Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
REACTIVE SUSPENSION
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2000/063033
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
The present invention relates to a reactive suspension system which counterbalances the effects of side forces using conventional suspension elements, without increasing rigidity on flat ground and in a straight path and without using any engine power. It is essentially characterised in that it consists of a transverse rod (1) or an equivalent structure which is attached to the structure (9) of the vehicle by means of a sliding element (7) or another functionally similar element, and the ends (2) of which are attached to the arms (3) of the wheels (4) so that, on the transverse vertical plane, the movement of the wheels (4) in relation to this rod (1) is approximately rectilinear and vertical, the aforementioned wheels (4) being supported by springs (5) which are attached to the structure of the vehicle body (9) at points (6) situated on the inside of the vertical of the points of articulation thereof with the same wheels, so that a lateral component of the resulting force applied to the vehicle body will bring towards the vertical the springs situated on the side towards which the force pushes the vehicle body, making the vertical component of its reaction bigger and tending to lift the vehicle and, inversely, on the opposite side, the vertical component of the reaction of the springs will be lower since their position becomes less vertical, meaning that the weight of the vehicle will lower it on this side.

Inventors:
RELOGIO RIBEIRO ANTONIO MANUEL (PT)
Application Number:
PCT/PT1999/000009
Publication Date:
October 26, 2000
Filing Date:
April 20, 1999
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
INST SUPERIOR TECNICO (PT)
RELOGIO RIBEIRO ANTONIO MANUEL (PT)
International Classes:
B60G9/00; B60G21/05; (IPC1-7): B60G21/05
Foreign References:
EP0163382A11985-12-04
GB965667A1964-08-06
US2689747A1954-09-21
US2978255A1961-04-04
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Pereira Da, Cruz João (14 -103 Lisboa, PT)
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS
1. Reactive suspension which counterbalances the effects of side forces using conventional suspension elements, without increasing rigidity on flat ground and in a straight path and without using any engine power, characterised in that it consists of a transverse rod (1) or an equivalent structure with relative transverse movement, which is attached to the structure by means of a sliding element (7) or another approximately equivalent element, and the ends (2) of which are attached to the arms (3) of the wheels (4) so that, on the transverse vertical plane, the oscillating movement of the wheels (4) in relation to this rod (1) is approximately rectilinear and vertical, the aforementioned wheels (4) being supported by springs (5) which are attached to the structure of the vehicle body (9) at points (6) situated on the inside of the vertical of the points at which they articulate with the hubs of said wheels, so that any lateral component of the resulting force applied to the vehicle body will bring towards the vertical the springs situated on the side towards which the force pushes the vehicle body, making the vertical component of its reaction bigger and tending to lift the vehicle and, inversely, on the opposite side, the vertical component of the reaction of the springs will be made lower since their position becomes less vertical, meaning that the weight of the vehicle will lower it on this side.
2. Reactive suspension according to claim 1, characterised in that the sliding element (7) or an equivalent attachment only allows the aforementioned rod (1) to make relative transverse movement, the amplitude of which is conditioned by a springs (8) which attach the rod (1) to the structure (9) of the vehicle, so that the permitted movement does not go beyond the point at which the springs (5) become vertical, and which simultaneously regulate the relative movement between the vehicle body (9) and the rod (1).
3. Reactive suspension according to claim 2, characterised in that the sliding element (7) which attaches the rod (1) to the structure (9) of the vehicle can be replaced by another one which allows for the same type of movement, even if only approximately.
4. Reactive suspension according to claim 1, characterised in that the system is assembled in such a way that when the vehicle is in its normal position, i. e. stationary on flat ground, the springs (5) are in a divergent position, i. e. the ends attached to the wheels (4) are further apart than the ends which are attached to the vehicle body (9).
5. Reactive suspension according to claims 1 and 2, characterised in that the movement of the aforementioned rod (1) is limited so that even in its extreme positions, the line of action of any of the springs (5) never forms a right angle with the line of action of the rod (1).
6. Reactive suspension according to the previous claims, characterised in that the mechanism described above makes it possible to adapt traditional suspension systems, by replacing the attachment of the suspension arms to the vehicle body with the attachment thereof to the ends of a transverse rod (1).
Description:
DESCRIPTION REACTIVE SUSPENSION The present document relates to a reactive suspension system.

The suspension of a motor vehicle is responsible for keeping its wheels in contact with the ground, in order to ensure traction and allow for an adequate level of comfort while maintaining the stability of the vehicle. However, to meet these requirements is a matter of compromise. In particular, when the vehicle is subject to a side force, it is difficult to guarantee both the comfort of a soft suspension and stability, since the latter is normally achieved by means of a more rigid suspension system which prevents large side oscillations. The presence of a lateral component in the resultant force that the vehicle is subjected to occurs particularly on bends and in off-road situations. In these cases, the tendency of the vehicle is to roll sideways, which on the one hand will increase the lateral component to which passengers and the vehicle's load are subjected to, thus causing greater discomfort and a risk of unbalancing the vehicle's load, and on the other hand it will move the centre of gravity to the same side as the lateral force, which will increase its effect even further.

Background to the invention In order to resolve or at least minimise this problem without using very hard or uncomfortable suspensions, active suspensions have been developed in order to try to counterbalance the effect of the side forces. However, this solution is not without problems of its own, notably complexity, manufacturing costs and the fact that it uses part of the available power, which are by no means of minor importance. Of the solutions already used, special mention should be made of the one that is normally used, i. e. a stabiliser consisting of a torsion rod which reduces the lateral inclination which occurs when the vehicles goes round a bend.

