Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
PRODUCTION OF KAPPA-CASEIN MACROPEPTIDE
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/1999/018808
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
The present invention relates to a process for producing $g(k)-casein macropeptides having nutraceutical properties from whey using ion exchange and/or immobilized metal affinity chromatography. A hydrolyzed $g(k)-casein macropeptide nutraceutical food product having less than about 4 % total of the hydrophobic aromatic amino acids phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine is also disclosed.

Inventors:
ETZEL MARK R (US)
Application Number:
PCT/US1998/021283
Publication Date:
April 22, 1999
Filing Date:
October 08, 1998
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
WISCONSIN ALUMNI RES FOUND (US)
ETZEL MARK R (US)
International Classes:
A23C9/146; A23J1/20; (IPC1-7): A23J1/20; A23C9/146
Domestic Patent References:
WO1998014071A11998-04-09
WO1994015952A11994-07-21
WO1997026797A11997-07-31
Foreign References:
GB2188526A1987-10-07
US5278288A1994-01-11
US5169936A1992-12-08
Other References:
MIRABEL B.: "Nouveau procédé d'extraction des protéines du lactosérum", ANN. NUTR. ALIM., vol. 32, 1978, pages 243-253, XP002090512
MARSHALL S C: "CASEIN MACROPEPTIDE FROM WHEY - A NEW PRODUCT OPPORTUNITY", CSIRO FOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY, vol. 51, no. 1/02, 1991, pages 86 - 91, XP002044765
TANIMOTO M ET AL: "Large-scale preparation of.Nm-casein glycomacropeptide from rennet casein whey.", BIOSCIENCE, BIOTECHNOLOGY, AND BIOCHEMISTRY, vol. 56, no. 1, 1992, Tech. Res. Inst., Snow Brand Milk Products Co. Ltd., 1-1-2 Minamidai, Kawagoe 350, Japan, pages 140 - 141, XP002090513
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 9529, Derwent World Patents Index; Class A97, AN 95-220083, XP002090076
OUTINEN M ET AL: "CHROMATOGRAPHIC ISOLATION OF -CASEIN MACROPEPTIDE FROM CHEESE WHEYWITH A STROING BASIC ANION EXCHANGE RESIN", MILCHWISSENSCHAFT, vol. 50, no. 10, 1 January 1995 (1995-01-01), pages 570 - 574, XP000539295
FUKUMOTO L R ET AL: "Isolation of immunoglobulins from cheese whey using ultrafiltration and immobilized metal affinity chromatography.", FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, vol. 27, no. 4, 1994, Correspondence (Reprint) address, S. Nakai, Dep. of Food Sci., Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada, pages 335 - 348, XP002090514
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Sara, Charles S. (WI, US)
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A process for producing Kcasein macropeptide from whey comprising: (a) fractionating the whey by contacting the whey with a first ion exchanger to yield a first Kcasein macropeptide fraction; and (b) fractionating the first fraction by contacting the first fraction with a resin selected from the group consisting of a second ion exchanger, wherein the second ion exchanger has an opposite charge to the first ion exchanger, and an immobilized metal ion affinity column, to yield a Kcasein macropeptide product.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein in step (a) the whey is fractionated by contacting it with a cation exchanger, and in step (b) the first fraction is further fractionated by contacting it with an anion exchanger.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein in step (a) the whey is fractionated by contacting it with an anion exchanger, and in step (b) the first fraction is further fractionated by contacting it with a cation exchanger.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein in step (a) the whey is fractionated by contacting it with an anion exchanger, and in step (b) the first fraction is further fractionated by contacting it with an immobilized metal ion affinity column.
5. The process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the anion exchanger comprises porous membranes containing charged immobilized moieties.
6. The process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the cation exchanger comprises porous embranes containing charged immobilized moieties.
7. The process according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising eluting the adsorbed fraction on the cation exchanger to produce a whey protein isolate.
8. The process according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising removing residual protein or peptide impurities from the Kcasein macropeptide product by contacting the product with an adsorbent.
9. The process according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising hydrolyzing the amino acid chain of Kcasein macropeptide product.
10. The process according to claim 9, wherein the hydrolysis is accomplished enzymatically.
11. The process of according to any one of the preceding claims conducted at a temperature of from about 40°C to about 50°C.
12. A process for producing Kcasein macropeptide which comprises: (a) adjusting whey to a pH less than about 4; (b) fractionating the adjusted whey by contacting the whey with a cation exchanger to yield a first Kcasein macropeptide fraction; (c) adjusting the first fraction of step (b) to a pH greater than about 4; (d) fractionating a first fraction of step (c) by contacting the first fraction with an anion exchanger to yield a second adsorbed Kcasein macropeptide fraction; and (e) eluting the second fraction to obtain substantially purified Kcasein macropeptide.
13. A process for producing Kcasein macropeptide from whey which comprises: (a) adjusting the whey to a pH greater than about 4; (b) fractionating the adjusted whey by contacting the whey with an anion exchanger to adsorb a first Kcasein macropeptide fraction; (c) eluting the first adsorbed fraction; (d) adjusting the eluted product of step (c) to a pH less than about 4; and (e) fractionating the eluted product of step (d) by contacting the product of step (d) with a cation exchanger to adsorb other proteins and collecting the unadsorbed fraction to obtain the substantially purified Kcasein macropeptide.
14. The process of Claim 12 or Claim 13, further comprising hydrolyzing the amino acid chain of the substantially purified Kcasein macropeptide to form a nutraceutical food product.
15. The process of claim 14, wherein the substantially purified Kcasein macropeptide is hydrolyzed enzymatically.
16. A process for producing Kcasein macropeptide from whey which comprises: (a) adjusting the whey to a pH greater than about 4; (b) contacting the whey with an anion exchanger to yield a bound whey protein fraction enriched in Kcasein macropeptide and an unbound whey protein fraction depleted in Kcasein macropeptide; (c) eluting the bound whey protein fraction enriched in Kcasein macropeptide; and (d) contacting the eluted bound whey protein fraction enriched in Kcasein macropeptide of step (c) with an immobilized metal affinity adsorbent to separate out the remaining whey protein fraction.
17. The process of claim 16 wherein the bound whey protein fraction enriched in Kcasein macropeptide is eluted out in a salt solution.
18. The process of claim 17 wherein the salt solution is 0.5 molar sodium chloride.
19. The process according to any one of claims 16 through 18, comprising adjusting whey to a pH of about 5.
20. The process according to any one of claims 16 through 19, conducted at a temperature between about 35°C and 60°C.
21. The process of claim 20, conducted at a temperature of about 40°C.
22. The process according to any one of claims 16 through 21 wherein the immobilized metal affinity adsorbent comprises immobilized metal ions selected from the group according to Cu, Zn, Ni, Ca, Co and Mg.
23. The process according to any one of claims 16 through 21, wherein the immobilized metal affinity adsorbent is Cu.
24. A hydrolyzed Kcasein macropeptide nutraceutical food product wherein the amino acid residue content of the product is less than about 4% by total weight phenylalanine, tryptophan and tyrosine residues.
25. The food product of claim 24, further comprising less than about 3 % of the total amino acid residue weight of arginine and histidine residues; and less than about 1 % of the total amino acid residue weight of the sulfurcontaining cysteine residue.
26. A process for producing a whey protein concentrate substantially depleted in Kcasein macropeptide from whey which comprises: (a) adjusting the whey to a pH greater than about 4; (b) contacting the whey with an anion exchanger to yield a bound whey protein fraction enriched in Kcasein macropeptide and an unbound whey protein fraction depleted in Kcasein macropeptide; and (c) concentrating the unbound whey protein fraction depleted in Kcasein macropeptide.
27. The process of claim 27, further comprising contacting the bound whey protein fraction of step (b) with an immobilized metal affinity adsorbent to separate Kcasein macropeptide from the whey protein fraction.
28. A whey protein concentrate substantially depleted in Kcasein macropeptide produced according to the process of claim 26 or claim 27.
Description:
PRODUCTION OF KAPPA-CASEIN MACROPEPTIDE This invention was made with United States'government support awarded by the following agencies: NSF Grant Nos. BCS-9109577 and BES-9631962. The United States has certain rights in this invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a process for producing K-casein macropeptides having nutraceutical properties. The present invention specifically relates to a process for producing large amounts of substantially-pure K-casein macropeptide from whey using ion exchange and immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Complete bibliographic citations of the references referred to herein can be found in the Bibliography section, immediately preceding the claims.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Nutraceuticals are foods that have specific medicinal as well as nutritional benefits. One nutraceutical, kappa-casein (K-casein) macropeptide comprises 15- 20% of the protein in whey, making its supply plentiful.

