Methods for producing the modified aluminophosphate materials also are disclosed. Advantageously, this material can be used as a support for a cracking catalyst, for example, in a fluid catalytic cracking process.

B. Description of the Prior Art Amorphous metallophosphates are known and have been prepared by various techniques. One such material is described in U. S. Patent No. 4, 767, 733.

This patent describes rare earth aluminum phosphate materials, which, after calcination, have a relatively broad pore size distribution with a large percentage of pores greater than 150 A. The typical pore size distribution is as follows : Pore Size Volume Percent 50 to 100 A 5 to 20% 100 to 150 A 10 to 35% <BR> 150 to 200 A 15 to 50%<BR> 200 to 400 A 10 to 50% U. S. Patent Nos. 4, 743, 572 and 4, 834, 869 describe magnesia-alumina- aluminum phosphate support materials prepared using organic cations (e. g.,

tertiary or tetraalkylammonium or phosphonium cations) to control the pore size distribution. When organic cations are used in the synthesis, the resulting materials have a narrow pore size distribution in the range from 30 to 100 A.

When they are not used, the pore size is predominantly greater than 200 A. U. S.

Patent No. 4, 179, 358 also describes magnesium-alumina-aluminum phosphate materials, materials described as having excellent thermal stability.

The use of aluminophosphates in cracking catalysts is known. For example, U. S. Patent No. 4, 919, 787 describes the use of porous, rare earth oxide, alumina, and aluminum phosphate precipitates for catalytic cracking. This material was used as part of a cracking catalyst, where it acted as a metal passivating agent. The use of a magnesia-alumina-aluminum phosphate supported catalyst for cracking gasoline feedstock is described in U. S. Patent No. 4, 179, 358.

Additionally, a process for catalytic cracking high-metals-content-charge stocks using an alumina-aluminum phosphate-silica-zeolite catalyst is described in U. S.

Patent No. 4, 158, 621.

There remains a need in the art for highly stable aluminophosphate materials for use in catalytic cracking processes, as well as for simple, safe processes for producing these materials. The aluminophosphate materials preferably possess excellent hydrothermal and acid stability with uniform pore sizes in the mesoporous range, and provide increased gasoline yields with increased butylene selectivity in C4-gas.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION This invention relates, in a first aspect, to a mesoporous aluminophosphate material comprising a solid aluminophosphate composition modified with at least one element selected from zirconium, cerium, lanthanum, manganese, cobalt, zinc, and vanadium, wherein the mesoporous aluminophosphate material has a specific surface of at least 100 m2/g, an average pore diameter less than or equal to 100 A,

and a pore size distribution such that at least 50% of the pores have a pore diameter less than 100 A.

Preferably, the mesoporous aluminophosphate material has an average pore diameter of 30 to 100 A.

The invention also relates to a method of making the mesoporous aluminophosphate material described above, the method comprising the steps of : (a) providing an aqueous solution containing a phosphorus component ; an inorganic aluminum containing component ; and an inorganic modifying component containing at least one element selected from zirconium, cerium, lanthanum, manganese, cobalt, zinc, and vanadium ; (b) adjusting the pH of said aqueous solution into the range of about 7 to about 12 so that a solid material is precipitated from said solution ; and then (c) recovering the solid material from said solution, wherein the solid material includes the mesoporous aluminophosphate material.

Preferably, the inorganic aluminum containing component includes sodium aluminate and the method includes the further step of lowering the sodium level of the solid material recovered in step (c). This may be achieved by ion exchange with an ammonium salt or an acid. Typically, the sodium level of the final aluminophospate material is less than 1. 0 wt% Na.

Preferably, the method includes the further step of exposing the aqueous solution, after step (b) but before step (c), to hydrothermal or thermal treatment at about 100°C to about 200°C to facilitate uniform pore formation.

Advantageously, the solid materials according to the invention can be used as solid support materials for fluid catalytic cracking ("FCC") catalysts.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION A mesoporous aluminophosphate material according to this invention, as described above, includes a solid aluminophosphate composition modified with at

least one element selected from zirconium, cerium, lanthanum, manganese, cobalt, zinc, and vanadium."Mesoporous,"as used in this patent application, means a material having pores with diameters in the approximate range 30-100 A.

Various preferred properties of the aluminophosphate materials according to the invention have been identified. In its preferred embodiments, the materials according to the invention have a specific surface area of at least 100 m2/g, preferably at least 125 m2/g, and most advantageously at least 175 m2/g.

Additionally, the pore sizes of the materials according to the invention provide a mesoporous material. In general, the average pore diameter of the materials according to the invention is less than or equal to 100 A, preferably less than 80 A, and most advantageously less than 60 A.

Pore size distribution and pore volume provide other measures of the porosity of a material. In preferred modified aluminophosphate materials according to this invention, 50% or more of the pores have a diameter less than 100 A, more preferably 60% or more of the pores have a diameter less than 100 A, and most preferably, 80% or more of the pores have a diameter less than 100 A.

With respect to the pore volume, the aluminophosphate materials according to the invention preferably have a pore volume in the range from 0. 10 cc/g to 0. 75 cc/g, and more preferably within the range of 0. 20 to 0. 60 cc/g.

The invention further relates to methods for making mesoporous aluminophosphate materials according to the invention. In one particularly advantageous aspect of this method, no organic reagents or solvents are used to produce the mesoporous aluminophosphate material ; rather, water, inorganic reactants, and aqueous solutions are used. This feature simplifies production and waste disposal for the method of the invention. The method of the invention includes providing an aqueous solution that contains a phosphorus component (e. g., phosphoric acid, phosphate salts such as ammonium phosphate which can be monobasic, dibasic or tribasic salt) ; an inorganic aluminum containing component

(e. g., sodium aluminate, aluminum sulfate, or combinations of these materials) ; and an inorganic modifying component containing at least one element selected from zirconium, cerium, lanthanum, iron, manganese, cobalt, zinc, and vanadium.

Typically, the molar ratios of the starting materials are as follows : Component Useful Preferred Phosphorus component 0. 02-0. 90 0. 05-0. 85 Aluminum containing component 0. 02-0. 90 0. 05-0. 85 Inorganic modifying component 0. 01-0. 50 0. 02-0. 40 After thoroughly mixing the ingredients, the pH of the aqueous solution is adjusted, with an acid or base, into the range of about 7 to about 12 so that a solid material (e. g., a homogeneous gel) forms in and precipitates from the solution.

