LONG LASTING COSMETIC COMPOSITIONS

RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/663,315, filed April 27, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

[0002] Polyurethanes and polyurethane-ureas are a well-known class of synthetic polymers with broad utility in multiple industries. This versatility is derived from the ability to prepare polyurethanes from a large and diverse set of potential monomers. These diverse monomer options allow the realization of an equally diverse set of physical properties.

Hence, the resulting polyurethanes can be in many different forms including e.g., soft foams, elastomers, adhesive films, or hard plastics, and can be used in many different types of products including bedding, foot wear, adhesives, and automobile parts.

[0003] Among these many forms of polyurethanes, waterborne polyurethanes (WBPUs) and polyurethane-ureas (WBPU-Us) have been used as film forming agents in commercially available personal care products. When used as hair fixatives, these film forming polymers provide style-holding benefits. The problem with the use of WBPUs and WBPU-Us for consumer-based cosmetic products has been the lack of performance and overall consistency in application. For example, common polyurethane products such as Luviset® P.U.R, DynamX, and DynamX H ₂ 0 lack elasticity. This leads to an undesirable stiff feeling when applied to hair. Avalure UR 405, Baycusan C1004, Baycusan C1008, and Polyderm PE/PA ED, however, are very flexible (i.e., do not lack elasticity). Yet, these products have poor initial curl hold and elicit a gummy feeling. Other problems associated with the use of WBPUs and WBPU-Us include, but are not limited to, flaking upon touching or combing (e.g., dusty micro-flakes shown on hair fibers); undesirable tactile feelings upon touch (e.g., brittle, stiff, or tacky, gummy); poor humidity resistance (e.g., styling resins absorb moisture and weigh down hair resulting in a loss of style); lack of movement (e.g., plastic-like mold shape; hair curls don’t move with motion; can’t easily comb through; gummy; lack of bounciness); and short-lived hair styles (e.g., hair styles, curls, waves, etc. don’t last long - on average styles typically last less than a half day).

[0004] Previously, we identified a combination of selection markers that could be used to determine whether certain WBPU based cosmetic compositions, such as hair fixatives, would result in improved performance. See WO 2017/155906 the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. In one aspect, e.g., we have shown that compositions comprising WBPUs having a Young’s modulus above 150 MPa, an elongation at break from about 15% to about 300%, and a moisture uptake of less than 10%, provide long-lasting and natural hairstyles. See WO 2017/155906. Here, we focus on improving the mechanical properties while maintaining a moisture uptake of less than 10%, which was previously demonstrated to be optimal for achieving long-lasting styling performance.

SUMMARY

[0005] It has now been found that the long-lasting characteristics arising from WBPUs possessing our previously disclosed combination of mechanical properties can by further enhanced by incorporating at least one multi-functional chain extender (such as a triol or tetraol) into the composition. Provided herein, therefore, are hair treatment compositions comprising a polyurethane-urea crosslinked by at least one multi-functional chain extender such as a hydrocarbon based triol or tetraol, wherein the Young’s modulus of the

polyurethane-urea is above 150 MPa; the elongation at break of the polyurethane-urea is from about 15% to about 300%; and the moisture uptake of the polyurethane-urea is less than 10%. In one aspect, the use of these multi-functional chain extenders provided hair compositions with better hold and stronger humidity resistance over those previously described. See e.g., FIG. 1, which shows a comparison of the in vivo performance of PU 419, an inventive WBPU crosslinked by multi-functional chain extender, with a commercial resin. As shown, PU 419 displays better initial hold and stronger humidity resistance.

[0006] It has also been found that incorporating nanoparticles into WBPU-based compositions possessing the proper combination of mechanical properties described above further improve the long-lasting effects of WBPUs in hair treatment products. Thus, in another aspect, also provided herein are hair treatment compositions comprising a

