A tool and a cutting body for chip removing machining with a resilient male/female coupling between the cutting body and basic body.

5 Technical Field of the Invention

In a first aspect, this invention relates to a tool intended for chip removing machining of the type that comprises a basic body and a replaceable cutting body, which by means of a tightening member is fixable to the basic body via a male/female coupling, which includes a plurality of male-like fingers 0 peripherally spaced-apart around an axis, as well as at least equally many spaced-apart seats into which the fingers can be pressed axially, and which are delimited between elastically resilient projections, the individual finger, in addition to an underside and a free end, including a pair of opposite wedge surfaces, which converge toward said underside, i.e., axially, and are pressable 5 against a pair of diverging support surfaces of adjacent projections, and the fingers, upon pressing-in toward a lower end position, having the purpose of bending away the elastic projections, while the fingers are wedged up between the projections and subjected to a spring force from the same.

In a second aspect, the invention also relates to a replaceable cutting 0 body as such, suitable for use in the tool according to the invention.

Prior Art

Within all main disciplines of the technique for chip removing or cutting machining (turning, milling and drilling), tools are used that are 5 composed of a fixed or rotatable basic body and at least one replaceable cutting insert. In order to obtain optimum dimensional accuracy of the usually metallic workpieces being machined, it is vital that the cutting insert is fixed to the basic body in a stable, reliable and solid-geometrically exact way. For this reason, recently there have been developed a number of different connecting interfaces 0 between the cutting inserts and the insert seats formed in the basic bodies and in which the cutting inserts are applied. Contrary to the planar and numerous contact surfaces, which previously have been present to hold the cutting inserts in place in the insert seats, the modern connecting interfaces are based on a combination of male and female elements engaging each other, which among

other things have the purpose of counteracting turning of the cutting insert in relation to the insert seat. Therefore, the connecting interfaces are frequently also called male/female couplings.

By EP 1366840 A1 and EP 1535681 A1 , tools are previously known of the type initially mentioned, which make use of a number of rim-like spaced- apart, male-like fingers on the cutting insert, as well as a number of spaced- apart and elastically resilient projections in the insert seat of the basic body, wherein the fingers may be pressed in and be wedged up in seats between the projections. In doing so, the resilient projections are bent away and apply a spring force to the fingers, which powerfully and tightly presses the contact or wedge surfaces of the fingers against co-operating support surfaces on the projections. The different embodiments of connecting interfaces presented in the above-mentioned patent documents have given promising results with respect to the capability of, in co-operation with a tightening member, e.g., a screw, fixing the cutting insert in a stable and exact way in the insert seat.

However, a disadvantage has appeared in the form of difficulties to detach the cutting insert from the insert seat in connection with the cutting insert being replaced. Thus, after loosening of the tightening screw, the fingers of the cutting insert are fixed in a self-locking way by such a force that the cutting insert cannot be picked away manually by the fingers of the hand, but only by means of mechanical tools, such as a hammer and pliers. This disadvantage is not acceptable in connection with practical, everyday use of the tools, since frequent insert exchanges have to be possible to be carried out in a smooth and fast way. Another disadvantage is that it may be difficult to bring the fingers into the seats initially. In such a way, the work of the operator is further delayed.

Objects and Features of the Invention

The present invention aims at obviating the above-mentioned disadvantages of previously known tools of the type initially mentioned, and at providing an improved tool. Thus, a primary object of the invention, in a first aspect, is to provide a cutting tool, the cutting insert or cutting body of which can be detached and be dismounted from the appurtenant insert seat in a simple and smooth way without unnecessary waste of time. An additional object is to provide a tool, the connecting interface of which between the cutting body and

the insert seat of the basic body has improved properties in respect of the stability and exact position of the cutting body, in particular in repeated use of the basic body and the insert seat thereof for a large number of cutting bodies. Another object of the invention is to provide a tool, the main components of which, i.e., the cutting body and the basic body, respectively, can be manufactured in a simple and economical way production-wise. In particular, the cutting body should be possible to be made from cemented carbide by direct pressing, i.e., without the need of grinding, and in spite of this guaranteeing good precision in respect of the solid-geometrical position in relation to the basic body.

