Background of the invention

The invention relates to an apparatus comprising at least one data processing device for designing blasting order of drill holes of a drilling pattern of a round .

The invention further relates to a method of de signing blasting order of drill holes of a round, and also to a computer program product for executing the disclosed method and solution .

The field of the invention is defined more specif ically in the preambles of the independent claims .

Underground tunnels are excavated in rounds . Sev eral successive rounds produce the tunnel having a tunnel face . At first drill holes are drilled to a face surface , where after the drilled holes are charged and blasted . Quality and efficiency of the blast depends on many things , such as feasibility of the used drilling pattern, accuracy of the executed drilling and success of a charg ing plan defining amount of the charges and timing se quence of the blast . Firing order and timing of the drilled holes have significant influence on succeed of the blast . The blasting plans are typically designed manually . However, the manual design work and the manually designed blasting plans have shown to contain some disadvantages .

Brief description of the invention

An obj ect of the invention is to provide a novel and improved apparatus , method and computer program prod uct for designing blasting order of drill holes of a round .

The apparatus according to the invention is char acterized by the features of a first independent apparatus claim .

The method according to the invention is charac terized by the features of an independent method claim . The computer program product according to the in vention is characterized by the features of a second inde pendent apparatus claim .

An idea of the disclosed solution is that an appa ratus is configured to design blasting order of drill holes of a face drilling pattern of a round . The apparatus comprises one or more data processing devices for execut ing the designing measures . A face of the round defines a first free surface for the blasting and the apparatus is provided with data on drill holes and available time de lays of the blast . The apparatus designs a blasting se quence for the drilling pattern by dividing the blast into several successive time delays following an initial blast ing of cut charges creating an initial second free surface for the blast . Thus , the blast has two free surfaces , the first and second free surfaces . The apparatus may select one or more drill holes for each greater time delay where in the drill holes are surrounding previously formed sec ond free surface defined by drill holes having shorter time delay than the examined time delay . The selected drill holes form a drill hole set for the time delay . The apparatus determines burst volumes for each subsequent time delay based on input data on the selected drill hole set and data on the expanding second free surface . The ap paratus also determines free volume for each subsequent time delay, wherein the free volume is defined by the ex panding second free surface and length of the round . Fur ther, the apparatus determines swollen burst volumes by multiplying the determined burst volumes with an input swell factor and compares the swollen burst volumes with the determined free volumes . The apparatus only allows se lection of drill hole sets where the swollen burst volumes are minor than the calculated free volumes .

An advantage of the disclosed solution is that the properly designed blasting sequence ensures that the rock material to be blasted at each time delay has enough space to expand . When the rock material is blasted, it requires more space than before the blasting . In other words , the blasting causes the rock material to swell and greater space is always required to receive the swollen volume . The disclosed solution takes into account this phenomenon and may thereby prevent blasting failures caused by unfa vorable blasting order of the drill holes . By means of the disclosed properly designed drilling sequence quality of the blasting is improved . The blasts are not blocked when the blasted and fragmented rock material may move towards the neighboring free space , and further, at least part of the blasted loose rock material may also flow fluently out of the free space due to the explosion . All this may be achieved when the blasted material has enough space to ex pand . In other words , blocking tendency may be reduced and laborious and time consuming re-drilling, re-charging and re-blasting may be avoided . The rounds may be blasted in one go and no expensive corrective measures are required . And still , the blasting sequence can be designed to ful - fill required other quality and effectiveness require ments .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to determine the swollen burst volumes by multi plying the determined burst volumes with an input swell factor SF, which is greater than 1.0. The value of the swell factor depends on how big rock material blocks are formed during the blasting . The greater the blocks the larger the volume is needed and vice versa . The size of the blocks may depend on quality and type of the rock ma terial and also on implemented blasting techniques and principles . Further, when two rock volumes are blasted simultaneously on opposite sides of the free volume , then the blasted rock material collides and the blocks break into several minor pieces . This way the block size may al so depend on the used blasting technique . According to an embodiment , magnitude of the swell factor input to the apparatus is 1.6, or in some cases even greater . This means that the free volume needs to be at least 60% greater than the burst volume . The value 1.6 is determined empirically .

According to an embodiment , the swell factor is adaptable by an operator . Then the apparatus may provide the operator with a possibility to freely select values for the swell factor which are greater than 1.0.

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to examine burst angles of the unblasted holes and takes them into account when selecting drill holes . Thus , the apparatus determines burst angles for the drill holes surrounding the second free surface . The apparatus com pares the detected burst angles with input minimum allowa ble burst angle and allows only selection of drill holes having magnitude of the burst angle greater than the mini - mum burst angle towards the second free surface . When the burst angle opens wide enough, then the blasted material moves properly towards the free volume . However, when too narrow burst angles are used, the blast may block and cause laborious and time consuming extra work and may even ruin the entire round .

