ROBINSON, Ian N. (1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California, 94304-1100, US)
TAN, Kar-Han (1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California, 94304-1100, US)
ROBINSON, Ian N. (1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California, 94304-1100, US)
| CLAIMS 1. A method of establishing perceived eye contact between a first participant and a second participant engaged in a video conference using a computing device, the method comprising: capturing images of the first participant through a display using a camera (80 i ), the display located between the first participant and the camera; receiving a video stream encoding images of the second participant (802.905); shifting the images of the second participant in accordance with a shift vector, wherein the shift vector places the images of the second participaiit's face in approximate alignment with the eyes of the first participant and the lens of the camera (803); and projecting the shifted images on the display using. a. projector (804)., 2. The method of claim I , wherein shifting the images of the second participant in accordance with the shift vector further comprises: determining a first lateral distance between the first participant's face and the position of the camera; determining a second lateral distance between the second participant's face and the position of a camera located at the second participant's site; mid summing the first distance and the second distance to obtain, a distance corresponding to the length of the shift vector. 3, The method of claim 1 , wherein shifting the images of the second participant in accordance with the shift vector further comprises; identifying a first coordinate pixel location associated with the first participant's face in the images captured with the camera (606,722); identifying a second coordinate pixel location associated with the second participant's face in the images encoded in the video stream (608,724); and computing a distance between the first coordinate pixel location and the second coordinate pixel location, wherein the distance between the first and second coordinate pixel locations corresponds to the length of the shift vector. 4. The method of claim !, wherein shifting the images of the second participant further comprises mirroring the image of the second participant followed by shifting the mirrored image of the second participant .in accordance with the shift vector. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein shifting the images of the second participant further comprises mirroring the shifted image of the second participant, 6. The method of claim i further comprises: generating an image of shared content (704) for presenting on the display; shifting the image of shared content (732,738); and compositing the shifted image of shared content with the shifted image of the second participant (702,706), 7. The method of claim 1 .further comprises: generating an image of shared content (704) for presenting on the display; .mirroring the image of the second participant (750): and compositing the image of the shared content with the mirrored image of the second participant (752). S. The method of claim 1 , wherein shifting the images of the second, participant further comprises creating a blank space in the image of the second participant presented on the display. 9. A computer-readable medium having instructions encoded thereon for establishing perceived eye contact between a first participant and a second participant engaged in a video conference, the instructions enabling one or mote processors to perform the operations of: capturing images of the first participant through a display using a camera (801), the display located between the first participant and the camera: receiving a video stream encoding images of the second participant (802, 905); shifting the images of the second participant in accordance with a shift vector, wherein the shift vector places the images of the second participant's face in approximate alignment with the eyes of the first participant and the lens of the camera (803); and projecting the shifted images on the display using a projector (804). 10, The medium of claim 9, wherein shifting the images of the second participant accordance with the shift vector further comprises: determining a first lateral distance between the first participant's, face and the position of the camera; determining a second lateral distance between the second participant's face and the position of a camera located at the second participant's site; and summing the first distance and the second distance to obtain a distancecorresponding, to the length of the shift vector. 1 1. The medium of claim 9, wherein shifting the images of the second participant in accordance with the shift, vector further comprises; identifying a first coordinate pixel location associated with the first participant's face in the images captured with the camera (606,722); identifying a second coordinate pixel location associated with the second participant's face in the images encoded in the video stream (608,724); and computing a distance between the first coordinate pixel location and the second coordinate pixel location, wherein the distance between the first and second, coordinate pixel locations corresponds to the length of the shift vector. 12. : The .medium of claim 9, wherein shifting the images of the second participant further comprises one of: mirroring the shifted image of the second participant followed by shifting the mirrored image of the second participant in accordance with the shift vector; and mirroring the shifted image of the second participant, 13. The .medium of claim 9, wherein shifting the images of the second participant further comprises mirroring the shifted image of the second participant, 14. The medium of claim 9 further comprises: generating an image of shared content (704) for presenting on the display; shifting the image of shared content (732, 738); and compositing the shifted image of shared content with the shifted image of the second participant ( 702,706), 15. The medium of claim 9 further comprises; generating an image of shared content (704) for presenting on the display; miiToring the image of the second-participant (750); and compositing the image of the shared content with the mirrored image of the second participant (75.2). |
TECHNICAL FIELD
Embodiments of the present invention relate to video-conferencing technology.
