Bjurnemark, Anders (Romelegatan 3, Malm�, S-216 19, SE)
Bergkvist, Anders (Upplandsgatan 4, Malm�, S-214 29, SE)
Bjurnemark, Anders (Romelegatan 3, Malm�, S-216 19, SE)
| 1. | A method for determining the volume of fuel being dispensed from a fuel pump unit, comprising the steps of generating pulses by means of a pulse generator corre sponding to a volume flow rate when dispensing fuel, and correcting the number of pulses generated by the pulse generator by at least one correction factor, thereby emitting substantially a predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume of fuel that is being dispensed, c h a r a c t e r i s e d in that the step of correction comprises counting the pulses generated by the pulse generator and, for at least one first period of a volume determination, carrying out one of the measures of skip ping every Nth counted pulse and emitting a pulse in addition to the pulses generated by the pulse generator for every Nth counted pulse, N constituting said correc tion factor and being an integer which is greater than one and which has been predetermined for said pulse gene rator. |
| 2. | The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein none of the measures is carried out for at least one second period of the volume determination. |
| 3. | The method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the step of correction further comprises refraining once, for every Mth counted pulse, from carrying out said one of the measures, M being an integer which is greater than N and being predetermined for said pulse generator. |
| 4. | The method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the step of correction further comprises the steps of determining the volume flow rate when dis pensing fuel, and selecting said at least one correction factor corresponding to the volume flow rate. |
| 5. | The method as claimed in any one of the preced ing claims, wherein the predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume is determined to be greater than 100 pulses per litre of fuel. |
| 6. | A method for calibrating an apparatus for deter mining the volume of fuel being dispensed from a fuel pump unit, said apparatus comprising a pulse generator (2), which is adapted to generate pulses corresponding to the volume flow rate when dispensing fuel, and means (3) for correcting the number of pulses generated by the pulse generator by at least one correction factor, such that the correction means emit substantially a predeter mined number of pulses per unit of volume of dispensed fuel, said method comprising the steps of making the fuel pump unit dispense a predetermined calibration volume; counting the number of pulses generated by the pulse generator when dispensing the calibration volume; determining the size of the correction factor by means of said predetermined number of pulses, the size of the predetermined calibration volume and the counted number of pulses; and storing the correction factor in the apparatus to be used in the determination of fuel volume, c h a r a c t e r i s e d in that the correction factor is determined to be an integer N, which is such that if the apparatus when emitting the pulses carries out one of the measures of skipping every Nth pulse and adding a pulse for every Nth counted pulse, the apparatus will emit substantially the predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume. |
| 7. | The method as claimed in claim 6, further com prising the steps of determining a further correction factor, which is an integer M, which is greater than N and which is such that if the apparatus, for every Mth counted pulse, refrains once from carrying out said one of the measures, a pulse number is obtained which is closer to the desired pulse number than that obtained if said one of the measures is carried out every time; and storing the integer M in the apparatus to be used in the determination of fuel volume. |
| 8. | The method as claimed in claim 6 or 7, wherein the predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume is stored in the apparatus, and wherein the steps of count ing the number of pulses, determining the correction fac tor and storing the correction factor are carried out automatically by the apparatus. |
| 9. | The method as claimed in any one of claims 68, further comprising the steps of storing a plurality of pulse numbers, each corresponding to a predetermined calibration volume, in the apparatus, and making the apparatus determine the size of the calibration volume by comparing the counted number of pulses with said plu rality of predetermined pulse numbers. |
| 10. | An apparatus for determining the volume of fuel dispensed from a fuel pump unit, comprising a pulse gene rator (2) which is adapted to generate pulses correspond ing to the volume flow rate, means (3) for correcting the number of pulses generated by the pulse generator by at least one correction factor, such that the apparatus emits substantially a predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume of fuel that is being dispensed, c h a r a c t e r i s e d in that the correction means (3) are adapted to carry out the correction in accordance with any one of claims 15. |
| 11. | The apparatus as claimed in claim 10, wherein the apparatus further is calibratable in accordance with any one of claims 69. |
| 12. | The apparatus as claimed in claim 10 or 11, wherein the correction means (3) comprise a processor unit (6) and its associated software. |
Description of the Prior Art A volume determining apparatus to be used in a fuel pump unit at a petrol station must be able to perform volume determination with a predetermined minimum accu- racy for different volume flow rates when filling up and for different volumes. It should also be able to indicate the correct volume continuously during filling-up. To achieve such accuracy, the apparatus must be calibrated in manufacture and subsequently at regular intervals.
