BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Technological leaps in the electronics industry are often preceded by advances in the art of miniaturization. The desire to pack more information and device features into smaller and smaller spaces has always been a premier driving force in the semiconductor and computer industries. Among the myriad of issues involved in miniaturization is the development of methods for writing very thin lines or electrical circuits onto the surface of a substrate. The questions then become what kind of "pencil" can be used to draw lines which are less than a millionth of a meter wide, and what kind of "paper" do you write on using this "pencil"? For theoretical reasons the "pencil of choice" is light. For a material to then act as the "paper", it must interact with light and undergo some physical change which can then be exploited later on to form the conducting circuitry.

The modern microlithographiσ process can be illustrated using a positive photoresist material. Microchip circuits are currently formed by applying a thin film of a polymer called a photoresist to the surface of a silicon dioxide coated, silicon wafer. A photoresist is a polymer which is designed to specifically undergo a change in solubility upon exposure to light. The photoresist layer is then masked (selected regions protected from light) to expose only the incipient

circuit pattern and photolyzed. The photolyzed regions become more soluble and are selectively washed away to expose the underlying silicon oxide layer while the unexposed regions remain behind. The silicon oxide is then etched to bare the conducting silicon underneath. Finally, the remaining photoresist is stripped away and the result is a wafer possessing conducting circuits etched into its surface. Although successful, this process of drawing electrical circuits is quite protracted and requires numerous processing steps. It would be desirable to design polymeric materials which can be converted directly into conductors upon exposure to light.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, a photoactive cationic organic polymer is formed which is electrically insulating and which is capable of photolysis to an electrically conductive form in the presence of ultra¬ violet light in the absence of the hydrogen donor source. More specifically, the organic polymer includes a C-A linkage, wherein C is a chalcogenide-sulfide selenide or telluride-in the polymer backbone chain and A is in aryl or alkyl group. The C-A linkage is capable of being cleaved in the presence of ultraviolet light to release A as a free radical and cause the polymer to become electrically conducting in the presence of the light while the remainder of the polymer remains electrically non-conducting. A preferred polymer is an arylated poly(phenylene sulfide) (APPS) cationic polymer. Unlike its parent, unsubstituted poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS) it is soluble in common solvents at room temperature and is photoactive.

This unique photoactive behavior suggests that these polymers may find application as photoresist materials for microlithographic materials.

These polymers can be used as either positive or negative resists depending on the choice of post-photolysis processing conditions. ^• In addition, these materials appear to behave as "photodoped" electrically conducting polymers upon photolysis. In combination with common microlithographic techniques, we envision that materials of this type may find great utility in the fabrication of novel, conducting polymeric circuit boards. For example, thin films composed of these polymers could be masked, exposing only the desired electrical circuit pattern. Photolysis and removal of the mask would then yield a polymeric film electrically conducting in the regions photolyzed, and insulator in the unphotolyzed regions.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Figure 1 is a schematic representation of semiconductor manufacture according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT General Synthesis Scheme The invention will first be described regarding preferred embodiments, photoactive, arylated poly(p-phenylene sulfide) (APPS) derivatives (The term PPPS is used interchangeably, referring to phenylated poly(p- phenylene) . These are synthesized through the direct arylation of preformed poly(p-phenylene sulfide) (PPS) . When thin films of APPS are masked (regions protected from light) , then photolyzed in the absence of hydrogen atom donors, the photolyzed regions become permanently conducting while the nonphotolyzed (masked) regions remain insulating. This unique attribute in combination with modern lithographic techniques, allows indelible, high resolution, electrically conducting circuitry and images to be imprinted directly into a polymeric film. This technique is illustrated in Figure 1.

PPS can be phenylated at the sulfur centers by allowing the polymer to react with diaryliodonium salts (Equation 1) .

Based on the known chemistry of triaryl sulfonium salts, uponphotolysis, thesematerials undergo aphotochemical rearrangementwhich result in a change in their character from polar (ionic) to nonpolar and hence allow them to act as a photoresist materials (Equation 2) .