According to the invention, at least the primary object is attained by means of the features defined in the characterizing clause of the independent claim 1. Preferred embodiments of the tool according to the invention are furthermore defined in the dependent claims 2-8. In a second aspect, the invention also aims at providing a new, improved cutting body for use in the tool according to the invention. The primary features of this cutting body are seen in the independent claim 9. Preferred embodiments of the cutting body according to the invention are furthermore defined in the dependent claims 10-16.

Brief Description of the Appended Drawings

In the drawings: Fig. 1 is a partial perspective view showing an example of a cutting tool in the form of a turning tool, where the invention is applied, a cutting body included in the tool being shown in a mounted state on an appurtenant basic body, Fig. 2 is a perspective exploded view showing the cutting body and a tightening screw of the same spaced-apart from the basic body and an insert seat included in the same, wherein it should be noted that one and the same cutting body is shown from above as well as from below, Fig. 3 is a perspective exploded view, which on an enlarged scale illustrates a male member included in the cutting body, as well as the insert seat of the basic body,

Fig. 4 is an additional enlarged perspective view of the male member only, Fig. 5 is an enlarged perspective view of the insert seat, a projection included in the same being shown separately on an extremely enlarged scale, Fig. 6 is an exploded view showing the insert seat from above, as well as the cutting body from below in a state in which the male member of the cutting body is imagined to be separated from the insert seat, Fig. 7 is an analogous exploded view showing the insert seat and the cutting body in a state in which the male member of the cutting body is imagined to be pressed into and fixed in an end position in the insert seat,

Figs. 8-10 are a series of pictures in the form of perspective exploded views of the cutting body and the insert seat in three different states, viz. a state shown in Fig. 8, in which the male member of the cutting body is completely separated from the insert seat (see also Fig. 6), an intermediate state shown in Fig. 9, in which the male member of the cutting body is imagined to be partly pressed into the insert seat, and a state shown in Fig. 10, in which the male member of the cutting body is imagined to be completely pressed in and fixed in an end position in the insert seat (compare Fig. 7), all figures also containing partial detail enlargements of co-operating wedge and support surfaces, Fig. 11 is an exploded view, which on a very enlarged scale shows a section through a finger included in the male member, as well as a section through a seat delimited between adjacent projections in the insert seat for the receipt of the finger,

Fig. 12 is a section showing the finger in engagement with the seat, Fig. 13 is a perspective view showing the underside of a cutting insert having a male member according to an alternative embodiment of the invention,

Fig. 14 is a cross section A-A in Fig. 13, and

Fig. 15 is a perspective exploded view showing an alternative embodiment of the tool according to the invention, the cutting body of the tool not only being indexable, but also turnable.

Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments of the Invention

In Figs. 1 and 2, a tool is shown, which in a traditional way comprises a basic body or holder 1 and a replaceable cutting body 2, which is manufactured from a hard and wear-resistant material. In the example, the tool is in the form of a turning tool, the basic body 1 of which most suitably consists of steel, while the cutting body 2 may be manufactured from cemented carbide and have a flat basic shape.

In the basic body, an insert seat 3 is formed in the form of a female- like recess into which a male member 4 on the underside of the cutting body 2 can be pressed in and fixed by means of a tightening member 5, which in this case is a screw. In the bottom of the insert seat 3, a hole 6 mouths, which is formed with a female thread (not visible) in which the male thread 7 of the screw 5 can be fastened. A centre axis of the hole 6 is designated C. In order to allow the screw to be tightened in the threaded hole 6, the cutting body 2 is formed with a through hole 8, which like the hole 6 is defined by a centre axis C, which should coincide with the centre axis C of the insert seat when the cutting body is fixed in the insert seat. In this connection, it should be mentioned that the screw 5 includes a head 9, which in this case is flat and has a planar, ring-shaped contact surface (not visible) for pressing against a ring-shaped, planar shoulder surface 10, which surrounds the hole 8.

