Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
DETERGENT COMPOSITION
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/2000/031229
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
The present invention provides a detergent composition and a bleacher composition where the generation of sweet smell is improved. The present invention provides a detergent composition comprising a surfactant, a perfume component (a) having a vapor pressure of 6.67 Pa or more at 25°C, a perfume component (b) having a vapor pressure of from 0.67 Pa to less than 6.67 Pa at 25°C and at least one compound (c) selected from 2-methyl-2, 4-dihydroxybutane, 2-methyl-2,4-dihydroxypentane, 2,4-dihydroxybutane, dipropylene glycol and tripropylene glycol in a specific ratio by weight.

Inventors:
OGURA NOBUYUKI (JP)
KUBONO YUMI (JP)
SUZUKI AKIRA (JP)
Application Number:
PCT/JP1999/006335
Publication Date:
June 02, 2000
Filing Date:
November 12, 1999
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
KAO CORP (JP)
OGURA NOBUYUKI (JP)
KUBONO YUMI (JP)
SUZUKI AKIRA (JP)
International Classes:
C11D3/20; C11D3/39; C11D3/395; C11D3/50; C11D10/02; (IPC1-7): C11D3/50; C11D3/39; C11D3/395
Domestic Patent References:
WO1995015186A11995-06-08
Foreign References:
US5955093A1999-09-21
EP0572080A11993-12-01
US4663068A1987-05-05
US5952292A1999-09-14
Other References:
DATABASE WPI Derwent World Patents Index; AN 1988-266477, XP002127990
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Furuya, Kaoru (Nihonbashi-Hamacho Chuo-ku Tokyo, JP)
Download PDF:
Claims:
CLAIMS
1. A surfactant composition comprising 0.1 to 60% by weight of a surfactant, a perfume component (a) having a vapor pressure of 6.67 Pa or more at 25°C, a perfume component (b) having a vapor pressure of from 0.67 Pa to less than 6.67 Pa at 25°C and at least one compound (c) selected from 2 methyl2,4dihydroxybutane, 2methyl2,4dihydroxypentane, 2,4dihydroxybutane, dipropylene glycol and tripropylene glycol at the ratio by weight of the component (a) to the component (b) of 0 to 6 and at the ratio by weight of the component (c) to the total amount of the components (a) and (b) of 0.01 to 2.
2. The composition as claimed in Claim 1, further comprising 0.1 to 80% by weight of a bleacher.
3. The composition as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, wherein the component (c) is dipropylene glycol.
4. The composition as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, which comprises the component (a).
Description:
DESCRIPTION DETERGENT COMPOSITION TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a detergent composition and a bleacher composition having an excellent generation of a sweet smell.

BACKGROUND ART A perfume composition is compounded with a detergent composition or a bleacher composition in view of a liking therefor (refer, for example, to JP-A 3-115399 and JP-A 60-23498). Water-insoluble solvents or fixatives such as benzyl benzoate and diethyl phthalate are used in the perfume composition for the purpose of adjusting the sustaining property of perfume components.

However, when the water-insoluble solvent or fixative as mentioned above is used, sustaining property of the perfume components is good but the so-called middle note is suppressed whereby that is not so preferred in view of the generation of sweet smell.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide a detergent composition and a bleacher composition having an improved generation of a sweet smell.

The present invention provides a surfactant composition, such as detergent composition, comprising 0.1 to 60% by weight of a surfactant, a perfume component (a) having a vapor pressure of 6.67 Pa or more at 25°C, a perfume component (b) having a vapor pressure of from 0.67 Pa to less than 6.67 Pa at 25°C and at least one compound (c) selected from 2-methyl-2,4-dihydroxybutane, 2-methyl-2,4-dihydroxypentane, 2,4-dihydroxybutane, dipropylene glycol and tripropylene glycol in such amounts that the ratio by weight of the component (a) to the component (b) is 0 to 6 and the ratio by weight of the component (c) to the total amount of the components (a) and (b) is 0.01 to 2.