polyurethane-urea and at least one nanoparticle, wherein the Young’s modulus of the polyurethane-urea is above 150 MPa; the elongation at break of the polyurethane-urea is from about 15% to about 300%; and the moisture uptake of the polyurethane-urea is less than 10%. These compositions were found to outperform commercial resins in both initial curl hold and curl retention after high humidity stress. See e.g., FIG. 2, which shows a comparison of the in vitro performance of PU 427, an inventive WBPU/silica nanocomposite synthesized by in situ polymerization, with a commercial resin and comparator PU 339. As shown, PU 427 displays better initial hold and stronger humidity resistance. In addition, FIG. 4 shows the in vitro curl retention under 75% relative humidity for 15 minutes of PU 339 following post- blend with 1% Aerosil 200 (silica nanoparticles) or 0.25% Ti0 ₂ . As shown, PU 339 post blend with nanoparticles showed better initial curl hold and curl retention after high humidity. Taken together, this data shows that the disclosed nanocomposite technology applies generally to compositions comprising a polyurethane-urea having the disclosed mechanical properties, and is not limited to only those which comprise a multi-functional chain extender.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0007] FIG. 1 shows the in vivo performance of a WBPU crosslinked by multi-functional chain extender of the present disclosure (PU 419) compared to a commercial resin.

[0008] FIG. 2 shows the in vitro performance of a WBPU/silica nanocomposite of the present disclosure synthesized by in situ polymerization (PU 427) compared to a commercial resin and comparator PU 339.

[0009] FIG. 3 shows the in vivo performance between PU 427 and comparator PU 339.

[0010] FIG. 4 shows the in vitro curl retention under 75% relative humidity for 15 minutes of comparator PU 339 following post-blend with 1% Aerosil 200 (silica

nanoparticles) or 0.25% Ti0 ₂ .

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

1. Definitions.

[0011] As used herein,“cationic polyurethanes” refer to thermoplastic polymers comprising carbamate (urethane) groups and which bear an overall net positive charge at pH < 7.“Cationic polyurethane-ureas’’refer to thermoplastic polymers comprising a -O-C(O)- NR- and a -NR-C(0)-NR-linkage and which bear an overall net positive charge at pH < 7. In some aspects, the cationic polyurethanes and cationic polyurethane-ureas described herein bear an overall net positive charge at pH from about 3.7 to about 6.5, from about 3.7 to about 6.0, or from about 3.7 to about 5.5. Unless otherwise specified, cationic polyurethanes and cationic polyurethane-ureas, when used herein, include amphoteric/cationic polyurethanes and polyurethane-ureas. In one aspect, however, cationic polyurethanes and cationic polyurethane-ureas do not encompass amphoteric/cationic polyurethanes or

amphoteric/cationic polyurethane-ureas .

[0012] As used herein,“amphoteric polyurethanes” refer to thermoplastic polymers comprising carbamate (urethane) groups and which can act both as a cationic or an anionic polyurethanes depending on neutralization method.“Amphoteric polyurethane-ureas” refer to thermoplastic polymers comprising a -0-C(0)-NR- and a -NR-C(0)-NR-linkage and which can act both as a cationic or an anionic polyurethanes depending on neutralization method.

An“amphoteric/cationic polyurethane” or“amphoteric/cationic polyurethane-urea” means that the described amphoteric species is one which acts as a cationic polyurethane or cationic polyurethane-urea when neutralized with an acid. An“amphoteric/anionic polyurethane” or “amphoteric/anionic polyurethane-urea” means that the described amphoteric species is one which acts as an anionic polyurethane or anionic polyurethane-urea when neutralized with a base.

[0013] As used herein,“anionic polyurethanes” refer to thermoplastic polymers comprising carbamate (urethane) groups and which bear an overall net negative charge at pH > 7. “Anionic polyurethane-ureas’’refer to thermoplastic polymers comprising a -O-C(O)- NR- and a -NR-C(0)-NR-linkage and which bear an overall net negative charge at pH > 7. Unless otherwise specified, anionic polyurethanes and anionic polyurethane-ureas, when used herein, include amphoteric/anionic polyurethanes and amphoteric/anionic polyurethane-ureas. In one aspect, however, anionic polyurethanes and anionic polyurethane-ureas do not encompass amphoteric/anionic polyurethanes or amphoteric/anionic polyurethane-ureas.

[0014] “Young’s modulus (or the modulus of elasticity, tensile modulus)” is a measure of the stiffness of a solid polymer film. Young’s modulus, E, can be calculated by dividing the tensile stress by the extensional strain in the elastic (initial, linear) portion of the stress-strain curve. The Young’s modulus of the waterborne polyurethanes and waterborne polyurethane- ureas can be determined by a protocol defined to measure mechanical properties, and is developed in reference to ASTM D638, ASTM D412, test guidelines as described below in Example 1.

