Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
METHOD FOR LEVELING SENSOR READINGS ACROSS AN IMPLEMENT
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2018/200870
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
Described herein are implements and methods for leveling of measured values of sensors across an implement having sensors. In one embodiment, a method for leveling sensors across an implement having a plurality of sensors comprises providing an implement having a plurality of sensors, measuring a value at each sensor, calculating an average of all values measured, associating the value at one of the rows to the average, and calculating a correction factor for the one of the rows based on the association.

Inventors:
STRNAD MICHAEL (US)
Application Number:
PCT/US2018/029644
Publication Date:
November 01, 2018
Filing Date:
April 26, 2018
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
CLIMATE CORP (US)
International Classes:
A01C5/06; B60K35/00; G01N21/55; G01N33/24; G01V8/10
Domestic Patent References:
WO2016205424A12016-12-22
Foreign References:
US20160071410A12016-03-10
US20140129146A12014-05-08
US20140191857A12014-07-10
Other References:
See also references of EP 3614822A4
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
LIU, Agatha H. et al. (US)
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS

What is claimed is:

1 . A computer-implemented method of leveling readings of a plurality of sensors on an agricultural implement, comprising:

for each of a plurality of periods within a length of time during which the agricultural implement travels a distance:

receiving, by a processor, a reading from a first sensor of the plurality of sensors on the agricultural implement;

computing, by the processor, a cumulative aggregate of readings received from a set of the plurality of sensors during the length of time so far;

computing a difference between the reading and the cumulative aggregate;

determining whether the reading is to be filtered; and

storing, in response to determining that the reading is not to be filtered, a difference between the reading and the cumulative aggregate;

calculating a correction factor for the first sensor based on one or more differences corresponding to one or more of the plurality of readings received from the first sensor; updating the one or more readings using the correction factor.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , the agricultural implement comprising a planting implement, a tillage implement, a side dress bar, a sprayer, or a harvester.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , each of the plurality of sensors detecting reflectivity, temperature, electrical conductivity, moisture, organic matter, seed presence, seed spacing, percentage of seeds firmed, or soil residue presence.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , the set of sensors including the plurality of sensors, sensors within a section of the agricultural implement, sensors adjacent to one another, or sensors that produce readings within a specific range.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , the agricultural implement supporting multiple row units,

the set of sensors including sensors on one row unit.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 ,

each of the plurality of sensors detecting reflectivity,

the set of sensors including sensors measuring reflectance at a specific wavelength.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising determining whether specific readings received from the set of sensors during the period are to be used for computing the aggregate based on whether the agricultural implement was moving or conducting an operation when the readings were taken by the set of sensors,

the computing a cumulative aggregate being based on the specific readings in response to determining that the specific readings are to be used for computing the aggregate.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , the determining comprising judging whether the reading is faulty based on a range of predetermined normal values for the plurality of sensors.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 ,

the length of time being at least 10 minutes,

the period being at most 1 /5 of a second.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , the calculating comprising applying a linear regression technique.

1 1 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising, for each of the plurality of periods:

receiving a second reading from a second sensor of a second plurality of GPS sensors on the agricultural implement, the second sensor corresponding to the first sensor; storing, in response to determining that the reading is not be filtered, the second reading in association with the reading to form a map with readings produced by the first plurality of sensors.

12. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing instructions which, when executed, cause performance of a method of leveling a plurality of sensors on an agricultural implement, the method comprising:

for each of a plurality of periods within a length of time during which the agricultural implement travels a distance:

receiving a reading from a first sensor of the plurality of sensors on the agricultural implement;

computing a cumulative aggregate of readings received from a set of the plurality of sensors during the length of time so far;

computing a difference between the reading and the cumulative aggregate;

determining whether the reading is to be filtered; and

in response to determining that the reading is not to be filtered, storing a difference between the reading and the cumulative aggregate;

calculating a correction factor for the first sensor based on one or more differences corresponding to one or more of the plurality of readings received from the first sensor; updating the one or more readings using the correction factor.

13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12, the agricultural implement comprising a planting implement, a tillage implement, a side dress bar, a sprayer, or a harvester.

14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12, each of the plurality of sensors detecting reflectivity, temperature, electrical conductivity, moisture, organic matter, seed presence, seed spacing, percentage of seeds firmed, or soil residue presence.

15. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12, the set of sensors including the plurality of sensors, sensors within a section of the agricultural implement, sensors adjacent to one another, or sensors that produce readings within a specific range.

16. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12,

the agricultural implement supporting multiple row units,

the set of sensors including sensors on one row unit.

17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12,

each of the plurality of sensors detecting reflectivity,

the set of sensors including sensors measuring reflectance at a specific wavelength.

18. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12, the method further comprising

determining whether specific readings received from the set of sensors during the period are to be used for computing the aggregate based on whether the agricultural implement was moving or conducting an operation when the readings were taken by the set of sensors,

the computing a cumulative aggregate being based on the specific readings in response to determining that the specific readings are to be used for computing the aggregate.

19. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12, the determining comprising judging whether the reading is faulty based on a range of predetermined normal values for the plurality of sensors.

20. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 12, the method further comprising, for each of the plurality of periods:

receiving a second reading from a second sensor of a second plurality of GPS sensors on the agricultural implement, the second sensor corresponding to the first sensor;

in response to determining that the reading is not be filtered, storing the second reading in association with the reading to form a map with readings produced by the first plurality of sensors.

Description:
METHOD FOR LEVELING SENSOR READINGS ACROSS AN IMPLEMENT

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to methods of leveling sensor readings between sensors.

BACKGROUND

[0002] In recent years, the availability of advanced location-specific agricultural application and measurement systems (used in so-called "precision farming" practices) has increased grower interest in determining spatial variations in soil properties and in varying input application variables (e.g., planting depth) in light of such variations. However, the available mechanisms for measuring properties such as temperature are either not effectively locally made throughout the field or are not made at the same time as an input (e.g. planting) operation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0003] Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views, the present disclosure is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which:

[0004] Figure 1 is a top view of an embodiment of an agricultural planter.

[0005] Figure 2 is a side elevation view of an embodiment of a planter row unit.

[0006] Figure 3 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a soil monitoring system.

[0007] Figure 4A is a side elevation view of an embodiment of a seed firmer having a plurality of firmer-mounted sensors.

[0008] Figure 4B is a plan view of the seed firmer of Figure 4A.

[0009] Figure 4C is a rear elevation view of the seed firmer of Figure 4A.

[0010] Figure 5 is a side elevation view of another embodiment of a seed firmer having a plurality of firmer-mounted sensors.

[0011] Figure 6 is a sectional view along section D-D of Figure 5.

[0012] Figure 7 is a sectional view along section E-E of Figure 5.

[0013] Figure 8 is a sectional view along section F-F of Figure 5.

[0014] Figure 9 is a sectional view along section G-G of Figure 5. [0015] Figure 10 is a partially cutaway partial side view of the seed firmer of

Figure 5.

[0016] Figure 1 1 is a view along direction A of Figure 10.

[0017] Figure 12 is a view along section B-B of Figure 10.

[0018] Figure 13 is a view along section C-C of Figure 10.

[0019] Figure 14 is an enlarged partial cutaway view of the seed firmer of Figure

Ό.

[0020] Figure 15 is a rear view of another embodiment of a seed firmer.

[0021] Figure 16 is a rear view of still another embodiment of a seed firmer.

[0022] Figure 17 is a plot of a reflectivity sensor signal.

[0023] Figure 18 is a side elevation view of an embodiment of a reference sensor.

[0024] Figure 19A is a side elevation view of an embodiment of an instrumented seed firmer incorporating fiber-optic cable transmitting light to a reflectivity sensor.

[0025] Figure 19B is a side elevation view of an embodiment of an instrumented seed firmer incorporating fiber-optic cable transmitting light to a spectrometer.

[0026] Figure 20 illustrates an embodiment of a soil data display screen.

[0027] Figure 21 illustrates an embodiment of a spatial map screen.

[0028] Figure 22 illustrates an embodiment of a seed planting data display screen.

[0029] Figure 23 is a side elevation view of another embodiment of a reference sensor having an instrumented shank.

[0030] Figure 24 is a front elevation view of the reference sensor of Figure 23.

[0031] Figure 25 is a side elevation view of another embodiment of a seed firmer.

[0032] Figure 26 is a side cross-sectional view of the seed firmer of Figure 25.

[0033] Figure 27A is a perspective view of a seed firmer according to one embodiment.

[0034] Figure 27B is a side view of the seed firmer of Figure 27A.

[0035] Figure 28A is a side view of a lens according to one embodiment.

[0036] Figure 28B is a front view of the lens of Figure 28A.

[0037] Figure 29A is a perspective view of a firmer base according to one embodiment.

[0038] Figure 29B is a side perspective view of the firmer base of Figure 29A.

[0039] Figure 29C is a bottom view of the firmer base of Figure 29A. [0040] Figure 30A is a perspective view of a sensor housing according to one embodiment.

[0041] Figure 30B is a perspective view of a cover according to one embodiment.

[0042] Figure 31 A is a perspective view of a lens body according to one embodiment.

[0043] Figure 31 B is a side view of the lens body of Figure 31 A.

[0044] Figure 32 is a side view of a sensor with an emitter and a detector according to one embodiment.

[0045] Figure 33 is a side view of a sensor with an emitter and a detector that are angled towards each other according to one embodiment.

[0046] Figure 34 is a side view of a sensor and prism combination according to one embodiment.

[0047] Figure 35 is a side view of a sensor with two emitters and a detector according to one embodiment.

[0048] Figure 36 is a side view of a sensor with two emitters angled toward a detector according to one embodiment.

[0049] Figure 37 is a side view of a sensor with two emitters and a detector and a prism according to one embodiment.

[0050] Figure 38 is a side view of a sensor with an emitter and a detector along with a prism that uses the critical angle of the material of the prism according to one embodiment.

[0051] Figure 39 is a side view of a sensor with one emitter and two detectors according to one embodiment.

[0052] Figure 40 is a side sectional view of an orifice plate used with the embodiment of Figure 37.

[0053] Figure 41 is a side sectional view of a sensor with one emitter and one detector along with a prism that uses the critical angle of the material of the prism according to one embodiment.

[0054] Figure 42A is an isometric view of a prism according to one embodiment.

[0055] Figure 42B is a top plan view of the prism of Figure 42A.

[0056] Figure 42C is a bottom elevation view of the prism of Figure 42A.

[0057] Figure 42D is a front elevation view of the prism of Figure 42A.