Widely differing extents of glycosylation of K-casein macropeptide (CMP) exist in whey and whey products, ranging from fully-glycosylated CMP (called K- casein glycomacropeptide, or GMP) to non-glycosylated CMP. For purposes of the present invention, CMP includes all forms of the K-casein macropeptide from the fully-glycosylated K-casein glycomacropeptide to the non-glycosylated K-casein glycomacropeptide. As discussed by Shammet et al. (1992), total CMP, which includes all degrees of glycosylation, is measured as non-protein nitrogen (NPN-2) soluble in 2% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). GMP is measured as non-protein

nitrogen soluble in 12% TCA (NPN-12). The difference between NPN-2 and NPN-12 is non-glycosylated CMP.

CMP is the moiety cleaved from K-casein at the Phel05-Metl06 position by chymosin during cheese making (Dalgleish, 1982; Fox, 1989). CMP occurs at a concentration of 1.2 to 1.5 g/L in sweet whey, e. g., Cheddar cheese whey, and comprises 15 to 20% of the total protein (Marshall, 1991). Kawaski et al. reviewed known biological functions of GMP as consolidated from several nutritional and biological research reports (U. S. Patent 5,278,288 to Kawaski and Dosako; Kawaski et al., 1992), and Tanimoto et al. (1992) suggested the utilization of GMP in dietetic foods and pharmaceuticals. The advantage of CMP as a substrate for hydrolysis is that it does not contain the amino acids tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan. These are hydrophobic aromatic amino acids responsible for the bitter taste of some peptides (Pedersen, 1994). Alternatively, Marshall (1991) suggested that CMP can be used as a protein source for the treatment of phenylketonuria, a hereditary disorder in which aromatic amino acids cannot be metabolized.

On a laboratory scale, CMP has been purified from K-casein in bovine whey using TCA precipitation (Shammet et al., 1992). GMP has been purified from bovine whey by alcohol precipitation after heat coagulation of whey protein (Saito et al., 1991). These methods are unlikely to be economical for large-scale manufacturing.

On a large scale, several methods have been developed using ultrafiltration (Kawakami et al., 1992; Kawaski et al., 1993; Tanimoto et al., 1990) and ion exchange (U. S. Patent 5,278, 288 to Kawaski and Dosako; U. S. Patent 5,290,107 to Kawaski et al.) to purify GMP from whey or whey protein concentrate.

However, the recovery of GMP using these methods is uneconomically low, at most 18% (U. S. Patent 5, 278, 288 to Kawaski and Dosako; U. S. Patent 5,290,107 to Kawaski et al.).

The basis of ultrafiltration purification is that the apparent molecular weight <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> of GMP is 10 to 30 kDa at pH 3.5 and 20 to 50 kDa at pH 7.0. At pH 3.5, GMP permeates 20 to 50 kDa molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) ultrafiltration systems while proteins are retained by the membrane. Then at pH 6.5, GMP is retained

by the same MWCO membranes while small molecular weight contaminants such as peptides pass through the filter.

U. S. Patents 5,278,288 and 5,280,107 to Kawasaki et al. are specifically <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> directed to GMPs. In the'288 patent, the GMP flows through a concentrating and desalting step unadsorbed.

U. S. Patent 5,280,107 to Kawasaki et al. relates to contacting whey, adjusted to pH 4 or lower, with an anion exchanger to adsorb CMP. The adsorbed fraction is eluted and then concentrated and desalted to obtain the CMP.

However at a pH of about 4 or lower, largely glycosylated CMP would be adsorbed to the anion exchanger, leaving unadsorbed and unrecovered a large amount of valuable non-glycosylated material. Kawasaki et al. state that because the sialic acids present in GMP have a pKa value of 2.7, these moieties have a net negative charge at pH values as low as 3 to 4. In non-glycosylated CMP, the acidic amino acid side chains (aspartic and glutamic acid) have a pKa of 3 to 5, and would have a substantial net negative charge only at a pH 5 and higher. The presence of sialic acids allowed Kawasaki et al. to separate GMP from proteins which lack sialic acids, by adsorbing the GMP to an anion exchanger at pH 4 or lower, because the other proteins are neutrally or positively charged at this pH.

However, the method of Kawasaki et al. would not be suitable for recovering both glycosylated and non-glycosylated CMP from whey because non-glycosylated CMP would not bind strongly to an anion exchanger until it had a substantial net negative charge, which would occur only at pH 5 and higher.

Neither of these Kawasaki et al. patents mention the hydrolysis of GMP to form a solution depleted in aromatic amino acids, the presence of which causes bitterness. Neither patent mentions the use of two ion exchangers in series for the adsorption of GMP.

Outinen et al. (1995) adjusted whey to pH 5 and loaded it into an anion exchange column. The column was rinsed with water and the CMP fraction eluted with 2% sodium chloride. No downstream process was developed to remove contaminating peptides which contain aromatic amino acids. However, many applications for CMP require a low concentration of proteinaceous materials

containing aromatic amino acids. For example, CMP can be used as a source or protein for patients with phenylketonuria as described previously.

U. S. Patent 5,075,424 to Tanimoto et al., U. S. Patent 5,061,622 to Dosako et al., U. S. Patent 5,216,129 to Berrocal et al. also describe processes for producing GMPs.

Separation and purification accounts for a large proportion of the production cost of proteins. The main problem with processes based on precipitation methods is that achieving a pure product from a dilute solution such as whey is not commercially economical. The difficulty with ion exchange-based methods is the efficient production of a pure product.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION CMP is an example of a purified whey protein that has unique medical or health benefits not found with other proteins. Developing a technology for fractionation of CMP from whey allows the production of a high-value nutraceutical product from whey.

A first embodiment of the invention is directed to a process for producing CMP from whey comprising fractionating the whey by passing the whey over a first ion exchanger to yield a first CMP fraction, and then fractionating the first fraction by passing is over a second ion exchanger, wherein the second ion exchanger has an opposite charge to the first ion exchanger to yield a CMP product.

More specifically, the invention is also directed to a process for producing CMP which comprises adjusting whey to a pH less than about 4, fractionating the adjusted whey by passing it over a cation exchanger to yield a first CMP fraction, fractionating the first fraction by passing it over an anion exchanger to yield a second adsorbed CMP fraction, and then eluting the second fraction to obtain substantially purified K-casein macropeptide.

The present invention is further directed to a process for producing CMP from whey which comprises adjusting the whey to a pH greater than about 5, fractionating the adjusted whey by passing it over an anion exchanger to adsorb a first CMP fraction, then eluting the first adsorbed fraction and adjusting the eluted

product to a pH less than about 4, and then fractionating the eluted product by passing the pH adjusted eluted product over a cation exchanger to adsorb protein contaminants, and then collecting the unadsorbed fraction to obtain the CMP.

