UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Nan-Provisional Patent Application of

BENCHMARK HARRIS

United States Citizen tor new and useful invention entitled:

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROTECTION OF UNDER-SLAB UTILITIES FROM CHANGES IN SOIL VOLUME

Neal G. Massand, Reg. No. 54,296 Nl, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC 8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500 Dallas. Texas 75231 Tel.: (972) 331-4601

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROTECTION OF UNDER-SLAB UTILITIES FROM CHANGES IN SOIL VOLUME

PRIORITY

[0001] This application claims priority to U.S, Provisional Patent Application Nos,

63/253,515, 63/245,835, and U.S. Nori-Provisional Patent Application No. 17/512,612.

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0002] The present application relates generally to an improved system and method for protecting plumbing lines, electrical lines and other utility lines under a stab that is isolated from soils that exhibit volumetric changes after construction, in which the urider-slab utilities are isolated from these soils to protect them from the damage these soils can cause, and in which flexible expansion joints in the utilities at the perimeter of tile slab allow the utilities to transition from an isolated condition under the slab to a soil-supported condition outside ofthe slab, allowing utilities outside of a building to move due to Changes in soil voltime without impairing the function or damaging The under-slab portions ofthe titilfty lines.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] Problems due to expansive soils have been repotted in many countries all around the world, Every year they cause millions of dollars to repair costs due to their severe damage to structures. Expansive soils often contain day minerals such as bentonite, moritmorillonite, and smectite that have die potential to expand and shrink significantly due to changes in moisture content. Ute expansive potential of the clay is greater near the ground surface where the profile is subjected to seasonal arid environmental changes in moisture content and has less soil overburden pressure^ from soil above, to counteract expansion. Increasing the moisture content of the clay often causes dramatic increases in volume, especially near the ground surface where the ground surface can rise tip to 18 inches or more tn some areas, with an estimated 6 inches of potential upward movement being common in many urban areas where hjglily expansive soils are present.

Similarly, decreasing the moisture content of the clay often causes dramatic decreases in volume. especially near the ground surface where tile ground elevation can drop in elevation as much as it is rises when the clay gets wet. Fissures in the Soi.1 can develop during periods of time when the day dries Out due to seasonal variations in min, growth of trees, dr other sources. These fissures often alto w water to penetrate to deeper layers when water is present, litis often produces a cycle of shrinkage and swelling that causes the soil to undergo progressively greater amounts of volumetric elwges over time. This movement tn the soil often results in damage to buildings, especially in lijghtwdight infrastructure stM as Sidewalks, driveways, basement floors, pipelines and shallow foundations that are not isolated from the volumetric changes and do pot have sufficient weight and/or stiffness to resist the changes In stress caused by the volumetric changes

In the soil.

(0064] The depth at which expansive soils cab cause damage & also significant Asnotcd tile 2014 Senior Thesis fitted “An Examination of Changes Within the Active Zone Moisture

Content and Soil Swell Potential of Expansive Clay Soils at a Site in Denton County, Texas,, by Marc William Cappcll with Oklahoma State Umvemity, “Deep-seated swell is the additional upward soil swell movement that could result from moisture changes and soil swelling below a typical 10 foot (305 cm) deep active-zone (Farrow and Roland 2005).„ As noted in a paper by

Nelson, Overton and Durkee, all from Colorado, ihiact Wps published: for the Shallow Foundation and Spil Properties Committee Sessions at the 2001 American Society ofCivilEngineers (ASCE)

Civil En^neering Conference, titled “Depth of Wetting and the Active Zone , zone. . generally re fers to the zone of soil that either is contributing to or has the potential to produce heave , The 2001 paper describes how, for any specific soil profile with expansive clay, there is a ‘’Depth ofPotential Heave:, at “which tile overburden vertical stress,,, from the weight of the soil above, “equals or exceeds the swelling pressure of the soil,,, with the “swelling pressure,, being the pressure required to prevent swelling, As notodin the Discussion and Conclusipns of the 2001 paper, “There is no sound rationale behind assuming that the depth of wetting wiU stop at some assumed depth. Instead^ a more prudent assumption is to assume that, in time, lhe depth of wetting will extend throughout the entire depth of potential heave. This tri fact, is realistic and conservative^, Therefore, for the purposes of this application, the term “active zone,, will refer to the region of soil from the ground surface down to the depth of potential heave.

[0005] There are other types pf soil, conditions which can cause changes in volume similar to expansive soil. These other soil conditions can include w ithout limitation: frost heave in colder climates where water in the soil seasonally expands as it freezes and then contracts as it melts; settlement in under-consolidated clay soil cases due to poor water pressure dissipation over long periods of tithe after a construction project increases the overburden pressure such as by adding soil to raise the ground elevation to a desired finish floor elevation; and, collapsible soils cases in which a small reduction in moisture content of some sand configurations with relatively low densities can cause an imme diate arid dramatie reduction in toi l volume. While the focus of this disclosure primarily discusses protection of under-s]ab utilities fran expansive clay soils, the same comments often apply to these other toil conditions which can be equally challenging in areas: of the country where expansive clay soils are riot present.

[0006] Most buildings require one or moreutility lines to, for example, provide clean water and remove Wastewater with a plumbing system. Utility lines buried in the ground and in contact with expansive soil are subject to stresses from expansive soft. Domestic water pipes are plumbing

Unes thm provide clean wafer by a pressurized water line, Fire protection pipes are plumbing liiaes that provide water for automatic fire sprinkler lijftcs by a pressurized water line; A significant amount of water damage often occurs when pressurized water lines break due to expansive soil damage; And, often the stresses from expansive soil are great, enough to break these pipes.

Expansive soft can push plumbing lines up through the slab, damaging plumbing fixtures and even causing damage to walls. When utilities transporting water in any form leak, especially pressurized water lines, the leaks can cause excessive saturation under a foundation. This saturation often leads to further soil expansion which often Causes even greater damage to the foundation and superstructure. Sanitary sewer pipes an? plumbing lines that transport .wastewater away fritm plumbing fixtures such as toilets and smks by gtoyity> requiring that the lines slope downward to the exterior of the building with sufficiient slope. When expansive soil movement causes sanitary sewer tines to shift; so that they no longer slope as intended, solids in wastewater often stop in the plumbing and this causes sewage to build up and obstruct the plumbing, which becomes a health, safety and welfare problem fif ths occupants.

[0007] Several techniques have been used In the past to solve problems caused, by the sweiimgand shrinking of expansi vesoils. Sectton 18,08.6 of the 2021 International BuildingCode

(IBC) provides design requirements for foundations on expansive soilusingmany older techniques in the prior art. These requirements dp not addrigs under-slab utilities but in certain eases they can reduce tor even prevent damage to under-slab utilities from volumetric soil changes.

[0008] 2021 IBC Section 1808.6.3 allows expansive soil to simply be *f.. removed to a deptfr . sufficient to ensure a constant moisture contem in the remaining s&il^ which can protect under-slab utilities if all ofthe expansive soil is removed to expose dimensionally stable material, such as limestone, if dimensionally stable material happens fa exist naturally near the ground surface. However, where such favorable conditions do not exist, the depth of excavation recjuinecl would often exceed 10 feet below toe ground surface. As noted above, there is no sound rationale behind assuming that the depth of wetting will stop at some assumed depth, and the prudent approach is to assume the depth of wetting can occur over the full depth of potential heave.

Consequently ,a disadvantage of the approach of removing thecxpansive soil to a sufficient depth, and the reason this approach is often not selected by designprofessionals in many areas, is that toe depth required to sufficiently address (he problems associated with expansive soils is not practical and/or more expensive than other options in the prior art. An example of this approach being impraclical and/or expensive is when constructing ait addition to an existing building and such an operation could undermine tite existing foundation. Another example of this approach being impractical and/or expensive is when constructing a new building in a densely populated urban area where toe property line is at near toe perimeter of toe foundation so it does not allow a sufficiently deep vertical retaining wall to be erected without permission of titc adjacent property owner, Which is often a mtiiiidpality that uses the adjacent land tor a road where they are not inclined to allow disturbing their property. Another disadvantage of this approach is that installing dimensionally stable material such as crushed limestone rode (often: called “flex base,, and used tor road construction) is often more expensive to purchase in areas where expansive clay soils are predominant than other types of CH that cost less Init are not as dimensionally stable, such as

“select fill,, consisting of soil with less expansive properties than the original soil in the ground.

If select fill is used in relatively shallow depths, such as a few feet, many geotechnical engineers have found the level of damage to structures associated with toe use of the less-desirable material to he tolerated; however, when depths greater than id feet are required, many geotechnical etigipeers have concerns with the cumulative effect of the volumetric changes that can occur in even select fill such as expansive soil swelling arid shrinking as well as settlement. Even when rock is encountered, many areas of the county have naturally occurring layers of expansive soil and rock layers alternating, sometimes with high variability over a single building footprint* The intermittent layers of rock can iit6ke excavation of the expansive soils to a sufficient depth highly problematic, especially where there are targe rock boulders that can be greater tiiari the size of a school bus and much harder than concrete, causing urtpredklably lungdelays in construction when they are encountered. In cases where the slab is placed on the ground after removing expansive soil to a sufficient depth and replacing it with dimensionally-stabie material# under-slab plumbing is typically bulled in the dimensionally-stable material. However, all of the challenges noted above in removing and replacing expansive soil under slabs are the same challenges in removing ahd replacing expansive soil under the utilities under those slabs- Therefore, in areas where expansive soil exists without a layer of competent bedrock that Is encountered within a few feet of the ground surface and that extends wellbelow 10 feet under the ground surface, the approach of simply removing expansive soil to protect imder-slab plumbing is often not possible, hot effective, not practical, time-consuming^ and/or mote expensive than other options in the prior art

[0009] 2021 IBC Section 1808.6.3 also allows expansive soil to be .stabilized by chemical, dewatering, presaturation or equivalent techniques.,,

[00019] PreSaturation is still commonly used today in many areas, with the theory that pre-swelling the soil will reduce or eliminate the potential heave. This theory is based on an ass umption, though, that the moisture win not leave the clay subgrade and cause damage from soil shrinkage; however, this assumption has proven to be false in many cases where long periods of drought and/or tree roots dry out the subgrade under buildings and cause damage to foundations and under-slab utilities. [00011] Dewatering is the opposite of presaturation and is a less common approach to reduce flic potential vertical movement of expansive soil because, white in theory this may reduce the shrinkage, many people recognize that if water is introduced to dewatered soil, the soil will swell.

[00012] In laboratories, companies that claim to be able to stabilize expansive soil with proprietary techniques often produce laboratory evidence that they can reduce the volumetric changes of soil. These manufacturers do not typically claim to reduce all of the potential volumetric changes of the soil, but rather claim to be able to reduce it to a level where they believe the level of damage to a facility is tolerable. A paper by Petry mid Little in the

November/December 2002 edition of the Journal of Materials ip Civil Engineering, titled “Review of Stabilization pf Clays and Expansive Soils in Pavements and Lightly Loaded Structures -

History, Practice, and Future,, addresses some of the chalicnges with stebilizatibn tec hniques and states, “Tt is always important and will continue to be important to clearly identity the mechanisms of modification and stabilization of clay soils. Only when these have been clearly identified can we address problematic reactions and improve the product.,. Ute paper further states, ^Although some nontraditional stabilizers are attractive alternatives, some of their producers are overiy aggressive in promoting their product. Some of these; promotions attack traditional stabilizers in an attempt to discredit them and obtain market share. These attacks often demonstrate a poor level of understanding of the mechanisms mvolved.,, And, the paper in summery states, “llie paper warns that competent engineers who apply their profrasional knowledge judiciausly musi judge the effectiveness and appropriateness of all stabilizers. litis knowledge is not cheap but must be gained through a dedicated effort to learn the fundamental ciwaepls of stabilization arid to keep abreast of the state of knowledge as it develops nationally and in a given region. This requires dedication to continuing education and a proactive mindset in attitude by the engineer,,, These comments speak to the difficulty in selecting a proprietary stabilization technique and knowing with confidence that it will be successful* And, again, white same claim to come ven ⁷ close, it is important to remember that these techniques do not completely eliminate any possible soil voltime change- An added concern with chemical stabilization techniques tian be concerns regarding poteially hazardous chemicals being introduced into the ground.

[00013] The prior art also teaches the controlling the moisture content of expansive soil under a foundation. For example, U.S, pal. No, 4, 534, 143* issued to Goines ei ak, discloses a subsurface irrigation system causing water to slowly percolate into tiie expansive soil supporting a foundation so as to maintain tlte moisture content of the soil. However, it is virtually impossible forany artifteiaimeans of moisture control to maintain absolutely constant moisture contents under a real facility exposed to the highly' variable conditions which are common* Moisture migration n partially saturated soil is extremely complex and the mechanisms arc only generally understood by limited empirical evidence that supp<>rts widcly varying themics. What little evidence there is relative to the complexity of The phenomenon actually indicates that moisture migration can occur even: if there was a vertical barrier toany moisture migration in or out under the perimeter edge of a foundation, making any attempt at complete moisture control potentially ineffective, with any interior moisture migration as soil ctrnditions MH equilibrium Over time causing volumetric changes considering that In alfateit all cases on teal project there are hon-homogenous soil conditions under a building, especially so as tire moisture content of soil itself is a common non- homogenous soil condition. LLS. Rat No. 4,015, 432# issued to Ball, discloses a foundation stnicture supported ort expansi ve soil moistened to its plastic limit Tlirougha moisture controlling barrier placed arotmd the foundation periphery, moisture can be added in an attempt to ensure that fhe moistuie content af tire sail remains at its plastic limit However, a moisture controlling barrier cannot bp reliably effective in all cases as described above. Furthermore, it is only effective even in theory if it is deep enough, and the depth reqitired in seme instances, as discussed above considering the depth of the active zone, ean be mote expensive to construct than other approaches which are more likely to tie successful that do not require suc h a deep excavation.

[00014] 2021 IBC Section 1806.6,2 allows foundations to bedesigned as a slab-onground foundation, where the entire bottom surface of the foundation, including the slab, is generally supported vertically by the soil. In general, when this approach is taken, any significant concerns with the potential magnitude of damage from volumetric changes in expansive soil are typically addressed in part by attempting to lessen toe antleipated level of damage by applying the techniques described above as referenced in 2021 IBC Sections 1808.63 and 1808,6,4, and the challenges with those approaches are discussed above. In addition, a primary challenge With installing 8 slab-on-ground foundation over expansive Soils that are hot completely' removed at totitplstely stabilized Is titer some level of damage due to expansive soil should be expected, 2021

IBC Section 1806.6.2 refers to design methods that attempt to account for soil-structure interaction, toe deformed- shape of the soil support as well as eetifer lift and edge lift conditions, all of which note how 8 foundation will distort in three-dimensional geometry and an attempt is made to limit the distortion to an acceptable level, This U a common approach, especially far residences and .small Commercial struclures built in geographic areas where expansive soils are prevalent, however, damage occurs to both the superstructure and often the tinder-slab utilities regularly in these types of facilities. Evidence of this is the large number of foundation repair uhnparties that are pre valent m geographic arete* where expansive soils are common. If damage occurs to an under-slab utility, the slab can be sqwcut and removed immediately above the area of broken utility so that the utility can be repaired and the slab repaired; however, damage to underslab utilities can and often does occur, requiring, expensive repairs.

[00015} 2021 IBC Section 1808.6.1 provides an alternate to a slab-on-groWid foundation by permitting foundations be designed toresist differential volume changes and prevent structural damage to the supported structure. With this alternative approach, ^Foundations peneltating expansive soils shall be designed to resist forces exerted on the foundation due to soil volume changes or shall be isolated from the expansive soil.*.

[<>0016} An older method in the prior art that meets the requirements of 2021 IBC

Section 18O8»6« I is to install an elevated foundation with a traditional crawlspaue under the flupr.

When a properly designed crawlspace foundation resists expansive soil forces* the superstructure beingelevatedby a crawlspace protects the superstructure from expansive soil damageifthe height of the crawlspace is greater than the magnitude of the potential vertical upward movement due to volumetric changes of expansive soils. There ate two primary plumbing codes used irithe United

States today : the International P lumbing Code and the Uniform Phimbing Code. Neither of the latest published versions of either code explicitly require isolation of plumbing from expansive soils. And* where under-slab utilities are supported by and Wied in an expansive soil material, volumetric soil changes; can cause damage to the. under-slab utilities, especially where the flour structure is isolated and the differential movement is greater than if die slab was a slab on grade foundation. If urider-slab utilities are hung from an elevated floor structure after the elevated floor structure is installed, die under-stab utilities being elevated above an under-utility space protects the under-slab utility from expansive soil damage if the under-utility space is greater than die magnitude of the potenti^ vertical upward movement due to volumetric changes pf expansive soils. Arid, this post-slab isolation approach is actually common in portions of crawlspace foundations where access is provided to the under-floor space after the floor structure is installed by means of an access opening, bin this post-slab isolation approach is not typically' applied to areas under » slab where the depth of under-slab utilities is deeper than the subgrade of a crawispace. Many building codes require that underfloor spaces with access openings be considered crawispaces and be ventilated for the safety of those that enter an under-floor Space, either with an unpowered natural ventilation system comprised of sufficiently large openings in appropriate locations or with a mechanical ventilation system. However, a disadvantage of the natural ventilation system is that animals such as snakes, opossums, cats, rats, mice, spiders, termites, bees. etc. can often find access to the trnder-floor space and create safety hazards for the occupants when they leave the building and an ongoing nuisance for maintenance xtaiT to address these safety hazards. Furthermore, water and/or humidity can often enter through natural ventilation openings and the prcscriptively designed natural ventilation openings are sometimes not sufficient to be capable ofremoving the water and/ot humidity, Which can create problems with corrosion of structural members, as well as potentially smells and/or fungal growth Mt can find its way through openings in the slab ami create health, safety and welfare concerns. Mechanically ventilated systems are problematic for owners because they can have mechanical failures over time due to wear and tear oil moving parts and exposure io the elements, and it is common for occupants and maintenance staff to not realize when these mechanical failures have occurred because occupants generally do nut go into: under-floor spaces unless there is an event creating a special need such as a maintenance acti vity. When mechanical ventilation systems stop functioning and there is not a natural ventilation system io places the problems with moisture accumulatitin cab occur such as corrosion to structural elemenls that causes safety concerns and mold and smells that enter the occupied space above the floor structure, which can all be dramatic where steel floor structures are used that are not sufficiently protected from corrosion, such as with ungaivariized steel, and when openings such as floor hatches dp not have rpbust and properly functioning seals.

(000171 A more recent alternative to a crawlspace type of foundation isthe slab-on- voidform foundation type. An advantage ofthe slab-on-voidform system is that it can cost significantly less to construct than a crawlspace foundation. One reason a slab-on-voidform foundation can post significantly less is because the floor structure dees not require expensive formwork, often regularly spaced unshored steel beams, U> span tong distances and hold up flesh concrete that has no compressive strength white not deflecting an unacceptable amount Another reason a slab-on-voidform foundation can cost significantly less is becaustehe height of the underfloor space of a slab-oiwoidfonn foundation needs only to be enough to accommodattehe potential vertical movement of expansive soil whereatshe height of the xmder-fleor space of a crawlspace foundation must be adequate to meet building code requirements for access and allow workers to do work such as removing any temporary* shoring, installing atty under-slab utilities that will be installed after a floor structure is in place, as well as inspecting conditions after occupancy and eventually doing repairs; and, foe cost of a foundation Increases as the height of the gradebeams around perimeter increase due to increases in the height of an under-floor space.

