Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
PROCESS TEMPERATURE CONTROL OF A FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/1996/034992
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
Process for temperature control in a fluidized bed reactor for chlorinating titanium bearing material is disclosed by comparing a carbonyl sulfide concentration with a predetermined set range and manipulating the temperature until the carbonyl sulfide concentration is maintained within the predetermined set range.

Inventors:
ELKINS THOMAS SHIELDS
Application Number:
PCT/US1996/005949
Publication Date:
November 07, 1996
Filing Date:
April 29, 1996
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
DU PONT (US)
International Classes:
C22B34/12; (IPC1-7): C22B34/12
Foreign References:
US3573000A1971-03-30
GB872865A1961-07-12
US3591333A1971-07-06
US3883636A1975-05-13
US4619815A1986-10-28
US2701179A1955-02-01
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS What is Claimed is:
1. A process for temperature control of a fhiidized bed reactor comprising the steps of: (a) comparing a carbonyl sulfide concentration with a predetermined set point or set range, wherein the carbonyl sulfide concentration is analyzed from an exhaust gas arising from chlorinating a titanium bearing material in a fhiidized bed reactor; and (b) manipulating the fhiidized bed reactor temperature until the carbonyl sulfide concentration is maintained within the predetermined set point or set range.
2. A process for temperature control of a fhiidized bed reactor comprising the steps of: (a) comparing a ratio of concentrations of carbonyl sulfide and sulfur dioxide with a predetermined set point or set range, wherein the concentrations are analyzed from an exhaust gas arising from chlorinating a titanium bearing material in a fluidized bed reactor; (b) manipulating the fluidized bed reactor temperature until the ratio of concentrations of carbonyl sulfide and sulfur dioxide is maintained within the predetermined set point or set range.
3. The process of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein step (b) is carried out manually.
4. The process claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the carbonyl sulfide concentration or concentrations of carbonyl sulfide and sulfur dioxide are analyzed with an analytical technique selected from the group consisting of spectroscopy, spectrometry and chromatography.
5. The process of claim 4 wherein the spectroscopy is infrared spectroscopy.
6. The process of claim 1 or claim 2, further comprising the steps of: (c) in step (a), sending a signal generated from an analytical device to a control system wherein the analytical device is selected from the group consisting of spectrometer, spectrophotometer and chromatograph; and (d) sending a signal from the control system to a control device if a difference exists between the concentration and predetermined set point or set range.
7. The process of claim 6 wherein the spectrometer is a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer and the control system is a distributed control system which houses a feedback controller selected from the group consisting of a proportional integral controller and a proportional integral derivative action controller.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein step (b) is carried out by changing a flow rate of a cool material selected from the group consisting of ΗCI4, nitrogen, carbon dioxide or mixtures thereof, wherein the cool material is injected up to about 10 feet from a surface of the bed into the fluidized bed reactor to manipulate the temperature.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein TiCLj. is injected up to about 10 feet above a surface of the fluidized bed reactor and the ΗCI4 falls into a portion of the fluidized bed so that effective cooling is achieved.
10. The process of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the temperature is manipulated using a heat exchanger.
11. The process of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the temperature is optimized so that coke and chlorine added as feed materials to the fluidized bed are efficiently utilized.
12. The process of claim 1, further comprising the step of: maintaining a CI2 concentration from the exhaust gas within a predetermined set point or set range.
Description:
TITLE PROCESS TEMPERATURE CONTROL OF A FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to process temperature control of a fhiidized bed reactor used in the chlorination of titanium bearing materials by monitoring the concentration of carbonyl sulfide in an exhaust gas.

The process for chlorinating titanium containing materials in a fhiidized bed reactor is known. Suitable processes are disclosed in the following U.S. Patents: 2,701,179; 3,883,636; 3,591,333; and 2,446,181 which are hereby incorporated by reference. In such processes, particulate coke, paniculate titanium bearing materials, chlorine and optionally oxygen or air are fed into a reaction chamber, and a suitable reaction temperature, pressure and flow rates are maintained to sustain the fhiidized bed. Gaseous titanium tetrachloride and other metal chlorides are exhausted from the reaction chamber. The gaseous titanium tetrachloride so produced can then be separated from the other metal chlorides and exhaust gas and used to produce titanium dioxide or titanium metal.