DE 29 26 451 discloses a volume measuring apparatus for a fuel pump unit having a measuring chamber, in which pistons are movably arranged. The pistons are displaced by the action of fuel flowing through the measuring cham- ber. The movement of the pistons is transmitted to a crankshaft, whose rotation is a function of the volume of the fuel flowing through the measuring chamber. The crankshaft extends through the wall of the measuring chamber, and on its end positioned outside the measuring chamber, a pulse generator is arranged. The pulse gene- rator emits a predetermined number of pulses for each revolution of the crankshaft.
If the proportionality factor between the number of pulses and the volume is known, the volume of the fuel flowing through the measuring chamber can be determined by counting the number of pulses emitted by the pulse generator and multiplying the counted number of pulses
by the proportionality factor. The proportionality fac- tor can be determined by a known volume of fuel being dispensed from the fuel pump unit and by determining the number of pulses generated by the pulse generator. Since the number of pulses emitted by the pulse generator is different for different volume measuring apparatus, depending on work tolerances and the stroke of the pis- tons, different proportionality factors will be obtained for different volume measuring apparatus.
However, the pulses are normally supplied from a pulse generator directly to a volume counter, which is incremented by a predetermined amount each time it receives a predetermined number of pulses. It is then desirable that the proportionality factor between the number of pulses and the volume be the same for different volume measuring apparatus. In other words, the same num- ber of pulses should always be supplied to the counter when dispensing a given volume of fuel, independently of the function of the volume measuring apparatus.
This can be accomplished by manually adjusting the stroke of the pistons in the measuring chamber, such that the desired ratio of pulses to volume is obtained. How- ever, several attempts may be required, before the desir- ed number of pulses is obtained, and therefore this is a time-consuming and inaccurate calibrating method.
In the above-mentioned DE 29 26 451, a pulse cor- rection unit is instead arranged after the pulse gene- rator. In this pulse correction unit, the number of pulses counted during a working cycle is multiplied by a correction factor, thereby obtaining the desired ratio of pulses to volume. The correction factor is determined by calibration, an actually dispensed volume per working cycle being compared with a volume measured by the appa- ratus per working cycle, and a correction factor being calculated on the basis of the ratio of the dispensed volume to the measured volume. This correction factor is then adjusted manually by an adjusting member. The
calculation of the correction factor and the manual adjustment thereof are, however, a source of error and besides increase the risk of somebody tampering with the apparatus.
This pulse correction method, however, also suffers from other drawbacks. If the correction factor is not an integer, which will probably be the case, the multipli- cation will normally result in a corrected pulse number which is not an integer, which is unfavourable if the corrected pulse number is to be used for incrementing a volume counter and which can result in considerable rounding errors. Moreover, this pulse correction method does not allow continuous incrementing of the volume since the pulse correction is carried out merely once per working cycle. A further drawback of this prior art appa- ratus is that the correction is carried out without regard to the flow rate when determining the volume. This may result in insufficient accuracy since, as a rule, the number of pulses emitted by the pulse generator varies with the flow rate.