[0015] The“elongation at break (also known as fracture strain, ultimate elongation)” is the ratio between changed length and initial length after breakage of the solid polymer film. The elongation at break of the waterborne polyurethanes and waterborne polyurethane-ureas can be determined by a protocol defined to measure mechanical properties, and is developed in reference to ASTM D638, ASTM D412, test guidelines as described below in Example 1.

[0016] The“moisture uptake” is the measure of water adsorbed by the solid polymer film. The method for determining the moisture uptake of the solid polymer film is provided in

Example 2.

[0017] A“sensory score” may be determined by the performance of the hair fixative. In one aspect, the tress with the composition applied is blow dried for 90 seconds. The tresses are prepared in duplicate and blinded randomly and evaluated for natural feeling and overall sensory attributes on a scale of -2 to 2 by trained sensory analysts under blinded conditions. Sensory analysts are licensed hair stylists and cosmetic scientists with significant long-term experience evaluating sensory attributes of hair. Sensory analysts assign a score of -2 to tresses deemed entirely undesirable, a score of +2 to entirely soft, natural feeling and appearing hair, and intermediate scores between these two extremes.

[0018] The term“alkyl” refers to a monovalent saturated hydrocarbon group. Ci-C ₆ alkyl is an alkyl having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms. An alkyl may be linear or branched. Examples of alkyl groups include methyl; ethyl; propyl, including H- propyl and isopropyl; butyl, including n-butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, and /-butyl; pentyl, including, for example, n-pentyl, isopentyl, and neopentyl; and hexyl, including, for example, «-hexyl and 2-methylpentyl.

2. Selection Markers

[0019] Provided herein are specific combinations of WBPU-U properties that have been found to result in cosmetic compositions (e.g., hair products) having substantially improved performance. Those properties include e.g., a combination of certain mechanical properties, a combination of certain chemical properties, or a combination of both mechanical and chemical properties.

Youne’s Modulu , Elongation at Break , and Moisture Uptake

[0020] The combination of mechanical properties described herein include the Young’s modulus (e.g., above 150 MPa), the elongation at break (e.g., from about 15% to about 300%), and hydrophobicity (moisture uptake, e.g., less than 10%).

[0021] In one aspect, the Young’s modulus of the polyurethane-urea described herein should be above about 150 MPa. For example, the Young’s modulus of the polyurethane-urea in the disclosed compositions may be above about 160 MPa, above about 170 MPa, above about 180 MPa, above about 190 MPa, above about 200 MPa, above about 210 MPa, above about 220 MPa, above about 230 MPa, above about 240 MPa, above about 250 MPa, above about 260 MPa, above about 270 MPa, above about 280 MPa, above about 290 MPa, above about 300 MPa, above about 310 MPa, above about 320 MPa, above about 330 MPa, above about 340 MPa, above about 350 MPa, above about 360 MPa, above about 370 MPa, above about 380 MPa, above about 390 MPa, above about 400 MPa, above about 410 MPa, above about 420 MPa, above about 430 MPa, above about 440 MPa, above about 450 MPa, above about 460 MPa, above about 470 MPa, above about 480 MPa, above about 490 MPa, above about 500 MPa, above about 510 MPa, above about 520 MPa, above about 530 MPa, above about 540 MPa, or above 550 MPa. In other aspects, the Young’s modulus of the polyurethane-urea should be between about 150 MPa and about 500 MPa. For example, the Young’s modulus of the polyurethane-urea in the disclosed compositions may be between about 150 MPa and about 400 MPa, between about 150 MPa and about 350 MPa, between about 170 MPa and about 390 MPa, between about 180 MPa and about 320 MPa, between about 190 MPa and about 300 MPa, between about 200 MPa and about 290 MPa, or between about 210 MPa and about 280 MPa.

[0022] In one aspect, the elongation at break of the polyurethane-urea in the disclosed compositions should be from about 15% to about 300%. For example, the elongation at break of the polyurethane-urea in the disclosed compositions may be from about 20% to about 300%, from about 25% to about 300%, from about 40% to about 280%, from about 100% to about 280%, from about 100% to about 250%, from about 150% to about 250%, from about 200% to about 250%, from about 210% to about 250%, about 30% to about 150%, from about 15% to about 150%, from about 150% to about 300%, from about 50% to about 250%; from about 75% to about 225%, or from about 100% to about 200%. The elongation break may be optionally combined with one or more of the Young’s modulus values described in the paragraph above or any one of the Young’s modulus values described in the remainder of the disclosure.

