FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The instant invention relates to razors and more particularly to razor blades wherein the cutting area of the razor blade is profiled.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In particular, the instant invention is related to a razor blade. The shape of the blade plays an important role in the quality of the shaving. The blade typically has a continuously tapering shape converging toward an ultimate tip. The portion of the blade which is closest to the ultimate tip is called the tip edge.

If the tip edge is robust, it will enable less wear and a longer service life, but it would result in larger cutting forces, which adversely affect the shaving comfort. A thin tip edge profile leads to less cutting forces but also to an increase in risk of breakage or damage, and a shorter service life. Therefore, a cutting edge of a razor blade for which an optimal trade-off between the cutting forces, the shaving comfort and the service life is attained is desired.

To achieve the aforementioned object, the cutting edge of the razor blade is shaped, which is a result of a grinding process.

Historically, there has been a number of patents which are related to the geometry of some specific parts of the blade. A typical example is US 3,835,537, from 1971, which focuses on the geometry of the ultimate tip of the blade. It precisely defines the geometry up to 8000 Angstroms, that is 0.8 micrometers from the tip. This geometry mostly relates to the entry of the blade inside the hair to be cut (the diameter of which is generally of the order of 100 micrometers) .

Very few documents provide an overall view of the whole blade geometry. One of these documents is GB 1 465 697, from 1973. GB 1 465 697 first describes a prior art geometry both using numerical data and an included angle of 19°.

Compared to its prior art, the object of the invention of GB 1 465 697 is thinner in the first 100 micrometers from the tip, and has an included angle of between 12° and 17° further away from the tip.

Another document having a global approach is EP 0 126 128 from 1992. This document provides with a general overview of the shape of the blade in its first figure. Just as the above, it also shows an included angle of 14° or 12°. However, almost no description of this figure is provided, and the document mainly only relates to the geometry up to 100 micrometers from the tip. The detailed description contradicts this figure and mentions angles between 9° and 11,5°, possibly extendable between 7° and 14° to take the manufacturing dispersion into account. It has a more mathematical approach, and also defines two regions of interest with different types of geometry: Between 40 and 100 micrometers from the tip, the geometry of the edge is defined by the included angle whereby, up to 40 micrometers from the tip, the geometry of the edge tip is defined by a mathematical equation of the hyperbolic type, w=ad ⁿ , with the value for parameter "a" unspecified (less than 0.8), and the parameter "n" comprised between 0.65 and 0.75. Blades prior art to EP 0 126 128 are said to exhibit a value of "n" over 0.76.

WO 2003/006,218 claimed to be improving this shape by defining by another hyperbolic equation the shape of the ultimate tip, up to 5 micrometers from the tip.

Many documents mainly refer to the shape of the coated blade without detailing the shape of the underlying substrate, or simply by defining the included angle. EP 1 259 361B1 already describes such a razor blade by disclosing that the sharpened tip comprises adjacent facets having an included angle between 15 and 30 degrees, preferably about 19 degrees measured 40 microns from the sharpened tip. However, this cutting edge configuration discloses only a constant facet convergence towards to the tip of the blade.

Recently, it has been advertised a razor blade with a "thinner" edge in EP 2 323 819. This document gives ranges of dimensions for the geometry of the blade for the 16 microns from the tip. There appears to be some overlap between these data and the parameter sets disclosed in previous documents. Further, this document is totally silent about the geometry of the blade beyond 16 micrometers from the tip.

Although the present applicant considers that a thinner edge tip of the blade might present certain advantages, the definition of this geometry itself is not sufficient because, as mentioned above, such an edge might be weak. Further, as discussed above, there are also known some overall geometries of razor blades with a specific facet starting about 40 micrometers away from the tip. Which of these geometries would be suitable for a thinner blade edge tip is not straightforward, especially since the precise disclosure in EP 2 323 819 stops 16 micrometers from the tip. The applicant has therefore performed intensive work in order to determine the characteristics of the blade which, overall, could be beneficial when looking for a thinner edge geometry.

