Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
REDUCING THE FRICTION BETWEEN RELATIVELY SLIDING SURFACES
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/1982/002234
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
A method for reducing friction between relatively sliding members (1-3, 15-17) which are subject to a relative lateral force (F). One member is given a slight rotation (R) about an axis substantially perpendicular to the direction of sliding (T) and the direction of the force (F). This may be achieved by angularly offsetting the direction of motion of one of the members with respect to the direction of sliding engagement.

More Like This:
Inventors:
COJON ROGER (FR)
Application Number:
PCT/GB1981/000284
Publication Date:
July 08, 1982
Filing Date:
December 23, 1981
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
AE PLC (GB)
International Classes:
F01B1/01; F15B15/17; F16J10/02; (IPC1-7): F16J10/02
Foreign References:
GB529885A1940-11-29
US2284645A1942-06-02
FR2146811A51973-03-02
FR1001088A1952-02-19
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS
1. A method for reducing friction between relatively sliding lubricated surfaces , whose main movement is generally rectilinear and reciprocal, and which are subject to a relative lateral force in a direction generally perpendicular to the direction of the main movement characterised in that a lowamplitude secondary relative rotation or tilting is imposed on the main motion, about an axis substantially perpend¬ icular to the direction of the main motion and to the direction of the lateral force.
2. Amethod as claimed in Claim 1, characterised in that the secondary rotation tends to close an "oil wedge" formed between the two surfaces during motion.
3. A method as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, characterised in that during one reciprocal cycle, L the secondary rotation is through between 5 and 150 x 10 radian. 4.
4. A device comprising two relatively sliding lubricated surfaces whose main movement is generally rectilinear and reciprocal, and which are subject to a relative lateral force in a direction generally perpendicular to the direction of the main movement characterised in that the direction of movement of one surface is angularly offset with respect to the direction of sliding engagement in a plane defined by the direction of the lateral force and the direction of sliding engagemen .
5. A device as claimed in Claim 4, characterised in that at least one of the surfaces in contact initially has a convex shape.
6. A device as claimed in Claim 4, characterised in that at least one of the. surfaces in contact acquires a convex shape during the runningin of the device.
7. A device as claimed in any of Claims 4 to.5, characterised in that the said direction of offset is substantially the opposite direction to the lateral force.
8. A device comprising a lubricated cylinder having a bearing at one end and a piston mounted on a shaft, the piston being slidahly located within the cylinder and the shaft being slidably located in the bearing, the shaft also being subject to a lateral force, characterised in that the bearing is offset from the axis of the cylinder in a direction opposite to that of the lateral force.
9. A device as claimed in Claim 8 characterised in that the surface of bearing is convex in the axial direction.
10. A device as claimed in Claim 8 or Claim S. characterised in that the surface of the piston is 'convex in the axial direction. BAD ORIGINAL.
Description:
REDUCING THE FRICTION BETWEEN RELATIVELY SLIDING SURFACES

5. TECHNICAL FIΞL

The present invention relates to a method and a device for improving the operating conditions of sliding mechanical joints.

BACKGROUND ART 10. In conventional sliding mechanical joints which move e.g. in reciprocation substantially in a straight line, the axes of the bearings or the .bearing surfaces are generally parallel with the axis of motion. .

Conventional joints are efficient when the resultant 15. of the received or transmitted forces is substantially parallel to the direction of relative motion.

DISCLOSURE 0? THE INVENTION

This situation however is extremely rare in practice. As a rule, either occasionally or permanently 20. the joint has to withstand considerable forces having a component perpendicular to the direction of motion.

The results may be increased wear on the parts in conτact resulting in gaps and lower geometrical accuracy of relative otion, and a coefficient of 25. friction which results in an oppositing force which wastes power.

There is also a serious risk of seizure under heavy laterial loads.

It is an object of the present invention to obviate 30. these disadvantages or at least delay or reduce the

BAD ORIGIN

aforementioned harmful effects (.i.e. opposing force, wear, power ' consumption and seizure), in the case where operation occurs in the presence of oil or, more generally, in the presence of a fluid.

5. According to the invention, a low-amplitude secondary relative rotation or tilting is imposed on the main motion, about an axis substantially perpend¬ icular to the direction of the main motion and to the direction of the lateral force. As a result, the

10. surfaces may be in contact at points or lines which vary during motion, local wear can be avoided and the surfaces may not be flattened and so have a shape which may.facili ate th.e formation of an "oil wedge" during motion. This produces a hydroάynamic force which can

15. separate the two surfaces and prevent permanent direct contact between them.

In a preferred form of the method, th≤ secondary rotation is such that, during the motion, it acts so as to "close" the oil wedge in the immediate vicinity of

20. the two surfaces in contact.

This method may result in the following advantages:-

1. .Improved efficiency of the materials in contact, avoiding seizure;

2. Distribution of wear over a larger area; 25. 3. Reduction of energy consumption;

4-. Positive lift during reversal of direction of motion, and

5. Lower opposing force during reversals, thus reducing the associated "impact".

30 The amplitude of rotation during the entire

reciprocating travel is small, usually between 5 and ISO x 10 radian (.0.5 and 15 thousandth of a radian).