After pH adjustment, the aqueous solution may be exposed to hydrothermal or thermal treatment at about 100°C to about 200°C to further facilitate uniform pore formation. After formation, the solid material, which includes the desired aluminophosphate material, can be recovered by any suitable method known in the art, e. g., by filtration. The filtered cake is then washed with water to remove any trapped salt, and then may be contacted with a solution containing ammonium salt or acid to exchange out the sodium ions. Such reduction in the sodium level of is found to increase the hydrothermal stability of the aluminophosphate material.

Typically, the sodium level of the final aluminophospate material should less than 1. 0 wt% Na. After washing and optional exchange, the solid material is dried and calcined.

Although any suitable inorganic modifying component can be used without departing from the invention, preferably it is a sulfate or a nitrate of zirconium, cerium, lanthanum, manganese, cobalt, zinc, or vanadium.

The modified aluminophosphate materials according to the invention can be used in cracking catalysts for catalytic cracking processes, preferably as a support in combination with other cracking catalyst materials, such as zeolites (e. g., USY zeolites), and activated matrix. Other conventional cracking catalyst materials, such as binding agents, clays, alumina, silica-alumina, and the like, can also be included as part of the cracking catalyst.

As is well known in the art, catalytic cracking processes convert feedstock hydrocarbon compounds to product hydrocarbon compounds of lower molecular weight than the feedstock hydrocarbon compounds. In particular, the modified aluminophosphate materials according to the present invention can be used in catalytic processes operating at temperatures from about 200°C to about 870°C and under reduced, atmospheric or superatmospheric pressure. The catalytic process can be either fixed bed, moving bed or fluidized bed and the hydrocarbon flow may be either concurrent or countercurrent to the catalyst flow. The modified aluminophosphate materials of the invention are useful in the Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) and Thermofor Catalytic Cracking (TCC) processes.

The TCC process is a moving bed process and the catalyst is in the shape of pellets or beads having an average particle size of about one-sixty-fourth to one-fourth inch. Active, hot catalyst beads progress downwardly concurrent with a hydrocarbon charge stock through a cracking reaction zone. The hydrocarbon products are separated from the coked catalyst and recovered, and the catalyst is recovered at the lower end of the zone and regenerated. Typically TCC conversion conditions include an average reactor temperature of about 450°C to about 510°C ; catalyst/oil volume ratio of about 2 to about 7 ; reactor space velocity of about 1 to about 2. 5 vol./hr./vol. ; and recycle to fresh feed ratio of 0 to about 0. 5 (volume).

The modified aluminophosphate materials of the invention are particularly useful in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC), in which the cracking catalyst is typically a fine powder with a particle size of about 10 to 200 microns. This powder is

generally suspended in the feed and propelled upward in a reaction zone. A relatively heavy hydrocarbon feedstock, e. g., a gas oil, is admixed with the cracking catalyst to provide a fluidized suspension and cracked in an elongated reactor, or riser, at elevated temperatures to provide a mixture of lighter hydrocarbon products. The gaseous reaction products and spent catalyst are discharged from the riser into a separator, e. g., a cyclone unit, located within the upper section of an enclosed stripping vessel, or stripper, with the reaction products being conveyed to a product recovery zone and the spent catalyst entering a dense catalyst bed within the lower section of the stripper. In order to remove entrained hydrocarbons from the spent catalyst prior to conveying the latter to a catalyst regenerator unit, an inert stripping gas, e. g., steam, is passed through the catalyst bed where it desorbs such hydrocarbons conveying them to the product recovery zone. The fluidizable catalyst is continuously circulated between the riser and the regenerator and serves to transfer heat from the latter to the former thereby supplying the thermal needs of the cracking reaction which is endothermic.

Typically, FCC conversion conditions include a riser top temperature of about 500°C to about 595°C, preferably from about 520°C to about 565°C, and most preferably from about 530°C to about 550°C ; catalyst/oil weight ratio of about 3 to about 12, preferably about 4 to about 11, and most preferably about 5 to about 10 ; and catalyst residence time of about 0. 5 to about 15 seconds, preferably about 1 to about 10 seconds.

The hydrocarbon feedstock to be cracked may include, in whole or in part, a gas oil (e. g., light, medium, or heavy gas oil) having an initial boiling point above 204°C, a 50 % point of at least 260°C and an end point of at least 315°C.

The feedstock may also include vacuum gas oils, thermal oils, residual oils, cycle stocks, whole top crudes, tar sand oils, shale oils, synthetic fuels, heavy

hydrocarbon fractions derived from the destructive hydrogenation of coal, tar, pitches, asphalts, hydrotreated feedstocks derived from any of the foregoing, and the like. As will be recognized, the distillation of higher boiling petroleum fractions above about 400°C must be carried out under vacuum in order to avoid thermal cracking. The boiling temperatures utilized herein are expressed for convenience in terms of the boiling point corrected to atmospheric pressure.

Resids or deeper cut gas oils with high metals contents can also be cracked using catalysts employing the modified aluminophosphate materials of the invention.

The invention will now be more particularly described with reference to the following Examples. In the Examples, pore size distributions are measured by a N2 desorption process based on ASTM method D4641 and pore volumes are measured by a N2 adsorption process based on ASTM method D4222, which documents are entirely incorporated herein by reference. The pore volume and pore size distribution data reported herein correspond to pores ranging from approximately 14 to 1000 A in radius, and do not include any microporous pores which have typically less than 14 A in radius.

EXAMPLE 1-Zirconium Aluminophosphate A. Production of the Support Material A zirconium modified aluminophosphate material was prepared by mixing together, at 40° C, 1700 grams of water, 29 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 133 grams of zirconium sulfate, and 170 grams of sodium aluminate. In this mixture, the zirconium/aluminum/phosphorus molar ratio was 0. 35/0. 5/0. 15.

After thoroughly mixing these ingredients, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 11 using ammonium hydroxide. The resulting mixture was transferred to a polypropylene bottle and placed in a steam box (100° C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered to separate the solid material from the liquid, and the solid material was washed to provide a wet cake, a portion of which was dried at

about 85° C (another portion of this washed material was used in the following test for measuring its hydrothermal stability). A portion of the dried solid material was calcined in air at 540° C for six hours. The resulting zirconium aluminophosphate material had the following properties and characteristics : Elemental Analysis Weight Percent Zr 26. 4 Al 24. 3 P 4. 0 Surface Area-175 m2/g Average pore diameter-41 A Pore volume-0. 21 cc/g Pore Size Distribution Desorption, % < 50 Å 80% 50-100 A 10% 100-150 A 5% > 150Å 5%.

