Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING DIRECTIONS OF UNCORRELATED SOUND SOURCES IN A HIGHER ORDER AMBISONICS REPRESENTATION OF A SOUND FIELD
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2014/122287
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
Higher Order Ambisonics (HOA) represents three-dimensional sound. HOA provides high spatial resolution and facilitates analysing of the sound field with respect to dominant sound sources. The invention aims to identify independent dominant sound sources constituting the sound field, and to track their temporal trajectories. Known applications are searching for all potential candidates for dominant sound source directions by looking at the directional power distribution of the original HOA representation, whereas in the invention all components which are correlated with the signals of previously found sound sources are removed. By such operation the problem of erroneously detecting many instead of only one correct sound source can be avoided in case its contributions to the sound field are highly directionally dispersed.

Inventors:
KRUEGER ALEXANDER (DE)
KORDON SVEN (DE)
Application Number:
EP2014/052479
Publication Date:
August 14, 2014
Filing Date:
February 07, 2014
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
THOMSON LICENSING (FR)
International Classes:
H04S3/00; G01S3/80; G10L19/008
Foreign References:
EP2469741A12012-06-27
EP12305537A2012-05-14
EP12306485A2012-11-29
Other References:
HAOHAI SUN ET AL: "Optimal 3-D hoa encoding with applications in improving close-spaced source localization", APPLICATIONS OF SIGNAL PROCESSING TO AUDIO AND ACOUSTICS (WASPAA), 2011 IEEE WORKSHOP ON, IEEE, 16 October 2011 (2011-10-16), pages 249 - 252, XP032011472, ISBN: 978-1-4577-0692-9, DOI: 10.1109/ASPAA.2011.6082263
ERIK HELLERUD ET AL: "Spatial redundancy in Higher Order Ambisonics and its use for lowdelay lossless compression", ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009. ICASSP 2009. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON, IEEE, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA, 19 April 2009 (2009-04-19), pages 269 - 272, XP031459218, ISBN: 978-1-4244-2353-8
JÉRÔME DANIEL ET AL: "Further Investigations of High Order Ambisonics and Wavefield Synthesis for Holophonic Sound Imaging", PREPRINTS OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE AES CONVENTION, XX, XX, 22 March 2003 (2003-03-22), pages 1 - 18, XP007904475
M.A. POLETTI: "Three-Dimensional Surround Sound Systems Based on Spherical Harmonics", J. AUDIO ENG. SOC., vol. 53, no. 11, 2005, pages 1004 - 1025
H.W. KUHN: "The Hungarian method for the assignment problem", NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS QUARTERLY, vol. 2, no. 1-2, 1955, pages 83 - 97
E.G. WILLIAMS: "Applied Mathematical Sciences", vol. 93, 1999, ACADEMIC PRESS, article "Fourier Acoustics"
B. RA- FAELY: "Plane-wave Decomposition of the Sound Field on a Sphere by Spherical Convolution", J. ACOUST. SOC. AM., vol. 4, no. 116, 2004, pages 2149 - 2157
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
HARTNACK, Wolfgang (European Patent OperationsKarl-Wiechert-Allee 74, Hannover, DE)
Download PDF:
Claims:
Claims

1. Method for determining directions ) °f uncor- related sound sources in a Higher Order Ambisonics repre¬ sentation denoted HOA of a sound field, said method in¬ cluding the step:

in a current time frame (/c) of HOA coefficients (C(/c)) , searching (11) successively preliminary direction esti¬ mates (/2^M(/c)) of dominant sound sorces, and computing

(11) HOA sound field components (Cp¾M C0RR(/c) ) created by the corresponding dominant sound sources, wherein in each iteration of said searching each further direction estimate is computed from a residual HOA representation

(CREM(/c)) which represents the original HOA representation from which all the components correlated with the signals of previously found sound sources have been removed, wherein a current direction estimate is selected out of a number of predefined test directions, such that the power of the related general plane wave of the residual HOA representation (CREM(/C)) r impinging from the chosen direc¬ tion on a listener position, is maximum compared to that of all other test directions.

2. Method according to claim 1, wherein said selected direc¬ tion estimates for said current time frame (/c) of HOA co¬ efficients (C(/c)) are assigned (13) to dominant sound sources found in the previous time frame (/c— 1) of HOA co¬ efficients (C(k— 1)) and the final direction estimates are smoothed with respect to the resulting time trajectory.

Method according to claim 2, wherein said smoothing is performed by carrying out a Bayesian inference process, wherein this Bayesian inference process exploits a sta- tistical a priori sound source movement model and the rectional power distributions of the dominant sound source components of the original HOA representation.

Method according to claim 3, wherein said statistical a priori model statistically predicts the movement of indi¬ vidual sound sources from the knowledge of their direc¬ tion in said previous time frame (/c— 1) and the knowledge of the movement between said previous time frame (/c— 1) and the penultimate time frame (/c— 2) .

Method according to claim 3 or 4, wherein said assignment of direction estimates to dominant sound sources found in said previous time frame (/c— 1) of HOA coefficients is ac¬ complished by a joint minimisation of the angles between pairs of a direction estimate and the direction of a pre¬ viously found sound source, and maximisation of the abso¬ lute value of the correlation coefficient between the pairs of the directional signals related to a direction estimate and to a dominant sound source found in said previous time frame (fc— 1) of HOA coefficients.

Method for determining directions (Qn,DOM,Acr(k) ) °f uncor- related sound sources in a Higher Order Ambisonics repre¬ sentation denoted HOA of a sound field, said method in¬ cluding the steps:

in a current time frame (/c) of HOA coefficients (C(/c)) , searching (11) successively preliminary direction esti¬ mates (/2^M(/c)) of dominant sound sources, and computing

(11) HOA sound field components (Cp¾M C0RR(/c) ) which are created by the corresponding dominant sound sources, and computing (11) the corresponding directional signals assigning (13) said computed dominant sound sources to corresponding sound sources active in the previous time frame (/c— 1) of said HOA coefficients by comparing said preliminary direction estimates (/2^M(/c)) of said current time frame (/c) and smoothed directions (Qn.DOMAcr ik 1)) °f sound sources active in said previous time frame (k— 1), and by correlating said directional signals ( * NST ) of said current time frame (/c) and directional signals

(XACT (k— 1)) of sound sources active in said previous time frame (k— 1), resulting in an assignment function ; computing (14) smoothed dominant source directions

( /2p0M (fc)) using said assignment function (fa^) > said S E T ( ^.DOM.ACT C^ 1) ) °f smoothed directions in said previ¬ ous time frame, a set (^DOM.ACT C^ 1) ) °f indices of active dominant sound sources in said previous time frame (k— 1), a set (Q@,OOM,A T .k— 1)) of respective source movement an¬ gles between the penultimate time frame ( k— 2) and said previous time frame (k— 1), and said HOA sound field com¬ ponents (Cp¾M C0RR(/c) ) created by the corresponding domi- nant sound sources;

determining (15) indices (^DOM.ACT C^) ) and directions

( ^.2,DOM,ACT(^)) °f the active dominant sound sources of said current time frame (/c), using said smoothed dominant source directions ( Ω^ (fc)), the frame delayed (174) version of directions (Qn.DOMAcr ik 1) ) °f the active domi¬ nant sound sources of said previous time frame (/c— 1) and the frame delayed (172) version of indices (^DOM.ACT C^ 1) ) of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame (k— 1),

wherein said directional signals (-^ACT C^ 1)) °f sound sources active in said previous time frame (/c— 1) are com¬ puted (12) from said frame delayed (174) version of di¬ rections ( j2,DOM,ACT(k 1) ) of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame (/c— 1) and the HOA co- efficients (C(k— 1)) of said previous time frame using mode matching,

and wherein said set 1) ) °f source movement angles between said penultimate time frame (k— 2) and said previous time frame (/c— 1) is computed from said frame delayed (174) version of directions 1) ) of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame (fc— 1) and a further frame delayed (173) ver¬ sion (£fl,DOM,ACT(fr - 2)) thereof.