Other suspension systems use transverse rods mounted across the vehicle, such as the suspension system described in European patent n° EP349584, or suspension systems which make it possible to create movements which give the vehicle greater stability, such as the suspension systems described in European patent n°s EP348623 and EP348817. All these documents refer to suspension systems which reduce the sideways roll of the vehicle. However, the composition and functioning thereof are complex and different from the suspension system described in this patent application.

Summary of the invention The solution proposed by the suspension system which is the subject of the invention makes it possible to control the sideways oscillation of the vehicle without draining the engine power supply and it is simple enough to avoid a significant increase in production costs.

It is a simple mechanism which makes use of conventional suspension elements and, without increasing the rigidity of the suspension when driving over flat ground in a straight line, it redistributes this rigidity by increasing it on the side to which the lateral force pushes the vehicle and reducing it on the other side. In this way, when the vehicle goes round a bend, this suspension makes it possible to compensate, to an extent to be defined when the system is implemented, the effect of the centrifugal component of the force, by causing the vehicle body to roll into the bend. Likewise, even when driving in a straight line, it is possible to compensate any possible lateral inclination of the ground, thus ensuring a more horizontal position for the vehicle body.

The behaviour of the vehicle is therefore improved as described above, without the inconveniences of active suspensions.

Short description of the drawings For an easier understanding of the description give below, a sheet of drawings showing one embodiment of the model is attached hereto by way of a non-restrictive example, in which: Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the suspension described in the invention; Figure 2, which is also a schematic diagram, shows how the suspension which is the subject of the invention works.

Detailed description of the invention As can be seen, the suspension described in the invention, as shown in figure 1, consists of a transverse rod (1), or a functionally equivalent structure, the ends (2) of which are attached to the arms (3) of the wheels (4) so that, on the transverse vertical plane, the oscillating movement of the wheels (4) in relation to the rod (1) is approximately rectilinear and vertical. Furthermore, the springs (5) which support the wheels (4) are attached to the structure of the vehicle body (9) at points (6) situated on the inside of the vertical of the points at which they articulate with the hubs of said wheels.

Each end of the rod (1) has a geometric configuration or even a structure suitable for attaching the suspension arms (3).

The rod (1) is attached to the structure of the vehicle by means of a sliding element (7) or an equivalent attachment which only allows it to make relative transverse movement, the amplitude of which is conditioned by a spring or springs (8) which attach the rod (1) to the structure of the vehicle, so that the movement allowed does not go beyond the point at which any of the springs (5) of the wheels (4) take on a vertical position, and which simultaneously regulate the relative movement between the vehicle body (9) and the rod (1).

In a conventional suspension system, each wheel is attached to the structure of the vehicle by means of an articulated arm system and a set of elastic and dissipative elements. The description hereunder makes reference to the points where these arms articulate with the structure, hereby referred to as points of articulation. It also covers the points where the elastic elements or springs are attached to the structure, hereby referred to as suspension points. Each pair of wheels is also covered (right and left wheel of each axle).

Thus, this new suspension consists of. a rod or equivalent structure (1) between the points of articulation of each pair of wheels (4). The rod moves transversally in relation to the vehicle body (9), but the maximum amplitude of this movement is limited and is centred by a spring-shock absorber system.

The points of articulation of each wheel are situated at the ends (2) of a rod (1) which can move transversally in relation to the body of the vehicle within the limits imposed by the project.

The suspension points remain inside the structure of the body (9) of the vehicle in suitably chosen places. The selection suitable for each implementation should take into account the elastic and dissipative characteristics of the wheels and the shock absorbers, the amplitude of the lateral movement permitted for the rod (generally a few centimetres) and the location of the suspension points in the structure of the vehicle, the positioning and the dimension of the rod and the position of the points of articulation in the rod.

The system should be assembled in such a way that, when the vehicle is in its normal position, i. e. stationary on flat ground, the springs (5) are in a divergent position, i. e. the ends attached to the wheels are further apart than the ends which are attached to the vehicle body, the rod remaining horizontal.

The movement of the rod should be limited so that even in its extreme positions, the line of action of the springs (5) never forms a right angle with the line of action of the rod (1).

Furthermore, the rigidity of the springs (5) should be sufficient for supporting the maximum weight of the vehicle with the rod in any position, at an adequate distance from the ground.

Under these circumstances, a lateral component of the resulting force applied to the vehicle body will bring towards the vertical the springs situated on the side towards which this force pushes the vehicle body, making the vertical component of its reaction bigger and tending to lift the vehicle. Inversely, on the opposite side, the vertical component of the reaction of the springs will be lower since their position becomes less vertical, meaning that the weight of the vehicle will lower it on this side. Thus, a signal is generated opposite to the one caused by the lateral component considered initially.

The dimensions of the springs and the judicious positioning of its rest points make it possible to project this suspension in order to partially or totally compensate the tendency to roll sideways, or even overcompensate it (which would usually not be of any practical interest in normal motor vehicles).

The mechanism described above makes it possible to adapt traditional suspension systems, by replacing the attachment of the suspension arms to the vehicle body with the attachment thereof to the ends of the transverse rod described above.

Since this mechanism can be associated to various types of traditional suspension, for example superimposed triangles, oscillating arm, etc., the geometry will be suitable for the implementation in question.