METHOD FOR PREPARING SILAHYDROCARBONS

RELATED APPLICATIONS

[1] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial Nos. 62/400,195, filed September 27, 2016, and 62/442,091, filed January 4, 2017, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS

[2] This invention was made with government support under Grant No. 1254360, awarded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The government has certain rights in the invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[3] The present disclosure relates generally to processes for preparing

silahydrocarbons. The present disclosure is also directed to silahydrocarbons prepared by such processes, as well as to compositions and articles of manufacture comprising such silahydrocarbons.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[4] Silahydrocarbons are broadly useful materials and have a multitude of applications in basic science, medicine, and industry, including in materials,

pharmaceuticals, and agrochemicals, as well as organic synthesis. The subtle steric, electronic, and spectroscopic differences between carbon and silicon are ideal for studies in bioisosterism. Small silicon-containing molecules are used as additives in rubber manufacturing (such as automobile tires), and silahydrocarbons are used as cryogenic fluids and as lubricants in aerospace applications due to drastically altered phase properties compared to their carbon analogues. Thus, methods to install a silicon atom with various substitution patterns in a rapid manner can have significant impact across a range of disciplines.

[5] Syntheses of silahydrocarbons have been reported for over a century.

Historically, hydrosilylation has been a workhorse reaction for the synthesis of n- alkylsilanes. However, hydrosilylation often encounters issues of isomerization and regioselectivity with 1,2-disubstituted olefins. Arguably, the most attractive method for preparing alkyl silanes is the alkylation of widely available silyl electrophiles with equally abundant organometallic nucleophiles. Unfortunately, these reactions suffer from low yields, long reaction times, and significant side reactions. Alkylations with primary and aryl nucleophiles are known. However, the addition of secondary organometallic reagents to silyl electrophiles is rarely effective. In fact, over the past seventy years only five isolated examples with secondary nucleophiles have been reported in the chemical literature. This is due to lack of reactivity or competitive reductive processes with these more sterically demanding and electron-rich

nucleophiles. Prior catalytic methods, which have proven effective with primary and aryl nucleophiles, are ineffective in coupling secondary alkyl groups.

[6] In an effort to circumvent this poor reactivity, developments have been made in the cross-coupling of silyl nucleophiles and carbon electrophiles. While these are highly valuable transformations that allow access to secondary alkyl silanes, they rely on nucleophilic silicon reagents, the umpolung reactivity of naturally electropositive silicon. Since silyl electrophiles are the main feedstock of silicon reagents, developing a general method of alkyl silane synthesis from these abundant and cheap starting materials is highly appealing.

[7] Furthermore, the development of cross-coupling conditions that allow for the use of silyl chlorides would be a significant advance, as silyl chlorides are not only much less air and moisture sensitive, they are much more abundant and functional group tolerant than silyl iodides. Whereas silyl iodides typically require multiple steps to access, chlorosilanes are the product of the Muller-Rochow "Direct" Process, which is widely practiced on commodity scale. Thus, the ability to directly engage

monochlorosilanes in cross-coupling is important for the ability to modify feedstock chemicals of critical importance to the silane industry,

[8] Despite this appeal, the high bond strength of the Si-CI bond (113 kcal/mol) has severely hampered the development of transition metal methods involving its activation. Reports of productive chlorosilane activation have been limited to the weaker Si-CI bonds of polychloro- or hydrochlorosilanes. However, those reactions have not been exploited in synthetic applications. In addition, three reports of monochlorosilane activation using iridium (I) complexes have also been described, but the resultant silyliridium chlorides are unstable to /3-hydride elimination.

[9] Finally, several metal-catalyzed arylations of monochlorosilanes have been reported. However, these reactions are believed to proceed via nucleophile activation, and not via activation of the Si-CI bond. Moreover, none of those conditions exhibited any advantage in the case of alkyl Grignard reagents. [10] Thus, there exists a continuing need for improved processes for synthesizing silahydrocarbons, particularly with regard to coupling secondary alkyl groups and the ability to leverage the advantages of silyl chlorides.

EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

[ 11] This need is met by the process of the present invention.

[12] Thus, one embodiment of the present invention is a process for preparing a compound of formula (I) :

R ²

R ¹ -Si- R ^{3 R4} (I)

comprising the step of reacting a compound of formula (II) :

R ¹ — MX _(II) wherein M is Zn or Mg; RMs an alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkenyl, heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, or heteroaryl group, each of which is optionally substituted with one or more substituents, wherein at least one of the one or more substituents is optionally a moiety of formula -M'X', wherein M' is Zn or Mg and X' is CI, Br, or I; and X is CI, Br, or I, or, when R ¹ is an alkyl group, X is optionally an alkyl group identical to that of R ¹ ; with a compound of formula (III) :

R ²

X"- ^■ Si- R ³

R ⁴ (III)

wherein X" is CI, Br, I, -OS(0) ₂ alkyl, -OS(0) ₂ perfluoroalkyl, or -OS(0) ₂ aryl; and R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ are, independently, selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkenyl, heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, heteroaryl, wherein each alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkenyl, heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, heteroaryl group is optionally substituted with one or more substituents, CI, Br, I, -OS(0)2alkyl, -OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl, and -OS(0) ₂ aryl groups, wherein at least one of the one or more substituents is optionally a moiety of formula -SiR ⁵ R ⁵ X"', wherein R ⁵ and R ⁶ are each, independently, selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkenyl, heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, heteroaryl, each of which is optionally substituted with one or more substituents, and X'" is CI, Br, I, -OS(0)2alkyl, -OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl, or - OS(0)2aryl ; and wherein R ² , R ³ , and/or R ⁴ , when taken together, optionally define an optionally substituted ring system; in the presence of a catalyst comprising a Group 8, 9, or 10 transition metal, a ligand, a solvent, and, optionally, an additive; wherein R ² , R ³ , and/or R ⁴ are optionally covalently linked to R ¹ ; and R ¹ , R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ of the compound of formula (I) are as defined above.

[13] In certain embodiments of the above process, R ¹ is sterically hindered . In certain embodiments of the above process, R ¹ is selected from the group consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary alkyl groups, primary, secondary and tertiary alkenyl groups, and primary, secondary and tertiary alkynyl groups, each of which is optionally substituted . In certain embodiments of the above process, one or more of R ¹ , R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ is substituted with a least one silyl group.

[ 14] In certain embodiments of the above process, R ² is selected from the g roup consisting of CI, Br, I, -OS(0)2alkyl groups, -OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl groups, and - OS(0)2aryl groups. In certain embodiments of the above process, R ³ is selected from the group consisting of CI, Br, I, -OS(0)2alkyl groups, -OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl groups, and -OS(0)2aryl groups. In certain embodiments of the above process, R ⁴ is selected from the group consisting of CI, Br, I, -OS(0)2alkyl groups, -OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl groups, and -OS(0)2aryl groups. In certain embodiments, X" and R ² are both CI . In certain embodiments, X", R ² , and R ³ are all CI .

[15] In certain embodiments of the above process, the Group 8, 9, or 10 transition metal is selected from the group consisting of Pd, Ni, Co, Rh, and Ir. In certain embodiments of the above process, the catalyst comprises Pd and is selected from the group consisting of Pd(OAc) ₂ , PdBr ₂ , Pdl ₂ , Pd(dba) ₂ , Pd(dba) ₃ , [allylPdCI] ₂ ,

Pd2dba ₃ »CHCl3, [(3,5-C ₆ H ₃ (t-Bu)2) ₃ P]2Pdl2, [(3, 5-C6H ₃ (t-Bu) ₂ ) ₃ P]2PdCl2,

(COD)Pd(CH ₂ TMS) ₂ , (COD)PdCI ₂ , (PPh ₃ )2PdCI ₂ , (PPh ₃ ) ₄ Pd, and (MeCN) ₂ PdCI ₂ . In certain embodiments of the above process, the catalyst comprises Ni and is selected from the group consisting of Ni halide salts, Ni halide solvent complexes, and Ni(COD)2.

[16] In certain embodiments of the above process, the ligand is selected from the group consisting of phosphine ligands, arsine ligands, nitrogen-containing ligands, and N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. In certain embodiments of the above process, the ligand is selected from the group consisting of PPh3, (3,5-t-BuC6H3)2P(tBu), Ph2P(tBu), PhP(t-Bu) ₂ , (3, 5-C ₆ H ₃ (t-Bu)2)3P, (4-MeO-C ₆ H ₄ ) ₃ P, (t-Bu) ₃ P, (t-Bu) ₂ PCy, (t-Bu)PCy ₂ , Cpy ₃ P, Cy2PMe, Cy2PEt, Cy3P, (o-tol) ₃ P, (furyl) ₃ P, (4-F-C ₆ H ₄ )3P, (4-CF ₃ -C6H ₄ ) ₃ P, BIPH EP, NapthPhos, XantPhos, dppf, dppe, dppb, dpppe, dcpe, dcpp, dcpb, SPhos, XPhos, DavePhos, JohnPhos, BrettPhos, QPhos, AmgenPhos, RockPhos, RuPhos, VPhos, tBuXPhos, tBuBrettPhos, TrixiePhos, AZPhos, CPhos, (3,5-t-BuC6H3)2P(iPr), (3,5-t- BuC ₆ H ₃ )2P(Et), (3,5-t-BuC ₆ H ₃ ) ₂ P(Me), (3,5-/-PrC ₆ H3)2P(i:Bu), (3,5-/-PrC ₆ H3)2P(iPr), (3,5- /-PrC ₆ H3)2P(Et), (3,5-/-PrC ₆ H3)2P(Me), (3,5-f-Bu-4-MeO-C ₆ H2)2P(tBu), (3, 5-f-Bu-4-MeO- C6H ₂ )3P, BINAP, SIPr, IPr, IMes, ISMes, and derivatives thereof.

[ 17] In certain embodiments of the above process, the solvent is selected from the group consisting of dioxane, toluene, 1,2-dichloroethane, acetonitrile, dibutyl ether, diethyl ether, hexane, tetrahydrofuran, and mixtures thereof.

[18] In certain embodiments of the above process, additive is present during the reaction and is selected from the group consisting of trialkylamines and iodide salts. In certain embodiments, the additive is triethylamine or TMEDA. In certain embodiments, the additive is Lil, Nal, KI, or ammonium iodide salts.

[19] In certain embodiments of the above process, M and X of the compound of formula (II) are Zn and Br or I, respectively, X" of the compound of formula (III) is I, the catalyst is [(3,5-C6H3(i ^" -Bu)2)3 ]2Pdl2, the additive is triethylamine, and the solvent is dioxane. In certain embodiments, M and X of the compound of formula (II) are Mg and Br or I, respectively, X" of the compound of formula (III) is CI, the catalyst is

[(3,5-C ₆ H3(t-Bu)2)3P]2Pdl2, and the solvent is Et ₂ 0.

[20] Another embodiment of the present invention is a compound of formula (I) :

R ²

R ¹ — Si R ³

R ⁴ wherein R ¹ , R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ are each, independently, an alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkenyl,

heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, or heteroaryl group, each of which is optionally substituted with one or more substituents; wherein R ² , R ³ , and/or R ⁴ , when taken together, optionally define an optionally substituted ring system; and R ² , R ³ , and/or R ⁴ are optionally covalently linked to R ¹ .

[21] In certain embodiments of the above compound, R ¹ is sterically hindered. In certain embodiments of the above compound, R ¹ is selected from the group consisting of secondary and tertiary alkyl groups, secondary and tertiary alkenyl groups, and secondary and tertiary alkynyl groups, each of which is optionally substituted. In certain embodiments of the above compound, one or more of R ¹ , R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ is substituted with a least one silyl group.

[22] In certain embodiments, the above compound is selected from the group consisting of compounds of formulae (2), (3), (7)-(9), ( 13), (16)-(23), (25)-(27), and (30)-(47) :

(46), and

[23] Another embodiment of the present invention is a composition comprising at least one of the above compounds of formula (I). In certain embodiments, the composition is selected from the group consisting of aerospace materials,

pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, rubber materials, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, damping fluids, diffusion pump fluids, cryogenic fluids, waterproofing agents, hydrophobing agents, heat transfer media, anti-stick coatings, and fuel additives.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[24] In one aspect of the present invention, the present disclosure provides for a process for preparing a compound of formula (I) :

^■ Si- R ³

R ⁴ (I).

[25] The process comprises the step of reacting a compound of formula (II) :

R1— MX _(II) with a compound of formula (III) :

R ²

X"- ^• SI- R ³

R ⁴ (III)

[26] In the compounds of formula (II), M is Zn or Mg and R ¹ is an alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyi, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl, heterocycloalkyi, heterocycloalkenyi, heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, or heteroaryl group, each of which is optionally substituted with one or more substituents. At least one of these one or more substituents may optionally be a moiety of formula -M'X', wherein M' is Zn or Mg and X' is CI, Br, or I. Variable X of the compounds of formula (II) is CI, Br, or I, or, when R ¹ is an alkyl group, X is optionally an alkyl group identical to that of R ¹ . In certain embodiments, R ¹ is a sterically hindered group, such as a primary, secondary, or tertiary alkyl, alkenyi, or alkynyl group, each of which is optionally substituted.

[27] In the compounds of formula (III), X" is CI, Br, I, -OS(0)zalkyl,

-OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl, or -OS(0)2aryl. Examples of -OS(0)2alkyl,

-OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl, and -OS(0)2aryl groups include, but are not limited to, methanesulfonate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, and toluenesulfonate groups,

respectively. R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ of the compounds of formula (III) are, independently, selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyi, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl, heterocycloalkyi, heterocycloalkenyl, heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, heteroaryl, wherein each alkyl, alkenyi, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl,

heterocycloalkyi, heterocycloalkenyl, heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, heteroaryl group is optionally substituted with one or more substituents, as well as from CI, Br, I,

-OS(0)2alkyl, -OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl, and -OS(0)2aryl groups. In certain

embodiments, R ² , R ³ , and/or R ⁴ , when taken together, optionally define an optionally substituted ring system. Furthermore, R ² , R ³ , and/or R ⁴ are optionally covalently linked to R ¹ of the compound of formula (II).

[28] In certain embodiments, at least one of the one or more optional substituents on R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ of the compounds of formula (III) may be a moiety of formula -SiR ⁵ R ⁶ X"'. R ⁵ and R ⁶ are each, independently, selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyi, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkynyl, heterocycloalkyi, heterocycloalkenyl, heterocycloalkynyl, aryl, heteroaryl, each of which, in turn, is optionally substituted with one or more substituents. X'" is CI, Br, I, -OS(0)2alkyl, -OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl, or -OS(0)2aryl.

[29] In certain embodiments, in addition to X", R ² and/or R ³ and/or R ⁴ of the compound of formula (III) is selected from the group consisting of CI, Br, I,

-OS(0)2alkyl groups, -OS(0)2perfluoroalkyl groups, and -OS(0)2aryl groups.