BACKGROUND
In recent years, individuals and businesses have begun using video- conferencing technologies to increase efficiency and productivity. In particular, videoconferencing technologies allow people at a first location to simultaneously converse with people at other locations in nearly real time, without wearing faceset ' s or using handheld communication devices. Video conferencing can be as simple as a conversation between two people in different locations (point-to-point) or involve several locations (multi-point) with more than one person at each location. Video-conference communication Is becoming more affordable to a wide range of users including individuals and businesses, because high-speed Iniemet connectivity has become more widely available at a reasonable cost, and because the hardware used for this technology has continued to improve in quality at ever lower costs. Carefully designed video- conferencing rooms with large displays can be used to present the video-conference participants with approximately the same size as they would appear if they were in the same room.
However, many video-conferencing technology users argue that a number of issues prevent current video-conferencing technology from becoming a standard part of communication. One- major issue is lack of eye contact, which plays a major role in conversational communications, perceived attention and intent, and other important aspects of natural face-to-face communication. For example, consider a first person and a second person participating in a video conference. When the first person looks at a display screen of the second person, the first person is not looking at the camera, resulting in the second person getting a view of the first person without eye contact. On the other hand, when the first person looks at the camera, the first person at best gets a peripheral view of the second person exhibited on the display. Another major issue is gaze awareness. For example, conveying the focus of a remote user ' s attention (or lack of attention) with regard to shared content, such as a shared document, is an important part of establishing the intersubjectivity required for effective communication. Typically, shared content is displayed separately from the user's displays and the gaze direction is rarely conveyed correctly at each location. Thus, typical video-conferencing technologies are- arguably worse than traditional audio conferencing technologies that provide no eye contact cues, because typical video-conferencing technologies create the false impression that participants are either avoiding eye contact or are distracted.
Designers -and users of video-conference technologies continue to seek, improvements to the . video-conferencing experience.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure I shows an example of two video-conferencing participants in teracting in accordance with embodiments of the present in vention.
Figures 2A-2B each show a different top-plan, view and schematic ' representation of a visual-collaborative -system in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
Figure 3 shows an example of a video conference between two participants.
Figure 4 shows an example top-plan view of a video conference with a gaze problem and failure to establish eye contact.
Figure 5 shows an example top-plan view of establishing eye contact between two participants by shifting the images of the participants in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
Figure 6 shows an example top-plan view of shifted images used to establish perceived eye contact between participants in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Figures 7A-7C show examples of shifting images and shared content to establish perceived eye contact between participants and accurate gaze awareness in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 8 shows a flow diagram summarizing a method of establishing perceived eye contact between participants engaged in a video conference in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 9 shows a real-time processing pipeline diagram for establishing perceived eye contact between participants engaged in a video conference in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 10 shows a schematic representation of a computing device in .accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Various embodiments of the present invention are directed to videoconferencing systems that create eye contact and accurate gaze awareness between videoconferencing participants. Figure 1 shows an example of two video-conferencing participants interacting in accordance with embodimenis of the present invention. In the example shown in. Figure i, a large display 102 enables a participant A to interact with a remotely located participant B., The .participant B can be presented on the display 102 to: appear substantially life size to participant A. The display 102 can also be used to present shared content such as a graph. 104 and a document 106. The shared content can be presented at participant A and B's separate sites with the correct orientation. A camera 108 is positioned behind the display 102 at approximately eye level to participant A, and the display 102 enables the camera 108 to capture images of participant A through the display 102. The camera 108 can be positioned at a distance from the rear surface of the display 102, so that its viewpoint is roughly equivalent to that of participant B. In order to capture gestures made by participant A with respect to the shared content presented on the display 102. the camera's field of view encompasses approximately the entire display 102. images of the participants A and B are captured at their respective sites and processed according to embodiments described below so that perceived eye contact and accurate gaze awareness is created between the participants. For example, as shown in Figure I , the image of participant B is projected onto the display 102 so that when participant A looks at the image of participant B's face, participant A looks along a line represented by dashed line 108 that passes approximately between the eyes of participant B 's image and into the lens of the camera 108. As a result, participant A perceives eye contact with participant B and by iooking into the lens of the camera 108 that same experience can he created for participant B at participant B's remote site.
