Cross Reference to Related Application This application is based on provisional application Serial No. 62/104,138, filed January 16, 2015, all of the details of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.

Background of this Invention

Historically, the geometry of knife blades has varied significantly in length, thickness and shape of the blade. This has been particularly the case for sport, pocket knife and tactical knife blades.

In order to control the sharpening angle, the face of the knife blade is laid on a planar surface, acting as the angle guide, and held by hand, a magnet or a spring against that surface .

Because of the geometric complexity and variety of

thickness of the sports and tactical knife blades , the

positioning of these type of blades on such planar angle guides is unstable and ambiguous. Consequently, the precise angular control of the edge facets to be sharpened are further

compromised when the knife blades are excessively thick and the blade is held in place against the guide by a spring which creates increasing friction as the blade is pulled through the sharpening slot.

Summary of the Invention

An object of this invention is to provide a sharpener capable of precision sharpening a larger variety of knives, and in particular be more effective in sharpening and angle control the thicker sport, pocket knife and tactical knife that contain a partially hollow ground concave blade. Recently, these inventors have discovered a combination of a unique spring and knife angle guide design that can

effectively hold the above knives precisely and reproducibly in position during the sharpening process.

The success of this design centers on "mimicking" , in reverse, the typical profiles of the type of knife blades on the knife angle guide and preferably the spring that holds the knife against the angle guide.

THE DRAWINGS

Figure 1 is a side elevational view of a portion of a sharpener for thick knives showing two sharpening stages in accordance with this invention;

Figures 2-3 are side elevational views of typical hunting knives which may be sharpened by the sharpener of Figure 1;

Figures 2A and 3A are cross-sectional views of the hunting knives shown in Figures 2-3 taken along the lines 2A-2A and 3A- 3A, respectively;

Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view of one of the stages of the knife sharpener shown in Figure 1 showing a knife being sharpened;

Figure 5 is a view similar to Figure 4 showing an

alternative spring guide; and

Figure 6 is an exploded view of a variation of the

removable or interchangeable knife guides which may be used in accordance with this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Prior art on combinations of knife angle guides and springs are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,611,726 ('726 patent) and 7,686,676 ('676 patent), all of the details of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto. In both of these patents, the knife angle guides, against which the knife blade rested were planar. These type of planar angle guides are particularly effective when the surface of the knife blade is itself planar and the contact surface of the guide matches that of the knife blade. However , many of the sport, pocket knife and tactical knife blades are not planar. Many of these knives have hollow ground blades as shown in Figures 2-3.

While the conventional shaped knife holding spring works well with a flat faced blade , the typical hunting knives 2 , having blade 32 , shown in Figures 2 and 3 , become surprisingly unstable. Commonly the large portions 31 of the face of hunting knives is hollow ground. The hunting knives are constructed this way to reduce the thickness of blade 32 behind the edge so that less metal need be removed to sharpen them and making them easier to sharpen. The back 33 of the blade 32 and the adjacent areas 34 along the blade edge can by this design be very thick, on the order of 1/8 to 3/16" thick, creating a very strong knife for heavy duty work.

The cross section A-A of these blades is shown in adjacent FIGS. 2A and 3A. These commonly show hollow ground concave features 36 on the lower sections 31 of the blade 32 face adjacent to the edge, but the upper section 34 of the blade 32 faces adjacent to the blade backs 33 are generally planar and parallel to each other.

Although the * 676 patent addressed this inconsistency by focusing the spring guide force against the hollow ground

(concave) portion of the knife blade, it only partially

addressed the ambiguity of the blade' s positioning on the planar knife guide. By applying the pressure in the hollow ground portion of the knife blade, it forced the opposite side of the knife blade to assume a position against the planar knife guide following a tangent line spanning the apex of the blade edge to the shoulder of the hollow ground geometry where it transitions to the flat portion of the blade. Although this improvement covered by the '676 patent, improved the guiding of knife blades over the '726 patent, the inventors noted that instability still existed in alignment of sports and tactical knives, particularly thicker ones with hollow ground blades, where the friction between knife guide and the spring increases, requiring greater force to pull the knife through. However, the guide system described in the '676 patent allowed for significant tilting of the knife blade thereby diminishing the precision of the edge formation .

Figure 1 illustrates a sharpener 10 in accordance with this invention. As shown therein sharpener 10 includes at least one pre-sharpening stage 5 and a finishing stage 7. Each stage includes a pair of fixed guides 12 and a spring 14. Figure 4 shows one of the stages, namely the finishing stage, in its condition of use. The same operation would apply to all stages for each guiding slot in each stage.

