinedione terbuchlor N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-[2-(l,l-dimethyl- ethyl)-6-methylphenyl]acetamide

terbuthylazine 2-(tgrt-butylamino ⁾ -4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-s- triazine

Common ^flτr * ^ft hemic l Nfl-mg

terbutol 2.6-di-tert-butyl-p-tolyl methylcarbamate terbutryn N-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-N'-ethyl-6-(methylthio)- l,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine

thiobencarb S-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl] diethylcarbamo- thioate

triallate S-(2 ,3 ,3-trichloro-2-propenyl) bis(l-methylethyl)- carbamothioate

[(3 ,5 ,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acid

2-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2-(2,2,2-trichloroethyD- oxirane

2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)- benzenamine l-(p.-chlorophenyl)-2,3,3-trimethylpseudourea

(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid

4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acid

S-propyl dipropylcarbamothioate

xylachlor 2-chloro-N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-N-(l-methyl- etiiyDacetamide

The herbicidal properties of the subject compounds were discovered , in a number of greenhouse tests conducted as described below.

TABLE OF COMPOUNDS

CMPP E mp.(°C)

1 167-169 2 oil

4 oil 5 oil

Compound 3 (m.p. 158-159°C)

TEST A

Seeds of legume cover crops Pueraria javanira. and Calapogoniyni were planted in 11.4 cm square pot filled with greenhouse planting medium. a^p l-πm fςtpjy pt-ym cuttings were planted in 15.2 cm plastic pots filled with the same planting medium. Plants were sprayed postemergence with the test compounds in a non-phytotoxic solvent. Treated plants were visually rated 14 days-after- treatment (DAT) and compared with the appropriate controls. The injury ratings were based on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no effect, 20 indicates minimal effect and 100 indicates complete control. The results are shown in Table A.

2ESUB

Rhizones of lalang <I,ιrperfltP c ^y lindrical and stem cuttings of MiVania spp. were planted in separate 15.2 cm plastic pots filled with greenhouse planting medium and grown in the greenhouse. The Mikf- ³ spp. was profusely vining and the lalang had profusely growing rhizones at the time of treatment.

The plants were sprayed postemergence with the test compound in a non-phytotoxic solvent. The treatments were visually rated 24 DAT and compared with the appropriate controls. Plant injury ratings were based on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no effect, 20 indicates minimal injury and 100 indicates complete control. The results are shown in Table B.

TAE E P

Rate Plant Iniurv Rating ompound g/ha ikqpifl ppp, T,a1fln _j r

1 250 70 0

TEST C

Stem cuttings of M-ikani spp. and Boston fern (Nephrolepis exaltata) were planted in separate 15.2 cm plastic pots filled with greenhouse planting medium and grown in the greenhouse.

The plants were sprayed postemergence with the test compounds in a non-phytotoxic solvent. The treated plants were visually rated 49 DAT and compared with appropriate controls. The plant injury ratings scale used in Table A was used in this test also. The results are shown in Table C.

TABLE C

TESTP

Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). pecan (Carva spp.), Swamp oak ( uercus spp.), white ash (Fraxinus pm ^p rir n t and sweetgum strvaciflua) seedlings were planted in 30-liter plastic pot filled with planting medium. The plants were grown in the greenhouse for five months before spraying.

Plants were sprayed postemergence with Compound 1 formulated in a non-phytotoxic solvent. The treated plants were visually rated 99 DAT and compared with appropriate controls. Plant injury ratings scale used in Test A was used in this test also. The results are shown in Table D.

TEST E

Guineagrass rooted cuttings were planted in separate 15.2 cm plastic pots filled with greenhouse planting soil.

The plants were treated postemergence with Compound 1 formulated in a non-phytotoxic solvent. The guineagrass (£. was treated preemergence and at early and late growth stages postemergence. Treated plants were visually rated 32 DAT and compared with appropriate controls. Plant injury ratings used in Test A were also used in this test. The results are shown in Table E.

TABLE E

TES F

Stem cuttings of St. Augustine grass and Alexandergrass πwfr rif ¹ plantayenea ⁾ . Kentucky bluegrass sod and seeds of Kentucky fescue, annual bluegrass, bermudagrass, bentgrass, large crabgrass and smooth crabgrass were planted in individual 11.4cm square plastic pots. The plants were grown in the greenhouse until used.

The plants were sprayed postemergence with Compound 1 formulated in a non-phytotoxic solvent. The treated plants were visually rated 29 DAT compared with appropriate controls. The rating scale used in Test A was also used in this test. The results are shown in Table F.

