Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
OLEFIN POLYMERIZATION PROCESS
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2017/144559
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
A process for the preparation of an ethylene polymer in the presence of a Phillips-type chromium catalyst in a gas-phase polymerization reactor equipped with a cycle gas line including a heat- exchanger, wherein the cooled reactor gas returned to the polymerization reactor through the cycle gas line has been partly condensed and the amount of liquid in the returned reactor gas is from 0.5 wt.% to 1 0 wt.%, the polymerization is carried out at from 1 08 °C to 125 °C, and an aluminum alkyl is fed into the polymerization reactor in an amount in the range of from 0.0025 mole to 0.1 mole per ton of dosed ethylene.

Inventors:
MEIER GERHARDUS (DE)
SCHUELLER ULF (DE)
FIBLA CLAUDIO (DE)
MIHAN SHAHRAM (DE)
Application Number:
PCT/EP2017/054109
Publication Date:
August 31, 2017
Filing Date:
February 23, 2017
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE)
International Classes:
C08F2/34; C08F2/00; C08F210/16
Domestic Patent References:
WO2016150996A12016-09-29
Foreign References:
EP2155374A12010-02-24
EP2813520A12014-12-17
US20110009577A12011-01-13
US4101289A1978-07-18
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
SEELERT, Stefan (DE)
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS

A process for the preparation of an ethylene polymer comprising polymerizing ethylene or copolymerizing ethylene and one or more other olefins in the presence of a Phillips-type chromium catalyst in a gas-phase polymerization reactor containing a reactor bed of particulate polymer, which gas-phase polymerization reactor is equipped with a cycle gas line for withdrawing reactor gas from the reactor, leading the reactor gas through a heat- exchanger for cooling and feeding the reactor gas back to the reactor, wherein the reactor gas returned to the polymerization reactor through the cycle gas line has been partly condensed and the amount of liquid in the reactor gas returned to the polymerization reactor is from 0.5 wt.% to 10 wt.%, the polymerization is carried out at a temperature from 1 08°C to 125 °C, and an aluminum alkyl of formula AIR3 or of formula AIRnR'm, in which R is a C4-C12- alkyl, R' is a C4-C -alkanediyl group which is bridging two aluminum atoms, and n + m = 3, is fed into the polymerization reactor in an amount in the range of from 0.0025 mole to 0.1 mole per ton of dosed ethylene.

The process according to claim 1 , wherein the ethylene polymerization is an ethylene copolymerization of ethylene and 1 -butene or an ethylene copolymerization of ethylene and 1 -hexene.

The process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the aluminum alkyl is trihexylaluminum.

The process according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the aluminum alkyl is fed to the reactor bed or to the cycle gas line.

The process according to any of claims 1 to 4, wherein the polymerization is carried out in the presence of an antistatic agent.

The process according to claim 5, wherein the antistatic agent is a mixture comprising an oil-soluble surfactant, water, optionally an alcohol, and one or more aliphatic hydrocarbons.

The process according to claim 6, wherein first a mixture of the oil-soluble surfactant, the water, optionally the alcohol, and one or more aliphatic hydrocarbons is prepared and then the mixture is introduced into the polymerization reactor.

The process according to any of claims 1 to 7, wherein the reactor gas comprises more C4-C6 alkanes.

9. The process according to claim 8, wherein the content of C4-C6 alkanes in the reactor gas is from 1 vol.% to 1 0 vol.%.

10. The process according to any of claims 1 to 9, wherein the Phillips-type chromium catalyst has been activated at a temperature of from 350 °C to 1 000 °C.

The process according to any of claims 1 to 1 0, wherein the ethylene polymer has a density determined according to DI N EN ISO 1 1 83-1 :2004, Method A at 23 °C of from 0.91 8 g/cm3 to 0.970 g/cm3.

The process according to any of claims 1 to 1 1 , wherein the ethylene polymer has a melt flow rate MFR21 determined according to DIN EN ISO 1 133:2005 at a temperature of 190 <€ under a load of 21 .6 kg from 0.1 g/1 0 min to 1 00 g/10 min.