Let it be mentioned that in this document the term burst angle is used . However, the burst angle can also be called an eruption angle or a blasting angle . The same ap plies also for the term burst volume , which may be also be called as an eruption volume or a blasting volume .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to allow only selection of drill holes having mag nitude of the burst angle at least 55 ⁰ towards the second free surface . In practice it has been noted that 55 ⁰ is suitable burst angle value for most situations .

According to an embodiment , the operator of the apparatus is allowed to adjust magnitude of the blasting angle towards the second free surface . The apparatus may offer a predetermined range for the selection .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus aims to select maximum amount of drill holes for each detonator time delay because number of time delays is limited . Typi cally the number of time limits is about 30 and the number of drill holes may be over 200. Thereby, each time delay after few initial time delays around a cut needs to in clude several drill holes , or otherwise the time delays run out .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is fur ther configured to determine perpendicular distances de fining burst distances Bd between the outermost drill holes of allowable alternative at least two drill hole sets and the second free surface . The apparatus prioritiz es one drill hole set having the shortest distance . The burst distance may alternatively be called the shortest distance .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is fur ther configured to maximize momentary total amount of ex plosive material for the used time delays . Then data on charges of the drill holes and data on maximum momentary total amount of explosive material allowed to be blasted at the time delays are input to the apparatus . The appa ratus calculates total amount of explosive material of the selected drill holes of the examined time delay and may limit the selection of the drill holes so that the total amount of explosive material of the drill holes is below the allowed momentary total amount of explosive material . This way, the blasting may be executed effectively since as great amount of explosive material as possible is blasted at each time delay, and still , generation of over sized harmful vibrations are avoided when the set maximum values are not exceeded . Let it be further mentioned that the generated vi bration of the blast depends on the mass of the explosives that are blasted at one particular time . This amount is called momentary mass . This amount is calculated by the apparatus and number of same time detonated holes are re stricted to be below the set maximum momentary mass .

According to an embodiment , when the apparatus no tifies that the maximum amount of explosive material is not close for the examined time delay, then the apparatus may suggest to select , or may automatically select , maxi - mum amount of drill holes for the time delay still without exceeding the allowed momentary total amount of explosive material . This way efficient blast is achieved without ex ceeding set ground vibration limits .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to automatically define following longer time de lay for additional manually selected drill holes when causing exceed of the allowed momentary total amount of explosive material .

According to an embodiment , the operator may se lect manually one or more drill holes for desired time de lay . The apparatus may take over the planning measures af ter the manual selections have been terminated and may continue the planning by fulfilling the selection of drill holes . This embodiment allows an experienced operator to make desired selections , and after being done , the appa ratus may continue the automated planning mode until de signing work of the blasting sequence is finished, or un til the manual mode is implemented again .

According to an embodiment , the planning work of the blasting sequence is executed in computer aided man ner . Then the apparatus operates in co-operation with the operator and may provide the operator with proposals of the selected drill holes for each time delay . The appa ratus may generate the suggestions automatically but re quests acceptance from the operator for the suggested pre- vious time delay before initiating planning subsequent time delay . The operator needs only to monitor the plan ning work and to acknowledge the suggested designs steps . Thereby the operator is all the time aware of the situa tion, which is important since the operator is responsible for the end result . However, the apparatus provides valua ble assistance for the operator thereby quickening and fa cilitating the design work .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to operate in a computer assisted manner in co operation with an operator . The apparatus may assist an operator for selecting suitable drill holes for the time delays . However, in this embodiment the operator creates the end result .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to take into account manual selection of one or more drill holes input by the operator, and is configured use the input selection as a base selection for the exam ined time delay . Then the operator may select manually drill holes for the examined time delay and the computer aided operation of the apparatus may continue in response to receiving control command to continue . Thus , the appa ratus prioritizes the manual selections and adapts to the made selections .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to orientate selection of drill holes of subse quent time delay relative to the already formed free sec ond surface based on input manual selection of the opera tor .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to examine the blasting sequence on the first free surface , i.e. on the face of the round .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to examine the blasting sequence at the bottom of the round, i.e. at a plane defined by the bottoms of the drill holes . According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to examine the blasting sequence three dimension- ally (3D) .