In the example shown, the cutting body 2 is in the form of a cemented carbide plate having a quadrangular, viz. slightly rhombic shape, which is defined by a top side 11 , an underside 12 and four side surfaces 13, which form clearance surfaces. The four straight edges 14 that form transitions between the top side 11 and the clearance surfaces 13 serve as major cutting edges, which at the four corners of the cutting body transform into surface- wiping secondary edges 15.

In this case, the male member 4 on the underside of the cutting body 2 is formed with four fingers 16, which protrude radially from a common ring- shaped wall or ring 17. Each individual finger 16 includes an underside 18 and a free, peripheral end 19 (see also Fig. 3). On the opposite sides thereof, the finger 16 is formed with contact surfaces 20 (only one of which for each finger is visible in Fig. 3), which converge in the downward direction toward the

underside 18 of the finger, i.e., axially. As a consequence of this convergence, the surfaces 20 will be wedged up against co-operating surfaces in the insert seat 3. For this reason, henceforth the surfaces 20 are referred to as "wedge surfaces". In the example, the insert seat 3 is formed with an equally large number of seats 21 as the number of fingers 16 on the cutting body 2, i.e., four, the seats being geometrically arranged in the same way as the fingers 16 so that the same can be inserted into the seats. The seats 21 extend radially outward from a common, central hollow space, and are mutually spaced-apart by means of leaf- or flap-like projections 22, which on opposite sides have support surfaces 23 against which the wedge surfaces of the fingers 16 can be pressed. Because these projections 22 have a limited thickness, counted as the distance between the top sides and the undersides (in practice 0,4-0,8 mm), and because the material of the basic body, i.e., the steel, has a certain inherent elasticity, the projections 22 will be elastically resilient so that they can spring away in the downward direction, when the male member 4 is pressed into the insert seat 3.

The two opposite support surfaces 23, which together delimit the individual seat 21 , diverge in the direction upward in order to receive the wedge surfaces 20 of the fingers 16 converging in the downward direction. For the sake of clarity of description, when the surfaces 20, 23, and the angles thereof, are described henceforth, the pairs of support surfaces 23 will be described as diverging, in spite of the fact that they also are converging, viz. in the downward direction. As far as the shown tool, and the connecting interface thereof between the cutting body and the basic body, hitherto has been described, the same is in all essentials previously known by the above-mentioned patent documents. However, an unacceptable disadvantage of the previously known tools is the difficulty of detaching the male member of the cutting body from the insert seat, when the tightening screw has been unscrewed. Furthermore, the contact between the wedge surfaces of the fingers and the support surfaces of the seats becomes insufficient and unreliable. Although surface contact is aimed at, in practice, only point contact or partial surface contact has been obtained in the known tools. Another disadvantage of the previously known

tools is that the male member of the cutting body has to be located in very exact correspondence with the insert seat in order to be possible to be inserted into the same.

The present invention, such as this will be described in detail below, aims at obviating the above-mentioned disadvantages, more precisely by providing a new, improved connecting interface between the cutting body and the basic body.

With continued reference to Fig. 2, it should first be noticed that the underside 12 of the cutting body 2 does not extend in a single continuous plane. On the contrary, the underside includes four corner-wise located surface fields 24, which are planar and situated in a in common cross-plane perpendicular to the centre axis C. Inside said corner surface fields 24, a countersunk surface 25 is formed, which advantageously is concavely arched and delimited inside a generally ring-shaped limiting edge 26. It should be noted that the male member 16, in its entirety, is present inside the limiting edge 26.

Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the surface 27 of the basic body 1 that surrounds the hollow space 6 and is part of the insert seat 3, is planar. When the cutting body is correctly fixed in the insert seat, the corner surfaces 24 of the cutting body should abut against said planar surface 27 of the basic body.