Nonpolar ^{( 2 )}

More importantly, one of the intermediates involved in thephoto-decompositionprocess shown in Equation 2, has the same electronic structure as does the known conducting polymer derived from the doping of PPS with powerful oxidizing agents (Scheme II) . Thus, the photolyzed regions of our polymer is converted from an insulator to a conductor if ways of "trapping-out" this electronic structure could be devised.

Scheme I

*€ AsF,

*Gfø Known Conductor

In order to "trap" out the intermediate with the proper electronic structure, the decomposition cascade this intermediate would normally undergo is stopped by eliminating from the reaction all sources of hydrogen atoms (i.e. , good H-atom donors) . When dry thin films of these APPS materials are masked and then photolyzed, the photolyzed regions turn black and shiny and are found to be persistently conducting, while the nonphotolyzed regions remain insulating. Conductivity values of greater than 10 ^"2 Ω" ¹ cm ^"1 can be routinely obtained using this "photodoping" process. This value is remarkably consistent with the conductivity values obtained from the moderate AsF ₅ doping of PPS (Scheme II) . Using standard microlithographic techniques, these APPS materials become our "paper" in which conducting circuitry can be directly written into it by using a laser "pencil".

These APPS materials represent a new system which for the first time bridges the gap between two exciting, but distinct areas of polymer science: photoresists and electrically conducting polymers. Using the system described above, circuit boards and semiconductor devices can be directly fashioned by masking the insulating polymer and photolyzing the exposed electrical circuit pattern. The photolyzed regions now become the circuit "wires" and the protected (masked) regions remain the insulator.

Detailed Synthesis Scheme These polymers are synthesized through the reaction of commercial PPS with various diphenyl iodonium salts at high temperature. PPS is dissolved in chloronaphthalene (other solvents, such as diphenyl ether and N-methylpyrrolidinone may also be used) at elevated temperatures (i.e., above 200-220 ^β C) . Below this temperature, the parent PPS is insoluble. Polymer

concentrations between 15% and 25% by weight have been used. The hot, homogeneous polymer solution is then allowedto reactwithdiaryliodonium salts (Equation 3) .

X _n ^* =BF ₄ \ PF _β \ AsF _β \ SbF _β \ etc. (3)

A number of factors act to influence the important properties of these APPS polymers. Properties such as solubility, crystallinity, film quality and photosensitivity appear to be dependent upon such variables as the degree of substitution along thepolymer backbone, the type and position of the substituents placed on the aryl ring and the counterions present. We are currently studying the influence of each of these individual factors. A variety of substituted phenyl groups may be used in this reaction. We have to date prepared the polymers where R = H, and tert-butyl, and are now in the process of synthesizing a number of the precursor substituted diaryliodonium salts in order to prepare PPPS materials with various donor and acceptor groups attached. It is anticipated that substituents on the aryl rings will influence the photochemistry of the resultant sulfonium polymers.

It appears that the degree of substitution along the PPS backbone can be varied by controlling the amount of diaryliodonium salt reacted with the polymer. We are currently investigating these limits. The reactivity of the diaryliodonium salts varies depending upon the substituent on the aryl rings. This will also be a factor in determining the degree of substitution obtainable in these systems.

Preliminary photolysis studies on these PPPS materials have been carried out. The results are explained based on what is known concerning the photochemistry of small model compounds. Upon photolysis, triphenylsulfonium salts decompose to give aryl radical addition products and protic acids (Equation 4) .

The mechanism of this reaction is shown in Scheme II.

Scheme II

O-g-O — ~ ®- ^$ -Q * " ^*

etc.

___.n the above example, the net result is to transform a water-soluble organic salt into a water-insoluble organic molecule through liberation of an inorganic acid.