The present invention further provides to an another surfactant composition, such as bleacher composition, comprising 0.1 to 80% by weight of a bleacher, 0.1 to 60% by weight of a surfactant, a perfume component (a) having a vapor pressure of 6.67 Pa or more at 25°C, a perfume component (b) having a vapor pressure of from 0.67 Pa to less than 6.67 Pa at 25°C and at least one compound (c) selected from 2-methyl-2,4-dihydroxybutane, 2-methyl-2,4-dihydroxypentane, 2,4-dihydroxybutane, dipropylene glycol and tripropylene glycol in such amounts that the ratio by weight of the component (a) to the component (b) is 0 to 6 and that the ratio by weight of the component (c) to the total amount of the components (a) and (b) is 0.01 to 2.

Incidentally, in the present invention, the amount of the components (a), (b) and (c) is preferably 0.001 to 10% by weight and more preferably 0.005 to 5% by weight.

The composition of the present invention is suitable for the use such as laundry of clothing, washing of tableware, washing of the surface of architectures or house materials such as bathtub, floor, furniture and wall and bleacher of clothing-product.

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Examples of the perfume components which have been known are those mentioned at line 4 from the bottom of page 42 to line 24 of page 45 in"Collection of Well-known Prior Arts (Powdered Detergent for Clothing)" (published as"Patent Office Gazette 10 (1998)-25 7159 on March 26th, 1998"in Patent Office in Japan) and those mentioned in"Industrial Chemistry Series-Chemistry of Perfumes" (written by Ryoichi Akaboshi, edited by the Chemical Society of Japan, published by Dainippon Tosho KK on September 16th, 1983), while the perfume component of the present invention comprises a perfume component (a) having a vapor pressure of 6.67 Pa or more, preferably not more than 20Pa at 25°C and a perfume component (b) having a vapor pressure of from 0.67 Pa to less than 6.67 Pa at 25°C in such amounts that the ratio by weight of the component (a) to the component (b) is 0 to 6, preferably 0 to 2 and particularly preferably 0.001 to 6 or 0.001 to 1.

As examples of the component (a) may be cited orange pera, o-tert-butylcyclohexyl acetate, d-limonene, linalool, tetrahydrolinalool, tetrahydrogeraniol, terpineol, iso- bornyl acetate and tetrahydromuguol. As examples of the component (b) may be mentioned citronellol, geraniol, methylionone, phenylethyl alcohol, p-tert-butylcyclohexyl acetate, allylcyclohexane propionate, tricyclodecenyl propionate, tricyclodecenyl acetate and hexylcinnamic aldehyde. The total amount of the components (a) and (b) may depend upon the use, shape, etc. of the composition but the amount in the composition is preferably 0.01 to 5% by weight and particularly preferably 0.01 to 2% by weight.

The component (c) may be at least one compound selected from 2-methyl-2,4-dihydroxybutane, 2-methyl-2,4- dihydroxypentane, 2,4-dihydroxybutane, dipropylene glycol and tripropylene glycol and, when these compounds are used as a fixative, the sustaining property of the perfume components, particularly the middle note and generation of sweet smell derived from the component (b), is improved. In view of such an effect and also in view of compatibility with a terpene-type perfume, dipropylene glycol is particularly preferred.

Incidentally, in the above-mentioned"Collection of Well- Known Prior Arts", dipropylene glycol is mentioned to be used as a solvent or as a fixative for perfumes. In view of the generation of sweet smell, the component (c) is used in such an amount that the ratio by weight of the component (c) to the total amount of the components (a) and (b) is 0.01 to 2, preferably 0.1 to 1, and particularly preferably 0.1 to 0.5.

The present invention is applicable to a composition which is used for various treatments such as washing and bleaching wherein the perfumes greatly contribute to the liking of the product.