A second embodiment of the invention is directed to a process for producing CMP from whey comprising contacting the whey with an anion exchanger to yield an adsorbed whey protein fraction enriched in CMP and a non- adsorbed whey protein fraction depleted in CMP; and then contacting the adsorbed whey protein fraction with an adsorbent to separate CMP from the whey protein fraction.

More specifically, the invention is directed to a process for producing CMP from whey which comprises adjusting the whey to a pH greater than about 4; contacting the whey with an anion exchanger to yield a bound whey protein fraction enriched in K-casein macropeptide and an unbound whey protein fraction depleted in K-casein macropeptide; eluting the bound whey protein fraction enriched in K-casein macropeptide; and contacting the eluted bound whey protein fraction enriched in K-casein macropeptide with an immobilized metal affinity adsorbent to separate out the remaining whey protein fraction and obtain the substantially purified CMP.

The use of immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) to purify CMP from whey is novel and was discovered by experiment. When the CMP-rich whey protein fraction was passed through a metal affinity column, all the whey proteins except CMP were adsorbed, leaving the substantially pure CMP to pass through the column as effluent. The invention therefore provides for an"on-off" method for producing pure or substantially purified CMP.

The combination of anion exchange followed by IMAC adsorption is important for the success of the second embodiment of the process for several reasons. IMAC adsorption is relatively expensive and because it does not bind the CMP by itself, it would not be able to remove lactose, fat and minerals from the CMP or be able to concentrate it compared to its concentration in whey. By preceding the IMAC step with an anion exchange step, the CMP is bound to and concentrated on the anion exchanger and rinsed free of lactose, fat and minerals, and the majority of the whey proteins. The upstream anion exchange step reduces

the demands on the downstream IMAC step for adsorption capacity because the IMAC step only needs to remove small amounts of proteinaceous contaminants.

Because these contaminants are present at low concentrations after the anion exchange step, and CMP does not adsorb to the IMAC adsorbent, the IMAC adsorbent does not saturate rapidly, meaning large volumes of the elution solution can be treated before the IMAC adsorbent must be regenerated. This improves the economics of the process.

Thus, the invention provides a large-scale low-cost method for producing purified CMP using two synergistic adsorption steps. The invention also provides a means for the large-scale production of CMP in a very pure form using fewer steps than previous methods. For example, the process of the present invention uses one less step than other methods of similar capability in purity of product and produces higher purity than the methods described above in the description of the prior art.

The whey protein isolate, i. e., the contaminants separated from CMP and bound to the IMAC column, is also commercially valuable and could be concentrated and sold as whey protein or fractionated into a-lactalbumin and ß- lactoglobulin.

The present invention is also directed to a process for producing a whey protein concentrate substantially depleted in K-casein macropeptide from whey which comprises adjusting the whey to a pH greater than about 4, contacting the whey with an anion exchanger to yield a bound whey protein fraction enriched in K-casein macropeptide and an unbound whey protein fraction depleted in K-casein macropeptide, and eluting the bound whey protein fraction enriched in K-casein macropeptide from the unbound whey protein fraction depleted in K-casein macropeptide. A whey protein concentrate substantially depleted in K-casein macropeptide for use in food products, such as nutraceuticals, animal feeds and infant formula, produced according to the above process is also contemplated.

The unadsorbed whey protein fraction left after contact with the anion exchanger is depleted in CMP, which makes it commercially valuable for use in infant formula, for example. After concentration and drying, this fraction would be a powdered whey protein concentrate (WPC) depleted in CMP. WPC is used

in infant formula instead of dried milk because it is closer in protein composition to human mother's milk. For example, human milk contains nearly 90% less casein than bovine milk (3.2 vs. 26 g/L), whereas bovine whey is largely depleted in casein. However, the protein composition of bovine whey is not an exact match to the protein composition of mother's milk either. For example, since CMP is the moiety cleaved from K-casein, and bovine milk contains 270% more K-casein than mother's milk, infant formula based on whey protein has a great excess of CMP compared to the level of CMP normal in an infant's diet. Therefore, a powdered WPC depleted in CMP, such as from the product of this invention, would be valuable as an ingredient in infant formula.

Furthermore, the anion exchange step preferentially binds the whey protein ß-lactoglobulin as well as CMP. B-Lactoglobulin is plentiful in bovine whey, whereas mother's milk contains none, making its presence undesirable in infant formula.

Additionally, CMP reportedly acts to suppress appetite in humans (Corring, <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> T. et al, 1997) and other animals (Stan, E. et al, 1983; Buecher, S. et al, 1994) making its presence undesirable in animal feed, such as for baby pigs, and in human infant formula, where rapid weight gain is desired. This further enhances the commercial value of the whey left over after the contact with the anion exchanger in the process of the present invention because it is depleted in CMP.

The process of the present invention is advantageously applicable to large- scale commercial production of CMP in a substantially pure form and CMP- depleted WPC.

There is a high value-added market for whey proteins for foods for infants, geriatrics, individuals with allergic reactions to particular compounds, and individuals with enzyme deficiency. This is the growing nutraceutical marketplace. However, the bitterness of hydrolysates limits its use, and the removal of bitter peptides from the hydrolysate is expensive. The advantage of CMP as a substrate for hydrolysis is that it does not contain the hydrophobic amino acids tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan that make peptides bitter.

The present invention offers increased purity, lower cost, and increased throughput compared to existing processes, and a hydrolyzed, non-bitter nutrient

solution for human consumption. It also produces a non-fat, low-lactose, high protein product (CMP) for food use.

The present invention is also directed to a hydrolyzed CMP nutraceutical food product wherein the amino acid residue content of the product is less than about 4% by total weight phenylalanine, tryptophan and tyrosine residues.

The invention is further directed to a method for the hydrolysis of the purified CMP.

There is a growing high value-added market for hydrolyzed whey proteins for foods for infants, geriatrics, individuals with allergic reactions to particular compounds, and individuals with enzyme deficiency. This is the growing nutraceutical marketplace. However, the bitterness of hydrolysates limits their use and the removal of bitter peptides from the hydrolysate is expensive. The advantage of CMP as a substrate for hydrolysis is that it does not contain the hydrophobic amino acids tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan that make peptides bitter.

The present invention offers increased purity, lower cost, and increased throughput compared to existing processes, and a hydrolyzed, non-bitter nutrient solution for human consumption. It also produces a non-fat, low-lactose, high protein product for food use.

Although the U. S. market for high value, purified whey proteins is small at present, several factors indicate it will grow. Other major dairying countries are developing markets for these purified individual whey protein products. In the future, the food industry will demand proteins with higher nutritional and functional properties because of the trend towards foods with enhanced health benefits, lower fat content and lower lactose content.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 depicts a flow chart illustrating the ion exchange method of the present invention wherein the first ion exchanger is a cation exchanger and the second ion exchanger is an anion exchanger.

Fig. 2 depicts a flow chart illustrating the ion exchange method of the present invention wherein the first ion exchanger is an anion exchanger and the second ion exchanger is a cation exchanger.

Fig. 3a depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) for a whey sample in the first ion exchanger in Example 1. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 3b depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) of an elution peak for the first ion exchanger in Example 1. One division of the x- axis equals one minute.

Fig. 3c depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) for the effluent sample in the first ion exchanger in Example 1. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 3d depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) for the elution peak in the second ion exchanger in Example 1. One division of the x- axis equals one minute.

Fig. 3e depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) for for the effluent sample in the second ion exchanger in Example 1. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 4 is an SDS-PAGE analysis of the samples from the first ion exchanger in Example 1. Lane 1 = molecular weight markers, Lane 2=6- lactoglobulin, Lane 3 = whey, Lane 4 = effluent, Lane 5 = elution peak, and Lane 6 = Sigma GMP.