[0058] Figure 42 E is a rear elevation view of the prism of Figure 42A.

[0059] Figure 42F is a right elevation view of the prism of Figure 42A. [0060] Figure 42G is a left elevation view of the prism of Figure 42A.

[0061] Figure 43 is a sectional view of seed firmer of Figure 27A at section A-A.

[0062] Figure 44A is a front schematic view of a sensor with two emitters and one detector in line and an offset detector according to one embodiment.

[0063] Figure 44B is a side schematic view of the sensor of Figure 44A.

[0064] Figure 45 illustrates an embodiment of a seed germination moisture screen.

[0065] Figure 46 is a side view of a seed firmer and sensor arm according to one embodiment.

[0066] Figure 47 illustrates a representative reflectance measurement and height off target.

[0067] Figure 48 illustrates an embodiment of a void screen.

[0068] Figure 49 illustrates a flow diagram of one embodiment for a method 4900 of obtaining soil measurements and then generating a signal to actuate any implement on any agricultural implement.

[0069] Figure 50 illustrates an embodiment of a uniformity of moisture screen.

[0070] Figure 51 illustrates an embodiment of a moisture variability screen.

[0071] Figure 52 illustrates an embodiment of an emergence environment score.

[0072] Figure 53 is a perspective view of a temperature sensor disposed on an interior wall according to one embodiment.

[0073] Figure 54 is a side view of a temperature sensor disposed through a seed firmer to measure temperature of soil directly according to one embodiment.

[0074] Figures 55A to 55C are graphs of implement wide sensor average to Row 1 reading according to one embodiment.

[0075] Figures 56A to 56D are a map of different organic matter zones in a field and sensor readings with different averaging according to one embodiment.

BRIEF SUMMARY

[0076] Described herein are implements and methods for leveling of sensors across an implement having sensors. In one embodiment, a method for leveling sensors across an implement having a plurality of sensors comprises providing an implement having a plurality of sensors, measuring a value at each sensor, calculating an average of all values measured, associating the value at one of the rows to the average, and calculating a correction factor for the one of the rows based on the association.

[0077] In one example, the plurality of sensors is all sensors on the implement.

[0078] In another example, the plurality of sensors is all sensors in a section of the implement.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Depth Control and Soil Monitoring Systems

[0079] Figure 1 illustrates a tractor 5 drawing an agricultural implement, e.g., a planter 10, comprising a toolbar 14 operatively supporting multiple row units 200. An implement monitor 50 preferably including a central processing unit ("CPU"), memory and graphical user interface ("GUI") (e.g., a touch-screen interface) is preferably located in the cab of the tractor 5. A global positioning system ("GPS") receiver 52 is preferably mounted to the tractor 5.

[0080] Turing to Figure 2, an embodiment is illustrated in which the row unit 200 is a planter row unit. The row unit 200 is preferably pivotally connected to the toolbar 14 by a parallel linkage 216. An actuator 218 is preferably disposed to apply lift and/or downforce on the row unit 200. A solenoid valve 390 is preferably in fluid communication with the actuator 218 for modifying the lift and/or downforce applied by the actuator. An opening system 234 preferably includes two opening discs 244 rollingly mounted to a downwardly-extending shank 254 and disposed to open a v- shaped trench 38 in the soil 40. A pair of gauge wheels 248 is pivotally supported by a pair of corresponding gauge wheel arms 260; the height of the gauge wheels 248 relative to the opener discs 244 sets the depth of the trench 38. A depth adjustment rocker 268 limits the upward travel of the gauge wheel arms 260 and thus the upward travel of the gauge wheels 248. A depth adjustment actuator 380 is preferably configured to modify a position of the depth adjustment rocker 268 and thus the height of the gauge wheels 248. The actuator 380 is preferably a linear actuator mounted to the row unit 200 and pivotally coupled to an upper end of the rocker 268. In some embodiments the depth adjustment actuator 380 comprises a device such as that disclosed in International Patent Application No.

PCT/US2012/035585 ("the '585 application"), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. An encoder 382 is preferably configured to generate a signal related to the linear extension of the actuator 380; it should be appreciated that the linear extension of the actuator 380 is related to the depth of the trench 38 when the gauge wheel arms 260 are in contact with the rocker 268. A downforce sensor 392 is preferably configured to generate a signal related to the amount of force imposed by the gauge wheels 248 on the soil 40; in some embodiments the downforce sensor 392 comprises an instrumented pin about which the rocker 268 is pivotally coupled to the row unit 200, such as those instrumented pins disclosed in Applicant's U.S. Patent Application No. 12/522,253 (Pub. No. US 2010/0180695), the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

[0081] Continuing to refer to Figure 2, a seed meter 230 such as that disclosed in Applicant's International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/030192, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, is preferably disposed to deposit seeds 42 from a hopper 226 into the trench 38, e.g., through a seed tube 232 disposed to guide the seeds toward the trench. In some embodiments, instead of a seed tube 232, a seed conveyor is implemented to convey seeds from the seed meter to the trench at a controlled rate of speed as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 14/347,902 and/or U.S. Patent No. 8,789,482, both of which are incorporated by reference herein. In such embodiments, a bracket such as that shown in Figure 30 is preferably configured to mount the seed firmer to the shank via sidewalls extending laterally around the seed conveyor, such that the seed firmer is disposed behind the seed conveyor to firm seeds into the soil after they are deposited by the seed conveyor. In some embodiments, the meter is powered by an electric drive 315 configured to drive a seed disc within the seed meter. In other embodiments, the drive 315 may comprise a hydraulic drive configured to drive the seed disc. A seed sensor 305 (e.g., an optical or electromagnetic seed sensor configured to generate a signal indicating passage of a seed) is preferably mounted to the seed tube 232 and disposed to send light or electromagnetic waves across the path of seeds 42. A closing system 236 including one or more closing wheels is pivotally coupled to the row unit 200 and configured to close the trench 38.

[0082] Turning to Figure 3, a depth control and soil monitoring system 300 is schematically illustrated. The monitor 50 is preferably in data communication with components associated with each row unit 200 including the drives 315, the seed sensors 305, the GPS receiver 52, the downforce sensors 392, the valves 390, the depth adjustment actuator 380, and the depth actuator encoders 382. In some embodiments, particularly those in which each seed meter 230 is not driven by an individual drive 315, the monitor 50 is also preferably in data communication with clutches 310 configured to selectively operably couple the seed meter 230 to the drive 315.

[0083] Continuing to refer to Figure 3, the monitor 50 is preferably in data communication with a cellular modem 330 or other component configured to place the monitor 50 in data communication with the Internet, indicated by reference numeral 335. The internet connection may comprise a wireless connection or a cellular connection. Via the Internet connection, the monitor 50 preferably receives data from a weather data server 340 and a soil data server 345. Via the Internet connection, the monitor 50 preferably transmits measurement data (e.g.,

measurements described herein) to a recommendation server (which may be the same server as the weather data server 340 and/or the soil data server 345) for storage and receives agronomic recommendations (e.g., planting recommendations such as planting depth, whether to plant, which fields to plant, which seed to plant, or which crop to plant) from a recommendation system stored on the server; in some embodiments, the recommendation system updates the planting recommendations based on the measurement data provided by the monitor 50.

[0084] Continuing to refer to Figure 3, the monitor 50 is also preferably in data communication with one or more temperature sensors 360 mounted to the planter 10 and configured to generate a signal related to the temperature of soil being worked by the planter row units 200. The monitor 50 is preferably in data communication with one or more reflectivity sensors 350 mounted to the planter 10 and configured to generate a signal related to the reflectivity of soil being worked by the planter row units 200.

[0085] Referring to Figure 3, the monitor 50 is preferably in data communication with one or more electrical conductivity sensors 365 mounted to the planter 10 and configured to generate a signal related to the temperature of soil being worked by the planter row units 200.

[0086] In some embodiments, a first set of reflectivity sensors 350, temperature sensors 360, and electrical conductivity sensors are mounted to a seed firmer 400 and disposed to measure reflectivity, temperature and electrical conductivity, respectively, of soil in the trench 38. In some embodiments, a second set of reflectivity sensors 350, temperature sensors 360, and electrical conductivity sensors 370 are mounted to a reference sensor assembly 1800 and disposed to measure reflectivity, temperature and electrical conductivity, respectively, of the soil, preferably at a depth different than the sensors on the seed firmer 400.

[0087] In some embodiments, a subset of the sensors are in data communication with the monitor 50 via a bus 60 (e.g., a CAN bus). In some embodiments, the sensors mounted to the seed firmer 400 and the reference sensor assembly 1800 are likewise in data communication with the monitor 50 via the bus 60. However, in the embodiment illustrated in Figure 3, the sensors mounted to the seed firmer the sensors mounted to the seed firmer 400 and the reference sensor assembly 1800 are in data communication with the monitor 50 via a first wireless transmitter 62-1 and a second wireless transmitter 62-2, respectively. The wireless transmitters 62 at each row unit are preferably in data communication with a single wireless receiver 64 which is in turn in data communication with the monitor 50. The wireless receiver may be mounted to the toolbar 14 or in the cab of the tractor 5.

Soil Monitoring, Seed Monitoring and Seed Firming Apparatus

[0088] Turning to Figures 4A-4C, an embodiment of a seed firmer 400 is illustrated having a plurality of sensors for sensing soil characteristics. The seed firmer 400 preferably includes a flexible portion 410 mounted to the shank 254 and/or the seed tube 232 by a bracket 415. In some embodiments, the bracket 415 is similar to one of the bracket embodiments disclosed in U.S. Patent No.

6,918,342, incorporated by reference herein. The seed firmer preferably includes a firmer body 490 disposed and configured to be received at least partially within v- shaped trench 38 and firm seeds 42 into the bottom of the trench. When the seed firmer 400 is lowered into the trench 38, the flexible portion 410 preferably urges the firmer body 490 into resilient engagement with the trench. In some embodiments the flexible portion 410 preferably includes an external or internal reinforcement as disclosed in PCT/US2013/066652, incorporated by reference herein. In some embodiments the firmer body 490 includes a removable portion 492; the removable portion 492 preferably slides into locking engagement with the remainder of the firmer body. The firmer body 490 (preferably including the portion of the firmer body engaging the soil, which in some embodiments comprises the removable portion 492) is preferably made of a material (or has an outer surface or coating) having hydrophobic and/or anti-stick properties, e.g. having a Teflon graphite coating and/or comprising a polymer having a hydrophobic material (e.g., silicone oil or polyether-ether-ketone) impregnated therein. Alternatively, the sensors can be disposed on the side of seed firmer 400 (not shown).

