Login| Sign Up| Help| Contact|

Patent Searching and Data


Title:
BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER MODEL
Document Type and Number:
WIPO Patent Application WO/1991/005038
Kind Code:
A1
Abstract:
An $i(in vitro) model of a blood-brain barrier comprising a porous solid support upon which is disposed an essentially confluent monolayer of brain microvascular endothelial cells in contact with agents that elevate effective cyclic AMP concentrations in endothelial cells, with or without astrocyte-derived or endothelial cell-derived conditioned medium or the equivalent so that high electrical resistance tight junctions are formed between endothelial cells, and endothelial cells exhibit peripheral phalloidin staining and E-cadherin. Also disclosed is the use of agents that reduce effective cyclic AMP concentrations or interfere with the functioning of cyclic AMP or increase effective cyclic GMP concentrations to open up blood-brain barriers $i(in vitro) and $i(in vivo), so that drugs normally excluded by such barriers may substantially penetrate such barriers. Also disclosed are uses of the model to screen for reagents with clinical utility in disorders involving brain endothelial cells.

Inventors:
RUBIN LEE L (US)
PORTER SETH (US)
HORNER HEIDI C (US)
YEDNOCK THEODORE A (US)
Application Number:
PCT/US1990/005106
Publication Date:
April 18, 1991
Filing Date:
September 13, 1990
Export Citation:
Click for automatic bibliography generation   Help
Assignee:
ATHENA NEUROSCIENCES INC (US)
International Classes:
A61K38/00; A61K38/17; A61K39/395; A61K31/505; A61K45/00; A61K47/48; A61P25/00; A61P25/28; A61P29/00; C07K16/28; C12N5/071; C12Q1/02; G01N33/15; G01N33/50; G01N33/566; (IPC1-7): A61K31/52; A61K37/02; C12N5/06
Foreign References:
US4208406A1980-06-17
US4764504A1988-08-16
Other References:
Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 107, issued October 1988, GUMBINER, et al., "The Role of the Cell Adhesion Molecule Uromorulin in the Formation and Maintenance of the Epithelial Junctional Complex", pages 1575-1587, see entire document.
Nature, Volume 294, No. 5840, issued 03 December 1981, DUFFEY, et al., "Regulation of Epithelial Tight Junction Permeability by Cyclic AMP", pages 451-453, see entire document.
CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, Volume 109, No. 9, issued 29 August 1988, VAN BREE, et al., "Carrier-Mediated Transport of Bovine Brain Endothelial Cells in Primary Culture", see page 12, column 2, Abstract No. 109: 66314f, Pharm. Res., 5(6), 369-371, 1988.
CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, Volume 105, No. 5, issued 04 August 1986, K. L. AUDUS et al., "Characterization of an In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model System for Studying Drug Transport and Metabolism", see page 10, column 1, Abstract No. 105: 35047;, Pharm. Res., 3(2), 81-87, 1986.
CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, Volume 113, No. 7, issued 13 August 1990, SWARTZ, et al., "Identification of Surface Proteins Mediating Adherence of CD 11/CD18-Deficient Lymphoblastoid Cells to Cultured Human Endothelium", see page 511, columns 1 and 2, Abstract No. 57012m, J. Clin. Invest., 85(6), 2019-2022, 1990.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Volume 81, issued October 1984, M.D. PIERSCHBACHER et al., "Variants of the Cell Recognition Site of Fibronectin that Retain Attachment-Promoting Activity", pages 5985-5988, see particularly page 5985.
R. I. FRESHNEY, "Culture of Animal Cells-A Manual of Basic Technique", published 1983 by Alan R. Liss, Inc (N.Y.), see page 58.
R.F. KRUSE and M.K. PATTERSON, "Tissue Culture-Methods and Applications", published 1973 by Academic Press (New York, San Francisco, London), pages 372-377.
Nature, Volume 325, issued 15 January 1987, JANZER et al., "Astrocytes Induce Blood-Brain Barrier Properties in Endothelial Cells", pages 253-257, see entire document.
Immunological Reviews, Volume 114, issued April 1990, HEMMLER, et al., "Structure of the Integrin VLA-4 and its Cell-Cell and Cell-Matrix Adhesion Functions", pages 45-65, particularly pages 56-62.
See also references of EP 0493444A4
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
Blecher, Melvin (34th Floor Los Angeles, CA, US)
Download PDF:
Claims:
70We claim:
1. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier, comprising a porous solid support upon which is disposed an essentially confluent monolayer of brain microvascular endothelial cells and a means for augmenting cyclic AMP concentrations in said cells such that peripheral phalloidin staining is substantially present.
2. A model as recited in claim 1, wherein said endothelial cells are mixed endothelial cells.
3. A model as recited in claim 1, wherein said porous solid support is a porous filter or membrane of a material selected from the group consisting of polycarbonate, nitrocellulose, cellulose, collagen and fiberglass.
4. A model as recited in claim 1, further comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed upon said porous solid support interposed between a second coat of said endothelial cells and said porous solid support.
5. A model as recited in claim 4, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix material is selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fribronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
6. A model as recited in claim 1, wherein said means for augmenting effective endothelial cell cyclic AMP concentration is selected from among the group consisting of agents that increase cell adenylate cyclase activity, agents that inhibit the degradation of intracellular cyclic AMP, and derivatives of cyclic AMP to which endothelial cells are permeable and which act physiologically as does cyclic AMP.*& 71.
7. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier as recited in claim 1, further comprising a.n essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes disposed on a side of said porous solid support,, , opposite the side on which are disposed said endothelial cells.
8. An in vitro model of a blood—brain barrier as recited in claim 1, further comprising an essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes disposed on a second surface other than the pprous ' ' solid support upon which is disposed a monolayer of endothelial cells, in contact with a growth medium to which the endothelial cells are also exposed.
9. A model as recited in claim 1, wherein said porous solid support comprises microcarrier beads.
10. A model as recited in claim 9*, ' further. comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed on said beads, interposecl between said beads and said endothelial cells.
11. A model as recited m claim 10, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix material is selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, " ' fibronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
12. A model as recited in claim 1, wherein said porous solid support comprises" tubular hollow"", "" fiber.
13. A model as recited in cla •im'i"12 fur•ther comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed on said hollow fiber, int^frpoSsed ' ' ' It < ι ι < i H« )t* ' i between said hollow fiber and said endothelial cell__jf ., .
14. A model as recited in claim..13.,. ^ rein > said first coat extracellular matrix material is" selected from the group consisting of έstrocyte ' J* ' "" ' '1. *'" extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and Matrigel".
15. A model as recited in claim 1, wherein Ecadherin is substantially present between endothelial cells.
16. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier, comprising a porous solid support upon which is disposed an essentially confluent monolayer of brain microvascular endothelial cells and a means for augmenting effective cyclic AMP in such cells, such that the transmonolayer resistance is at least about 200 ohmcm2.
17. A model as recited in claim 16, wherein said endothelial cells are mixed or cloned endothelial cells.
18. A model as recited in claim 16, wherein said porous solid support is a porous filter or membrane selected from the group consisting of polycarbonate, nitrocellulose, cellulose, collagen and fiberglass.
19. A model as recited in claim 16, further comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed upon said porous solid support interposed between said endothelial cells and said porous solid support.
20. A model as recited in claim 19, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix material is selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
21. A model as recited in claim 16, wherein said means for augmenting effective endothelial cell cyclic AMP concentration is selected from among the group consisting of agents that increase cell adenylate*& 73.
22. of intracellular cyclic AMP, and derivatives of cyclic AMp to which endothelial cells are permeable and which act physiologically as does cyclic AMP. ^ < 22 An in vitro tfoaett of fel%lMr.i M^'nt barrier as recited in claim 16, further comprising an essentially confluent disposed on a side of opposite the side on which are disposed said endothelial cells. '.
23. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier as recited in claim 16 , further cdmpr^ising^an * essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes . disposed on a second surface other than the porous solid support upon which is dispofee$$ι sosft.4. »» endothelial cells, in contact with a growth, medium to which the endothelial cells are also exposed.
24. A model as recited itt'fcladΛ 1 ,> wherein said porous solid support comprises a ( fiber.
25. A model as recited in claim 24, further comprising a first coat of an eXtrabelliiϊar^ώatrli. f» J material disposed on said hollow fiber, infeerpoβesd ' between said hollow fiber and said endothelial. c l „ i.
26. A model as recited, in claim ?5f , said first coat extracellular matrix material is t selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR« \.
27. A model as recited in claim 16/ wherein Ecadherin is substantially present between eϊϊdothelial cells.
28. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier comprising a porous solid support upon which i~ disposed an essentially confluent monolayer of brain microvascular endothelial cells, a means for augmenting effective cyclic AMP concentrations in said cells, and a means for growing the brain microvascular endothelial cells in a cellderived conditioned medium or the equivalent, such that peripheral phalloidin staining is substantially present.
29. A model as recited in claim 28, wherein said endothelial cells are mixed or cloned endothelial cells.
30. A model as recited in claim 28, wherein said porous solid support is a porous filter or membrane selected from among the group consisting of polycarbonate, nitrocellulose, cellulose, collagen and fiberglass.
31. A model as recited in claim 28, further comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed upon said porous solid support interposed between said endothelial cells and said porous solid support.
32. A model as recited in claim 31, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix is selected from among the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
33. A model as recited in claim 28, wherein said means for augmenting effective endothelial cell cyclic AMP concentration is selected from among the group consisting of agents that increase cell adenylate cyclase activity, agents that inhibit the degradation of intracellular cyclic AMP, and derivatives of cyclic AMP to which endothelial cells are permeable and which act physiologically as does cyclic AMP.
34. A model as recited in claim 28 wherein said cellderived conditioned medium comprises endothelial cellderived conditioned.medium. or *f_ w ;«' 1 i astrocytederived conditioned medium, a∞y ai< f«. ^ > ,j equivalent comprises a tissue extract.
35. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier as recited in claim 28, further comprising an essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes disposed on a side of said porous solid support opposite the side on which are disposed said endothelial cells.
36. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier as recited in claim 28, further comprising an essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes disposed on a second surface other than the porous solid support upon which is disposed al tonolMte W t '.! l it i ili ■ 11, "'ft '"'• ij i't ,1 ' endothelial cells, in contact wi^h^a.1 rb ffl 1 fciu which the endothelial cells are also exposed.
37. A model as recited in claim 28, wherein said porous solid sport comprises microcarrier beads.
38. A model as recited in claim 37, further ,,_ •_ comprising a first coat of an extrac^llulaιπ matri4 < material disposed on said beads, interposed between '.. i1 i said beads and said endothelial cells.
39. A model as recited in claim 38, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix materialis selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitrq eptiή ^i t „ι,f fribronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
40. A model as recite4 in ^i^μ28 ( .^ ^pe^n said porous solid support comprises a tubular hollow fiber. ' ' ' t,^'t.
41. A model as recited in claim 40, further comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix 76 material disposed on said hollow fiber, interposed between said hollow fiber and said endothelial cells.
42. A model as recited in claim 41, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix material is selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
43. A model as recited in claim 28, wherein Ecadherin is substantially present between endothelial cells.
44. An in vitro model of a blood brain barrier comprising a porous solid support upon which is disposed an essentially confluent monolayer of brain microvascular endothelial cells, a means for augmenting effective cyclic AMP concentrations in said cells and a means for growing said endothelial cells in a cell derived conditioned medium or the equivalent, such that peripheral phalloidin staining is substantially present, and having a transmonolayer resistance of at least about 200 ohmcm2.
45. A model as recited in claim 44, wherein said endothelial cells are mixed or cloned endothelial cells.
46. A model as recited in claim 44, wherein said porous solid support is a porous filter or membrane selected from among the group consisting of polycarbonate, nitrocellulose, cellulose, collagen and fiberglass.
47. A model as recited in claim 44, further comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed upon said porous solid support interposed between said endothelial cells and said porous solid support.*& 77.
48. A model as recited in claim 47, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix material is selected from among the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, cyclic AMP concentration is selected from among the group consisting of agents that increase cell adenylate cyclase activity, agents that inhibit the degradation AMP to which endothelial cells are permeable and which act physiologically as does cyclic AMP.
49. A model as recited in clai,m 44, wherein said cellderived conditioned medium1 co pr^e^ i ^ "' endothelial cellderived or astrocytederived conditioned medium, and said equivalent comprises a cell extract.
50. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier as recited in claim 44, further c έ risinp4 ap.
51. An in vitro model of a blbodbrain . barrier as recited in claim 44, further comprising an essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes disposed on a second surface other than the porous solid support upon which is disposed a monolayer of endothelial cells, ._.n contact with a growth medium to which the endothelial cells are also exposed. . ι, ,.ι*.
52. A model as red&ted iffi oMϊil*}4'4' W t fe said porous solid support comprises a tubular hollow fiber. * H ' ή ι'_ i .
53. A model as recited in claim 53, further comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed on said hollow fiber, interposed between said hollow fiber and said endothelial cells.
54. A model as recited in claim 54, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix material is selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and Matrigel".
55. A model as recited in claim 44, wherein Ecadherin is substantially present between endothelial cells.
56. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier, comprising a porous solid support upon which is disposed an essentially confluent monolayer of brain microvascular endothelial cells and a means for augmenting effective cyclic AMP concentrations in said cells such that peripheral phalloidin staining is substantially present, and having a transmonolayer electric resistance of at least about 200 ohmcm2.
57. A model as recited in claim 57, wherein said endothelial cells are mixed endothelial cells.
58. A model as recited in claim 57, wherein said porous solid support is a porous filter or membrane selected from the group consisting of polycarbonate, nitrocellulose, cellulose, collagen and fiberglass.
59. A model as recited in claim 57, further comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed upon said porous solid sport interposed between a second coat of said endothelial cells and said porous solid support.
60. A model as recited in claim 60, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix material is 79 selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and Matπgel .
61. A model as recited in claim 57, wherein said means for augmenting effective endothelial cell' cyclic AMP concentration is selected frOm'amdng the group consisting of agents that increase cell adenylate cyclase activity, agents that inhibit the degradation of intracellular cyclic AMP, and derivatives of cyclic AMP to which endothelial cells are permeable and wh,jcl|j, act physiologically as does cyclic AMP. '.
62. An in vitro model of a bloόdbfain barrier as recited in claim 57, further co^mprising an essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes disposed on a side of said porous solid suppoirt opposite the side on which are disposed saiά •I* i t ttt't* endothelial cells.
63. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier as recited in claim 57, further cqjnprj^iηg, an , . essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes disposed on a second surface other tjap the po oup J, i i i i medium to which the endothelial cells ' re^al'so ei όsed*.
64. A model as recited in data.57, vheirein! ■• said porous solid support comprises, a tφular ho^α^ fiber.
65. A model as recited in claim.69v comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed on said hollow fiber, inletjSfee '' ' between said hollow fiber and said endothelial cells.
66. A model as recited in' όϊfcitø' 6 ,' 'Vlwath#ri ,s said first coat extracellular matrix material is selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
67. A model as recited in claim 57, wherein Ecadherin is substantially present between endothelial cells.
68. An in vitro model of a bloodbrain barrier, comprising a porous solid support upon which is disposed an essentially confluent monolayer of brain microvascular endothelial cells, a means for augmenting effective cyclic AMP concentrations in said endothelial cells, and a means for growing said cells in a cell derived conditioned medium or the equivalent, such that the transmonolayer electrical resistance is at least about 200 ohmcm2.
69. A model as recited in claim 69, wherein said endothelial cells are mixed or cloned endothelial cells.
70. A model as recited in claim 69, wherein said porous solid support is a porous filter or membrane selected from t he group consisting of polycarbonate, nitrocellulose, cellulose, collagen and fiberglass.
71. A model as recited in claim 69, further comprising a first coat of an extracellular matrix material disposed upon said porous solid support interposed between a second coat of said endothelial cells and said porous solid support.
72. A model as recited in claim 72, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix materia is selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
73. from among the group consisting of agents that increase cell adenylate cyclase activity, agents that inhibit the degradation of intracellular cyclic AMP, and derivatives of cyclic AMP to which endothelial cells are permeable and which act physiologically as does cyclic AMP.
74. An in vitro model q )fffia. bloqdbrφin. barrier as recited in Claim 69, furthe essentially disposed on solid support upon which is disposed a monolayer of endothelial cells, in contact with" ai g^ 1'"!^.^ which the endothelial cells are also ej psed.
75. A model as recited in claim 79, wherein said first coat extracellular matrix material is selected from the group consisting of astrocyte extracellular matrix, laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin, collagen, and MatrigelR.
76. A model as recited in claim 69, wherein Ecadherin is substantially present between endothelial cells.
77. A model as recited in claim 1, wherein said microvascular endothelial cells are brain capillary cells.
78. A model as recited in claim 16, wherein said microvascular endothelial cells are brain capillary cells.
79. A model as recited in claim 28, wherein said microvascular endothelial cells are brain capillary cells.
80. A model as recited in claim 44, wherein said microvascular endothelial cells are brain capillary cells.
81. A model as recited in claim 57, wherein said microvascular endothelial cells are brain capillary cells.
82. A model as recited in claim 69, wherein said microvascular endothelial cells are brain capillary cells.
83. A drug delivery composition for opening tight junctions between microvascular endothelial cells, whereby means are provided for said drug to cross the permeability barrier created by such junctions, comprising an agent capable of reducing the effective intracellular concentration of cyclic AMP, so that cellcell adhesion is disrupted. said cells are brain microvascular endothe ial cells and said permeability barrier is the bloodbrain barrier. , ^ *, .,.
84. , ' »{ι " ^.
85. The composition of c ι .9 ,#bm;ψ~ l lt ft , said cells are brain microvascular endothelial cells and said permeability barrier is the blqodbram barrier. . >. . , , < H.._ , • •.
86. The composition of claim 91, wherein said agent is an agent that inhibits cyflib'AMP J ' !# activatable protein kinase or stimulates a t I > ι ' * I 1 rlj > phosphoprotem phosphatase.
87. A drug delivery composition for opening tight junctions between microvascular endbthelial ,!* cells, whereby means are provided for a drug to cross the permeability barrier created by Stϊbh "factions; ' '*" ' comprising an agent capable of elevating the effective intracellular concentration of cyclic GMP, so that cellcell adhesion is disrupted. " . JJj l'*■ • , }"■ ff' ' ''* '< 84 .
88. The composition of claim 94, wherein said cells are brain microvascular endothelial cells and said permeability barrier is the bloodbrain barrier.
89. The composition of claim 94, wherein said agent is selected from among the group consisting of an agent that elevates guanylate cyclase activity, an agent that decreases the degradation of cyclic GMP or cyclic GMP analogues or derivatives, and an agent that stimulates the entry into cells of cyclic GMP or analogues or derivatives of cyclic GMP.
90. A drug delivery composition for opening tight junctions between microvascular endothelial cells, whereby means are provided for a drug to cross the permeability barrier created by such junctions, comprising an agent capable of increasing the physiological effects of cyclic GMP, so that cellcell adhesion is disrupted.
91. The composition of claim 97, wherein said cells are brain microvascular endothelial cells and said permeability barrier is the bloodbrain barrier.
92. The composition of anyone of claims 88, 91, 94 and 97 in a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle.
93. A drug delivery method for opening tight junctions between microvascular endothelial cells of a subject, comprising the steps of administering to said subject an agent, in an effective amount and in a pharmaceuticallyacceptable vehicle, capable of reducing the effective intracellular concentration of cyclic AMP, so that cellcell adhesion is disrupted and whereby means are provided for a drug to cross permeability barriers imposed by said tight junctions.
94. The method of claim 100, wherein said cells are brain microvascular endothelial cells and said permeability barrier is the bloodbrain barrier.
95. The method of claim 100, wherein said agent is selected from among the group consisting of i d ti i AMP analogues or derivatives, and agents that inhibit the penetration of cells by cyclic , fr* derivatives of cyclic AMP.
96. A drug delivery op pg (, tight junctions between microvascular endothelial cells of a subject, comprising the s e ,. ^, _i l,^Bjtjar ng!,τ_q said subject an agent, in an effective amount and in a pharmaceuticallyacceptable vehicle, capable of reducing the physiological effects of cyclic**AMP, _sb that cellcell adhesion is .disrupted and whereby meawp are provided for a drug to cross permeability' ba rie^ imposed by said tight junctions.
97. The method of claim i1l0l!3, wherei*nt> sai.d t cells are brain microvascular endothelial cells and said permeability barrier is the bloodbrain barrier. .
98. The method of claim 1J3,3, w <=^€ _ ,^aic ... u agent is an agent that inhibits cyclic AMPactivatable' protein kinase or stimulates a phosphoprotein * phosphatase.
99. A drug delivery method for opening, tight junctions between microvascular endothelial cells of a subject, comprising the steps of administeri,ng. to t said subject an agent, in an ef ective amo nt and in. a « pharmaceuticallyacceptable vehicle, capablilOf elevating the effective intracellular concentration of cyclic GMP, so that cellcell adhesion is disrupted Mήd 86 whereby means are provided for a drug to cross permeability barriers imposed by said tight junctions.
100. The method of claim 106, wherein said cells are brain microvascular endothelial cells and said permeability barrier is the bloodbrain barrier.
101. The method of claim 106, wherein said agent is selected from among the group consisting of an agent that elevates guanylate cyclase activity, an agent that decreases the degradation of cyclic GMP or cyclic GMP analogues or derivatives, and an agent that stimulates the entry into cells of cyclic GMP or analogues or derivatives of cyclic GMP.
102. A drug delivery method for opening tight junctions between microvascular endothelial cells of a subject, comprising the steps of administering to said subject an agent, in an effective amount and in a pharmaceuticallyacceptable vehicle, capable of increasing the physiological effects of cyclic GMP, so that cellcell adhesion is disrupted and whereby means are provided for a drug to cross permeability barriers imposed by said tight junctions.
103. The method of claim 109, wherein said cells are brain microvascular endothelial cells and said permeability barrier is the bloodbrain barrier.
104. A method of treating vasogenic brain edema in a subject, comprising the step of administering to said subject an agent, in an effective amount and in a pharmaceuticallyacceptable vehicle, capable of increasing the physiologicallyeffective intracellular concentration of cyclic AMP, so that means are provided for increasing tight junctions between brain microvascular endothelial cells and so that cell tight junction permeability is reduced.
105. The method of claim 111, wherein said agent is selected from among the group consisting of agents that increase cellular adenylate cyclase activity, agents that inhibit the degradation of , cellular cyclic AMP, and derivatives pf cyclic AMP to which endothelial cells are permeable and which act physiologically as does cyclic AMP.
106. A method of treating vasogenic brain edema in a subject, comprising the step of administering to said subject an agent, in an effective amount and in a pharmaceuticallyacceptable vehicle, capable of increasing the physiological effects of" " cyclic AMP, so that means are provided for increasing tight junctions between brain microvascular endothelial cells and so that cell tight junction permeability is reduced.
107. The method of claim 113, wherein said agent comprises a protein kinase stimulator or a phosphoprotein phosphatase inhibitor.
108. A composition for treating vasogenic brain edema in a subject, whereby means are provided for inhibiting tight junction permeability of brain microvascular endothelial cells, comprising an agent, • in a pharmaceuticallyacceptable vehicle, capable* of" increasing the physiologicallyeffective intracellular concentration of cyclic AMP.
109. The composition of claim 115, comprising agents selected from among the group consisting of agents that increase cellular adenylate cyclase activity, agents that inhibit the degradation * of cellular cyclic AMP, and derivatives of cyclic AMP to which endothelial cells are permeable and which act physiologically as does cyclic AMP.*& 88.
110. A composition for treating vasogenic brain edema in a subject, whereby means are provided for inhibiting tight junction permeability of brain microvascular endothelial cells, comprising an agent, in a pharmaceuticallyacceptable vehicle, capable of increasing the physiological effects of cyclic AMP.
111. The composition of claim 117, wherein said agent comprises a protein kinase stimulator or a phosphoprotein phosphatase inhibitor.
112. A method for modulating leukocyte adhesion to brain endothelial cells by substantially preventing a leukocyte VLA4 molecule from binding to a brain endothelial VCAM1 molecule.
113. The method of claim 119 wherein said method includes use of a reagent that blocks the binding of said VLA4 molecule to said VCAM1 molecule.
114. A method of claim 119 wherein said reagent is a receptor.
115. A method of claim 121 wherein said receptor is selected from the group consisting of an antibody, an antibody fragment thereof, and a peptide.
116. A method of claim 121 wherein said receptor is directed against a VLA4 molecule.
117. A method of claim 123 wherein said receptor is directed against the α1 subunit of the VLA4 cell adhesion molecule.
118. A method of claim 121 wherein said receptor is directed against both the α4 and β1 subunits of the VLA4 adhesion molecule.
119. A method of claim 121 wherein said receptor is directed against a VCAM1 molecule.
120. A method of claim 121 wherein said receptor is a monoclonal antibody.
121. 89 ι .|.
122. A method'£or i or ameliorating brain inflammation including modulating leukocyte VLA4 molecule adhesion to brain endothelial cell VCAM1 molecules. > *> j ' t« .L'u .!'.
123. A method of claim 1 8! wherein 'said' method includes use of a reagent which blocks the binding of said VLA4 molecule to said VCAM1 molecule.
124. A method of claim 129 wherein said reagent is a receptor. . . ; ..,,!;,!,.!,.
125. A method ofn cldϊ i^o, w#e αfltt3 id ' . j receptor is selected from the groip coh'sisting or;an., antibody, an antibody fragment thereof, and a peptide.
126. A method of claim 130 wherein said receptor is directed against the VLA4 molecule.
127. A method of claim 132 wherein said receptor is directed against the α1 subunit of the VLA4 molecule.
128. A method of claim 130 wherein said receptor is directed against, bqjih τ$e . subunits of the VLA4 moleculeJ.
129. A method of claim 130 wherein said receptor is directed against a VCAM1 molecule.
130. A method of dϊkϊn 131> wterώn'&ai * ' receptor is a monoclonal antibody.
131. IH a method 'for >,. l ' inflammatory brain disease, the improvement comprising administering a therapeutically effective' do a e Of > j * '< reagent that substantially prevents a leukocyte V__A4 molecule from binding to a brain' fendbtheϊial VCAM1 ^ 'tf< ' molecule.
132. A method of claim 1T7 wherein said reagent is a receptor. 'I. *& 90.
133. A method of claim 138 wherein said receptor is selected from the group consisting of an antibody, an antibody fragment thereof, and a peptide.
134. A method of claim 138 wherein said receptor is directed against the VLA4 molecule.
135. A method of claim 140 wherein said receptor is directed against the α1 subunit of the VLA4 molecule.
136. A method of claim 138 wherein said receptor is directed against both the α4 and β1 subunits of the VLA4 molecule.
137. A method of claim 138 wherein said receptor is directed against a VCAM1 molecule.
138. A method of claim 138 wherein said receptor is a monoclonal antibody.
139. A composition for preventing or ameliorating brain inflammation including at least one reagent that substantially prevents binding of a leukocyte VLA4 molecule to a brain endothelial VCAM1 molecule.
140. A composition in therapeutically effective form for preventing or ameliorating brain inflammation including at least one receptor that substantially prevents binding of a leukocyte VLA4 molecule to a brain endothelial VCAM1 molecule.
141. A composition for treating brain inflammation including a therapeutically effective form of at least one receptor that substantially prevents binding of a leukocyte VLA4 molecule to a brain endothelial VCAM1 molecule.
142. A composition for treating inflammation including a therapeutically effective form of at least one receptor that substantially prevents binding of a leukocyte VLA4 molecule to a brain endothelial VCAM1 molecule and delivers to the brain endothelial cell an antiinflammatory agent.
143. A method for inducing brain inflammation via the intracranial injection of tumor cells.
144. The method of claim 149 wherein said tumor cells are ATCC 1573 human kidneyderived.
145. The method of claim 149 wherein a rat is injected intracranially.
146. An assay for ascertaining whether a compound is effective as an antiinflammatory agent i the brain, wherein said assay includes inducing brain inflammation in a living organism via the intracranial injection of tumor cells, exposing brain tissue from said injected living organism to said putative brain antiinflammatory agent. t* >tn i 4 n i.
Description:
'u

