Rear projection display devices, such as projection televisions, are well known. Such systems generally include a video source, projection optics, and a screen. More recently, rear projection type displays have incorporated liquid crystal display (LCD) projectors as the imaging source. LCD projectors are often used to reduce the overall size of the rear projection device. It has been proposed that such devices can be employed not only as televisions, but in any type of display device including computer monitors and the like.

Over the past few years, efforts have been made to reduce the overall size of the projection devices, particularly in the depth direction. Depth reduction is important to accommodate use in smaller rooms in a home, for example, or to fit on a desktop, as in the case of a computer monitor. One way to reduce the overall depth of a rear projection system is to use one or more mirrors to fold the optical path of light from the image projector to the screen. In such a system, a projected cone of light travels a greater distance within a given volume by redirecting the cone of light back and forth over a given distance within the housing of the projection device. As the light travels over at least a portion of the distance two or more times, the cone of light expands to fill a desired screen dimension. One particular folded optical path uses polarized light to fold the optical path by selectively reflecting and transmitting light depending on its polarization.

Summarv Generally, the present invention relates to rear projection display systems which use different polarization states to fold an optical projection path. In one embodiment, a rear projection display includes a screen, oriented in the direction of a first plane, having a height and a width. The display further includes a

polarization sensitive beam splitter extending in the direction of a second plane which forms an angle with the first plane. The polarization sensitive beam splitter transmits light of a first polarization state and reflects light of a second polarization state. The distance between the screen and a most distant point on the polarization sensitive beam splitter measured along the direction orthogonal to the screen is less than the smaller of the height and the width of the screen. A light source projects a light beam onto the polarization sensitive beam splitter. Light of the first polarization state is transmitted through the polarization sensitive beam splitter. A polarization state converter receives and converts the light transmitted through the polarization sensitive beam splitter from the first polarization state to the second polarization state. The converted light is incident on and reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter towards the screen.

In one embodiment, the polarization sensitive beam splitter reflects light of one linear polarization state and transmits light of another linear polarization state.

One such beam splitter includes a polymeric multilayer optical film. In still another embodiment, the polarization sensitive beam splitter reflects one type of circularly polarized light and transmits another.

One embodiment of the invention includes a light sensor which receives light transmitted through the screen. The light sensor may be used to remotely control functions of the display.

In accordance with still another embodiment of the invention, a rear projection display includes a light source which projects a light beam along an optical path with a cone angle of at least 15°. A polarization sensitive beam splitter is disposed in the optical path of the light beam and is operative over the entire range of incidence angles to substantially transmit incident light of a first polarization state and reflect incident light of a second polarization state. A polarization state converter receives light transmitted through the polarization sensitive beam splitter and converts the received light to the second polarization state. The converted light is reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter toward a screen for display.

In still another embodiment, a rear projection display includes an image source which is disposed within a housing of the display such that at least a portion of the image source is in a space between the polarization sensitive beam splitter and an adjacent portion of the housing.

The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present invention. The figures and detailed description which follow more particularly exemplify these embodiments.

Brief Description of the Draines The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which: Figures 1 and la illustrates a schematic cross-sectional and exploded view of a rear projection display in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 illustrates a manner in which improved off-angle performance of a rear projection display in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention can be achieved; Figure 3 illustrates an advantage of a folded optical path in accordance with an embodiment of the invention; Figure 4 illustrates another advantage of a folded optical path in accordance with an embodiment of the invention; Figure 5 illustrates still another advantage of a folded optical path in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; Figure 6 illustrates second embodiment of the invention which facilitates vertical and horizontal tiling of multiple rear projection displays; Figure 7 illustrates a front view of tiled rear projection displays in accordance with another particular embodiment of the invention; Figure 8 illustrates still another embodiment of the invention; Figure 9 illustrates still another embodiment of the invention; and

Figure 10 illustrates another embodiment of the invention.