Examples of such compounds of formula (III) include, but are not limited to, dimethyldichlorosilane ( ^' .e, Me2SiCl2) and trichlorophenylsilane {i.e. , PhSiC ). These polychlorosilanes can be monoalkylated with alkyl zinc halides, as shown in the following reaction schemes: (OEt)

51 % (NMR)

29% isolated

then EtOH, Et ₃ N no double alkylation observed

The respective ethoxy-substituted products result from post-reaction workup with ethanol to yield a stable adduct.

[30] The compounds of formula (II) and (III) are reacted in the presence of a catalyst comprising a Group 8, 9, or 10 transition metal, a ligand, a solvent, and, optionally, an additive.

[31] Any suitable catalyst comprising a Group 8, 9, or 10 transition metal (e.g. , Fe, Ru, Os, Co, Rh, Ir, Ni, Pd, and Pt) may be used in the processes of the present invention. In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a Group 8, 9, or 10 transition metal selected from the group consisting of Pd, Ni, Co, Rh, and Ir. In embodiments where the catalyst comprises Pd, examples of such catalysts include, but are not limited to, Pd(OAc) ₂ , PdBr ₂ , Pdh, Pd(dba) ₂ , Pd(dba) ₃ , [allylPdCI] ₂ ,

Pd ₂ dba ₃ »CHCI ₃ , [(3,5-C ₆ H ₃ (t-Bu) ₂ ) ₃ P] ₂ PdI ₂ , [(3,5-C ₆ H ₃ (t-Bu) ₂ ) ₃ P] ₂ PdCI ₂ ,

(COD)Pd(CH ₂ TMS) ₂ , (COD)PdCI ₂ , (PPh ₃ ) ₂ PdCI ₂ , (PPh ₃ ) ₄ Pd, and (MeCN) ₂ PdCI ₂ . In embodiments, where the catalyst comprises Ni, examples of such catalysts include, but are not limited to, Ni halide salts, Ni solvent complexes, and Ni(COD) ₂ .

[32] Any suitable ligand may be used in the processes of the present invention. Examples of classes of such ligands include, but are not limited to, phosphine iigands, arsine ligands, nitrogen-containing ligands, and N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands. An example of an NHC ligand that may be used in the processes of the present invention includes, but is not limited to, a ligand having the following structure:

For example, this particular ligand can be used to alkylate Me2PhSiCI with

cyclohexylmagnesium bromide, as shown in the following reaction scheme

2 mol %

e,PhSiCI 78%

Examples of other particular ligands that may be used, include, but are not limited to, PPh ₃ , (3,5-t-BuC ₆ H ₃ )2P(tBu), Ph ₂ P(tBu), PhP(f-Bu) ₂ , (3,5-C ₆ H3(t-Bu) ₂ )3P, (4-MeO- C6H ₄ ) ₃ P, (t-Bu) ₃ P, (t-Bu) ₂ PCy, (t-Bu)PCy ₂ , Cpy ₃ P, Cy2PMe, Cy2PEt, Cy3P, (o-tol) ₃ P, (furyl) ₃ P, (4-F-C ₆ H ₄ )3P, (4-CF ₃ -C ₆ H ₄ )3P, BIPHEP, NapthPhos, XantPhos, dppf, dppe, dppb, dpppe, dcpe, dcpp, dcpb, SPhos, XPhos, DavePhos, JohnPhos, BrettPhos, QPhos, AmgenPhos, RockPhos, RuPhos, VPhos, tBuXPhos, tBuBrettPhos, TrixiePhos, AZPhos, CPhos, (3,5-t-BuC ₆ H ₃ ) ₂ P(iPr), (3,5-t-BuC ₆ H ₃ )2P(Et), (3,5-t-BuC ₆ H ₃ )2P(Me), (3,5-/- PrC ₅ H ₃ ) ₂ P(i-Bu), (3,5-/-PrC6H ₃ )2P(iPr), (3,5-/-PrC ₆ H3)2P(Et), (3,5-/-PrC ₆ H3)2P(Me), (3,5-t- Bu-4-MeO-C ₆ H ₂ )2P(ffiu), (3,5-t-Bu-4-MeO-C ₆ H ₂ )3P, BINAP, SIPr, IPr, IMes, ISMes, and derivatives thereof. In certain embodiments, the ligand can be a XantPhos derivative having the following structure:

[33] Any suitable solvent may be used in the processes of the present invention. Examples of such solvents include, but are not limited to, dioxane, toluene, 1,2- dichloroethane, acetonitrile, dibutyl ether, diethyl ether, hexane, tetrahydrofuran, and mixtures thereof.

[34] Additives that facilitate the processes of the present invention may be present during the reaction. Examples of such additives include, but are not limited to, trialkylamines, such as triethylamine, TMEDA, and iodide salts, such as Lil, Nal, KI, or ammonium iodide salts.

[35] The processes according the present invention can be performed at any suitable temperature. Examples of suitable temperatures include, but are not limited to, temperatures in the range of from -78 °C to 100 °C. In certain embodiments, the reaction temperature is room or ambient temperature, i. e. , approximately 20 to 25 °C. In certain other embodiments, the reaction temperature is 50 °C.

[36] In another aspect of the present invention, the present disclosure provides for compounds of formula (I) :

R ²

R ¹ Si R ³

R ⁴ (I)

wherein R ¹ , R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ are as defined above. Substituents R ² , R ³ , and/or R ⁴ , when taken together, optionally define an optionally substituted ring system and are optionally covalently linked to R ¹ . In certain embodiments, R ¹ is a sterically hindered group, such as an optionally substituted secondary and tertiary alkyl, alkenyl, or alkynyl group. In certain embodiments, one or more of groups R ¹ , R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ is substituted with a least one silyl group.

[37] In another aspect of the present invention, the present disclosure provides for compositions and articles comprising at least one compound of formula (I) . Examples of such compositions and articles include, but are not limited to, aerospace materials, pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, rubber materials, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, damping fluids, diffusion pump fluids, cryogenic fluids, waterproofing agents, hydrophobing agents, heat transfer media, anti-stick coatings and fuel additives.

[38] The following examples are included to demonstrate preferred embodiments. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples which follow represent techniques discovered by the inventor to function well in the practice of the products, compositions, and methods described herein, and thus can be considered to constitute preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments which are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

EXAMPLES

[39] General Experimental Details

[40] Dioxane, trimethylamine, toluene, dibutyl ether (BU2O), diethyl ether (Et20), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), triethylamine, dichloromethane (DCM), acetonitrile (MeCN), and tetrahydrofuran (THF), were dried on alumina according to published procedures. Cyclopentylmethyl ether (CPME) was dried over CaH2, distilled under N2, and stored in a Straus flask.

[41] The following Grignard reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and titrated with iodine before use: phenylmagnesium bromide [3M] in Et20 (Aldrich), ο/ΐ/70-tolylmagnesium bromide [2M] in Et20 (Aldrich), 2-mesitylmagnesium bromide [1M] in Et20 (Aldrich), cyclopentylmagnesium bromide [2M] in Et∑0 (Acros), and 2- methyl-2-phenylpropylmagnesium chloride [0.5M] in Et ₂ 0 (Acros).

[42] Instrumentation and Chromatography

[43] 400 MHz H 101 MHz ¹³ C, and 376 MHz ¹⁹ F spectra were obtained on a 400 MHz FT-NMR spectrometer equipped with a Bruker CryoPlatform. 600 MHz ^X H, 151 MHz ¹³ C, 119 MHz ²⁹ Si, and 243 MHz ³¹ P spectra were obtained on a 600 MHz FT-NMR

spectrometer equipped with a Bruker SMART probe. All samples were analyzed in the indicated deutero-solvent and were recorded at ambient temperatures. All chemical shifts are reported in ppm. ^X H NMR spectra were calibrated using the residual protio- signal in deutero-solvents as a standard. ¹³ C NMR spectra were calibrated using the deutero-solvent as a standard. Product ² Si spectra were calibrated using a

hexamethyldisiloxane capillary standard at 7.32ppm. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Magma-IR 560 FT-IR spectrometer as thin films on KBr plates. High resolution MS data was obtained on a Waters GCT Premier spectrometer using chemical ionization (CI), electron ionization (EI), or liquid injection field desorption ionization (LIFDI). Vacuum controller refers to J-Kem Digital Vacuum Regulator Model 200. Unless otherwise noted, column chromatography was performed either by hand or by use of Isolera 4 Biotage unit with 40- 63 μιη silica gel, and the eluent reported in parentheses. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel (60 F254 Merck) pre-coated glass plates and visualized by UV or by staining with iodine, KMn04, or eerie ammonium molybdate (CAM).

[44] Synthesis of Liqand "DrewPhos"

[45] An oven-dried 500 mt_ round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar and rubber septum was attached to a double manifold and cooled under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with N2, the rubber septum was removed, l-bromo-3,5-di-te/t- butylbenzene (32.4 g, 120 mmol, 3.01 equiv.) was added, and the septum replaced. The flask was then purged with N2 for 15 minutes. THF (240 ml_, [0.5 M]) was added and the flask was cool to -78 °C in a dry ice/acetone bath. While stirring, nBuLi (48.2 mL, 120 mmol, 3 equiv., [2.49 M] in hexanes) was added dropwise via syringe pump over 30 minutes. PCI3 (3.5 mL, 40 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added dropwise via syringe pump over 15 minutes. After the addition was complete, the flask was warmed to 0 °C in an ice/water bath and stirred for 4 hours. The flask was allowed to warm to RT, the septum was removed and the reaction was quenched by adding brine (100 mL). The reaction was poured into a separatory funnel and the product was extracted 2X with Et20 (100 mL) . The organic layer was dried over MgS0 ₄ , filtered through a glass frit, and the solvent removed in vacuo. The product was purified by recrystallization from hot EtOH (200 mL), cooled under ambient conditions, then placed in a -20 °C freezer overnight. Collection of the solid via filtration and washing with EtOH resulted in white crystals ( 10.6 g, 44% yield) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.38 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 3H), 7.12 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.8 Hz, 6H), 1.22 (s, 54H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 150.6 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 137.3 (d, J = 9.4 Hz), 128.1 (d, J = 19.3 Hz), 122.4 , 35.0 , 31.5; ³¹ P NMR (243 MHz, CDCb) δ -3.59; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2963, 1589, 1577, 1362, 1249, 1130, 875, 710; mp = 145-147 °C; HRMS (LIFDI) m/z, calculated for [C ₄₂ H ₆₃ P] ⁺ : 598.4667; found :

598.4688.

[46] Synthesis of Catalyst (DrewPhos)2Pdl2

[47] A 50 mL round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with palladium(II) iodide (1.08 g, 3 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and DrewPhos (3.59 g, 6 mmol, 2.0 equiv.). The flask was sealed with a rubber septum and purged 10 min with

Toluene (24 mL) was added via syringe and the reaction was stirred for 24 hours at 85 °C. The reaction was cooled to RT, transferred to a 250 mL round bottom flask and the solvent evaporated in vacuo. The resulting solid was recrystallized from hot 3 : 1 ethanoktoluene ( 100 mL), cooled under ambient conditions, then placed in a -20

°CVfreezer overnight. Collection of the solid via filtration resulted in a stable, red solid

(3.52 g, 75% yield). A second crop of product was obtained by subsequent

recrystallization with same solvent system resulted in red crystals (900 mg, 19%). Total 4.42 g, 95% : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.60 - 7.54 (m, 12H), 7.29 (s, 6H), 1.21 (s, 108H); ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 149.2 (t, J = 5.1 Hz), 134.5 (t, J = 24.9 Hz), 129.9 (t, J = 6.2 Hz), 123.2, 35.1, 31.6; ³¹ P NMR (243 MHz, CDCb) δ 18.90 ; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2953, 1589, 1384, 1247, 1087, 702, 584; mp = >250 °C. HRMS (LIFDI) m/z, calculated for [C ₈₄ H ₁₂₆ P ₂ PdI] ⁺ : 1429.7414; found : 1429.7373.

[48] Synthesis of Alkyl Zinc Halides [49] General Procedure

[50] An oven dried Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar and rubber septum was attached to a double manifold and cooled under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with N2, the septum removed, and zinc dust (2 equiv.) added. The septum was replaced; the flask was attached to a double manifold and evacuated. Under vacuum, the zinc was heated for 5 minutes with a heat gun then allowed to cool to RT under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with N2 then dioxane [2 M], trimethylsilyl chloride (0.03 equiv), and alkyl bromide (1 equiv) were added. The flask was then stirred in an oil bath at 100 °C for the indicated time. Conversion of starting haiide was monitored via GC by quenching reaction aliquots with saturated NH ₄ CI solution and extracting with Et20. Once all starting haiide was consumed, the excess zinc was allowed to settle while the flask cooled. The mixture was filtered via cannula to a Schlenk tube. If insoluble particles persist, filtration through a 0.2 μιτι PTFE syringe filter was employed. Solutions were then titrated according to the literature procedure by Knochel.

[51] Synthesis of Cyclohexylzinc Iodide

[52] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (3.92 g, 60 mmol), dioxane (15 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (115 pL, 98 mg, 0.9 mmol), and cyclohexyl iodide (3.88 mL, 6.3 g, 30 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 12 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [0.97 M] solution of cyclohexylzinc iodide in dioxane.

[53] Synthesis of Isopropylzinc Iodide

[54] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (3.92 g, 60 mmol), dioxane (15 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (115 pL, 98 mg, 0.9 mmol), and isopropyl iodide (3.0 mL, 5.1 g, 30 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 20 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.56 M] solution of isopropylzinc iodide in dioxane.

[55] Synthesis of Isopropylzinc Bromide

Me^^ZnBr

Me

[56] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (3.92 g, 60 mmol), dioxane (15 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (120 pL, 102 mg, 0.9 mmol), and isopropyl bromide (2.9 mL, 3.8 g, 31 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 20 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.81 M] solution of isopropylzinc bromide.

[57] Synthesis of Isobutylzinc Iodide

[58] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (3.92 g, 60 mmol), dioxane (15 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (115 pL, 98 mg, 0.9 mmol), and isobutyl iodide (3.6 mL, 5.8 g, 30 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 17 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.59 M] solution of isobutylzinc iodide in dioxane.

[59] Synthesis of Isobutylzinc Bromide

Me

^^ZnBr

Me'

[60] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (3.92 g, 60 mmol), dioxane (15 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (115 pL, 98 mg, 0.9 mmol), and isobutyl bromide (3.3 mL, 4.2 g, 30 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 17 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.40 M] solution of isobutylzinc bromide in dioxane.

[61] Synthesis of n-Propylzinc Iodide

[62] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (1.52 g, 23 mmol), dioxane (6 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (50 pL, 45 mg, 0.4 mmol), and n-propyl iodide (1.5 mL, 2.61 g, 15 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 20 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [2.25 M] solution of n-propylzinc iodide in dioxane.