« >< .

BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER MODEL

This is a continuation-in-part of United States Serial No. 097/413,274, filed September 27, 1989.

BACKGROUND OF THE ' -^g ^tτJN ! * ' '* * " Field of the Invention ' « *** .. «.' m » " The present invention relates* gerrett-βlljj * o *jιβ .• < vitro models of endothelial cells, the invention relates to an in vitro model that simulates the characteristics of microvascular endothelial cells of the brain that ? c_8Mι_.tif __e' the '' blood-brain barrier. - , ,,

Description of Related Art ' " ' ,wM ' "" ' *'• ^ * * " ( unlike that of any other organ of the body. This unique capillary system has morphqlpg±Θai. d. J,, . biochemical characteristics that make " up the "blood- brain barrier" (BBB) . The BBB acts to separate the brain ." prevents molecules in the blood that are neither lipophilic or transported by specific carrier proteins from entering the brain (Beta, A. . et ϋ,» Ann, ~B&ΨΛ

» Jf ι* t1 J_i.ι y'*. rt'lIiil IIifllll! H * Phvsiol.. 48:241 (1986),- Pardridgfe; » W y M imMMψ j * «

Pharmacol. Toxicol.. 28:25 (1988)).

The characteristics of the brain capillaries that make up the BBB include: (a) high-resistance tight junctions between endothelial cells of the brain that block transport of molecules between cells; and (b) limited amount of transport across cells, as compared to that occurring in peripheral capillaries.