And* another reason whythe slab-on-voidform sy stem can cost less to construct is that a slab-on- voidform system typically does not have ah utideMlab drainage system since the under-floor space is npt accessible whereas crawlspace foundations typically have a drainage System. And, another reason why the slab-on-voidform system can cost less to construct is that a slab-un-voidfonn system typically does not have any lighting like is common m many crawlspaces becaustehe under-floor space of a slab-cm-voidform foundation is hot an accessible space. Another reason Why tlicslab-on-voidform system is preferred over a crawlspace system is that a slab-on -voidform foundationcan be installed atthe graund level surrounding a building wifoput requiring stairs to raise a floor elevation so as to provide natural ventilation of a crawkpace. if such a system tensed,

Another reason why the slab-on- v'oidforui system is preferred over a crawlspaee is that there is not natural ventilation or mechanical ventilation as described above for crawlspace foundations, and consequently no challenges associated with those sytems as described above, as there are withcrawteptM foundations. While the slab^n-voidform foundation type is a more recent application than a crawlspaee foundation type, slate whh various types of voids that could possibly be considered slab-on-voidfomi foundations have been Installed for over a century* With time, the slab-on-voidform foundation type has evolved and a common manifestation is where drilled piers and grade beams are installed that resist the forces of expansive soil, then a layer of degradable canon voidtbrms arc installed over a subgrade arid the voidfom system often includes a layer of

Masonite at the top, then a vapor harrier such aS a plastic Sheet is installed over the vbidforM, and then slab reinforcement is installed, and them concrete fe poured to create die stab of a slab-on- voidform foundation tn which the degradable carton voidforms deteriorate sufficiently that the slab is isolated from the expansive soil beneath the under-floor space. One manufacturer of carton voidforms has indicated that they distribute approximately 30 Million square feel of carton

Yoidforms for this type of application every year for new construction in North America. Because there is no means of access to the under-floor space as with a crawtspaee foundation, under-slab utilities have historically been supported by and juried in expansive soil when a slab-irn-vbidfomi

System is used, which can cause damage like has been described above In expansive soil conditions. It i§ true Mt moisture can accumulate in an under-floor space ofa slab-on-voidform system; however, today many slabs are installed over vapor barriers with tape Mt adhere to the concrete at the edges of vapor barrier shttets and penetrations to prevent moisture fromrisingabove the vapor barrier in modem slab-on- voidform foundations. Studies have shown that, if there is not a vapor barrier under carton voidfomis, a subgrade typical ly has enough moisture With the moisture associated with fresh concrete as it cures, to cause modem carton vpidfomis to degrade in an acceptably fast time, several months for example, to lose enough strength that: they will crush before telegraphing atty toads up from a heaving subgrade, as they are typically not wax impregnated today as in some decades past. A paper by David K. Isbell, PE titled, Performance of Cardboard Carton Forms as presented on February 21, 2001 to the Foundation Performance

ANsripititiori, arid previously a part of a conference of the Texas Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) states, “The moisture from the subgrade plus the hydration of the concrete appear to provide adequate deterioratfon of tire boxes,„ In some climates more titan in others, degradable voidforms can be problematic ifit rains too frcquentJyoris toc humid, because the degradable voidfonns can lose their strength before concrete is poured arid there have been many collapses of degradable voidforms when contractors have tried to take the risk rather than remove all of tire reinforcement and voidforms and start all over again. Primarily for this reason, non-degradabte voidform materials used in slab-on-voidform foundations ate also in the prior art,

In general, with voidfomis that have non-degradable components, designers typically specify (hat they be installed in a manner so that they are capable of crashing under some theory of a crashing mechanism of that they are capable of cutting into a heavihg soil tinder some theory in which the soil will swell in between Lhe non-degradable cxnnpcmenLs of a voitlftirtn system.

[00018] As an example of one of the more common systems of carton voidforms used today in many parts .of the United States fo provide temporary support for a Slab of a slab-on- vbidform foundation, VoidForm® Products, LLC provides a SureVoid® product cojnrugated paper vpidform system with regularly spaced vertical cardboard partitions in a grid pattern with a horizontal layer of cardboard across foe top and bottom. Typically, a layer of Masonite is placed

Over the carton boxes.

[00019] As anottier example of systems in the prior art tor supporting slabs of stab- on-voidfonti foundations, Reliable Void forms, of Austin, Texas, provides ah alternative td the traditional carton void form system. Instead of corrugated paper, Reliable Void Forms uses a molded pulp form made of 100% recycled paper with a consLstency and shape similar to an egg carton. Forms are produced in 61 cm x 61 cm (24„x24„) squares with thicknesses of either 15 cm

(6 in) or 20 cm (8 in). During installation. the forms can be cut, trimmed, or grinded to the appropriate shape and Size, iMHKe cardboard forms, the manufacturer claims these forms can be used in wet or dry conditions, Also, due to their shape and weight, they can easily be shipped, stored, hauled, and manipulated in the tield. Once laid out on the site, the concrete is poured over the top, Gradually, over time, the forms Will degrade, but until that happens, one theory purports that any soil expansion is isolated within foe pockets.

[00920] An example of a voidform system with tion-degradable components is a t^aliy plastic voidform product by VoidForm^ called Stonn Void™ which has plastic elements that do not deteriorate like the standard carton SureVoid^ products. This means the structural elements (i»e. slabs, grade beams, etc.) must be designed for the potential uplift pressures the form is capable of exert ing.

[00021] Another example of a voidform system with non-degradable components ip the prior are involves the use of a metal wire mesh formed into a volumetric shape as produced by

StiperVnid Systems. LtC. In tine theory, volumetric changes in the soil could cause foe soil to piish on the wire mesh, in turn causing the mesh to deform .er the soil to push through the mesh. This means die structural elements (i-e. slabs, grade beams, etc.) must be designed for the potential uplift pressures the form is capable of exerting. If a version of the SuperVoid product is used with a horizontal layer of oriented strand board or ply wood at the top of the wire mesh, the oriented strand board or plywood is degradable and can lose strength over time, but this, is not problematic in and of itself when the SuperVoid system is used as a slab voidform because the slab wilt have cured by the time the wood material decays.

[00022] As there are many advantages with slab-on-voidform foundations, given that nan-degradable voidforms can be used where degradable voidforms are not practical due to a wet climate, the primary disadvantage of the slab-<m- voidform foundation type has been that there is no method available in the prior art of sufficiently protecting under-slab utilities from volumetric

Soil changes to a subgrade.

(00023) With regard to the protection of under-slab utilities under slab-on-voidform foundations, many slab-on-voidtbrtn foundations today are constructed with under-slab utilities being supported by and buried In a subgrade of expansive Soil even though there is a known risk that volumetric soil changes couldcausc damage to afacility. The primary reasonthat under-slab utilities are still soil-supported is that a technology has not yet emerged in the prior art which provides complete isolation of the utilities from potential volumetric roil changes Even if access tothe under-floor space was provided, because the vbidforms do not degrade quickly enough for workers -fo access an Under-floor spaed without removing: the voidforms or because hott-degradable void forms obstruct such access and would require removal, which would be an arduous task, the industry has not yet developed a method of construction with the necessary apparatuses so as to suspend under-slab utilities before a concrete slab of a steb^m-vdidforrn foundation is poured.

While there are some disagreements between designers on the relative merits of the theories applied when non-degradablc voidibrms are used to isolate slabs of a slabron-voidfonn system, with, regard to various specific types of non-degradable voidform systems, there is a general consensus among design professionals of all design disciplines that absolutely none of these: systems are appropriate if pop-degradable components of a voidfbrrn system can cause soil to impart forces, directly or indirectly through the non-degradable crehportente.

[00024) Section 506.1 of the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code

(IPMC), for example, requires where it is adopted locally that “Every plumbing stack, vept, waste and sewer Hneshatl function property and be kept free from obstruetiqns, leaks and defects.,, And, for example only a small amount ofniovemertl from vqlumietilesrtii change is di that it can take to cause a P-irap to creek j ust enough that the water in the P-trap spi lls out allowing noxious gases from a sanitary sewer system to enter an occupied space. There have been numerous lawsuits around the country that arise when plumbing Is damaged from volumetric soil change soon after a building is occupied and under-slab Utilities fail in various Way’s, especially When Owners realise the magnitude of tile cost required to repair the undcr-slab utilities as they can be required by buildihg codeto repair. The costs of repairs are so significant because, unlike withaslab on grade or a crawispace, there is.no convenient access to: the under-slab utility locations needing repair.

One reason it is so expensive to repair ah under-slab utility under a slab of a slab-on-voidform foundation is that it is often required to sawcut temporary access openings ip the slabs; at the intersection of two lines with each line being approximately at the midpoint between a gridlifie of deep foundation eletnenis such as drilled pit®*, tiiert excavate by hand to dig lateral ly and find all locations where plumbing needs to be repaired^ often having to walk wheelbarrows of din out of a building and dump it outside. If one were to sawcut immediately over arty damaged utility

Iocation, sawcutting through a typical two-way structurally suspended. reinforced concrete slab of a slab-on- voidforai foundation, one could easily Cause the slab to collapse as they sawcut through portions of the slab between piers that are necessary' for structural stability and this does happen from time to time in the industry by accident When contractors think a slab is a slab on ground but find put tod late thai it is a slah-on-voidforrn system. Owners are even more angry' when they find out that the repairs will not prevent the problem from happening over and over again, potentially* over the life of the facility. Designers in areas where expansive soil often discuss this primary disadvantage of a slaMn-voidform system with Owners before construction, noting that Owners could select a urawlspace option for additional cost if they want the ability to access and even to isolate some portions of the plumbing; however, most owners are unfortunately short-sighted in authorizing -a stab-on-voidforni system a$ they are focused oh the short-term goal of trying to maximize the floor plan area for their facility’s program with a given budget

(0002S) For example. in March 2021* the Geoprofessional Business Association

(GBA) has publishedacase study, CascIIistoryNumbcr 108, ofa$25Milliondatnageclaim madc by an owner of a senior-living facility in Colorado in which siab-on-voidform construction was used whereundcr-slab utilities were not sufficiently isolated from expansive soil that damaged the under-slab utilities. About four years after construction was completed and the building was occupied., sanitary sewers began hacking up and a powerful stench was permeating the building and the walls and fewer-level slab began to show heaving distress. The owner had to move residents out of the building and into suitehfe temporary housing and they eventually paid a contractor to excavate under the building and install a crawlspaee.

(00026) As another example, inthe United States Court of Federal Claims, Cause

No. 09-672C, filed September 7, 2012, which involves a case where under-slab utilities under a slab-on-voidfbrrn foundation were damaged by expansive soil because the under-slab utilities were not sufficiently isolated from the damage that expansive soil can cause, the court rated that the mechanical engineering firm ..had a duly to isolate the plumbing from the expansive soil in a way tfiat would accommodate the maximum potential soil heave predicted in the soils reports,, noting that “...whether willful or not. the mechanical engineering firm “...failed to heed the warning and guidance set forth the soils reports’ prediction that the soil could heave..

“...and provided a negligent design in violation: of the Contract,.

[00027] M early as 2U07,thc f oundation Performance Association (FPA) published a recommendation in their SC-i l-d publication titled Specification and Application of Void

Spaces Below Concrete Foundations that “Expansive soils should not support under slat) utilities bdtow aStructural Slab,, where the industry often refers to aslab of a slab-on-voidform foundation as a structural slab. The publicat iun further states, “tinder slab piping must remain stationary with respect to the slab. The distance between the slab and toe buried utilities may change as the soil moisture changes. These changes cohid cause the utility lines to disconnect, start leaking or

Otherwise fail. There arc various methods to accommodate such differential movement by using designs that allow the utilities to adjust to the changing conditions. The piping design beneath the foundation must take into consideration the differential movement between die interior stationary piping and the soil outside the foundation, and any associated bending stresses.,, The SC-11 -0 publication even includes a diagram that diagrammatically shows a hanger assembly, including a traditional clevis hanger supporting an under-slab utility pipe, but the diagram shows the hanger to be either supported by rebar or to be supported by a concrete slab after it is poured and cured, both of which are impossible because the diagram shows both the slab and the rebar being supported py votdfotms which are still intact which mean,* that there is no access fo install the utility pipe after the slab is poured and it means there was no support to install the utility pipe before the slab Was poured. Additionally, the diagram docs not show any means for retaining foe soil an either side of a utility pipe. The discussion and diagram showthe disconnect between what i$ desired and what limited technology wasavailable in the prior art in 2007. In a 2014 revision to die SC-11 document, numbered SC-11-L die FPA did not change any of the text cited but event with a revised detail they showed a scenario foal is impossible to cOri$tnict for reasons cited above.

Iheir reference to ^various methods to accommodate such differential movement by using designs: ihatallothwe utilities to adjust to the changing conditions,, is referring to what some in the industry refer to as flexibl e joints, such as a flexible expansion joint, The FFA’s recomniendatiom have been made as a community of primarily geotechnical and structural engineers With the best, of inieni but with little to ho involvement from plumbic designers or contractors that could point out foe disconnect in what they are recommending and what construction methods are in the prior art, For example. die problem with a sanitary sewer plumbing design that incorporated flexible expansion joints all alongthe length of an under-slab utility is that most sanitary sewer systems function by a gravity system that has to stope downward at a minimum slope along the entire length of the plumbing system and. tn addition, plumbing codes require specific minimum slopes, so it is nottechnically feasible to ha ve an underslab utility system with so many flexible expansion joints slope So dramatically that at any point under a slab the subgrade could heave and/or fall without cau&inga ne^tive slope that would: cause the sanitary sewer system to no longer function properly, and furthermore the cost of so many flexible expansion joints would Cost more than a erawlspace foundation in many cases sueh that, even if it were technically feasible for a specific casUj it would most likely not be a logical approach compared with a erawlspaee foundation. As another example.. SC- 114 diagramatically shows a soil retainer system that has no means of

Stabil i ty to retain foe toi l. [00028] There have been several attempts to invent methods and apparatuses with a goal being to attempt to isolate undcr-slab utilities from expansive softs. However, all of these attempts have failed in one form or another to provide ah actual means of isolation. When the

Structural Engineers Association of Texas (SEAoT) became aware of the concept behind some of the disclosed inventions for novel ways to isolate under-stab utilities it quickly assembled approximately a dozen engineers including structural engineers, geotechnical engineers and mechanical engineers to review available technologies and make recommendations because they recognized Ihatnone oftheprior art has been able to sufficiently isolate utititiesand utility supports from expansive soil, in contrast icr embodiments t>f the invention disclosed herein,, In January

2021, based on the reeommendations oftiie aforementioned group of engineers, SEAoT submitted tothe International Code Council (ICC) a codechange proposal to the 2024 International Plumbing

Code (IPC) that would require an sufficient means of Isolating under-slah utilities from expansive soil tinder slabs that ate isolated, consistent With this invention, and would prohibit the majority of prior art methods as they do not sufficiently isolate under-slab Utilities; One exception tn the prior art is that it would remain permitted to install plumbing and supports after the slab is poured by removing vojdforms and post-installing anchors overhead, which is in the prior art butis often thoughtto he eost-prohibitive for new construction. SEAoT submitted a 14 page document io ICC with the rationale for their proposed code change. The -SEAuT document is available at at group-a/ and is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein herein.. At the

International Plumbing Code Committee Code Action Hearings, SEAoT' s proposed code change was supported by testimony from various mechanical and structural engineers, die

GcoprotCssioual Business Association, the American Institute of Architects arid the American Council of Engineering Companies of Texas. The 2024 International Plumbing Code Committee then approved the proposed cpde change, with some modifications tliat SEAoT supported that clarified the intent of the proposed code change. And, the change Will be a part of the 2024 liTtemational Plumbing Code when it is published. While numerous serious attempts have been made in the last Several decades, the prior art methods, as described above, do not meet die requirements for isolation as will beset forth in the 20241PC.

It may be important to note that, white the United Sw Court of Federal Claims indicated in the case cited above that the mechanical engineering firm was negligent in designing a soil- supported under-slab utility under a slab- on-vodform foundation for the specific project al issue. there were approximately a dozen engineers assembled by the Structural Eingincers Association of

Texas, including structural engineers, geotechntcalengi fleers and mechanical engineers, which all

Indicated in their collective rationale statement to ICC that designing a soil-supported under-slab utilities under a slabron-voidforni foundation Was within the standard of care fix each of those professions in Texas as of January 2021 when the statement was issued to ICC. Tile standard of care may change over time to exclude this practice, but this practice is still being used today.

And, while some building officiate might interpret current code requirements to prohibit soil-supported utilities under slab-on-voidfortn where expansive suite are present, ths only interpretation of code provisions that applies toany specific project with regard to code compliance is the opihidii of the building official With the Authority Having JuriSdictfon (AHJ) ^: for that project. There are many prujecte in Texas where building officials issue building permits without taking any exception to soil-supported under-slab utilities under a slab-on-voidform or a crawlspace foundation, even when they are provided a copy of a soil report inditiatmg that expansive soilsare present and documentation indicating that there wUl remain some potential vertical movement of the subgrade after the building is occupied. .

(00029) Prior art systems forvertically supporting utilities (including but nbt limited to sanitary Sewer piping^ that ate designed to be located under structurally suspended concrete stilbs over void forms (including but rtol limited to carton and plastic void forms) bearing on other foundation dements including but not limited to piers, piles, caissons, footings, and grade beams) without a typical crawl-space access include systems that directly hear on soil within the active zone (“Direct Bear Systems,,), hi these systems the utilities are laid down directly <m top of the soil in the active zone at on top of material (includmgbut pot limited to coarse aggregate (rocks), title aggregate (sand), cemented sand, flowable cementitous fill, road base. lime-stabilized earth) that is laid down directly on top of the soil in the active zone.

(00930) The prior Sri also includes systems that indirectly bear on soil within the active Zone (“indhect Beat Systems^), in which utilities typicaliy hang from above by a threaded rod that is supported by a primary nut bearing on the system (e.g. prior art systems known as:

PlumbingVoid> and Pipe-Void) which is bearing on soil witfun tite active zone or other material that is bearing on soil within the active zone. The threaded rods typically extend up into the thickness of the concrete slab with some form of anchorage (including but not limited to a secondary nut) so that the slab can act as another support; however, the primary nut stays in place and is not removed because the operations of pouring the concrete Slab and allowing it to cure prohibit any kind of convenient access underneath to remove the primary nut Indirect Hear

Systems do not liave a reliable means of avoiding the risk that expansive soil could damage underslab utilties; and, there can even be a risk of a much larger amount of damage titan with Direct Bear Systems if any hangers in contact with soil corrode and pipes fall or if any soil retaining systems fail arid pipes shift dramatically.

[00031] Both Direct Bear Systems and Indirect Bear Systems can allow volumetric changes (vertically and horizontally) in the active zone to cause tbroes to bear on the utilities which can cause the utilities to shift (including but not limited id deflecting up Or down over certain regions of utility piping, breaking utilities, Pt causing them to leak), the Indirect Bear Systems are not capable of resisting the forces like foundation elements such as drilled piers, driven piles and sufficiently deep footings. When utilities shift too much, the utilities carmen function properly.

