S P E C I F I C A T I O N

A LOW LIFT GOLF BALL

BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

[0001] The embodiments described herein are related to the field of golf balls and, more particularly, to a spherically symmetrical golf ball having a dimple pattern that generates low-lift in order to control dispersion of the golf ball during flight.

2. Related Art

[0002] The flight path of a golf ball is determined by many factors. Several of the factors can be controlled to some extent by the golfer, such as the ball's velocity, launch angle, spin rate, and spin axis. Other factors are controlled by the design of the ball, including the ball's weight, size, materials of construction, and aerodynamic properties.

[0003] The aerodynamic force acting on a golf ball during flight can be broken down into three separate force vectors: Lift, Drag, and Gravity. The lift force vector acts in the direction determined by the cross product of the spin vector and the velocity vector. The drag force vector acts in the direction opposite of the velocity vector. More specifically, the aerodynamic properties of a golf ball are characterized by its lift and drag coefficients as a function of the Reynolds Number (Re) and the Dimensionless Spin Parameter (DSP). The Reynolds Number is a dimensionless quantity that quantifies the ratio of the inertial to viscous forces acting on the golf ball as it flies through the air. The Dimensionless Spin Parameter is the ratio of the golf ball's rotational surface speed to its speed through the air.

[0004] Since the 1990's, in order to achieve greater distances, a lot of golf ball development has been directed toward developing golf balls that exhibit improved distance through lower drag under conditions that would apply to, e.g., a driver shot immediately after club impact as well as relatively high lift under conditions that would apply to the latter portion of, e.g., a driver shot as the ball is descending towards the ground. A lot of this development was enabled by new measurement devices that could more accurately and efficiently measure golf ball spin, launch angle, and velocity immediately after club impact.

[0005] Today the lift and drag coefficients of a golf ball can be measured using several different methods including an Indoor Test Range such as the one at the USGA Test Center in Far Hills, New Jersey, or an outdoor system such as the Trackman Net System made by Interactive Sports Group in Denmark. The testing, measurements, and reporting of lift and drag coefficients for conventional golf balls has generally focused on the golf ball spin and velocity conditions for a well hit straight driver shot - approximately 3,000 rpm or less and an initial ball velocity that results from a driver club head velocity of approximately 80-100 mph.

[0006] For right-handed golfers, particularly higher handicap golfers, a major problem is the tendency to "slice" the ball. The unintended slice shot penalizes the golfer in two ways: 1 ) it causes the ball to deviate to the right of the intended flight path and 2) it can reduce the overall shot distance.

[0007] A sliced golf ball moves to the right because the ball's spin axis is tilted to the right. The lift force by definition is orthogonal to the spin axis and thus for a sliced golf ball the lift force is pointed to the right.

[0008] The spin-axis of a golf ball is the axis about which the ball spins and is usually orthogonal to the direction that the golf ball takes in flight. If a golf ball's spin axis is 0 degrees, i.e., a horizontal spin axis causing pure backspin, the ball will not hook or slice and a higher lift force combined with a O-degree spin axis will only make the ball fly higher. However, when a ball is hit in such a way as to impart a spin axis that is more than 0 degrees, it hooks, and it slices with a spin axis that is less than 0 degrees. It is the tilt of the spin axis that directs the lift force in the left or right direction, causing the ball to hook or slice. The distance the ball unintentionally flies to the right or left is called Carry Dispersion. A lower flying golf ball, i.e., having a lower lift, is a strong indicator of a ball that will have lower Carry Dispersion. [0009] The amount of lift force directed in the hook or slice direction is equal to: Lift Force * Sine (spin axis angle). The amount of lift force directed towards achieving height is: Lift Force * Cosine (spin axis angle).

[0010] A common cause of a sliced shot is the striking of the ball with an open clubface. In this case, the opening of the clubface also increases the effective loft of the club and thus increases the total spin of the ball. With all other factors held constant, a higher ball spin rate will in general produce a higher lift force and this is why a slice shot will often have a higher trajectory than a straight or hook shot. [001 1] Table 1 shows the total ball spin rates generated by a golfer with club head speeds ranging from approximately 85-105 mph using a 10.5 degree driver and hitting a variety of prototype golf balls and commercially available golf balls that are considered to be low and normal spin golf balls:

Spin Axis, degree Typical Total Spin, rpm Type Shot

-30 2,500 - 5,000 Strong Slice

-15 1 ,700 - 5,000 Slice

0 1 ,400 - 2,800 Straight

+15 1 ,200 - 2,500 Hook

+30 1 ,000 - 1 ,800 Strong Hook

TABLE 1 [0012] If the club path at the point of impact is "outside-in" and the clubface is square to the target, a slice shot will still result, but the total spin rate will be generally lower than a slice shot hit with the open clubface. In general, the total ball spin will increase as the club head velocity increases.

[0013] In order to overcome the drawbacks of a slice, some golf ball manufacturers have modified how they construct a golf ball, mostly in ways that tend to lower the ball's spin rate. Some of these modifications include: 1) using a hard cover material on a two-piece golf ball, 2) constructing multi-piece balls with hard boundary layers and relatively soft thin covers in order to lower driver spin rate and preserve high spin rates on short irons, 3) moving more weight towards the outer layers of the golf ball thereby increasing the moment of inertia of the golf ball, and 4) using a cover that is constructed or treated in such a ways so as to have a more slippery surface. [0014] Others have tried to overcome the drawbacks of a slice shot by creating golf balls where the weight is distributed inside the ball in such a way as to create a preferred axis of rotation.

[0015] Still others have resorted to creating asymmetric dimple patterns in order to affect the flight of the golf ball and reduce the drawbacks of a slice shot. One such example was the Polara™ golf ball with its dimple pattern that was designed with different type dimples in the polar and equatorial regions of the ball. [0016] In reaction to the introduction of the Polara golf ball, which was intentionally manufactured with an asymmetric dimple pattern, the USGA created the "Symmetry Rule". As a result, all golf balls not conforming to the USGA Symmetry Rule are judged to be non-conforming to the USGA Rules of Golf and are thus not allowed to be used in USGA sanctioned golf competitions. [0017] These golf balls with asymmetric dimples patterns or with manipulated weight distributions may be effective in reducing dispersion caused by a slice shot, but they also have their limitations, most notably the fact that they do not conform with the USGA Rules of Golf and that these balls must be oriented a certain way prior to club impact in order to display their maximum effectiveness.

[0018] The ..method of using a hard cover material or hard boundary layer material or slippery cover will reduce to a small extent the dispersion caused by a slice shot, but often does so at the expense of other desirable properties such as the ball spin rate off of short irons or the higher cost required to produce a multi-piece ball.

SUMMARY

[0019] A low lift golf ball is described herein.

[0020] According to one aspect, a golf ball having a plurality of dimples formed on its outer surface, the outer surface of the golf ball being divided into first and second areas each containing a plurality of dimples, the first and second areas being of different shapes, each first area containing first dimples and each second area containing second dimples, at least some first dimples being of different types from the second dimples, and the first areas being formed of circular paths around the outer surface of the ball, the second areas being formed by the intersection of the circular paths.

[0021 ] These and other features, aspects, and embodiments are described below in the section entitled "Detailed Description."

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0022] Features, aspects, and embodiments are described in conjunction with the attached drawings, in which: [0023] Figure 1 is a graph of the total spin rate versus the ball spin axis for various commercial and prototype golf balls hit with a driver at club head speed between 85-105 mph;

[0024] Figure 2 is a picture of golf ball with a dimple pattern in accordance with one embodiment;

[0025] Figure 3 is a top-view schematic diagram of a golf ball with a cuboctahedron pattern in accordance with one embodiment and in the poles-forward- backward (PFB) orientation;

[0026] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram showing the triangular polar region of another embodiment of the golf ball with a cuboctahedron pattern of figure 3; [0027] Figure 5 is a graph of the total spin rate and Reynolds number for the

TopFlite XL Straight golf ball and a B2 prototype ball, configured in accordance with one embodiment, hit with a driver club using a Golf Labs robot;

[0028] Figure 6 is a graph or the Lift Coefficient versus Reynolds Number for the golf ball shots shown in figure 5;

[0029] Figure 7 is a graph of Lift Coefficient versus flight time for the golf ball shots shown in figure 5;

[0030] Figure 8 is a graph of the Drag Coefficient versus Reynolds Number for the golf ball shots shown in figure 5;

[0031] Figures 9" is a graph of the Drag Coefficient versus flight time for the golf ball shots shown in figure 5;

[0032] Figure 10 is a diagram illustrating the relationship between the chord depth of a truncated and a spherical dimple in accordance with one embodiment; [0033] Figure 1 1 is a graph illustrating the max height versus total spin for all of a 172-175 series golf balls, configured in accordance with certain embodiments, and the Pro Vl ® when hit with a driver imparting a slice on the golf balls;

[0034] Figure 12 is a graph illustrating the carry dispersion for the balls tested and shown in figure 1 1 ;

[0035] Figure 13 is a graph of the carry dispersion versus initial total spin rate for a golf ball with the 172 dimple pattern and the ProVl® for the same robot test data shown in figure 1 1 ;

[0036] Figure 14 is a graph of the carry dispersion versus initial total spin rate for a golf ball with the 173 dimple pattern and the ProVl® for the same robot test data shown in figure 1 1 ;

[0037] Figure 15 is a graph of the carry dispersion Versus initial total spin rate for a golf ball with the 174 dimple pattern and the ProVl® for the same robot test data shown in figure 1 1 ;

[0038] Figure 16 is a graph of the carry dispersion versus initial total spin rate for a golf ball with the 175 dimple pattern and the ProVl® for the same robot test data shown in figure 1 1 ;

[0039] Figure 17 is a graph of the wind tunnel testing results showing Lift

Coefficient (CL) versus DSP for the 173 golf ball against different Reynolds Numbers;

[0040] Figure 18 is a graph of the wind tunnel test results showing the CL versus DSP for the Pro Vl golf ball against different Reynolds Numbers;

[0041 ] Figure 19 is picture of a golf ball with a dimple pattern in accordance with another embodiment; [0042] Figure 20 is a graph of the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

3,000 rpm spin rate for the TopFlite® XL Straight, Pro VI®, 173 dimple pattern and a

273 dimple pattern in accordance with certain embodiments;

[0043] Figure 21 is a graph of the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

3,500 rpm spin rate for the TopFlite® XL Straight, Pro VI®, 173 dimple pattern and

273 dimple pattern;

[0044] Figure 22 is a graph of the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

4,000 rpm spin rate for the TopFlite® XL Straight, Pro VI®, 173 dimple pattern and

273 dimple pattern;

[0045] Figure 23 is a graph of the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

4,500 rpm spin rate for the TopFlite® XL Straight, Pro VI®, 173 dimple pattern and

273 dimple pattern;

[0046] Figure 24 is a graph of the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

5,000 rpm spin rate for the TopFlite® XL Straight, Pro VI®, 173 dimple pattern and

273 dimple pattern;

[0047] Figure 25 is a graph of the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

4000 RPM initial spin rate for the 273 dimple pattern and 2-3 dimple pattern balls of

Tables 10 and 1 1 ;

[0048] Figure 26 is a graph of the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

4500 RPM initial spin rate for the 273 dimple pattern and 2-3 dimple pattern balls of

Tables 10 and 1 1 ;

[0049] Figure 27 is a graph of the drag coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

4000 RPM initial spin rate for the 273 dimple pattern and 2-3 dimple pattern balls of

Tables 10 and 1 1 ; and [0050] Figure 28 is a graph of the drag coefficient versus Reynolds Number at

4500 RPM initial spin rate for the 273 dimple pattern and 2-3 dimple pattern balls of Tables 10 and 1 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0051] The embodiments described herein may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description. However, the techniques, systems, and operating structures described can be embodied in a wide variety of forms and modes, some of which may be quite different from those in the disclosed embodiments. Consequently, the specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are merely representative. It must be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an", and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

[0052] The embodiments described below are directed to the design of a golf ball that achieves low lift right after impact when the velocity and spin are relatively high. In particular, the embodiments described below achieve relatively low lift even when the spin rate is high, such as that imparted when a golfer slices the golf ball, e.g., 3500 rpm or higher. In the embodiments described below, the lift coefficient after impact can be as low as about .18 or less, and even less than .15 under such circumstances. In addition, the lift can be significantly lower than conventional golf balls at the end of flight, i.e., when the speed and spin are lower. For example, the lift coefficient can be less than .20 when the ball is nearing the end of flight. [0053] As noted above, conventional golf balls have been designed for low initial drag and high lift toward the end of flight in order to increase distance. For example, U.S. Patent 6,224,499 to Ogg teaches and claims a lift coefficient greater than .18 at a Reynolds number (Re) of 70,000 and a spin of 2000 rpm, and a drag coefficient less than .232 at a Re of 180,000 and a spin of 3000 rpm. One of skill in the art will understand that and Re of 70,000 and spin of 2000 rpm are industry standard parameters for describing the end of flight. Similarly, one of skill in the art will understand that a Re of greater than about 160,000, e.g., about 180,000, and a spin of 3000 rpm are industry standard parameters for describing the beginning of flight for a straight shot with only back spin.