Applicant's previous application WO 88/08518 dis- closes an apparatus, in which the pulse correction is carried out continuously and with regard to the flow rate. In this apparatus, the volume determining period is divided into a number of measuring intervals. For each measuring interval, the pulses from the pulse generator are detected, each detected pulse is multiplied by a flow correction factor, which is determined on the basis of the sum of the corrected pulse values for one or more preceding measuring intervals, the corrected pulse values are added to a first summation variable, and the liquid volume is determined by the value of the first summation variable being multiplied by a volume conversion factor.
Finally, the liquid volume is summed up for all measuring intervals during the measuring period.
This apparatus results in fact in a very accurate value of the volume, but places high demands on the hard-
ware owing to the great amount of multiplications that should be executable in real time.
Summary of the Invention One object of the present invention therefore is to provide a method and an apparatus for determining the volume of fuel being dispensed from a fuel pump unit, said method and apparatus eliminating or at least reduc- ing the above-mentioned drawbacks of prior-art technique.
A special object is to provide a simple pulse cor- rection which allows accurate volume determination con- tinuously during filling-up. The pulse correction should be carried out such that after correction a predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume is obtained.
A further object is that the method and the appara- tus should allow the pulse correction to be carried out with regard to the volume flow rate during filling-up.
The above-mentioned objects and other objects that will appear from the following specification are achieved by a method and an apparatus according to claims 1 and 10, respectively. Preferred embodiments of the method and the apparatus are defined in the subclaims.
According to the present invention, pulses are thus generated by a pulse generator corresponding to a volume flow rate when dispensing fuel. The pulse generator can be of any type whatever, optical, magnetic etc, which generates pulses corresponding to a volume flow rate and which does not always emit the desired number of pulses per unit of volume of dispensed fuel. It can be affected in some convenient manner by the fuel volume flow any- where between a pump and a nozzle for dispensing fuel.
Preferably, the pulse generator, however, is connected to a shaft which is affected by the flow through a measuring chamber in the same manner as in the prior-art technique.
Furthermore, according to the invention, a correc- tion of the number of pulses generated by the pulse gene- rator is carried out by at least one correction factor, such that the apparatus emits substantially a predeter-
mined number of pulses per unit of volume of dispensed fuel.
By "substantially a predetermined number of pulses" is meant that the apparatus can be designed so as not to always emit exactly a predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume, but such that the deviation is so small that the desired measuring accuracy can be achieved.
According to the invention, the correction is car- ried out by counting the pulses generated by the pulse generator and by one of the measures of skipping every Nth counted pulse and emitting a pulse in addition to the pulses generated by the pulse generator for every Nth counted pulse being carried out during at least one first period of a volume determination, N being said correction factor and an integer which is greater than one and which has been predetermined for said pulse generator. The cor- rection factor N thus depends on the function of the pulse generator at issue. The different alternatives are, of course, used when the pulse generator generates more or fewer pulses per unit of volume than the predetermined number. Preferably, the pulse generator is arranged in such manner that one of the alternatives is always used.
This technique of carrying out the pulse correction is very simple and, thus, inexpensive to accomplish. No complicated multiplications are required, just a simple subtraction or addition of pulses. Consequently, it can be carried out while using less sophisticated hardware than according to prior art.
As mentioned above, the correction is carried out for at least one first period of a volume determination.
The first period can be equal to the entire period during which the volume determination takes place or it can con- stitute a part thereof. The volume determination may com- prise a plurality of first periods.
In a preferred embodiment of the volume determina- tion, the correction takes place continuously by skipping every Nth pulse when emitting pulses from the apparatus.
This is the easiest way of carrying out the correction.
It requires basically just a counter, which, when the number N is reached, emits a signal which results in the emission of a pulse not being carried out.
In order to compensate for the fact that it is entire pulses that are subtracted or added, and in order to achieve still greater accuracy without the number of emitted pulses per unit of volume having to be increased, a further correction is carried out in a preferred embo- diment of the invention, which comprises the steps of refraining from, for at least one second period of the volume determination, carrying out the correction that is carried out during the first period.