Enhancing razor blade properties is an extremely difficult process. First, blades are manufactured using an industrial process with very high throughput (millions of products per month) . Such industrial processes are not constant and there are dispersions between the products which must be kept within suitable ranges. Second, in order to know if a new razor blade provides enhanced performance, tests which simulate shaving must be performed, the results of which have to be correlated with razor blade properties.

When it comes to razor blade geometry, it is quite difficult to measure small features for complex geometries such as razor blade edges with good accuracy. One known method for measuring blade edge geometry is the so-called scanning-electron microscopy (SEM) . SEM is performed on a blade cross-section. Currently, there are doubts that SEM could provide relevant measurement data because it is compulsory to prepare a cross-section of the razor blade. The preparation of samples to be imaged is rather difficult, so that very few samples are imaged, and the results are likely to be non-statistically relevant.

Other methods for measuring blade geometry include interferometry and confocal microscopy. Both can be used non-invasively, and cope with the problem raised above with SEM. However, due to different approaches, these two methods provide different results. Further, the dispersion of the measurement method is also to be taken into account when assessing the measurement results.

Following heavy testing, it is believed that confocal microscopy can offer the most accurate measurement for the manufactured razor blade. Unless stated otherwise, the geometrical data provided later in this text were all obtained using this method.

It is an object of the invention to provide a razor blade, suitable for a shaving head of a shaver, wherein the wear of the razor blade is reduced and the service life is further extended, while the cutting forces are at least equally small and the shaving comfort at least equally high as in the known cutting members.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION To this aim, according to the invention, it is provided a razor blade substrate with a symmetrical tapering cutting edge ending in a sharpened tip wherein the substrate has a continuously tapering geometry toward the tip with a thickness of between 1.55 and 1.97 micrometers measured at a distance of five micrometers from the tip, a thickness of between 4.60 and 6.34 micrometers measured at a distance of twenty micrometers from the tip, a thickness of between 19.80 and 27.12 measured at a distance of hundred micrometers from the tip. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all blade edge measurement data provided in the claims are obtained through confocal microscopy measurements .

It has been found that the definition of the geometry of the profile at the above claimed specific keypoints is essential to define a properly supported thin edge tip, which would in turn provide an optimal trade-off between shaving performance, in terms of comfort, since it results in low cutting forces and adequate service life, due to the resulted geometry and the thickness beyond the 20μη area from the ultimate tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 6.50 and 8.94 micrometers measured at a distance of thirty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 8.40 and 11.54 micrometers measured at a distance of forty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 10.30 and 14.13 micrometers measured at a distance of fifty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 29.30 and 40.11 micrometers measured at a distance of hundred fifty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 38.80 and 49.74 micrometers measured at a distance of two hundred micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 48.30 and 59.37 micrometers measured at a distance of two hundred fifty micrometers from the tip .

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 57.80 and 69.00 micrometers measured at a distance of three hundred micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 67.30 and 78.62 micrometers measured at a distance of three hundred fifty micrometers from the tip .

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 1.80 and 1.95 micrometers measured at a distance of five micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 5.40 and 6.30 micrometers measured at a distance of twenty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 7.00 and 8.00 micrometers measured at a distance of thirty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate has a thickness of between 9.20 and 10.70 micrometers measured at a distance of forty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 11.20 and 13.10 micrometers measured at a distance of fifty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 23.00 and 25.10 micrometers measured at a distance of hundred micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 32.30 and 37.10 micrometers measured at a distance of hundred fifty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 41.00 and 47.30 micrometers measured at a distance of two hundred micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 51.40 and 56.50 micrometers measured at a distance of two hundred fifty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 61.00 and 65.40 micrometers measured at a distance of three hundred micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the substrate of the razor blade has a thickness of between 70.40 and 76.10 micrometers measured at a distance of three hundred fifty micrometers from the tip.