1 -. * *»'?.*♦ 'U _ 1liitt*!,!i M« ''_ _ '

The tight junctions of the BBB prevent passive diffusion of molecules and ions around the endothelial cells. Thus, most hydrophilic drugs and peptides that gain ready access to other tissues of the body are barred from entry into the brain, or their rates of entry are low. Thus, at the BBB, the only substances that can readily pass from the luminal core of the capillary to the abluminal tissue that surround the capillary are those molecules for which selective transport systems exist in the endothelial cells, as well as compounds that are lipid soluble. Such compounds, because of their inherent lipophilicity, are able to intercalcate into the plasma membrane of endothelial cells and move to the abluminal side. These unique properties of the BBB have provided a major hindrance to the development of therapeutic agents directed toward diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), e.g., Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

There are two general situations in which the ability to test for CNS entry of therapeutic agents is important. First, the increasing prevalence of CNS disorders and the introduction of new molecular biological and biochemical techniques to treat such disorders will lead to the development of new drugs that will be centrally active. These drugs must be tested for their ability to reach the brain, i.e., penetrate the BBB. Second, many drugs used to treat peripheral disorders have undesirable CNS side effects. As replacements for these drugs are developed, they will have to be screened for CNS penetration as well. Of course, the objective in that case is to develop peripherally-acting drugs that do not enter the brain.

Screening batteries of compounds for passage into the brain by conventional techniques is impractical. Generally, compounds are introduced into the carotid artery, and their concentration in the bra.in is then determined. This means that for each individual compound many animals must be injected and processed. While animal testing .in vivo is important, it is not the optimal screening system when many compounds have to be examined.

Thus, it would be highly desireable to have an ;Ln vitro model of the BBB so as to be able efficiently and inexpensively to screen numerpus drugs in a relatively short amount of time. The test system should- piosely simulate the morphological and physiological characteristics of the .in vivo BBB in having tight junctions between cells and similar permeability characteristics, and should be composed of defined cell types.

Another desirable characteristic of an in vitro model is that it should provide a system for testing manipulations of the endothelial cells of a nature as to increase or decrease the passage of drufcjό from the blood side to the brain side of these cells.

Previous attempts to construct an in Vitro model of the BBB have not met the criteria outlined above. Intact brain microvessels (Kumagai, A.K., J. Biol.

Chem.. 262:15214 (1987)) are likely to contain not only endothelial cells and astrocytes, but mast cells as well. Further, the limited volume and access to the lumen of microvessels precludes their use for vectorial transport studies, and therefore makes them suboptimal as a workable model for the BBB.

Several laboratories claim to have created a BBB in vitro model using brain capillary endothelial cells

0 in the presence of standard growth media (Audus, K.L., et al. , Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.. 507:9 (1987); Van Bree, J.B.B.H., et al., Phar . Res.. 5:369 (1988); Hart, M.N. , et _ _. , J. Neuropath. Exp. Neurol. , 46:141 (1987)). Cloned bovine brain capillary endothelial 5 cells, grown on a permeable support of glutaraldehyde- treated collagen gel, have been reported to exhibit high transendothelial cell resistance (Rutten, M.J. et al. , Brain Res. , 425:301 (1987)). However, these studies have demonstrated only one or a few of the

10 inherent morphological, biochemical and functional characteristics of brain capillaries, and the data derived from such systems are often conflicting, in part because in most studies the systems employed incompletely characterized populations of primary cell

15 cultures or cell lines, and in part because the brain capillary endothelial cells were not grown in the proper milieu.

It is known that brain astrocytes influence the properties of brain capillary endothelial cells.

20 Janzer et al. (Janzer, R.C., Nature, 325:253 (1987)) disclosed that neonatal rat brain type 1 astrocytes, cultured on filters and transplanted into the eyes of εyngeneic animals or chick embryo chorioallantoic membranes, became vascularized by the endogenous

25 endothelial cells, and caused the endothelial cells to exclude the dye, Evans blue.

Exclusion of Evans blue dye or other cationic dyes that bind to albumin is one property of endothelial cells in the brain. These results might be used to

30 predict that astrocytes can cause endothelial cells to exhibit a generally low rate of macromolecular transport. They do not necessarily indicate, however, that the endothelial cells have been induced to form

the high resistance tight junctions which are also characteristic of those cells in vivo.

Other in vitro studies have examined the effects of brain astrocytes on ultra-structural properties of endothelial cells. Brain astrocytes enhanβδd the frequency, length and complexity of tight junctions formed between cultured, brain-derived endothelial cells (Tao-Cheng, J.-H. et al. , J. Neurosci. , 7:3293 (1987)). Also, fourth passage rat brain capillary endothelial cell cultures, grown in rat brain astrocyte-conditioned medium on endothelial cell matrix-coated substrate, exhibited tight juiiction biogenesis (Arthur, F.E. et al . . , Dev. Brain Research, 36:155-9 (1987)). Both studies relied solely upon ultrastructural examination of individual groups of treated cells, but neglected to look at resistance of tight junctions.

Thus, an important need still exists for an in vitro model of a BBB that meets all of the criteria necessary for a model to simulate the in vivo situation: 1) a monolayer of endothelial cells essentially all of which are connected by tight junctions; 2) a diffusion barrier for components that do not ordinarily cross the BBB; and 3) a high transendothelial cell electrical resistance barrier indicating the presence of tight junctions that prevent passive diffusion of ions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, an in vitro model of the vertebrate BBB is disclosed that simulates important morphological and permeability characteristics of the brain BBB, that permits the

efficient and inexpensive screening of CNS drugs, and that allows testing of manipulations of the BBB.

The present invention is based on the effects of the brain microenvironment on the special properties of brain capillary endothelial cells. More specifically, the present invention is based in part upon a reconstruction of interactions between brain astrocytes and brain capillary endothelial cells in in vitro monolayer systems.

This invention is also based on the discovery that treatments that raise effective cyclic AMP concentrations in cultured brain endothelial cells, particularly in conjunction with the presence of components of endothelial cell and brain astrocyte- derived conditioned media or the equivalent, markedly increase the production of tight junctions that exhibit properties of the BBB in vivo such as high electrical resistance, peripheral staining of cells by phalloidin, and a diffusion barrier for substances known ordinarily not to cross the BBB. This invention is also based upon the discovery that tight junctions between brain microvascular endothelial cells may be disrupted and the blood-brain barrier made more permeable by agents that decrease the effective intracellular concentration of cyclic AMP, interfere with the physiological actions of cyclic AMP, increase the effective intracellular concentration of cyclic GMP, or promote the physiological actions of cyclic.GMP, and that such manipulations allow for the facile delivery of drugs across the blood-brain barrier.

It is thus an object of this invention to disclose an i vitro model of the BBB comprising a porous solid support separating monolayer cocultures of

microvascular endothelial cells and brain astrocytes juxtaposed in a device that permits physiological interaction between the cell types.

It is another object of this invention to disclose an i vitro model of the BBB comprising a monolayer of microvascular endothelial cells disposed on a filter in contact with conditioned growth media derived from endothelial cells or astrocytes.

It is yet another object of this invention to provide criteria for selecting endothelial cells and astrocytes particularly suitable for the in vitro model.

It is a further object of this invention to provide criteria for selecting substrata for the culture of onolayers of cells in the in vitro model of the invention.

It is still another object of this invention to provide means for elevating the effective intracellular cyclic AMP concentration in microvascular endothelial cells of the in vitro model. It is yet another object of this invention to provide testing criteria for the genesis of tight junctions in the in vitro model of the invention'.

It is yet another object of this ' invention to provide an in vitro model of a BBB which uses endothelial cells from blood vessels other than brain capillaries.

It is still another object of this invention to provide compositions and methods involving manipulations of cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP levels or physiological effectiveness in order to open up blood- brain barriers in vivo and in vitro and thereby to permit drug delivery across such barriers.

These and other objects of this invention will become clear by reference to the following disclosure and appended claims.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Fig. 1 provides transmonolayer electrical resistance data for the BBB model of the invention using bovine brain capillary endothelial cell cultures.

Fig. 2 provides albumin flux data for monolayer cultures of bovine retinal endothelial cells and MDCK epithelial cells. Fig. 3 shows flux data for sucrose and chlorambucil across tight junction brain endothelial cells.

Fig. 4 shows the effect of agents that lower cyclic AMP concentrations on morphine analgesia in animals.

Fig. 5 shows the effects of elevating endothelial cell levels of cyclic GMP on cyclic AMP-induced tight junctions.

Fig. 6 shows the effects of elevating in vivo levels of cyclic GMP on morphine analgesia.

Fig. 7 shows the effects of different classes of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase inhibitors on tight junctions of brain endothelial cells in the BBB in vitro model.

Fig. 8 Panels A and B, are photomicrographs of sections from a brain sections in which MS-type inflammation was induced via intracranial injection of human tumor cells. Human and mouse lymphocytes were allowed to contact the sections, and, as seen in Panel A, bind selectively to exposed brain endcfthelium. In Panel B, the lymphocytes were treated with an antibody that inhibits the human VLA-4 receptor (anti-human β-1 integrin) and as can be seen, the human lymphocyte (large cell) binding is substantially inhibited. Fig. 9 is a photograph showing lymphocyte binding and inhibition to binding in brain endothelial cells in culture. Panel A shows the low level binding of lymphocytes to the BBB model endothelium. In Panel B,the endothelium has been treated with an inflammatory reagent, and lymphocyte binding is increased substantially. In Panel C, the lymphocytes were pretreated with anti-human β-1 integrin monoclonal antibody, and their binding to the stimulήt.ed endothelium is substantially inhibited_ Fig. 10 is a graph showing the relative degree of lymphocyte binding to blood vessels in sections of inflamed brain tissue, and, as a basis for comparison, normal lymph node tissue. The "no additions" column shows brain tissue (scored) and "lymph node enddthelitϊm (solid) to which untreated lymphocytes have been added. The degree of binding is represented as' ^ 100%. In the next two columns, lymphocytes have been pretreated with anti-VLA-4 reagents. The middle bars show lymphocytes pretreated with anti-β-1 monoclonal antibody, the right-hand bars show lymphocytes pretrfeated with έmti- α-4 monoclonal antibody. In both cases, lymphocyte binding in brain tissue is almost completely inhibited, as compared to the control. But, lymphocyte binding to

lymph node endothelium, in both cases, is not significantly inhibited.

Fig. 11 is a graph showing the relative degree of Jurkat T-cell lymphocyte binding to brain endothelial cells in the BBB system. As can easily be seen, the anti-β-1 antibody effectively inhibited the binding of leukocytes to TNF-α activated brain endothelial cells. Anti-yS-2, as a control, on the other hand, approaches the untreated control. Plainly, the β-1 subunit provides an effective target for preventing VLA-4/VCAM- 1 interaction in the brain.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention comprises an in vitro model of mixed or cloned endothelial cells expressing high electrical resistance tight junctions and other properties of the BBB in vivo.

One embodiment of the invention comprises a chamber separated into at least two compartments by a porous solid support, on one surface of which support is disposed an essentially confluent monolayer of brain microvascular mixed or cloned endothelial cells growing on a particular substratum, the second compartment of the chamber housing an essentially confluent monolayer of brain astrocytes disposed either on a second surface of the chamber or on the underside of the porous solid support, the monolayers of both cell types being in sufficiently close juxtaposition so that products of each cell type can readily reach the cells of the other cell type. By "porous" we mean containing interstices through which water and the solutes contained therein, but not cells, can pass. In an alternative embodiment, the growth medium in contact with the endothelial cells contains, in part, an astrocyte or endothelial cell-

11

derived conditioned medium or equivalent. By

"conditioned medium" we mean a tissue culture growth medium into which cultured cells have secreted materials of cellular origin. By "equivalent" we mean cell or tissue extracts containing materials of cellular origin that may in other circumstances be secreted extracellularly. Examples of the preparation of conditioned mediums and equivalents ar provided below. In these embodiments of the model, transcellular electrical resistance can be measured directly, as described below. Details as to the construction of these models will be provided below.

In another embodiment of the invention, ixed or cloned microvascular endothelial cells may also be grown on coated microcarrier beads, e.g., Cytodex-3 microcarriers (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) , according to Ryan et al. (Ryan, J., et al. , Tissue Cell, 12:619 (1980)). Although in this model transcellular resistance cannot be measured directly, macromolecular transcellular transport, e.g., of labeled albumin, cationized albumin, or glycosylated albumin, and of dyes such as Trypan blue or Evans blue, can be determined (Kempski, 0., et al. , Acta Neuropathol. , 74:329 (1987); Bioadjieva, S., et al., Lab Invest. , 50:239 (1984); Smith, R.K. , et al. , Pharm. Res. , 5:466 (1988)). The influence of astrocytes on endothelial cells grown on microcarriers can be determined by first growing brain astrocytes, such as neonatal rat type 1 astrocytes, on the beads, then removing the astrocytes, leaving their extracellular matrix behind. This can be accomplished either by lysing the astrocytes in 5 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1% Triton X-100 for 15 minutes or by incubating the astrocytes in phosphate- buffered saline (PBS) containing 10 mM EDTA for 30

minutes, both solutions containing protease inhibitors, e.g., aprotinin and phenylmethysulfonyl fluoride. Coated beads can be washed 3 times in PBS, then treated with 25 mM NH 4 OH. After the beads are washed again with PBS, they can be coated with an essentially confluent layer of cultured endothelial cells. Once the endothelial cells reach confluence, they can be maintained in a growth medium containing cultured astrocytes, or in astrocyte-derived or endothelial cell-derived conditioned medium. In another embodiment, mixed or cloned microvascular endothelial cells can be grown on porous tube-like structures, such as those used in hollow- fiber cell growth devices (A icon Corp., Danvers, MA). Again, a surface of hollow fibers can be coated with astrocytes, from which astrocyte extracellular matrix (ECM) can be prepared as described above. Endothelial cells can then be grown on the astrocyte ECM, and the cells exposed to astrocyte or endothelial cell-derived conditioned medium. In this embodiment, transcellular electrical resistance can be measured by passing current between electrodes inside and outside the hollow fiber. Macromolecular flux can be measured by adding labeled macromolecules outside the fiber, and following their transport across the endothelial cells into the fiber.

Origin of Astrocytes

Purified populations of neonatal rodent brain type 1 astrocytes were prepared according to the procedures of Lillien et al. (Lillien, L.E., et al. , Neuron, 1:485 (1988)). In brief, cerebral cortices were removed from neonatal rats, white matter was discarded, and the gray mater mechanically and

13

enzymatically (trypsinization) dissociated.. Cells were plated in poly-lysine-coated flasks in Dulbecco'ε Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) plus 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) . After 5 days, loosely attached oells were dislodged by shaking, attached cells were passaged into new flasks, and treated with cytosine arabinoside (an anti-mitotic drug) to remove actively proliferating contaminating cells. Finally, astrocytes were maintained in a chemically defined medium and fed twice weekly. Cell type was determined by reactivity with particular sets of antibodies. For example, type 1 astrocytes are fluorescently labeled by an antibody against glial fibrillary acidic protein, but not wi h the monoclonal antibody A2B5 (which label's type 2 astrocytes) or with an anti-galactocerebroέlde antibody (which labels oligodendrocytes) (Raff, M.C , et al. , J. Neurosci.. 3:1289 (1983)).

