FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to vessels. More

particularly, the invention relates to manoeuvrability handling arrangement and to a method, and computer program product for handling the manoeuvrability of a vessel equipped with a hull.

BACKGROUND

Large vessels, such as cargo or container ships, crossing the oceans consume a lot of fuel. This fact has triggered the search of ways to reduce the fuel consumption. One method is optimization of the so called trim, which is a measure of the distribution of the ballast in the vessel. The trim may be represented by the horizontal angle of the vessel in the sea. Trim optimization is now a quite established functionality.

One trim optimization method is described in US

7389165. The trim optimization methods are all based on an underlying principle that the hull of the ship is a mechanically stiff body. The trim that is deemed to be optimal may have been set for a nominal hull shape, such as the hull shape of an un-loaded vessel, i.e. the hull shape of a vessel without cargo, or a vessel with a nominal load. However, the cargo carried by such a vessel may be of considerable weight. This may have a non-negligible influence of the ship hull shape. Furthermore also the distribution of the cargo may have an influence on the hull shape. A ship having the majority of the cargo weight close to the stern and bow may for instance have a very different hull shape than a ship having the majority of the cargo weight placed midships. Furthermore, since the hull shape may deviate from the nominal shape based on cargo weight and distribution, this also means that a trim assumed to be optimal may in fact not at all be that. This may lead to a non-optimal fuel consumption leading to higher transportation costs than expected. However, there are also other disadvantages. As an estimation of the fuel consumption may be made, it is also clear that the trim used may lead to more fuel being consumed than expected.

Furthermore, the hull shape may also have an influence when estimating other manoeuvrability data of a ship such as turning radius and braking distance. If a wrong assumption of ship hull shape is used, these

estimations may also become unreliable.

There is therefore a need for also employing the ship hull shape deformation as an input to manoeuvrability functions of a vessel. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention addresses this situation. The invention is therefore directed towards solving the problem of providing an improvement in relation to ship hull deformation.

This object is according to a first aspect of the invention solved through a method of handling

manoeuvrability of a vessel equipped with a hull, the method being performed by a manoeuvrability handling arrangement and comprising the steps of:

obtaining current hull shape defining data for at least three positions of the hull along the length of the vessel,

comparing the current hull shape defining data with corresponding reference data,

determining state of deformation for a type of deformation of the hull based on the deviations of the current hull shape defining data from the corresponding reference data, where the type of deformation is set based on the mechanical

properties of the vessel, and

applying the state of deformation of the set type in a manoeuvring handling function for improving handling of the vessel, wherein the manoeuvring handling function comprises a trim handling

function, the output data of which comprises power consumption .

This object is according to a second aspect of the invention solved through an arrangement for handling the manoeuvrability of a vessel equipped with a hull, the arrangement comprising a computer comprising a deformation handling unit configured to:

obtain current hull shape defining data for at least three positions of the hull along the length of the vessel ,

compare the current hull shape defining data with corresponding reference data,

determine state of deformation for a type of

deformation of the hull based on the deviations of the current hull shape defining data from the corresponding reference data, where the type of deformation is set based on the mechanical

properties of the vessel, and

apply the state of deformation of the set type in a manoeuvring handling function provided by a

manoeuvring handling unit for improving handling of the vessel, wherein the manoeuvring handling

function comprises a trim handling function, the output data of which comprises power consumption.

This object is according to a third aspect of the invention achieved through computer program product for handling manoeuvrability of a vessel equipped with a hull, the computer program product being provided on a data carrier comprising computer program code

configured to cause a manoeuvrability handling

arrangement to, when the computer program code is loaded into the manoeuvrability handling arrangement obtain current hull shape defining data concerning at least three positions of the hull along the length of the vessel, compare current hull shape defining data with corresponding reference data,

determine state of deformation for a type of

deformation based on the deviations of the current hull shape defining data from the corresponding reference data, where the type of deformation is set based on the mechanical properties of the vessel, and

apply the state of deformation of the set type in a manoeuvring handling function for improving handling of the vessel, wherein the manoeuvring handling function comprises a trim handling function, the output data of which comprises power consumption. The present invention has a number of advantages.