[63] Synthesis of Cyclopentylzinc Bromide

[64] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (2.6 g, 40 mmol), dioxane ( 10 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (80 pL, 66 mg 0.6 mmol), and cyclopentyl bromide (2.2 mL, 20 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 18 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [0.89 M] solution of cyclopentylzinc bromide.

[65] Synthesis of n-Butylzinc Bromide

[66] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (3.92 g, 60 mmol), dioxane (15 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride ( 115 pL, 98 mg, 0.9 mmol), and n-butyl bromide (3.3 mL, 4.2 g, 30 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 17 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.51 M] solution of n- butylzinc bromide in dioxane.

[67] Synthesis of Pentan-3-ylzinc Bromide

[68] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (2.6 g, 40 mmol), dioxane (10 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (80 pL, 66 mg 60 pmol), and 3-bromopentane (2.5 mL,3.0 g, 20 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 4 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.35 M] solution of pentan-3-ylzinc bromide.

[69] Synthesis of 1-Octylethylzinc Bromide

[70] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (2.1 g, 32 mmol), dioxane (8 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (60 pL, 52 mg, 0.5 mmol), and 2-bromodecane (3.4 mL, 16 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 2 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.00 M] solution of 1-octylethylzinc bromide.

[71] Synthesis of (4-Methylpentan-2-yl)zinc Bromide

[72] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (1.83 g, 28 mmol), dioxane (7 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (50 pL, 43 mg, 0.4 mmol), and 2-bromo-4-methylpentane (2.29 g, 14 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 2 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [0.91 M] solution of (4- methylpentan-2-yl)ztnc bromide in dioxane.

[73] Synthesis of (lS,4#)-Bicyclo[2.2.1 ^" |heptan-2-ylzinc Bromide

[74] According to the general procedure, a 25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (2.6 g, 40 mmol), dioxane (10 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (80 pL, 65 mg, 0.6 mmol), and 2-exo-bromonorbornane (2.6 mL, 3.5 g, 20 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 3 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.23 M] solution of (1S,4 ?)- bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ylzinc bromide.

[75] Synthesis of a-Methylbenzylzinc Bromide

[76] A 50 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a stirbar and rubber septum attached to a double manifold (with cold trap) was charged with titrated, [0.38 M] a- methylbenzylzinc bromide (Aldrich) in THF (25 mL, 9.5 mmol) and dioxane (8 mL). Solvent was removed in vacuo (26 °C/0.3 mm Hg) until total volume was reduced to approximately 2-3 mL (solution became viscous). Dioxane (12 mL) was added and solvents were removed again in vacuo (26 °C/0.2 mm Hg) until total volume was reduced to approximately 2-3 mL (viscous solution). Dioxane (8 mL) was added to afford a total volume of approximately 10 mL. Filtration via cannula to a Schlenk bomb and titration resulted in a [0.82 M] solution of a-methylbenzylzinc bromide in dioxane. The solvent exchange setup diagram is depicted in Figure 2.

[77] Synthesis of (4-Phenylbutan-2-yl)zinc Bromide

[78] According to the general procedure, a 10 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust ( 1.3 g, 20 mmol), dioxane (5 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (40 pL, 33 mg 0.3 mmol), and 2-bromo-4-phenylbutane (2.1 g, 10 mmol) . The flask was heated to 100 °C for 2 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.32 M] solution of (4-phenylbutan- 2-yl)zinc bromide.

[79] Synthesis of (4-f4-(Ethoxycarbonyl)phenyl)butan-2yl)zinc Bromide

[80] According to the general procedure, a 10 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust ( 1.3 g, 20 mmol), dioxane (6 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (100 pL, 86 mg, 0.8 mmol), and ethyl 4-(3- bromobutyl)benzoate (2.85 g, 10 mmol) . The flask was heated to 100 °C for 2 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [ 1.09 M] solution of (4-(4- (ethoxycarbonyl)phenyl)butan-2yl)zinc bromide in dioxane.

[81] Synthesis of (4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)butan-2yl)zinc Bromide

[82] According to the general procedure, a 10 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust ( 1.3 g, 20 mmol), dioxane (5 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (40 pL, 33 mg, 0.3 mmol), and l-(3- bromobutyl)-4-methoxybenzene (2.4 g, 10 mmol) . The flask was heated to 100 °C for 2 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [ 1.26 M] solution of (4-(4-methoxyphenyl)butan-2yl)zinc bromide.

[83] Synthesis of (4-(4-Chlorophenyl)butan-2-yl)zinc Bromide

[84] According to the general procedure, a 10 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (1.3 g, 20 mmol), dioxane (5 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (40 L, 33 mg, 0.3 mmol), and l-(3-bromobutyl)-4- chlorobenzene (2.5 g, 10 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 2 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.25 M] solution of (4-(4- chlorophenyl)butan-2-yl)zinc bromide.

[85] Synthesis of (4-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)butan-2yl)zinc Bromide

[86] According to the general procedure, a 10 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (1.3 g, 20 mmol), dioxane (5 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (40 μ ΐ, 33 mg, 0.3 mmol), and l-(3- bromobutyl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene (2.82 g, 10 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 2 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.14 M] solution of (4-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)butan-2yl)zinc bromide in dioxane.

[87] Synthesis of (3-Methylbutan-2-yl)zinc Iodide

[88] According to a modified procedure, a 10 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (294 mg, 4.5 mmol), dioxane (1 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (20 μί, 17 mg, 0.1 mmol), and 2-iodo-3-methylbutane (446 mg, 2.3 mmol) was added dissolved in dry dioxane (1.1 mL). The flask was heated to 50 °C for 1 hour. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.05 M] solution of (3-methylbutan-2-yl)zinc iodide.

[89] Synthesis of (3,3-Dimethylbutan-2-yl)zinc Iodide

[90] According to a modified procedure, a 10 mL Schlenk flask was charged with zinc dust (0.8 g, 12 mmol), dioxane (5 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (50 μί., 43 mg, 0.4 mmol), and 3-iodo-2,2-dimethylbutane (1.31 g, 6 mmol). The flask was heated to 50 °C for 2 hours. Filtration and titration resulted in a [0.54 M] solution of (3,3- dimethylbutan-2-yl)zinc iodide in dioxane.

[91] Synthesis of Alkylmaqnesium Halides

[92] General Procedure

[93] An oven dried round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar and rubber septum was attached to a double manifold and cooled under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with N2, the septum removed, magnesium turnings (1.5 equiv.) and a single chip of I ₂ (~20-30 mg) were added. The septum was replaced; the flask was attached to a double manifold and purged with N2 for 10 min. The flask was held under positive N2 then Et20 [3 M] was added. The solution was stirred until clarity was reached (disappearance of brown I2 color). An initial amount of alkyl halide (~200-400 μΙ_) was added to start the reaction as evidenced by a minor exotherm. If reaction does not initiate, gentle warming (for example with a heating mantle) may be necessary. Once initiated, the alkyl halide was added dropwise so as to keep the mixture warm, but below full reflux. If desired, a reflux condenser may be used as well. After full addition of the alkyl halide, the flask was allowed to stir at RT for an additional 1-4 hours. The excess magnesium was allowed to settle and the mixture was filtered via cannula to a Schlenk tube. If insoluble particles persist, filtration through a 0.2 pm PTFE syringe filter was employed. Solutions were then titrated according to the literature procedure by Knochel. Titration concentrations used in the isolation runs in Section 5 may differ from those reported here. The procedures listed below reflect titrations from specific experimental runs.

[94] Synthesis of Isopropylmaqnesium Iodide [95] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (1.1 mg, 45 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), diethyl ether (10 mL), I2 chip, and isopropyl iodide (3.0 mL, 5.1 g, 30 mmol, 1 equiv.) were combined under nitrogen and stirred for 2 hours at RT. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.84 M] solution of isopropylmagnesium iodide.

[96] Synthesis of Isopropylmagnesium Bromide

Me^^MgBr

Me

[97] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (1.1 mg, 45 mmol, 1.5 equiv. ), diethyl ether (10 mL), chip, and isopropyl bromide (2.8 mL, 3.69 g, 30 mmol, 1 equiv.) were combined under nitrogen and stirred for 2 hours at RT. Filtration and titration resulted in a [2.23 M] solution of isopropylmagnesium bromide.

[98] Synthesis of Isopropylmagnesium Chloride

Me-^MgCI

Me

[99] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (1.1 mg, 45 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), diethyl ether (10 mL), no iodine, and isopropyl chloride (2.7 mL, 2.36 g, 30 mmol) were combined under nitrogen and stirred for 4 hours at RT. Filtration and titration resulted in a [2.65 M] solution of isopropylmagnesium chloride.

[100] Synthesis of n-Butylmagnesium Bromide

[ 101] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (730 mg, 30 mmol), diethyl ether (7 mL), no iodine, and a solution of n-butyl bromide (2.7 mL, 3.4 g, 25 mmol) in diethyl ether (5 mL) were combined under nitrogen and stirred for 4 hours at RT. Filtration and titration resulted in a [ 1.93 M] solution of n-butylmagnesium bromide.

[102] Synthesis of 3-Pentyl magnesium Bromide

MgBr [103] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (300 mg, 12 mmol), diethyl ether (3 mL), I2 chip, and solution of 3-bromopentane (1.2 mL, 1.5 g, 10 mmol) in diethyl ether (2 mL) were combined under nitrogen and stirred for 4 hours at RT. Filtration and titration resulted in a [0.67 M] solution of 3- pentylmagnesium bromide.

[104] Synthesis of ( 15,4fl)-Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ylmagnesium Bromide

^{1 J} According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (730 mg, 30 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), diethyl ether (6.7 mL), I2 chip, and (lS,4 ?)-2-bromobicyclo[2.2.1]heptane (2.6 mL, 3.5 g, 20 mmol, 1 equiv.) were combined under nitrogen and stirred 3 hour at RT. Filtration and titration resulted in a [1.21 M] solution of (lS,4fl)- bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ylmagnesium bromide in an exo:endo ratio of 41 : 59, as determined by NMR.

[ 106] Synthesis of Neopentylmaqnesium Bromide

[107] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (730 mg, 30 mmol), diethyl ether (7 mL), I2 chip, and solution of neopentyl bromide (3 mL, 3.6 g, 24 mmol) in diethyl ether (5 mL). Filtration and titration resulted in a [0.95 M] solution of neopentylmagnesium bromide.

[108] Synthesis of (4-Phenylbutan-2-yl)maqnesium Bromide

[109] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (1.1 g, 45 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), I2 chip, Et20 (10 mL), and (3-bromobutyl)benzene (6.4 g, 30 mmol, 1 equiv.) were combined under nitrogen and stirred for 1 hour at RT. Filtration and iodometric titration resulted in a [1.34 M] solution of (4- phenylbutan-2-yl)magnesium bromide. [110] Synthesis of (4-(4-Chlorophenyl)butan-2- yQmagnesium Bromide (GR9)

[111] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (292 mg, 12 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), chip, Et20 (3.3 mL), and l-(3-bromobutyl)-4-chlorobenzene (2.48 g, 10 mmol, 1 equiv.) were combined under nitrogen and stirred for 2 hours at RT. Filtration and iodometric titration resulted in a [0.85 M] solution of (4-(4-chlorophenyl)butan-2- yl)magnesium bromide.

[112] Synthesis of (4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)butan-2-yl)magnesium Bromide

[113] According to the general procedure, magnesium turnings (292 mg, 12 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), chip, Et20 (3.3 mL), and l-(3- bromobutyl)-4-methoxybenzene (2.43 g, 10 mmol, 1 equiv.) were combined under nitrogen and stirred for 2 hours at RT.

Filtration and iodometric titration resulted in a [0.85 M] solution of (4-(4- methoxyphenyl)butan-2-yl)magnesium bromide.

[114] Synthesis of (l-Phenylethyl)maqnesium Bromide)

[115] According to a modified version of the general procedure, magnesium turnings ( 1.1 g, 45 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), diethyl ether (10 mL), and h chip were added. Once clarity of the solution was reached, the flask was cooled to 0 °C in an ice/water bath. Stirring at 0 °C, (l-bromoethyl)benzene (5.6 g, 4.1 mL, 30 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added dropwise via syringe pump over ~1 hour. After addition, the flask was allowed to stir at RT ~3 h. Filtration and titration resulted in a [0.55 M] solution of (1- phenylethyl)magnesium bromide. [ 116] Synthesis of Silahydrocarbons

[ 117] General Procedure A

[ 118] Reactions were run at [0.5 M] overall concentration based on the sum of all liquid reagents. THF quenches were performed for certain substrates due to inseparable disiloxane formed upon aqueous workup. This quench generates the more easily separated (4-iodobutoxy)silane through silyl iodide induced ring opening of THF.

[ 119] An oven dried 10 mL Schienk flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar and rubber septum was attached to a double manifold and cooled under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with the rubber septum was removed, and (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (0.01 equiv.) was added. The septum was replaced and the flask purged with 2 for 10 minutes. Dioxane, triethylamine (1 equiv.), silyl iodide (2 equiv.), and alkylzinc bromide ( 1 equiv.) were added via syringe. The flask was then stirred at RT for the indicated time. The reaction was quenched as indicated, diluted with Et20 (20 mL) or EtOAc (20 mL) then washed 2 times with brine (20 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSC , filtered, and the solvent removed in vacuo. The crude material was purified via silica gel flash chromatography in the indicated solvent.

[ 120] General Procedure B: Room Temperature Coupling

[ 121] An oven dried 10 mL Schienk flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar and rubber septum was attached to a double manifold and cooled under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with N2, the rubber septum was removed, and (DrewPhos)2Pdb (0.01 equiv.) was added. The septum was replaced and the flask purged with N2 for 10 minutes. Et20, silyl chloride (1.2 equiv.), and alkylmagnesium halide (1 equiv.) were added sequentially via syringe. The solution was then stirred at RT for 24 h. A vent needle was added and the reaction was quenched with EtOAc (3 mL) then H2O (3 mL) via syringe. The mixture was washed 2 times with brine (20 mL) and extracted using EtOAc or Et20. The combined organic layer was dried over MgSC>4, filtered, and the solvent removed in vacuo. The crude material was purified via silica gel flash chromatography in the indicated solvent.

[ 122] General Procedure C: 50 °C Coupling

[ 123] An oven dried 10 mL Schienk flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar and rubber septum was attached to a double manifold and cooled under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with N2, the rubber septum was removed, and (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (0.01 equiv.) was added. The septum was replaced and the flask purged with N2 for 10 minutes. BU2O, silyl chloride (2 equiv.), and alkylmagnesium halide (1 equiv.) were added sequentially via syringe. The solution was then stirred in an oil bathour at 50 °C for 24 h. The flask was cooled to RT, a vent needle was added and the reaction was quenched with EtOAc (3 mL) then H2O (3 mL) via syringe. The mixture was washed 2 times with brine (20 mL) and extracted using EtOAc or Et20. The combined organic layer was dried over MgS0 ₄ , filtered, and the solvent removed in vacuo. The crude material was purified via silica gel flash chromatography in the indicated solvent.