Apparatus for determining directions ) °f un_ correlated sound sources in a Higher Order Ambisonics representation denoted HOA of a sound field, said appa¬ ratus including:

means (11) being adapted for searching successively in a current time frame (fc) of HOA coefficients (C(fc)) prelimi¬ nary direction estimates (/2^M(/c)) of dominant sound sources, and for computing HOA sound field components

(^DOM CORR^) ) which are created by the corresponding domi¬ nant sound sources, and for computing the corresponding directional signals (*NST ) ;

means (13) being adapted for assigning said computed dom¬ inant sound sources to corresponding sound sources active in the previous time frame (/c— 1) of said HOA coefficients by comparing said preliminary direction estimates

(n^QM(k) of said current time frame (fc) and smoothed di¬ rections ( j2,DOM,ACT(k 1) ) of sound sources active in said previous time frame (k— 1), and by correlating said direc- tional signals (* NST ) of said current time frame (/c) and directional signals (-^ACTC^ 1)) °f sound sources active in said previous time frame (k— 1), resulting in an as¬ signment function ) ;

- means (14) being adapted for computing smoothed dominant source directions ( A^Q^ ^(^)) using said assignment func¬ tion (fa ) r said set (Qn.DOMAcrik— 1)) °f smoothed direc¬ tions in said previous time frame, a set (^DOM.ACTC^ 1) ) °f indices of active dominant sound sources in said previous time frame (fc— 1), a set (^©.DOM.ACTC^ 1) ) °f respective source movement angles between the penultimate time frame (k— 2) and said previous time frame (k— 1), and said HOA sound field components (Cp¾M C0RR(/c) ) created by the corre¬ sponding dominant sound sources;

- means (15) being adapted for determining indices

(¾OM,Acr(k)) and directions ( Ω,ΌΟΜΛΟΎΟ<- ) of the active dom¬ inant sound sources of said current time frame (/c), using said smoothed dominant source directions ( Ω^ (fc)), the frame delayed (174) version of directions (Qn.DOMAcrik 1) ) of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame (fc— 1) and the frame delayed (172) version of indices (^DOM.ACTC^ 1) ) °f the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame (k— 1),

wherein said directional signals (-^ACTC^ 1)) °f sound sources active in said previous time frame (/c— 1) are com¬ puted (12) from said frame delayed (174) version of di¬ rections (Qn.OOMA rik— 1) ) of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame (/c— 1) and the HOA co¬ efficients (C(k— 1)) of said previous time frame using mode matching,

and wherein said set (^©.DOM.ACTC^ 1) ) °f source movement angles between said penultimate time frame (k— 2) and said previous time frame (/c— 1) is computed from said frame delayed (174) version of directions of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame (fc— 1) and a further frame delayed (173) ver

SlOn (£/J2,DOM,ACT (fc-2)) thereof.

Method according to claim 6, or apparatus according to claim 7, wherein in said determination of the number

(D(/c)) of detected dominant directional signals and the corresponding preliminary direction estimates (/2^M(/c)) , an HOA sound field component (Cp¾M C0RR(/c) ) which is creat¬ ed by the corresponding dominant sound sources is sub¬ tracted from said current time frame (/c) of HOA coeffi¬ cients (C(/c)) in order to obtain a corresponding residual

HOA representation (CRE;M(/c)) , and this subtraction pro¬ cessing is repeatedly performed based on the in each case remaining residual HOA representation (CR^M(fc)) for further such sound field components, such that sound field components found are excluded for the further direction search .

Method according to the method of claim 8, or apparatus according to the apparatus of claim 8, wherein for a single direction index (d) the directional power distribu¬ tion (p(d k)) of the remaining residual HOA representation

(CREM(fc)) is computed for a predefined number of discrete test directions {iiq) which are nearly uniformly distrib¬ uted on the unit sphere and said directional power dis¬ tribution is analysed for the presence of a dominant sound source, and if the absence of a dominant sound source is detected the direction search is stopped and if a dominant source is detected a preliminary estimate of its direction (/2^M(/c)) with respect to the coordinate origin is computed. 10. Method according to the method of claims 8 and 9, or ap¬ paratus according to the apparatus of claims 8 and 9, wherein, after having determined a preliminary estimate

(-Qj¾M(/c)) of a dominant source direction, the respective directional signal ( * NST ) and the HOA representation ( ^DOM CORR^) ) °f the sound field components which are as¬ sumed to be created by the same sound source are comput¬ ed as follows:

rotating (31) a fixed predefined spherical grid consisting of sampling positions (ί2ΙΝΙΤ )) , which are target- ed to be uniformly distributed on the unit sphere, to provide the grid ( ^A ROT ^) ) of rotated sampling positions

(/2^To(/c)), wherein said rotation is performed such that a first rotated sampling position (/2^T1(/c)) corresponds to said preliminary direction estimate (/2^M(/c)) ;

- transforming (32) said remaining residual HOA representation ( CREM C^)) to a spatial domain where it is equiva- lently represented by corresponding plane wave functions

( ^INST ^) ) which are assumed to impinge on the coordinate origin from the rotated grid directions, and computing dominant sound source signals and grid direction sig¬ nals;

performing (33) a prediction of said grid direction signals from dominant sound source signals;

computing (34) the HOA representation (Cp¾M C0RR(/c)) of the predicted grid directional signals, representing the contribution of the dominant sound source to the sound field represented by said remaining residual HOA repre- sentation (CREM(/C)) by an inverse Spherical Harmonics Transform.

Method according to the method of one of claims 6 and 8 to 10, or apparatus according to the apparatus of one of claims 7 to 10, wherein said computing (14) of smoothed dominant source directions ( Ω^ (k)) is carried out as follows :

computing (42) a directional a priori probability func- tions ( PpRl0 (.k) ) for dominant sound source directions using said assignment function ) , said set

( i2,DOM,ACT(k 1)) of smoothed directions in said previous time frame, said set (JDOM.ACT C^ 1)) °f indices of active dominant sound sources in said previous time frame, and said set (^©.DOM.ACT C^ 1) ) °f source movement angles;

(41) directional likelihood functions for dominant sound source directions using said assignment function ) and using said HOA sound field components (Cp¾M C0RR(/c)) created by dominant sound sources ;

computing (43) directional a posteriori probability functions ( Pposr ) for dominant sound source direc¬ tions using said directional likelihood functions and using said directional a priori probabil- ity functions ( PpRl0 .k) ) ;

determining (44) smoothed dominant sound source direc- tions (-βροΜ W) using said directional a posteriori probability functions ( Pposr ) for dominant sound source directions.

Description:
Method and Apparatus for determining directions of uncorre- lated sound sources in a Higher Order Ambisonics representation of a sound field The invention relates to a method and to an apparatus for determining directions of uncorrelated sound sources in a Higher Order Ambisonics representation of a sound field.