Origin of Capillary Endothelial Cells _ „

Endothelial cells are 1 prepared from a variety of animal and human sources. For example, mixed populations of endothelial cells may be' * prepared from purified capillaries derived from r-odent and bovine brain, bovine retina, bovine adrenal,. bov,ine aorta,,. > nd human omentum or from human umbilical vein * . fioVine sources are particularly suitable because of the large amounts of tissue available, the ready availability, of fresh tissues, and the similarity of tftt ^permeability of bovine capillary cells to that of their human counterparts.

Bovine brain microvascular cells were isolated according to Audus et aJL. , Pharm. Res.. 3:51 (1986)). Briefly, a slurry of brain grey matter in Liebovitz* L-15 medium was homogenized, and the microyascul.ar

cell-containing particular fraction was separated on a Dextran cushion. Capillaries were resuspended and homogenized, then passed through a series of nylon filters. Capillaries were digested further with collagenase plus trypsin to provide a population of single mixed endothelial cells. These cells were plated on a collagen or fibronectin treated substratum in 10% plasma-derived horse serum (PDHS) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) . Rat brain microvascular endothelial cells were prepared similarly according to Bowman, et ai. (Bowman, P.D., et al . , In Vitro. 17:353 (1981)). Briefly, brain grey matter is minced and digested with collagenase and dispase. The particulate matter is separated over a 25% bovine serum albumin (BSA) cushion, and the pellet further digested with collagenase and DNase. Finally, endothelial cells are isolated on a Percoll gradient, and washed cells are plated on a collagen-treated substratum in DMEM + 20% plasma-derived horse serum (PDHS) + 150 μg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS, available from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO); (McGuire, P.G., et al. , Lab. Invest.. 57:94 (1987)).

To prepare mixed bovine aortic endothelial cells, aortas were trimmed of adventitia and connective tissue, cut open to expose the intimal layer, and the internal aspect contacted with 0.1% collagenase in RPMI 1640. After incubation for 20 minutes at 37"C, the loosened cells were scraped into DMEM + 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and plated into tissue culture flasks. For rodent aortic endothelial cells, the exposed intima were placed on a collagen-treated surface in a minimal quantity of growth medium (DMEM + 20% FCS + 150 μg/ml ECGS) ; endothelial cells will grow out from the explant and proliferate in this growth medium.

Mixed populations of human endothelial cells may also be isolated from fresh umbilical Veins. After cannulating the vein and flushing it with RPMI 1640 medium, the intimal layer is exposed to l mg/ml collagenase in RPMI 1640. After 15 minutes at about 37"C, the detached cells are washed out of the vein / pelleted by centrifugation, the cell pellet suspended in DMEM + 20% FCS, and the cells plated on a collagen- treated substratum (Gimbrone, M.A. , et jal. , J. Cell Biol. , 60:623 (1974)). These cells are also available commercially (Clonetics, San Diego, CA) .

Cells are identified as endothelial by immunofluorescence assay with anti-vorf Wiϊlebrand protein (rabbit serum from Bering 'Diagnostics', I . Jolla, CA) and uptake of di-I-labeled acetylated LDL (Molecular Probes, Junction City, OR) . Endothelial cells are typically passaged once a week and maintained in DMEM + 10% or 20% FCS or 10% PDHS.

Endothelial cell cultures can be cloned, if desired, using the cloning ring technique. Cells are plated in at low density (1000 ce'lls per 10 cm plate) in 10% FCS. Plastic cloning rings, dippqd in εilicone grease, are paced on cells so as to encircle and isolate single or paired cells on an inverted microscope. Once the clone expands, the cells are detached by trypsinization within the ting and transferred to a well of a multi-well * culture disk. Multiple clones of microvascular endoth'elial cells from bovine brain, bovine aorta, rat aorta, and rat brain can be isolated by this technique. "

Astrocvte-Derived Conditioned Medium

Neonatal rat brain type 1 astrocytes were grown to confluency in poly-D-lysine-coated 75 cm 2 flaskε>.

Fresh medium was added to the cells, and removed after 2-4 days. The medium was filtered through a 0.2 μ Millipore filter, and stored frozen at -80°C in small aliquots.

Endothelial Cell-Derived Conditioned Medium Bovine aortic or retinal endothelial cells were grown to confluency in 75 cm 2 flasks. Fresh medium was added to the cells, and conditioned medium collected and stored as above.

Astrocyte Extract Type 1 astrocytes from neonatal rat brain were grown as above. Cells were scraped from the dish in 3 ml of ice-cold DMEM, and homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer at ice-bath temperatures. After centrifuging the homogenate at 40,000 rpm for 30 minutes in a Beckman Instruments SW40 rotor, the supernatant fluid was filtered through a 0.2 μ Millipore filter, and small aliquots stored frozen at -80°C.

Brain Extract Neonatal rat brain cortex was removed and homogenized in DMEM (3 ml per gm. tissue, wet wt.) in a Dounce homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged and processed as for the astrocyte extract above.

Elevation of Cyclic AMP Concentrations Cultures of endothelial cells were treated with one or more agents known to increase cyclic AMP concentrations. These include, but are not limited to: 1) from about 10 to about 100 μM of a J-adrenergic agent, such as isoproterenol, that binds to specific

3-adrenergic receptors on cell surfaces and" stimulates G-protein-mediated activation of adenylate cyclase; 2) serotonergic compounds such as 5-hydroxytryptamine; 3) forskolin, (Sigma Chem. Co., St. Louis, MO) an agent that directly activates adenylate cyclase; 4) parathyroid hormone; and 5) calcitonin gene related peptide. Adding an inhibitor of cyclic AMP phosphodieεterase, the enzyme that degrades cyclic AMP to adenylic acid, will accentuate the cyclic AMP elevating effects of the aforementioned modalities; examples of such inhibitors are 4-(3-butoχy-4- methoxybenzyl)-2-imidazolidinone (Hoffman-LaRoche, Nutley, N.J.) , theophylline and methylisobutylxanthine (Sigma Chem. Co.), Rolipram (Berlex, Inc.) and RO-20-1724 (BioMol, Inc., Phymouth Meeting, PA). In addition, certain derivatives of cyclic AMP can be. used to elevate the effective cyclic AMP concentration in such cells; such derivatives include 8-bromo cyclic AMP (Sigma Chem. Co) and 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)cyclic AMP (Boehringer-Mannheim Corp., Indianapolis, IN). By "effective cyclic AMP" we mean endogenous cyclic AMP or cyclic AMP derivatives to which endothelial, ' cells are permeable and which act physiologically as does endogenous cyclic AMP within such cells. By "effective cyclic GMP" we mean endogenous cycliσ,,-GMP or ςyclic <~H ~ > derivatives to which endothelial cells'are permeable and which act as does endogenous cyclic G1SJP within such cells. By "physiological actioh" of cyclic AMP or cyclic GMP or derivatives thereof we mean those immediate biochemical reactions of these cyclic nucleotides that lead ultimately to the physiological actions ascribed to them. For example, cyclic AMP activates certain protein kinases that catalyze the phosphorylation of hydroxya ino acid residues such as

18

0 serine, threonine and tyrosine in particular proteins, such phosphorylation activating these proteins. Effects of cyclic AMP are reversed by phosphoprotein phosphatases that catalyze the de-phosphorylation of the aforementioned hydroxyamino acid residue-containing 5 proteins.

When brain capillary endothelial cells were grown on a porous solid support with a growth medium containing PDHS plus one or more of the aforementioned agents that elevated the actual or effective

10 intracellular cyclic AMP concentration, transmonolayer electrical resistance increased about 7-fold, from about 50 to about 350 ohm-cm 2 (Fig. 1) . However, when in this system, bovine aortic endothelial cell-derived conditioned medium (BAEC-CM) was also present, the

15 transmonolayer electrical resistance increased about 10-fold (Example 5) . Growing endothelial cell monolayers on astrocyte extracellular matrix potentiated the effects of cyclic AMP and BAEC-CM, producing as much as a 26-fold increase in resistance

20 (Example 5) . Thus, the BBB model of this invention is capable of providing transmonolayer electrical resistances of at least 200 ohm-cm 2 , preferably greater than about 300 ohm-cm 2 , more preferably greater than about 1000 ohm-cm 2 up to about 1500-2000 ohm-cm 2 .

25 In addition, it has been discovered that an elevation of actual or effective cyclic AMP concentrations, with consequent formation of tight junctions between mixed endothelial cells as determined by electrical resistance measurements, was also

30 associated with substantial peripheral staining by phalloidin, a toxin produced by Amanita phalloides that is known to bind to filamentous actin and prevent their depolymerization (Stryer, L. , "Biochemistry", 3d., W.H.

Freeman, N.Y. 1988, p. 940). The belt-like pattern, of phalloidin staining in these treated endothelial cells is similar to that seen in epithelial cells exhibiting high resistance tight junctions. (Gumbiner, B. , J. Cell Biol. , 107:1575 (1985).) In addition, when endothelial cells were grown with endothelial cell- derived or astrocyte-derived conditioned medium plus cyclic AMP enhancing agents such that peripheral phalloidin staining of cells was substantially present, transmonolayer electrical resistance was increased over that obtained in the absence of conditioned medium.

It has also been discovered that the- formation of tight junctions between endothelial cells in the blood- brain barrier model of the invention is 'substantially enhanced when endothelial cells are grown from the time of their isolation in the presence of astrocyte-derived conditioned medium (ADCM) . Thus, when endothelial cells are passaged onto filters, e.g., Costar filters, they are preferably grown in a medium containing 50% ADCM made in MEM with 10% fetal calf serum and 50% N2 (a chemically-defined medium) . After 2-3 days of growth on the filters, they may be treated with a cyclic AMP analogue and a cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor (e.g. , Rolipram or RO 20-1724) ..

In addition, it has been discovered that, when endothelial cells are cultured in concentrations of fetal calf serum substantially lower (e.g., 0.5% to 5%) than the customary 10% used for culturing 'such cells for other purposes, increased cellular resistivity in the blood-brain model of the invention may be attained. ,

20

0 Decreased Cyclic AMP Concentrations or Physiological Activity

As noted above, increases in cyclic AMP in tissues by whatever means (e.g., addition of cyclic AMP analogues, addition of compounds that stimulate 5 endogenous adenylate cyclase activity, or addition of compounds that inhibit the activity of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase thereby inhibiting cyclic AMP degradation) result in enhanced tight junction formation between brain endothelial cells.

10 It has also been discovered that removal of cyclic AMP analogues or other agents that elevate cyclic AMP levels from endothelial cell cultures in the blood- brain model of the invention produces a rapid decrease in resistance, signalling increased permeability of

15 tight junctions.

These discoveries have led to other approaches to regulating tight junctions between brain endothelial cells: (a) compounds that inhibit formation of endogenous cyclic AMP by adenylate cyclase; (b)

20 competitive inhibitors of cyclic AMP; (c) inhibitors of protein kinases, the enzymes that are activated by cyclic AMP; and (d) stimulators of protein phosphatases, the enzymes that dephosphorylate proteins that had been phosphorylated, and thereby activated, by

25 the cyclic AMP system.

The basis of approach (a) above is as follows. A system -for the regulation of adenylate cyclase activity in plasma membranes consists of GTP; a G. regulator protein which, when bound to GTP, inhibits the activity

30 of adenylate cyclase; a G s regulatory protein which, when bound to GTP, activates adenylate cyclase; and, agonists that increase the binding of GTP to G- or G . It has now been discovered that agonists that increase

the binding of GTP to G ? , such as α-adrenergic agents and adenosine Al receptor agonists [e.g., cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and the (-) stereoisomer of N 6 -(phenylisopropyl)-adenosine (R-PIA) ] , particularly the latter agonists, are effective in reducing the resistance of brain endothelial cells. Such observations may be made in vitro in the blood-brain model of the invention or in vivo in brain infusion and behavorial test systems in mice, as shown in the in vivo examples below. For example, it was found that G. agonists that presumably inhibited the cellular production of cyclic AMP lowered the amount of morphine that had to be administered intravenously to mice in order to produce analgesia (morphine does not penetrate well into the brain) . Another in vivo test system comprises the intravenous administration of a tes,t drug to an unanesthetized animal, the injeσtate also containing labeled tracer substances that _ > normally do not penetrate the BBB. Thereafter, the test animal is injected with an anesthetic, followed by phosphate- buffered saline and a tissue fixative. The brain is then removed and dissected, and the amount of tracer substance quantified. Observation with these test systems suggest that agents that inhibit adenylate cyclase and reduce cyclic AMP production increase the permeability of tight junctions and open up the blood- brain barrier, thereby providing a drug delivery system.

Approach (a) above also includes the use of inhibitors that block the binding to the receptors for the aforementioned Gs system of endogenous ligands, e.g., norepinepurine, that stimulate the G s system. By this means, endogenous production of cyclic AMP is reduced, thereby reducing tight junction formation

between brain microvascular endothelial cells.

Approach (a) also includes agents that directly inhibit adenylate cyclase, such as the synthetic nucleoside dideoxyadenosine.

The basis of approach (b) above is that competitive inhibitors of the action of cyclic AMP will increase the permeability of tight junctions, thereby opening up the blood-brain barrier. Compounds of this type that can be tested in the blood-brain model of the invention include the R diastereoisomer of cyclic AMP. The basis of approach (c) above is as follows. Cyclic AMP is known to act physiologically by activating one or more protein kinases that, in turn, catalyze the phosphorylation of key proteins. Thus, inhibitors of protein kinases should nullify the effects of cyclic AMP on tight junction formation between brain endothelial cells. As will be detailed in the examples below, protein kinase inhibitors such as K252a and staurosporine at nM (10-200 nM) concentrations can markedly reduce the resistance of brain endothelial cell cultures. Both inhibitors were reversible. At the light microscope level, it was discovered that either removing cyclic AMP or adding a protein kinase inhibitor caused clear separations of endothelial cell tight junctions. The basis of approach (d) above is that dephosphorylation of those key proteins whose phosphorylation had been catalyzed by cyclic AMP- activated protein kinases will produce an unphosphorylated protein that is inactive in maintaining tight junctions among endothelial cells.

23

Increased Cyclic GMP Concentrations or Activity

Cyclic GMP, another regulatory cyclic nucleotide, is produced from GTP by the enzyme guanylate ' cyclase.

It has now been discovered that increasing cyclic GMP concentrations or physiological activity in brain endothelial cells leads to a decrease in resistance, and thus to an increase in tight junction perϊtteability. Increased concentrations or physiological ' activity of brain endothelial cell cyclic GMP can be achieved b for example, 8-bromo-cyclic GMP, atrial natriuretic factor and sodium nitroprusside, and by cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as dipyridamole (Research Biochemicals, Inc.) or Zaprinast (Rhone- Poulenc) . It was observed, for example, that nitroprusside at concentrations of from 0.1 to 100 μ"k markedly inhibited the effect of a cyclic AMP analogue, RO-20-1724, on elevating the resistance of brain endothelial cells in the blood-brain model of the invention. Such agents may be used in the aforementioned in vivo test systems to determine their effect on the opening up the blood brain barrier in test animals. For example, the m vivo morphine analgesia test system described below can be used to demonstrate that sodium nitroprusside opened up the blood-brain barrier to morphine, and ', that dipyridamole opened up the blood-brain barrier to'enkephalin, an endogenous opiate in vertebrates that does not penetrate significantly into the brain when administered in the peripheral circulation.

