Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
METHODS OF DETECTING 14Q32 TRANSLOCATIONS
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2014/078571
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
The present invention provides methods to predict and detect 14q32 translocations in patients with B-cell malignancies, such as multiple myeloma, as well as methods of treating multiple myeloma.

Inventors:
TIAN ERMING (US)
ZHANG QING (US)
EPSTEIN JOSHUA (US)
BARLOGIE BARTHEL (US)
Application Number:
PCT/US2013/070149
Publication Date:
May 22, 2014
Filing Date:
November 14, 2013
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
UNIV ARKANSAS (US)
International Classes:
C12Q1/68
Foreign References:
US20040156854A12004-08-12
Other References:
PINEDA-ROMAN MAURICIO ET AL: "Sustained complete remissions in multiple myeloma linked to bortezomib in total therapy 3: comparison with total therapy 2", BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, vol. 140, no. 6, 1 March 2008 (2008-03-01), pages 625 - 634, XP055093698, ISSN: 0007-1048, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06921.x
KALFF A ET AL: "The t(4;14) translocation and FGFR3 overexpression in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications and current clinical strategies", BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL, vol. 2, no. 9, 7 September 2012 (2012-09-07), pages e89, XP055093344, DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2012.37
AVET-LOISEAU HERVÉ ET AL: "Molecular heterogeneity of multiple myeloma: pathogenesis, prognosis, and therapeutic implications", JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, USA, vol. 29, no. 14, 10 May 2011 (2011-05-10), pages 1893 - 1897, XP009175165, ISSN: 1527-7755, DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8435
OTSUKA M ET AL: "Constitutively active FGFR3 with Lys650Glu mutation enhances bortezomib sensitivity in plasma cell malignancy", ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 1 January 2011 (2011-01-01), pages 113 - 122, XP055093424, Retrieved from the Internet [retrieved on 20131213]
TAJIMA E ET AL: "Global real-time quantification/reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for detecting proto-oncogenes associated with 14q32 chromosomal translocation in multiple myeloma", HAEMATOLOGICA, 1 April 2005 (2005-04-01), pages 559 - 562, XP055093710, Retrieved from the Internet [retrieved on 20131216]
ZHAN FENGHUANG ET AL: "The molecular classification of multiple myeloma", BLOOD, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY, US, vol. 108, no. 6, 1 September 2006 (2006-09-01), pages 2020 - 2028, XP002444356, ISSN: 0006-4971, DOI: 10.1182/BLOOD-2005-11-013458
LONIAL S. ET AL: "Treatment Options for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma", CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, vol. 17, no. 6, 15 March 2011 (2011-03-15), pages 1264 - 1277, XP055093359, ISSN: 1078-0432, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1805
KARLIN LIONEL ET AL: "Clinical and biological features of t(4;14) multiple myeloma: a prospective study", LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, INFORMA HEALTHCARE, UK, vol. 52, no. 2, 1 February 2011 (2011-02-01), pages 238 - 246, XP009175174, ISSN: 1029-2403, DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2010.537795
MULLIGAN G ET AL: "Pharmacogenomics (PGx) research in the APEX randomized multicenter international phase 3 trial comparing bortezomib and high-dose dexamethasone (Dex)", BLOOD; 47TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN-SOCIETY-OF-HEMATOLOGY; ATLANTA, GA,USA; DECEMBER 10-13, 2005, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY, US, vol. 106, no. 11, Part 1, 1 November 2005 (2005-11-01), pages 975A, XP002558148, ISSN: 0006-4971
BAYANI J; SQUIRE JA: "Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH", CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2004
OSOEGAWA K. ET AL., GENOME RES, vol. 11, no. 3, 2001, pages 483 - 96
KYLE; RAJKUMAR, LEUKEMIA, vol. 23, 2009, pages 3 - 9
AVET-LOISEAU H.; FACON T. ET AL., BLOOD, vol. 99, no. 6, 2002, pages 2185 - 91
AVET-LOISEAU H.; BRIGAUDEAU C., GENES CHROMOSOMES CANCER, vol. 24, no. 1, 1999, pages 9 - 15
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
COLLINS, Anne J. et al. (Brook Smith & Reynolds, P.C.,530 Virginia Rd, P.O. Box 913, Concord MA, US)
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS

What is claimed is:

1. A method to identify a multiple myeloma patient that would benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib, or determine if a multiple myeloma patient would or would not benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib, the method comprising determining whether a patient has a 14q32 translocation by measuring the gene expression level of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, MAFB, or a combination thereof, wherein elevated levels of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, or MAFB, relative to a suitable reference, indicates the presence of a 14q32 translocation, and the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation guides the treatment decision.

2. A method to identify a multiple myeloma patient that would benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib, or determine if a multiple myeloma patient would benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib, the method comprising determining whether a patient has a 14q32 translocation according to the any of the methods of claims 1 1-22 and 29, wherein the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation guides the treatment decision.

3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the presence of a t(4; 14), t(6; 14), t(l 1 ; 14), or t(14;20) translocation indicates that the subject would benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib.

4. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the presence of a t(14; 16) translocation indicates that the subject would not benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib.

5. The method of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the benefit is increased overall survival.

6. A method of treating multiple myeloma in a subject in need thereof, comprising providing a treatment comprising bortezomib or not comprising bortezomib to the subject on the basis of the outcome of the method of any one of Claims 1 -5.

7. The method of Claim 6, wherein a treatment comprising bortezomib is

administered to the subject on the basis of detecting the presence of a t(4;14), t(6;14), t(l l ; 14), or t(14;20) translocation in the subject.

8. The method of Claim 7, wherein the subject was not a candidate for bortezomib therapy before detecting the translocation.

9. The method of Claim 6, wherein a treatment not comprising bortezomib is

administered on the basis of detecting the presence of a t(14; 16) translocation in the subject.

10. The method of Claim 9, wherein the subject was a candidate for therapy

comprising bortezomib before detecting the translocation.

1 1. A method to detect a 14q32 translocation in a subject with a B-cell malignancy, the method comprising performing fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) on a biological sample from a subject with a B-cell malignancy using at least a first probe and a second probe, wherein the first probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC or IgHV and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSCl/MMSET, CCNDl, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB.

12. The method of claim 1 1, wherein the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for FGFR3, WHSCl/MMSET, CCNDl, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB.

13. The method of claim 11 or claim 12, wherein the source of nucleic acid for the first and second probe is independently selected from the group consisting of a BAC, a PAC, and a YAC.

14. The method of any one of claims 1 1-13, wherein the B-cell malignancy is

selected from the group consisting of precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), B-cell chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (B-CLL), B-cell non- Hodgkin's lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.

15. The method of any one of claims 1 1-14, wherein the B-cell malignancy is

multiple myeloma, the first probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC or IgHV, and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, MAFB, or a combination thereof.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for a gene selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, MAFB, or a combination thereof.

17. A method to detect an IgHC translocation in a subject with a B-cell malignancy, the method comprising performing fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) on a biological sample from the subject using at least a first probe and a second probe, wherein the first probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1 , CCND3, MAF, and MAFB.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, MAFB, or a combination thereof.

19. The method of claim 17 or 18, wherein the source of nucleic acid for the first and second probe is independently selected from the group consisting of a BAC, a PAC, and a YAC.

20. The method of any one of claims 17-19, wherein the B-cell malignancy is

selected from the group consisting of precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), B-cell chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (B-CLL), B-cell non- Hodgkin's lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.

21. The method of any one of claims 17-20, wherein the B-cell malignancy is

multiple myeloma, the first probe is specific for IgHC, and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for FGFR3, WHSC1 MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, MAFB, or a combination thereof.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific to a gene selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB.

23. A method to establish a gene expression threshold value for a 14q32

translocation partner indicative of a 14q32 translocation in a subject with a B- cell malignancy, the method comprising (a) measuring the expression level for a 14q32 translocation partner in biological samples from subjects with 14q32 translocations and without 14q32 translocations, (b) determining the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation by FISH using at least a first probe and a second probe, wherein the first probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC or IgHV, and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding the translocation partner whose expression was measured in (a), (c) comparing the expression level of the translocation partner with the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation, and (d) determining a gene expression threshold value for the translocation partner above which indicates increased expression due to a 14q32 translocation and below which indicates increased expression not due to a 14q32 translocation.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the expression level for a 14q32 translocation partner is measured by quantitative RT-PCR or microarray analysis.