Figures 2 A-2B each show a top-plan view and schematic representation of a visual-collaborative , system. In Figure 2A, a system 200 includes a display 202, a camera 204. a projector 206, and a computing device 208. As shown in Figure 2 A, the camera 204 arid projector 206 are connected to the computing device 208, and the lenses of the camera 204 and the projector 206 are positioned to fate a rear surface 210 of the display 202. in the example system 200, the display 202 is a rear projection display screen where the camera 204 captures images through the display 202 and the projector 206 projects images onto the rear surface 210 of the display 202 enabling the images to be viewed by looking at the front surface 212 of the display 202. in Figure 2B, a system 214 also includes ' a display 216, a camera 218, a projector 220, and a computing device 222. Like the system 200, the camera 218 and projector 220 are connected to the computing device 222, however, the display 216 is a front projection display screen. In the example system 214, the camera 218 captures images through the display 216 and the projector 220 projects images onto a front surface . 224 of the display 216 enabling the images to be viewed by looking at the front surface 224 of the display 216, The cameras 204 and 218 each generate a video stream encoding images captured through the respective screens 202 and 216. The video streams can then be sent over a network, such as the Internet or a local area network, to a remote site for video processing. The computing devices 208 and 220 also receive video streams encoding images captured at a remote site and can process the images captures at the local site and the images received from the remote site.
Displays, such as the displays 200 and 214, allow for capturing an image of a remotely located participant from a viewpoint that corresponds to that of a local participant, as if the participants were co-located on opposite sides of a transparent screen, with the exception of minOring the images of the participants which may be necessary to keep any shared content intelligible. Figure 3 shows an example of a video conference between two participants identified as participant A and participant B. Participants A and B are. each located at different sites. In the example of Figure 3, participant A's site includes a rear projection display screen 302, a camera C A , and a projector P A , Participant B's site also includes a rear projection display screen 304, a camera C B , and a projector P B . AS shown in Figure 3. participant A creates shared contend 306 that is projected in the form of an image 308 on the display 302 using the projector Ρ Λ . Alternatively, the display 302 can be a touch screen or include a touch surface enabling participant A to generate the shared content 3:06 directly on the display 302, or participant A can create shared content using a diagramming application or a word processing application. Camera C A captures- participant A's image through the display 302 but does not capture any Images projected on the: screen, such as the shared content, as represented by capture image 31.0. image 310 is then mirrored left to right to create image 312. Mirrored image 312 is then composited with shared content image 308 to produce composited image 314 which is projected on the display 304 using the projector P B . As a result, participant B sees the composited mirrored image of participant A with the shared content 306 on the display 304, Although not represented in Figure 3, an- analogous process can. be used to capture images of participant B through the display 304, which are processed in the same manner and sent to the projector P A . .for presentation on the display 302,
Note that the computing devices not .shown in Figure 3 are used to process the images captured by the respective cameras for projection by the projectors. For example, in certain embodiments, captured images of participant A can be -sent from camera C A to a computing device located at participant A's site which in turn sends the images to a -computing device located at participant B's site in the form of a video stream. The computing device located at participant B's site performs the operations of mirroring and composting and presenting the resulting images on the display 304 using the projector P B . In alternative embodiments, the operations of mirroring and composting can be performed by the computing device located at participant A's site and the composited images can ' be sent to the computing device on participant B's site in the form of a video stream and displayed by the projector Ρ B .