[0089] Returning to Figures 4A through 4C, the seed firmer 400 preferably includes a plurality of reflectivity sensors 350a, 350b. Each reflectivity sensor 350 is preferably disposed and configured to measure reflectivity of soil; in a preferred embodiment, the reflectivity sensor 350 is disposed to measure soil in the trench 38, and preferably at the bottom of the trench. The reflectivity sensor 350 preferably includes a lens disposed in the bottom of the firmer body 490 and disposed to engage the soil at the bottom of the trench 38. In some embodiments the reflectivity sensor 350 comprises one of the embodiments disclosed in 8,204,689 and/or U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/824975 ("the '975 application"), both of which are incorporated by reference herein. In various embodiments, the reflectivity sensor 350 is configured to measure reflectivity in the visible range (e.g., 400 and/or 600 nanometers), in the near-infrared range (e.g. , 940 nanometers) and/or elsewhere the infrared range.

[0090] The seed firmer 400 may also include a capacitive moisture sensor 351 disposed and configured to measure capacitance moisture of the soil in the seed trench 38, and preferably at the bottom of trench 38.

[0091] The seed firmer 400 may also include an electronic tensiometer sensor 352 disposed and configured to measure soil moisture tension of the soil in the seed trench 38, and preferably at the bottom of trench 38.

[0092] Alternatively, soil moisture tension can be extrapolated from capacitive moisture measurements or from reflectivity measurements (such as at 1450 nm). This can be done using a soil water characteristic curve based on the soil type.

[0093] The seed firmer 400 may also include a temperature sensor 360. The temperature sensor 360 is preferably disposed and configured to measure temperature of soil; in a preferred embodiment, the temperature sensor is disposed to measure soil in the trench 38, preferably at or adjacent the bottom of the trench 38. The temperature sensor 360 preferably includes soil-engaging ears 364, 366 disposed to slidingly engage each side of the trench 38 as the planter traverses the field. The ears 364, 366 preferably engage the trench 38 at or adjacent to the bottom of the trench. The ears 364, 366 are preferably made of a thermally conductive material such as copper. The ears 364 are preferably fixed to and in thermal communication with a central portion 362 housed within the firmer body 490. The central portion 362 preferably comprises a thermally conductive material such as copper; in some embodiments the central portion 362 comprises a hollow copper rod. The central portion 362 is preferably in thermal communication with a thermocouple fixed to the central portion. In other embodiments, the temperature sensor 360 may comprise a non-contact temperature sensor such as an infrared thermometer. In some embodiments, other measurements made by the system 300 (e.g., reflectivity measurements, electrical conductivity measurements, and/or measurements derived from those measurements) are temperature-compensated using the temperature measurement made by the temperature sensor 360. The adjustment of the temperature-compensated measurement based on temperature is preferably carried out by consulting an empirical look-up table relating the

temperature-compensated measurement to soil temperature. For example, the reflectivity measurement at a near-infrared wavelength may be increased (or in some examples, reduced) by 1 % for every 1 degree Celsius in soil temperature above 10 degrees Celsius.

[0094] The seed firmer preferably includes a plurality of electrical conductivity sensors 370r, 370f. Each electrical conductivity sensor 370 is preferably disposed and configured to measure electrical conductivity of soil; in a preferred embodiment, the electrical conductivity sensor is disposed to measure electrical conductivity of soil in the trench 38, preferably at or adjacent the bottom of the trench 38. The electrical conductivity sensor 370 preferably includes soil-engaging ears 374, 376 disposed to slidingly engage each side of the trench 38 as the planter traverses the field. The ears 374, 376 preferably engage the trench 38 at or adjacent to the bottom of the trench. The ears 374, 376 are preferably made of a electrically conductive material such as copper. The ears 374 are preferably fixed to and in electrical

communication with a central portion 372 housed within the firmer body 490. The central portion 372 preferably comprises an electrically conductive material such as copper; in some embodiments the central portion 372 comprises a copper rod. The central portion 372 is preferably in electrical communication with an electrical lead fixed to the central portion. The electrical conductivity sensor can measure the electrical conductivity within a trench by measuring the electrical current between soil-engaging ears 374 and 376.

[0095] Referring to Figure 4B, in some embodiments the system 300 measures electrical conductivity of soil adjacent the trench 38 by measuring an electrical potential between the forward electrical conductivity sensor 370f and the rearward electrical conductivity sensor 370f. In other embodiments, the electrical conductivity sensors 370f, 370r may be disposed in longitudinally spaced relation on the bottom of the seed firmer in order to measure electrical conductivity at the bottom of the seed trench.

[0096] In other embodiments, the electrical conductivity sensors 370 comprise one or more ground-working or ground-contacting devices (e.g., discs or shanks) that contact the soil and are preferably electrically isolated from one another or from another voltage reference. The voltage potential between the sensors 370 or other voltage reference is preferably measured by the system 300. The voltage potential or another electrical conductivity value derived from the voltage potential is preferably and reported to the operator. The electrical conductivity value may also be associated with the GPS-reported position and used to generate a map of the spatial variation in electrical conductivity throughout the field. In some such embodiments, the electrical conductivity sensors may comprise one or more opening discs of a planter row unit, row cleaner wheels of a planter row unit, ground- contacting shanks of a planter, ground-contacting shoes depending from a planter shank, shanks of a tillage tool, or discs of a tillage tool. In some embodiments a first electrical conductivity sensor may comprise a component (e.g., disc or shank) of a first agricultural row unit while a second electrical conductivity sensor comprises a component (e.g., disc or shank) of a second agricultural row unit, such that electrical conductivity of soil extending transversely between the first and second row units is measured. It should be appreciated that at least one of the electrical conductivity sensors described herein is preferably electrically isolated from the other sensor or voltage reference. In one example, the electrical conductivity sensor is mounted to an implement (e.g., to the planter row unit or tillage tool) by being first mounted to an electrically insulating component (e.g., a component made from an electrically insulating material such as polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, or a rubber-like polymer) which is in turn mounted to the implement.

[0097] Referring to Figure 4C, in some embodiments the system 300 measures electrical conductivity of soil between two row units 200 having a first seed firmer 400-1 and a second seed firmer 400-2, respectively, by measuring an electrical potential between an electrical conductivity sensor on the first seed firmer 400-1 and an electrical conductivity sensor on the second seed firmer 400-2. In some such embodiments, the electrical conductivity sensor 370 may comprise a larger ground- engaging electrode (e.g., a seed firmer housing) comprised of metal or other conductive material. It should be appreciated that any of the electrical conductivity sensors described herein may measure conductivity by any of the following combinations: (1 ) between a first probe on a ground-engaging row unit component (e.g., on a seed firmer, a row cleaner wheel, an opening disc, a shoe, a shank, a frog, a coulter, or a closing wheel) and a second probe on the same ground- engaging row unit component of the same row unit; (2) between a first probe on a first ground-engaging row unit component (e.g., on a seed firmer, a row cleaner wheel, an opening disc, a shoe, a shank, a frog, a coulter, or a closing wheel) and a second probe on a second ground-engaging row unit component (e.g., on a seed firmer, a row cleaner wheel, an opening disc, a shoe, a shank, a frog, a coulter, or a closing wheel) of the same row unit; or (3) between a first probe on a first ground- engaging row unit component (e.g. , on a seed firmer, a row cleaner wheel, an opening disc, a shoe, a shank, a frog, a coulter, or a closing wheel) on a first row unit and a second probe on a second ground-engaging row unit component (e.g., on a seed firmer, a row cleaner wheel, an opening disc, a shoe, a shank, a frog, a coulter, or a closing wheel) on a second row unit. Either or both of the row units described in combinations 1 through 3 above may comprise a planting row unit or another row unit (e.g., a tillage row unit or a dedicated measurement row unit) which may be mounted forward or rearward of the toolbar.

[0098] The reflectivity sensors 350, the temperature sensors 360, 360', 360", and the electrical conductivity sensors 370 (collectively, the "firmer-mounted sensors") are preferably in data communication with the monitor 50. In some embodiments, the firmer-mounted sensors are in data communication with the monitor 50 via a transceiver (e.g., a CAN transceiver) and the bus 60. In other embodiments, the firmer-mounted sensors are in data communication with the monitor 50 via wireless transmitter 62-1 (preferably mounted to the seed firmer) and wireless receiver 64. In some embodiments, the firmer-mounted sensors are in electrical communication with the wireless transmitter 62-1 (or the transceiver) via a multi-pin connector comprising a male coupler 472 and a female coupler 474. In firmer body embodiments having a removable portion 492, the male coupler 472 is preferably mounted to the removable portion and the female coupler 474 is preferably mounted to the remainder of the firmer body 190; the couplers 472, 474 are preferably disposed such that the couplers engage electrically as the removable portion is slidingly mounted to the firmer body.

[0099] Turning to Figure 19A, another embodiment of the seed firmer 400"' is illustrated incorporating a fiber-optic cable 1900. The fiber-optic cable 1900 preferably terminates at a lens 1902 in the bottom of the firmer 400"'. The fiber-optic cable 1900 preferably extends to a reflectivity sensor 350a, which is preferably mounted separately from the seed firmer, e.g., elsewhere on the row unit 200. In operation, light reflected from the soil (preferably the bottom of trench 28) travels to the reflectivity sensor 350a via the fiber-optic cable 1900 such that the reflectivity sensor 350a is enabled to measure reflectivity of the soil at a location remote from the seed firmer 400"'. In other embodiments such as the seed firmer embodiment 400"" illustrated in Figure 19B, the fiber-optic cable extends to a spectrometer 373 configured to analyze light transmitted from the soil. The spectrometer 373 is preferably configured to analyze reflectivity at a spectrum of wavelengths. The spectrometer 373 is preferably in data communication with the monitor 50. The spectrometer 373 preferably comprises a fiber-optic spectrometer such as model no. USB4000 available from Ocean Optics, Inc. in Dunedin, Florida. In the

embodiments 400"' and 400"", a modified firmer bracket 415' is preferably configured to secure the fiber-optic cable 1900.