B. Hydrothermal Stability Test A portion of the wet cake from Example 1A above was slurried with deionized (DI) water (20 g DI water per g of ZrAIPOx). The pH of the slurry was adjusted to 4. 0 by adding concentrated HCl solution while stirring for 15 minutes.

Then the cake was filtered and washed until it was free of residual chloride. The resultant material was dried at 120° C overnight and then air calcined at 540° C for three hours. One portion of this calcined material was steamed (100% atmospheric pressure steam) at 815'C for 2 hours, and another portion was

steamed at 815° C for 4 hours. The surface area of the calcined and steamed materials were as follows : Material Surface Area, in Calcined only 227 Steamed for 2 hours 85 Steamed for 4 hours 68 These results demonstrate that the zirconium aluminophosphate material according to the invention is hydrothermally stable and maintains about 30% or more of its surface area under the severe steam deactivating conditions, such as would be experienced in a FCC regenerator. It will also be seen that sodium removal resulting from the acid exchange increased the surface area of the base air calcined material from 175 m2/g for the product of Example lA to 227 m2/g for the product of Example 1B.

EXAMPLE 2-Cerium Aluminophosphate A. Production of the Support Material A cerium modified aluminophosphate material was prepared by mixing together, at 40° C, 2100 grams of water, 45 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 133 grams of cerium sulfate, 75 grams of concentrated sulfuric acid, and 760 grams of sodium aluminate. In this mixture, the cerium/aluminum/phosphorus molar ratio was 1/8/1. After thoroughly mixing these ingredients, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 7 using 50% sulfuric acid. The resulting mixture was transferred to a polypropylene bottle and placed in a steam box (100° C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered to separate the solid material from the liquid, and the solid material was washed to provide a wet cake, a portion of which was dried at about 85° C (another portion of this washed material was used in the following hydrothermal stability test). A portion of this solid material was

calcined in air at 540° C for six hours. The resulting cerium aluminophosphate material had the following properties and characteristics : Elemental Analysis Weight Percent Ce 8. 6 AI 36. 2 P 1. 6 Surface Area-272 m2/g Average pore diameter-65 A Pore volume-0. 50 cc/g Pore Size Distribution Desorption, % <50Å 44% 50-100 A 20% 100-150 A 12% > 150 Å 24%.

B. Hydrothermal Stability Test A portion of the wet cake from Example 2A above was slurried with deionized (DI) water (20 g DI water per g of CeAlPOx). The pH of the slurry was adjusted to 4. 0 by adding concentrated HCl solution while stirring for 15 minutes.

Then the cake was filtered and washed until it was free of residual chloride. The resultant material was dried at 120° C overnight and then air calcined at 540° C for three hours. One portion of this calcined material was steamed (100% atmospheric pressure steam) at 815° C for 2 hours, and another portion was steamed at 815° C for 4 hours. The surface area of these calcined and steamed materials were as follows :

Material Surface Area, m2/g Calcined only 272 Steamed for 2 hours 138 Steamed for 4 hours 143 These results demonstrate that the cerium aluminophosphate material according to the invention is hydrothermally stable and maintains greater than 50% of its surface area under these severe steam deactivating conditions.

EXAMPLE 3-Cerium Aluminophosphate Another cerium modified aluminophosphate material was prepared by mixing together, at 40° C, 2100 grams of water, 360 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 135 grams of cerium sulfate, and 100 grams of aluminum sulfate.

In this mixture, the cerium/aluminum/phosphorus molar ratio was 1/1/8. After thoroughly mixing these ingredients, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 7 using ammonium hydroxide. The resulting mixture was transferred to a polypropylene bottle and placed in a steam box (100° C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered to separate the solid material from the liquid, and the solid material was washed and dried at about 85° C. This solid material was calcined in air at 540° C for six hours. The resulting cerium aluminophosphate material had the following properties and characteristics : Elemental Analysis Weight Percent Ce 31. 4 Al 5. 5 P 21. 0 Surface Area-133 m2/g Average pore diameter-93 A Pore volume-0. 31 cc/g

Pore Size Distribution Desorption, % < 50 Å 33% 50-100A 18% 100-150 Å 12% > 150 Å 27%.

EXAMPLE 4-Lanthanum Aluminophosphate A lanthanum modified aluminophosphate material was prepared as follows. A first solution was prepared by mixing together 2500 grams of water, 90 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, and 260 grams of lanthanum nitrate. A second solution was prepared by combining 1670 grams of water and 600 grams of sodium aluminate. These two solutions were combined with stirring. The lanthanum/aluminum/phosphorus molar ratio of this mixture was 1/8/1. After thoroughly mixing these solutions, the pH of the resulting mixture was adjusted to 12 by adding 150 grams of sulfuric acid. The resulting mixture was then transferred to a polypropylene bottle and placed in a steam box (100° C) for 48 hours. Thereafter, the mixture was filtered to separate the solid material from the liquid, and the solid material was washed and dried at about 85° C. This solid material was calcined in air at 540° C for six hours. The resulting lanthanum aluminophosphate material had the following properties and characteristics : Elemental Analysis Weight Percent La 16. 6 Al 29. 8 P 4. 8 Surface Area-123 m2/g Average pore diameter-84 A Pore volume-0. 26 cc/g

Pore Size Distribution Desorption, % <50Å 32% 50-100 A 56% <BR> 100-150 A 10%<BR> > 15o A < 5%.