Alternatively, image processing can be carried out at the camera C' A and/or the projector P A - For example, images by the camera C A can be sent from the camera C A to the projector P B over a network located at participant B's site in the form of a video stream. Projector P B can then perform the operations of mirroring, compositing, and displaying the composited image, As another example, the operations of mirroring and compositing can be performed by the camera C A and the composited image can be sent to the projector PB in the form of a video stream and displayed by the projector !な.
Alternatively, the operations of mirroring and compositing can be split between, the .participant's sites. For example, images captured by the camera C A can be mirrored by a computing device located at participant A's site or mirrored by the camera C A and the mirrored images are sent to participant B's site where the mirrored images are composited by a computing device located at participant B's site or are composited by the projector P B ,
Video conferencing performed in the manner described above with reference to Figure 3 recreates a whiteboard- like collaboration experience for the participants, because the participants are not constrained to stand at the center of the display, but instead the participants are tree to move about in the area in front of their respective displays and each participant can use the entire display surface for interaction and communicating information. However, this type of interaction may also create problems with establishing eye contact and accurate gaze awareness.
Figure 4 shows an example top-plan view of a video conference where gaze awareness and eye contact problems are created by participants not being centered in front of their respective displays. As shown in the example of Figure 4, camera C A captures images of participant A through the display 302 at participant A's site. The captured images are mirrored and projected on the display 304 at participant B's site using the projector P. Likewise camera C B captures images of participant B through the display 304 at participant B's site. The captured images are also mirrored and projected onto the display 302 at participant A's site using the projector P A . As shown in Figure 4, participant A is looking directly at participant B's image, as indicated by directional arrow 402, and participant B is looking directly at participant A's image, as indicated by directional arrow 404, However, from camera€-A'S viewpoint, participant A appears to be looking to participant A's left, and from camera CR'S viewpoint, participant B appears to be looking to participant B's right. The mirrored image of participant A presented on the display 304 reveals participant A looking to the .left, but from where participant B is located, participant B perceives that participant A is. not looking directly at participant B. in addition, the mirrored image of participant B presented on the display 302 reveals participant .8 looking to the right but from where participant A is located, participant A perceives that participant B is also not looking directly at participant A. As a result neither participant A nor participant B perceives eye contract is established with the other participant,
hi order to capture a view of participant A that communicates eye contact with participant B, participant A has to look directly into the lens of camera C A as indicated, by dashed line . 406, The image of participant A presented to participant B is then one in which participant A appears to look straight out of the display 304. In general, -because the eyes of a static portrait appear to follow the viewer, an effect called the "Moria Lisa Effect," from participant B's point of view, participant A. appeal's to be looking at participant B, irrespective of participant A and B's positions in front of their respective displays. Likewise, in order for participant B to communicate eye contact with participant A, participant B has to look directly into the lens of camera (¾ as indicated by dashed line 408. However, as shown in the example of Figure 4, each participant is presented on the other participant's display such thai the participant's attention is drawn away from looking into the lens of the camera.
in order to direct a first participant to look into the lens of a camera located behind a display when attempting to make perceived eye contact with a remotely located second participant, the image of the second participant is shifted to intersect a path or line connecting the .first participant's eyes to the lens of the camera. In other words, embodiments of the present invention are directed to shifting the image of the second participant such that the first participant's camera lens, first participant's eyes, and the image of the second participant are aligned.
Figure 5 shows an example top-plan view of establishing eye contact between two participants by shifting the images of the participants, in Figure 5, dashed- line image 502 of participant B corresponds to the im-shifted location of participant B presented on the display 302 at participant A's site, as shown in Figure 4. Figure 5 also includes a dashed-lute image 504 of participant A corresponding to the un-shifted location of participant A presented on the display 304 at participant B's site, as shown in Figure 4. In order to get participant A to: look into the lens of camera C A , participant B's image 506 is shifted to intersect the line 406 connecting participant A's eyes to the lens of camera C A . Also, in order to. get. participant B to look into the lens of camera C B , participant A's image .508 is shifted to intersect the line 408 connecting participant B's eyes to the lens of camera C B . AS a result, participant A and participant B each look into their respective cameras and perceive eye contract is established with the other participant.