[0100] Turning to Figures 25-26, another firmer embodiment 2500 is illustrated. The firmer 2500 includes an upper portion 2510 having a mounting portion 2520. The mounting portion 2520 is preferably stiffened by inclusion of a stiffening insert made of stiffer material than the mounting portion (e.g., the mounting portion may be made of plastic and the stiffening insert may be made of metal) in an inner cavity 2540 of the mounting portion 2520. The mounting portion 2520 preferably includes mounting tabs 2526, 2528 for releasably attaching the firmer 2500 to a bracket on the row unit. The mounting portion 2520 preferably includes mounting hooks 2522, 2524 for attaching a liquid application conduit (e.g., flexible tube) (not shown) to the firmer 2500. The upper portion 2510 preferably includes an internal cavity 2512 sized to receive the liquid application conduit. The internal cavity 2512 preferably includes a rearward aperture through which the liquid application conduit extends for dispensing liquid behind the firmer 2500. It should be appreciated that a plurality of liquid conduits may be inserted in the internal cavity 2512; additionally, a nozzle may be included at a terminal end of the conduit or conduits to redirect and/or split the flow of liquid applied in the trench behind the firmer 2500.

[0101] The firmer 2500 also preferably includes a ground-engaging portion 2530 mounted to the upper portion 2510. The ground-engaging portion 2530 may be removably mounted to the upper portion 2510; as illustrated, the ground-engaging portion is mounted to the upper portion by threaded screws 2560, but in other embodiments the ground-engaging portion may be installed and removed without the use of tools, e.g. by a slot-and-groove arrangement. The ground-engaging portion 2530 may also be permanently mounted to the upper portion 2510, e.g., by using rivets instead of screws 2560, or by molding the upper portion to the ground- engaging portion. The ground-engaging portion 2530 is preferably made of a material having greater wear-resistance than plastic such as metal (e.g., stainless steel or hardened white iron), may include a wear-resistant coating (or a non-stick coating as described herein), and may include a wear-resistant portion such as a tungsten carbide insert.

[0102] The ground-engaging portion 2530 preferably includes a sensor for detecting characteristics of the trench (e.g., soil moisture, soil organic matter, soil temperature, seed presence, seed spacing, percentage of seeds firmed, soil residue presence) such as a reflectivity sensor 2590, preferably housed in a cavity 2532 of the ground-engaging portion. The reflectivity sensor preferably includes a sensor circuit board 2596 having a sensor disposed to receive reflected light from the trench through a transparent window 2592. The transparent window 2592 is preferably mounted flush with a lower surface of the ground-engaging portion such that soil flows underneath the window without building up over the window or along an edge thereof. An electrical connection 2594 preferably connects the sensor circuit board 2596 to a wire or bus (not shown) placing the sensor circuit board in data

communication with the monitor 50.

[0103] Turning to Figures 5-14, another seed firmer embodiment 500 is illustrated. A flexible portion 504 is preferably configured to resiliently press a firmer body 520 into the seed trench 38. Mounting tabs 514, 515 releasably couple the flexible portion 504 to the firmer bracket 415, preferably as described in the '585 application.

[0104] A flexible liquid conduit 506 preferably conducts liquid (e.g., liquid fertilizer) from a container to an outlet 507 for depositing in or adjacent to the trench 38. The conduit 506 preferably extends through the firmer body 520 between the outlet 507 and a fitting 529 which preferably constrains the conduit 506 from sliding relative to the firmer body 520. The portion of the conduit may extend through an aperture formed in the firmer body 520 or (as illustrated) through a channel covered by a removable cap 530. The cap 530 preferably engages sidewalls 522, 524 of the firmer body 520 by hooked tabs 532. Hooked tabs 532 preferably retain sidewalls 522, 524 from warping outward in addition to retaining the cap 530 on the firmer body 520. A screw 533 also preferably retains the cap 530 on the firmer body 520.

[0105] The conduit 506 is preferably retained to the flexible portion 504 of the seed firmer 500 by mounting hooks 508, 509 and by the mounting tabs 514, 515. The conduit 506 is preferably resiliently grasped by arms 512, 513 of the mounting hooks 508, 509 respectively. The conduit 506 is preferably received in slots 516, 517 of mounting tabs 514, 515, respectively.

[0106] A harness 505 preferably comprises a wire or plurality of wires in electrical communication with the firmer-mounted sensors described below. The harness is preferably received in slots 510, 51 1 of the mounting hooks 508, 509 and additionally retained in place by the conduit 506. The harness 505 is preferably grasped by slots 518, 519 of the mounting tabs 514, 515, respectively; the harness 505 is preferably pressed through a resilient opening of each slot 518, 519 and the resilient opening returns into place so that the slots retain the harness 505 unless the harness is forcibly removed.

[0107] In some embodiments the lowermost trench-engaging portion of the seed firmer 500 comprises a plate 540. The plate 540 may comprise a different material and/or a material having different properties from the remainder of the firmer body 520; for example, the plate 540 may have a greater hardness than the remainder of the firmer body 520 and may comprise powder metal. In some embodiments, the entire firmer body 520 is made of a relatively hard material such as powder metal. In an installment phase, the plate 540 is mounted to the remainder of the firmer body 520, e.g., by rods 592 fixed to plate 540 and secured to the remainder of the firmer body by snap rings 594; it should be appreciated that the plate may be either removably mounted or permanently mounted to the remainder of the firmer body.

[0108] The seed firmer 500 is preferably configured to removably receive a reflectivity sensor 350 within a cavity 527 within the firmer body 520. In a preferred embodiment, the reflectivity sensor 350 is removably installed in the seed firmer 500 by sliding the reflectivity sensor 350 into the cavity 527 until flexible tabs 525, 523 snap into place, securing the reflectivity sensor 350 in place until the flexible tabs are bent out of the way for removal of the reflectivity sensor. The reflectivity sensor 350 may be configured to perform any of the measurements described above with respect to the reflectivity sensor of seed firmer 400. The reflectivity sensor 350 preferably comprises a circuit board 580 (in some embodiments an over-molded printed circuit board). The reflectivity sensor 350 preferably detects light transmitted through a lens 550 having a lower surface coextensive with the surrounding lower surface of the firmer body 550 such that soil and seeds are not dragged by the lens. In embodiments having a plate 540, the bottom surface of the lens 550 is preferably coextensive with a bottom surface of the plate 540. The lens 550 is preferably a transparent material such as sapphire. The interface between the circuit board 580 and the lens 550 is preferably protected from dust and debris; in the illustrated embodiment the interface is protected by an o-ring 552, while in other embodiments the interface is protected by a potting compound. In a preferred embodiment, the lens 550 is mounted to the circuit board 580 and the lens slides into place within the lowermost surface of the firmer body 520 (and/or the plate 540) when the reflectivity sensor 350 is installed. In such embodiments, the flexible tabs 523, 525 preferably lock the reflectivity sensor into a position wherein the lens 550 is coextensive with the lowermost surface of the firmer body 520.

[0109] The seed firmer 500 preferably includes a temperature sensor 360. The temperature sensor 360 preferably comprises a probe 560. The probe 560 preferably comprises a thermo-conductive rod (e.g., a copper rod) extending through the width of the firmer body 500 and having opposing ends extending from the firmer body 500 to contact either side of the trench 38. The temperature sensor 360 preferably also comprises a resistance temperature detector ("RTD") 564 fixed to (e.g., screwed into a threaded hole in) the probe 560; the RTD is preferably in electrical communication with the circuit board 580 via an electrical lead 585; the circuit board 580 is preferably configured to process both reflectivity and temperature measurements and is preferably in electrical communication with the harness 505. In embodiments in which the plate 540 and/or the remainder of the firmer body 520 comprise a thermally conductive material, an insulating material 562 preferably supports the probe 560 such that temperature changes in the probe are minimally affected by contact with the firmer body; in such embodiments the probe 560 is preferably primarily surrounded by air in the interior of the firmer body 520 and the insulating material 562 (or firmer body) preferably contacts a minimal surface area of the probe. In some embodiments the insulating material comprises a low- conductivity plastic such as polystyrene or polypropylene.

[0110] Turning to Figure 15, another embodiment 400' of the seed firmer is illustrated having a plurality of reflectivity sensors 350. Reflectivity sensors 350c, 350d and 350e are disposed to measure reflectivity of regions 352c, 352d and 352e, respectively, at and adjacent to the bottom of the trench 38. The regions 352c, 352d and 352e preferably constitute a substantially contiguous region preferably including all or substantially the entire portion of the trench in which seed rests after falling into the trench by gravity. In other embodiments, a plurality of temperature and/or electrical conductivity sensors are disposed to measure a larger, preferably substantially contiguous region.

[0111] Turning to Figure 16, another embodiment of a seed firmer 400" is illustrated having a plurality of reflectivity sensors 350 disposed to measure at either side of the trench 38 at various depths within in the trench. The reflectivity sensors 350f, 350k are disposed to measure reflectivity at or adjacent to the top of the trench 38. The reflectivity sensors 350h, 350i are disposed to measure reflectivity at or adjacent to the bottom of the trench 38. The reflectivity sensors 350g, 350j are disposed to measure reflectivity at an intermediate depth of the trench 38, e.g., at half the depth of the trench. It should be appreciated that in order to effectively make soil measurements at a depth at an intermediate depth of the trench, it is desirable to modify the shape of the seed firmer such that the sidewalls of the seed firmer engage the sides of the trench at an intermediate trench depth. Likewise, it should be appreciated that in order to effectively make soil measurements at a depth near the top of the trench (i.e., at or near the soil surface 40), it is desirable to modify the shape of the seed firmer such that the sidewalls of the seed firmer engage the sides of the trench at or near the top of the trench. In other embodiments, a plurality of temperature and/or electrical conductivity sensors are disposed to measure temperature and/or electrical conductivity, respectively, of soil at a plurality of depths within the trench 38.

[0112] As described above with respect to the system 300, in some

embodiments a second set of reflectivity sensors 350, temperature sensors 360, and electrical conductivity sensors 370 are mounted to a reference sensor assembly 1800. One such embodiment is illustrated in Figure 18, in which the reference sensor assembly opens a trench 39 in which a seed firmer 400 having firmer- mounted sensors is resiliently engaged in order to sense the soil characteristics of the bottom of the trench 39. The trench 39 is preferably at a shallow depth (e.g., between 1/8 and 1 /2 inch) or at a deep depth (e.g., between 3 and 5 inches). The trench is preferably opened by a pair of opening discs 1830-1 , 1830-2 disposed to open a v-shaped trench in the soil 40 and rotating about lower hubs 1834. The depth of the trench is preferably set by one or more gauge wheels 1820 rotating about upper hubs 1822. The upper and lower hubs are preferably fixedly mounted to a shank 1840. The seed firmer is preferably mounted to the shank 1840 by a firmer bracket 1845. The shank 1840 is preferably mounted to the toolbar 14. In some embodiments, the shank 1840 is mounted to the toolbar 14 by a parallel arm arrangement 1810 for vertical movement relative to the toolbar; in some such embodiments, the shank is resiliently biased toward the soil by an adjustable spring 1812 (or other downforce applicator). In the illustrated embodiment the shank 1840 is mounted forward of the toolbar 14; in other embodiments, the shank may be mounted rearward of the toolbar 14. In other embodiments, the firmer 400 may be mounted to the row unit shank 254, to a closing wheel assembly, or to a row cleaner assembly.