<Detergent Composition> To be specific, the detergent composition of the present invention may refer to"Dictionary of Detergents and Washing" (edited by Haruhiko Okuyama and Motoi Minakawa, published by Asakura Shoten) and may be applied to detergent compositions for clothing where the perfume greatly contributes to the liking of the product.

The detergent composition of the present invention comprises 0.1 to 60% by weight and preferably 1 to 50% by weight of surfactant. Anionic, nonionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants may be used as the surfactant.

As examples of the anionic surfactant may be mentioned higher alcohol sulfate salts, ethoxylated higher alcohol sulfate salts, alkylbenzene sulfonates, paraffin sulfonates, fatty acid salts, a-olefinsulfonates, a-sulfofatty acid salts and a-sulfofatty acid alkyl ester salts. Linear alkylbenzene sulfonates having C1l l5 alkyl chain and sulfate salts of higher alcohol having 10 to 15 carbon atoms are particularly preferred in view of detergency. Incidentally, the compounding amount of the anionic surfactant is preferably 1 to 40% by weight and particularly preferably 1 to 30% by weight.

As examples of the nonionic surfactant may be cited adducts of alcohol having 10 to 16 carbon atoms with alkylene oxide, fatty acid alkanolamides and alkyl polyglycosides.

Polyoxyalkylene alkyl ethers having C10-16 alkyl chain are particularly preferred in view of detergency to sebum dirt and resistance to hard water. An average number of moles of ethylene oxide added thereto is preferably 5 to 15.

Incidentally, the compounding amount of the nonionic surfactant is preferably 1 to 50% by weight and particularly preferably 1 to 40% by weight.

In the detergent composition, the content ratio of the anionic surfactant to the nonionic surfactant is preferably from 100/0 to 40/60 (ratio by weight), more preferably from 95/5 to 50/50 and particularly preferably from 95/5 to 60/40, in view of the solubility and detergency.

The detergent composition of the present invention may further comprise 5 to 60% by weight and preferably 20 to 60% by weight of a builder. In addition to an inorganic builder such as crystalline aluminosilicate, amorphous aluminosilicate, crystalline silicate, and carbonate and an organic builder such as nitrilotriacetate, ethylenediaminetetraacetate, tartrate, citrate and acrylic acid (co) polymer, it may comprise antidesperitioning agent such as carboxymethyl cellulose; enzyme; reductant such as sulfite; fluorescent whitening agent; and anti-foaming agent such as silicone. Preferred builders are crystalline silicate and carbonate. It is also possible to compound 0 to 20% by weight and preferably 0.1 to 20% by weight of a bleaching component as a detergent aid. When the form is liquid, the builder composition comprises preferably in an amount of 40 to 94.9% by weight of water.

<Bleacher composition > The bleacher composition of the present invention comprises 0.1 to 80% by weight, preferably 10 to 70% by weight and more preferably 30 to 70% by weight of a bleacher. As examples of the bleacher may be cited percarbonate, perborate, persulfate, organic peracid and hydrogen peroxide as well as hypochlorite which is a chlorine type. Among these bleacher, sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate and hydrogen peroxide are preferred for clothing, for example. When a bleaching activator is used together with the bleacher, more excellent bleaching effect can be obtained. As examples of the bleaching activator may be cited a bleaching agent of a metal type and a bleaching agent which generates an organic peracid and which includes carboxylate or amide. In the bleacher composition, it is appropriate to select, for example, a perfume component having no unsaturated bond. In addition, the bleacher composition of the present invention may comprise the above-mentioned surfactant in the above-mentioned amount, the above-mentioned builder and also publicly known bleacher component.

Examples of the form of those compositions include powder, granule, liquid, briquette, tablet, sheet and rod. In preparing the product, a container where easy use, stability, etc. are taken into consideration is used and it is particularly preferred to select a container which has little influence by light to the component (a) and/or the component (b).