According to an embodiment , the blasting sequence comprises a limited number of time delays . The number of the time limits is limited by the available number of non electronic detonators with different delays . Typically the number of available different time delays is 30 - 40. Since the number of time delays is limited, the apparatus may be arranged to select as many drill holes as possible for each time delay so that the drilling pattern with a great number of drill holes can be managed . However, when selecting the number of drill holes to be blasted simulta neously at the same time delay, generated vibrations and amount blasted explosive material needs to be taken into consideration . Thereby, the selection of drill holes is a kind of optimization problem, and the apparatus aims to solve that problem, typically in co-operation with the op erator .

According to an embodiment , the blasting sequence is designed for electronic detonators . Then the number of available different time delays may be greater than when using non-electronic detonators . The apparatus may be con figured to adjust number of used time delays of the elec tronic detonators , and may also be configured to adjust time intervals between the subsequently fired detonators .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus compris es at least one display device and is configured to visu alize on a display device the generated blasting sequence step by step by presenting the burst volumes at each time delay . As an alternative , the display device may display areas of the burst volumes two-dimensionally on the face of the round or at the bottom of the round . Thanks to the visualization it is easier for the operator to monitor the planning work . An overall understanding of the situation is improved and it is also easier for the operator to val - idate the planned sequence . Further, the visualization may also be used for the training purposes .

According to an embodiment , the created blasting sequence is presented or animated on the display device , whereby the result of the planning work can be shown in an illustrative and intuitive manner .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus compris es at least one display device and is configured to dis play the drilling pattern together with the selectable drill holes on the display device . The display device may display at the examined time delay previous second free surface defined by drill holes having shorter time delay compared to the examined time delay . The system may also indicate the selected drill holes of the examined time de lay relative to the previous second free surface , and may indicate expansion of the second free space caused by the selected drill holes of the examined time delay .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus deter mines the same time delays or firing number for two sepa rate sets of drill holes locating on opposite sides of the second free surface . Then the two opposing drill hole sets are blasted simultaneously and the removing rock material will collide during the blast and will thereby become crushed when colliding . An advantage of this embodiment is that blocking of the blast can be avoided when no big sized rock blocks are created . Crushed rock material may move fluently away from the created free space of the round .

According to an embodiment , the blasting sequence may have special initial steps at the beginning of the blast . The apparatus may select only single drill holes for a predetermined amount of first time delays . This way it is ensured that adequate free volume is created for the blasted rock material at the beginning of the blast . The number of such single hole time delays is selectable by the operator . According to an embodiment , the apparatus is con figured to take into account set maximum amount for simul - taneously fired explosive material . Thereby strict envi ronmental limits on ground vibration set by authorities may also be fulfilled in sensitive sections without the need to utilize unnecessary restrictions to blasting oper ations . The disclosed solution may also allow use of the drilling and blasting method at work sites , which are pre viously excavated by means of other methods because of ex tremely strict ground vibration limits . All in all , quali ty and efficiency of the blasting may be improved and ad vance of the tunnel may be ensured .

According to an embodiment , the apparatus is pro vided with at least one designing algorithm or computer program for allowing the apparatus to execute the dis closed design steps and process . Thus , a semi -automated or possibly a fully automated blasting sequence design pro cess is provided .

The above disclosed embodiments can be combined in order to form suitable solutions provided with necessary features .

Brief description of the figures

Some embodiments are described in more detail in the accompanying drawings , in which

Figure 1 is a schematic view showing some basic issues relating to tunnel excavation utilizing the drill ing and blasting method,

Figure 2 is a schematic and simplified control block diagram of an apparatus for designing blasting se quences ,

Figure 3 is a schematic diagram showing some input data needed for the design work of the blasting sequence ,

Figure 4 is a schematic diagram showing design rules for the design work of the blasting sequence ,

Figure 5 is a schematic view of a round with an initially blasted free space , Figure 6 is a schematic and simplified view demon strating swelling of rock material when being blasted,

Figure 7 is a schematic view of some non-allowable selections of drill hole sets ,

Figure 8 is a schematic view of two opposite posi tioned drill hole sets having the same firing number,

Figures 9 and 10 are schematic views of selected drill hole sets following the situation shown in Figure 7 , and

Figure 11 is a schematic detail of numerical data shown on a display device .

For the sake of clarity, the figures show some em bodiments of the disclosed solution in a simplified man ner . In the figures , like reference numerals identify like elements .