In the chlorination process to prepare ΗCI4 in a fhiidized bed reactor, it is desirable to reduce the formation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) from any sulfur present in the feed streams since removal of COS from the exhaust gas is difficult and costly. It is also desirable to minimize the formation of carbon monoxide (CO) so as to reduce carbon consumption in the reactor. Both COS and CO formation can be minimized by cooling the bed. Overcooling the bed is undesirable because (1) excessive formation of ferric chloride from iron impurities in the feed can occur, which increases chlorine consumption and (2) under some conditions, unreacted chlorine may exit the reactor which, if treatment, for example, in scrubbers is insufficient, can result in release of chlorine to the atmosphere which is a safety and environmental concern.

Direct measurement of temperature in the fhiidized bed is costly and unreliable. First, thermocouples generally have a relatively short life time in the corrosive environment of the bed. Also, measurement of temperature in the bed can be inaccurate because the bed is so large that the entire bed will not have the same activity and therefore the entire bed will not be at the same temperature. Portions of the bed can be relatively inactive and may have considerably lower temperatures than others. Thermocouples have also been used in the top of the

reactor to measure temperature. This is still a corrosive environment which can cause thermocouples to deteriorate relatively rapidly over time and still does not provide a reliable measurement of temperature of the bed on which to base a temperature control strategy. Further complicating the task of temperature control is the fact that the temperature at which the bed can become unreactive can vary due to factors such as the composition of the reactor bed and the distribution of chlorine.

A simple, reliable and economical basis for monitoring, controlling or optimizing temperature in a fhiidized bed reactor for use in the chlorination of titanium bearing materials is therefore needed. Concomitantly, there is a need to reduce COS emissions, among others, from the reactor without incurring substantial cost for downstream abatement with incinerators or scrubbers. It is further desired to use the basis for monitoring temperature to create a feedback response which can be performed automatically or manually in response to changes that reflect increases or decreases in temperature outside of pre-established limits. The present invention meets these needs.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with this invention there is provided a process for temperature control of a fhiidized bed reactor comprising the steps of: (a) comparing a carbonyl sulfide concentration with a predetermined set point/range, wherein the carbonyl sulfide concentration is analyzed from an exhaust gas arising from chlorinating a titanium bearing material in a fhiidized bed reactor; and (b) manipulating the fhiidized bed reactor temperature until the carbonyl sulfide concentration is maintained witiiin the predetermined set point/range. A ratio of concentrations of carbonyl sulfide and sulfur dioxide can also be used.

The process is characterized by the following advantages which cumulatively render this process preferable to processes previously employed: 1. temperature control is achieved without direct measurement of the temperature of the fhiidized bed;

2. use of carbonaceous material such as coke is more efficient since consumption to form wasteful products such as COS and CO in the fhiidized bed reactor is minimized; 3. COS emissions are reduced;

4. need for manual control of temperature may be obviated;

5. high installation and operating costs associated with downstream abatement of the COS and CO formed in the fhiidized bed reactor are avoided;

6. advantages 2 and 5 above are accomplished at maximum ferrous chloride concentrations so as to minimize ferric chloride production and hence minimize chlorine consumption and use of chlorine is more efficient; and

7. risk of over-cooling the reactor, which can result in release of unreacted chlorine to the atmosphere, is minimized.