The amount by which the second participant's image is shifted at the first participant's location to establish perceived eye contact is approximately equal to the difference between the position of the first participant's face in the first participant's captured images and the position of the second participant's face in the second participant's captured images. By symmetry, the amount of shift applied to the two images .captured by the. separate video-conterencing system is approximately equal and opposite in direction.
Figure 6 shows an example top-plan view of shifted images used to establish perceived eye contact for participants A and B. As shown in Figure 6, camera C A captures an image 602 of participant A through the display 302 and camera CB captures an image 604 of participant B through the display 304. Next, when the cameras C A and CB are in the same place with respect the displays 302 and 304, facial recognition can be used to identify the locations of the participant's faces in their respective images and a shift vector can be produced to shift the images to obtain perceived eye contract as follows. In the example of Figure. 6, facial recognition identifies the location of participant A's face, as indicated by box 606, in captured image 602, and facial recognition identiik's the iocation of participant B's face, as indicated by box 608, in captured image 604. The location of participant- B's feee 608 -indicates that the desired position of participant A's image lies along a line 610 connecting participant B's eyes to the lens of camera C B , and the location of participant A's face 606 indicates the desired position of participant B's image lies along a line 612 connecting participant A's eyes to the fens of camera C A . As shown in the example of Figure 6, this can be accomplished by determining a distance D 609 between the approximate center of the image of participant. A's face 606 in captured image- 602 and the approximate center of the image of participant B's face 608 in captured image 604, The approximaie center of a participant's face can correspond to a pixel or set of pixels. Next, because the cameras C A and (¾ are in the same place with respect the displays 302 and 304, shift vectors are determined to shift the captured images. For example, a shift vector associated -with captured image 606 shifts the captured image 602 by the amount D in a direction 614 to produce shifted image 616, and a shift vector associated with captured image 604 shifts the captured image 604 by the same amount D in an opposite direction 618 to produce shifted image 620. The shifted images 616 and 620 may be mirrored and projected on the. respective displays 304 and 302. As a result, the image of participant B's face intersects, or is aligned with, the line 61.2 connecting participant A's eyes to the lens of camera C A , and the image of participant A's face intersects,, or is ' . aligned with, the line 610 connecting participant B's eyes to- the lens of camera C B .
In alternative embodiments, using the location of the each participant's face obtained from facial recognition, the shift vector can be determined by measuring the lateral or horizontal distances from the approximate center of each participant's face to the positions of their respective cameras. For example, as shown in Figure 6, the cameras C A and C B are located behind the centers of their respective displays 302 and 304. The .lateral distance d from the approximate center of participant A's face to position 622 of the camera C A is determined, and the lateral distance d' from the approximate center of participant B's face to the position 624 of the camera Cg is determined. When cameras C A and C B are in the same iocation with respect to the corresponding displays 302 and 304, the distance D is approximately equal to the sum of
Note thai shifting the images as described in Figure 6 creates a blank area 626 and collaboration area 628 in the image presented on the. display 302 and a blank area 630 and a collaboration area 632 in the image presented on the display 304. The blank areas 626 and 632 are located farthest from the participant viewing the associated display. A blank area created as a result of shifting images as described above has two functions'. First, a blank area serves to indicate to each participant the extent to which the collaboration area can be used for shared content. Second, dynamic coupling of the blank areas ' to the participants' shifts In position may induce the participants to move in such a manner as to maximize the collaboration areas.
In addition to providing perceived eye contact between participants, an additional important aspect of video-conferencing methods of the present invention is enabling communication of participant gaze and gestures with respect to shared content. For example, participant A can point at a part of the shared content and look to see whether participant. B is following paiticipatit A's gesture, or concentrating on some other part of the display- As a result, when an image of a participant is shifted, as described above, the shared content is also shifted accordingly. Because a participant's image is ultimately projected ' onto: the same display as the shared content, the amount by which the shared content is shifted is the same as the shift applied to the participant's image.