[ 124] General Procedure D: Coupling Using Solid Silyl Chlorides

[125] An oven dried 10 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar and rubber septum was attached to a double manifold and cooled under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with N2, the rubber septum was removed, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (0.01 equiv.) and silyl chloride (2 equiv.) were added. The septum was replaced and the flask purged with N2 for 10 minutes. BU2O and alkylmagnesium halide ( 1 equiv.) were added sequentially via syringe. The solution was then stirred in an oil bathour at the indicated temperature for 24 h. The flask was cooled to RT, a vent needle was added and the reaction was quenched with EtOAc (3 mL) then H2O (3 mL) via syringe. The mixture was washed 2 times with brine (20 mL) and extracted using EtOAc or Et.20. The combined organic layer was dried over MgS0 ₄ , filtered, and the solvent removed in vacuo. The crude material was purified via silica gel flash chromatography in the indicated solvent.

[126] Example 1 - Synthesis of Compound ( 1)

[ 127] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (820 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [1.56 M] isopropylzinc iodide (640 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under l\h and stirred at RT for 1 h. The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (1) as a clear volatile oil ( 165.1 mg, 93%) : ^X H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.59 - 7.45 (m, 2H), 7.44 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 1.02 - 0.92 (m, 7H), 0.25 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDC ) δ 138.7, 134.1, 128.9, 127.7, 17.7, 13.9, -5.2; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.40; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2955, 2864, 1463, 1427, 1248, 1112, 882, 831, 812, 770, 733, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [CnHi ₈ Si] ⁺ : 178.1178; found : 178.1179.

[128] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (940 pL), triethylamine ( 140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [ 1.79 M] isopropylzinc bromide (560 pl_, 1 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 4 h . The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatog raphy (hexanes) to afford compound ( 1) as a clear volatile oil ( 160.5 mg, 90%) . NMR spectra matched previous isolation : ^J H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.57 - 7.45 (m, 2H), 7.40 - 7.32 (m, 3H), 1.07 - 0.86 (m, 7H), 0.25 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDCb) δ 138.7, 134.1, 128.9, 127.7, 17.7, 13.9, -5.2.

[129] A two dram vial with stirbar (open to air) was charged with (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (910 pL), triethylamine ( 140 pL, 1 mmol) and

dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 p L, 2 mmol) . The vial was sealed with a Teflon lined cap. While stirring, the cap was removed, [ 1.70 M] solution isopropylzinc iodide (590 pL, 1 mmol) was added via syringe, and the cap was replaced . Stirring at RT was continued for 1 h . The reaction was quenched by removing the cap and adding wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe and then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound ( 1) as a clear volatile oil ( 156.1 mg, 88%). NMR spectra matched previous isolations: ^J H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.52-7.49 (m, 2H), 7.36-7.35 (m, 3H), 0.99- 0.94 (m, 7H), 0.25 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDCb) δ 138.6, 133.9, 128.7, 127.6, 17.6, 13.8, -5.3.

[130] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (390 mg, 0.25 mmol), dioxane (21 mL), triethylamine (3.5 mL, 25 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (9 mL, 50 mmol), and [1.52 M] isopropylzinc bromide ( 16.5 mL, 25 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with THF ( 10 mL), stirred for 15 min then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound ( 1) as a clear volatile oil (4.35 g, 98%) . NMR spectra matched previous isolation : *H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.53 - 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.37 - 7.33 (m, 3H), 0.97 - 0.94 (m, 7H), 0.25 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDCb) δ 138.8, 134.1, 128.9, 127.7, 17.7, 13.9, -5.2. [131] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (1.36 mL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 μΙ_, 1.2 mmol), and [2.29 M]

isopropylmagnesium bromide (440 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under Hi and stirred at RT for 1 h. After workup, the crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (1) as a clear oil (178 mg, 99%): ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.55 - 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.39 - 7.33 (m, 3H), 1.01 - 0.94 (m, 7H), 0.26 (s, 6H). ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 138.8, 134.1, 128.9, 127.8, 17.7, 13.9, - 5.2. ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 0.4.

[132] Example 2 - Synthesis of Compound (2)

(2)

[133] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pd (16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (1.00 mL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [2.25 M] n-propylzinc iodide (440 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 1 h. The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (2) as a clear very volatile oil (169.5 mg, 96%): ^J H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.56 - 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.39 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 1.42 - 1.31 (m, 2H), 0.96 (t, J - 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.79 - 0.72 (m, 2H), 0.26 (s, 6H); ¹³ C NMR (101 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.9, 133.7, 128.9, 127.8, 18.51, 18.48, 17.6, - 2.8; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -3.37; FTIR (cm ¹ ): 2955, 2868, 1427, 1248, 1114, 1065, 997, 882, 834, 767, 727, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [CioHi ₅ Si] ⁺ :

163.0943; found: 163.0941.

[134] Example 3 - Synthesis of Compound (3)

[135] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (900 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [1.59 M] isobutylzinc iodide (640 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under N2and stirred at RT for 1 h. The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (3) as a clear volatile oil ( 187.0 mg, 95%) . NMR spectra matched previous isolation : ^J H N R (400 MHz, CDCh) δ 7.58 - 7.44 (m, 2H), 7.43 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 1.77 (dh, J = 13.3, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.77 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 0.29 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDCh) δ 140.4, 133.7, 128.8, 127.8, 26.50, 26.48, 25.1, - 1.9.

[136] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (800 μΙ_), triethylamine ( 140 μΙ_, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.34 M] isobutylzinc bromide (750 μΙ_, 1 mmol) were combined under l\h and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound 3 as a clear volatile oil ( 183.3 mg, 95%) : ^J H NMR (400 MHz, CDCh) δ 7.55 - 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.38 - 7.32 (m, 3H), 1.77 (dh, J = 13.3, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.78 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 0.29 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDCh) δ 140.3, 133.7, 128.8, 127.8, 26.50, 26.48, 25.1, - 1.9; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCh) δ -4.17 ; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2953, 2893, 2361, 2338, 1248, 1112, 838, 812, 790, 698. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₂ Hi ₉ Si] ⁺ : 191.1256;

found : 191.1253.

[ 137] Example 4 - Synthesis of Compound (4)

[ 138] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (440 \ L) , triethylamine ( 140 μί, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [0.97 M] cyclohexylzinc iodide ( 1.00 mL, 0.97 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 1 h. The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (4) as a clear oil (205.6 mg, 97%) : ^X H NMR (400 MHz, CDCh) δ 7.52 - 7.47 (m, 2H), 7.40 - 7.32 (m, 3H), 1.75 - 1.61 (m, 5H), 1.27 - 1.02 (m, 5H), 0.84 - 0.73 (m, 1 H), 0.24 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDCh) δ 138.8, 134.1, 128.8, 127.7, 28.2, 27.5, 27.0, 25.9, -5.1 ; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCh) δ -2.20; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2919, 2846, 1446, 1427, 1247, 1112, 850, 834, 818, 770, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₄ H ₂ 2Si] ⁺ : 218.1491 ; found : 218.1486.

[ 139] Example 5 - Synthesis of Compound (5) Me SiMe ₂ Ph

(5)

According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (900 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [1.60 M] ri-butylzinc bromide (630 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at T for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (5) as a clear oil (175.1 mg, 91%) : *H NMR (400 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.55 - 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.39 - 7.33 (m, 3H), 1.37 - 1.26 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J - 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.80 - 0.73 (m, 2H), 0.26 (s, 6H); ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.9, 133.7, 128.9, 127.8, 26.7, 26.2, 15.6, 13.9, -2.9; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -3.08; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2956, 2922, 2872, 1427, 1248, 1113, 887, 837, 779, 727, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [CnHi ₇ Si] ⁺ : 177.1100; found :

177.1102.

^ ¹⁴¹ ^ According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (1.32 mL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [2.1 M] n- butylmagnesium bromide (480 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 1 h. After workup, the crude product was purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (3) as a clear oil (192 mg, 99%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.55 - 7.48 (m, 2H), 7.39 - 7.32 (m, 3H), 1.37 - 1.26 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.78 - 0.73 (m, 2H), 0.26 (s, 6H). ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.9, 133.7, 128.9, 127.8, 26.7, 26.2, 15.6, 13.9, -2.9. ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -3.1.

[142] Example 6 - Synthesis of Compound (6)

[ 143] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdb 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (380 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [0.89 M] cyclopentylzinc bromide ( 1.1 mL, 1 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with wet Et20 (3 mL) and H2O (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (6) as a clear oil ( 197 mg, 97%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.55 - 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.36 - 7.33 (m, 3H), 1.80 - 1.73 (m, 2H), 1.59 - 1.46 (m, 4H), 1.36 - 1.25 (m, 2H), 1.11 (tt, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 0.25 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.4, 133.9, 128.7, 127.6, 28.2, 27.0, 25.5, -4.5; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -2.01 ; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3068, 2950, 2862, 1427, 1248, 1114, 827, 811, 699, 415. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H ₂ oSi] ⁺ : 204.1334; found :

204.1337.

[ 144] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol ), diethyl ether ( 1.24 mL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 μΙ_, 1.2 mmol), and [1.77 M] cyclopentylmagnesium bromide (0.56 mL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (6) as a clear oil (200 mg, 99%) : ^l NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.56 - 7.52 (m, 2H), 7.40 - 7.32 (m, 3H), 1.83 - 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.58 - 1.49 (m, 4H), 1.39 - 1.27 (m, 2H), 1.13 (tt, J = 10.8, 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 0.26 (s, 6H) . ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.5, 134.0, 128.8, 127.8, 28.4, 27.2, 25.6, - 4.3. ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -2.0.

[ 145] Example 7 - Synthesis of Compound (7)

(7)

[ 146] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2PdI ₂ ( 16 mg, 10 μιτιοΙ ), dioxane (760 μί), triethylamine ( 140 μί, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.35 M] pentan-3-ylzinc bromide (740 μΙ_, 1 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at RT for 4 h . The reaction was quenched with wet Et2<D (3 mL) and H2O (3 mL) via syringe and worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound 7 as a clear oil ( 192 mg, 93%) : ^l NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.53 - 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.36 - 7.32 (m, 3H), 1.57 - 1.47 (m, 2H), 1.36 (dp, J = 14.7, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 6H), 0.74 - 0.68 (m, 1 H), 0.28 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.7, 133.8, 128.6, 127.6, 28.9, 21.7, 13.7, -3.6; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ - 1.04; FTIR (αττ ^θβθ, 2959, 2871, 1427, 1248, 1029, 831, 810, 700, 471. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H ₂₂ Si] ⁺ : 206.1491 ; found : 206.1495.

[ 147] Example 8 - Synthesis of Compound (8) Bu SiMe ₂ Ph

Me

[148] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 μιηοΙ), dioxane (500 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [1.00 M] 1-octylethylzinc bromide (1 mL, 1 mmol) were combined under l\h and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with dry THF (405 pL, 5 equiv, 5 mmol) via syringe and allowed to stir 15 minutes at RT then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (8) as a clear oil (261 mg, 94%): ^J H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.51 - 7.48 (m, 2H), 7.36 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 1.49 - 1.36 (m, 2H), 1.33 - 1.20 (m, 9H), 1.19 - 1.13 (m, 2H), 1.13 - 1.06 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J - 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.86 - 0.80 (m, 1H), 0.24 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 6H); ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.1, 134.1, 128.8, 127.7, 32.1, 31.7, 29.8, 29.7, 29.5, 28.7, 22.8, 19.2, 14.3, 14.2, -4.7; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.17; FTIR (cm ¹ ): 3069, 2955, 2924, 2853, 1466, 1427, 1248, 1112, 832, 813, 770, 733, 700. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₈ H ₃ iSi] ⁺ :

275.2195; found: 275.2206.

[149] Example 9 - Synthesis of Compound (9)

[150] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (400 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [0.91 M] (4-methylpentan-2-yl)zinc bromide in dioxane (1.10 mL, 1 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at RT for 15 h. The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe and worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (9) as a clear volatile oil (170.1 mg, 77%): ^J H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.52 - 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.37 - 7.33 (m, 3H), 1.67 (ttd, J = 13.2, 6.6, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 1.16 (ddd, J = 13.4, 9.7, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.09 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.8, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 1.00 - 0.94 (m, 1H), 0.90 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.79 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.25 (s, 3H), 0.24 (s, 3H); ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 138.9, 134.1, 128.8, 127.7, 40.9, 25.5, 24.1, 21.1, 16.5, 14.0, -4.8, -4.9; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 0.16; FTIR (cm ¹ ): 2954, 2900, 2867, 1248, 1112, 830, 767, 733, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H ₂ iSi] ⁺ : 205.1413; found : 205.1419.

[151] Example 10 - Synthesis of Compounds ( 10-exo) and (10-endo) (10-exo) _{( 1} o-entfo)

[152] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (690 μΙ_), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [1.23 M] (lS,4#)-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2ylzinc bromide (810 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under l\h and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with wet Et.20 (3 mL) and H2O (3 mL) via syringe and worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compounds (10- exo) and (10-endo) as an inseparable mixture of exo:endo (80 : 20) diastereomers as a clear oil (230 mg, 99%) . Useful diagnostic peaks for each compound are listed : ( 10- exo) : *H INMR (600 MHz, CDCI3) δ 2.21 (dd, J = 3.7, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 1.06 - 1.05 (m, 2H), 0.84 - 0.78 (m, 1H), 0.24 (s, 3H), 0.22 (s, 3H) ; ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDC ) δ 139.6, 134.1, 128.8, 127.8, 38.1, 37.9, 37.1, 34.5, 32.9, 29.1, 28.8, - 3.9, -3.9; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -3.23. (10-endo) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCI3) δ 2.33 - 2.25 (m, 2H), 1.78 - 1.69 (m, 1H), 1.03 - 0.98 (m, 1H), 0.31 (s, 3H), 0.29 (s, 3H); ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 140.4, 133.9, 128.7, 127.8, 41.9, 39.8, 37.3, 32.0, 30.0, 28.6, 27.6, - 2.7, -2.9; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -2.81.