25. The method of claim 23 or 24, wherein the at least first probe and second probe are selected from a group consisting of (i) a first probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHV and a second probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for MMSET, (ii) a first probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for FGFR3, (iii) a first probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for CCND1 , (iv) a first probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for CCND3, (v) a first probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for MAF, and (vi) a first probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a nucleic acid sequence specific for MAFB.

26. The method of any one of claims 23-25, wherein the B-cell malignancy is

selected from the group consisting of precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), B-cell chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (B-CLL), B-cell non- Hodgkin's lymphoma, and myeloma.

27. The method of any one of claims 23-26, wherein:

(i) the translocation is t(4;14), the gene fusion is MMSET/IgHV, the

expression of MMSET is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 209054_s_at, and the threshold value predictive of the translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is about 2,405,

(ii) the translocation is t(4; 14), the gene fusion is FGFR3/IgHC, the

expression of FGFR3 is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 204379_s_at, and the threshold value predictive of the translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is about 6,558,

(iii) the translocation is t(6; 14), the gene fusion is CCND3/IgHC, the

expression of CCND3 is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U 133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 201700_at, and the threshold value predictive of the translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is about 15,696,

(iv) the translocation is t(l 1 ;14), the gene fusion is CCNDl/IgHC, the

expression of CCND 1 is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 20871 l_s_at, and the threshold value predictive of the translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is about 5,525,

(v) the translocation is t(14; 16), the gene fusion is MAF/IgHC, the

expression of MAF is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 206363_at, and the threshold value predictive of the translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is about 5,096, or

(vi) the translocation is t(14;20), the gene fusion is MAFB/IgHC, the

expression of MAFB is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 222670_s_at, and the threshold value predictive of the translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is about 19,850.

28. The method of claim 23, wherein the first probe comprises a nucleic acid

sequence specific for a gene selected from the group consisting of IgHC and IgHV, and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for a gene selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSC l/MMSET, CCNDl , CCND3, MAF, and MAFB.

29. A method to predict a 14q32 translocation in a subject suspected to have

multiple myeloma, the method comprising (a) measuring the expression level for one or more 14q32 translocation partners in a biological sample from the subject, and (b) comparing the expression level(s) to the gene expression threshold value(s) of any one of claims 23-28, wherein an expression level for a 14q32 translocation partner in the biological sample that is greater than the threshold value, indicates that the subject has a 14q32 translocation.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the expression level for two or more 14q32 translocation partners are measured.

Description:
METHODS OF DETECTING 14Q32 TRANSLOCATIONS

RELATED APPLICATION

[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/726,327, filed on November 14, 2012.

[0002] The entire teachings of the above application are incorporated herein by reference.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

[0003] This invention was made with government support under CA55819 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0004] Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous plasma cell disorder characterized by genetic abnormalities, including chromosomal translocations, deletions, duplications and genetic mutations. Translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IgH) on the long arm of chromosome 14 region 32 (t(14q32)) are detected in 50%-70% of multiple myeloma patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and increase in frequency with progression. The 14q32 translocations involve many chromosomal partners.

Translocation of oncogenes into the 14q32 region may lead to their increased expression, contributing to disease initiation, disease progression and therapeutic resistance. Commercially available FISH probes for 14q32 translocations exist, but are significantly longer than a gene locus on a chromosome and are prone to false- positive errors. For example, t(4; 14) is currently defined as any fusion between an IgH probe spanning approximately 1.5 Mb and containing sequences homologous to essentially the entire IgH locus, as well as sequence extending about 300 kb beyond the 3 ' end of the IgH locus, and a probe spanning approximately 900 kb. [0005] In addition to 14q32 translocations, hyperdiploidy is a common genetic abnormality in patients with multiple myeloma, as are deletions and amplifications. Thus, gene expression profiling (GEP), which provides information on genome- wide transcription levels, is another powerful tool, in addition to FISH, to query genetic abnormalities associated with myeloma plasma cells. GEP expression data from multiple myeloma patients can be used to stratify patients into those with expression levels of 14q32 translocation partners are similar to healthy donor plasma cells and those with GEP-based spikes (i.e. increased expression). However, current methods do not exist to differentiate GEP-based gene spikes representing 14q32 translocations from those reflecting changes in gene copy number.

[0006] Thus, there exists a need in the art for better tools and methods to simultaneously identify multiple 14q32 translocations, as well as methods to guide treatment decisions based on the presence or absence of 14q32 translocations.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0007] In a first aspect, the invention provides methods to detect a 14q32 translocation in a subject with a B-cell malignancy. These methods entail performing fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) on a biological sample from a subject with a B-cell malignancy using at least a first probe and a second probe, where the first probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC and/or IgHV and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB.

[0008] In another aspect, the invention provides methods to detect an IgHC translocation in a subject with a B-cell malignancy. These methods entail performing fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) on a biological sample from the subject using at least a first probe and a second probe, where the first probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSC1 MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB. [0009] A further aspect of the invention provides methods to establish a gene expression threshold value for a 14q32 translocation partner indicative of a 14q32 translocation in a subject with a B-cell malignancy. These methods entail (a) measuring the expression level for a 14q32 translocation partner in biological samples from subjects with 14q32 translocations and without 14q32 translocations, (b) determining the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation by FISH using (at least) a pair of probes where the first probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for IgHC or IgHV, and the second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding the translocation partner whose expression was measured in (a), (c) comparing the expression level of the translocation partner with the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation, and (d) determining a gene expression threshold value for the translocation partner above which indicates increased expression due to a 14q32 translocation and below which indicates increased expression not due to a 14q32 translocation.

[0010] In yet another aspect, the invention provides methods to predict a 14q32 translocation in a subject suspected to have multiple myeloma. These methods entail (a) measuring the expression level for one or more 14q32 translocation partners in a biological sample from the subject, and (b) comparing the expression level(s) to the gene expression threshold value(s) (determined by any suitable means), where an expression level for a 14q32 translocation partner in the biological sample that is greater than the threshold value, indicates that the subject has a 14q32 translocation.

[0011] The invention aslso provides methods to identify a multiple myeloma patient that would benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib, or determine if a multiple myeloma patient would benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib. These methods entail determining whether a patient has a 14q32 translocation according to the any of the methods provided by the invention, wherein the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation guides the treatment decision.

[0012] In another aspect, the invention provides methods to: identify a multiple myeloma patient that would benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib or determine if a multiple myeloma patient would or would not benefit from a treatment comprising bortezomib. These methods entail determining whether a patient has a 14q32 translocation by measuring the gene expression level of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, MAFB, or a combination thereof, where elevated levels of FGFR3, WHSC 1/MMSET, CCND1 , CCND3, MAF, or MAFB, relative to a suitable reference (e.g. predetermined reference values, positive and/or negative controls processed in parallel with the sample, et cetera), indicates the presence of a 14q32 translocation, and the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation guides the treatment decision.

[0013] In a further aspect, the invention provides methods of treating multiple myeloma in a subject. These methods entail providing a suitable treatment comprising bortezomib or not comprising bortezomib to the subject on the basis of the the result of methods provided by the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

[0015] FIG. 1 depicts a schematic representation of human chromosome 14. The Immunoglobulin Heavy (IgH) locus is positioned at region 3, band 2 of the long arm of chromosome 14 (14q32).

[0016] FIGs. 2A-2B depicts a schematic representation of human chromosome 14q32 (FIG. 2A) and 4pl6 (FIG. 2B). In FIG. 2A, the green line represents a commercially available Locus Specific Identified (LSI) probe for the IgH locus, and the green arrows represent IgHC and IgHV specific probes of the invention. In FIG. 2B, the orange line represents a commercially available Locus Specific Identified (LSI) probe for the FGFR3/MMSET region of 4pl6, and the red arrows represent FGFR3 and MMSET specific probes of the invention. Note, using the larger probes depicted in FIG. 2 A and FIG. 2B, the definition of t(4; 14) is if any fusion occurs between the two large probes (represented by lines). In contrast, using the probes of the invention (represented by arrows), specific gene fusions between IgHV/MMSET and FGFR3/IgHC can be detected, providing greater specificity. [0017] FIG. 3 A depicts an illustration of human chromosome 14 and the binding location of the IgHC (green arrow) and IgHV (red arrow) FISH probes. FIG. 3B shows representative images of the probes binding normal chromosome 14.

[0018] FIG. 4 shows normal 14q32 FISH using the IgHC (green) and IgHV (red) probes. The left panel shows normal G-banded chromosomes hybridized with IgHC and IgHV probes; the right panel shows DAPI-stained normal chromosomes hybridized with IgHC and IgHV probes.