Construction of a Chamber BBB Model

In a general embodiment of this invention, brain capillary endothelial cells are grown on a porous substratum-coated solid support, e.g., filters or

membranes. It has been found that endothelial cells can attach to and grow on Nucleopore polycarbonate filters (Costar, Inc., Cambridge, MA), Millicell CM and HA porous nitrocellulose filters (Millipore Corp, Bedford, MA) , and collagen membranes (ICN Biomedical, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA) . The Millicell CM and Nucleopore polycarbonate filters required pre-treatment, i.e., coating, with extracellular matrix material (ECM, see below) , components in order to promote adhesion of cells to the filter. Nucleopore filters promote media exchange across the filter, and permit cellular processes to cross through. Filters allow cells more completely to establish blood side and brain side domains, as they permit separate manipulation of the two compartments of the chamber. Porous solid supports can be coated with ECM by soaking them in an aqueous solution of laminin, vitronectin, or fibronectin (typically, from about 10 to about 50 μg/ml) , Matrigel R (an extract of EHS sarcoma obtainable from Collaborative Res., Bedford, MA) in PBS, type I rat tail collagen or type IV collagen in dilute acetic acid (Collaborative Research, Inc., Collagen Corp, and New York Blood Bank, N.Y.), or astrocyte extracellular matrix (AECM) .

In a preferred embodiment, filters were coated with astrocyte extracellular matrix (AECM) synthesized by astrocytes, in the following manner. Rat brain type I astrocytes, produced as described above, were grown on filters in a chemically-defined medium. Once cells reached confluence, they were lysed by a low ionic strength buffer containing a nonionic detergent, e.g., Triton X-100, and rinsed with PBS containing a protease inhibitor such as aprotinin. This removed the cells and left behind AECM as a coating on the filter.

Alternatively, AECM was generated by solubilizing the cells of a confluent monolayer of astrocytes with nonionic detergent, and then extracting residual extracellular matrix components with a denaturant such as 6 M urea, 6 M guanidine HC1 or 2 M MgCl 2 . This extract was dialyzed against physiological saline before adding to endothelial cells being cultured on filters or used as a filter coat prior to adding endothelial cells.

In one embodiment of the chamber-type in vitro model of the BBB of this invention, an " essentially confluent monolayer of rat brain type 1 astrocytes was disposed on one side of a porous solid support, and an essentially confluent monolayer of endothelial cells was disposed atop an ECM coating on the opposite sid of the porous solid support. The thus-obtained co-culture device was then affixed in a chamber, effectively dividing the chamber into at least two compartments, one of which represents the brain side (endothelial cell side) and the otlier the blood side of a BBB. The cells were then placed in contact with a growth medium, preferably containing PDHS.

In another embodiment, an ECM-coated porous solid support was affixed in a chamber. On one"ECM-coated surface of the porous solid support there was disposed a culture of astrocytes; endothelial cells were then plated at low density (about 10 5 cellε/30 mm filter) onto the opposite ECM-coated surface. The astrocytes "condition" the growth medium that contacts the endothelial cells and may induce appropriate differentiative changes in the endothelial cells, including formation of tight junctions. The cells were grown in a culture medium containing serum, preferably PDHS.

In another embodiment, microvascular endothelial cells were disposed on an uncoated or EMC-coated porous solid support as described above, and the support was affixed in a chamber, on a surface of which there was disposed a culture of brain astrocytes. The growth medium must contact both the endothelial cells and astrocytes to effect biochemical interaction between the co-cultures.

In yet another embodiment, microvascular endothelial cells were disposed on an ECM-coated porous solid support as described above, but astrocytes were absent from either the contralateral side of the porous solid support or from a surface of the chamber. Instead, the growth medium in the blood compartment of the chamber, i.e., the compartment opposite that which houses endothelial cells, was supplemented with from 0% to 100% with astrocyte-derived or endothelial cell- derived conditioned media, or with brain or other tissue extracts, obtained as described above, as required. Agents that are intended to elevate intracellular concentrations of cyclic AMP in endothelial cells or to increase the concentration of effective cyclic AMP may be added to the growth medium, as can be dyes, e.g., trypan blue or Evans blue, or other macromolecules that are used to test for tight junction resistance.

It is preferred that the glucose concentration of a growth medium in contact with endothelial cells not be higher than physiological in vertebrates, i.e., approximately 100 mg/dl.

Assay for Tight Junctions

The presence of tight junctions in the endothelial layer of the BBB model can be detected using reagents

that recognize proteins associated with tight junctions. For example, the monoclonal antibody 40.76, made against ZO-1 tight junction protein, specifically recognizes an antigen on both bovine and mouse endothelial cells (Anderson, J.M. et ai. , J. Cell Biol. , 106:1141 (1988); Stevenson, R.B., et al. , J.

Cell Biol.. 103:755 (1986)). This approach allows the user to detect the formation of tight junctions among small subsets of endothelial cells, and to refine » culture conditions to enhance the formation of tight junctions.

The degree of tightness of tight junctions can be also assessed by transcellular electrical resistance measurements. For transendothelial cell resistance measurements, cells were grown on a porous solid support, e.g., a filter or membrane'attacφel to a holding device in order adequately to sus'pend the cellular monolayer, such as the Costar, ϊ ariswell apparatus or the ICN Cellogen. Trarismoriblayer resistance is measured, for example, with the device of Perkins et al. (Perkins, F.M. , et al. .Am. J. Phvsiol. > 241:C154 (1981)). Cells were maintained in a growth medium or physiological saline, and calomel electrodes on each of the endothelial cells- are connected" by a. saturated KCl - 3% agar bridge. Current is passed between two Ag-AgCl electrodes and the * voltage measured with a Keithly multimeter. Resistance is .calculated from the change in voltage across the mono-layer induced when a short current pulse (10-100 jLtamp) is applied. The resistance of the filter or membrane alone is subtracted. The resistance, multiplied fcy the surface area of the filter or membrane, yields the resistance in ohms-cm 2 .

As noted above, peripheral binding of the toxin phalloidin reveals the presence of belt-like filamentous actin, a hallmark of tight junction formation among endothelial cells. Staining of filamentous actin by phalloidin can be visualized using derivatives such as phalloidin coumarin phenylisothiocyanate or fluorescent FITC-phalloidin or TRITC-phalloidin (Signma Chem. Co., St. Louis, MO).

Another means for assessing the formation of tight junctions among endothelial cells is to determine the transport of macromolecules from the apical blood side to the abluminal brain side. For example, the water- soluble dye Evans blue (mol. wt. 960) that binds strongly to albumin (Freedman, F.B., et al. , Am. J. Physiol. , 216:675 (1969)), can be used to assess the tightness of newly formed endothelial cell junctions; tissues with tight junctions that exclude the dye or exhibit limited transport will remain white, whereas those without tight junctions or that exhibit significant transport capabilities will be stained blue as the dye passes through the junctions. Other water- soluble, macromolecular markers for tight junction formation include fluorescein isothiocyanate bound to dextran (FITC-dextran. mol. wt. 20,000, Sigma Chem.

Co.) and 125I-labeled albumi•n (DuPont/NEN, Wilmington, DE) . Fluorescent dextrans of other sizes and sodium fluorescein itself may be used as well.

Still another means for assessing the tightness of junctions among endothelial cells in the blood-brain model of the invention is to compare the transport of a hydrophilic compound, e.g., sucrose, and a hydrophobic compound of similar size, e.g., chlorambucil, across filters with and without monolayered endothelial cells.

When the transmonoloayer resistance is high, the

29

. tt t

>.i f transport of sucrose should be low compared to that of chlorambucil (or other hydrophobic compounds of similar size) . Alternatively, when the resistance is high, the transport of sucrose should be much * less (e.g., 50-fold or more) than across cell-free filters. Contrariwise, in "leaky" cell junctions, the relative * transport of sucrose will be substantially increased.

Assessment of Ligand Binding, Transcvtosis and Drug Delivery _ * > *

The access in the model of the' invention to both " ' sides of a differentiated endothelium or ECM-coated , , t porous solid supports permits the r ι»assayM.of specifics »<.»ι * binding ,>1 apical ( Furthermore, by adding a labeled probe to one side qf the porous solid support, one can assess the "ability of the probe to be transcytosed from onέ'sid of 1 tHe monolayer to the other.

The model also allows for testing the access of potential new therapeutics to the brain parenchyma. For example, drugs such as L-DOPA cart C!_?©__s the"BBB,* being recognized and transported by amiho acid transporters. Lipophilic drugs are also able to penetrate the BBB. However, as indicated above, potentially therapeutic drugs that are not lipophilic and for which no specific transport mechanism exists may be unable to penetrate the BBB< or "tatty do so at rates insufficient to maintain a therajiitiτϊi'a 4 tWrxlg level in the brain. The in vitro model of the BBB of this invention can also be used to test tight junction- disrupting compositions. It has been found by immunohistological methods that a iplβcule immunologically related to the mouse cell-adhesion

molecule E-cadherin is present on mouse endothelial cells. The expression of the E-cadherin-like molecule is enhanced in cultures of brain endothelial cells exhibiting increased resistance (Example 9) .

Vasogenic Brain Edema It is generally thought that brain edema is caused by increased tight junction permeability (decreased resistance) and/or increased pinocytosis. To the extent to which enhanced tight junction is important, agents that increase cyclic AMP concentration or physiological activity in brain microvascular endothelial cells may be of therapeutic value. These include cyclic AMP analogues, agonists that bind to receptors coupled to the Gs regulatory protein, adenylate cyclase activators, cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitors, protein phosphatase inhibitors, and protein kinase stimulators. We have discovered, in this connection, that the phosphodiesterase primarily responsible for degrading cyclic AMP in brain microvascular endothelial cells is a member of the class termed the Type III cyclic GMP- noninhibitable phosphodiesterase, and that this enzyme is inhibited by compounds such as Rolipra and RO-20-1724 mentioned above.

Other Uses of the Model While the foregoing illustrates preferred modes of practicing this invention, other embodiments of the basic concepts of the present invention can also be practiced. For example, the model can be used with cocultures of pulmonary or aortic arterial endothelial cells, with other cells of vascular walls, e.g., smooth muscle cells, in order to study morphological and

31

metabolic interactions between the two types of cells, as well as transcellular transport and drug permeability. The model may also be used as a chemotaxis chamber to study brain ig ation of lymphocytic cells through monolayers of brain endothelial cells to analyze CNS diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Yet another use of the model is to test other endothelial cell barriers, such as in the testes and retina. Still another use of this model is to screen reagents useful to prevent or ameliorate

to brain endothelia.

MODULATION OF LEUKOCYTE ADHESION TO BRAIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS

The present blood brain barrier model was also used to screen reagents useful to prevent or ameliorate brain inflammation. The blood brain barrier model was used to select reagents that prevent the attachment of inflammatory white blood cells to the brain endothelium. This model, in conjunction with analysis of brain tissue, allowed identification of one of the receptors that white blood cells use to adhere to brain endothelial cells. Once this receptor was identified, reagents and methods useful for ameliorating or preventing inflammation were ascertained, as were therapeutic compositions useful for treating brain- inflammatory disease such as multiple sclerosis.

White blood cells (leukocytes) travel continuously in the general circulation. At the site of an injury or other inflammatory stimulus, cells that line blood vessels (endothelial cells) become activated to express

t .f Pi PI H '

32

0 molecules that are adhesive for leukocytes. Thus, following an inflammatory stimulus, leukocytes bind to the activated endothelium. Once bound, the leukocytes migrate across the blood vessel wall to enter the injured site and release toxic mediators to combat 5 infection. Unfortunately, the leukocyte toxins can also cause indiscriminate tissue damage. Such is the case with multiple sclerosis (MS) . In MS, large numbers of leukocytes leave the blood stream within the brain and cause extensive tissue damage. See Hickey, W.F.,

10 Psychneuroimmunology II, Academic Press (1990) .

In order for leukocytes to enter any tissue, they must first bind to the vascular endothelium. It has been shown in other disease systems that, in spite of the initial insult, if leukocyte binding to the

15 endothelium at the damaged site is inhibited, then the leukocytes do not enter the tissue and further damage is greatly avoided. Simpson et al., J.C1in.Invest. 81: 624-629 (1988) disclose that the administration of a monoclonal antibody that binds to a leukocyte cell

20 adhesion-promoting glycoprotein (Mol; CDllb/CD18) resulted in reduced injury to heart tissue because fewer leukocytes (neutrophils) bound to the heart tissue.

The mechanics of leukocyte adhesion to endothelial

25 cells involves, in part, the binding of cell surface receptors on leukocytes to the corresponding cell surface receptors on endothelia. Both leukocytes and endothelial cells are known to express various adhesion-promoting receptors at various times in

30 response to various stimuli. For reviews of adhesion receptors of the immune system, see generally. Springer, Nature 346: 425 -434 (1990), and Osborn, Cell 62: 3-6 (1990) both of which are herein incorporated by

.'. .,, ( , , J|< ( reference. The expression of cell adhesion molecules is not predictable, and may vary widely in response to different inflammatory stimuli and d_n ' different anatomical locations. For example, JTuqmarji≥n et a.3.. r . ,^ Exp. Med. 170: 959-968 (1989) show that antibodies directed against the CD18 family of adhesion-promoting receptors blocks the migration of leukocytes ac oss^ €lie* blood brain barrier in response to acute' fcflamm tcs'Y * stimulus of bacterial origin. Anti-CD±8 ^dfe< ^fto n ttø not block leukocyte migration to the lung. ' *- Vedder t al., Surgery 106: 509 (1989).

Circulating leukocytes may e ress the VLA-4 receptor, and this has been show to bind to the VCAM-1 receptor on cytokine-activated human Elices, et al., Cell 60: 577-584 (1990). -The different types of molecules induced on blood brain Car .. ier . endothelial cells during brain .and the role that they play in chronic inflammatory brain disease, such as MS, is poorly understood. . „,

A. Ameliorating or Preventing Brain Inflammation The present embodiment was directed toward reagents that modulate leukocyte adhesion in the brain. The blood brain barrier model of the present invention was one system used. Using this model, -brain endothelial cell samples, prepared in accordance ki h the present description, were activated with . . * , inflammation mediators. To a panel of thesέ activated cell samples, leukocytes were introduςed in the ,, , ,, presence of a different putative receptor-bleaker for ' each sample. Individual samples were assayed for the * ' presence or degree of leukocyte adhp^iop«, Here, ~Mo g - the various reagents tested, two antibodies dirfested against VLA-4 (the leukocyte cell adhesion molecule)

were shown to block lymphocyte binding to brain endothelium.

