TALL FESCUE ENDOPHYTE ISOLATE 647

FIELD

This disclosure relates to a new tall fescue grass endophyte referred to as 647. This new endophyte does not produce detectable ergovaline or any other ergopeptide alkaloids which are known to be harmful to grazing livestock. In addition, presence of the 647 endophyte can provide increased resistance to black beetles and thereby reduce damage to grass plants. PARTIES TO JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT

DLF Trifolium A/S and the University of Aarhus Denmark are parties to a joint research agreement governing inventions disclosed herein.

BACKGROUND

Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) is a cool season, perennial, sod forming bunch grass grown on over 35,000,000 acres (141 ,640 kin ) (Ball et al, 1993) of pasture and forage land in the United States, including 17 million acres (68,797 kin ) in Missouri (Roberts, C.A., 2000), 5.5 million acres (22,257 km ² ) in Kentucky (Lacefield and Evans, 1984), 1 million acres (4,047 km ² ) in each Georgia (Hancock, D., 2011), and Indiana (Cherney and Johnson, 1993). Tall fescue supplies most of the nutrients needed by more than 20 percent of United States beef cattle herds (West and Waller, 2007).

In 1931 , Dr. Fergus of the University of Kentucky discovered a tall fescue ecotype while visiting the Suiter Farm in Menifee County, Kentucky. After 12 years of testing in Kentucky, the tall fescue cultivar was released as Kentucky 31 in 1943

(Lacefield and Evans, 1984). Most tall fescue, including Kentucky 31, in the United States is infected with a wild-type fungal endophyte, Neotyphodi m coenophialum (former known as Acremonium coenophialum) that is toxic to animals, causing a syndrome known as fescue toxicosis or summer slump. Fescue toxicosis is a disorder of all domestic grazing animals, including; cattle (Bos spp.), sheep (ovis spp.), and horses (Equus spp.) grazing endophyte (Neotyphodi m coenophialum) infected tall fescue. Fescue toxicosis can cause decreased weight gain from 30 to 100% for grazing steers (Paterson et al, 1995), decreased milk production (Peters et al, 1992), decreased pregnancy rates (Schmidt et al, 1986), and increased respiration rate, and body temperature (Zanzalari et al, 1989). Fescue toxicosis is one of the most costly animal disorders facing the livestock industry in the eastern United States, affecting over 8.5 million cattle (Ball et al, 2007) and costing the United States beef industry an estimated $609 million annually in lost revenue because of reduced reproductive and growth rates in cattle herds (Hoveland, 1993).

To combat the effects of fescue toxicosis, the first Acremonium coenophialum free tall fescue variety, AU Triumph, was released in 1983. Animal performance was reported to be excellent (Hoveland et al, 1982), with annual forage production equal to or greater than Kentucky 31 (Pedersen et al, 1983). AU Triumph was however reported to be less tolerant to cold, drought, and overgrazing than Kentucky 31 E+ (where E+ means that the variety has a high content of endophyte), resulting in stand losses in overgrazed stressful environments.

Although the wild-type endophyte's toxins cause livestock disorders, infection of tall fescue cultivars with a Neotyphodium endophyte and the resulting host plant- endophyte interactions often results in improved tolerance to abiotic (Arachevaleta et al, 1988) and biotic (Popay and Bonos, 2008) stresses and improved overall persistence of cool-season perennial grasses.

One management strategy for minimizing the effects of tall fescue toxicosis is the replacement of toxic tall fescue with cultivars that are endophyte-free or contain non-toxic endophytes. SUMMARY

Herein disclosed is an isolated Neotyphodi m coenophialum endophyte (647) that can be used to inoculate tall fescue grass plants. In a particular example, the endophyte is present in an axenic culture of an endophyte deposited with The

Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS) in The Netherlands, as Deposit No. CBS 133163 on July 31 , 2012, under the Budapest Treaty. This endophyte will be irrevocably and without restriction released to the public upon the issuance of a patent. Therefore, this endophyte is known and readily available to the public. In one example, the disclosure provides the 647 endophyte deposited as Deposit No. CBS 133163. This endophyte can be used to form symbiotic host relationships with grass plants and is different from all known endophytes.

It is shown herein that the 647 endophyte increases the fresh weight yield of tall fescues, such as the variety Martin 2, as compared to grass plants without the endophyte, such as an increase of at least 5%, at least 10%, or at least 15% measured on single plants in a pot trial. In addition, the 647 endophyte produces no detectable ergovaline (0 ppm) and was not toxic to grazing animals, in contrast to Kentucky 31 with its native endophyte, for example as evidenced by higher prolactin levels and increased weight gain when animals were allowed to graze on tall fescue inoculated with 647 endophyte. It is also shown herein that presence of the 647 endophyte can reduce damage due to black beetles (Heteronychus arator), for example as evidenced by a reduction in the number of severely damaged tillers, such as a reduction of at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, or even at least 60%, in the presence of the 647 endophyte. Presence of the 647 endophyte can also increase the dry matter of live tillers, such as an increase of at least at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, or even at least 60%, in the presence of the 647 endophyte. The foregoing and other objects and features of the disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGS. 1A-1C are bar graphs showing the average grazing period prolactin level

(ng/ml) of sheep grazing tall fescue treatments in (A) 2009, (B) 2010, and (C) 2011.

FIG. 2 is a bar graph showing the percentage of tillers that were severely damaged after being caged with black beetle adults for 3 weeks. (P>0.05) LSD 5%

=24.2.

FIG. 3 is a bar graph showing the average dry matter weights (g) of tillers from each fescue treatment after being caged with black beetle adults for 3 weeks. (P>0.05) LSD 5%=0.015.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Provided herein is a Neotyphodi m coenophialum endophyte referred to as 647. This endophyte was originally isolated from a wild tall fescue, and can be used to inoculate other grasses, such as other forage grasses, to provide the benefits associated with the presence of endophyte 647.

It is shown herein that the 647 endophyte increases the fresh weight yield of tall fescues, such as Martin 2, as compared to grass plants (such as a tall fescue) without the endophyte. In some examples, the 647 endophyte can increase the fresh weight yield of tall fescue or other forage grass, for example an increase of at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 11%, at least 12%, at least 13%, at least 14%, or at least 15% as compared to the fresh weight yield of the grass (such as a tall fescue) without the 647 endophyte.