TABLE F

g/ha

TEST G

Seeds of guineagrass (£. mss- nffi) were planted in 15.2 cm plastic pots filled with planting medium, planting was done in two stages. Sugarcane stem cutting, paspalum goldenrod (Solidago spp.) stem and rhizone cuttings were also planted in 15.2 cm plastic pots filled with planting medium. Plants were cut back often to stimulate ratoon production in the sugarcane and vigorous growth in paspalum and goldenrod.

Plants were treated postemergence with Compound 1 in a non- phytotoxic spray solvent. The treatments were visually rated 20 DAT and compared with appropriate controls. The plant injury ratings were based on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no effect, 20 indicates minimal injury and 100 indicates complete control. The results were shown in Table G.

TABLE G

TESTJi

Rooted cutting of rough lemon (Citrus spp.) were planted in 30- liter plastic pots and also in 11.4 cm square plastic pots. The 30-liter pots were also seeded with pigweed f^.,mgr^nt.bn ^g viridis). sandbiu* (Cenchrus echinatus). Texas panicum narrowleaf panicum (£. wia-rimiim seeds and yellow nutsedge (Cvperus esculentus) tubers.

The citrus in the 30-liter pots were sprayed to simulate the trunk- to-trunk herbicide application method used in citrus groves, while the weeds were treated preemergence. The citrus in the 11.4 cm square pots were given direct over the top treatments. All pots were treated with Compound 1 formulated in a non-phytotoxic spray solvent. Plants were visually rated 28 DAT and compared with appropriate controls. The injury rating scale used in Test A was also used. The results are shown in Table H.

TABLE H

TEST I

Mikania spp. vine cuttings, Boston fern (M- exaltata) and coffee (Coffea spp.) were planted separately in 15.2 cm plastic pots. Compound 1 was applied postemergence to the plants using 30 psi and 40 psi spray pressure.

In this test Compound 1 was formulated with 0.25% X-77 surfactant. Plants were visually rated 32 DAT and compared with appropriate controls. The injury rating scale used in Test A was used in this test. The results are shown in Table I.

TEST J

Rooted rough lemon cuttings were planted in 30-liter plastic pots. The pots were also seeded with Texas panicum, guineagrass, pigweed (A* viridis). sandbur and yellow nutsedge tubers. Mjfc _fl spp. vine cutting and Boston fern were planted in 15.2 cm plastic pots. The plants were treated postemergence with Compound 1 formulated in non-phytotoxic spray solvent. Texas panicum, guineagrass and pigweed were seeded into the 30-liter pots and treated preemergence.

Plants were visually rated 35 DAT compared with appropriate controls. The injury ratings were based on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no effect, 20 indicates minimal injury and 100 indicates complete control. The results are shown in Table J.

TABLE J

1QQQ. 500 250 125 g ha

Postemergence Rough lemon 30 30 30 0 Guineagrass 100 100 0 0 Sandbur 100 100 100 Pigweed 100 100 100 100 Texas panicum 100 70 60 0 Yellow nutsedge 70 0 0 0 Mikania 90 80 80 60 Boston fern 90 80 60 30 Preemergence Texan panicum 100 100 100 100 Guineagrass 100 100 100 100 Pigweed 100 100 100 100

TEST K

Stem cuttings of St. Augustine grass, Kentucky bluegrass sod, seeds of Kentucky fescue, bentgrass, bermudagrass, large crabgrass, smooth crabgrass, dallisgrass and blackseed plantain transplants were planted separately in 11.4 cm square pots filled with planting medium. Plants were treated postemergence with Compound 1 formulated in a non-phytotoxic spray solvent.

The treated plants were visually rated 24 DAT and compared with appropriate controls. The rating scale used in Test F was used in this test also. The results are shown in Table K. The variations in these results from those observed with Test F could be due to the fact that the tests were conducted at different times of the year.

TEST L

Plastic windowsill flats were filled with planting medium and seeded with corn, johnsongrass, shattercane, sorghum, giant foxtail, wild proso millet, large crabgrass, velvetleaf and sugarcane node cutting at the spike stage. In a second test, windowsill flats were seeded with untreated and antidote seed-treated corn, johnsongrass, velvetleaf,

Williams soybean, W-20 and W-4 soybean, wild proso millet, cocklebur, untreated and antidote seed-treated sorghum, momingglory, shattercane, giant foxtail lambsquarters and sugarcane node cuttings at the spike stage. The plants were treated preemergence with Compound 1 formulated in a non-phytotoxic spray solution. Treatments were visually rated 24 and 41 DAT and compared with appropriate controls. The injury ratings were based on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no effect, 20 indicates minimal injury and 100 indicates complete control. The results are shown in Tables La and Lb.

g/ha

Corn

Johnsongrass

Shattercane Sorghum

Giant foxtail

Wild proso millet

Large crabgrass

Velvetleaf Sugarcane

TΕS

The object of this test was to evaluate the effect of pre-plant- incorporation of Compound 1 on loblolly pine and rough lemon plants. Soil was sprayed with Compound 1. The treated soil was mixed thoroughly in plastic bags to incorporate the compound into the soil. Loblolly and rough lemon plants were then transplanted into the Compound 1 treated soil. Plants were visually rated 66 DAT and compared with the appropriate controls. The injury ratings were based on the same scale as used in Test L. The results are shown in Table M.