It has been found that in the process of this invention COS concentration relates to both temperature and raw material utilization so that temperature does not need to be explicitly known and the relationship between

COS concentration and bed temperature is surprisingly consistent and proportional even at low COS concentrations. It further has been discovered that use of carbon monoxide (CO) concentration in the exhaust gas to reflect temperature of the bed is unreliable since the CO concentration in the exhaust gas at which the reactor bed becomes unreactive varies depending on reactor conditions, and so CO concentration in the exhaust gas does not always vary proportionally with temperature.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGURE sets forth an embodiment of this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Carbonaceous material, titanium bearing material containing iron oxide, chlorine, and optionally oxygen or air are fed into a fhiidized bed reactor. Typical conditions and specifications for fhiidized beds useful for this invention are as follows: reaction temperature of about 900°C to 1300°C, pressure of about 1-3 atmospheres, reactor with multiple jets in or near the base. Preferably, the point of introduction of the chlorine will be located within about 0-10 feet (about 0-3 m), more preferably about 0-8 feet (about 0-2.4 m), and most preferably about 0-5 feet (about 0-1.5 m) of the base of the reactor. A most preferred location is in the base of the reactor.

The titanium bearing material can be any suitable titanium source material such as titanium containing ores including rutile, ilmenite or anatase ore; beneficiates thereof; titanium containing byproducts or slags; and mixtures thereof.

Ordinarily, the titanium bearing material contains iron oxide in the amount of about 0.5-50%, and preferably up to about 20% by weight.

Suitable carbonaceous material for use in this invention is any carbonaceous material which has been subjected to a coking process. Preferred is coke or calcined coke which is derived from petroleum or coal or mixtures of such cokes.

In the process of this invention, preferably the feed rates of the raw materials to the fhiidized bed reactor, and the conditions of operation of the bed should be adjusted so that any iron oxide is substantially converted to ferrous chloride. (By substantially converted is meant that at least 50%, preferably at least 60%, and most preferably at least 70%, by weight, of the iron oxide in the titanium bearing material is converted to ferrous chloride.) The reason for this desired conversion is that to the extent iron oxide is allowed to react to the ferric state, additional quantities of chlorine will be required which will add additional cost to the process. Means for favoring the reaction to the ferrous state are well known, and most importantly involve not adding chlorine in substantial excess to that required to obtain the ferrous state. However, under certain circumstances it may be desirable to operate with substantial conversion, i.e, up to 85% of iron oxide to ferric chloride by adding excess chlorine.

Gaseous reaction products from the fhiidized bed reactor are cooled in stages to first condense and remove iron and metal chlorides other than titanium tetrachloride. The remaining product from the reactor is then cooled to condense titanium tetrachloride leaving a non-condensable exhaust gas stream comprising COS, SO2, CO, CO2 and CI2. A portion or all of the exhaust gas stream, i.e., a sample stream is sent to an analytical device or analyzer such as a spectrometer, spectrophotometer and chromatograph. A sampling system may be required depending on the type of analyzer chosen, the condition of the exhaust gas and/or the placement of the analyzer. The analytical device can be in-line, meaning installed directly in the path of the exhaust gas stream or on-line, meaning a portion of the exhaust gas stream is directed away from the main process stream and toward the analytical device. The sample stream of the exhaust gas is analyzed for COS concentration or, in an alternative embodiment, a ratio of concentrations of COS and SO2 is determined. The analysis of the gas stream is able to proceed quickly, continuously and quantitatively. Suitable means of analysis include, but are not limited to, spectroscopy, spectrometry and chromatography. Preferably a spectroscopic method is used to analyze the COS concentration of the exhaust gas.

Most preferably, infrared spectroscopy and more particularly, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy is used as the analytical method. Optionally, any portion of the sample stream can be returned to the exhaust gas stream, if desired, or sent to a process ventilation system.