[153] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 16 mg, 10 pmol), Et∑0 (970 pL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [1.21 M] ( 1S,4 ?)- bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ylmagnesium bromide (830 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compounds (10-exo) and ( 10-enoO) as an inseparable mixture of exo:endo (73 : 27) diastereomers as a clear oil (150 mg, 65%). Useful diagnostic peaks for each compound are listed : ¾](10-exo) : ^l NMR (600

MHz, CDCb) δ 2.22 - 2.20 (m, 2H), 1.06 - 1.05 (m, 2H), 0.83 - 0.79 (m, 1H), 0.24 (s, 3H), 0.22 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.5, 134.0, 128.8, 127.8, 38.1, 37.9, 37.1, 34.5, 32.9, 29.0, 28.7, -3.9, -3.9, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -3.20. (10- endo): ^l NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 2.31 (s, 1H), 2.27 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 1.77 - 1.70 (m, 1H), 1.02 (tdd, J = 11.0, 4.9, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 0.31 (s, 3H), 0.28 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 140.4, 133.9, 128.7, 127.8, 41.9, 39.7, 37.3, 32.0, 30.0, 28.5, 27.6, -2.7, -3.0, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -2.78. [154] Example 11 - Synthesis of Compound (11)

[155] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos) ₂ PdI ₂ (16 mg, 10 mol), dioxane (260 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsiiyi iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [0.80 M] a-methylbenzylzinc bromide in dioxane (1.25 mL, 1 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 16 h. The reaction was quenched with THF (0.4 mL), stirred for 15 min, and then wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) were added via syringe and worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford 233 mg of mixture: compound (11), DL-2,3- diphenylbutane, r?eso-2,3-diphenylbutane, and (PhMe2Si)20 in a relative ratio

78:8:5:9. This mixture was purified by reverse phase chromatography on Biotage instrument using SNAP Ultra C18120 g column (50:50 MeCN:H ₂ 0 to 80:20 MeCN:H ₂ 0 linear gradient) to obtain compound (11) as a colorless oil (171.1 mg, 71%): ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.43 - 7.29 (m, 5H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.39 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 1.35 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 0.25 (s, 3H), 0.21 (s, 3H); ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 145.4, 137.8, 134.3, 129.1, 128.1, 127.7, 127.5, 124.6, 29.7, 15.3, -4.2, -5.3; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ - 1.06; FTIR (cm ¹ ): 3023, 2957, 2870, 1495, 1450, 1427, 1248, 1112, 833, 817, 775, 735, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₆ H ₂ oSi] ⁺ : 240.1334; found: 240.1345.

[156] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos) ₂ PdI ₂ 16 mg, 10 pmol), Et ₂ 0 (100 pL), dimethylphenylsiiyi chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [0.55 M] (1- phenylethyl)magnesium bromide (1.8 mL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) then by reverse phase chromatography on C18 modifed silica (gradient from acetonitrile:water = 50:50 to acetonitrile:water = 75:25) to afford compound (11) as a clear oil (129 mg, 54%): ^l H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.40 - 7.30 (m, 5H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.38 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 1.33 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 0.24 (s, 3H), 0.19 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 145.2, 137.5, 134.1, 129.0, 127.9, 127.5, 127.3, 124.4, 29.5, 15.1, -4.4, -5.5, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -1.03.

[157] Example 12 - Synthesis of Compound (12)

[158] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdh ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (745 pL), triethyiamine ( 140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [ 1.32 M] (4-phenylbutan-2-yl)zinc bromide (760 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with dry THF (405 pL, 5 equiv, 5 mmol) via syringe and allowed to stir 15 minutes at RT then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound ( 12) as a clear oil (267 mg, 99%) : ^J H NMR (600 MHz, CD ₂ CI2) δ 7.49 - 7.46 (m, 2H), 7.36 - 7.30 (m, 3H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.14 (t,

J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.76 (ddd, J = 14.6, 10.4, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.1, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.79 (dddd, J = 13.7, 10.3, 6.6, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.44 - 1.36 (m, 1 H), 1.02 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (ddp, J = 11.2, 7.3, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 0.26 (s, 3H), 0.25 (s, 3H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDC ) δ 143.0, 138.6, 134.1, 128.9, 128.6, 128.4, 127.8, 125.7, 35.0, 33.9, 19.0, 14.1, -4.6, -4.8; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDC ) δ - 0.08; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3067, 3025, 2953, 2864, 1454, 1427, 1248, 1112, 833, 812, 772, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H ₂ 2Si] ⁺ : 253.1413 ; found : 253.1403.

[159] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), diethyl ether ( 1.1 mL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [ 1.34 M] (4- phenylbutan-2-yl)magnesium bromide (750 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes gradient to hexanes: dichloromethane = 95 : 5) to afford compound ( 12) as a clear oil (264 mg, 98%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.50 - 7.47 (m, 2H), 7.37 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.17 - 7.13 (m, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.76 (ddd, J = 14.0, 10.4, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.46 (ddd, J = 13.6, 10.1, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.79 (dddd, J = 13.7, 10.3, 6.7, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.41 (dtd, J = 13.6, 10.3, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.02 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.96 - 0.89 (m, 1H), 0.26 (s, 3H), 0.25 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 143.0, 138.7, 134.1, 128.9, 128.6, 128.4, 127.8, 125.7, 35.0, 33.9, 19.0, 14.1, -4.6, -4.8, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.05.

[160] Example 13 - Synthesis of Compound ( 13)

[161] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (580 μΙ_), triethylamine ( 140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.09 M] 4-(4-(ethoxycarbonyl)phenyl)butan-2yl)zinc bromide (920 μΙ_, 1 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 ml_) via syringe and worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes: dichloromethane = 90 : 10 gradient to hexanes:dichloromethane = 80 : 20) and product dried (50 °C/0.1 mmHg) for 43 h to afford compound ( 13) as a clear oil (276.1 mg, 81%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.94 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.49 - 7.43 (m, 2H ), 7.39 - 7.30 (m, 3H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 4.37 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (ddd, J = 14.3, 9.9, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.52 (ddd, J = 13.6, 9.7, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.80 (dddd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.48 - 1.39 (m, 1H), 1.39 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (dtq, J = 14.9, 7.6, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 0.26 (s, 3H), 0.25 (s, 3H) ; ¹³ C N MR ( 101 MHz, CDCI3) δ 166.8, 148.4, 138.4, 134.0, 129.7, 129.0, 128.5, 128.0, 127.8, 60.9, 34.9, 33.5, 18.8, 14.5, 14.0, -4.6, - 5.0; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCI3) δ -0.04; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2954, 2864, 2361, 2340, 1427, 1718, 1610, 1275, 1248, 1107, 1021, 833, 701. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C ₂ iH290 ₂ Si] ⁺ : 341.1937; found : 341.1926.

[162] Example 14 - Synthesis of Compound ( 14)

According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (710 pl_), triethylamine ( 140 μ1_, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [1.26 M] (4-(4-methoxyphenyl)butan-2yl)zinc bromide (795 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with wet Et20 (3 mL) and H2O (3 mL) via syringe and worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes: DCM = 85 : 15 ; ) to afford compound ( 14) as a clear oil (257 mg, 86%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.50 - 7.44 (m, 2H), 7.38 - 7.30 (m, 3H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.71 (ddd, J = 14.4, 10.2, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (ddd, J = 13.7, 9.9, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.82 - 1.73 (m, 1H), 1.42 - 1.34 (m, 1H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.94 - 0.85 (m, 1H), 0.25 (s, 3H), 0.24 (s, 3H); ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 157.8, 138.7, 135.1, 134.1, 129.4, 128.9, 127.8, 113.9, 55.4, 34.08, 34.07, 18.9, 14.1, -4.6, -4.8; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.08; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3068, 2998, 2952, 2864, 1612, 1512, 1246, 1177, 1113, 1038, 816, 771, 735, 702. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for

[Ci9H ₂ 60Si] ⁺ : 298.1753; found : 298.1741.

[ 164] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 mol), diethyl ether (620 M L), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 μ!_, 1.2 mmol), and [0.85 M] (4-(4- methoxyphenyl)butan-2-yl)magnesium bromide (1.18 mL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under l\h and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes gradient to hexanes:dichloromethane = 90: 10) to afford compound (14) as a clear oil (283 mg, 95%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.50 - 7.46 (m, 2H), 7.36 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 2.70 (ddd, J = 14.5, 10.2, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (ddd, J = 13.6, 10.0, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.74 (dddd, J = 13.6, 10.2, 6.8, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.40 - 1.33 (m, 1H), 1.00 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (dqd, J = 11.0, 7.6, 7.2, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 0.25 (s, 3H), 0.24 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 158.3, 139.2, 135.5, 134.5, 129.8, 129.3, 128.1, 114.1, 55.7, 34.6, 34.4, 19.3, 14.3, - 4.5, -4.7, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.17.

[ 165] Example 15 - Synthesis of Compound (15)

[ 166] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (700 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [1.25 M] (4-(4-chlorophenyl)butan-2-yl)zinc bromide (800 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with dry THF (405 pL, 5 equiv, 5 mmol) via syringe and allowed to stir 15 minutes at RT then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (15) as a clear oil (285 mg, 94%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.46 (dd, J = 7.3, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (q, J = 5.6 Hz, 3H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 2.71 (ddd, J = 14.3, 10.0, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (ddd, J = 13.7, 9.7, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (dddd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.42 - 1.34 (m, 1 H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (dqd, J - 10.9, 7.3, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 0.25 (s, 3H), 0.24 (s, 3H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 M Hz, CDCb) δ 141.4, 138.5, 134.1, 131.4, 129.9, 129.0, 128.5, 127.8, 34.3, 33.8, 18.9, 14.1, -4.6, -4.9; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.05 ; FTIR (οην^ ^Οδδ, 2953, 2864, 1492, 1427, 1248, 1111, 1092, 1015, 831, 812, 701, 522, 472. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₈ H22SiCI] ⁺ : 301.1179;

found : 301.1166.

[ 167] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdb ( 16 mg, 10 μιτιοΙ), diethyl ether (0.52 ml_), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 μΙ_, 1.2 mmol), and [0.79 M] 4-(4- (chloro)phenyl)butan-2-yl)magnesium bromide ( 1.28 imL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under INh and stirred at RT for 24 h. After worku p, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) then by reverse phase chromatography on C18 modified silica (gradient from acetonitrile : water = 50 : 50 to acetonitrile :water 100 : 0) to afford compound ( 15) as a clear oil (272 mg, 89%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.52 -

7.43 (m, 2H), 7.40 - 7.32 (m, 3H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 2.76 - 2.69 (m, 1 H), 2.44 (ddd, J = 13.7, 9.7, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.77 (dddd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 7.0, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.40 (dtd, J = 13.9, 10.1, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.02 (d, J - 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.94 - 0.83 (m, 1 H), 0.27 (s, 3H), 0.26 (s, 3H) . ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 141.4, 138.6, 134.1, 131.5, 129.9, 129.0, 128.5, 127.8, 34.3, 33.8, 18.9, 14.1, -4.6, -4.9. ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.05.

[ 168] Example 16 - Synthesis of Compound ( 16)

[ 169] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (640 pL), triethylamine ( 140 μΙ_, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [ 1.14 M] (4-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)butan-2yl)zinc bromide (880 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at RT for 8 h. The reaction was quenched with THF (405 pL, 5 equiv, 5 mmol) via syringe and allowed to stir 15 minutes at RT then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes: ethyl acetate = 99: 1 ) and product dried (45 °C/0.1 mmHg) for 7 h to afford compound ( 16) as a clear oil (276.1 mg, 81%) : *H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.50 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.48 - 7.44 (m, 2H), 7.39 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (ddd, J = 14.4, 10.1, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (ddd, J = 13.6, 9.8, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 1.79 (dddd, J = 13.6, 10.2, 6.9, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.47 - 1.36 (m, 1H), 1.02 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (ddp, J = 11.4, 7.6, 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 0.26 (s, 3H), 0.25 (s, 3H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDC ) δ 147.0, 138.4, 134.0, 129.0, 128.8, 128.0 (q, J = 32.2 Hz), 127.8, 125.3 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 124.5 (q, J = 271.9 Hz), 34f.8, 33.6, 18.9, 14.1, -4.6, - 5.0; ¹⁹ F NMR (376 MHz, CDCb) δ -62.22; ²⁹ Si N MR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.03; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2954, 2866, 2361 , 1618, 1427, 1326, 1249, 1163, 1124, 1068, 1018, 814, 701. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci8H ₂ oF ₃ Si] ⁺ : 321.1286; found : 321.1271.

[ 170] Example 17 - Synthesis of Compound ( 17

[ 171] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (780 pL), triethylamine ( 140 μΙ_, 1 mmol), trimethylsilyl iodide (290 pl_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.25 M] (4-(4-chlorophenyl)butan-2-yl)zinc bromide (800 μΙ_, 1 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 4 h . The reaction was quenched with wet Εί∑0 (3 mL) and H2O (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound ( 17) as a clear oil (232 mg, 96%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.25 - 7.22 (m, 2H), 7.13 - 7.08 (m, 2H), 2.76 (ddd, J = 14.4, 10.1 , 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.47 (ddd, J = 13.8, 10.1, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.74 (dddd, J = 13.8, 10.4, 6.7, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.38 (dtd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 0.99 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.65 - 0.56 (m, 1 H), -0.04 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 9H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 141.6, 131.4, 129.9, 128.5, 34.5, 34.0, 19.4, 14.0, -3.1 ; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ 4.55; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2953, 2865, 1492, 1248, 1093, 1016, 856, 834, 747, 521. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H ₂ oSiCI] ⁺ : 239.1023; found : 239.1026.

[ 172] Example 18 - Synthesis of Compound ( 18)

[ 173] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (650 μΙ_), triethylamine ( 140 μΙ_, 1 mmol), benzyldimethylsilyl iodide (410 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.25 M] (4-(4-chlorophenyl)butan-2-yl)zinc bromide (800 μ!_, 1 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was diluted with dry THF (405 μΙ_, 5 equiv, 5 mmol) via syringe and allowed to stir 15 minutes at RT then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound ( 18) as a clear oil (313 mg, 99%) : ¹ N R (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.24 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.95 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.77 (ddd, J = 14.3, 10.1, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.45 (ddd, J = 13.6, 9.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.08 (s, 2H), 1.74 (dddd, J = 13.4, 10.0, 6.9, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.43 - 1.35 (m, 1 H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.69 (dqd, J - 10.7, 7.3, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), -0.08 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 141.2, 140.2, 131.3, 129.7, 128.4, 128.1, 123.9, 34.1, 33.7, 23.9, 17.8, 13.7, -5.2, -5.3; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ 5.24; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3081, 3024, 2952, 2864, 1600, 1492, 1452, 1248, 1093, 1015, 830, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₉ H ₂ 6SiCI] ⁺ : 317.1492; found : 317.1490.