[0019] FIG. 5 presents images of normal plasma cell interphase 14q32 FISH using the IgHC (green) and IgHV (red) probes. Left panel: cytoplasmic

immunoglobulin (clg) Kappa light chain isotype stain; Right panel: Lambda clg. The white bar indicates 2 micrometer (μηι).

[0020] FIG. 6A depicts an illustration of human chromosome 4 and the binding location of the FGFR3 (green arrow) and MMSET (red arrow) FISH probes. FIG. 6B shows representatives images of the probes binding normal chromosome 4.

[0021] FIG. 7 shows normal 4ql 6 FISH using the FGFR3 (green) and MMSET (red) FISH probes. The right panel shows normal G-banded chromosomes hybridized with FGFR3 and MMSET probes; the left panel shows DAPI-stained normal chromosomes hybridized with FGFR3 and MMSET probes.

[0022] FIG. 8 depicts schematic representation of reciprocal translocation between 4pl6 and 14q32 (t(4; 14)(pl6;q32)). The images on the left of the arrow depict normal chromosome 4 (far left) and chromosome 14 (near left). Areas of interest are identified by the circles, representing the binding location of the FISH probes. The images on the right of the arrow depict the chromosomes after the translocation event. The circles again identify where the FISH probes bind, and illustrate that IgHV is now on chromosome 4 (near right) and FGFR3 is now on chromosome 14 (far right).

[0023] FIG. 9 depicts a graph showing baseline GEP levels of MMSET expression in patients enrolled in TT4 and TT5 Protocols. MMSET expression levels quantified using the Affymetrix U133plus2.0 microarray probe set

209054_s_at are graphed along the y-axis. The gene expression threshold valued indicative of t(4; 14) and an IgHV/MMSET gene fusion was determined to be 2,405. [0024] FIG. 10 depicts a graph showing baseline GEP levels of FGFR3 expression in patients enrolled in TT4 and TT5 Protocols. FGFR3 expression levels quantified using the Affymetrix U133plus2.0 microarray probe set 204379_s_at are graphed along the y-axis. The gene expression threshold valued indicative of t(4;14) and an FGFR3/IgHC gene fusion was determined to be 6,558.

[0025] FIG. 11 depicts a graph showing baseline GEP levels of CCND 1 expression in patients enrolled in TT4 and TT5 Protocols. CCND1 expression levels quantified using the Affymetrix U133plus2.0 microarray probe set

20871 l_s_at are graphed along the y-axis. The gene expression threshold valued indicative of t(l 1 ; 14) and a CCNDl/IgHC gene fusion was determined to be 5,525.

[0026] FIG. 12 depicts a graph showing baseline GEP levels of CCND3 expression in patients enrolled in TT4 and TT5 Protocols. CCND3 expression levels quantified using the Affymetrix U133plus2.0 microarray probe set 201700_at are graphed along the y-axis. The gene expression threshold valued indicative of t(6; 14) and a CCND3/IgHC gene fusion was determined to be 15,696.

[0027] FIG. 13 depicts a graph showing baseline GEP levels of MAF expression in patients enrolled in TT4 and TT5 Protocols. MAF expression levels quantified using the Affymetrix U133plus2.0 microarray probe set 206363_at are graphed along the y-axis. The gene expression threshold valued indicative of t(14; 16) and an MAF IgHC gene fusion was determined to be 5,096.

[0028] FIG. 14 depicts a graph showing baseline GEP levels of MAFB expression in patients enrolled in TT4 and TT5 Protocols. MAFB expression levels quantified using the Affymetrix U133plus2.0 microarray probe set 222670_s__at are graphed along the y-axis. The gene expression threshold valued indicative of t(14;20) and an MFAB/IgHC gene fusion was determined to be 19,850.

[0029] FIGs. 15A-B are two graphs showing overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in TT2 (FIG. 15A) and TT3a/b (FIG. 15B) based on the presence or absence of t(4; 14) predicted by the gene expression threshold value determined for MMSET. Blue lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with MMSET expression levels less than the threshold value. Red lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with MMSET expression levels equal to or greater than the threshold value. Patients in TT3 with t(4;14) predicted by the MMSET threshold value (FIG. 15B, red line) benefited from bortezomib therapy and had improved OS compared to patients not predicted to have t(4;14) (FIG. 15B, blue line), and which was not available to patients in TT2 (FIG. 15A). In these experiments, cRNA synthesis from cDNA was performed with an older GeneChip labeling kit (Affymetrix) no longer available.

[0030] FIGs. 16A-B are two graphs showing overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in TT2 (FIG. 16A) and TT3a/b (FIG. 16B) based on the presence or absence of t(4; 14) predicted by the gene expression threshold value determined for FGFR3. Blue lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with FGFR3 expression levels less than the threshold value. Red lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with FGFR3 expression levels equal to or greater than the threshold value. Patients in TT3 with t(4; 14) predicted by the FGFR3 threshold value (FIG. 16B, red line) benefited from bortezomib therapy and had improved OS compared to patients not predicted to have t(4;14) (FIG. 16B, blue line), and which was not available to patients in TT2 (FIG. 16A). In these experiments, cRNA synthesis from cDNA was performed with an older GeneChip labeling kit (Affymetrix) no longer available.

[0031] FIGs. 17A-B are two graphs showing overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in TT2 (FIG. 17A) and TT3a/b (FIG. 17B) based on the presence or absence of t(6; 14) predicted by the gene expression threshold value determined for CCND3. Blue lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with CCND3 expression levels less than the threshold value. Red lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with MMSET expression levels equal to or greater than the threshold value. Patients in TT3 with t(6; 14) predicted by the CCND3 threshold value (FIG. 17B, red line) benefited from bortezomib therapy and had improved OS compared to patients not predicted to have t(6;14) (FIG. 17B, blue line), and which was not available to patients in TT2 (FIG. 17A). In these experiments, cRNA synthesis from cDNA was performed with an older GeneChip labeling kit (Affymetrix) no longer available. [0032] FIGs. 18A-B are two graphs showing overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in TT2 (FIG. 18A) and TT3a/b (FIG. 18B) based on the presence or absence of t(l 1 ;14) predicted by the gene expression threshold value determined for CCND1. Blue lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with CCND1 expression levels less than the threshold value. Red lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with CCND1 expression levels equal to or greater than the threshold value. Patients in TT3 with t(l 1 ; 14) predicted by the CCND1 threshold value (FIG. 18B, red line) benefited from bortezomib therapy and had improved OS compared to patients not predicted to have t(l 1 ; 14) (FIG. 18B, blue line), and which was not available to patients in TT2 (FIG. 18A). In these experiments, cRNA synthesis from cDNA was performed with an older GeneChip labeling kit (Affymetrix) no longer available.

[0033] FIGs. 19A-B are two graphs showing overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in TT2 (FIG. 19A) and TT3a/b (FIG. 19B) based on the presence or absence of t(14;20) predicted by the gene expression threshold value determined for MAFB. Blue lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with MAFB expression levels less than the threshold value. Red lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with MAFB expression levels equal to or greater than the threshold value. Patients in TT3 with t(14;30) predicted by the MAFB threshold value (FIG. 19B, red line) benefited from bortezomib therapy and had improved OS compared to patients not predicted to have t(14;20) (FIG. 19B, blue line), and which was not available to patients in TT2 (FIG. 19A). In these experiments, cRNA synthesis from cDNA was performed with an older GeneChip labeling kit (Affymetrix) no longer available.

[0034] FIGs. 20A-B are two graphs showing overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in TT2 (FIG. 20A) and TT3a/b (FIG. 20B) based on the presence or absence of t( 14; 16) predicted by the gene expression threshold value determined for MAF. Blue lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with MAF expression levels less than the threshold value. Red lines indicate the survival probability (y-axis) over time (x-axis) for patients with MAF expression levels equal to or greater than the threshold value. Patients in TT3 with t(14; 16) predicted by the MAF threshold value (FIG. 20B, red line) benefited from bortezomib therapy and had worse OS compared to patients not predicted to have t(14;16) (FIG. 20B, blue line), and which was not available to patients in TT2 (FIG. 20A). In these experiments, cRNA synthesis from cDNA was performed with an older GeneChip labeling kit (Affymetrix) no longer available.

[0035] FIG. 21 shows representative images of 14q32 translocations by FISH using a IgHC specific probe (green probe, top row) and a IgHV specific probe (green probe, bottom row) in multiple myeloma plasma cells. The second probe is either an FRFG3 specific probe (red probe, left panels), a MMSET specific probe (red probe, middle panels), or a MAF specific probe (red probe, right panels). The white bars indicate 2 micrometers.

