Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
VACUUM INSULATION PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/1996/001346
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
A vacuum panel (1) includes a jacket (2) having a bottom (2a) that is formed into a "pan" shape. A top (2b) is welded to the flanges (4) of the bottom (2a) to create a hermetic seal therebetween. A dense glass fiber mat (10) fills the jacket (2). A getter (12) is strategically located in the panel (1) to absorb residual gases in the panel (1) and maintain the vacuum life. To create the vacuum in the panel (1), the panel (1) is heated to a specified temperature and time, and evacuated through an opening (14). The opening (14) is sealed with a braze seal (18) that is melted over the opening (19).

Inventors:
NEESER TIMOTHY A
LYMAN BRUCE E
RUSEK STANLEY J JR
Application Number:
PCT/US1995/008255
Publication Date:
January 18, 1996
Filing Date:
July 05, 1995
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP (US)
MINNESOTA VALLEY ENG (US)
International Classes:
E04B1/80; F25D23/06; (IPC1-7): E04B1/80
Foreign References:
US5252408A1993-10-12
DE3012096A11981-10-08
US2824364A1958-02-25
US3167159A1965-01-26
US4726974A1988-02-23
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS
1. A vacuum panel, comprising: (a) a sealed metal jacket defining an interior space, said jacket being of a thickness to minimize heat transfer; (b) an insulating media in said interior space comprising glass wool media having a density sufficient to oppose the atmospheric force on the jacket to prevent collapse after evacuation of said interior space; (c) at least one getter located in said interior space; (d) an opening in said jacket communicating the interior space with the exterior; and (e) a brazing material melted to seal said opening after a vacuum is created in said panel.
2. The vacuum panel according to Claim 1, wherein the metal is stainless steel of approximately 3 mil (76.2 10"6 m) in thickness.
3. The vacuum panel according to Claim 1, wherein the insulating media has a density of 9 to 20 pounds per cubic foot (144.166 to 320.369 kg/m3).
4. The vacuum panel according to Claim 1, wherein the brazing material is a nickelbased alloy.
5. The vacuum panel according to Claim 1, wherein the brazing material is BNi7 per AWS A5.8, a microgap filler comprising a fine granular metal powder having a higher melting temperature than said BNi7 to assist in sealing said opening.
6. The vacuum panel according to Claim 1 wherein the insulating media has a density of not less than 9 pounds per cubic foot (144.166 kg/m3).
7. The vacuum panel according to Claim 1 wherein said jacket consists of top and bottom members hermetically joined at their perimeters, said jacket being formed of a metal having a low coefficient of thermal conductivity to minimize perimeter heat transfer.
8. A method for manufacturing a vacuum panel comprising the steps of: (a) forming a jacket of metal defining an interior space and an opening communicating with the interior space; (b) filling the interior space with a glass wool insulating media of a density sufficient to oppose the atmospheric force on the jacket after evacuation of the interior space; (c) locating a brazing material adjacent the opening; (d) preheating the panel at atmospheric pressure to reduce the air density in said interior space, expel moisture, and increase the velocity of the gas molecules in the interior space thereby to facilitate their evacuation; (e) promptly after step (d) evacuating the interior space; and (f) melting the brazing material to seal the opening while mamtaining the vacuum.
9. The method according to Claim 8, wherein the step of evacuating the internal space is accomplished in a vacuum chamber and wherein the step of melting the brazing material occurs within said chamber.
10. The method according to Claim 8 wherein the insulating media has a density of not less than 9 pounds per cubic foot (144.166 kg m3).
11. The method according to Claim 8 further including the step of locating a getter in the interior space.
12. The method according to Claim 8, wherein the brazing material is a nickelbased alloy.
13. The method according to Claim 8, wherein the brazing material is BNi7 per AWS A5.8 with a microgap filler comprising a fine granular metal powder having a higher melting temperature than said BNi7 to assist in sealing said opening.
14. The method according to Claim 11, wherein the getter is a molecular sieve in combination with palladium oxide.
15. The method according to Claim 8, wherein the panel is preheated in step (d) to approximately 600°F (315 °C).