EXAMPLES I Evaluation of generation of sweet smell of various compositions as mentioned below was carried out using the perfumes A to F shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Compounded Components (% by weight) perfume A B C D E F orangepera 4. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 11.6 o-tert-Butylcyclohexyl acetate4. 80. 00. 05. 80. 00.0 v Linalool 4. 7 8. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 5.8 iso-Bornyl acetate 0. 0 0. 0 5. 6 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 COLTetrahydrolinalool 0. 0 0. 0 11. 1 5. 8 0. 0 0.0 o Tetrahydrogeraniol 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 5. 8 0. 0 0.0 Terpineol 0.0 0. 0 11. 1 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 Tetrahydromuguol 0. 0 3. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 Allylcyclohexanepropionate 1. 2 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 Tricyclodecenylacetate 4. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 Tricyclodecenyl propionate 4. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 Citronellol 4. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 5. 7 Phenylethyl alcohol 14.2 0. 0 22. 2 23. 3 13. 5 5.7 Hexylcinnamic aldehyde 9. 5 19. 8 22. 2 23. 3 20. 1 17.3 0 U Geraniol 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 6. 8 0.0 p-tert-Butylcyclohexylacetate 7. 1 0. 0 11. 0 11. 6 6. 8 7.0 MethyliononeG 4. 8 7. 9 0. 0 0. 0 4. 1 5. 7 Hedione 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 6. 8 0.0 Aldehyde C-14. Peach 1. 2 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 Lilial 9. 4 11. 8 0. 0 11. 6 13. 3 11.6 Amber Core 4. 8 15. 8 0. 0 0. 0 6. 8 5.7 o Acetylcedrene 4. 8 11. 8 5. 6 0. 0 0. 0 6.8 Sandalmysore core 2. 4 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 1. 4 0.0 Coumarin 2. 4 0. 0 5. 6 0. 0 6. 8 5.7 Pearlide 9. 5 10. 5 0. 0 7. 0 6. 8 5.7 Benzyl salicylate 0. 0 10. 5 5. 6 5. 8 6. 8 5.7 Sumtotal 100 100 100 100 100 100 II Preparation and Evaluation of Compositions (1) Powdered Detergent Compositions (1-1) Powdered Detergent Composition A 23 parts by weight of sodium linear alkyl (number of carbons being 10 to 13) benzenesulfonate, 5 parts by weight of sodium alkyl (number of carbons being 12 to 16) sulfate, 3.5 parts of nonionic surfactant (an adduct of higher alcohol comprising 98% or more of lauryl alcohol with 6 moles on average of oxyethylene), 4 parts by weight of soap (number of carbons being 14 to 20), 11 parts by weight of zeolite A having 4 A pore-diameter, 7 parts by weight of sodium silicate No. 1 (Na20/Si02 = 2.15), 10 parts by weight of sodium carbonate (dense ash), 4 parts by weight of potassium carbonate, 6.5 parts by weight of sodium sulfate, 5 parts by weight of a copolymer of acrylic acid with maleic acid (having a monomer ratio of 3: 7, molecular weight of 50,000) and water were mixed to prepare a detergent slurry comprising 48% of solid (temperature of 65°C). The slurry was spray-dried in a counter-flow spray drier (volatile content of 6%). The spray-dried product thereof in an amount of 80.5 parts by weight was firstly mixed with 2 parts by weight of crystalline aluminosilicate (zeolite A having 4 A pore-diameter, average particle size of 2.7Mm) and then poured into a high-speed mixer (type FS-GC-10, manufactured by Fukae Kogyo K. K) together with 5 parts by weight of crystalline pyllosilicate (pulverized product of SKS-6 (powder), average particle size of 27Mm) whereupon the spray-dried product was pulverized and granulated upon stirring. At that time, 2.5 parts by weight of the above-mentioned surfactantwas sprayed thereon Before 60 seconds from completion of the granulation, 5 parts by weight of the above-mentioned zeolite was added to coat the surface therewith. Then the above granules were sieved using a sieve of 1.4 mm mesh and coarse particles on the sieve were pulverized and mixed with that granules which passed through the sieve. After that, 4 parts by weight of the above zeolite was mixed therewith in a V-blender and 1 part by weight of granulated enzyme (Savinase 18.0 Type W; manufactured by Novo Nordisk Industry) was added to give a powdered detergent composition A. Its bulk density was 0.75 to 0.79 g/cm3 and average particle size was 350 to 400tm.