[0036] FIG. 22 shows IgHC more efficiently drives expression of MAFB (measured by GEP) compared to IgHV. Briefly, FISH with IgHC/MAFB or IgHV/MAFB probe combination was performed on individual spots of myeloma cells. GEP values of MAFB are shown in the far left column (e.g., 475 - 40,331.1). Open (white) circles indicate the number of FISH signal counts of IgHC or IgHV probe. Half-open circles indicate a t(14;20) occurred. Closed (black) circles indicate copy numbers of MAFB. Using GEP=19,850.9 as an example, FISH indicated myeloma cells had four copies of IgHC and four copies of IgHV, and a translocation was found involving a copy of IgHC and a copy of MAFB. In the case of GEP=853, two copies of IgHC and two copies of IgHV, and a translocation occurred between a copy of IgHV and a copy of MAFBs, but in these cells IgHV did not drive MAFB to spike (i.e., did not result in increased expression) as measured by GEP.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0037] The present invention provides, inter alia, new fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes and methods of using the same to identify

translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain (lgH) locus on the long arm of chromosome 14 region 32 (14q32 translocations). In addition to using the probes to more accurately identify 14q32 translocations, the probes may also be used to establish for each translocation partner a gene expression threshold that is predictive of 14q32 translocations. The FISH probes and gene expression thresholds of the invention, and their methods of use are described below.

I. FISH probe

[0038] A probe provided by the invention encompasses, in certain embodiments, a nucleic acid suitable for use as a fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probe. FISH is a cytogenetic technique used to visualize labeled DNA probes hybridized to a region of interest on a chromosome. FISH probes are designed to only bind those parts of the chromosome with which they show a high degree of sequence complementarity. Accordingly, as used to refer to probes herein, the term

"complementary" includes "substantially complementary", and refers to the ability of nucleic acids to hybridize by Watson-Crick base-pairing and form, at least partially, a double stranded structure. For example, a probe that hybridizes to a region of interest on a chromosome (e.g., by Watson-Crick base-pairing) under the test conditions that are employed, and thus be useful for detecting and localizing the region, is said to be complementary or substantially complementary to the region of interest. Complementarity will be extensive enough so that the probes will form specific and/or stable hybrids with the target DNA under the hybridization conditions used. Persons of skill in the art will be able to determine suitable sequences through the general knowledge available in the art, and by routine experimentation, using the examples set forth herein below as guidelines.

[0039] In certain embodiments, complementary or substantially complementary means two sequences (e.g., a probe and a target sequence) hybridize under highly stringent hybridization conditions. "Highly stringent hybridization" conditions, in some embodiments, refers to at least about 50% (v/v) Formamide with 2X SSC and 0.1% SDS at 42°C, with a first wash for 30 minutes at about 50°C with about 50% (v/v) Formamide in 2X SSC, and with a subsequent wash with 1XPBS and 0.01% IGEPAL CA-630 at room temperature. In other embodiments, "highly stringent hybridization" conditions refers to at least about 6X SSC and 1% SDS at 65°C, with a first wash for 10 minutes at about 42°C with about 20% (v/v) Formamide in 0.1X SSC, and with a subsequent wash with 0.2 X SSC and 0.1% SDS at 65°C. In certain embodiments, complementarity or substantially complementary means a nucleic acid sequence is at least about: 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99%, or more (e.g. 100%) identical to the complement (i.e. reverse complement) of a region of interest.

[0040] Reference to a pair of probes, such as a pair of FISH probes,

encompasses not only exactly two probes, such as a first probe and a second probe, but also, unless clearly indicated otherwise, additional probes, such as an additional 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more probes.

(a) Labeled DNA probes

[0041] In one aspect, a probe of the invention provides one or more labeled DNA probes. Labeled nucleic acid probes are synthetically and/or artificially labeled and are not naturally-occurring, but rather are products of human innovation. Probes may be indirectly labeled with haptens or directly labeled with a

fluorochrome-conjugated nucleotide, i.e., dUTP (2 ' -Deoxyuridine, 5 '-Triphosphate) in place of dTTP. Non-limiting examples of suitable haptens include biotin and digoxigenin. Non-limiting examples of suitable fluorochromes include the Alexa fluor dye series, amino-methyl coumarin, cascade blue, cyanine 2 d , cyanine 3 d , cyanine 5 d , cyanine 7 d , DEAC, fluorescein, fluorescein isothiocyanate, rhodamine B and rhodamine derivatives (for example, 5(6)-carboxyrhodamine, 5-ROX, 5- TAMRA (5-carboxytetramethylrhodime), 6-TAMRA, etc.) and Texas Red. In some embodiments, the probe is directly labeled with a fluorochrome-conjugated nucleotide selected from the group consisting of DEAC-dUTP, 5-Fluorecein dUTP, 5(6)-Carboxyrhodamine 6G-dUTP, 5-TAMRA-dUTP, and 5-ROX-dUTP.

[0042] Labeling the probe can be accomplished by any suitable method known in the art. Briefly, depending on the source of the nucleic acid, probes are either labeled by nick translation and PCR, or labeled by PCR using region specific primers, primers to vector/plasmid sequences, universal primers or degenerative oligonucleotide primers. For greater detail, see Bayani J and Squire JA 2004 "Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH)" Current Protocols in Cell Biology, incorporated by reference herein. (b) Hybridize to a region of interest on a chromosome

[0043] In another aspect, a probe provided by the invention hybridizes (i.e., is complementary or substantially complementary) to a region of interest on a chromosome. A probe can be designed to hybridize to any region on a chromosome. Generally, a probe of the invention is to be used to detect translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy locus (IgH) on the long arm of chromosome 14 region 32 (FIG. 1). As used herein, translocations involving IgH on the long arm of chromosome 14 region 32 may be abbreviated as "14q32 translocations" or

"tl4q32". The IgH locus includes variable (IgHV), diversity (IgHD), joining (IgHJ), and constant (IgHC) segments (FIG. 1 and FIG. 2A). 14q32 translocations involve many chromosomal partners (transloaction partners). For example, 14q32 translocation partners in multiple myeloma may include, but are not limited to, Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 (FGFR3, human GenelD No. 2261), Wolf- Hirschhorn syndrome candidate 1 (WHSC1 or MMSET or WHSC1/MMSET, human GenelD No. 7468), Cyclin D3 (CCND3, human GenelD No. 896), Cyclin Dl (CCNDI, human GenelD No. 595), V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog (MAF, human GenelD No. 4094), V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B (MAFB, human GenelD No. 9935) and c-MYC (human GenelD No. 4609).

[0044] Several factors determine the length of a FISH probe. For example, probes designed to identify chromosomal translocations would be sufficiently long to hybridize to a region of interest on a chromosome {e.g., some or all of a chromosomal region encoding the IgH genomic locus or a genomic locus of a 14q32 translocation partner) but short enough to exclude other potential translocation partners. As used herein, genomic locus refers to the specific location of a DNA sequence on a chromosome that encodes a polypeptide or RNA chain that has a function in the organism, and includes all associated regulatory regions, transcribed regions, termination sequences, and other functional sequence regions. Preferably, a probe of the invention is specific for a single genomic locus. As used herein, "specific" means a probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence that is complementary to a particular sequence of interest, e.g., a genomic locus or target transcript thereof. A probe specific for a (e.g., single) genomic locus is not complementary or substantially complementary to, for example, a second genomic locus or a target transcript thereof. For some genomic loci, it is more advantageous to design a probe specific for only a portion of, or a segment of, a single locus. For example, the IgH locus is approximately 1 ,250 kb in length and comprises the four segments described above (i.e., IgHC, IGHJ, IGHD, IGHV), which encode an estimated 170- 176 different genes. It has been discovered that (i) smaller probes to the IgH locus reduce the false positive rate of 14q32 translocations identified by current commercially available probes, and (ii) when a 14q32 translocation event occurs, IgHC drives expression of its translocation partner more efficiently than IgHV drives expression of its translocation partner, and increased expression driven by IgHC can be used prognostically to identify patients who will be responsive bortezomib therapy. This is described in more detail in Example 4.

[0045] In some embodiments, a probe comprises a DNA sequence

complementary to a chromosomal region comprising an entire genomic locus. In other embodiments, a probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a chromosomal region comprising a portion of a genomic locus. In still other embodiments, a probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a

chromosomal region comprising some or all of a genomic locus, as well as DNA sequences upstream and/or downstream of the genomic locus. In exemplary embodiments, a probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for a single genomic locus. In other exemplary embodiments, a probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for segment of a genomic locus. In some preferred embodiments, a probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus comprising IgHC, IgHV, FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, MAFB, c-MYC, or a combination thereof. In other preferred embodiments, a probe comprises a DNA sequence specific to a genomic locus comprising IgHC, IgHV, FGFR3, WHSC l/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, MAFB, c-MYC, or a combination thereof.