The 647 endophyte was used in a grazing trial. Tall fescue cultivars were artificially inoculated with non-ergot alkaloid producing endophytes to evaluate differences between wild-type and non-toxic endophytes. Three Polypay yearling ewes were assigned to one of six different pasture treatments containing either non- ergovaline alkaloid producing endophytes (207, 647, or Gold ), ergovaline producing endophytes (Kentucky 31 E+), or no endophytes cultivars Martin 2 and AU Triumph (Reg. No. CV-21 , PI 601 106) in 0.1 hectare replicated pasture treatments. The 36 ewes were evaluated for changes in body weight, serum prolactin, and rectal temperatures during three grazing periods over three years (2009 to 2011) to determine animal performance and evaluate fescue toxicosis. The nutritional quality of endophyte - infected tall fescue was shown to be comparable to other tall fescues that did not contain the Neotyphodium endophyte. Ergovaline alkaloid concentration was only found in detectable amounts in the Kentucky E+ forage, when sampled during each year of the each grazing period. Pre-treatment sheep body weight did not differ ( <0.9948) among treatments. Mean total weight gain (kg) was lower (P=0.0039) for Kentucky 31 E+ compared to 207, 647, Gold™, and E-. Mean average daily gain was lower ( =0.0026) for Kentucky 31 E+ compared to 207, 647, Gold™, and E-. Pre-treatment serum prolactin concentration did not differ (P=0.5526) among treatments. Post- treatment prolactin level showed a highly significant effect in the 3 year mean

(PO.0001). Serum prolactin concentrations in sheep consuming wild-type endophyte fescue (Kentucky 31 E+) were lower than those sheep consuming endophyte fescues that did not produce the ergovaline alkaloid at detectable levels. No differences in rectal temperatures were observed, either; pre-treatment ( =0.8404), treatment

( =0.7180), or post-treatment (P=0.5905). The rectal temperature measurements were subjected to confounding variables, such as sheep handling stress, and ambient air temperature.

Thus, the data provided herein show that the 647 endophyte produces no detectable ergovaline and was non-toxic to grazing animals (such as sheep) in contrast to Kentucky 31 with its native endophyte, for example as evidenced by higher prolactin levels and increased weight gain when animals were allowed to graze on tall fescue inoculated with 647 endophyte. In some examples, animals allowed to graze on grasses containing the 647 endophyte have prolactin levels that are at least 1.5 fold, at least 2- fold, at least 3-fold, at least 4-fold, at least 5-fold, at least 6-fold, at least 7-fold, or at least 7.5-fold higher than animals allowed to graze on Kentucky 31 grass with its native endophyte. In some examples, animals allowed to graze on grasses containing the 647 endophyte weighed at least 1.5 fold, at least 2-fold, at least 2.5-fold, or at least 3-fold more than animals allowed to graze on Kentucky 31 grass with its native endophyte. Sheep grazing tall fescue cultivars inoculated with endophytes not producing ergovaline displayed total weight gains similar to sheep consuming cultivars not containing endophyte. Lowered prolactin concentration and depressed weight gain of sheep grazing Kentucky E+ tall fescue indicates that the use of non-toxic endophyte tall fescue cultivars is viable management strategy for minimizing the effects of tall fescue toxicosis in grazing animals such as sheep, cows, horses, and goats. Thus, the use of 647 provides a grass plant having reduced or undetectable amounts of the alkaloid ergovaline compared to naturally occurring endophyte/grass combinations, reduced toxicity to livestock compared to naturally occurring endophyte/grass combinations, or combinations thereof.

It is also shown herein that presence of the 647 endophyte provides increased resistance to black beetles, and thus can be used to reduce damage due the black beetles, for example as evidenced by a reduction in the number of severely damaged tillers. In some examples, grasses (such as a tall fescue) inoculated with 647 have fewer severely damaged tillers by black beetles or other insects (such as Argentinian stem weevil {Listronotus bonariensis) , pasture mealy bug (Balanococcus poae) or other leaf eating insects), such as a reduction of at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, or even at least 60%, as compared to the grass (such as a tall fescue) without the 647 endophyte. Thus, the 647 endophyte can be used to provide a grass plant increased resistance to black beetles or other insects, for example by reducing infestation by black beetles or other insect.

Data provided herein demonstrate that inoculation of grasses with the 647 endophyte can increase the dry matter of live tillers. In some examples, grasses (such as a tall fescue) inoculated with 647 have more dry matter of live tillers, such as an increase of at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, or even at least 60%, as compared to the grass (such as a tall fescue) without the 647 endophyte.

In some examples, endophyte 647 can form a stable synthetic combination with a grass host, such as turf grass or forage grass. Exemplary forage grasses that can be inoculated with 647 include but are not limited to any tall fescue (Festuca

arundinacea), such as cultivars Martin 2, Tower, or IS-FTF 68. In one example, the disclosure provides a stable synthetic combination of endophyte 647 and a grass host, such as a lawn or turf grass, or a forage grass. In a specific example the grass is a bentgrass (common or creeping), fescue (such as a tall, red, meadow or fine fescue), ryegrass (annual or perennial Lolium species), bromegrass, and the like.

A "synthetic endophyte/grass combination" is the combination of an endophyte and a grass cultivar (such as a tall fescue or other grass species) each of which has been isolated from nature, but the combination of which does not exist in nature. For example, the grass cultivar can be a culturally improved grass variety, such as having one or more desirable characteristics, such as improved grass yield and forage quality, increased persistence, drought tolerance, resistance to one or more diseases, and the like. Methods of making such a synthetic combination are known in the art (Johnson- Cicalese et al. 2000), and can include inoculating the desired grass cultivar (such as a tall fescue cultivar) with an axenic culture of endophyte 647, or crossing a synthetic endophyte/grass cultivar combination with an endophyte-free grass cultivar (such as a tall fescue cultivar) to form a new cultivar infected with the endophyte. In one example, the endophyte-free grass cultivar includes one or more desirable

characteristics, such as improved yield and forage quality, disease resistance, herbicide resistance, drought resistance, salt resistance, persistence, low toxicity to grazing animals, and so forth.

Also provided by the present disclosure are seeds of the disclosed synthetic combinations. For example, such seeds can be harvested from grass plants (such as tall fescue or other grass plants) inoculated with the disclosed endophyte. In another example, the seeds are harvested from plants of the disclosed synthetic endophyte/grass combination grown from seeds harvested from grass plants inoculated with the endophyte.

Also provided is a method to screen for endophytes with properties similar to the endophyte 647. Example 3 illustrates the unique genetic background of the 647 isolate and allows the characterization of alternate isolates of Neotyphodium coenophialum endophyte with similar genetic and phenotypic character to the 647 isolate. Typically the method is a PCR based method using oligonucleotide primers adapted to amplify genetic microsatellite fragments as described in table 3.

The method comprises:

i) providing an isolated Neotyphodium coenophialum endophyte to be tested and extracting genomic DNA;

ii) forming a preparation comprising: one or more pairs of oligonucleotide probes adapted to anneal to genomic DNA comprising microsatellite nucleotide sequences selected from the group consisting of Bl, B4, B9, BIO, Bl l, NCESTA1AG05, NCESTA1DH04, NCESTA1FH03, NCESTA1IC04, NCESTA1GA07, NCESTA1AG12, NCESTA1FC04, and NCESTA1DB06; a thermostable DNA polymerase, deoxynucleotide triphosphates and co-factors;

iii) providing polymerase chain reaction conditions sufficient to amplify all or part of said genomic microsatellite DNA;

iv) analysing the amplified products of said polymerase chain reaction for the presence of genomic microsatellite DNA as defined in ii) above; and optionally v) comparing the amplified product with one or more Neotyphodium coenophialum endophytes including Neotyphodium coenophialum endophyte 647.