The second correction can suitably be carried out by the apparatus, for every Mth pulse, refraining from carrying out the measure at issue, i.e. refraining from either performing a skip of a pulse or adding a pulse. M is an integer which is greater than N and which has been predetermined for the pulse generator.
The above-described pulse correction can be effect- ed in a simple manner with regard to the volume flow rate when dispensing fuel. To this end, the volume flow rate is determined when dispensing, and the correction factor, for instance N and, if required, also M, is selected cor- responding to the volume flow rate.
It has been found convenient that the predetermined number of pulses that is to be achieved after the pulse correction is at least 100 pulses per litre, preferably 400 pulses per litre. A smaller number of pulses results in too low a resolution of volume.
In an apparatus according to the invention, the above-described pulse correction is accomplished by cor- rection means which are adapted to carry out the correc- tion according to any one of claims 1-5. Preferably the correction means are realised as a processor unit and its associated software. However, it should be possible to realise them by discrete logical circuits, or as a combi-
nation of discrete logical circuits and software, but this would be more expensive.
As mentioned above, the correction means emit a number of pulses which in prior-art manner represents a volume. These pulses are then converted into a direct volume measure and are presented on a display in the fuel pump unit. The conversion can be made in the actual volume determining apparatus, which may comprise means for this purpose, or outside said apparatus.
A further object of the invention is to provide a method for calibrating an apparatus for volume determina- tion, which is adapted to the inventive method for volume determination.
This object is achieved by a method according to claim 6, which confers essentially the same advantages as the volume determination method and which is easy to carry out.
When calibrating, the fuel pump unit is made to dis- pense a predetermined calibration volume of fuel. The dispensed volume can be determined by the user in prior- art manner by means of a precalibrated pitcher. During dispensing, the number of pulses generated by the pulse generator is counted. Then the size of the correction factor is determined and stored in the apparatus to be used in the volume determination. The correction factor consists of the above-mentioned integer N. Also the cor- rection factor M can suitably be determined and stored in the apparatus.
The determination of the correction factor can in fact be effected outside the actual apparatus, but in a preferred embodiment, the apparatus performs on its own all the calculations required for the calibration, in which case all manual input of data in connection with the calibration is avoided. The predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume, i.e. the number of pulses to be output from the correction means for a given volume, is then stored in the apparatus.
If the apparatus can be calibrated for several dif- ferent volumes, various pulse numbers corresponding to various volumes can advantageously be stored in the appa- ratus. The desired pulse numbers can be indicated by, for instance, intervals or tolerances. In this way, the appa- ratus can, when calibrating, decide on its own for which volume the calibration takes place. This means that also these data need not be input when calibrating, and thus the reliability during calibration increases.
The pulse correction is described above as being carried out for pulses. Of course, the method can be carried out in exactly the same manner if, instead of pulses, pulse edges are counted. In this application, reference is made to pulses only, so as to not burden the specification unnecessarily. Thus, this term should here also comprise pulse edges.
Brief Description of the Drawings The invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings which show embodiments and in which: Fig. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of an apparatus for carrying out volume measurement; Fig. 2 is a flow diagram of a preferred embodiment of the inventive calibration; and Fig. 3 is a flow diagram of a preferred embodiment of the inventive volume measurement.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments Fig. 1 shows schematically how an automatically calibratable apparatus 1 for fuel volume determination can be composed and arranged. In this embodiment, the apparatus comprises a pulse generator 2, a pulse correc- tion unit 3, a fuel pump computer 4 and a volume counter 5.
The apparatus 1 is adapted to be arranged in a fuel pump unit. The pulse generator 2 is adapted to generate pulses corresponding to the volume flow rate when dis- pensing fuel from the fuel pump unit. To this end, the
pulse generator 2 is arranged adjacent to the metering means 8 of the fuel pump unit, said metering means being arranged between a pump for pumping fuel from a fuel con- tainer and a nozzle for dispensing the fuel. Depending on the type of pulse generator, some part of the pulse gene- rator 2 can besides be arranged in the metering means.
