This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 14/275,430, filed May 12, 5 2014, entitled“PERMEABLE REACTIVE WEIR,” the entire disclosure (s) of which is/are hereby incorporated by reference in its/their entirety.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Contaminants in streams, rivers, and other waterways adversely affect water quality and the ecological balance of the environment. A water filtration device, which can be 10 placed in waterways, can be used to positively affect water quality. Weirs are barriers,

usually smaller than dams, are placed across waterways to change the characteristics of water flow. A permeable reactive weir can be used as a water treatment device to improve water quality.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

15 The inventive, permeable reactive weir is comprised of at least one outer wall which defines a chamber that holds reactive filter media (“filter media”). The filter media removes contaminants from fluid and may be renewed or changed to increase the functional lifespan of the permeable reactive weir. The filter media is chosen to address site-specific concerns; e.g., metals, oil and grease, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, nutrients, amongst 20 others. Flow through the permeable reactive weir may be controlled through ports on the influent and effluent sides, baffles, and/or valvular conduits or other similar mechanisms. The inventive, permeable reactive weir may be used in a plurality of configurations. For example, at least two permeable reactive weirs may be used in series or parallel; engineered streambeds (i.e., engineered hyporheic zones) may be installed below at least one permeable reactive 25 weir; or a combination thereof. The inventive, permeable reactive weir can improve aquatic habitats by removing pollutants from water, and can improve aquatic habitats by creating upstream pools that allow suspended solids to settle, and downstream cascades that increase dissolved oxygen. Engineered hyporheic zones can also improve aquatic habitats by removing pollutants from water and lowering water temperatures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

5 Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following detailed descriptions of the preferred embodiment with reference to the

accompanying drawings, of which:

Fig. 1A is a perspective view of an exemplary weir;

Fig. 1B is a perspective view of an exemplary weir;

10 Fig. 1C is a perspective view of an exemplary weir;

Fig. 1D is a perspective view of an exemplary weir;

Fig.2A is a perspective view of an exemplary weir having a replaceable cartridge; Fig.2B is a perspective view of an exemplary weir having a replaceable cartridge; Fig. 3A is a schematic showing fluid flowing through an exemplary weir comprising a 15 valvular conduit;

Fig. 3B is a schematic showing fluid flowing through an exemplary weir comprising baffles;

Fig. 4 is a side view of an exemplary weir.

Fig. 5A is a schematic of an exemplary weir showing an influent port with a

20 drawdown orifice.

Fig. 5B is a schematic of an exemplary weir showing an influent port with a hood.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a permeable reactive weir used to remove pollutants from fluid. Multiple embodiments of the invention are described hereinafter with reference to the 25 accompanying drawings. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. For exemplary purposes, the inventive, permeable reactive weir is described as it would be used in a 5 waterway. However, a person having ordinary skill in the art will understand that the

inventive, permeable reactive weir may be used to treat any kind of fluid. Accordingly, fluid and water are used interchangeably throughout these specifications. Further, flow paths shown in accompanying drawings are exemplary; flow paths can change depending on placement and design of influent/effluent ports, baffles, and conduits defined below. Also, 10 the influent/effluent ports are shown as circular herein for ease of description. However, the influent/effluent ports may be of any size/shape.

Generally, the permeable reactive weir is a chamber, where the chamber is defined by one or more outer walls. The chamber accommodates filter media that may be renewed or changed to address local environmental concerns, erosion, and/or wear and tear. Fluid flow 15 may be directed through the permeable reactive weir by at least one influent and at least one effluent port, baffles, and/or a valvular conduit or other similar mechanism.

Referring to Figs. 1A-1B, 4, in an exemplary embodiment, the permeable reactive weir (“Weir”) (10) is a chamber (100) defined by a downstream-wall (20), an upstream-wall (30), a pair of end walls (40A, 40B), a top-wall (50), and a base (60). Preferably, the20 downstream-wall (20), upstream-wall (30), and end walls (40A, 40B) are upright. The top- wall (50) may be a removable cover plate. The base (60) and/or end walls (40A, 40B) may be anchored to the waterway using any known anchoring method such as steel reinforced concrete footings with post-tensioning embedded within the stream bank, and/or pre-stressed bedrock anchors allowing water to flow under the Weir (10) through a natural streambed or 25 engineered streambed (200) (i.e., engineered hyporheic zone). Fluid will enter the Weir (10) through at least one influent port (70) and exit through at least one effluent port (80). Influent (70) and effluent (80) ports may be closable allowing external control of fluid flow through the Weir (10). The top-wall (50) may define at least one influent port (70).