The PPPS cationic materials were prepared as described above. Polymer I, prepared by the formal addition of phenyl PF ₆ . to PPS (degree of substitution currently unknown) is soluble in acetone. We believe that by increasing the degree of substitution (adding greater numbers of charges) , incorporating functionalized phenyl groups and changing the counterion, the solubility range of these substituted polymers will increase. Under the right choice of conditions, water soluble polymers can be prepared in this fashion. When I is photolyzed in acetone solution (quartz or Pyrex tubes using a mercury vapor lamp) , aprecipitate forms in less than 15 minutes. Unlike I, the new polymer, II, is insoluble in acetone. Based on the observed solubility, NMR results and the small molecule studies, we tentatively assign polymer II the structure shown in Equation 5.

(5)

Photolysis of I can also be carried out in thin films. After photolysis of the solid state polymer, the unexposed area is soluble in acetone, while the exposed area becomes insoluble.

This basic chemistry can be used in the design of new photoresists. Thin films ofthe phenylated PPS materials can be formed and masked. After photolysis, either positive or negative resist images can be fashioned, depending on the choice of washing solvent. It is anticipated that the photolyzed regions can be removed by washing with organic solvents to form positive resists. Alternatively, washing with acetone (and

potentially water) removes the nonphotolyzed regions forming negative resists.

It is believed that alternative photochemical reactions may also be used. In the photolysis of triphenylsulfonium hexfluorophosphate, one of the three equivalent sulfur-phenyl bonds undergoes homolytic cleavage. In the sulfonium centers of the PPPS polymers, however, there are two equivalent aryl-sulfur bonds along the polymer chain and one unique sulfur-aryl bond. In addition to the previously described homolytic cleavage of the unique aryl-sulfur bond, there also exists the possibility of chain scission in these PPPS materials

(6)

Derivatives may also be synthesized with X- substituents in the para-position of the unique phenyl group in order to either stabilize or destabilize the incipient phenyl radical. The results obtained in this study should allow us to select between path "a" (stabilized case) or pathway "b" (destabilized case) , thereby controlling the amount of chain scission which occurs. It is important to remember that chain scission to lowermolecularweight fragments is also a viable pathway toward photoresist materials.

One alternative is the use of PPS derivatives with substituents placed along the phenyl groups of the polymer backbone^ When phenylated to form the charged sulfonium polymers, these substituted derivatives may well have improved solubility and photochemical properties.

It is known that the parent PPS polymer can be oxidized (p doped) with strong oxidizing agents to form conducting polymeric materials (PPSox) . Conductivities near 1 Ω^cm ^"1 are routinely obtained usingAsF ₅ as the oxidant. The oxidation process can be viewed as the removal of one electron from the lone-pair orbitals located on the sulfurs to form radical cations. These radicals are free to migrate down the polymer chain where recombination can occur. This process leaves two positive charges (bipolaron) which then becomes the conducting species (Equation 7) .

FPS -PPBox

(Insulator) (Conductor) ₍₇₎

This one electron oxidized form, PPSox, is the same species which is generates by the removal of a phenyl radical upon photolysis of our sulfonium PPPS materials (Equation 8) .

Q- ^s >

Our approach is to conduct the photolysis of our PPPS derivatives under conditions in which we can quench the reaction following the initial homolytic cleavage which liberates the phenyl radical shown in Equation 8. Doing so gives us the same material as that generated by the oxidation of the parent PPS (Equation 7) . In order to inhibit any of the subsequent steps in the photochemical process (see Scheme I) , it is preferable to: (1) eliminate any hydrogen atom donor source (RH in Scheme I) and (2) trap the phenyl radical before it recombines or adds to the phenyl groups of the PPS backbone. Elimination of a hydrogen donor source is easily accomplished by carrying out the photochemistry on solid, thin films in the absence of solvent. Eliminating the phenyl radical may include the addition of a radical trap which will combine with the reactive phenyl radical but leave the delocalized sulfonium radical cation untouched. A number of radical traps may beused forthispurpose, e.g. , molecular iodine included in the polymer films. (I ₂ is known to react extremely rapidly with phenyl radicals.)