According to the invention ship hull deformation is considered in a manoeuvring handling function that comprises a trim handling function. Thereby better results are obtained from the function if the hull is deformed. This can be used to improve manoeuvring in a number of different ways. It is for instance possible to improve power consumption.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will in the following be

described with reference being made to the accompanying drawings, where Fig. 1 schematically shows a vessel in the form of a ship having a bridge, Fig. 2 schematically shows the bridge comprising a number of windows and a computer functioning as a manoeuvrability signalling arrangement,

Fig. 3 schematically shows a computerized control system controlling various operations of the ship and including the manoeuvrability signalling arrangement, Fig. 4 schematically shows a first type of hull deformation,

Fig. 5 schematically shows a second type of hull deformation,

Fig. 6 shows a flow chart of a number of method steps being performed in a method of handling

manoeuvrability,

Fig. 7 schematically shows a screen depicting various ship manoeuvrability data having been determined for a deformed ship hull, and

Fig. 8 schematically shows a data carrier with computer program code, in the form of a CD-ROM disc, for

performing the steps of the method.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the following, a detailed description of preferred embodiments of a method, manoeuvrability handling arrangement and computer program product for handling the manoeuvrability of a vessel equipped with a hull will be given.

Fig. 1 schematically shows a vessel exemplified by a ship 10. The ship 10 shown in fig. 1 comprises a hull 16, a rudder 11, a propeller 12, a draft sensor 14 as well as a radar 15. The rudder 11 and propeller 12 may with advantage be combined in an azimuthing podded propulsion device, such as an Azipod. The draft sensor 14 may be placed on the hull 16. The propeller 12 is also connected to an engine (not shown) in order to propel the ship forward or backward. In order to control the propeller 12 and engine as well as the rudder 11, the ship 10 is also provided with a bridge 13, where various aspects of the ship 10 can be

controlled. The rudder 11, propeller 12, engine, draft sensor 14 and radar 15 are examples of entities used in relation to the steering of the ship 10. On the ship there are furthermore ballast tanks (not shown) , which may be filled with liquid such as water in order to influence the steering of the vessel. In the figure only one propeller is shown. It should be realized that there may be more propellers, for instance in the bow. It may also be possible to move the ship sideways with certain type of motors.

Fig. 2 schematically shows the bridge 13. The bridge comprises three windows 17, 18 and 19, a first front window 17 facing the bow, a second starboard side window 19 and a third port side window 18. The windows are thus placed on the bridge 13. On the bridge there is also a bridge computer 20 with a display 22. The bridge computer 20 is according to some variations of the invention used for forming a manoeuvrability handling arrangement and the display 22 is an operator user interface via which a ship operator can make various selections with regard ship operations and see various ship operations data, which ship operations data comprises manoeuvrability data. Fig. 3 shows a block schematic of a simplified control system 26 that may be used for controlling the ship. The control system 26 is a computerized control system. In fig. 3 the control system 26 includes a number of work stations. In this example only one work station is shown, the above-mentioned bridge computer 20. It should however be realized that there may be several work stations for instance in other areas of the ship. As the bridge computer is used for forming a

manoeuvrability handling arrangement it comprises a manoeuvring handling unit 38, a parameter correction unit 39 and a deviation determining unit 40. The manoeuvring handling unit 38 provides a manoeuvring handling function, such as a trim optimization function or a fuel consumption optimizing function. Other examples of manoeuvring handling functions are a turning radius determining function and a braking distance determining function. Furthermore, it should be realized that in one embodiment of the invention there is no parameter correction unit 39.

As an example the bridge computer 20 may be connected to a data bus Bl . The use of a data bus is just one way of realizing data communication. It should be realized that other ways exist, for instance point-to-point connections .

There are furthermore a group of vessel handling computers connected to the bus 10, which computers are provided for handling various aspects of the vessel, such as navigation and security aspects. These

computers more particularly provide data of different types employed in the navigation and steering of the vessel .

There is here a manoeuvring control computer 28, a forecasting computer 30, a load computer 31, a tracking computer 32, a chart computer 34, a sensor handling computer 36 and an external indications computer 37. These computers are involved in handling various aspects of the ship. The manoeuvring control computer 28 may be involved with controlling manoeuvring such as steering using the rudder and controlling direction and speed through controlling the propeller. For this reason it is connected to the engine 35 and to the rudder 11. It may also control the ballast tanks in order to further influence the manoeuvrability. It may for this reason be connected to valves of the tanks in order to control filling and emptying of such tanks (not shown) . The forecasting computer 30 is a computer used for keeping track of the weather and receives weather forecast data from weather forecast services. The data may comprise weather forecasts such as