Fig. 5a is an SDS-PAGE analysis of the samples from the first ion exchanger in Example 1 before precipitation of proteins by 6% trichloroacetic acid. Lane 1 = molecular weight markers, Lane 2 = immunoglobulin G, Lane 3 = whey, Lane 4 = effluent, Lane 5 = elution peak, Lane 6 = Sigma GMP, Lane 7 = B-lactoglobulin, and lane 8 = molecular weight markers.

Fig. 5b is an SDS-PAGE analysis of the samples from the first ion exchanger in Example 1 after precipitation of proteins by 6% trichloroacetic acid.

Lane 1 = molecular weight markers, Lane 2 = immunoglobulin G, Lane 3 = whey, Lane 4 = effluent, Lane 5 = elution peak, Lane 6 = Sigma GMP,. Lane 7 = B-lactoglobulin, and lane 8 = molecular weight markers.

Fig. 6 is an SDS-PAGE analysis of the samples from the second ion exchanger in Example 1. Lane 1 = molecular weight markers, Lane 2 = immunoglobulin G, Lane 3 = the first CMP fraction, Lane 4 = elution peak, Lane 5 = effluent and Lane 6 = Sigma GMP.

Fig. 7a depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) for whey samples from the first ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x- axis equals one minute.

Fig. 7b depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) for effluent samples from the first ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 7c depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) for the first CMP fraction from the first ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 7d depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (sensitivity-0.05) for the effluent sample from the second ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 8a depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 214 nm (sensitivity-0.5) for the whey samples from the first ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 8b depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 214 nm (sensitivity-0.5) for the effluent samples from the first ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 8c depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 214 nm (sensitivity-0.5) for for the first CMP fraction from the first ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 8d depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 214 nm (sensitivity-0.5) for the effluent samples from the second ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x-axis equals one minute.

Fig. 8e depicts an HPLC chromatogram at 214 nm (sensitivity-0.5) for elution peak from the second ion exchanger in Example 2. One division of the x- axis equals one minute.

Fig. 9 is an SDS-PAGE analysis of the samples in Example 2. Lane 1 = molecular weight markers, Lane 2 = immunoglobulin G, Lane 3 = whey, Lane 4 = effluent from the first ion exchanger, Lane 5 = the first CMP fraction, Lane 6 = effluent from the second ion exchanger, Lane 7 = elution peak from the second ion exchanger, Lane 8 = Sigma GMP.

Fig. 10 is an SDS-PAGE analysis of the samples from the anion exchanger and the IMAC adsorbent in Example 3.

Fig. 11 is a graph showing the absorbance ratio (whey protein isolate CMP product) vs. wavelength in Example 3.

Fig. 12 is an SDS-PAGE analysis of the samples form the anion exchanger and the IMAC adsorbent in Example 4.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION The basis of this disclosure using the ion exchange method is that at a slightly acidic whey pH (greater than about 5) both non-glycosylated CMP and GMP have a substantial net negative charge, whereas some whey proteins and peptides are charged negative and some are charged positive at this pH. At a lower whey pH (less than about 4), the whey proteins and peptides take on a positive charge, but non-glycosylated CMP loses its substantial net negative charge. Consequently, by contacting whey at acidic pH with only an anion exchanger, it is not possible to capture all of the CMP (GMP and non-glycosylated CMP) without also capturing some contaminating whey proteins and peptides. By contacting whey at acidic pH with only a cation exchanger, it is not possible to capture any CMP, although it is possible to capture all the proteins from the whey.

Nevertheless, the unadsorbed fraction from the cation exchanger is only partially purified in CMP because it still contains peptide, lactose, mineral, fat, and other impurities present in whey. By using two ion exchangers, in an interchangeable sequence, each of opposite charge, a negatively-charged cation exchanger and a positively-charged anion exchanger, it is possible to separate CMP from impurities in whey to obtain purified CMP.

Another aspect of the invention is based upon the discovery that whey proteins bind to immobilized metal ions but CMP does not. This observation is

attributed to the fact that immobilized transition metal ions bind to proteins and peptides containing surface histidine and cysteine amino acid residues at about pH 5.5 to 8.5, and that is chiefly the number of surface histidines that controls the binding strength (Arnold and Haymore, 1991). Cysteine residues are rarely at the surface of a protein and do not bind as strongly as histidine residues. However, histidine is a relatively rare amino acid, and many natural proteins contain no surface histidines at all. Therefore, although impurities such as whey proteins and peptide hydrolysis products of caseins and whey proteins contain some histidine residues, whereas CMP does not, it is not obvious that each of these impurities contains multiple surface histidines sufficient in number to cause strong binding to an IMAC adsorbent. Because it was discovered that other proteins in whey do bind to an IMAC adsorbent, CMP can be purified from residual protein and peptide impurities in whey by adsorption of the impurities onto an IMAC adsorbent.

The following describes in detail the production of CMP for food and medical uses by the present invention.

I. WHEY Any kind of whey containing CMP may be used. Whey is defined as the thin, watery part of milk that separates from the thicker part (curds) after coagulation. The major dry-matter components in whey are lactose (approximately 75% on a total solids basis), protein (approximately 13%) and ash (approximately 9%). The ratio between the components changes depending on the process involved in its preparation. Examples of whey include cheese whey, rennet casein whey and products of these wheys such as whey protein concentrate and dried whey. Reconstitution of dried whey products with water is necessary before use.

Furthermore, purified K-casein, a milk product, may be substituted for milk to prepare whey containing CMP.

II. CLARIFIER Small amounts of casein curds and lipids remain in these wheys, which are removed using a centrifuge, a cream separator or a clarifier prior to use, according to processes well known in the industry.

III. ADJUST pH In the first embodiment, where the whey is passed over ion exchange columns of different polarity, the whey is adjusted to about 6.5 or lower using an acid such as phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, and citric acid, according to methods known to the art.

In the second embodiment, where the whey is passed over an anion exchange column, followed by IMAC, the whey is preferably adjusted to a pH greater than about 4, preferably about 5, using an acid such as phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, and citric acid, according to methods known to the art. A pH less than 4 would still allow the process to work although not as efficiently. A pH of 4 to 6 is most preferred because a pH less than about 4 does not allow for the binding of non-glycosylated CMP and a pH greater than about 6 tends to bind too much whey protein.

IV. FILTER Following pH adjustment, the whey may be filtered to avoid plugging of the ion exchanger if a fine microporous membrane or column packed with fine beads is utilized. Filtering is not necessary when using ion exchange membranes having large pores or columns packed with beads of large diameter. Filtering is accomplished by means known to art, such as, for example, 0.7 ym filter paper (Micro Filtration Systems, Dublin, CA). One advantage of filtering is that it allows increasing the flow rate of whey and other solutions through the ion exchanger without a significant increase in pressure drop or loss of performance.

V. HEAT Advantageously, the process can be conducted at elevated temperatures, ranging from 35°C to 60°C, preferably at a temperature of about 40°C to 50°C.

Increasing the temperature increases the efficiency of the separations by increasing the diffusion coefficient of the solutes and decreasing the viscosity of the fluid.

This decreases mass transfer limitations to attaining equilibrium in the separations and decreases pressure drops and restrictions to attaining rapid fluid flow.

VI. CHROMATOGRAPHY A. Separation by Sequential Ion Exchange on Columns of Opposite Polarity: The basis of the ion exchange method is that both GMP and non- glycosylated CMP have a substantial net negative charge in whey at slightly acidic pH, whereas some whey proteins and peptides are charged negative and some are charged positive at this pH. At more acidic whey pH, the whey proteins and peptides take on a positive charge, and can be captured by a cation exchanger, whereas GMP and non-glycosylated CMP cannot be captured.