Detailed Description The present invention is applicable to a number of different rear projection display systems. One particular embodiment of a rear projection display system is illustrated in Figure 1 and in the exploded view of Figure la. The rear projection display 101 includes an image source 103, a polarization sensitive beam splitter 105, a polarization state converter 107 and a screen 109. The screen 109 generally has a height and width dimension and is oriented in a plane. The screen 109 may be flat or may have some other shape. For example, the screen may be slightly curved.

The relationship between the height and width of the screen is typically determined by the aspect ratio of the display. While the terms height and width are used to facilitate a discussion of the invention, these terms are relative to the orientation of the display and should not be deemed to limit the invention too a particular orientation. The polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 forms an angle Os with the plane of the screen 109.

The general arrangement of a projection system like the one depicted in Figure 1 provides a number of advantages. For example, the horizontal distance d between the screen 109 and the most distant point on the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105, measured along a direction orthogonal to the plane of the screen, may be less than the smaller dimension of the height and width of the screen. The projection system can also accommodate relatively large angles of incidence on the various components with substantially uniform performance. Additionally, a portion of the image source can be disposed within the housing 111 in the space 110 defined between the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 and an adjacent portion of the housing 111. A polymeric multilayer optical film can be used as the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 to provide particularly uniform performance over a wide range of incidence angles.

In the embodiment illustrated in Figure 1, the image source 103 is positioned behind the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 and is used to project an image to be displayed on the screen 109. The optical path of the projected

image in the illustrated embodiment sequentially includes the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 (in transmission), the polarization state converter 107, the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 (in reflection) and the screen 109. As described more fully below, the polarization sensitive beam splitter 103 is used to transmit light of one polarization state and reflect light of another polarization state.

It should be noted that a polarization sensitive beam splitter will typically transmit and reflect at least some of light of each polarization state. However, as used herein, one state is optimally transmitted through the polarization sensitive beam splitter while the other state is optimally reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter.

The image source 103 can be used to produce a substantially polarized image (i. e., a group of light rays having a similar polarization which form an image, when collectively projected on a screen). The polarized image has a polarization state Pt which is optimally transmitted through the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105. The image projected by the image source depends on the type of application for which the rear projection display is employed. In a rear projection television, for example, the image projected corresponds to a television signal received from an antenna, cable, satellite dish, etc. In a rear projection computer monitor, the image corresponds to the video output of a computer. In each case, the rear projection display may further include audio reproduction equipment as is known in the art.

After passing through the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 the image is incident on the polarization state converter 107. The polarization state converter 107 converts the polarization state of the image to a reflection polarization state Pr.

The converted light beam is reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 towards the screen 109. The image is transmitted through screen 109 for viewing.

In the illustrated embodiment, the positioning of the image source behind the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 and screen 109 permits the display device to be constructed in a more compacted manner. The invention also facilitates a construction in which the overall height of the rear projection display device is less than twice the height of the screen with a relatively small depth.

In one embodiment of the invention, linear polarization is used. The polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 optimally transmits linearly polarized Light oriented in a first direction and optimally reflects linearly polarized light oriented substantially orthogonal to the first direction. The image source may include, for example, a projector which outputs an image which is substantially linearly polarized such as a liquid crystal display (LCD) projector. The linearly polarized image produced by the image source 103 is projected on the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 with a polarization state Pt which transmits through the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105. The polarized image transmitted through the beam splitter is incident on a polarization state converter 107. When using a linear polarization sensitive beam splitter, the polarization state converter 107 may be include a retarder and a mirror. This combination rotates the linear polarization direction of the image source to produce a light beam having a linear polarization Pr which is reflected by the linear polarization sensitive beam splitter. Thus, the rotated polarized image is reflected by the linear polarization sensitive beam splitter towards the screen 109.

While a linearly polarized light source is described, it will be appreciated that unpolarized light such as from a cathode ray tube (CRT) could be used. In such an embodiment the linear polarization sensitive beam splitter further functions as a polarizer for the projected light. In such a system, however, approximately 50% of the initial light will be reflected by the beam splitter and will not contribute to the brightness of the final image.

Light transmitted through the screen 109 is spread to at an appropriate viewing angle. Any of a number of known rear projection screens may be used.