Thin films of polymer I were prepared by casting films from acetone solutions. The addition of iodine was accomplished by including the iodine in the acetone/polymer solutions before casting. Preliminary conductivity measurements were performed by measuring the resistance of the films. Appropriate control experimentswereperformed. Pristine PPS films areknown to be nonconducting. Before and after photolysis, our sulfonium PPPS/I ₂ films were found to be nonconducting. After photolysis under a dry, inert atmosphere (N ₂ ) , PPPS/I ₂ films were converted to conducting materials. Our working hypothesis is that the photolysis proceeds as shown in Equation 6, with the I ₂ acting to trap the phenyl radical, leaving only the "photodoped" PPSox conductor (Equation 9) .

(Insuator) (Conductor) ⁽ 9 ⁾

When regions of the PPPS/I ₂ films are masked (protected from light) before photolysis, the exposed portions of the film are found to be conducting, while the masked (nonphotolyzed) regions remain insulators (Figure 1) .

The foregoing invention has been described with respect to a preferred embodiment, APPS. However, it should be understood that other polymers may be employed in accordance with the present invention which can be activated in the presence of light. The preferred form of light in ultraviolet light, although it may be possible to use other forms of electromagnetic radiation such as in the visible light range.

Activation according to the invention results from a novel form of polymer in which an alkyl or aryl group is bonded to an alkyl or aryl group in accordance with the following linkage.

A I

C In the above linkage, the C is a chalcogenide selected from the group consisting of sulfide, selenide and telluride. A is in aryl or alkyl group. A preferable aryl group is the phenyl group while the preferred alkyl group is the benzyl group. The important feature is that the C-A linkage is capable of being cleaved in the presence of ultra violet light to release the aryl or alkyl group as a free radical. It is believed that the presence of the free radical in the polymer backbone causes the formerly insulating polymer to become

electrically conductive. As set out above, it is important to eliminate the hydrogen atom donor source and, in some manner or other, trap the A group. One way to use this is to provide an A scavenger. However, it is believedthat eventually the free radical A eventually reattaches itself to the polymer at a point other than the free radical.

Similarly derivatized polymers may be prepared based on the heavier chalcogenide analogues, poly(p-phenylene selenide) (PPSe) and poly(p-phenylene telluride) (PPTe) . It is known that PPSe can be doped using AsF ₅ to produce good conducting materials (10 ^"3 -10 ^"2 Ω ^"1 cm ^"1 ) . PPTe has been shown to only be a poor conductor under similar conditions. It is postulated that this lack of conductivity in the PPTe case may be due to extensive degradation of the polymer during the doping process. It is ourbelief that the photolysis of arylated selenium and tellurium polymers may prove to be a much milder doping process, leading to less degradation and therefore, greater conductivity.

When dry thin films of APPS are masked off and exposed to light, or photolyzed, the exposed area becomes black and shiny. These black, shiny areas conduct electricity while the masked off areas remain insulators. In essence, the thin film becomes a microcircuit after photolyzing with no subsequent processing needs.

The semiconductor applications of these polymers render them useful as well in photocopying, photoengraving, graphic arts, and electronic photographic industries.

Theconducting capacity ofthe photolyzedAPPS is similar to that of silicon, so there is no need to use silicon wafers. The APPS films can be mounted on a variety of materials, including glass, rubber and plastics.

Since the films are transparent and ultrathin (0.25 2microns thick) , these microcircuits could potentially be coated directly on television and computer screens. Visual patters could then be created by running current directly over the screen instead of shooting electrons onto the screen as is currently done.

Electronic photography could also be conducted using these films. By reflecting light off a document and onto an APPS film - much like xerographic copiers do - a permanent image of the document could be developed. By applying a charge across the "developed" APPS film, dyes would form a pattern on the film that duplicates the document and can be transferred onto a piece of paper. Unlike xerox copiers, the image is permanent and there is no need to flash the light again each time a new copy is needed.