Description:
OLEFIN POLYMERIZATION PROCESS

FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0001 ] The present disclosure relates to a process for the preparation of an ethylene polymer comprising polymerizing ethylene or copolymerizing ethylene and one or more other olefins in the presence of a Phillips-type chromium catalyst in a gas-phase polymerization reactor.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Gas-phase polymerization processes are economical processes for the preparation of ethylene polymers. Phillips-type chromium catalysts are especially suitable for producing poly- ethylenes with a broad molecular weight distribution and a low level of long chain branching. Operating gas phase polymerizations in condensed mode is well known for ethylene polymeriza- tion processes utilizing Ziegler-Natta or metallocene catalysts. Condensed mode operations are carried out, for example, to increase production rates. Using chromium-based catalysts in gas phase polymerizations operated in condensed mode was much less successful, especially for producing high density polyethylenes having a relatively high molecular weight. [0003] WO 99/12982 A1 describes a process for preparing high-density polyethylene in the gas phase in the presences of a titanated porous silica supported chromium oxide catalyst, in which process the recycle gas is partially condensed and recycled to the reactor where it promotes cooling by evaporation. [0004] WO 01 /771 91 A1 discloses a process for preparing high density polyethylene in the gas phase comprising contacting ethylene or a mixture comprising ethylene and one or more alpha- olefins with a supported chromium oxide catalyst in a fluidized-bed reactor, in which process oxygen and a organoaluminum compound are introduced into the reactor. [0005] WO 201 1 /0061 1 1 A1 relates to a gas phase polymerization process for producing a polyethylene polymer under condensed mode operating conditions using a Cr+6-based supported catalyst and a catalyst initiation enhancing agent comprising an aluminum alkyl.

WO 201 1 /0061 1 1 A1 describes that the use of such a catalyst initiation enhancing agent prevents operating problems while maintaining polymer characteristic and further while maintaining com- mercially desirable production rates. The examples however present polymerizations without condensation of the recycle gas.

[0006] Thus, there is still a need for a process for the preparation of an ethylene polymer in the presence of a Phillips-type chromium catalyst, which allows increasing the production rate without causing operational problems such as fouling, sheeting or gel formation and which results in ethylene polymers with outstanding mechanical and processing properties.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0007] The present disclosure provides a process for the preparation of an ethylene polymer comprising polymerizing ethylene or copolymerizing ethylene and one or more other olefins in the presence of a Phillips-type chromium catalyst in a gas-phase polymerization reactor containing a reactor bed of particulate polymer, which gas-phase polymerization reactor is equipped with a cycle gas line for withdrawing reactor gas from the reactor, leading the reactor gas through a heat-exchanger for cooling and feeding the reactor gas back to the reactor, wherein the reactor gas returned to the polymerization reactor through the cycle gas line has been partly condensed and the amount of liquid in the reactor gas returned to the polymerization reactor is from 0.5 wt.% to 1 0 wt.%, the polymerization is carried out at a temperature from 1 08°C to 1 25 °C, and an alumi- num alkyl of formula AIR 3 or of formula AIR n R' m , in which R is a C 4 -C 12 -alkyl, R' is a C 4 -C -alkane- diyl group which is bridging two aluminum atoms, and n + m = 3, is fed into the polymerization reactor in an amount in the range of from 0.0025 mole to 0.1 mole per ton of dosed ethylene.

[0008] In some embodiments, the ethylene polymerization is an ethylene copolymerization of ethylene and 1 -butene or an ethylene copolymerization of ethylene and 1 -hexene.

[0009] In some embodiments, the aluminum alkyl is trihexylaluminum.

[0010] In some embodiments, the aluminum alkyl is fed to the reactor bed or to the cycle gas line.

[0011 ] In some embodiments, the polymerization is carried out in the presence of an antistatic agent. [0012] In some embodiments, the antistatic agent is a mixture comprising an oil-soluble surfactant, water, optionally an alcohol, and one or more aliphatic hydrocarbons.

[0013] In some embodiments, first a mixture of the oil-soluble surfactant, the water, optionally the alcohol, and one or more aliphatic hydrocarbons is prepared and then the mixture is intro- duced into the polymerization reactor.

[0014] In some embodiments, the reactor gas comprises one or more C 4 -C 6 alkanes.

[0015] In some embodiments, the content of C 4 -C 6 alkanes in the reactor gas is from 1 vol.% to 1 0 vol.%. [0016] In some embodiments, the Phillips-type chromium catalyst has been activated at a temperature of from 350 °C to 1000 °C.

[0017] In some embodiments, the ethylene polymer has a density determined according to DIN EN ISO 1 183-1 :2004, Method A at 23 °C of from 0.925 g/cm 3 to 0.970 g/cm 3 .

[0018] In some embodiments, the ethylene polymer has a melt flow rate MFR 2 i determined according to DIN EN ISO 1 133:2005 at a temperature of 1 90 °C under a load of 21 .6 kg from 1 g/1 0 min to 1 00 g/1 0 min.