Provided are primer pairs suitable for use in the method according to the invention wherein the one or more primer pairs comprise nucleotide sequences selected from the group consisting of:

i) SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2 [Bl]; ϋ) SEQ ID NO: 3 and SEQ ID NO: 4 [B4];

iii) SEQ ID NO: 5 and SEQ ID NO: 6 and SEQ ID NO: 7 [B9];

iv) SEQ ID NO: 8 and SEQ ID NO: 9 [BIO];

v) SEQ ID NO: 10 and SEQ ID NO: 11 [Bl l];

vi) SEQ ID NO: 12 and SEQ ID NO: 13 [NCESTA1DH04];

vii) SEQ ID NO: 14 and SEQ ID NO: 15 [NCESTA1H03];

viii) SEQ ID NO: 16 and SEQ ID NO: 17 [NCESTA1AG05];

ix) SEQ ID NO: 18 and SEQ ID NO: 19 [NCESTA1IC04];

x) SEQ ID NO: 20 and SEQ ID NO: 21 [NCESTA1GA07];

xi) SEQ ID NO: 22 and SEQ ID NO: 23 [NCESTA1AG12];

xii) SEQ ID NO: 24 and SEQ ID NO: 25 [NCESTA1FC04]; and

xiii) SEQ ID NO: 26 and SEQ ID NO: 27 [NCESTA1DB06].

Provided are Neotyphodium coenophialum endophytes isolated by the screening method that has the following characteristics:

i) the new endophyte does not produce detectable ergovaline or any other ergopeptide alkaloids which are known to be harmful to grazing livestock; and/or

ii) the new endophyte has increased resistance to black beetles and thereby reduce damage to grass plants.

The following examples are provided to better describe the present disclosure and to guide those of ordinary skill in the art in the practice of the present disclosure. The singular forms "a," "an," and "the" refer to one or more than one, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, the term "comprising a grass plant" includes single or plural plants and is considered equivalent to the phrase "comprising at least one grass plant." The term "or" refers to a single element of stated alternative elements or a combination of two or more elements, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. As used herein, "comprises" means "includes." Thus, "comprising A or B," means "including A, B, or A and B," without excluding additional elements. Unless explained otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. All references cited herein are incorporated by reference.

The foregoing and other objects and features of the disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description of several embodiments.

EXAMPLE 1

Endophyte Isolation and Inoculation of Tall Fescue

This example describes methods used to isolate the 647 endophyte from a wild- type fescue, and to inoculate the Martin 2 variety with the 647 endophyte.

The 647 endophyte was isolated from a tall fescue. Routine methods of endophyte isolation were used. Briefly, seeds were sterilized in a solution of 1.9% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 15 minutes, washed four times with distilled water, and incubated in water overnight to allow any viable microbial spores to germinate. The sodium hypochlorite treatment was repeated the following day and the seeds were rinsed four times with sterile water in a laminar flow cabinet and plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates. The plates were incubated under light, which allowed the germinating seedlings to continue to grow. After the seeds germinated it was sometimes necessary to aseptically push the seedling back into the agar surface using sterile forceps. The fungal endophytes emerged from the seedlings in about 2 weeks. Fungal cultures were maintained by subculturing every 2 to 3 weeks. To aid in removing mycelium from the plates, fungi were subcultured on PDA plates overlaid with a piece of cellophane.

The resulting isolated endophytes were used to inoculate shoots from mature Martin 2 variety plants using routine methods (Johnson-Cicalese et al. 2000). Briefly,

Martin 2 endophyte-free status was confirmed by microscopic examination of leaf sheath tissue. Plants to be inoculated were separated into individual tillers with roots and washed in water to remove excess soil. The leaf blades were trimmed to about 3 cm. A vertical slit about 2 mm long was made at the junction between the root and shoot using a 16 gauge syringe needle. A small piece of 647 fungal mycelium was then removed from the culture plate using the tip of the needle and inserted into the slit. The tiller was then immediately planted into potting mix and returned to the greenhouse. New growth was microscopically examined for the presence of endophyte.

EXAMPLE 2

Tall Fescue Yield Trial

This example describes methods used to identify endophyte-containing fescues that have higher fresh weight yield than fescues without endophyte.

Materials and Methods

The 2005 forage tall fescue trial was sown on 10 October 2005 near Berry, Kentucky (38.538667 -84.3925) on Ashton silt loam with a 0 to 2 percent slope. The land area produced an annual tobacco crop the previous year and a winter wheat crop that was harvested prior to being tilled in preparation for this trial. The average annual monthly maximum temperature was 19°C and 21 °C during 2005 and 2006,

respectively. The site received 914 mm and 1,142 mm of precipitation in 2005 and 2006, respectively.

The trial consisted of 16 entries arranged in a complete randomized block design with two replications

Each plot was originally drilled at 8.4 m ² consisted of seven rows drilled on

23.3cm centers with a Hege 1000 cone plot drill with 30.5 cm between plots at a seeding rate of 29.43 kg per hectare at a depth of 12.7 mm. The plot ends were sprayed to a consistent length following establishment in the fall of 2005 and measured following the first harvest in the spring of 2006 with a finished plots size of averaging 7.7 m ² .

The trial area received 56 kg per hectare of actual nitrogen as 19-19-19 (NPK) prior to sowing in 2005 and again in the fall of 2006. Nitrogen was also applied in the spring of 2006 and 2007 prior to the first harvest at a rate of 56 kg per hectare of actual nitrogen as Ammonium nitrate and again following each harvest. In the spring of 2006 and 2007, the trial area received one broadcast application of Prowl®3.3 EC herbicide (37.4% Pendimethalin) at a rate 0.91 liters per hectare (4.8 pints/A) in 95 liters of water and one application of 2,4-D Amine broadleaf herbicide (46.3% Dimethylamine salt of 2, 4-D-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid) at a rate of 0.57 liters per hectare (3.0 pints/ A) in 95 liters of water.

The trial was harvested four times in 2006 and two times in 2007. Fresh weight yield was collected on all harvest. During each harvest (Table 1) the trial was cut with a Haldrup plot harvester at a plot height 5 cm.

Table 1: Harvest dates

2006 2007

1 15 May 8 May

2 22 June 9 July

3 23 August

4 10 November

Results

As shown in Table 2, Martin 2 with endophyte 647 showed significantly higher fresh weight yield than Martin 2 without endophyte. Thus, endophyte 647 was selected for further analysis.

Table 2: Fresh weight yield of tall fescues

EXAMPLE 3

Genetic Marker Characterization of Endophyte Isolate 647 This example describes methods used to genetically characterize endophyte 647.