TABL M

TES

Rough lemon rooted cuttings were planted in 30-liter plastic pots. The pots were also seeded with Spanish needles (Bidens pilosa). pigweed (A- viridis). narrowleaf panicum, Texas panicum, guineagrass, sandbur and purple nutsedge tubers. Mikania spp. vine cutting and Boston fern were planted in separate 15.2 cm plastic pots.

The plants were treated postemergence with Compound 1 formulated in a non-phytotoxic spray solution. The 30-liter pots were treated to simulate the trunk-to-trunk type treatment used in some citrus groves. Treatments were visually rated 37 DAT and compared with the appropriate controls. The rating scale used in Test L was used in this test also. The results are shown in Tables Na and Nb. The variations in these results from those observed for other tests could be due to the fact that the tests were conducted during different months of the year and on different growth size of plants at time of treatment. Greenhouse tests are conducted on a year-round basis (12 calendar months). These tests are repeated anytime of the year and not at the exact time when the test was first conducted.

TES O

Large fiberglass tubs filled with planting medium were planted with seed potato and seeded with ragweed, black nightshade, wild proso millet, giant foxtail and barnyardgrass. In another test, the tubs were planted with seed potato and volunteer pigweeds allowed to grow. The tubs were treated preemergence with Compound 1 formulated in a non- phytotoxic spray solvent. Plants were visually rated 34 and 66 DAT compared with appropriate controls. The injury ratings scale used in Test A was used in this test. The results are shown in Table Oa and Ob.

125 ft 22. g/ha

Potato 30 10 0 Pigweed 100 100 100

T £T_£

Plastic tray liners with individual planting compartments were filled with planting medium and seeded separately with bermudagrass ( ynodoa dactvlon). broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platvphvlla ⁾ . guineagrass f umni-m j jasiauim), smooth crabgrass fDigitaria ischasmuo), barnyardgrass fE hinnrl a emiB- alTiV large crabgrass (P_. fia&guilialig), johnsongrass fSmyh-nm halepense). Texas panicum (F lTlimm tssasum), sandbur ⁽ Cenchrus whinflfrlP), itchgrass (Rottfrpellia dallisgrass (Fflppflliim djlataiuaa), annual bluegrass (£Q& a nmV alfalfa ⁽ Medicago fiaϋxa), Pueraria javaaic , mo ingglory flpomea spp.), purslane (PortuJaca filsiacsa), field bindweed ⁽ Convolvulus fir∑≤ΛSi≤), ragweed (AmhrOSJa elatior). peanut (Arachis hvpogea). purple nutsedge (Cvperus rotundus). yellow nutsedge (£. esculentus). and Kentucky bluegrass sod (Poa pratense). Sugarcane node cuttings were planted in 15.2 cm plastic pots filled with planting medium.

The plantings were tested peremergence and postemergence with the compounds formulated in a non-phytotoxic spray solution. Plantings were staggered so that the preemergence and postemergence treatments were sprayed on the same day. Plants were visually rated 18 to 29 days after treatment (DAT) and compared with appropriate controls. The injury ratings were based on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no effect, 20 indicates minimal effect and 100 indicates complete control. A dash (-) indicates not determined. The variations in these results could be due to the fact that the tests were conducted at different times of the year and on plants at different growth stages. The results are shown in Tables Pa-Pr.