[0023] In one aspect, the moisture uptake of the polyurethane-urea in the disclosed compositions should be less than about 10%. For example, the moisture uptake of the polyurethane-urea in the disclosed compositions may be less than about 9.5%, less than about 9%, less than about 8.5%, less than about 8%, less than about 7.5%, less than about 7%, less than about 6.5%, less than about 6%, less than about 5.5%, less than about 5%, less than about 4.5%, less than about 4%, less than about 3.5%, less than about 3%, less than about 2.5%, less than about 2%, less than about 1.5%, less than about 1%, less than about 0.5%, or is about 0%. In one aspect, the moisture uptake of the polyurethane-urea in the disclosed compositions should be from about 0% to about 10%. For example, the moisture uptake may be from about 0% to about 8%, from about 2% to about 8%, or from about 3% to about 7%. The moisture uptake may be optionally combined with one or more of the Young’s modulus values, one or more of the elongation break values, or both as described in the paragraphs above or in the remainder of the disclosure.

[0024] As shown in the Exemplification section below, polyurethane-ureas having the Young’s modulus, elongation at break, and moisture uptake described above improve initial hold and display better curl retention under high humidity. 3. Compositions

[0025] In a first embodiment, provided herein are hair fixative compositions comprising a polyurethane-urea crosslinked by at least one hydrocarbon based triol or tetraol, wherein the Young’s modulus of the polyurethane-urea is above 150 MPa; the elongation at break of the polyurethane-urea is from about 15% to about 300%; and the moisture uptake of the polyurethane-urea is less than 10%.

[0026] In a second embodiment, the polyurethane-urea described in the composition of the first embodiment is anionic.

[0027] In a third embodiment, the polyurethane-urea described in the composition of the first or second embodiment is a salt of the formula: [Q, W, V, Y and Z]X, wherein

Q is the product formed from polyisocyanate;

W is the product formed from polycarbonate polyol monomer;

V is the product formed from hydrocarbon based triol or tetraol;

Y is the product formed from Cs-Csalkyldiol optionally substituted with -(O)OH or a mono-aminoC3-C8alkyldiol;

Z is the product formed from CVCxalkyldiaminc optionally substituted with -(O)OH; and

X is a neutralizer.

[0028] In a fourth embodiment, the polyisocyanate described in the composition of the third embodiment is selected from tetramethylene diisocyanate, l,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, dodecamethylene diisocyanate, cyclohexane- 1,3- and -1, 4-diisocyanate, 1- isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexane (isophorone diisocyanate or IPDI), bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)-methane, 1,3- and l,4-bis(isocyanatomethyl)- cyclo hexane, bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methyl-cyclohexyl)-methane, l,5-diisocyanato

naphthalene, 4,4'-methylenebis(cyclohexyl isocyanate) (H _I2 MDI) and norbornene

diisocyanate, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first or second embodiment. In one alternative, the polyisocyanate described in the composition of the third embodiment is isophorone diisocyanate, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first or second embodiment.

[0029] In a fifth embodiment, the polycarbonate polyol monomer described in the composition of the third embodiment has a molecular weight ranging from about 500 g/mol to about 4,000 g/mol, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, or fourth embodiment. Alternatively, the polycarbonate polyol monomer described in the composition of the third embodiment has a molecular weight ranging from about 750 g/mol to about 3,500 g/mol, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, or fourth embodiment. In another alternative, the polycarbonate polyol monomer described in the composition of the third embodiment has a molecular weight ranging from about 1,000 g/mol to about 3,000 g/mol, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, or fourth embodiment. In yet another alternative, the polycarbonate polyol monomer described in the composition of the third embodiment has a molecular weight of about 1,000 g/mol or about 2,000 g/mol or about 3,000 g/mol, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, or fourth embodiment.

[0030] In a sixth embodiment, Y in the composition of the third embodiment is the product formed from C ₃ -Csalkyldiol optionally substituted with -(O)OH, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth embodiment. Alternatively, Y in the composition of the third embodiment is the product formed from 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)butyric acid, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth embodiment.

[0031] In a seventh embodiment, Z in the composition of the third embodiment is lysine, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, or sixth embodiment.

[0032] In an eighth embodiment, the neutralizer in the composition of the third embodiment is Na ₂ C0 ₃ , triethylamine, or lactic acid, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, or seventh embodiment.

Alternatively, the neutralizer in the composition of the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, or seventh embodiment is Na ₂ C0 ₃ , wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, or seventh embodiment.