forecasts of low pressure areas, their movements and their wind speeds. This computer 30 is therefore used for keeping track of weather changes and the movement of weather systems such as the movement of storms. The load computer 31 keeps track of the distribution and weight of the load or cargo on the vessel. The tracking computer 32 is used for tracking other vessels and is therefore connected to the radar 15. This computer 32, which may be part of an Automatic Identification (AIS) system, is thus used for keeping track of mobile objects in the environment. The chart computer 34 comprises navigation charts of the waters through which the ship is to move. The chart computer 34 therefore keeps track of stationary objects or obstacles in the environment. The chart computer 34 may also comprise route data, i.e. data defining a route that the ship is to take.

The sensor handling computer 36 is provided for

receiving sensor data such as position data, speed data, as well as the trim, the list and the draft of the vessel, where the draft describes i.e. how deep into the water the vessel sails, which may be expressed through points of the hull where the waterline is crossed. The trim is a measure of the ballast

distribution of the ship. For this reason the draft sensor 14 may be connected to the sensor handling computer 36. The draft data may be detected by the previously described draft sensor. The sensor 14 may be placed on a position on the hull and sense the distance from this position to the waterline. It should be realized that the draft sensor does not need to be placed on the hull as long as it is able to sense the distance to the waterline. It may as an example be placed on the bridge or on a part of a mast. The trim may be represented by one or more angles between the keel and the water. List may on the other hand be a horizontal angle of the vessel in the sea at right angles to the above mentioned trim. Various sensors may for this reason be placed at different locations of the ship. A position sensor may be a Global Positioning Sensor.

Finally the external indications computer 37 is

provided for receiving external indications such as piracy indications and/or International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) security indications.

The bridge 13 of the ship is surrounded by the windows 17, 18 and 19 for the crew of the ship to be able to visually observe the environment of the ship. The bridge may comprise a main bridge and possibly two wing bridges on the port and starboard sides in order to enable support to be given to the captain or navigator as he or she manoeuvres the ship.

User interface screens for visualizing information related to navigation, voyage and ship management systems may be located around the bridge so that they are visible when a crew member is seated or standing next to a pilot chair/station. In this setting there may furthermore be meters above the windows . A crew member standing at the main bridge, can then also look at the meters to see different values related to velocity, pitch, trim and fuel consumption etc.

On ships such as cargo ships power consumption, such as fuel consumption, may be an issue. One way of

influencing the fuel consumption is through influencing the trim of the ship, where the trim has traditionally been represented by the horizontal angle of a rigid vessel in the sea. The trim may in this case be

influenced through emptying and filling different ballast tanks in the length direction of the ship

The determination of the fuel consumption has thus traditionally been based on the assumption that the ship hull is a stiff body having a nominal hull shape. The nominal hull shape may be the hull shape of an un ^¬ loaded vessel, i.e. a vessel without cargo. It may as an alternative be the hull shape of a vessel with a nominal load, which nominal load may be a load for which various ship/hull properties, such as trim, may be optimized.

However the cargo of a ship, such as a cargo or

container vessel, will have a considerable weight which, depending on how it its distributed, may also influence the shape of the ship hull. The hull may thus be deformed slightly, depending on the lengthwise distribution of the load. Fig. 4 schematically shows one type of hull deformation and fig. 5 another type of hull deformation. The ship may be defined as "sagging" when the load is centred midships, with compression of the upper deck, see fig. 4. When the load is displaced towards the rear and aft, the ship may be defined as "hogging", with tension of the upper deck, see fig. 5. The shapes in fig. 4 and 5 are examples of two types of deformation that the hull may experience. Furthermore the deviations shown in fig. 4 and 5 have been

exaggerated in order to illustrate different deviating shapes of the hull.

The deformation of the hull has an effect on the ship resistance in the water and thereby also on the fuel consumption . In trim optimizing functions an optimal trim may be determined as a trim providing the lowest fuel

consumption. This determination is, as was previously mentioned, traditionally made using an assumption that the ship hull is not deformed but has the nominal shape. The optimal trim of a ship with deformed hull should thus differ from its nominal counterpart. A conventional trim optimization system measures ship position in the water, speed and other operating conditions. It then predicts optimal trim, usually based on historical data and/or empirical correlations derived by hydrodynamic computations. A conventional trim optimization system does not consider hull deformation. This causes an error in the optimal trim prediction, or increases its variance.