[ 174] Example 19 - Synthesis of Compound ( 19)

[ 175] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdh 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (610 pL), triethylamine ( 140 μΙ_, 1 mmol), methyldiphenylsilyl iodide (450 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.25 M] (4-(4-chlorophenyl)butan-2-yl)zinc bromide (800 μΙ_, 1 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with dry THF (405 μΙ_, 5 equiv, 5 mmol) via syringe and allowed to stir 15 minutes at RT then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound ( 19) as a clear oil (291 mg, 80%) : ^: H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.49 - 7.45 (m, 4H), 7.41 - 7.30 (m, 6H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (ddd, J = 13.9, 9.4, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.47 (dt, J = 13.7, 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.91 - 1.79 (m, 1 H), 1.49 - 1.40 (m, 1 H), 1.35 - 1.23 (m, 1H), 1.08 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.52 (s, 3H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 141.0, 136.4, 136.2, 134.8, 134.8, 131.3, 129.8, 129.1, 129.1, 128.3, 127.8, 127.8, 34.0, 33.6, 17.0, 14.1, -6.4; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -4.70; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3068, 2952, 2864, 1491, 1427, 1252, 1111, 1015, 788, 737, 700, 490, 477. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C ₂₃ H24SiCI] ⁺ : 363.1336; found : 363.1320.

[ 176] Example 20 - Synthesis of Compound (20)

[ 177] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (700 pL), triethylamine (140 pL, 1 mmol), triethylsilyl iodide (360 pl_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.25 M] (4-(4-chlorophenyl)butan-2-yl)zinc bromide (800 pL, 1 mmol) were combined under l\h and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with wet Et20 (3 mL) and H2O (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (20) as a clear oil (85 mg, 30%) : ^J H NMR (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.24 (d, J - 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 2.79 (ddd, J = 14.3, 10.2, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (ddd, J = 13.6, 9.9, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.75 (dddd, J = 13.4, 10.0, 6.9, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 1.46 - 1.38 (m, 1 H), 1.02 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 9H), 0.82 - 0.74 (m, 1H), 0.53 (q, J = 7.9 Hz, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 141.6, 131.4, 129.9, 128.5, 34.6, 34.2, 16.5, 14.2, 7.8, 2.3; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ 8.20; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2952, 2909, 874, 1492, 1456, 1239, 1093, 1016, 834, 806, 732, 521. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₄ H22SiCI] ⁺ : 253.1179; found : 253.1177.

[ 178] Example 21 - Synthesis of Compound (21 )

[ 179] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), dioxane (500 pl_), triethylamine ( 140 pL, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 pL, 2 mmol), and [ 1.05 M] (3-methylbutan-2-yl)zinc iodide in dioxane ( 1.00 mL, 1.05 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 4 h . The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (21) as a clear volatile oil ( 175.1 mg, 81%) : ^: H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.54 - 7.51 (m, 2H), 7.37 - 7.33 (m, 3H), 1.87 (heptd, J = 6.8, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 0.94 - 0.89 (m, 7H), 0.81 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.30 (s, 3H), 0.29 (s, 3H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.9, 134.0, 128.7, 127.8, 29.0, 26.8, 23.2, 19.9, 9.7, -3.2, -3.3 ; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.85; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2955, 2871, 1465, 1427, 1248, 1111, 834, 817, 768, 733, 700. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H2 ₂ Si] ⁺ : 206.1491 ; found :

206.1482.

[180] Example 22 - Synthesis of Compounds (22) and (23)

[181] According to general procedure A, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 mol), dioxane (60 μΙ_), triethylamine (140 μΙ_, 1 mmol), dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (360 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [0.54 M] (3,3- dimethylbutan-2-yl)zinc iodide ( 1.85 mL, 1 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at RT for 8 h . The reaction was quenched with wet EtOAc (0.5 mL) and brine (3 mL) via syringe then worked up according to general procedure B and purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford an inseparable mixture of isomers (22) : (23) (62 : 38) as a clear oil ( 123.0 mg, 56%) : Useful diagnostic peaks for each compound are listed . (22) : ^X H NMR (400 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.56 - 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.38 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 0.98 - 0.92 (m, 4H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.36 (s, 3H), 0.32 (s, 3H) ; ¹³ C NMR (101 MHz, CDCI3) δ 141.2, 134.0, 128.6, 127.7, 33.7, 32.3, 30.3, 11.9, -0.5, - 2.0; ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ -2.06. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C ₁₃ H ₂ iSi] ⁺ : 205.1413; found : 205.1407. (23) : *H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.55 - 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.38 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 1.22 - 1.15 (m, 2H), 0.85 (s, 9H), 0.72 - 0.65 (m, 2H), 0.25 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR ( 101 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.8, 133.7, 128.9, 127.8, 37.9, 31.2, 28,9, 9.8, - 3.0 ; ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -2.21. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C ₁₃ H ₂ iSi] ⁺ : 205.1413 ; found : 205.1406. (22) +(23) : FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2955, 2911, 1466, 1427, 1363, 1249, 1112, 834, 815, 700.

[182] Example 23 - Synthesis of Compound (24)

[183] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (0.3 mL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 μί, 1.2 mmol), and [0.67 M] 3- pentylmagnesium bromide ( 1.50 mL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, the crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (24) as a clear oil (203 mg, 99%): ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.55 - 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.38 - 7.34 (m, 3H), 1.54 (dqd, J = 14.7, 7.5, 5.3 Hz, 2H), 1.38 (dp, J = 14.7, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 6H), 0.72 (tt, J = 7.5, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 0.29 (s, 6H). ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 139.8, 134.0, 128.8, 127.8, 29.04, 21.9, 13.8, - 3.4. ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 1.0.

[184] Example 24 - Synthesis of Compound (25)

[185] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pd (16 mg, 10 prnol), diethyl ether (0.76 mL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [0.96 M] (trimethylsilyl)methylmagnesium chloride (1.04 mL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (25) as a clear oil (122 mg, 55%): ^J H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.59 - 7.48 (m, 2H), 7.38 - 7.33 (m, 3H), 0.31 (s, 6H), 0.02 (s, 2H), -0.01 (s, 9H). ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz CDCb) δ 141.5, 133.4, 128.86, 127.8, 3.4, 1.4, 0.0. ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 0.5, -4.2. FTIR (cm ¹ ): 2953, 2897, 1426, 1250, 1113, 1051, 836, 698. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [CnHi9Si ₂ ] ⁺ [M- CH ₃ ] ⁺ : 207.1025; found: 207.1027.

[186] Example 25 - Synthesis of Compound (26)

[187] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 prnol), Et2<D (750 pL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [0.95 M]

neopentylmagnesium bromide (1.05 mL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N∑and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (26) as a clear oil (205 mg, 99%): ^X H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.55 - 7.52 (m, 2H), 7.42 - 7.29 (m, 3H), 0.95 (s, 11H), 0.35 (s, 6H). ¹³ C NMR (101 MHz, CDCb) δ 141.0, 133.6, 128.7, 127.8, 33.2, 33.2, 31.3, -0.4. ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -5.7. FTIR (cm ¹ ): 2954, 2893, 2869, 1465, 1427, 1363, 1249, 1113, 832, 707. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H ₂ 2Si] ⁺ [M] ⁺ : 206.1491 ; found : 206.1501.

[188] Example 26 - Synthesis of Compound (27)

[ 189] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (50 pL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [0.40 M] 2-methyl-2- phenylpropylmagnesium chloride (2.50 mL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (27) as a clear oil ( 136.2 mg, 51%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.42 - 7.37 (m, 2H), 7.33 - 7.32 (m, 2H), 7.30 - 7.27 (m, 3H), 7.27 - 7.22 (m, 2H), 7.15 - 7.13 (m, 1H), 1.37 (s, 2H), 1.32 (s, 6H), 0.01 (s, 6H). °C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 151.1, 140.8, 133.6, 128.7, 128.1, 127.8, 125.7, 125.6, 37.5, 34.2, 32.6, -1.2. ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -5.7. FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2959, 2360, 2339, 1652, 1558, 1456, 1110, 826. 668. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for

Ci7H ₂ iSi ⁺ [M-CH3] ⁺ : 253.1413; found : 253.1417.

[190] Example 27 - Synthesis of Compound (28)

[191] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdb (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (1.40 mL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [2.62 M]

phenylmagnesium bromide (400 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes) then by reverse phase chromatography on C18 modifed silica (gradient from acetonitrile:water = 50 : 50 to acetonitrile:water = 100:0) to afford compound (28) as a clear oil (215 mg, 97%) : H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.61 - 7.50 (m, 4H), 7.40 - 7.35 (m, 6H), 0.59 (s, 6H). ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 138.4, 134.4, 129.2, 128.0, -2.2. ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -8.1.

[192] Example 28 - Synthesis of Compound (29)

[193] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdh (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (1.3 mL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [2.0 M] ortho- tolylmagnesium bromide (0.500 mL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (29) as a clear oil (210 mg, 93%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.51 - 7.47 (m, 3H), 7.38 - 7.31 (m, 3H), 7.29 (td, J = 7.5, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (d, J - 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 0.58 (s, 6H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 144.7, 139.7, 136.8, 135.9, 134.6, 130.4, 130.1, 129.5, 128.4, 125.5, 23.5, -1.0, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDC ) δ -8.1, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3067, 3050, 3003, 2956, 1589, 1428, 1250, 1130, 1112, 817, 775, 701, 642, 474. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for Ci ₄ Hi ₅ Si ⁺ [M] ⁺ : 211.0943; found : 211.0952.

[ 194] Example 29 - Synthesis of Compound (30)

[195] According to general procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdb (16 mg, 10 pmol), Ef.20 (720 pL), dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (200 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [0.93 M] 2- mesitylmagnesium bromide ( 1.08 mL, 1 ,0 mmol) were combined under 2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (30) as a clear oil (250 mg, 98%) : ^J H NMR (400 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.52 - 7.44 (m, 2H), 7.35 - 7.29 (m, 3H), 6.84 (s, 2H), 2.30 (s, 6H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 0.63 (s, 6H). ¹³ C NMR (101 MHz, CDCb) δ 145.2, 141.7, 139.2, 133.5, 130.8, 129.3, 128.7, 128.0, 25.1, 21.1, 3.2. ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -9.0. FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2954, 1605, 1450, 1427, 1250, 1105, 816, 701, 667. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for Ci ₇ H22Si ⁺ [M] ⁺ : 254.1491 ; found : 254.1495.

[196] Example 30 - Synthesis of Compound (31)

[ 197] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 prnol), Et20 (1.04 mL), trimethylsilyl chloride (150 μΙ_, 1.2 mmol), and [1.43 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (700 μί., 1.0 mmol) were combined under l\h and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (31) as a clear oil ( 154 mg, 75%) : ¹ h NMR (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.29 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.21 - 7.16 (m, 3H), 2.81 (ddd, J = 14.8, 10.6, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.3, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.79 (dddd, J = 13.9, 10.3, 6.5, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 1.49 - 1.33 (m, 1H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.65 (dqd, J = 10.9, 7.4, 3.7 Hz, 1H), -0.03 (s, 9H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 143.3, 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 35.2, 34.1, 19.6, 14.0, -3.1, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 4.53, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3027, 2953, 2865, 1604, 1496, 1454, 1248, 856, 834, 745, 698. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H2iSi] ⁺ : 205.1413; found : 205.1418.

[ 198] Example 31 - Synthesis of Compound (32)

[ 199] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdh (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (950 μΙ_), phenethyldimethylsilyl chloride (240 μΐ,, 1.2 mmol), and [1.23 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (810 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) then by reverse phase chromatography on C18 modifed silica (gradient from acetonitrile:water = 75 : 25 to acetonitrile:water = 95:0) to afford compound (32) as a clear oil (280 mg, 94%) : ^J H NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.29 - 7.23 (m, 4H), 7.22 - 7.12 (m, 6H), 2.82 (ddd, J = 14.3, 10.5, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.59 (dd, J = 11.4, 6.1 Hz, 2H), 2.50 (ddd, J = 13.6, 10.1, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.84 - 1.76 (m, 1H), 1.47 - 1.39 (m, 1H), 1.04 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.90 - 0.85 (m, 2H), 0.78 - 0.70 (m, 1H), -0.01 (s, 6H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCI3) δ 145.5, 143.1, 128.6, 128.4, 127.9, 125.8, 125.7, 35.2, 34.1, 30.2, 18.5, 1.6.1, 14.0, -4.98, -5.00, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 5.5. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₉ H ₂ 5Si] ⁺ : 281.1726; found : 281.1716.

[200] Example 32 - Synthesis of Compound (33)

[201] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2PdI ₂ (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (930 pL), (3,3-dimethylbutyl)dimethylsilyl chloride (250 pl_, 1.2 mmol), and [1.23 M] (4- phenylbutan-2-yl)magnesium bromide (810 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under INh and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) then by reverse phase chromatography on C18 modified silica (gradient from acetonitrile:water = 75 : 25 to acetonitrile:water = 100: 0) to afford compound (33) as a clear oil (255 mg, 92%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.28 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.21 - 7.16 (m, 3H), 2.82 (ddd, J - 14.1, 10.4, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.1, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.78 (dddd, J = 13.7, 10.3, 6.7, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.46 - 1.37 (m, 1H), 1.11 (ddd, J = 12.7, 5.8, 2.1 Hz, 2H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (s, 9H), 0.74 - 0.66 (m, 1H), 0.45 - 0.40 (m, 2H), -0.07 (s, 3H), -0.07 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 143.2, 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 38.0, 35.2, 34.1, 31.2, 29.0, 18.4, 14.1, 7.8, -5.1, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 6.14, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3027, 2952, 2913, 2865, 1604, 1466, 1454, 1363, 1248, 1159, 886, 835, 745, 698. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₇ H29Si] ⁺ : 261.2039; found : 261.2038.

[202] Example 33 - Synthesis of Compound (34)

[203] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdh (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 (1.23 imL), (3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)dimethylsilyl chloride (210 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [1.78 M] (4- phenylbutan-2-yl)magnesium bromide (560 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (34) as a clear oil (234 mg, 81%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.29 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.21 - 7.15 (m, 3H), 2.83 (ddd, J = 14.2, 10.1, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.51 (ddd, J = 13.6, 9.8, 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.03 - 1.89 (m, 2H), 1.77 (dddd, J = 13.6, 10.2, 6.9, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 1.49 - 1.39 (m, 1H), 1.03 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.78 - 0.66 (m, 3H), -0.01 (s, 3H), -0.01 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 142.7, 128.5, 128.5, 127.80 (q, J = 276.7 Hz) 125.9, 34.9, 33.8, 28.95 (q, J = 29.8 Hz), 18.0, 13.8, 5.5, -5.3, -5.4, ¹⁹ F NMR (565 MHz, C CDCb) δ 68.78, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ 6.11, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3028, 2953, 2867, 1604, 1497, 1364, 1264, 1212, 1125, 1067, 900, 844, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₅ H ₂ 4F ₃ Si] ⁺ : 289.1599; found : 289.1587.