[0054] The lift (CL) and drag coefficients (CD) vary by golf ball design and are generally a function of the velocity and spin rate of the golf ball. For a spherically symmetrical golf ball the lift and drag coefficients are for the most part independent of the golf ball orientation. The maximum height a golf ball achieves during flight is directly related to the lift force generated by the spinning golf ball while the direction that the golf ball takes, specifically how straight a golf ball flies, is related to several factors, some of which include spin rate and spin axis orientation of the golf ball in relation to the golf ball's direction of flight. Further, the spin rate and spin axis are important in specifying the direction and magnitude of the lift force vector. [0055] The lift force vector is a major factor in controlling the golf ball flight path in the x, y, and z directions. Additionally, the total lift force a golf ball generates during flight depends on several factors, including spin rate, velocity of the ball relative to the surrounding air and the surface characteristics of the golf ball. [0056] For a straight shot, the spin axis is orthogonal to the direction the ball is traveling and the ball rotates with perfect backspin. In this situation, the spin axis is 0 degrees. But if the ball is not struck perfectly, then the spin axis will.be either positive (hook) or negative (slice). Figure 1 is a graph illustrating the total spin rate versus the spin axis for various commercial and prototype golf balls hit with a driver at club head speed between 85-105 mph. As can be seen, when the spin axis is negative, indicating a slice, the spin rate of the ball increases. Similarly, when the spin axis is positive, the spin rate decreases initially but then remains essentially constant with increasing spin axis.

[0057] The increased spin imparted when the ball is sliced, increases the lift coefficient (CL). This increases the lift force in a direction that is orthogonal to the spin axis. In other words, when the ball is sliced, the resulting increased spin produces an increased lift force that acts to "pull" the ball to the right. The more negative the spin axis, the greater the portion of the lift force acting to the right, and the greater the slice.

[0058] Thus, in order to reduce this slice effect, the ball must be designed to generate a relatively lower lift force at the greater spin rates generated when the ball is sliced.

[0059] Referring to Figure 2, there is shown golf ball 100, which provides a visual description of one embodiment of a dimple pattern that achieves such low initial lift at high spin rates. Figure 2 is a computer generated picture of dimple pattern 173. As shown in figure 2, golf ball 100 has an outer surface 105, which has a plurality of dissimilar dimple types arranged in a cuboctahedron configuration. In the example of figure 2, golf ball 100 has larger truncated dimples within square region 1 10 and smaller spherical dimples within triangular region 1 15 on the outer surface 105. The example of figure 2 and other embodiments are described in more detail below; however, as will be explained, in operation, dimple patterns configured in accordance with the embodiments described herein disturb the airflow in such a way as to provide a golf ball that exhibits low lift at the spin rates commonly seen with a slice shot as described above.

[0060] As can be seen, regions 1 10 and 115 stand out on the surface of ball 100 unlike conventional golf balls. This is because the dimples in each region are configured such that they have high visual contrast. This is achieved for example by including visually contrasting dimples in each area. For example, in one embodiment, flat, truncated dimples are included in region 1 10 while deeper, round or spherical dimples are included in region 1 15. Additionally, the radius of the dimples can also be different adding to the contrast.

[0061 ] But this contrast in dimples does not just produce a visually contrasting appearance; it also contributes to each region having a different aerodynamic effect. Thereby, disturbing air flow in such a manner as to produce low lift as described herein.

[0062] While conventional golf balls are often designed to achieve maximum distance by having low drag at high speed and high lift at low speed, when conventional golf balls are tested, including those claimed to be "straighter," it can be seen that these balls had quite significant increases in lift coefficients (CL) at the spin rates normally associated with slice shots. Whereas balls configured in accordance with the embodiments described herein exhibit lower lift coefficients at the higher spin rates and thus do not slice as much.

[0063] A ball configured in accordance with the embodiments described herein and referred to as the B2 Prototype, which is a 2-piece Surlyn-covered golf ball with a polybutadiene rubber based core and dimple pattern "273", and the TopFlite® XL Straight ball were hit with a Golf Labs robot using the same setup conditions so that the initial spin rates were about 3,400 - 3,500 rpm at a Reynolds Number of about 170,000. The spin rate and Re conditions near the end of the trajectory were about 2,900 to 3,200 rpm at a Reynolds Number of about 80,000. The spin rates and ball trajectories were obtained using a 3-radar unit Trackman Net System. Figure 5 illustrates the full trajectory spin rate versus Reynolds Number for the shots and balls described above. [0064] The B2 prototype ball had dimple pattern design 273, shown in Figure 4.

Dimple pattern design 273 is based on a cuboctahedron layout and has a total of 504 dimples. This is the inverse of pattern 173 since it has larger truncated dimples within triangular regions 1 15 and smaller spherical dimples within square regions or areas 110 on the outer surface of the ball. A spherical truncated dimple is a dimple which has a spherical side wall and a flat inner end, as seen in the triangular regions of Figure 4. The dimple patterns 173 and 273, and alternatives, are described in more detail below with reference to Tables 5 to 1 1.

[0065] Figure 6 illustrates the CL versus Re for the same shots shown in Figure

5; TopFlite® XL Straight and the B2 prototype golf ball which was configured in accordance with the systems and methods described herein. As can be seen, the B2 ball has a lower CL over the range of Re from about 75,000 to 170,000. Specifically, the CL for the B2 prototype never exceeds .27, whereas the CL for the TopFlite® XL Straight gets well above .27. Further, at a Re of about 165,000, the CL for the B2 prototype is about .16, whereas it is about .19 or above for the TopFlite® XL Straight. [0066] Figures 5 and 6 together illustrate that the B2 ball with dimple pattern

273 exhibits significantly less lift force at spin rates that are associated with slices. As a result, the B2 prototype will be much straighter, i.e., will exhibit a much lower carry dispersion. For example, a ball configured in accordance with the embodiments described herein can have a CL of less than about .22 at a spin rate of 3,200-3,500 rpm and over a range of Re from about 120,000 to 180,000. For example, in certain embodiments, the CL can be less than .18 at 3500 rpm for Re values above about 155,000.

[0067] This is illustrated in the graphs of figures 20-24, which show the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at spin rates of 3,000 rpm, 3,500 rpm, 4,000 rpm, 4,500 rpm and 5,000 rpm, respectively, for the TopFlite® XL Straight, Pro VI®, 173 dimple pattern, and 273 dimple pattern. To obtain the regression data shown in figures 23-28, a Trackman Net System consisting of 3 radar units was used to track the trajectory of a golf ball that was struck by a Golf Labs robot equipped with various golf clubs. The robot was setup to hit a straight shot with various combinations of initial spin and velocity. A wind gauge was used to measure the wind speed at approximately 20 ft elevation near the robot location. The Trackman Net System measured trajectory data (x, y, z location vs. time) were then used to calculate the lift coefficients (CL) and drag coefficients (CD) as a function of measured time-dependent quantities including Reynolds Number, Ball Spin Rate, and Dimensionless Spin Parameter. Each golf ball model or design was tested under a range of velocity and spin conditions that included 3,000-5,000 rpm spin rate and 120,000-180,000 Reynolds Number. It will be understood that the Reynolds Number range of 150,000-180,000 covers the initial ball velocities typical for most recreational golfers, who have club head speeds of 85-100 mph. A 5-term multivariate regression model was then created from the data for each ball designed in accordance with the embodiments described herein for the lift and drag coefficients as a function of Reynolds Number (Re) and Dimensionless Spin Parameter (W), i.e., as a function of Re, W, Re ^Λ 2, W ^Λ 2, ReW, etc. Typically the predicted CD and CL values within the measured Re and W space (interpolation) were in close agreement with the measured CD and CL values. Correlation coefficients of >96% were typical.

[0068] Under typical slice conditions, with spin rates of 3,500 rpm or greater, the 173 and 273 dimple patterns exhibit lower lift coefficients than the other golf balls. Lower lift coefficients translate into lower trajectory for straight shots and less dispersion for slice shots. Balls with dimple patterns 173 and 273 have approximately 10% lower lift coefficients than the other golf balls under Re and spin conditions characteristics of slice shots. Robot tests show the lower lift coefficients result in at least 10% less dispersion for slice shots.

[0069] For example, referring again to figure 6, it can be seen that while the

TopFlite® XL Straight is suppose to be a straighter ball, the data in the graph of figure 6 illustrates that the B2 prototype ball should in fact be much straighter based on its lower lift coefficient. The high CL for the TopFlite® XL Straight means that the TopFlite® XL Straight ball will create a larger lift force. When the spin axis is negative, this larger lift force will cause the TopFlite® XL Straight to go farther right increasing the dispersion for the TopFlite® XL Straight. This is illustrated in Table 2:

Ball Dispersion, ft Distance, yds

TopFlite® XL Straight 95.4 217.4

Ball 173 78.1 204.4

TABLE 2

[0070] Figure 7 shows that for the robot test shots shown in figure 5 the B2 ball has a lower CL throughout the flight time as compared to other conventional golf balls, such as the TopFlite® XL Straight. This lower CL throughout the flight of the ball translates in to a lower lift force exerted throughout the flight of the ball and thus a lower dispersion for a slice shot.

[0071] As noted above, conventional golf ball design attempts to increase distance, by decreasing drag immediately after impact. Figure 8 shows the drag coefficient (CD) versus Re for the B2 and TopFlite® XL Straight shots shown in figure 5. As can be seen, the CD for the B2 ball is about the same as that for the TopFlite® XL Straight at higher Re. Again, these higher Re numbers would occur near impact. At lower Re, the CD for the B2 ball is significantly less than that of the TopFlite® XL Straight.

[0072] In figure 9 it can be seen that the CD curve for the B2 ball throughout the flight time actually has a negative inflection in the middle. Thus, the drag for the B2 ball will be less in the middle of the ball's flight as compared to the TopFlite XL Straight. It should also be noted that while the B2 does not carry quite as far as the TopFlite XL Straight, testing reveals that it actually roles farther and therefore the overall distance is comparable under many conditions. This makes sense of course because the lower CL for the B2 ball means that the B2 ball generates less lift and therefore does not fly as high, something that is also verified in testing. Because the B2 ball does not fly as high, it impacts the ground at a shallower angle, which results in increased role.

