Background Description The helical antenna is old in the art, having first appeared in the late 1940's. In a helical configuration, a length of conducting material is wound at a radius and with a pitch angle around a central axis. The radius of curvature of the helix is defined by the radius of the enclosing cylinder. The helix antenna produces a directional antenna pattern, generates circularly polarized radio waves, and has a wide operational frequency bandwidth.

In certain communication applications the antenna may be the largest component of the system. Thus there is a need for a way to reduce antenna size without reducing antenna performance.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is therefore an object of the present invention to reduce antenna size without reducing antenna performance.

The present invention is an improved geometry for a helical antenna. Along its length are a plurality of stubs which project from the outer radius of curvature of the helix toward the central axis of the helix. The stubs are not in electrical contact with one another. The stub loaded helical geometry is defined by a) the circumference of the helix (which is 2E times the radius of the enclosing cylinder), b) the number of turns of the helix, c) the pitch angle of the helical windings, d) the number of stubs per turn, e) the depth of the stubs, and f) the angular width of each stub (i.e. the angle subtended by the width of the stub at the radius of the enclosing cylinder) . A stub loaded helix antenna in accordance with the invention exhibits performance characteristics such as gain and circular polarization similar to the traditional helical antenna, but is approximately one third smaller in diameter and one-half as long. The stub loaded helix antenna can be used in wireless local area networks, satellite communications, microwave point-to-point systems, and personal communication Systems. The antenna is most useful in applications which use frequencies from the low VHF to low microwave range.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a top view of a single turn of a stub loaded helix antenna.

Figure 2 is a side view of a four turn stub loaded helix antenna.

Figure 3 is an oblique view of a stub loaded helix antenna.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to Figure 1, there is shown a top view of a single turn of a stub loaded helix antenna. The antenna is formed from a continuous length of conducting material.

The distance from the center 10 to the circumference 11 of the enclosing cylinder of the helix is a radius "R" (hereinafter called "radius of the helix" or "helix radius") . The diameter "D" of the helix is the diameter (2R) of the enclosing cylinder, and the circumference of the enclosing cylinder is "C". The helical shape is a continuous curve, and along the length of that continuous curve (hereinafter "curve length of the helix" or "helix curve length") the distance

around one turn of the helix is <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> T, = <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> d cos(o) where C = ED and a = pitch angle between successive turns of the helix. Each stub 12 (four are shown in this example) is formed by bending the conducting material at approximately right angles from the circumference at points 13 and 13' toward the center 10 extending a distance "d", less than radius "R". The angular width of the stub 12 is the angle subtended by the arc defined by the width of the stub at the radius of the enclosing cylinder (i.e. between points 13 and 13') . For each turn of the helix there are a number ("n") of stubs 12 extending from the circumference 11 along the helix curve length. In the example shown, n = 4 and each stub has a depth of about two thirds of a radius and is truncated in a side 14 of length "s". In general "n" need not be an integer, nor need it be the same from turn to turn, although it would be the same in typical implementations. Typically, as well, "s" would be less than the width of the stub at the radius, and could be zero so that the stub end in the direction of the center axis is pointed (as indicated in Figure 3).

Turning now to Figure 2 there is shown a side view of a stub loaded helix antenna. The helix has a pitch angle a, which is measured by taking a tangent 21 along the helix curve length and, at the point where the tangent meets the enclosing cylinder defined by the helix, taking another tangent 22 which lies in a plane perpendicular to the central axis of the helix. If the length of the central axis of the helix is "L" and the

length of a single helical turn without stubs is "Td" then <BR> <BR> <BR> C <BR> L = N Td sin = N sin a = N C tan a cos a where "N" is the number of turns in the helix.

The actual length of conductor in a single turn of the stub loaded helix antenna is not "Td" (which is the length of a helical turn without stubs). From "Td" there must be subtracted the length corresponding to the angular width of the stubs (yielding an angular component of 2 - and then there must be added the length of conductor taken by the stubs. In the example shown in Figure 1, the conductor length taken by each stub is = = (2 d + S) Therefore, the length of conductor for each turn of the stub loaded helix antenna is <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> T = (2 = - n )R<BR> cos c: L where SL 2 2d.

Figure 3 shows an oblique view of an antenna in accordance with the invention, having a stub loaded helical winding mounted on a reflector 30 in the conventional manner, with the central axis 31 of the helix being along the beam axis of the reflector. In a typical implementation of the preferred embodiment of the invention, which achieves size reductions of about one-third in diameter and one-half in length over a conventional helix antenna with comparable

performance characteristics such as gain and circular polarization, preferably the pitch angle is in the range of 70 to 90, the number of stubs per turn may range from 3 to 15, the number of turns may range from 4 to 10, and the depth of stubs may range from two-thirds to three-quarters of a helix radius. Other embodiments of the invention may show different, yet still significant, levels of size reduction over a conventional helix antenna having comparable performance characteristics.

While the invention has been described in terms of a preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.