16. The method according to Claim 8, wherein said panel is evacuated in a chamber to avoid compression of the jacket during evacuation, thereby to facilitate evacuation.
17. The method according to Claim 11, wherein the getter is heat activated after sealing the opening.
18. The method according to Claim 11, wherein the getter is heat activated during sealing of the opening.
19. The method according to Claim 14, wherein step (d) includes the substep of expelling moisture from the molecular sieve.
20. The method according to Claim 8, wherein step (f) is accomplished by rapidly heating the brazing material to approximately 1800°F (982 °C), thereby to rninimize decomposition and outgassing from the glass wool insulating media.
21. The method according to Claim 8, wherein step (d) is performed in an oxygenfree environment to minimize oxidation of the panel elements.
22. A method for manufacturing a vacuum panel, comprising the steps of: (a) forming a jacket of metal defining an interior space and an opening communicating with the interior space; (b) filling the interior space with glass wool insulating media of a density sufiScient to oppose the atmospheric force on the jacket after evacuation of the interior space; (c) locating a brazing material adjacent the opening; (d) heating the panel while simultaneously evacuating the interior space; and (e) melting the brazing material to seal the interior space.
23. The method according to Claim 22 further including the steps of locating a getter in the interior space.
24. The method according to Claim 22, wherein the insulating media has a density of not less than 9 pounds per cubic foot (144.166 kg/m3).
25. The method according to Claim 22, wherein the brazing material is a nickelbased alloy.
26. The method according to Claim 22, wherein the brazing material is BNi7 per AWS A5.8, a microgap filler comprising a fine granular metal powder having a higher melting temperature than said BNi7 to assist in sealing said opening.
27. The method according to Claim 23, further including the step of heating the portion of the panel adjacent the getter to activate said getter.
28. A vacuum panel, comprising: (a) a sealed metal jacket defining a substantially evacuated interior space, said jacket being of a thickness to minimize heat transfer; (b) an insulating media in said interior space having compressive strength sufficient to substantially prevent deformation of the jacket due to atmospheric pressure on the jacket; (c) at least one getter located in said interior space, said getter comprising a molecular sieve in combination with palladium oxide.
29. The vacuum panel of Claim 28 wherein said media comprises glass wool media having a density of not less than 9 pounds per cubic foot (144.166 kg/m3) to provide said compressive strength.
30. The vacuum panel according to Claim 28, wherein the metal is stainless steel of approximately 3 mil (76.2 10*6 m) thickness.
31. The vacuum panel according to Claim 28 wherein said jacket consists of top and bottom members hermetically joined at their perimeters, said jacket being formed of a metal having a low coefiBcient of thermal conductivity to minimize perimeter heat transfer.
32. A method for manufacturing a vacuum panel comprising the steps of: (a) forming a thinwalled jacket of metal to minimize heat transfer defining an interior space and an opening communicating with the interior space; (b) filling the interior space with an insulating media having a compressive strength sufficient to oppose atmospheric pressure on the jacket after evacuation of the interior space; (c) locating a getter comprising a molecular sieve in combination with palladium oxide in said interior space; (d) preheating the panel at atmospheric pressure to reduce the air density, expel moisture, and increase the velocity of the gas molecules in the interior space, thereby to facilitate their evacuation; (e) promptly after step (d) evacuating the interior space and sealing the opening.
33. The method according to Claim 32, wherein the step of evacuating the internal space is accomplished in a vacuum chamber.
34. The method according to Claim 32 wherein the insulating media comprises a glass wool having a density of not less than 9 pounds per cubic foot (144.166 kg m3).
35. The method according to Claim 32, wherein the panel is preheated in step (d) to approximately 600°F (316 °C).
36. The method according to Claim 32, wherein step (d) is performed in an oxygenfree environment to minimize oxidation of the panel elements.
Description:
VACUUM INSULATION PANEL AND

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING

BACKGROUND ART The invention relates, generally, to insulating panels and, more particularly, to an improved thermal insulation vacuum panel.