[0073] Returning to figures 2-4, the outer surface 105 of golf ball 100 can include dimple patterns of Archimedean solids or Platonic solids by subdividing the outer surface 105 into patterns based on a truncated tetrahedron, truncated cube, truncated octahedron, truncated dodecahedron, truncated icosahedron, icosidodecahedron, rhombicuboctahedron, rhombicosidodecahedron, rhombitruncated cuboctahedron, rhombitruncated icosidodecahedron, snub cube, snub dodecahedron, cube, dodecahedron, icosahedrons, octahedron, tetrahedron, where each has at least two types of subdivided regions (A and B) and each type of region has its own dimple pattern and types of dimples that are different than those in the other type region or regions.

[0074] Furthermore, the different regions and dimple patterns within each region are arranged such that the golf ball 100 is spherically symmetrical as defined by the United States Golf Association ("USGA") Symmetry Rules. It should be appreciated that golf ball 100 may be formed in any conventional manner such as, in one non-limiting example, to include two pieces having an inner core and an outer cover. In other non-limiting examples, the golf ball 100 may be formed of three, four or more pieces.

[0075] Tables 3 and 4 below list some examples of possible spherical polyhedron shapes which may be used for golf ball 100, including the cuboctahedron shape illustrated in figures 2-4. The size and arrangement of dimples in different regions in the other examples in Tables 3 and 4 can be similar or identical to that of figure 2 or 4.

13 Archimedean Solids and 5 Platonic solids - relative surface areas for the polygonal patches

TABLE 3

TABLE 4

[0076] Figure 3 is a top-view schematic diagram of a golf ball with a cuboctahedron pattern illustrating a golf ball, which may be ball 100 of Figure 2 or ball 273 of Figure 4, in the poles-forward-backward (PFB) orientation with the equator 130 (also called seam) oriented in a vertical plane 220 that points to the right/left, and up/down, with pole 205 pointing straight forward and orthogonal to equator 130, and pole 210 pointing straight backward, i.e., approximately located at the point of club impact. In this view, the tee upon which the golf ball 100 would be resting would be located in the center of the golf ball 100 directly below the golf ball 100 (which is out of view in this figure). In addition, outer surface 105 of golf ball 100 has two types of regions of dissimilar dimple types arranged in a cuboctahedron configuration. In the cuboctahedral dimple pattern 173, outer surface 105 has larger dimples arranged in a plurality of three square regions 1 10 while smaller dimples are arranged in the plurality of four triangular regions 1 15 in the front hemisphere 120 and back hemisphere 125 respectively for a total of six square regions and eight triangular regions arranged on the outer surface 105 of the golf ball 100. In the inverse cuboctahedral dimple pattern 273, outer surface 105 has larger dimples arranged in the eight triangular regions and smaller dimples arranged in the total of six square regions. In either case, the golf ball 100 contains 504 dimples. In golf ball 173, each of the triangular regions and the square regions containing thirty-six dimples. In golf ball 273, each triangular region contains fifteen dimples while each square region contains sixty four dimples. Further, the top hemisphere 120 and the bottom hemisphere 125 of golf ball 100 are identical and are rotated 60 degrees from each other so that on the equator 130 (also called seam) of the golf ball 100, each square region 1 10 of the front hemisphere 120 borders each triangular region 1 15 of the back hemisphere 125. Also shown in Figure 4, the back pole 210 and front pole (not shown) pass through the triangular region 1 15 on the outer surface 105 of golf ball 100.

[0077] Accordingly, a golf ball 100 designed in accordance with the embodiments described herein will have at least two different regions A and B comprising different dimple patterns and types. Depending on the embodiment, each region A and B, and C where applicable, can have a single type of dimple, or multiple types of dimples. For example, region A can have large dimples, while region B has small dimples, or vice versa; region A can have spherical dimples, while region B has truncated dimples, or vice versa; region A can have various sized spherical dimples, while region B has various sized truncated dimples, or vice versa, or some combination or variation of the above. Some specific example embodiments are described in more detail below.

[0078] It will be understood that there is a wide variety of types and construction of dimples, including non-circular dimples, such as those described in U.S. Patent 6,409,615, hexagonal dimples, dimples formed of a tubular lattice structure, such as those described in U.S. Patent 6,290,615, as well as more conventional dimple types. It will also be understood that any of these types of dimples can be used in conjunction with the embodiments described herein. As such, the term "dimple" as used in this description and the claims that follow is intended to refer to and include any type of dimple or dimple construction, unless otherwise specifically indicated. [0079] It should also be understood that a golf ball designed in accordance with the embodiments described herein can be configured such that the average volume per dimple in one region, e.g., region A, is greater than the average volume per dimple in another regions, e.g., region B. Also, the unit volume in one region, e.g., region A, can be greater, e.g., 5% greater, 15% greater, etc., than the average unit volume in another region, e.g., region B. The unit volume can be defined as the volume of the dimple sin one region divided by the surface area of the region. Also, the regions do not have to be perfect geometric shapes. For example, the triangle areas can incorporate, and therefore extend into, a small number of dimple form the adjacent square region, or vice versa. Thus, an edge of the triangle region can extend out in a tab like fashion into the adjacent square region. This could happen on one or more than one edge of one or more than one region. In this way, the areas can be said to be derived based on certain geometric shapes, i.e., the underlying shape is still a triangle or square, but with some irregularities at the edges. Accordingly, in the specification and claims that follow when a region is said to be, e.g., a triangle region, this should also be understood to cover a region that is of a shape derived from a triangle.

[0080] But first, Figure 10 is a diagram illustrating the relationship between the chord depth of a truncated and a spherical dimple. The golf ball having a preferred diameter of about 1.68 inches contains 504 dimples to form the cuboctahedral pattern, which was shown in figures 2-4. As an example of just one type of dimple, figure 12 shows truncated dimple 400 compared to a spherical dimple having a generally spherical chord depth of 0.012 inches and a radius of 0.075 inches. The truncated dimple 400 may be formed by cutting a spherical indent with a flat inner end, i.e. corresponding to spherical dimple 400 cut along plane A — A to make the dimple 400 more shallow with a flat inner end, and having a truncated chord depth smaller than the corresponding spherical chord depth of 0.012 inches.

[0081 ] The dimples can be aligned along geodesic lines with six dimples on each edge of the square regions, such as square region 1 10, and eight dimples on each edge of the triangular region 1 15. The dimples can be arranged according to the three- dimensional Cartesian coordinate system with the X-Y plane being the equator of the ball and the Z direction passing through the pole of the golf ball 100. The angle Φ is the circumferential angle while the angle θ is the co-latitude with 0 degrees at the pole and 90 degrees at the equator. The dimples in the North hemisphere can be offset by 60 degrees from the South hemisphere with the dimple pattern repeating every 120 degrees. Golf ball 100, in the example of figure 2, has a total of nine dimple types, with four of the dimple types in each of the triangular regions and five of the dimple types in each of the square regions. As shown in Table 5 below, the various dimple depths and profiles are given for various implementations of golf ball 100, indicated as prototype codes 173-175. The actual location of each dimple on the surface of the ball for dimple patterns 172-175 is given in Tables 6-9. Tables 10 and 1 1 provide the various dimple depths and profiles for dimple pattern 273 of Figure 4 and an alternative dimple pattern 2-3, respectively, as well as the location of each dimple on the ball for each of these dimple patterns. Dimple pattern 2.-3 is similar to dimple pattern 273 but has dimples of slightly larger chord depth than the ball with dimple pattern 273, as shown in Table 1 1.

TABLE 5 Dimple # 1 Dimple # 2 Dimple # 3

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.05 Radius 0.0525 Radius 0.055

SCD 0.0075 SCD 0.0075 SCD 0.0075

TCD n/a TCD n/a TCD n/a

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 28.81007 1 3.606874 86.10963 1 0 17.13539

2 0 41.7187 2 4.773603 59.66486 2 0 79.62325 i 5.308533 47.46948 3 7.485123 79.72027 3 0 53.39339

4 9.848338 23.49139 4 9.566953 53.68971 4 8.604739 66.19316

5 17.85912 86.27884 5 10.81146 86.10963 5 15.03312 79.65081

6 22.3436 79.84939 6 12.08533 72.79786 6 60 9.094473

7 24.72264 86.27886 7 13.37932 60.13101 7 104.9669 79.65081

8 95.27736 86.27886 8 16.66723 66.70139 8 111.3953 66.19316

9 97.6564 79.84939 9 19.58024 73.34845 9 120 17.13539

10 102.1409 86.27884 10 20.76038 11.6909 10 120 53.39339

11 110.1517 23.49139 11 24.53367 18.8166 11 120 79.62325

12 114.6915 4 ₇ .46948 12 46.81607 15.97349 12 128.6047 66.19316

13 120 28.81007 13 73.18393 15.97349 13 135.0331 79.65081

14 120 41.7187 14 95.46633 18.8166 14 180 9.094473

15 125.3085 47.46948 15 99.23962 11.6909 15 224.9669 79.65081

16 129.8483 23.49139 16 100.4198 73.34845 16 231.3953 66.19316

17 137.8591 86.27884 17 103.3328 66.70139 17 240 17.13539

18 142.3436 79.84939 18 106.6207 60.13101 18 240 53.39339

19 144.7226 86.27886 19 107.9147 72.79786 19 240 79.62325

20 215.2774 86.27886 20 109.1885 86.10963 20 248.6047 66.19316

21 217.6564 79.84939 21 110.433 53.68971 21 255.0331 79.65081

22 222.1409 86.27884 22 112.5149 79.72027 22 300 9.094473

23 230.1517 23.49139 23 115.2264 59.66486 23 344.9669 79.65081

24 234.6915 47.46948 24 116.3931 86.10963 24 351.3953 66.19316

25 240 28.81007 25 123.6069 86.10963

26 240 41.7187 26 124.7736 59.66486

27 245.3085 47.46948 27 127.4851 79.72027

28 249.8483 23.49139 28 129.567 53.68971

29 257.8591 86.27884 29 130.8115 86.10963

30 262.3436 79.84939 30 132.0853 72.79786

31 264.7226 86.27886 31 133.3793 60.13101

32 335.2774 86.27886 32 136.6672 66.70139

337.6564 79.84939 ii 139.5802 73.34845

34 342.1409 86.27884 34 140.7604 11.6909

35 350.1517 23.49139 35 144.5337 18.8166

36 354.6915 47.46948 36 166.8161 15.97349

37 193.1839 15.97349

38 215.4663 18.8166

39 219.2396 11.6909

40 220.4198 73.34845

41 223.3328 66.70139

42 226.6207 60.13101

43 227.9147 72.79786

44 229.1885 86.10963

45 230.433 53.68971

46 232.5149 79.72027

47 235.2264 59.66486

48 236.3931 86.10963

49 243.6069 86.10963

50 244.7736 59.66486

51 247.4851 79.72027

52 249.567 53.68971

53 250.8115 86.10963

54 252.0853 72.79786

55 253.3793 60.13101

56 256.6672 66.70139

57 259.5802 73.34845

TABLE 6 (Dimple Pattern 172) Dimple # 2 (cont'd)

# Phi Theta

58 260.7604 11.6909

59 264.5337 18.8166

60 286.8161 15.97349

61 313.1839 15.97349

62 335.4663 18.8166

63 339.2396 11.6909

64 340.4198 73.34845

65 343.3328 66.70139

66 346.6207 60.13101

67 347.9147 72.79786

68 349.1885 86.10963

69 350.433 53.68971

70 352.5149 79.72027

71 355.2264 59.66486

72 356.3931 86.10963

TABLE 6 (Dimple Pattern 172) (continued)

Dimple # 4 Dimple # 5 Dimple # 6

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.075 Radius 0.075 ] Radius 0.0775

SCD 0.005 SCD 0.005 SCD 0.005

TCD n/a TCD n/a TCD n/a

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 4.637001 1 11.39176 35.80355 1 22.97427 54.90551

2 0 65.89178 2 17.86771 45.18952 2 27.03771 64.89835

3 4.200798 72.89446 3 26.35389 29.36327 3 47.66575 25.59568

4 115.7992 72.89446 4 30.46014 74.86406 4 54.6796 84.41703

5 120 4.637001 5 33.84232 84.58637 5 65.3204 84.41703

6 120 65.89178 6 44.16317 84.58634 6 72.33425 25.59568

7 124.2008 72.89446 7 75.83683 84.58634 7 92.96229 64.89835

8 235.7992 72.89446 8 86.15768 84.58637 8 97.02573 54.90551

9 240 4.637001 9 89.53986 74.86406 9 142.9743 54.90551

10 240 65.89178 10 93.64611 29.36327 10 147.0377 64.89835

11 244.2008 72.89446 11 102.1323 45.18952 11 167.6657 25.59568

12 355.7992 72.89446 12 108.6082 35.80355 12 174.6796 84.41703

13 131.3918 35.80355 13 185.3204 84.41703

14 137.8677 45.18952 14 192.3343 25.59568

15 146.3539 29.36327 15 212.9623 64.89835

16 150.4601 74.86406 16 217.0257 54.90551

17 153.8423 84.58637 17 262.9743 54.90551

18 164.1632 84.58634 18 267.0377 64.89835

19 195.8368 84.58634 19 287.6657 25.59568

20 206.1577 84.85637 20 294.6796 84.41703

21 209.5399 74.86406 21 305.3204 84.41703

22 213.6461 29.36327 22 312.3343 25.59568

23 222.1323 45.18952 23 332.9623 64.89835

24 228.6082 35.80355 24 337.0257 54.90551

25 251.3918 35.80355

26 257.8677 45.18952

27 266.3539 29.36327

28 270.4601 74.86406

29 273.8423 84.58637

30 284.1632 84.58634

31 315.8368 84.58634

32 326.1577 84.58637

33 329.5399 74.86406

34 333.6461 29.36327

35 342.1323 45.18952

36 348.6082 35.80355

TABLE 6 (Dimple Pattern 172) (continued)

Dimple # 7 Dimple # 8 Dimple # 9

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.0825 Radius 0.0875 Radius 0.095

SCD 0.005 SCD 0.005 SCD 0.005

TCD n/a TCD n/a TCD n/a

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 35.91413 51.35559 1 32.46033 39.96433 1 51.33861 48.53996

2 38.90934 62.34835 2 41.97126 73.6516 2 52.61871 61.45814

3 50.48062 36.43373 3 78.02874 73.6516 3 67.38129 61.45814

4 54.12044 73.49879 4 87.53967 39.96433 4 68.66139 48.53996

5 65.87956 73.49879 5 152.4603 39.96433 5 171.3386 48.53996

6 69.51938 36.43373 6 161.9713 73.6516 6 172.6187 61.45814

7 81.09066 62.34835 7 198.0287 73.6516 7 187.3813 61.45814

8 84.08587 51.35559 8 207.5397 39.96433 8 188.6614 48.53996

9 155.9141 51.35559 9 272.4603 39.96433 9 291.3386 48.539960 158.9093 62.34835 10 281.9713 73.6516 10 292.6187 61.45814 1 170.4806 36.43373 11 318.0287 73.6516 11 307.3813 61.458142 174.1204 73.49879 12 327.5397 39.96433 12 308.6614 48.539963 185.8796 73.49879 4 189.5194 36.43373 5 201.0907 62.34835 6 204.0859 51.35559 7 275.9141 51.35559 8 278.9093 62.34835 9 290.4806 36.43373 0 294.1204 73.49879 1 305.8796 73.49879 2 309.5194 36.43373 3 321.0907 62.34835 4 324.0859 51.35559

TABLE 6 (Dimple Pattern 172) (continued)

Dimple # 1 Dimple # 2 Dimple # 3

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 005 Radius 00525 Radius 0055

SCD 00075 SCD 00075 SCD 00075

TCD n/a TCD n/a TCD n/a

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 2881007 1 3606873831 8610963 1 0 1713539

2 0 417187 4773603104 5966486 0 7962325

3 530853345 4746948 3 7485123389 7972027 3 0 5339339

4 9848337904 2349139 4 9566952638 5368971 4 8604738835 6619316

5 1785912075 8627884 5 1081146128 8610963 5 1503312161 7965081

6 2234360082 7984939 6 1208533241 7279786 6 60 9094473

7 2472264341 8627886 7 1337931975 6013101 7 104 9668784 7965081

8 9527735659 8627886 8 1666723032 6670139 8 111 3952612 6619316

9 9765639918 7984939 9 1958024114 7334845 9 120 1713539

10 1021408793 8627884 10 2076038062 116909 10 120 5339339

11 1101516621 2349139 11 2453367306 188166 11 120 7962325

12 1146914665 4746948 12 4681607116 1597349 12 128 6047388 6619316

13 120 2881007 13 731 8392884 1597349 13 135 0331216 7965081

14 120 417187 14 9546632694 188166 14 180 9094473

15 1253085335 4746948 15 9923961938 116909 15 224 9668784 7965081

16 1298483379 2349139 16 100 4197589 7334845 16 231 3952612 6619316

17 1378591207 8627884 17 103 3327697 6670139 17 240 1713539

18 1423436008 7984939 18 106 6206802 6013101 18 240 5339339

19 1447226434 8627886 19 107 9146676 7279786 19 240 7962325

20 2152773566 8627886 20 109 1885387 8610963 20 248 6047388 6619316

21 2176563991 7984939 21 110 4330474 5368971 21 255 0331215 7965081

22 2221408793 8627884 22 112 5148766 7972027 22 300 9094473

23 2301516621 2349139 23 115 2263969 5966486 23 344 9668784 7965081

24 2346914665 4746948 24 116 3931262 8610963 24 351 3952612 6619316

25 240 2881007 25 123 6068738 8610963

26 240 417187 26 124 7736031 5966486

27 2453085335 4746948 27 127 4851234 7972027

28 2498483379 2349139 28 129 5669526 5368971

29 2578591207 8627884 29 130 8114613 8610963

30 2623436008 7984939 30 132 0853324 7279786

31 2647226434 8627886 31 133 3793198 6013101

32 3352773566 8627886 32 136 6672303 6670139

33 3376563992 7984939 33 139 5802411 7334845

34 3421408793 8627884 34 140 7603806 116909

35 3501516621 2349139 35 144 5336731 188166

36 3546914665 4746948 36 166 8160712 1597349

37 193 1839288 1597349

38 215 4663269 188166

39 219 2396194 116909

40 220 4197589 7334845

41 223 3327697 6670139

42 226 6206802 6013101

43 227 9146676 7279786

44 229 1885387 8610963

45 230 4330474 5368971

46 232 5148766 7972027

47 235 2263969 5966486

48 236 3931262 8610963

49 243 6068738 8610963

50 244 7736031 5966486

51 247 4851234 7972027

52 249 5669526 5368971

53 250 6114613 8610963

54 252 0853324 7279786

55 253 3793198 6013101

56 256 6672303 6670139

57 259 5802411 7334845

TABLE 7 (Dimple Pattern 173) Dimple # 2 (cont'd)

# Phi Theta

58 260.7603806 11.6909

59 264.5336731 18.8166

60 286.8160712 15.97349

61 313.1839288 15.97349

62 335.4663269 18.8166

63 339.2396194 11.6909

64 340.4197589 73.34845

65 343.3327697 66.70139

66 346.6206802 60.13101

67 347.9146676 72.79786

68 349.1885387 86.10963

69 350.4330474 53.68971

70 352.5148766 79.72027

71 355.2663969 59.66486

72 356.3931262 86.10953

TABLE 7 (Dimple Pattern 173) (continued)

Dimple # 4 Dimple # 5 Dimple # 6

Type spherical Type truncated Type truncated

Radius 0.075 Radius 0.075 Radius 0.0775

SCD 0.005 SCD 0.0119 SCD 0.0122

TCD n/a TCD 0.005 TCD 0.005

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 4637001 1 1139176224 3580355 1 2297426943 5490551

2 0 6589178 2 1786771474 4518952 2 2703771469 6489835

3 4200798314 7289446 3 2635389345 2936327 3 476657487 2559568

4 1157992017 7289446 4 3046014274 7486406 4 5467960187 8441703

5 120 4637001 5 3384232422 8458637 5 6532039813 8441703

6 120 6589178 6 4416316958 8458634 6 723342513 2559568

7 1242007983 7289446 7 7583683042 8458634 7 9296228531 6489835

8 2357992017 7289446 8 8615767578 8458637 8 9702573057 5490551

9 240 4637001 9 8953985726 7486406 9 1429742694 5490551

10 240 6589178 10 9364610655 2936327 10 1470377147 6489835

11 2442007983 7289446 11 1021322853 4518952 11 1676657487 2559568

12 3557992017 7289446 12 1086082378 3580355 12 1746796019 8441703

13 1313917622 3580355 13 1853203981 8441703

14 1378677147 4518952 14 1923342513 2559568

15 1463538935 2936327 15 2129622853 6489835

16 1504601427 7486406 16 2170257306 5490551

17 1538423242 8458637 17 2629742694 5490551

18 1641631696 8458634 18 2670377147 6489835

19 1958368304 8458634 19 2976657487 2559568

20 2061576750 8458637 20 2946796019 8441703

21 2095398573 7486406 21 3053203981 8441703

22 2136461065 2936327 22 3123342513 2559568

23 2221322853 4518952 23 3329622853 6489835

24 2286082378 3580355 24 3370257306 5490551

25 2513917622 3580355

26 2578677147 4518952

27 2663538935 2936327

28 2704801427 7486406

29 2738423242 8458637

30 2841631696 8458634

31 3158368304 8458634

32 3261576758 8458637

33 3295398573 7486406

34 3336461065 2936327

35 3421322853 4518952

36 3486082378 3580355

TABLE 7 (Dimple Pattern 173) (continued)

Dimple # 7 Dimple # 8 Dimple # 9

Type truncated Type truncated Type truncated

Radius 00825 Radius 00875 Radius 0095

SCD 00128 SCD 00133 SCD 0014

TCD 0005 TCD 3005 TCD 0005

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 3591413117 5135559 1 3246032855 3996433 1 5133861068 4853996

2 3890934195 6234835 2 4197126436 736516 2 5261871427 6145814

3 5048062345 3643373 3 7802873564 736516 3 6738128573 6145814

4 5412044072 7349879 4 8753967145 3996433 4 6866138932 4853996

5 6587955928 7349879 5 1524603285 3996433 5 1713386107 4853996

6 6951937655 3643373 6 1619712644 736516 6 1726187143 6145814

7 8109065805 6234835 7 1980287356 736516 7 1873812857 6145814

8 8408586883 5135559 8 2075396715 3996433 8 1886613893 4853996

9 1559141312 5135559 9 2724603285 3996433 9 2913386107 4853996

10 158909342 6234835 10 2819712644 736516 10 2926187143 6145814

11 1704806234 3643373 11 3180287356 736516 11 3073812857 6145814

12 1741204407 7349879 12 3275396715 3996433 12 3086613893 4853996

13 1858795593 7349879

14 1895193766 3643373

15 201090658 6234835

16 2040858688 5135559

17 2759141312 5135559

18 278909342 6234835

19 2904806234 3643373

20 2941204407 7349879

21 3058795593 7349879

22 3095193766 3643373

23 321090658 6234835

24 3240858688 5135559

TABLE 7 (Dimple Pattern 173) (continued)