For example, commercially available rear projection screens available from Dai Nippon Company of Japan and Stewart Company of Torrance California are suitable for the invention. Beaded screens available from the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company of Minnesota could also be used. One screen, particularly suited for use in such a rear projection display system, includes a diffuser which diffuses the light. The diffuser may be a bulk diffuser or a surface diffuser. The viewing angle of the screen 109 may be adjusted in order to accommodate a

particular end-use application for the rear projection display. For example, if the rear projection monitor is to be vertically and horizontally tiled, as described more fully below, relatively large vertical and horizontal viewing angles may be required to provide uniform brightness. Additional screen elements, such as leuticular and Fresnel lenses, for example, may also be used. Screens also vary in contrast, gain and uniformity. The type of screen used will generally be selected in view of the ultimate application for the display device.

As noted above, the embodiment illustrated in Figure 1 can be arranged in a manner which significantly reduces the overall size of the display. The size of the display depends in part on the projection cone angle Oc (i. e., the angular width of a cone of light rays diverging from the light source). Generally, the cone angle is selected to be large as possible under the geometric constraints of the optical path in order to minimize the overall dimensions of the system. If the cone angle is selected to be too large in a folded optical path, however, certain light rays within the cone angle may be blocked by components of the system in one or more of the folds. For a given cone angle, the arrangement of Figure 1 provides a relatively long optical path and permits construction with a small depth dimension.

The arrangement of Figure 1 permits the use of relatively large cone angles.

For example, a cone angle greater than 10° can be used with substantially uniform performance of the polarization sensitive beam splitter over the range of incidence angles. Cone angles ranging from 15° to 50° are particularly suited to the invention and provide relatively uniform performance for the various angles of incidence. A suitable cone angle can be selected in consideration of the size of the projector, the requirements for height and depth of the projection system and/or the desired relative positioning of the various optical components. The projected image size on the screen is also a function of the cone angle.

Designs which minimize depth and/or height of the overall rear projection display can be achieved using cone angles greater than 30°. For example, cone angles ranging from 30° to 36° are well suited for such rear projection displays.

Where vertical tiling of multiple units on top of one another is desired, the relative orientation of the projector and the polarization state converter must be taken into

account. Generally, if vertical tiling is not required, the depth of the system can be reduced by changing the orientation of the image projector, polarization sensitive beam splitter and/or polarization state converter. Such changes, however, may increase the overall height of the system.

In many instances, it is also desirable to orient the various elements of the rear projection display in a manner which provides normal cone incidence on the screen 109. The angular orientation of the components may be described by the angle Opsbs of the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105, the angle Opc, of the polarization state converter 107 and the angle nuls, of the light source 103. The angles are depicted in Figure 1 and are measured from a line orthogonal to the plane of the screen 109. Normal cone incidence on the screen 109 can be obtained by selecting the angles of the various components to satisfy the relationship 20pubs uls+2Opc. It is also possible to adjust the angular incidence on the screen to optimize viewing in different applications. A system having a projection cone angle Oc can be construction with a small depth dimension by selecting the angle Os between the screen 109 and the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 to satisfies the relationship Os = 45--OC/4.

As noted above, the screen 109 diffuses the light as it transmits through the screen. This provides for improved uniform brightness over a wide range of viewing angles. The screen 109 may also have its rear surface coated with an antireflection (AR) coating or be matted iii order to reduce unwanted ghost images.

The source of one particular unwanted ghost image is illustrated by ray path 113 in Figure 1. Light exiting the image source transmits through the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 and is converted by the polarization state converter 107 to a reflection polarization state Pr. The light is reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 toward the screen 109. A portion of the light may be reflected from the back surface of the screen 109 rather than being transmitted through the screen 109. This portion of light is then again reflected from the polarization sensitive beam splitter 105 and exits the screen as a ghost image at point 114. A matte or antireflection (AR) coated rear surface of the screen 109 significantly

reduces or eliminates the ghost image by reducing or preventing reflection from the rear surface of the screen. When the screen is made up of multiple elements, it is generally desirable to dispose the AR coating on the rearmost surface of the elements (e. g., the surface closest to the polarization sensitive beam splitter).