DETAILED DESCRI PTION OF THE INVENTION

[0019] The present disclosure provides a process for the preparation of an ethylene polymer comprising polymerizing ethylene or copolymerizing ethylene and one or more other olefins in the presence of a Phillips-type chromium catalyst. Suitable olefins for being copolymerized with ethylene are especially 1 -olefins, i.e. hydrocarbons having terminal double bonds, without being restricted thereto. Suitable olefins can however also be functionalized olefinically unsaturated compounds. Preference is given to linear or branched C 3 -C 12 -1 -alkenes, in particular linear C 3 -C 10 - 1 -alkenes such as propylene, 1 -butene, 1 -pentene, 1 -hexene, 1 -heptene, 1 -octene, 1 -decene or branched C 2 -C 10 -1 -alkenes such as 4-methyl-1 -pentene or conjugated and nonconjugated dienes such as 1 ,3-butadiene, 1 ,4-hexadiene or 1 ,7-octadiene. Suitable olefins also include ones in which the double bond is part of a cyclic structure which can have one or more ring systems. Examples are cyclopentene, norbornene, tetracyclododecene or methylnorbornene or dienes such as 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, norbornadiene or ethylnorbornadiene. It is also possible to polymerize mixtures of two or more olefins.

[0020] The process is suitable for the homopolymerization or copolymerization of ethylene. Preferred comonomers are up to 20 wt.%, more preferably from 0.01 wt.% to 15 wt.% and especially from 0.05 wt.% to 12 wt.% of C 3 -C 8 -1 -alkenes, in particular 1 -butene, 1 -pentene, 1 -hexene and/or 1 -octene. Particular preference is given to a process in which ethylene is copolymerized with from 0.1 wt.% to 12 wt.% of 1 -hexene and/or 1 -butene.

[0021 ] The process of the present disclosure is carried out using a Phillips-type chromium catalyst, which are preferably prepared by applying a chromium compound to an inorganic sup- port and subsequently activating the obtained catalyst precursor at temperatures in the range from 350 to 1000 °C, resulting in chromium present in valences lower than six being converted into the hexavalent state. Apart from chromium, further elements such as magnesium, calcium, boron, aluminum, phosphorus, titanium, vanadium, zirconium or zinc can also be used. Particular preference is given to the use of titanium, zirconium or zinc. Combinations of the abovemen- tioned elements are also possible. The catalyst precursor can be doped with fluoride prior to or during activation. As supports for Phillips-type catalysts, which are also known to those skilled in the art, mention may be made of aluminum oxide, silicon dioxide (silica gel), titanium dioxide, zirconium dioxide or their mixed oxides or cogels, or aluminum phosphate. Further suitable support materials can be obtained by modifying the pore surface area, e.g. by means of compounds of the elements boron, aluminum, silicon or phosphorus. Preference is given to using a silica gel. Preference is given to spherical or granular silica gels, with the former also being able to be spray dried. The activated chromium catalysts can subsequently be prepolymerized or prereduced. The prereduction is usually carried out by means of cobalt or else by means of hydrogen at 250 °C to 500 °C, preferably at 300 < € to 400 °C, in an activator.

[0022] The process of the present disclosure is carried out as gas-phase polymerization, i.e. as process in which the solid polymers are obtained from a gas-phase of the monomer or the monomers in a gas-phase polymerization reactor containing a reactor bed of particulate polymer. The gas-phase polymerization reactor is equipped with at least one cycle gas line for withdrawing reactor gas from the reactor, leading the reactor gas through a heat-exchanger for cooling and feeding the reactor gas back to the reactor. Suitable reactors are, for example, stirred gas-phase reactors, multizone circulating gas-phase reactors, or fluidized-bed gas-phase reactors. Reactors of these types are generally known to those skilled in the art. [0023] Stirred gas-phase reactors, in which the reaction bed of polymer particles is kept in motion by means of a stirrer, can for example be horizontally or vertically stirred gas-phase reactors. The cooling of the polymerization usually occurs by withdrawing reactor gas from the reactor, leading the reactor gas through a heat-exchanger and feeding the reactor gas back to the reactor.