For example, sanitary sewer piping typically requires sewage flow downhill and any portions that bend after uonstruetion, in any direction, can cause sewage to hut flo w properly. Even if flexible joints are installed to these utilities, the pipes themselves (including but limited to PVC, cast iron and ductile iron piping) are typically not capable of flexing as much as they may need to flex and: blatotato a positive Slope for drainage. Unlike maintenance of sanitary sewer under crawl-space and slab-on-grade type foundations, maintenance of utilities is relatively difficult and expensive because oenvenmt access directly to or directly above the area of concern cannot be provided. and lndirect Bear Systems often create additional obstacles to such repairs.

[00032] It is, therefore, desirable to have a system tiiat dries not bear (directly or indirectly) on any soil witton the active zone but rather bears on structural elements that are bearing dji still below the active zone and/or are designed to sufficiently resist the vertical forces associated’ witii voltimetrie changes in the acti ve rone by virtue of their penetration below the active zone.

[00033] Additionally, Indirect Bear Systems are generally proprietary systems which require relying on components of the system to retain soil so that soil does not toll, slide, push, deflect, rotate, or otherwise either directly cause forces on the utilities or indirectly by means of beconungashimwhcte a void was intended (including but not limited to under foe utility piping, above foe utility piping, on eitf ler side adjacent to the utility piping, and related to any permanent system element such as saddles and hangers) to isolate the utility from potential soil-related forces, whidi can cause utilities to rid longer fiinctioti as intended and require relatively expensive maintenance. One reason these systems typically require that the proprietary components retain soil is that the systems are too wide for the main layer of void forms (immediately under the slab) to structurally span over them and reliably support rebar, workers, arid wet concrete until the concrete cures. T he problem with: these proprietary retaining elements is that these systems have

Pot been designed by structural engineers and there is insufficient evidence that they can reliably retain soil after eonstriictioti for many common conditions which are necessary for typical construction. For example, a horizontal layer of plywood sipports several feet of still in foe

SuperVoid system. And, as another example, l/2„ thick plastic retainer boards with the manufacturer claiming that they are acceptable to a depth of 8 feet bat the height of the soil to be retained in flat limited, which could lead an installer to install a retaining wall foal is 8 feet tall made entirely out of 1/2 _N thick plastic retainer board and these systems can fell.

(00034] Therefore, there is a need for a system that allows soil retainage aspects to be designed by qualified design professionals for each specific application, using methods in the prior art (including but not limited to temporary vertical cuts in cohesive soil where there is an acceptable factor of safety, sloping the grade to an acceptable stable slope such as foe angle of repose for cohesionless soils, and installing permanent concrete retaining walls that become buried underground but do not extend above the bottom of the main layer of void forms immediately under the concrete slab). [00035] Also, Indirect Bear Systems Ore typically buried under sod as utility lines elevations vary in depth below the slate, which exposes the badger ftypically a threaded rod) to soil which can corrode the hanger over time if it is made of a corrodable material The main reason that these Systems are buried is that, since they are too wide for boxes above to span over them, they have to support soil above them and retain soil adjacent to lhem and therefore it is desired to have the soil retaining elements span as short a distance as possible. If the hanger corrodes sufficiently, U can cause the support system u> fail which can cause the utilities to mn function and require relatively expensive repairs, the primary nut typically needs to only support empty piping before the slab is poured. After the stab is poured and cured, as piping is filled with fluids arid emptied during occupancy, the hangers support a larger load than the system supporting the primary nut was designed to support and die hangers begin to support a dynamic (not static) load which can cause failure of hangers upon jarring. Under occupied conditions, these hangers can fail if corroded.

[00036] It is, therefore, desirable to have a system that does not allow soil to contact any of the hanger assemblies. Furthermore, generally corrosion resistant materials such as fiberglass, aluminum, stainless steel and galvanized steel ate available with far use ii> Ibis invention to resist any ambient sub-slab moisture for an even longer useful life expectancy.

[00037] Also, since Indirect Bear Systems retain soil, the inspections required by the building ctode are hindered by the soil retaining components of those systems.

[00038] A desirably solution, therefore, allows full inspection of piping as requited by building codes.

[00039] In Indirect Bear Systems, because they retain soil, there is not sufficient height in the systems to accommodate a sufficiently long hinge pipe with void space underneath. a rotating joint at the end of the slab-hung length of utility piping and a rotating and telescoping joint at the soil-supported end of the hingepipe to transition between the two systems at the exterior ofthe grade beam. Huis arrangement is necessary so that, if the potential vertical movement occurs upward, the utility piping will not slope less than tile minimum permitted by applicable regulations.

If the potential vertical movement downward occurs, then the utility piping will not exceed any maximum slope permitted by applicable regulations.

[00040] It is, therefore, desirable to have as system that allows independent soil retaining systems so that a hinge pipe can be installed to successfully transition between slab-hung and sol i-supported sections of utility piping and can utilize rotating and telescoping joints available in the prior art.

[000411 Also, Indirect Bear Systems are difficult to access after construction if it is necessary to maintain them.

[00042] It is, therefore, desirable to have a system that avoids the need for maintenance associated with damage caused by expansive soil, which can happen in the prior art as noted above. It is also desirable to have a system that allows imiependently designed soil retaining systems so that design professionals can create sufficiently large void spaces along the sides of the utility piping that can be more-easily accessed horizontally through openings in exterior grade beams by removing exterior backfill (rather than cutting temporary access openings vertically into the slabs and hand-digging from the opening to pipe location which can often be for from the nearest potential location for a temporary slab opening),

[00043] An example of an Indirect Bear System in the prior art device aimed at addressing the issue of damage ciyused by expansive soils is the PlurnbingVoid® product by

VoidForm, which includes a unit having a plurality of tnembers that, when used in combination, is intended to create a self-contained void space for the safe routing of plumbing lines, electrical lines and other conduits underground. The Unit included a plurality of selectively arrayed panel sections coupled together to form a routing path. The panel sections are Supported with a plurali ty of bracc^connvctors for stability, Additional panels may be added over the top of the panel sections so as to enclose the spade; Pipe is laid withinfoespace and elevated as necessary to ensure proper drainage. Elevation is secured through the use of a clevis bracket and threaded tod configured: to extend put through the space and panel sections. A fastener and washer combination is used io provide temporary su^ort for the pipe being supported by the braees/connectors. By modifying the panel sections, routes may be customized to accommodate plumbing heeds.

However, this system does not isolate the utilities from expansive soil because it is an Indirect

Bear System and, as noted by SEAoTin their 14 page rationale statementsupporttng their proposed code change to prohibit Indirect Bear Systems, the PlumbingVoid product does not sufficiently isolate Utilities from expansive soil A common PlumbingVoid detail that has been used has interior spacers “above or below pipe,, which can contact the pipe and impart loads onto the piping if the soil swells er shrinks and causes the box to shift up or down mere than the gap between the pipe and the interior spacers# No specific elevation for the spacers is provided an the detail and spec! tiers typically do not specify any clearance dimension above or below the pipe. The purpose of the spacers is to provide an intermediate bracepoint for tile retaining boards,, which are mt designed by an Engineer for the site conditions m the standard product, to prevent excessive deflection which could pinch the pipe arid cause damage. For this reason, the interior spacers are typically near the piping and so this is a legitimate concern, in addition, the LUbars at the bottom ate often bare steel without any protective coating and in contact with soil studi that they could corrodeaiid fail even though they are structurally necessary to keep the tWb vertical retainer boards separated enough so that they do not fail and pinch the pipes, which could cause the pipes to break,

It bps been suggested that a “knife-edge,, will occur so that no load will push the box up from the bottom;, however, SBAoT indicates they believe this! is an incorrect theory because, while soil docs expand when it gets wet, expansive soil does not become a tim'd as is evidenced by the fept that it has sufficient internal compressive strength to impart significant upward pressures and a layer of dry soil can na to rally occur over a layer that becomes wet Such as with deep seated swell that has been observed in many forensic investigations. The, PlumbingVoid® Washer is a large washer that is intended tu fold in between two U-Bars when the hex is pushed upward when soil swells.

Until this folds, there is a load imparted unto the hanger sd that it could buckle Ihe hanger, especially if the hanger is about 7 feet long as the manufacturer’s derail indicates it is applicable with trenches that are 8 feet deep, If the rod does not fall, the rod will impart load onto the slab that the slab must be designed for, A Structural Engineer designing the slab would need to know ths locations of these hangers and design M Slab to resist these loads. If the soil Shrinks, the apil above die box would wcigb dowm the top of the box, which would not allow failure of the washer and this would mate an additional tension on the hanger which it was not designed for. Failure oftherodin tension could cause the pinmbjng tosbift downwardajnd break or r^uircmamtetiatice.

If the soil shrinks, the bottom and sides of the box would shift down with the soil whereas the top could be suspended at the original installation elevation. |f the vertical legs: of the top U-Bars are not long enough, the bottom of Hie box ebuld slide down enough that the top U-Bars no longer provide Sufficient lateral bracing of the vertical retainer boards. If the tops o f the vertical retainer board fall inward, the shifting elements could break the plumbing and/or cause shifting that indicates there could bet 8 feet of hydrpstetic soil load from a cohesionless strtita; if ib is retainer board is not thick enough io resist the lateral soil pressures at the. depths installed, the retainer board could fall inward and damage a utility pipe, . the detail calls for soil to be backfilled against flic retaining boards, but equipment loadi ng can be significant, AlsQ.theire does not appear to be shy typical, specification expected for lateral movement associated with swelling in a typical detail that has been used in industry, Swelling of expansive soil is a three-dimensional phenomenon and some lateral movement should be expected which may cause the pipes to pinch and break or service disrupted I f there is not sufficient space on each side of the clevi s hangers. I n applications where the PlumbingVoid® product has been used^the product may not have had sufficient vertical leg length bf the U-Bar _t minimum clearance above and below the piping, minimum load capacity of the sacrificial washer to support plumbing during initial installation, and maximum ultimate load capacity of the sacrificial washer. A threaded rod and clevis support is shown in the typical detail fo he in Contact with soil that could cause corrosion if the Mechanical Engineer specifics steel unless it is protected ihan approved manner ormade of fiberglass. If the hanger and/or clevis support corrodes, the plumbing may shift downward and need maintenance in an area Where maintenance Is difficult to access; Mis-installations have been encountered in industry Indicating that it js difficult for a plumber to understand the structural and geotechnical significance of the small details associated with the customization of the generic assembly for a specific application, thereby foiling the attempt to properly partially isolate foe plumbing even further.

[00044] Another example of ah Indirect Bear System fo foe prior art device aimed at addressing the issue Of dmage caused by expansive soils is the PipeVoid System manufactured by SuperVoid m which an expanded metal lath shape supports oriented strand board or plywood under an under-^lab utility pipe that is buried in soil ever the apparatus. Ibis soil is placed on top of the SuperVoid product and plumbing is placed on that soil, wi th hangers extending vertically to be roimived by the slab when the slab is installed. If expansive soil swells undetrhe assembltyh,e soil cancause the SuperVoid product totift up, which would cause the soil to tittup, which would cause the plumbing to lift up in places. This: uplift can be contrary to tiie hangerandclevissupport which can anchor foe pipe at a fixed location at supports, causing distortion in sanitary sexver lines that may cause clogs or break the lines. The SuperVuid product is comprised of expanded metal lath and plywood, ft is not likely that the expanded metal lath would corrode sufficiently soon a Iter ixicupancy . Some have claimed that these products c^nnoi transfer load because they form a

“knife edge,, where the soil splits as it heaves. This? is an invalid theory which assumes soil Is a fluid when expansive soil is associated with moisture migration through ptrrtially saturated strils that can leave soils near the surface relatively dry as soil deeper down in an expansive strata swell as a “deep seated; swell„. In reality; just as expansive soil has proven to push piping up when buried, expansive soil can push up on any material The pressure required to resist all swell in these circumstances if often thousands of pounds pct Square fobt; the metal lath product is not: sufficient to resist these loads. If the expanded metal lath compresses like a spring, there still is load that is transferred upward that the plumbing is not designed to accommodate. And, many Mechanical Engmeenido not havethe training or experience to predict whatthe stresses and strains in the plumbing would be under these circumstances, much less verify that they will not damage foe piping or interrupt service. In addition, if expansi ve soil swells on each side of the assembly, the soil can cause the plumbing to I ift tip id places. A typical detail used for the prtxitict calls for cohesionless, granular material; however, expansive soil swells laterally and upward, which can cause compression arches to form and transmit load onto thepiping, eVen in coheslonless^ granular material Furthermore, this approach uses plywood to retain fee soil above a voidspace hut the plywood may decay over time arid cause the soil to cave in undetrhe piping, which could allow expansive soil swelling to push pipes upward, even though toe hangers and clevis system would resist this upward movement, and also create the plumbing problems described above. If tile rod does not fail in buckling, the rod will impart load onto the slab that toe slab must be designed for.

A Structural Engineer would need to know the Ideations b.f these hangers and Verily that die slab can resist these loads. If toe still shrinks, the soil above the plumbing could drag down the plumbing which is at fixed elevations at each hanger* which could require maintenance; The plywood is covered on top with a eovcriR& but the bottom is ex pos ed t o moisture from the subgrade, which is typically sufficient to degrade carton voidforms soon after construction. to addition, the toil retainers ate shown to Sit on the ground when installed and not have any extension buried below the trench subgrade. If the expanded metal lath does corrode, the plastic soil retainers on each side do not have sufficient resistance at toe bottom to prevent lateral movement caused by soil loading, which could cause material to fill into the proposed voidspace. A galvanized threaded tod arid clevis support is toownin contact with soil that could cause corrosion. If the hanger and/or clevis support coflodds, tiie plumbing may shift downward and need maintenance m an area where maintenance is difficult to access.

[00945] Another example of an Indirect Bear System in toe prior art device aimed at addressing the issue of damage caused by expansive soils is the Pipe Void System manufactured by SuperVoid in which an expanded metal lath shape supports oriented strand bow’d or plywood over art under-slab utili ty pipe, wherein various soil materials ate installed over the oriented strand board or plywood. Ih this application, many concerns are similar to those expressed ft.it toe above example with the PipeVoid product under the under-slab utility pipe; In this application though, there is a SuperVoid product which provides no voidspace above the plumbing in case the soli shrinks. In this version tif the typical detail, it is possible tor toe plywood to decay at the initial suspension nut which would theoretically allow the system to slip upward. However, a threaded rad as part of a hanger assembly could cause compression on the hanger that could cause it to buckle, especially given toe note dti the typical detail to not compact soil above the plywood. In this typical detail, the plywood deteriorating could allow soil total I down under the piping and fill in the voidspace, which would allow expansive soil to heave and cause the plumbing to shift upward. If the soil shrinks> the soil above the box would weigh down the top of the box. which would create an additional tension rat the hanger which it was not designed for. Failure of the rod in tension could cause the pl umbing to shift downward and break or require maintenance. Thera does opt appear to be any specification in the detail accounting for lateral movement associated with swelling. Swelling ofexpansive soil is a three-dimensional phenomenon and some lateral movement should be expected which may cause toe pipes to pinch and break or service disrupted if there is tiqt sufficient space bn cadi side of die clevis hangers.

100046] Yet other examples of Indirect Bear Systems in the prior mt are specified on construction documents issued -by Mechanical Engineers, such as installing a strut channel over a narrow trench with a hangcr assembty suspended by toe strat channel. The soil can collapse into toe trench because there is no retaining structure. And, additiramliy, toe channel is bearing on toe subgrade which can rise or toll with volumetric soil change, which would cause the loads to transfer to toe nut supporting toe hanger assembly that would then cause the load to transfer into the slab. The slab would need to bd designed for this load and, more importantly. the load, can function intendeds.

[00047] Here is, therefore, a need tor a system that provides adequate isolation of under-slab utilities from volumetric soil changes under slaps of slab-on-\x>idfbnn foundations for many project types in geographic locations where soils undergo volumetric changes after initial construction of a project is complete.

[00048] Also, when foundation systems are isolated from expansive soil movement by voidfbrms or crawl spaces, if one attempts to isolate any slab-hung (at essentially a constant elevation) under-slab utilities (including but not limited to sanitary sewer systems, domestic water

1 into, tire protection lines, roof drains, natural gas lines* electrical conductors, telecommunications systems, etc....) from expansive soil, it is necessary to successfully transition utilities to a soll- supported utility condition at die building perimeter.

[00049] One challenge to transition when applied to a crawlspace foundation is that, because the site beyond the perimeter of a crawlspace foundation typically has expansive soil which can cause problems as systems must transition from a building condition to a site condition.

Consequently, ft is common for sanitary sewer plumbingsystems to be installed wherein theunder- slab plumbing near the perimeter is ndt hung over an under-utility space but rather buried in the subgrade because mato sanitary sewer lines which serve the under-slab utility line are typically very deep considering that traditionally sanitary sewer systems operate by gravity flow where possible. Wherfc urtder-slab utilities under ctawlspaee building foundations are not isolated, which can often extend very far into the interior of a building where a progressively deep sanitary sewer main is installed under a building to collect wastewater from many fixtures, expansive soil often causes damage to the under-slab utilities needing repair. Crawlspaee foundations are requited by the many building codes to have access and ventilation. Where such access and ventilation are provided, it is possible to dig up a buried utility line and repair the tine, but dear height conditions are often extremely limited to make the construction as economical* making these utility repairs sometimes more expensive than with a slab-on-grade system, and the repairs are not necessarily permanent because the underly ing cause of the problem can continue over and over again with tiltie.:

[00050] Flexible expansion joints have been used in the prior aft, such as those describe m IAPMO PS 51 , Industry Standard for Expansion Joints and Flexible Expansioniomts for DWV Piping Systems as published by the International Association of Plumbing and

Mechanical Officials (IAPMOX in which 0WV Pipingrefem to drain, waste and vent piping used in sanitary sewer systems. A flexible expansion joint can, have a telescoping fitting that allows axial Contraction and elongation with a rotating fitting at each end wherein each end rotates, with internal gaskets that can be suitaLble fur *itir$ilary sewer systems and a dilforent arrangement. of internal gaskets that can be suitable for pressurized Water applications such as domestic water or automatic fire sprinkler water supply pipes. Thus, flexible expansion joints can allow one end of the fixture to be at a constant elevation while the other end can Ilftor drop vertically, and in theory they can lift or drop the magnitude of the potential vertical movement ca used by volumetric sot! changes. However, there are challenges With installing such a fixture.