In the ion-exchange method, two ion exchangers are used, in an interchangeable sequence, each having an opposite charge, a negatively-charged cation exchanger and a positively-charged anion exchanger. By contacting the whey with two oppositely-charged ion exchangers, with a pH adjustment step in between contacting steps, the net charge on the CMP can be altered relative to the net charge on the impurities in at least one of the two ion exchange steps. The first ion exchanger can either be a cation exchanger or an anion exchanger. Then, the second ion exchanger must have a polarity opposite to the first ion exchanger.

This section contains a description of the case where the first ion exchanger is a cation exchanger and the second ion exchanger is an anion exchanger.

1. Cation Then Anion Exchanger : Referring now to Fig. 1, when the first ion exchanger is a cation exchanger, the adjusted whey is contacted via line 10 with a cation exchanger 12 containing charged immobilized molecules such as carboxymethyl or sulfopropyl moieties. Examples of materials used to form the cross-linked polymeric beads used for the cation exchanger include cellulose, agarose, or dextran, each containing charged immobilized moieties. Microporous polymeric membranes

comprised of regenerated cellulose, polysulfone, or cellulose acetate and containing the charged immobilized moieties are also contemplated here. A further example includes microporous paper containing the charged immobilized moieties.

Methods of contacting cation exchangers with whey are well known in the art. Conventional methods of contact are described in the following references which are incorporated herein by reference for their description of contacting methods (Ayers et al., 1986; Etzel, 1995; Adisaputro et al., 1996).

Two fractions are produced after contacting the cation exchanger with whey: whey containing compounds not adsorbed to the cation exchanger, i. e., the unadsorbed fraction with partially purified CMP through line 14, and the cation exchanger containing adsorbed compounds, i. e., adsorbed and eluted fraction or proteinaceous impurities through line 16.

The adsorbed compounds can be eluted by increasing the ionic strength or the pH. Elution may be accomplished using a volatile buffer such as ammonium acetate, which can vaporize during spray drying of the desorbed fraction, lowering the ash content of the dry product. Elution at pH 9 produces a whey protein isolate consisting of a mixture of the proteins in whey. Alternatively, elution at pH 6.5 desorbs whey protein isolate, but lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase remain adsorbed. These proteins can be desorbed at pH 9, or separately lactoperoxidase can be eluted using 0.3 M salt, followed by lactoferrin using 0.9 M salt.

The fraction consisting of whey containing the desired CMP is contacted with an anion exchanger 18 via line 14, using materials and methods similar to the above description, to capture the CMP. The anion exchanger 18 contains charged immobilized molecules such as diethylaminoethyl or quaternary amine moieties.

Commercially available anion exchangers and methods of contacting anion exchangers 18 with whey are well known in the art. The whey may first be adjusted to a pH greater than about 4 using an alkali such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and ammonia.

The adsorbed and eluted fraction of CMP (substantially free of impurities) can be eluted from the anion exchanger via line 20 by increasing the ionic strength or decreasing the pH. Elution may be accomplished using a volatile buffer as

described above. The unadsorbed fraction, depleted in CMP, is removed from the anion exchanger 18 via line 22.

In the process of the production of whey protein isolate, a by-product is produced that can be used directly in the contacting step with an anion exchanger and subsequent steps or in the contacting step with a cation exchanger and subsequent steps. The by-product is produced when whey or whey products are contacted with a cation exchanger to adsorb whey proteins (Ayers et al., 1986).

The whey proteins can be eluted from the cation exchanger for sale as whey protein isolates.

The whey containing the unadsorbed components is a by-product stream rich in K-casein macropeptide, an anion that does not adsorb to the cation exchanger.

2. Anion Then Caton Exchanger : Referring now to Fig. 2, this section contains a description of the reverse case wherein the first ion exchanger is an anion exchanger and the second ion exchanger is a cation exchanger.

When the first ion exchanger is an anion exchanger, the adjusted whey is contacted via line 10 with an anion exchanger 18 containing charged immobilized molecules such as diethylaminoethyl or quaternary amine moieties. Examples of materials used to form the ion exchanger, and methods of contacting ion exchangers with whey have been discussed above.

Two fractions are produced after contacting the anion exchanger 18 with whey: whey containing compounds not adsorbed to the anion exchanger via line 30 and the anion exchanger containing adsorbed compounds, i. e., adsorbed and eluted fraction or partially purified CMP, via line 32.

The fraction consisting of whey containing the unadsorbed compounds contains the bulk of the whey proteins, lactose, minerals, and peptides. It can be used to make a whey protein concentrate that is depleted in CMP.

The adsorbed compounds are partially purified in CMP, and can be eluted by increasing the ionic strength or decreasing the pH. Elution may be

accomplished using a volatile buffer as described above. Elution using 0.3M salt has been found to work well.

The eluted fraction is contacted via line 32 with a cation exchanger 12 containing charged immobilized molecules such as carboxymethyl or sulfopropyl moieties, using materials and methods similar to the above description. The whey may first be adjusted to a pH less than about 4 using an acid such as phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, and citric acid. The cation exchanger step is to remove proteinaceous impurities from the CMP via line 34. The CMP does not adsorb to the cation exchanger and is wholly contained in the fraction containing the unadsorbed compounds via line 36. Methods of contacting cation exchangers with whey are well known in the art. Conventional methods of contact are described in Adisaputro et al. 1996.

In the process of the production of whey protein isolate, a by-product is produced that can be used directly in the contacting step with the anion exchanger and subsequent steps. The by-product is produced when whey or whey products are contacted with a cation exchanger to adsorb whey proteins (Ayers et al., 1986). The whey proteins can be eluted from the cation exchanger for sale as whey protein isolates. The whey containing the unadsorbed components is a by- product stream rich in CMP, an anion that does not adsorb to the cation exchanger. This by-product can be used instead of whey.

B. Separation by Anion Exchange Followed by Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC): Alternatively, the adjusted whey is contacted with an anion exchanger containing charged immobilized molecules such as diethylaminoethyl or quaternary amine moieties. Two fractions are produced after contacting the anion exchanger with whey: a whey protein fraction enriched in CMP and a whey solution depleted in CMP. Commercially available anion exchangers and methods of contacting anion exchangers with whey are well known in the art. If the pH of the whey is acidic, the whey may be adjusted to a pH of about 5 using an alkali such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and ammonia.

The fraction consisting of whey containing the unadsorbed compounds is removed from the anion exchanger. It contains the bulk of the whey proteins, lactose, minerals, and peptides. It can be used to make a whey protein concentrate that is depleted in CMP.

The adsorbed and eluted fraction of CMP (substantially free of impurities) can be eluted from the anion exchanger by increasing the ionic strength or decreasing the pH. Elution may be accomplished using a volatile buffer according to methods well-known to the art. Elution using 0.3M salt has been found to work well.

The whey protein fraction enriched in CMP is then contacted with an immobilized metal affinity adsorbent generally in an immobilized metal affinity column (IMAC), to separate the CMP from the remaining whey protein fraction.

CMP is obtained as an effluent that is essentially free of other whey proteins and contaminants.

The invention is thus directed towards optimizing techniques for the large- scale separation and purification of CMP from whey. Processes in which proteins are exposed to and bound to an IMAC resin and purified away from contaminants by selectively eluting the desired purified protein using the binding affinity of histidine residues for immobilized divalent copper ions are known to the art although not for the present invention (U. S. Patent 5,169,936 to Staples et al.; U. S. Patent 5,646,016 to McCoy et al.; U. S. Patent 5,310,648 to Arnold et al.; and U. S. Patents 5,641,539,5,453,199 and 5,372,719 to Afeyan).

