This application is a continuation-in-part of my copend- ing patent application, Ser. No. 473,895, filed February 2, 1990.

This invention relates to an improved reinforced cemen¬ titious construction panel such as gypsum wallboard, light¬ weight concrete panels, fabric reinforced tile backerboards, and the like. In general, such cementitious panels are fas¬ tened to the framing of a building and serve as a backer- board for the installation of a facing material, for example, ceramic tile, thin brick, thin marble panels and stucco. However they also are used without a facing material as with the application of a paint.

More particularly this invention relates to a cementiti¬ ous backerboard comprising a panel having a core layer of light-weight concrete with each of the two faces being cov¬ ered with a layer of reinforcing fabric bonded to the core layer. Such cementitious backerboards are described in U.S. Patent No. 3,284,980 11966) , P. E. Dinkel. These panels are nailable and are readily fastened to the framing members. Furthermore they are substantially unaffected by water and consequently find extensive use in wet areas such as shower enclosures, bathtub surrounds, kitchen areas and entryways, as well as on building exteriors.

Cementitious backerboards are generally produced using a core mix of water, light-weight aggregate (e.g., expanded clay, expanded slag, expanded shale, perlite, expanded glass beads, polystyrene beads, and the like) , and a cementitious material (e.g., portland cement, magnesia cement, alumina cement, gypsum and blends of such materials) . A foaming agent as well as other additives can be added to the mix. The reinforcing fabric most generally employed is a fi- ber glass scrim, in particular, a woven mesh of vinyl coat¬ ed fiber glass yarns. The yarn count per inch of the fabric varies from 8 x 8 to 12 x 12, depending upon the size of the

openings in the mesh or scrim for the passage of the bond¬ ing material through the fabric. Other pervious fabrics having suitable tensile strength, alkali resistance and sufficiently large pores or openings may be employed.

Very commonly the reinforcing fabric is bonded to the surface of the core layer with a thin coating of portland cement slurry, with or without some fine aggregate added. Alternatively the core mix can be sufficiently fluid to be vibrated or forced through the openings of the reinforcing fabric to cover the fabric and to bond it to the core layer. This is described in U. S. Patent No. 4,450,022 (Galer) .

In the installation of eementitώαus backerbo.aaids, s for example in the construction of a wall section, it is stand¬ ard practice to leave a small space (e.g., 1/8") between two panels where the two abut, which then must be filled with mortar or the like and tape applied over this joint. This filling and taping of the joints between the panels is carried out in order to bridge across the gap between the panels and thereby provide a continuous surface on which to install the ceramic tile or other facing material. Such fill¬ ing and taping is specified in the "Wonder-Board" brochure published by Modulars, Inc., and in the "Durock" brochure published by the Durabond Division of U.S.G. Industries,Inc.

Also, the filling and taping of joints between panels is specified by the backerboard manufactures for the intended purpose of securing edge-to-edge bonding of the panels. This is to obtain a stronger integral wall structure and thereby reduce wall surface movement and avoid cracking of the cer¬ amic tile of the like.

However, edge-to-edge bonding can be achieved only in part due to the manner in which the backerboards are con¬ ventionally installed. This is illustrated in Fig.1. ^' Wall section 1 consists of framing members 2 (wood or steel studs) floor plate .3,top plate 4^and backerboard panels 5 attached to the studs with nails or screws 6. The backerboard panels 5 conventionally are installed in the horizontal position in order to catch the stud spacing, normally 16"o.c. A gap 7

of about 1/8", is left between the longitudinal edges of the panels. A problem arises when the effort is made to fill the longitudinal joint, that is gap 7, with mortar. Since there is only empty space in back of the gap 7, except at the studs, the mortar tends to fall through and cannot be packed, leaving voids in the joint. A gap 8 also is left between ends of the panels but since the abutting ends 9 are secured to a stud, the end joints are provided with a backing and can be filled solid. All joints must then be covered, according to the manufacturer's specifications, with a tape 10, normally 2" wide.

Another problem area with the present type of backer¬ board panels is the taping step. Not only is this is an ex¬ tra step in the installation of ceramic tile or other facing material, but the tape is also an obstruction in the tile setting operation. Since the tape is applied over the sur¬ face of the backerboard at the joints it leaves a raised band or strip which tends to catch the tile setter's notch¬ ed trowel as the installer is spreading the tile setting mor¬ tar, slowing the work and, in some cases, tearing away the tape. In addition each strip of tape presents a raised area on an otherwise flat surface. Since the tile setter is re¬ quired to set the tile in a smooth plane, in particular on a flat wall, the tile setting mortar must be applied in a heavier layer in the tape-free areas in order to compensate for the raised areas of the taped joints.

Consequently the elimination of the need for taping the joints between the panels would materially simplify the in¬ stallation of facing materials thereby increasing the pro- ductivity of the installer. Also a better installation is made ¹ possible,the facing material being set in a truer plane.