[0024] Multizone circulating reactors are gas-phase reactors in which two polymerization zones are linked to one another and the polymer is passed alternately a plurality of times through these two zones. Such reactors are, for example, described in WO 97/04015 A1 and

WO 00/02929 A1 and have two interconnected polymerization zones, a riser, in which the growing polymer particles flow upward under fast fluidization or transport conditions and a downcomer, in which the growing polymer particles flow in a densified form under the action of gravity. The polymer particles leaving the riser enter the downcomer and the polymer particles leaving the down- comer are reintroduced into the riser, thus establishing a circulation of polymer between the two polymerization zones and the polymer is passed alternately a plurality of times through these two zones. It is further also possible to operate the two polymerization zones of one multizone circulating reactor with different polymerization conditions by establishing different polymerization conditions in its riser and its downcomer. For this purpose, the gas mixture leaving the riser and entraining the polymer particles can be partially or totally prevented from entering the downcomer. This can for example be achieved by feeding a barrier fluid in form of a gas and/or a liquid mixture into the downcomer, preferably in the upper part of the downcomer. The barrier fluid should have a suitable composition, different from that of the gas mixture present in the riser. The amount of added barrier fluid can be adjusted in a way that an upward flow of gas countercurrent to the flow of the polymer particles is generated, particularly at the top thereof, acting as a barrier to the gas mixture entrained among the particles coming from the riser. In this manner it is possible to ob- tain two different gas composition zones in one multizone circulating reactor. Furthermore it is also possible to introduce make-up monomers, comonomers, molecular weight regulator such as hydrogen and/or inert fluids at any point of the downcomer, preferably below the barrier feeding point. Thus, it is also easily possible to create varying monomer, comonomer and hydrogen concentrations along the downcomer resulting in a further differentiation of the polymerization condi- tions. The cooling of the polymerization usually occurs by withdrawing reactor gas leaving the riser, leading the reactor gas through a heat-exchanger and feeding the cooled reactor gas back to the reactor at a position before the riser for fast-fluidizing the polymer particles in the riser.

[0025] The process of the present disclosure is preferably carried out in a fluidized-bed gas- phase reactor. Fluidized-bed polymerization reactors are reactors in which the polymerization takes place in a bed of polymer particles which is maintained in a fluidized state by feeding in gas at the lower end of the reactor, usually below a gas distribution grid having the function of dispensing the gas flow, and taking off the gas again at the upper end of the reactor. The reactor gas is then returned to the lower end to the reactor via a cycle gas line equipped with a compres- sor and a heat exchanger.

[0026] The velocity of the reactor gas within the fluidized-bed reactor has to be sufficiently high firstly to fluidize the bed of particulate polymer present in the tube serving as polymerization zone and secondly to remove the heat of polymerization effectively. The velocity of the reactor gas velocity is generally specified as superficial velocity.

[0027] For removing entrained polymer particles from the reactor gas withdrawn from the reactor, the cycle gas line can be equipped with a cyclone which is then preferably located in the cycle gas line upstream of the heat-exchanger for cooling the cycle gas. According to a preferred em- bodiment of the present disclosure, a catalyst poison having a boiling point above the maximum temperature within the cycle gas line is fed into the cycle gas line at a position between the reactor and the cyclone to prevent polymer deposits in the cycle gas line as disclosed by

WO 2003/042253 A1 . Preferred catalyst poisons are compounds or mixtures of compounds containing at least one of the functional groups -NR 2 , -NR-, -OR, -0-, =0, -OS, -S- and =S, where R is hydrogen or an alkyl radical having from 1 to 8 carbon atoms and are more preferably compounds which bear a plurality of such functional groups, with these groups being able to be identical or different. Particular preference is given to using catalyst poisons which contain a hydroxy- ethylamino group, in particular ones having a di(hydroxyethyl)amino group. Particular mention may be made of, for example, the commercially available synthetic ethoxylated amine Atmer 163 (marketed by Croda GmbH, Nettetal, Germany). [0028] The circulated reactor gas is usually a mixture of the olefins to be polymerized and inert gases such as nitrogen and/or lower alkanes. The process for the preparation of an ethylene polymer according to the present disclosure is preferably conducted in the presence of nitrogen or a C 2 -C 5 alkane as inert gas and more preferably in the presence of nitrogen or propane. The circulated reactor gas may further include a C 4 -C 6 alkane to raise the molecular weight or specific heat of the gas in order to promote condensation. Examples of such condensing agents are iso- butane, cyclobutane isopentane, neopentane, n-hexane or iso-hexane. The content of C 4 -C 6 alkanes in the reactor gas is preferably from 1 vol.% to 10 vol.%. [0029] Furthermore, hydrogen may be added to the polymerization reactor. Hydrogen is then preferably added in an amount that the content of hydrogen in the reactor gas composition is from 1 vol.% to 1 0 vol.%.

[0030] Oxygen may also be added to the polymerization reactor. Oxygen is then preferably added in an amount that the content of oxygen in the reactor gas composition is from 0.1 ppm by volume to 0.5 ppm by volume.