Figures 7A-7B show an example top-plan view of shifting images and shared content. In Figure 7 A, a mirrored composite-shifted image 702 of participant B and shared content 704 is presented on the display 302 for viewing by participant A, and a mirrored composite-shifted image 706 of participant- A and the same shared content 704 is presented on the display 302 for viewing by participant B. The display 302 includes a blank area 708 corresponding to the image of participant 8 and Che shared content 704- having been shifted in a direction by an amount D' represented by a first shift, vector 710. The display 304 also includes a blank area 712 corresponding to the image of participant. A and the shared content 704 having been shifted in an opposite direction by the same amount D' represented by a second shift vector 714. An example of image processing 716 used to obtain mirrored composite-shifted images 702 and 706 is now described as follows with reference to Figure 7B. In Figure 7B, captured images 718 and 720 of participants A and B, respectively, are obtained and facial recognition is used to identify the location of participants A and B's faces as indicated by boxes 722 and 724, respectively,, as described above with .reference to Figure 6. The distance D' between the approximate center of the image of participant A's face 722 and the approximate center of the image of participant. . B's face 724 are determined and used to create the shift vectors 71 0 and 714 with opposite directions but with the same magnitude £>', as described above with reference to Figure 6. Shift vector 714 is applied to captured image 71 8 to produce a shifted image 726, and shift vector 710 is applied to captured image 720 to produce a shifted image 728. Figure 7B also includes an image 730 of the shared content 704 presented on displays 302 and 304, shown in Figure 7A. Cameras C A and CB do not capture images of the remote participant or of the shared content 704 due to the configuration of systems referenced in the incorporated patent applications identified above, in order to produce mirrored composite-shifted image 702. shown in Figure 7A, the image 730 of shared content 704 is shifted by the shift vector 710 to produce a first shifted shared-content image 732, The shifted image 728 is mirrored to produce mirrored shifted image 734, which is composited with the shifted shared content image 732 to produce the mirrored composite-shifted image 702 that is projected on the display 302, as shown in Figure 7A. On the other hand,, in order to produce mirrored composite-shifted image 706, also shown in Figure 7A, the image 730 of shared content 704 is shifted by the shift vector 714 to produce a second shifted shared-content image 738. The shifted image 726 is mirrored to produce mirrored shifted image 740 and composited with shifted shared-content image 738 to produce the mirrored composite-shifted image 706 that is projected on the display 304 » as shown in Figure 7A.
Figure 7C shows an alternative method for producing mirrored composite- shifted images 702 and 706 without shifting the image 730 of shared content 704. hi Figure 7€, the captured image 71 8 is mirrored to produce mirrored image 750, which is composited with image 730 to produce mirrored-composite image 752. Mirrored composite image 752 is then shifted by the shift vector 710 to produce mirrored composite-shifted image 706. Likewise, the captured image 720 is mirrored to produce mirrored image 754, which is composited with image 730 to produce mirrored-eomposiie image 756, Mirrored composite image 756 is then shifted by the shift vector 714 to produce mirrored composite-shifted image 702.
Embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the length of the shift vector applied to the shared content image having the same length as the shift vector applied to the captured images of the participants. In other embodiments, the length of shift vector applied to the shared content can be selected to create motion parallax. For example, in Figure 7B, the length of the shift vector applied to the image 730 of the shared content 704 can be a fraction of the length D'. Shifting the image 730 in this manner creates the effect that as a participant viewing the display moves their head, the image of the participant presented on the display appears to move more than the shared content, providing a sense of depth through motion parallax. In other words, the shared content 704 appears to be closer than the participant presented on the display.