EXAMPLE 5-Manganese Aluminophosphate A manganese modified aluminophosphate material was prepared by mixing together 2100 grams of water, 45 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 68 grams of manganese sulfate, and 760 grams of aluminum sulfate. In this mixture, the manganese/aluminum/phosphorus molar ratio was 1/8/1. After thoroughly mixing these ingredients, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 11 by adding ammonium hydroxide. The resulting mixture was transferred to a polypropylene bottle and placed in a steam box (100° C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered to separate the solid material from the liquid, and the solid material was washed and dried at about 85°C. The solid material was re- slurried with deionized water (20 cc of DI water/g of MnAlPOx) and the pH of the slurry was adjusted to 4. 0 or slightly below with a concentrated HCl solution. The pH was maintained for 15 minutes and filtered to separate the solid material from the liquid. The filter cake was washed thoroughly with 70°C DI water until the washed solution is free of chloride anion, dried overnight at 120 °C, and then calcined in air at 540°C for six hours. The resulting manganese aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 6-Zinc Aluminophosphate A zinc modified aluminophosphate material was prepared by mixing together 2100 grams of water, 45 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 115 grams of zinc sulfate, 75 grams of concentrated sulfuric acid, and 760 grams of

sodium aluminate. In this mixture, the zinc/aluminum/phosphorus molar ratio was 1/8/1. After thoroughly mixing these ingredients, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 11 by adding 50% sulfuric acid. The resulting mixture was transferred to a polypropylene bottle and placed in a steam box (100° C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered to separate the solid material from the liquid, and the solid material was washed and dried at about 85°C. The solid material was re- slurried with deionized water (20 cc of DI water/g of ZnAlPOx) and the pH of the slurry was adjusted to 4. 0 or slightly below with a concentrated HCI solution. The pH was maintained for 15 minutes and filtered to separate the solid material from the liquid. The filter cake was washed thoroughly with 70°C DI water, dried overnight at 120 °C, and then calcined in air at 540°C for six hours. The resulting zinc aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 7 (Comparative)-Iron Aluminophosphate A solution was prepared by mixing 1700 grams of water, 65 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 200 grams of ferrous sulfate, and 110 grams of aluminum sulfate. The molar ratio of the iron/aluminum/phosphorous was 0. 34/0. 33/0. 33. The pH of the product was adjusted to 7 with the addition of concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The material was then filtered and washed and dried at-85°C. A portion of the material was air calcined to 540°C for six hours. The resulting iron aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 1.

Table 1 ZnAIPOx MnAlPOx FeAIPOx Example 5 Example 6 Erample 7 Invention Invention Comparative Calcined Acid Form Metal loading, wt% 4. 2% Zn 5. 7% Mn 21% Fe Al203, wt%--12. 2 P, wt%--12. 4 Na, wt% 0. 22 0. 08 0. 009 Surface area, m 2Ig 314 244 109 Average pore diameter (A) 50 44 202 Pore volume (>14A), cc/g 0. 37 0. 26 0. 55 Pore size distribution, % <50 Å 39 75 4 50-100 A 17 23 12 100-150 A 9 1 15 >150 Å 35 1 69 Steam Deactivated Catalyst (1500°Ffor4hrs) Surface area, m/g 155 103 6

The results in Table 1 show that ZnAIPOx and MnAIPOx of the invention retained a surface area in excess of 100 mug after severe steaming. However, the FeAlPOx with a pore size distribution outside the invention lost almost all of its surface area upon steaming.

EXAMPLE 8-Cobalt Aluminophosphate Sample A (Invention) A solution was prepared by mixing 500 grams of water, 45 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 117 grams of cobalt nitrate and 75 grams of concentrated sulfuric acid. Another solution was prepared containing 1600 grams of water and 300 grams of sodium aluminate. These two solutions were combined

with stirring. The molar ratio of the cobalt/aluminum/phosphorous was 1/8/1.

The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 9 with the addition of 50% solution of sulfuric acid. The resulting mixture was placed in a polypropylene bottle and put in a steam box (100°C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered and the solid residue was washed and dried at-85°C. A portion of the residue was air calcined to 540°C for six hours. The elemental analyses and physical properties were as follows : Element, wt% Co 7. 1 Al 25. 3 P 3. 4 Surface Area, m2/g 145 A portion of the above material was exchanged four times with a 0. 1N solution of ammonium nitrate and the resulting material was then filtered and washed and dried at-85°C. A portion of the material was air calcined to 540°C for six hours. The resulting cobalt aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 2.

Sample B (Invention) A solution was prepared by mixing 2100 grams of water, 45 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 117 grams of cobalt nitrate, 75 grams of concentrated sulfuric acid, and 300 grams of sodium aluminate. The molar ratio of the cobalt/aluminum/phosphorous was 1/8/1. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 8 with the addition of 50% solution of sulfuric acid. The resulting mixture was placed in a polypropylene bottle and put in a steam box (100°C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered and the solid residue was washed and dried at-85°C. A portion of the residue was air calcined to 540°C for six hours.

The elemental analyses and physical properties were as follows : Element, wt% Co 6. 0 Al 19. 2 P 2. 6 Surface Area, m2/g 114

A portion of the above material was exchanged four times with a 0. IN solution of ammonium nitrate and the resulting material was then filtered and washed and dried at-85°C. A portion of the material was air calcined to 540°C for six hours. The resulting cobalt aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 2.

Sample C (Invention) A cobalt modified aluminophosphate material was prepared in the same manner as for Sample B above, except the pH of the mixture was adjusted to 7 with the addition of 50% solution of sulfuric acid. The elemental analyses and physical properties of the product were as follows : Element, wt% Co 6. 8 Al 19. 6 P 2. 9 A portion of the above material was slurried with DI water (20 g DI water per g of CoAlPOx). The pH of the slurry was adjusted to 4. 0 by adding concentrated HCl solution while stirring for 15 minutes. Then the cake was filtered and washed until it was free of residual chloride. The gel was dried at

120°C for overnight and calcined in air at 538°C for 3 hours. The resulting cobalt aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 2.

Sample D (Comparative) A cobalt modified aluminophosphate material was prepared by mixing 2100 grams of water, 45 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 117 grams of cobalt nitrate, 75 grams of concentrated sulfuric acid, and 300 grams of aluminum sulfate. The molar ratio of the cobalt/aluminum/phosphorous was 1/8/1. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 11 with the addition of concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The resulting mixture was placed in a polypropylene bottle and put in a steam box (100°C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered and the solid residue was washed and dried at-85°C. A portion of the residue was air calcined to 540°C for six hours. The elemental analyses and physical properties were as follows : Element, wt% Cl 10. 7 Al 27. 4 P 5. 8 A portion of the above material was slurried with DI water (20 g DI water per g of CoAlPOx). The pH of the slurry was adjusted to 4. 0 by adding concentrated HCl solution while stirring for 15 minutes. Then the cake was filtered and washed until it was free of residual chloride. The gel was dried at 120°C for overnight and calcined in air at 538°C for 3 hours. The resulting cobalt aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 2.