[0031 ] According to the process of the present disclosure, the cooling of the reactor gas in the heat-exchanger located in the cycle gas line is carried out in a way that the reactor gas is partly condensed by cooling below the dew point and the amount of liquid in the reactor gas returned to the polymerization reactor is from 0.5 wt.% to 1 0 wt.%, preferably from 1 wt.% to 8 wt.%, and more preferably from 2 wt.% to 6 wt.%. The liquefied part of the reactor gas may be returned to the reactor together with the remaining gas as a two-phase mixture. It is however also possible to separate the liquid and the gaseous phase and return both portions separately to the reactor.

[0032] The polymerization of the present disclosure is carried out at a temperature from 1 08 °C to 125Ό, preferably from 1 -\ 0 °C to 120 °C, more preferably from 1 08°C to 1 1 6 °C.

[0033] In a preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the polymerization pressure is from 0.1 M Pa to 20 M Pa, more preferably from 0.5 M Pa to 1 0 M Pa and in particular from 1 .0 MPa to 5 M Pa.

[0034] According to the process of the present disclosure, the polymerization is carried out in the presence of an aluminum alkyl of formula AIR 3 or of formula AIR n R' m , in which R is, inde- pendently of each other, a C 4 -C 12 -alkyl, preferably a C 6 -C 10 -alkyl, R' is, independently of each other, a C 4 -C 2 4-alkanediyl group which is bridging two aluminum atoms, and n + m = 3. Examples of suitable aluminum alkyls of formula AIR 3 are tri-isobutylaluminum, tri-n-hexylaluminum, tri-n- octylaluminum, tri-n-decylaluminum, or tridodecylaluminum. An example for an aluminumalkyl of formula AIR n R' m is isoprenylaluminum which has the formula (i-C 4 Hg) m AI(C5H 10 ) n with n/m > 3,5. Preferred aluminum alkyls for the process of the present disclosure are tri-isobutylaluminum, tri-n-hexylaluminum, tri-n-octylaluminum and especially tri-n-hexylaluminum. It is also possible to conduct the process of the present disclosure in the presence of a mixture of such aluminum alkyls. [0035] The aluminum alkyl can bed fed as such to the polymerization reactor. Preferably, the aluminum alkyl is fed as solution, preferably as solution in a hydrocarbon solvent like n-hexane or iso-hexane or as solution in a mineral oil. The concentration of aluminum alkyl in a solution to be fed to the polymerization reactor is preferably from 0.5 wt.% to 5 wt.%, more preferably from 1 wt.% to 3 wt.%

[0036] According to the process of the present disclosure, the aluminum alkyl is fed into the polymerization reactor in an amount which is in the range of from 0.0025 to 0.1 mole per ton of ethylene dosed into the polymerization reactor. Preferably the amount of aluminum alkyl fed into the polymerization reactor is from 0.005 to 0.05 mole per ton of dosed ethylene and more prefer- ably from 0.01 to 0.04 mole per ton of dosed ethylene.

[0037] The aluminum alkyl can in general be fed to polymerization process by introducing the aluminum alkyl into the polymerization reactor at any point of the reactor. However, preferably the aluminum alkyl is introduced into the polymerization reactor at a position where the reactor bed is present or the aluminum alkyl is introduced into the cycle gas line.

[0038] The gas-phase polymerization reactor, in which the process of the present disclosure is conducted, may be a single polymerization reactor. The gas-phase polymerization reactor may also be part of a reactor cascade of two or more polymerization reactors. Preferably, all polymeri- zation reactors of the cascade are gas-phase reactors. In a preferred embodiment of the present disclose, the reactor cascade is a series of two fluidized-bed reactors or a reactor cascade comprising a fluidized-bed reactor and a multizone circulating reactor in which preferably the fluidized- bed reactor is arranged upstream of the multizone circulating reactor. Such a reactor cascade of gas-phase reactors may also further comprise additional polymerization reactors. Further reac- tors of such a reactor cascade can however also be of any kind of low-pressure polymerization reactors such as suspension reactors and may also include a pre-polymerization stage.

[0039] The process of the present disclosure is preferably carried out in the presence of an antistatic agent.