[0113] An embodiment of the reference sensor 1800' including an instrumented shank 1840' is illustrated in Figures 23 and 24. Reference sensors 350u, 350m, 350I, are preferably disposed on a lower end of the shank 1840 and disposed to contact soil on a sidewall of the trench 39 at or adjacent the top of the trench, at an intermediate trench depth, and at or adjacent the bottom of the trench, respectively. The shank 1840 extends into the trench and preferably includes an angled surface 1842 to which the reference sensors 350 are mounted; the angle of surface 1842 is preferably parallel to the sidewall of the trench 39.

[0114] It should be appreciated that the sensor embodiment of Figures 4A-4C may be mounted to and used in conjunction with implements other than seed planters such as tillage tools. For example, the seed firmer could be disposed to contact soil in a trench opened by (or soil surface otherwise passed over by) a tillage implement such as a disc harrow or soil ripper. On such equipment, the sensors could be mounted on a part of the equipment that contacts soil or on any extension that is connected to a part of the equipment and contacts soil. It should be appreciated that in some such embodiments, the seed firmer would not contact planted seed but would still measure and report soil characteristics as otherwise disclosed herein.

[0115] In another embodiment, any of the sensors (reflectivity sensor 350, temperature sensor 360, electrical conductivity sensor 370, capacitive moisture sensor 351 , and electronic tensiometer sensor 352) can be disposed in seed firmer 400' with an exposure through a side of seed firmer 400'. As illustrated in Figure 27A in one embodiment, seed firmer 400' has a protrusion 401 ' from a side of seed firmer 400' through which the sensors sense. Disposed in protrusion 401 ' is a lens 402'. Having protrusion 401 ' minimizes any buildup that blocks lens 402', and lens 402' can stay in contact with the soil.

[0116] Lens 402' can be made from any material that is durable to the abrasion caused by soil contact and transparent to the wavelengths of light used. In certain embodiment, the material has a Mohs hardness of at least 8. In certain

embodiments, the material is sapphire, ruby, diamond, moissanite (SiC), or toughened glass (such as Gorilla™ glass). In one embodiment, the material is sapphire. In one embodiment as illustrated in Figures 28A and 28B, lens 402' is a trapezoidal shape with sides sloped from the back 402'-b to the front 402'-f of lens 402'. In this embodiment, lens 402' can sit within protrusion 401 ' with no retainers against the back 402'-b of lens 402'. Sensors that are disposed behind lens 402' are then not obstructed by any such retainers. Alternatively, lens 402' can be disposed the opposite to the previous embodiment with the sides sloped from the front 402-f to the back 402-b.

[0117] For ease of assembly and for disposing sensors in seed firmer 400', seed firmer 400' can be fabricated from component parts. In this embodiment, seed firmer 400' has a resilient portion 410', which mounts to shank 254 and can urge seed firmer body portion 490' into resilient engagement with the trench 38. Firmer body portion 490' includes a firmer base 495', sensor housing 496', and lens body 498'. Base 495' is illustrated in Figures 29A to 29C. Sensor housing 496' is illustrated in Figure 30A, and a cover 497' for mating with sensor housing 496' is illustrated in Figure 30B. Lens body 498' is illustrated in Figures 31 A and 31 B, and lens body 498' is disposed in opening 499' in firmer base 495'. Lens 402' is disposed in lens opening 494' in lens body 498'. Sensors are disposed (such as on a circuit board, such as 580 or 2596) in sensor housing 496'. As illustrated in Figure 27B, there is a conduit 493 disposed through a side of resilient portion 410' and entering into sensor housing 496' for wiring (not shown) to connect to the sensors.

[0118] Protrusion 401 ' will primarily be on lens body 498', but a portion of protrusion 401 ' can also be disposed on firmer body 495' to either or both sides of lens body 498' to create a taper out to and back from protrusion 401 '. It is expected protrusion 401 ' will wear with contact with the soil. Disposing a major portion of protrusion 401 ' on lens body 498' allows for replacement of lens body 498' after protrusion 401 ' and/or lens 402' become worn or broken.

[0119] In another embodiment illustrated in Figure 53, a temperature sensor 360' is disposed in a seed firmer 400 (the reference to seed firmer 400 in this paragraph is to any seed firmer such as 400, 400', 400", or 400"') to measure temperature on an interior wall 409 that is in thermal conductivity with an exterior of seed firmer 400. Temperature sensor 360' measures the temperature of interior wall 409. In one embodiment, the area of interior wall 409 that temperature sensor 360' measures is no more than 50% of the area of interior wall 409. In other embodiments, the area is no more than 40%, no more than 30%, no more than 20%, no more than 10%, or no more than 5%. The smaller the area, the faster that temperature sensor 360' can react to changes in temperature. In one embodiment, temperature sensor 360' is a thermistor. Temperature sensor 360' can be in electrical communication with a circuit board (such as circuit board 580 or 2596).

[0120] In another embodiment illustrated in Figure 54, a temperature sensor 360" is disposed through seed firmer 400 (the reference to seed firmer 400 in this paragraph is to any seed firmer such as 400, 400', 400", or 400"') to measure temperature of soil directly. Temperature sensor 360" has an internal thermally conductive material 1361 covered by a thermally insulating material 1362 with a portion of thermally conductive material 1361 exposed to contact soil. The thermally conductive material in one embodiment can be copper. Temperature sensor 360" can be in electrical communication with a circuit board (such as circuit board 580 or 2596).

[0121] In either of the embodiments in Figures 53 and 54, temperature sensor 360', 360" is modular. It can be a separate part that can be in communication with monitor 50 and separately replaceable from other parts. [0122] In one embodiment with seed firmer 400', the sensor is the reflectivity sensor 350. Reflectivity sensor 350 can be two components with an emitter 350-e and a detector 350-d. This embodiment is illustrated in Figure 32.

[0123] In certain embodiments, the wavelength used in reflectivity sensor 350 is in a range of 400 to 1600 nm. In another embodiment, the wavelength is 550 to 1450 nm. In one embodiment, there is a combination of wavelengths. In one embodiment, sensor 350 has a combination of 574 nm, 850 nm, 940 nm, and 1450nm. In another embodiment, sensor 350 has a combination of 589nm, 850 nm, 940 nm, and 1450nm. In another embodiment, sensor 350 has a combination of 640 nm, 850 nm, 940 nm, and 1450nm. In another embodiment, the 850 nm wavelength in any of the previous embodiments is replaced with 1200 nm. In another embodiment, the 574 nm wavelength of any of the previous embodiments is replaced with 590 nm. For each of the wavelengths described herein, it is to be understood that the number is actually +/- 10 nm of the listed value.

[0124] In one embodiment, the field of view from the front 402-f of lens 402' to the soil surface is 0 to 7.5 mm (0 to 0.3 inches). In another embodiment, the field of view is 0 to 6.25 mm (0 to 0.25 inches). In another embodiment, the field of view is 0 to 5 mm (0 to 0.2 inches). In another embodiment, the field of is 0 to 2.5 mm (0 to 0.1 inches).

[0125] As seed firmer 400' travels across trench 38, there may be instances where there is a gap between trench 38 and seed firmer 400' such that ambient light will be detected by reflectivity sensor 350. This will give a falsely high result. In one embodiment to remove the signal increase from ambient light, emitter 350-e can be pulsed on and off. The background signal is measured when there is no signal from emitter 350-e. The measured reflectivity is then determined by subtracting the background signal from the raw signal when emitter 350-e is emitting to provide the actual amount of reflectivity.

[0126] As shown in Figure 32, when reflectivity sensor 350 has just one emitter 350-e and one detector 350-d, the area of overlap between the area illuminated by emitter 350-e and the area viewed by detector 350-d can be limited. In one embodiment as illustrated in Figure 33, emitter 350-e and detector 350-d can be angled towards each other to increase the overlap. While this is effective, this embodiment does increase the manufacturing cost to angle the emitter 350-e and detector 350-d. Also, when the surface of trench 38 is not smooth, there can be some ray of light 999 that will impact trench 38 and not be reflected towards detector 350-d.

[0127] In another embodiment illustrated in Figure 34, the configuration from Figure 32 can be used, and a prism 450' with a sloped side 451 ' disposed under emitter 350-e can refract the light from emitter 350-e towards the area viewed by detector 350-d. Again with a single emitter 350-e, ray of light 999 may impact trench 38 and not be reflected towards detector 350-d.

[0128] In another embodiment illustrated in Figure 35, sensor 350 can have two emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 and one detector 350-d. This increases the overlap between the area viewed by detector 350-d and the area illuminated by emitters 350- e-1 and 350-e-2. In another embodiment, to further increase the overlap, emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 can be angled towards detector 350-d as illustrated in Figure 36.

[0129] In another embodiment illustrated in Figure 37, two emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 are disposed next to detector 350-d. A prism 450" has two sloped surfaces 459-1 and 459-2 for refracting light from emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 towards the area viewed by detector 350-d.

[0130] In another embodiment illustrated in Figure 38, a single emitter 350-e can be used in conjunction with a prism 400" to approximate a dual emitter. Prism 450"' is designed with angled sides to utilize the critical angle of the material used to make prism 450" (to keep light within the material). The angles vary depending on the material. In one embodiment, the material for prism 450"' is polycarbonate. A portion of the light from emitter 350-e will impact side 451 and be reflected to side 452 to side 453 to side 454 before exiting bottom 455. Optionally, spacers 456-1 and 456-2 can be disposed on the bottom 455 to provide a gap between prism 450"' and lens 550.

[0131] In another embodiment, illustrated in Figure 39, reflectivity sensor has one emitter 350-e and two detectors 350-d-1 and 350-d-2. As shown, emitter 350-e and detector 350-d-1 are aligned as viewed into the figure. Detector 350-d-2 is angled towards emitter 350-1 and detector 350-d-2.