[0033] In a ninth embodiment, V in the composition of the third embodiment is glycerol, trimethylol propane, erythritol, or pentaerythritol, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, or eighth embodiment. Alternatively, V in the composition of the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, or seventh embodiment is glycerol or erythritol, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, or eighth embodiment.

[0034] In a tenth embodiment, the molar ratio of W to Q in the composition of the third embodiment is about 0.2:1 to about 0.3:1, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, or ninth embodiment. Alternatively, the molar ratio of W to Q in the composition of the third embodiment is about 0.22:1 to about 0.3:1, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, or ninth embodiment.

[0035] In an eleventh embodiment, the molar ratio of V to Q in the composition of the third embodiment is about 0.10:1 to about 0.26:1, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, or tenth embodiment. Alternatively, the molar ratio of V to Q in the composition of the third embodiment is about 0.12:1 to about 0.24:1, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, or tenth

embodiment.

[0036] In a twelfth embodiment, the molar ratio of Y to Q in the composition of the third embodiment is about 0.18:1 to about 0.25:1, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, or eleventh embodiment. Alternatively, the molar ratio of Y to Q in the composition of the third embodiment is about 0.20:1 to about 0.23:1, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, or eleventh embodiment.

[0037] In a thirteenth embodiment, the molar ratio of Z to Q in the composition of the third embodiment is about 0.05:1 to about 0.40:1, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, or twelfth embodiment. Alternatively, the molar ratio of Z to Q is about 0.11 : 1 to about 0.34:1, wherein the remaining features are as described above in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, or twelfth embodiment.

[0038] In a fourteenth embodiment, the polyurethane-urea of the first or second embodiment is of the Formula I or II:

or a salt thereof, wherein each R 1 and R 2 are independently repeating units of the formula:

wherein n is from 6 to 21 and m is from 5 to 15.

[0039] In a fifteenth embodiment, the polyurethane-urea of the first or second

embodiment is selected from any one of those described in the Exemplification section below. Both neutral and salt forms of the polyurethane-ureas are included.

[0040] In a sixteenth embodiment, the polyurethane-urea of the first embodiment is cationic.

[0041] In a seventeenth embodiment, the polyurethane-urea of the first and sixteenth embodiment is of the formula: [Q’, W\ V’, Y’ and Z’]X’, wherein

Q’ is the product formed from polyisocyanate;

W’ is the product formed from polycarbonate polyol monomer;

V’ is the product formed from hydrocarbon based triol or tetraol;

Y’ is the product formed from Ci-Csalkyldiol monomer;

Z’ is the product formed from Ci-saminoalkyldiol monomer; and

X’ is a neutralizer.

[0042] In an eighteenth embodiment, the polyisocyanate in the composition of the sixteenth embodiment is isophorone diisocyanate monomer, wherein the remaining features are as described in the first or fifteenth embodiment.

[0043] In an nineteenth embodiment, Y’ in the composition of the sixteenth embodiment is the product formed from l,4-butanediol monomer, wherein the remaining features are as described in the first, fifteenth, or eighteenth embodiment.

[0044] In a twentieth embodiment, Z’ in the composition of the sixteenth embodiment is the product formed from 3-(dimethylamino)-l, 2-propanediol monomer, wherein the remaining features are as described in the first, fifteenth, eighteenth, or nineteenth embodiment.

[0045] In a twenty-first embodiment, the compositions described in any one of the first to twentieth embodiment, further comprise nanoparticles.

[0046] In a twenty- second embodiment, the compositions described in any one of the first to twenty-first embodiment, further comprise nanoparticles, wherein the nanoparticles are incorporated into the polyurethane-urea (e.g., through in situ polymerization). [0047] In a twenty- third embodiment, the compositions described in any one of the first to twenty-second embodiment, further comprise nanoparticles, wherein the nanoparticles are post-blended with the composition.

[0048] In a twenty-fourth embodiment, the nanoparticles described in any one of the twentieth to twenty-third embodiments are fumed silica or titanium dioxide nanoparticles.

[0049] In a twenty-fifth embodiment, also provided herein is a hair treatment composition comprising a polyurethane-urea and at least one nanoparticle, wherein the Young’s modulus of the polyurethane-urea is above 150 MPa; the elongation at break of the polyurethane-urea is from about 15% to about 300%; and the moisture uptake of the polyurethane-urea is less than 10%. In one aspect, the at least one nanoparticle of this embodiment is incorporated into the polyurethane-urea (e.g., through in situ polymerization). Alternatively, the at least one nanoparticle of this embodiment is post-blended with the composition. The nanoparticle described in this embodiment may be fumed silica or titanium dioxide nanoparticle.