Background

Higher Order Ambisonics (HOA) offers one possibility to rep ¬ resent three-dimensional sound among other techniques like wave field synthesis (WFS) or channel based approaches like 22.2. In contrast to channel based methods, however, the HOA representation offers the advantage of being independent of a specific loudspeaker set-up. This flexibility, however, is at the expense of a decoding process which is required for the playback of the HOA representation on a particular loud- speaker set-up. Compared to the WFS approach, where the num ¬ ber of required loudspeakers is usually very large, HOA may also be rendered to set-ups consisting of only few loud ¬ speakers. A further advantage of HOA is that the same repre ¬ sentation can also be employed without any modification for binaural rendering to headphones.

HOA is based on a representation of the spatial density of complex harmonic plane wave amplitudes by a truncated Spher ¬ ical Harmonics (SH) expansion. Each expansion coefficient is a function of angular frequency, which can be equivalently represented by a time domain function. Hence, without loss of generality, the complete HOA sound field representation actually can be assumed to consist of 0 time domain func ¬ tions, where 0 denotes the number of expansion coefficients. In the following, these time domain functions are referred to as HOA coefficient sequences or as HOA channels.

HOA has the potential to provide a high spatial resolution, which improves with a growing maximum order N of the expansion. It offers the possibility of analysing the sound field with respect to dominant sound sources.

Invention An application could be how to identify from a given HOA representation independent dominant sound sources constitut ¬ ing the sound field, and how to track their temporal trajec ¬ tories. Such operations are required e.g. for the compres ¬ sion of HOA representations by decomposition of the sound field into dominant directional signals and a remaining am ¬ bient component as described in patent application EP

12305537.8 . A further application for such direction tracking method would be a coarse preliminary source separation. It could also be possible to use the estimated direction trajectories for the post-production of HOA sound field re ¬ cordings in order to amplify or to attenuate the signals of particular sound sources.

In EP 12305537.8 it is proposed to successively perform the following three operations:

- The number of currently present dominant sound sources within a time frame is identified and the corresponding directions are searched for. The number of dominant sound sources is determined from the eigenvalues of the HOA channel cross-correlation matrix. For the search of the dominant sound source directions the directional power distribution corresponding to a frame of HOA coefficients for a fixed high number of predefined test directions is evaluated. The first direction estimate is obtained by looking for the maximum in the directional power distribu- tion. Then, the remaining identified directions are found by consecutively repeating the following two operations: the test directions in the spatial neighbourhood are elim ¬ inated from the remaining set of test directions and the resulting set is considered for the search of the maximum of the directional power distribution.

- The estimated directions are assigned to the sound sources deemed to be active in the last time frame.

- Following the assignment, an appropriate smoothing of the direction estimates is performed in order to obtain a temporally smooth direction trajectory.

However, although with such processing the temporal smoothing of the direction estimates is accomplished in principle by computing the exponentially-weighted moving average, this technique has the disadvantage of not being able to accu ¬ rately capture abrupt direction changes or onsets of new dominant sounds.

To overcome this problem, it was suggested in patent appli ¬ cation EP 12306485.9 to introduce a simple statistical source movement prediction model, which is employed for a statistically motivated smoothing implemented by the Bayesi- an learning rule. However, EP 12306485.9 and EP 12305537.8 compute the likelihood function for the sound source direc ¬ tions only from the directional power distribution. This distribution represents the power of a high number of general plane waves from directions specified by nearly uni ¬ formly distributed sampling points on the unit sphere. It does not provide any information about the mutual correla ¬ tion between general plane waves from different directions. In practice, the order N of the HOA representation is usual ¬ ly limited, resulting in a spatially band-limited sound field. In particular, this means that the contribution of a directional sound source to the directional power distribu ¬ tion is smeared around the true direction of incidence to directions in the neighbourhood. This smearing effect is mathematically described by a 'dispersion function', see be ¬ low section Spatial resolution of Higher Order Ambisonics . Its extent grows with a decreasing order of the HOA repre- sentation. The EP 12306485.9 and EP 12305537.8 direction tracking methods, are considering this effect to a certain degree by constraining the search of directions to areas outside the neighbourhood of previously found directions. However, the specification of the neighbourhood assumes that all sound sources are encoded with the full order N of the HOA representation. This assumption is violated for HOA representations of order N which contain general plane waves encoded in a lower order than N. Such general plane waves of lower order than N may be the result of artistic creation in order to make sound sources appearing wider. However, they also occur with the recording of HOA sound field representa ¬ tions by spherical microphones.

The EP 12306485.9 and EP 12305537.8 direction tracking meth ¬ ods would identify more than a single sound source in case the sound field consists of a single general plane wave of lower order than N, which is an undesired property.

A problem to be solved by the invention is to improve the determination of dominant sound sources in an HOA sound field, such that their temporal trajectories can be tracked. This problem is solved by the methods disclosed in claims 1, 2 and 6. An apparatus that utilises the method of claim 6 is disclosed in claim 7. The invention improves the EP 12306485.9 processing. The in ¬ ventive processing looks for independent dominant sound sources and tracks their directions over time. The expres ¬ sion 'independent dominant sound sources' means that the signals of the respective sound sources are uncorrelated . While the state-of-the-art methods EP 12305537.8 and EP 12306485.9 are searching for all potential candidates for dominant sound source directions by looking at the direc ¬ tional power distribution of the original HOA representation only, the inventive processing described below removes for the search of each direction candidate from the original HOA representation all the components which are correlated with the signals of previously found sound sources. By such oper ¬ ation the problem of erroneously detecting many instead of only one correct sound source can be avoided in case its contributions to the sound field are highly directionally dispersed. As mentioned above, such an effect would occur for HOA representations of order N which contain general plane waves encoded in an order lower than N.

Like in EP 12306485.9, the candidates found for the dominant sound source directions are then assigned to previously found dominant sound sources and are finally smoothed ac ¬ cording to a statistical source movement model. Hence, like in EP 12306485.9 the inventive processing provides temporal- ly smooth direction estimates, and is able to capture abrupt direction changes or onsets of new dominant sounds.

The inventive processing determines estimates of dominant sound source directions for successive frames of an HOA rep- resentation in two subsequent processings:

From a current time frame k of an HOA representation, candi ¬ dates or estimates for dominant sound source directions are successively searched, and the components of the HOA repre ¬ sentation, which are supposed to be created by the respec- tive sound sources, are determined. In each iteration of this search process each further direction candidate is computed from a residual HOA representation which represents the original HOA representation from which all the components correlated with the signals of previously found sound sources have been removed. The current direction candidate is selected out of a number of predefined test directions, such that the power of the related general plane wave of the residual HOA representation, impinging from the chosen di- rection on the listener position, is maximum compared to that of all other test directions.

Next, the selected direction candidates for the current time frame are assigned to dominant sound sources found in the previous time frame k— 1 of HOA coefficients. Thereafter the final direction estimates, which are smoothed with respect to the resulting time trajectory, are computed by carrying out a Bayesian inference process, wherein this Bayesian inference process exploits on one hand a statistical a priori sound source movement model and, on the other hand, the di ¬ rectional power distributions of the dominant sound source components of the original HOA representation. That a priori sound source movement model statistically predicts the cur ¬ rent movement of individual sound sources from their direc- tion in the previous time frame k— 1 and movement between the previous time frame k—1 and the penultimate time frame k-2.

The assignment of direction estimates to dominant sound sources found in the previous time frame (/c— 1) of HOA coef- ficients is accomplished by a joint minimisation of the an ¬ gles between pairs of a direction estimate and the direction of a previously found sound source, and maximisation of the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between the pairs of the directional signals related to a direction es- timate and to a dominant sound source found in the previous time frame.