Metal chelate matrices consist of immobilized metal ions that bind to protein and peptide contaminants containing surface histidine and cysteine amino acid residues at around pH 6-8. Other whey proteins and peptide hydrolysis products of caseins and whey proteins contain these amino acids whereas CMP does not. According to the present invention, these residues are present at the surface of the molecule, and by contacting the fraction containing CMP with a metal chelate adsorbent, peptide and protein contaminants are removed by adsorption, purifying the fraction in CMP. For the chelating group and metal ion, iminodiacetic acid and Cu2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Co2+, and Mg2+, respectively, may be exemplified. The materials and methods described above

may be used for the immobilization matrix and contacting procedures for removal of peptide or protein contaminants.

IMAC adsorbents contain metal ions, such as Cu, Zn, Ni, Ca, Co and Mg, chelated to the adsorbent by immobilized iminodiacetic acid. The most commonly used metal ions are Cu and Ni. Ca and Zn are not preferred as they were found experimentally to bind to whey proteins with some difficulty.

VII. ADSORBENT The fraction containing CMP thus obtained is substantially free of impurities, but may be further purified by contacting the fraction with one or more adsorbents to remove residual peptide or protein contaminants. The adsorbent or adsorbents may consist of activated carbon, hydrophobic moieties, and/or another metal chelate affinity moiety. Hydrophobic interaction matrices such as immobilized butyl, phenyl, and octyl moieties, and activated carbon may be used to adsorb peptide and protein contaminants containing hydrophobic amino acids such as phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine. Other whey proteins and peptide hydrolysis products of caseins and whey proteins contain these amino acids whereas CMP does not. Therefore, by contacting the fraction containing CMP with an adsorbent such as hydrophobic interaction matrices and activated carbon, peptide and protein contaminants can be removed by adsorption, enriching the fraction in CMP.

VIII. HYDROLYSIS The purified CMP may be hydrolyzed to form a food product having special medical and health benefits. Hydrolysis is the chemical reaction in which the amino acid chain of the protein reacts with water so as to be split into smaller molecular weight peptides and amino acids. Hydrolysis can be conducted by the use of acids (acid hydrolysis), alkalis (alkaline hydrolysis) or enzymes (enzyme hydrolysis). The use of enzymes is preferred. Examples of enzymes used for hydrolysis include alkaline, neutral, and acid proteases having endoprotease and exoprotease specificity; exopeptidases such as carboxypeptidase and aminopeptidase; and endopeptidases such as subtilisin. The enzyme may be

contacted with the purified CMP in a batch reactor or a flow reactor. In a flow reactor, the enzyme may be immobilized to the same matrices as discussed above i. e. beads, microporous membranes, and microporous papers.

Hydrolysis reactions are generally carried out over a temperature and pH range of from about 120°F-140°F (49°C-60°C) and from about 4.0 to 6.0, respectively. Hydrolysis reaction times usually range between about 2 to 8 hours.

EXAMPLES In order to more fully illustrate the present invention, the following Examples are provided. The Examples, which make reference to the attached figures, are for illustration purposes only, to aid in a more complete understanding of the invention. The Examples do not limit the scope invention disclosed and claimed herein in any fashion.

EXAMPLE 1: Partially defatted (by centrifugation) unpasteurized Cheddar cheese whey at pH 6.2-6.4, made from pasteurized milk, was adjusted to pH 3.0 by addition of 2.0 M HC1. The whey was vacuum-filtered through a 0.7-pm glass filter and stored at 4°C. An aliquot of whey (5.8L) was pumped at 80mL/min through a 50-mm diameter waterjacketed (50°C) chromatography column (XK50/60), Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) filled with 1,000 mL of cation exchange beads (GibcoCel SP HB2, Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). All solutions were thermally equilibrated to 50°C before loading into the column using a Masterflex pump (Cole-Parmer Instrument Co., Chicago, IL). The column was washed with deionized water (1,500 mL) and eluted using 0.2 M NH4Cl pH 9.0 (4,500 mL).

An aliquot (40 mL) of the effluent whey solution from the column was adjusted to pH 5.0 using 1 M NaOH and passed at 15 mL/min through a stack of 10 47-mm disks of anion exchange filter paper (DE81, Whatman, Fairfield, NJ) at 22°C.

The disks were washed with deionized water and then eluted using 0.3 M NaCI.

The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and by size-exclusion HPLC at detection wavelengths of 214 and 280 nm. At 214 nm, all amino acids absorb light and are detected. At 280 nm, only the aromatic amino acids (tyrosine and tryptophan) absorb light. Because CMP does not contain aromatic amino acids, it

will not be detected at 280 nm. Only proteinaceous impurities are detected at 280 nm.

From a calibration of the HPLC column, a plot of loglo molecular weight (kDa) vs. retention time (RT) in minutes had a slope of-0.43 0.02 and a y- intercept of Consequently, the four major whey proteins would have the following RTs: a-lactalbumin (14 kDa) = 101 min, B-lactoglobulin dimer (37 kDa) = 9+1 min, serum albumin (67 kDa) = 8 1 min, and immunoglobulins (> 150 kDa) < 7.5 min. GMP (C 7278, Sigma) had a RT of 8 to 9 min, and was detectable at 214 nm, but not at 280 nm.

From the HPLC chromatograms at 280 nm (Fig. 3), whey (Fig. 3a) contained proteins i. e. peaks with RTs of 6 to 10 min, and peptides with RTs of greater than 11 min. The peptides had a molecular weight of less than about 4 kDa. The elution peak (Fig. 3b) from the cation exchanger, the first ion exchanger, contained the major whey proteins and essentially no peptides, as determined by the absence of peaks with RTs > 11 min, whereas the effluent (Fig. 3c), the first CMP fraction, contained the peptides and trace amounts of the major whey proteins.

By SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 4), the elution peak (Lane 5) from the cation exchanger contained the major whey proteins, but no CMP. Although CMP did not stain as intensely as the major whey proteins, an unusual fingering pattern in the CMP band simplified detection.

The presence of CMP was confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 5) of the samples before and after precipitation of the proteins by 6% trichloroacetic acid. The elution peak (Lane 5) contained no CMP. The first CMP fraction contained all the CMP along with trace amounts of the major whey proteins.

The first CMP fraction was adjusted to pH 5.0 and loaded into a second ion exchanger, a stack of anion exchange paper. From the HPLC chromatograms at 280 nm, the elution peak from the second ion exchanger (Fig. 3d) was substantially free of protein and peptide impurities compared to the feed solution (Fig. 3c), because these components passed through without binding and into the effluent (Fig. 3e).

From SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 6), the first fraction was contaminated with trace amounts of whey proteins, in agreement with the HPLC results, and the elution peak from the second exchanger was CMP, substantially free of proteinaceous impurities.

EXAMPLE 2: Whey, prepared as described in Example 1, was adjusted to pH 5.0 by addition of 1 M HC1. The whey was vacuum-filtered through a 0.7-» m glass filter and stored at 4°C. An aliquot (40 mL) of whey was pumped at 1.5 mL/min through a stack of 10 47-mm disks of anion exchange filter paper (DE81) at 22°C.

The disks were washed with deionized water and eluted using 0.3 M NaCI. The elution peak was adjusted to pH 3.0 using 1 M HC1 and passed by gravity flow through a chromatography column (Econo-Pac, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) containing 10 mL of cation exchange beads (GibcoCel SP HB5, Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). The column was washed with water and eluted using 0.2 M NH4CI pH 9.0.

From the HPLC chromatograms at 280 nm (Fig. 7), whey (Fig. 7a) contained peptides and the major whey proteins. The effluent (Fig. 7b) from the first ion exchanger (the anion exchanger) contained nearly all the peptides and major whey proteins. The elution peak (Fig. 7c), the first CMP fraction, contained trace amounts of both peptides and major whey proteins.