[0050] In a twenty-sixth embodiment, the polyurethane-urea of the twenty-fifth embodiment is selected from any one of those described in the Exemplification section below. Both neutral and salt forms of the polyurethane-ureas are included.

[0051] The compositions described herein may further comprise oils. Oils for use in the disclosed compositions can be selected from mineral, animal, plant or synthetic oils. In one aspect, the oil is linoleic acid or a mixture of fatty acids. Examples include, but are not limited to fragrance oils, emollients, monoterpenoids, fatty alcohols, fatty acids, fatty esters, fatty ethers, fluorinated small molecules (e.g., perfluoromethylcyclopentane,

perfluoroperhydrophenanthrene, perfluoro- 1 ,3-dimethylcyclo hexane, perfluoromethyldecalin, and perfluoroperhydrobenzyl-tetralin), and mixtures thereof. In another aspect, the oil is present in an amount ranging from about 0.2 to about 1.65% based on the total weight of the composition. In another aspect, the oil is present in an amount of about 0.2 to about 0.25% based on the total weight of the composition.

[0052] In one aspect, the disclosed compositions are applied to the hair with water.

[0053] In one aspect, the disclosed compositions, when applied to the hair, change the texture and appearance.

[0054] In one aspect, the disclosed compositions, when applied to the hair, improve hold, i.e., hair that is formed into a given curl or style retains that curl or style over time. [0055] In one aspect, the disclosed compositions, when applied to the hair, provide sufficient stylability, i.e., the composition applied to hair supplies sufficient rigidity and flexibility to form and maintain a style.

[0056] In one aspect, the disclosed compositions, when applied to the hair, minimize flyaways, i.e., there are minimal individual hair fibers that do not conform to the given curl or style.

[0057] In one aspect, the disclosed compositions, when applied to the hair, preserves curl shape, i.e., hair that is formed into a given curl retains that curl over time.

[0058] In one aspect, the disclosed compositions, when applied to the hair, provides natural curl enhancement, i.e., hair that naturally tends to curl displays a more defined and less diffused curl pattern.

[0059] The compositions described herein may further comprise an antioxidant.

Antioxidants that may be suitable with the compositions described herein include, but are not limited to, a< _j ai oil, alpha lipoic acid, green and white tea, retinol, vitamin C, Vitamin E, butylated hydroxytoluene, butylated hydroxyanisole, coenzyme Q10 (Co Q-10), isoflavones, polyphenols, curcumin, turmeric, pomegranate, rosemary, glutathione, selenium, and zinc.

4. Methods of Use

[0060] The compositions described herein may be used for any cosmetic application. Such applications include, but are not limited to, skin-care creams, eye and facial makeup (e.g., mascara, eye liner, eyebrow makeup, and the like), deodorants, lotions, powders, perfumes, baby products, body butters; and hair products (e.g., permanent chemicals, hair colors, hair sprays, and gels).

[0061] In one aspect, the compositions described herein are used as a hair product, e.g., in a conventional manner for providing hairstyle/hold benefits.

[0062] In an exemplary aspect, an effective amount of a composition described herein may be sprayed or applied onto dry or damp hair before and/or after the hair is styled. As used herein“effective amount” means an amount sufficient to provide the hair hold and style performance desired according to the length and texture of the hair.

[0063] In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of fixing hair comprising the step of applying a polyurethane disclosed herein. In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of retaining the curl of hair comprising the step of applying polyurethane disclosed herein. [0064] In one aspect, the present disclosure also includes a method to determine the curl retention of a hair tress. In one aspect, the method of measuring the curl retention of a hair tress includes the steps of a) measuring the length of the hair tress; b) applying a composition disclosed herein to the hair tress; c) blow drying the hair tress without brushing; d) curling the hair tress with a heated curling rod; e) mechanically manipulating the hair tress by pulling, combing and brushing; and f) measuring the length of the curled hair tress.