Isolation of Genomic DNA

Genomic DNA was isolated from endophyte infected plant tillers. Three or four tillers from each plant were harvested, and wilted leaf tissue was removed. The basal 2 to 3 cm of tiller material were crushed in a leaf press (MERKU, Germany). The resulting plant sap was dissolved in 400 uL extraction buffer (200 mM Tris HC1 pH 7.5, 250 mA/ aCI, 25 mM NaEDTA, 1% SDS) and incubated for 1 5 min at room temperature. Then 400 μL· 5 M potassium acetate were added and the samples were vortexed and incubated on ice for 30 min. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min (13000 rpm). 600 μL· of each sample were transferred to a 1.5-mL centrifuge tube, and

DNA was precipitated by adding 600 μL· ice-cold isopropanol. The samples were vortexed and incubated on ice for 30 min followed by centrifugation for 10 min at

13,000 rpm. DNA pellets were washed in 300 μL· 70% ethanol. The air-dried pellets were re-suspended in 1.25 mL distilled water. Microsatellite Primers and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification

A total of 13 endophyte microsatellite loci were examined. The microsatellites were Bl , B4, B9, BIO, Bl 1 published by Moon et al. (1999) and NCESTA1AG05, NCESTA1DH04, NCESTA1FH03, NCESTA1IC04, NCESTA1GA07,

NCESTA1AG12, NCESTA1FC04, and NCESTA1DB06 published by van Zijll de Jong et al. (2003). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications were performed in 25- xL volumes according to Moon et al. (1999) with the exception that the primers were fluorescently labeled with IRD-800 (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). Reference strains from F. arundinacea included N. coenophialum isolate Tf27 and el 9 (= ATCC 90664) both belonging to taxonomic group FaTGl , Tfl3 and Tfl 5 (both taxonomic group FaTG-2), and Tfl 8 (FaTG-3). (Schardl et al, 1991 ; Christensen et al, 1993; Moon et al, 1999). All microsatellites were also tested on non-infected F. arundinacea DNA. Electrophoresis of Microsatellite Markers

Gel electrophoresis and pattern visualization were performed using a LI-COR model 4000 automated fluorescent DNA sequencer (Middendorf et al., 1992) (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). Gel dimensions were 25 cm long and 0.25 mm thick. The gel contained 7 M urea and 7.0% SequaGel XR concentrate (National Diagnostics, Atlanta, Georgia). The running buffer was 0.4 x TBE (dilution of 10 TBE: 0.9 M Tris, 0.9 M boric acid, 0.2 M EDTA). The gel was run at 2000 V constant voltage, and the gel temperature was maintained at 50°C. A 64 well comb was used for lane formation, and 0.6 μL· of each sample was loaded. A size ladder was produced by mixing PCR products originating from amplifications of a known DNA sequence of L. perenne. The size ladder included 42, 44, 125, 126, 150, 151 , 193, 251 , 280, 327, 328, 414, and 551 base pair fragments and was loaded in lanes 1 , 32, and 64. In addition, a positive control of an endophyte isolated from a DLF-Trifolium. F. arundinacea breeding line was run on each gel as an internal standard. Results

The observed marker sizes of endophyte 647, as compared to reference samples and to endophytes on the market and described in other patent applications, are shown in Tables 3-5.

Table 3. Observed marker sizes of endophyte 647 compared to reference samples:

Table 4. Observed marker sizes of endophyte 647 compared to reference samples:

647 180/182 244/256 187 220/233 310

TF_27 FaTGl 180/182 244/252 187 220/225/230 310

E_19 FaTGl 180/182 244/252 187 220/225/230 310

TF_13 FaTG2 184/186 234/246 180/197 227/230 310

TF_15 FaTG2 192/194 238 180/193 220/230 310

TF_18 FaTG3 197 238 190 233/237 310

E34 Barenbrug 180/182 244/250 187 216/222/228 310

MaxP

310

AgResearch 180/182 244/250 187 216/222/234

MaxQ

AgResearch 180/182 244/250 187 216/222/234 310

Gold Univeristy

310 of Arkansas 180/182 244/250 187 213/222/236

Table 5. Observed marker sizes of endophyte 647 compared to reference samples:

Gold Univeristy

310

of Arkansas 180/182 244/250 187 213/222/236

Thus, the observed marker sizes of endophyte 647 differ clearly from other known endophytes including those described in other patent applications, and thus endophyte 647 is unique.

EXAMPLE 4

Performance of Sheep Grazing Tall Fescue Cultivars Containing

Non-Ergot Alkaloid Producing Endophytes

This example describes methods used to determine the growth performance and toxicosis effects in sheep grazing tall fescue cultivars containing endophytes (207, 647, and Gold™ (Arkansas Strain 9)) which showed low levels of ergovaline production (Table 12), the ergopeptide primarily responsible for fescue toxicosis (Lyons et al, 1986). The protocol used was adapted from Parish et al. (2003). MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pasture Establishment

Six pasture treatments were established on September 28, 2008 with the following tall fescue cultivars: Martin 2 inoculated with the endophyte designated 207, Martin 2 inoculated with the endophyte designated 647, Duramax inoculated with the endophyte Gold™ (Arkansas Strain 9), Kentucky 31 tall fescue containing the wild- type endophyte, AU Triumph endophyte free, and Martin 2 endophyte free. The experiment was developed with a randomized complete block design with two blocks for each pasture treatment. Each 0.1 hectare paddock was established near Corvallis, Oregon. Seed was drilled on 20 cm row centers into Bashaw clay soils with 3 to 12 percent slopes at a seeding rate of 27 kg per hectare. The paddocks were fertilized with 49 kg of nitrogen per hectare at establishment and prior to each grazing period in the early spring. Grazing Management

Three Polypay yearling ewes were randomly assigned based on body weight to each pasture treatment at the start of each grazing period (Table 6). The entire treatment area was perimeter fenced with galvanized iron wire mesh field fence and cross fenced with 0.9 m tall ElectorNet electric netting (Premier Sheep Supplies, Washington, Iowa 52353).

Table 6: Grazing period dates

Season Dates Duration (days)

Spring

June 3 to July 22, 2009 49

May 12 to July 15, 2010 64

May 31 to June 30, 201 1 30

The ewes were allowed access to fresh water and free choice mineral (Wilbur- Ellis, Clackamas, Oregon 97015) (Table 7) in each paddock. Ewes were shorn, ear- tagged, paint branded, docked, and treated for internal parasites with Ivomec Sheep Drench (0.08 % Ivermectin) (Merial Limited, Duluth, Georgia 30096) at a rate of 0.2 mg/kg of body weight at the beginning of each grazing period.

Table 7: Composition of free choice mineral supplement

Guaranteed Analysis

Calcium (min) 8.30 %

Calcium (max) 9.30 %

Phosphorus (min) 6.00 %

Magnesium (min) 2.70 %

Salt (min) 35.10 %

Salt (max) 38.90 %

Cobalt (min) 60 ppm

Iodine (min) 210 ppm

Manganese (min) 1700 ppm

Selenium (min) 200 ppm

Zinc (min) 7700 ppm

Vitamin A (min) 1 16120 IU/kg

vitamin D (min) 14515 IU/kg

Vitamin E (min) 23 IU/kg

Feed 14.17g per head per day

Manufactured by: Wilbur-Elli Company, Clackamas, Oregon 97015

Data Collection

Sheep body weights, blood samples, and rectal temperatures were collected at the beginning of each grazing period and at approximately two week intervals for the duration of the grazing period. During 2009, on dates the sheep were weighted, the ewes were gathered at approximately 10:00 AM from all pasture treatments, transported 0.4 km to the working facilities for data collection in a random order before being returned to the paddocks and sorted into the pasture treatments within approximately two hours. After 2009, on dates the sheep were weighted, the ewes were gathered at approximately 09:00 AM from their pasture treatment for data collection and returned to their pasture treatment within approximately 20 minutes. Approximately 10ml blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture, split into equal size sampled, centrifuged (to separate and harvest serum) and frozen (0°C). The harvested serum was sent for prolactin radioimmunoassay. Weights were measured using a lamb balance scales (Arkfeld Manufacturing and Distributing Co., Norfork, Nebraska 68701).

At the beginning of the grazing period, pasture treatments were sampled for forage by clipping herbage to approximately a 5 cm stubble height in 10 random locations within each pasture. The random samples were pooled to make a composite sample that was separated into two separate equal size samples, which were air dried. One sample was used to determine the total ergot alkaloid concentrations, which were sent to one endophyte testing laboratory during 2009 (Oregon State University

Endophyte Testing Laboratory) and to another laboratory during 2010 and 201 1 ( University of Missouri Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory) for analysis. The remaining sample was sent for chemical forage quality analysis (Dairyland

Laboratories, Arcadia, Wisconsin 54612), during each year.

In the fall of 2009, approximately 50 tall fescue vegetative tillers were collected from each pasture treatment. The vegetative tillers were cut from the remaining plant just below the soil surface. Roots and leaf blades were removed from the tillers and the tiller section was cut 2.5 to 5.0 cm to determine the percent endophyte infection of each pasture treatment using the tissue print- immunoblot method described by Gwinn et al., 1991. Statistical Analysis

Data was analyzed with general linear model regression ( PROC GLM) with the appropriate error terms to test relationships between treatment and methods of analysis (SAS institute). Mean separation was determined by one-way Students t-test means separation at p = 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Forage Quality

The nutritional quality of endophyte-infected tall fescue was shown to be comparable to other tall fescues that did not contain the Neotyphodium endophyte (Tabic 8). Acid detergent fiber (P=0.0874), neutral detergent fiber ( P=0.1473) and crude protein (P=0.1668) as a percent of dry matter (DM) showed no significant difference between the endophyte infected (E+) and endophyte free (E-) cultivars in three year mean.

Table 8: Forage quality

Cultivar Parameter Year

Spring 2009 Spring 2010 Spring 2011 3 Year Mean

Martin 2

ADF, % of DM 29.93 ^b 35.32 ^abc 43 ₄₂ ^a 36.27 ^a

NDF, % of DM 52.74 59.19 68.43 60.07 ³

CP, % of DM 6.41 14.79 7.17° 9 45*

Martin 2 207

ADF, % of DM ₃₁ 44* 34.08 ^c 37.44 ^b 34.32 ^b

NDF, % of DM 53.92 55.74 61.64 57.10 ^ab

CP, % of DM 6.54 17.02 9.28 ^ab 10.95 ³

Martin 2 647

ADF, % of DM 32.24 ^ab 36.9Γ 40.15 ^ab 36.43 ^a

NDF, % of DM 54.36 62.17 65.23 60.58 ³

CP, % of DM 6.42 13.92 8.32 ^abc 9.55 ^ab

Au Triumph

ADF, % of DM 32.62 ^a 34.79 ^bc 39.70 ^ab 35.70 ^ab

NDF, % of DM 54.60 59.12 63.51 59.07 ^ab

CP, % of DM 6.77 14.42 9.76 ^a 10.31 ^ab

Duramax Gold

ADF, % of DM 31.83 ^ab 36.12 ^ab 39.72 ^ab 35.88 ^ab

NDF, % of DM 52.93 60.56 64.00 59.16 ^ab

CP, % of DM 6.02 13.64 _{7 95} bc 9.20 ^b

Kentucky 31 E+

ADF, % of DM 31.29 ^ab 35.78 ^abc 37.48 ^b 34.85 ^ab

NDF, % of DM 52.98 54.11 60.35 55.81 ^b

CP, % of DM 5.89 16.98 9.67 ^ab 10.84 ^ab

Means with different superscripts differ, p<0.05. Means lacking superscripts are not declared significant, p<0.05

CP (%)=Crude Protein. ADF (%)=Acid detergent fiber. NDF (%) = Neutral detergent fiber.

Weight Gain

Mean pre -treatment body weights did not differ significantly ( =0.9948) between treatment groups (Table 9). Mean total weight gain was lower P=0.0039) for Kentucky 31 E+ than all other treatments (Table 10). Average daily gain was higher ( =0.0026) for ewes grazing 207, 647, Gold™, and endophyte free cultivars compared to Kentucky 31 E+ (Table 1 1). No significant difference (P=0.0039) in three year total weight gain was observed between the non-endophyte cultivars (Martin 2 and Au Triumph) and the cultivars containing non-ergot alkaloid producing endophytes (207, 647, and Gold™) (Table 10), indicating no negative effect on weight gain as seen with Kentucky 31 E+ containing the wild-type endophyte.

Table 9: Mean pre -treatment (Day-0) weight, kg

Cultivar Year

Spring Spring Spring Mean

2009 ₊ 2010 _φ 2011 _φφ ( =0.9948)

(P=0.9594) ( =0.7212) ( =0.6666)

Martin 2 33.42 51.02 53.38 45.94

Martin 2 207 34.55 49.52 53.52 45.86

Martin 2 647 33.73 47.78 56.87 46.11

Au Triumph 34.18 47.78 55.72 45.89

Duramax Gold™ 33.48 47.62 55.10 45.41

Kentucky 31 E+ 34.63 49.68 54.03 46.11

₊ Treatment day 0, June 1, 2009. _{ Treatment day 0, May 12, 2010. ^Treatment day 0, May 31, 2011 Means with different superscripts differ, p<0.05. Means lacking superscripts are not declared significant, p<0.05

Table 10: Mean treatment weight gain, kg

Cultivar Year

Spring Spring Spring Mean

2009 ₊ 2010 _φ 2011 _φφ (PO.0039)

(PO.0184) (P<0.0005) (PO.0781)

Martin 2 5.44 ^a 3.55 4.23 ^a 4.4 l ^a

Martin 2 207 0.45 ^b 8.32 ^a 2.19 ^ab 3.65 ^ab

Martin 2 647 2.27 ^b 7.79 ^a 4.08 ^a 4.71 ^a

Au Triumph 0.23 ^b 8.62 ^a 1.51 ^b 3.45 ^ab

Duramax Gold™ 1.59 ^b 5.52 ^b 2.35 ^ab 3.15 ^b

Kentucky 31 E+ -0.30 ^b 3.86 ^b 1.21 ^b 1.59 ^c

₊ Treatment day 23 thru 51. _j Treatment day 22 thru 64. ^Treatment day 14 thru 30 Means with different superscripts differ, p<0.05. Means lacking superscripts are not declared significant, p<0.05 Table 11: Average daily gain, g

Cultivar Year

Spring Spring Spring Mean

2009 ₊ 2010 _φ 2011 _φφ ( <0.0026)

(PO.0182) (P<0.0009) (PO.0797)

Martin 2 0.1 10 ^a 0.057" 0.143 ^a 0.103 ^a

Martin 2 207 0.010 ^b 0.130 ^a 0.075 ^ab 0.072 ^bc

Martin 2 647 0.045 ^b 0.122 ^a 0.138 ^a 0.102 ^ab

Au Triumph 0.003 ^b 0.135 ^a 0.053 ^b 0.064 ^c

Duramax Gold™ 0.033 ^b 0.087 ^b 0.078 ^ab 0.066 ^c

Kentucky 31 E+ -0.007 ^b 0.062 ^b 0.042 ^b 0.032 ^d

₊ Day 51 of treatment. _j Day 64 of treatment. _jj Day 30 of treatment

Means with different superscripts differ, p<0.05. Means lacking superscripts are not declared significant, p<0.05

Endophyte Infection

The endophytes 207, 647, Gold™, and the wild-type endophyte in Kentucky 31 E+ had infection rates of 100, 96, 80 and 96 percent, respectively, at the time of sowing. The pasture treatment infection rate during late fall 2009 was 80, 90, 90, and 100 percent for 207, 647, Gold™, and the wild-type endophyte, respectively. Endophyte infection rate was determined in the seed by direct microscope technique (Latch et al, 1987) and in the tiller by tissue print-immunoblot (Gwinn et al, 1991).

Ergot Alkaloids

Ergovaline is the most abundant alkaloid of the ergopeptide alkaloids (Lyon et al., 1986), and the main alkaloid which causes fescue toxicosis. Ergovaline

concentration was evaluated during each grazing period from air-dried forage samples. Mean ergovaline alkaloid concentration was only found in detectable amounts in the Kentucky 31 E+ (Table 12). Table 12: Ergovaline concentration of air-dry forage sample, ppm

Cultivar Year Mean

Spring 2009 Spring 2010 Spring 2011 (P=0.0001)

(P=0.0001) (P=0.1225) (P=0.1428)

Martin 2 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0

Martin 2 207 o.o ^b 0.0 ^b 0.0 ^b o.o ^b

Martin 2 647 o.o ^b 0.0 ^b 0.0 ^b o.o ^b

Au Triumph o.o ^b 0.0 ^b 0.0 ^b o.o ^b

Duramax Gold™ o.o ^b 0.0 ^b 0.0 ^b o.o ^b

Kentucky 31 E+ 197.0 ^a 1 17.5 ^a 102.5 ^a 139.0 ^a

Means with different superscripts differ, p<0.05. Means lacking superscripts are not declared significant, p<0.05.

Serum Prolactin

Lowered prolactin (PRL) concentrations (ng/ml) are known to be an indication of fescue toxicosis (Schillo et al., 1988). Mean pre-treatment (Day=0) prolactin levels did not differ ( =0.5526) among treatments in the three year mean (Table 13). Serum prolactin showed a decline as consumption of the toxic Neotyphodi m endophyte continued over time (FIGS. 1A-1C, Table 14). Post-treatment prolactin level showed a highly significant effect in the 3 year mean ( =0.0001) (Table 15). Serum prolactin concentrations in sheep consuming wild-type endophyte fescue were lower than those sheep consuming endophyte fescues that did not produce the ergovaline alkaloid at detectable levels, in agreement with the results of Aldrich et al., 1993.

Table 13: Mean pre-treatment (Day-0) serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations, ng/ml

Cultivar Year

Spring Spring Spring 3 Year Mean 2009 ₊ 2010 _φ 2011 _φφ ( =0.5526)

(P=0.5901) ( =0.5047) ( =0.1886)

Martin 2 265.90 199.98 146.80 168.50

Martin 2 207 215.95 119.47 227.52 125.01

Martin 2 647 183.44 239.27 120.07 154.12

Au Triumph 223.98 138.87 1 17.83 134.18

Duramax Gold™ 186.02 236.40 128.87 153.97

Kentucky 31 E+ 234.98 198.03 257.35 157.54

₊ Treatment day 0, June 1 , 2009. _j Treatment day 0, May 12, 2010. ^Treatment day 0, May 31 , 201 1

Means with different superscripts differ, p<0.05. Means lacking superscripts are not declared significant, p<0.05

Table 14: Mean treatment serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations, ng/ml

Cultivar Year

Spring Spring Spring 3 Year

2009 ₊ 2010 _φ 2011 _φφ Mean

( =0.0086) ( =0.0275) ( =0.2402) ( =0.0028)

Martin 2 191.70 ^a 249.53 ^a 459.99 300.41 ^a

Martin 2 207 160.65 ^ab 182.99 ^ab 522.38 288.67 ^ab

Martin 2 647 136.53 ^b 215.14 ^ab 310.58 220.75 ^ab

Au Triumph 123.28 ^bc 282.70 ^a 393.63 266.54 ^ab

Duramax Gold™ 139.47 ^b 144.84 ^bc 346.53 210.28 ^b

Kentucky 31 E+ 77.58 ^c 38.55 ^c 228.58 114.90 ^c

₊ Treatment day 23 thru 51. _j Treatment day 22 thru 64. ^Treatment day 14 thru 30 Means with different superscripts differ, p<0.05. Means lacking superscripts are not declared significant, p<0.05

Table 15: Mean post-treatment serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations, ng/ml

Cultivar Year

Spring Spring Spring 3 Year 2009 ₊ 2010 _φ 2011 _φφ Mean

(P=0.0550) (P=0.0562) ( =0.0343) (P=0.0001)

Martin 2 190.16 ^a 360.87 ^a 332.05 ^a 294.36 ^a

Martin 2 207 152.12 ^ab 340.70 ^a 400.52 ^a 297.78 ^a

Martin 2 647 1 17.78 ^ab 442.72 ^a 259.12 ^a 273.20 ^a

Au Triumph 97.55 ^bc 343.12 ^a 282.47 ^a 241.04 ^a

Duramax Gold™ 105.37 ^bc 253.03 ^a 289.27 ^a 215.89 ^a

Kentucky 31 E+ 25.83 ^c 10.17 ^b 80.92 ^b 38.97 ^b

₊ Day 51 of treatment. _j Day 64 of treatment. _jj Day 30 of treatment

Means with different superscripts differ, p<0.05. Means lacking superscripts are not declared significant, p<0.05

The results from ergovaline and the prolactin demonstrate that the endophytes 207, 647, and Gold™ do not produce detectable levels of ergovaline or any other ergopeptide alkaloids which are harmful to the grazing sheep. This is confirmed by the total weight gain that is not significantly different from the endophyte free control cultivars (Martin 2 and Au Triumph), in contradiction to what was seen for Kentucky 31+, containing wild-type endophyte. The results clearly show that the endophytes 207, 647, and Gold™ are safe to use for grazing sheep or other livestock and is a viable management strategy for minimizing the effects of fescue toxicosis.

EXAMPLE 5

Evaluation of endophyte-infected fescue grasses

for protection against adult black beetles

This example describes a replicated pot trial to evaluate endophyte-infected fescue lines for effects on black beetle adult feeding. There were 12 fescue lines which were run as two separate trials. Each trial included 5 endophyte-free lines as controls.

Black beetle can cause serious damage to North Island pastures of New Zealand.

Chemicals which once gave good control of black beetle have been banned from use, leaving few control measures available to farmers. One plant from each fescue line was caged together in a ring so that beetles had a choice of plants to feed on. After 3 weeks containment, each plant was assessed for their number of live tillers, dead tillers, dry matter and the number of beetles found associated with each plant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tall fescue seed was used, including five endophyte-free lines as controls (Table

16).

Table 16: Tall fescue seed line and endophyte status

Trial establishment

On March 30, 201 1 , 50 seeds from each of the seed lines were placed on moistened filter paper in individual Petri dishes. After 7 days, 20 germinated seeds from each line were transferred into polystyrene trays containing potting mix and kept in a glasshouse where the seedlings were watered and trimmed when required. Black beetle adults were collected from March through to June from ryegrass pastures and fed on a carrot until required for the trial.

From the 30th June, all plants with at least 3 tillers were tested for endophyte using the tissue print immunoblot method (Hahn et al., 2003). Remaining plants with too few tillers and those with unclear results from the immunoblot method were tested by staining with analine blue followed by microscopic examination. On August 4, 10 plants with the appropriate endophyte status from each fescue treatment were transplanted into individual planter bags (64mm x 64mm x 150mm) containing potting mix. The number of tillers on each plant was counted then the plant was trimmed to 3 cm height. The plants were randomly arranged in a galvanized iron ring (20 cm height x 32 cm diameter) and the spaces between the planter bags were filled with sand. One week later, 1 beetle/plant, therefore 16 beetles per fescue rep was seeded into each ring. The rings were covered with shade cloth stretched over metal hoops and secured by strong elastic. This was replicated 10 times. The trial was maintained in a glasshouse at Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton where the plants were watered when required.

Damage assessments

Three weeks post black beetle addition, each plant was assessed for the number of live tillers, tillers with minor damage (small amount feeding) and those severely damaged (tiller very shredded). Each plant was then trimmed down to 3 cm and the herbage was dried and weighed. After a further 2 weeks, the plants were again assessed for tiller damage. The number of live beetles within each planter bag was also recorded at this time. Data analysis

The data was analyzed using ANOVA. As there was a difference between treatments in the number of tillers/plant prior to the addition of beetles, damage and dry matter data were analyzed using initial tiller counts as a covariate. This enabled treatments to be compared as if they had the same number of tillers available for black beetle consumption. RESULTS

Presented here is the comparison between the variety Martin2 with no endophyte and Martin2 with endophyte 647 and the comparison between the variety Tower with no endophyte and Tower with endophyte 647.

Feeding damage

Feeding damage was easily identified by the degree of shredding at the base of the tillers. Severely damaged tillers were either dead or wilting and could be removed from the plant by gently tugging at the tiller base. If a small amount of feeding damage was visible but the tiller was still healthy, the damage was scored as minor. There was no difference in the number of beetles found associated with each treatment (within the planter bag). Black beetle survival was excellent, with between 85% and 100% survival replicate.

At three weeks post black beetle addition, endophyte-infected lines (Martin2 + 647; Tower + 647) had fewer damaged tillers than endophyte-free treatments. Martin2 + 647 was significant (P<0.001) different to endophyte-free treatment (Martin2 no endo) (FIG. 2 and Table 17).

Table 17: % Severely damaged tillers with and without 647 endophytes

Treatment % severely damaged tillers at week 3

Martin2+647 23

Martin2 no endo 68

Tower+647 17

Tower no endo 36

LSD 5% 24 Dry Matter

Once the dead tillers were removed, dry matter cuts were taken from the remaining live tillers on each plant. Data were analyzed using initial tiller numbers prior to black beetle addition as a covariate.

Endophyte treatments (Martin2 + 647; Tower + 647) had greater average dry weights than endophyte-free treatments. Martin2 + 647 was significantly (P<0.001) different to endophyte-free treatment (Martin2 no endo) (FIG. 3, Table 18).

Table 18: Dry matter of live tillers with and without 647 endophytes

Treatment Dry matter of live tillers (g)

Martin2+647 0.030

Martin2 no endo 0.014

Tower+647 0.034

Tower no endo 0.028

LSD 5% 0.015

Thus, the new 647 endophyte provides increased resistance to black beetles and can be used to control black beetles. For example, by inoculating grass seeds and grass plants with 647, this provides a grass plant that will have increased resistance to infestation by black beetles, thereby reducing damage to the grass plants.

EXAMPLE 6

Evaluation of endophyte-infected fescue grasses for production of dry matter in a field trial

This example expands on the results provided in Example 5, by evaluating matter in a field trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was sown near Christchurch (43 40 S; 172 33 E), New Zealand on 31 March 2011 into a neutral to alkaline grey clay using a cone seeder. The site receives a mean annual rainfall of 650 mm. The site was under a pea crop the year before the experiment. After harvest the area was cultivated and sprayed with glyphosate to kill weeds. Plot size was 8x1,2 m with a 30cm buffer between plots. Forty grass/endophyte combinations were arranged in a randomized block design with two replicates.

Presented here is the comparison between the variety Kentucky 31 with no endophyte and Kentucky 31 with the wildtype endophyte and the comparison between the variety Tower with no endophyte and Tower with endophyte 647.

The sowing rate was 20 kg/ha and fertilizer was applied at a rate of 200 kg/ha of "nitrophoska" (NPKS: 12; 5.2; 14.1 ; 6) at sowing.

Weed control after sowing consisted of a post emergence application of 4 litres/ha of "Nortron" (Ethofumesate containing 500 g/liter of active ingredient) in early winter to kill "Poa annua" followed by an application of 1.5 liters/ha of "Jaguar" (25g/litre diflufenican and 250 g/liter bromoxynil) in early spring to control broad leaf weeds.

The first cut for dry matter production was done on August 2, 2011 using a "Haldrup" plot harvester which cuts the whole plot at a height of 5 cm and weighs the fresh forage. Dry matter was determined by taking sub-samples and drying them in an oven at 100°C until constant weight. Subsequent cuts were made each time plants reached a standing biomass of more than 1000 kgDM/ha but less than 2500 kgDM/ha. After each cut a light top dressing of 40 kg urea/ha (46%N) was applied. Eleven cuts were taken between sowing and the end of March 2012 and another 1 1 cuts until 2 April 2013. During summer the trial was irrigated every time the plants showed signs of water stress. No further irrigation will be applied in future to determine the effects of the endophyte symbiosis on drought tolerance. No insect spraying will be applied to make sure of maximum biotic and abiotic stresses are applied on the plants. RESULTS

Results were analyzed using "Genstat" release 12.1. As shown in Table 19, there was no significant difference yet between the non endophyte infected varieties and their endophyte infected partners in the first year. However, the difference between Tower no endophyte and Tower 647 were almost significant at the 5% level.