[0040] According to a preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the antistatic agent is a mixture comprising an oil-soluble surfactant, water, and optionally an alcohol. For utilizing such mixtures, preferably first a mixture of the oil-soluble surfactant, the water, optionally the alcohol, and one or more aliphatic hydrocarbons is prepared and then the mixture is introduced into the polymerization reactor. Preferred mixtures comprise from 1 0 to 69.9 wt.-% of oil-soluble surfac- tant, from 0.1 to 2 wt.-% of water, from 0 to 15 wt.-% of alcohol and from 30 to 89.9 wt.-% of aliphatic hydrocarbon and specially preferred mixtures comprise from 20 to 50 wt.-% of oil-soluble surfactant, from 0.2 to 1 wt.-% of water, from 2 to 10 wt.-% of alcohol and from 40 to 77.8 wt.-% of aliphatic hydrocarbon. The oil-soluble surfactant is preferably an ionic oil-soluble surfactant and is more preferably a strong organic acid comprising a hydrocarbyl group of from 6 to 40 carbon atoms. Suitable classes of organic acids are organic sulfonic acids, organic sulfinic acids or organic phosphonic acids. Preferably the organic acid is a sulfonic acid. Especially preferred representatives of such oil-soluble surfactants are dinonylnaphthylsulfonic acids and dodecylbenzenesulfonic acids. Preferred alcohols are linear or branched C C 12 alcohols, which can be mono alcohols, diols or triols. More preferably such alcohols are mono alcohols having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms. Most preferably the alcohol is methanol, ethanol or isopropanol. Preferred hydrocarbons for a preparing the antistatic mixtures are propane, isobutane, n-hexane, isohexane, EXXOL® grades obtainable from ExxonMobil Chemical or white mineral oils. The amount of oil-soluble surfactant introduced into the polymerization reactor is preferably from 0.025 to 50 ppm per weight referring to the weight of the prepared ethylene polymer and the amount of water introduced into the polymerization reactor is preferably from 0.005 to 0.5 ppm per weight referring to the weight of the prepared ethylene polymer. Preferably the amount of alcohol introduced into the polymerization reactor is from 0.05 ppm to 5 ppm per weight referring to the weight of the prepared polyolefin. Such antistatic agents are described in WO 2014/198693 A1 .

[0041 ] The residence time of the mixture of reactants including gaseous and liquid reactants, catalyst, and polymer particles in the polymerization reactor is preferably in the range from 1 to about 6 hours and more preferably in the range from 1 .5 to about 4 hours. [0042] The process of the present disclosure results in a substantial reduction of the level of electrostatic charges observed in the gas-phase polymerization reactor and in an improved polyethylene powder morphology with a low level of fines. Because of the reduced electrostatics, grid and heat exchanger fouling and the tendency of the polyethylene particles to stick to the reactor walls is reduced. This reduces the risks of forming chunks or wall sheeting, which mostly leads to an unavoidable shut-down of the polymerization reactor because of plugging the discharge line, and allows smooth polymerization at high plant reliability. Furthermore, the obtained polyethyl- enes are characterized by good organoleptic properties and a low level of polymer gels.

[0043] The process of the present disclosure is especially suitable for the preparation of poly- ethylenes having a relatively high molecular weight. Preferably the polyethylenes have a MFR 2 i 6 at a temperature of 190 °C under a load of 21 .6 kg, determined according to DIN EN ISO

1 133:2005, condition G, of from 0.1 to 100 g/10 min, more preferably of from 1 to 20 g/1 0 min, and especially of from 1 .2 to 12 g/1 0 min. The ratio of M FR 2 6 and MFR 5 , determined according to DIN EN ISO 1 133:2005, condition T, at a temperature of 190 < € under a load of 5 kg, is prefer- ably from 1 0 to 40, more preferably from 12 to 30 and especially from 1 5 to 25. [0044] Polyethylenes obtained by the process of the present disclosure have preferably a density according to DIN EN ISO 1 183-1 :2004, Method A at 23 °C in the range of from 0.91 8 g/cm 3 to 0.970 g/cm 3 , more preferably in the range of from 0.935 g/cm 3 to 0.968 g/cm 3 and especially preferred in the range of from 0.940 g/cm 3 to 0.960 g/cm 3 .

[0045] Preferred polyethylenes obtained by the process of the present application have a content of vinyl groups/1000 carbon atoms, determined by means of I R in accordance with ASTM D 6248 98, of not more than 1 .2 and more preferably a content of vinyl groups/1000 carbon atoms in the range from 0.5 to 1 .0.

[0046] The polyethylenes obtained by the process of the present disclosure process are characterized by a low level of polymer gels. In a preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the number of gels, determined by preparing a 50 μιη cast film, analyzing the film defects by means of an optical scanning device and classifying and counting the film defects according to their size, is not more than 1000/m 2 , more preferably not more than 800/m 2 and especially not more than 500/m 2 .

