WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH REDUCED SIDEBAND

NOISE AND CARRIER LEAKAGE

CROSS REFERENCE

[0001] The present application claims the benefits of U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 60/748,456, which was filed on December 7, 2005 and U.S. Patent Application No. 11/592,823 filed November 4, 2006.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0002] This invention relates generally to wireless communications, and more particularly to a system and method for detecting and reducing sideband noise and carrier leakage.

BACKGROUND

[0003] A wireless communications system typically includes a transmitter and a receiver for sending signals over carrier waves. The transmitter modulates information, such as voice, text, image, audio, and video data, onto a carrier before sending it to the receiver. The receiver demodulates the received signals to recover the original information. One of the typically used modulation schemes is IQ modulation, where I and Q represent in-phase and quadrature parts of a modulated signal. The IQ modulation is an efficient way of sending information, particularly in digital formats.

[0004] There are various factors that can cause the transmitter to generate imperfect modulated output signals. For example, in a quadrature modulation scheme, IQ imbalance, which occurs when there are different amplitude and phase distortions in I and Q channels, is one of the widely-recognized factors causing imperfect signals. The IQ imbalance induces sideband noise, which is essentially an image frequency interference "aliasing" into a desired signal band.

The sideband noise degrades signal reception in a wireless communications system. The IQ imbalance has become a crucial issue as higher-level modulations appear in communications standards and low-cost, direct-conversion transmitters and receivers are increasingly employed in wireless communications systems.

[0005] Another typical factor causing imperfect signals is the hardware- induced carrier leakage. The carrier leakage, which is at the same frequency as the carrier, is often induced by the limited isolation between the carrier and output ports of the transmitter. On an IQ plane, a modulated signal with carrier leakage appears with a fixed offset vector.

[0006] Conventional solutions to combat carrier leakage rely on implementation of additional circuitry. The solutions for IQ imbalance are usually based on cancellation of the sideband noise in the transmitter, which also require additional circuitry or manufacturing calibration. For example, one can detect the sideband noise and carrier leakage by sampling an output signal, and minimize the same through hardware calibration. The signal sampling can be performed by using a testing receiver to detect output signals from a device under a test (DUT) transmitter.

[0007] One drawback of the conventional solutions is that the carrier leakage and sideband noise generated by the DUT transmitter cannot be distinguished from those generated by the testing receiver. This prevents an accurate calibration of the sideband noise and carrier leakage for the DUT transmitter.

[0008] As such, what is needed is a detection scheme to identify the sideband noise and carrier leakage of the DUT transmitter apart from those of the testing receiver.

SUMMARY

[0009] The present invention discloses a wireless communications system with reduced sideband noise and carrier leakage. In the system, at least one transmitter modulates at least one input signal with a first carrier to generate a modulated output signal, and at least one receiver receives the modulated output signal and demodulates the same with a second carrier to generate at least one demodulated output signal. The first and second carriers are at difference frequencies, such that the sideband noise and carrier leakage generated by different sources can be distinguished.

[0010] The construction and method of operation of the invention, however, together with additional objectives and advantages thereof will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0011] FIG. 1 illustrates a frequency spectrum of an output signal from a conventional transmitter.

[0012] FIG. 2 illustrates a conventional wireless communications system for detecting sideband noise and carrier leakage.

[0013] FIG. 3 illustrates a proposed wireless communications system for detecting sideband noise and carrier leakage in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

[0014] FIG. 4 illustrates frequency spectrums of output signals from a DUT transmitter and a testing receiver in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION

[0015] FIG. 1 illustrates a frequency spectrum of an output signal from a conventional transmitter (not shown in the figure). Frequency is plotted on the X-axis and amplitude on the Y-axis. Fc denotes the frequency of a carrier that modulates an input signal, Fout denotes the center frequency of a modulated signal output from the transmitter, and Fc-2*Fout denotes the center frequency of side band noise associated with the modulated signal located at frequency Fout. Here the output signals are represented by their center frequencies for simplicity. The output frequency Fout is offset from the carrier frequency Fc because of certain unwanted frequency components generated as a result of the IQ imbalance and carrier leakage of the transmitter. The IQ imbalance induces sideband noise, which is essentially an image frequency interference "aliasing" into the desired signal band. Due to limited isolation between the carrier and the output ports of the transmitter, there is always carrier leakage appearing as a signal at the same frequency of the carrier. The relation between the center frequency Fout of the output signal and the carrier frequency Fc is expressed by the following equation.

Fout = Fc + If

where If is the frequency of intermediate carrier. In the case where the direct conversion architecture is used (base band I and Q signals are directly converted to RF carrier), If is zero.

[0016] FIG. 2 illustrates a conventional wireless communications system 100 for detecting the sideband noise. The system 100 includes a DUT transmitter 110 and a testing receiver 120. The DUT transmitter 110 receives an input signal having an in-phase part Iu and a quadrature phase part Qn. The DUT transmitter 110 receives a carrier of frequency Fc, and converts the input signal to a

modulated output signal TXoi. A sample of the modulated output signal TXoi is coupled into the testing receiver 120. The testing receiver 120 receives a carrier of frequency Fc, and converts the modulated signal TXoi back to a demodulated output signal that has an in-phase part Ioi and a quadrature phase part Qoi.