Figure 8 shows a flow diagram summarizing a method of establishing perceived eye contact between a first participant and a second participant engaged in a video conference. In step 801, images of the first participant are captured through a display using a camera. The display is located between the first participant and the camera, as described above with reference to Figures 2-7. In step 802, a video stream encoding images of the second participant located at a remote site are received, as described above with reference to Figures 2-7, In step 803, the images of the second participant are shifted so that the images of the second participant's face are approximately aligned with the eyes of the first participant and the lens of the camera (803), as described above with reference to Figures 6 and 7. In step 804, the shifted image is projected on the display using a projector with the image of the second participant's face approximately aligned with the eyes of the first participant and the Jens of the camera, as described above with reference to Figures 2-7.
Figure 9 shows a real-time processing pipeline diagram for establishing perceived eye contact between a first participant, and a second participant engaged in a video conference. in step 901 , the first participant generates a video stream encoding images of the .first participant through, a display, as described above with reference to Figures 2-7. In step 902, the video stream is compressed and set to the second participant over a network 903, such as the Internet or a local area network. In step 904, the images encoded in the video stream produced by the first participant are processed using a face detector in order to identify the location of the first participant's face in the images, as described above with reference to Figure 6. While the video stream associated with the first participant is being generated, a video stream encoding images of the second participant's is received, in step 905 from the network and a video stream encoding any shared media also is received, in step 906 from the. network, in step 907, the images encoded in the video stream produced by the second participant are processed using a face detector in order to identify the location of the second participant's face is the images, as described above with reference to Figure 6. In step 908, a shift vector is computed based on the face detection, results of steps 907 and 90S, as described above with reference to Figure 7. In step 909. the images of the second participant are shifted, mirrored, and composited with shifted images of the shared content, as described abovewith reference to Figures 6 and 7. Alternatively, step 907 can be omitted by transmitting the location of the first participant's face in the images along with the video stream in step 902 o ver the network 903 ,
Methods of establishing eye contact between participants in a video conference are described above with reference to a computing device. The computing device can be a desktop computer, a laptop, or any oilier suitable device configured to carry out video and image processing. However, embodiments of the present invention are not so limited, in other embodiments, the video processing performed by the computing devices described above may also be performed by a projector or the video processing can be performed by a camera.
Figure 10 shows a schematic representation of a computing device 1000, The device 1000 may include one or more processors 1002, such as a central processing unit; a projector interface 1004; a video or camera interface 1006; one or more network interfaces 1008, such as a Local Area Network LAN, a wireless 802.1 1 x LAN, a 3G mobile WAN or a WiMax WAN; and one or more computer- readable mediums 1010. Each of these components is operative!}'' coupled to one or more buses 1012, For example, the bus 1012 can be an EISA, a PCI, a USB, a. Fire Wire, a NuBus, or a PDS.
The computer readable medium 1010 can he any suitable medium that participates in providing instructions to the processor 1002 for execution. For example; the computer readable medium 1010 can be non-volatile media, such as firmware, an optica} disk, a magnetic disk, or a magnetic disk drive; volatile media, such as memory; and transmission -media, such as coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber optics. The computer readable medium 1010 can also store other software applications, including word processors, browsers, email. Instant Messaging, media players, and telephony software.
The computer-readable medium 1010 may also store an operating system 10.14, such as Mac. OS-, MS Windows, Unix, or Linux; network applications 1016; and a video-conferencing application 1018. The operating system 1014 can be . multi-user, multiprocessing, multitasking, ' multithreading, real-time and the like. The operating- system 1014 can also perform basic tasks such as recognizing input from input devices, such as a keyboard, a keypad, or a mouse; sending output to a projector and a camera; keeping track of files and directories on medium 1010; controlling peripheral devices, such as disk drives, printers, image capture device; and managing traffic on the one or more buses 1012, The network applications 1016 includes various components for establishing and maintaining network connections, such as software for implementing communication protocols including TCP/IP, HTTP, Ethernet, USB, and FireWire.
The video-conference application 1018 provides various software components for established eye contact between video conference participants, as described above. In certain embodiments, some or all of the processes performed by the application 1018 can be integrated into the operating system 1014. In certain embodiments, the processes can be at least partially implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or in any combination thereof.
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to he exhaustive of or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments are shown and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications; to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particuiar use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents: