Title of Invention: "Born To Live"

DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

Here in, the disclosing "Born To Live" new business method invention is use for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems. The new business method invention consist a series of Programs, Policies, Systems, HSYG and Methodological know-how for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic in multi-level tree formation systems to deriving a Pareto efficient system for scheduling fair leveraging treatment frequencies. [Para: 001]

The disclosing "Born To Live" inventive steps advocates tabulating chains of parent and child relationship age range interval groupings to trim off exponential broadening base effect of large multi-level tree systems. Every leveraging contributor within the multi-level tree system would be subsequently re-posted into successive parent age range interval groupings or ultimately graduated out of the multi-level tree system after having gone through respective interval years of leveraging qualifying periods. [Para: 002]

"Born To Live" new business method may works with pool of leveraging contributors starting with a specified age of ninety (90) years old or otherwise beyond, all the way down to the youngest age contributors of eighteen (18) years old. "Born To Live" inventive steps defines all oldest age leveraging contributors at the top of each age range interval group are those first to be posted into the base of successive parent age range interval group during re-posting and position reassignment exercises. All oldest age leveraging contributors assigning within each age range interval group are pre-sorted for position assignment to be assigned from the top of each age range interval grouping and at each level downwards according to oldest age's priority base on oldest birth-date, birth-time and respective online system registration-time priorities. [Para: 003]

A position assignment computer program assigning these pre-sorted assignment priorities information would work down each age range interval grouping until the last leveraging contributor within these pre-sorted assignment information is also assigned with a position within the multi-level tree system. Each leveraging contributor could also be assigned "one" or "more" levels of child or sub-child contributors during the top-down assignment sequent. [Para: 004]

The disclosing "Born To Live" inventive steps also advocates "annually" or "periodically" re-assigning each leveraging contributor into a "new position" within respective age range interval group by re-posting leveraging contributors in an "upward" or "downward" direction and "through" multi-level tree systems. Governed by individuals' age advancement, these "annual" or "periodical" position's re-assignment and re-posting exercises performed, subsequently release every leveraging contributor from their respective contributing position to resume respective scheduled qualifying position. Ultimately all leveraging contributors would be graduated out of the multi-level tree system at a specific age after having gone through respective interval periods of receiving leveraging benefits. [Para: 005] By applying a series combinations of the disclosed Programs, Policies, Systems, HSYG and methodological know-how for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic, detailed out in the inventive steps of Born To Lives sequence listing, "Born To Live" new business method invention has instructed for the first time that indeed individuals in income-leveraging societies could actually leverage on a fraction of each others' economical strengths as sources of supplemental income lifelines at different intervals of individuals' lifetime. [Para: 006]

Prior Art

No known former patented prior art known to have processes similar characteristics invention to current disclosing art. Therefore to date, the art of overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems had remain non-obvious to any forms of known prior art. [Para: 001]

Please see "what is obstacle of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree systems?" in "Disclosure of Invention" section. [Para: 002]

Descriptions of Related Arts

Multi-level Arts

Multi-levels, is a form of art originated from ancient Egypt where constructions of four dimensional polygons begin with the bottom after having determined the base area of the pyramid. Multi-level trees is an art of applying logical increase in exponential base entities in a top-down manner usually starting with the first entity to configuring multiple parents and child relationship formations in multilevel tree systems. The physics of exponential increase in base entities within multi-level tree system is practically inexhaustible. [Para: 001]

The use of multi-levels arts in multi-levels tree formations could be found in many parts of societies from formation of organizational structure, to businesses distribution channels, to commissions overriding schemes, to networking topologies and to families' tree history records and so on... [Para: 002]

Commonly all multi-level arts practices do not required to determine the maximum base levels' limits of exponential base increases, however any attempt to determine the maximum base levels' limits of exponential base increases could be near impossible. [Para: 003]

To date, no one has yet to overcome obstacles of exponential broadening base effects inherent in multi-levels tree formations. Therefore exponential base increases in multi-levels tree formations always remain an interesting open ended subject with physics of insurmountable exponential base increases. [Para: 004] Multi-levels Marketing

Multi-levels marketing schemes are forms of direct selling business mechanism that simulate indirect economics activities through exclusive end-consumers' products sales networking. Most MLM's businesses targeting exclusive products networking sales' objective would design forms of multi-levels commission payout schemes employing the synergy of "leveraging" to derive accumulative reward payouts administrated to associated business operation partners. [Para: 001]

Power of leveraging was often miss-understood and described by many holding position of advantages at the top of multi-level tree systems as being promising. Technically all multi-level tree systems including pyramid systems have broadening base that would get larger at each level downwards, filling the endless exponential broadening base of a multi-level tree systems with child entities may overtly require more than the world's populations. [Para: 002]

Given the filling of the exponential base entities gets bigger and slower at each level downwards, other than easily qualifying those at the top of the multi-level tree with a relative minority group of individuals receiving qualifying benefits, more would be needed and waiting at the base of the system. [Para: 003]

Basing on products networking sales performance requirements and working with frequencies of leveraging harvesting, many conventional and advance multi-level schemes alike often tend to post disproportion benefiting results. These promising schemes could end up with unfair exploitation of late comers including who have worked very hard at the beginning suffering un-promised long-term benefits when the system become unstable challenged by fear competitions. [Para: 004]

Power of leveraging were often overly stated by MLM companies but Power of leveraging is only promising, provided the gaining of exponential momentums or contribution strengths could be absolutely made sustainable and at the same time fulfilling requirements of Pareto efficiencies. Otherwise Power of leveraging could also be easily reversible brought about by unfavourable conditions, especially when such systems become unsustainable or degraded overtime due to poor sales performances. [Para: 005]

Although sustainability auditing has long challenged many multi-level arts engineering, but none processes sounded solution of any kinds have claimed to overcome obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree systems. Nonetheless these obstacles don't border multi-level marketing companies, as most of MLM businesses' objectives were driven by frequencies leveraging harvesting schemes. These frequencies leveraging harvesting were meant only for the sole purpose of administrating commission payouts to not possibly all in societies, but handful of direct- selling operators whom could qualify them from time to time. [Para: 006] These are common technical setbacks of exponential broadening base logic in multi-level tree systems as most multi-level arts would rather decisively ignore these obstacles to working with inherent open-ended broadening base logic in the system. It is evidences that many advance multi-level arts engineering attempting to harness the Power of leveraging were not capable of delivering a Pareto efficient system of scheduling fair treatment frequencies, let alone there were no prior requirements to fulfil Pareto efficient. [Para: 007]

Absents of comprehending methodological know-how in managing obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree systems could be commonly witnessed in: - [Para: 008] a) random age formation of multi-level tree systems, b) leveraging contributions were mainly driven by product sales frequencies, c) working with unpredictable contributors' attempts, d) inability to deliver constant predicable contributions from time to time, e) working with inconsistent power of leveraging from time to time, f) lacking sustainable scale of critical masses (at times), g) inability to relief contributors' of unfavourable position, h) inability to schedule distributions of fair treatment frequencies, i) and living on with endlessly open-ended broadening base logic in the

system without a solution.

Common characteristics of Multi-level Arts [Para: 009]

1) All multi-level art systems including pyramid systems, ponzi schemes and multi-level marketing scheme systems are characterized by having endless open-ended broadening base logic inherent in the multi-level tree system.

2) All multi-level art systems have no ability to increase the numbers of benefiting positions without relatively increasing the size of the multilevel tree system.

3) All multi-level art systems are characterized by having position holders in the multi-level tree system permanently wedged onto an initial assigned position.

4) When such assigned position become unfavourable to the position's holder, all multi-level art systems have no ability to enable holders of position to be subsequently re-assigned into a new position or move upward, or graduated out from the entire multi-level tree system.

5) All multi-level art systems have no knowledge of working with distributed chains of relational sub-multi-level tree tabulations, let alone commonly seen working within a single contact of large independent multi-level tree system inherent with endless broadening base.

Orthodoxy of multi-level art concept was thought by many to be incomprehensible solutions. Harnessing Power of leveraging with multi-level tree systems remain a cynical idea, nonetheless these perceptions were true as all multi-level art works were deem to fall short of Pareto efficient. This is because prior the disclosure of "Born To Live" business method invention, overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic in multi-level tree systems is a near impossible. To date no multi-level arts were deem capable of claiming to have derived sounded or workable solution of any kinds in overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree systems. [Para: 010]

Ponzi scheme

Ponzi scheme is characterized by formulating a fraudulent business investment scheme riding on some forms of business like investment objectives that would otherwise pay a minority pool of receivers or investors with illogically high returns. Given the endlessly recycling of resources form majority pools of new contributors or investors, it is usually done in a non-transparent manner without contributors' or investors' knowledge on how these returns are deriving from the business operations. [Para: 001]

The nature of ponzi scheme is to claiming a "businesslike investment vehicle" other than capable of describing the true nature of it business objective in details. Such scheme often misleading investors or contributors into thinking that high returns derive from the presented forms of business investment vehicle are viable "secret investment instrument". [Para: 002] Common characteristics of ponzi schemes [Para: 003]

1) Ponzi schemes have no ability set out to explain in full details the true logic of its business operations or deliver any forms of sound transparency that could be vetted by experts and professionals in the related business arena.

