HUISH DAVID WILLIAM (GB)
SHERRY DAVID (GB)
DOMOKOS JOHN (GB)
HUISH DAVID WILLIAM (GB)
SHERRY DAVID (GB)
US5809405A | 1998-09-15 | |||
EP1153369A1 | 2001-11-14 | |||
EP0696113A2 | 1996-02-07 | |||
EP0364190A2 | 1990-04-18 |
Neill, Andrew (c/o Siemens AG P.O. Box 22 16 34, Munich, DE)
1. | An apparatus having a transmitter portion and a receiver portion each isolated from each other and comprising a plurality of antennae, each antenna being selectively connectable to both the receiver portion and transmitter portion, said antennae thus being common to both transmitter and receiver. |
2. | An apparatus as claimed in claim 1 adapted such that one antenna is selectable to be used as a transmitter whilst at the same time an alternative antenna is selectable to be used as a receiving antenna. |
3. | An apparatus as claimed in claim 1 adapted to enable two or more of the antennae to be used as receiving or transmitting antennae. |
4. | An apparatus as claimed in claim 3 wherein where two antennae are used for receiving, their output is summed to a receiving unit. |
5. | An apparatus as claimed in wherein the there are a plurality of receiver units each adapted to be connected to one or more antennas which are not being transmitted on. |
6. | An apparatus as claimed in claim 5 having means to ensure all the signals from each antennae are in the same phase. |
7. | An apparatus as claimed in claim 5 or 6 having means to scale the signals from each antennae so as to have the same signal strength. |
8. | A method of transmitting and receiving signals comprising the steps of providing a transceiver comprising isolated receiver and transmitter portions, transmitting a signal via at least one antenna and receiving a signal from a second antenna, wherein said antennae are can be selectively used by said transmitter or receiver portions. |
9. | A method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said received signal is a reflection of the transmitted signal. |
10. | A method as claimed in claims 8 or 9 wherein said received signal the transmitted signal modulated. |
11. | A method as claimed in claim 8 to 9 wherein a plurality of antennae are used to transmit or are used to receive the signals. |
12. | A method as claimed in claim 11 where a plurality of antennae are used to receive said signal comprising summing said signals. |
13. | A method as claimed in claims 8 to 11 where a plurality of antennae are used to receive said signals including scaling the received signal from each of those antennae and/or ensuring that they are in the same phase. |
14. | A method of identifying a tag comprising employing any method of any of claims 8 to 13. |
This invention relates to tranceivers and has particular but not exclusive
applications to transceivers which transmit signals and also receives the
reflected signals therefrom or receives signals wherein the transmitted
signal has been modulated by a passive object such as a tag.
Radio frequency identification devices (RFIDs) are passive devices, also
known as tags, which are used for identification purposes. They may be
located on items such as consumer goods. RFID systems typically
comprise a reader which comprises a transmitter and receiver, and one or
more antennas to transmit and receive signals from the tag.
In passive RFID systems the tag is energised by the reader, typically by a
continuous wave (CW) RF field transmitted via an antenna of the reader.
The reader to tag communication is arranged by modulating the CW
signal. The tag decodes this and responds by back scattering the
transmitted CW. The back scattered signals is received by an antenna and
decoded in the receiver.
In a typical system the power of the transmitted signal is in the order of
10OmW - 2W and the back scattered signal is recovered with a homodyne
receiver. The received signal is very weak, in the order of InW - 10OnW
depending on the distance between the reader and the tag.
Figure 1 shows a prior art arrangement of a typical reader. In this example
four antenna A, B, C and D are used to interrogate the tag. It includes a
transmitter 3 and receiver 2. If the path from antenna A to the tag is
obstructed (or impaired by multi-path propagation) the switch selects
antenna B. For example if the reader is located on a fork lift truck the
antennae may be located at various points on the truck and antennae
proximal to the tag may have better transmission/reception than those
antenna distal thereto. The switch 1 cycles through all antennae until the
communication between the reader and the tag has been successfully
completed.
The problem with this arrangement is that the receiver 2 is desensitised by
the transmitted (own) signal. This signal leaks through the circulator Pl
because of the finite isolation of a practical device. Furthermore some of
the transmitted signal is reflected back from the antenna because of the
return loss limitation of the antenna and cabling. The transmitter receiver
isolation (sum of Pl and P2) is in the order of 15-25 dB; this limits the
reading range of this type of reader to about l-3m.
A known improvement is to isolate the transmitter and receiver. Such an
arrangement is shown schematically in figure 2. In this example there are
separate antennae for the transmitter and the receiver and thus the
aforementioned desensitisation problem is greatly reduced. The isolation
(P3) is typically 30 - 40 dB which means that typically
the reading range is increased to 3 to 10 m. The disadvantage with such a
system is that twice as many antennae are required. This means that the
hardware and the installation costs of this system are higher.
It is an object of the invention to provide for transceiver means having
effective isolation and which reduces the inherent cost of prior art
solutions.
- A -
The invention will now be described by way of example.
Figure 3 shows a basic embodiment of a reader 1 comprising a transmitter
2 and a receiver 3 both if which are connectable to a plurality of antennae
A, B C D by means of a switching matrix 5. In general there are N
antennae, where N=4, all of which can be used as a transmitting or
receiving antenna.
In a basic embodiment of the operation of such a system, one antenna at a
time is used for transmission and the switch matrix permits all the
remaining antennas to be used as receivers. Having separate antenna for
transmitting and receiving at any one time ensures high isolation, in a
similar way to the figure 2 prior art embodiment. Thus if antenna A is
being used to transmit, any of the antenna B C or D may be used to
receive.
In a further variation in methodology more than one antenna may be used
to receive the signal. If in the apparatus and example of figure 3a, antenna
A is being used as the transmitting antenna, then antenna B is used to
receive.
Any combination of transmitters B, C or D may be used. For example B+C
or B+D or C+ D. Additional all the antenna B+ C + D may be used to
receive the signal. The signals coming into the receiving unit from all
antennae B C & D are effectively summed; this is shown schematically in
figure 3 a. Figure 3 b shows such an enhanced system of the invention
where the receiving antennas are summed before being fed into the
receiving unit.
Figure 3c shows a further refined embodiment of the invention. A
drawback of the figure 3b arrangement is that although unlikely, it may be
that occasionally the signals received at the antennae may be out of phase
and/or have different strength. This may lead to the signals cancelling each
other out to a certain extent. In a preferred embodiment the signals of the
antenna used for receiving are combined coherently. By is meant the
received signals from the antenna are rotated in phase so as to make sure
they are all in the same phase by phase rectification units 4. Additionally
the magnitudes of the signals are amplified by an appropriate scaling
factors (amplifiers 5) to ensure that they each have equal weighting.
Next Patent: LOCK WITH ROTOR FIXING ELEMENT