As noted above, a linear polarization sensitive beam splitter may be used in certain embodiments. A polymeric multilayer optical film is particularly suited for use in such a system. A linear polarization sensitive beam splitter may be constructed by laminating or otherwise adhering such a film to a sheet of glass or other optically neutral substrate. Suitable lamination techniques for laminating multilayer optical films to glass include wet lamination roll processes, autoclave lamination processes and pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) roll lamination processes. The substrate should be substantially flat as should the polymeric multilayer optical film when laminated to the substrate. Multilayer optical films laminated to glass are available from the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Other potential lamination sources include Lamination Technologies of Los Angeles, California, Optical Coating Laboratories, Inc. of Peteluma, California, Nitto Denko Company of Japan, Sumitomo Chemical Company of Japan and San Rietz of Japan. When the reflective polarizing film is laminated to glass, the glass side of the laminate can be placed toward the image source to help reduce ghost images which might otherwise result from reflections at the glass-air interface of the polarization sensitive beam splitter back towards the screen.

One type of polymeric reflective polarizing films is available from the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company under the name of Dual Brightness Enhancement Film (DBEF). Other reflective polarizing films are described in U. S. patent applications Serial No. 08/402,041, filed March 10,1995 and entitled Optical Film, and Serial No. 08/610,092, filed February 29,1996, entitled An Optical Film, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. As described therein, such films have high performance over a wide range of incidence angles and are particularly suited for use in the present invention. A polymeric multilayer optical film based linear polarization sensitive beam splitter can be oriented to reflect p- polarized light and transmit s-polarized light or to reflect s-polarized light and

transmit p-polarized light. The orientation is selected in consideration of the polarization direction of light output from the image source. In general, the projection system can be constructed to use any orientation of the polymeric multilayer optical film. For example, orientations using mixed polarization states (e. g., p and s) can be used.

In the embodiment of the projection system of the present invention illustrated in Figure 1, the image source is positioned above the polarization sensitive beam splitter. This arrangement tends to reduce any back reflection of overhead ambient light which may transmit through the screen. Such an arrangement may also provide improved transfer of heat generated by the light source away from the interior components. The general geometry, however, can be readily inverted in the vertical direction (see Figure 6). The display could also be oriented in a manner which rotates the entire system by 90° about an axis orthogonal to the plane of the screen. The display could also be tipped until the screen is located in a plane substantially horizontal. Such a display could be incorporated into the surface of a desk, for example, for computer monitor applications.

The present invention provides a number of advantages by virtue of its design and optical path, examples of which are illustrated in Figures 2-5. Some advantages are particularly important when a linear polarization sensitive beam splitter is used. For example, the linear polarization sensitive beam splitter may serve multiple functions by virtue of the optical path and design.

In systems using linearly polarized light, a polarization state converter can be used to rotate the polarization direction of light as illustrated in Figure 2. The polarization state converter includes a mirror 201 and a/4-wave retarder 203.

Commercially available l/4-wave retarders suitable for use in the present invention are available from Nitto Denko Corporation of Japan. In Figure 2, the l/4-wave retarder is disposed on the mirror. It should be appreciated, however, that physical proximity is not required. In general, the retarder can be located anywhere in the optical path between transmission through the polarization sensitive beam splitter

and reflection by the polarization sensitive beam splitter, provided the path permits the light to pass through the retarder twice.

The l/4-wave retarder/mirror combination rotates the polarization direction of linearly polarized light by 90° for example, from a transmission polarization state Pt (e. g., p-or s-polarized light) to a reflection polarization state Pr (e. g., s-or p- polarized light). To maximize performance, it is generally desirable that the retarder/mirror combination rotate the polarization state of substantially all of the incident light by the same amount. Typical retarders are quite sensitive to the incoming angle of light. The angular sensitivity of such retarders is described in European Patent Application No. EP 0,783,133, for example. As a result of the angular sensitivity of the retarder, the polarization of the reflected light may not be perfectly linearly polarized, but may be slightly elliptical. Thus, if the off-angle retardation is significantly different from normal incidence retardation, a reduction in performance will occur.