Reference is now made to Figs. 3-5, which in detail illustrate the new connecting interface according to the invention. Since the different details have to be illustrated on a very enlarged scale, substantially only the male member and the insert seat, respectively, are shown in Fig. 3, but not other parts of the cutting body and the basic body, respectively. The four fingers 16, which are included in the male member 4, are identical and peripherally spaced-apart along the central ring wall 17. More precisely, the fingers are equidistantly spaced-apart, the spacing between the same amounting to 90°. The two side surfaces or wedge surfaces 20 of each individual finger are situated at equally large distances from a common symmetry plane S, which is shown in the form of a screened field. The symmetry planes of the other fingers are shown only in the form of simple, dash-dotted lines. Each such symmetry plane S extends radially from the centre axis C. In this connection, it should be pointed out that the four fingers 16 generally are located in a common cross-plane, which

extends perpendicularly to the centre axis C (and is parallel to the underside of the cutting body). In the example shown, the undersides 18 of the fingers transform directly, i.e., without interruption, into the lower end surface 28 of the ring wall 17. In other words, the surfaces 18, 28 form a continuous, planar and ring-shaped surface, which extends in the cross-plane.

One of a plurality of characteristic features of the two wedge surfaces 20 of the individual finger 16 is that they converge at a certain angle toward the underside 18. This is most clearly seen in Fig. 11 , in which the angle of convergence is designated α. In Figs. 3 and 4, it is further seen that the individual wedge surface

20, in this case, has a tetragonal contour shape. More precisely, the surface 20 is delimited by upper and lower limiting lines 29, 30, as well as outer and inner limiting lines 31 , 32 (end lines). All lines 29-32 are in the form of straight turning lines against adjacent surfaces of the finger. The upper limiting line 29 ends in outer and inner corner points 33, 34, while the lower limiting line 30 correspondingly ends in outer and inner corner points 35, 36. In the embodiment of the tool shown in Figs. 1-12, the wedge surfaces 20 are planar. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, a guide surface, which is designated 37, is formed between the individual wedge surface 20 and the underside 18 of the finger. Together with an analogous guide surface 37 (see Fig. 11) on the opposite side of the finger, a surface pair is formed, which converges toward the underside of the finger. The angle of convergence β of these surfaces 37 is greater than the angle of convergence α of the surfaces 20. By means of the guide surfaces 37, the operator's possibilities of quickly finding the correct position for the male member upon insertion in the insert seat are improved.

With continued reference to Fig. 4 as well as Fig. 11 , it should be noticed that particular chamfer surfaces 38 or concave surfaces are formed between the upper limiting lines 29 of the wedge surfaces 20 and the underside of the cutting body, more precisely in the form of the countersunk, central surface 25 (which advantageously is concavely arched). From the lines 29, the surfaces 38 turn off in the direction inward. In other words, the two wedge surfaces 20 are spaced a distance from the underside of the cutting body.

In conclusion, it should be mentioned that the individual wedge surface 20 (see Fig. 4) transforms into a front end surface 39 via a rounded corner surface 40. Analogous, rounded corner surfaces 41 , 42 form transitions between the surfaces 37, 38 and a front guide surface 43 and a front chamfer surface 44, respectively.

In the embodiment of the invention shown in Figs. 1-12, the pair of wedge surfaces 20 of each finger converges not only in the axial direction, i.e., toward the underside 18 of the finger, but also in the radial direction, i.e., toward the free end 19 of the finger. This is seen in Fig. 6, in which the radial angle of convergence of the wedge surfaces 20 is designated γ.

By the fact that the two opposite wedge surfaces 20 of the finger converge not only axially (toward the underside 18), but also radially (toward the front end surface 39 of the finger), it follows that the corner point 35 between the lines 30, 31 is situated closer to the symmetry plane S of the finger than the corner point 36 and the corner point 33 is situated closer to the symmetry plane S than the fourth corner point 34. In other words, the finger tapers simultaneously in two different directions, viz. axially downward and radially outward.

Contrary to the fingers 16 of the male member, which have the free ends thereof pointing outward, the elastic projections or flaps 22 (see Figs. 3 and 5) are formed with the free ends thereof pointing inward, viz. toward the centre axis C of the insert seat. The projections 22 are, in a known way, provided by the fact that recesses 46 have been formed in the material below the same, e.g., by milling. Generally, each individual projection has a tapering shape in the direction inward, and is delimited by, in addition to the two diverging support surfaces 23, a concavely arched or curved end surface 47, which defines the free end of the projection. Above the end surface, a chamfer surface 45 is formed. Upward, the projection is delimited by the planar surface 27 of the basic body. Downward, in this case the same is delimited by a planar underside 48 (see Fig. 11).