Dimple # 1 Dimple # 2 Dimple # 3

Type truncated Type truncated Type truncated

Radius 0.05 Radius 0.0525 Radius 0.055

SCD 0.0087 SCD 0.0091 SCD 0.0094

TCD 0.0035 TCD 0.0035 TCD 0.0035

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 28.81007 1 3.606874 86.10963 1 0 17.13539

2 0 41.7187 2 4.773603 59.66486 2 0 79.62325

3 5.308533 47.46948 3 7.485123 79.72027 3 0 53.39339

4 9.848338 23.49139 4 9.566953 53.68971 4 8.604739 66.19316

5 17.85912 86.27884 5 10.81146 86.10963 5 15.03312 79.65081

6 22.3436 79.84939 6 12.08533 72.79786 6 60 9.094473

7 24.72264 86.27886 7 13.37932 60.13101 7 104.9669 79.65081

8 95.27736 86.27886 8 16.66723 66.70139 8 111.3953 66.19316

9 97.6564 79.84939 9 19.58024 73.34545 9 120 17.13539

10 102.1409 86.27884 10 20.76038 11.6909 10 120 53.39339

11 110.1517 23.49139 11 24.53367 18.8166 11 120 79.62325

12 114.6915 47.46948 12 46.81607 15.97349 12 128.6047 66.19316

13 120 28.81007 13 73.18393 15.97349 13 135.0331 79.65081

14 120 41.7187 14 95.46633 18.8166 14 180 9.094473

15 125.3085 47.46948 15 99.23962 11.6909 15 224.9669 79.65081

16 129.8483 23.49139 16 100.4198 73.34845 16 231.3953 66.19316

17 137.8591 86.27884 17 103.3328 66.70139 17 240 17.13539

18 142.3436 79.84939 18 106.6207 60.13101 18 240 53.39339

19 144.7226 86.27886 19 107.9147 72.79786 19 240 79.62325

20 315.2774 86.27886 20 109.1885 86.10963 20 248.6047 66.19316

21 217.6564 79.84939 21 110.433 53.68971 21 255.0331 79.65081

22 222.1409 86.27884 22 112.5149 79.72027 22 300 9.094473

23 230.1517 23.49139 23 115.2264 59.66486 23 344.9669 79.65081

24 234.6915 47.46948 24 116.3931 86.10963 24 351.3953 66.19316

25 240 28.81007 25 123.6069 86.10963

26 240 41.7187 26 124.7736 59.66486

27 345.3085 47.46948 27 127.4851 79.72027

28 249.8483 23.49139 28 129.567 53.68971

29 257.8591 86.27884 29 130.8115 86.10963

30 262.3436 79.84939 30 132.0853 72.79786

31 264.7226 86.27886 31 133.3793 60.13101

32 335.2774 86.27886 32 136.6672 66.70139

33 337.6564 79.84939 33 139.5802 73.34845

34 342.1409 86.27884 34 140.7604 11.6909

35 350.1517 23.49139 35 144.5337 18.8166

36 354.6915 47.46948 36 166.8161 15.97349

37 193.1839 15.97349

38 215.4663 18.8166

39 219.2396 11.6909

40 220.4198 73.34845

41 223.3328 66.70139

42 226.6207 60.13101

43 227.9147 72.79786

44 229.1885 86.10963

45 230.433 53.68971

46 232.5149 79.72027

47 235.2264 59.66486

48 236.3931 86.10963

49 243.6069 86.10963

50 244.7736 59.66486

51 247.4851 79.72027

52 249.567 53.68971

53 250.8115 86.10963

54 252.0853 72.79786

55 253.3793 60.13101

56 256.6672 66.70139

57 259.5802 73.34845

TABLE 8 (Dimple Pattern 174) Dimple # 2 (cont'd)

# Phi Theta

58 260.7604 11.6909

59 264.5337 18.8166

60 286.8161 15.97349

61 313.1839 15.97349

62 335.4663 18.8166

63 339.2396 11.6909

64 340.4198 73.34845

65 343.3328 66.70139

66 346.6207 60.13101

67 347.9147 72.79786

68 349.1885 86.10963

69 350.433 53.68971

70 352.5149 79.72027

71 355.2264 59.66486

72 356.3931 86.10963

TABLE 8 (Dimple Pattern 174) (continued)

Dimple # 4 Dimple # 5 Dimple # 6

Type truncated Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.0575 Radius 0.075 Radius 0.0775

SCD 0.0098 SCD 0.008 SCD 0.008

TCD 0.0035 TCD π/a TCD π/a

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 4.637001 1 11.39176 35.80355 1 22.97427 54.90551

2 0 65.89178 2 17.86771 45.18952 2 27.03771 64.89835

3 4.200798 72.89446 3 26.35389 29.36327 3 47.66575 25.59568

4 115.7992 72.89446 4 30.46014 74.86406 4 54.6796 84.41703

5 120 4.637001 5 33.84232 84.58637 5 65.3204 84.41703

6 120 65.89178 6 44.16317 84.58634 6 72.33425 25.59568

7 124.2008 72.89446 7 75.83683 84.58634 7 92.96229 64.89835

8 235.7992 72.79446 8 86.15768 84.58637 8 97.02573 54.90551

9 240 4.637001 9 89.53986 74.86406 9 142.9743 54.90551

10 240 65.89178 10 93.64611 29.36327 10 147.0377 64.89835

11 244.2008 72.89446 11 102.1323 45.18952 11 167.6657 25.59568

12 355.7992 72.89446 12 108.6082 35.80355 12 174.6796 84.41703

13 131.3918 35.80355 13 185.3204 84.41703

14 137.8677 45.18952 14 192.3343 25.59568

15 146.3539 29.36327 15 212.9623 64.89835

16 150.4601 74.86406 16 217.0257 54.90551

17 153.8423 84.58637 17 262.9743 54.90551

18 164.1632 84.58634 18 267.0377 64.89835

19 195.8368 84.58634 19 287.6657 25.59568

20 206.1577 84.58637 20 294.6796 84.41703

21 209.5399 74.86406 21 305.3204 84.41703

22 213.6461 29.36327 22 312.3343 25.59568

23 222.1323 45.18952 23 332.9623 64.89835

24 228.6082 35.80355 24 337.0257 54.90551

25 251.3918 35.80355

26 257.8677 45.18952

27 266.3539 29.36327

28 270.4601 74.86406

29 273.8423 84.58637

30 284.1632 84.58634

31 315.8368 84.58634

32 326.1577 84.58637

33 329.5399 74.86406

34 333.6461 29.36327

35 342.1323 45.18952

36 348.6082 35.80355

TABLE 8 (Dimple Pattern 174) (continued)

Dimple # 7 Dimple # 8 Dimple # 9

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.0825 Radius 3.0875 Radius 0.095

SCD 0.008 SCD 0.008 SCD 0.008

TCD n/a TCD n/a TCD n/a

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 35.91413 51.35559 1 32.46033 39.96433 1 51.33861 48.5399

2 38.90934 62.34835 2 41.97126 73.6516 2 52.61871 61.45814

3 50.48062 36.43373 3 78.02874 73.6516 3 67.38129 61.45814

4 54.12044 73.49879 4 87.53967 39.96433 4 68.66139 48.53996

5 65.87956 73.49879 5 152.4603 39.96433 5 171.3386 48.53996

6 69.51938 36.43373 6 161.9713 73.6516 6 172.6187 61.45814

7 81.09066 62.34835 7 198.0287 73.6516 7 187.3813 61.45814

8 84.08587 51.35559 8 204.5397 39.96433 8 188.6614 48.53996

9 155.9141 51.35559 9 272.4603 39.96433 9 291.3386 48.53996

10 158.9093 62.34835 10 281.9713 73.6516 10 292.6187 61.45814

11 170.4806 36.43373 11 318.0287 73.6516 11 307.3813 61.45814

12 174.1204 73.49879 12 327.5397 39.96433 12 308.6614 48.53996

13 185.8796 73.49879

14 189.5194 36.43373

15 201.0907 62.34835

16 204.0859 51.35559

17 275.9141 51.35559

18 278.9093 62.34835

19 290.4806 36.43373

20 294.1204 73.49879

21 305.8796 73.49879

22 309.5194 36.43373

23 321.0907 62.34835

24 324.0859 51.35559

TABLE 8 (Dimple Pattern 174) (continued)

Dimple # 1 Dimple # 2 Dimple # i

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.05 Radius 0.0525 Radius 0.055

SCD 0.008 SCD 0.008 SCD 0.008

TCD n/a TCD n/a TCD n/a

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 28.81007 1 3.606874 86.10963 1 0 17.13539

2 0 41.7187 2 4.773603 59.66486 2 0 79.62325

3 5.308533 47.46948 3 7.485123 79.72027 3 0 53.39339

4 9.848338 23.49139 4 9.566953 53.68971 4 8.604739 66.19316

5 17.85912 86.27884 5 10.81146 86.10963 5 15.03312 79.65081

6 22.3436 79.84939 6 12.08533 72.79786 6 60 9.094473

7 24.72264 86.27886 7 13.37932 60.13101 7 104.9669 79.65081

8 95.27736 86.27886 8 16.66723 66.70139 8 111.3953 66.19316

9 97.6564 79.84939 9 19.58024 73.34845 9 120 17.13539

10 102.1409 86.27884 10 20.76038 11.6909 10 120 53.39339

11 110.1517 23.49139 11 24.53367 18.8166 11 120 79.62325

12 114.6915 47.46948 12 46.81607 15.97349 12 128.6047 66.19316

13 120 28.81007 13 73.18393 15.97349 13 135.0331 79.65081

14 120 41.7187 14 95.46633 18.8166 14 180 9.094473

15 125.3085 47.46948 15 99.23962 116909 15 224.9669 79.65081

16 129.8483 23.49139 16 100.4198 73.34845 16 231.3953 66.19316

17 137.8591 86.27884 17 103.3328 66.70139 17 240 17.13539

18 142.3436 79.84939 18 106.6207 60.13101 18 240 53.39339

19 144.7226 86.27886 19 107.9147 72.79786 19 240 79.62325

20 215.2774 86.27886 20 109.1885 86.10963 20 248.6047 66.19316

21 217.6564 79.84939 21 110.433 53.68971 21 255.0331 79.65081

22 222.1409 86.27884 22 112.5149 79.72027 22 300 9.094473

23 230.1517 23.49139 23 115.2264 59.66486 23 344.9669 79.65081

24 234.6915 47.46948 24 116.3931 86.10963 24 351.3953 66.19316

25 240 28.81007 25 123.6069 86.10963

26 240 41.7187 26 124.7736 59.66486

27 245.3085 47.46948 27 127.4851 79.72027

28 249.8483 23.49139 28 129.567 53.68971

29 257.8591 86.27884 29 130.8115 86.10963

30 262.3436 79.84939 30 132.0853 72.79786

31 264.7226 86.27886 31 133.3793 60.13101

32 335.2774 86.27886 32 136.6672 66.70139

33 337.6564 79.84939 33 139.5802 73.34845

34 342.1409 86.27884 34 140.7604 116909

35 350.1517 23.49139 35 144.5337 18.8166

36 354.6915 47.46948 36 166.8161 15.97349

37 193.1839 15.97349

38 215.4663 18.8166

39 219.2396 11.6909

40 220.4198 73.34845

41 223.3328 66.70139

42 226.6207 60.13101

43 227.9147 72.79786

44 229.1885 86.10963

45 230.433 53.68971

46 232.5149 79.72027

47 235.2264 59.66486

48 236.3931 86.10963

49 243.6069 86.10963

50 244.7736 59.66486

51 247.4851 79.72027

52 249.567 53.68971

53 250.8115 86.10963

54 252.0853 72.79786

55 253.3793 60.13101

56 256.6672 66.70139

57 259.5802 73.34845

TABLE 9 (Dimple Pattern 175) Dimple # 2 (cont'd)