[0132] In another embodiment that can be used with any of the previous embodiments or following embodiments, an aperture plate 460 can be disposed adjacent to the sensor 350 with apertures 461 adjacent to each emitter 350-e and detector 350-d. This embodiment is illustrated in Figure 40 with the embodiment from Figure 37. The aperture plate 460 can assist in controlling the half angles.

[0133] In another embodiment illustrated in Figure 41 , a reflectivity sensor 350 has one emitter 350-e and one detector 350-d. Disposed adjacent to the detector is an orifice plate 460 that is only controlling the light entering detector 350-d. Prism 450"" is then disposed adjacent to the emitter 350-e and detector 350-d.

[0134] In another embodiment of a prism, multiple views of prism 450 can be seen in Figures 42A-42G.

[0135] Figure 43 is a cross-sectional view of seed firmer 400' of Figure 27A taken at section A-A. Two emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 and one detector 350-d are disposed in sensor housing 496'. Prism 450 from Figures 42A-42G is disposed between emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 and detector 350-d and lens 402'.

[0136] In another embodiment as illustrated in Figures 44A and 44B, there is a reflectivity sensor 350 that has two emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 in line with a detector 350-d-1 . As viewed the emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 are pointed out of the paper, and the view of detector 350-d-1 is pointed out of the paper. There is a second detector that is offset from emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 and detector 350-d- 1 . In another embodiment (not shown) emitter 350-e-2 is omitted. As seen in Figure 44B, detector 350-d-2 is angled from vertical by an angle a and is viewing towards emitters 350-e-1 and 350-e-2 and detector 350-d-1 , which are aligned into the paper. In one embodiment, the angle a is 30 to 60°. In another embodiment, the angle a is 45°. In one embodiment, the wavelength of light used in this arrangement is 940 nm. This arrangement allows for measurement of void spaces in soil. Detecting void spaces in soil will inform how effective tillage has been. The less or smaller void spaces indicates more compaction and less effective tillage. More or larger void spaces indicates better tillage. Having this measurement of tillage effectiveness allows for adjustment of downforce on row unit 200 as described herein.

[0137] The depth away from seed firmer 400, 400' and the length of void spaces can be measured by this arrangement. For short distances (generally up to 2.5 cm (1 inch) or up to about 1 .27 cm (0.5 inches), the signal output from detector 350-d-2 increases as the distance to the target surface increases. While the signal from the primary reflectance detector, 350-d-1 , stays mostly constant to slightly decreasing. An illustrative reflectance measurement is shown in Figure 47 along with a corresponding calculated height off of target. The reflectance measurement from 350-d-1 9001 and the reflectance measurement from 350-d-2 9002 are shown.

When reflectance measurement from 350-d-1 9001 and the reflectance

measurement from 350-d-2 9002 are approximately the same, region 9003 is when target soil is flush with lens 402'. As a void is detected at region 9004, reflectance measurement from 350-d-1 9001 remains about the same or decreases, and the reflectance measurement from 350-d-2 9002 increases. The distance from the target surface is a function of the ratio between signals produced by 350-d-1 and 350-d-2. In one embodiment, the distance is calculated as ( 350-d-2 signal - 350-d- 1 signal ) / ( 350-d-2 signal + 350-d-1 signal ) * scaling constant. The scaling constant is a number that converts the reflectance measurement into distance. For the illustrated configuration, the scaling factor is 0.44. The scaling factor is measured and depends on emitter and detector placement, aperture plate dimensions, and prism geometry. In one embodiment, a scaling factor can be determined by placing a target at a known distance. A plot of the calculated target distance produces an elevation profile 9005 along the scanned surface. Knowing travel speed, the length 9006, depth 9007, and spacing 9008 of these voids can be calculated. A running average of these void characteristics (length 9006, depth 9007, and spacing 9008) can be calculated and then reported as another metric to characterize the texture of the soil being scanned. For example, once every second, a summary of average void length, average void depth, and number of voids during that period could be recorded/transmitted to monitor 50. The timing interval can be any selected amount of time greater than 0. Having a shorter amount of time, a smaller space is analyzed. An example of monitor 50 displaying on screen 2310 void length 231 1 , void depth 2312, and number of voids 2313 is illustrated in Figure 48.

[0138] In another embodiment, any scratches or films that form on lens 402' will affect the reflectivity detected by reflectivity sensor 350. There will be an increase in internal reflectivity within seed firmer 400, 400'. The increase in reflectivity will increase the reflectance measurement. This increase can be accounted for when seed firmer 400, 400' is removed from trench 38. The reading of seed firmer 400, 400' at this time will become the new base reading, e.g. zeroed out. The next time seed firmer 400, 400' is run in trench 38, the reflectivity above the new base or zero reading will be the actually measured reading. [0139] In another embodiment, the reflectivity measurement from reflectivity sensor 350 allows for a seed germination moisture value to be obtained from a data table and displayed to an operator on monitor 50. Seed germination moisture is a dimensionless measurement related to the amount of water that is available to a seed for each given soil type. For different types of soil, water is retained differently. For example, sandy soil does not hold onto water as much as clay soil does. Even though there can be more water in clay than sand, there can be the same amount of water that is released from the soil to the seed. Seed germination moisture is a measurement of weight gain of a seed that has been placed in soil. Seed is placed in soil for a sufficient period of time to allow moisture to enter the seed. In one embodiment, three days is the period. The weight of the seed before and after is measured. Also, the reflectivity of soils at different water contents is stored in a data table. A scale of 1 to 10 can be used. Numbers in the middle of the scale, such as 4-7, can be associated with water contents in each soil type that is an acceptable level of water for seeds. Low numbers, such as 1 -3, can be used to indicate that soil is too dry for the seed. High numbers, such as 8-10, can be used to indicate that soil is too wet for the seed. Knowing the soil type as input by the operator and the measured reflectivity, seed germination moisture can be obtained from the data table. The result can be displayed on monitor 50 with the actual number. Also, the result can be accompanied by a color. For example, the font color of the reported result or the screen color on monitor 50 can use green for values within the acceptable level and another color, such as yellow or red, for values that are high or low. An example of monitor 50 displaying on screen 2300 seed germination moisture 2301 is illustrated in Figure 45. Alternatively, seed generation moisture 2301 can be displayed on monitor 50 in Figure 20. Also, a uniform moisture can be displayed on monitor 50 (not shown). Uniform moisture is the standard deviation of seed germination moisture.

[0140] Depending on the seed germination moisture reading, the depth of planting can be adjusted as described herein. If the seed germination moisture is indicating too dry of conditions, then the depth can be increased to go deeper until a specified moisture level is achieved. If the seed germination moisture is indicating too moist, then the depth can be decreased to go shallower until a specified moisture level is achieved. [0141] In another embodiment, the uniformity of moisture or moisture variability can be measured and displayed on monitor 50. An example of monitor 50 displaying on screen 2320 uniformity of moisture 2321 and/or displaying on screen 2330 moisture variability 2331 are illustrated in Figures 50 and 51 . One or both can be displayed, or both can be displayed on the same screen. Uniformity of moisture is 1 - moisture variability. Any of the moisture readings can be used, such as capacitance moisture, seed germination moisture, or even volumetric water content or matrix potential or days until germination, to calculate uniformity of moisture and moisture variability. Moisture variability is deviation from the average measurement. In one embodiment, moisture variability is calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the average using any of the moisture measurements. This provides a percentage. Any other mathematical method for expressing variation in measurement can also be used. In one embodiment, root mean square can be used in place of the standard deviation. In addition to displaying the result on monitor 50, the result can be accompanied by a color. For example, the font color of the reported result or the screen color on monitor 50 can use green for values within the acceptable level and another color, such as yellow or red, for values that are unacceptable. For the above days to germination, this is determined by creating a database by placing seeds in different moisture levels and measuring the days until germination. Uniformity of moisture and moisture variability is then the variability in the days until germination.

[0142] Depending on the uniformity of moisture reading or moisture variability reading, the depth of planting can be adjusted as described herein. In one embodiment, depth can be adjusted to maximize uniformity of moisture and minimize moisture variability.

[0143] In another embodiment, an emergence environment score can be calculated and displayed on monitor 50. An example of monitor 50 displaying on screen 2340 an emergence environment score 2441 is illustrated in Figure 52. The emergence environment score is a combination of temperature and moisture correlated to how long a seed takes to germinate under these conditions. A database can be created by placing seeds in different combinations of temperature and moisture and measuring the days until germination. The emergence

environment score displayed on monitor 50 can be the days until germination from the database. In another embodiment, the emergence environment score can be the percentage of seeds planted that will germinate within a selected number of days. The selected number of days can be input into monitor 50. In another embodiment, a scaled score can be used that is based on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 representing the shortest number of days that a seed takes to germinate and 10 representing the longest number of days that a seed takes to germinate. For example, if a seed can germinate within 2 days, this is assigned a value of 1 , and if the longest that the seed takes to germinate is 17 days, this is assigned a value of 10. In addition to displaying the result on monitor 50, the result can be accompanied by a color. For example, the font color of the reported result or the screen color on monitor 50 can use green for values within the selected number of days and another color, such as yellow or red, for values that are greater than the selected number of days.

[0144] Depending on the emergence environment score, the depth of planting can be adjusted as described herein. In one embodiment, depth can be adjusted to minimize the number of days to germination.

[0145] In another embodiment, any of the previous embodiments can be in a device separate from seed firmer 400, 400'. As illustrated in Figure 46, any of the sensors described herein (sensor 350 is illustrated in in the Figure) is disposed in sensor arm 5000. Sensor arm 5000 has flexible portion 5001 that is attached to seed firmer 400"' at an end of flexible portion 410"' of seed firmer 400"' proximate to bracket insert portion 41 1 "'. At the opposite end of flexible portion 5001 is base 5002. Sensor 350 is disposed in base 5002 behind lens 5003. While it is desirable for any of the sensors to be in seed firmer 400"', there may be times when a difference in the applied force is needed. In one embodiment, seed firmer 400"' may need a lower amount of force to firm a seed but a greater force is needed to keep the sensor in soil contact. A different amount of stiffness can be designed into flexible portion 5001 as compared to flexible portion 410"'. By having the seed firmed by seed firmer 400, 400' first, then the biasing from sensor arm 5000 does not touch the seed that is already firmed into trench 38 or does not move the seed if contact is made.

[0146] In other embodiments, any of the sensors do not need to be disposed in a firmer, and in particular any of the embodiments illustrated in Figures 27A to 54. The sensors can be in any implement that is disposed on an agricultural implement in contact with the soil. For example, firmer body 490 can be mounted to any bracket and disposed anywhere on an agricultural implement and in contact with soil. Examples of an agricultural implement include, but are not limited to, planters, harvesters, sprayers, side dress bars, tillers, fertilizer spreaders, and tractor.