Differences between treatments with endophytes and their no endophyte counterparts became evident during the second summer with the largest significant differences (p<0.05) shown in the last cut at the end of the summer drought in early April 2013 (Table 19). When the total production for the first two years is examined, significant differences in favor of the treatments containing an endophyte were observed. Since no insecticide was applied and drought conditions were observed in the second summer without applied irrigation, it is concluded that the better performance between treatments was a combination of better drought and insect tolerance in the varieties with endophyte. These results demonstrate a positive effect on the dry matter yield from using endophyte 647. These results are supported by the dry matter yields recorded in the pot trial in Example 5 (FIG. 3 and Table 19).

Table 19: Dry matter (kg/DM/ha) of live tillers with and without endophytes

EXAMPLE 7

Inoculation of Other Grasses with 647 Endophyte

The 647 endophyte can also be used to inoculate other grasses, such as other forage grasses, such as tall fescues. Such synthetic combinations of endophyte and grass or endophyte and seed can be used for grazing or for planting in a pasture. For example, the inoculation methods described in Example 1 can be used to inoculate seeds from any desired grass, such as a forage grass (e.g., a tall fescue).

Example 8

Genetic Engineering of Endophyte 647

The 647 endophyte described herein can be used as a host for the introduction or deletion of various nucleic acid sequences (for example through the use of recombinant nucleic acid sequences or mutagenesis). For example, the genes responsible for alkaloid biosynthesis can be attenuated through deletion or alteration of their control sequences using the methods described in U.S. patent number 6,335,188, which is herein incorporated by reference.

Table 20: primer sequences used in endophyte geno typing

REFERENCES

Aldrich et al., 1993. The effects of endophyte-infected tall fescue consumption on diet utilization and thermal regulation in cattle. J. ANIM. SCI. 71:164

Arachevaleta, M., C.W. Bacon, C.S. Hoveland, D.E. Radcliffe (1988). Effect of the tall fescue endophyte on plant response to environmental stress. AGRON. J. Vol. 81 , No 1 83-90.

Ball, D. M., J. F. Pedersen, G. D. Lacefield (1993). J. ANIM. SCI. 81, 370-379. Ball, D.M., C.S. Hoveland, and G.D. Lacefield (Forth Edition). 2007 FESCUE TOXCITY. Page 198-205. SOUTHERN FORAGES. Potash and Phosphate Institute. Atlanta, GA.

Cherney and Johnson, 1993. Tall Fescue for Forage Production. Indiana Ext. Serv., Purdue Univ. AY-98 Rev. 3/93

Christensen et al., 1993. Taxonomy of Acremonium endophytes of tall fescue {Festuca amndinaecea), meadow fescue (F. pratensis), and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Mycol. Res. 97: 1083-1092

Gwinn et al., 1991. Tissue print- immunob lot: an accurate method for the detection of Acremonium coenophialum in tall fescue. Phytopathology 81 :747-748.

Hahn et al., 2003. Detection of the endophytic fungi in Festuca spp. by means of tissue print immunoassay. Plant Breeding 122: 217-222.

Hancock, D.W. 2011. Tall fescue. Georgia Ext. Serv., Univ. of Georgia. CSS-

F016.

Hoveland, C.S. 1993. Importance and economic significance of Acremonium endophytes to performance of animals and grass plant. Pages 3-12 in R. Joost and S. Quisenberry, ed. Acremonium Grass Interactions. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Hoveland, C.S., S.P. Schmidt, C.C. King, Jr., J.W. Odom, E.M. Clark, J.A.

McGuire, L.A. Smith, H.W. Grimes, and J.L. Holliman. 1983. Steer performance and association Johnson-Cicalese J, Seeks ME, Lam CK, Meyer WA, Murphy JA, Belanger FC. 2000. Cross species inoculation of Chewings and strong creeping red fescues with fungal endophytes. Crop Science 40, 1485-9.

Lacefield, G.D., J.K. Evans. 1984. TALL FESCUE IN KENTUCKY. University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Agricultural Communications Services. AGR-108.

Latch et al., 1987. Incidence of endophytes in seeds from collections of Lolium and Festuca species. Annals of Applied Biology 11 1 :59-64.

Lyons et al., 1986. Occurrence of Peptide and Clavine Ergot Alkaloids in Tall Fescue Grass. Science, 232:487-489.

Middendorf et al., 1992. Continuous, online DNA sequencing using a versatile infrared-laser scanner electrophoresis apparatus. Electrophoresis 13:487^-94.

Moon et al., 1999. Identification of Epichloe endophytes in planta by a microsatellite-based PCR fingerprinting assay with automated analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 1268-1279.

Parish, J.A., M.A. McCann, R.H. Watson, C.S. Hoveland, L.L. Hawkins, N.S. Hill, J.H. Bouton. 2003. Use of nonergot alkaloid-producing endophytes for alleviating tall fescue toxicosis in sheep. J. ANIM. SCI, 81 : 1316-1322.

Paterson, J., C. Forcherio, B. Larson, M. Samford and M. Kerley. 1995. The effects of fescue toxicosis on beef cattle productivity. J ANIM. SCI. 1995, 73:889-898.

Pedersen et al. ,1986. Check year on page 2 year is 1983 Steer performance as affected by tall fescue cultivar and level of Acremonium coenophialum infection, New Zealand J. Exp. Agriculture, 14:3, 307-312.

Peters et al., 1992. J. Anim. Sci., 70:1550-1561.

Popay, A. J. and S.A. Bonos (2008) Biotic Responses in Endophytic Grasses, in Neotyphodium in Cool-Season Grasses (eds C. A. Roberts, C. P. West and D. E.

Spiers), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. doi: 10.1002/9780470384916.ch7.

Roberts, C.A. (2000). Tall fescue toxicosis. MU Guide, MU Extension, University of Missouri-Columbia. G 4669:1-4. Schardl et ah, 1991. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of nonpathogenic grass mycosymbionts and clavicipitaceous plant pathogens. Plant Syst. Evol. 178:27— 41.

Schillo et al., 1988. Effects of Endophyte-Infected Fescue on Concentrations of Prolactin in Blood Sera and the Anterior Pituitary and Concentrations of Dopamine and Dopamine Metabolites in Brains of Steers. J. Anim. Sci. 66:713-718.

Schmidt, S.P., D.A. Danielson, J.A. Holliman, H.W. Grimes, and W.B. Webster (1986). Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ. Highlights of Agric. Res. 33: 15.

van Zijll de Jong, E., K.M. Guthridge, G.C. Spangenberg and

J.W. Forster. 2003. Development and characterization of EST-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for pasture grass endophytes. Genome 46:277-290

West, CP., and J.C. Waller (2007). Humid transition zone. p. 313-321. In R.F. Barnes et al. (ed.) Forages: The science of grassland agriculture, vol. 2, 6th ed.

Blackwell Publ, Ames, IA.

Zanzalari, K.P., R. N. Heitmann, J. B. McLaren and H. A. Fribourg. 1989.

Effects of endophyte infected fescue and cimetidine on respiration rates, rectal temperatures and hepatic mixed function oxidae activity as measured by hepatic antipyrine metablism in sheep. J. ANIM. SCI, 67:3370-3378. In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosure may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only examples of the disclosure and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the disclosure is defined by the following claims. We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope and spirit of these claims.