[0017] The conventional system 100 can detect the sideband noise and carrier leakage by sampling the output signal, and then minimizes their magnitudes using hardware calibration. The frequency of the output signals from the testing receiver 120 should be the same as that of the output signal from the DUT transmitter 110. The frequency spectrum of the output signals from the testing receiver 120 usually contains various unwanted frequency components, such as the carrier leakage of the transmitter 110, carrier leakage of the receiver 120, sideband noise of the transmitter 110 corresponding to its input signal, sideband noise of the receiver 120 corresponding to its input signal, sideband noise of the receiver 120 corresponding to the carrier leakage of the transmitter 110, sideband noise of the receiver 120 corresponding to the sideband noise of the transmitter 110 that is corresponding to its input signal.

[0018] One drawback of the conventional system is its inability to distinguish the sideband noise and carrier leakage induced by the DUT transmitter from those induced by the testing receiver, because the carriers of the transmitter and receiver have the same frequency.

[0019] FIG. 3 illustrates a proposed wireless communications system 200 for detecting the sideband noise and carrier leakage in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The system 200 includes a DUT transmitter 210 and a testing receiver 220. The DUT transmitter 210 receives an input signal having an in-phase part Ia and quadrature phase part Qn. The DUT transmitter 210 receives a carrier of frequency Fci, and converts the input signal to a modulated output signal TX02. A sample of the modulated output signal

TXθ2 is input into the testing receiver 220. The testing receiver 220 receives a carrier of frequency Fc2, and converts the modulated signal TXθ2back to a demodulated output signal that has an in-phase part I02 and a quadrature phase

[0020] In this embodiment, the carrier frequency Fc ₂ used by the testing receiver 220 is different from the carrier frequency Fc ₁ used by the DUT transmitter 210. In the system 200, the frequency spectrum of the output signal from the testing receiver 220 contains the input signal and carrier leakage of the transmitter 210, and the sideband noise of the transmitter 210 corresponding to its input signal, the carrier leakage of the receiver 220, the sideband noise of the receiver 220 corresponding to its input signal, the sideband noise of the receiver 220 corresponding to the carrier leakage of the transmitter 210, the sideband noise of the receiver 220 corresponding to the sideband noise of the transmitter 210 that is corresponding to its input signal. Due to the difference between the carrier frequencies Fci and Fc ₂ , the sideband noise and carrier leakage of the DUT transmitter 210 can be distinguished from those of the testing receiver 220 as shown below.

[0021] FIG. 4 illustrates frequency spectrums of output signals form the DUT transmitter and the testing receiver shown in FIG. 3 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Frequency is plotted on the X-axis and amplitude on the Y-axis. Graph 402 illustrates various frequency components of the output signal from the DUT transmitter, including the input signal to the transmitter (Sl), the carrier leakage of the transmitter (Cl), the sideband noise of the transmitter corresponding to its input signal (Nl). Graph 404 illustrates various frequency components of the output signal from the testing receiver, including the input signal to the transmitter (Sl), the carrier leakage of the transmitter (Cl), the sideband noise of the transmitter corresponding to its input

signal (Nl), the carrier leakage of the testing receiver (C2), the sideband noise of the testing receiver corresponding to its input signal (N2), the sideband noise of testing receiver corresponding to Cl (N3), and the sideband noise of testing receiver corresponding to Nl (N4). It is noteworthy that the magnitudes of the frequency components N3 and N4 are much smaller than those of Nl and N2. This is due to the fact that N3 and N4 are sideband noise components generated at the testing receiver from two weak signal components (Cl and Nl), i.e., they are the sideband noise of the transmitter's sideband noise and carrier leakage. Hence, they are negligible.

[0022] As shown in graph 404, the carrier leakage of the transmitter (Cl) is offset from the carrier leakage of the testing receiver (C2) by a certain value, and the sideband noise of the transmitter (Nl) is offset from the sideband noise of the receiver (N2) by a certain value. This is due to the fact that the carriers of the transmitter and receiver have different frequencies. Thus, the sideband noise and carrier leakage of the DUT transmitter can be specifically identified, and therefore minimized by software calibration. For instance, one can use the detected frequency spectrum to reduce the sideband noise. Similarly, the detected frequency spectrum can be used to suppress the carrier leakage. The above described test and adjustment procedure can be carried out during actual functioning of the transmitter, particularly when the transmitter is a base station. Such real-time calibration can be applied at some periodic time instances while the base station is functioning. The period of above calibration is quite short and it is solely for the purpose of tracking any temporal change in the characteristics of IQ imbalance and carrier leakage.

[0023] The proposed system has the following advantages. The carrier leakage and sideband noise of the DUT transmitter and testing receiver can be distinguished. This allows accurate monitoring of the imperfection

characteristics for the DUT transmitter, regardless of the testing receiver. Adjusting the difference between the carrier frequencies for the transmitter and the receiver changes the observation windows for the carrier leakage and sideband noise. Since the carrier leakage and sideband noise of various sources are clearly identified, they can be suppressed by software solutions without requiring any manufacture calibration or any additional circuitry. The proposed scheme can be carried out real-time on a periodic basis in order to track any temporal characteristics of the IQ imbalance and carrier leakage. This can be done by assigning a negligible portion of time to the real time calibration.

[0024] To further improve the robustness of the detection, one could adjust the differences between the carrier frequencies for the DUT transmitter and the testing receiver in such a way that the carrier leakages and side band noises of the transmitter and the receiver would fall uniformly in separated non- overlapping regions on the frequency spectrum. The values used for software calibration will be the averaged values of signal strength over each region.

[0025] The above illustration provides many different embodiments or embodiments for implementing different features of the invention. Specific embodiments of components and processes are described to help clarify the invention. These are, of course, merely embodiments and are not intended to limit the invention from that described in the claims.

[0026] Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in one or more specific examples, it is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the invention, as set forth in the following claims.