[0147] Figure 49 illustrates a flow diagram of one embodiment for a method 4900 of obtaining soil measurements and then generating a signal to actuate any implement on any agricultural implement. The method 4900 is performed by hardware (circuitry, dedicated logic, etc.), software (such as is run on a general purpose computer system or a dedicated machine or a device), or a combination of both. In one embodiment, the method 4900 is performed by at least one system or device (e.g., monitor 50, soil monitoring system, seed firmer, sensors, implement, row unit, etc). The system executes instructions of a software application or program with processing logic. The software application or program can be initiated by a system or may notify an operator or user of a machine (e.g., tractor, planter, combine) depending on whether soil measurements cause a signal to actuate an implement.

[0148] In any embodiment herein, at operation 4902, a system or device (e.g., soil monitoring system, monitor 50, seed firmer, sensors) can obtain soil

measurements (e.g., measurements for moisture, organic matter, porosity, texture/type of soil, furrow residue, etc.). At operation 4904, the system or device (e.g., soil monitoring system, monitor 50) can generate a signal to actuate any implement on any agricultural implement (e.g., change a population of planted seeds by controlling a seed meter, change seed variety (e.g., hybrid), change furrow depth, change application rate of fertilizer, fungicide, and/or insecticide, change applied downforce or upforce of an agricultural implement, such as a planter or tiller, control the force applied by a row cleaner) in response to obtaining soil measurements. This can be done in real time on the go. Examples of soil measurements that can be measured and the control of implements include, but are not limited to, :

A) moisture, organic matter, porosity, or texture/type of soil to change a population of planted seeds by controlling a seed meter;

B) moisture, organic matter, porosity, or texture/type of soil to change seed variety (e.g., hybrid);

C) moisture, organic matter, porosity, or texture/type of soil to change furrow depth:

D) moisture, organic matter, porosity, or texture/type of soil to change application rate of fertilizer, fungicide, and/or insecticide: E) moisture, organic matter, porosity, or texture/type of soil to change applied downforce or upforce of an agricultural implement, such as a planter or tiller:

F) furrow residue to control the force applied by a row cleaner.

[0149] Data processing and display

[0150] Referring to Figure 20, the implement monitor 50 may display a soil data summary 2000 displaying a representation (e.g., numerical or legend-based representation) of soil data gathered using the seed firmer 400 and associated sensors. The soil data may be displayed in windows such as a soil moisture window 2020 and soil temperature window 2025. A depth setting window 2030 may additionally show the current depth setting of the row units of the implement, e.g., the depth at which the seed firmers 400 are making their respective measurements. A reflectivity variation window 2035 may show a statistical reflectivity variation during a threshold period (e.g., the prior 30 seconds) or over a threshold distance traveled by the implement (e.g., the preceding 30 feet). The statistical reflectivity variation may comprise any function of the reflectivity signal (e.g., generated by each reflectivity sensor 350) such as the variance or standard deviation of the reflectivity signal. The monitor 50 may additionally display a representation of a predicted agronomic result (e.g., percentage of plants successfully emerged) based on the reflectivity variation value. For example, values of reflectivity emergence may be used to look up a predicted plant emergence value in an empirically-generated database (e.g., stored in memory of the implement monitor 50 or stored in and updated on a remote server in data communication with the implement monitor) associating reflectivity values with predicted plant emergence.

[0151] Each window in the soil data summary 2100 preferably shows an average value for all row units ("rows") at which the measurement is made and optionally the row unit for which the value is highest and/or lowest along with the value associated with such row unit or row units. Selecting (e.g., clicking or tapping) each window preferably shows the individual (row-by-row) values of the data associated with the window for each of the row units at which the measurement is made.

[0152] A carbon content window 2005 preferably displays an estimate of the soil carbon content. The carbon content is preferably estimated based on the electrical conductivity measured by the electrical conductivity sensors 370, e.g., using an empirical relation or empirical look-up table relating electrical conductivity to an estimated carbon content percentage. The window 2005 preferably additionally displays the electrical conductivity measured by the electrical conductivity sensors 370.

[0153] An organic matter window 2010 preferably displays an estimate of the soil organic matter content. The organic matter content is preferably estimated based on the reflectivity at one or a plurality of wavelengths measured by the reflectivity sensors 350, e.g., using an empirical relation or empirical look-up table relating reflectivity at one or a plurality of wavelengths to an estimated organic matter percentage.

[0154] A soil components window 2015 preferably displays an estimate of the fractional presence of one or a plurality of soil components, e.g., nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and carbon. Each soil component estimate is preferably based on the reflectivity at one or a plurality of wavelengths measured by the reflectivity sensors 350, e.g., using an empirical relation or empirical look-up table relating reflectivity at one or a plurality of wavelengths to an estimated fractional presence of a soil component. In some embodiments, the soil component estimate is preferably determined based on a signal or signals generated by the spectrometer 373. In some embodiments, the window 2015 additionally displays a ratio between the carbon and nitrogen components of the soil.

[0155] A moisture window 2020 preferably displays an estimate of soil moisture. The moisture estimate is preferably based on the reflectivity at one or a plurality of wavelengths (e.g., 930 or 940 nanometers) measured by the reflectivity sensors 350, e.g., using an empirical relation or empirical look-up table relating reflectivity at one or a plurality of wavelengths to an estimated moisture. In some embodiments, the moisture measurement is determined as disclosed in the '975 application.

[0156] A temperature window 2025 preferably displays an estimate of soil temperature. The temperature estimate is preferably based on the signal generated by one or more temperature sensors 350.

[0157] A depth window 2030 preferably displays the current depth setting. The monitor 50 preferably also enables the user to remotely actuate the row unit 200 to a desired trench depth as disclosed in International Patent Application No.

PCT/US2014/029352, incorporated herein by reference.

[0158] Turning to Figure 21 , the monitor 50 is preferably configured to display one or more map windows 2100 in which a plurality of soil data, measurement, and/or estimate values (such as the reflectivity variation) are represented by blocks 2122, 2124, 2126, each block having a color or pattern associating the measurement at the block position to the ranges 21 12, 21 14, 21 16, respectively (of legend 21 10) in which the measurements fall. A map window 2100 is preferably generated and displayed for each soil data, measurement, and/or estimate displayed on the soil data screen 2000, preferably including carbon content, electrical conductivity, organic matter, soil components (including nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium), moisture and soil temperature. The subsets may correspond to numerical ranges of reflectivity variation. The subsets may be named according to an agronomic indication empirically associated with the range of reflectivity variation. For example, a reflectivity variation below a first threshold at which no emergence failure is predicted may be labeled "Good"; a reflectivity variation between the first threshold and a second threshold at which predicted emergence failure is agronomically unacceptable (e.g., is likely to affect yield by more than a yield threshold) may be labeled "Acceptable"' a reflectivity variation above the second threshold may be labeled "Poor emergence predicted".

[0159] Turning to Figure 22, the monitor 50 is preferably configured to display one or more planting data windows including planting data measured by the seed sensors 305 and/or the reflectivity sensors 350. The window 2205 preferably displays a good spacing value calculated based on seed pulses from the optical (or electromagnetic) seed sensors 305. The window 2210 preferably displays a good spacing value based on seed pulses from the reflectivity sensors 350. Referring to Figure 17, seed pulses 1502 in a reflectivity signal 1500 may be identified by a reflectance level exceeding a threshold T associated with passage of a seed beneath the seed firmer. A time of each seed pulse 1502 may be established to be the midpoint of each period P between the first and second crossings of the threshold T. Once times of seed pulses are identified (whether from the seed sensor 305 or from the reflectivity sensor 350), the seed pulse times are preferably used to calculate a good spacing value as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No.

13/752,031 ("the Ό31 application"), incorporated by reference herein. In some embodiments, in addition to good spacing other seed planting information (including, e.g., population, singulation, skips and multiples) is also calculated and displayed on the screen 2200 according to the methods disclosed in the Ό31 application. In some embodiments, the same wavelength (and/or the same reflectivity sensor 350) is used for seed detection as moisture and other soil data measurements; in some embodiments the wavelength is about 940 nanometers. Where the reflectivity signal 1500 is used for both seed detection and soil measurement (e.g. , moisture), the portion of the signal identified as a seed pulse (e.g., the periods P) are preferably not used in calculating the soil measurement; for example, the signal during each period P may be assumed to be a line between the times immediately prior to and immediately following the period P, or in other embodiments it may be assumed to be the average value of the signal during the previous 30 seconds of signal not falling within any seed pulse period P. In some embodiments, the screen 2200 also displays a percentage or absolute difference between the good spacing values or other seed planting information determined based on seed sensor pulses and the same information determined based on reflectivity sensor pulses.

[0160] In some embodiments, seed sensing is improved by selectively measuring reflectivity at a wavelength or wavelengths associated with a characteristic or characteristics of the seed being planted. In some such embodiments, the system 300 prompts the operator to select a crop, seed type, seed hybrid, seed treatment and/or another characteristic of the seed to be planted. The wavelength or wavelengths at which reflectivity is measured to identify seed pulses is preferably selected based on the seed characteristic or characteristics selected by the operator.

[0161] In some embodiments, the "good spacing" values are calculated based on both the seed pulse signals generated by the optical or electromagnetic seed sensors 305 and the reflectivity sensors 350.

[0162] In some such embodiments, the "good spacing" value for a row unit is based on the seed pulses generated the reflectivity sensor 350 associated with the row unit, which are filtered based on the signal generated by the optical seed sensor 305 on the same row unit. For example, a confidence value may be associated each seed pulse generated by the optical seed sensor, e.g., directly related to the amplitude of the optical seed sensor seed pulse; that confidence value may then be modified based on the optical seed sensor signal, e.g. , increased if a seed pulse was observed at the optical seed sensor within a threshold period prior to the reflectivity sensor seed pulse, and decreased if the a seed pulse was not observed at the optical seed sensor within a threshold period prior to the reflectivity sensor seed pulse. A seed pulse is then recognized and stored as a seed placement if the modified confidence value exceeds a threshold. [0163] In other such embodiments, the "good spacing" value for a row unit is based on the seed pulses generated the optical seed sensor 305 associated with the row unit, which are modified based on the signal generated by the reflectivity sensor 350 on the same row unit. For example, the seed pulses generated by the optical seed sensor 305 may be associated with the time of the next seed pulse generated by the reflectivity sensor 350. If no seed pulse is generated by the reflectivity sensor 350 within a threshold time after the seed pulse generated by the seed sensor 305, then the seed pulse generated by the seed sensor 305 may be either ignored (e.g. , if a confidence value associated with the seed sensor seed pulse is below a threshold) or adjusted by an average time delay between reflectivity sensor seed pulses and seed sensor seed pulses (e.g., the average time delay for the last 10, 100 or 300 seeds).