[0065] In one aspect, the method of measuring the curl retention of a hair tress, includes the steps of a) measuring the length of the hair tress; b) applying a composition described herein to the hair tress; c) blow drying the hair tress without brushing; d) curling the hair tress heated curling rod; e) subjecting the hair tress to humidity; and f) measuring the length of the curled hair tress. In one aspect, the curled hair tress is subjected to 60%, 70%, 75%, 80% or 90% relative humidity for 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 75, 90, 105,120, 180 or 210 minutes at a temperature of 25 °C.

EXEMPLIFICATION

Example 1. Methods for Determining Mechanical Performance

[0066] The Young’s modulus is a measure of the ability of a material to withstand changes in length when under uniaxial tension or compression. A higher Young’s modulus typically indicates that the material is more rigid. The elongation at break, also known as fracture strain, is the ratio between changed length and initial length after breakage of the test specimen. A higher elongation at break expresses the capability of a material to resist fracture. For a composition applied to hair to hold the shape of the hair, the Young’s modulus and elongation at break of the composition should be such that the composition provides rigidity to the hair but is not brittle.

[0067] A comparison of Young’s modulus and the elongation at break for the some of the polyurethanes disclosed herein was made to several commercially available polyurethane products. The Young’s modulus and the elongation at break can be determined by a protocol defined to measure mechanical properties is developed in compliance with ASTM D638, ASTM D412, test guidelines. In particular, the following protocol can be used to determine the Young’s modulus and elongation at break (or ultimate elongation) of dry film of polyurethanes. Testing requires approximately 10-20 min per sample to complete.

[0068] Materials:

> 25 g polyurethane aqueous dispersion 1 clean rectangular mold (2 mm x 20 mm x 45 mm) grooved on Teflon sheet per sample

1 clean razor blade

Scotch tape

Universal Testing Machine mounted with extension grip geometry

[0069] Sample Preparation:

1. Prepare 25 g of 10 wt% WBPU solution from their respective stock solution.

2. Apply 2.5 mL prepared solution in each mold (2 mm x 20 mm x 45 mm) and allow drying for 2 days to give WBPU film.

3. After it dries out, use a spatula to remove film from the mold.

4. Use the razor blade to cut corners and get film with around 15 mm width and around 150-300 micron thickness. Make sure that the film is free of air bubbles.

5. Label the test film.

6. Cut four pieces of tape (20mm) per sample and adhere them to both sides of the specimen strip and make a dog-bone shaped sample to improve hold of sample in grip. Store the prepared test films in desiccators for 1-2 hour to fully dry them. Take one sample out of desiccators at a time for testing.

[0070] Sample Testing

1. Balance the load registering on the universal testing machine so that it reads 0 Newtons.

2. Use calipers to set a distance of 20 mm between the top and bottom extension grip geometries.

3. Mount a sample in the extension grips and secure tightly, ensuring that the scotch tape is not visible, and that the sample is as close to vertical as possible in both vertical planes.

4. Stretch the sample slightly, by separating the geometries until a force of 2— 5 N is registered.

5. Begin a tensile testing run on the universal testing machine at a speed of 100 mm/minute, stopping the test upon sample fracture.

6. Elongation at break is calculated at the elongation at which the material fractures. 7. Young’s modulus is calculated as the modulus during the initial, elastic portion of deformation by calculating the slope of a linear fit to that region with an R value > 0.99.

a) low modulus and high elongation (Avalure UR 450, C1004, Polyderm PE/PA ED, Polyderm PE/PA), which leads to inferior curl hold (e.g., hold is temporary, transient, or short-lived) or

b) high modulus and low elongation (DynamX, DynamX/H ₂ 0, Luviset PUR), which leads to a brittle material with low performance (e.g., resin is brittle or fractures) after manipulation.

Example 2. Methods for Determining Hydrophobicity/Water Uptake

[0071] The moisture uptake properties, under highly humid environment, of WBPU dry films have been linked to their long lasting hold performance. As such, it is important to be able to reproducibly and accurately evaluate such moisture uptake properties to enable predictive in vitro and in vivo evaluation of WBPU dry films. The following protocol can be used to determine moisture uptake ability of WBPU dry films under high humid environment. Test requires about 2-3 days per sample set to complete

[0072] Materials

>15 g WBPU solution

1 clean cell culture petri dish (60 mm dia x 15 mm H) per sample

Humidity chamber with flexibility to control temperature and relative humidity (RH)

[0073] Sample Testing

1. Prepare 15 g of 10 wt% WBPU solution from their respective stock solution.

2. Label cell culture petri dishes for each sample and measure their empty weight

( W _pd ).