In an embodiment of the present invention, the maximum angle of incidence on the retarder is kept to a minimum. Referring to Figure 2, the angular relationships for light incident on the retarder 203 for two different cases 205A and 205B are depicted. Each case represents the angles which are incident on the retarder across its surface. The incidence angle is measured from a line 207A and 207B normal to the plane of the retarder. In Figure 2, the range of angles (i. e., the <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> cone angles 01 and 02) for each case are the same. In the first case 205A, however,<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> the cone axis of the cone angle 01 is coincident with the normal line 207A. In the second case, the cone axis 209 of the cone angle 02 forms a relatively large angle ûca from the normal line 207B. As will be appreciated, in the second case 205B the maximum angle 2 at which light is incident on the retarder is significantly greater that the maximum angle fI for the first case 205A. As the center of the cone axis becomes more perpendicular to the surface of the retarder, the maximum off-axis angle is reduced.

As noted above, in one embodiment of the system depicted in Figure 1, the center of the cone angle incident on the retarder is very close to normal. Since the

performance of a retarder can degrade as the angle of incidence gets larger, improved performance may be achieved by reducing the maximum angle. Thus, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention the system performance can be improved while simplifying the construction and reducing costs.

Another problem encountered with the various prior art designs which place a beam splitter adjacent to the screen relates to leakage of light as the light is initially incident on the screen. This problem is described generally in United States Patent 4,969,732. Where a polarization sensitive beam splitter is used, the leak will be a function of the efficiency of the beam splitter in reflecting properly polarized light and the ability of the image source to produce perfectly polarized light. Even when a high efficiency beam splitter is used, such as the above described polymeric multilayer optical film based beam splatters, as much as 10% of light polarized for reflection may leak through the polarization sensitive beam splitter. If light which leaks through the polarization sensitive beam splitter reaches the screen, noticeable ghost images will likely occur.

Figure 3 illustrates how the projection arrangement in accordance with the present invention naturally inhibits light improperly transmitted and/or reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter from reaching the screen. In Figure 3, a light ray 301 is typically transmitted through the polarization sensitive beam splitter 303, converted by the polarization state converter 305, returned to and reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter 303, and transmitted through the screen 307. If a portion of the light leaving the source is incorrectly polarized, it will be harmlessly reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter 303 to the back of the projection display as illustrated by light ray 309. Similarly, if a portion of the light leaks through the polarization sensitive beam splitter 303 after conversion by the polarization state converter 305, it is also harmlessly transmitted to the back of the projection display. As the above discussion illustrates, the polarization sensitive beam splitter 303 not only accomplishes its primary function, but also prevents unwanted light from reaching the screen. Thus, certain stray images can be reduced or eliminated from the screen without adding additional components.

Figure 4 illustrates another source of potential ghost images which are reduced or eliminated by the present invention. In certain instances, a light ray 401 may reflect from the front surface 403 of the retarder 405. Because the light ray 401 does not pass through the retarder 405 it substantially maintains its transmission polarization state Pt. Such a reflection may be reduced or eliminated by providing an antireflection (AR) coating on the surface 403 of the retarder 405.

However, in the present design an AR coating is not necessary to reduce this potential ghost since the light ray 401 will pass through the polarization sensitive beam splitter 407 to the back of the system. Thus, undesirable ghost images are prevented from reaching the screen. While not needed to prevent the stray light from reaching the screen, an AR coating may still be desirable on the surface 403 of the retarder 405 to increase the brightness at the screen.

Light ray 409 illustrates another potential undesirable image. Light ray 409 passes through the retarder 405 as intended. In this case, however, the retarder does not perfectly retard the light ray 409. While the light ray is substantially linearly polarized, a slight ellipticity, for example, may exist (i. e., a small component of the light ray is polarized for transmission) or the polarization may be rotated at an angle slightly different than 90°. The component of the light polarized for transmission is harmlessly passed through the polarization sensitive beam-splitter 407 to the back of the system.