A£L£ £h

Compound 1

22 lfi fi fifea

Postemergence

S EI Es

Com und 1

500. 250 125 500 250125 g/ha Preemergence Postemergence

TABLE Pf

TABLE_Ph

Compound 1

250 250 g/ha

Preemergence Postemergence

B ELE

Compound 1

250 250 g&

Preemergence Postemergence

TABLE Pk

Compound 2

500 250 125 500 250 125 g/ha Preemergence Postemergence

TABLE PI

Compound 2

250 250 g/ &

Preemergence Postemergence

TABLE Po

Compound 3

125 125 g ha

Preemergence Postemergence

TABLED

Compound 3

125 £4 22 10 4 g ha Preemergence

T ED

Compound 4

250 250 g/ha

Preemergence Postemergence

3ES Q

Seeds of crabgrass (Digitaria spp.), barnyardgrass ( s iBΩEhlΩ ∑∑SS Ss i), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) _τ wild oats ⁽ Avena fatua ⁾ . cheatgrass (Bromus secalinus). velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). momingglory (Ipomoea spp.), cocklebur sorghum, corn, soybean, sugarbeet, cotton, rice, wheat, barley, cassia and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) tubers were planted and treated preemergence with the test chemicals dissolved in a non-phytotoxic solvent. At the same time, these crops and weed species were treated with a soil/foliage application. At the time of treatment, the plants ranged in height from 2 to 18 cm. Treated plants and controls were maintained in a greenhouse for sixteen days, after which all species were compared to controls and visually rated for response to treatment. The ratings, summarized in Tables a- g are based on a numerical scale extending from 0 = no injury, to 10 = complete kill. The accompanying descriptive symbols have the following meanings: C = chlorosis/necrosis B s= burn D = defoliation E ss emergence inhibition G = growth retardation

H = formative effect U = unusual pigmentation X = axillary stimulation S = albinism 6Y = abscised buds or flowers

TABLE ^Q c

Compound 2

400 400 g/ha

Preemergence Postemergence

TEST R

Postemergence

Three round pans (25 cm diameter by 12.5 cm deep) were filled with Sassafras sandy loam soil. One pan was planted with nutsedge (Cvperus rotundus) tubers, crabgrass (Digitaria paηgujpalip), sicklepod (Cassia

(Abutilon theophrasti). lambsquarters rice (Orvza sativa). and teaweed (Sida spinosa). The second pot was planted with green foxtail (Setaria viridis). cocklebur momingglory (Ipomoea hederacea). cotton fftoasγ ? m fe gui ia), johnsongrass galli). corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glvcine max), and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi). The third pot was planted with wheat barley (ftnrtfeyf vulgare). wild buckwheat f ply Qnum convolvulus), downy brome (Bromus tentomml, sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). wild oat (Avena fatua) _τ common chickweed (Stellaria media), blackgrass

(Alopecurus mvosuroides). and rape (Brassica napus). The plants were grown for approximately fourteen days, then sprayed postemergence with the chemicals dissolved in a non-phytoxic solvent. Preemergence Three round pans (25 cm diameter by 12.5 cm deep) were filled with Sassafras sandy loam soil. One pan was planted with nutsedge tubers, crabgrass, sicklepod, jimsonweed, velvetleaf, lambsquarters, rice, and teaweed. The second pot was planted with green foxtail, cocklebur, momingglory, cotton, johnsongrass, barnyardgrass, corn, soybean, and giant foxtail. The third pot was planted with wheat, barley, wild buckwheat, downy brome, sugarbeet, wild oat, common chickweed, blackgrass, and rape. The three pans were sprayed preemergence with the chemicals dissolved in a non-phytotoxic solvent.

Treated plants and controls were maintained in the greenhouse for approximately 24 days, then all rated plants were compared to controls and visually rated for plant response.

Response ratings used in Test Q were used in some tests. In other tests the ratings are based on a scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no

effect, 20 minimal injury and 100 indicated complete control. A dash (-) response means no test was conducted. The results are shown in Tables Ra through Re.

TEST S

Seeds of spring wheat -TritJΗITP ass&ΣUffi). winter wheat C∑. aesϋyjim), spring barley ^TT"T^f !P vulgare ⁾ . winter barley (fi. yjulga∑fi), sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). rape (Brassica aajaiδ), wild oat ⁽ Avena faJaia), downy blackgrass (Alopercurus mvosuroides). annual bluegrass (Poa nnτιιιτnV green foxtail (Setaria yjri ϋs), Itahan ryegrass jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica Matrfcgria iffidsra, Ctøliπm spp., Russian thistle (Salsola k ϋ), lambsquarters ⁽ h ^p p^p^j- nlhιιτnV kochia (∑ΩS & scoparia). black nightshade CfinHflηvT" nigrum). speedwell ⁽ Veronica persica). wild buckwheat fP-^yg- ^ convolvulus), viola (Viola spp.), Veronica hederaefolia and field pennycress (Thlapsi arvensis) were placed in 26 cm plastic pans containing pasteurized sandy loam soil. Plantings were maintained in the greenhouse for 28 days at which time the postemergence treatments were applied using compounds formulated in a non-phytotoxic solvent. The preemergence portion of the test was seeded just before spraying. The postemergence treatments also contained wild oats and blackgrass at 1-leaf and 3-leaf growth stages. All treatments were held in the greenhouse for an additional 21 days at which time visual assessments of plant injury were made using a scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no effect, 20 indicates minimal injury and 100 indicates complete control. The variation in observed activity could be due to the fact that the tests were conducted at different times of the year or on different growth stages of plants. The results are shown in Tables Sa through Sf.