The pulse generator 2 emits pulses PA to the pulse correction unit 3, which comprises a processor unit 6 with memory means 7 for storing correction factors and programs for carrying out the calibration and volume determination according to the invention. The pulse cor- rection unit 3 further comprises an input 9, through which an operator can enter a calibration signal. When the pulse correction unit 3 is correctly calibrated, it corrects the number of pulses in such a manner that when a predetermined volume of fuel flows through the metering means, the pulse correction unit 3 will always emit sub- stantially a predetermined number of pulses independently of how many pulses the specific pulse generator emits for the predetermined volume.
In volume determination, the corrected number of pulses PC is supplied continuously to the pump computer 4, where the pulses are processed in traditional manner and used for controlling the volume counter 5, which indicates the dispensed volume to the user. The pump com- puter 4 can thus function in the same manner for all fuel pump units independently of the function of the specific pulse generator 2, since it will always receive substan- tially the same number of pulses per unit of volume.
With reference to the flow diagram in Fig. 2, a description follows below of how the pulse correction unit 3 can be calibrated for a specific pulse generator 2. In this embodiment it is assumed that the pulse gene- rator generates more pulses per unit of volume than the predetermined, ideal number of pulses per unit of volume that is to be output from the pulse correction unit 3, and that the correction is carried out by skipping, at
regular intervals, the output of a pulse from the pulse correction unit. Furthermore, it is assumed that the predetermined number of pulses per unit of volume has already been stored in the memory means 7, as well as a number of pulse intervals, each corresponding to a given calibration volume.
When the pulse correction unit is to be calibrated, the operator puts the pulse correction unit 3 in calibra- tion mode by giving a calibration signal on the input 9 of the unit. This can take place, for instance, by the operator pressing a calibration button. When the pulse correction unit detects that it is in calibration mode, step 201, it performs the steps described below in the subsequent dispensing of fuel. If it is not in calibra- tion mode, the pulse correction unit processes the sub- sequent dispensing of fuel as normal dispensing for which the volume is to be determined, step 202.
When the operator has put the pulse correction unit in calibration mode, he dispenses a predetermined volume of fuel from the fuel pump unit. During dispensing, the pulse correction unit counts the number of pulses gene- rated by the pulse generator during dispensing, step 203.
When the volume of fuel selected by the operator has been dispensed, which is determined by the operator by means of a calibrated pitcher, the operator signals on the input 9 of the pulse correction unit 3 that the dis- pensing operation is completed. When the pulse correction unit 3 detects this signal, step 204, it proceeds to step 205 and determines the volume that has been dispensed.
This is carried out by comparing the counted number of pulses with the pulse intervals stored in the memory means 7. If the counted number of pulses is within one of these intervals, the pulse correction unit determines that the corresponding volume has been dispensed. If the counted number of pulses is not within one of the stored pulse intervals, it determines that no volume could be identified, step 206, and that the calibration therefore
could not take place, whereupon the calibration is inter- rupted, step 207.
If a dispensed volume has been identified, the pulse correction unit determines, in step 208, a first correc- tion factor N as follows: N = INT (A/(A-k)) wherein INT is the integer part of the expression within parentheses, A is the number of pulses received from the pulse generator, k is the predetermined, ideal number of pulses for the identified, dispensed volume, and N indi- cates the number of pulses which the pulse correction unit should receive before refraining from outputting a pulse for effecting a correction.
Subsequently, the pulse correction unit determines, step 209, a second correction factor M as follows: M = k/(k-INT(A*(N-1)/N)) wherein INT, A, k and N have the same meaning as above.
M is used for correction of the decimal error that may arise when correcting by means of the correction factor N. The decimal error correction means that the pulse cor- rection unit, for every Mth received pulse, refrains from carrying out the following correction carried out for every Nth pulse.