Figure 5 illustrates another potential stray image which is harmlessly directed to the back of the system. This stray light results from correctly polarized light being reflected by the polarization sensitive beam splitter 501. In the present invention, light polarized for transmission Pt which reflects from the polarization sensitive beam splitter 501 is reflected to the back of the system and does not reach the screen. The reflection of light correctly polarized for transmission may be a function of the inefficiency of the polarization sensitive beam splitter 501 itself or may be reflected from a laminated surface. In either case, the light exits the system harmlessly. Depending on the construction of the polarization sensitive beam splitter, it may also be desirable to AR coat one or both surfaces of the polarization sensitive beam splitter.

As noted above, the invention is particularly suited for tiling. Rear projection systems generally can be tiled horizontally. The configurations required to get compact depth, however, tend-to inhibit vertical tiling. Figure 6 illustrates an embodiment of the invention in which vertical tiling is achieved. It should be noted that in Figure 6 the overall system is shown in an inverted arrangement from that illustrated in Figure 1. It will be appreciated, however, that either orientation can be tiled.

Figure 6 illustrates two display devices 601A and 601B shown in a vertically tiled orientation. While only two displays are shown, more than two such rear projection display devices may be vertically tiled in a similar manner. The basic operation of the tiled display devices 601 A and 601B is the same as that described above. The dashed lines 603A and 603B indicate an area which is available to further compact the design. The area may be used to fold the path of the image source, to house electronics associated with the display, and the like. Moreover, as noted above, a linear polarization sensitive beam splitter can be used with any orientation of linearly polarized light. Thus, the image source may be further compacted by extending the path within the projector in the direction of the projection display width (i. e., a direction orthogonal to a plane of the page of Figure 6).

The housing illustrated in Figure 6 is provided primarily to demonstrate the tiling capability and can be suitably adapted depending on the desired design. For example, the bottom surface may be made flat, as illustrated by line 605, to accommodate placing the display on a flat surface. Alternatively, an adapter piece could be provided which mates with the bottom of the display when used alone.

Braces could be used to affix and support the tiled arrangement or the housing could be appropriately modified. It will be appreciated that the housing shape at the sides may be different than that shown in the cross section. For example, the housing may extend upwards at the edges as indicated by line 607, forming a recess in the center of the top of the display device (or bottom in an inverted geometry).

The recess may be used to mate with a portion of an adjacent display housing that holds a projector (with appropriate modifications).

Figure 7 illustrates a front view of nine projection display units of the invention tiled both vertically and horizontally. As will be appreciated, the rear projection display system in accordance with the present invention can provide for virtually seamless tiling in both the vertical and horizontal direction. Moreover, any desired number of such systems may be tiled together in the horizontal and/or, vertical direction. Using control electronics and software known in the art multiple units may be tiled together to form a single integrated image.

Figure 8 illustrates another particular embodiment of a rear projection display 801 in accordance with the present invention. In Figure 8, an mage source 802 projects a circularly polarized image. The projector may include, for example, a projector 803 which produces a linearly polarized image and a 4-wave retarder 805 which converts the linearly polarized image to a circularly polarized image.

While the retarder is shown external to the projection lens, it will be appreciated that it may be provided within the projection system. In another alternative, the retarder can be disposed on the surface of the polarization sensitive beam splitter facing the projector.

The circularly polarized image is incident on a circular polarization sensitive beam splitter 807. The circular polarization beam splitter 807 may be comprised of a cholesteric polarizer, for example, which transmits circularly polarized light having a first rotation direction and reflects circular polarized light polarized with an opposite rotation direction. A cholesteric polarizer having the above characteristics is described in United States Patent No. 5,573,324.

The circularly polarized image which is output from the image source 802 is polarized with a rotation which transmits through the circular polarization sensitive beam splitter 807. The image is next incident on a polarization state converter 809.

The. polarization state converter arrangement may be a planar mirror, which functions to reverse the rotation direction of the circularly polarized light. The mirror may also have a coating to enhance reflection. The mirror reflects the light back towards the circular polarization sensitive beam splitter 807. The light is now polarized with a rotation direction which is reflected by the circular polarization

sensitive beam splitter 807 towards a screen 811. The screen 811 may be any suitable rear projection screen such as those described above.