Detailed description of some embodiments

Figure 1 shows features relating to the disclosed system of excavating underground tunnels 1 in several suc cessive rounds 2a - 2d. Drill holes 3 are drilled by means of a rock drilling rig 4 on a face surface 5 of the tunnel 1. After the drilling the drill holes 3 are charged with blasting material or explosives 6. For the drilling work drilling patterns are 7 designed typically at office 8 , as well as charging plans , such as blasting sequences 9. The design work may be executed in a computer aided manner . In other words , an operator 10 may co-operate with one or more computers or design apparatuses 11. Automated or com puter aided drilling typically requires the use of the pre-designed drilling patterns 7 , which define for each round number of drill holes , dimensions of the drill holes , direction of the drill holes , or alternatively, start and end coordinates of the drill holes , for example . Sometimes the same basic drilling pattern 7 may be repeat ed for several successive rounds . However, there exist relatively often manually made deviations to the planned drilling patterns , and these manually made selections re- quire that the blasting sequence needs to be re-designed . Design work of the blasting sequence manually is time con suming and demanding work .

The round 2 is blasted by firing the charges in serted inside the drill holes 3 either manually of by means of a charging manipulator . The firing is initiated at a special location and it expands further during the available total blasting time . The drill holes 3 , or actu ally their charges , are fired in accordance with the pre designed blasting sequence 9, which defines firing order of the charges . Thus , the entire blast is divided into several successive smaller blasts . After an initial firing there are several time delays following the initial fir ing .

The blasting sequence also determines positions of the blasts and amount of the fired charges per each time delay . The blasting expands rapidly towards an outer con tour of the round . The blasting forces breaks the solid rock material and move it towards available , already formed free space 12. The detached and broken material may, at least partly, fly axially 13 away from the face due to the produced gases of the detonation .

Figure 2 illustrates some features and composition of the disclosed apparatus 11 configured to design the mentioned blasting sequences . The apparatus 11 comprises one or more data processing devices 14 provided with pro cessors or corresponding devices . The processing device 14 comprises a computer program product 15 , which is executed in the processor . The computer program 15 may be recorded on non-transitory computer-readable media including pro gram instructions for implementing various operations exe cuted by the device 14. Required data may be input to the processing device as individual data elements or may be retrieved from one or more memory devices . The apparatus 11 may comprise an input device 16 for receiving the data . The input data may comprise data on drilling patterns 7 , data on charges 17 and available time delays , and also other input parameters 18 , examples of which are disclosed in Figure 3. Further, the operator may input data and make selections 19 via one or more input devices . The input de vice may also comprise a touch screen, a keypad, a mouse or any other suitable control device . The data may be in put to the processing device as individual data elements or may be retrieved from one or more memory devices .

The processing device 14 may execute needed calcu lations and operations as instructed by the computer pro gram 15 and input parameters . The apparatus 11 may trans mit the results by means of an output device 20 to a dis play device 21 , memory device 22 and data communication device 23. This way the designed blasting sequence 9 may be displayed, stored and transmitted to desired location .

When the apparatus operates in a computer aided mode , then the apparatus may make proposals for the opera tor on the display 21 and the operator can accept them by using the input device 16.

Figure 3 discloses possible data input to the ap paratus for the design of the blasting sequence . These is sues have already been discussed above in this document .

Figure 4 discloses design rules which are utilized in the disclosed solution . The rules 1 - 4 are discussed above in this document and may be implemented and weighted in the numerical order in the design work . However, in some cases not all of them are considered, which means that rules 2 - 4 may be optional and different combina tions are also possible .

Figure 5 discloses a round 2 having a face 5 , which serves as a first free surface 24. Several drill holes 3 extend from the face 5 to a bottom 25 of the round 2. The round 2 has length L . In Figure 5 it is also illus trated in a simplified manner that some of the drill holes 3 have already been blasted and a second free surface 26 is thus created inside the round 2. The first free surface 24 , second free surface 26 and the bottom define a free space 27. Volume of the free space 27 expands after each time delay when new charges of the drill holes 3 are fired . The free space 27 has free volume VF, which can be defined by multiplying free surface area AF with the length L of the round 2. The free space 27 needs to be large enough to be capable of receiving rock material de tached by the explosive material fired at the following time delay . Let it be further mentioned that in Figure 5 the shape of the free space 27 is simplified for clarity reasons .