Sample E (Comparative) A cobalt modified aluminophosphate material was prepared from a solution which was prepared with mixing, containing 1700 grams of water, 29 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 213 grams of cobalt nitrate, and 170 grams of aluminum sulfate. The molar ratio of the cobalt/aluminum/phosphorous was 0. 35/0. 5/0. 15. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 7 with the addition of concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The resulting mixture was placed in a polypropylene bottle and put in a steam box (100°C) for 48 hours. The mixture was then filtered and the solid residue was washed and dried at-85°C. A portion of the residue was air calcined to 540°C for six hours. The elemental analyses and physical properties were as follows : Element, wt% Co 28 Al 10. 9 p 6. 3 1 A portion of the above material was slurried with DI water (20 g DI water per g of CoAIPOx). The pH of the slurry was adjusted to 4. 0 by adding concentrated HCl solution while stirring for 15 minutes. Then the cake was filtered and washed until it was free of residual chloride. The gel was dried at 120°C for overnight and calcined in air at 538°C for 3 hours. The resulting cobalt aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 2.

Hydrothermal Stability Test of the COAIPO,, Samples The hydrothermal stability of each CoAlPOx gel was evaluated by steaming the material at 1500°F (815°C) for 4 hours with 100% steam at atmospheric pressure. The results are given in Table 2 below and Figure 1. The results show that Samples A-C, with the average pore size and pore size

distribution according to the invention, exhibited excellent hydrothermal stability in that they maintained over 100 m2/g surface area even after severe steaming. In contrast, Samples D and E, without the narrowly-defined mesopores structure of the invention, lost nearly all of their surface area upon steaming at 1500°F.

Table 2 Sample A B C D E Calcined Acid Form Co loading, wt% 6. 2 7. 9 10 15 28 A1203, wt% 47. 8 36 51 18 20 P, wt% 3. 4 2. 6 4 11 10 Na, wt% 0. 49 0. 28 0. 05 0. 01 0. 01 Surface area, m2/g 321 247 175 103 82 Average pore diameter (A) 67 74 74 152 108 Pore volume (>14A), cc/g 0. 55 0. 44 0. 37 0. 38 0. 24 Pore size distribution, % <50 A 38 29 32 8 13 50-100 A 32 39 27 14 27 100-150 A 9 11 13 14 19 >150 21 21 28 64 41 Steam Deactivated Catalyst (1500°F for 4 hrs) Surfacearea, m2/g 128 113 111 29 18

EXAMPLE 9-Vanadium Aluminophosphate Sample F A solution was prepared by mixing 2100 grams of water, 45 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 87 grams of vanadyl sulfate, 75 grams of concentrated sulfuric acid and 760 grams of sodium aluminate. The molar ratio of the vanadium/aluminum/phosphorous was 1/8/1. The pH of the mixture was

adjusted to 7 with the addition of 50% sulfuric acid. The mixture was then filtered and the solid residue washed and dried at about 85°C. A portion of the dried material was air calcined to 540°C for six hours. The elemental analyses and physical properties of resulting vanadium aluminophosphate material were as follows : Element, wt% v 3. 0 Al 17. 0 P 1. 7 Surface Area, m2/g 335 A further portion of the above dried material was slurried with DI water (20 g DI water per g of VAlPOX). The pH of the slurry was adjusted to 4. 0 by adding concentrated HCl solution while stirring for 15 minutes. Then the cake was filtered and washed until it was free of residual chloride. The gel was dried at 120°C for overnight and calcined in air at 538°C for 3 hours. The resulting vanadium aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 3.

Sample G A solution was prepared by mixing 2100 grams of water, 45 grams of concentrated phosphoric acid, 87 grams of vanadyl sulfate, 75 grams of concentrated sulfuric acid and 760 grams of sodium aluminate. The molar ratio of the vanadium/aluminum/phosphorous was 1/8/1. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 8 with the addition of 50% solution of sulfuric acid. The elemental analyses and physical properties of the resulting vanadium aluminophosphate material were as follows : Element, wt% V 2. 1 Al 20. 9 P 1. 2 Surface Area, m2/g 130

A further portion of the above dried material was exchanged four times with a 0. 1N solution of ammonium nitrate to remove the excess sodium, and the resultant product was then filtered and the residue washed and dried at about 85°C. A portion of the residue was air calcined to 540°C for six hours. The resulting vanadium aluminophosphate material had the properties and characteristics listed in Table 3.

The calcined acid form of each of the VAlPOx Samples F and G were subjected to the steam deactivation test described above and the results are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 VAIPOx VAIPOx Sample Sample Invention Invention Calcined Acid Form V loading, wt% 3. 0 2. 1 Al203, wt% 39 35. 6 P, wt% 1. 2 0. 3 Na, wt% 0. 59 0. 83 Surface area, m/g 317 304 Average pore diameter (A) 53 36 Pore volume (>14A), cc/g 0. 42 0. 27 Pore size distribution, % <50 A 55 82 50-100 A 20 10 100-150 A 6 2 >150 19 6 Steam Deactivated Catalyst (1500F for 4 hrs) Surface area, m/g 81 126

The results in Table 3 show that Samples F and G, with the average pore size and pore size distribution according to the invention, exhibited excellent hydrothermal stability. Sample G prepared under higher pH conditions exhibited better stability in that it maintained over 100 m2/g surface area even after severe steaming.

EXAMPLE 10-Fluid Catalytic Cracking with ZrAIPOx A. Preparation of a ZrAlPOx Material A thermally stable, high surface area, mesoporous ZrAlPO, material was prepared as described above in Example 1. The described wet cake of ZrAIPOx was used for the catalyst preparations that follow.

B. Preparation of a USY/ZrAlPOx/Clay Catalyst A first catalyst, Catalyst A, was prepared using commercial Na-form USY zeolite with a silica to alumina ratio of 5. 4 and a unit cell size of 24. 54 A. The Na-form USY was slurried and ball milled for 16 hours. A wet cake of the ZrAlPOx material above was slurried in deionized water, and the pH of the resultant slurry was adjusted to 4 using concentrated HCI. The ZrAlPOx material was then filtered, washed, and ball milled for 16 hours.