A separate assay produced the same results. Essentially, slices of brain tissue were analyzed for their ability to bind leukocytes in the presence of putative cell adhesion modulators. In this system, another novel aspect of the present invention was developed. Rats were injected with human tumor cells in order to induce inflammation in the brain. Previously, it was not known that this method could induce traffic across the blood brain barrier into the brain. Further, the type of inflammation induced is very much like that seen in multiple sclerosis victims where inflammation is characterized by small vessels, with activated almost cuboidal endothelium. The vessels appear very similar to the "high endothelial venules" seen in lymphoid tissues. Further, the vessels are surrounded by a cusp of lymphocytes, and active lymphocyte traffic is apparent. While MS-type inflammation has been observed, it has never before been induced by this method. Thus, induction of brain inflammation using tumor cells possesses great utility in obtaining tissue for an in vitro model of multiple sclerosis.

After an appropriate length of time, rat brains in which inflammation had been induced were removed and sectioned. To these sections, leukocytes were added, in the presence of the putative cell adhesion modulator to be screened. Here too it was found that the anti-VLA-4 antibodies inhibited leukocyte adhesion.

This inhibition is graphically illustrated in the Figures. Figure 8, Panel A shows a brain section in which no antibody is added. The small dark dots are leukocytes against the background of inflamed brain endothelial cells. As can be seen, the leukocytes are

35

quite densely bound to the vessels in inflamed tissue. Figure 8, Panel B shows inhibition of binding by antibodies directed against the βl subunit of VLA-4. Figure 9 shows a brain endothelial cultur _ie to whichII!.* lymphocytes have bound. Panel j illustrates bin ^i |* o„ unstimulated endothelium. Panel B shows binding to endothelium stimulated for twelve hours by TNFα. In Panel C, the lymphocytes have been pretreated with anti-?-l integrin and their binding to stimulated endothelium is greatly inhibited. As, fe ή Λn ϋέώ i,n., * Example 21, below, the binding density of human leukocytes to brain sections was confirmed by using an

quantification confirmed the visual observation that anti-VLA antibodies prevented leuiao yte i-S^d ig to '' ' brain sections in which multiple sclerotic-type inflammation had been induced. '(Figure 10) . leukocyte binding to cultured endothelium was quantified by prelabeling the. ceHflastl^l f I 25 jy the ^ inhibitory effects of anti-/3 are illustrated in Figure 11.

Different cell adhesion molecules ar% express©^ in different tissues in response to a variety of stimuli. Brain-specificity may be beneficial in administering a ' leukocyte adhesion modulator fo 'therapeutic p«εj_oses. The VLA-4 leukocyte adhesion molecule is known to b expressed throughout the body under various conditions. Other tissues, apart from brain tissue, w e <, hal -aeH* in order to determine if either the anti-o_-4 or the anti-jB-l antibody had any iϊrimune 1 reεlct i i£in dn , ht!se " * tissues. As shown in more detail in Example 22, the anti-α_-4 inhibited lymphocyte binding" to nbscrtel intestinal lymphoid tissue, but did not affect binding

to normal lymph nodes. The anti-/3-l antibody does not inhibit binding to lymph nodes and would not be expected to affect binding to intestinal lymphoid tissue.

VLA-4 is a member of the βl integrin family of cell adhesion molecules, each of which is comprised of two subunits, an and a β chain. There are at least six βl integrins, all sharing the same βl chain and each having a distinct α chain. These six receptors all bind a different complement of the various cell matrix molecules, such as fibronectin, laminin, and collagen. VLA-4, for example, binds to fibronectin. VLA-4, however, is unique in that it also binds to a non-matrix molecule that is expressed by endothelial cells. This molecule is called VCAM-1, and is thought to be expressed on endothelium at various geographic locations in response to various stimuli. Distinct epitopes of VLA-4 are responsible for the fibronectin and VCAM-1 binding activities, and each activity can be inhibited independently. One of the monoclonal antibodies presently used, HP2/1 reacts with the chain of VLA-4 and blocks only its binding to VCAM-1. It does not affect binding of VLA-4 to fibronectin, nor does it affect the activity of the other members of the βl integrin family. However, the chain of VLA-4 also interacts with a distinct β chain, called βp. This receptor mediates all lymphocyte binding to intestinal lymphoid tissues. Another of the antibodies used, the monoclonal antibody, HP2/1, reacting with VLA-4α blocks the activity of this molecule, i.e., it prevents the binding of VLA4αj8p to intestinal endothelium (illustrated in Table 12) . The monoclonal antibody, AIIB2 reacts with the βl chain that is common to all

members of the βl integrin immunoreacts with the entire family, including the fibronectin and the VCAM-1 binding activities of VLA-4. It would not be expected to inhibit lymphocyte binding to intestinal endothelium, however, because it would not bind to βp .

only lymphocyte migration into sites of inflammation, such as the brain during multiple sclerosis. This reagent further would not affect matrix interactions (mediated by all members of the βl integrins) nor would it affect normal intestinal immunity (mediated by VLA- 4 βp) . The production of this, and other such reagents is well within the skill of the art. B. VLA-4/VCAM-1 Directed Cell

Adhesion Modulators And Uses The VLA-4/VCAM-1 molecules, instrumental in brain inflammation (particularly MS-type brain inflammation) provide molecular targets that can be put to a variety of uses. The present invention thus encompasses these uses and related compositions.

First, as is shown by Example 23" rjsoe t tes i .. " ifc ! againisstt the VLA-4 ligand may be used'to; mi ij If . ' leukocyte adhesion to brain endothelial ceils. ' Herein " , the term "receptor" is used to denote a biologically active molecule that binds to a ligand. For example, antibodies or fragments thereof, which immunoreact with the VLA-4 molecule may be useful to prevent leukocyte binding to brain endothelial cells. Peptides, qr peptido imetics or related c bind the cellular adhesion m

contemplated, and these may be made synthetically by methods known in the art. Other receptors which react with a VLA-4 ligand will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Additionally, receptors against a VCAM-1 ligand may be used to modulate leukocyte adhesion to brain endothelial cells. Either way, one cell adhesion molecule is blocked, and one pathway of leukocyte adhesion is terminated.

It should be recognized that for therapeutic purposes, therapeutically effective compositions for preventing or ameliorating brain inflammation containing such VLA-4 or VCAM-1 directed receptors are contemplated as within the scope of the present invention. For example, therapeutic compositions including at least one VLA-4 receptor or VCAM-1 receptor as well as other therapeutic compositions could be used to prevent or ameliorate inflammation of brain endothelial cells. Another example is the use of a VCAM-1 receptor, to which is attached a drug useful for treating MS or other inflammatory condition, for a drug delivery vehicle which also prevents the adhesion of leukocytes to the VCAM-1 molecule. Peptides or peptidomimetics or other molecules, which serve to substantially mimic one cell adhesion molecule or the other, could be used in competition therapy wherein such peptides or peptidomimetics (or other compounds) compete for the available locations on the surface of either the leukocyte (if substantially mimicking VCAM- 1) or the endothelial cell (if substantially mimicking VLA-4) .

Suitable pharmaceutical carriers and their formulations are described in Martin, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 15th Ed. (Mack Publishing Co.,

Easton 1975) . Such compositions will, in " general, '" contain an effective amount of the aqtiye cqmppund . . -._. . _. together with a suitable amount of carrier so as tb prepare the proper dosage form for proper ^ administration to the host. Useful pharmaceutical carriers for the preparation cf the phaAafcititical ' "" ' compositions hereof can be solids, liguids qr gases; thus, the compositions can take the for of tablets,

lipid protein vesicles or adding additional terminal amino acids) , sustained* release formUlat ' i'ons, solutions

excipients include starch, lactose, sucrose, gelatin, malt, r ce, flour, chalk, silica gel, magnesium glycerol monostearate, sodium chloride, dried ski the like. The compositions may be subjected to conven¬

emulsifying agents, salts for adjusting osmotic pressure, buffers, and the like.

In the practice of the therapeutic methods of the present invention, an effective amount of the active

compound, including derivatives or salts thereof, or a pharmaceutical composition containing the same, as described above, is administered via any of the usual and acceptable methods known in the art, either singly or in combination with another compound or compounds of the present invention or other pharmaceutical agents such as anti-inflammatory agents, or other therapeutics known to have an effect on inflammation or the like. These compounds or compositions can thus be adminis¬ tered orally, sublingually, topically (e.g., on the skin or in the eyes), parenterally (e.g., intramuscularly, intravenously, subcutaneously or intrader ally) , or by inhalation, and in the form of either solid, liquid or gaseous dosage including tablets, suspensions, and aerosols, as is discussed in more detail above. The administration can be conducted in single unit dosage form with continuous therapy or in single dose therapy ad libitum.

In one preferred embodiment, the therapeutic methods of the present invention are practiced when the relief of symptoms is specifically required or perhaps imminent; in another preferred embodiment, the method hereof is effectively practiced as continuous or prophylactic treatment.

In the practice of the therapeutic methods of the invention, the particular dosage of pharmaceutical composition to be administered to the subject will depend on a variety of considerations including the nature of the disease, the severity thereof, the schedule of administration, the age and physical characteristics of the subject, and so forth. Proper dosages may be established using clinical approaches familiar to the medicinal arts. It is presently believed that dosages in the range of 0.1 to 100 mg of

41

compound per kilogram of subject body weight will be useful, and a range of 1 to 100 mg per kg generall preferred, where administration is by in ection or. ingestion. Topical dosages may tilise fqpjsiul tions, containing generally as low as 0.1 g of " compound, per ' ml of liquid carrier or excipient. With IrtUϊtipie' daily^ applications being appropriate.

Imaging reagents are also contemplated * A tracer molecule, detectable in radiographic or othe imaging techniques) could be linked to an anti- CAM or anti- VLA-4 reagent to identify areas of actiye,leukocyte traffic in the brain. This is useful in diagnqst3.c Λ .. protocols and in determining the progression o the disease or the effectiveness of therapy^ for example, , . Other uses, formulations, compositions, and ' [ " . ' processes will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.

The following examples are illustratiγ of severa , embodiments of this invention, and should; pot p construed as in any way limiting the invention as * recited in the claims.

EXAMPLE 1 ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE OF ENDOTHELIA CELL CULTURES TREATED WITH CYCLIC AMP' Bovine brain capillary endothelial ceils were grown on polycarbonate filters in a conditioned growth medium containing either 5% or 10% PDHS. in contrqls, the growth medium contained 5% PDHS (□) or 10% PDHS (H In experimental cultures, the growth medium was supplemented with either 5% PDHS ■+ 250 μM &-(4- - chlorophenylthio) cyclic AMP ( Q ) or 10% PDHS + 250 μM 8-(4-clorophenylthio)cyclic AMP + 35 μM RO-20-1724, a cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor ( Λ ) .

Transmonolayer electrical resistances were then determined; these are shown in Fig. 1.

The cyclic AMP analogue alone greatly increased transmonolayer electrical resistance, which is indicative of tight junction formation. Resistances of about 400 ohm-cm 2 , were obtained with monolayers treated with both the cyclic AMP analogue and an agent (RO-20-1724) that inhibited degradation of cyclic AMP.

EXAMPLE 2 TRANSPORT OF LABELED ALBUMIN ACROSS ENDOTHELIAL CELLS AS A FUNCTION OF TRANSMONOLAYER

ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE

The flux of 125I-labeled albumin across monolayers of primary cultures of bovine retina endothelial cells and of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney epithelial cells disposed on 0.4 μ pore-sized polycarbonate filters was determined as a function of tight junctions as reflected in trans-monolayer electrical resistance of each cell type. The results of such experiments are plotted in Fig. 2. The height of the bars in the histogram is a reflection of leakage of albumin through the junctions between cells - the higher the bar, the greater the leakage of albumin.

Control cell-free filter, of course, exhibited the smallest impediment to albumin flux. Substantial flux of albumin across monolayers of bovine retina cells occurred when the electrical resistance was only 20 ohm-cm 2 , and this flux was reduced by 75% in cultures exhibiting an electrical resistance of 60 ohm-cm 2 . In contrast, the flux of albumin was virtually abolished in monolayers of MDCK cells in which

200 ohm-cm were observed.

50% (w/v) bovine aortic endothelial cell-derived

results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Treatment

Control 3 μm polycarbonate 38 cAMP

CAMP + BAEC-CM 3 μm polycarbonate ' #4.8

6-fold ncrease n transmonolayer res stance, to abou 200 ohm-cm 2 . The combination of BAEC-CM and cAMP

EXAMPLE 4

EFFECTS OF ELEVATION OF

INTRACELLULAR CYCLIC AMP CONCENTRATION ON

TRANSENDOTHELIAL CELL ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE

Bovine brain capillary endothelial cells were grown essentially to confluency on 0.4 μm polycarbonate filters.

Cultures were either untreated for 24 hours (Control) or treated for 24 hours with 250 μM 8-(4- chlorophenylthio) cyclic AMP (cAMP) , 10 μM isoproterenol (ISO) , 10 μM 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) , or 10 μM forskolin. In all cultures, 35 μM RO-20-1724 was also present. Transmonolayer electrical resistances were then determined. Each value in Table 2 represents the average of 3 replicate experiments, referred to control cells to which was assigned a resistance value of 100.

The results indicated that any agent that elevated effective intracellular cyclic AMP concentrations enhanced transmonolayer electrical resistance by at least 4-fold. The greatest enhancement of resistance (over 8-fold) was obtained by the use of forskolin, a compound that activates adenylate cyclase directly.

45

EXAMPLE 5 * • • > " ■• "" "

EFFECTS OF CYCLIC AMP, CONDITION ' ME&ItJM ' " ' ' ^ ' AND ASTROCYTE EXTRACELLULAR MATJRIX ON . ,, ... TRANSENDOTHELIAL CELL ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE v »

then grown to confluency on these collagen an fibronectin-coated filters. In case C, the astrocytes were lysed in 1% Triton X-100 in 5 mM Tris buffer, pH , ,

min. at 37°C to remove the cells. These filters were also treated with 25 mM NH 4 OH and ringed i, .P . BJ3.., Bovine brain endothelial cells were grown to confluency on these different types of filters, in B," C and D, f cells were treated as in Table 1 with 250, μ 8-(4-, ,,, chlorophenylthio) cyclic AMP (cAMP) 35 M 35 ! μ

RO-20-1724 and bovine endothelial cell ' cbnα_itioried medium (BAEC-CM). Transendothelial electrical > resistances were determined; re∑sista'hce-S were . . « normalized to a control value of 100 in Table 3. The combination of the cyclic AMP derivative,

when the cells were grown on astrocyte extradellula matrix prepared as described in C.' When cells were grown on astrocyte extracellular matrix.,.©spared- a© i D, they did not grow to confluency (and; hfehce, the* — transmonolayer resistance was low). When cells were *

Hi .' v_ <

46

0 grown on matrices prepared from other cell types (such as endothelial cells) , there was no increase in resistance.