[00951] For example, if the flexible expansion joint is buried in soil, expansive soil may cause damage to the length of the pipe between rotating ends, which the pipe is not designed to withstand. Additionally, if the flexible expansion joint is buried in soil, it will reduce the useful life of the fixture compared to unburied conditions because it is has moving parts in soil. Over time, through Cyclical flexing, soil particles CM intrude and interfere with the intended operation of the nmving components. If the flexible expansion jdintis buried, it cannot easily be inspected during the life of tbe forility and replaced as needed. In fact, applicable regulations require certain fixtures -|||ce this be accessible for this reason. Also, if the flexible expansion Joint is not buried,

One end will need to be soi l supported. At the soil-supported end, to successfully isolate the fixture from expansive soil, the soil needs to be retained so that the soil does not encroach on the clear vertical distance required Under the length of the fixture to allow for the soil to rise the estimated potential vertical movement, The retaining structure, however, cannot be part of the foundation but must rather be soil-supported and allow for the estimated potential vertical movement up or down. Al the building perimeter, however, there needs to be a foundation element such as a grade beam, which is to remain at essentially a constant elevation. If one were to simply have soil- supported piping outside of the building extending from an unfilled trench through a vertically slotted hole, the weight of the fixture when being installed or replaced could cause a structural instiibility which would lift the soil-supported pipe, causing it to rotate which Otiuld damage the plumbing and possibly cause injury. Furthermore, in the conditions for the case described above, any pressure on the piping up or down would cause the pipe to push up or down on the soil* retaining system, which can damage the pipe. Also in these condition^ any fboting/counter-weight toaddressorpipe protection system to address issues cotild change the potential Vertical movement of die soil at those elements, Which could cause a negative drainage scenario (where water drains to the building instead of away, potentially causing more vertical movement than, originally estimated) if the soil at the plan locations of such system lias a lower potential vertical movement than the soil around such system. Also, any systems such as those described cannot be bonded to the utility line, which may need to be replaced over the life of the facility. Also, mechanieal engineers typically design and specify utilities up to 5 feet from the building perimeter with civil engineers specifying the work beyond, and there is a desire to keep any kind of transition system within this boundary' so as to stay within the scope of a single design discipline, and avoid the expensive miscoordinution that can occur if a site utility plan is designed assuming utilities can be ran Without, consideration of a transition system up to S feet away from tt building perimeter and there is a conflict discovered after installation of site utilities which requires that an entire site utility system be removed and replaced simply because the industry commonly understands the basic scope of a mechanical engineer designing utilities to end 5 feet away from a building.

[00052] Furthermore, methods in the prior art for clamping, such as a standard pipe clamp and standard pipe strap are not sufficient for clamping onto a non-structural pipe and mounting it onto a perpendicular concrete element such as a gradebeam with an over-sized hole so that the clamp «an resist axial forces in either direction, transverse forces, and momenta to allow a non-structural pipe such as a pvc sanitary sewer pipe can cantilever out to support an end of a flexible expansion joint, especially not a clamp in the prior art that can also be adjusted and remounted.

[00053] In the prior art, a standard ciamp consists of two halves that are bolted together and, when bolted together, they form a circular opening that can be clamped around a pipe. Each half of the standard clamp has flanges that extend so that, for example, a vertical pipe can be dlamped and supported vertically on a horizontal surface but this does not resist upward movement on the pipe and it does not resist transverse movement. In general, it is not typically necessary to anchor anything to a standard clap because the pipe Itself can be supported and braced as necessary. In and of itself,, a standard clamp is not capable of being hotted to a surface that is perpendicular to the pipe unless potentially bolts are; inserted in between gaps between the two halves df the cltintp, and in this case the distances of the bolts from the pipe in standard configurations are generally not sufficient to avoid reinforcement in a concrete element and have sufficient edge distance to comply with minimum building code requirements or to provide a suffitiefttiy targeenough diameter bolt to be capable of resisting toe required forces. For example, moat building codes require that plumbing be isolated from any elements with felt pr a gap so that foe plumbing can be removed add replaced over time if neeossaiy, and the oversizing of the hole for this alone can make it difficult for hefts through the gap between halves of a pipe damp to fee successfol, and if the pipe elevation needs to be adjusted after mounting it is likely that the new

Ibcatidn Will partially overlap with the old bolt and make it necessary to core out the old bolt and make the remediation even more expensive;

[00054] A standard pipe strap is a method oF mounting a pipe to a surface, however it is only suitable for mounting a pipe that is parallel to a concrete face whereas a pipe needs to cantilever out perpendicular from a foundation element m support a flexible expansion joint in this invention. Inthe prior art, attempts have been made to try to geometrically arrange a concrete face in parallel With a pipe and Use a pair of standard pipe straps so as to accommodate the need for resistance to axial forces, transverse forces and moments and provide construction tolerance in vertical elevation, however such attempts require an elaborate geometry be constructed with a cohcretc protrusion cantilevered fojm a foundation for this purpose and the field tolerances ton the plan location of such a parallel face must be relatively precise, and this approach has proven difficult in the field because it is not adjustable.

[00955] Another problem is that attempting to fabricate some kind of brace in foe field raises other concerns, for use with a system that protects plumbing under a slab of a slab- on-vuidform foundation, it is necessary by some building code provisions for components subject to corrosion to be protected in ah approved manner ahd not simply be unprotected steel, IF a standard pipe clamp is modified in the field by welding it to a support element, such as a steel component that is galvanizedth,e welding process will destrotyhe galvanized coating that protects foe Steel from initial corrosion. If a standard pipe clamp is modified in the field by welding it to a support element Such as a Component that is stainless steel, the welding process will be expensive because a stainless-steel welding operation will peed to be set up on a project Furthermore, it mag/ be xiiliivult to get proper access fo do welding, tor a welding rod to reach Where it peed? to reach. and for proper inspection of a weld between a standard clamp in the field and any other component used hi an attempt to stabilize a standard pipe clamp- Plastic components can break. in the field if overstressed during installation and/or field modification.

[00056] ‘There is, therefore, a need for an improved method of transitioning under- slab utilities of isolated foundation systems to soil-supported utility conditions suitable for both crawlspace foundations as well as siab-on-voidform foundations.

[00057] Also, voidforms are not sufficiently rig|<l for a sufficient lime to provide support to under-slab utilities under slab-on-voidform foundations before the slab Is poured- Therefore, utility suspension systems must bear on the ground; Foundation elements can do this, but they are typically tar apart so that a reinforced concrete slab can span between them, which foakeS it tiii added cost to install a utility fitoning system that bears only on foundation elements.

Any support that bears on the ground itself Is nor acceptable if it can allow forces from volumetric soil changes fo puslVpuil oti utilities and/or foundations and cause damage.

[00058] Therefore- there is a need for a method and system whereby a foaming system that is flexibly positioned arid doe? not bear on the ground.

[00059] Also, it is necessary to retain soil when supporting under-slab utilities over a voidspace that extends below the main layer of voidforms under a slabton-voidforin foundation slab. And, it is common that under-slab utilities, and voidspaces under those uliltiies, need to extend below themain layerpf voidforms if it U desired to effectively isolate them from expansive soil. Benching soil to retain this soil is problematic bepaw it is time-consunting to map out in 3 dimensional Space hbw to retain Sail to protect the distributing piping systems for under-slab utilities which can be complex, and it is time consuming to grade the benched trenches to foe propercle vati on so that when voidforms are placed the bottom of foe slab is At foe correct elevation, and soil can slough Off into foe trench, requiri ng timc-consunring, regular maintenance of foe trenches as well as risking loss of support for the boxes above which could require either exeavating a wider trench ojr trying io reconstruct the sloped soil of foe original excavation, Ibe time required is a challenge in dial it costs a lot for labor but also challenging in that carton vqidforms often used in slab-on-voidform foundations need to be placed cm a dry subgrade and concrete poured before a rein event occurs (to avoid deterioration of the catton voidforms which could cause the voidforres to collapse when placing fresh concrete., and it can be difficult to find sufficient dry periods in the weather to accomplish all that is needed whenthe sides ofthe trenches need to be benched, The only alternative to benchfog when the utilities are below tiie bottotri of the main layer of voidfonns is to install a relatively short retaining structure (often less than 4 feet inheight) Which can be more expensive than benching ifmefoods of htetalling a retaining structure tn the prior artarc used. Retaining structures are expensive to form with formwork and expensive in that they need to extend deep enough below the bottom ofthe utility trench so as to sufficiently resist overturning: and sliding from soil pressures behind the retaining structure as the building codes require retaining structures have a minimum factor df safety of 1 ,5 against overturning and sliding. These type of retaining structures are typically concrete,, reinforced with conventions! rebar, that requires additional labor costs, materials Costs arid time which increases foe construction schedule drt a project. A challenge with utility trench walls under slab-on-voidform foundations is that the soil is typically a highly expansive clay, which the International Building Code deems ^U uhs>uiteble” for use behind a retaining tirutiure. Complicating and making reteining structures in the prior art more expensive Is the fact that, expansive Soil can Create very large teral pressures on retaining structures when the expansive soil swells due to moisture content changes, and there is wide disagreement within toe GeoTcchnicai Engineering community on how great these pressures ate, with some indicating that may be thousands of pounds per square foot Many

Geotechnical Engineers recommend that ait expansive sail be removed behind a retaining structure and be replaced with less expansive “select*’ fill. There has been liligation ciaiming engineers were negligent for allowing expansive soil backfill behind a retaining structure but not accounting for the amount of rotation that can occur when these walls are embeded in the ground, as is common in the industry. H is also expensive and risky to cut voidforms around intricate spaces of compfox plumbing distribution systems in toe plumbing trenches. Manufacturers of such voidforms do not recommend overly-eutting the forms because they are designed to collapse m their manufactured ’’whole'’ condition. The risk is that the voidforms could collapse when placing concrete.

[00060] Therefore, there is a need for an underslab utility suspension system that incorporates improved soil netcHtion suitable for both crawispacc foundations as vvxrll as slab-ra> voidform foundations.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[00061] The present invention solves the above-described problems. In one aspect* it provides a system and method of using a utility support framing system for slab-on-voidform foundation systems. In another aspect it provides a method and system whereby a framing system for suspending under-slab utilities can be flexibly positioned and does not bear on the ground. In another aspect, h provides a method and system that allows soil retainage employing vertical cuts in cohesive spih sloping the grade to an acceptable stable slope, installing conventional permanent retaining structures and installing inventive mobile retaining walls that are permanent concrete retaining Walls that become buried underground but do not extend above the bottom of tod main layer of void forms immediately trader a concrete slab so as to be capable of sliding when exposed to sufficient lateral expansion pressures from retained soil The invention also provides a system and method for an under-slab utility suspension system that incorporates improved soil retention suitable for both crawlspsce foundations as weti as slab-on-voidform foundations. In another aspect, lite invention provides a method for successfully transitioning utilities to Soil-Supported conditions at a building perimeter where a slab-on-voidform foundation or a crawlspace foundation is used, th yet another aspect, it provides for an inventive clamp and method of using the same where the clamp resists axial forces, transverse forces and moments* especially when a pear of the clamps are used in fondem# such as would be necessary for a pipe to cantilever but froth a foundation gradebeam tHat is perpeifoicular to a utility pipe, and Support one end of a flexible expansion joint. In yet another aspect, the invention includes an inventive protective utility counterweight for use around a utility pipe so as to prevent the utility pipe from breaking that is alto sufficiently rigid to cantilever Support of a utility pipe through an opening tn a foundation dement, that resists overturning when itcantilevers support of a utility pipe through an opening in a foundation element, and that allows for removal and replacement of a utility pipe.

[00062] For purposes of fols disclosure, the term slab-on- voidfonn foundation means a foundation system, for a building, wherein there is a slab located immediately above a voidfonn system arid Nd slab is capable of structurally spanning over said voidform system after constructum of the building is complete, without heeding the voidform System to provide any means of Ktouctiiral support. The slab of a slab-on-voidform system is the lowest floor at the floorplan area location of the slab* wherein occupants can either walk directly on the slab or on a flooring system that js installed on fop of the slab, 1'he slab pF a slab-on-voidform foundation is primarily concrete and is reinforced With conventional reinforcement bars or post-tensioried cables. Examples uf buildings that can have slab-on-voidform foundations are government buildings, schools, churches, office buildings, banks, retail stores, parking garages, industrial bui id-irigs, Agricultural buildings, storage buildings, multi-thmily facilities and. singlc-foxriily residences.

[00063] For the purposes of this disclosure, a slab of a slab-on-voidform foundation is a reinforced concrete slab system that is installed over voidforms and attached to foundation elements. As an example, many slabs afslab-on-voidform foundations are installed in stages, with a vapor barrier placed on top of voidforms, then slab reinforcement installed on reinforcement supports thatare placed on top of the vapor barrier, then concrete pouted »n top o f the vapor barrier to encase most of all of the slab reinforcement Where a vapor barrier is installed immediately under a dab of a slab-on-voidfonn foundation, the vapor barrier shall be considered a part of the slab. As another example, some slabs of slab-on-voidform foundations are installed in stages, with post-tensioning cables installed on cable supports that are placed ori top of vordtbrms, then concrete poured on top of the voidforms to encase most or all of the slab reinforcement, then posttensioning cables tensioned.

[00064] For purposes of this disclosure, a voidtbnn system is a system that is structurally supported by a subgrade and is capable of structurally supporting a concrete slab of a slab-on-voidform foundation, wherein no part of the yoidform system is a foundation element, wherein no part of the voidform system is a framing system, wherein no part of the voidform system is a vapor barrier and related vapor barrier components, wherein the majority of the voidfarm system is not manually removed after said concrete slab is installed, and wherein the system either partially or completely consists of a configuration of material that is: degradable in that said configuration of material loses the majority of its vertical compression capacity after said configuration of material has been exposed to 100% humidity for 120 days, when compared to the vert ical compression capacity of the configuration of material with said configuration of material when originally manufactured; compressible in that the configuration ofmaterial compresses at least ’/? inch when a vertical compressive load is applied that is equal to the tributary dead load of the slab plus the tributary portion of the ultimate upward load capacity of the slab 28 days after tire concrete is poured for the slab; or hollow in that the geometric configuration of material is such that at least 25% of a horizontal cross-section of the void system is open, not any type of solid material.

[00065] For die purposes of determining if a majority of a type of formwork is not manually removed in order to determine if a type of formwork meets the definition of a voidform, the formwork ts a voidform if it is not removed from a majority fo.g, 51%) of the slab area of the formwork wherein formwork is removed completely between the slab and the subgrade; In a hybrid foundation, consisting of more than one type of formwork, determination if a type of formwork meets the definition of a vbidform is made separately for each type of formwork (e.g. areas where temporary lumber shoring has been removed are not relevant to the determination of whether traditional carton vbidfomts are voidfortns);

[00066] Examples of void form systems include degradable corrugated paper voidforms, often with vertical partitions creating a cellular configuration with sets of these cells surrounded by corrugated paper, all produced with varying degrees of moisture protection as follows dr in various combinations. ’“Uncoated,, describes corrugated paper voidforms that have no protective material used to either coat or impregnate the tbrms, and therefore are not protected from water, soil, moisture, insects, or micro-organisms. “Wax Coated*, describes a proc ess that is used to coat only the exteridr liner surface of corrugated paper vbidfbrms. This process temporarily helps maintain structural integrity, should the corrugated paper vaidfotms come in coninct with moisture befbre orduring lhe roundaiion construetion. “Wax: Impregnated,, describes the result of a process that saturates individual papers used la manufacture corrugated paper vQidfnrms with wax- Fully wax impregnated describes die result of a manuracturing process where all paper components (e.g. liners and mediums) are wax impregnated.

[00067] Compressible and/or hollow math! voidforms, are lightweight metal components that are fabricated to configure a voidspace system. An example is an expanded sheet metal material that is repetitively slit and pulled to expand into diamond shape open areas leaving connecting strands of metal having an average open space of 75 to 80 percent Hie material in one example can be formed into a configuration of corrugated vertical segments. Metal voidforms can

6e compressible and can be hollow.

[06068] Degradable molded paper voidforms, made from 100% recovered paper pulp, recycled paper, and/or recovered Kraft paper slurries that are shaped into a product

Compressible and/or hallow plastic voidforms or compressible and/or hollow hybrid plastic and corrugated paper voidfOrms, with plastic elements that can be made from up to 100% recycled plastic, often polypropylene. Hybrid plastic and corrugated paper voidforms can consist of vertical plastic partitions creating a cellular configuration with corrugated paper material that surrounds sets, of vertical plastic partitions.

[00069] Compressible and/or hollow Styofoam void forms are molded into an upside-down “U„-shaped ora box-shapedvoidfonn. CompressibleSriTofoain voidtbnus are solid bitt have sufficient compressibility. They my include compressible conglomerations of smaller perticks, such as uncompacted soil, loose sand, uncompacted cinders, and/or styrofoam peanuts, having Sufficient compressibility overall in their conglomerated configuration.

[00070] Examples of systems that provide formwork over a subgrade but are not voidform systems are:

Slab on metal deck, wherein the metal deck forms the bottom of a slab but it also structurally spans between steel beams that are Foundation elements of a composite stab over a conventional crawlspace;

Slab over temporary wooden formwork, wherein the majority of the wooden formwork is manually removed after the slab is installed; and

Slab oh grade wherein the slab is poured over a vapor barrier sheet or a vapor retarder sheet that covertshe ground, whereitnhe sheet does not sufficiently degrade dr compress and is hot sufficiently hollow.

[00071] For purposes of this disclosure a foundation clement is a component of a foundation for a building, not including a slab of a slab-on-voidfibtm foundation; not including a voidform system and not including a framing system. A foundation element Is a structural member or connection between structural members, wherein the members are commonly identified or addressed somewhere on foundation drawings or specifications, structural drawings dr specifications, or architectural drawings or specifications. Examples of materials that typically comprise a Foundation element are concrete, steel, aluminum, masonry, timber, fiber neinforccd polymer pea combination of these materials. A foundation element is not a microscopic element, not k theoretically infinitesimally small element, and not a portion of a larger elemenl font is manufactured st one tune. A. foundation, element is necessary for the structural functions of a foundation after construction of the building is complete, wherein a portion or portions of a foundation clement may not be necessary but some portion of a foundation element is necessary*. Furthermore, foundation dements ate configured to be capable of being installed before the slab

Is installed Examples of foundation elements are drilled concrete piers, augured east iti place piles* steel piles, helical piles, micropiles, timber piles, pier caps, piie caps, gradebeams or walls that are pouted directly on the ground* gradebeams or walls that are poured over a system that is similar to a voidform system fora slab, steel columns and steel beams- Where the primary slab and other concrete elements are integrally poured together at the same time, such as drop panels around drilled concrete piers or thickened slab areas for slab recesses m internal Stiffening beams, the other concrete elements that are integrally poured together with the primary slab at the same time are parts of the slab and are therefore not foundation elements.

[00072] For purpo ses of th is disclosure, a subgrade wi thinthe perimeter of a slabooHVoidform foundation is material over which a voidform sy stem is placed in the construction of a Slab-on-vo&ifonn foundation, wherein Said material is not a part of a foundation element.

Examples of subgrade material are clay, sand, »M rooks, watery naturally occurring organic material, and combinations of these materials. Subgrade material also includes any manufaetured materials, other than foundation elements, that are present when a voidform system is placed over the subgrade, with some examples being polyethylene vapor barrier sheeting, polyefoyWe vapor retarder sheeting, injected lime slimy, injected proprietary chemical slurries, imteihforced concrete slabs-on-grade such as those commonly called^mudslabs^and sometimes debris like in a landfill or existing construction to be abandoned such as an existing reinforced slab-on-grade.

[00073] Fpr purposes o f this disclosure, a hanger assembly is a system that provides

Support to ah under-slab utility at one point atong the length of foe utility system, artd the hanger assembly is supported by a framing system. A hanger assembly does not include any components of the under-slab utility itself. Common examples of conventional hanger assembly components are adjustable clevis hungers, threaded rods, nuts and washers. Another example of hanger assembly components could be a pipe clamp that is bolted to a framing system, wherein the pipe could be below tir above the framing system, noting that it is still a hanger assembly even if the pipe is located above the framing system such that the hanger assembly is- not in tension like a conventional threaded rod that supports a pipe below a framing system, Examples of common hanger assembly materials are galvanized steel, stainless steel, aluminum and fiber reinforced polymer.

(000741 For purposes of this disckisure, an under-slab utility is a system underneath a slab of a slab-on-voidform foundation, wherein the system transmits something to the occupants from outside of the building, from the occupants to outside of the building, between areas of the building or betwuert buildings. Examples of such Utility Systems are sanitary stover, domestic water, tire protection, natural gas, outside air for ventilation, heated air, cooled air, elcefricr^y,und data systems. It is common for an under-stab utility to include a pipe or conductor system that contains what is being transmitted. While under-slab utilities can often span a limited distance between supports, they typically require supports be located much closer together than the distance apart that foundation elements are typically located in a slab-on-voidform foundation^

[W/s] For purposes of this disclosure a framing system is a system that consists of at least one beam and at least one heam-ro-foundation element connection, Wherein a bearn-to- foundation element conneciion provides support to a beam. In litis disclosure a “'beam,, is also referred to as a ^utility support member and the terms beam and utility support member are intended to be used interchangeably. A framingsystem does not include any foundation elements. does not include a slab of a slab-on-voidfbrm foundation, and does not include voidfortns. A beam-to-foundation elementconncction can consist of one or more mem bers and Connectors so. as to elevattehe supports for the beams in foe framing system to a specified elevation relative tothe foundation elements. A framing system can include at least one benm-to-beam connection, wherein a beam provides support for another beam. Examples of the components of connections can include plates* angles, brackets, post bases, posts, bolts, washers and nuts. Altogether, a framing system is con figured to be capable of being supported by at least one foundation element and capable of supporting foe weight of an under-slab utility system at the floorplan location or locations where said support is required for the under-slab utility system. Examples of support patterns for beams of a framing system Can be beams simply spanning between two supports. beams supported by three or more supports, beams cantilevered off of a fixed support, and beams cantilevered off of a beam that Is supported at two points. Examples of point loading on beams for a framing system Cail be simple or complex, depending 00 the Specific needs of the project, where a beam could only have one point load at a hanger assembty could have multiple bangers assemblies on one beam, could be supporting another beam that supports hanger assemblies, could be supporting multiple such beams, and could be supporting one or more such beams while also supporting one or more hanger assemblies.

[00076] In one embodiment a method of isolating under-slab utilities from U subgrade under a slab o f a slab-on-voidform foundation is employed whereby a fiumihg system is attached to one or more foundation elements ofsaid slal>cm-voidfOrm foundation wherein said fram ing system is configured to not be in contact with subgrade. A hanger assembly is used to suspend a segment of a minty line wherein said hangerassembly is configured to be supported by said fram ing system and also configured to be above said Slab, partially or completely embedded in said slab, or below said, slab, wherein said hanger assembly is configured so that said hanger assembly mid said utility are to not be in contact with said subgrade. Voidforms are placed over said subgrade and a slab is poured over the voidforms.

[00077] Ip another embodiment a method of isolating under-slab utilities from soil under a slab of a slab-on-voidfornl foundation is employed whereby a temporary sapportapparatus is used, lo an embodiment a temporary support apparatus is comprised of a stake, a tod and an adjustable support pul is secured in a subgrade. Other configurations of a temporary support apparatus could include a frame which is driven into the subgrade and extends above a slab, could include a structure that is placed <m a subgrade arid extends efficiently high enough to provide termporary util ity support, could include a variation with a two part structure in which a lower part that bears on a subgrade is not removable after slab reinforcement is installed but an upper part is removable after utilities are suspended by permanent components of a slab-on-voidform foundation, cQuld be comprised of materials such as dimensioned lumber, masonry, light gage steel studs, strut channels, and plastic members. In an embodiment, when a vapor barrier is used and temporary members are removed after a vapor barrier is installed, the vapor barrier could be patched where the removal creates apenetrationin the vapor A framing system comprised of utility support members is attached to the temporary support apparatus, wherein said framing system is configured to riot be ip contact with the subgrade. A hanger assembly is used to suspend a segrrient of a utility line, wherein the hanger assembly is configured to be supported by the framing system and also configured to be partially or completely embedded in the slab while not being in contact with said subgrade. Voidforms are then placed over the subgrade, slab reinforcement is installed over reinforcement supports, the utility support framing system N tied to the dab reinforcement, and the rod is then removed from said temporary support apparatus. A slab then poured over the voidforms.

[00078] In another aspect, the invention could include a permanent support apparatus that supports under-slab utilities under a slab tif a slab-on-voidform foundation wherein the permanent support apparatus is supported by a subgrade but all components of Said permanent support apparatus that are below said slab are not in contact with any portion of an under-stab utility ora hanger assembly for an undep-slab utility, thereby iransferring all forces associated with volumetric soil changes to said slab or foundation elements which will have a significantly greater ability to resist volumetric soil cbanges than atypical under-stab utitity. This could include a stake, a rod and a support nut similar to an embodiiberit of a temporary support apparatus as described: above but wherein the rod is not removed because the slab is capable of resisting the uplift forces associated with expansive soil pushing up on the stakes. lit another embodiment, a permanent support apparatus could be comprised of dimensioned lumber, masonry, cdld-formed metal framing studs, strut channels and plastic members.

[00079] In an embodiment of an apparatus of rhe invention, first and second members are employed. Each of the first and second members hast a length m die range of 2 to

24 inches; a first side surface haying a width in the range of 1 to 2 inches; a second side surface having a width in the range of 1 to 2 inches; a third side surface having a width in the range of I to 2 inches. In the apparatus a third member is connected to the first and second members. The third member spans the distance: between the first and second members without intermediate

Support. The third member has: a length in the range of 12 to 30 feet; a first side surface having a width in the range of I to 2 inches; a second side surface having a width in the range of ] to 2. incties; a third side surface haying a width in the range of 1 to 2 inches. the first, second, and third members may be Composed of steel, stainless steel aluminum, or fiber reinforced polyurethane.

[00080] In one embodiment a utility Support framing system of the invention comprises strut channel framing, such as produced by Unistrut or Eaton, to an embodiment the concrete foundation# and the utility support framing sy stem i s above a vapor barrier over Masonite over void forms Over soil Also# in an embodiment, a layer of void forms immediately tinder jMasonite, which is a part of thy voidforms, comprises a main slab void layer, rtefow the main slab void layer, a tower void Space can be comprised of additional layers of void forms. In a preferred embodiment the void forms ctiinprtsiqg the main slab void layer, an additional layer of void forms below and soil define an interstitial space, in smother embodiment, an interstitial space is defined byMasonite, tile void forms comprising the main slab void layer, and an additional layer of void forms below. In an embodiment, the utility support framing system is used to fasten a fiberglass threaded tod fiom the stint channel into die interior space. In art embodiment the fiberglass threaded rod Is used to suspend a fiberglass saddle that holds utility piping,

[00081] In practicing an embodiment of the inventive method a utility support framing system is supported vertically only by foundation elements (including but not limited to piers, caissons, piles, mini-piles, grade beams, and footings) which are designed to resist volumetric soil changes (including but not limited to expansive soil, frost heave, collapsible soil, etc...) in the active zone by sufficient isolation from soil and/or penetration below the active zone.

[00082] Further, the utility support system is installed before the utilities, void forms and reinforced concrete slab are installed and the concrete is cured, allowing the utilities to be installed and inspected before the slab is poured. [00083] It also includes a feature that allows the flow line elevations of the utility piping to be adjusted by adjusting (including, but not limited to, turning the supporting nuts in) the hanger assembly after the framing system deflects, before it is inspected.

[00084] Further, there are no components conceding or hindering any utility piping from visual inspection, flow line elevation measurement, and adjustment if inspection identifies any construction defects before a utility is inspected.

[00085] It is also located in elevation so that it is above the soil supporting the void forms, thereby creating a void to isolate the utilities from soil movement so that the framing does not need to be removed after the slab is poured.

[00086] Additionally, it does not include a soil retaining component in the framing or hanger assembly, which allows vo id forms to be placed on either side of the piping (including but not limited to typical 4„ diameter piping at sanitary sewer lines) so that the mam layer of slab void forms immediately under the concrete slab can have a gap or bridge themselves over a gap or be bridged over a gap with degradable material such as Masonite,

[0008?] lite utility support framing system can be located in elevation above the voidtbrms so that the frami ng generall y does not interrupt the void forms.

[00088] Further, the utility support framing system can be encased in the concrete slab (including bat not limited to locating the framing between the upper and lower reinforcing bar mats that are common in such slabs, allowing for the flaming level itself arid the associated deflection of the flaming to occur without interrupting the reinforcing bars If the slab is designed to be sufficiently thick, with the flexural requirements for reinforcing bars being reduced if the slab is made any thicker Wait ft wou ld otherwise be) to mitigate concerns with corrosion of the framing and also allow rebar to be installed without interruption (including but not limited to locating the framing in the middle portion of structuralfy suspended slabs which are less stressed in flexure than the upper and tower zones of the slab thickness and can therefore structurally accommodate interruption by the framing aS well as utilizing narrow portions of the slab in plan view at discrete points of support such as piers or piles whereby this limits the impact of this framing on the punching shear capacity of the slab).

[00089] It prevents any need for soil to contact hanger assemblies# thereby reducing corrosion potential. h further encases the utility support framing system in the concrete slab itself# so that it has the same leva) of corrosion protection as the concrete reinforcing bars themselves.

And# because these are encased in concrete, even if it does corrode, it wil l not M down and cause damage (directly by falling, or indirectly by becoming a shin Where a void was intended) to the utility piping as occurs with Indirect Bear Systems*

[00090] It can also be installed with hanger assembly' materials that are more corrosion resistant (including but not limited to fiberglass, stainless steel, aluminum and galvanized steel)

[00091] It also allows design professionals to design a soil retention system using any of the methods available to engineers In the prior art (including but not limi ted to vertical cuts in cohesive soil with an acceptable factor of safety, stoped grades in cohesion less soil based on the angle of internal friction, retaining structures such as concrete walls, sheet piles, or other systems), and can be used where vertical cuts in soil: and/or backfill adjacent to void forms that may overtime allow a slope Stability failure (if the soil to occur if it is far enough away (including but not limited to a certain multiple of the vertical grade change such as 1 .5 or 2 times the height of the soil being retained) so that the diesign professional dues not anticipate any soil falling under tiie utility piping. [00092] The utility support framing system does not bear (directly or indirectly) on any $oil within the active zone because the system Instead bears on structural elements that are bearing on soil below the active zone and/or are designed to sufficiently resist the vertical forces associated with volumetric changes inthe active zone by virtue of their penetration below the active zone.

[00093] Also, the invention allows soilretainage to be designed by qualified design professionals for each specific application, using methods in foe prior art (including but not limited totemporajy vertical cuts in cohesive soil where there is an acceptable factor ofsafety, sloping the grade to an acceptable stable slope such as tire angle of repose for cohesionless soils? and installing permanent Concrete retaining walls), in ah ernbodiment, the invention allows this because the main voidforms bear on lower voidforms with a maximum gap thatthe main layer of voidforms can reliably bridge with degradable material such as carton void forms. For example, 4„ diameter

PVC sanitary sewer lines can be installed with lower void forms on each side, slotting the void forms to accommodate any saddles and flanges.

[00094] AMttonally, Die invention does not allow soil in a subgrade to contact any ofthe hanger assemblies, Furthermore, generally corresion resistant materials such as fiberglass. aluminum, stainless steel and galvanized steel are available with invention to resist any ambient sub-slab moisture for an even longer useful life expectancy.

[00095]

[00096] Further because foeinvention allows independent soil retaining systems, a flexible expansion joint can be installed to successfully transition betweoi suspended and soil- supported sections of utility piping. Flexible expansion joints utilize rotating and telescoping joints available in the prior art [00097] Also, the invention avoids the need for maintenance associated with damage caused by expansive soil or any other type of volumetric soil changes, which can happen in the prior art as noted above* It also allows independently designed soil retaining systems, where: design professionals can create sufficiently large void spaces along the sides of the Utility piping that can be more-easily accessed horizonlaity through openings in exterior grade beams by removing exterior backFill (rather than cutting holes vertically into the slabs and hand-digging from the opening to pipe location which can often be over 20 feet from the nearest potential location for a temporary slab opening).

[00098] Ah ertibodiment of the invention comprises of a protective utility counterweight with a larger pipe and encasing the soil-supported utility tine in concrete with a felt separation, with sufficient length; and diamw of the protective utility counterweight to provide structural stability to cantilever one end through a vertical slot in a foundation element with the vertical slot having sufficient height to accommodate at least the potential vertical niovethent up or down from initial position, in which a flexible expans ion joint is initially installed at a slope that is the minimum Slope required by the applicable plumbing code plus the stope required to allow the soil-supported end to rise at least the estimated potential vertical movement, in which the soil is retained by soil retaining boards that are penetrated by the over-sized pipe of (he protective utility counterweight, and (here is sufficient length and weight of concrete to provide a minimum factor of safety of 1.5 to resist toe overturning associated with the full weight of the flexible expansi<m jtiint(applicable when the juint is disconnected from (he slab-hungend for installation or replacement), and in which toe diameter of the concrete in-fill is sufficient to reduce toe bearing stress uh the utility to a le vel tiiatwill not damage the utility pipe as it pushes uparid down on the concrete which in then pushes tip and downonthe soil-retention boards. This embodiment utilizing a protective utility counterweight and a flexible expansionjoint, with one or more mountable pipe clamps connecting a suspended utility pipe to a foundation element, fully isolates the suspended portions of utilities from expansive soil changes or atty other type of volumetric soil changes. Soil is retained from encroaching under the flexible expansion joint with commercially available materials that can horizontally span the vertically slotted hole to accommodate any height of hole required, wherein these boards can slide up and down along the side of the foundation elements. Further, providing a concrete collar around the utility pipe helps to avoid breaking the utility pipe as It engages the soil retention boards. Also, in an embodiment a counter-weight and retention protection collar tout is similar in shape to the utility pipe is provided. This redticys the difference in potential vertical movement, relative Io fee subgrade adjacent to the Utility and outside of a building,while also providing a transitional drainage region over the pipe Where toe pipe itself beyond the concrete encasement reduces the potential vertical movement also arid provides a path tor positive drainage. Additionally, protecting the utility With felt that allows replacement ofthc piping in the future may be incorporated. Furthemiore, making the length of the concrete encasement approximately 5 or 6 feet allows speciflcatton of the system to fell within toe industry standard scope pfeme design professfofial (a mechanical engineer) rattier than two (a mechanical engineer and a civil engineer).

[00099] Additionally, practicing one embodiment of the invention, includes: installing all of the foundation elements arid a suspended siruetural supporl for a mountable pipe clamp, with an qvemized opening for a fixed elevation building condition utility pipe and an oversized Opening: for a protective utility emmterweight that allows sufficient vertical eleanmee above and below the protective utility counterweight to accommodate toe potential vertical movement It next involves installing under-slab utility piping under all building areas, arid installing one or more mountable pipe clamps on each side of a suspended structural support so that a utility pipe in a building, cantilevers away from a suspended structural support while itedallfog under-slab piping, installing this piping and clamps (with sealant around any piping penetrating an exterior grade beam being a preferred example) before pourings slab of a slab-on- voldform foundation or after installing a floor structure of a crawlspace foundation. The method then requires excavating outside of the foundation element where aprotecti ve utility counterweight will be installed, overexcavating away from the foundation element snflteientiy so that the protective utility counterweight can be slid into place through a hole in a slidable retainer board. ft then requires installing a slidable retainer board* with a bote sized to receive a protective utility counterweight, onio the side of a foundation element over the oversized hole made to receive a protective utility counterweight, surveying the elevation of the cantitevered pipe and then bolting the top of the slidable retainer board at the elevation which will sei the hole in tits board ait the elevation which accommodates the specified initial Vertical offset fixxrh the cantilevered pipe of the building. The next Step requires compacting subgrade materials under the elevation of tite proposed bottom of the protective utility counterweight, with bentonite as an example of a subgrade material against the slidable retaining wall, extending 6 _n for example past the edges of the slidable retainer board, but stopping a few inches below below the proposed bottom elevation of the protective utility counterweight. Then the protective utility counterweight is lowered irtio the excavation adjacent to the foundation element, using manpower, a forklift and/or a frame with a winch, and white it is suspended by the lowering jitedhanism, slide the. protective utility counterweight through die hole in the slidable retainer board and then install shims to temporarily maintain the correct elevation of the protective utility counterweight relative to the building condition pipe elevation. Locate. One set of shims so that they are at the end furthest away from the slidable retainer board and another set at die end inside the oversized hole til a foundation dement which the protective utilitycounterwcightcantilevers through. Next, concrete er flowable concrete fill is installedasa leveling bed of subgrade material under the proposed protective utility counterweight between ttie slidable retainer beard and the set of shims furthest from the slidable retainer board, pouring up to a point below the middle of the protective utility counterweight as needed to stabilize the elevation for the current soilconditions. Install bentonite as anexample so that the concrete leveling bed does not contact ths slidable retainer board itsel f. Temporary shims are then remove the temporary Wms. Soil supported plumbing from the site is then attached to a utility jpipe that extends through tire protective utility counterweight, cantilever past the end of the protective utility counterweight so as to receive a flexible expansion joint Subgrade material is then compacted under, around and on top of the protective utility counterweight to achieve the finished subgrade elevation desired outside of the building. Be careful to pot change the elevation of the protective utility coimterwcight during compaction operations, resetting the pipe if it shifts during compaction operation s. A flexible expansion joint is then lowered into the gap between the cantilevered building condition pipe and the cantilevered site condition pipe^ connecting the flexible expansion joint to each pipe end. Finally an access hatch or door that may be required by building code dr desired to allow inspection and maintenance of the flexible expansion joint is installed.

[WIO0] can be hammered into the subgrade tor a slafoon-voidform foundatmn beforethe voidforms are installed, then die rods can be installed so as to provide temporary support for utility Irammg, bearing on an adjustable nut that can be set at an elevation compatible with the vpidforms height and slab thickness. In an embodiment, a headed boh could be installed into the Stakes to protect foe rod during hammering and keep soil/debris from getting into the threaded hole, or a smooth hole, at the top of the stake. The headed bolt cap then be removed and die main support rods are then installed, with support nut and utility support training bearing on the support nut Then the voidforms are installed and reinforomg bars tat* the slab of the slab-on-void foundation. Then, before concrete is poured, the utility support framing can be lied with wire to foe reinforcing bars

(which are supported by the voidforms at that point in the method), and, as this makes the rods no longer necessary, foe rods can be removed by hand or mechanically by a wrench, or by installing a double nut or a lock nut or a lock not and a conventional nut on the rads^ abovtehe utility support framing members, and turning foe double nut assemblage or lock nut so as to unthread foe threaded rod from the support not, and if the hole in the slake -is threaded then remo ve the stake belo w as well, An open-ended socket wrench can beused for this purpose. And an open-ended box wrench can be used to stabilize the support nut below while turning the double nut assemblage. The small holes in die voidformscan then be patched with plastic sheeting (typically tried as a vapor battier).

This solves the above problem by providing support that is temporarily on the ground before voidforms are installed but then removed after voidfortns are in place before concrete is poured,

[000101] Another embodiment of foe invention includes a retaining structure that foies not extend below the bottom of the trench so that it is capable of sliding horizontally if expansive soil swells, sliding until the soil has swollen as much aS it needs to relieve internal soil pressure build-up. The maximum vertical movement estimated by geotechnical engineers & commonly reported when expansive soils are encountered. An embodiment of the invention includes an approach which provides a gap between the wall and the utilities (and utility supports), so that H will not damage (he utilities if the wall slides. [000102] The embodiment al lows design and installation without knowing what the expapsiVe soil pressures are because it is designed based on the magnitude of foe potential vertical movement, which is commonly reported data, allowing a horizontal gap of that same magnitude which is tite maximum possible horizontal movement foam expansive soil because volume change is ihree-dimertsiohaL

[000103] Because the system is capable of sliding without damaging utilities, this invention can be approved by building officials as an "alternative method of construction”, avoiding the need to resist the overturning and sliding with a factor of safety of 1.5 due to expansive soil swelling, which would otherwise not be pertmtted by building codes.

[(>00104] The embodiment also takes advantage of the cohesion of the earth common in soil under siab-on-voidform foundations by digging a trench in the soil so that the cohesive soils maintain the Shape of the trench long enough for Concrete to be poured in the trench. This avoids the costs of constructing formwork for the retaining structure and the coSts of removing such formwork.

[000105] No reififoreement is necessary with this invention, becaustehe wall is simply a "gravity wall", ’’Engineered Gravity Wall" retaining structures inthe prior art are embedded belowthe soil on hoth sides. "Unengineered Gravity Wall* retaining structures thal are in the prior art which do pot extend below the lower elevation are common for minor

“Uhengfoeered” retaining walls such as landscaping "railroad tie” timbers or simple border stories laid on (he ground with landscaping behind the stones. This invention is constructed similar to an

"unengineered gravity wall” used in landcaping but is engineered to be capable of resistintghe active soil pressures required by the building code and it forgoes the extension of the wall unde# foe grade of the trench so as to be capable of Sliding. It is also different from either style of gravity Waft in the prior art because it is earth formed on both side and then excavated on one side to expose the entire height of the walk It is furthermore different in that there is a gap between the wall and. utilities set based ern the expansive soft potential vertical movement iso as to avoid damaging utilities.

[OoftWl Furthermore, the embodiment allows decking such as plywood or metal deck or plastic formboards to bp installed on top of the retaining structares on each side of the plumbing trench, or conventional retaining strucures, or ledger supports attached to the side of foundation elements, so as to support: carton or other voidforms without the need to cut voidfomts around intricate areas of complex plumbing distribution systems* The decking: is not attached tri the supports so that different systems do not have undesirable forces from expansive soil movement (e.g, a foundation element will not have upward pressures as expansive soil causes a retaining structure to shift upward as the expansive soil swells).

10001071 LOWer^ost, low strength, flowable concrete fill and/or “lean concrete*' wfthoutcoarse aggregate can also be used with Skis invention so as to make it easy for ’’joists’* fo,g. horizontal strut channels under decking where the longitudinal axis of utility trenches chang and/or decking needs additional support) to he: installed in seats that are formed or cut into ths retaining structures so that the joists are not attached to supports bitt the joists can be attached to the decking. llris allows the plumbing elevation to occur immediately below the decking Ur joists for the decking so M to maximize the suitability for this application to mure scenarios oh $ project aS: utilities slope in elevation. In practicing the invention a level ground surface is erated by cutting. and filling operations. Wall trenches are excavated on each side of proposed utility locations, providing a horizontal clear dimension between the proposed utilities and the proposed walls equal to the potential vertical movement estimated by the geotechnical engineer of record with the depth and Width installed to bo capable of resisting both overturning and sliding, by a factor of safety of

1.5 against die active soil loads required by the building code if the soil between the wall trenches were to be removed. Concrete is poured in the wall trenches- After curing the concrete, soil is excavated between the walls over the full depthofthe walls. Stakes and rods are installed on each side of the concrete walls, rhe stakes have a sharpened edge at the bottom, are embedded in the soil and they have a smooth or threaded hole in the top. Threaded tods are installed in each slake, and support nuts are installed on each rod, Horizontal strut channel fa installed over the support nuts. Hanging pipe supports are installed to suspend utijilies over a voidspace equal or greater than the potential vertical movement bee-kmg is installed oyetrhe plumbing trench between foe concrete walls and additional framing supports added where necessary support of decking is not provided by walls, with the decking befog supported by the concrete walls without attaching decking to the walls. Support may also be provided by installing ledger supports onto the side of

Overthe walls and decking, with no voidfohrts necessary under foe decking or Supports described.

Rebar is installed tor the slab of the slab-on-voidform foundation, using bar support spacers. Strut channels are tied at each hanger assembly to the rebar in the slab of the slab-on- voidform foundation, The rods are removed froth the stakes: by preventing rotation of the supporting nuts

(e.g< with an open-ended wrench) and rotatintghe threaded rod by hand, or by installing two nuts at the? top dnd Wrenching them together so as to effectively create a temporary bolt-head that cap lie used to remove the rod more quickly with a. power drill and a socket bit Finally, the concrete foundation is poured. As an example, in an embodiment the web of a strut channel could face downward* leaving an opening at the fop of the strut channel that allows concrete to flow into the strut channel as it is mechanically vibrated during concrete placement. This allows the strut channel to function as additional reinforcement in the slab.

[000108] The invention can also incorporate installing a novel mountable pipe clam as shown in the figures, allowing a method and system for resisting axral and transverse forces placed on a pipe that cantilevers from a fixed foundation element to support and connect to a flexible expansion joint that will shift during volumetric soil changes. Installing a pair of mountable pipe clamps as sho wn in the figures provides a method of resisting moments in such a condition. The pair of mountable pipe clamps can be mounted at any desired elevation arid any desired horizontal location perpendicular tothe face of the wall from which a pipe cantileverx, for a pipe W ithin an opening of any size or geometry, and can be removed and remounted using other locations of the inventive device for bolt holes that do hot interfere with the original boh locations. avoiding the need for coring an existing bolt And, as a pair. If the holes in the mountable pipe clamps on each side of a wall are aligned, bolts can be installed that extend through the wall entirely.

[000109] Furthermore, installing a mountable pipe clamp on one face of a foundation element will lock a pipe into a position and make it possible for sealant to be added all around the pipe between the pipe and the opening on the other side of the foundation element, before installing the second mountable pipe clamp on that face.

[000110] Furthermore, this mountable pipe Clam can allow inspection of any sealant added behind the pipe clamp and a second mountable pipe ciamp can be removed to remove old

Sealant and reapply new ones and then reinstall the mountable pipe clamp. If bolts are used with nuts, the nuts could be removed in such an application so that the bolts and nutscan even be reused after sealant has beep replaced. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[000111] Fig. I shows » cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000112] Fig. 2 shows a side view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000113] Fig. 3 shows a partial side view' of an embodiment of the invention.

[000114] Fig. 4 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000115] Fig. 5 shows a cross sectional view of the embodiment of the invention.

[000116] Fig, 6 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000117] Fig. 7 show's a plan view of an embodiment of the in venlion.

[000118] Fig. 8 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000119] Fig. 9 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000120] Fig. 10 show's a plan view of an embodiment of the invention,

[000121] Fig. 11 shows a side view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000122] Fig. 12 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000123] Fig. 13 shows a side view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000124] Fig. 14 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000125] Fig. 15 shows a crass sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000126] Fig. 16 shows a crass sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000127] Fig, 17 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000128] Fig. 18 shows a crass sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000129] Fig, 19 shows a crass sectional view of an embodiment of the inventi on.

[000130] Fig. 20 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention;.

[000131] Fig. 21 shows an elevation view of an embodiment of the invention.

[0001.32] Fig. 22 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention; [000133] Fig. 23 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000134] Fig, 24 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention;

[000135] Fig. 25 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000136] Fig. 26 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention.

[000137] Fig. 27 shows a plan view of embodiments of the invention.

[000138] Fig. 28 shows a plan view of embodiments of the invention.

[000139] Fig, 29 describes methods of the invention.

[000140] Fig. 30 shows an embodiment of the invention wherein the utility support member is above the slab.

[000141] Fig. 31 shows an embodiment of tee invention wherein tee utility support member is below the stab.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS]

[000142] Fig. 1 shows a cross sectional view of ah embodiment of the invention wherein a utility pipe [101] is hanging over a subgrade [102] Item one or more hanger assemblies

[103]. A hanger assembly [103] is connected to and supported by one or more utility support members [104] of the inventi ve filming system.

[000143] In an embodiment, utility pipe 1101 ] is comprised of polyvinyl chloride, east iron, or galvanized steel. Furthermore, tn an embodiment, utility pipe [101] is a component of a sanitary sewer plumbing system; a domestic water supply system, a fire protection system, a natural gas piping system, an electrical power supply system or a teleeommunieations system.

[000144] Furthermore, in an embodiment, hanger assembly [103] is comprised of galvanized steel, stainless steel or plastic. Also, in an embodiment, hanger assembly [103] includes a partially or completely threaded rod Wi th a nut and washer configurable above a utility support member [104] wherein the threaded tod hangs from tire utility support member [104] and could include a clevis hanger that holds a utility pipe [101] with a ftut under a portion of a clevis hanger wherein the clevis hanger hangs from thetlireadedrod and the devatian of the clevis hanger can be adjusted by tiituing a nut above a utility support member [104].

[000145] In an emlxxlimenL, a utility support member [104] is comprised :0f ungalvanized steel, galvanized steel, stainless steel or plastic; Furtliermore, in an embodiment, utility support member [104] could be a strut channel with 12 gage thickness and regularly spaced slotted holes in the web of the strut cliannyl. Alternatively, in an embodiment, utility support member [104] could be a hollow, rectangular Steel tube. Also alternatively, hi an embodiment, utility support member [104] could be rebar such as might be used as slab reinforcement for a concrete slab* As an example, in an embodiment a washer, as part of a banger assembly, above a utility support member [ 104] could be a strut channel saddle washer if the utility support member

[104] is a strut channel.

[000146] Also, in an embodiment the difference in elevation between the bottom of a hanger assembly [103] and a subgrade [102] could be established to protect a utility pipe [101] by being greater than or equal to the potential vertical movement of the subgrade [102] due to volumetric changes of the subgrade as estimated by a geotechnical engineer.

[000147] Fig. 2 shows a side view of an embodiment of the invention as shown in

Fig. 1

[000148] Fig, 3 shows a partial side vie* of an embodiment of the invention wherein an inventive temporary support apparatus [301] includes an inventive stake [302], a threaded rod

[303] and an adjustable support nut [304]. In practicing an embodiment of a method of the invention, flic inventive stake [302] is driven into a subgrade [102]. A threaded rod [303] is insertedinto abate at tiiefop of am inventive stake [302] wherein die inventive stake [302] provides support for die threaded rod [303], An adjustable support [3041 is connected to and supported by the threaded rod [303].

[000140] In art embodiment, the inventive stake [302] has a sufficiently long length such that it can be driven into, a subgrade [102] to a sufficient depth that provides a desired or greater level of rigidity for use in the inventive temporary support apparatus [30:1], Also, in an embodiment thy inventive stake [303] has a sufficiently short length so that, after the inventive stake [J02] is driven into a: subgrade [102] to a sufficient depth that provides a desired or greater level: of rigidity for use in the inventive temporary support apparatus [301], the inventive stake

[302] could be driven further ifnecessary so that the top of the inventivestake [302] will not extend above the subgrade [1021 more than the difference between a specified height of voidforms proposed under a slab of a slab-on-voidform foundation and the potential vertical movement estimated by a geotechnical engineer for the subgrade [102].

[000150] In an embodiment of a method of the invention, a threaded rod [303] is inserted into the inventive stake [302] alter the inventive stake [302] is driven into a subgrade.

The elevation of an adjustable support put [304] is adjusted to a desired elevation by turning an adjustable support nut [304] after the threaded rod [303] is inserted into the inventi ve slake [302] after the inventi ve stake was previously driven into a subgrade [102|, thus adjusting for a specific ernbedment depth of the inventive stake [302] info the subgrade [ 102].

[000151] In an embodiment, the inventive stake [302] is comprised of steel. Further, i n an emlxxfimeni, the inventive slake [302] is 18 inches long, In embodiments, the inventive stake [302] has a round cross sectional shape or a rectangular cross sectional shape. As an example, the Inventive stake [302] cam have a round Cross sectional Shape With ait outer diameter that is 3/4 inches with a round hole that is 2 1 /2 inches deep and 1/2 inches In diameter. In another example, the inventive stake [302] could have an unthreaded hole with smooth sides. Further, in aft embodiment, the inventive stake [302] could have a threaded hole. Also, in an embodiment the

Inventive stake [392] could have a ‘v, shaped bottom with two Sloped surfaces that form a linear edge along the bottom^ In other embodiments, the inventive stake [302] could have a single-sloped bottom, a flat bottom, a conical bottom that forms a pointed tip, or a hemispherical shaped bottom.

[000152] Further, in embodiments, the threaded rod [303] is completely threaded or partially threaded. Furthermore, the threaded rod [363] could have a consistent diameter inclusive of any threads over the length of the threaded tod [303] or it could have varying diameters, inclusive of any threads, allowing an adjustable support nut [304] to slide without turning where the diameter of the threaded rod is greater than the diameter of portions of a threaded rod [303],

Furthermore^ in an embodiment the threaded rod [303] is comprised of ungalvanized steel or galvanized Steel. Further, the adjustable support nut [304] ihay be comprised of ungalvanized steel or gaivattized sted.

[OOOI531 Fig. 4 shows a. cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention wherein a utility pipe [ 101 ] is hanging Over a subgrade [102] from one or more hanger assemblies

[103]. The hanger assembly [103] is connected to arid supported by one dr more utility support members [ 164] ofthe inventive framing System. In the embodiment, one or more utility support members [ 104} of the in ventive framing system are supported, part'telly or completely, by one or more inventive temporary support apparatuses [301]. In the embodiment, the subgrade [102] & be benched so as to create a plumbing trench with steps in the sides of the plumbing trench arranged geometrically’ in a manner that in compatible with placement of rectangular voidforms on the subgrade [102] and also prevents an unacceptable amount of subgrade [102] material from entering the space under a utility pipe [101] or a hanger assembly [103] after a concrete slab of a slab-on- void foundation is. poured.

[000154] Fig. 5 shows h cross sectional view of the embodiment of the invention shown in Fig. 4 after voidforms [5f)l] are installed, after slab reinforcement [502] is installed, wherein slab reinforcement (502] is supported by one or more reinforcement supports [503] that are supported by voidforms [501 J, after one Or more utility support members [ 104] of the incentive framing system are tied tothe slab reinforcement [502] with tie wire (or ofoersimilar listener such as, but not limited to, zip ties, baiting wire, reinforcement ties, string or the like) [504] so as to stabil ize the utility support member [104] in preparation for rempvirig portions of any in ventive temporary support apparatuses [301] before a concrete slab of a slab-on-voidform foundation is poured as well as in preparation for any static wafer pressure testing of one or more utility pipes

[101] before a concrete slab of a slab-on-voidform foundation is poured.

[000155] In an embodiment; fixe V'oidforms [501] ate comprised of M wax coated cardboard, plastic, or a hybrid of plastic materials and degradable materials, if sufficient separation is provided between voidforms [501] and any utility pipes [101] as well as between voidforms [S)l] and any hanger assemblies [103]. Further* In an embodiment, a protective vaidfbrm sheathing [505], as. a cdmponeiii of the voidforms, could be installed at the lop of the voidforms

[501 j over any spaces between voidfomi [501] components installed to accommodate any hanger assemblies [103], and utility pipes [101] add any inventive temporary support apparatuses [301],

Also in an embodiment, the degradable protective vtiidform sheathing [505] could be 9/32 inches. thick oriented strand board with sufficient structural span rating to be capable, for the required spans, of supporting the loads associated with pouring a concrete slab of a slab-on-voidform foundation or 9/32 inches thick plywood with sufficient structural span rating to be capable, for the required spans, of supporting the loads associated with pouring a concrete slab of a slab-on- voidform foundation.

[000156] Furtbennore, by way of example, vapor barrier [506], as part of the slab, could be installed over the voidforms [501] or could be capable of adhering to the bottom of a concrete slab so that h will remain in the installed position after any degradable voidforms [501] degrade. As an example, Sealant [507], as part of a vapor barrier [506] which is part of a slab, could be installed around any boles [508] where components of the hanger assembly (103 J where the hanger assembly [103] penetrates a vapor barrier [506], with the sealant [507] penetrating into any threads of a component of a hanger assembly [103].

[<>00157] As an example, the tie wire [504] material could be steel wire commonly used to tie reinforcement for reinforced concrete construction. Also as an example, slab reinforcement [502] could be #5 reinforcing bars at 12 inches on corner each way at the top of a slab and #5 reinforcing bars at 12 inches on center each way at the bottom of a slab. As an example, reinforcement supports [503] could be individual wire reinforcement supports at 3 feet on center each way under each mat of slab reinforcement.

[000158] A$ an example, double nut [509] could be installed at the top of any temporary support apparatuses [301] to effectively create a bolt head that allows convenient removal of portions of the temporary support apparatus before a concrete slab of a slab-on- voidform foundation is poured. Also, in ah embodiment, a lock nut could be installed at the top of any temporary support apparatuses [301 ] to effectively create a bolt head that allows convenient removal of portions of the temporary support apparatus before a concrete slab of a slab-on- voidform foundation is poured. [0001 $9] In an embodiment, before a concrete slab of aslab-omvoidform foundation is pourcd. any threaded rods [303] and adjustable support nuts [304] that are part ofthe inventive temporary support apparatus [301] could be removed by preventing. rotation of die adjustable support nuts [304] at a constant elevation while turnintghe threaded rods [303] until the threaded rods [303] completely rise up above a utility support member [104], removing the threaded rods

[303] and the adjustable support huts [304] so thatthe threaded rods P03] do not transferany loads to the foundation from volumetric soil changes, leaving the inventive stake [302] inthe subgrade

[000160] Fig. 6 shows * sectiiinal View of an embodiment (if the invention shown in Fig. 5 after removal of components as described for Fig. S, leaving any inventive stakes [302] inthe subgrade [102], after installing vapor barrier patches [601], as part of foe vapor barrier

[506] which is a part of the slab [603] of a slab-on-voidform foundation, aver any vapor barrier holes [602], and after pouring a concrete slab [603] of a slah-on-voidform foundation.

[000161] Fig, 7 shows a plan view of an embodirnent ofthe invefition wherein a utility support member [104] of the inventive foaming system is connected to and supported by another utility support member [104] ofthe inventive foaming system with one or more connectors [701] secured by one or more bolts [702]. In an embodiment, the connectors [701 J could be a pair of matching horizontal plates above and below the utility support member [104] which are compatible with the utility support member [104]. Also, in ah embodiment, foe conttectibn could consist of welding utility support members [104] together in lieu of using a kilt, Additionally, tn art embodiment, a hanger assembly [103] could be supported by a connector [701].