Like the wedge surfaces 20 of the fingers 16 of the cutting body, the support surfaces 23 of the seats 21 are in this case planar. More precisely, the surfaces 23 are delimited between an upper limiting line 49 and a lower limiting line 50, which separates the support surface 23 from a lower chamfer surface

51. In the example, the support surfaces 23 of one and the same projection 22 extend generally perpendicularly to each other, such that the angle between, for instance, the two upper limiting lines 49, 49 is right. Here, it should be observed that the pair of support surfaces 23, which co-operate with one and the same finger 16 of the cutting body 2, are not formed on one and the same projection 22. Thus, the support surfaces 23, which co-operate with one and the same finger, are placed on opposite sides of a common seat 21 , the support surfaces being situated at equally large distances from a symmetry plane designated P, which in analogy with the previously described symmetry plane S extends radially out from the centre axis C. Furthermore, the support surfaces 23 are inclined in one and the same angle in relation to the symmetry plane P, more precisely in such a way that the surfaces diverge axially in the upward direction at an angle of divergence δ, such as is shown in Fig. 11.

In accordance with the invention, the angle of divergence δ of the support surfaces 23 is greater than the axial angle of convergence α of the wedge surfaces 20, as long as the projections 22 are unloaded, i.e., in an inactive state before the individual finger has been pressed into the appurtenant seat. In such a way, a clearance is provided between the individual support surface 23 and the co-operating wedge surface 20. This clearance counteracts the tendency to so-called self-locking, which arises if the angles α and δ would be equally large. Hence, experiments made indicate that the clearances on both sides of the finger provided by the angular difference contribute to lifting up the male member of the cutting body from the insert seat, when the tightening screw 5 is loosened. Before the function of the connecting interface in connection with the fixation and loosening, respectively, of the cutting body is described more in detail, it should be pointed out that, reference being made to Fig. 5, the upper limiting line 49 of each support surface 23 ends in outer and inner corner points

52, 53, while the lower limiting line 50 ends in an outer corner point 54 and an inner corner point 55. The two inner and outer ends of the surface 23 are defined by the limiting lines 56, 57.

In order to illustrate the function of the described connecting interface in connection with the fixation of the cutting body in the insert seat, reference is now made to the series of pictures in Figs. 8-10. In all figures, the cutting body

is shown spaced-apart from the basic body in order to expose the different cooperating surfaces as clearly as possible. However, in the state according to Fig. 8, the male member 4 of the cutting body 2 is imagined to be initially inserted in a manual way in the insert seat 3, but without the screw 5 having been applied in the appurtenant hole. The insertion may, for instance, be effected by means of the fingers of the hand, wherein a moderate force is applied to the cutting body, such as is illustrated by the diminutive arrow in Fig. 8. In the next step, which is shown in Fig. 9, the tightening screw 5 has been applied in the appurtenant hole 6 and has been screwed in a distance, wherein a significant pressing force is applied to the cutting body, such as is illustrated by the arrow F1. It should be observed that the planar corner surfaces 24 on the underside of the cutting body here still have no contact with the surface 27 of the basic body 1. Finally, in Fig. 10, the cutting body is shown in a state in which the tightening screw is imagined to be fully tightened, the corner surfaces 24 having been brought into full surface contact with the surface 27 of the basic body.