2) Other than endlessly employing some forms of multi-level structural exploitations on new comers, ponzi schemes have no ability to educate every contributor or investor within the geometric progression to effectively leverage on each others' contribution strengths.

3) Ponzi schemes have no ability to deliver predicable scheduled returns to its contributors or investors due to the pool of resources coming form new comers could also be unpredictable.

4) Ponzi schemes also have no ability to ensure every contributor or investor within the geometric progression could go through distributions of fair treatment frequencies at any one time.

5) Ponzi schemes are known to be worst in term of Pareto efficient.

Disclosure of Invention

What are obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree systems?

Traditionally all multi-level tree systems have multiple broadening base entities relationships that would get larger at each level downwards, any attempt to determine the maximum base limits of exponential broadening base increases could be near impossible. The physics of exponential increase in base entities within multi-level tree systems are practically inexhaustible. Filling the endless exponential broadening base of multi-level tree formation systems with child entity assignments could require more than the world's populations. [Para: 001]

Any attempt to accord fair treatment frequencies to all fixed-position child entities within multi-level tree systems could inevitably generate insurmountable obstacles of inefficient distributions of fair treatment frequencies. This is due to the physics of ever enlarging base entities in multi-level tree systems, especially when encountering the next level of insurmountable exponential increment. To date none has claimed or instructed solution of any kinds for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree systems, despite the mathematical notions or not of the next insurmountable obstacles also existed in multi-level tree formation systems. [Para: 002]

What is invented?

"Born To Live" business method invention is not about a totally new forms multilevel art knowledge, but the disclosure of "Born To Live" is about an unique methodological know-how invention for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems. [Para: 001]

The ultimate objective of the invention was derived form passion of enabling young generations of individuals in income-leveraging society to leverage on a fraction of each others' economical strengths as head start joining the economy at early age. To deliver that alone, the wealth of aging societies must first receive a creditable empowerment solution. [Para: 002]

For the first time, the invention has disclosed and enlightened a unique methodological know-how of "annually" or "periodically" re-posting and reassigning leveraging contributors into a "new position" within age respective range interval group and subsequently throughout successive parent age range interval groupings that were prioritized by the human age advancement relationship factor that happens to govern many events at later state of individuals' life. These "annual" or "periodical" position's re-assignment and re-posting exercises taught when performed, would subsequently release every leveraging contributor from their respective contributing position to resume respective scheduled qualifying position in due cause. [Para: 003] Other than instructing out the solution for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic, the invention has also detailed out for the first time the necessary solution needed to manage obstacle of the next insurmountable in order to realize the optimal shape of multi-level tree formations. [Para: 004]

"Born To Live" inventive steps

Programs, Policies, Systems, HSYG and Methodological know-how of creating a multi-level tree system capable of unlocking the legitimate power of leveraging by overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic. [Para: 001]

Step: 1. Creating the multi-level tree contributors' database: - a) Obtain a separate copy of population identities database from registrar of births for intended purpose of automatic inclusion application or, b) create a separate copy of contributors' database from existing clients, existing customers' bank accounts, existing policyholder accounts, or associates members' accounts or non-profit organization membership's database etc... for intended purpose of opt- in or opt-out application or, c) setup online registration to build up contributors' database by publishing an online registration and subscription pay up closing date for intended purpose of masses participation application.

Step: 2. Applying geographical or divisional classification code with contributors' database information.

Example of divisional groupings

DO 1: North region or North state

D02: South region or South state

D03: East region or East state

D04: West region or West state

D05: North region or North state

etc...

Apply further breakdown into smaller sub divisional classification code if desired from the above example illustrated. [Para: 001] Step: 3. Determine the desired age range interval tabulations.

With all the divisional classification of contributors' database, determine the desired age range interval tabulations for the multi-level tree system. [Para: 001]

Starting with the oldest age of ninety (90) year old specified or otherwise beyond toward the youngest age of eighteen (18) year old. Determine the . numbers of age range interval tabulations forming the distributed chain of relational sub multi-level trees formation, where h is the successive parent of all relational sub multi-level trees. (Please see FIG. 1 on drawing: 1/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 45 for a typical Single Age Range Interval Multi-level tree tabulations.) [Para: 002]

Example:

Tabulation Interval Range

Age range interval h : 81 - 90 9 years

Age range interval g : 72 - 80 9 years

Age range interval f: 63 - 71 9 years

Age range interval e: 54 - 62 9 years

Age range interval d : 45 - 53 9 years

Age range interval c: 36 - 44 9 years

Age range interval b: 27 - 35 9 years

Age range interval a: 18 - 26 9 years

Step: 4. Applying desired optimal age range interval groupings.

Example: Application of age range interval groupings in division D01 forming distributed chains of sub relational multi-level trees, where DOlh is the successive parent of all sub relational multi-level trees in divisional classification code: D01. (Please see FIG. 2 on drawing: 2/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 45 for a typical relational multi-level trees tabulations.) [Para: 001]

Age range interval group: DOlh

Age range interval group: DOlg

Age range interval group: DO If

Age range interval group: DOle

Age range interval group: DO Id

Age range interval group: DOlc

Age range interval group: DO lb

Age range interval group: DO la Note: Depending on the size of contributors' pool, there could be further sideward grouping of multiple age range interval groups within each relational sub multi-level tree. Given if particularly DOlh have exceptionally large pool of contributors they could be further grouped into D01H0, DOlhl, D01h2, D01h3 etc., forming adjacent chains of optimal age range interval groups in age range interval: DOlh. [Para:.002]

Step: 5. Sorting contributors' position assignment sequence in multi-level tree system before computer programmed assignment.

Before performing any computer programmed assignment of contributors' position into distributed chains of relational sub multi-level trees, all contributors database records are pre-sorted in an assignment prioritizing sequence call position assignment prioritizing pre-process. [Para: 001]

This position assignment prioritizing pre-process would be observed during subsequent years of age advancement re-posting and position reassignment exercises (to be detailed out in step: 11 of "Born To Live" inventive steps). [Para: 002]

The sorting is performed basing on contributors' paid subscriptions status before the leveraging year beings, therefore all non-active contributors, lapsed subscription contributors and contributors age exceeded the highest age range interval group (for instance, age range interval group: DOlh), would not be automatically included into the position assignment prioritizing pre-process. [Para: 003]

During the position assignment prioritizing pre-process, each contributors' position assignment are sorted according to oldest birth-date, birth-time and online system registration-time priorities. A unique assignment serial numbers is tag onto every sorted position during the assignment prioritizing pre-process for verification purpose. [Para: 004]

Step: 6. Resolving position assignment priority conflicts for two or more contributors having the same birth-date and birth-time.

If two or more contributors having the same birth-date and birth-time encountered. An earliest online system registrations-date-time indicator use to resolve the assignment priority conflict. [Para: 001] Step: 7. Determine the Contributor strengths.

Contributor strengths are the numbers of collective contributors in one level of assignment. [Para: 001]

If the working contributor strength of the leveraging system determined is five (5), then each active contributor would be assigned five (5) child contributor assignments whenever there are available remaining contributors for assignment within each age range interval group. [Para: 002]

Step: 8. Determine the Contributor weights.

Contributor weights are the numbers of child level assignments. [Para: 001]

If one (1) level of contributors weight is determined, then each active contributor could only be computed for a full qualifying leveraging benefits basing on five (5) collective child contributors' strength assignment, which is constitute (1) level of contributors weight. [Para: 002]

If two (2) levels of contributor weights is determined, then each active contributor could be computed for a full qualifying leveraging benefits basing on thirty (30) collective child contributors' strength assignment, which constitute the strength of five (5) contributors in level (1) and twenty-five (25) contributors in level (2). [Para: 003]

Step: 9. Assigning contributors into optimal age range interval groups.

With the prioritized contributors' database information and using a computer programmed position-assigning application, starting with the highest age range interval group (for instance, age interval group: DOlh mentioned in step: 4 of "Born To Live" inventive steps) and starting with the first prioritized contributor within the prioritized contributors' database information. Contributors are sequentially assigned with a position in a left to right and top to bottom manner into respective age range interval group. This assignment sequence is done according to the contributor strengths and weights predetermined. Following example describe the assignment sequence in details. [Para: 001]

Note: The actual assignment sequence starts with age range interval group: DOlh for the whole multi-level tree system. Illustration here demonstrates assigning age range interval group: DOld which age range falls between 45 - 53. [Para: 002]

Before a computer programmed position-assigning application starts assigning contributors into age range interval groups, a separate computer program would compute the total numbers of contributors within each age range interval group. [Para: 003]

The numbers of oldest age contributors' information within each age range interval group would then be compared with a (Level's Strengths Analysis Chart, please see following Chart mentioned) basing on the contributor strengths chosen. This would determine the numbers of oldest age contributors to be assigned at the top of respective age range interval group. [Para: 004]

Level's Strengths Analysis Chart basing on incremental of (5).

[Para: 005]

Level Level's Accumulative

Strength Strengths

0 1 1

1 5 6

2 25 31

3 125 156

4 625 781

5 3,125 3,906

6 15,625 19,531

7 78,125 97,656

8 390,625 488,281

9 1,953,125 2,441,406

10 48,828,125 51,269,531

11 244,140,625 295,410,156 Given DOld have a total of 35,868,281 contributors age between 45 to 53 the computer programmed position-assigning application would starts assigning 15,625 contributors as level (0) at the top of age range interval group: DOld. This could result in minority of 3,906 +/- accumulative strengths at level (0) to level (5) shown in Level's Strengths Analysis Chart effectively channelled to contributing the base support of the age range interval group: DOld itself. [Para: 006]

Next the computer programmed position-assigning application would move down to level (1) to assign each level's (0) contributors with five (5) child contributors. [Para: 007]

After assigning all level's (0) contributors with five (5) child assignments each in level's (1), the computer programmed position-assigning application would move down to level's (2) to assign each level's (1) contributor with five (5) child contributors. [Para: 008]

The left to right and top to bottom assignment sequence would subsequently move on to assign every subsequent levels' of child assignments, until all 35,868,281 contributors within age range interval group: DOld are all assigned with a due leveraging position. [Para: 009]

DOld would form a Plateau shape multi-level tree formation, after the computer programmed position-assigning application have finished assigning all DO Id's contributors into age range interval group: DOld, so is the rest of the others age range interval groups having successfully assigned with respective pool of age range contributors. (Please see FIG. 3 on drawing: 3/6 descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 45 for a Single Optimal Age Range Interval Groupings.) [Para: 010]

Notice that, from level (6) to level (9), the total accumulative strengths are only 2,437,500 after minus away 3,906 accumulative strengths at level from level (0) to level (5) referred to in Level's Strengths Analysis Chart. If the computer programmed position-assigning application were to assign all the still remaining 33,430,781 into age range interval group: DOld, then at level (10) referred to in Level's Strengths Analysis Chart would require 48,828,125 child assignments in order to qualify 1,953,125 contributors in level (9) with only one level of child assignments. This is term as "the next big lap" or the next insurmountable exponential obstacles in multi-level tree formation systems. [Para: 01 1] As mentioned in step: 4 of "Born To Live" inventive steps "Applying desired optimal age range interval groupings" Given if particularly age range interval group have exceptionally large pool of contributors, they could be further group into multiple optimal age range interval groupings of DOldO, DOldl, D01d2, D01d3 etc., forming adjacent chains of multilevel trees within age range interval group: DO Id. In this case, the total numbers of 35,868,281 contributors age between 45 to 53 in age range interval: DOld could be first divided by 2,437,500 -> accumulative strengths from level (6) to level (9) referred to in Level Strengths Analysis Chart to find out the total numbers of adjacent optimal age range interval groupings for age range interval: DOld. [Para: 012]

Therefore 35,868,281 divided by 2,437,500 would give us around 14.7 adjacent optimal age range interval groups for age range interval DOld. The computer programmed position-assigning application would starts assigning 15,625 contributors as level (0) at the top of age range interval group: DOldO followed by assigning another 15,625 contributors as level (0) at the top of age range interval group: DOldl and followed for D01d2, D01d3, D01d4 - etc..., until optimal age range interval group: D01dl4 or D01dl5 whichever desired. [Para: 013]

Next the computer programmed position-assigning application would move down to DOldO's level (1) to assign each DOldO's level (0's) contributors with five (5) child contributors followed by moving to DOldl's level (1) to assign each DOldl's level (0's) contributors with five (5) child contributors and followed for D01d2, D01d3, D01d4 - etc., until optimal age range interval group: D01dl4 or D01dl5 whichever desired. [Para: 014]

The left to right and top to bottom assignment sequence would move on along DOldO to DO Id 14 or D01dl5 whichever desired to assign every subsequent levels of child assignments, until all 35,868,281 contributors within age range interval: DOld are all assigned with a due leveraging position. [Para: 015]

Given when all sub relationship age range interval multi-level trees are subsequently assigned using desired optimal age range interval groupings, these ages range interval multi-level trees would form a series of Plateau shape multi-level trees formation. (Please see FIG. 4 on drawing: 4/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 45 for Multi Optimal Age Range Interval Groupings.) [Para: 016] Step: 10. Assigning contributors with rest of the remaining relational child age range interval groupings.

Starting with age range interval group DOlh the computer programmed position-assigning application program would work through all subsequent child relationship age range interval multi-level tree groupings, using assigning contributors into optimal age range interval groups mentioned in step: 9 of "Born To Live" inventive steps whenever necessary for any particular age range interval group with exceptionally large pool of leveraging contributors. [Para: 001]

Using the computer programmed position-assigning application program repeating similar position-assignment sequence moving on to the second highest age range interval group (for instance, age interval group: DOlg). When this is done the computer programmed position-assigning application program would follow on with other successive child relationship age range interval groups. [Para: 002]

This exercise is repeated until the lowest age range interval group is worked through by the computer programmed position-assignment application (for instance, age interval group: DOla). Given when all sub relationship age range interval multi-level trees are subsequently assigned with leveraging contributors these age range interval multi-level trees would form a series of Plateau shape multi-level trees formation. [Para: 003]

Step: 11. Managing annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercises.

This is done annually or periodically by identifying oldest age contributors at the top level of each age range interval group having received duration years of qualified leveraging benefits, to be those re-posting into the base of respective parent age range interval group. [Para: 001]

For instance, all the age 80 contributors in age range interval group: DOlg would be posted into the base of age range interval group: DOlh, similarly for the rest of oldest age contributors at the top of each lower age range interval tabulated groupings would be posted into the base of respective parent age interval group. [Para: 002] When all oldest age contributors at the top of respective age range interval groups were re-posted into the base of respective parent age range interval groups during annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercises, those contributors second oldest in age (for instance, age: 79 within age range interval group: DOlg) would be moving upward to be assigned a new position at the top of age range interval group: DOlg when their age reaches 80 years old and so are all second oldest contributors reaching respective highest age within respective age range interval groups. (Please see FIG. 3 on drawing: 3/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 45 for sequence of posting leveraging contributors.) [Para: 003]

Step: 12. Managing insertion of contributors into multi-level tree systems.

In order to be fair to all leveraging contributors faithfully contributing toward respective scheduled qualifying periods. Leveraging contributors are make aware of in the event of insertion of contributors into the collective income-leveraging system would required the inserted contributor to observe 'n' numbers of years of insertion transfers by transferring respective assigned income-leveraging benefits to the first or subsequent partial qualifying contributors at the lowest level of respective age range interval group, whom are effected by these insertion displacements. [Para: 001]

In the case of the insertion transfer, qualifying contributor having qualified a full or partial leveraging benefits. The monthly leveraging benefit amount qualified would be divided into numbers of child contributors' benefits and transferred to further assigning under the first or subsequent partial qualifying contributors at the lowest level, of respective age range interval group. [Para: 002]

Step: 13. Managing accounts' donations, wills and entrustments.

In order for an income-leveraging society to maximize the social value of respective lifetime income lifeline, ACTIVE leveraging contributors' account status' holders are allowed to donated, will or entrusted, his or her leveraging account managements and maintenances to designated spouse or the estate, for up to a maximum leveraging age specified or otherwise. [Para: 001] In the case of single parent of deceased spouse with at least one children below the age of eighteen (18) years old before the disclosure of "Born To Live" invention. The lawful surviving spouse could automatically regain the entrustment of the deceased's leveraging account managements and maintenances prior to the implementation of an income-leveraging society, by the living spouse furnishing up the deceased account registration information supported with lawful relationship documents, child birth certificates and the deceased death certificate and etc... [Para: 002]

As long as these non-living leveraging contributors' ACTIVE account status' maintenances are actively managed by the living spouse, they would still be managed accordingly in position assignment prioritizing pre-process. [Para: 003]

Step: 14. Graduating contributors out of multi-level tree systems.

Eldest age contributors at the top of the oldest age range interval group (for instance, all age 90 contributors at the top of age interval group: DOlh) would be completely graduated out from the leveraging system at the final year of contributor's age advancement re-posting. (Please see FIG. 3 on drawing: 3/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 45 for graduating of leveraging contributors.) [Para: 001]

Step: 15. Overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic.

In order to relief contributors assigned at the base of respective age range interval groups to gradually resuming qualifying positions, "Born To Live" inventive steps annually or periodically apply re-posting and position reassignment exercises (mentioned in step: 11 of "Born To Live" inventive steps) on all contributors within each age range interval group, reassigning them into a new position or posting them upward into successive age range interval groups. So that younger age contributors could be gradually release form their assigned position to takeover these qualifying positions previously held by older age contributors. [Para: 001]

These "annual" or "periodical" position's re-assignment and re-posting exercises performed, subsequently release every leveraging contributor from their respective contributing position to resume respective scheduled qualifying position. This is done annually by repeating step: 5 and step: 11 of "Born To Live" inventive steps to deriving a Pareto efficient system for scheduling fair leveraging treatment frequencies. The methodological know-how invented herein is capable of uniquely unlock the legitimate power of leveraging with multi-level tree systems. [Para: 002] Step: 16. Enabling individuals in income-leveraging societies to leverage on a fraction of each others' economical strengths.

Please see illustrations for how "Born To Live" new business method invention derive the income-leveraging system solution to enable individuals in income-leveraging societies to leverage on a fraction of each others' economical strengths lifeline at different states of their life. [Para: 001]

Illustrations of 'Born To Live" new business method invention deriving the income-leveraging system solution.

Using the unique annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercise, "Born To Live" new business method invention would apply posting of leveraging contributors into successive age range interval groupings. Starting with societies' age as early as 18 years old to the specified age of 90 years old or otherwise beyond, "Born To Live" new business method invention would also apply a series of age range interval grouping tabulations between these age ranges of contributors. By doing so the invented methodology not only overcome obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems but it is also enables all age groups in societies to inter-qualify for respective scheduled income-leveraging benefits at different state of their life. Table: 001 illustrates one model of breaking down age range interval grouping into 9 years period. [Para: 001]

Table: 001

No one would be indefinitely left at the bottom of the multi-level tree system given every year these leveraging contributors would be annually reposted and assigned into a new position within the respective age range interval group or into the successive higher age range interval group. All contributors would be eventually posted out of each age range interval group and into the successive higher age range interval group after each contributor successfully having posted upward within each age range interval group. The newly posted and assigned position would determine the scheduled income lifeline qualifying periods. This is especially for contributors at and among the older age contributors within each age range interval group. [Para: 002] The derived income-leveraging system solution may base on one or more levels of leveraging child contributors assigned to the particular contributor's position to qualify that contributor for respective monthly income-leveraging benefits. Contributors reassigned into a new position, especially at the base of successive age range interval group may not straight away qualify for any leveraging income benefit until they are subsequently reassigned into higher position within respective age range interval group as the individuals' age advance annually. [Para: 003]

Example:

(Please refer to Table: 001) John was posted into age range interval group: 'b' when John reaches the age of (27) and John would posted out of age range interval group: 'b' to joining age range interval group: 'c' when John reaches the age of (36). [Para: 004]

John would also be qualifying his final years of leveraging payout benefits at the age of (35) within age range interval group: 'b'. [Para: 005]

' John would most likely be observing his respective years of leveraging break period at the base of age range interval group: 'c'. [Para: 006]

Depending on the numbers of child contributors annually reassigned and are taking up position under the qualifying contributor, the higher a contributor is posted upward within the age range interval group, the nearer one would be qualifying respective scheduled leveraging income benefits. Ultimately every contributor would be scheduled to go through respective qualifying periods within that particular age range interval group as older contributors are posted out into successive parent age range interval group. (Please see FIG. 3 on drawing: 3/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 45.) [Para: 007]

Table: 002 to 006 illustrate the contribution strengths John could receive with a fully qualified scheduled income-leveraging benefit basing on contribution strengths of 5, with two (2) levels of child and sub-child contributor assignments. [Para: 008]

Table: 002

Table: 003

Note: The monthly contributions used here is use for illustration purpose only. The actual contributions use may vary accordingly, depending on respective society's standards of living and exchange rate values. [Para: 009]

004

Table: 005

Illustration here shows how a fully assigned leveraging contributor could be qualifying respective monthly income-leveraging benefit. Please see following draft certificate for a fully assigned leveraging contributor could receive would look like. These certificates could be viewed or download by respective leveraging account holders at leveraging solution provider's webpage. [Para: 010] (DRAFT COPY)

Certificate of Leveraging Assignment 2013

Full Assignment

Contributor Account No: 030-7645-8993213

Contributor Name: John

Contact: email address

Leveraging Year: 2013

Account Status: "Reinstated" / "Active"

Position Serial Code: 13-D02B-488280

Position Code: 13-D02B-L08-390625

Parent: D02B-L07-387654

Parent Serial Code: 13-D02B-487232

Qualifying Status: "Full" / "Partial" / "Insertion Transfer"

Insertion Transfer Received: "Yes" / "No"

Assignment Details

Relation Name Position Code Position Serial Contact

(YY-DIV-Level-######) (YY-DIV-######)

Child Michael 13- ^• D02B-L09-408621 13-D02B-489321 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child William 13- ^• D02B-L10-507621 13-D02B-491891 e- -mail

Sub-Child Annie 13- -D02B-L10-507622 13-D02B-491892 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Ruth 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507623 13-D02B-491893 e- -mail

Sub-Child Joyce 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507624 13-D02B-49 894 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Vivian 13- -D02B-L10-507625 13-D02B-491895 e- -mail

Child Lucy 13- -D02B-L09-408622 13-D02B-489322 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Roger 13- ^• D02B-L10-507626 13-D02B-491896 -

Sub-Child Luke 13- •D02B-L10-507627 13-D02B-491897 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Edward 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507628 13-D02B-491898 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Kenny 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507629 13-D02B-491899 -

Sub-Child Kris 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507630 13-D02B-491900 e- ^• mail

Child Katherine 13- ^• D02B-L09-408623 13-D02B-489323 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Mark 13- -D02B-L10-507631 13-D02B-491901 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Jane 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507632 13-D02B-491902 -

Sub-Child Keith 13- -D02B-L10-507633 13-D02B-491903 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Nancy 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507634 13-D02B-491904 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child May 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507635 13-D02B-491905 e- ^■ mail

Child Edwin 3- ^■ D02B-L09-408624 13-D02B-489324 -

Sub-Child Louis 13- -D02B-L10-507636 13-D02B-491906 e- ^• mail

Sub-Child Bill 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507637 13-D02B-491907 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Gilbert 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507638 13-D02B-491908 -

Sub-Child James 13- -D02B-L10-507639 13-D02B-491909 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Tommy 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507640 13-D02B-49191 0 e- ^■ mail

Child Jonathon 13- ^■ D02B-L09-408625 13-D02B-489325 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Tony 13- -D02B-L10-507641 13-D02B-491911 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Charles 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507642 13-D02B-49 912 -

Sub-Child Tom 13- •D02B-L10-507643 13-D02B-491913 e- ^■ mail

Sub-Child Billy 13- ^■ D02B-L10-507644 13-D02B-491914 e- ^• mail

Sub-Child Lisa 13- -D02B-L10-507645 13-D02B-491915 e- ^■ mail However given leveraging contributors who are partially assigned with remaining child contributors available would also receive the due income-leveraging benefit from respective partial assigned contributors. Table 006 illustrates a partial assigned income-leveraging benefit computation. [Para: Oi l]

Table: 006

Illustration here shows how partially assigned leveraging contributors could also be qualifying respective partial monthly income-leveraging benefit. Please see following draft certificate for a partial assigned leveraging contributor could receive would look like. These certificates could be viewed or download by respective leveraging account holders at leveraging solution provider's webpage. [Para: 012]

(DRAFT COPY)

Certificate of Leveraging Assignment 2013

Partial Assignment

Contributor Account No: 030-7645-8993378

Contributor Name: Jack

Contact: email address

Leveraging Year: 2013

Account Status: "Reinstated" / "Active"

Position Serial Code: 13-D02B-488281

Position Code: 13-D02B-L08-390626

Parent: D02B-L07-386352

Parent Serial Code: 13-D02B-486732

Qualifying Status: "Full" / "Partial" / "Insertion Transfer"

Insertion Transfer Received: "Yes" / "No"

Assignment Details

Relation Name Position Code Position Serial Contact

(YY-DIV-Level-######) (YY-DIV-######)

Child Gilbert 13- -D02B-L09-408921 13-D02B-489321 e-mail

Sub-Child Billy 13- ^■ D02B-L10-508621 13-D02B-491891 e-mail

Sub-Child Eileen 13- ^• D02B-L10-508622 13-D02B-491892 e-mail

Sub-Child Alan 3· ^• D02B-L10-508623 13-D02B-491893 e-mail

Sub-Child Kelvin 13- ^■ D02B-L10-508624 13-D02B-491894 e-mail

Sub-Child Johnny 13· ^■ D02B-L10-508625 13-D02B-491895 e-mail

Child Willie 13· ^■ D02B-L09-408922 13-D02B-489322 e-mail

Sub-Child Oliver 13· ^■ D02B-L10-508626 13-D02B-491896 -

Sub-Child Alton 13· ^■ D02B-L10-508627 13-D02B-491897 e-mail

Sub-Child Lily 13- ^• D02B-L10-508628 13-D02B-491898 e-mail

Sub-Child Marry 13- -D02B-L10-508629 13-D02B-49 899 -

Sub-Child Paul 13- -D02B-L10-508630 13-D02B-491900 e-mail

Child Evelyn 13· ^■ D02B-L09-408923 13-D02B-489323 e-mail

Sub-Child Jason 13- ^• D02B-L10-508631 13-D02B-491901 e-mail

Sub-Child Christine 13- ^• D02B-L10-508632 13-D02B-491902 -

Sub-Child Kristine 13- ^■ D02B-L10-508633 13-D02B-491903 e-mail

Sub-Child Harry 13· ^■ D02B-L10-508634 13-D02B-491904 e-mail

Sub-Child Bobby 13- ^■ D02B-L10-508635 13-D02B-491905 e-mail

Child Jin 13· ^■ D02B-L09-408924 13-D02B-489324

Sub-Child Vanessa 13- ^■ D02B-L10-508636 13-D02B-491906 e-mail

Sub-Child Mike 13- ^• D02B-L10-508637 13-D02B-491907 e-mail

Sub-Child Kenny 13- ^■ D02B-L10-508638 13-D02B-491908 -

Sub-Child Wilson 13- ^■ D02B-L10-508639 13-D02B-491909 e-mail

Child Mindy 13· ^• D02B-L09-408925 13-D02B-489325 e-mail "Bom To Live" HSYG Inventive Steps

What is HSYG?

Given young generations of individuals in income-leveraging societies could start participating in income-leveraging activities at the age of eighteen (18) years old, many would be assigned at the base of youngest age group trees. It would not be so soon that these young generations of individuals in income-leveraging societies could immediately qualify for respective scheduled income-leveraging benefits other than the older contributors that were based on oldest age priorities. [Para: 001]

HSYG smart solution systems is meant to give young generations joining the economy an economic head-start in income-empowerment at the early state of their life's journey. These initial qualifying opportunities for the young and energetic individuals in societies may start with (18) year old to a specified oldest age of (30) or (35) years old. (Please see FIG. 5 on drawing: 5/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 46 for Single Optimal HSYG Tree.), especially for the young to be family makers in societies. These initial qualifying opportunities help serve as intermediate forms of income-empowerment stream on top of individuals' initial income capacities derive form contributing to economy. [Para: 002]

Given many ageing societies with mushroom's shape population would gradually hitting population ageing rate above 4.2, the average of OECD countries. HSYG solution is critical at this point and it would likely works with more elderly economically supporting young individuals shouldering their respective reproductive role in society. This is because Born To Live new business method only needs a leveraging ratio of 1 :5 to invert or to savage situations of population ageing economically. That why HSYG smart solution systems is encapsulated into "Born To Live" invention as integral part of the unique invention. [Para: 003]

Head Start Young Generations (HSYG) is a second tier young generation income- leveraging activities. That fuel by tokens of leveraging subscription donations derived from contributors qualifying respective scheduled income-leveraging benefits, agreeing to contribute a fraction of respective qualifying benefits toward realizing HSYG's objective. Instead of assigning HSYG contributors by oldest age priorities, HSYG starts with youngest age assignment form 18 to 30 or 35 years old whichever the later. Instead of qualifying HSYG contributors' income- leveraging benefits by oldest age priorities, the smart solution qualifies HSYG contributors by youngest age priorities. [Para: 004] These monthly token subscriptions donated by qualifying contributors form the leveraging multi-level tree system basing on oldest age priorities would be assigned to HSYG contributors in the HSYG multi-level tree systems as token of HSYG leveraging subscriptions. These token of HSYG leveraging resources are distributed out as assigned subscriptions to young generations benefiting from HSYG income-leveraging activities. HYSG contributors within HSYG multilevel tree system did not physically contribute these HSYG leveraging subscription resources. [Para: 005]

Depending on the sustaining pool of HSYG contributors within respective societies, any surplus tokens of HSYG leveraging resources shall go into a HSYG sinking reserves. These HSYG sinking reserves is not necessary and shall not be exposed to any investment risk outside the leveraging system's domain, as they would be consumed off in due cause to contributing greater futures of societies liquidities. There is absolutely no other ultimate investments that could generate more economic wealth benefits than investing within HSYG itself. Otherwise depending on the available token pool of HSYG leveraging resources or the available pool of surplus HSYG sinking reserves meant for covering HSYG's objective, some age 30 or younger contributors may be designated to graduate out of the HSYG multi-level tree system earlier than expected. [Para: 006]

HSYG Step: 1. Deriving HSYG token subscriptions.

In order to enable HSYG contributors to also leverage on a fraction of each others' strengths at head-start without having to physically contribute a separate HSYG leveraging subscription resources, the bulk of monthly token leveraging subscriptions would be donated by leveraging contributors qualifying leveraging benefits within respective age range interval group in multi-level tree system basing on oldest age priorities. These donated tokens of HSYG leveraging subscriptions would be assigned to HSYG contributors within the HSYG multi-level tree systems as token of HSYG leveraging subscriptions. [Para: 001]

HSYG Step: 2. Determine the active reproductive period for HSYG multi-level tree systems.

This is done by assigning a specific age ranges of young age contributors (suggesting contributing active reproductive period to societies' rejuvenation rate) into another separate HSYG multi-level tree system. These nominal active reproductive periods of HSYG contributors age 18 to 30 or 35 years old whichever the later, would be assigned according to the contributor strengths and contributor weights determined basing on youngest age priority. The determined active reproductive period of respective societies could varies depending on population scale. Also depending on the size of young age contributors' pool within respective societies, these young age HSYG contributors' age between 18 to 30 or 35 years old whichever the later, could be assigned into one or more multiples of optimal HYSG groupings. [Para: 001]

Note: HSYG multi-level tree systems have no child relationship age range interval group. [Para: 002]

HSYG Step: 3. Sorting HSYG contributors' position assignment sequence within HYSG multi-level tree systems before computer programmed assignment.

The position assignment prioritizing pre-process for HSYG multi-level trees are pre-sorted according to "youngest" birth-date, birth-time and system online registration-time priorities instead of oldest birth-date, birth-time and online system registration-time priorities, (mentioned in step: 5 of "Born To Live" inventive steps). [Para: 001]

HSYG Step: 4. Handling position assignment priority conflict in HSYG multilevel tree systems.

Similarly the position assignment priority conflict handlings are handled by the online system registrations-date-time indicator, (mentioned in step: 6 of "Born To Live" inventive steps). [Para: 001]

HSYG Step: 5. Determine the Contributor Strengths and Contributor Weights for HSYG multi-level tree systems.

Similarly the contributor strengths and contributor weights are intended to following the predetermined contributor strengths and weights for age range interval groups multi-level tree system basing on oldest ages' priorities (mentioned in step: 7 and step: 8 of "Born To Live" inventive steps). HSYG child contributor assignments are done sequentially according to the contributor strengths and weights predetermined. [Para: 001]

HSYG Step: 6. Assigning HSYG contributors' position into optimal HSYG multi-level tree systems.

With the prioritized HSYG contributors' database information and using a computer programmed position-assigning application program, starting with the "youngest" age contributors, (for instance, age: 18) HSYG contributors are sequentially assigned with a position in a top down order into the HSYG multi-level tree systems. Following examples describe the assignment sequence. [Para: 001] Example 1 :

Note: This example only illustrate the assignment sequence with single optimal HSYG group in HSYG multi-level tree systems. [Para: 002]

Y is the youngest active leveraging account holder in single optimal HSYG grouping. (Please see FIG. 5 on drawing: 5/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 46 for Single Optimal HSYG Tree.) [Para: 003]

Y would be assigned at level-zero on the top of the single optimal HSYG group follow by five (5) nominal child HSYG contributors assigned to Y as Y's level-one child assignments. The next level assignment starts with Y's level -one first HSYG contributor, Y's level-one first HSYG contributor would be assigned five (5) nominal child assignments similar to Y. The similar assignment would then move on to Y's level-one second HSYG contributor until all five (5) HYSG contributors in Y's level-one child assignments were all assigned with five (5) nominal child HSYG contributors each. [Para: 004]

The assignment sequence would then move on to Y's level-two HSYG child assignments to assign each sub child HSYG contributor with five (5) nominal child assignments. [Para: 005]

The top down assignment sequence would move on to assign every subsequent levels of HSYG sub child assignments with five (5) nominal child HSYG contributors each, until the "last oldest" HSYG contributors within the prioritized HSYG contributors' database information for single optimal HSYG group are all assigned with a due leveraging position. [Para: 006]

As mentioned in step: 9 of "Born To Live" inventive steps. Given if particularly HSYG group have exceptionally large pool of contributors, they could be further group into multiple optimal HSYG groupings of a, b, c, d, etc., forming adjacent chains of HSYG groups within HSYG multi-level tree systems. [Para: 007] Example 2 :

Note: This example illustrate the assignment sequence with three (3) multiple optimal HSYG groupings in HSYG multi-level tree systems. [Para: 008]

John, Marry and Tommy are all youngest active leveraging account holders in multiple optimal HSYG groupings "a", "b" and "c". (Please see FIG. 6 on drawing: 6/6 and descriptions of drawings on sheet no. 46 for Multiple Optimal HSYG Tree.) [Para: 009]

John would be assigned at level-zero on the top of multiple optimal HSYG group: "a", Marry would be assigned at level-zero on the top of multiple - optimal HSYG group: "b" and Tommy would be assigned at level-zero on the top of multiple optimal HSYG group: "c". [Para: 010]

John would be first assigned five (5) nominal child contributors as John's level-one HSYG child assignments in multiple optimal HSYG group: "a". Followed by Marry would be assigned five (5) nominal child contributors as Mary's level-one HSYG child assignments in multiple optimal HSYG group: "b". Next Tommy would be assigned five (5) nominal child contributors as Tommy's level-one HSYG child assignments in multiple optimal HSYG group: "c". [Para: 011]

The next level assignment starts with John's level-one first child HSYG contributor, John's level-one first child HSYG contributor would be assigned five (5) nominal child assignments similar to John in multiple optimal HSYG group: "a", followed by moving on to Marry level-one first child HSYG contributor, Mary's level-one first child HSYG contributor would be assigned five (5) nominal child assignments similar to Marry in multiple optimal HSYG group: "b". And next moving on to Tommy level- one first child HSYG contributor, Tommy's level-one first child HSYG contributor would be assigned five (5) nominal child assignments similar to Tommy in multiple optimal HSYG group: "c". [Para: 012]

The assignment sequence would subsequently move between multiple optimal HSYG group: "a", "b" and "c" at each level of HSYG sub child assignments downward until the last oldest contributor in prioritized HSYG contributors' database information for multiple optimal HSYG group: "a", "b" and "c" are all assigned with a due leveraging position. [Para: 013] HSYG Step: 7. Managing annual or periodical re-posting and position

reassignment exercises for HSYG multi-level tree systems.

This is done annually by identifying oldest age contributors at the "bottom level" of HSYG groups having received duration years of qualified leveraging benefits, to be those graduating out of the HSYG multi-level tree system. [Para: 001]

Example: All the age 30 contributors in HSYG group: "a", "b" and "c" would be graduated out of these HSYG optimal multi-level tree systems, similarly for the rest of youngest age HSYG contributors at the higher level of each HSYG group would also be assigned lower toward to the bottom of respective HSYG groups when their age gradually reached 30 years old [Para: 002]

When all youngest age HSYG contributors at the top of respective HSYG groups were re-posted downward during annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercises, newer youngest age HSYG contributors age (18) joining the collective income-leveraging system would be assigned onto the top of these HSYG optimal multi-level tree systems. [Para: 003]

HSYG Step: 8. Graduating HSYG contributors out of HSYG multi-level tree systems.

Older age HSYG contributors at the bottom of the HSYG multi-level tree systems example: all age 30 HSYG contributors at the bottom of HSYG group: "a", "b" and "c" would be completely graduated from the HSYG multi-level tree system at respective final year of HSYG contributor's age advancement re-posting when their age reached (31) years old. This mean that even age (31) HYSG contributors who are fully or partially assigned with one or two levels of child assignments "would not" be qualifying those assignments when their age reaches (31) years old. [Para: 001]

Note: These child assignments overlapping across contributors' age older 30 years are meant for qualifying HSYG contributors age 30 or younger with full assignments. [Para: 002]

Also depending on the available pool of donated HSYG leveraging resources and surplus sinking HSYG reserves covering HSYG's objective of respective societies, age 30 or less contributors within HSYG multi-level tree systems may be graduated earlier than expected. [Para: 003] HSYG Step: 9. Overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic in HSYG multi-level tree systems.

In order to admit newer youngest age HSYG contributors onto the top of HSYG multi-level tree systems, HSYG inventive steps would annually or periodically apply re-posting and position reassignment exercises on all HSYG contributors in each HSYG group, These re-posting and position reassignment exercises would gradually post HSYG contributors "downward" within the HSYG group and subsequently gradating older HSYG contributors out of the HSYG multi-level tree system. So that younger age HSYG contributors could be annually admitted onto the top of HSYG multi-level tree systems. [Para: 001]

This is done annually by repeating step: 5 and step: 11 of "Born To Live" inventive steps, however it is using HSYG step: 6 of the "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Managing annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercises for HSYG multi-level tree systems", to also deliver a Pareto efficient system for scheduling fair leveraging treatment frequencies for HSYG multi-level tree systems. [Para: 002]

HSYG Step: 10. Realizing the "Born To Live" HSYG Smart Solution.

(Please see illustrations for how "Born To Live" new business method invention derives "HSYG Smart Solution" to realize HSYG objective.) [Para: 001]

Illustrations of HSYG Smart Solution

Over view of how HSYG smart solution managed to schedule initial income empowerment benefits for young generations of individuals joining the economy. Using the unique annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercise methodological know-how, "Born To Live" HSYG smart solution systems also annually apply re-posting and reassigning of leveraging contributors into new position. Starting with societies' age, as early as 18 years old to the specified age of 30 years old, all older age HSYG contributors would be annually reassigned into lower position within the HYSG multi-level tree systems, while youngest leveraging contributor's age 18 years old would annually be admitted and assigned onto the top of HSYG multi-level tree systems. [Para: 001]

Table : 008 Nominal HSYG Active Re roductive Period.

All HSYG contributors are assigned with token of HSYG subscriptions when assigned into the new position within HSYG groups. HSYG group multi-level tree systems have no partial assigned contributors, Depending on the availability of HSYG resources token pool, all HSYG contributors age between: 18 to 30 or 35 years old whichever the later, would be assigned with full qualifying assignments. Table: 009 illustrate how a fully assigned HSYG contributor could be qualifying respective monthly HSYG's income-leveraging benefit. [Para: 002]

Table: 009 HSYG Qualifying Assignments.

Note: The assigned monthly HSYG token contributions use here is use for illustration purpose only. The actual assigned token contributions used may vary accordingly, depending on respective society's standards of living and exchange rate values. [Para: 003]

When HSYG 'Young' age reaches 31 years old, HSYG 'Young' would be graduating out of the HSYG group at the following year's age advancement reposting and position reassignment exercise. HSYG 'Young' would also be qualifying respective final year of HSYG income-leveraging benefits at the age of 30 years old. After then HSYG 'Young' would resume qualifying rest of the income-leveraging benefits within respective age range interval groups with the collective income-leveraging system. [Para: 004]

Note: HSYG "Young" would not be qualifying any assigned child assignments given HYSG "Young" age reaches 31 years old. [Para: 005]

Preferred Embodiment

Introduction

The objective of "Born To Live" invention in the preferred embodiment is not meant to create millionaires in societies, but to enable many living in the economic oriented world to leverage on a fraction of each other's economical strength. So that individuals in societies could be periodically empowered by scheduled forms of monthly supplemental incomes at difference state of the life. [Para: 001]

This could only to be made possible by the embodiment of the said disclosed invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution of its kind. [Para: 002]

In order to deliver the inventive objective and merits of legitimate Power of Pareto efficient leveraging unlocked by the disclosure of the invention, herein the embodiment section present "Born To Live" new business method invention as preferred forms of collective income-leveraging system solution. [Para: 003]

The preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution is unique, and that the disclosed methodological know-how is non-replicate-able for any institutions enlighten by the disclosure of the invention, without the prior concern of the inventor. [Para: 004]

Preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention.

Preferred Embodiment: 1 The embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall embodied all of "Born To Live" inventive steps and all of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps, together with stating a set of income-leveraging standing polices to realizing the collective income-leveraging system solution.

Preferred Embodiment: 2 Basing on preferred embodiment (1), the embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall embodied step: 1 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Creating the multi-level tree contributors' database", to creating the multi-level tree contributors' database.

Preferred Embodiment: 3 Basing on preferred embodiment (2), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 2 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Applying geographical or divisional classification code with contributors' database information", to apply geographical or divisional classification code with contributors' database information. Preferred Embodiment: 4 Basing on preferred embodiment (3), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 3 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Determine the desired age range interval tabulations", to determine the desired age range interval tabulations required.

Preferred Embodiment: 5 Basing on preferred embodiment (4), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 4 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Applying desired optimal age range interval groupings", to apply the desired optimal age range interval groupings required.

Preferred Embodiment: 6 Basing on preferred embodiment (5), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 5 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Sorting contributors' position assignment sequence in multi-level tree system before computer programmed assignment", for sorting contributors' position assignment sequence within multi-level tree system before computer programmed assignment.

Preferred Embodiment: 7 Basing on preferred embodiment (6), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 6 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Resolving position assignment priority conflicts for two or more contributors having the same birth-date and birth-time", for resolving position assignments priority conflicts for two or more contributors having the same birth-date and birth-time.

Preferred Embodiment: 8 Basing on preferred embodiment (7), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 7 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Determine the Contributor strengths", to determine the desired variables for Contributor strengths.

Preferred Embodiment: 9 Basing on preferred embodiment (8), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 8 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Determine the Contributor weights", to determine the desired variables for Contributor weights.

Preferred Embodiment: 10 Basing on preferred embodiment (9), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 9 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Assigning contributors into optimal age range interval groups", to assign contributors' position into optimal age range interval groups in order to overcome obstacles of the next insurmountable level encounter in multi-level tree formation systems. Preferred Embodiment: 11 Basing on preferred embodiment (10), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 10 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Assigning contributors with rest of the remaining relational child age range interval groupings", to assign contributors' position with rest of the remaining relational child age range interval groupings.

Preferred Embodiment: 12 Basing on preferred embodiment (11), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 11 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Managing annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercises", to manage annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercises.

Preferred Embodiment: 13 Basing on preferred embodiment (12), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall embodied step: 12 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Managing insertion of contributors into multi-level tree systems", to states an income-leveraging policy of - inserted leveraging contributors are required to observe 'n' numbers of years of insertion transfers by transferring respective assigned income-leveraging benefits to the first or subsequent partial qualifying contributors at the lowest level of respective age range interval group, whom are effected by these insertion displacements.

Preferred Embodiment: 14 Basing on preferred embodiment (13), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 13 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Managing accounts' donations, will or entrustments", to manage accounts' donations, will or entrustments.

Preferred Embodiment: 15 Basing on preferred embodiment (14), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 14 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Graduating contributors out of multi-level tree systems", to graduate contributors out of multi-level tree systems.

Preferred Embodiment: 16 Basing on preferred embodiment (15), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 15 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic", to overcome obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems in order to deliver a Pareto efficient system for scheduling fair leveraging treatment frequencies. Preferred Embodiment: 17 Basing on preferred embodiment (16), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied step: 16 of "Born To Live" inventive steps: "Enabling individuals in income-leveraging societies to leverage on a fraction of each others' economical strengths", to enable individuals in income-leveraging societies to leverage on a fraction of each other economical strengths.

Preferred Embodiment: 18 Basing on preferred embodiment (1), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

1 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Deriving HSYG token subscriptions", to derive HSYG token subscriptions.

Preferred Embodiment: 19 Basing on preferred embodiment (18), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

2 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Determine the active reproductive period for HSYG multi-level tree systems", to determine the active reproductive period.

Preferred Embodiment: 20 Basing on preferred embodiment (19), the preferred embodiment of Born To Live Business Method into forms of collective income- leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step: 3 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Sorting HSYG contributors' position assignment sequence within HYSG multi-level tree systems before computer programmed assignment", for sorting of HSYG contributors' position assignment sequence within HYSG group before computer programmed assignment.

Preferred Embodiment: 21 Basing on preferred embodiment (20), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

4 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Handling position assignment priority conflict in HSYG multi-level tree systems", to handle position assignment priority conflict for HSYG multi-level tree systems.

Preferred Embodiment: 22 Basing on preferred embodiment (21), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

5 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Determine the Contributor Strengths and Contributor Weights for HSYG multi-level tree systems", to determine the contributor strengths and contributor weights for HSYG Multi-level tree systems.

Preferred Embodiment: 23 Basing on preferred embodiment (22), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

6 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Assigning HSYG contributors' position into optimal HSYG multi-level tree systems", to assign contributors' position into optimal HSYG groups. Preferred Embodiment: 24 Basing on preferred embodiment (23), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

7 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Managing annual or periodical re- posting and position reassignment exercises for HSYG multi-level tree systems", to perform annual or periodical re-posting and position reassignment exercise for HSYG multi-level tree systems.

Preferred Embodiment: 25 Basing on preferred embodiment (24), he preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

8 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Graduating HSYG contributors out of HSYG multi-level tree systems", to graduate contributors out of HSYG multilevel tree systems.

Preferred Embodiment: 26 Basing on preferred embodiment (25), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

9 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic in HSYG multi-level tree systems", to overcome obstacles of exponential broadening base logic in HSYG multi-level tree systems.

Preferred Embodiment: 27 Basing on preferred embodiment (26), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall further embodied HSYG step:

10 of "Born To Live" HSYG inventive steps: "Realizing the "Born To Live" HSYG Smart Solution", to realize HSYG smart solution's objective.

Preferred Embodiment: 28 Basing on preferred embodiment (1), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - all contributors must be minimum eighteen (18) years old and above.

Preferred Embodiment: 29 Basing on preferred embodiment (28), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - each leveraging contributor "may" or "may not" pay any registration fee to remain as active or non-active leveraging member.

Preferred Embodiment: 30 Basing on preferred embodiment (29), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - each leveraging contributor shall contribute the total yearly subscription fee in advance regardless of qualifying years in order to become ACTIVE leveraging account status holder. Preferred Embodiment: 31 Basing on preferred embodiment (30), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account holder shall pay annually the 'n' dollars of specified monthly administrative fee in advance regardless of qualifying years and before each leveraging year begins, in order to become ACTIVE leveraging account status holder.

Preferred Embodiment: 32 Basing on preferred embodiment (31), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution could states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account holder would pay annually the 'n' percentage of local tax payable to the local authority, if required by the local tax authority in advance regardless of qualifying years and before each leveraging year begins, in order to become ACTIVE leveraging account status holder.

Preferred Embodiment: 33 Basing on preferred embodiment (32), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account holder shall pay annually the total annual fiscal leveraging subscription including the administrative fee and the applicable local tax in advance regardless of qualifying years and before each leveraging year begins, in order to become ACTIVE leveraging account status holder.

Preferred Embodiment: 34 Basing on preferred embodiment (33), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - only ACTIVE leveraging account status' holders are included into the following year position assignment prioritizing pre- process. (Mentioned in step: 5 of "Born To Live" inventive steps.)

Preferred Embodiment: 35 Basing on preferred embodiment (34), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - only ACTIVE leveraging account status' holders would be managed in following years' age advancement re-posting and position reassignment exercise.

Preferred Embodiment: 36 Basing on preferred embodiment (35), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - only ACTIVE leveraging account status' holders could donated, will or entrusted, his or her leveraging account managements and maintenances to designated spouse or the estate, for up to a maximum leveraging age specified or otherwise. Preferred Embodiment: 37 Basing on preferred embodiment (36), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - single parent of deceased spouse with at least one children below the age of eighteen (18) years old before the disclosure of "Born To Live" invention, could automatically regain the entrustment of the deceased to the spouse's prior to the implementation of an income-leveraging society, by the living spouse furnishing up the deceased account registration information supported with relationship documents, child birth certificates and the deceased death certificate and etc...

Preferred Embodiment: 38 Basing on preferred embodiment (37), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution could states and embody an income- leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account status holder DOES NOT required to sponsor any child or sub-child contributors.

Preferred Embodiment: 39 Basing on preferred embodiment (38), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution could states and embody an income- leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account status holder DOES NOT consumes and DOES NOT market any products of any kind.

Preferred Embodiment: 40 Basing on preferred embodiment (39), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution could states and embody an income- leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account status holder IS NOT an IBO (Independent Business Owner).

Preferred Embodiment: 41 Basing on preferred embodiment (40), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution could states and embody an income- _ leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account status holder DOES NOT receive leveraging payouts benefits base on commission polices.

Preferred Embodiment: 42 Basing on preferred embodiment (41), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution could states and embody an income- leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account status holder could be provided with life insurance policies or any forms of accidents protection coverage of any kind.

Preferred Embodiment: 43 Basing on preferred embodiment (42), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account status holder successfully assigned with full qualifying child contribution assignments would receive the due year long monthly income-leveraging benefits computed according to the numbers of qualifying child contribution assignments. Preferred Embodiment: 44 Basing on preferred embodiment (43), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall - states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account status holder include those partially assigned with child contribution assignments would also receive the due year long of monthly partial qualifying income-leveraging benefits computed according to the numbers of qualifying child contribution assignments.

Preferred Embodiment: 45 Basing on preferred embodiment (44), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - each ACTIVE leveraging account status holder successfully assigned with full qualifying child contribution assignments would agree to donating a token of qualifying leveraging benefits to contributing HSYG's objective.

Preferred Embodiment: 46 Basing on preferred embodiment (45), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states, and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - leveraging contributors are free to lapse or reinstate respective leveraging account status before each leveraging year begins.

Preferred Embodiment: 47 Basing on preferred embodiment (46), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - leveraging contributors lapsed any particular year's leveraging participation regardless of qualifying periods would automatically become "INACTIVE" leveraging account status holder.

Preferred Embodiment: 48 Basing on preferred embodiment (47), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - INACTIVE leveraging account status holders WOULD NOT be included into the following year position assignment prioritizing pre-process.

Preferred Embodiment: 49 Basing on preferred embodiment (48), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - INACTIVE leveraging account status holders WOULD NOT be managed in following years' age advancement re- posting and position reassignment exercise. Preferred Embodiment: 50 Basing on preferred embodiment (49), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - INACTIVE leveraging account status holders CANNOT donated, will or entrusted, his or her leveraging account managements and maintenances to designated spouse or the estate, otherwise the account is successfully reinstated into active status.

Preferred Embodiment: 51 Basing on preferred embodiment (50), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - leveraging contributors are make aware of in the event of new citizenship conversion would incurred insertion of the contributor into the collective income-leveraging system where by these insertions would result in insertion displacements of others ACTIVE leveraging account status contributor's position within respective age range interval group. Newly converted citizens would also require the newly inserted active leveraging account status holder to observe 'n' numbers of years of insertion transfer.

Preferred Embodiment: 52 Basing on preferred embodiment (51), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - leveraging contributors are also make aware of in the event of leveraging contributors lapse particular year of active leveraging account subscriptions regardless of anticipating a qualifying or nonqualifying period would automatically become non-active account holders, these non-active account status holders would not be included into the following year's position assignment prioritizing pre-process and would not be managed in the following year's age advancement re-posting and position reassignment exercise.

Preferred Embodiment: 53 Basing on preferred embodiment (52), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - leveraging contributors are free to reinstate an inactive leveraging account status before the following leveraging year begins by contributing the respective year's subscription fee in advance in order to become ACTIVE leveraging account status holder.

Preferred Embodiment: 54 Basing on preferred embodiment (53), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - leveraging contributors are make aware of in the event of reinstating an inactive leveraging account status, these accounts reinstating would also incurred insertion of contributors into the collective income-leveraging system where by these insertions would result in insertion displacements of others active leveraging account status contributor's position within respective age range interval group. Preferred Embodiment: 55 Basing on preferred embodiment (54), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - in order to be fair to all faithful leveraging contributors and to discourage fiscal activities individuals anticipating respective non-qualifying period to exploiting unfair leveraging practices through irregular participations in the collective income-leveraging system. A reinstated active leveraging account status holder is required to observe a minimum of 'n' number of years of insertion transfers.

Preferred Embodiment: 56 Basing on preferred embodiment (55), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - reinstating an inactive leveraging account status is required to observe a minimum of 'n' numbers of years insertion transfer for every one (1) year intentional or non-intentional lapse participation.

Preferred Embodiment: 57 Basing on preferred embodiment (56), the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution shall states and embodied an income-leveraging standing policy of - in order to be fair to all faithful leveraging contributors collectively leveraging within the collective income-leveraging system, the Pareto efficient income-leveraging system provider reserves the rights deem appropriate to accept or reject any contributors' subscriptions paid.

Preferred Embodiment: 58 Herein the preferred embodiment of "Born To Live" new business method invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution "may" or "may not" include putting in place a social rank and file feedback system to reject overwhelming poor social rank file members from successfully subscripting to the desired collective income-leveraging system, solemnly meant for the social and economical well being of societies.

Containing empowered errant labours

Born To Live was never invented to condone errant labours empowered by supplemental incomes. The moral that make the invention breakthrough works include maintaining a sustainable and amicable long- term employers/employees working relationship within economies. In order for the invention to be fully useful to societies on a long-term basis, the embodiment of the "Born To Live" invention into forms of collective income-leveraging system solutions may want to include putting in place a social rank and file feedback system. (Otherwise it is subjected to respective societies' standards of moral support and backing) "Born To Live" invention would strongly recommended it, for rejecting particular overwhelming poor social rank and file individuals form successfully subscribing to the desired collective income-leveraging system, given necessary. [Para: 001]

This could be suggesting by responses from more than three or more employers' complaints within a holding period of 'n' numbers of years, when such deem necessary rejections could be administrated by informing the individual concerned of the rejection decision and by crediting back the due paid in advance subscriptions before the leveraging year begin. [Para: 002]

Appendix File Reference : "Born To Live Invention Treatise (Condensed) . pdf"

Summary of Invention

The disclosing "Born To Live" new business method invention seeks to patent the disclosed Programs, Policies, Systems, HSYG and Methodological know-how for unlocking the legitimate power of leveraging by overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems. [Para: 001]

Many professionals in the related field of multi-level art technically knew for decades the level of difficulties having to overcome obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems. Despite the notion of the technical present of these inherent obstacles, solutions for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic had remained non- obvious throughout history to the skill's of any prior art or any professional's knowledge in the related field. Other than seen exploiting half-sounded logic or non-Pareto efficient system of multi-level trees engineering to achieving desired objectives, many seem incapable of teaching or instructing out a workable solution for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems. [Para: 002]

The disclosing invention seeking patent has outlined and highlighted weaknesses and shortcoming in conventional and advance multi-level art (MLA) engineering systems, having to work with obstacles of exponential broadening base logic inherent in multi-level tree formation systems itself. The invention also explains the difficulties faced in attempting to exploit power of leveraging with multi-level tree formation systems due to the physic of exponential broadening base logic. [Para: 003]

By identifying and differentiating the various harmful application contacts of multi-level art engineering, the invention is also aware of the historical harming effects given attempt to exploit half-sound or illegitimate power of leveraging with multi-level tree formation systems. This is because any attempt to exploit the power of leveraging with half-sound logic, would ultimately result in infinite unfair treatments on the majorities of contributors at the base of any multi-level tree systems in order to produce marginal proportion of gainers at the top of any multi-level tree systems. To date no multi-level arts in the related filed has claimed to derived any Pareto efficient solution to release those unfavourable positions at the base of any multi-level tree systems. None also seem to processes such desire. [Para: 004] The disclosing methodological know-how invention has successfully achieved a break through solution to mitigating the above mentioned situation. The invention does not abolish the good structural gene of multi-level tree systems but the invention seeks to fix problems associated with the good gene of multi-level tree systems. While constructively revealing effective steps for harnessing the legitimate power of collective leveraging, it manages to combine the human age advancement relationship factor with multi-level tree formation systems to reinventing and reengineering it into forms of wealth redistribution balancing systems intended for futures' economic oriented societies. [Para: 005]

Instead of pining leveraging contributors onto a fixed position within the multilevel system, the invented methodological know-how does these by annually posting leveraging contributors "through" multi-level tree systems. These "periodical" re-posting and position's re-assignment exercises performed, subsequently release every leveraging contributor from their respective contributing position to resume respective scheduled qualifying position. Given the invented periodical inter-posting of leveraging contributors is governed by the human age advancement relationship factor, absolutely no one would be unjustly left at the bottom of Born To Live multi-level tree systems. [Para: 006]

The disclosing methodological know-how is unique in "Born To Live" invention and has all along remained non-obvious to be witnessing for the first time, that indeed multi-level tree formations could start forming at level (6) onward or any desired level instead of conventional level (0's) practices. "Born To Live" invention has also instructed out for the first time that accumulative strengths effects in the so call "the next big lap" or "the next insurmountable" could actually be overcome by having determine the numbers of optimal adjacent multi-level tree formations to forming an entire relational multi-level tree formation systems. No one on earth for the first time has taught the art of inter-posting of leveraging contributors among relational multi-level tree systems other than "Born To Live" invention. [Para: 007]

Therefore Born To Live is the only unique form of Pareto efficient multi-level art intellectual property that is capable of unlocking the legitimate power of leveraging with multi-level tree formation systems. Having successfully derived the Pareto efficient solution for unlocking the legitimate power of leveraging with multi-level tree systems, the new invention is capable and complete enough to be embodying into forms of collective income-leveraging system solution of its kind. Given granted the rights to patent, it harbours the direct and indirect economical role for empowering societies' liquidity sustainability to boosting disposable income capacities' of consumers to the next higher level. [Para: 008]

For more understanding of the rationale of "Born To Live" invention, please see a copy of appendix research document attached in PDF format "Born To Live Invention Treatise (Condensed).pdf' found in the read only media submitted. DESCRIPTIONS OF DRAWINGS

Drawing: 1/6 Figure: 1

Figure: 1 illustrate a typical tabulation single parent and child relationship multilevel trees formation.

Drawing: 2/6 Figure: 2

Figure: 2 illustrate a combination tabulation of single and multiple optimal parent child relationship multi-level trees formation.

Drawing: 3/6 Figure: 3

Figure: 3 illustrate a typical single optimal age range interval posting.

Leveraging contributors are successively posted into parent age range interval groups. The posting sequence starts with the youngest age group (for instance: "a") after successful registration at the age of (17).

All active account status's contributors are assigned with a position within respective age range interval group using the top/down assignment sequence based on oldest age priorities. These active account status' contributors would be successively assigned into different positions until they reach the highest age level within respective age range interval group.

All oldest age active account status contributors reached the highest age level within respective age range interval group would posted into successive parent age range interval group until they are finally graduated out of the parent, and child relationship multi-level trees formation system.

Drawing: 4/6 Figure: 4

Figure: 4 illustrate a typical multiple optimal age range interval posting.

Leveraging contributors are successively posted into parent optimal age range interval groups. The posting sequence starts with the youngest age group (for instance: "a") after successful registration at the age of (17).

Similarly all active account status's contributors are assigned with a position within respective optimal age range interval group using the top-down assignment sequence based on oldest age priorities. These active account status' contributors would be successively assigned into different positions until they reach the highest age level within respective age range interval group.

All oldest age active account status contributors reached the highest age level within respective age range interval group would posted into successive parent age range interval group until they are finally graduated out of the parent and child relationship multi-level trees formation system. Drawing: 5/6 Figure: 5

Figure: 5 illustrate a typical Single optimal HSYG Multi-level tree formation.

Youngest HSYG contributors are assigned with a position into the HSYG multilevel tree system using the using the top/down assignment sequence based on youngest age priorities.

As the age of HSYG contributors advance, they would be subsequently assigned into a position at the low level of the HSYG multi-level tree system. New youngest age HSYG contributors would be annually assigned into the top of the HSYG multi-level tree system.

When the age of those oldest HSYG contributors reached the specific age of (30), they would be graduated of the HSYG multi-level tree system.

Drawing: 6/6 Figure: 6

Figure: 6 illustrate a typical Multiple Optimal HSYG Multi-level tree formation.

Similarly youngest HSYG contributors are assigned with a position into the HSYG multi-level tree system using the using the top/down assignment sequence based on youngest age priorities.

As the age of HSYG contributors advance, they would be subsequently assigned into a position at the low level of the HSYG multi-level tree system. New youngest age HSYG contributors would be annually assigned into the top of the HSYG multi-level tree system. When the age of those oldest HSYG contributors reached the specific age of (30), they would be graduated of the HSYG multilevel tree system.