Thermal insulation vacuum panels typically consist of a thermally insulative media retained in an enclosure. A vacuum is created in the enclosure to mimmize heat transfer through the panel. Examples of such panels are found in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,444,821; 4,668,551; 4,702,963; and 4,726,974. As is evident from these patents, a wide variety of materials have been used for the insulating material and the enclosure. See, for example, United States Patent No. 5,252,408 wherein a paniculate block, such as carbon black, is used for the dual purpose of insulation and gettering.

These panels are used in a wide variety of applications such as refrigerator walls, oven walls, cryogenic vessels, and other devices requiring thermal insulation. While such panels provide thermal insulation to some degree, the existing panels have undesirable characteristics. For example, in some cases, the insulating media outgases thereby degrading the vacuum in the panel and reducing the effectiveness of the insulation, have low melting temperatures, or do not have compressive strength. In some panels the enclosures are not sufficiently gas impermeable, have low operating temperature limits, or do not have the necessary structural strength for desired applications. Moreover, to provide suitable insulation characteristics the prior art panels tend to be relatively thick and heavy.

Thus, an improved thermal insulation vacuum panel is desired which is economical, has high performance in terms of insulation value, has a relatively long life, and is self-supporting.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION The vacuum panel of the invention consists of a stainless steel jacket. The jacket includes a bottom that is preferably formed into a "pan" shape. A flat or pan top is welded to the flanges of the bottom to create a hermetic seal therebetween. A dense fiberglass mat fills the panel. Getters are located in the panel to absorb residual gases in the panel and to maintain the vacuum life.

In accordance with the present invention, preferably a prebake step precedes panel evacuation. This greatly enhances the creation of a vacuum in the panel. To create the vacuum in the panel, air is evacuated through a slit-like or slotted opening which is then sealed with a braze seal. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Figure 1 is a bottom view of the vacuum panel of the invention.

Figure 2 is a section view along line 2-2 of Figure 1.

Figure 3 is a detailed sectional view of the evacuation opening.

Figures 4 and 5 are graphs comparing the results of prebaking (Figure 4) to one-step (Figure 5) evacuation of the panels. In both of these figures, the x-axis represents time (minutes) and the y-axis represents vacuum (microns).

Figure 6 is a graph showing the heating and evacuation times (minutes) along the x-axis, temperatures (°C) along the y-axis, and pressures for the one-step process.

MODESFORCARRYINGOUTTHEINVENTION Referring more particularly to Figures 1 and 2, the vacuum panel of the invention is shown generally at 1 and consists of a metal jacket 2. The jacket 2 includes a bottom 2a and a top 2b. The bottom is preferably formed into a "pan" shape having a cavity

5 for receiving the insulating media and a flat flange 4 extending around the periphery thereof. An evacuation port or opening is formed in bottom 2a or top 2b to provide a vacuum as will hereinafter be described. It is important that the flange 4 be flat, unthinned, and wrinkle free to permit a hermetic seal with top 2b. The top which may be flat, pan-shaped, or other appropriate configuration is welded to flange 4 to create the hermetic seal, preferably using either laser welding or a roll resistance seam welding process.

Preferably, both the jacket top and bottom are made of 3 mil (76.2 10 **5 m) stainless steel; however, carbon steel or other suitable material may be used. For example,

T304L stainless steel is particularly well suited for the vacuum panel of the invention because it is not gas permeable and is cost effective, readily available, formable, has low outgassing, good corrosion resistance, and a high melting temperature. Also, very important in this application is that the jacket material has a relatively low thermal conductivity. This is necessary to reduce edge losses.