PRIOR ART U. S. Patent No. 3,284,980 (1966), P. E. Dinkel,discloses a fabric reinforced tile backerboard and illustrates the tap¬ ing of the joints between backerboard panels. ϋ. S. Patent No. 4,203,788 (1980) T. E. Clear, discloses!

a method and apparatus for producing fabric reinforαed tile backerboard panels.

U. S. Patent No. 4,450,022 (1984), R. E. Galer et al de¬ scribes a modified type of cementitious backerboard in which the same cementitious composition is used both as the core and the bonding material for the reinforcing fabric.

U. S. Patent No. 4,488,909 (1984) R. E. Galer et al de¬ scribes in further detail, in column 4 , the cementitious composition used in a cementitious backerboard.

U. S. Patent No. 4,518,652 (1985) M. D. Willoughby de¬ scribes formation of a cementitious construction panel based upon gypsum.

U. S. Patent No. 4,504,335 (1985) R. E. Galer, discloses a modified method for producing fabric reinforced cementi¬ tious backerboards.

U. S. Patent No. 4,916,004 (1990) R. P. Ensminger et al describes a reinforced cementitious panel in which the rein¬ forcement wraps the edges but is embedded in the core mix. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

An object of my invention is to provide an improved means of edge bonding cementitious construction panels.

A second object of my invention is to provide cementiti¬ ous construction panels having greater potential edge-to- edge bonding strength.

A further object of my ^* invention is to eliminate the need for taping the joints between abutting backerboard panels in the installation of ceramic tile or other facing materials. My invention comprises a fabric reinforced construction panel in which the fabric on at least one of the faces of the panel is wrapped around at least one of the longitudi¬ nal edges of the panel and bonded in place on the top and bottom faces of the panel, the edge portion of the fabric being free of material and being open and pervious• to re¬ ceive the joint filling material.

In the preferred embodiment, the panel of my invention comprises a core layer of a mix of portland cement and a light-weight aggregate with a layer of fiber glass mesh scrim covering and bonded to the top face and the bottom 5 face of the core layer, the scrim also wrapping the two longitudinal edges of the core layer, the portion of the scrim wrapping each of the edges being substantially un¬ bonded and being open and pervious to receive the mortar or other joint filling material. 0

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

My invention is more fully described with teference to the drawings, in which:

Fig. 1 i? a view in front elevation of a typical wall ₁₅ erected witπ cementitious construction panels.

Fig. 2 is a perspective view of an end portion of a cementitious construction panel of the prior art.

Fig.3 is a perspective view of an end portion of a second prior art cementitious construction panel. __ Fig. 4 is a partial cross-sectional view of the cementi¬ tious construction panel of my invention.

Fig. 5 is a partial cross-sectional view of two of the panels of my invention in abutting position before the mortar is applied to form a panel joint. „.. Fig. 6 is the same view as in Fig. 5 showing the mor¬ tar in place in the joint.

Fig. 7 is a cross-sectional view of one of the panels of my invention forming a corner joint with another panel.

The typical wall construction shown in Fig. 1 has been «-, _n described previously in the specification.

Fig. 2 shows a cross-section of a prior art backerboard 11. Such panels normally are 1/2" thick, three feet wide and 4 to 8 feet long. A core of expanded shale and portland cement is covered on each of its two faces with a layer of ₃₅ fiber glass mesh 13 bonded to the core face with a thin lay¬ er 14 of neat portland cement. The edges 15 and ends 16 are bare with the core 12 exposed.

Fig. 3 shows a cross-section of a second prior art back¬ erboard 17. The core 18 is composed of a foamed portland cement matrix with expanded polystyrene beads and other light-weight aggregate. The core is enclosed by a layer of fiber glass scrim 19, top, bottom and edges, the scrim being embedded in the core composition and bonded to the core lay¬ er. None of the scrim is exposed. The one cementitious com¬ position constitutes the core 18 and the surface bonding layer 20.

My invention is shown in Fig. 4, in cross-sectional view; the dimensions are exaggerated in order to more clear¬ ly illustrate its structure. The core layer 22 is a light¬ weight aggregate-portland cement composition. It is covered with a layer of reinforcing fabric, preferably a woven mesh of vinyl coated fiber glass yarns, 23 on top and 24 on the bottom, each bonded to the core with a coating of a cementi¬ tious material, 25 on the top and 26 on the bottom. Typi¬ cally the usual bonding layer is a coating of neat portland cement. In the forming operation the bottom fabric layer 24, of a suitable width, is folded around the edge 28 and a nar¬ row section 27 thereof folded over on to the top of the core along the length of the panel. In a prior step' the coating of neat portland cement is applied to that portion of the fabric web 24 which is brought into contact with the bottom of the core. The second layer of fabric 23 is laid down on the top of the core and extends over the portion 27 of the bottom fabric layer; a coating of the cement is applied over the fabric 23 as indicated at 25 to bond it to the core lay¬ er 22. The folded over section 27 becomes embedded in the portland cement and becomes united with the web 23. One or both edges of the panel can be wrapped with the bottom layer 24. The fabric actually is much thinner than is shown in Fig. 4, and in the finished product the top surface is sub¬ stantially flat as shown.in Figs. 5 and.6.