In principle, the inventive method is suited for determining directions of uncorrelated sound sources in a Higher Order Ambisonics representation denoted HOA of a sound field, said method including the steps:

in a current time frame of HOA coefficients, searching successively preliminary direction estimates of dominant sound sources, and computing HOA sound field components which are created by the corresponding dominant sound sources, and computing the corresponding directional sig ¬ nals;

assigning said computed dominant sound sources to corre- sponding sound sources active in the previous time frame of said HOA coefficients by comparing said preliminary direc ¬ tion estimates of said current time frame and smoothed di ¬ rections of sound sources active in said previous time frame, and by correlating said directional signals of said current time frame and directional signals of sound sources active in said previous time frame, resulting in an assign ¬ ment function;

computing smoothed dominant source directions using said assignment function, said set of smoothed directions in said previous time frame, a set of indices of active dominant sound sources in said previous time frame, a set of respec ¬ tive source movement angles between the penultimate time frame and said previous time frame, and said HOA sound field components created by the corresponding dominant sound sources;

determining indices and directions of the active dominant sound sources of said current time frame, using said

smoothed dominant source directions, the frame delayed ver ¬ sion of directions of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame and the frame delayed version of indices of the active dominant sound sources of said previ ¬ ous time frame,

wherein said directional signals of sound sources active in said previous time frame are computed from said frame de- layed version of directions of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame and the HOA coefficients of said previous time frame using mode matching,

and wherein said set of source movement angles between said penultimate time frame and said previous time frame is com ¬ puted from said frame delayed version of directions of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame and a further frame delayed version thereof. In principle the inventive apparatus is suited for determin ¬ ing directions of uncorrelated sound sources in a Higher Or ¬ der Ambisonics representation denoted HOA of a sound field, said apparatus including:

means being adapted for searching successively in a cur- rent time frame of HOA coefficients preliminary direction estimates of dominant sound sources, and for computing HOA sound field components which are created by the correspond ¬ ing dominant sound sources, and for computing the corre ¬ sponding directional signals;

- means being adapted for assigning said computed dominant sound sources to corresponding sound sources active in the previous time frame of said HOA coefficients by comparing said preliminary direction estimates of said current time frame and smoothed directions of sound sources active in said previous time frame, and by correlating said direction ¬ al signals of said current time frame and directional sig ¬ nals of sound sources active in said previous time frame, resulting in an assignment function;

means being adapted for computing smoothed dominant source directions using said assignment function, said set of smoothed directions in said previous time frame, a set of indices of active dominant sound sources in said previous time frame, a set of respective source movement angles be ¬ tween the penultimate time frame and said previous time frame, and said HOA sound field components created by the corresponding dominant sound sources;

means being adapted for determining indices and direc ¬ tions of the active dominant sound sources of said current time frame, using said smoothed dominant source directions, the frame delayed version of directions of the active domi ¬ nant sound sources of said previous time frame and the frame delayed version of indices of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame,

wherein said directional signals of sound sources active in said previous time frame are computed from said frame de ¬ layed version of directions of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame and the HOA coefficients of said previous time frame using mode matching,

and wherein said set of source movement angles between said penultimate time frame and said previous time frame is com ¬ puted from said frame delayed version of directions of the active dominant sound sources of said previous time frame and a further frame delayed version thereof.

Advantageous additional embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the respective dependent claims.

Drawings

Exemplary embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings, which show in:

Fig. 1 Block diagram of the inventive processing for estimation of the directions of dominant and uncorrelat ed directional signals of a Higher Order Ambisonics signal ;

Fig. 2 Detail of preliminary direction estimation;

Fig. 3 Computation of dominant directional signal and HOA representation of sound field produced by the domi ¬ nant sound source;

Fig. 4 Model based computation of smoothed dominant sound source directions;

Fig. 5 Spherical coordinate system;

Fig. 6 Normalised dispersion function ν Ν (Θ) for different

Ambisonics orders N and for angles θΕ[0,π].

Exemplary embodiments

The principle of the inventive direction tracking processing is illustrated in Fig. 1 and is explained in the following. It is assumed that the direction tracking is based on the successive processing of input frames C(/c) of HOA coefficient sequences of length L, where k denotes the frame index. The frames are defined with respect to the HOA coefficient se ¬ quences specified in equation (45) in section Basics of Higher Order Ambisonics as

fC{k):= [c((fcfl + l)7- s ) c{{kB + 2)T s ) ... c{{kB + L)T S ) ] , (1) where T s denotes the sampling period and B < L indicates the frame shift. It is reasonable, but not necessary, to assume that successive frames are overlapping, i.e. B<L. In a first step or stage 11, the fc-th frame C(/c) of the HOA representation is preliminary analysed for dominant sound sources. A detailed description of this processing is pro ¬ vided in below section Preliminary direction search. In particular, the number D(k) of detected dominant directional signals is determined as well he corresponding D(k) pre ¬ liminary direction estimates . Additionally, the HOA sound field components C p ¾ M C0RR (/c), d = 1, ... , D(k), which are (supposed to be) created by the corresponding individual dominant sound sources as well as the corresponding instan ¬ taneous directional signals x^ ST (k , d = 1, ... , D(k) (i.e. general plane wave functions) are computed.

The individual preliminary direction estimates and related quantities are computed in a sequential manner, i.e. first for d = 1, then for d = 2 and so on. In the first step the di ¬ rectional power distribution of the original HOA representa ¬ tion C(/c) is computed as proposed in EP 12305537.8 and suc ¬ cessively analysed for the presence of dominant sound sources. In the case that a dominant sound source is detect- ed, the respective preliminary direction estimate /2 pQM (/c) is computed. Additionally, the corresponding directional signal

^ INST ^) i s estimated, together with that component C DOM,CORR of current frame C(/c) which is assumed to be created by this

(Λ Λ

sound source. It assumed that C DQMCORR (/C) represents that component of C(/c) which is correlated with the directional signal ¾ INST (/c) . Finally, the HOA component C DQMCORR (/C) is sub ¬ tracted from C(/c) in order to obtain the residual HOA repre- sentation C RgM (/c). The estimation of the d-th (d > 2) prelimi- nary direction is performed in a completely analogous way as that of the first one, with the only exception of using the residual HOA representation ^ M (k) instead of C(/c) . It is thereby explicitly assured that sound field components cre ¬ ated by the found d-th sound source are excluded for the further direction search.

In direction assignment step or stage 13, the dominant sound sources found in step/stage 11 in the fc-th frame are as ¬ signed to the corresponding sound sources (assumed to be) active in the (k— 1) -th frame. On one hand, the assignment is accomplished by comparing the preliminary direction esti- mates for the current frame (/c) and the smoothed directions of sound sources (assumed to be) active in the (k— 1) -th frame, which are contained in the set

i2 (k 1) and whose indices are contained in the set

1) · On the other hand, for the assignment the cor ¬ relation between the instantaneous directional signals x^ ST (k , d = 1, ... , D(k) of the detected dominant sound sources at frame k and the directional signals -X 1) °f sound sources (assumed to be) active in the (k— 1) -th frame is ex- ploited. The result of the assignment is formulated by an assignment function f cAk :{l,...,D k)}→{l,...,D} r where D denotes the maximum number of expected sound sources to be tracked, meaning that the d-th newly found sound source is assigned to the previously active sound source with index ^ ,f c(d).