[0164] In addition to displaying seed planting information such as good spacing values, in some embodiments the seed pulses measured may be used to time deposition of in-trench liquid and other crop inputs in order to time application such that the applied crop input lands on the seed, adjacent to the seed, or between seeds as desired. In some such embodiments, a liquid applicator valve selectively permitting liquid to flow from outlet 507 of the liquid conduit 506 is briefly opened a threshold time (e.g., 0 seconds, 1 ms, 10 ms, 100 ms or 1 second) after a seed pulse 1502 is identified in signal 1500 from the reflectivity sensor 350 associated with the same row unit 200 as the liquid applicator valve.

[0165] A signal generated by the reflectivity sensor may also be used to identify the presence of crop residue (e.g., corn stalks) in the seed trench. Where reflectivity in a range of wavelengths associated with crop residue (e.g., between 560 and 580 nm) exceeds a threshold, the system 300 preferably determines that crop residue is present in the trench at the current GPS-reported location. The spatial variation in residue may then be mapped and displayed to a user. Additionally, the

downpressure supplied to a row cleaner assembly (e.g., a pressure-controlled row cleaner as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 8,550,020, incorporated herein by reference) may be adjusted either automatically by the system 300 in response to the identification of residue or adjusted by the user. In one example, the system may command a valve associated with a row cleaner downpressure actuator to increase by 5 psi in response to an indication that crop residue is present in the seed trench. Similarly, a closing wheel downforce actuator may also be adjusted by the system 300 or the operator in response to an indication that crop residue is present in the seed trench.

[0166] In some embodiments, an orientation of each seed is determined based on the width of reflectivity-based seed pulse periods P. In some such embodiments, pulses having a period longer than a threshold (an absolute threshold or a threshold percentage in excess of the mean pulse period) are categorized in a first category while pulses having a shorter period than the threshold are categorized in a second category. The first and second category preferably correspond to first and second seed orientations. Percentages of seeds over the previous 30 seconds falling in the first and/or second category may be displayed on the screen 2200. The orientation of each seed is preferably mapped spatially using the GPS coordinates of the seed such that individual plant performance may be compared to seed orientation during scouting operations.

[0167] In some embodiments, a determination of seed-to-soil contact is made based on the existence or lack of a recognized seed pulse generated by the reflectivity sensor 350. For example, where a seed pulse is generated by the optical seed sensor 305 and no seed pulse is generated by the reflectivity sensor 350 within a threshold time after the optical seed sensor seed pulse, a "Poor" seed-to-soil contact value is preferably stored and associated with the location at which the reflectivity sensor seed pulse was expected. An index of seed-to-soil contact may be generated for a row or rows by comparing the number of seeds having "Poor" seed- to-soil contact over a threshold number of seeds planted, distance traveled, or time elapsed. The operator may then be alerted via the monitor 50 as to the row or rows exhibiting seed-to-soil contact below a threshold value of the index. Additionally, the spatial variation in seed-to-soil contact may be mapped and displayed to the user. Additionally, a criterion representing the percentage of seeds firmed (e.g., not having "Poor" seed-to-soil contact) over a preceding time period or number of seeds may be displayed to the operator.

[0168] In one embodiment, the depth of planting can be adjusted based on soil properties measured by the sensors and/or camera so that seeds are planted where the desired temperature, moisture, and/or conductance is found in trench 38. A signal can be sent to the depth adjustment actuator 380 to modify the position of the depth adjustment rocker 268 and thus the height of the gauge wheels 248 to place the seed at the desired depth. In one embodiment, an overall goal is to have the seeds germinate at about the same time. This leads to greater consistency and crop yield. When certain seeds germinate before other seeds, the earlier resulting plants can shade out the later resulting plants to deprive them of needed sunlight and can disproportionately take up more nutrients from the surrounding soil, which reduces the yield from the later germinating seeds. Days to germination is based on a combination of moisture availability (soil moisture tension) and temperature.

[0169] In another embodiment, the depth can be adjusted based on a

combination of current temperature and moisture conditions in the field and the predicted temperature and moisture delivery from a weather forecast. This process is described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2016/0037709, which is incorporated herein by reference.

[0170] In any of the foregoing embodiments for depth control for moisture, the control can be further limited by a minimum threshold temperature. A minimum threshold temperature (for example 10°C (50°F)) can be set so that the planter will not plant below a depth where the minimum threshold temperature is. This can be based on the actual measured temperature or by accounting for the temperature measured at a specific time of day. Throughout the day, soil is heated by sunshine or cooled during night time. The minimum threshold temperature can be based on an average temperature in the soil over a 24 hour period. The difference between actual temperature at a specific time of day and average temperature can be calculated and used to determine the depth for planting so that the temperature is above a minimum threshold temperature.

[0171] The soil conditions of conductivity, moisture, temperature, and/or reflectance can be used to directly vary planted population (seeds/acre), nutrient application (gallons/acre), and/or pesticide application (Ib./acre) based off of zones created by organic matter, soil moisture, and/or electrical conductivity.

[0172] In another embodiment, any of the sensors or camera can be adapted to harvest energy to power the sensor and/or wireless communication. As the sensors are dragged through the soil, the heat generated by soil contact or the motion of the sensors can be used as an energy source for the sensors.

[0173] Sensor Leveling

[0174] In an implement that has sensors across the implement for measuring properties, a method is provided to level the results of the sensors. This can be needed when a measured property is sensitive to variations in what the sensor is measuring. When measuring organic matter using light reflectance, the calculated organic matter is sensitive to the reflection value. On an implement drawn across a field, the organic matter is not significantly changing across the implement. Leveling the sensor readings provides a more accurate measurement of the field.

[0175] Sensor leveling compares the reading for each sensor to an average of all sensors on an implement, to an average of all sensors in a section, or to adjacent sensors. One type of sensor is a reflectance sensor that measures reflected light. The reflectance can be at a single wavelength or a plurality of wavelengths. When measuring reflectance at several wavelengths, leveling can be conducted at each wavelength separately.

[0176] In one embodiment, reflectance sensors measure reflectance to determine organic matter or moisture level in soil. Examples of implements include, but are not limited to, a planting implement (such as a row planter, an air seeder, or a grain drill), a tillage implement, a side dress bar, a sprayer, or a harvester.

[0177] In one embodiment, as the sensors are moved across a field, a

cumulative average of each row will be about the same for all rows after a period of time, such as at least 10 minutes or 10 to 15 minutes.

[0178] The following example illustrates sensor leveling for a six row planter having a reflectance sensor on each row. Any of the reflectance sensors described above can be used. Row 1 will be illustrated at one wavelength. The same leveling can also occur for each row and for each wavelength. In the example, readings are taken at 5 Hz. But, readings can be taken at any chosen frequency.

[0179] First, it can be determined that sensor readings may be used in a running average. Examples include, but are not limited to, are the sensors in the soil, is the implement moving, and/or is the implement conducting an operation, such as planting.

[0180] The reading of row 1 is measured and compared to an average of all sensors. If the reading is not faulty, as described below, then the reading is added to a table of filtered reflectance values, which is depicted in Figure 55A. Reflectance readings are continued to accumulate as the implement passes through the field, which can have different soil zones, which is illustrated in Figure 55B. When enough readings have been taken to be able to make a correlation, such as linear regression, a correlation between the data points is calculated to provide a correction factor for the row, which is illustrated in Figure 55C. [0181] The reported number, which is the corrected number, is reported to monitor 50 and/or stored in memory to create a map of the reading at the GPS coordinate. The reported number can be the actual reflectance, or it can be the corresponding organic matter or moisture level.

[0182] Readings can continue to be added to the average for any selected period of time, after which, readings that are older than the selected time are dropped from the calculation. In one embodiment, the time is at least 20 minutes or any amount of time from 20 to 30 minutes. Other examples of filtering out old readings include, but are not limited to the following. A variable rate filter can be used. This is based on how long readings have been taken (such as during planting). A fast responding filter can be used initially to level the row initially upon start-up; then, the filter is gradually slowed down over time to the maximum filter time after start-up. In another embodiment, data points can be collected and time stamped, and expired data can be removed. In another embodiment, data can be grouped by building a 2D histogram of the incoming data over time.

[0183] In another embodiment, sub-ranges across the entire range that the sensor reads can be created, and leveling can occur in these sub-ranges. For example using reflectance, sub-ranges can be created for 0-3%, 3-6%, 6-10%, 10- 15%, 15-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, and 40-60%. In the preceding ranges, the value at the change from one range to the next can be included with the lower range or the higher range. For example, 3 can be included with 0-3%, which means that the next range is a value greater than 3 up to 6. The number of sub-ranges can be any chosen number. In one embodiment, there are eight sub-ranges. The data in each sub-range is then kept for the selected amount of time as described above. The use of sub-ranges can provide increased accuracy.

[0184] In another embodiment, a reading from a sensor is not included in any calculation when the sensor reading is faulty. One faulty reading can be when a sensor reading exceeds a selected percent difference from a mean of all sensors for a specified amount of time. For example, if a sensor reading is more than 3% different from the mean of all sensors, then the sensor is determined to be faulty. Another faulty reading can be based on readings that are not possible for the medium being measured. For example for soil, if the reflectance at 589nm is higher than reflectance at 940nm, the reading is determined to be faulty since this scenario is not possible for soil. [0185] The above sensor leveling is exemplified using the reflectance

measurements. The same method can be applied to organic matter (OM) values or moisture levels. A benefit to reflectance is that reflectance is generally a linear relationship; whereas, OM can be non-linear.

[0186] Figures 56A to 56D illustrate a field have 3% organic matter (OM) and 1 % OM zones and the different types of averaging. Figure 56A illustrates the zones as they are in the field with the 1 % OM zone 5602 disposed at a 45° angle within the 3% OM zone 5604. Figure 56B shows the readings from reflectance sensors with no averaging or correction used. Figure 56C illustrates simple planter wide averaging with no correction for the readings from reflectance sensors. Figure 56D illustrates the above described leveling the readings from reflectance sensors. With leveling, the zones in the field are more accurately mapped.