[0046] A skilled artisan will appreciate, therefore, that the length of the probe can and will vary. Factors including, but not limited to, the genomic locus and the proximity of adjacent loci on the chromosome may influence the maximal length of the probe. Generally, a probe of the invention is about 1 to about 500 kilobases (kb) in length or about 50 to about 500 kb in length. In some embodiments, a probe is about 1 to about 100 kb in length. For example, a probe is about 1 to about 50 kb, or about 50 to about 100 kb in length. In other embodiments, a probe is about 100 to about 200 kb in length. For example, a probe is about 100 to about 150 kb, or about 150 to about 200 kb in length. In still other embodiments, a probe is about 200 to about 300 kb in length. For example, a probe is about 200 to about 250 kb, or about 250 to about 300 kb in length. In still other embodiments, a probe is about 300 to about 400 kb in length. For example, a probe is about 300 to about 350 kb, or about 350 to about 400 kb in length. In yet other embodiments, a probe is about 400 to about 500 kb in length. For example, a probe is about 400 to about 450 kb, or about 450 to about 500 kb in length. In some exemplary embodiments, a probe is about 100-300 kb in length. In other exemplary embodiments, a probe is about 200-400 kb in length. In still other exemplary embodiments, a probe is about 300-500 kb in length.

[0047] Any suitable source (i.e. , template) of nucleic acid may be used to produce a probe of the invention. Generally, the source is a vector comprising the DNA sequence complementary to a region of interest on a chromosome. As used herein, "vector" refers to an autonomously replicating nucleic acid unit. The present invention can be practiced with any known type of vector, including viral, cosmid, phasmid, artificial chromosomes, and plasmid vectors. Non-limiting examples of artificial chromosomes include BACs (bacterial artificial chromosomes), PACs (PI bacteriophage-derived artificial chromosome), and YACs (yeast artificial chromosomes). Alternative sources of DNA for FISH include, but are not limited to, genomic DNA from flow sorted chromosomes and genomic DNA from microdissected DNA. In exemplary embodiments, the source of DNA for a probe is a BAC. In other exemplary embodiments, a source of DNA for a probe is a PAC. In still other exemplary embodiments, a source of DNA for a probe is a YAC.

[0048] Vectors containing DNA complementary to a region of interest on a chromosome may be purchased through commercial vendors, or may be generated by the methods known in the art (Osoegawa K., et al, 2001 Genome Res 11(3):483- 96). In some embodiments, a source of DNA for a probe is selected from the group of BAC clones listed in Table 1.

II. Use of the probe

[0049] A FISH probe of the invention may be used for cytogenetic and genomic analyses using methods well known in the art. Generally, locus specific probes are used to detect gene fusions, translocations, deletions, and amplifications. According to the invention, methods of the invention encompass means to detect 14q32 translocations and to establish for each translocation partner a gene expression threshold that is predictive of 14q32 translocations.

(a) Method to detect 14q32 translocations

[0050] In one aspect, a method of the invention provides a means to detect 14q32 translocations in a sample by metaphase FISH or interphase FISH using (at least) a pair of FISH probes. Chromosomal translocations can be detected as gene fusions. A gene fusion may be created when the translocation joins two otherwise separated genes. Non-limiting examples of gene fusions associated with 14q32 translocations include IgHV/MMSET, FGFR3/IgHC, CCND3/IgHC, CCNDl/lgHC, MAF/IgHC, and MAFB/IgHC. To detect a translocation as a gene fusion, the two probes are labeled with different fluorochromes, each fluorochrome emitting at different ultraviolet-wavelengths. When a translocation occurs, the two probes are brought into close proximity. The gene fusion may appear as two colors near each other, or the two colors may appear as a third color (for example, a red probe and green probe may produce a yellow signal). In some embodiments, a first probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus or a segment of a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of IgH, IgHC, and IgHV, and a second probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB. In other embodiments, a first probe comprises a nucleic acid sequence specific for a genomic locus or a segment of a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of IgH, IgHC, and IgHV, and a second probe comprises a DNA specific for a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3,

WHSCl/MMSET, CCNDl, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB. In still other embodiments, a first probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for a genomic locus or a segment of a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of IgH, IgHC, or IgHV, and a second probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3,

WHSCl/MMSET, CCNDl, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB. In yet other embodiments, a first probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus or a segment of a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of IgH, IgHC, or IgHV, and a second probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3,

WHSCl/MMSET, CCNDl, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB. Substantially similar probes to any of the forgoing probes (the reference probes) can also be used consonant with the invention. Substantially similar probes are those that hybridize to the reference probes, or their complements, under highly stringent hybridization conditions or, in other embodiments, are at least about: 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99%, or more identical to the reference probe. In a preferred embodiment, a first probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for IgHC, and a second probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3,

WHSCl/MMSET, CCNDl, CCND3, MAF, or MAFB. Suitable fluorochromes and probes are further described in Section I. In particular embodiments, probes provided by the invention and/or useful in the methods provided by the invention, as described above, are those described in Table 1, or probes substantially similar to those in Table 1.

[0051] The methods of the invention may be performed on any sample comprising a nucleic acid, for example, containing any cell type with a nucleus. A cell may or may not have a 14q32 translocation. In some embodiments, a cell has a 14q23 translocation. In other embodiments, a cell does not have a 14q32 translocation. In some embodiments, a sample is comprised of cells grown in vitro. In other embodiments, a sample is a biological sample. As used herein, "biological sample" refers to a sample derived (i.e., isolated) from a subject. In some embodiments, a biological sample is modified, e.g., through staining or detectable labeling, such that the biological sample is a new res, that is not naturally occurring and is instead a product of human ingenuity. Suitable subjects may include a human, a livestock animal, a companion animal, a laboratory animal, or a zoological animal. In one embodiment, a subject may be a rodent, e.g., a mouse, a rat, a guinea pig, etc. In another embodiment, a subject may be a livestock animal. Non-limiting examples of suitable livestock animals may include pigs, cows, horses, goats, sheep, llamas and alpacas. In yet another embodiment, a subject may be a companion animal. Non-limiting examples of companion animals may include pets such as dogs, cats, rabbits, and birds. In yet another embodiment, a subject may be a zoological animal. As used herein, a "zoological animal" refers to an animal that may be found in a zoo. Such animals may include non-human primates, large cats, wolves, and bears. In yet another embodiment, a subject may be a laboratory animal. Non-limiting examples of a laboratory animal may include rodents, canines, felines, and non-human primates. In a preferred embodiment, a subject is human.

[0052] The subject may or may not have been diagnosed with a disease or condition associated with a 14q32 translocation. IgH translocations are common in B-cell malignancies. Non-limiting examples of B-cell malignancies include precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), B-cell chronic

lymphoblastic leukemia (B-CLL), B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (including, but not limited to, follicular, mantle cell, Burkitt, diffuse large B-cell, marginal cell, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma) and myeloma. In some embodiments, the subject has no clinical signs or symptoms of disease. In other embodiments, the subject has clinical signs of disease. In yet other embodiments, the subject may be at risk for disease. In still other embodiments, the subject has been diagnosed with disease. In some exemplary embodiments, a subject has a tumor. In other exemplary embodiments, a subject has lymphoma. In still other exemplary embodiments, a subject has leukemia. In yet other exemplary embodiments, a subject has a B-cell malignancy. In a preferred embodiment, a subject has multiple myeloma. "Multiple myeloma" includes symptomatic myeloma, asymptomatic myeloma, and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), as defined in Kyle and Rajkumar Leukemia 23 :3-9 (2009, PubMedID 18971951, incorporated by reference in its entirety), as well as the other stratifications and stages described in Kyle and Rajkumar 2009. In particular embodiments, multiple myeloma is symptomatic myeloma.