[0047] The polyethylenes obtained by the process of the present disclosure process are further characterized by a low content of catalyst residues. Preferably the ash content of the ob- tained polyethylene, determined according to DIN EN ISO 3451 -1 :2008-1 1 , is not more than 250 ppm, more preferably not more than 200 ppm and especially not more than 150 ppm.

[0048] The processes of the present disclosure are distinguished in that the utilized Phillips- type catalysts achieve a high productivity, i.e. produce a high amount of polymer per amount of employed catalysts and the polymerization results in a low amount of fines and low electrostatics.

[0049] The invention is illustrated below with the aid of examples, without being restricted thereto. Examples

[0050] The electrostatic charges present in the fluidized-bed reactor were measured by a sensor (Correstat 341 0; Progression, Inc., Haverhill, MA, USA), which monitors charge activity and polarity within the reactor. It has a measurement range from +/- 0 to 0.1 nA full scale. For the evaluation of the electrostatic charges inside the reactor, the difference between measured negative and positive charges was chosen. The maximum difference is 0.2 nA and is defined as 100 % scale whereas no variation in the electrostatic charge is referred to as 0 % scale.

[0051 ] Based on experience and continuous observation of the reactor conditions, the opera- bility was classified according to the four following categories: Very bad operability: Large fluctuations of reactor skin temperatures which is a sign of polymer layers growing at reactor walls. The formation of sheets and chunks lead to a shut down within 3 hours.

Bad operability: Some fluctuations of reactor skin temperatures which is a sign of some polymer layers growing at reactor walls. The formation of sheets and chunks lead to a shut down within 24 hours.

Good operability: Stable reactor behavior with minor fluctuations in terms of reactor skin temperatures. No chunk formation.

Excellent operability: Stable reactor behavior without fluctuations.

[0052] The melt flow rate MFR 21 6 was determined according to DIN EN ISO 1 133:2005, condition G at a temperature of 1 90 °C under a load of 21 .6 kg.

[0053] The density was determined according to DIN EN ISO 1 1 83-1 :2004, Method A (Immer- sion) with compression molded plaques of 2 mm thickness. The compression molded plaques were prepared with a defined thermal history: Pressed at 1 80 °C, 20M Pa for 8 min with subsequent crystallization in boiling water for 30 min.

[0054] The number of gels was determined by preparing a 50 μιη cast film, analyzing the film defects by means of an optical scanning device and classifying and counting the film defects according to their size (circle diameter). The films were prepared by an extruder (type M E20) equipped with a chill roll and winder, model CR-9, and analyzed by an optical film surface analyzer with flash camera system, model FTA100 (all components produced by OCS Optical Control Systems GmbH, Witten, Germany). The apparatus had the following characteristics

- screw diameter: 20 mm;

- screw length: 25 D;

- compression ratio: 3:1 ;

- screw layout 25 D: 1 0 D feeding, 3 D compression, 12 D metering;

- dimensions: 1360x 650 x1 778 mm 3 (L x W x H; without die) ;

- die width (slit die): 1 50 mm;

- resolution: 26 m x 26 m;

and was operated under the following conditions

- T 1 230 °C;

- T 2 230 °C;

- T 3 230 °C;

- T 4 (adapter) 230 °C;

- T 5 (die) 230 °C;

- die slit die 150 mm;

- take off speed 3.0 m/min;

- screw speed to be adjusted to film thickness 50 μιη; - throughput 1 .0 to 1 .5 kg/h (target 1 .15 kg/h);

- air shower on - 5 m 3 /h,

- chill roll temperature 50 °C;

- vab chill roll 4 N;

- winding tensile force 4 N,

- draw off strength 5 N;

- camera threshold threshold 1 : 75% - threshold 2: 65%.

For starting the measurement, extruder and take off unit were set to the specified conditions and started with a material having a known gel level. The film inspection software was started when the extruder showed steady conditions of temperature and melt pressure. After having operated the extruder with the starting material for at least half an hour or after the gel count having reached the known gel level, the first sample to measure was fed to the extruder. After having reached a stable gel level for 45 minutes the counting process was started until the camera had inspected an area of at least 3 m 2 of film. Thereafter the next sample was fed to the extruder and after having reached again a stable gel count for 45 minutes the counting process for the next sample was started. The counting process was set for all samples in a way that the camera inspected an area of at least 3 m 2 of film and the number of measured defects per size-class was normalized to 1 m 2 of film. Example 1

Preparation of Phillips-type catalyst

[0055] A Phillips-type catalyst was prepared as in Example 1 of WO 99/29736 A1 except that such an amount of 0(Ν0 3 ) 3 2 0 solution was used that the resulting intermediate contained 0.3 wt.% of chromium and that the chromium-doped support was activated at 560 °C.