(1-2) Powdered Detergent Composition B A powdered detergent composition (Composition B) (average particle size of 435Mm, bulk density of 876 g/liter) was prepared with 18 parts by weight of polyoxyethylene lauryl ether [average number of moles of ethylene oxide (hereinafter, referred to as EO) added thereto (hereinafter, referred to as EOp) = 7. 0, 2 parts by weight of palmitic acid, 2 parts by weight of polyethylene glycol (K-PEG 6000, manufactured by Kao Corp), 2 parts by weight of sodium linear alkyl (number of carbons being 10 to 13) benzenesulfonate, 18 parts by weight of zeolite A having 4 A pore-diameter (Toyobuilder manufactured by Tosoh Corp), 16 parts by weight of sodium carbonate (dense ash), 14 parts by weight of oil-absorbing carrier, 15 parts by weight of crystalline silicate (SKS-6 manufactured by Hoechst, having particle size of 30Mm), 1 part by weight of sodium sulfite, 2 parts by weight of sodium sulfate, 7 parts by weight of sodium polyacrylate (average molecular weight of 8,000), 1.5 parts by weight of fluorescent dyes [Cinopal CBS (manufactured by Ciba-Geigy)/Whitex SA (manufactured by Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.) = 1/1 (by weight) and 1.5 parts by weight of enzymes [a 2: 1: 1 mixture of Savinase 12.0TW, Lipolase 100T and Celluzyme 0.1T (all manufactured by Novo Nordisk Industry)]. Here, the oil- absorbing carrier was prepared as follows.

Production of Oil-Absorbing Carrier 132 g of a 6% by weight aqueous solution of sodium carbonate dissolved in deionized water and 38.22 g of an aqueous solution (concentration of 50% by weight) of sodium aluminate were placed in a reaction vessel. 201.4g of water glass No. 3 diluted with two-fold water, under strong stirring, was added drop-by-drop into the obtained mixture solution at 40°C for 20 minutes followed by aging at 50°C for 30 minutes (pH = 9.0). The obtained slurry was filtered and the cake was washed with water of 1,000-fold and dried for 10 hours under the condition of 105°C/300 Torr (40 kPa) followed by disintegrating to give an oil-absorbing carrier having an average particle size of 10µm.

(1-3) Evaluations Powdered detergent compositions as shown in Table 2 were prepared. Then 50 ml of each of the compositions filled in a 100-cc screw tube made of glass, which was then tightly closed and allowed to stand at 20°C for 1 hour, the cover was opened and, after 30 seconds, the generation of sweet smell was evaluated by trained panelists. The results were that Invention Products 1,3 and 5 had good generation of the sweet smell as compared with Comparative Product 1. A particularly excellent generation of sweet smell was noted in Invention Product 1. Invention Products 2 and 4 of the present invention showed a good generation of the sweet smell as compared with Comparative Product 2.

Table 2 Compounded Components (% by Invention Product Comparative weight) Product 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 Perfume F 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Dipropylene glycol 0.04 2-Methyl-2,4-dihydroxybutane 0.04 2-Methyl-2,4-dihydroxypentane 0.04 2,4-Dihydroxybutane 0.04 Tripropylene glycol 0.04 Diethyl phthalate 0.04 0.04 Powdered detergent composition Balance Balance Balance Balance A Powdered detergent composition B Balance Balance Balance (2) Liquid Detergent Composition.

Liquid detergent compositions C to H comprising the components shown in Tables 3 and 4 were prepared. The figures 1 and 2 after the alphabets in the tables stand for the product of the present invention and the comparative product, respectively.