[204] Example 34 - Synthesis of Compound (35)

[205] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), Et20 ( 1.1 mL), chloromethyldimethylsilyl chloride ( 160 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [ 1.34 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (750 pl_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (35) as a clear oil ( 154 mg, 64%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.29 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.21 - 7.16 (m, 3H), 2.81 (s, 3H), 2.52 (ddd, J =

13.5, 10.3, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.80 (dddd, J = 13.9, 10.3, 6.5, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.51 - 1.42 (m, 1 H), 1.05 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (dqd, J = 11.1, 7.3, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 142.7, 128.5, 128.5, 125.9, 35.0, 33.8, 29.5,

17.6, 13.9, -6.0, -6.1, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ 6.21, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3027, 2954, 2927, 2865, 1604, 1496, 1454, 1251, 842, 746, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₃ H ₂ 2CISi] ⁺ : 241.1179; found : 241.1182.

[206] Example 35 - Synthesis of Compound (36) CI

[207] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos) ₂ PdI ₂ (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et ₂ 0 (970 pL), 4- chlorobutyidimethylsilyl chloride (220 μΙ_, 1.2 mmol), and [1.23 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (810 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (36) as a clear oil (247 mg, 87%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.28 (dd, J = 8.3, 6.9 Hz, 2H), 7.21 - 7.14 (m, 3H), 3.53 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.81 (ddd, J = 13.6, 10.3, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (ddd, J - 13.5, 10.1, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.82 - 1.73 (m, 3H), 1.46 - 1.36 (m, 3H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.69 (dqd, J = 10.8, 7.3, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 0.55 - 0.48 (m, 2H), -0.05 (s, 3H), -0.05 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCb) δ 143.1, 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 44.9, 36.4, 35.1, 34.1, 21.4, 18.5, 14.0, 13.1, - 4.98, -5.01, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ 5.45, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3026, 2952, 2931, 2864, 1603, 1496, 1454, 1248, 834, 747, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci6H ₂ 8CISi] ⁺ : 283.1649; found : 283.1658.

[208] Example 36 - Synthesis of Compound (37)

[209] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos) ₂ Pdh (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et ₂ 0 (810 pL), 4- bromobutyldimethylsilyl chloride (220 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [1.34 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (750 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) then reverse phase chromatography on C18 modified silica (gradient from acetonitle:water = 70 : 30 to acetonitrile:water = 100: 0) to afford compound (37) as a clear oil (302 mg, 92%) : ^: H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.28 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 3.41 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (ddd, J = 14.7, 10.4, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.49 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.1, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.85 (p, J - 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.77 (dddd, J = 13.7, 10.2, 6.7, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 1.41 (dddd, J = 14.7, 10.3, 6.8, 3.5 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.69 (dqd, J = 10.8, 7.4, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 0.53 - 0.47 (m, 2H), -0.05 (s, 6H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDC ) δ 143.1 , 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 36.6, 35.1, 34.1, 33.8, 22.6, 18.4, 14.0, 12.9, -4.98, -5.01, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 M Hz, CDC ) δ 5.42, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3026, 2951, 2930, 2864, 1603, 1496, 1454, 1248, 835, 748, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₅ H ₂ 4BrSi] ⁺ : 311.0831 ; found : 311.0842.

[210] Example 37 - Synthesis of Compound (38)

[211] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos) ₂ PdI ₂ ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), Et ₂ 0 (950 pL), 5- hexenyldimethylsilyl chloride (240 pL, 1.2 mmol), and [ 1.23 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (810 pl_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) then reverse phase chromatography on C18 modified silica (gradient from acetonitle : water = 70 : 30 to acetonitrile : water = 100 : 0) to afford compound (38) as a clear oil (251 mg, 91%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.31 - 7.26 (m, 2H), 7.20 - 7.15 (m, 3H), 5.80 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.99 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.95 - 4.91 (m, 1 H), 2.84 - 2.77 (m, 1 H), 2.49 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.04 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.77 (dddd, J = 13.7, 10.2, 6.6, 3.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.45 - 1.35 (m, 3H), 1.31 - 1.24 (m, 2H), 1.00 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.68 (dqd, J = 10.8, 7.4, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 0.53 - 0.47 (m, 2H), -0.07 (s, 3H), -0.07 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 143.2, 139.3, 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 114.3, 35.2, 34.1, 33.6, 33.1, 23.6, 18.6, 14.1, 13.7, -4.9, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ 5.31. FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3063, 3027, 2923, 2854, 1641, 1604, 1496, 1454, 1248, 909, 834, 746, 698. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C ₁₇ H ₂ 7Si] ⁺ : 259.1882; found : 259.1882.

[212] Example 38 - Synthesis of Compound (39)

[213] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 μπποΙ), Et20 ( 1.0 mL), pentafluorophenyldimethylsilyl chloride (230 μΙ_, 1.2 mmol), and [1.34 M] (4- phenylbutan-2-yl)magnesium bromide (750 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under l\h and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (39) as a clear oil (227 mg, 63%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.25 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (ddd, J = 14.6, 10.3, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.49 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.0, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (dddd, J = 13.7, 10.2, 6.7, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 1.45 (dddd, J = 16.9, 12.2, 8.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.09 (dp, J = 12.3, 4.7, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 1.04 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.39 (s, 3H), 0.38 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDC ) δ 149.2 (dddt, J = 241.4, 17.4, 8.7, 4.0 Hz), 142.5, 142.0 (dtt, J = 254.3, 12.9, 5.7 Hz), 138.3 - 136.2 (m), 128.5, 125.9, 110.0 - 109.3 (m), 34.9, 33.6, 19.0, 13.8, -3.34 (dt, J = 14.4, 3.7 Hz), ¹⁹ F NMR (565 MHz, CD2CI2) δ - 126.48 - - 126.61 (m), -152.97 (t, J - 19.8 Hz), -162.37 (td, J = 22.6, 8.6 Hz), ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 4.07, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3028, 2955, 2868, 1642, 1517, 1457, 1374, 1283, 1256, 1086, 969, 841, 802, 747, 699. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₇ Hi ₆ F ₅ Si] ⁺ : 343.0941 ; found : 343.0945.

[214] Example 39 - Synthesis of Compound (40)

[215] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pd (16 mg, 10 μηηοΙ), Et20 ( 1.3 mL), 4- btphenyldimethylsilyl chloride (300 mg, 1.2 mmol), and [1.43 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (700 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) then reverse phase chromatography on C18 modified silica (gradient from acetonitle: water = 80: 20 to acetonitrile: water = 90: 10) to afford compound (40) as a clear oil (287 mg, 83%) : ^J H NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.64 - 7.61 (m, 2H), 7.61 - 7.55 (m, 4H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.14 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H), 2.84 - 2.76 (m, 1H), 2.53 - 2.44 (m, 1H), 1.87 - 1.78 (m, 1H), 1.48 - 1.39 (m, 1H), 1.06 (t, J - 5.9 Hz, 3H), 1.00 - 0.92 (m, 1H), 0.31 - 0.27 (m, 6H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDCI3) δ 143.0, 141.7, 141.3, 137.4, 134.6, 128.9, 128.6, 128.4, 127.5, 127.3, 126.5, 125.7, 35.0, 33.9, 19.0, 14.2, -4.5, -4.7, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ -0.04, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3062, 3025, 2952, 2863, 1597, 1496, 1485, 1454, 1384, 1250, 1115, 1007, 826, 811, 756, 697. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C ₂₃ H25Si] ⁺ : 329.1726; found : 329.1731.

[216] Example 40 - Synthesis of Compound (41)

[217] According to procedure B, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 pmol), Et.20 (1.0 mL), 3- phenoxydimethylsilyl chloride (285 μΙ_, 1.2 mmol), and [1.43 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (700 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) then reverse phase chromatography on C18 modified silica (gradient from acetonitle:water = 80: 20 to acetonitrile:water = 90: 10) to afford compound (41) as a clear oil (314 mg, 87%) : ^J H NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.32 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.26 - 7.22 (m, 3H), 7.18 - 7.13 (m, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.00 - 6.95 (m, 3H), 2.76 (ddd, J = 14.9, 10.4, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.78 (dddd, J = 13.8, 10.3, 6.6, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.40 (dtd, J = 13.6, 10.2, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 1.02 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.96 - 0.87 (m, 1H), 0.25 (s, 3H), 0.24 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 158.2, 157.0, 143.5, 141.7, 130.3, 129.7, 129.6, 128.9, 128.8, 126.1, 125.1, 123.5, 120.0, 118.9, 35.4, 34.4, 19.4, 14.3, -4.5, -4.8, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 0.34, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3061, 3026, 2952, 2864, 1566, 1489, 1476, 1401, 1226, 1110, 812, 771, 697. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C ₂ 3H ₂ 5SiO] ⁺ :

345.1675; found : 345.1685. [218] Example 41 - Synthesis of Compound (42)

[219] According to procedure C, (DrewPhos)2Pdb ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), BU2O (910 pL), triethylsilyl chloride (340 pL, 2 mmol), and [ 1.34 M] (4- phenylbutan-2-yl)magnesium bromide (750 p L, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N2 and stirred at RT for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (42) as a clear oil (249 mg, 99%) : *Η NMR (600 M Hz, CDCI3) δ 7.28 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.20 - 7.15 (m, 3H), 2.84 (ddd, J = 14.1, 10.5, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.48 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.80 (dddd, J = 13.6, 10.0, 6.6, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.50 - 1.41 (m, 1 H), 1.04 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.93 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 9H), 0.81 (dqd, J = 10.6, 7.4, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 0.54 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 6H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCI3) δ 143.2, 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 35.3, 34.3, 16.7, 14.3, 7.8, 2.3, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDC ) δ 8.21, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3027, 2952, 2909, 2874, 1604, 1496, 1454, 1416, 1238, 1016, 730, 698. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₆ H ₂ 7Si] ⁺ : 247.1882; found : 247.1884.

[220] Example 42 - Synthesis of Compound (43)

[221] According to procedure C, (DrewPhos)2Pdb 16 mg, 10 pmol), BU2O (880 pL), cyclohexyldimethylsilyl chloride (370 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.34 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (750 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 24 h . After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (43) as a clear oil (210 mg, 90%) : *H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.28 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.20 - 7.15 (m, 3H), 2.82 (ddd, J = 14.3, 10.5, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.48 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.78 (dddd, J = 13.6, 10.1 , 6.6, 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.74 - 1.67 (m, 3H), 1.61 (dd, J = 26.0, 13.0 Hz, 2H), 1.46 - 1.36 (m, 1 H), 1.24 - 1.15 (m, 3H), 1.13 - 1.03 (m, 2H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.74 (dqd, J = 10.7, 7.4, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 0.68 (tt, J = 12.7, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), -0.11 (s, 3H), -0.12 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDC ) δ 143.3, 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 35.2, 34.2, 28.37, 28.36, 27.9,

27.8, 27.2, 24.3, 17.2, 14.2, -6.9, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCb) δ 5.66, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3026, 2919, 2847, 1604, 1496, 1446, 1246, 1099, 996, 888, 833, 799, 767, 698. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₈ H ₂ 9Si] ⁺ : 273.2039; found : 273.2031.

[222] Example 43 - Synthesis of Compound (44)

[223] According to procedure C, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 pmol), BU2O (950 μΙ_), isopropyldimethylsilyl chloride (310 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.34 M] (4~phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (750 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under ISh and stirred at RT for 24 h . After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (44) as a clear oil (210 mg, 90%) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDCb) δ 7.28 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.20 - 7.15 (m, 3H), 2.83 (ddd, J = 14.8, 10.6, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.49 (ddd, J = 13.5, 10.3, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.78 (dddd, J = 13.7, 10.1, 6.6, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.41 (ddt, J = 14.0, 10.5, 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.02 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.95 - 0.90 (m, 6H), 0.88 - 0.81 (m, 1 H), 0.76 (dqd, J = 10.7, 7.4, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), -0.10 (s, 3H), - 0.11 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCb) δ 143.2, 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 35.2, 34.3, 18.0, 17.9, 17.5, 14.2, 12.1, -7.20, -7.23, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3027, 2953, 2864, 1604, 1496, 1454, 1249, 997, 883, 832, 808, 765, 697. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₄ H ₂₃ Si] ⁺ : 219.1569; found : 219.1559.

[224] Example 44 - Synthesis of Compound (45)

[225] According to procedure C, (DrewPhos) ₂ Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 μιτιοΙ), Bu20 (850 μΙ_), diphenylmethylsilyl chloride (410 μΙ_, 2 mmol), and [ 1.34 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (750 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N ₂ and stirred at RT for 24 h . After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (45) as a clear oil (315 mg, 95%) : ^X H N MR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.50 - 7.47 (m, 4H), 7.39 - 7.31 (m, 6H), 7.24 (t, J - 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.16 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (ddd, J = 14.1 , 9.9, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.50 (ddd, J = 13.5, 9.5, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.91 - 1.82 (m, 1 H), 1.51 - 1.43 (m, 1H), 1.41 - 1.33 (m, 1 H), 1.09 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.53 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 143.4, 137.4, 137.2, 135.40, 135.37, 129.7, 129.6, 129.1, 128.8, 128.37, 128.35, 126.2, 35.4, 34.5, 17.8, 14.5, -6.2, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CDCi ₃ ) δ -4.7, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3068, 2953, 2856, 1603, 1495, 1427, 1251, 1110, 788, 737, 698, 476. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C22H ₂₃ Si] ⁺ : 315.1569; found : 315.1579.

[226] Example 45 - Synthesis of Compound (46)

[227] According to procedure D, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 ( 16 mg, 10 mol), BU2O (1.25 mL), triphenylsilyl chloride (590 mg, 2 mmol), and [ 1.34 M] (4- phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (750 μΙ_, 1.0 mmol) were combined under N∑and stirred at 50 °C for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes: DCM 100 : 0 to hexanes: DCM 90 : 10) to afford compound (46) as a viscous clear oil (267 mg, 68%) : ^l NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.50 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 6H), 7.42 - 7.37 (m, 3H), 7.37 - 7.31 (m, 6H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.86 (ddd, J = 13.8, 9.3, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.57 (dt, J = 13.5, 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.09 - 2.02 (m, 1H), 1.75 - 1.68 (m, 1H), 1.52 - 1.44 (m, 1 H), 1.21 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCI3) δ 143.2, 136.5, 135.2, 129.9, 129.2, 128.8, 128.4, 126.3, 35.3, 34.7, 16.7, 14.8, ²⁹ Si NMR ( 119 MHz, CD2CI2) δ -8.7, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3067, 3024, 2935, 2856, 1602, 1495, 1428, 1189, 1108, 998, 741, 698, 575, 510. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [C22H ₂₃ Si] ⁺ : 315.1569; found : 315.1578.