Disposed in jacket 2 is an insulating media 10. Insulating media 10 consists of a dense glass wool maniifactured by Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Toledo,

Ohio, having a density in the range of 9.0 to 20.0 pounds per cubic foot (144.166 to

320.369 kg/m 3 ). The dense glass media opposes atmospheric pressure that tends to collapse the jacket after the panel is evacuated. The glass wool media also has minimal outgassing, low cost, low thermal conductivity, low emissivity, and a high melting temperature. To reduce the panel evacuation time and improve vacuum life, it is preferable to bake out the media to approximately 600°F (316 °C) to drive off the moisture and gases in the glass wool media before it is sealed in the jacket. This is preferably accomplished by prebaking the panel while the glass wool media is at atmospheric pressure. The prebake significantly reduces the evacuation cycle time by reducing the quantity of air molecules contained in the jacket. Subsequent evacuation in a vacuum chamber is then quickly and efficiently accomplished.

Also located in jacket 2 is a getter system 12. One preferred getter is manufactured by SAES GETTERS, Colorado Springs, Colorado, type ST301. Another suitable getter system employs a molecular sieve, type 5 A in conjunction with palladium oxide. The SAES getter is activated by heating to about 1850°F (1010 °C) for 30 seconds at low vacuum. Once activated, it will absorb most residual gases (i.e., H j , O 2 , N-) and water vapor to maintain the vacuum in the panel throughout its extended life. This particular getter is very advantageous when the panels of the present invention are used in high temperature applications because it is activated at, and can withstand, high temperatures (for example, above 500°F [260 °C]). In addition, it may be regenerated by reheating to sufficiently high temperatures.

The use of a molecular sieve (zeolite type) with palladium oxide as a getter system in an evacuated space is preferred for low temperature applications because it is lower cost and quite effective where high temperatures are not encountered. The palladium oxide converts hydrogen gas to water which in turn is absorbed by the molecular sieve along with other gases. Another advantage of the molecular sieve-palladium oxide combination is that it is well suited for the preferred manufacturing cycle which includes a pre-baking step at atmospheric pressure. At temperatures achieved during the prebake, the molecular sieve expels any water vapor it may have absorbed during the assembly process. This insures that the getter is regenerated for maximum effectiveness once the panel is evacuated and sealed off. Another advantage of this system is that no additional heating step is required for activation, as is the case with the SAES getter.

To create a vacuum in the panel an opening 14 is provided in the bottom 2a (or alternately the top 2b) that communicates the inside of the panel with the atmosphere as best shown in Figure 3. The evacuation opening 14 is formed in a recess 16. A nickel-based braze material 18 is located in recess 16 adjacent, but not blocking, the openings which may simply be narrow slots 19. When heated to approximately 1800°F (982 °C) brazing material 18 will melt and seal the slots 19 to create a hermetic seal. Recess 16 is required to retain the molten braze 18 prior to cooling. The brazing material should have good wetting characteristics to stainless steel without flux, low melting temperature, low base metal erosion, and high ductility (to flex with metal foil). To permit maximum slot width for quick evacuation while still ensuring a hermetic seal, the nickel-braze paste is mixed with a micro-gap filler which consists of a fine particulate which does not melt at the braze temperature. Finally, the braze material should be zinc and cadmium free because these elements will vaporize in a vacuum. In the preferred embodiment the nickel-based brazing-filler alloy BNi-7 per American Welding Society AWS A5.8 is used with micro-gap filler #108 manufactured by Wall Colmonoy Corporation of Madison Heights, Michigan. For a typical home appliance panel of modest dimensions, the evacuation slots 19 are desirably 0.025 inches (0.635 mm) wide by 0.600 inches (15.240 mm) long. Preferably, two such slots are used adjacent one another. Multiple sets of slots can be installed in larger panels to reduce evacuation cycle time. Conversely, longer or other slot geometries are possible.