According to an aspect, the thickness of the cutting edge of the substrate is described with the following mathematical formulas:

t = a. (x ^b ) (A)

t = (c.x)+d (B)

wherein, in formulas A and B, a and c are constants from an interval )0, 1), b is a constant from an interval (0.5, 1), d is a constant from an interval (0.5, 20), x refers to a distance from the tip in micrometers and t refers to the thickness of the blade in micrometers, and wherein equation A is applied from the tip to a transition point, and either equation A or equation B elsewhere.

According to an aspect, the substrate is a stainless steel comprising in weight mostly iron and

0.62-0.75% of carbon, 12.7-13.7% of chromium,

0.45-0.75% of manganese,

- 0.20-0.50% of Silicon,

No more than traces of Molybdenum.

According to an aspect, the substrate is covered by a strengthening coating.

According to an aspect, the strengthening coating comprises Titanium and Boron.

According to an aspect, the substrate is covered by an interlayer, and the interlayer is covered by said strengthening layer.

According to an aspect, the strengthening layer is covered by a top layer.

According to an aspect, the top layer is covered by a polytetrafluoroethylene layer.

According to some specific embodiments, the thickness range between 50 and 350μη distance from the tip is important to be satisfied in order to achieve the desired geometry for shaving comfort and blade durability.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will readily appear from the following description of some of its embodiments, provided as non- limitative examples, and of the accompanying drawings.

On the drawings :

Fig. 1 is a schematic profile view of the ultimate tip of a razor blade of the present invention;

Fig. 2 is a schematic profile view of the cutting edge of a razor blade of the present invention;

Fig. 3 is a schematic profile view of a cutting edge of a razor blade covered by coating layers;

Fig. 4 is a schematic profile view of a cutting edge of a razor blade covered by coating layers of the present invention; Fig. 5 is a schematic view of the confocal measurement setup,

Fig. 6 and 7 are schematic views of a grinding machine,

- Figs. 8a and 8b are cross-sectional view of two embodiments of a razor blade.

On the different Figures, the same reference signs designate like or similar elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The desired blade profile can be achieved by a grinding process that involves two, three or four grinding stations. Figure 6 schematically shows a grinding installation 1 having two stations 2a and 2b. The base material is a continuous strip 3. The continuous strip 3 is made of the raw material for the razor blade substrate, which has previously been submitted to a suitable metallurgical treatment. This is for example stainless steel. The invention is also believed to be applicable to razor blades with a substrate of carbon steel. Another possible material is ceramics. These materials are considered insofar as they are suitable for razor blade materials. The metal strip is longer than a plurality of razor blades, for example it corresponds to 1000 to-be razor blades or more. Before grinding, the metal strip 3 has, generally speaking, a rectangular cross-section. The height of the metal strip can be slightly over the height of one finished razor blade, or slightly over the height of two finished razor blades, if grinding is to be performed on both edges. The thickness of the metal strip is the maximum thickness of the future razor blades. The strip may comprise through punches which enable to carry the strip along the installation 1 during the grinding process, and/or may be used to facilitate future separation of the individual razor blades from the strip. As the metal strip 3 moves along the grinding stations 2a, 2b, it is sequentially subjected to a rough grinding, a semi-finishing and a finishing grinding operation. Depending on the number of stations involved, the rough grinding and semi-finishing operation may be performed separately or in the same station. Thereafter, a finishing grinding operation can be required. The grinding steps are performed continuously, in that the strip is moved continuously through the stations without stopping.

When the rough grinding is performed separately, one or two grinding stations are required. Each grinding station may utilize one or two abrading wheels that are positioned parallel with respect to the moving strip. The abrading wheels have uniform grit size along their length. They may also be full body or helically grooved along their length. The material of the abrading wheels might use resin-bonded or vitrified diamond, resin-bonded or vitrified CBN (Cubic Boron Nitride) , or resin-bonded or vitrified silicon carbide, aluminium oxide grains or a mixture of the above grains.