[228] Example 46 - Synthesis of Compound (47)

[229] According to procedure D, (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (16 mg, 10 μηηοΙ), BU2O (1.25 mL), tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (300 mg, 2 mmol), and [1.34 M] (4-phenylbutan-2- yl)magnesium bromide (750 pL, 1.0 mmol) were combined under ISh and stirred at 100 °C for 24 h. After workup, crude product was purified via silica gel flash

chromatography (hexanes) to afford compound (47) as a clear oil (74 mg, 30%) : ^l NMR (600 MHz, CD2CI2) δ 7.26 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.20 - 7.14 (m, 3H), 2.83 (ddd, J = 13.7, 10.5, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (ddd, J - 13.4, 10.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.85 (dddd, J = 13.5, 10.2, 6.6, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 1.48 - 1.39 (m, 1 H), 1.07 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.85 (ddq, J - 15.0, 7.5, 4.5, 3.6 Hz, 1H), -0.070 (s, 3H), -0.075 (s, 3H), ¹³ C NMR (151 MHz, CDC ) δ 143.2, 128.6, 128.4, 125.7, 35.2, 35.0, 27.6, 17.6, 17.4, 15.2, - 7.0, ²⁹ Si NMR (119 MHz, CDCb) δ 9.7, FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 3027, 2928, 2856, 1604, 1470, 1250, 828, 765, 697. HRMS (CI) m/z, calculated for [Ci ₅ H ₂ 5Si3 ⁺ : 233.1726; found : 233.1722.

[230] All-Chloride Experiments

[231] Synthesis of (DrewPhos)2Pdl2

[232] A 100 mL round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with bis(acetonitrile)dichloropalladium(II) (259 mg, 1 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and DrewPhos (1.2 g, 2 mmol, 2.0 equiv.). The flask was sealed with a rubber septum and purged 10 min with N2. CH2CI2 (20 mL) was added via syringe and the solution was stirred for 6 hours at RT. The solvent was then removed in vacuo. EtOAc ( 15 mL) was added and the flask sat overnight at RT. The solid was collected via vacuum filtration and rinsing with EtOH resulted in a stable, yellow solid (905 mg, 66% yield) : ^X H NMR (600 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.52 - 7.48 (m, 12H), 7.38 (s, 6H), 1.19 (s, 108H); ¹³ C NMR ( 151 MHz, CDCI3) δ 149.69 (t, J = 5.0 Hz), 130.41 (t, J = 23.9 Hz), 129.87 (t, J = 6.4 Hz), 123.83 , 35.01 , 31.54, ³¹ P NMR (243 MHz, CDCb) δ 26.82; FTIR (cm ¹ ) : 2963, 2903, 2868, 1590, 1477, 1421, 1363, 1266, 1249, 1138, 731, 705, 586; mp = >250 °C. HRMS (LIFDI) m/z, calculated for [C ₈ 4H i ₂ 6P2PdCI ₂ ] ⁺ : 1372.7747; fou nd : 1372.7599.

[233] Synthesis of Isopropylmagnesium Chloride

Me^MgCI

Me

[234] An oven-dried 25 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar and rubber septum was attached to a double manifold and cooled under vacuum. The flask was backfilled with N2, the septum removed, magnesium turnings (1.1 g, 45 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) were added. The septum was replaced; the flask was attached to a double manifold and purged with N2 for 10 min. The flask was held under positive N2 then Et20 (10 mL, [3 M]) was added. An initial amount of alkyl halide (~200-400 pL) was added and the reaction to start the reaction as evidenced by a minor exotherm. If reaction does not initiate, gentle warming (for example with a heating mantle) may be necessary. Once initiated, the flask was placed in a RT water bath and the remaining alkyl halide (2.74 mL, 2.36 g, 30 mmol, 1 equiv., total addition amount) was added dropwise over ~30 min. After full addition of the alkyl halide, the mixture was allowed to stir at RT for an additional 4 h. The excess magnesium was allowed to settle and the mixture was filtered via cannula to a Schlenk tube. Titration resulted in a [2.65 M] solution of isopropylmagnesium chloride. In this preparation, I ₂ was not used to activate the magnesium turnings.

[235] All-Chloride Process According to the Present Invention

[236] In a nitrogen filled glovebox, a 1-dram vial equipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with (DrewPhos)2PdCl2 (3.4 mg, 2.5 pmol, 0.01 equiv.), Et20 (350 pL) or BU2O (350 pL), and dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (50 pL, 51 mg, 300 pmol, 1.2 equiv.). Vial was then sealed with a septum cap and removed from the glovebox.

Isopropylmagnesium chloride [2.65 M] (94 pL, 250 pmol, 1 equiv.) was then added via syringe and the vial was then stirred at the indicated temperature for 24 h. The reaction was quenched with Et20 (1 mL) then H2O (0.5 mL) via syringe. n-Nonane (32 mg, 45 pL, 0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.) and 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (TMB) ( 14 mg, 0.25 mmol, 0.33 equiv.) were added as GC internal standards. Brine (1 mL) and Et20 (1 mL) were then added and the vials shaken. An aliquot was then filtered through a MgS04 and silica plug. The solution was directly analyzed by GC.

[237] Table 1 : All-Chloride Conditions

_MgC| 1 mol % (DrewPhos) ₂ PdCI ₂ Me^SiMo.Ph

J + Me ₂ PhSiCI ►

Me solvent, X °C, 24 h Me

1

Entry Solvent Temp Additive Yield (%) ^c

1 Et ₂ 0 rt 6

2 Bu ₂ 0 50 °C 70

3 Et ₂ 0 rt 0.25 equiv TMEDA 52 aYields determined by GC. All reactions gave >99: 1 B:L selectivity by GC.

[238] All reactions in the following paragraphs were performed at 0.25 mmol in a nitrogen-filled glovebox with a [0.5 M] overall concentration based on the sum of all liquid reagents.

[239] Examination of Stoichiometry

[240] In a nitrogen filled glovebox, a 1-dram vial equ ipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (4 mg, 2.5 μιτιοΙ, 0.01 equiv.), Er.20 (330 pL), and dimethylphenylsilyl chloride (52 pL, 53 mg, 313 pmol, 1.25 equiv. , or 46 μΙ_, 47 mg, 275 pmol, 1.1 equiv., or 42 pl_, 43 mg, 250 pmol, 1 equiv.) . Vial was then sealed with a septum cap and removed from the glovebox. Isopropylmagnesium bromide [2.13 M] ( 117 μΙ_, 250 pmol, 1 equiv., or 129 pL, 275 pL, 1.1 equiv., or 147 pL, 313 μηηοΙ, 1.25 equiv. ) was then added via syringe and the vial was then stirred at RT for the indicated time. The reaction was quenched with Et∑0 ( 1 mL) then H2O (0.5 mL) via syringe, n- Nonane (32 mg, 45 pL, 0.25 mmol, 1 equiv. ) and 1,3, 5-trimethoxybenzene (TMB) ( 14 mg, 0.25 mmol, 0.33 equiv. ) were added as GC internal standards. Brine ( 1 mL) and Et∑0 ( 1 mL) were then added and the vials shaken. An aliquot was then filtered through a MgS04 and Silica plug. The solution was directly analyzed by GC.

[241] Table 2 : Effect of Stoichiometry 1 mol % (DrewPhos) ₂ Pdl ₂

Me^MgBr X equiv Me,PhS,CI Me^SiMe Ph

Me Et ₂ 0, rt, X h Me

1

Entry Mg:Si 4 h (%) ^a 8 h (%) ^a 24 h (%) ^a

1 1 :1 .25 99 99 99

2 1 : 1.1 78 96 99

3 1 : 1 73 90 97

4 1 .1 : 1 74 88 93

5 1 .25:1 71 86 93 aYields determined by GC. All reactions gave >99:1 B:L selectivity by GC.

[242] Examination of Ethereal Solvents

[243] In a nitrogen filled glovebox, a 1-dram vial equipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with (DrewPhos^Pdb (4 mg, 2.5 μιτιοΙ, 0.01 equiv.), MTBE or CPME (280 μΙ_), and triethylsilyl chloride (84 μΙ_, 75 mg, 500 μιηοΙ, 2 equiv.) or iso- propyldimethylsilyl chloride (78 μΙ_, 68 mg, 500 μιτιοΙ, 2 equiv.). Vial was then sealed with a septum cap and removed from the glovebox. (4-phenylbutan- 2-yl)magnesium bromide [1.78 M] ( 140 μΙ_, 250 μηηοΙ, 1 equiv.) was then added via syringe and the vial was then stirred at 50 °C for the indicated time. The reaction was quenched with Et20 (1 mL) then H2O (0.5 mL) via syringe. n-Nonane (32 mg, 45 μΙ_, 0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.) and 1,3,5- trimethoxybenzene (TMB) ( 14 mg, 0.25 mmol, 0.33 equiv.) were added as GC and NMR internal standards. Brine (1 mL) and Et.20 (1 mL) were then added and the vials shaken. An aliquot was then filtered through a MgS0 ₄ and Silica plug. The solution was directly analyzed by GC then concentrated in vacuo and analyzed by NMR.

[244] Table 3 : Examination of Ethereal Solvents 1 mol % DrewPhos Pdl

Et ₃ Si = 28 'PrMe ₂ Si = 30

Entry [Si] MTBE CPME

1 Et ₃ Si 99 99

2 'PrMe ₂ Si 97 90 aYields determined by NMR. All reactions gave >99:1 B:L selectivity by GC.

[245] Examination of Silyl Electrophiles

[246] The use of other silyl electrophiles other than silyl iodides was also examined. Previous studies have shown that the addition of iodide additives can be beneficial with use of silyl chlorides, bromides, and triflates, so the reaction was also examined with Nal additive. The results show minimal reactivity with Me3SiBr in the absence of Nal, and modest reactivity with. For silyl chlorides and triflates, negligible reactivity was observed with or without Nal.

[247] In a nitrogen filled glovebox, a 1-dram vial equipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (0.01 equiv.), dioxane, triethylamine (1 equiv.), and trimethylsilyl halide (2 equiv.). Vial was then sealed with a septum cap and removed from GB. (4-phenylbutan-2-yl)zinc bromide (1 equiv.) was added via syringe and the flask was then stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with Et20 (1 mL) then H2O (0.5 mL) via syringe. Nonane (32 mg, 45 μΙ_, 0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.) and 1,3,5- trimethoxybenzene (TMB) (14 mg, 0.25 mmol, 0.33 equiv.) were added as GC and NMR internal standards respectively. Brine (1 mL) and Et20 ( 1 mL) were then added and the vials shaken. An aliquot was then filtered through a MgS0 ₄ and Silica plug. The solution was directly analyzed by GC. The solvent was removed in vacuo then analyzed by NMR.

[248] Table 4: Examination of Silyl Electrophiles 1 mol % DrewPhos Pdl

Entry Me ₃ SiX 0 equiv Nal ^a 3 equiv Nal

1 Me ₃ Sil 98% 99%

2 Me ₃ SiBr 26% 61 %

3 Me ₃ SiCI 1 % 1 1 %

4 Me ₃ SiOTf 2% 5%

"Yields obtained by H NMR with TMB as an internal standard.

[249] Examination of Dibutyl Zinc Reactivity

[250] The use of dialkylzinc reagents in the coupling reaction was also examined. As can be seen in Table 5, with Bu2Zn only trace background reaction is observed, which is comparable to the background reaction with BuZnBr. Under palladium-catalyzed conditions, quantitative alkylation resulted. Et3N does not effect this reaction. It is notable that only 0.5 equiv of Bu∑Zn is required in this reaction, both alkyl groups transfer to the product.

[251] In a nitrogen filled glovebox, a 1-dram vial equipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with (DrewPhos)2Pdl2 (0.01 equiv.), dioxane, triethylamine (1 equiv.), and dimethylphenylsilyl iodide (2 equiv.), and dibutylzinc (0.5 equiv.). Vial was then sealed with a septum cap, removed from GB, and stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with Et20 (1 mL) then H2O (0.5 mL) via syringe. Nonane (32 mg, 45 pL, 0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.) and 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (TMB) (14 mg, 0.25 mmol, 0.33 equiv.) were added as GC and NMR internal standards respectively. Brine (1 mL) and Et20 (1 mL) were then added and the vials shaken. An aliquot was then filtered through a MgS04 and Silica plug. The solution was directly analyzed by GC. The solvent was removed in vacuo then analyzed by NMR.

[252] Table 5 : Reactivity of Dibutylzinc X mol % (DrewPhos) ₂ Pdl ₂

X equiv Et ₃ N

₂ PhSil

dioxane, rt, 4 h

Entry % Pd 1 equiv Et ₃ N ^a 0 equiv Et ₃ N

1 1 99% 99%

2 0 7% 7%

aYields obtained by ¹ H NMR with TMB as an internal standard.

[253] Isolation of the palladium catalyzed reaction in the presence of triethylamine via flash chromatography (hexanes) afforded 5 as a clear oil (42 mg, 88%) : ^J H NMR (400 MHz, CDC ) δ 7.54 - 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.37 - 7.34 (m, 3H), 1.36 - 1.26 (m, 4H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.79 - 0.73 (m, 2H), 0.26 (s, 6H) ; ¹³ C NMR (101 MHz, CDCI ₃ ) δ

139.9, 133.7, 128.9, 127.8, 26.7, 26.3, 15.6, 13.9, -2.9. [254] Examination of Alkene Additives

[255] Alkenes appear to interfere with the reaction, as is reflected in the study shown in Table 6. This appears to be a function of alkene substitution, as the effect is most notable with lower substituted alkenes.

[256] In a nitrogen filled glovebox, a 1-dram vial equipped with a magnetic stirbar was charged with (DrewPhos)2Pdh (0.01 equiv), dioxane, triethylamine (1 equiv), alkene (1 equiv) and trimethylsilyl halide (2 equiv). Vial was then sealed with a septum cap and removed from GB. Isopropylzinc bromide (1 equiv) was added via syringe and the flask was then stirred at RT for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with Et.20 (1 mL) then H2O (0.5 mL) via syringe. Nonane (32 mg, 45 pL, 0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) and 1,3,5- trimethoxybenzene (TMB) (14 mg, 0.25 mmol, 0.33 equiv) were added as GC and NMR internal standards respectively. Brine (1 mL) and Et20 (1 mL) were then added and the vials shaken. An aliquot was then filtered through a MgS0 ₄ and Silica plug. The solution was directly analyzed by GC. The solvent was removed in vacuo then analyzed by NMR.

[257] Table 6: Impact of Alkene Additives 1 mol % (DrewPhos) ₂ Pdl ₂

Me. ^Znl 1 equivEt ₃ N _M si e _? Ph

J ► + Et\^SiMe ₂ Ph

Me 2 equiv Me ₂ PhSil Me

1 equiv alkene 1 2

dioxane, rt, 4 h

Entry Alkene 1+2 (%) ^a 1:2 ^D

1 None 98 >99:1

2 4-octene 55 98:2

3 ¹ - ^m _h ^ethy| - 99 >99:1 cyclohexene

4 (+)-limonene 75 >99:1 ^a Yields obtained by ¹ H NMR with TMB as an internal standard. Ratio determined by GC.