Table 3

Treatment Relative Resistance

A) Control 100

B) CAMP + BAEC-CM 980

C) CAMP + BAEC-CM + astro-ECM #1 2652

D) cAMP + BAEC-CM + astro-ECM #2 138

EXAMPLE 6 10 EFFECT OF ASTROCYTE-DERIVED CONDITIONED MEDIUM

ON ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE OF BRAIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS Freshly-dissociated bovine brain endothelial cells (BBEC) were plated on tissue culture dishes either in the absence or presence of astrocyte-derived 15 conditioned medium (ADCM) . Cells were then plated onto collagen-fibronectin-coated filters, again in the absence or presence of ADCM. After the cells reached confluency, samples were treated with 250 μM 8-(4- chlorophenylthio) cyclic AMP and 35 μM RO-20-1724 20 (+CAMP in Table 4) .

The data of Table 4 demonstrate that the highest resistances were obtained when cells were placed initially in ADCM.

Table 4

Growth Plating feiec iά i Aesiktitaϋe Medium* Medium - b tøg + C ohm-cϋr

MEM/FCS MEM/FCS 11 42

50% MEM/FCS: MEM/FCS 12 142 50% ADCM

MEM/FCS 50% MEM/FCS: 27 160 50% ADCM

50% MEM/FCS: 50% MEM/FCS: 46 312 50% ADCM 50% ADCM

*MEM, minimal essential medium; FCS, fetal cal serum; ADCM, astrocyte-derived conditioned medium.

ι. * ι

EXAMPLE 7 EFFECT OF FETAL CALF SESUM RgEJgfcTlOW O

ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE OF BRAIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS Bovine brain endothelial cells were dissociated " " and plated on tissue culture dishes ip 50^ MEM/EC^ -. ,, ^ 50% ADCM. Cells were then passaged onto collagen- fibronectin-coated filters and grown in the e'αϊa *.. indicated in Table 5. Conditions were.as in jExamplq^.6, except that some cells were grown in 50 serum-j:;ree defined medium (N2) . The results are shown in Table 5. i - 1 p * *«» i .V 111 t

The data demonstrate that the highest resistance were attained with cells grown m ADCM and cyclic AMP analogues in the presence of reduced * fetal calf serum. The same result was obtained when the defined medium N2

I . . < was replaced by MEM.

_ * .

Table 5

Treatment of cells*

MEM/FCS 40 ± 6 + cAMP 163 ± 22 + ADCM 56 ± 15 + CAMP + ADCM 345 ± 64

50% MEM/FCS, 50% N2 61 ± 2 + CAMP 305 ± 50 + ADCM 115 ± 11 + CAMP + ADCM 625 ± 82

* MEM, minimal essential medium; cAMP, cyclic AMP; ADCM, astrocyte-derived conditioned medium.

EXAMPLE 8 TRANSPORT DATA ACROSS HIGH RESISTANCE MONOLAYERS Figure 3 shows transport data across high resistance monolayers of bovine endothelial cells on filters in the blood-brain model of the invention, using labeled sucrose (360 dalton, hydrophilic) and labeled chlorambucil (304 dalton, mildly hydrophobic anti-tumor compound) .

Although these compounds are of similar size, the hydrophobic compound was transported much better than was the hydrophilic compound across filters with cells, compared to transport rate across cell-free filters.

Sucrose was almost entirely prevented from leaking between the cells. This is a significant advance over previous models in which the difference in the rate of sucrose across filters with and without cells was 3 to 5-fold due to leaky tight junctions in those models.

49

EXAMPIiE 9 EFFECTS OF PROTEIN KINASE lNl__IBlTOR-_ j l_ ' ' ' ' '

confluency on filters in the blood-brain mo el of the invention as described in EXsttnples 1 / 3 J ε_ιjd §» "above? 1 , " 4 and the effects of protein kinase inhibitors K252a and staurosphorine on resistance deterjtrφped- i , h ^e , ( ^ * compounds are non-specific in that they inhibit protein kinases A and C, MLCK, etc. The re_sulfe|_i are phowi an )f Table 6

Table 6 " -'< -

Drug Resistance (% of control)

Staurosporine

10 nM 108 30 _ V

30 nM 64 f/l-i /« n " ■■ M' ι -

100 nM 5.5

Both compounds, but particularly staurosporine, were remarkably effective in reducfi*ng ir'epistapcξe, i . e.,

then determined. The data in Table 7 represent the amount of radioactivity remaining in the brain after infusion and washout. An average of 3-4 animals was used in each category.

The results showed that staurosporine enhanced entry into the brain of both small (sucrose) and large (BSA) molecules, as the result of the inhibitance of the activity of cyclic AMP-activated protein kinase.

EXAMPLE 11 EFFECT OF Gi RECEPTOR AGONISTS AND AGENTS THAT INCREASE CYCLIC GMP ON BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER

IN AN IN VIVO TEST SYSTEM The test compound was delivered to a restrained, unanesthetized mouse (30-35g) via the tail vein. The injectate also contained 10 μCi 3 H-sucrose and 1 μCi 125 I-BSA as tracer substances that do not normally penetrate the BBB in vivo. Fifteen or sixty minutes after the injection, the animal, anesthetized with 2% Avertin, was perfused via venipuncture with phosphate buffered saline followed by fixative. The brain was removed immediately, the medulla, pons and hypothalamus

51

0 excised and the remaining tissue homogenized by passsage through a 3 cc needle into a preweighed scintillation vial containing 1.5 ml Soluene (Packard) . The vial was weighed to determine wet tissue weight. Ten ml of Inst-Gel (Packard) was added to each sample

5 after overnight incubation at 75°C. The samples were counted for DPM by liquid scintillation spectro etry. Values are expressed as DPM/gm tissue. A minimum of four animals/group were used for each experiment. Data are expressed as the mean fold-increase which , is " 0 derived by dividing the treatment value by the control value. Numbers in parenthesis represent the number of experiments carried out for the particular condition *

Table 8

Radioa tii i M > 5 Compound

CPA, 100 ug/kg

R-PIA, 25 ug/kg

0 Nitroprusside, 3 mg/kg

The results show that adenosine Gi receptor agonists (such as cyclopentyladenosine, CPA) and the 5_- (,-). st___ereoi • somers of .. N_•. 6 - (,ph. enyl . ι» sopr 'opy « l',) -a . »d.,en < o . fsi .ne l ft ' » "

(R-PIA) increased the uptake by brbϊrf'Or'Wll ' ' * " * " '"" (sucrose) and large (BSA) molecules by. as much »at 30Θ% . ' , «i>ι. ».

<<

EXAMPLE 12

EFFECT OF TIGHT JUNCTION PERMEABILITY MODULATORS

ON BEHAVIORAL ASSAY

The behavorial assay is designed to demonstrate delivery of a drug into the brain parenchyma at levels sufficient to have a therapeutic effect. Morphine and the naturally occurring opioid peptides, endorphin and enkephalin, bind to μ opioid receptors in the brain and suppress the sensation of pain. This analgesic effect can be demonstrated with mice in the hot plate assay. Mice are placed on a surface uniformly heated to 55"C.

The time it takes for the mouse to respond to the heat stimulus by licking its front or hind paws is measured.

Morphine (700 MW) delivered by i.v. injection at doses of 1-10 mg/kg, has an analgesic effect in that it increases the latency of response to the heat stimulus measured 15 minutes after the injection. The latency is expressed as % analgesia.

% analgesia = (t c t c ) x 100 t e = experimental latency

(T - t c ) at given dose of analgesic t c = control latency with no analgesic T = 60 sec. , the maximum allowed latency The purpose of these experiments is to test the ability of putative BBB openers to shift the morphine dose response curve to lower doses and thus have analgesic activity when delivered peripherally. In this experiment (Fig. 4) 25 μg/kg of CPA potentiated the effects of morphine, particularly at lower morphine levels. •, morphine alone; x, CPA + morphine

Thus, CPA, which reduces cyclic AMP production, lowered the amount of morphine that had to be administered to produce analgesia, i.e., CPA opened the blood-brain barrier.

EXAMPLE 13 • ' *

INHIBITION BY NITROPRUSSIDE OF E * FFEc "fr O jF C ϊYCLIC " ~~~ ι AπMP

ON ENDOTHELIAL CELL TIGHT JUNCTIONS Confluent layers on filters of bov.Lιie<brain endothelial cells not previously treated with * cyclic AMP analogues were stimulated with RO-20-Ϊ724 (+ RO in Fig. 5) at the beginning of the experiment so as to increase cyclic AMP levels and resistance' or left untreated (- RO) . Other cultures were ttbated with RO-20-1724 plus sodium nitroprusside (Nit oP) n various concentrations. Nitroprusside is?kn_rwn to < • < > increase the activity of the Gi system- The resistance of the cells was then determined as above.

The results, shown in Fig. 5 , showf'-that > ^« nitroprusside inhibited the increase in resistance produced by cyclic AMP elevation in a *■ manner.

EXAMPLE..14 ,5 ' .fj > ,* . , fjj ' ϊ .f ,]

' 1 ! Ffttii i 1 ' 1 ' r, i ' W Hi 1 ' 1 'fj tj « ***i*ϊ|fϊ*** *

EFFECT OF SO )DDIIUUMM NNIITTRRODPPJ(RRUt.SSB6l_II-Jl-_ MORPHINE-INDUCED ANALGESIA The effects of sodium nitroprusside, an agent that increases cyclic GMP levels, on morphine-induced analgesia in mice were determined by the assay system of Example 12, and are shown in Fig. 6. Nitroprusside

EXAMPLE 15 APPEARANCE OF E-CADHERIN ON BNDOTHELIAL .QltLUg . ., Bovine brain endothelial cells were grown to confluency on filters either in control medium (low resistance cultures) or under condlt'iohs dϊ? enhanced

cyclic AMP plus endothelial cell conditioned medium as in Examples 1, 3 and 5 (high resistance cultures) . After transendothelial cell resistance measurements, cultures were fixed and labeled with a rabbit antibody prepared against mouse E-cadherin with a fluorescent FITC-conjugate of goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin. The high resistance cultures stained much more brightly for E-cadherin than did low resistance cultures, and also showed some localization of the E-cadherin around cell borders. As E-cadherin appears to be expressed specifically in endothelial cells in brain, these observations are a further demonstration that treatments that increase electrical resistance of brain endothelial cells in culture also cause them to adopt another characteristic property of the BBB.

EXAMPLE 16

EFFECT OF INHIBITION OF CYCLIC GMP PHOSPHODIESTERASE ON ENKEPHALIN-INDUCED ANALGESIA The behavioral assay described in Example 12, modified to induce analgesia with an endogenous opiate, enkephalin (20 mg/kg) , rather than with morphine, was applied to mice treated with the cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, dipyridamole. The results are shown in Table 9.

55

' *V l!

Percent Analaesia ^.-.. ..» .., . . . ii-^•' . -," :

Experiment Enkephalin Enkephalin + Dipyriαaroole

»i:i __» -h

1 2.8 13.5 2 6.4 25„8

it . ' ' ; .*U ι.( : .

These results are consistent with e"th^bry lfiat 1 elevation of intracellular levels of σyelite- ; .GB :"■ ' ■- , * ' -■ ■■ ■■ increase the permeability . endothelial cell tight junctions to ©qr hJjrjeμ

EXAMPLE 17 ,.. „ . .. . ,.,- . i .

EFFECT OF INHIBITION OF CYCLIC GMPuPHQgPH@.DIESTERASE. ON BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER IN N,; IN .¥l O>.TEST.-S STEMi The in vivo tracer experiment o© Bxkttple 11 wa_3 i ' repeated, except that the test compOl ήtf * .afe' fce cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, dipyridamole.

The results show that inhibition of cyclic GMP ...1*t» phosphodiesterase, which results in an elevation of intracellular levels of cyclic GMP, increased the

.!*•.'...*' : . i M ; .-- 'i ..i

transport across the blood-brain barrier of both small (sucrose) and large (bovine serum albumin) molecules.

EXAMPLE 18 EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CLASSES OF PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS ON BRAIN MICROVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CELL TIGHT JUNCTIONS IN VITRO Bovine brain microvascular endothelial cells were isolated and grown on permeable filters in the BBB in vitro model of the invention. Cells were maintained in astrocyte-derived conditioned medium, but were not treated with agents that elevate cyclic AMP levels in such cells.

At the beginning of the experiment (i.e., in a low resistance state) , cells were either left untreated (blk in Figure 7) or treated with 17.5 μM Rolipram or RO-20-1724 (RO in Figure 7) (specific inhibitors of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase) . Resistance was then measured at various times. In both experiments (Figure 7) , by 30 minutes resistance was already substantially higher in cells treated with these compounds. In contrast, specific inhibitors of cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase, zaprinast, dipyridamole and milrinone, were ineffective under analogous conditions. This suggests that the phosphodiesterase predominantly responsible for degrading cyclic AMP in brain endothelial cells is a Type III cyclic GMP- noninhibitable phosphodiesterase. This also suggests that inhibitors of this class of enzyme may be effective in treating vasogenic brain edema.

57

EXAMPLE 19

RESISTANCE OF HUMAN BRAIN MICROVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CELLS IN AN IN VITRO BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER MObEL ,. Brain biopsy specimens from „"' patients were transported from the operatiηg' roo to the laboratory in a MEM-antibiotic medium. After dissecting away the meninges, gray matter Was rinsed, then homogenized in L-15 medium as described above. The homogenate was passed through a 50 μm nylon filter; the residue was passed through a 50 μm filter twice more. The final residue was spun down, then suspended in 5 ml of a solution containing collagenase, tryps . and DNAse, as described above for bovine brain endothelial cells. Isolated capillary fragments and cells were centrifuged, resuspended and plated on collagen-fibronectin-coated flasks in a growth medium containing rat astrocyte-derived conditioned medium., The cells were then maintained as described above fqr bovine brain cells.

After the cells had been transferred to permeable supports and grown to confluency, some were treated with chlorophenyl-thio-cyclic AMP + RO-20-1724 as detailed above.

Prior to elevation of cyclic AMP levels, . , , resistance of the cells (average of six replicates) was, 62.5 ohm-cm 2 . Subsequent to treatment, resistance of the cells (average of six replicates) averaged" 357.8' ohm—cm .

This experiment demonstrated that human brain microvascular endothelial cells responded as did the counterpart cells from bovine brain in terms of tight junction formation in response to cyclic AMP.

EXAMPLE 20 EFFECT OF REMOVAL OF CYCLIC AMP-ELEVATED AGENTS ON THE SUBSEQUENT RESISTANCE OF BRAIN MICROVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CELLS Bovine brain endothelial cells were grown to confluency on filters in the blood-brain barrier of the invention using the standard protocol described in Examples 1, 3 and 5. Thereafter, cells were treated for 48 hours with chlorophenyl-thio-cyclic AMP + RO-20-1724. The medium containing these cyclic AMP elevating agents was removed, and the cells were washed with fresh growth medium. To some cells was added growth medium alone, and to other cells was added growth medium containing the cyclic AMP analogue and RO-20-1724. The resistance of the cell monolayers was measured periodically, and the results are shown in Table 11.

Resistance dropped quite rapidly when intracellular levels of cyclic AMP were reduced (Medium alone in Table 11) , due, probably, to the presence of a rapidly acting phosphoprotein phosphatase that

59

dephosphorylates cyclic AMP-activated proteins.