When rough grinding and semi-finishing operations are performed simultaneously, a single grinding station is required for these operations. In this case, the station includes two abrading wheels formed into spiral helixes or a sequence of straight discs with a special profile. The rotational axes of these wheels may be parallel or positioned at an angle (¾i with respect to the moving strip. The tilt angle ranges between 0.5 degrees and 2 degrees. The grit size of the wheels may also be uniform or progressively decreasing along their length towards the exit of the strip. The material of the abrading wheels might use resin-bonded or vitrified diamond, resin-bonded or vitrified CBN (Cubic Boron Nitride) or resin-bonded or vitrified silicon carbide, aluminium oxide grains or a mixture of the above grains.

The finishing operation requires a single grinding station with two abrading wheels positioned at an angle with respect to the moving strip. The tilt angle a2 is reversed compared to the one used in the rough grinding operation. The tilted angle ranges between 1 degree and 5 degrees. The wheels form spiral helixes and are specially profiled. The abrasive material can be single grain or multi-grain material from the aforementioned CBN, silicon carbide, aluminium oxide or Diamond.

The process is tuned so as to obtain a symmetrical razor blade substrate 10 with a continuously tapering geometry toward the tip, as shown in Figure 2.

For the measurement of the blade geometry, surface roughness and grinded angle, a confocal microscope has been used. A typical example is shown on Figure 5. The confocal microscope comprises a LED light source 21, a pinhole plate 22, an objective lens 23 with a piezo drive 24 and a CCD camera 25. The LED source 21 is focused through the pinhole plate 22 and the objective lens 23 on to the sample 26 surface, which reflects the light. The reflected light is reduced by the pinhole of the pinhole plate 22 to that part which is in focus, and this falls on the CCD camera. The sample 26 shown here does not represent a razor blade. The razor blade is used with its side angled with respect to the lens focus axis passing through the lens 23 within the device. The confocal microscope has a given measurement field of, for example 200 ym x 200 ym. In the present example, a semi-transparent mirror 28 is used between the pinhole plate 22 and the lens 23 to direct the reflected light toward the CCD 25. In such case, another pinhole plate 27 is used for the filtering. However, in variant, the semi-transparent mirror 28 could be used between the light source and the pinhole plate 22, which would enable to use only one pinhole plate for both the emitted light signal and the reflected light signal.

The piezo-drive 24 is adapted to move the lens 23 along the light propagation axis, to change the position of the focal point in depth. The focal plane can be changed while keeping the dimensions of this measurement field.

To extend the measurement field (in particular in order to measure the blade edge further away from the tip) , one could perform another measurement at another location, and the data resulting from all measurements can be stitched .

The other side of the blade can then be measured, simply by flipping the blade to its other side.

According to one example, one could use a confocal microscope based on the Confocal Multi Pinhole (CMP) technology .

The pinhole plate 22 has then a large number of holes arranged in a special pattern. The movement of the pinhole plate 22 enables seamless scanning of the entire surface of the sample within the image field and only the light from the focal plane reaches the CCD camera, with the intensity following the confocal curve. Thus the confocal microscope is capable of high resolution in the nanometer range .

Also, other methods can be used to measure the thickness of the razor blade, for example measuring the cross-section of the blade by a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) . SEM is performed on a blade cross- section. Currently, there are doubts that SEM could provide relevant measurement data because it is compulsory to prepare a cross-section of the razor blade. The preparation of samples to be imaged is rather difficult, so that very few samples are imaged, and the results are likely to be non-statistically relevant. Besides, it is also possible to measure the thickness of the blade by an interferometer. For this measurement, white light probes from one of a variety of sources (halogen, LED, xenon, etc.) are coupled into an optical fibre in the controller unit and transmitted to an optical probe. The emitted light undergoes reflection from the blade and is collected back into the optical probe, passes back up the fibre where it is collected into an analysis unit. The modulated signal is subjected to a fast Fourier transform to deliver a thickness measurement. However, since this measurement is based on light interference from the surface of the blade, the thickness measured by this method can be adversely affected.