# Phi Theta

58 260.7604 11.6909

59 264.5337 18.8166

60 286.8161 15.97349

61 313.1839 15.97349

62 335.4663 18.8166

63 339.2396 11.6909

64 340.4198 73.34845

65 343.3328 66.70139

66 346.6207 60.13101

67 347.9147 72.79786

68 349.1885 86.10963

69 350.433 53.68971

70 352.5149 79.72027

71 355.2264 59.66486

72 356.3931 86.10963

TABLE 9 (Dimple Pattern 175) (continued)

Dimple # 4 Dimple # 5 Dimple # 6

Type spherical Type truncated Type truncated

Radius 0.0575 Radius 0.075 Radius 0.0775

SCD 0.008 SCD 0.012 SCD 0.0122

TCD n/a TCD 0.0035 TCD 0.0035

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 4.637001 1 11.39176 35.80355 1 22.97427 54.90551

2 0 65.89178 2 17.86771 45.18952 2 27.03771 64.89835

3 4.200798 72.89446 3 26.35389 29.36327 3 47.66575 25.59568

4 115.7992 72.89446 4 30.46014 74.86406 4 54.6796 84.41703

5 120 4.637001 5 33.84232 84.58637 5 65.3204 84.41703

6 120 65.89178 6 44.16317 84.58634 6 72.33425 25.59568

7 124.2008 72.89446 7 75.83683 84.58634 7 92.96229 64.89835

8 235.7992 72.89446 8 86.15768 84.58637 8 97.02573 54.90551

9 240 4.637001 9 89.53986 74.86406 9 142.9743 54.90551

10 240 65.89178 10 93.64611 29.36327 10 147.0377 64.89835

11 244.2008 72.89446 11 102.1323 45.18952 11 167.6657 25.59568

12 355.7992 72.89446 12 108.6082 35.80355 12 174.6796 84.41703

13 131.3918 35.80355 13 185.3204 84.41703

14 137.8677 45.18952 14 192.3343 25.59568

15 146.3539 29.36327 15 212.9623 64.89835

16 150.4601 74.86406 16 217.0257 54.90551

17 153.8423 84.58637 17 262.9743 54.90551

18 164.1632 84.58634 18 267.0377 64.89835

19 195.8368 84.58634 19 287.6657 25.59568

20 206.1577 84.58637 20 294.6796 84.41703

21 209.5399 74.86406 21 305.3204 84.41703

22 213.6461 29.36327 22 312.3343 25.59568

23 222.1323 45.18952 23 332.9623 64.89835

24 228.6082 35.80355 24 337.0257 54.90551

25 251.3918 35.80355

26 257.8677 45.18952

27 266.3539 29.36327

28 270.4601 74.86406

29 273.8423 84.58637

30 284.1632 84.58634

31 315.8368 84.58634

32 326.1577 84.58637

33 329.5399 74.86406

34 333.6461 29.36327

35 342.1323 45.18952

36 348.6082 35.80355

TABLE 9 (Dimple Pattern 175) (continued)

Dimple # 7 Dimple # 8 Dimple # 9

Type truncated Type truncated Type truncated

Radius 0.0825 Radius 0 .0875 Radius 0.095

SCD 0.0128 SCD 0 .0133 SCD 0.014

TCD 0.0035 TCD 0 .0035 TCD 0.0035

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 35.91413 51.35559 1 32.46033 39.96433 1 51.33861 48.53996

2 38.90934 62.34835 2 41.97126 73.6516 2 52.61871 61.45814

3 50.48062 36.43373 3 78.02874 73.6516 3 67.38129 61.45814

4 54.12044 73.49879 4 87.53967 39.96433 4 68.66139 48.53996

5 65.87956 73.49879 5 152.4603 39.96433 5 171.3386 48.53996

6 69.51938 36.43373 6 161.9713 73.6516 6 172.6187 61.45814

7 81.0966 62.34835 7 198.0287 73.6516 7 187.3813 61.45814

8 84.08587 51.35559 8 207.5397 39.96433 8 188.6614 48.53996

9 155.9141 51.35559 9 272.4603 39.96433 9 291.3386 48.53996

10 158.9093 62.34835 10 281.9713 73.6516 10 292.6187 61.45814

11 170.4806 36.43373 11 318.0287 73.6516 11 307.3813 61.45814

12 174.1204 73.49879 12 327.5397 39.96433 12 308.6614 48.53996

13 185.8796 73.49879

14 189.5194 36.43373

15 201.0907 62.34835

16 204.0859 51.35559

17 275.9141 51.35559

18 278.9093 62.34835

19 290.4806 36.43373

20 294.1204 73.49879

21 305.8796 73.49879

22 309.5194 36.43373

23 321.0907 62.34835

24 324.0859 51.35559

TABLE 9 (Dimple Pattern 175) (continued)

Dimple # 1 Dimple # 2 Dimple # i

Type truncated Type truncated Type truncated

Radius 0.0750 Radius 0.0800 Radius > 0 0825

SCD 0.0132 SCD 0.0138 SCD 0 0141

TCD 0.0050 TCD 0.0050 TCD 0 0050

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0 25.85946 1 19.46456 17.6616 1 0 6.707467

2 120 25.85946 2 100.5354 17.6616 2 60 13.5496

3 240 25.85946 3 139.4646 17.6616 3 120 6.707467

4 22.29791 84.58636 4 220.5354 17.6616 4 180 13.5496

5 1.15E-13 44.66932 5 259.4646 17.6616 5 240 6.707467

6 337.7021 84.58636 6 340.5354 17.6616 6 300 13.5496

7 142.2979 84.58636 7 18.02112 74.614 7 6.04096 73.97888

8 120 44.66932 8 7.175662 54.03317 8 13.01903 64.24653

9 457.7021 84.58636 9 352.8243 54.03317 9 2.41E-14 63.82131

10 262.2979 84.58636 10 341.9789 74.614 10 346.981 64.24653

11 240 44.66932 11 348.5695 84.24771 11 353.959 73.97888

12 577.7021 84.58636 12 11.43052 84.24771 12 360 84.07838

13 138.0211 74.614 13 126.041 73.97888

14 127.1757 54.03317 14 133.019 64.24653

15 472.8243 54.03317 15 120 63.82131

16 461.9789 74.614 16 466.981 64.24653

17 468.5695 84.24771 17 473.959 73.97888

18 131.4305 84.24771 18 480 84.07838

19 258.0211 74.614 19 246.041 73.97888

20 247.1757 54.03317 20 253.019 64.24653

21 592.8243 54.03317 21 240 63.82131

22 581.9789 74.614 22 286.981 64.24653

23 588.5695 84.24771 23 593.959 73.97888

24 251.4305 84.24771 24 600 84.07838

TABLE 10 (Dimple Pattern 273)

Dimple # 4 Dimple # 5 Dimple # 6

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.0550 Radius 0.0575 Radius 0.0600

SCD 0.0075 SCD 0.0075 SCD 0.0075

TCD - TCD - TCD -

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 89.81848 78.25196 1 83.35856 69.4858 1 86.88247 85.60198

2 92.38721 71.10446 2 85.57977 61.65549 2 110.7202 35.62098

3 95.11429 63.96444 3 91.04137 46.06539 3 9.279821 35.62098

4 105.6986 42.86305 4 88.0815 53.82973 4 33.11753 85.60198

5 101.558 49.81178 5 81.86536 34.37733 5 206.8825 85.60198

6 98.11364 56.8624 6 67.54444 32.56834 6 230.7202 35.62098

7 100.3784 30.02626 7 38.13465 34.37733 7 129.2798 35.62098

8 86.62335 26.05789 8 52.45556 32.56834 8 153.1175 85.60198

9 69.399 23.82453 9 28.95863 46.06539 9 326.8825 85.60198

10 19.62155 30.02626 10 31.9185 53.82973 10 350.7202 35.62098

11 33.37665 26.05789 11 36.64144 69.4858 11 249.2798 35.62098

12 50.601 23.82453 12 34.42023 61.65549 12 273.1175 85.60198

13 14.30135 42.86305 13 47.55421 77.35324

14 18.44204 49.81178 14 55.84303 77.16119

15 21.88636 56.8624 15 72.44579 77.35324

16 30.18152 78.25196 16 64.15697 77.16119

17 27.61279 71.10446 17 203.3586 69.4858

18 24.88571 63.96444 18 205.5798 61.65549

19 41.03508 85.94042 19 211.0414 46.06539 0 48.61817 85.94042 20 208.0815 53.82973 1 56.20813 85.94042 21 201.8653 34.34433 2 78.96492 85.94042 22 187.5444 32.56834 3 71.38183 85.94042 23 158.1347 34.37733 4 63.79187 85.94042 24 172.4556 32.56834 5 209.8185 78.25196 25 148.9586 46.06539 6 212.3872 71.10446 26 151.9185 63.82973 7 215.1143 63.96444 27 156.6414 69.4858 8 225.6986 42.86305 28 154.4202 61.65549 9 221.558 49.81178 29 167.5542 77.35324 0 218.1136 56.8624 30 175.843 77.16119 1 220.3784 30.02626 31 192.4458 77.35324 2 206.6234 26.05789 32 184.157 77.16119 3 189.399 23.82453 33 323.3586 69.4858 4 139.6216 30.02626 34 325.5796 61.65549 5 153.3766 26.05789 35 331.0414 46.06539 6 170.601 23.82453 36 328.0815 53.82973 7 134.3014 42.86305 37 321.8653 34.37733 8 138.442 49.81178 38 307.5444 32.56834 9 141.8864 56.8624 39 278.1347 34.37733 0 150.1815 78.25196 40 292.4556 32.56834 1 147.6128 71.10446 41 268.9586 46.06539 2 144.8857 63.96444 42 281.9185 53.82973 3 161.0351 85.94042 43 276.6414 69.4858 4 168.6182 85.94042 44 274.4202 61.65549 5 176.2081 85.94042 45 287.5542 77.35324 6 198.9649 85.94042 46 295.843 77.16119 7 191.3818 85.94042 47 312.4458 77.35324 8 183.7919 85.94042 48 304.157 77.16119 9 329.8185 78.25196 0 332.3872 71.10446 1 336.1143 63.96444 2 345.6986 42.86305 3 341.558 49.81178 4 338.1136 56.8624 5 340.3784 30.02626 6 326.6234 26.05789 7 309.399 23.82453 8 259.6216 30.02626 TABLE 10 (Dimple Pattern 273) (continued) 9 373.3766 26.05789 Dimple # 4 (cont'd)

# Phi Theta 0 290.601 23.82453 1 254.3014 42.86305 2 258.442 49.81178 3 261.8864 56.8624 4 270.1815 78.25196 5 267.6128 71.10446 6 264.8857 63.96444 7 281.0351 85.94042 8 288.6182 85.94042 9 296.2081 85.94042 0 318.9649 85.94042 1 311.3818 85.94042 2 303.7919 85.94042

TABLE 10 (Dimple Pattern 273) (continued)

Dimple # 7 Dimple # 8 Dimple # 9

Type spherical Type spherical Type pheπcal

Radius 0.0625 Radius 0.0675 Radius 0.0700

SCD 0.0075 SCD 0.0075 SCD 0.0075

TCD - TCD - TCD -

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 80.92949 77.43144 1 74.18416 68.92141 1 65.6084 59.710409