A uniform physical mixture of the milled USY slurry, the milled ZrAIPOx slurry, binding agent, and kaolin clay was prepared. The final slurry contained 21% USY, 25% ZrAlPOx, 7% binding agent, and 47% clay, on a 100% solids basis. The mixture was spray-dried to fine spherical particles with approximately 70 u average particle diameter. The sprayed product was then air calcined, followed by ammonium exchange using an ammonium sulfate solution. The

exchanged catalyst was further washed with deionized water, dried overnight, and calcined at 538°C for three hours. The properties of the final catalyst are shown in Table 4.

C. Preparation of a USY/Alumina/Clay Catalyst A second catalyst, Catalyst B, was prepared following the procedure in Example 10B, above, except that the ZrAIPOx in Catalyst A was replaced with HCl-peptized alumina. The peptized alumina gel was prepared from pseudoboehmite alumina powder that was peptized with HCl solution for 30 minutes (at 12 wt% solids). The properties of Catalyst B also are shown in Table 4.

D. Preparation of a USY/ZrAlPOx/Alumina/Clay Catalyst A third catalyst, Catalyst C, was prepared following the procedure in Example 1 OB, above, except that the amount of ZrAlPOx was reduced and part of the clay was replaced with the HCl-peptized alumina used in Example 10C so that the spray dried slurry contained 21% USY, 15% ZrAlPOx, 25% alumina, 7% binding agent, and 32% clay, on a 100% solids basis. The final properties of Catalyst C are shown in Table 4.

E. Preparation of a USY/ZrAIPOx/Alumina/Clay Catalyst A fourth catalyst, Catalyst D, was prepared following the procedure in Example 10D, above, except that the ZrAIPOx in Catalyst C was replaced with HCl-peptized ZrAlPOx gel, prepared by peptization of wet cake using HCl solution. The properties of Catalyst D also are shown in Table 4.

Before evaluating the catalysts for performance on a pilot unit for catalytic cracking, each catalyst was deactivated at 1450° F and 35 psig for 20 hours using 50% steam and 50% air. The surface areas of the steamed catalysts are shown in Table 4.

TABLE 4 Catalyst A Catalyst B Catalyst C Catalyst D Compositional 25% ZrAlPOx 25% Alumina 15% Ball 15% Peptized Feature and No and No Milled ZrAIP0, ZrAIPO, Alumina ZrAlPOx (Replaced Part (Replaced Part of Clay) and of Clay) and 25% Alumina 25% Alumina Calcined Catalyst Properties Rare Earth wt. % 1. 7 1. 9 1. 9 1. 8 Na wt. % 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 I SiO2 wt. % 37. 1 36. 7 29. 6 30. 3 Al203 wt. % 42. 5 52. 0 51. 6 54. 2 Surface Area 221 222 255 256 m2/g Steam Deactivated Catalyst Properties Surface Area -- 123 122 120 mug

F. Catalytic Cracking Process Catalysts B through D were compared for catalytic cracking activity in a fixed-fluidized-bed ("FFB") reactor at 935°F, using a 1. 0 minute catalyst contact time on a Arab Light Vacuum Gas Oil. The feedstock properties are shown in Table 5 below :

TABLE 5 Charge Stock Properties Vacuum Gas Oil Gravity at 60° F 0. 9010 Refractive Index 1. 50084 Aniline Point, ° F 164 CCR, wt. % 0. 90 Hydrogen, wt. % 11. 63 Sulfur, wt.% 2.8 Nitrogen, ppm 990 Basic nitrogen, ppm 250 Distillation IBP, ° F 536 50 wt. %, ° F 868 99. 5 wt.%, °F 1170 These catalysts were then used in the FFB pilot plant. The catalyst performances are summarized in Table 6, where product selectivity was interpolated to a constant conversion, 65 wt. % conversion of feed to 430° F- material.

TABLE 6 Catalyst B Catalyst C Catalyst D Matrix No Added ZrAIPOx + 15% Ball Milled + 15% Peptized ZrAlPOx ZrAlPO. Conversion, wt. % 65 65 65 Cat/Oil 3. 8 3. 3 3. 6 C5 Gasoline, wt. % 39. 6 42. 1 42. 4 LFO, wt. % 25. 4 25. 6 25. 5 HFO, wt. % 9. 6 9. 4 9. 5 Coke, wt. % 5. 1 5. 3 5. 1 RON, C5+ Gasoline 88. 2 85. 7 85. 6 H2S, wt.% 1.7 1.8 1.9 Cl + C2 Gas, wt. % 1. 8 1. 8 1. 7 Total C3 Gas, wt. % 6. 3 4. 9 4. 9 Total C4 Gas, wt. % 10. 4 8. 9 8. 8 C3=/total C3 0. 81 0. 80 0. 80 C4=/total C4 0. 48 0. 48 0. 50 C4=/C3= 0-98 1. 10 1. 13

The test results in Table 6 demonstrate that incorporation of ZrAIPOx into the zeolite matrix resulted in significantly improved gasoline yields (as much as 2. 8 wt. %). This increase in gasoline yields for Catalysts C and D resulted mostly from lower C3 and C4 yields. The ZrAlPOx matrix"as-is" (Catalyst C) had a slightly higher coke-making tendency, but this tendency was alleviated by HCI peptization of the gel (Catalyst D).

The ZrAlPOx matrix has bottoms cracking activity, and a slight decrease in HFO (heavy fuel oil) yield is observed (0. 2%). The bottoms yield differences are small for these catalysts, probably because all three catalysts convert nearly all of

the crackable heavy ends at this conversion level. One negative aspect of the ZrAIPOx containing catalyst is the lower research octane number ("RON") of the produced gasoline, lowered by as much as 2. 6.

The ZrAIPOx containing catalysts increased the H2S yield by >10%, suggesting that this material may have potential for SOx removal and/or gasoline sulfur removal. The ZrAlPOx containing catalysts increased the butylene selectivity in C4-gas and the C4 olefin-to-C3 olefin ratio. The results in Table 6 clearly show that the chemistry of ZrAIPOx is different from a typical active alumina matrix, which is usually added to improve bottoms cracking.