In a model based computation of smoothed dominant sound source directions step or stage 14 the smoothed dominant source directions Ω β0Μ (k) , d = 1, ... , D(/c) are computed, based on the statistical sound source movement model proposed in EP 12306485.9 by using the set OOMACT (k— l) of the indices of active dominant sound sources at frame (k— 1) , the set

i2 (k 1) of the corresponding dominant source direction estimates at frame (k— 1) , the set ^ © . 1) °f the re ¬ spective source movement angles between the frames (k— 2) and (k— 1) , the HOA sound field components C^ M C0RR (/c) ,

d = 1, ...,D(k) which are supposed to be created by the the found dominant sound sources, and the assignment function f Mik . A detailed description of this model based smoothing procedure is provided in below section Model based computation of smoothed dominant sound source directions . In a last step or stage 15, the indices and the directions of the currently active dominant sound sources are deter ¬ mined, which are supposed to be contained in the sets

JDOM.ACT C^) and Qn.DOMAcr ik) r respectively, using the smoothed dominant source directions (/c), d = 1, ... , D(/c) from step

/stage 14 and the sets 6Α, 0 ΟΜ,Α(:Τ (^ - 1) and JDOM.ACT O - 1) con ¬ taining the smoothed directions and respective indices of sound sources assumed to be active in the ( k— 1) -th frame. This operation has the purpose to not spuriously deactivate sound sources which have not been detected for a small num ¬ ber of successive frames.

Step or stage 12 performs the computation of the directional signals of sound sources supposed to be active in the ( k— 1) -th frame using the HOA representation C(k— 1) of frame k— 1 and the set ^DOM.ACT C^ 1) °f smoothed directions of sound sources supposed to be active in the ( k— 1) -th frame. The computation is based on the principle of mode matching as described in M.A. Poletti, "Three-Dimensional Surround Sound Systems Based on Spherical Harmonics", J. Audio Eng. Soc, vol.53(11), pp.1004-1025, 2005.

In a source movement angle estimation step or stage 16, the set ^Θ,οοΜ,Αστ^ 1) of movement angles of the dominant active sound sources at frame k— 1 is computed from the two sets

6fl,DOM,Acr(fr - 1) and ^, D oM,ACT( fc - 2) of smoothed direction esti ¬ mates of sound sources supposed to be active in the ( k— 1) - th and ( k— 2) -th frame, respectively. The movement is under ¬ stood to happen between frames k— 2 and k— 1 . The movement angle of an active dominant sound source is the arc between its smoothed direction estimate at frame k—2 and that at frame k— 1 . Remarks: if no direction estimate for frame k—2 is availa ¬ ble for a dominant sound source which is assumed to be ac ¬ tive in frame k— 1, the respective movement angle can be set to a maximum value of 'ττ'. In general, when initialising the processing for a first frame k and frame k— 1 values are not yet available, the corresponding sets or values to be input in the steps or stages of Fig. 1 are empty or set to zero, respectively . This operation causes the a-priori probability for the next direction of this sound source to become nearly uniform over all possible directions, cf. below section Determine indices and directions of currently active dominant sound sources . Frame delays 171 to 174 are delaying the respective signals by one frame .

In the following, the above-mentioned steps and stages are explained in more detail.

Preliminary direction search

In the preliminary direction search step/stage 11, the current number D(k) of present dominant sound sources (in frame k) and the respective directions /2^ M (/c), d = 1, .., D(k), are es ¬ timated. Additionally, the HOA sound field components

C^ M C0RR (/c) , d = 1, ... , D(k) which are supposed to be created by the individual sound sources, as well as the corresponding directional signals x^ ST (k , d = 1, ... , D(k) (i.e. general plane wave functions) are computed. All the previously enumerated quantities are computed first for direction index d = 1, then for d = 2 and so on until d = D(k) .

The computation procedure for a single direction d index is illustrated in Fig. 2. The remaining HOA representation C^ M (/c) produced after the estimation of the (d— 1 ) -th direction (related to the estimation of the d-th direction for the fc-th time frame) is input to this stage. It is thereby

(Λ Λ

understood that in the beginning of the loop C REM (/C) corre- sponds to the original HOA frame C(/c) . In a first step or stage 21, the directional power distribution p^ d k) of the remaining HOA representation C^ M (fc) is computed for a predefined number of Q discrete test directions q , q = l,...,Q, which are nearly uniformly distributed on the unit sphere. To be more specific, each test direction q is defined as a vector containing an inclination angle 9 q E [Ο,π] and azimuth angle 0 Q £ [0,2π[ according to q : = (6 q , 0 Q ) , (2) where (·) τ denotes transposition. The directional power dis ¬ tribution is represented by the vector

whose components

nant sound sources remaining in the representation C^ M (fc) related to the direction q for the fc-th time frame. The ac ¬ tual computation of the directional power distribution p^ d k) from C REM C may be performed as proposed in EP 12305537.8. In step or stage 22, the directional power distribution p (d) (fc) is analysed for the presence of a dominant sound source. One way of detecting a dominant source is described in below section Analysis for dominant sound source pres- ence. If the absence of a dominant sound source is detected, then the direction search is stopped and the total number of found dominant directions is set to D(k = d— 1. Otherwise, if a dominant source is detected, a preliminary estimate of its direction /2^ M (/c) with respect to the coordinate origin is computed in step or stage 23, see below section Search for dominant sound source direction for details.

Successively, the respective directional signal ^{^.(/c) and the HOA representation C^ M C0RR (/c) of the sound field component assumed to be created by the d-th dominant sound source are computed in step or stage 24 as described in more detail in below section Computation of dominant directional signal and HOA representation of sound field produced by the dominant sound source.

Finally, in step or stage 25 the HOA component C DOMCORR ^) is subtracted from C R ^ M (fc) in order to obtain the residual HOA representation C Rg ^(/c), which is used for the search of the next (i.e. (d + 1) -th) directional sound source. It is thereby explicitly assured that sound field components created by the d-th sound source found are excluded for the further direction search.

- Analysis for dominant sound source presence

For detecting the presence of a dominant sound source within the sound field represented by C^ M (k), the directional power distributions p^(k), ... , p^(fe) of the remaining HOA representations C R g M 0), ... , ^ REM ^) are considered. On one hand, it has been experimentally found that it is reasonable to monitor the variance ratio , (4)

which can be regarded as a measure for the importance of the sound field represented by the remaining HOA representation

C^ M (k compared to the sound field represented by the initial HOA representation C(/c) . A small ratio indicates that none of the sound sources represented by the HOA representation C^ M k should be considered as being dominant. On the other hand, it is also reasonable to watch the ratio

of the variances of the normalised directional power distri ¬ butions ? =

1, ... , Q , of the normalised directional power distribution

are defined in dependence of those of p^ d k) by r/-y - p ? (fc) ( 7 )

The variance var (P NORM ^)) can regarded as a measure of the uniformity of the directional power distribution p^ d k) . In particular, the variance is the smaller the more uniform the power is distributed over all directions of incidence. In the limiting case of a spatially diffuse noise, the variance var (P NORM CO) should approach a value of zero. Based on these considerations, the variance ratio 5p¾ 0RM (/c) indicates wheth- er the directional power of the HOA representation C^ M (fc) is distributed more uniformly than that of

To summarise the above considerations, it can be assumed that there is always at least a single dominant sound source present in the sound field represented by C(/c), i.e. D(/c)>l. Further dominant sources are detected (for d≥ 2) if the val ¬ ue of the variance ratio remains above a certain pre ¬ defined threshold ε ρ < 1 and the value of the variance ratio is smaller than one, i.e. Dominant sound source is detected

(ford> 2) if 5 p (d) {k)≥e v and ¾J 0RM (fc) < 1 · < 8 > The value for ε ρ is to be set with respect to the interpreta ¬ tion of what 'dominant' means. The inventors have found that a reasonable choice is given by ε ρ = 10 -3 . - Search for dominant sound source direction

After the d-th sound source has been detected, a preliminary estimate of its direction /2^ M (/c) is searched for by employ ¬ ing the directional power distribution p^ d k) . The search is accomplished by taking that test direction q for which the directional power is the largest, i.e.