Figure 4 illustrates a cross section of a thick hunting knife 2 with a hollow ground blade inserted into the guided sharpening slot of knife sharpener 10 against a sharpening member 4 using this invention. The sharpening members 4 preferably are rotatable disks having an abrasive surface. The sharpening members could also have a non-abrasive steeling surface. The hollow ground portion of the blade rests against the non-planar knife guide 12 which provides a convex portion 13 to match the concave shape of the hollow ground blade. On the other side of the knife blade, the spring guide 14 with a convex portion 16 presses against the hollow ground portion of the blade. The result is that the hollow ground portion of the blade is nested between matching formed convex guides. This allows for a predictable alignment of the center line of the blade' s cross section and the surface of the sharpening member for a precise determination of the half angle of the knife' s edge. An additional benefit of this guide structure is that the spine, or thicker portion, of the knife blade is in reduced contact with either the upper portion of the guide surface or the spring guide, thereby reducing the friction when sharpening thick knives. With thinner knives, contact with the upper portions of the guide surface or spring guide may be totally eliminated, thereby further reducing friction during sharpening.

In order to increase the versatility of sharpeners with the novel knife holding spring 14 and knife guide 12 design as described above, these inventors discovered that by controlling the relative stiffness of the lower and upper portions of the spring arms it is possible to stabilize the larger sporting and tactical blades as described but also to stabilize smaller pocket knives and kitchen paring knives.

Surprisingly, the inventors also discovered that by combining part of this invention, namely the non-planar knife guide 12 of this invention with the spring guide described in the '676 patent, an effective and stable positioning of the knife edge relative to the abrasive surface was achieved. This was possible because the focus of the spring guide force, as described in the '676 patent, is against the lower portion of the hollow ground knife blade. Furthermore, this combination of non-planar knife guide of this invention with the spring guide of '676 patent also effectively sharpens knives with narrower blades such as paring knives, fish filet knives and pocket knives .

Figure 5 illustrates the combination of the non-planar knife guide 12 having its convex portion 13 used with a spring guide 14A having a planar spring end 16A rather than the convex portion 16 shown in Figure 4. Figure 6 is an exploded view showing two of the stages of a sharpener which may incorporate a removable spring 14 to add to the versatility of the sharpener for accommodating different specific thick knife structures. Except for the later noted differences, spring 14 is similar to the spring in U.S.

published application 2015/0258651 ('651 application), all of the details of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto. The primary difference is that spring 14 of Figure 6 has a non-planar spring arm, whereas the corresponding spring arm in the '651 application is planar. The spring of the '651 application could be usable in the embodiment of Figure 5.

As illustrated Figure 6 the spring 14 includes a post 20 which of a size and shape to be inserted into a channel 22 in the fixed portion of the sharpener. Post 20 includes a

deflectable spring 24 which would then snap into opening 26 in the sharpener to mount the spring in place. The left-hand portion of Figure 6 shows a spring 14 partially inserted while the right-hand portion shows a spring completely detached. The ability to use replicable springs provides the sharpener with various spring guide structures to accommodate different knives. If desired, the fixed guiding surface might also have a

detachable sheet-like guide surface that could be mounted against the permanent guide surface corresponding to fixed guide surface 12, thus providing the ability to replace the fixed guide surface with different guide shapes.

As shown in Figure 6 one of the spring arms of spring 14 includes the non-planar portion 16. Unlike the spring of the '651 application, the opposite spring arm of spring 14 is split, having a gap or open area 28 between the spring arm portions.

Figure 6 illustrates a module 30 that could be detachably mounted in the sharpener housing. The module 30 is illustrated as including the finishing stage 7 and a pre-sharpening stage 5. The module 30 could be mounted in the housing as described in the '651 application.

Although the prior description has been directed to sharpeners using abrasive coated sharpening members it is to be understood that the invention can also be practiced where the member is a steeling or conditioning member substantially free of abrasive particles. Reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos.

7,235,004 and 7,287,445, all of the details of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto. Thus, the invention can be incorporated into sharpeners which have sharpening members which use abrasives, which steel the edge or which condition the edge. The knife holding springs will be effective regardless of what is being done to the edge facets.

Accordingly, unless otherwise specified the term "knife

sharpener" and the term "sharpening member" are intended to include abrasive sharpening as well as steeling or conditioning.

While the need for this improved design has been described as it is used in electric or powered sharpeners that commonly have a force applying spring urging an abrasive covered disk toward the knife edge as it is being sharpened, this novel spring design is applicable also to manual sharpeners with stationary abrading or steeling surfaces.

The guide technology of this invention can be used for sharpening metal knives or ceramic knives, even knives that do not have hollow ground blades .