EXAMPLE 11-Fluid Catalytic Cracking with CEAIPO,, A. Preparation of a CeAIPOx Material A thermally stable, high surface area, mesoporous CeAlPOx material was prepared as described above in Example 2. The wet cake of CeAlPOx described above was used for the catalyst preparations that follow.

B. Preparation of a USY/CeAIPOx/Clay Catalyst A first catalyst, Catalyst E, was prepared using commercial Na-form USY zeolite with a silica to alumina ratio of 5. 4 and a unit cell size of 24. 54 A. The Na-form USY was slurried and ball milled for 16 hours. A wet cake of the CeAlPOx material above was slurried in deionized water, and the pH of the resultant slurry was adjusted to 4 using concentrated HCI. The CeAlPOx material was then filtered, washed, and ball milled for 16 hours.

A uniform physical mixture of the milled USY slurry, the milled CeAlPOx slurry, binding agent, and kaolin clay was prepared. The final slurry contained 21% USY, 25% CeAlPOx, 7% binding agent, and 47% clay, on a 100% solids basis. The mixture was spray-dried to fine spherical particles with approximately 70 L average particle diameter. The sprayed product was then air calcined, followed by ammonium exchange using an ammonium sulfate solution. The

exchanged catalyst was further washed with deionized water, dried overnight, and calcined at 538°C for three hours. The properties of the final catalyst are shown in Table 7.

C. Preparation of a USY/Alumina/Clay Catalyst A second catalyst, Catalyst F, was prepared following the procedure in Example 11B, above, except that the CeAlPOx in Catalyst E was replaced with HCI-peptized pseudoboehmite alumina. The properties of Catalyst F also are shown in Table 7.

D. Preparation of a USY/CeAIPOx/Alumina/Clay Catalyst A third catalyst, Catalyst G, was prepared following the procedure in Example 11B, above, except that the amount of CeAlPOx was reduced and part of the clay was replaced with the HCl-peptized alumina used in Example 11 C so that the spray dried slurry contained 21% USY, 15% CeAIPOx, 25% alumina, 7% binding agent, and 32% clay, on a 100% solids basis HCl-peptized pseudoboehmite alumina. The final properties of Catalyst G are shown in Table 7.

E. Preparation of a USY/CeAIPOx/Alumina/Clay Catalyst A fourth catalyst, Catalyst H, was prepared following the procedure in Example 11D, above, except that the CeAlPOx in Catalyst G was replaced with HCl-peptized CeAlPOx. The properties of Catalyst H also are shown in Table 7.

Before evaluating the catalysts for performance on a pilot unit for catalytic cracking, each catalyst was deactivated at 1450° F and 35 psig for 20 hours using 50% steam and 50% air. The surface areas of the steamed catalysts are shown in Table 7.

TABLE 7 Catalyst E Catalyst F Catalyst G Catalyst H Compositional 25% 25% 15% Ball Milled 15% Peptized Feature CeAIPOX and Alumina and CeAIPOx CeAlPOx No Alumina No CeAlPOx (Replaced Part of (Replaced Part Clay) and 25% of Clay) and Alumina 25% Alumina Calcined Catalyst Properties Rare Earth wt. % 4. 9 1. 9 3. 7 3. 5 @ Na wt. % 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 2 SiO2 wt.% 38. 1 36. 7 31. 0 30. 6 Al2O3 wt. % 46. 5 52. 0 57. 9 55. 5 Surface Area m2/g 238 222 249 257 Steam Deactivated Catalyst Properties Surface Area m2/g 90 123 130 126

F. Catalytic Cracking Process Catalysts E and F were compared for use in a catalytic cracking process using an FFB reactor at 935°F, having a 1. 0 minute catalyst contact time using Arab Light Vacuum Gas Oil. The feedstock had the properties described in Table 5 above.

The performances of the catalysts are summarized in Table 8, where product selectivity was interpolated to a constant conversion, 65 wt. % conversion of feed to 430° F-material.

TABLE 8 Deactivated Catalyst E Deactivated Catalyst F Matrix 25% CeAlPOx 25% Activated A1203 Conversion, wt. % 65 65 Cat/Oil 4. 1 3. 8 Cl + C2 Gas, wt. % 2. 0 1. 8 Total C3 Gas, wt. % 5. 4 6. 3 Total C4 Gas, wt. % 9. 5 10. 4 C5+ Gasoline, wt. % 40. 7 39. 6 LFO, wt. % 25. 0 25. 4 HFO, wt. % 10. 0 9. 6 Coke, wt. % 5. 5 5. 1 RON, C5+ Gasoline 87. 6 88. 2

The results in Table 8 suggest that the CeAlPOx matrix has bottoms cracking activity comparable to that of the activated alumina matrix. The catalysts provided comparable HFO yields. The CeAlPOx catalyst shows higher gasoline selectivity (1. 1 wt. % yield advantage).

G. Product Selectivity Improvement With Addition of CeAIPOx Catalysts G and H were compared with Catalyst F to determine the benefits of adding CeAlPOx to an FCC catalyst. An FFB reactor was used with the Arab Light Vacuum Gas Oil described above in Table 5. The performances of the catalysts are summarized in Table 9, where product selectivity was interpolated to a constant conversion, 65 wt. % conversion of feed to 430° F-material.

TABLE 9 Catalyst F Catalyst G Catalyst H Matrix No Added CeAlPOx + 15% Ball Milled + 15% Peptized CeAlPOx CeAlPOx Conversion, wt. % 65 65 65 Cat/Oil 3. 8 3. 6 3. 5 C5+ Gasoline, wt. % 39. 6 40. 7 42. 0 LFO, wt. % 25. 4 25. 0 25. 3 HFO, wt. % 9. 6 10. 0 9. 7 Coke, wt. % 5. 1 5. 5 5. 2 RON, C5+ Gasoline 88. 2 87. 8 85. 5 H2S, wt.% 1.7 1.9 1.9 Cl + C2 Gas, wt. % 1. 8 1. 8 1. 7 Total C3 Gas, wt. % 6. 3 5. 4 5. 0 Total C4 Gas, wt. % 10. 4 9. 5 9. 1 C3=/total C3 0. 81 0. 81 0. 80 C4/total C4 0. 48 0. 52 0. C4"/C3"0. 981. 111. 13

The test results in Table 9 demonstrate that incorporation of CeAIPOX into the matrix resulted in significantly improved gasoline yields (as much as 2. 4 wt. %). The increase in gasoline yields for Catalysts G and H resulted mostly from lower C3 and C4 yields. The CeAIPOx matrix"as-is" (Catalyst G) had a slightly higher coke-making tendency, but this tendency was alleviated by HCl peptization of the gel (Catalyst H).