One objective of the invention is to provide a

manoeuvring handling function, such as a trim

optimization function, which function uses information about the shape of the hull, as it is deformed by loading conditions in order to provide an improved determination of desired manoeuvrability data.

An embodiment that is directed towards this will now be described with reference also being made to fig. 6, which shows a flow chart of a number of method steps in a method of handling manoeuvrability, which method is being performed by the manoeuvrability handling

arrangement 20.

The method is started by the deviation determining unit 40 obtaining current hull shape defining data related to at least three positions of the hull 16 along the length of the ship, step 42. The hull shape defining data may be current draft data measured by draft data sensors on the ship hull, where one sensor may be provided at the bow, another at the stern and a third may be the sensor 14 placed midships. The sensors may thus be sensors sensing the draft of the ship at three positions, for instance fixed, along the length of the ship. Draft data may then be obtained through measuring the distance from the sensor to the waterline. The distance may as an example be measured using microwave radars, ultrasound devices or lasers. This is a direct draft measurement.

Alternatively, it is possible that ship hull defining data also comprises local inclination readings, for instance using accelerometers . It is for instance possible to combine draft data from one position with inclination data from two other positions. This means that in addition to the draft sensor 14 it is also possible to use at least two accelerometers. Draft data may also be draft data input by a user after visual inspection of a plimsoll line or a draft mark on the hull. As an alternative to such manual entry it is also possible to capture images of the hull and determine the draft based on image processing with regard to the above-mentioned draft marks or plimsoll lines. Yet another alternative is to use pressure sensors and convert the sensed pressure to a corresponding draft.

As an alternative it is possible that the deviation determining unit 40 has a draft estimating function, which estimates the draft of the ship at various positions on the hull. The draft estimating function may estimate the current draft based on cargo data and data of properties of the ship. The cargo data may be obtained from the load computer 31 and may comprise data about the mass and distribution of the cargo in the longitudinal direction. The properties of the ship may comprise data about the thickness, shape and material of the hull as well as information about major stationary machines of the ship that are mechanically linked to the hull. One such machine may be a ship engine. The cargo data and ship properties are thus used for determining the draft at said at least three positions on the ship hull. In this determination the properties of the water are typically also considered. Alternatively the load computer 31 may calculate the current draft at the positions based on the ship and cargo properties and supply these to the deviation determining unit 40. As yet another alternative the load computer 31 may calculate the draft for one position, which draft data is combined with

inclinometer readings from at least two positions. This draft data may also be manually input by a user or kept constant .

The current hull shape defining data of the at least three positions is then compared with corresponding reference data, step 44, where the reference data may be related to the positions of the current hull shape defining data. For the positions where the current hull shape defining data is measured or estimated there may exist reference data obtained in relation to the nominal hull shape. This reference data may also have been obtained using measurements or estimated using knowledge of the hulls and ship properties. When the positions are positions where measurements have been made, the reference data may have been measured at the same positions. In the case of estimation, the current data may be the draft at a position in the longitudinal direction of the ship and the reference data may then be the draft at the same position in the longitudinal direction of the ship. Vertically though the positions may differ.

The deviation determining unit 40 thus compares the current hull shape defining data with the reference data in order to investigate if there is any difference between the current hull shape defining data and the reference data. If there is no difference between the current hull shape defining data and the reference data, step 46, there is no hull shape deviation. This means that the difference in draft for the positions in question is negligible or even non-existent. Therefore ordinary ship manoeuvring handling is performed, step 48. This means that the deviation determining unit 40 instructs the manoeuvring handling unit 38 to perform standard manoeuvring handling. If the manoeuvring handling function is a trim optimisation function, this function would perform normal trim optimisation, i.e. using the assumption that the ship hull is a stiff body. If determining trim, it is then possible to use power consumption, speed, wind, waves, draft, trim angle, list angle, etc. in this determination.

However, if there is a difference between the current hull shape defining data and the reference data, step 46, then there is a ship hull shape deformation.

Therefore the deviation determining unit 40 determines a state of deformation of the hull 16 for a type of deformation of the ship hull based on the deviation of the current hull shape defining data from the corresponding reference data. It may also determine or set the type of deformation based on the same

deviation. Alternatively the type of deformation may be pre-set .