[000162] Fig.X shows apian view ofap embodiment of the invention wherein a utility support member [104] of the inventive framing system is Connected wnfo a connector [701] and bolts [702] to utility support members [104] pf the inventive foaming system so that the two members aetcompositelywifogreatCT strengfo and stilfoess than one member. In an embodiment, a pair ofstrut channels that dre parallel cotdd be wimected with a regularly spaced cojrmector[701] that is a plate compatible with strut channel framing above and below the pair of strut channels, allowing a flatter prose sectional geometry than combining foe two strut channels with One on top oftheolher, as the flatter cross sectional geometry is more compatible with the invention to allow the utility support members [104] to be located between the upper and lower mats of reinforeemehl. in an embodiment more than two strut channels acting as utility support "m«ftbeis.[|.d4jjM)tiild be connected [701] in a similar manner to maintain a relatively flat cross-sectional geometry spas to not require a thicker slab pF a slab-on-voidform foundation.

[000163] Fig. 9 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention wherein utility support members [104] connected with connectors [701] and bolts [702] to act compositcly as shown in Fig. 8 wherein a hanger assembly [T03] supported bythe connector [701). As an example, a pa ir of parallel utility support members acting compositcly are spaced to allow for a hanger assembly [103] to be hanging fromthe center of gravity of the composite combination of utility support members, which avoids twisting the utility support members (104b

[000164] Fig. 10 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention wherein a utility support member [104] could be connected to and supported by a composite of utility support members [104] which are connected its shown in Fig. 8 with a connector [701 ] and. bolts [702].

[000165] Pig. 11 shows a side view of an embodiment of the invenlion wherein one or more utility support members [104] are connected to and supported by one or more foundation piements [1 1111] with one or more post-installed elevation support umnectors [I 102] so that the one or more utility support members [104] cantilever and support s hanger assembly [103] as well as a perpendicular utility support member [104] so that the utility pipe [101] is notmeontaet with the subgrade [1021. As aft example, a post-installed elevation support connector [1102] could include strut channel post bases, angles and bolts that arc compatible with strut channel foaming, and post-installed anchors into one or more foundation elements [1101]. Additionally, in an embodiment a foundation element could he a drilled and reinforced concrete pier.

[000166] Fig. 12 shows a Cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention similar to that shown in Fig. $ but with two composite utility support members [104] of the inventive framing system attached by connectors [701].

[000167] Fig, 13 shows a side view of an embodiment of the invention wherein one or more wet-set elevation support connectors [1301] are set into the fresh concrete when one or more foundation elements [I tOlj are poured, and one or more utility support members [104] extends to another support, with a utility support member [104] being connected to and supported by a Utility support inember [194} Which is supported by a foundation element [1191], The one or more utility support members [104} are connected to and supported by one or more elevation support connectors [1301 ] so thatthe elevation of one or mote utility support members [104] can be adjusted to a desired elevation. As an example, a utility support member supported by a foundation element [| T01] on one end eptild be supported on another end by another foundation element [I itif] as shown in Fig. 13, As an example, a utility support member supported by a Foundation element [I T Oil j on one end could be supported on another end by another utility support member [104].

[000168] Fig. 14 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention wherein one or more utility support members [i 04] of the inventive framing system are shown to spaa structurally between two foundation elements [1191] without any need for intermediate support* supporting the loads of one er more hanger assemblies [103]» the loads of one or more titility pipes [101] , and the loads of other utility support members [104] that arc connected to and supported by the one or more utility support members [104] that span between the two foundation elements. As aa example, a pair of parallel Utility support members [104] could be made into a composite structural element with periodically spaced connectors [701] and bolts [702] Us shown in Fig. 8 with connectors [701] Ort both the top and bottom of the utility support member [104] as shown ip Fig- 14, with a nut attached te a bolt [702] that is used to make the pair act compositely. in an«R)bodhnent the conditions at each foundation element [110 i ] as shown in Fig. 14 arc similar

U> tiie conditions shown in Fig. 13 « As an example, in an embodiment the conditions at the hanger assembly [103] as shown in Fig. 14 are similar to the conditions shown in Fig. 6 but tie wine [504] could be installed to connect a utility support member [104] to reinforcement [502] so as to stabilize the hanger assembly [103] so that die uti lity pipe [101] could be static water tested without the additional weight of the 'water causing deflection tifthe Utility Support members [104] spanning long distances between foundation elements [1101] which would cause a change in the flow line elevations of the utility pipes [101 [ that may be unacceptable in that the changes in flow line elevations may impair the functionality of the uttljty pipe [1011# In another example, one or more utility support members [104] can be at a height determined by vertical support member [1301] so that the elevation of ¹ the utility support; members [104] is between the upper and lower mats of reinforcement [502] where the utility support members [104] can be cast permanently into the slab

[603] of a slab-on- vnidform foundation without Impairing the ability of the reinforcement [502] and the slab [603] to function structurally as the slab [603] structurally spans between foundation elements [i 10l] over a subgrade [102] without being in contact with a subgrade [102]- [000169] Fig. 15 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the Invention wherein one or more inventive mobile retaining walls [1501] are economically earth-formed by excavating and filling the excavation with concrete. In ah embodiment there is a mobile retaining wall [I 501] on each side of a proposed plumbing trench. As an example, the mobile retaining wall

[1501 ] has a cross sectional geometry that is at least as wide as it is tall, which prevents the mobile retaining wall [1501] from tipping over when functioning as a retaining wall that has lateral expansive soil pressures. Furthermore, to an embodiment the mobile retaining wall [1501] is comprised of flowable concrete fill with at least 110 pounds per cubic foot density and no course aggregate, concrete with at least i4O pounds per cubic foot density and no Course aggregate dr concrete that is unreinforced.

[000170] Fig. 16 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention

’wherein a utility pipe [101] is hanging over a subgrade [102] from one or more hanger assemblies

[103], similar to that shown in Fig. 4. A hanger assembly [103] is connected to and supported by the one or more utility support members [104] of the inventive framing system, similar to that shown in Fig. 4; In an embodiment, one or more utility support members [104] of the inventive framing system is supported, partially or completely. by one or more Inventive temporary support apparatuses [301], similar to that shown in Fig; 4. As an example, a subgrade [102] could be excavated adjacent to tine or more inventive mobile retaining waits [1501] so as to create a plumbing trench arranged geometrically to a manner that is compatible with placement of rectangular voidfonns [501] on a subgrade |102] and also prevent subgrade [! l)2| material from entering the space under a utility pipe [101] or a hanger assembly [103] after a concrete slab of a slab-on-void foundation is poured, in an embodiment, tine br more inventive stakes [302] which are part of one dr more inventive temporary support apparatus [301] could be driven into one or mon? mobile retaining walls [ISO!] instead of a subgrade [W2]. Also, in an embodiment, utility support members [104] could structurally span between foundation elements [1101] as shown in

Fig 14, over a plumbing trench that is created by excavating adjacent to one dr more niobite retaining walls (1501] rather than benching tire sides ofa plumbing trench.

[000171] Fig. 17 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention similar to that shown in Fig. 5 but with a plumbing trench that is created by excavating adjacent to one or more mobile retaining wails [1501 ], rather than benching the sides. In an embodiment. decking [1701] could be installed over mobile retaining walls [1501] so as to create a support system for yoidfornp> [501 J above decking [1701], which reduces or eliminates a need to cut voidforms around complex Utility pipe [101 J configurations below decking [1701] and thereby reduces the number of days between rain events necessary to allow for any degradable voidform installation above decking [1701] if decking [1701] material Is sufficiently rigid. Decking] 1701] has gaps to allow for penetrations such as hanger assemblies [ 103]. to an embodiment, voidforms

[501] could be degradable carton vbidforms and decking [1701] material could be degradable plywood. In another embodiment, voidforms [501] could be plastic voidforms and decking [1701] material could be plastic. Jri yet another embodiment, yoidfotms [501 ] could be a hybrid of plastic and carton material and decking [1701 ] could be galvanized corrugated metal deck. As another example, voidforms [501] could be degradable earton void forms and decking [1701] material could be nondcgradable.

[000172] Pig, 18 shows a cro&s sectional view erf w embodiment of the invention similar to that shown in Fig.6 bid with a plumbing trench that is created by excavating adjacent to one yr more mobile retaining walls [150 J], rather than benching the sides without impairing foe utility pipe [101] or hanger assembly [103]. [000173] Fig. 19 shows across sectional view efan embodiment of the invention as

Shown In Fig. 18 wherein voidforms [501] and decking [ 1701] could be degradable and after any degrtidable material has degraded and a reduction in subgrade [102] volume has occurred.

[000174] Fig. 20 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the mVentian similar to that shown in Fig; 18 wherein voidfonns [501] and decking [1701 ] are degradable after the after any degradable material has degraded and an increase in subgrade [102] volume has occurred without impairing the utility pipe [10T] or hanger assembly [103], in an embodiment. the mobile retaining walls [1501] ate installed adjacent to plumbing trenches, mobile retaining walls [15(11] are allowed to slide laterally i f lateral forces from volumetric soil change exceed foe sliding resistance of the mobile retaining wall as a gravity Wall system; tn ah embodimentht,e horizontal distance of separation between a utility pipe [101] and a mobile retaining wall [1501] could be greater than or equal to the potential vertical movement estimated by a geotechnical engineer so as to protect the utility pipe [101] from the etibets of volumetric changes in soil.

[000175] Fig, 21 show’s an elevation view of an embodiment of foe invention wherein an mventive mountable pipe elamp [2101] suitable for supporting a utility pipe [1.01] and simultaneously clamping onto utility pipe [101] to prevent vertical and horizontal movement of utility pipe |10i] when the inventive mountable pipe clamp [2101] is mounted onto a structure with a utility opening foal is larger than the utility pipe [I Of] to allow construction tolerance and code-required felt so that the utility pipe [101] can be removed and replaced; The inventive clamp

[21OIJ is suitable for preventing rotation ofa utility pipe [101 ] about a transverse axis of a utility pipe [101] when an inventive mountable pipe clamp [2101] is installed on two sidesofa strueiure so as to create a moment arm of resistance against overturning. As an example, two mounting components [2102] together could comprise an inverTtive mauntable pipc clamp [2101] when bolted together with two clamping bolt and. nut assemblies [2103]. In an embodiment, mounting components [21.02] Could consist of half of a standard pipe clamp [2104] that is the appropriate geometry to cradle a utility pipe [TOlj and a mounting arm [2105],

[000176] In an embodiment, the Inventive mountable pi pe clamp [21011 is comprised of stainless steel, galvanized steel, or plastic. Also, in an embodiment., the mounting arm [2105] could be a strut channel with regularly spaced slotted holes in the web of a ntrut channel allowing convenient options for mounting onto a structure a sufficient distance away from the edge of a utility opening. As an example* a half of a standard pipe clamp [2104] could be welded to a mounting anti [2105] to create a mounting component [2102] > Also, as an example., a mounting arm [2105] and components that have a similar shape to half of a standard pipe Clamp [2104] could be fabricated as. one plastic component.

[000177] Fig. 22 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention wherein an inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] provides a protective collar around a utility pipe [101] so as to prevent the utility pipe [101] from breaking under certain loads, is sufficiently rigid to cantilever support of a utility pipe [101] through an opening in a foundation element [1101], is sufficiently long and heavy to resist overturning when it cantilevers support of a utility pipe [101] through an opening in a foundation element [1 101], and allows removal and replacement of a utility pipe [101]. In an embodiment, the inventive protective utility counterWeight [2201] could consist of an outer pipe [2202] with a larger diameter than a utility pipe [101] wherein the outer pipe [2202] is infilled with counterweight material [2203] around a protective sheathing [2204] that acts as a bond breaker between the counterweight material [2203] and a utility pipe [101]. [0091781 Fig. 23 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment ofthe invention wherein a vault capable of housing a transition of utility pipes [101] foam a building where a utility pipe [101] is supported simi lar to the conditions shown bn Fig. 18 transitioning to where the utility pipe (101) is supported by an inventive protective utility counterweight [2291] that is supported by a subgrade [ 102] and can rise or fall if a subgrade experience® volumetric changes.

[009179] In an embodiment, the vault is comprised of foundation elements [1 101] and reinforced concrete asthe vault top [230:1]. In another embodiment, the vault consists; of reinforced concrete grade beams with a vault top [2301) that is poured over temporary form work which is r^noyed from the vault by an access opening [2302] which can be used for periodic inspection and maintenance. .As. another example, the access opening [2302] could be a manhole.

As anofoer example, the access opening [23021 could be an access door. In another embodiment. one or more foundation elements [ 1 Wl] forming the perimeter of the vault could be one or more reinforced Concrete grade beams of -Walls. It also incorporates aslidable soil retainer [2303],which is a soil retainer capable of retaining soil and slitting up or down along the foce of a foundation element [1101] if a subgrade [192] experiences volumetric changes. As an exampleth*e slidable soil retainer [2303] could be comprised of plastid. In another an exampleth,e slidable soil retainer [2303] could have horizontally oriented flutes Id span horizontally across an opening m the foundation element [ 1101]. In another example, foe slidable soil retainer [2303] is comprised of concrete.

[000180] and the installation of the site has occurred up to tlie pomi in time thatthe inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] has been installed, in Fig, 23 an embodiment of the invention is shown wherein the inventive mountable pipe damp [2191) has been installed on both sides tif a foundation element [1101] so that a utility pipe [101 ] cantilevers intothe vault. Fig. 23 shows an embodiment of title invention wherein a slidable soil retainer [<23033, with a COunteryveight hole

[2304] in it capable of accommodating foe diameter of an inventive protective utility counterweight [2201], te initially bolted [2035] to a foundation element [HOI] ofthe vault so that tftie slidable soil retainer [2303] can he temporarily fixed at a proper initial elevation to recei ve a flexible expansTdnjoinl that will transition the utility pipe [101] from the building to the site, with the slidable soil retainer [2303] being bolted [2305] tothe foundation element [1 101] before backfilling against foe slidable soil retainer [23003]. Fig* 23 shows an embodiment of the invention after a slidable soil retainer [2303] is bolted [2305] to a foundation element [1101].

Subgrade [102] material is backfilled up to ah elevation which is necessary for the inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] to be at a proper elevation to receive a flexible expansion joint and be located in a vertically slotted opening [2306] in a foundation element fl 101] with sufficient clearance above and belowthe portion of the inventive protective utility counterweight

[2201] that cantilevers through rhe vertically slotted opening [2306].

[000181] As an example, backfill material [2307], as part ofasubgrade [102], against foe slidable soil retainer [2303] could be expansive material that is capable of expanding when exposed to moisture so that it seals ofF gaps that may allow moisture to entetrhe vault and be capable of expanding with a subgrade [102] that is capable of experiencing volumetric changes.

As another example^ backfill material [2307] against the slidable soil retainer could be bentonite extending 6 inches pastthe edges of the slidable soil retainer [2303] and extending 8 Inches away from the exterior face of a foundation element [1101], Also, in an embodiment, an inventive protective utility counterweight could be suspended by chains from a forklift and lowered tothe correct elevation, slid through the counterweight hole [2304] ofthe slidable soil retainer [2303], and than shims [2308] could be installed under theends of ope or mare inventive protective utility counterweights [ 2201 ] so that a levelling bed [2309], as part of a subgrade [102], 98m be poured under the bottom of the inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] . In another example, levelling bed [2309] could be comprised of concrete, flowable concrete fill, or gravel.

[000182] Fig. 24 draws a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention wherein a vault is capab le of housing a iransitionof utility pipes [101 ] from a building where ibe utility pipe [101] is supported as shown on Fig. 18 to foe utility pipe [101] being supported by an inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] that is supported by a subgrade [i02] and can rise or fall if d subgrade experiences volumetric changes. As an example, in an embodiment a flexible expansion joint [240] j allows for rotation al each end of the flexibleexpansionjoint [2491] as well as telescoping capability in and out aidatty along the longitudinal aids of the flexible expansionjoint [2401] so that the horizontal distance between the ends of the initial installation of the flexibtc expansion joint [2401] could be constant While the Vertical distance, tfac differetice in elevation, between the ends of foe initial installation of a flexible expansion joint [2401] could change by increasingand decreasing in dimension within the limits of functionality for the flexible expansion joint [2491] such as the maximum vertical offset from a horizontal position for a particular flexible expansion joint. In an embodiment, the flexible expansion joint [2401] could be installed with the vertical distance between the ends of the flexible expansion joint [2401 j equal to the sum df the minimum required vertical fall to damply With applicable building code regulations and half of the maximum Vertical offset from a horizontal position for a particular flexible expansion joint, allowing the site condition to rise half of the reserve vertical offset capacity and tn fall half ofthe reserve vertical offset capacity. In an embodiment, the flexible expansion joint [2401] could be installed to maximize the reserve upward vertical ofifeet capacity by mstalling fire elevation of an inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] at the steepest possible slope that foe flexible expansion joint can provide, giving sufficient clearance above foe inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] in the vertical slotted opening [2306]. As to example, into embodiment a flexible expansion joint [2401] could be installed to maximize the reserve downward vertical offset capacity by installing the elevation of an inventive protective utility counterweight at the most shallow slope allowed by applicable building code regulation, giving sufficient clearance under foe inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] in the vertical slotted opening [2306j.

[000183] lo an embodiment, the vault is comprised of foun dation elements [1101]. and a reinforced concrete slab as foe vault top [2301]. hi another embodimentht,e vault is comprised of reinforced concrete grade beams with a vault top [2301] that is poured over temporary formwork which is removed from the vault by an access opening [2302] which can be

Used for periodic inspection tod maintenance. In another embodiment, the access opening [2302] could be a manhole. In another embodiment, the access opening [2302] could be an access door,

In another embodiment, one or more foundation elements [1101 ] forming the perimeter of a vault could be one ormore reinforced concrete grade beams or walls. Also, slidable soil retainer [2303] is a toil retainer capable of retaining soil and sliding dp or down along the face of a foundation element [1101] if a subgrade [102] experiences volumetric changes.

[000184] Alto, Fig, 24 shows an embodiment of the invention after the biiiidihg is complete and a flexible expansion joint [2401 J has been installed, Fig. 24 shows an embodiment of the invention wherein an inventive mountable pipe damp [2101] has been installed on both sides of a foundation element [1101 ] so that a utility pipe [101 ] cantilevers into the vault. Fig, 24 also shows an embodiment of the invention wherein a slidable soil retainer [2303], with a counterweight hole [2304] hi it is capable of accommodating tile diameter of an inventive protective utility Counterweight [2201], after initially installing the mVefitiVe protective utility counterweight [2201] but before installing any subgrade [102] material Over the inventive protective utility counterweight, one or more temporary Suits [2035] that were used to held a slidable soil retainer [2303] tn position are ex posed by pulling back the slidable soil retainer [2303] and then one or more temporary bolts (2035] are out back to the face of a foundation element [1 1.01] of the vault so that a slidable soil retainer [2303] can slide up or down without engaging any remaining portions of temporary bolts [2035] left in ah foundation element [H01j» In an embodiment, a flexible expansionjoint (2401 j is connected to utility pi pe at one end of the vault from die building and connected to utility pipe al the other end of the vault ftom the site. In an embodiment, a flexible expansion j oint [2401] could transition one or mote utility pipes [101] from the building to the site, with one or more slidable soil retainers [2303]. As an example, shims

[2308] installed to facilitate installation of the inventive protective utility counterweight are removed and subgrade (102) material is backfilled. Fig. 24 shows an embodiment of tlte invention wherein after any bolts [2305] connecting a slidable soil retainer [2303] to a. fbtmdation elmeot

[1101] are removed, subgrade [102] material Is backfilled up to a final grade.