TEST U

Plastic pots were partially filled with silt loam soil. The soil was then saturated with water. Japonica rice (Orvza sativa) seedlings at the 2.0 to 2.5 leaf stage; seeds of barnyardgrass F-rb TPWMftfi cru£-£&12i), duck salad (Heteranthera 1iτrms»V and umbrella sedge (Cvperus jjffbrmig); and tubers of arrowhead (Sagittaria spp.), and waterchestnut (Eleocharis spp.) were planted into this soil. Several days after planting, water levels were raised to 3 cm above the soil surface and maintained at this level throughout the test. Chemical treatments were formulated in a non- phytotoxic solvent and applied directly to the paddy water. Treated plants and untreated controls were maintained in a greenhouse for approximately 21 days, after which all treated plants were compared to untreated control and visually evaluated for injury. Plant response ratings, summarized in Table Ua, are reported on a zero to 10 scale where zero is no effect and 10 is complete control.

TESTV

The Corn and Sorghum Herbicide Test included the following species in both the preemergence and postemergence evaluations:

SPECIES Category Cnfmprvn Nam fitøif ptifio Name Crops Corn Zea mays

Soybean Glvcine max

Sorghum

Grasses Green foxtail Sgtarie viridjg

Giant foxtail Setaria faberii

Johnsongrass nr-yV-m-m halepense

Barnyardgrass Echinochloa crus-galli

Fall panicum

Crabgrass Digitaria sanguinalis

Nutsedge Cvpems rotundus

Broadleaves Cocklebur

Momingglory

Velvetleaf Abutilon theophrasti

Jimsonweed Dflt -i a at.rflmr»τιi*tτm

Lambsquarters Chenopodi m a) -vm

Pigweed Amaranthus retroflexus

Smartweed Fplygom m pgrsicaris

Postemergence

Postemergence plantings were grown in Sassafras sandy loam soil. Corn and soybeans were grown in separate 25 cm diameter containers. Sorghum and the seven grass weed species were grown in two 18 cm diameter containers, 4 species per container. The seven broadleaf weed species were also grown in two 18 cm diameter containers, 4 species in one container, 3 species in the second container. One additional planting of corn in an 18 cm diameter container was made. The soil surface of this

additional container of corn was covered with the absorbent, perlite, before spray treatment so that test chemicals would enter the plant only via the foliage. The plants were grown 10-21 days, dependent upon the species and then sprayed postemergence with the test chemicals dissolved in a non-phytotoxic solvent. Preemergence

Preemergence plantings were grown in fertilized Tama silt loam soil. These plantings are identical to those described in the postemergence section, with the exception of the corn planting having perlite covering the soil surface. These plantings were made the day of or the day before spraying the test chemicals dissolved in a non-phytotoxic solvent.

Treated plants and controls were maintained in thegreenhouse for 2 to 4 weeks. Visual ratings were made using a scale of 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no effect, and 100 indicates complete control. The results are shown in Tables Va and Vb.

*soil covered with perilite at time of postemergence treatment

TEST W

Sugarcane plants growing in 20.3 cm plastic pots were cut back to stimulate ratoon growth. At the early ratoon stage the pots were seeded with itchgrass (β. soεhffiεh s&sis), guineagrass (£. ms∑JBmm) and large crabgrass seeds. The pots were sprayed with Compound 1 formulated in a non- phytotoxic spray solvent. The treatments were postemergence to the sugarcane and preemergence to the weed seeds. Plants were visually rated 65 DAT and compared with the appropriate controls. The injury rating scale used in Test G was also used here. The results are shown in Table W.

TABLE fipyn nym ] 250 g/ha Postemergence

Sugarcane 0

Preemergence Itchgrass 100

Guineagrass 100 Large crabgrass 100

IESL2

Banana (Musa sp.) plants growing in 20.3 cm pots were used in this test. Plants at the 11-leaf stage were sprayed with Compoimd 1 in a non-phytotoxic solvent. The treatments were applied over-the-top in one group of plants and post-directed to simulate field type treatment in another group. Treated plants were visually rated 54 DAT and compared with the appropriate controls. The injury rating scale used in Test W was also used here. The results are shown in Table X.

TA ED Compound 1

250 225 & g/ha Over-the-top

Banana 20* 0 0

Post-directed Banana 0 0 0

^♦ main stem died but healthy side suckers developed.