In a preferred embodiment, the panel is preheated to 600°F (316 °C) in an oven at atmospheric pressure to reduce the panel's internal air density (by up to one-half) and to energize the air and other volatiles. The gas composition in this prebake oven can be dry air or an oxygen-free gas mixture as necessary to prevent oxidation of braze or foil panel components or chrome depletion. This preconditions the panel for efficient evacuation. The panel is then promptly placed in a vacuum chamber while it is still hot. Typically, this should occur within about five minutes of the preheat step to obtain maximum benefits. As a result of the atmospheric preheat followed by evacuation of the panel in a vacuum chamber, optimum vacuum levels can be achieved which are not easily obtained without the preheat step. For example, using an atmospheric preheat of 30 to 40 minutes at 600°F (316 °C) followed by vacuum chamber evacuation, a vacuum of 10 microns (mercury) has been obtained within 25 minutes. Without the preheat step (instead using a simultaneous heat and

evacuate technique, i.e. a one-step technique) typical vacuum results are 100 microns in approximately 60 minutes. These data are shown graphically in Figures 4 (prebaking) and 5

(one-step). In Figure 4 the vacuum in the chamber is represented by the asterisk (*), and the vacuum in the panel is represented by the filled triangle (A). In Figure 5 the vacuum in the chamber is represented by the filled square (■), and the vacuum in the panel is represented by the filled circle (*). Seal off is indicated at point "D". Empirical testing of a particular panel configuration quickly yields the necessary preheat period.

The improved vacuum achieved in the panels by employing the atmospheric preheating step (10 versus 100 microns) is extremely important to the commercial success of the panels. These panels are particularly useful for consumer and commercial appliances which have a useful life of at least 10 and often as much as 25 years. Better vacuum results in significantly improved thermal performance, lowering operating costs of the appliance. Also, less residual gas results in extended panel life as the getter system will be able to maintain an effective vacuum environment for a longer period of time. By way of comparison, panels have been produced using both the atmospheric preheat technique and the one-step technique. For panels which are otherwise identical in construction, the thermal characteristics (measured at the center of the panel) are:

With preheat R = 75 per inch (25.4 mm) (10 micron vacuum) Without preheat R = 54 per inch (25.4 mm) (100 microns) in the alternative embodiment which does not use a preheat step, a heated vacuum chamber is used to evacuate and seal the panel and to activate the getter. The panel is inserted in the chamber where the temperature and vacuum are gradually increased in steps (see Figure 6). As the temperature and vacuum increase, the insulating media is preheated (step "A"), outgassing is achieved (step "B"), the getter is activated (step "C"), and the braze is melted to seal the panel (step "D"). In this embodiment the previously described SAES getter is preferably used. The brazing paste is locally heated to 1800°F (982 °C) as, for example, by a resistive heater disposed within the oven. The parameters for operation of the heated vacuum chamber are specifically shown in Figure 6 where the time (minutes) (x-axis) and temperature (°C) (y-axis) are related to the specific processing steps. An important aspect of the present invention is the manner in which the panel is evacuated. It is typical in the prior art to evacuate insulating containers via a port or tube which is pinched off or otherwise sealed when vacuum draw-down is complete. In the

present invention, the use of a vacuum chamber, instead of the prior art technique, is significant in reducing the evacuation time while increasing the quality of the vacuum in the panel. The use of a vacuum chamber causes the jacket 2 initially to expand slightly thereby to facilitate the quick removal of gases during evacuation through the slots 19. In contrast, in the prior art, when a thin-walled vessel at atmospheric pressure is evacuated through a pinch-off tube, the outer wall of the enclosed space tends to collapse or at least deflect inwardly decreasing evacuation efficiency, increasing evacuation time, and almost certainly reducing the quality of the vacuum achieved.

While the invention has been described in some detail with respect to the drawings, it will be appreciated that numerous changes in the details and construction of the vacuum panel can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.