Finally, N and M are stored in the memory means 7 in the pulse correction unit, step 210, before completion of the calibration. Preferably, also the number of pulses A generated by the pulse generator 2 is stored in the memo- ry means.
Example Now supposing that the ideal number of pulses is 400 pulses per litre and that the pulse interval stored in the memory means 7 for 5 litres of fuel is 2000-2160 pulses. Assume further that, during calibration, the pulse correction unit receives 2077 pulses from the pulse generator when dispensing 5 litres of fuel from the fuel pump unit. The pulse correction unit then determines that
5 litres have been dispensed and that the ideal number of pulses is 2000. The pulse correction unit further calcu- lates N as follows: N = INT (2077 / (2077-2000)) = 26.
Thus, this means that in the volume determination, every 26th pulse is to be skipped in order to output substan- tially the ideal number of pulses from the pulse correc- tion unit.
By using the correction factor N, exactly the ideal number of pulses will not be obtained in all cases. The number of pulses obtained when dispensing 5 litres of fuel can be determined as follows: p = INT(A*(N-1)/(N)), which in this example becomes 1997, which yields an error of 0.15%.
In order to further reduce the error, the second correction factor M is used, which in this case becomes 666. When the pulse correction unit has received 666 pulses, the subsequent correction by skipping should thus not be carried out. In this example, the use of M means that the pulse correction unit will output 2000 pulses for 5 litres.
The calibration can, of course, be carried out for a number of different volumes. Moreover, the calibration can be effected for different flow rates, in which case the flow rate when dispensing can be determined by count- ing the number of pulses generated per unit of time.
A presently preferred embodiment of the volume determination according to the invention will be describ- ed below with reference to the flow diagram in Fig. 3.
To keep a check when a pulse is to be skipped or not, the pulse correction unit uses two variables Ncoun- ter and Mcounter. Moreover, use is made of a variable which is designated loop counter. These variables are set at zero, step 301, after each calibration.
When the pulse correction unit detects a pulse from the pulse generator, step 302, it investigates whether the value of the Ncounter equals N-1, step 303. If this is not the case, the Ncounter is incremented by 1, step
304, and the Mcounter by 1, step 305. Then the pulse cor- rection unit proceeds to step 306. If, on the other hand, the value of the Ncounter equals N-1, it is set at zero, step 307. Subsequently, the pulse correction unit inves- tigates whether M differentiates from zero and if the value of the Mcounter is greater than or equal to M-1, step 308. If this is the case, the Mcounter is set at zero, step 309, and the pulse correction unit proceeds to step 306, in which the pulse correction unit outputs a pulse to the pump computer and then proceeds to step 310, in which the loop counter is incremented by 1. If the condition in step 308 is not satisfied, the pulse correction unit proceeds to step 310, in which the loop counter is incremented. After step 310, the pulse correc- tion unit checks in step 311 if the value of the loop counter is greater than or equal to A, which is the num- ber of pulses generated by the pulse generator 2 during calibration when N and M were determined. If this is the case, the loop counter, the Ncounter and the Mcounter are cleared in step 312. Finally, the pulse correction unit 3 returns to step 302. By operating in measuring periods corresponding to A generated pulses and clearing all counters between the measuring periods, the errors are minimised.
If the volume determination is to be carried out with regard to the flow rate when dispensing fuel, various N and M can be determined for various flow rates.
In the volume determination, N and M are then selected corresponding to the flow rate. Alternatively, one or more further compensation factors can be used to accom- plish flow compensation.
The above Examples relate to a case where the number of generated pulses is greater than the desired number of pulses such that pulses must be skipped for correcting the number of pulses. The Examples are also applicable to the case where the number of generated pulses is smaller than the desired number of pulses. The only modification that is needed in this case is to exchange the skipping for an addition of a pulse.