Table 3 Composition No. Ci C2 D1 D2 El E2 Type A A A A E E Perfume Content Perfume amount_ 0. 4 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0. Dipropelene glycol 0.1 0.05 0.15 Diethyl phtalate 0.05 0.15 Nonionic surfactant A 10.0 10.0 Nonionic surfactant B 25.0 25.0 Nonionic surfactant C 9. 0 9. 0 3. 0 3. 0 Nonionic surfactant D 9.0 9.0 3. 0 3. 0 W. -Nonionic surfactant D 9. 0 9. 03 Nonionic surfactant E 3. 0 3. 003.03 Nonionic surfactant E 3. - LAS-S agent 4. 0 4. 0 -° LAS-S agent 4.0 3.0 ae ____________________________________ _________ _______ __ ________ _________ _-20. p-_ _ 20. p-__ ES 20. 0 20. 0 Fatty acid 2.0 2.0 a Lauryldimethylamine oxide 7. 0 7. 0 D Hydroxysulfobetaine oxide 7.0 3.0 'SQ'86 5.0 5.0 -a- :---------------------------------------------- õ AM/isoBT copolymer 1. 0 1. 0 õ AM/PN copolymer _ 0. 8 0. 8 AMXPNcopoIymer 0. 8 0. 8 Q.-86 5. 0 5. 0 0 U Polypropylene glycol 1.0 1.0 Propylene glycol 6.0 6.0 POlyoxyethylene (EOp=3) pheny 3. 0 3. 0 I ether ethenol 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Monoethanolamine 5.0 5.0 Citric acid 1.0 1.0 Deionized water Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance pH 10.5 10.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Table 4 Composition No. Fl F2 Gl G2 H1 H2 Type B B E E A A Perfume content uontent g amount Perfume Content 0. 5 0. 5 0. 5 amount Diethyl phtalate 0.1 0.05 0.1 > Nonionic surfactant E 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 o. _________________________________________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ES 0. 1 0. 1 3. 0 3. 0 _________________________________________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ c Lauryl dimethyl amineoxide 3.0 3.0 LAPDMB 2. 0 2. 0 cl LAPDMB 2. 0 2. 0 CL ° Q-OS 1. 0 1. 0 U Propylene glycol methylether 5.0 5.0 Diethylene glycol butylether 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 E Monoethanol amine 1.0 1.0 0 U 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol 5.0 5.0 Citric acid 3.0 3. 0 EDTA-4Na 2.0 2.0 deioned water Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance pH 11.0 11. 0 8.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 Compounds in these tables are as follows.

Nonionic surfactant A; Adduct of primary alcohol having 10 to 14 carbon atoms with 5 moles of EO, 2 moles of propylene oxide and 3 moles of EO (a block adduct) Nonionic surfactant B; Adduct of secondary alcohol having 10 to 14 carbon atoms with 7 moles of EO Nonionic surfactant C; Adduct of primary alcohol having 12 carbon atoms with 8 moles of EO Nonionic surfactant D; Adduct of primary alcohol having 12 carbon atoms with 11.5 moles of EO Nonionic surfactant E; Alkyl (having 12 carbon atoms) polyglucoside (average polymerization degree: 1.5) 'LAS-S agent; Linear alkyl (having 10 to 13 carbon atoms) benzenesulfonate (an acid type) 'ES: Sulfate of adduct of primary alcohol having 12 to 14 carbon atoms with 3 moles on average of EO Fatty acid; Coconut oil fatty acid having 12 and 14 carbon atoms 'Hydroxysulfobetaine; Lauryldimethyl-2-hydroxy-3- sulfobetaine 'LAPDMB; N-Lauroylaminopropyl-N, N-dimethyl-N-acetic betaine 'Q-86; Monoalkyl (having 16 and 18 carbon atoms in a ratio of 3: 7) trimethylammonium chloride Q-08; Octyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride AM/isoBT copolymer; Copolymer of maleic acid with diisobutylene (50/50) (average molecular weight of 10,000) AM/PN copolymer; Copolymer of maleic acid with pentene (50/50) (average molecular weight of 15,000) Polypropylene glycol; average molecular weight of 1,000 EDTA'4Na; Tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate.