[0053] The method of the invention may be used with any of the numerous types of biological samples known in the art. Non-limiting examples may include tissue samples or bodily fluids. In some embodiments, the biological sample is a tissue sample such as a tissue biopsy— e.g. a sample containing plasma cells, such as a bone marrow sample. The tissue biopsy may be a biopsy of a tumor. The biopsied tissue may be fixed, embedded in paraffin or plastic, and sectioned, or the biopsied tissue may be frozen and cryosectioned. Alternatively, the biopsied tissue may be processed into individual cells or an explant, or processed into a homogenate, a cell extract, or a membranous fraction. The sample may also be primary and/or transformed cell cultures derived from tissue from the subject. In other

embodiments, the sample may be a bodily fluid. Non-limiting examples of bodily fluids include cerebrospinal fluid, interstitial fluid, blood, serum, plasma, saliva, sputum, semen, tears, lymph and urine. The fluid may be used "as is", the cellular components may be isolated from the fluid, or a protein faction may be isolated from the fluid using standard techniques. In some preferred embodiments, the sample may be selected from the group consisting of blood, plasma, serum or lymph. In other preferred embodiments, the sample is a biopsy of a tumor.

[0054] As will be appreciated by a skilled artisan, the method of collecting a biological sample can and will vary depending upon the nature of the biological sample and the type of analysis to be performed. Any of a variety of methods generally known in the art may be utilized to collect a biological sample. Generally speaking, the method preferably maintains the integrity of the sample such that it can be accurately measured according to the method of the invention. For example, metaphase FISH requires the availability of viable cells from which to produce chromosome preparations for analysis, whereas interphase FISH is able to make use of preserved cellular material and may thus be extended to include the use of paraffin embedded biopsy sections.

[0055] Methods of sample preparation for interphase FISH and metaphase FISH are well known in the art. Briefly, a sample is fixed, the fixed sample is hybridized in a buffer containing the labeled probe(s) at a temperature which favors the specific binding of the probe(s) to target, the sample is washed, and then the hybridized sample is analyzed by fluorescence microscopy or by flow cytometry. For greater detail, see the Examples and Bayani J and Squire JA 2004 "Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH)" Current Protocols in Cell Biology.

(b) Method to detect IgHC translocations

[0056] In another aspect, a method of the invention provides a means to detect IgHC translocations in a sample by interphase FISH or metaphase FISH using at least a pair of FISH probes. In some embodiments, a first probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for IgHC, and a second probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSCl/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB. In other embodiments, a first probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for IgHC, and a second probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for a genomic locus selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSCl/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, and MAFB. In exemplary embodiments, a first probe comprises a clone, such as a BAC clone (e.g., as described in Table 1), and a second probe comprises a clone selected from the group consisting of FGFR3, WHSCl/MMSET, CCND1, CCND3, MAF, or MAFB (e.g., as described in Table 1). Suitable fluorochromes and probes are further described in Section I. Suitable samples and methods of interphase and metaphase FISH are described in Section 11(a).

(c) Method to establish a gene expression threshold value

[0057] In another aspect, a method of the invention provides a means to establish a gene expression threshold value for a 14q32 translocation partner, above which a gene expression level indicates a 14q32 translocation in a subject with a B- cell malignancy. Current methods do not exist to differentiate gene expression profile (GEP)-based spikes in expression representing 14q32 translocations from those reflecting changes in other genetic abnormalities in a subject with a B-cell malignancy that may result in increased expression levels, for example

hyperdiploidy or gene amplification. It has been discovered that IgHC drives expression of its translocation partner more efficiently than IgHV drives expression of its translocation partner. Further, a unique GEP threshold value can be defined for each gene fusion that results from a 14q32 translocation (e.g., IgHV- translocation partner gene fusion or translocation partner-IgHC gene fusion), such that the gene expression threshold value can be used to determine whether increased expression is either a result of a 14q32 translocation with the translocation partner or gene copy number driven increases in expression.

[0058] Accordingly, in some embodiments, a method of the invention comprises (a) obtaining biological samples from subjects with 14q32 translocations and without 14q32 translocations, (b) measuring the expression level of a 14q32 translocation partner in the samples, (c) determining the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation by FISH using at least a pair of probes, wherein the first probe comprises a DNA sequence specific for IgHC or IgHV, and the second probe comprises a DNA sequence complementary to a chromosomal region encoding the translocation partner whose expression was measured in (b), (d) comparing the expression level of the translocation partner with the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation, and (d) determining a gene expression threshold value for the translocation partner above which indicates increased expression due to a 14q32 translocation and below which indicates increased expression not due to a 14q32 translocation. Measuring the expression level of two or more 14q32 translocation partners in a single sample is also contemplated, and within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the presence or absence of a 14q32 translocation will then need to be determined by FISH for each translocation partner (e.g., a different second probe will need to be for each FISH analysis), and a unique gene expression threshold will need to be determined for each translocation partner. Suitable biological samples and FISH probes are described in above in Section I. Suitable samples, sample preparation and methods of interphase and metaphase FISH are described in Section 11(a).

[0059] Suitable methods to measure gene specific expression levels are well known in the art, and further detailed in the Examples. In more particular embodiments, the gene expression levels are tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), digital droplet PCR, (ddPCR), sequencing (including next generation sequencing, including various sequencing by synthesis or sequencing by ligation methodologies), microarray hybridization (to any microarray platform with suitable probes for detecting 14q32 translocation partners), northern blotting, or Southern blotting.

[0060] In some embodiments, expression levels of 14q32 translocation partners are measured by microarray analysis. For example, gene expression levels of one or more of FGFR3, WHSC1/MMSET, CCND3, CCND1, MAF, or MAFB may be measured with, for example, the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip, using probes 204379_s_at, 209054_s_at, 201700_at, 20871 l_s_at, 206363_at, and 222670_s_at (see, e.g., Table 2), respectively, or substantially similar probes. For clarity, the method of the invention is not limited to the use of these specific probes. Any suitable probe and/or gene chip may be used to establish a threshold value specific for that probe/chip. In other embodiments, expression levels of 14q32 translocation partners are measured by quantitative RT-PCR.

[0061] In some embodiments, the (at least) pair of probes is selected from a group consisting of (i) a first probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for IgHV and a second probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for MMSET, (ii) a first probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for FGFR3, (iii) a first probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for CCND1, (iv) a first probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for CCND3, (v) a first probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for MAF, and (vi) a first probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for IgHC and a second probe comprising a DNA sequence specific for MAFB.

[0062] In some exemplary embodiments, the translocation is t(4;14), the gene fusion is MMSET/IgHV, the expression of MMSET is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 209054_s_at, and the threshold value predictive of a translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is 2,405. In other exemplary embodiments, the translocation is t(4; 14), the gene fusion is FGFR3/IgHC, the expression of FGFR3 is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 204379_s_at, and the threshold value predictive of a translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is 6,558. In still other exemplary embodiments, the translocation is t(6; 14), the gene fusion is CCND3/IgHC, the expression of CCND3 is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 201700_at, and the threshold value predictive of a translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is 15,696. In yet other exemplary embodiments, the translocation is t(l 1 ; 14), the gene fusion is CCNDl/IgHC, the expression of CCND1 is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 20871 l_s_at, and the threshold value predictive of a translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is 5,525. In different exemplary embodiments, the translocation is t(14;16), the gene fusion is MAF/IgHC, the expression of MAF is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 206363_at, and the threshold value predictive of a translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is 5,096. In alternative exemplary embodiments, the translocation is t(14;20), the gene fusion is MAFB/IgHC, the expression of MAFB is measured by microarray analysis using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Array GeneChip 222670_s_at, and the threshold value predictive of a translocation in a subject with multiple myeloma is 19,850.

(d) Method to predict a 14q32 translocation

[0063] In another aspect, a method of the invention provides a means to predict/detect one or more 14q32 translocations in a subject suspected to have a B- cell malignancy, such as multiple myeloma, the method comprising (a) obtaining a biological sample from the subject, (b) measuring the expression level for one or more 14q32 translocation partners in the biological sample, and (c) comparing the expression level to a gene expression threshold value indicative of a 14q32 translocation for each translocation partner, wherein if the expression level for a 14q32 translocation partner in the biological sample is greater than the threshold value, then the subject is determined to have a 14q32 translocation.

Advantageously, when expression levels are measured by GEP, the method of the invention allows a skilled artisan to simultaneously identify multiple 14q32 translocations in a single analysis, such as 2, 3, 4, or 5 translocations simultaneously. In contrast, identification of multiple 14q32 translocations by FISH would require multiple samples to be processed in parallel. In some embodiments, the expression level for one or more 14q32 translocation partners is measured in the biological sample. In other embodiments, the expression level for two or more 14q32 translocation partners is measured in the biological sample. In still other embodiments, the expression level for three or more 14q32 translocation partners is measured in the biological sample. In yet other embodiments, the expression level for four or more 14q32 translocation partners is measured in the biological sample. In some other embodiments, the expression level for five or more 14q32

translocation partners is measured in the biological sample. In different

embodiments, the expression level for six or more 14q32 translocation partners is measured in the biological sample.