Resistance remained high when washed cells continued to be exposed to sources of intracellular cyclic AMP (Medium + "cyclic AMP") .

EXAMPLE 21 MODULATION OF LEUKOCYTE ADHESION TO

INFLAMED BRAIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS In this preferred embodiment, antibodies against VLA-4 were shown to substantially prevent leukocyte adhesion to brain endothelial, using both a novel system for inducing MS-type inflammation in vivo, and the blood brain barrier model.

Unless otherwise stated, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill ,in the. art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are now described. As set forth above, all publications to which reference is made are incorporated herein by reference. Materials and Methods

Lymphocytes: Mouse or rat lymphocytes- were isolated immediately before a binding assay from mesenteric, cervical and brachial lymph nodes by standard methods and crushed between the frosted ends of two glass slides. Human lymphocytes were isolated from heparinized or EDTA-treated whole blood using Mono/Poly separation medium (Flow Labs, Mclean, V ) , and used immediately. , ,,„,,,

Lymphoid Cell Lines: All cell lines were t obtained from the cell culture facility at the University of

California, San Francisco and were maintained in RPMI- 1640 with 10% FBS (37°C, 10% C02) . RPMI-1460 was purchased from the University of California, San Francisco. These University of California cell lines are all made available to the public. Specifically, the cell lines obtained from the University of California, San Francisco are the Jurkat T-cell line, U937, THP-1, FRO, HL60, and HUT78. These cell lines may also be available from other sources.

Monoclonal Antibodies: AIIB2, against human βl integrin (the "anti-0-1") , is available from Dr.

Caroline Damsky, Department of Oral Biology, University of California, San Francisco. HP2/1, against the VCAM- 1-binding domain of VLA-4 (the "anti-α-4") was pur¬ chased from AMAC, Inc. (Westbrook ME, Product # 0764) . The AP2/1 also cross-reacts with murine lymphocytes. P4H9, against human β2 integrin (the "anti-3-2") was purchased from Telios, Inc. (San Diego, CA Product #A052) . This anti-β-2, against the β-2 integrin is not known to react with any subunit of VLA-4. When used to treat lymphocytes, the anti-3-l hybridoma supernatant was used at a 1:2 dilution. The anti-α-4 antibody was purified by the manufacturer, and used at a 5μg/ml concentration. The anti-3-2 was purified by the manufacturer, and used at 5 μg/ml. For treatment of lymphocytes, the lymphocytes were mixed with the above concentrations of antibody, and allowed to incubate on ice for a about 30 minutes prior to use. The cells were washed to remove unbound antibody, and resuspended in RPMI to a typical concentration of 10 7 cells/ml.

Other tissue sections: In the in vitro frozen brain section assay, the preparation of brain sections is described below. Lymph node and intestinal tissues

61

were removed from rats, and sectioned as described'for brain tissues, below.

A. Iri Vitro Frozen Brain Section Assay In order to establish inflammatory brain lesions that involve a large degree of immune cell infiltration, rats were injected in the brain with human kidney cell line 293 (American Type Culture Collection, "ATCC," 1573). This method was found to stimulate the entry of all leukocyte classes into the brain in a predictable time course. The trauma of the injection induces the entry of neutrophils and monocytes within minutes, which continues for about 24 to about 48 hours. The presence of the human cells serves as a persistent irritant to the immune system, stimulating further leukocyte infiltration, including that of lymphocytes. Typically, by about day 6, lymphocytes and monocytes are the major infiltrating leukocyte classes, entering in such large numbers so as to produce cellular cuffs around small blood vessels in the brain near the injection site. The speed and predictability of this procedure has made it ideal for obtaining brain tissue that can be used in the in vitro assay described below. In this assay, the brains are quickly frozen and sectioned. Leukocytes (immortaliέed and grown as cell lines, or freshly isolated from rodents or humans as described above) are then exposed to the sections, and, if they express the appropriate receptors, adhere selectively to the exposed profiles of activated endothelium near the inflammatory lesion. The leukocytes do not bind to nonactivated endothelium in the brain sections away from the inflammatory lesion or within sections of the non-stimulated control brain.

Rats (male Sprague-Dawley, 275-300g) , were anesthetized with Nembutal (60 mg/kg-i_p.) and mounted

in a stereotaxic device. The head was shaved and an incision was made to reveal the dorsal skull. Holes were drilled through the skull on the left and right side overlying the parietal cortex. 10 7 human kidney derived cells (ATCC 1573 cell line) , suspended in PBS, were delivered to the parietal cortices in a volume of lOμl. It is believed that other allogeneic cells or cell lines would also induce the present MS-type symptoms via these methods. For example, we have used primary bovine microvascular endothelial cells to induce a similar inflammatory reaction.

The incision was sutured and the animal allowed to recover for 1-10 days. On the appropriate day, brains were removed from animals that had been anesthetized with halothane and killed by cardiac puncture. The cerebellum was removed and the brains were then placed rostral side down on a mound of gum tragacanth (mixed with water to the consistency of thick paste) and frozen by immersion for 60 seconds in 2-methyl butane chilled on dry ice. The brains were then stored in sealed tubes at -80"C.

Immediately before the assay, 10 micron thick brain sections were cut on a cryostat and transferred to the center of a 14 mm well, pre-formed within a thin epoxy coating (Catalog #100314, Carlson Scientific, Inc., Peotone, IL) and allowed to air-dry at room temperature. The transfer was accomplished by touching the slide (at room temperature) to the section, which was still on the cold knife blade. Sections of control tissues (peripheral lymph nodes and Peyer's patches, isolated from noninjected rats, frozen and stored as described above) were usually placed adjacent to the brain sections in the same wells. The slides were positioned on a metal tray resting on ice and the wells

were filled with 100 μl of the appropriate cell suspension. The metal tray and supporting ice were then gyrated at about 50- about 80 rp for 30 minutes on an orbital shaker (Lab Line Instruments, Inc., Model 3520, with 1 inch diameter rotation) . The cell suspension was then decanted and the slides were carefully placed vertically in PBS with 2.5% glutaraldehyde on ice for 20 minutes. The slides were then dipped 5 times in PBS, placed in 0.5% tbluidine blue (20% EtOH) for 1 minutes, destained with 2 brief dips in 100% ethanol, covered with Immu-mo ήt™ mounting medium (Shandon, Sweickley, PA) , and cover slipped.

Herein, cell suspensions used were freshly isolated rat, mouse or human lymphocytes, the U937T human myelomonocytic cell line ,and the Jurket human T cell line. Cell lines THP-1, FRO, HL60 and HUT78 were found not to bind with stimulated brain sections, and were not further analyzed in the brain section assay.

The degree of lymphocyte binding -was quantified by one of two methods. The first relied upon an internal reference population of cells, similar to that described by Butcher, et al., J.Immunol 123: 1996-2003 (1979) . The second method was based on the absolute number of lymphocytes bound to blood vessels in a given tissue section. For the internal reference method, populations of lymphoid cell lines were mixed with freshly isolated lymphocytes of a different species (e.g. human cell lines with mouse lymphocytes) so that both were at a final concentration of 3-5xl0 7 /ml. Aliquots of the mixed population were then treated with species-specific antibodies for 30 minutes on ice. In general, the cells were washed out of thά antibody prior to the binding assay. Binding was quantified" by

determining the ratio of two different populations of leukocytes bound to blood vessels. It was always arranged such that the leukocyte populations could readily be distinguished by size—lymphoid cell lines are large cells, generally greater than 20 μm in diameter, while lymphocytes are small cells, less than 10 μm in diameter. Thus in an experiment with human T cell line mixed with rat lymphocytes, the degree of inhibition produced by an anti-human monoclonal antibody (compared to control antibodies or to no treatment) was quantified by determining the ratio of large to small cells bound. The results obtained are presented in Table 12, below. As can be seen, use of an anti-VLA-4 reagent significantly inhibited binding of immune cells to brain cells displaying MS-type inflammation. These results are also shown in Figure

10, which clearly displays the inhibitory effect of the anti-VLA-4 reagents.

Table 12 Quantification of rat lymphocyte binding to different tissue sections by comparing the number of lymphocytes bound to all vessels under treated and untreated conditions. Four replicates were used for each treatment, and raw data are presented in parenthesis below the mean.

Treatment Brain Intestinal Lymph Node

No treatment 24(100%) 43(100%) 21(100%)

(24/24/32/18) (35/45/42/50) (25/27/18/15) anti-VLA-α 2(8%) 6(15%) 20(95%)

(2/3/2/2) (3/3/5/10) (14/30/22/12)

The second method of quantification compared a single population of leukocytes treated in different ways in adjacent assay wells. The degree of inhibition was determined by comparing the number of leukocytes bound to all vessels in a given tissue section under treated and untreated conditions. Tissue sections were prepared as described above. The degree of binding was quantified as the actual number of cells bound to the blood vessels within the sections. These data are presented in Table 13, below. In addition, lymph node tissue was also tested, and these data are displayed in Figure 11 * All reagents were prepared as described above. Here, anti- β-1 antibody and anti-α-4 antibody were both shown to inhibit Jurkat T-cell lymphocyte binding to brain sections, but not to lymph node sections.

These data confirm that anti-VLA-4 reagents showed substantial inhibition of leukocyte binding to brain tissue displaying the features of MS-type inflammation.

Table 13 Treatment Used Ratio large/small % Control

Jurkat Binding

No treatment 2.08 + 0.17 100 + 8 anti-/3-l 0.02 + 0.01 1 + 0.5 anti-α-4 0.23 + 0.15 11 + 7

B. Leukocy: Binding to Cultures of Blood Brain Barrier ..ndothelial Cells Bovine or human brain endothelial cells were maintained in accordance with the blood brain barrier model as described in the present specification. In

experiments where the endothelium was activated, 5 μl of stimulating agent was added directly to the lower chamber medium (800 μl) of the culture system. Here, TNFα (Amgen Biologicals, Thousand Oaks, CA) was added to the lower chamber for a final concentration of 400 μ/ml. In activation, PMA-S (in DMSO) was found not to be effective in stimulating lymphocyte binding, but other activating agents are known, and will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

In this manner, the endothelial cells were exposed to the agent on their ablumenal surface, as would be the typical situation during an inflammatory reaction in the brain. Immediately before the assay, the electrical resistance of the cultures was measured and the filters (supporting the endothelial cells) were washed at room temperature by dipping in three separate vats of D-MEM with 1% FBS and 20 mM Hepes (200 mis. each) . The filters were then placed in fresh wells containing the same medium and the assay was performed at room temperature. Typically, 10 μl of leukocytes (at a preferred concentration of 10 7 /ml) in the presence or absence of test reagents, were added to the upper chamber of the culture system, such that the leukocytes would encounter the lumenal or blood side of the endothelium, as they would in the brain vasculature. Here, leukocytes were rat, mouse or human lymphocytes, the U93T human myelomonocytic cell line, and the Jurket human T"cell line as described above. The lymphocytes were pretreated with anti-3-l or anti-/3-2 antibody as described above.

Cell lines THP-1 and FRO were also found to bind to brain endothelial stimulated with TNFα, but HL60 and

HUT78 did not so bind. U937 binding was found not to be inhibited by exposure to anti-β-1.

The culture plates were placed on a gyratory shaker at about 100 rpm for 30 seconds, then allowed to sit undisturbed at room temperature for aboμt 30 minutes. The assay was terminated by gently washing the filters in PBS with 1% glutaraldehyde (dipping and pouring three times at different angles). The glutaraldehyde causes the cells to fluoresce under the proper optical conditions, as described below. The . filters were then allowed to fix in the glutaraldehyd solution undisturbed for 60 minutes.

The degree of leukocyte binding to the filters was examined in one of two ways. In the first, the bound cells were visualized directly. The filter was cut free of the culture well apparatus and mounting on glass sli •des wi•th Immu-mountTM. The fi•lters were examined with an immunofluorescence microscope set for rhodamine or fluorescein optics, and observing the cells by glutaraldehyde-induced autofluorescence. The results of the immunofluorescence assay can be visualized in Figure 8. As is easily visualized, the ■ ' ■■ density of Jurkat T-cell lymphocytes pretreated with anti-3-l antibody is far lower (Panel A) than the binding density for untreated leukocytes (panel B) . This graphically depicts the anatomical and , physiological reaction when a reagent is used to block the VCAM-l/VLA-4 interaction between brain .endothelial cells and leukocytes.

In the second method, the leukocytes were pre ^ " labeled with a radioactive tracer and the degree q.f: binding was quantified by measuring the amount * of • - radioactivity associated with the entire endothelial , surface on the culture filter. Prelabeliήg of lymphoid

68

cell lines was accomplished by the addition of 1 uCi/ml 125IUDR (Amersham #XX) obtained from the Amersha Corporation, Arlington Heights, Illinois, to the standard culture medium approximately 12-20 hrs. before the assay. The cells were washed free of unincorporated label by three separate washes in 15 mis of fresh bench medium (RPMI-1640 with 5% FBS and 25 mM Hepes) . Concentration was then adjusted to 10 7 cells /ml in the presence or absence of test reagents. Again, all of the above lymphocytes were used (rat, mouse or human lymphocytes, the U937T human myelomonocytic cell line, and the Jurket human T cell line) as described above. The lymphocytes were pretreated with anti-/3-l or anti-β-2 antibody as described above. Also, the lymphocytes were pretreated with anti-VLA-α-4 as described above.

The assay was carried out as above, except that at the end the isolated filters are placed in tubes and counted in a gamma counter (Beckman Corporation, Model 5500B) for 1 minute. The results are presented in Table 14 below. As can be seen, the samples that contained anti-VLA-4 reagents show far lower radioactivity levels the controls. These data confirm the results from the above fluorescence data, namely, that the binding of anti-VLA-4 to the VCAM-1 receptor is substantially inhibited by reagents which would prevent binding at that locus.

These data are also presented at Figure 11 which shows the relative degree of Jurkat T-cell lymphocyte binding to brain endothelial cells in the BBB system. As can easily be seen, the anti-/3-l antibody effectively inhibited the binding of leukocytes to TNF- α activated brain endothelial cells. Anti-0-2, as a control, on the other hand, approaches the untreated

control. Plainly, the ,5-1 subunit provides an effective target for preventing VLA-4/VCAM-1 interaction in the brain.

Table 14 This table shows the quantification of lymphocyte binding via radioactive labelling of lymphocytes.

Lymphocyte Type Treatment Count per Minute Jurkat T-cell anti-3-l (no TNFα) 259; 156 anti-β-2 (no TNFα) ' 198; 124

0 (+ TNFα) 1430; il50 an i-jβ-1 (+ TNFα) 361; 385 anti-0-2 (+ TNFα) 1313; (nSa)

The above discussion of this invention is directed primarily to preferred embodiments and practices thereof. It will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that further changes and modifications in the actual implementation of the concepts desσaribed ^ .c» herein can easily be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention a.s defined by the . following claims. . ,

'Hi

3 ii '-> t i ι > t