As is seen in Fig. 8, initially only point contact is achieved, or very limited surface contact, between the wedge surfaces 20 of the fingers 16 and the corresponding support surfaces 23 in the insert seat 3. More precisely, contact arises, on one hand, between a limited surface portion in the immediate vicinity of the inner and lower comer point 36 of the individual wedge surface 20 (see also Fig. 4), and on the other hand the corner point 55 of the individual support surface 23. Here, it should be pointed out that the distance between the two corner points 36 of the opposite sides of the finger are somewhat greater than the corresponding distance between the two comer points 55 in an insert seat (the difference may amount to approx. 0,05-0,1 mm). In this initial state, double clearances are present between the surfaces 20 and 23, so far that the limiting line 30 clears radially in the direction outward from the corresponding lower limiting line 50 of the support surface 23, at the same time as the inner limiting line 32 of the wedge surface 20 clears in the direction upward in relation to the limiting line 56 of the support surface 23. By the marked compressive force F1 that is applied to the cutting body 2 by the screw 5 in the state according to Fig. 9, the elastic projections 22 begin to bend in the downward direction, such as is illustrated with the arched lines 58 in Fig. 9. This deflection

is effected by the fact that the frictional forces at the contact points or surfaces near the corners 36 and 55 respectively convey the free ends of the projections, when the cutting body and the fingers 16 thereof successively are pressed down axially in the insert seat. In this connection, the contact between the wedge surfaces 20 and the support surfaces 23 will successively be enlarged, such as is outlined in Fig. 9. More precisely, the contact zones extend in the direction from the corner 36 (along the wedge surface 20) toward the corner 34 as well as the corner 35, in order to finally reach up to the area of the corner 33, and in an analogous way (as regards the support surface 23) from the corner 55 toward the corner 53 as well as the corner 54, in order to finally reach the corner 52. When the tightening screw has been finally tightened, so that the contact surfaces 24 have been pressed against the surface 27, full contact has accordingly been established between the wedge surfaces 20 and the support surfaces 23, such as is shown in Fig. 10 by means of the screened fields along said surfaces.

Now reference is made particularly to Figs. 6 and 7, where Fig. 6 of which shows the cutting body 2 in dismounted state (compare Fig. 8), while Fig. 7 illustrates the cutting body in an (imaginary) state in which the cutting body has been fixed in the insert seat (compare Fig. 10). As previously pointed out, the wedge surfaces 20 converge not only axially, but also radially, viz. in the angle of convergence γ, irrespective of the cutting body being mounted or not, such as is seen by a comparison between Figs. 6 and 7. However, this does not apply for the co-operating support surfaces 23 adjacent to the individual seat 21. Because the two support surfaces 23 of one and the same projection 22 are located perpendicularly to each other, the two support surfaces 23 delimiting the individual seat 21 will, in the inactive state thereof according to Fig. 4, extend in the length extension of the symmetry plane P, so far that the upper and lower limiting lines 49, 50 of the surfaces are parallel to the symmetry plane P. As the free ends of the projections are bent down toward the end position according to Fig. 10, the two support surfaces 23 will, however, form a successively increasing angle of convergence, yjz. an angle that in the end position according to Fig. 7 corresponds with the radial angle of convergence γ of the wedge surfaces 20. In such a way, the good surface contact between the surfaces 20, 23 is guaranteed.

The design of the fingers 16 and the wedge surfaces 20 thereof as well as the support surfaces 23 of the co-operating seats may vary most considerably, provided that the axial angle of convergence α of the wedge surfaces (see Fig. 11) is smaller than the angle of divergence δ of the support surfaces 23, at the same time as at least the wedge surfaces 20 of the fingers 16 converge in the radial direction (the angle of convergence γ in Fig. 6). In the embodiment of the tool shown in Figs. 1-12, the axial angle of convergence α amounts to 22° (α/2 = 11°), at the same time as the angle of divergence δ amounts to 30° (δ/2 = 15°). Said angles may vary upward as well as downward. However, the angle α should amount to at least 17° and at most 27°. Preferably, these angular values should be closer to said 22°, and suitably amount to at least 19° and at most 25°.

In the example, the angle of divergence δ amounts to 30°. Therefore, on each side of the finger, an axial clearance angle of 4° (15°-11 °) is obtained at the corner contact points 36, 55 according to Fig. 8. If the radial angle of convergence γ of the wedge surfaces simultaneously amounts to 4°, such as is the case in the example shown, on each side of the finger, a radial clearance angle of 2° is obtained from the corner points 36, 55 toward the corner points 35, 54. Also the angle of divergence δ may be greater as well as smaller than 30°. However, in practice, the same should not exceed 35° or be below 25°. Most suitably, the angle of divergence should be at most 33° and at least 27°.