3. Apply 4 mL prepared solution in each petri dish (3 samples per WBPU and allow to equilibrate for 20 hours at 25 °C and 50% RH in humidity chamber.

4. After equilibration, measure and record sample weight ( W,·) .

5. Place the samples to humidity chamber at 25 °C and 90% RH and allow

equilibration to high humidity for 20 hours.

6. Measure and record final sample weight (Wf).

[0074] Sample Analysis

Calculate % moisture uptake using the following equation: (( Wf - Wpd ) - (Wi - Wpd ))

% moisture uptake x 100%

(Wi - Wpd )

Example 3. Compositions and Properties of WBPU-Us having Chain Extenders or

Nanoparticles through in situ Polymerization

[0075] Compositions comprising a polyurethane-urea crosslinked by at least one hydrocarbon based triol or tetraol were formulated by water or mixture of water and ethanol. The ratio of the constituents in the final blend is listed in Table 1.

Table 1

IPDI = isophorone diisocyanate; PCD1K = polycarbonate diol with molecular weight at 1,000 g/mol; BD = 1,4-butanediol; DMBA = 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)butyric acid; LL = L-lysine; and FA = fatty acids. NP = not present

[0076] Of the compositions listed in Table 1, PU 420, 424, 425, 426, and 428 have an elongation at break lower than 15%, are therefore considered to be compositions with suboptimal mechanical properties. Those having mechanical properties within the disclosed ranges are shown in Table 2. Table 2

*PU 339 comprises polycarbonate polyol, IPDI, DMBA, l,4-BD, LL, and fatty acid, i.e., No hydrocarbon based triol or tetraol was used.

[0077] FIG.2 shows the in vitro performance of the WBPU/silica nanocomposite PU 427 compared to a commercial resin and comparator PU 339. As shown, PU 427 showed better initial hold as well as stronger humidity resistance. In an in vivo mannequin head test, PU 427 also demonstrated better curl retention than PU 339 under 90% humidity for 3 min. See FIG.

3.

Example 4. Nanoparticle Post-blending Incorporation

[0078] The incorporation of nanoparticles to WBPU compositions having the disclosed properties was investigated. Fumed silica and titanium dioxide (Ti0 ₂ ) were explored. As shown in Table 3, when fumed silica nanoparticles, Aerosil 200 and Aerosil 300 (Evonik) were incorporated through post-blending, PU 339 showed improved mechanical properties. With increasing fumed silica concentration from 1% to 10% (with respect to waterborne polyurethane solid content), Young’s modulus increased significantly; elongation at break, on the other hand, remained similar as that for PU 339. All WBPU/fumed silica nanocomposites showed low water uptake, i.e., 5.4-6.9%.

Table 3

[0079] Titanium dioxide (Ti0 ₂ ) nanoparticles were also incorporated into PU 339 through post-blending. In Table 4, the results show a significant increase of Young’s modulus when 0.25% (with respect to waterborne polyurethane solid content) of Ti0 ₂ was post-blended into WBPU, similar to the WBPU/fumed silica systems (Table 3). Conversely, increasing loading concentration of Ti0 ₂ from 0.25% to 0.5% or 1% did not further enhance mechanical properties of WBPU. In vitro testing shows that, when 1% Aerosil 200 or 0.25% Ti0 ₂ was post-blended in PU 339, both initial curl hold and curl retention after high humidity stress were improved; moreover, the post-blended WBPU nanocomposites as well as PU 339 all performed much better than commercial resin (FIG. 4). All WBPU/Ti0 ₂ nanocomposites showed low water uptake, i.e., around 6.7%.

Table 4.

[0080] As previously described, compositions comprising WBPUs having a Young’s modulus above 150 MPa, an elongation at break from about 15% to about 300%, and a moisture uptake of less than 10%, provide long-lasting and natural hairstyles. The above data establishes that cross-linking these WBPUs with at least one hydrocarbon based triol or tetraol leads to hair compositions with better hold and stronger humidity resistance. The above data also establishes that incorporating nanoparticles into WBPU-based compositions possessing the proper combination of mechanical properties further enhance the long-lasting characteristic of WBPUs in hair treatment products.

[0081] The contents of all references (including literature references, issued patents, published patent applications, and co-pending patent applications) cited throughout this application are hereby expressly incorporated herein in their entireties by reference. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein are accorded the meaning commonly known to one with ordinary skill in the art.