A first signal (electrical, pneumatic, digital, etc.) is generated from the analysis which is related to the COS concentration in the exhaust gas, or COS and SO2 concentrations in the exhaust gas or ratio of COS and SO2 concentrations in the exhaust gas (collectively referred herein as a "controlled variable"). The signal relating to the controlled variable proceeds to a control system (such as a distributed control system or other feedback control system) where its value is compared to a set point or determined if it is within a set range. This set point/range is a predetermined or a preset value meaning it is a desired COS concentration or desired ratio of COS and SO2 concentrations. The COS concentration is dependent on the total concentration of sulfur in the exhaust gas (as SO2 and COS) which further depends on the sulfur content of the feed. Typically, about 0-2.5 mole% of the total gases in the noncondensable exhaust gas stream will be sulfur compounds. Subtracting from 0-2.5 mole% the COS concentration can provide the SO2 concentration. Under these conditions the full range of concentration of COS is about 0 to about 2.5 mole%, preferably about 0- 1.5 mole% and more preferably about 0-1 mole%, corresponding to about 2.5 to about 0 mole% SO2 preferably about 1.5-0 mole% SO2 and more preferably 1-0 mole% SO2, respectively. However, sulfur content can vary significantly, for example, based on the sulfur content of the feed, and these differences must be taken into account when determining a set point or set range for COS concentration in the exhaust gas. The set range for COS concentration depends on the sulfur content of the feeds which subsequently determines the total concentration of sulfur in the exhaust gas. The COS concentration set range has the broad limits of about 1-20 mole% based on the total sulfur content of the exhaust gas. The set point can be any desired value within this range. Preferably, the COS concentration set range is 2-15 mole% and more preferably 5-10 mole% of the total sulfur content of the exhaust gas. It is important that the lower limit to the set range of COS concentration is not below the detectability limit of the analytical device being used. In the alternative embodiment, a set point/range providing upper and lower limits to the COS:Sθ2 ratio is used for comparison with the ratio determined by the analytical device or by the feedback controller.

As described above, it may be desirable to operate so that iron oxide is substantially converted to ferric chloride, and excess chlorine favors ferric chloride production. In this alternative embodiment, COS concentration and CI2 concentration are analyzed from the exhaust gas. The set point for COS concentration in this embodiment is below the detectability limit. The set range for CI2 concentration is typically about 0.3-1.0 mole%.

If the controlled variable does not equal the set point or is outside of the set range, then the difference between the measured controlled variable and set point concentration or concentration range limitation is determined. A second signal (electrical, pneumatic, digital, etc.) corresponding to this difference is generated either manually or by a suitable feedback controller such as, for example, a proportional integral or a proportional integral derivative action controller or other suitable computer software or algorithm that provides a feedback response, which causes a change in the amount of a cool material being added to the bed by making a proportional change in the flow rate of the cool material to the fhiidized bed reactor. With automatic and continuous momtoring of the controlled variable, the amount of the cool material added to the fhiidized bed reactor can be changed until the controlled variable reaches the set point or is within the set range, as specified for the process.

If the concentration of COS in the exhaust gas is determined to be outside of the set range, appropriate changes to the amount of the cool material being added to the bed will be implemented. For example, if it is found that the COS concentration is above the set point or above the set range upper limit, the amount of the cool material being added to the bed will be increased by an amount proportional to the amount of COS above the upper limit or set point. The cool material added to control the temperature of the bed can be any cool material that does not substantially adversely impact the production of the desired products. By way of example, cool material includes titanium tetrachloride, nitrogen, carbon dioxide or the like. Mixtures of cool material are contemplated equivalents. The preferred cool material is titanium tetrachloride. Especially preferred is titanium tetrachloride that has been condensed and partially purified from the exhaust stream. The liquid ΗCI4 may undergo partial purification for example, by being vaporized and recondensed several times to assist in removing traces of other metal chlorides and entrained solids. In this embodiment, a portion of the ΗCI4 stream is recycled to the fhiidized bed reactor and introduced into the bed or at or near the top of the bed through an injection nozzle. The flow rate of

the recycled ΗCI4 is controlled by a suitable valve or other device whose setting is dependent upon the controlled variable.

The cool material, preferably titanium tetrachloride, which is added to the fhiidized bed reactor should be introduced into the bed or at or near the surface of the fhiidized bed. Preferably, the cool material will be introduced within about 0-10 feet (about 0-3 m), more preferably about 0-8 feet (about 0-2.4 m), and most preferably about 0-5 feet (0-1.5 m) of the surface of the bed. Thus, the cool material can be introduced into or at about the surface of the bed or above or below the surface of the bed, within about the foregoing ranges. An especially preferred embodiment is to add ΗCI4 up to about 10 feet above the surface of the bed. The ΗCI4 above the bed will cause cooling of the fhiidized bed by falling into and mixing with the solids of the fhiidized bed and then volatilizing to its gaseous form and heating to the temperature of the product gases.