Irrespective of what absolute values that are chosen for the above- mentioned angles, the difference between the angles δ and α should amount to at least 4° (which gives the clearance of 2° on each side of the finger). On the other hand, said angular difference should not exceed 16° (which would give a clearance of 8° on each side of the finger).

In the example, the radial angle of convergence γ (see Fig. 6) amounts to 4°, which gives a clearance of 2° on each side of the finger. Also this angle may vary upward as well as downward. However, the angle γ should amount to at least 1 ° (0,5° on each side), and suitably at least 2°. On the other

hand, the angle γ should not exceed 8°. Most suitably, the highest value of the angle should amount to 6°.

In this connection, it should be pointed out that the wedge surface 20 and the support surface 23 do not need to be equally large, neither in respect of the axial extension thereof nor the radial extension thereof. In fact, the surfaces in the example are differently large. Thus, the wedge surface 20 is narrower than the support surface 23 so far that the axial extension H1 (see Fig. 11), i.e., the distance between the limiting lines 29 and 30, is somewhat smaller than the corresponding extension H2 of the support surface 23, i.e., the distance between the limiting lines 49 and 50. This means that surface contact is established along the entire wedge surface 20 as viewed in the axial extension thereof, such as is seen in Fig. 10.

However, regarded in the radial direction, the wedge surface 20 is somewhat longer than the support surface 23, i.e., the distance between the limiting lines 31 , 32 of the wedge surface 20 (see Fig. 4) is somewhat greater than the distance between the limiting lines 56, 57 of the support surface 23

(Fig. 5).

Advantages of the Invention A primary advantage of the connecting interface of the tool according to the invention is that the cutting body can be detached from the insert seat of the basic body in a simple and fast way. This is the result of the support surfaces in the receiving seats in the insert seat being formed with an angle of divergence that is greater than the angle of convergence of the wedge surfaces of the fingers. Therefore, when the tightening screw is loosened and allows the elastic projections, on which the support surfaces are formed, to spring upward, a clearance is immediately established between the respective surfaces, an upwardly directed force being applied to the fingers and thereby to the cutting body, which force aims to lift the cutting body out of the insert seat. However, even if said lifting is not particularly powerful (the cutting body does not jump up by itself), in all events, it is guaranteed that the tendency of the surfaces to self- locking is eliminated. Therefore, as soon as the tightening screw has been removed, the operator can simply pick away the cutting body using the fingers of the hand.

Another advantage of the invention is that good surface contact is obtained between the wedge surfaces of the fingers and the support surfaces of the elastic projections during the deflection of the projections, as a consequence of the wedge surfaces of the fingers converging not only axially, but also radially. This means that a moderate radial clearance initially is present between the wedge surfaces and the support surfaces, but as the elastic projections are bent down, this clearance will successively decrease in order to finally cease in a state in which complete surface contact has been established, because the wedge and support surfaces in this state coincide in one and the same solid-geometrical position.

Another practical advantage of the invention is that the fingers of the cutting body easily enter into the appurtenant seats, as a consequence of the lower end portions of the fingers being limited by guide surfaces, which converge even more than the proper wedge surfaces. In other words, the operator's possibilities of quickly inserting the male member of the cutting body into the insert seat are significantly improved.

Additional Embodiments of the Invention

In Figs. 13 and 14, an alternative embodiment of a cutting body according to the invention is shown. In this case, the wedge surfaces 20 on the opposite sides of the individual finger 16 are made with an arched shape, instead of a planar. Advantageously, said arched shape extends all the way between the upper and lower limiting lines of the surface, the lower limiting line 30 forming a turning line in direct connection to the underside 18 of the finger. Also in this embodiment, the lower end portion of the finger is, such as this is defined by the distance between the turning lines 30 along the underside 18, considerably thinner than the width of the individual seat, such as this is defined by the distance between the opposite limiting lines 49 of the seat (see Fig. 5). The two embodiments of the cutting body, which are shown in Figs. 1-12 and 13-14, respectively, are formed with a male member only on one side thereof, viz. the underside, the cutting body being formed with four pairs of edges and the male member including equally many fingers. This means that the cutting body is indexable in four positions, but not tumable. However, in Fig. 15, an alternative embodiment of the tool according to the invention is