[0064] Suitable biological samples are described above in Section I, as are methods to obtain samples from a subject. Suitable methods to measure gene specific expression levels and determine a gene expression threshold value indicative of a 14q32 translocation are described above in Section 11(c), and further detailed in the Examples.

(e) Method to predict response to therapy

[0065] In another aspect, a method of the invention provides means to predict response to therapy. For example, gene expression data and/or metaphase or interphase FISH may be used to stratify subjects with B-cell malignancies, such as multiple myeloma, into those with predicted or confirmed 14q32 translocations, and predict outcome (e.g.., response to therapy) with the presence or absence of a response to a therapy. As used herein, patients who respond to therapy are said to have benefited from therapy. Typical responses to therapy measured in clinical practice include, but are not limited to, overall survival, event free survival, time to progression, time to death, partial response, and complete response. These terms are well known in the art and are intended to refer to specific parameters measured during clinical trials and in clinical practice by a skilled artisan. As detailed in

Example 4, it has been discovered that myeloma patients with t(14, 16) in their tumor cells did not benefit from bortezomib (VELCADE®, see, e.g., ChemID 387447) therapy. In fact, the median survival was reduced from 8 years (TT2, without bortezomib) to 3 years for TT3a/3b subgroup of patients (treated with bortezomib) compared to other groups of 14q32 translocations. In contrast, patients with other types of 14q32 translocations benefited from bortezomib therapy. One skilled in the art would appreciate that the method of the invention may be applied to any therapy suitable for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, not just bortezomib. For example, B-cell malignancies may be treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and bone marrow transplant. Non-limiting examples of chemotherapy include proteosome inhibitors, alkylating agents (e.g., melphalan, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin), anti-metabolites, taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), vinca alkaloids, such as vincristine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, vindesine), topoisomerase inhibitors (etoposide, irinotecan, topotecan), cytotoxic antibiotics (doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, bleomycin, mitomycin), histone deacetylase inhibitors, dexamethasone, thalidomide, and inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factors. In some embodiments, the treatment is chemotherapy. In other embodiments, the treatment is radiotherapy. In still other embodiments, the treatment is immunotherapy. In yet other embodiments, the treatment is bone marrow transplant. In exemplary embodiments, the therapy is a proteosome inhibitor. In preferred embodiments, the therapy is bortezomib.

[0066] In some embodiments, a 14q32 translocation indicates a patient should receive a therapy or treatment. For example, a t(4; 14), t(6; 14), t(l 1 ; 14), or t(14;20) translocation in a tumor cell from a subject with myeloma indicates a subject should receive treatment comprising bortezomib. In other embodiments, a 14q32 translocation indicates a patient should not receive a therapy or treatment comprising bortezomib. For example, a t(14; 16) translocation in a tumor cell from a subject with myeloma indicates a subject should not receive a treatment comprising bortezomib.

[0067] Accordingly, in related aspects, the invention provides methods of treating B cell malignancies, such as multiple myeloma. These methods entail providing a treatment comprising bortezomib or not comprising bortezomib to a subject (such as a human subject with multiple myeloma), as appropriate, on the basis of the presence of a 14q32 translocation, where the presence of a 14q32 translocation is determined by a method provided by the invention— e.g., either by FISH or GEP. For example, a subject with a translocation selected from t(4; 14), t(6; 14), t(l 1 ; 14), or t(14;20) is administered a treatment comprising bortezomib. A subject with a t(14; 16) translocation is administered a treatment that does not comprise bortezomib.

[0068] In certain embodiments, the invention also provides non-transient computer readable media comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform steps consonsant with the invention (e.g., the methods of detecting transclocations, prediciting responses to therapy, as well as calculating thresholds for any of the forgoing, et cetera). For example, the instructions may entail accepting data representing expression levels of 14q32 translocation partners, comparing the values to suitable references (e.g. controls) and providing an evaluation of the data— e.g. whether, and which, translocation is be present in a sample, and any implication (e.g. whether a treatment comprising bortezomib should or should not be administerd). The invention also provides systems comprising thesecomputer readable media and a processor adapted to execute the instructions.

[0069] Method provided by the invention, in some embodiments, entail comparison to reference values (e.g. controls), including, for example predetermined reference values (e.g., for known outcomes or determinations), positive and/or negative controls processed in parallel with the sample, et cetera. EXAMPLES

[0070] The following examples illustrate various aspects of the invention.

Example 1: Novel panel of fluorescent in situ hybridization probes to identify 14q32 translocations

[0071] In order to identify 14q32 translocations (tl4q32) more accurately, a panel of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes that are specific for a single gene and do not cross-hybridize to other chromosomal loci were developed. Briefly, bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) and PI artificial chromosome (PAC) libraries were screened to identify individual clones encoding Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 (FGFR3), Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome candidate I (MMSET), Cyclin D3 (CCND3), Cyclin D l (CCNDI); V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog (MAF), V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B (MAFB), IgH constant region (IgHC), and IgH variable region (IgHV).

[0072] Initially, a small radioactive ( 32 P) DNA probe was designed for screening BAC libraries (filters) or for performing PCR to amplify target PAC clone in an archive. After pinning down the clone locations (address; Table 1), BAC or PAC clones containing the chromosome segments of interest were purchased from the vendors. The bacterial colonies were re-examined for the DNA sequences, then, the plasmid was propagated from a single colony in large scale cultures. A high quality preparation of the plasmid was prepared using a commercially available kit and the probes were labeled in Nick Translation reactions to incorporate fluorochrome (green or red) conjugated dUTP into BAC/PAC DNA templates replacing dTTP. The reaction was optimized to fragment the template into 300-600 base pairs.

Human placental DNA and herring sperm DNA were used to block repetitive sequences. All probes were validated by FISH on normal metaphase chromosomes. Representative images of the probes designed for IgHV, IgHC, FGFR3 and MMSET are presented in FIGs. 3-6. Table 1: DNA probes used in FISH analyses

Example 2: Fluorescent in situ hybridization on healthy donor and myeloma patient cells using the new probes

[0073] To validate that the probes could identify 14q32 translocations in myeloma cells, FISH was applied to healthy donor and myeloma patient cells at interphase. One green and one red fluorescently labeled probe was used for each reaction— one for the selected region on chromosome 14q32, the other for its partner gene. Interphase FISH requires additional immunocytochemistry steps to recognize plasma cells in whole cell populations in bone marrow or blood using an immunoglobulin light chain specific antibody. All probes were documented for the correct locations in the human genome; and the 14q32 probe panel was optimized and suitable for all FISH applications.

[0074] 14q32 chromosomal translocations were identified by the merging of the two colors; green and red labeled probes yielding yellow fluorescence indicates chromosomal translocation of two genes. Using these probes, it was found that t(4;14) were reciprocal fusions of IgHC/FGFR3 and IGHV/MMSET respectively (FIGs. 7 and 21).

Example 3: Development of a GEP-based expression threshold is indicative of 14q32 translocation event

[0075] To determine whether GEP-based expression spikes of tl4q32 partner genes represent chromosomal translocations or changes in gene copy numbers, GEP-based expression data from 268 multiple myeloma (MM) patients was correlated with cytogenetic data developed using the new FISH probes. MM patients were enrolled Total Therapy (TT) 4 and 5 clinical protocols at the Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy of University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. The TT4 and TT5 protocols, initiated in late 2008, were the first myeloma treatment protocols at any facility to use risk-adapted therapy based on a robust predictive model built from GEP data. In the experiments described below, expression data on tl4q32 partner genes was obtained using an Affymetrix U133plus2.0 chip (Table 2) and FISH was performed using the combinations of either the IgHC or IgHV probe with each probe of the partner genes.

[0076] First, GEP-based expression spikes confirmed to be associated with t(4;14) were analyzed. GEP-based expression spikes (i.e., levels) of IgHC/FGFR3 were 5 fold higher than lgHV/MMSET spikes, suggesting IgHC is a highly efficient enhancer of expression. Other 14q32 translocations were also examined with the two IgH probes combined with each of the partners: t(6; 14), t(l l ;14), t(14; 16), and t(14;20). It was found that IgHC was potent to facilitate the spikes in expression of tl4q32 partner genes, while IgHV weakly promotes gene expression to the levels equivalent to gene copy increase (see FIG. 22).