The temperature of the cool material will vary depending upon the cool material selected but can range from about -196 °C to 150°C. If the cool material is titanium tetrachloride, the temperature is about 50°C to 140°C.

Optionally, sufficient chlorine could be added to the fhiidized bed according to the technique described in U.S. Patent 4,961,911, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. Sufficient chlorine may be added through a separate injection nozzle in conjunction with the cool material. It has been found that sufficient CI2 also decreases COS concentration.

The amount of cool material added into the bed or above or below the fhiidized bed reactor is controlled by the flow rate which is determined by a feedback response to an analytical signal generated by an analytical device which quantitatively determines the controlled variable. The cool material is introduced to the bed through any suitable means. A control device such as a valve can increase or decrease the flow rate of the cool material to the bed based on the analytical signal corresponding to the controlled variable. Alternatively, the flow rate of the cool material can be controlled manually based on the controlled variable read from the analytical device or the control system or by a human operator. Preferably, the flow rate adjustment of the cool material is carried out by automatic control, i.e., by commercially available instruments/computer hardware and software. Selecting optimized analyzer ranges, cooling material flow requirement and controller tuning can be routinely determined by one of ordinary skill in the art. In an alternative embodiment, any suitable means such as a heat exchanger could be used to manipulate the reactor temperature. This can be

accomphshed by a number of means known to one of ordinary skill in the art such as coils embedded in the fhiidized bed, around the walls of the reactor or by circulating the bed material through an external cooling device.

Very rarely is it necessary to increase the temperature in the fhiidized bed reactor. To increase temperature, additional oxygen (as O2, air or other oxygen containing gas) can be added to the f iidized bed reactor or chlorinating gas. Added oxygen reacts with carbon in the reactor bed releasing more heat which increases temperature. Minor decreases in temperature as determined by decreases in COS concentration below the set point or lower limit of the set range can be controlled by reducing the amount of the cool material being added to the bed proportionally as long as the COS concentration is above the detectability limit.

COS concentration is discovered to be a reliable indicator of optimum bed temperature which allows temperature to be efficiently controlled by suitable manipulation of a cooling system.

FIGURE

FIGURE is a flow chart setting forth an embodiment of this invention. With reference to FIGURE, raw materials comprising carbonaceous material, titanium bearing material and chlorine are added to the fhiidized bed reactor. The gaseous reaction products are cooled to condense typically TiC-4 and other metal chlorides leaving non-condensable gases which are analyzed for COS concentration by infrared spectroscopy. A first signal indicative of the concentration of COS proceeds to the feedback controller via electrical connections where its value is compared to the desired COS concentration, i.e., predetermined set point. If a difference exists, a second signal corresponding to this difference is sent to a control device via electrical connections where the flow rate of a cool material injected above the fhiidized bed reactor is adjusted accordingly until the COS concentration is within the predetermined set point.

To give a clearer understanding of the invention, the following example is construed as illustrative and not limitative of the underlying principles of the invention in any way whatsoever.

EXAMPLE

Experimentation was carried out in a plant to demonstrate one advantageous effect of automated COS control. COS emissions were evaluated

over a 22 month period. Eleven months without COS control for comparison and 11 months with automated COS control were observed. The average of each 11 month period is provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Weight units of COS exiting the fhiidized bed reactor per weight units Tiθ2 produced from ΗCI4 exiting the reactor With CO control (Comparative)

33.3

Weight units of COS exiting the fhiidized bed reactor per weight units Tiθ2 produced from ΗCI4 exiting the reactor With COS control (Present Invention) 19.6

This demonstrates on average a 41% reduction in COS emissions obtained by the present invention.

From the foregoing description, one skilled in the art can easily ascertain the essential characteristics of the invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modification of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions.

Having thus described and exemplified the invention with a certain degree of particularity, it should be appreciated that the following claims are not to be limited but are to be afforded a scope commensurate with the wording of each element of the claims and equivalents thereof.