illustrated, the cutting body being indexable as well as tumable in the general way described in EP 1535681 A1. In this case, the insert seat 3 is formed with a number of seats 21 , which are delimited between elastically resilient projections 22, which protrude from the planar surface 27 of the basic body, instead of being countersunk under said surface, such as has been described previously. In the generally flat cutting body 2, a through hole 8 is formed, i.e., a hole that opens in opposite surfaces 12, wherein each surface 12 alternately can form either an underside or a top side. Adjacent to each such surface 12, fingers 16 are formed in the same number as the number of seats 21. Said fingers 16 point in the direction inward from the surrounding hole wall. Also in this case, each individual finger includes two opposite wedge surfaces 20, which in a previously described way co-operate with pairs of support surfaces 23, which delimit the individual seats 21.

However, in the embodiment according to Fig. 15, the projections 22 spring away laterally and not in the downward direction, such as has been described previously. For this reason, in this case the axial angle of convergence of the fingers 16 is greater than the angle of divergence of the support surfaces 23. Furthermore, in this case the fingers 16 do not need to converge in the radial direction, because no deflection of the projections takes place. However, it still applies that the angle of divergence of the support surfaces and the angle of convergence of the wedge surfaces differ, and that the angular differences or clearances have the previously mentioned values.

Feasible Modifications of the Invention The invention is not only limited to the embodiments described above and illustrated in the drawings. Thus, the invention is applicable to fixed tools, e.g., for turning, as well as rotatable tools, for, for instance, drilling, milling, etc., wherein the cutting bodies of the tools may have a basic shape that deviates most considerably from the shown, tetragonal shape of the cutting body. For instance, the cutting body may have a round, e.g., circular or elliptical basic shape, instead of polygonal. Most preferably, the edge-carrying part of the cutting body and the set or sets of male-like fingers are formed in a single piece of a hard material. In addition to cemented carbide, this material may be, for instance, cermets, ceramics, or the like. However, it is also feasible to make the

proper cutting body and the male member provided with fingers in the form of two separate units, which are permanently united to each other in a suitable way. Furthermore, it is possible form the insert seat and the bendable projections thereof in another way than by machining (drilling, milling) the basic body of the tool. Hence, it is possible to form the elastic projections in the form of parts of a washer or ring, which forms an insert that is fixed in a suitable way, e.g., is laser welded, adjacent to a hole in the basic body.

Neither is the invention limited to the use of exactly a screw as a tightening member for the fixation of the cutting body. Thus, reliable clamping of the cutting body may also be provided by means of clamps or the like. Furthermore, the number of fingers of the cutting body does not need to correspond with the number of receiving seats in the insert seat, provided that the number of seats is greater than the number of fingers. For instance, the cutting body could have three fingers with a spacing of 120°, while the insert seat could have six seats with a spacing of 60°. In this connection, for the sake of completeness, it should also be pointed out that the number of fingers of the cutting body may vary from two and upward.

The concept of "basic body" should be interpreted in a wide sense. Thus, the basic body in which the seats of the insert seat for the fingers are formed may be in the form of not only a traditional tool holder (boring bar, milling cutter head, drill body, etc.), but also of an attachment, e.g., a shim plate, which in turn is fixed in a suitable way on a tool holder.

Concerning the clearances that are required to realize the general idea of the invention, it should be pointed out that the same may be partial, in the sense that they are present only along a part of the wedge and support surfaces, respectively, (such as is the case in the embodiment according to Figs. 13 and 14). In other words, the clearance does not need to be achieved all the way along the wedge and support surfaces, respectively, which both are planar. Although the support surfaces of the elastic projections extend parallel to the symmetry plane of the individual seat, it is within the scope of the invention also feasible to make the surfaces having a certain, radial convergence provided that the angle of convergence is smaller than the radial angle of convergence of the wedge surfaces.