¾ΟΜ ( ¾ = Ω where c£ x } : = argmax 1≤q≤(2 pj d) (/c) . (9)

¾ΜΑΧ

- Computation of dominant directional signal and HOA repre- sentation of sound field produced by the dominant sound source

Subsequently, after having determined a preliminary estimate n^ QM (k) of the dominant source direction, the respective di ¬ rectional signal x^ ST (k , as well as the HOA representation

C^ M C0RR (/c) of the sound field components assumed to be cre- ated by the same sound source, are computed according to Fig. 3. In step or stage 31, a fixed predefined spherical grid ^ NIT consisting of 0 sampling positions Ω INITo , 0 = 1,..., 0, which are assumed to be nearly uniformly distributed on the unit sphere, is rotated to provide the grid ^ Q R Q T ^) consist- ing of the rotated sampling positions /2 R ¾ To (/c), 0 = 1, ...,0. The rotation is performed such that the first rotated sampling position Ω^ Τ1 ^ corresponds to the preliminary direction estimate -Qj¾ M (/c).

In step or stage 32, the HOA representation ^ M (k) is trans- formed to the so-called spatial domain, where it is equiva- lently represented by 0 plane wave functions (also referred to as grid directional signals) ^ O ^INST ' O = 1,...,0, which are assumed to imping on the observer position (i.e. the coordi ¬ nate origin) from the rotated grid directions /2 R ¾ To (/c), o = Ι,.,.,Ο. To compute the plane wave functions ^ O ^INST ^ ' O = 1,...,0, the mode matrix ^GRID ^) with respect to the rotated grid direc ¬ tions is compute

aGRm(k) : = ... κ ΙΟι0 (¾] e K OXO (10) with s£¾ Di0 (fc): =

[so° (Λ¾ ΤΙ0 (*)) , ( j Ti0 (fc)) , s? ( j Ti0 (fc)), s ( o o (*))Γ e R° - ( 11 )

Assuming each grid directional signal ^ O ^INST to be a row vector composed of the individual samples of the fc-th time frame as

-^o.INST^) — (^ O .INST ^J X o,lNST ^' "' ' X o,lNST ^' ^)) ' (12) where L denotes the length (in samples) of the analysed HOA representation, the computation of all grid directional sig ¬ nals is accomplished by a Spherical Harmonics Transform (see below section Spherical Harmonic Transform for an explanation) as

Since the preliminary estimate /2^ M (/c) of the dominant sound source direction corresponds to the rotated sampling posi ¬ tion /2^ T 1 (/c) , the general plane wave function ^HNST^) can be regarded as the desired dominant directional signal x^ ST (k ,

To determine that component of C R ^ M (fc) which is produced by the d-th sound source, it is postulated that this component is equivalently represented by plane wave functions that can be predicted from ^ {^.(/c) in step or stage 33. Hence, the grid directional signals ^ O ^INST ^) / O = 2,...,0 are attempted to be predicted from ^ {^.(/c) . The predicted signals are denoted b V ^oINST^)' o = 2, ... , 0 . One way of accomplishing such prediction is to assume the predicted signals ^^INST ^) , O = 2,...,0, to be created from

-^INST^) by linear filtering where the filters are determined so as to minimise the prediction error. If the filters are assumed to be finite impulse response (FIR) filters of a very short duration (compared to that of the analysis frame) , the minimisation of the prediction error can be achieved by using state-of-the-art least squares techniques. Finally, the HOA representation of the dominant sound source signal ^{^.(/c) and all predicted correlated components is ob ¬ tained in step or stage 34 by an inverse Spherical Harmonics Transform (see below section Spherical Harmonic Transform for an explanation) as

Computation of directional signals of previously active dom ¬ inant sound sources

The directional signals x ACT {k— 1) of sound sources sup ¬ posed to be active in the (k— 1) -th frame are contained within matrix X ACT (k— 1) according to equation (20) . This matrix is computed using the principle of mode matching (see the above-mentioned Poletti article) by ACTO - 1) = OACTO - l)) _1 C(/c - 1) , (16) where C(k— 1) denotes the (k— l)-th frame of the original HOA sound field representation and z ACT (k— 1) denotes the mode matrix with respect to the directions -U/

d' = 1, ... , D ACT (k— 1) , of sound sources supposed to be active in the (k— 1) -th frame. The mode matrix ACT (k— 1) is computed by SACT 1) : =

[SACT,i(k- D, S ACT,2 (/c-l), ... S AC T, DACT (fc -i)(fc-l)] GlR 0 xD ACT(fc-i)

with S ACT d , (/c): =

0 ( s

ύο " '

Direction assignment

As previously mentioned, on one hand the assignment in step/stage 13 of Fig. 1 is accomplished by comparing the

preliminary direction estimates and the smoothed directions of sound sources supposed to be active in the (k— 1) -th frame, which are contained in the set , (19)

where denotes the index of the d'-th sound source assumed to be active in the (k— 1) -th frame. In particular, it is assumed that the smaller the angle lli "3D (d O ) MW(k)' - Ή

L) JΙ between a pair of a preliminary direction estimate /2^ M (/c)

— ('ACT k-i(di) )

and a smoothed direction ^DOM ACT — Ό' ^ e more likely the d-th newly found dominant sound source direction will corre ¬ spond to the previously active sound source with index

On the other hand, for the assignment the correlation be ¬ tween the instantaneous directional signals x^ ST (k , d =

1, ... , D(k) of the detected dominant sound sources at frame k and the directional signals X ACT ^ ~ 1) °f sound sources sup- posed to be active in the (k— 1) -th frame is exploited. It is here assumed that the frame s composed of the individual directional signals — 1) of sound sources supposed to be active in the (k— 1) -th frame as

Using this definition, it is postulated that the higher the absolute value of the correlation coefficient

PCORR I between the two signal — 1) is, the more likely the d-th newly found dominant sound source di ¬ rection will correspond to the previously active sound source with index · Such postulation is justified by the fact that the correlation coefficient provides a measure for the linear dependency between two signals.

Based on these considerations, an assignment function

k:{l,...,D(k)}→{l,...,D)

specifying the assignment is computed such as to minimise the following cost function (21) 1J 1 I CORRI -i)

It is implicitly assumed that for the direction indices d" E {1, ... , D}\ OOM ACT (k— 1) , which do not belong to any active sound source in the (fc— l)-th frame, the angles (^DOM ^)' ^DOM.ACT ^ ~~ 1))

are virtually set to a minimum angle of O mNr where e.g.

®MiN = 277:/N. Further, the correlation coefficients

PCORR (^!NST ^^ -^ACT ^ ~~ ^)) for the direction indices d" E {1, ... , D}\ OOMACT (k— 1) are virtually set to zero. The first operation has the effect that, if the angles between the d-th newly found direction /2^ M (/c) and the directions of all previously active dominant sound sources are greater than Θ , this newly found direction is favoured to belong to a new sound source.

The assignment problem can be solved by using the well-known Hungarian algorithm described in H.W. Kuhn, "The Hungarian method for the assignment problem", Naval research logistics quarterly, vol.2 (1-2), pp.83-97, 1955.