In confirmation, from the HPLC chromatograms at 214 nm (Fig. 8), nearly all the peptides and the major whey proteins in the whey (Fig. 8a) passed through the anion exchanger to the effluent (Fig. 8b). The first CMP fraction (Fig. 8c) contained trace amounts of both the peptides and major whey proteins, and a large peak at 8 min, which probably was primarily CMP, because this fraction contained small amounts of protein based on the chromatogram at 280 nm.

By SDS-Page analysis (Fig. 9), the effluent from the anion exchanger (Lane 4) contained nearly all the major whey proteins. The first CMP fraction (Lane 5) contained trace amounts of the major whey proteins, and a CMP band.

The first CMP fraction was adjusted to pH 3.0 and loaded into the second ion exchanger, a column containing cation exchange beads. From the HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm, the effluent (Fig. 7d) from the second ion exchanger

contained the majority of the peptides but was substantially free of protein impurities that had been present in the first CMP fraction.

In agreement, from the HPLC chromatograms at 214 nm, the effluent (Fig.

8d) contained primarily CMP and the majority of the peptides, but was substantially free of protein impurities. The elution peak (Fig. 8e) from the second ion exchanger contained a peak at 9 min, which was probably protein.

By SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 9) the effluent from the second ion exchanger (Lane 6) contained nearly all the CMP, and was substantially free of protein impurities. The elution peak (Lane 7) contained the major whey protein impurities (notably ß-lactoglobulin), but no CMP.

EXAMPLE 3: A water-jacketed chromatography column (XK 50/60, Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) operated at 40°C was packed with 500 ml of a quaternaryaminoethyl cellulose anion exchanger (QAE HB2 GibcoCel, Life Technologies, Rockville, MD). Mozzarella cheese whey was adjusted to pH 5.0 using 1 M phosphoric acid and 5 L was pumped into the column in upflow at a flow rate of 75 ml/min. The anion exchanger was washed with 160 ml of water to remove contaminants lactose, minerals and fat. CMP was eluted from the ion exchanger using 1650 ml of 0.5 M sodium chloride. The elution solution was adjusted to pH 7.15 using 1 M sodium hydroxide and loaded in upflow at a flow rate of 15 ml/min into a chromatography column (C 26/40, Pharmacia) operated at 22°C and packed with 50 ml of iminodiacetic acid agarose beads (Chelating Sepharose Fast Flow, Pharmacia) containing immobilized Cu2+ metal ions. The beads were washed with 50 ml of 0.02 M sodium phosphate, 0.5 M sodium chloride, pH 7.15. The effluent up to this point was the substantially purified CMP product. The beads were washed with an additional 450 ml of pH 7.15 buffer, and eluted using 500 ml of 0.02 M sodium phosphate, 0.5 M sodium chloride, pH 3.45.

Referring to Fig. 10, the fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE using Coomassie Blue R-350 staining of a PhastGel Gradient 10-15 polyacrylamide gel from Pharmacia. Bands were identified via molecular weight markers (lane 1).

Based on the observation that the effluent from the anion exchanger (lane 3) was

substantially the same in protein content as the whey (lane 2), most of the proteins in the whey were not adsorbed onto the anion exchanger.

The elution solution was concentrated four-fold by ultrafiltration (8,000 NMWL Centricon Plus 80, Millipore, Bedford, MA) and applied to lane 4. It contained CMP, the forked band at 30 kDa, and whey protein impurities, notably B-lactoglobulin (18.3 kDa band) and some a-lactalbumin (14.4 kDa band). When a CMP standard (C 7278, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, the same forked-shape characteristic and band location at 30 kDa was found.

Although the molecular weight of CMP is about 7 kDa, the apparent molecular weight by gel permeation chromatography is 30 to 45 kDa, and is explained by its large volumisity due to internal electrostatic and stearic repulsion of negatively charged moieties (Minkiewicz et al., 1996).

CMP does not stain well compared to the other whey proteins because Coomassie dye interacts primarily with arginine residues, and weakly with histidine, lysine, tyrosine, tryptophan and phenylalanine. Because CMP does not contain arginine, histidine, tyrosine, tryptophan, and phenylalanine, and it contains a less than average number of lysine residues, it does not stain well using Coomassie dye reagent. Therefore, the actual concentration of CMP is much greater, and the concentration of whey protein impurities is much smaller, than is apparent based on the density of the bands in SDS-PAGE analysis.

The effluent from the IMAC column was concentrated one hundred-fold and applied to lane 5. It contained a high concentration of CMP as seen by the large forked band at 30 to 40 kDa, and greatly reduced amounts of the impurity whey protein a-lactalbumin and B-lactoglobulin.

The effluent from the IMAC column (substantially purified CMP) was concentrated by ultrafiltration, freeze dried, rehydrated to 0.1 mg/ml in deionized water, and analyzed using a spectrophotometer. For comparison, whey protein isolate (BiPRO, Davisco Foods, Eden Prairie, MN), manufactured by cation exchange adsorption, was rehydrated to 0.05 mg/ml and analyzed in a similar manner. The ratio of the absorbances (whey protein isolate-CMP) is plotted in Fig. 11. If the amino acid composition of the two protein samples were similar, then the ratio would be essentially independent of wavelength. However, this was

not observed; instead there were strong peaks at 220 to 240 nm and at 280 to 300 nm, which are characteristic of aromatic amino acids tyrosine and tryptophan.

Based on this result, tyrosine and tryptophan are present in the whey protein isolate, but not in the CMP, indicating that this product is pure by spectrophotometric analysis.

Amino acid analysis was performed on the freeze-dried IMAC effluent sample as illustrated in the following table: TABLE 1.

Amino Acid Analysis of Effluent From IMAC Column and Whey Protein Isolate (WPI) Theoretical Value IMAC WPI Amino Acida (mol %)b (mol % (Mol %) AsxAsx6.3 7.2 11.6 Thr 17. 2 14. 8 5.7 Ser 9. 4 9.7 5. 6 Glx 15.6 13.3 14.9 ProPro12.5 10.7 5.4 2.23.6Gly1.6 Ala 9. 4 12.9 8. 5 Val 9.4 8.0 5.9 Met 1.6 0.9 2.9 lie 10.9 8.6 5.2 Leu 1. 6 2. 6 12.9 Tyr 0. 0 1. 8 2. 6 Phe 0.0 1.0 2.5 His 0.0 0.6 1.6 Lys 4. 7 5. 0 9.2 Arg 0.0 0.7 1.9 a Cys & Trp were not analyzed.

'Values are based on amino acids analyzed only.

It was far closer in composition to the theoretical values for CMP than to whey protein isolate. Nevertheless, the IMAC sample was not absolutely pure CMP based on amino acid analysis because small amounts of tyrosine, phenylalanine, histidine, and arginine were detected in the sample, and pure CMP does not contain

these amino acids. The amounts of these amino acids were less than found in whey protein isolate, and other amino acids were found at essentially the theoretical amounts, e. g. aspartic acid and asparagine, threonine, serine, glycine, leucine, and lysine. It is possible that the IMAC column (50 ml) was undersized and unable to remove all the impurities in the large volume of the eluted fraction (1650 ml) from the anion exchanger.

The elution peak from the IMAC column was concentrated 100-fold and applied to lane 6. It contained the whey protein impurities present in the elution peak from the anion exchanger (lane 4) and no CMP. Thus, the IMAC column bound the whey protein impurities but not the CMP product.

IMAC adsorbents can be eluted in several different ways. In all cases, 0.5 to 1.0 M sodium chloride is added to the eluting buffer to suppress ionic interactions.