Figure 6 discloses that when designing the blast ing sequence care should be taken to ensure that rock ma terial 28 , which is planned to be detached next , is free to move towards a neighbouring free space 27. If this is not the case , then there is a risk that the rock material will be blocked and the entire blast will fail . In this example the rock material 28 to be blasted is defined by a selected drill hole set 29 comprising two new drill holes 3a, 3b, and the free space 27. The drill holes 3a, 3b of the drill hole set 29 are fired simultaneously i.e. they have the same firing number in the blasting sequence . The disclosed apparatus can calculate burst volume VB of the rock material on the basis of data on the drill holes 3 and length L of the round 2. The selected rock material 28 has blast area AB, which may be substantially equal at the face and bottom of the round, or may deviate . When the drill hole set 29 is detonated, the rock material 28 be comes broken and detached . Initial volume of the rock ma terial 28 expands because the broken material comprises blocks 30 and voids and has thereby always looser configu ration compared to solid configuration . This is called swelling of the rock material . The swelled rock material 31 needs to fit inside the free space 27. Volume of the swelled rock material 31 may be 60% greater than in the solid state . Then the calculated burst volume VB is multi - plied with a swell factor SF, which is in this case 1.6. The swell factor SF is one of the parameters input to the apparatus . The swell factor SF is also configurable by the operator . Magnitude of the swelling depends on the size of formed blocks 31 , for example . Further, Figure 6 illus trates by means of arrows 32 how the rock material 28 moves towards the free space 27 , and that at least part of it may fly 13 towards a previously excavated round .

For clarity reasons Figures 7 - 10 disclose some examples of drill hole selection in two-dimensional presentation . In these Figures details of a drilling pat tern 7 with drill holes 3 are shown .

Figure 7 discloses a first free surface 26 and a free space 27 created by means of several blasts of previ - ous time delays . The previous blasts have expanded initial space created by cut holes 33 having larger diameter com pared to normal blast holes 3. The disclosed apparatus de tects drill holes 3 of the drilling pattern surrounding the free space 27 and considers the design rules mentioned above when suggesting selection of one or more drill holes for the next time delay . Two optional selections or drill hole sets 34a and 34b are shown in Figure 7. Neither of them fulfils the mentioned design rules . The first option al set 34a includes drill holes 3c and 3d, and the second optional set 34b includes one single drill hole 3e. The first optional set 34a has burst volume V _B , which is too large for the free volume V _F . The second optional set 34b has too narrow burst angle BA towards the free space . Thereby, neither of the optional sets 34a , 34b cannot be selected .

Figure 8 discloses that a drill hole set or selec tion 34c is allowable since its burst volume V _B fits well to the free space 27 and its burst angle BA is great enough . Thereby a drill hole 3 f can be selected . However, the apparatus notes that there is still room for addition al rock material in the free space 27 and further that the allowed total amount of simultaneously fired explosive ma terial does not yet limit the number of selected drill holes . Thereby, the apparatus selects also a drill hole 3g for the same time delay . Thereafter the apparatus notes that also a drill hole 3h may be included and thereby a drill hole set 34d with two drill holes 3g and 3h is cre ated . The apparatus also examines that the blasting angles BA of the drill hole sets 34c and 34d fulfil the set cri - teria . When two drill hole sets are located opposite to each other, then the detached rock material collides and crushes into smaller blocks . Then the above mentioned swell factor may be minor . Arrows 32 show the movements of the blasted rock material . Figure 8 further discloses that perpendicular distance from the selected drill holes to the free surface 26 may be calculated and based on this burst distance B _D drill hole sets with shorter distances may be prioritized in case there are several alternative drill hole sets that fulfil the other design rules .

Figure 9 discloses that the apparatus suggests se lecting a drill hole 3 i for following time delay . Thus , the drill hole set 34e comprises only the drill hole 3 i . The apparatus calculates burst volume V _B for the drill hole set 34e and notes that it is in accordance with the rules as well as the burst angle BA .

In Figure 10 the apparatus suggests selecting a drill hole 3 j after considering volumes and angles . After the drill hole set 34f is accepted by the operator, the design work continues in accordance with the same princi ples .

However, in addition to the volumetric considera tion and to the examination of the burst angles , vibration issues and limits may limit number of the selected drill holes per each time delay . When the explosives detonate in the drill holes , high intensity waves are generated and propagated throughout the rock . These waves generally at tenuate as they travel but depend on several factors such as the type of explosives , amount of explosives consumed per time delay, geological properties and the location of the round . Distance between the blasting and a sensitive target is an important factor . Environmental requirements may set limits on ground vibration levels and charge weight of explosive , especially when executing the blast ing operation nearby buildings and structures . Thus , the apparatus is provided with a special design rule for tak ing into account data on momentary total amount of explo- sive material and to thereby control the vibration mat ters . Since the number of the time delays is typically limited, and also for the reason of efficiency, as many drill holes as possible are selected to be fired simulta neously .

Figure 11 discloses that in addition to the above disclosed views the apparatus may display on a display de vice numerical data for assisting the operator .

The drawings and the related description are only intended to illustrate the idea of the invention . In its details , the invention may vary within the scope of the claims .