[000185] As an example, backfill material [2307], as part of a subgrade [102], against the slidable soil retainer [2303] could be expansive material that is capable of expanding when exposed to moisture so that it seals off gaps that may allow moisture to enter the vault and be capable of ex panding with a subgrade [102] dial is capable of experiencing vol umetric changes.

As another example backfill material [2307] agiinst lhe slidable soil retainer could be bentonite extending fl indites pastille edges of a slidable soil retainer [2303] and extending 8 inches away from the exterior face of a foundation element [1101 ), [000186] Fig. 25 shows a cross sectional view o f an embodiment of the invention

Similar to Fig. 24. however Fig. 25 shows soil conditions after an increase in soil volume has

Occurred and the volumetric soil change does not cause any impairment of the function of the

Utility pipe [101], As an example, Fig. 25 sjioWs conditions to an embodiment if degradable vpidforms [501] are used with degradable deck [1701] and soil expansion occurs over time after degradable voidforms [SO 1 ] arid degradable deck [I 701 ] degrade and are no longer present.

[000187] Fig, 26 shows a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention similar to Fig. 24, however Fig. 26 shows soil conditions after a decrease in soil volume has occurred and the volumetric soil change does hot cause any impairment of the function of flic utility pipe: [14!]. As an example, Fig. 26 shows conditions in art embodiment if degradable voidforms [501] ate used with degradable deck [1701] and soil expansion occurs over time after degradable voidfbrms [501 ] and degradable deck [1701 ] degrade and are no longer present

[000188] Fig. 27 shows a plan View of an embodiment of the invention wherein degradable voidforms [501] could be used.

[004189] Furflier, Fig. 27 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention wherein one or mote utility pipes [101] are hanging from one or more hanger assemblies [103] and one or more hanger assemblies [103] are connected to and supported by one or more utility support members [104] of the inventive framing system, as also shown in Figs, 1 , 2, 4 - 6, I 1 , 12,

14, )6 -20 arid 23 -26.

[000190] Fig. 27 further shows an embodiment wherein a utility pipes [101] form a

System that could be used for a sanitary sewer plumbing system of a men’s restroom with 2 water closets and 2 urinals, and a women’s restroom with 4 water closets, and each restroom having sinks, floor drains and clean buts as could be required by a locally adopted building code or desired by an owner. As an example, utility pipes [101] could be arranged in a complex tfoeextimensional geometry. Is another example, utility pipes [101] could create a partial slab penetration [2701]

Wherein pne or more utility pipes [101] extend partially through a slab, As an example, in aft embodiment the partial slab penetration; [2701 ] could occur at a floor dram. As another example, a utility pipe [101] could create a foil slab penetration [2702] wherein the utility pipe [101] extend completely through the slab. As another example, a foil slab penetration [2072] could occur at a water closet. As another example, a foil slab penetration [2072] could occur at a urinal. Also, in ait embodiment, a full slab penetration [2072] could occur at a sink. As another example, in an embodiment, a foil slab penetration [2072] could occur at aclean out. Also, a foil stab penetration

[2072] could occur at a Vent pipe. For examples with utility types Pthet than sanitary sewer plumbing, in an embodiment a foil stab penetration [2072] cotild occur at a. domestic water pipe.

Also, as anexample with utility types other than sanitary sewer plumbing, inan embodiment a full stab penetration [2072] could occur at: an automatic fire sprinkler pipe. Also, as an example with utility types other than sanitary sewer plumbing, in an embodiment a foil slab penetration [2072] could occur at a natural gas pipe. As another example with utility types other than sanitary sewer plumbing, than embodiment a Ml slab penetration [2072] could occur at aneletarical service pipe.

Also, as an example with utility types other titan sanitary sewer plumbing, a full slab penetration

[2072] could occur at a telecommunications cable. As an additional example with utility types other than sanitary se-Wer pluming, a full stab penetration (2072] could occur at a .driest for a beating. ventilation or air conditioning system. Also, asan example, in an embodiment one or mon: utility pipes [ 101] that extend partially or fully through the slab could be tied to one or more utility support members [104] placed nearby the partial stab|ienetrd.iion [2?(H] or foil slab penetration [2702] so as to prevent a vertical utility pipe [101] from leaning over before the concrete for the slab [603] is poured-

[000191] As another example, hanger assemblies [103] could occur at eveiy plan view intersection of a utility pipe [101] and a utility support member [104]. Also, in an embodiment, hanger assemblies [103] could occur periodically where utility pipes [101 J are under and parallel with a utility Support member [104], al a spacing that is less than or equal to the maximum permitted spacing of supports for a utility pipe [101], As an additional example, hanger assemblies fl 03] could occur periodically where utility pipes [101] are under and parallel with a composite assembly created by one or more utility support members [104] with connectors [701], with the hanger assemblies occurring at a spacing that is less than or equal to the maximum permitted spacing of supports for a utility pipe [101] and the connectors [701] occurring periodically' along the length of the composite assembly,

[000192] As another example. Fig, 27 shows 10 round foundation elements [1101] that could be 24 inch diameter drilled shaft reinforced concrete piers, with 8 of the piers on a consistent grid with each other, and these 8 plots geomettically creating three distinct, not overlapping, rectangular bays each representing an area of a building floor plan with a pier at every comer of each bay, with the three bays shown in Fig> 27 referred to herein as an exterior-most bay closest to toe flexible expansion joint [2401] shown, an interior-most bay furthest from the flexible expansion joint [2401] shown and a center bay between the exterior-most bay and the interibr- most bay.

[000193] The interior-most bay shown In Fig, 27 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention wherein one or more utility support members [104] as part of the inventive framing system are supported by Me or more inventive temporary support apparatuses [301] as shown in Fig,- 4 6, allowing a high degree pf flexibility m placing one or more inventive lemporaiy support apparatuses [301] so os to work around closely spaced utility pfocs, especially where they' could be relatively close in elevation to the bottom of the slab [603] bf a slab-on- voldform foundation, as a higher elevation of utility pipes [104] generally makes installation of the invention more economical and practical.

[000194] The center bay of Fig. 27, which is referenced herein to include an area near the boundary of the center bay and the interior-most bay as welt as an area near the boundary of the center bay and the exterior-most bay, shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention wherein one or more utility support members [104] as part of the inventive framing system are supported by one or more Other utility support members [104], wherein connectors [701 J would be used as shown in Figs, 7 and 10. In die embodiment the center bay of Fig, 27 shows a plan view of the invention wherein one or more utility support members [104] as part of the inventive framing system arc supported by one or more foundation elements (1101 ]» as shown in Figs. 1 i ,

13 and 14. Utility support members [104] could be supported in some locations by one or more inventive temporary support apparatuses [301 ] and in other locations by one or more other utility support members [104} and in other locations by foundation elements [liOl]. Also, m an embodiment, embodiment shown in the center hay could be more economical than the approach sbpwn in the interior-most bay because the approach shown in the center bay has significantly fewer inventive temporary support apparatuses [30 cbbsidering that While the inventive temporary support apparatuses [301] can reduce the length of utility support member [104] material required the inventive temporary support apparatuses J301 ] also create obstacles to placing voidforms: [501] which makes the _: voidfbrms more expensive to coordinate before fabrication of the vpidforms [5tt1 ] br to customize thegeometry of the voidfonns [501 ] tn the field, so it Can therefore be more economical tn minimize the use of inventive temporary support apparatuses ts a single Utili ty pipe f 101] in a relatively large area.

[000195] As to example, ip a» embodiment at the area near the boundary between the exterior-itiW bay and the center bay, Fig. 27 shows a plan view of an embottimehi of the invention wherein One ormore Utility support members [104] are connected with one or more tidier parallel utility support members [104] Id create a composite assembly that can structurally span between supports, as shown in Figs. 8, 13 and 14, using connectors as shown in Fig, 8, so as to provide a greater strength and stiffness than Wpuid be provided with a single utility support member [ 104] while maintaining a relatively flat cross sectional geometry so that the assembly of utility support members [1:04] can be located between an upper layer and a lower layer of reinforcing bars [502] in a slab [603] of a slab-on-voidform system, which could assist in making the design of die slab (603) more economical as it coiMavoid a need to make the slab [603] thicker lt> accommodate a taller cross sectional geometry 6f an assembly ofutility suppdrt members [104].

[000196] M an example, in an embodiment the exterior-most bay of Fig. 27 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention wherein relatively deeper elevations of one or more utility pipes [1:01] could be accommodated by Installing one or mote inventive mobile retaining

Vitalis [tSOl] to retain soil, aS shown in Figs. 15 - 20, where this approach could be more economical than excavating and maintaining a wide and deep trench in which the subgrade [102] is benched as shown in Fig. 4 - 6 and 14.

[000197) In art: embodiment, a decking support member [2703] could be used as part of the decking [1701 As examples, the decking support member [2703] could be a light gage steel strut channel; Also as an example, in an embodiment the decking support member [2703) could be supported at each end by one Or more inventive mobile retaining walls [1501] wherein a notched seat for a decking support member [2703] is created. As an additional example, in an embodiment the deckfog support member [2793] could be supported at each end by one or more inventive mobile retaining Walls [1501] wherein a notched seat for a decking support member

[2703] is created by grinding with a htod-held power grinder into an inventive mobile retaining wall [1501]. As to additional example, a decking support mambea [2703] could provide support to decking [1701] but not be mechanically joined to decking [1701}. As another example, in an embodiment a decking support member [2703] could be mechanically joined, such as with SCAWS* to decking [1701] where decking [170)} is not mechanically joined to both an inventive mobile retaining waif [1501] and a foundation clement [1101], as the inventive mobile retaining wall

[1501] is designed to rise and Fall With volumetric soil changes whereas a foundation element

[1101] is designed to resist forces associated with volumetric soil changes.

(000198] As aii example. Fig, 27 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention whcrciha vault as shown in Figs. 23-26 housesa transition siipports of utility pipes [TO 1] from a building to a. site by virtue of a flexible expansion joint [2401 ] that is secured in place to prevent lateral movement in either plan view direction, prevent vertical movement, and prevent rotation about a transverse axis of a utility pipe fl-01 j by a pair of mountable pipe damps [2101] that are capable of resisting the lateral forces and movements induced by a flexible expansion. joint

[2401] during instillation and during use of the invention after construction if soil changes in volume, as a ITexible expansion joint [2401] has internal gaskets that Create some friction as a flexible expanskm joint telescopes in and out axially and rotates at each end. In an example, the transition of support conditions could occur under the stab [603] of a slab-on-voidfomt fouftdatiom

Furthermore, in an example, the transition of supports eouid occur Outside of tire plan view of a slab [603] of d slab-on-voidform foundation. As ah example, the transition of support conditions could occur partially under the slab [603] of a slab-on-voidform foundation and partially outside ofthe plan view of a slab [603] of a Slab-on-voidfonn foundation. As an additional example, Fig.

27 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention wherein a slidable soil retainer [2303] and an inventive protective utility counterweight [2201] provide sufficient support for the site condition end of a flexible expansion joint (2401 J, as shown in Figs, 23-26.

[000199] Fig. 28 shows a plan view of an embodiment of the invention similar to the exterior-most bay of Fig, 27 wherein void forms [501] with nim-degradable components could be used for an entire utility pipe [101] sy stem as inventive mobile retaining walls [150 I] are installed fo retain the subgratie [tp2| and support decking [1701] as shown in Figs, 17 - 20, which cuuld require that the elevations of the utility pipes [101] be lower than possible at the interior-most bay of Fig, 27 wheredecking [1701] Is not used, even where foe utility pipe [101) is near a partial slab penetration [2701] or foil slab penetration [2702] and otherwise the utility pipe [101] could be higher, allowing for more flexibility in scheduling constniction to avoid delays caused by rain damaging degradable voidfortns [501] or risks that damp degradable voidforms [501] could collapse when concrete for a slab [603] is poured in geographic areas or periods of time where rain occurs more frequently^ even though the material cost oi'non-dcgr adahlc voidforms [501] could be higher than the cost of degradable vpidforms [501 J. In an embodimentdecking [1701] as shovrn in -Figs. 17 and 18 could be non-degradab1e material that provides a permanent support for voidfdrms [501 ] with non-degrudable components above the decking [501 ], as degradable decking

[I 7Q1J could deteriorate over time and allow any voidfonns [501] with non-degradahle components above foe decking [501]; to fall into the plumbing trench and possibly create a mechanism that could transfer forces to utility piping from volumetric soil change which could damage and/or impair the function of a utility pipe [101], [0002001 As an example, Fig. 28 shorn a plan view of an embodiment of the invention wherein intermediate Trench walls [2801] within the plumbing trench could provide intermediate support for decking {1701} so as tn reduce the length of the span that the decking

[1701 ] would need to accommodate Otherwise. Additionally, as an example, intermediate trench walls [2801 ] could be orie or more wails Us hah as adjacent inventi ve mobile retaining walls [1501 J.

Also, in an embodiment, intermediate trench walts [280i] could be a framing system of beams and columns as tall as adjacent inventive mobile retaining walls [1501]. As an additional example, intermediate trench walls [2801] could be dry-stacked unreinforced and ungrouted concrete masonry units. As an example, in an embodiment informed laid trench wails [2801 ] could be dry- stacked unreinforoed and ungrouted concrete masonry unite with a nominal height to width ratio of 2 to L As an example, intennedi ate trench walls [2801] could be comprised of unreinforced ungroured masonry. Also, in an embodiment, intermediate trench walls [2801] is comprised of unreinforced grouted masonry. Also, in an embodiment, intermediate trench walls [2801] material could be reinforced masonry. In an embodiment intermediate trench walls [2801] could be comprised of stainless steel. Also, as an example, in an embodiment intermediate trench walls

[2801] could be a iranting system of: stainless steel strut channel beams and columns. In another embodiment intermediate trench wails [2801 ] could be comprised of galvanized steel. Also, as an example, in an embodiment intermediate trench walls [2801] could be a framing system of galvanized strut channel beams and columns; Also^ as an example, intermediate trench walls

[2801] could be comprised of plastic. As an additional example, in an embodiment intermediate trench wails [2801] is comprised of degradable material such as wood If degradable voidforms

[501] and degradable decking [1701] are used above the degradable intermediate trend) walls

[2801]. As art additional example, in an embodiment intermediate trench walls [2801] could be supported by a foundation that supports the intermediate trench walls [2801]. As an additional example, in an embodiment vertical elements such as columns Mt are part of one or more intermediate trench walls [3801] could be supported by a foundation that supports the intermediate trench Walls [2801]. As. ah additional example, in an emboditnenione or more intermediate trench walls [28O|J could be modified geometrically to not interfere with one or more inventive temporary support apparatuses £301] that could be located in plan view such that they would otherwise interfere.

£000201] Figure 29 describes methods of the invention At Step 290 I piers# pier paps and grade beatns are installed add wet-sei elevation support connectors are wet-set tn concrete where desired. In Step 2902 utility retaining Waifs are installed where it will be desired to retain soil with a retaining structure adjacent: to on each side of the proposed utility as required, such as allowing a proposed clear dimension from soil under and adjacent to the utility and hanger assemblies equal to or j^reater than the potential Vertical movement In Step 2903, utility trenches are excavated, altowinga proposed dear dimension from soil under and adjacent to the utility and hanger assemblies equal to or greater than the potential vertical movement, benching along the length of the utility trenches as required Where soil is not retained by retaifling structures. extending, tn Step 2904, temporary support apparatuses are installed^ In Step 2905, post-installed elevation support connectors are installed, in Step 2906, utility support members are installed us part of the utility support framing system that is capable of supporting hanger apparatuses where necessary to support an under-slab utility. In Step 2907, hanger assemblies are installed so that they are supported by the utility framing system, tn Step 2908, under-slab utilities are installed so that the utilities are supported by the lianger assemblies. In Step 2909, where mtden-slab utilities penetrate gradebeams at the perimeter of slab-on- voidtonn slab areas, install a mountable pipe clamp on each side ofthe gradebeam s o as to connect the utility at the penetration to the gradebcam and provide sufficient anchorage so that the utility can cantilever past the gradebcam. to Step

2910, any additional decking supports required are installed where required to support proposed decking, including any intermediate support walls, any intermediate support beams and any ledgers attached tp foundation elements, In Step 291 1, decking is installed over retaining walls and other decking supports such as intermediate support walls* intermediate support beams and ledgers attached to foundation elements- to Step 2912, voidforms are installed. In Step 2913» vapor barriers and components of vapor barrier systems are installed, including Components arbuhd penetrations by hanger assemblies through the vapor barrier, lit Step 2914. slab reinforcement is installed over reinforcement supports that bear on toe vapor barrier, to Step 2915, tie wire is installed to connect utility support members to stabilize them so that they will not move substantially after removal of the rods from temporaty support apparatuses or during a concrete pour. Eti Step 2916, rods from temporary support apparatuses arc removed, to Step 2917, M concrete of the slab is. poured, to Step 2918, an excavation is made to access toe vertically slotted opening in a foundation element winch will receive a protective utility counterweight and the slidable soil retainer which retains soil from entering toe vertically slotted opening is bolted to the foundation elements at the top of the slidable soil retainers, to Step 2919, backfil I with subgrade material, including bentonite against the slidable soil retainer is installed to raise the subgrade elevation to the bbtforh of the hole in the slidable soil retainer. to Step 2920, the protective Utility counterweight is installed in toe correct position anil placed on shims at each end of toe protective utility counterweight to Step 2921 , concrete is poured under the protective util ity counterweight in between: the slidable soil retainer and tile shims furthest from the fouhdatitm element with the vertically slotted opening and the shims are removed from under the protective utility counterweight In Step 2922, the bolts connecting the slidable soil retainer to a foundation element arc ground back so as to allow the slidable soil retainer to slide in the future if expansive soil causes the elevation of the slidable soil retainers to rise or fell. In Step 2923 subgrade material is backfilled to raise the subgrade elevation over the protective utility countenveiglYt to the final grade elevations, including bentonite immediately against the slidable soil retainer. In Step 2924, toe flexible expansion joint is installed. In Step 2925, the slab over the flexible expansion joint is formed with temporary shoring that is removed after the slab is poured, and toe slab includes a means o f access such as a manhole cover or door.

[000202] Fig. 30 shows an embodiment of the invention wherein the utility support member is above toe slab. Fig. 31 shows an embodiment of toe invention wherein the utility

Support member is below the slab.

[008203] Numerous embodiments are described in this disclosure and arc presented for illustrative purposes only. The described embodiments ate not intended to be limiting in any sense. The invention is widely applicable to numerous embodiments, as is readily apparent from the disclosure herein; These embodiments are described in sufticient detail to enable those Skilled in tod art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood tost other embodiments may be utilized and that structural and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, those ski! led in the art Will recognize that toe present invention may be practiced With various modifiptifktos aito alterations. Although particular feat ures of (fie present invention may fee described with reference to ope tit more particular embodiments or figures that form a part of the present disclosure, and In which are shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments o f the invention, it should be understood that such features are hot limited to usage in the one or more particular embodiments or figures with retcrence to Which they are described. The present disclosure is thus neither a literal description of all embodiments of the invention nor a listing of features of the invention that must be present in all embodiments.