Model based computation of smoothed dominant sound source directions

This section addresses the computation of the smoothed domi nant sound source directions in step/stage 14 of Fig. 1 ac ¬ cording to a statistical sound source movement model. The individual steps for this computation are illustrated in Fig. 4 and are explained in detail in the following.

- Computation of directional a priori probability functions for dominant sound source directions

The directional a priori probability functions f pRI0 d = 1, ... ,D(k) , for the newly found dominant sound source direc ¬ tions are computed in step or stage 42 using:

- the set ^ 1) °f the indices tACT,/c-i (d'),d' = l, ... , D ACT (/c-l), of active dominant sound sources at frame (k— 1) ,

- the set ^ 1) °f the corresponding dominant source direction estimates — -U/ d = 1, ... , D ACT k— 1) , at frame (k— 1) ,

- the set (k 1) of the respective source movement angles Θ iAQT k i ^ dl ^{k— 1), d' = 1, ...,D ACT (k— 1), between the frame (k-2) and (k - 1) , - and the assignment function f Mik .

The computation is based on a simple sound source movement prediction model introduced in EP 12306485.9. In particular, the directional a priori probability function f pRI0 r the d-th newly found dominant sound source is assumed to be a discrete version of the von Mises-Fisher distribution on the unit sphere in the three-dimensional space.

In the following it is assumed that the directional a priori probability function f pRI0 is given by a vector composed of the probabilities f° r the individual test di- rections Sl q , q = l,...,Q, as Pp 0 W ■= l^ ' ) p(¾ w) ».¾ ) - p " £KQ · <22»

To compute the a priori probabilities for the individual test directions q two cases are to be distinguished:

a) If the source index /^(d) assigned to the d-th newly found dominant sound source is contained within the set 1) r the a priori probabilities are computed accord ¬ ing to

Pp o j (^J = ^ ex P fc ) ras w)) for¾ = l,..^ , (23) where O q d (k) denotes the angle between the estimated direc- tion

Further, K d (/c) denotes a concentration parameter that is com- puted using the source movement angle estimate Of ( d ) (/c— 1) n Λ ln(C R )

according to K^ K) = 7 , (25)

C0S [ 9 f^ k ^k-Dj-i-c O where C D may be set to C D = ln( - CR ^ . (26)

_K MAX

Reasonable values for the parameters KMAX and C R have been found to be (see EP 12306485.9) K MAX = 8, C R = 0.5 . (27) The principle behind this computation is to increase the concentration of the a priori probability function the less the sound source has moved before. If the sound source has moved a lot before, the uncertainty about its successive di ¬ rection is high and thus the concentration parameter has to achieve a small value.

b) If the source index /^(d) assigned to the d-th newly found dominant sound source is not contained within the set 1) r then the respective sound source is considered to not having been active before. Consequently, no a priori knowledge about the direction of this source is actually available. Hence, the a priori probability function f pRI0 is assumed to be uniform on the unit sphere, where the indi ¬ vidual robabilities are equal for all test positions q , i.e. f rq = 1,...,Q . (28) - Computation of directional likelihood functions for domi ¬ nant sound source directions

The directional likelihood functions L(^ fe(d) )(/c), d = l,...,D(k), are computed in step or stage 41 using the HOA sound field components C^ M C0RR (/c) , d = 1, ...,D(k), which are supposed to be created by the individual newly detected dominant sound sources, as well as the assignment function f Mik . The direc ¬ tional likelihood function i,(^' fc ^) (fc) is assumed to be a vector composed of the likelihoods for the individ ¬ ual test directions q = l,...,Q, as (29) ( fc , n Q ) eR« . The individual likelihoods are computed to be approximations of the powers of general plane waves imping ¬ ing from the test direction q , as described in EP 12305537.8. In particular,

where S TESTq ■=

[s°{n q ), s^{n q ), s?{n q ), s {n q ),... , s»- n q ), s»{n q )] T ε R° OD denotes the mode vector with respect to the test direction q (with .¾" · (·) representing the real valued Spherical Harmon- ics defined in below section Definition of real valued

Spherical Harmonics) and where

Ύ

"DOM.CORR ^ DOM.CORR DOM.CORR(fc)) (32) indicates the HOA inter-coefficients correlation matrix with respect to the HOA representation C p ¾ M C0RR (/c)

- Computation of directional a posteriori probability func ¬ tions for dominant sound source directions

The directional a posteriori probability functions

P p0ST (/c), d = 1, ...,D(fe), are computed in step or stage 43 us ¬ ing the directional a priori probability functions

P pRI0 (/c), d = 1, ... , DQi) and the directional likelihood func ¬ tions L^ A ' k ^ d ^{k), d = 1, ... , D(k) . Here, once again, the direc- tional a posteriori probability function P p0ST is as ¬ sumed to be a vector composed of the a posteriori probabili ties for the individual test directions H q , q = 1, ... , Q , as (k) :=

The i computed according to the Bayesian rule (see EP 12306485.9) as

Assuming a fixed direction index d the denominator of equa- tion (37) is constant for each test direction q . For the purpose of the following direction search, where only the maximum of the a posteriori probability functions is of in ¬ terest, such a global scaling is irrelevant. Hence, it is noted that the computation of the denominator of equation (37) may be completely waived to save computational power.

- Computation of smoothed dominant sound source directions

The smoothed dominant sound source directions Ω^ (k), d = 1, ... ,D(k), are computed in step or stage 44 using the a posteriori probability functions f p o ST (^), d = 1, ... , D(/c) . In particular, the smoothed direction Ω^ (k) of the d-th sound source found for frame k is obtained by searching for the maximum in the a posteriori probability function

P POST 1 - E - ^DOM W = ar g ma ¾ posT k, q ) . (35)

Determine indices and directions of currently active domi ¬ nant sound sources

The set OOMACT (k) of the indices i A CT ,/ c(d'), d' = 1, ... , D ACT (fc) of all D ACT (k) active dominant sound sources at frame k and the set ^DOM.ACTC^) °f the corresponding dominant source direc ¬ tion estimates ^DQI^ACT^^), = " ' ^ACTC^) r at frame k are computed in step or stage 15 of Fig. 1 using the set

-('ACT /-l(*)) ,

6.2,DOM,ACT(K - 1) of the smoothed estimates ^DOMACT v k ~ Ό ' d' = 1, ... , D ACT (k— 1) , of all active dominant sound source direc ¬ tions at frame (k— 1) , the set OOMACT (k 1) °f the corre ¬ sponding indices iACT,k-i id' , d' = 1, ...,D ACT (k— 1), and the

smoothed dominant sound source direction estimates ¾OM (fc), d = 1, ... , D(/c) obtained for frame k . This operation has the purpose of not spuriously deactivating sound sources which have not been detected for a small number of succes ¬ sive frames, which might happen for sources like e.g. casta ¬ nets producing impulse-like sounds with short pauses between the individual impulses. Thus, it is reasonable to deacti ¬ vate sound sources which were assumed to be active in the last (i.e. the (k— 1) -th) frame, only if they have not been detected for a predefined number ^NACT °f successive frames. According to the previous considerations, in a first step the joined set JJOINED C^) °f the set OOMACT (k— l) of the indi ¬ ces tACT ,/c -i(^') / d' = 1, ... , D ACT (k— 1) of all D ACT (k— 1) active domi ¬ nant sound sources at frame (k— 1) and the set

of the indices of all newly detected sound sources are com- puted: ^JOINED (fc)u J DOM,ACT(fc-1) - (37)

From this set the desired set OOMACT (k) is obtained by remov ¬ ing from JJOINED C^) the indices of such sources which have not been detected for a number of ^NACT previous successive frames. The number D ACT (k) of active dominant sound sources at frame k is set to the number of elements of JDOM.ACT C^) ·

Finally, the dominant source direction estimates J'DQM ACT ^ d' = 1, ... , D ACT (k) , where lACT.k id' indicate the elements of

JDOM ACT C^) , are determined by (rf' ) EW (/c)

·

This means that the directions of previously active dominant sound sources are held fixed if the respective sound source is not newly detected at frame k .