As mentioned earlier, the ship hull may receive a deformed shape that depends on how the load is

distributed as well as that depends on the mechanical design, i.e. that depends on the mechanical properties of the ship, for instance on strength. Based on the difference between the actual hull shape defining data and the reference data, for instance the difference in positions where the hull intersects the waterline, it is then possible to determine which out of a number of limited types of deformations the cargo has caused, step 52. Two parabolic examples were given in fig. 4 and 5. Other examples of types of deformations or types of shapes are sinusoidal shapes. The shapes may be shapes with one minimum or maximum along the length of the ship, although more complex shapes can be

considered, if enough measurements exist. The way the ship deforms (its shape) is usually characteristic of given ship mechanical design, as some sections of the ship may be stiffer than others and engines/machines have fixed positions. The expected modes (shapes) of deformation can therefore be defined beforehand, based on existing knowledge about the ship mechanical design. This also means that the type of deformation may be associated with a mathematical hull shape model, defining the longitudinal shape of the hull, where the magnitude is used to set the parameters of this

mathematical model of the set type of deformation. In one variation of the invention, there is only one type of shape associated with the ship. It is thus possible that only one type of hull deformation is possible given the structure of the hull and the way machines are linked to it.

If there is more than one shape, it is possible to determine type of deformation through investigating how well the mathematical hull shape models are matched. The best match may then be selected.

When the type of shape has been set it is then possible to determine the degree of deviation from the pre ^¬ defined shape. The degree of deviation or state of deformation may be determined as a magnitude M of deformation, step 52. Assuming modes with one

minimum/maximum along the length of the ship, for example, the state of deformation can then be described by one single (signed) scalar, the magnitude M.

When the state of deformation has been determined, this and the type of deformation are then used in a

manoeuvring handling function, where the manoeuvring handling function is provided by the manoeuvring handling unit 38. The state of deformation of the set type is thus applied in the manoeuvring handling function of the manoeuvring handling unit and this is done in order to improve handling of the vessel. In the first embodiment this is done through the assistance of the parameter correction unit 39.

Therefore the deviation determining unit 40 forwards the magnitude and optionally also a setting of the type to the parameter correction unit 39.

The parameters used by the manoeuvring handling

function in the manoeuvring handling unit 38 may as an example be the parameters power consumption, speed, wind, waves, draft, trim and list. In this case the parameter correction unit 39 may first select a model of the hull deformation type based on the setting. It may then adjust the parameters that are being input to the manoeuvring handling function using the magnitude in the model. It is possible that only some manoeuvring handling function parameters are adjusted. It is possible that only the internal ship parameters having a dependency on the hull such as speed, draft, trim and list are adjusted, while external parameters like wind and waves are not. The manoeuvring handling function thus operates as a traditional manoeuvring handling function. However, before the parameters are being input to the function they are adjusted in order for the manoeuvring handling function to actually consider the ship hull deviation.

The parameter correction unit 39 may do this through the correction function comprising a function of the deformation magnitude, with which each reading (data point) of data parameters fed to the manoeuvring handling function is corrected to reflect the

corresponding reading of the non-deformed hull.

Different formulations of correction functions can be envisioned, depending on to which parameter or quantity the correction is applied. If for instance the

manoeuvring handling function is a power consumption optimizing function where a predicted a propulsion power is to be corrected (to compensate for hull deformation) , the correction function may employ a set of data of actual or physical model tests or

simulations of the joint effect of hull deformation and trim on power consumption for various vessel operating conditions. The set may for instance be provided in a table. In this case the correction function may perform numerical predictions on the data in the table. The numerical function may either be a numerical function fitted to the gathered data, or a procedure for

interpolating correction factors from tabulated data. The set of data may also be provided in a neural network, which performs the same task (or any other "black box" providing an output value based on input variables) . The numerical function may employ an empirical or semi-empirical model comprising the set of data . In this way it is possible adjust the parameters input to the manoeuvring handling function so that the hull shape deviations are considered, which provides a more reliable manoeuvring handling function. The use of a correction function also avoids increasing the number of independent variables of the algorithm in the manoeuvring handling function.