5 The downstream-wall (20) and upstream-wall (30) may define at least one low-flow bypass (11) to allow fish or other aquatic life to bypass the Weir (10) during a dry season, for example. Referring to Figs. 1A and 1B, in one embodiment, the downstream-wall (20), upstream-wall (30), and top-wall (50) may define at least one low-flow bypass (11) where the low-flow bypass (11) is a depression. Referring to Figs. 1C and 1D, in another embodiment, 10 the Weir (10) may be configured such that at least one low-flow bypass (11) is created

between the top-wall (50) and the base (60).

Although the low-flow bypass (11) is shown as a rectangular shape in the exemplary drawings, it should be noted that the number, shape, size, and location of the low-flow bypass (11) will depend on local environmental conditions. Preferably, when located on the top of 15 the Weir (10) the low-flow bypass (11) is shaped as a rectangle, cipoletti (notch with sloped sides), or v-shaped notch.

Referring Figs. 2A-2B, the chamber (100) is large enough to accommodate filter media (90). The filter media (90) may be placed directly into the chamber (100), into a media cartridge (91) that is then placed into the chamber (100), or a combination thereof. 20 Fluid flow through the media cartridge (91) may be controlled by at least one influent port (92) and one effluent port (93). The chamber (100) may be large enough to accommodate a plurality of media cartridges (91) stacked on top of each other, side-by-side, or in any other conceivable configuration.

If the filter media (90) is placed directly into the chamber (100), the filter media (90) 25 may be removed by a vacuum truck or other vacuuming mechanism, for example, and then replaced. Media cartridges (91) may be replaced by sliding the media cartridge (91) out of the chamber (100); an exemplary embodiment is shown in Fig. 2B. In a preferred embodiment, the media cartridge defines at least one access door (94) allowing easy removal of the filter media (90).

5 Filter media (90) may be comprised of any known or unknown components such as semipermeable membranes, activated carbon, biochar, sand, zeolite, crushed rock, crushed glass, volcanic rock, agricultural and forestry waste, calcium carbonate, metal oxides, zero valent iron, pelletized or non-pelletized wastewater treatment residue, amongst others. The type and amount of filter media (90) used at a given site will depend on the pollutants to be 10 removed and local environmental conditions.

Referring to Figures 3A-3B, flow through the Weir (10) may be controlled by a valvular conduit (110) or other similar conduit or valve and/or baffles (120). A valvular conduit (110) and/or baffles (120) may be held within the chamber (100); the media cartridge (91) may be shaped as a valvular conduit (110) and/or contain baffles (120); or a combination 15 thereof. The valvular conduit (110) allows a portion of the fluid entering into the Weir (10) to pass downstream and a portion to return upstream to be treated again. Both the valvular conduit (110) and the baffles (120) increase fluid contact time with filter media (90) increasing the pollutant removal efficiency of the Weir (10).

Fig. 3A shows an exemplary fluid flow path when flow is controlled using a valvular 20 conduit (110). Fig. 3B shows an exemplary fluid flow path when flow is controlled using baffles (120). Flow rate through the Weir (10) will depend upon hydraulic head differences between the upstream and downstream sides of the Weir (10), permeability of filter media (90), the number and position of influent (70, 92) and effluent (80, 93) ports on the Weir (10) and media cartridge (91), valvular conduits (110), and/or baffles (120). Referring to Fig. 4, the downstream-wall (20) and upstream-wall (30) may define at least one bypass slit (12) allowing fine particles that settle within the Weir (10) to be flushed out. This bypass slit (12) may be of sufficient size to allow fish and other aquatic life to pass through the Weir (10). The Weir (10) may be installed above an engineered hyporheic zone 5 (125). The engineered hyporheic zone (125) may be comprised of filter media having

qualities similar to or the same as the filter media used in the Weir (10).

The top-wall (50) may be sloped in the downstream direction to prevent clogging of influent ports (70) that may be located at the top of the Weir (10). This configuration allows debris to be carried downstream as liquid flows over the top of the Weir (10).

10 A portion of the fluid on the upstream side of the Weir (10) may flow under the Weir (10) into the engineered hyporheic zone (125). Preferably, fluid flowing through the engineered hyporheic zone (125) will be treated, as described above, and rejoin surface fluid flow downstream of the Weir (10). The flow path within the engineered hyporheic zone (125) may be increased by installing one or more sheet piles or other flow diverting structures 15 (130). In some cases, downstream flow over the Weir (10) may cause a scour zone. This problem can be alleviated by locating at least one sheet pile or other flow diverting structures (130) at the edge of the scour zone.

Referring to Figs.5A-5B, to prevent debris from clogging influent ports (70,93) a drawdown orifice (140) or hood (150) may be placed over an influent port (70,93) providing 20 a barrier to floating debris. Preferably, the drawdown orifice (140) is a downturned pipe that allows fluid to flow upwards into the pipe and then redirects the fluid into the upstream side of the Weir (10). Preferably, the hood (150) is a curved cover that allows fluid to enter from below the liquid surface while excluding floating debris. It should be noted that a person having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other barrier methods, such as screens, 25 may be used.