Figure 9 illustrates still another embodiment of the invention. In Figure 9, an extra fold is introduced into the system with the introduction of an additional mirror. In this system, an image source 901 projects an image onto a first mirror 903. The first mirror 903 reflects the image towards a polarization sensitive beam splitter 905, which transmits the light to a polarization state converter 907 such as those described above. The overall operation of the system is similar to the various embodiments described above with appropriate modifications to accommodate the extra fold. For example, if a circular polarization beam splitter is used, the polarization rotation direction of light exiting the image source 901 is opposite to that which transmits through the-beam splitter. In this manner, reflection from the first mirror induces a proper rotation direction to pass the image through the circular polarization sensitive beam splitter 905 on the first pass.

In an alternative embodiment using a circular polarization sensitive beam splitter, the first mirror 903 incorporates an 1/8-wave retarder. In this embodiment, a linearly polarized light source can be used. The linearly polarized light passes through the 1/8-wave retarder, reflects from the mirror and passes back through the 1/8-wave retarder. In this manner, the linearly polarized light is converted to circular polarized light which, by proper selection of the initial linear polarization direction, is polarized to pass through the circular polarization sensitive beam splitter. In a similar manner, a system using a linear polarization sensitive beam splitter could employ a -wave retarder on the mirror 903 to change the linear polarization direction if desired.

Because the polarization sensitive beam splitter is transparent to light of a particular polarization, other optical elements may be placed behind the beam splitter. For example, a light detector such as a charged coupled device (CCD) array or photodiode can be placed behind the beam splitter out of the path of the projected image to detect light impinging on the screen. This arrangement can be used to provide input from a user to the projection system. For example, a remote

control device aimed at the screen could be used to control a cursor, select an option, change channels, and the like.

One such embodiment is illustrated in Figure 10. A rear projection display 1001 is adapted for display of an on-screen menu 1003 on the screen 1005 of the display 1001. A remote pointing device 1007 is used to select choices from the on- screen menu 1003. In the illustrated embodiment the remote pointing device includes a laser pointer which provides a visual indication of the location on the screen being selected. As the light from the remote pointing device passes through the screen 1005, it is diffused by the screen. The diffused light is detected by a light sensor 1009, such as a charged coupled device (CCD) array.. The light sensor 1009 determines the location on the screen selected by the user via the remote pointing device and produces a signal to the control electronics of the display (not shown) to implement the selected function. Appropriate filters may be provided on the light sensor to filter out light not associated with the remote light source.

As illustrated in Figure 10, the light sensor arrangement 1009 is positioned behind the polarization sensitive beam splitter 1011. Thus, the beam splitter 1011 acts as a window through which the externally generated light passes. The light sensor can, therefore, be positioned anywhere in the system where sufficient room is available. Moreover, rather than an on-screen menu/pointing device configuration, a more conventional remote control such as an infrared (IR) remote control could be used. An IR sensor would be placed behind the screen and polarization sensitive beam splitter to detect IR signals directed generally towards the screen. The operation thereof would be substantially the same as a conventional remote control.

This type of remote control function is especially suited for display devices adapted for tiling which do not have a position for an external IR sensor.

In an alternative embodiment, the light sensor can be positioned in the area illustrated by dotted line 1013 between the polarization sensitive beam splitter and the polarization state converter. It will be appreciated that a relatively thin CCD array could be disposed in this area, with corresponding electronics being disposed elsewhere in the system.

When the rear projection display unit is connected to a computer for use as a computer monitor, a remote light source could be used to control the cursor on the monitor. For example, a light sensor could be provided which senses a position at which the light source is transmitted through the screen. This information could then be passed to the computer which would control the cursor to move that point on the screen. Additional capability to select functions could also be provided. In this manner, the operation of the computer could be remotely controlled.

While the present invention has been described with reference to examples above, it should not be limited to the specifics of the examples. Rather, the intention is to fully cover the invention as set put in the attached claims.