Basics of Higher Order Ambisonics

Higher Order Ambisonics (HOA) is based on the description of a sound field within a compact area of interest, which is assumed to be free of sound sources. In that case the spa- tio-temporal behaviour of the sound pressure p(t,x) at time t and position x within the area of interest is physically fully determined by the homogeneous wave equation. In the following a spherical coordinate system as shown in Fig. 5 is assumed. In the used coordinate system the x axis points to the frontal position, the y axis points to the left, and the z axis points to the top. A position in space χ = (τ,θ,φ) τ is represented by a radius r > 0 (i.e. the distance to the coordinate origin) , an inclination angle Θ £ [Ο,π] measured from the polar axis z and an azimuth angle φ £ [0,2π[ measured counter-clockwise in the x— y plane from the x axis. (·) τ de ¬ notes the transposition.

Then, it can be shown (cf. E.G. Williams, "Fourier Acous ¬ tics", vol.93 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Academic Press, 1999) that the Fourier transform of the sound pres- sure with respect to time denoted by t (-) , i.e.

Ρ(ω,χ) = T t (p(t,x)) = p(t,x)e- iMt dt (39) with ω denoting the angular frequency and i indicating the imaginary unit, can be expanded into a series of Spherical Harmonics according to

P = kc s ,r,e,≠)=∑% =Q ∑^ = _ n A™(k)j n (kr)S™(0,≠) . (40)

In equation (40), c s denotes the speed of sound and k denotes the angular wave number, which is related to the angular frequency ω by k =—, _/ ' η (·) denotes the spherical Bessel func- cs

tions of the first kind and ø) denotes the real-valued

Spherical Harmonics of order n and degree m, which are de- fined in below section Definition of real-valued Spherical Harmonics . The expansion coefficients A™(k) are depending on ¬ ly on the angular wave number k . It is implicitly assumed that the sound pressure is spatially band-limited. Thus the series is truncated with respect to the order index n at an upper limit N, which is called the order of the HOA repre ¬ sentation .

If the sound field is represented by a superposition of an infinite number of harmonic plane waves of different angular frequencies ω arriving from all possible directions speci- fied by the angle tuple (θ,φ), it can be shown (see B. Ra- faely, "Plane-wave Decomposition of the Sound Field on a Sphere by Spherical Convolution", J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol.4 (116), pp.2149-2157, 2004) that the respective plane wave complex amplitude function ϋ(ω,θ,φ) can be expressed by the following Spherical Harmonics expansion:

ε{ω = ^ 5 ,θ,φ)=∑ Ν η=0 ∑^ = _ η ε^{^{θ,φ) , (4i) where the expansion coefficients C (/c) are related to the expansion coefficients A™(k) by A%(k) = -n\ n C™(k) . (42) When assuming that the individual coefficients C™(k = £t>/c s ) are functions of the angular frequency ω, the application of the inverse Fourier transform (denoted by y _1 (-)) provides time domain functions

for each order n and degree m, which can be collected in a single vector c(t) by c(t) = (44) [c 0 ° (t), c H , c° (t), {t)Y .

The position index of a time domain function c^ (t) within the vector c(t) is given by n(n + l) + l+m. The overall number of elements in the vector c(t) is given by 0 = (N + l) 2 .

The final Ambisonics format provides the sampled version of c(t) using a sampling frequency f $ as

{c(/r s )} ieM = {c(r s ), c{2T s ), c(3Ts), c(4T s ), ... } (45) where T s = l/ s denotes the sampling period. The elements of c(lT s ) are referred to as Ambisonics coefficients. The time domain signals (t) and hence the Ambisonics coefficients are real-valued.

- Definition of real-valued Spherical Harmonics

The real-valued Spherical Harmonics ø) are expressed by

$η ίθ,φ) = 2 1) -^ P n , |m| (cos0)trg m (0) (46)

The associate Legendre functions P niTn (p) are defined as

with the Legendre polynomial P n (p) and, unlike in the above- mentioned E.G. Williams textbook, without the Condon- Shortley phase term (— l) m .

- Spatial resolution of Higher Order Ambisonics

A general plane wave function x(t) arriving from a direction

Ωο = 0 0 ) τ is represented in HOA by

c™(t) = χ (ί)5™(Ω 0 )> 0≤n≤N,\m\≤n . (49) The corresponding spatial density of plane wave amplitudes c(t,/2): = ^ _1 (ί(ω,/2)) is given by

c(t ) =∑ =o∑m=-n (t)5-(/2) (50)

It can be seen from equation (51) that it is a product of the general plane wave function x(t) and a spatial dispersion function ν Ν (Θ) , which can be shown as depending only on the angle Θ between Ω and Ω 0 having the property

cos0 = cos6>cos#o + cos(0— 0 o )sin6>sin6>o . (52) As expected, in the limit of an infinite order, i.e. N→∞, the spatial dispersion function turns into a Dirac delta

However, in the case of a finite order N, the contribution of the general plane wave from direction Ω 0 is smeared to neighbouring directions, where the extent of the blurring decreases with an increasing order. A plot of the normalised function ν Ν (Θ) for different values of N is provided in Fig. 6.

For any direction Ω the time domain behaviour of the spatial density of plane wave amplitudes is a multiple of its behav ¬ iour at any other direction. In particular, the functions c(t,/2i) and c(t,/2 2 ) for some fixed directions Ω and Ω 2 are highly correlated with each other with respect to time t .

- Spherical Harmonic Transform

If the spatial density of plane wave amplitudes is discre- tised at a number of 0 spatial directions Ω 0 , 1 < o < 0 , which are nearly uniformly distributed on the unit sphere, 0 di ¬ rectional signals c(t,/2 0 ) are obtained. Collecting these sig ¬ nals into a vector as c SPAT (t): = [c(t i ■■■ c(t o V t (54) it can be verified by using equation (50) that this vector can be computed from the continuous Ambisonics representa ¬ tion d(t) defined in equation (44) by a simple matrix multiplication as c SPAT (t) = Ψ Η c(t) , (55) where (·) Η indicates the joint transposition and conjugation, and Ψ denotes a mode-matrix defined by Ψ: = [Si ... S 0 ] (56) with S 0 : = [5 0 °(Λ Ο ) SfHflJ 5°(Λ 0 ) 5ΚΛ 0 ) (57)

Because the directions Ω 0 are nearly uniformly distributed on the unit sphere, the mode matrix is invertible in gen ¬ eral. Hence, the continuous Ambisonics representation can be computed from the directional signals c(t,/2 0 ) by

Both equations constitute a transform and an inverse trans ¬ form between the Ambisonics representation and the 'spatial domain'. These transforms are denoted the Spherical Harmonic Transform and the inverse Spherical Harmonic Transform, re ¬ spectively. Because the directions Ω 0 are nearly uniformly distributed on the unit sphere, there is the approximation

(59) which justifies the use of Ψ -1 instead of Ψ Η in equation (55) . All mentioned relations are valid for the discrete- time domain, too.

The inventive processing can be carried out by a single pro ¬ cessor or electronic circuit, or by several processors or electronic circuits operating in parallel and/or operating on different parts of the inventive processing.