In a second embodiment it is possible that there is no parameter correction unit 39. In this cases the

deviation determining unit 40 may directly provide the magnitude M as a separate parameter and optionally also the deformation type as a setting to the manoeuvring handling unit 38. In this case a ship resistance prediction model that is used by the manoeuvring handling unit 38 is extended to also cover the

different hull shapes. The manoeuvring handling

function may thus employ a model of the hull shape to for instance determine the resistance of the ship in water. The hull deformation type model may first be selected based on the deformation type setting and parameters of this model may then be set through the magnitude. The resistance prediction model may in this case incorporate information obtained both from using a data-driven approach based on real measurements and empirical correlations found from computer simulations, for instance using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) . The manoeuvring handling function is in both

embodiments be a trim handling function, for instance a optimizing function used to determine an optimal trim. The output data of such a function may be trim. The output data may also comprise power consumption. The optimal trim is expected to depend on the state of deformation. It is also expected to exist a certain state of deformation, for which the optimal trim will yield a power consumption which is lower than for other deformation states, i.e. an optimal fuel consumption. The trim optimization function may furthermore help an operator to find both this optimal state of deformation and the optimal trim for this state (or any other non- optimal state) with regard to the power consumption. The trim optimization function provided by the

manoeuvring handling unit 38 may therefore be modified so that advice on optimal operation (trim and/or speed, for example) also accounts for the existing hull deformation. The deformation may in this case be a steady state deformation, which may be continually determined as a running average, where the changes in the loading condition, such as changes due to fuel consumption and ballast water pumping, are accounted for .

During loading, advice about the effect of hull

deformation on power consumption and optimal trim may also be available to the operator, so that loading can be optimized accordingly.

The system can also offer the possibility of off-line simulations of hull deformation effects on operation.

The deformation described above is a static

deformation, i.e. the steady-state deformation of the ship in calm water, due to the loading conditions of the ship. The hull may also deform dynamically, for example due to external waves and ship motion. The invention is not concerned with such dynamic

deformation effects.

The invention was above described in relation to trim optimisation and fuel consumption optimisation. It should however be realized that also other functions may be adjusted. Ship hull deviations may for instance be used to adjust the determining of the turning radius of the ship. Turning radius may be determined based on trim, speed, rudder angles, list and draft. Another function that may be correspondingly adjusted is braking distance of the ship, which may be determined based on ship speed, weight, wind, current, waves and trim.

Most ships use fuel and therefore fuel consumption is the most common used power consumption. However, also other power sources of are possible, such as nuclear power or electric power. Therefore power consumption is not limited to fuel consumption, such as diesel, petrol and gas consumption, but is applicable also for other energy sources.

Fig. 7 schematically shows a view of the display 22 on which a representation V of the ship is shown together with port and starboard turning radii Ri and ]¾ as well as a braking distance D. In the figure also trim and speed settings are shown. All this data has been determined for a deformed ship hull.

The position of the ship is in fig. 7 displayed in a physical environment. The position of the ship may be obtained from the sensor handling computer 36 and data about the physical environment may be obtained through obtaining a chart of an area covering the positions for the chart computer 34. A graphical representation V of the ship may then be placed on the chart in a position corresponding to the sensed ship position. Also route data concerning the route of the ship may be obtained from the chart computer and plotted in the chart.

In fig. 7 there is also shown turning radii Ri and R2 on the starboard and port sides of the ship V and a braking distance D. Also fuel consumption/trim may is shown as well as ship speed in knots. Furthermore, once an optimal trim that has consider the hull shape deviation has been determined, the manoeuvring handling arrangement may directly apply in the manoeuvring. It may thus be forwarded as a control command to the manoeuvring control computer which then controls the ship to obtain the optimal trim.

The manoeuvrability handling arrangement may be

implemented using software. It may thus be implemented using computer program code, which may be provided on one or more data carriers which performs the

functionality of the manoeuvrability signalling

arrangement when the program code thereon is being loaded into the bridge computer. One such data carrier 56 with computer program code 58, in the form of a CD ROM disc, is schematically shown in fig. 8. Such computer program may as an alternative be provided on another server and downloaded therefrom into the bridge computer .

The manoeuvrability handling arrangement is not limited to the bridge computer. It may for instance also comprise the user interface 22. It may furthermore comprise the manoeuvring control computer. It is also possible that it comprises the sensor handling computer perhaps together with the sensors and/or the load computer . tion is no

All or pa

rovided on

icates , fo on land. The manoeuvrability handling arrangement may for instance be provided on a computer on land that receives load data from a ship and determines the adjusted trim based on an estimated ship hull

deformation and sends to the ship. It is also possible with some functions being performed on land and others on-board the ship.