In order to check the repeatability of the above measurement methods, measurements of the same blade using the same method was performed at different times by different operators. This was performed for many blades. It is witnessed that confocal microscopy offers a much better repeatability and reproducibility than the interferometry method.

To be able to determine the correct thickness of the cutting edge, numerous measurements were carried out with the above mentioned measurement methods on several blades. The average results of these measurements are depicted in the following Table 1.

Thickness of the blade [μιη]

Distance from the tip Interferometer Confocal microscope

[μιη]

4 1.55 1.79

5 1.88 2.16

8 2.84 3.16

16 5.22 5.59

20 6.40 6.74

Table 1.: Comparison of thickness measuring methods

From the above Table 1, it is apparent that the results of the interferometry measurement method are different from the results of the confocal microscopy method. Therefore, and also in view of the better reproducibility of the measurement using confocal microscopy as discussed above, in the following, where dimensions are discussed, unless it is clear from the context that this is not the case, the dimensions are obtained by measurement using the above confocal microscopy method .

The razor blade, according to the present invention, comprises a blade substrate 10 which is sharpened. The blade substrate 10 has a planar portion 8, wherein the two opposite sides of the blade are parallel to each other. Further, the blade substrate also comprises a cutting edge portion 11, shown in cross-section on Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, connected to the planar portion 8, which sides 12 and 13 are tapered and converge to the substrate tip 14 of the cutting edge portion 11 of the blade. The thickness of the cutting edge portion 11 can be measured by a confocal microscope. The shape of the blade is profiled, meaning that the cross-section of the blade is roughly identical along the length of the blade.

Razor blades with various geometries have been manufactured, measured, and tested for shaving performance. Manufacture includes not only substrate sharpening by grinding, but also coatings as will be described below. For the shaving tests, only the grinding step was modified in order to generate various substrate geometries, the other process steps being kept equal.

The tests determined that the thinness of the tip edge can be defined by checking the thickness of control points located 5 and 20 micrometers from the tip. Further, the strength of the edge tip can be defined by checking the thickness of control points located 20 and 100 micrometers from the tip.

Further, the dimensions which are given here are average dimensions along the length of the blade. Due to the manufacturing process, a single blade does not have exactly the same profile along its whole length. Hence, each thickness value is an average value of various data obtained along the length, for example between 4 and 10 data .

After intense testing, it was determined that suitable shaving effects were obtained for blades having the following features:

The cutting edge portion 11 of the blade has a thickness of T5 between 1.55 and 1.97 micrometers measured at a distance D5 of five micrometers from the tip.

The cutting edge portion 11 of the blade has a thickness of T20 between 4.60 and 6.34 micrometers measured at a distance D20 of twenty micrometers from the tip.

The cutting edge portion 11 of the blade has a thickness of T100 between 19.80 and 27.12 micrometers measured at a distance D100 of hundred micrometers from the tip .

The above dimensions can be obtained through a dispersion of products manufactured using the same manufacturing process.

The blade has a smooth profile in between and beyond (both from and away from the tip) these control points. The above mentioned suitable results had the following profiles as detailed in following Table 2 (although measured thickness geometry in other check points is not considered as relevant in terms of qualifying the quality of the product) .

Tab e 2. Suitable blade profile parameters

More preferably, the thickness of the cutting edge 11 of one of the aforementioned embodiment has the following configuration of thicknesses. The thickness T5 is between 1.80 and 1.95 micrometers measured at a distance D5 of five micrometers from the tip. The thickness T20 is between 5.40 and 6.30 micrometers measured at a distance D20 twenty micrometers from the tip. The thickness of T100 is between 23.00 and 25.10 micrometers measured at a distance D100 hundred micrometers from the tip.