Generation of sweet smell was evaluated by the same manner as described above for each of the pairs of compositions Cl (Invention Product) and C2 (Comparative Product); compositions D1 (Invention Product) and D2 (Comparative Product); compositions E1 (Invention Product) and E2 (Comparative Product); compositions F1 (Invention Product) and F2 (Comparative Product); compositions G1 (Invention Product) and G2 (Comparative Product); and compositions H1 (Invention Product) and H2 (Comparative Product) whereupon the generation of sweet smell was found to be improved in the products of the present invention in all of the pairs.

(3) Bleacher composition A powdered bleacher composition (Composition I) comprising 60% by weight of sodium percarbonate, 30% by weight of sodium carbonate (dense ash) and 10% by weight of granulated bleaching activator was prepared. Here, the granulated bleaching activator was prepared as follows.

Production of Granulated Bleaching Activator Fifty parts by weight of sodium lauroyloxybenzenesulfonate, 30 parts by weight of sodium laurylsulfate and 4 parts by weight of succinic acid were poured into a high-speed mixer (type FS-GC-10, manufactured by Fukae Kogyo K. K) and heated until the temperature of the powder reached 70°C. 13 parts by weight of polyethylene glycol (molecular weight of 7500) previously melted at 70°C and 3 parts by weight of an aqueous solution of polyoxyethylene lauryl ether sulfate (effective amount of 70%) were added thereto followed by stirring and mixing for 30 minutes. The mixture was granulated by extruding it from a punching metal screen of pore diameter of 0.8 mm using an extruding granulator (Pelletter Double EDX-100, manufactured by Fuji Powder). The obtained extruded product was cooled by a shaking cooler (Vibro/Flow Drier VDF/6000; manufactured by Fuji Powder) and disintegrated by an arranging granulator (Knife Cutter FL- 200, manufactured by Fukae Kogo K. K). The obtained granules were classified whereupon granules of average particle size of 900Mm were prepared.

Composition I was compounded with the perfume C of Table 1 and dipropylene glycol so as to make their amounts 0.1% by weight and 0.05% by weight, respectively to obtain a bleacher composition (Invention Product I). On the other hand, a bleacher composition (Comparative Product I) compounded with the perfume C and diethyl phthalate so as to make their amount 0.1% by weight and 0.05% by weight, respectively, was prepared.

When generation of sweet smell of these two compositions was evaluated by the same manner as above, Invention Product I showed a significant improvement in the generation of sweet smell as compared with the Comparative Product I.

(4) Bleacher composition A liquid bleacher composition (Composition J) was obtained using 5% by weight of hydrogen peroxide, 5% by weight of nonionic surfactant (an adduct of higher alcohol comprising 98% or more of lauryl alcohol with 10 moles of EO), 1% by weight of dodecyltrimethylammonium methylsulfate, 1% by weight of sodium lauroyloxybenzenesulfonate, 0.5% by weight of a chelating agent (Diquest 2010 manufactured by Monsanto) and water as balance.

Composition J was compounded with the perfume D of Table 1 and dipropylene glycol so as to obtain their amounts 0.2% by weight and 0.1% by weight, respectively to prepare a bleacher composition (Product of the Present Invention J).

On the other hand, a bleacher composition (Comparative Product J) compounded with the perfume D and diethyl phthalate to make their amount 0.2% by weight and 0.1% by weight, respectively, was prepared. When the generation of sweet smell of the two compositions was evaluated by the same manner as described above, Invention Product J showed a significantly improved generation of sweet smell as compared with the Comparative Product J.