In this example, elution was with a pH change to 3.45. The nonprotonated imidazole-ring nitrogen atom of histidine is a powerful nucleophile, which binds to metal ions. The imidazole side chain is readily protonated at low pH, with a pKa of about 6.5, which destroys its metal-binding characteristic. By decreasing the pH to less than 6.0, non-specific elution of bound protein is effected. Nonspecific elution with strong chelators, e. g., ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tetrasodium salt and sodium citrate, strips the metal ions and bound protein from the IMAC adsorbent.

Specific elution may be effected by contacting the adsorbent with a displacer molecule, e. g., histidine and imidazole, that competes for binding to the immobilized metal ions. Because the pKa of the imidazole nitrogen of histidine depends on the local environment of the histidine within a given protein, elution using a gradient in displacer concentration will often resolve different proteins during elution.

EXAMPLE 4: A chromatography column (XK 16/40, Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) operated at 22°C was packed with 50 ml of a quaternaryaminoethyl cellulose anion exchanger (QAE HB2 GibcoCel, Life Technologies, Rockville, MD). Mozzarella cheese whey was adjusted to pH 5.0 using 1 M hydrochloric acid, filtered (2.5 jum, No. 42, Whatman, Fairfield, NJ) and 250 ml pumped into the column at a flow rate of 4 ml/min. The anion exchanger was washed with 100 ml of water to remove contaminants lactose, minerals, and fat. CMP was eluted from the ion exchanger using 125 ml of 0.3 M sodium chloride. Residual bound whey protein impurities were eluted from the anion exchanger using 125 ml of 0.2 M sodium hydroxide. The

sodium chloride elution solution was adjusted to pH 7.15 using 1 M sodium hydroxide and 30 ml loaded into a chromatography column (Econo-Pac, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) operated at 22°C and packed with 5 ml of iminodiacetic acid agarose beads (Chelating Sepharose Fast Flow, Pharmacia) containing immobilized Cu2+ metal ions. The beads were washed with 10 ml of 0.02 M sodium phosphate, 0.5 M sodium chloride, pH 7.15. The effluent was the substantially- purified CMP product. The beads were washed with two additional 45 ml aliquots of pH 7.15 buffer, and eluted using 100 ml of 0.02 M sodium phosphate, 0.5 M sodium chloride, pH 3.45.

Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE using Coomassie Blue R-350 staining of a PhastGel Gradient 10-15 polyacrylamide gel from Pharmacia as illustrated in Fig.

12. Bands were identified via molecular weight markers (LMW Marker Kit, Pharmacia) in lane 1. A protein standard, bovine immunoglobulin (I-5506, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), was applied to lane 2. The whey and effluent from the anion exchanger were concentrated five-fold by ultrafiltration (Centriprep-10, Millipore, Bedford, MA) an applied to the gel. Based on the observation that the effluent from the anion exchanger (lane 4) was substantially the same in protein content as the whey (lane 3), most of the proteins in the whey were not adsorbed onto the anion exchanger.

The sodium chloride elution solution from the anion exchanger was concentrated 400-fold by ultrafiltration (8,000 NMWL Centricon Plus-80, Millipore) and applied to lane 5. It contained a large amount of CMP, the large band at 30 to 70 kDa, and some whey protein impurities, mostly B-lactoglobulin (18.3 kDa band) and some a-lactalbumin (14.4 kDa band).

The sodium hydroxide elution solution from the anion exchanger was concentrated 400-fold by ultrafiltration (Centricon Plus-80) and applied to lane 6. It did not contain CMP, but did contain a substantial amount of whey protein impurities, mostly B-lactoglobulin (18.3 kDa band). Thus, 0.3 M sodium chloride removed all the bound CMP from the anion exchanger, but not all the bound whey protein impurities, resulting in a purification of the CMP.

The effluent from the IMAC column was concentrated 50-fold and applied to lane 7. It contained a high concentration of CMP as seen by the large band at 30 to 70 kDa, and greatly reduced amounts of the impurity whey proteins a-lactalbumin and ß-lactoglobulin.

The first elution peak fraction from the IMAC column was concentrated 400- fold and applied to lane 8. It contained the whey protein impurities present in the sodium chloride elution solution from the anion exchanger (lane 5) and no CMP.

Thus, the IMAC column bound the whey protein impurities and but not the CMP product. The second elution peak from the IMAC column was concentrated 400-fold and applied to lane 9. It contained a small amount of residual whey protein impurities.

It is understood that the invention is not confined to the particular construction and arrangement of parts herein illustrated and described, but embraces such modified forms thereof as come within the scope of the claims following the Bibliography.

BIBLIOGRAPHY U. S. Patent 5,169,936 to Staples et al.

U. S. Patent 5,646,016 to McCoy et al.

U. S. Patent 5,310,648 to Arnold et al.

U. S. Patent 5,641,539 to Afeyan et al.

U. S. Patent 5,453,199 to Afeyan et al.

U. S. Patent 5,372,719 to Afeyan et al.

U. S. Patent 5,061,622 to Dosako et al.

U. S. Patent 5,075,424 to Tanimoto et al.

U. S. Patent 5,216,129 to Berrocal et al.

U. S. Patent 5,278,288 to Kawaski and Dosako.

U. S. Patent 5,280,107 to Kawasaki et al.

Japanese Patent JP 2-276542 to Tanimoto, M. et al.

Adisaputro, 1. A., et al., 1996, J. Liq. Chrom. & Rel. Technol., 19 (9) 1437-1450.

Arnold & Haymore, 1991, Science 252,1796-1797.

Ayers, J. S. et al., 1986, New Zealand J. Dairy Sci. Technol., 21,21-35.

Buecher, S. et al., 1994, J. Nutr. Biochem., 5,578-584.

Corring, T. et al., 1997, Proc. 1997Intl. Whey Conf., Oct. 27-29,34.

Dalgleish, D. G., 1982,"The Enzymatic Coagulation of Milk,"Developments in Dairy Chemistry-1 Functional Milk Proteins, (Edited by P. F. Fox), pp. 157-187, Applied Science Publishers, New York.

Etzel, M. R., 1995,"Whey Protein Isolation and Fractionation Using Ion Exchangers,"Bioseparation Processes in Foods, R. K. Singh and S. S. H. Rizvi (eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York, Ch. 12.

Fox, P. F., 1989,"The Milk Protein System,"Developments in Dairy Chemistry-4 Functional Milk Proteins, (Edited by P. F. Fox), pp 1-53. Elsevier Applied Science, New York.

Kawakami, H., et al., 1992,"Determination of K-casein Glycomacropeptide by High Performance Liquid Chromotography Without Trichloroacetic Acid Pretreatment,"Milchwissenschaft 47,688-693.

Kawaski, Y., et al., 1993,"pH-Dependent Molecular Weight Changes of K- casein Glycomacropeptide and its Preparation by Ultrafiltration,"Milchwissenschaft 48,191-195.

Marshall, S. C., 1991,"Casein Macropeptide From Whey-A New Product Opportunity,"Food Research Quarterly 51,86-91.

Outinen, M. et al., 1995,"Chromatographic isolation of K-casein macropeptide from cheese whey with a strong basic anion exchange resin,"Milchwissenschaft 50 (10), 570-574.

Pedersen, B., 1994, Food Technol. 48,96-98,76.

Saito, T., et al., 1991,"A New Isolation Method of Caseinoglycopeptide from Sweet Cheese Whey,"Journal of Dairy Science, 74,2831-2837.

Shammet et al., 1992,"Characteristics of Macropeptide Fraction Isolation from Whole Casein and Purified K-casein,"Milchwissenschaft 47,615-619.

Stan, E. et al., 1983, Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 96,889-891.

Tanimoto, M. et al., 1992,"Large-Scale Preparation of K-casein Glycomacropeptide from Rennet Casein Whey,"Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 56,140-141.