The bottoms yields are comparable for all three catalysts, probably because all three catalysts convert nearly all of the crackable heavy ends at this conversion level. One negative aspect of the CeAIPOx containing catalyst is that it lowered the research octane number ("RON") of the produced gasoline by as much as 2. 7.

The CeAIPOx containing catalysts increased the H2S yield by >10%, suggesting that this material may have potential for SOx removal and/or gasoline sulfur removal. The CeAIPOx containing catalysts increased the butylene selectivity in C4-gas, and the C4 olefin-to-C3 olefin ratio. The results in Table 9 clearly show that the chemistry of CeAIPOx is different from a typical active alumina matrix, which is usually added to improve bottoms cracking.

EXAMPLE 12-Fluid Catalytic Cracking Evaluation of COAIPO,, and VAIPOX CoAlPOx from Example 8 (Sample A) and VAlPOX from Example 9 (Sample F) were each pelleted and sized to an average particle size of approximately 70 micrometer (p), then steamed in a muffle furnace at 1500°F for 4 hours to simulate catalyst deactivation in an FCC unit. Ten weight percent of steamed pellets were blended with an equilibrium catalyst from an FCC unit. The equilibrium catalyst has very low metals level (120 ppm V and 60 ppm Ni).

The additives were tested for gas oil cracking activity and selectivity using an ASTM microactivity test (ASTM procedure D-3907). The vacuum gas oil feed stock properties are shown in a Table 10 below.

Table 10

Charge Stock Properties Vacuum Gas Oil API Gravity 26. 6 Aniline Point, °F 182 CCR, wt% 0. 23 Sulfur, wt% 1. 05 Nitrogen, ppm 600 Basic nitrogen, ppm 310 Ni, ppm 0.32 V, ppm 0.698 Fe, ppm 9.15 Cu, ppm 0.05 Na, ppm 2.93 Distillation IBP, °F 358 50wt%, °F 716 99. 5%, °F 1130

A range of conversions was scanned by varying the catalyst-to-oil ratios and reactions were run at 980°F. Gasoline range product from each material balance was analyzed with a GC equipped with a sulfur detector (AED) to determine the gasoline sulfur concentration. To reduce experimental errors in sulfur concentration associated with fluctuations in distillation cut point of the gasoline, S species ranging only from thiophene to C4-thiophenes were quantified using the sulfur detector and the sum was defined as"cut-gasoline S". The sulfur level reported for"cut-gasoline S"excludes any benzothiophene and higher boiling S species which were trapped in a gasoline sample due to distillation overlap. Performances of the catalysts are summarized in Table 11, where the product selectivity was interpolated to a constant conversion, 65wt% or 70wt% conversion of feed to 430°F-material.

Table 11 Base Case + 10% CoAlPOx + 10% VAIPO, Conversion, wt% 70 70 70 Cat/Oil 3. 2 3. 2 3. 7 H yield, wt% 0. 04 +0. 24 +0. 21 C, + C2 Gas, wt% 1. 4 +0. 3 +0 Total C3 Gas, wt% 5. 4 +0. 1-0. 2 C3= yield, wt% 4. 6 +0-0. 1 Total C4 Gas, wt% 11. 1-0. 2-0. 4 C4 = yield, wt% 5. 4-0. 1 +0. 1 iC4 yield, wt% 4. 8-0. 2-0. 4 C5+ Gasoline, wt% 49. 3-1. 7-0. 9 LFO, wt% 25. 6-0. 4 +0. 1 HFO, wt% 4. 4 +0. 4-0. 1 Coke, wt% 2. 5 +1. 4 +1. 3 Cut Gasoline S, PPM 445 330 383 % Reduction in Cut Gasoline S Base 26. 0 13. 9 % Reduction in Gasoline S, Feed Base 28. 5 15. 4 Basis

Data in Table 11 show that the gasoline S concentration was reduced by 26% by addition of CoAlPOx, and 13. 9% by the addition of VAlPOx. The overall FCC yields (Cl-C4 gas production, gasoline, LCO, and bottoms yields) changed only slightly with the CoAlPOx and VAlPOx addition, although some increases in H2 and coke yields were observed. When the desulfurization results were

recalculated to incorporate the gasoline-volume-loss, CoAlPOx gave 29% S reduction and VAlPOx gave 15% reduction.

EXAMPLE 13-Fluid Catalytic Cracking Evaluation of ZnAlPOx ZnAIPOx from Example 6 was pelleted and sized to an average particle size of approximately 70 micrometer (p), then steamed in a muffle furnace at 1500OF for 4 hours to simulate catalyst deactivation in an FCC unit. Ten weight percent of steamed ZnAlPOx pellets were blended with a steam deactivated, Super Nova D FCC catalyst obtained from W. R. Grace. Performances of the ZnAlPOx are summarized in Table 12.

Table 12 Base Case + 10% ZnAlPOx Conversion, wt% 72 72 Cat/Oil 3. 2 3. 6 H2 yield, wt% 0. 09 +0. 03 Cl + C2 Gas, wt% 1. 8 +0. 2 Total C3 Gas, wt% 5. 8 +0. 3 C3= yield, wt% 4. 9 +0. 2 Total C4 Gas, wt% 11. 3 +0. 1 C4= yield, wt% 5. 9-0. 2 iC4 yield, wt% 4. 5 +0. 2 C5+ Gasoline, wt% 50. 0-1. 0 LFO, wt% 23. 7 +0 HFO, wt% 4. 3-0. 2 Coke, wt% 2. 9 +0. 4 Cut Gasoline S, PPM 477 449 % Reduction in Cut Gasoline S Base 5. 9 % Reduction in Gasoline S, Feed Basis Base 7. 7

It will be seen from Table 12 that gasoline sulfur concentration was reduced by 6% by addition of the ZnAIPOx. The overall FCC yields (H2, Cl-C4 gas production, gasoline, LCO, and bottoms yields) changed only slightly with the ZnAlPOx addition, although some increase in coke yield was observed. When the desulfurization results were recalculated to incorporate the gasoline-volume- loss, ZnAlPOx gave 8% S reduction.