2 76.22245 60.1768 2 79.64177 42.85974 2 66.31567 50.052318

3 77.98598 51.7127 3 40.35823 42.85974 3 53.68433 50.052318

4 94.40845 38.09724 4 45.81584 68.92141 4 54.39516 59.710409

5 66573 40.85577 5 1941842 68.92141 5 1856048 59.710409

6 53427 40.85577 6 1996418 42.85974 6 1863157 50.052318

7 25.59155 38.09724 7 160.3582 42.85974 7 173.6843 50.052318

8 42.01402 51.7127 8 165.8158 68.92141 8 174.3952 59.710409

9 43.77755 60.1768 9 314.1842 68.92141 9 305.6048 59.710409

10 39.07051 77.43144 10 319.6418 42.85974 10 306.3157 50.052318

11 55.39527 68.86469 11 280.3582 42.85974 11 293.6843 50.052318

12 64.60473 68.86469 12 385.8158 68.92141 12 294.3952 59.710409

13 2009295 77.43144

14 1962224 60.1768

15 197.986 51.7127

16 214.4085 38.09724

17 186.573 40.85577

18 173.427 40.85577

19 145.5915 38.09724

20 162.014 61.7127

21 163.7776 60.1768

22 159.0705 77.43144

23 175.3953 68.86469

24 1846047 68.86469

25 3209295 77.43144

26 316.2224 60.1768

27 317.986 51.7127

28 334.4085 38.09724

29 306.573 40.85577

30 293.427 40.85577

31 265.5915 38.09724

32 282.014 51.7127

33 283.7776 60.1768

34 279.0705 77.43144

35 2953953 68.86469

36 3046047 68.46469

TABLE 10 (Dimple Pattern 273) (continued)

Dimple # 1 Dimple # 2 Dimple # 3

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.0550 Radius 0.0575 Radius > 0.0600

SCD 0.0080 SCD 0.0080 SCD 0.0080

TCD - TCD - TCD -

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 89.818 78.252 1 83.359 69.486 1 86.882 85.602

2 92.387 71.104 2 85.500 61.655 2 110.720 35.621

5 95.114 63.964 5 91.041 46.065 3 9.280 35.621

4 105.699 42.863 4 88.081 53.830 4 33.118 85.602

5 101.558 49.812 5 81.865 34.377 5 206.882 85.602

6 98.114 56862 6 67.544 32568 6 230.720 35621

7 100.378 30026 7 38.135 34377 7 129.280 35621

8 86.623 26058 8 52.456 32568 8 153.118 85602

9 69.399 23.825 9 28.959 46.065 9 326.882 85.602

10 19.622 30.026 10 31.919 53.830 10 350.720 35.621

11 33.377 26.058 11 36.641 69.486 11 249.280 35.621

12 50.601 23.825 12 34.420 61.655 12 273.118 85.602

13 14.301 42.863 13 47.554 77.353

14 18.442 49812 14 55.843 77161

15 21.886 56862 15 72.446 77353

16 30.182 78.252 16 64.157 77.161

17 27.613 71.104 17 203.359 69.486

18 24.886 63.964 18 205.580 61.655

19 41.035 85.940 19 211.041 46.065

20 48.618 85.940 20 208.081 53.830

21 56.208 85.940 21 201.865 34.377

22 78.965 85.940 22 187.544 32.568

23 71.382 85.940 23 158.135 34.377

24 63.792 85.940 24 172.456 32.568

25 209.818 78252 25 148.959 46065

26 212.387 71104 26 151.919 53830

27 215.114 63.964 27 156.641 69.486

28 225.699 42.863 28 154.420 61.655

29 221.558 49.812 29 167.544 77.353

30 218.114 56.862 30 175.843 77.161

31 220.378 30.026 31 192.446 77.353

32 206.623 26.058 32 184.157 77.161

33 189.399 30.026 33 323.359 69.486

34 139.622 30.026 34 325.580 61.655

35 153.377 26.058 35 331.041 46.065

36 170.601 23825 36 328.081 53830

37 134.301 42863 37 321.865 34377

38 138.442 49.812 38 307.544 32.568

39 141.886 56.862 39 278.135 34.377

40 150.182 78.252 40 292.456 32.568

41 147.613 71.104 41 268.959 46.065

42 144.886 63.964 42 271.919 53.830

43 161.035 85.940 43 276.641 69.486

44 168.618 85.940 44 274.420 61.655

45 176.208 85.940 45 287.554 77.353

46 198.965 85.940 46 295.843 77.161

47 191.382 85940 47 312.446 77353

48 183.792 85940 48 304.157 77161

49 329.818 78.252

50 332.387 71104

51 335.114 63964

52 345.699 42.863

53 341.558 49.812

54 338.114 56.862

55 340.378 30.026

56 326.623 26058 57 309.399 23.825 TABLE 11 (Dimple Pattern 2-3)

Dimple # 1 (cont'd)

# Phi Theta

58 259.622 30.026

59 273.377 26.058

60 290.601 23.825

61 254.301 42.863

62 258.442 49.812

63 261.886 56.862

64 270.182 78.252

65 267.613 71.104

66 264.886 63.964

67 281.035 85.940

68 288.618 85.940

69 296.208 85.940

70 318.965 85.940

71 311.382 85.940

72 303.792 85.940

TABLE 11 (Dimple Pattern 2-3) (continued)

Dimple # 4 Dimple # 5 Dimple # 6

Type spherical Type spherical Type spherical

Radius 0.0625 Radius 0.0675 Radius 0.0700

SCD 0.0080 SCD 0.0080 SCD 0.0080

TCD - TCD - TCD -

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 80.929 77.431 1 74.184 68.921 1 65.605 59.710

2 76.222 60.177 2 79.642 42.860 2 66.316 50.052

3 77.986 51.713 3 40.358 42.860 3 53.684 50.052

4 94.408 38.097 4 45.816 68.921 4 54.395 59.710

5 66.573 40.856 5 194.184 68.921 5 185.605 59.710

6 53.427 40.856 6 199.642 42.860 6 186.316 50.052

7 25.592 38.097 7 160.358 42.860 7 173.684 50.052

8 42.014 51.713 8 165.816 68.921 8 174.395 59.710

9 43.778 60.177 9 314.184 68.921 9 305.605 59.710

10 39.071 77.431 10 319.642 42.860 10 306.316 50.052

11 55.395 68.865 11 280.358 42.860 11 293.684 50.052

12 64.605 68.865 12 385.816 68.921 12 294.395 59.710

13 200.929 77.431

14 196.222 60.177

15 197.986 51.713

16 214.408 38.097

17 186.573 40.856

18 173.427 40.856

19 145.592 38.097 0 162.014 51.713 1 163.778 60.177 2 159.071 77.431 3 175.395 68.865 4 184.605 68.865 5 320.929 77.431 6 316.222 60.177 7 317.986 51.713 8 334.408 38.097 9 306.573 40.856 0 293.427 40.856 1 265.592 38.097 2 282.014 51.713 3 283.778 60.177 4 279.071 77.431 5 295.395 68.865 6 304.605 68.865

TABLE 11 (Dimple Pattern 2-3) (continued)

Dimple # 7 Dimple # 8 Dimple # 9

Type truncated Type truncated Type truncated

Radius 0.0750 Radius 0 0800 Radiu i 0 0825

SCD 0.0132 SCD 0 0138 SCD 0 0141

TCD 0.0055 TCD 0 0055 TCD 0 0055

# Phi Theta # Phi Theta # Phi Theta

1 0.000 25.859 1 19.465 17.662 1 0.000 6.707

2 120.000 25.859 2 100.535 17.662 2 60.000 13.550

3 240.000 28.859 3 139.465 17.662 3 120.000 6.707

4 22.298 84.586 4 220.535 17.662 4 180.000 13.550

5 0.000 44.669 5 259.465 17.662 5 240.000 6.707

6 337.702 84.586 6 340.535 17.662 6 300.000 13.550

7 142.298 84.586 7 18.021 74.614 7 6.041 73.979

8 120.000 44.669 8 7.176 54.033 8 13.019 64.247

9 457.702 84.586 9 352.824 54.033 9 0.000 63.821

10 262.298 84.586 10 341.979 74.614 10 346.981 64.247

11 240.000 44.669 11 348.569 84.248 11 353.959 73.979

12 577.702 84.586 12 11.431 84.248 12 360.000 84.078

13 138.021 74.614 13 126.041 73.979

14 127.176 54.033 14 133.019 64.247

15 472.824 54.033 15 120.000 63.821

16 461.979 74.614 16 466.981 64.247

17 468.569 84.248 17 473.959 73.979

18 131.431 84.248 18 480.000 84.078

19 258.021 74.614 19 246.041 73.979

20 247.176 54.033 20 253.019 64.247

21 592.824 54.033 21 240.000 63.821

22 581.979 74.614 22 586.981 64.247

23 588.569 84.248 23 593.959 73.979

24 251.431 84.248 24 600.000 84.078

TABLE 11 (Dimple Pattern 2-3) (continued)

[0082] The geometric and dimple patterns 172-175, 273 and 2-3 described above have been shown to reduce dispersion. Moreover, the geometric and dimple patterns can be selected to achieve lower dispersion based on other ball design parameters as well. For example, for the case of a golf ball that is constructed in such a way as to generate relatively low driver spin, a cuboctahedral dimple pattern with the dimple profiles of the 172-175 series golf balls, shown in Table 5, or the 273 and 2-3 series golf balls shown in Tables 10 and 11, provides for a spherically symmetrical golf ball having less dispersion than other golf balls with similar driver spin rates. This translates into a ball that slices less when struck in such a way that the ball's spin axis corresponds to that of a slice shot. To achieve lower driver spin, a ball can be constructed from e.g., a cover made from an ionomer resin utilizing high-performance ethylene copolymers containing acid groups partially neutralized by using metal salts such as zinc, sodium and others and having a rubber-based core, such as constructed from, for example, a hard Dupont™ Surlyn® covered two-piece ball with a polybutadiene rubber-based core such as the TopFlite XL Straight or a three-piece ball construction with a soft thin cover, e.g., less than about 0.04 inches, with a relatively high flexural modulus mantle layer and with a polybutadiene rubber-based core such as the Titleist ProVl®.

[0083] Similarly, when certain dimple pattern and dimple profiles describe above are used on a ball constructed to generate relatively high driver spin, a spherically symmetrical golf ball that has the short iron control of a higher spinning golf ball and when imparted with a relatively high driver spin causes the golf ball to have a trajectory similar to that of a driver shot trajectory for most lower spinning golf balls and yet will have the control around the green more like a higher spinning golf ball is produced. To achieve higher driver spin, a ball can be constructed from e.g., a soft Dupont™ Surlyn® covered two-piece ball with a hard polybutadiene rubber-based core or a relatively hard Dupont™ Surlyn® covered two-piece ball with a plastic core made of 30-100% DuPont™ HPF 2000®, or a three-piece ball construction with a soft thicker cove, e.g., greater than about 0.04 inches, with a relatively stiff mantle layer and with a polybutadiene rubber-based core.

[0084] It should be appreciated that the dimple patterns and dimple profiles used for 172-175, 273, and 2-3 series golf balls causes these golf balls to generate a lower lift force under various conditions of flight, and reduces the slice dispersion. [0085] Golf balls dimple patterns 172-175 were subjected to several tests under industry standard laboratory conditions to demonstrate the better performance that the dimple configurations described herein obtain over competing golf balls. In these tests, the flight characteristics and distance performance for golf balls with the 173-175 dimple patterns were conducted and compared with a Titleist Pro VI® made by Acushnet. Also, each of the golf balls with the 172-175 patterns were tested in the Poles-Forward-Backward (PFB) and Pole Horizontal (PH) orientations. The Pro VI® being a USGA conforming ball and thus known to be spherically symmetrical was tested in no particular orientation (random orientation). Golf balls with the 172-175 patterns were all made from basically the same materials and had a standard polybutadiene-based rubber core having 90-105 compression with 45-55 Shore D hardness. The cover was a Surlyn™ blend (38% 9150, 38% 8150, 24% 6320) with a 58-62 Shore D hardness, with an overall ball compression of approximately 110-115. [0086] The tests were conducted with a "Golf Laboratories" robot and hit with the same Taylor Made ^® driver at varying club head speeds. The Taylor Made ^® driver had a 10.5° r7 425 club head with a lie angle of 54 degrees and a REAX 65 'R' shaft.