In such cases, the thickness configuration is detailed in following Table 3.

Lower Upper

Distance

thickness thickness

from tip

limit limit

[μιη]

[μιη] [μιη]

5 1.80 1.95 20 5.40 6.30

30 7.00 8.00

40 9.20 10.70

50 11.20 13.10

100 23.00 25.10

150 32.30 37.10

200 41.00 47.30

250 51.40 56.50

300 61.00 65.40

350 70.40 76.10

Table 3. Suitable blade profile parameters An example of a specific embodiment of the invention, has the following thickness configuration, as detailed in the following Table 4.

Table 4. Blade profile parameters according to the first embodiment of the invention

The blade thickness increase rate (slope) from the tip up to the transition point should be continuously decreasing, making the blade edge easier to penetrate the hair leading to better comfort. The blade profile after the transition point (from 40 μιη to 350 μιη) should be lying in a specific range of values in order to support a geometrically smooth transition from the first 40 μιη to the unground part of the blade In that region, the thickness increase rate is less than, or equal to, the increase rate at 40 μιη.

The blade edge profile generated by the rough grinding stage, typically covering an area between 50 - 350 μιη from the tip, determines the material removal rate of the finishing operation. Generally the finishing grinding stage is mainly called to smoothen out the excess surface roughness produced by rough grinding along with the final shaping of the blade edge profile. For optimal process efficiency, the material removal rate of finishing grinding wheel should be kept minimum but such that the induced surface roughness ranges between 0.005 - 0.040 μιη.

For example, the thickness of the aforementioned blade profile can be described with the following mathematical formulas:

t = a. (x ^b ) (A)

t = (c.x)+d (B)

In the above formulas a and c are constants from an interval [0, 1], b is also a constant from an interval [0.5, 1], d is a constant from an interval [0.5, 20], x refers to a distance from the tip in micrometers and t refers to the thickness of the blade in micrometers.

One or more formulas (A) can be applied one after the other to the portion of the blade extending from the tip to a transition point, and one or more formulas (B) can be applied one after the other from the transition point to the unground portion of the blade.

For some embodiments, formula (A) describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 0 to 40 micrometers from the tip. For example, with constants a=0.5 and b=0.8. Formula (B) describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 40 to 350 micrometers from the tip, with constants c=0.2 and d=1.5.

According to a second embodiment of the invention, the thickness of the cutting edge 11 of the blade has the following thickness configuration as detailed in following Table 5. Distance from the tip Thickness

[μιη] [μιη]

5 1.82

20 5.82

30 8.33

40 10.84

50 13.35

100 25.90

150 38.45

200 47.38

250 56.25

300 65.13

350 74.00

Table 5. blade profile parameters according to the second

embodiment of the invention

Further, the thickness of the aforementioned blade profile can be described by the above mentioned mathematical formulas (A) and (B) .

For the second embodiment, formula (A) describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 0 to 20 micrometers, with constants a=0.47 and b=0.84. Formula (B) describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 20 to 150 micrometers, with constants c=0.251 and d=0.800. Besides, formula (B) also describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 150 to 350 micrometers, with constants c=0.1775 and d=11.8750.

According to a third embodiment of the invention, the thickness of the cutting edge 11 of the blade has the following thickness configuration as detailed in the following Table 6.

Distance from the tip [μιη] Thickness [μιη]

5 1.60

20 4.80

30 7.00

40 9.15

50 11.25

100 22.44

150 31.26

200 40.86

250 50.28

300 59.57

350 68.75

Table 6. blade profile parameters according to the third

embodiment of the invention

Further, the thickness of the aforementioned blade profile can be described by the above mentioned mathematical formula (A) .

For the third embodiment, formula (A) describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 0 to 20 micrometers, with constants a=0.45 and b=0.79. Besides, formula (A) also describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 20 to 350 micrometers, with constants a=0.296 and b=0.93.