Alternatively the bottom web of fabric 24 pan be of suf¬ ficient width that it can be folded, not only around the

_S UBSTITUTESHEET

edges of the panel, but also over on to the top of the core so that the edges of this web 24 are brought together in abutting or over-lapping arrangement, eliminating the top layer 23.

The key element is the section 29 of the fabric; layer 24. Preferably, section 29 is clear- of cementitious or other material. However, in my invention it is only required that section 29 of the fabric be sufficiently open as to permit penetration of the fabric by the mortar or mastic employed to fill the joint between abutting panels to form an edge- to-edge bond. Thus, while some of the coating of cementiti¬ ous material applied as a slurry may extend over some of the openings in the pervious fabric along section 29, normally this will not interfere with adequate penetration of the fabric by the mortar or the like for the formation of a good bond with the mesh of the opposing panel.

The fabric web is not necessarily taut around the edge 28; this section 29 preferably is sufficiently slack to al¬ low space behind the fabric at 21 to permit mortar of other material used to fill the joint to come into contact with the core material.

Figs. 5 and 6 illustrate the formation of an edge-to- edge bond between two fabric reinforced backerboards; in this example glass fiber mesh fabric is employed. A small gap (e.g., 1/8" approx.) is left in the joint 30 between the two panels, A and B. The tile installer fills the joint either before or at the time of the tile setting, by press¬ ing mortar or other tile installing material into the gap. Fig. 5 shows the condition of the joint before the mortar is applied, while Fig. 6 shows the joint in the filled condi¬ tion. The mortar 31 enters the openings in the mesh at sec¬ tions 29a and 29b on the two edges, penetrating into bonding contact with the edges of the two panels, the mesh becoming embedded in the mortar. The joint can be packed solid quite readily due to the retaining action of the mesh.

As. shown in Fig. 7, a joint can be formed to advantage where only the edge of one panel is provided with the open mesh section 29. Such a situation occurs where two panels form a corner. The open portion of the mesh receives the mortar. 31a and holds it in place to fill the joint.

In a representative manufacturing operation for my pan¬ el, a continuous web of polyethylene coated paper is laid down on a moving conveyor belt as the carrier sheet, a con¬ tinuous web of reinforcing fabric is deposited on the paper web, a portland cement slurry is wiped onto the web of fab¬ ric to coat it except on the edge portions that are to be turned up, core composition is deposited on the slurry coat¬ ed bottom web, the core is shaped to the desired thickness and width of the panel being produced, the edge portions of the fabric web are turned up and folded over the edges with a suitable band of the fabric over-lapping onto the top of the core layer along each edge, a continuous web of reinfor¬ cing fabric is laid on top of the core extending sufficient¬ ly wide to cover the folded over portions of the lower web, and portland cement slurry is applied to coat the top layer of fabric and to bond it to the core and the folded over portions of the bottom web. The thus produced elongated panel-web is cut into panel lengths and cured, or the panel- web is cured and then cut into panels.

Specimens of cementitious backerboard were edge bonded and tested for tensile strength. The test results, presented in TABLE I, show that the strength of the joint formed by edge bonding with the panels of my invention, with no taping, is equal to or superior to that of the joints formed using the filling and taping method of the prior art.

TABLE I

Comparison of Edge-to-Edge Bond Strength

Tensile Strength Tests Performed in Accordance

With ASTM D-1037 (Modified)

1. Joints of "Wonder-Board" Tile Backerboard, Identified as "W-B", Prepared According to Instructions of Modulars, Inc.

Joints of Wrapped-Edge Backerboard of the Claimed Invention, Identified as "WEB"

Notes: Test results are the average of at least three tests. Mortar used was "Tile Mate" Premium Dual Purpose thin set mortar, sold by Bostik Construction Products, Co.

The "Wonder-Board" tile backerboard (aka glass mesh mortar units) used was produced by Fin-Pan, Inc., and marketed by Modulars, Inc.

The 2" fiber glass tape used is marketed by Modulars, Inc.

It is thus apparent from the test data that, ith my novel improved backerboard, the need for taping joints is

obviated. With the open-mesh wrapped-edge, the mortar is retained when pressed into the joint, whereas in the prior art type of backerboard the mortar pressed into the joint more often than not falls out on the back, leaving incom¬ plete bonding. A superior edge-to-edge bond is made pos¬ sible because the mortar is not only brought into bonding contact with edge of the core, but the mortar joint also is reinforced with the mesh that is present. This novel wrap- ped-edge backerboard simplifies the work of the tile me¬ chanic and, at the same time, a structurally stronger wall or other structure can be achieved with actual edge-to- edge bonding.