•In one device for working th.e method, one of the relatively moving parts bears on th.e counteracting part 5. by means of at least one bearing surface whose profile is a curved convex surface in the longitudinal direction (.parallel to the motion in a straight line)., and whose point Cor line), of contact moves with the moving part. The curved surface can be present from the beginning 10. or can be produced during initial use of the joint (.running-in) .

The curved surface could have any shape Cactualϊy • the envelope of th.e positions of the outer surface of one of the moving parts on the othe 1, however, for 15. practical reasons, it is usually an arc of an ellipse or circle having a large radius or radi.i or curvature.

The secondary rotation may be. brought about e.g. simply by moving the moving part out of centre by a 'certain amount relative to the axial geometrical position. 20 ' . The out-of-centre position is preferably in the plane

. - defined by the direction of lateral forces and the main axis of motion along a straight line.

Preferably the moving part is displaced to the side of the axis opposite to the point of contact 25. between the counteracting parts, and may result from the lateral forces acting on the moving part. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of the relative motion of two components according to the 30. invention;

BAD ORIGINAL

Figure 2 is a partial longitudinal section through a jack or actuator for working the method; for clarity in th.e drawing, the eccentricity and clearances have been greatly exaggerated;

5. Figures 3 and 4- show diagram atically the theoretical lines of contact between the piston and cylinder of Figure 2 during motion, and

Figure 5 is a section through a test device, BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT TEE INVENTION

10. In Figure 1, a moving member 1 bounded by its convex outer surface 2 ' moves in a main rectilinear direction T relative to a stationary member 3 having an outer surface 4-. During the rectilinear motion T,. member 1 also undergoes rotation R. During the motion, points

15. A, B, C on surface 2 of the moving member 1 move respectively and in succession to points A, R-. , C 2J spaced apart on the outer surface 4 in the direction of motion T. Consequently, an oil wedge, diagrammatically shows at 5 forms between the two members 1 and 3 and

20. this oil wedge 5 tends to close during the motion.

If the main motion occurs in the opposite direction T' a similar oil wedge 5' tends to form and to close as a result of secondary rotation R ! in the reverse direct¬ ion. Thus, the effect is observed if rotation R. or R'

25. occurs in either direction.

Figure 2 shows a jack or shock-absorber device which utilises the -claimed method. It comprises a cylinder 11 having an axis 12 and a bearing 13 whose axis 14- is out of centre by an amount e_ relative to

30. axis of the cylinder 12. The device also comprises a

BAD OBl^ A^

piston 15 in the cylinder 11,, the piston 15 being centred on a shaft 18 borne by the bearing 13. When the shaft IS is subjected ~o lateral bending, the piston 15 bears against the cylinder surface 17 to one side of the

5. axis 12 and the shaft 15 bears against the surface 18 of the bearing 13 to the opposite side of the axis 12. The eccentricity _e is in the plane defined by the theoretical point of contact between the piston and cylinder and the cylinder axis 12, and is preferably

10. displaced from the axis 12 in a direction away from the surface 18 where the shaft 16 bears on the bearing 13. The outer surface 17 of the piston 15 is, in the longitudinal direction, an arc of a circle having_a radius r which is usually much greater than the diameter

15. d of the cylinder 11. 3y way of example, in a cylinder 40 mm in diameter with a piston stroke 1 = * 90 mm relative to the central position and an eccentricity e_ of 0.25 mm, r can vary from 5 to 20 m.

If the piston 15 is out of centre by a distance _e'

20. which is in the same direction from the axis 12 as e_, then the situation -will be quite acceptable provided

As shown in Figures 3 and 4, the theoretical curve o contact between the piston and cylinder moves during the 25. motion T through positions I, II and III. It is thus possible to bring about and maintain nydrodynamic conditions and thus reduce wear. Similar conditions occur at the bearing 13. - EXAMPLE: 30. Tests were carried out on a device as shown in

" Figure 5. The device comprised a piston 15, 4-0 mm in • diameter and 13 mm thick in a cylinder 11 filled with 'oil which was free to move through apertures 21 formed ■ih the cylinder wall and in the piston 15. 5. • The piston-rod 15 was 20 mm in iαameter and was connected to a crank-connection rod system via a force pick-up 20. The piston was driven by this system in reciprocating motion having a period of one second and •an amplitude of _+ SO mm. The. rod 15 extended through 10. - ' an IS mm thick, guide 13. A transverse force of 500 N was applied by a calibrated spring 22, at a distance, of 300 mm from the central axis of the piston 15.

The distance of the guide from th.e piston in.its central position was 150 mm. 15. When the guide and piston were centred and had . cylindrica bearing surfaces, the average coefficient of friction during the cycle was found to be 5% and the instantaneous coefficient during reversal was 8%.

In a device according to the invention made of the 20. same materials,• except that the guide was 0.2 mm out of centre and the guide and piston had a convexity of r_ = 12 m, the coefficients of friction were found to be reduced to 3 and 4% respectively.