According to a fourth embodiment of the invention, the thickness of the cutting edge 11 of the blade has the following thickness configuration, as detailed in the following Table 7.

Table 7. blade profile parameters according to the fourth

embodiment of the invention Further, the thickness of the aforementioned blade profile can be described by the above mentioned mathematical formulas (A) and (B) .

For the fourth embodiment, formula (A) describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 0 to 20 micrometers, whith constants a=0.54 and b=0.80. Besides, formula (A) also describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 20 to 200 micrometers, whith constants a=0.40 and b=0.90. Formula (B) describes the thickness of the cutting edge from 200 to 350 micrometers, with constants c=0.18 and d=11.10.

All the above described embodiments, which relate to the tip and to the cutting edge of the razor of the present invention can be described by formula (A) and formula (B) or with the combination of both formulas. The formulas (A) and (B) describe different sections measured from the tip 14 of the razor.

The razor blade substrate 10 comprising the razor blade edge 11 is made of stainless steel. A suitable stainless steel comprises mainly iron, and, in weight

- 0.62-0.75% of carbon,

12.7-13.7% of chromium,

0.45-0.75% of manganese,

- 0.20-0.50% of Silicon,

No more than traces of Molybdenum.

Other stainless steels can be used within the invention. Other materials which are known as razor blade substrate materials, could be considered.

The further manufacturing steps of a razor blade are described below.

The blade substrate 10 comprising a cutting edge portion 11 having a profiled geometry and having a tapering geometry with two substrate sides 12, 13 converging toward a substrate tip 14, is covered by a strengthening coating 16 deposited on the razor blade substrate at least at the blade edge portion. Coating layers are implemented on the blade edge substrate to improve the hardness of the blade edge and thereby enhance the quality of the shaving.

The coating layers enable to reduce the wear of the blade edge, improve the overall cutting properties and prolong the usability of the razor blade.

The strengthening coating 16 covering the substrate tip 14, has a profiled geometry and has a tapering geometry with two coating sides converging toward a coating tip. On Fig. 3, the blade edge substrate 10 is coated with a strengthening coating layer 16 and a lubricating layer 17. The lubricating layer, which may comprise fluoropolymer, is commonly used in the field of razor blades for reducing friction during shaving. The strengthening coating layer 16 is used for its mechanical properties. The strengthening coating layer 16 may comprise titanium and boron. More precisely, the strengthening coating layer 16 may be made of titanium and boron with a low content of impurities. The content of impurities is kept as low as economically viably possible. The strengthening coating layer 16 can be prepared with various proportions of titanium and boron within the layer. Other embodiments may comprise a mixture of chromium and carbon, DLC, amorphous diamond, or else. Besides, the cutting edge 11 of the blade can be covered by and interlayer 15. For example, the interlayer 15 comprises, preferably is made of Titanium, notably in the case of a titanium- and boron-containing strengthening coating. In a case where the blade is covered by a Titanium interlayer 15, the interlayer 15 is implemented prior to the strengthening coating layer 16. Thus, the coating layer configuration of the cutting edge 11 of the blade comprises a Ti interlayer 15 covering the cutting edge 11 of the blade and strengthening coating layer 16 covering the Ti interlayer 15. Further, the strengthening coating layer 16 can be covered by a top layer 20. An example of a top layer is a top layer comprising, especially made of Chromium. The top layer 20 comprising Chromium can also covered by a lubricating layer 17, which may comprise fluoropolymer, as shown on Fig . 4.

The blade can be fixed or mechanically assembled to a razor head, and the razor head itself can be part of a razor. The blade can be movably mounted in a razor head, and mounted on springs which urge it toward a rest position. The blade could be fixed, notably welded to a support 29, notably a metal support with a L-shaped cross- section, as shown in Fig. 8a. Alternatively, the blade could be an integrally bent blade, as shown on Fig. 8b, where the above disclosed geometry applies between the blade tip and the bent portion 30.