[0077] Next, expression levels of the Affymetrix probe sets were correlated with FISH data and a signal threshold indicative of 14q32 translocation was defined (Table 3 and FIG. 9-14). Above this threshold, the expression level was clearly indicative of translocations between IgHC and the partners: t(4; 14)(pl6;q32); t(6; 14)(p21 ;q32), t(l l ; 14)(ql3;32); t(14;16)(q32;q23), or t(14;20)(q32;ql l). Below these thresholds, increased signals reflected gene copy numbers or the translocations between IgHV and the partners.

[0078] Overall, of the patients enrolled in the TT 4 and 5 clinical protocols, 42.2% (1 13/268) were confirmed to have 14q32 translocations: 14.9% had t(4; 14), 3.4% t(6; 14), 19.4% t(l 1; 14), 3.4% t(14; 16), and 1.1% t(14;20 ). In cases where the GEP analysis indicated simultaneous spikes of more than one 14q32 translocation partners in the same patient, we discovered that 14q32 translocation were mutually exclusive - one 14q32 translocation per clone. The spikes of the other 14q32 partner gene(s) shown by GEP reflected copy number driven increases, or in a few cases, the co-existence of distinct clones, each with a unique 14q32 translocation in the same patient.

Table 2: Affymetrix U133plus GeneChip probe sets

Table 3: GEP thresholds indicating 14q32 translocation

Probe Translocation GEP threshold

209054_s_at t(4;14) MMSET / IGHV 2,405

204379_s_at t(4; 14) FGFR3 / IGHC 6,558

201700_at t(6;14) CCND3 / IGHC 15,696

20871 l_s_at t(l l ;14) CCND1 / IGHC 5,525

206363_at t(14; 16) MAF/ IGHC 5,096

222670_s_at t(14;20) MAFB/ IGHC 19,850 Example 4: Validation of the GEP-based expression threshold and correlation with treatment outcome

[0079] The threshold expression levels identified with the TT4 and TT5 training set were used to predict 14q32 translocations in an earlier MM data set, patients enrolled in the TT2 and TT3 protocols. TT4 and TT5 were designed based on the learnings from TT2 and TT3, both of which incorporated new agents (thalidomide in TT2 and bortezomib in TT3) and adjusted timing of therapy to support stem cell transplants. Using threshold expression levels equivalent to those developed in the TT4 and TT5 training set, it was predicted that 42.3% (335/792) of patients treated on TT2 and TT3 protocols had 14q32 translocations at baseline, as follows; 14.9% t(4;14), 1.4% t(6; 14), 19.8% t(l l ; 14), 4.4% (14; 16), and 1.8% t(14;20) (Table 4).

Table 4: FISH confirmed tl4q32 in TT4/TT5 and GEP predicted tl4q32 in TT2/TT3

TT4/TT5 (n=268) TT2/TT3 (n=792)

14q32 translocations

GEP spikes/FISH GEP predicted

[0080] Next, the effects of 14q32 translocations were correlated with overall survival (OS) of patients treated in TT2 and TT3. As noted above, the

chemotherapy regimen used in TT2 included thalidomide, while TT3 included thalidomide and also introduced bortezomib. Thus, it was possible to determine if the addition of bortezomib extended OS by comparing data from TT2 and TT3, and, by layering on top of the OS data information regarding 14q32 translocations, it was possible to discover prognostic indicators associated with 14q32 translocation.

[0081] Patients whose GEP spikes predicted t(4; 14) and t(6; 14) significantly benefited from the inclusion of bortezomib in TT3 (FIGs. 15-17). Patients with t(l 1 ;14) and t(14;20) also benefited from bortezomib, showing an improved median survival in 8 years follow-ups of TT2 and TT3 (FIGs. 18 and 19, respectively). In contrast, patients with t(14; 16) as predicted by high MAF spikes clearly did not benefit from the inclusion of the proteasome inhibitor in TT3 (FIG. 20).

[0082] In conclusion, by combining interphase FISH and GEP, an expression- level threshold that is predictive of 14q32 translocations in multiple myeloma was established. Furthermore, 14q32 translocation thresholds have been correlated with response to bortezomib therapy. Hence, either FISH or GEP-based thresholds can be used to define molecular subgroups of patients and guide treatment decisions. This single -gene approach to define molecular subgroups was expedient and provided important information of prognostic significance in myeloma and other cancer treatments.

Example 5: Novel FISH probes are more accurate than commercially available probes.

[0083] An important difference between the new FISH probes and commercially available probes is that the new probes are made of gene locus-based BAC or PAC DNA templates while commercial probes are usually significantly longer than a gene locus on a chromosome. For example, using FISH probes offered for sale by Abbott, t(4;14) is currently defined as any fusion between an IgH probe spanning approximately 1.5 Mb and containing sequences homologous to essentially the entire IGH locus (IgHC, IgHJ, IgHD and IgHV), as well as sequence extending about 300 kb beyond the 3 ' end of the IGH locus, and an FGFR3 probe spanning approximately 900 kb and containing sequences homologous to both FGFR3 and MMSET. In our probe panel, two probes are assigned to 4pl6 (one each for FGFR3 and MMSET) and two probes are assigned to 14q32 (one each for IgHC and IgHV).

[0084] As described above, FISH and GEP-based analyses were applied to two sets of baseline myeloma samples collected from 1998 to 2007 (TT2/TT3) and 2007 to present (TT4/TT5). The overall incidences of tl4q32 and predicted tl4q32 subgroups were found to be the same in two patient populations (see Table 4). The lower incidence rates of tl4q32 found by these studies, whose analysis is based on the new FISH probes, compared to a 75% event rate cited in the early publications (Avet-Loiseau H., Facon T., et ah, 2002 Blood 99(6):2185-91 ; Avet-Loiseau H, Brigaudeau C, et al, 1999 Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24(1):9— 15) suggests nonspecific fusions of large- size probes from the commercial sources could state false positive 10%-30% more than 14q32 translocations detected using the new FISH probes and/or the GEP thresholds established with the new FISH probes.

[0085] It should be understood that for all numerical bounds describing some parameter in this application, such as "about," "at least," "less than," and "more than," the description also necessarily encompasses any range bounded by the recited values. Accordingly, for example, the description at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 also describes, inter alia, the ranges 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 2-3, 2-4, 2-5, 3-4, 3-5, and 4-5, et cetera.

[0086] For all patents, applications, and other references cited herein, such as non-patent literature and reference sequence or chemical information, it should be understood that it is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes as well as for the proposition that is recited. Where any conflict exits between a document incorporated by reference and the present application, this application will control.

[0087] Headings used in this application are for convenience only and do not affect the interpretation of this application.

[0088] The described computer-readable implementations may be implemented in software, hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. Examples of hardware include computing or processing systems, such as personal computers, servers, laptops, mainframes, and micro-processors. Any of the computer-readable implementations provided by the invention may, optionally, comprise a step of providing a visual output to a user, such as a visual representation on a screen or a physical printout.

[0089] Preferred features of each of the aspects provided by the invention are applicable to all of the other aspects of the invention mutatis mutandis and, without limitation, are exemplified by the dependent claims and also encompass

combinations and permutations of individual features (e.g., elements, including numerical ranges and exemplary embodiments) of particular embodiments and aspects of the invention including the working examples. For example, particular experimental parameters exemplified in the working examples can be adapted for use in the claimed invention piecemeal without departing from the invention. For example, for material that are disclosed, while specific reference of each various individual and collective combinations and permutation of these compounds may not be explicitly disclosed, each is specifically contemplated and described herein, as are methods of making and using such compounds. Thus, if a class of elements

A, B, and C are disclosed as well as a class of elements D, E, and F and an example of a combination of elements, A-D is disclosed, then even if each is not individually recited, each is individually and collectively contemplated. Thus, is this example, each of the combinations A-E, A-F, B-D, B-E, B-F, C-D, C-E, and C-F are specifically contemplated and should be considered disclosed from disclosure of A,

B, and C; D, E, and F; and the example combination A-D. Likewise, any subset or combination of these is also specifically contemplated and disclosed. Thus, for example, the sub-group of A-E, B-F, and C-E are specifically contemplated and should be considered disclosed from disclosure of A, B, and C; D, E, and F; and the example combination A-D. This concept applies to all aspects of this application including, elements of a composition of matter, and steps of method of making or using the compositions.

[0090] The forgoing aspects of the invention, as recognized by the person having ordinary skill in the art following the teachings of the specification, can be claimed in any combination or permutation to the extent that they are novel and non- obvious over the prior art. Thus, to the extent an element is described in one or more references known to the person having ordinary skill in the art, they may be excluded from the claimed invention by, inter alia, a negative proviso or disclaimer of the feature or combination of features.

[0091] While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to example embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.