The golf balls were hit in a random-block order, approximately 18-20 shots for each type ball-orientation combination. Further, the balls were tested under conditions to simulate a 20-25 degree slice, e.g., a negative spin axis of 20-25 degrees.

[0087] The testing revealed that the 172-175 dimple patterns produced a ball speed of about 125 miles per hour, while the Pro VI® produced a ball speed of between 127 and 128 miles per hour.

[0088] The data for each ball with patterns 172-175 also indicates that velocity is independent of orientation of the golf balls on the tee.

[0089] The testing also indicated that the 172-175 patterns had a total spin of between 4200 rpm and 4400 rpm, whereas the Pro VI® had a total spin of about 4000 rpm. Thus, the core/cover combination used for balls with the 172-175 patterns produced a slower velocity and higher spinning ball.

[0090] Keeping everything else constant, an increase in a ball's spin rate causes an increase in its lift. Increased lift caused by higher spin would be expected to translate into higher trajectory and greater dispersion than would be expected, e.g., at

200-500 rpm less total spin; however, the testing indicates that the 172-175 patterns have lower maximum trajectory heights than expected. Specifically, the testing revealed that the 172-175 series of balls achieve a max height of about 21 yards, while the Pro Vl ® is closer to 25 yards. [0091] The data for each of golf balls with the 172-175 patterns indicated that total spin and max height was independent of orientation, which further indicates that the 172-175 series golf balls were spherically symmetrical.

[0092] Despite the higher spin rate of a golf ball with, e.g., pattern 173, it had a significantly lower maximum trajectory height (max height) than the Pro VI®. Of course, higher velocity will result in a higher ball flight. Thus, one would expect the Pro VI® to achieve a higher max height, since it had a higher velocity. If a core/cover combination had been used for the 172-175 series of golf balls that produced velocities in the range of that achieved by the Pro VI®, then one would expect a higher max height. But the fact that the max height was so low for the 172-175 series of golf balls despite the higher total spin suggests that the 172-175 Vballs would still not achieve as high a max height as the Pro VI® even if the initial velocities for the 172-175 series of golf balls were 2-3 mph higher.

[0093] Figure 11 is a graph of the maximum trajectory height (Max Height) versus initial total spin rate for all of the 172-175 series golf balls and the Pro Vl ®. These balls were when hit with Golf Labs robot using a 10.5 degree Taylor Made r7 425 driver with a club head speed of approximately 90 mph imparting an approximately 20 degree spin axis slice. As can be seen, the 172-175 series of golf balls had max heights of between 18-24 yards over a range of initial total spin rates of between about 3700 rpm and 4100 rpm, while the Pro VI® had a max height of between about 23.5 and 26 yards over the same range.

[0094] The maximum trajectory height data correlates directly with the CL produced by each golf ball. These results indicate that the Pro Vl ® golf ball generated more lift than any of the 172-175 series balls. Further, some of balls with the 172-175 patterns climb more slowly to the maximum trajectory height during flight, indicating they have a slightly lower lift exerted over a longer time period. In operation, a golf ball with the 173 pattern exhibits lower maximum trajectory height than the leading comparison golf balls for the same spin, as the dimple profile of the dimples in the square and triangular regions of the cuboctahedral pattern on the surface of the golf ball cause the air layer to be manipulated differently during flight of the golf ball. [0095] Despite having higher spin rates, the 172-175 series golf balls have

Carry Dispersions that are on average less than that of the Pro VI® golf ball. The data in figures 12-16 clearly shows that the 172-175 series golf balls have Carry Dispersions that are on average less than that of the Pro VI® golf ball. It should be noted that the 172-175 series of balls are spherically symmetrical and conform to the USGA Rules of Golf.

[0096] Figure 12 is a graph illustrating the carry dispersion for the balls tested and shown in Figure 11. As can be seen, the average carry dispersion for the 172-175 balls is between 50-60 ft, whereas it is over 60 feet for the Pro VI®. [0097] Figure 13-16 are graphs of the Carry Dispersion versus Total Spin rate for the 172-175 golf balls versus the Pro VI®. The graphs illustrate that for each of the balls with the 172-175 patterns and for a given spin rate, the balls with the 172-175 patterns have a lower Carry Dispersion than the Pro VI®. For example, for a given spin rate, a ball with the 173 pattern appears to have 10-12 ft lower carry dispersion than the Pro VI® golf ball. In fact, a 173 golf ball had the lowest dispersion performance on average of the 172-175 series of golf balls.

[0098] The overall performance of the 173 golf ball as compared to the Pro

VI® golf ball is illustrated in figures 17 and 18. The data in these figures shows that the 173 golf ball has lower lift than the Pro VI® golf ball over the same range of

Dimensionless Spin Parameter (DSP) and Reynolds Numbers.

[0099] Figure 17 is a graph of the wind tunnel testing results showing of the

Lift Coefficient (CL) versus DSP for the 173 golf ball against different Reynolds

Numbers. The DSP values are in the range of 0.0 to 0.4. The wind tunnel testing was performed using a spindle of 1/16 ^th inch in diameter.

[00100] Figure 18 is a graph of the wind tunnel test results showing the CL versus DSP for the Pro Vl golf ball against different Reynolds Numbers.

[00101] In operation and as illustrated in figures 17 and 18, for a DSP of 0.20 and a Re of greater than about 60,000, the CL for the 173 golf ball is approximately

0.19-0.21, whereas for the Pro VI® golf ball under the same DSP and Re conditions, the CL is about .25-.27 ^' . On a percentage basis, the 173 golf ball is generating about

20-25% less lift than the Pro VI® golf ball. Also, as the Reynolds Number drops down to the 60,000 range, the difference in CL is pronounced - the Pro VI® golf ball lift remains positive while the 173 golf ball becomes negative. Over the entire range of

DSP and Reynolds Numbers, the 173 golf ball has a lower lift coefficient at a given

DSP and Reynolds pair than does the Pro VI® golf ball. Furthermore, the DSP for the

173 golf ball has to rise from 0.2 to more than 0.3 before CL is equal to that of CL for the Pro VI® golf ball. Therefore, the 173 golf ball performs better than the Pro VI® golf ball in terms of lift-induced dispersion (non-zero spin axis).

[00102] Therefore, it should be appreciated that the cuboctahedron dimple pattern on the 173 golf ball with large truncated dimples in the square sections and small spherical dimples in the triangular sections exhibits low lift for normal driver spin and velocity conditions. The lower lift of the 173 golf ball translates directly into lower dispersion and, thus, more accuracy for slice shots.

[00103] "Premium category" golf balls like the Pro VI® golf ball often use a three-piece construction to reduce the spin rate for driver shots so that the ball has a longer distance yet still has good spin from the short irons. The 173 dimple pattern can cause the golf ball to exhibit relatively low lift even at relatively high spin conditions. Using the low- lift dimple pattern of the 173 golf ball on a higher spinning two-piece ball results in a two-piece ball that performs nearly as well on short iron shots as the "premium category" golf balls currently being used.

[00104] The 173 golf ball's better distance-spin performance has important implications for ball design in that a ball with a higher spin off the driver will not sacrifice as much distance loss using a low- lift dimple pattern like that of the 173 golf ball. Thus the 173 dimple pattern or ones with similar low- lift can be used on higher spinning and less expensive two-piece golf balls that have higher spin off a PW but also have higher spin off a driver. A two-piece golf ball construction in general uses less expensive materials, is less expensive, and easier to manufacture. The same idea of using the 173 dimple pattern on a higher spinning golf ball can also be applied to a higher spinning one-piece golf ball.

[00105] Golf balls like the MC Lady and MaxFli Noodle use a soft core

(approximately 50-70 PGA compression) and a soft cover (approximately 48-60 Shore D) to achieve a golf ball with fairly good driver distance and reasonable spin off the short irons. Placing a low-lift dimple pattern on these balls allows the core hardness to be raised while still keeping the cover hardness relatively low. A ball with this design has increased velocity, increased driver spin rate, and is easier to manufacture; the low- lift dimple pattern lessens several of the negative effects of the higher spin rate. [00106] The 172-175 dimple patterns provide the advantage of a higher spin two-piece construction ball as well as being spherically symmetrical. Accordingly, the 172-175 series of golf balls perform essentially the same regardless of orientation. [00107] In an alternate embodiment, a non-Conforming Distance Ball having a thermoplastic core and using the low-lift dimple pattern, e.g., the 173 pattern, can be provided. In this alternate embodiment golf ball, a core, e.g., made with DuPont™ Surlyn® HPF 2000 is used in a two- or multi-piece golf ball. The HPF 2000 gives a core with a very high COR and this directly translates into a very fast initial ball velocity - higher than allowed by the USGA regulations.

[00108] In yet another embodiment, as shown in figure 19, golf ball 600 is provided having a spherically symmetrical low-lift pattern that has two types of regions with distinctly different dimples. As one non-limiting example of the dimple pattern used for golf ball 600, the surface of golf ball 600 is arranged in an octahedron pattern having eight symmetrical triangular shaped regions 602, which contain substantially the same types of dimples. The eight regions 602 are created by encircling golf ball 600 with three orthogonal great circles 604, 606 and 608 and the eight regions 602 are bordered by the intersecting great circles 604, 606 and 608. If dimples were placed on each side of the orthogonal great circles 604, 606 and 608, these "great circle dimples" would then define one type of dimple region two dimples wide and the other type region would be defined by the areas between the great circle dimples. Therefore, the dimple pattern in the octahedron design would have two distinct dimple areas created by placing one type of dimple in the great circle regions 604, 606 and 608 and a second type dimple in the eight regions 602 defined by the area between the great circles 604, 606 and 608.

[00109] As can be seen in figure 19, the dimples in the region defined by circles

604, 606, and 608 can be truncated dimples, while the dimples in the triangular regions 602 can be spherical dimples. In other embodiments, the dimple type can be reversed. Further, the radius of the dimples in the two regions can be substantially similar or can vary relative to each other.

[00110] Figures 25 and 26 are graphs which were generated for balls 273 and 2-3 in a similar manner to the graphs illustrated in Figures 20 to 24 for some known balls and the 173 and 273 balls. Figures 25 and 26 show the lift coefficient versus Reynolds Number at initial spin rates of 4,000 rpm and 4,500 rpm, respectively, for the 273 and 2-3 dimple pattern. Figures 27 and 28 are graphs illustrating the drag coefficient versus Reynolds number at initial spin rates of 4000 rpm and 4500 rpm, respectively, for the 273 and 2-3 dimple pattern. Figures 25 to 28 compare the lift and drag performance of the 273 and 2-3 dimple patterns over a range of 120,000 to 140,000 Re and for 4000 and 4500 rpm. This illustrates that balls with dimple pattern 2-3 perform better than balls with dimple pattern 273. Balls with dimple pattern 2-3 were found to have the lowest lift and drag of all the ball designs which were tested.

[00111] While certain embodiments have been described above, it will be understood that the embodiments described are by way of example only. Accordingly, the systems and methods described herein should not be limited based on the described embodiments. Rather, the systems and methods described herein should only be limited in light of the claims that follow when taken in conjunction with the above description and accompanying drawings.