Example 2

Polymerization [0056] A high-density polyethylene was prepared using the catalyst obtained in Example 1 . The polymerization was carried out in a stainless steel fluidized bed reactor having an internal diameter of 500 mm equipped with a gas circulation system, cyclone, heat exchanger, control systems for temperature and pressure and feeding lines for ethylene, 1 -hexene, nitrogen and n-hexane. The reactor pressure was controlled to be 2.2 M Pa. The feeding of the various com- pounds was controlled to obtain a reactor gas composition of 55 vol.% ethylene, 3 vol.% n-hexane and 0.15 vol.% 1 -hexene with the remainder being nitrogen.

[0057] The catalyst was injected in a discontinuous way by means of a dosing valve with nitrogen. In addition, triisobutylaluminum (TIBA; obtained from Chemtura Organometallics GmbH, Bergkamen, Germany) was added to the reactor in an amount that the MFR 2 6 of the prepared high-density polyethylene was 6 g/1 0 min, resulting in a feeding of 6 ppm per weight TIBA referring to the weight of the prepared polyolefin. The reactor was operated under conditions that the reactor gas returned to the reactor through the cycle gas line was partly condensed and the amount of liquid in the rector gas was 5 wt.%.

[0058] The operability was good with minor fluctuations in terms of reactor skin temperatures. No chunks were discharged from the reactor. The reaction conditions in the polymerization reactor and the properties of the obtained polyethylene are reported in Table 1 . Example 3

[0059] The polymerization of Example 2 was repeated, except that trihexylaluminum (THA; obtained from Chemtura Organometallics GmbH, Bergkamen, Germany) was added in an amount that the MFR 2 6 of the prepared high-density polyethylene was about 6 g/1 0 min, resulting in a feeding of 1 0 ppm per weight THA referring to the weight of the prepared polyolefin.

[0060] The operability was excellent. The detailed reaction conditions in the polymerization reactor and the properties of the obtained polyethylene are reported in Table 1 . Comparative Example A

[0061 ] The polymerization of Example 2 was repeated, except that the reactor was operated under conditions that the reactor gas returned to the reactor through the cycle gas line was not partly condensed.

[0062] The operability was good with small fluctuations in terms of reactor skin temperatures. No chunks were discharged from the reactor. The detailed reaction conditions in the polymerization reactor and the properties of the obtained polyethylene are reported in Table 1 . Comparative Example B

[0063] The polymerization of Example 2 was repeated, except that the polymerization temperature was lowered to 98 ^ and the amount of added trihexylaluminum was reduced so that the MFR 2 i 6 of the prepared high-density polyethylene was about 6 g/1 0 min, resulting in a feeding of 0.2 ppm per weight THA referring to the weight of the prepared polyolefin.

[0064] Because of very bad operability with very high electrostatic charges and high entrain- ment of fines to the cyclone, the fluidized reactor had to be shut down after 3 hours of operation. The detailed reaction conditions in the polymerization reactor and the properties of the obtained polyethylene are reported in Table 1 . Comparative Example C

[0065] The polymerization of Example 2 was repeated, except that triethylaluminum (TEAL, obtained from Chemtura Organometallics GmbH, Bergkamen, Germany) was added in an amount that the MFR 2 i 6 of the prepared high-density polyethylene was about 6 g/1 0 min, resulting in a feeding of 3 ppm per weight TEAL referring to the weight of the prepared polyolefin.

[0066] Because of bad operability with rather high electrostatic charges and high entrainment of fines to the cyclone, the fluidized reactor had to be shut down after 24 hours of operation. The detailed reaction conditions in the polymerization reactor and the properties of the obtained polyethylene are reported in Table 1 .

Table 1

[0067] The comparison of Comparative Example A and Example 3 shows that it is possible to increase the production rate by about 10% when raising the amount of liquid in the reactor gas returned to the polymerization reactor to 5 wt.%. Furthermore, the operability and the electrostatics improves. Example 2 demonstrates that it is further possible to carry out the polymerization in condensed mode operations when using triisobutylaluminum as aluminum alkyl although the op- erability of Example 2 is not as excellent as the operability of Example 3 with somewhat higher electrostatic charges and somewhat higher fines discharged to the cyclone. Comparative Examples B and C further show that neither a polymerization at a temperature of 98 °C nor a polymerization employing triethylaluminum as aluminum alkyl results in an acceptable operability.